User talk:Sjakkalle/November and December 2005

526:

specialized articles (none of them seems to have contributed there, I still do). I would of course be ready to consider any obeservations and/or suggestions made in a constructive spirit, as a dare hope to find with an Admin. After the next few weeks, in which I expect not to find the time to do much more than try to follow up my watchlist (in fact, there are periods without access to Internet, so please be patient if my reply is slow), I hope then to resume work on the P.P.-material; while reading up I found it's actually a subject on which it is very hard to find out abut the basics, such as terminology, so this is a 'niche' for Knowledge we would be unkind to the interested readers (and judging by the flood of material of unsatisfactory informative content, there is quite a public for it) to neglect.

3720:

them altogether. My current slate for the Arbcom, that is, candidates who I think definitely should get a position there, includes people like Filiocht, Charles Matthews, Mindspillage and SimonP, all very well experienced users who have demonstrated a lot of sensibility. I also think that Merovingian, Jayjg, Ral315 and Redwolf24 can do a good job at ArbCom. Everyking is another user who I think might be a positive addition to the ArbCom, he is controversial, sometimes a bit impulsive, and he has been sanctioned by the ArbCom some times, and nor would I support an ArbCom consisting of ten Everykings, but having a voice arguing for milder sanctions is perhaps a valuable check and balance there.

1562:

typical "Delete it's not notable. Keep, it is notable" kind of debate, which towards the end degenerated into a kind of meta-debate, with people voting based on external factors (i.e. the nominator's motive) rather than the article itself. There was little else to go on. Considering that this second AFD debate looked remarkably similar to the first debate, I decided to let it get a remarkably similar result, I felt that nothing had changed since the first debate and that the vote count was probably a rough tie anyway. I am glad that Aaron's vote-count confirmed a less than two-thirds majority so that it is no consensus based

518:

really could not find any objective rationale in their destructive rage, while suspecting there may be a hidden agenda, such as avid opponents of C.P. planning an ostrich approach: the less is known about it, the better? So rather then engaging in an endless edit war -wasting time better spend on actual contributions of content, in my view the measure of all things Wikipedian- I sat back for a while, gazing how every wave brought more harm, and cooled off just enough to realize that all the wasted material can fit in a wider context, see point one above.

2406:. I was dreading making the actual decision, so I'm glad somebody else stood up and did it. I agree with your decision 100% -- my personal opinion is that the article should have been deleted, but from the discussion that existed, I did not think any clear consensus had been arrived at, so I probably would have ended up with exactly the same result you came to. I did notice that closing the discussion didn't deter people from continuing the debate, so I protected the AfD page. Feel free to unprotect it if you think I did wrong. -- 514:

C.P. is the only of my many contributions (well, most of it was mine) that has fallen victim to perhaps the worst kind of vandalism: a bunch of 'contributors' (mostly anonymous, but I stress many anons do a fine job) who systematically demolish every eleborated section (they don't even get the point of the echelon structure), throwing out so much content that it is no longer informative, let alone encyclopaedic, but little more what I knew around the age of 10 on the subject, and even that bit is often misleading or even wrong.

2463: 3166: 3174: 330: 3455: 2450:, with people turning up all the time, to cut off a debate after the bare minimum time is a serious error. It will just mean that instead of the debate having run its course and had a chance to see if it could hit consensus level it will go on — people will now fight edit wars over the contents, and the page is guaranteed to be put on AfD again almost immediately. So you have just prolonged the issue by prematurely closing the vote. 1290: 3582: 2060:, A1 for no context and A3 for no content whatsoever. If we don't have an article, we don't have it. Just having some templates and categories at the page is worse than having a redlink, since it confuses the readers into believing we have an article when we don't. Feel free to write these articles, but make sure that there is some real content and flesh in them. Good luck in your endeavors! :-) 1695:) deleted it anyways (though it was still in the history). I've written a long letter pointing out their bogus plan, revealing them for the frauds they are. I've taken the bold move of reverting the list to BEFORE they started their hack job on it (Nov 15). If you want that list retained, you better get over there and help with the reversion war that is likely to result. I can't do it alone. 3424: 2926: 3257: 2965: 1408: 1330: 365: 2530: 3239:

nothing by it and support the judgment of the arb committee on the subject. He just needed some help that was all. Thanks for understanding that. As an admin, I would NEVER abuse the tools and that incident is well behind me and, frankly, I'd love to jsut forget the entire thing and move on. Thanks again :)

2901:

is not over yet, I figured that since so many people voted before it had been posted, I may as well start thanking people before it wraps up. It'll take me that long to thank everyone who voted anyway! Thank you, Sjakkelle, for your support and your kind comments - I'll do my best as an admin to make

2801:

I have to confess that I was a terrible Catholic and had to cheat by looking up the exact reference, though I'd remembered the quote: it's the one about Jesus saying that you shouldn't be worrying about the mote in your brother's eye when you've got a beam in your own. Considering the bad behavior of

2654:

for deletion. I created the page, its a sub stub, and I am the only contributor, and my research has determined that I will be unable to ever make an actual article out of it, and besides which its not actually sufficiently notable so I thought I'd like to just delete it. Does it qualify for speedy

723:

visit every single article and judge it as an article, not as a possible article. This particular article, for example, could have been speedy deleted as a substub, IMO. It didn't say anything. However, it invoked the old arguments -- arguments that belong on an RfC for the subject -- instead of a

3694:

Hey how come you are not going up for the Arbitration Committee elections? I think you would make a great job. I am struggling to think of who to vote for. Do you know how many people you vote for? If its just 1 I know who, but if its like 5 or something I am struggling. I don't think there's 5

1523:

Remember, Aaron, that these are supposed to be discussions on whether to delete an article, not whether to keep it. If the delete proponents don't ensure that their reasons are adequately discussed, we can't very well delete an article anyway. An article doesn't need to justify its existence. I've

983:

and would like some constructive comments regarding why these arguments are not really that strong. I have looked at all these arguments for not merging and I personally think they are baseless. One obvious contradiction in the arguments against merger is the worry that district lists are too large

974:

I just noticed that you added a good section on arguments for merging in the school arguments page. Thivierr has also added some anti merging arguments. Since all schools are kept now, regardless of the size, quality of the stub the merging issues seem like the most likely to succeed with regard to

2601:

I thought that I'd write again to say how impressed I was by the eloquence of your arguments on this page, in what was a very difficult topic to decide on. I am personally of the view that topics such as that one will always be no consensus decisions, but that is what makes them encyclopaedic. We

2445:

Why did you close the debate so early? Many debates go on longer. With 60% voting to delete, more people coming to vote only to find that they now cannot (2 have since turned up to vote but cannot) shutting down a discussion mid-debate, is IMHO a serious misjudgment. If there the debate had clearly

2204:

I was rather expecting this AfD to be relisted for further comment, as I've seen happen to several AfDs that attracted few votes. In the end we had a single delete (mine), and a single keep, which while not explicitly conditional, carried the caveat that the subject should be shown to have received

2111:

There is not a lot we can do I'm afraid, just keep an eye out and revert as needed. The good thing is that there are more of us than there is of him, and he will get bored and go away eventually. Just take time away from the wack-a-mole game any time you get tired, and don't let it burn you out.

1915:

Keep in mu\ind that a "keep" or "no consensus" result on an AFD is not synonymous with keeping the article as it is. It just means that it cannot be deleted from the history. The article may still be moved, merged, trimmed, completely rewritten and so on. I see that an RFC on this article is up, so

995:

I was wondering if you would like to contribute to this debate as you have in the past. So far I have seen very few of the users who are active participants in the school Afd's make comments. Those that have shown up seem to be discouraged. Hopefully if we don't let this drop they will see that a

151:

it was only "keep" because only the four or so people involved with the project were involved and no one else knew that the page even existed; the fact that the likes of Kappa and Tony Sidaway made no objection to its speedy deletion (nor, in fact, anyone that I've seen; no one has posted a comment

706:

I understood why folks had referred to another page, but, as I'm sure you know from my own user page, it's antithetical to my philosophy on VfD/AfD. I personally (and thunderously, sometimes) reject the idea that there are blanket decisions or blanket reasonings. Because I believe that it is the

297:

I will revert - if the debate was reopened just because of a premature close, it seems to me that discounting the votes already cast is the exact opposite of what's trying to be achieved. And though the article may have changed in a week, if the issues are issues that can be edited to and fro in a

3719:

Thanks for the kind words! Well, I am not at all sure that I will have the time to be as active in 2006 as I have been in 2005, and with the time I will have available I would prefer to write and fix up articles and do less distressing janitorial tasks than putting people on probation and banning

2370:

Yeah OK. If you are feeling depressed at the RFAr, then I agree: take a break from it for a while now. If you don't want to take a full wikibreak there are always things to do in the calm(er) waters of the main article namespace. Write some articles, do some random page random fix-up and so. Such

1618:

Hi, Sjakkalle. I just want to thank you very much for supporting my RfA, and to say also that I hope I'll make a good job of it. I'm supposed to be working on an assignment at the moment, and had delayed thanking people, but I'm finding the new rollback button so easy to use that I'm just keeping

1586:

I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA, and the compliment. As I wrote, I was looking forward to feedback from the community, and I would like to let you know that you should please feel free to leave any further feedback for me you may have for me in the future at my Talk page. Thanks

513:

Firstly, as will become clearer when I elaborate on P.P., this notion is (used) wider, since C.P. (though etymologically parallel, as I point out) is usually limited to beatings, excluding Amputation, deprivations, excessive exercice and other forms. Secondly, and actually even more importantly,

166:

I'll wait for a response from you before re-deleting, but seeing as no one has complained, this does seem to be a clear-cut case of ignore all rules; the process led to a flagrantly absurd result (because no one else knew it was happening). With this in mind, I'd seriously appreciate if you could

3238:

I alos want to thank you for assuming good faith in me. I honestly saw someone in distress and in horrible need of an advocate that could speak on his behalf, so, as an attorney, I instinctively jumped in and tried to be a voice that could be a little more articulate than he was being. I meant

1561:

One thing which struck me when closing the debate was that this was the second AFD on the article with the first nomination only some weeks old, and that there were really no new reasons provided to delete it this time around, when it had not been deleted the last time around. It looked like the

956:

with edits that are easy to see. The big problem is that they also make sneaky edits to pages of the type 1986 to 1987. With the exception of someone from that range who was making proper additions yesterday I have taken to blocking the IP as soon as a vandalistic edit is made without a warning.

517:

I have tried to reason with them and am generally willing to accomodate for sensitivities, but such arrogance and ignorance as i never read on othertalk pages are both close to insufferable and indicative that a compromise is not within reach. I realise that this sounds to much ad hominem, but I

2250:

I was the first anonymous user you mentioned in your Evidence at the RfA. I'd actually edited from a couple of other IP addresses occasionally, and only created this account subsequently. Still only about 20-25 edits total, mostly minor. Do you think this should be mentioned in the Evidence and

1506:

But I can't imagine what would happen to the admin who did the arguably correct thing and deleted or re-directed this. I know I would have, but it probably would not have stuck, unless I did a really good job explaining it. Bugger. It's really not you I'm cranky with, of course, so forgive

2568:

I thought I'd drop you a line to say well done! I think that far too few people go around saying nice things to each other in talk pages, and I was impressed with your interpretation of the vote towards merge. 2 deletes and 2 merges could have gone either way, but I think that merge is the

525:

redirect which would really be something far less desirable: wasting most of the material contributed in this context, since the present dribble in C.P. is no substitute by a long shot, nor a workable basis for the further additions I plan to make under P.P. as well as in various appropriate

637:

about deletionists: they are concerned with quality, they usually write pretty good articles and they usually behave responsibly. Some of the things I like about inclusionists: They like to make information accessible to everyone, they are usually tolerant of newbies who write articles on

1495:

But that's what makes me cranky. These are meant to be discussions, but they aren't. There was nothing cited here that demonstrated that this had any impact outside blogland. The "references" all were either about people whom are on the blog or were in other blogs. There is really

1647:

possess, that of grandmaster status. Is there an easy way to get them onto their natioanlity page only, or is it even desirable to do so? The chess category now sticks out among the rest of the sportspeople categories, but I guess I could live with that if there's a good reason.

236: 574:

was the one who called him a jerk. He'd done a lot worse, but still I lost my head. I've got to get some new method. I'm fine with an argument, an exchange of ideas, someone violently objecting to what I say and providing concrete reasons with citations. I was actually

1553:

Well, to business, I must admit that when I closed the debate I didn't take out a sheet of sheet of paper, draw up two columns and start entering the names to make a careful tally. Rather I took a glance at the votes, saw that there were a number of dubious votes on

54: 3888:

Hi Sjakkalle/November and December 2005! I have been on a refreshing wikibreak for the last week, so this is a belated thank-you for supporting my adminship nomination. You've seen enough of these before, so, simply: Happy new year (if that's your kind of thing)!

2349:

If and when some arbitrators step in and this starts to make some sense, I'll try and present my case. But if that doesn't happen, it's simply not worth the unpleasantness to try and push it uphill. I can always find something other than Knowledge to do with my

79:

Excellent call on that AfD. Some admins are kind of weenies when closing them, while others make it hard not to assume an agenda behind their decisions (even though I assume good faith). This was just a good, heads-up call on your part. Keep up the good work.

3045:

We'll see. If it's a vandal or someone trying to impersonate me it will have to be blocked some time, but if the edits are legitimate I am not too worried about the name "Skalle". The two users I have blocked for names too similar to, or insulting, mine are

49: 39: 201:

No worries. I deleted it for the reasons above, but as with all WP:IAR things, it is on the proviso that no one actually does object. I hadn't seen the VfU at the time I replied, and I hadn't actually seen anyone complaining about it anywhere else.

44: 3529:

I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details. This is a copied announcement, please reply on

3294:

Hello, please do not ban this IP, this is the IP of an entire school/school board, so you will be banning lots of people willing to make good contributions. Also, if you ban this IP, someone who wants to vandalise can simply go home and do it.

1817:

When an article is moved, the change history is moved with it, and a redirect is placed under the original article's title. If the redirect is edited, then the article cannot be moved back. That is exactly what has happened to the list. See

1191:'s deletions were done to respond to my point that the article, as he/she previously had it, was too much company propaganda. With the deletions, the article actually reads more NPOV and better, I think. Your mileage may vary, of course. -- 312:

Thank you very much for supporting my rather contentious request for adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to do a little dance here *DANCES*. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on

2592: 656:

Just so you understand the context here, Sjakkalle, about a month ago, Aaron put forward a block request against me because he felt that when I referred to him as a deletionist, that it was a personal attack. I agree with your statements

2559: 1420:. It closed with the final tally of 57/0/0. I can only hope I can live up to the expectations that this wonderful community of ours demands from each of its administrators. If you ever need anything, please just let me know. Cheers! -- 947:

I notice that you gave this user a warning earlier. This person comes in from the whole range of 4.242.*.* and edits. While one or two of the edits are useful most of the work is vandalistic in nature. For some strange reason they hit

3850:

My wife sends her curses, as Knowledge will likely suck up more of my time. She jokingly (I think) said she was tempted to log on to Knowledge just to vote Oppose and let everyone know that she didn't want her husband to be an admin.

1949:

I see s/he has stopped again so I am not blocking it right now. I'm not even sure if it is the same person or multiple people (probably schoolchidren) using a shared IP. But thanks for letting me know and adding another warning!

298:

week, deletion is not an appropriate remedy - going to the page and changing it back to the preferred version is. And if the article was editable to quality, one shouldn't have voted delete, one should have edited it. :)

2569:

diplomatic thing to do in such a situation, so well done (after all, it can easily be deleted if a dispute arises, while an undeletion is a bit more difficult). I was quite impressed with the decision, so well done. :)

1715:

Two users in particular The Literate Engineer & Voice of All(MTG) have apparently made it their duty to get rid of the list and they have been using underhanded tactics in an attempt to do so in any way they can.

3392: 3695:

good candidates there. I was looking for your name, and was going to put you down for who I'd vote for, but I couldn't see it there. Is there any reason why you don't want to be on the Arbitration Committee?

509:

particular case I can NOT agree that my article in the making would be aborted by a redirect to Corporal Punishment, where I originally contributed most of the material now restored as a first work-draft.

3497:

It wasn't a test nor vandalism. My net cut out and not all the info got sent so only the first bit of the new version got thourhg. I was trying ot correct it but got edit conflicts from you reveting it.

2624: 2587: 1658:

Good question. One thought has been that most chess players worthy of their own article are grandmasters, and therefore the category specifies that the player has that status. You might want to talk to

3181:

Thanks for participating in my RfA. The final vote was 57/4/3. I hope I don't disappoint those who voted support, and that those who didn't won't wish they'd campaigned more strongly in opposition.

2663:

for the same reason (although those two I did get some info on, I am no longer convinced that they are sufficiently notable for their own page). Nobody else has contributed to any of the 3 articles.

3523: 1814:, citing the introduction at the top of the list as the basis for the move ("it is more than a list"). Several users then used the article title as an argument against including any list entries. 746:

For what it's worth, I agree that merging is sensible. I would not have a problem with school district article, nor city schools articles. To me, those would be logical, as well as significant and

996:

truce and real discussion has to happen to stop the atrocious waste of time that is currently sapping energy from constructive editing. I know for a fact that I have wasted too much time there.

2977:. Even though it failed with a with the final tally of 55/22/6, I want to thank you anyways. I don't want to be one a admin anymore until I reach 10,000 edits now that it's over with. Thanks -- 1489:

I'd firstly like to say that it would have been gratifying to see a slightly longer closing comment. I went and parsed out the discussion on the talk page, and yes it is indeed a no consensus

2484: 453:

I hope to do all those things and, even if I can't keep my fourth classified, will do all I can to be a great admin. I appreciate your comment about me being a good contributor, it really

2397: 1225:

My pleasure. I wish all sub-pages were as well-written as that one. I wholeheartedly agree with you on your criteria, and so you saved my the time it'd take for me to write it myself ;).

2435: 1302:. I was both surprised and delighted about the amount of support votes and all the kind words! If I can ever help with anything or if you have any comments about my actions as an admin, 2410: 2012: 1518: 2469: 853: 719:

to be debated on VfD, I don't believe that anyone should use shorthand. If it means retyping until our fingers fall off or until war breaks out again, then so be it, but I think we

1540: 1369: 474:: Well, in all fairness, Ed Poor did lose his bureaucratship. But still, I dislike the presence of the Ed Poor barnstar since it seems to encourage vigilante behaviour from admins. 2269:

of someone surely couldn't be made a finding of fact, could it? Then again, now that I think about it and review the Able Baker AfD, that's really all that this has been about. -

743:

I do understand that part of the judgment in the past is a decision on "notability," and the various school arguments are about that, but that's merely one criterion among many.

1546:

Ah yes, the Progressive Bloggers AFD... things really get amusing when the outside world learns of one of our AFD debates, doesn't it? Remember, when you become an admin Aaron,

3925: 2837: 1437:

I really appreciate your support vote on my RfA. I will do the best job I can to ensure you know you made the right choice. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you!--

768: 3592:. I was rather suprised at the overwhelming support I received. Thank you for your confidence in me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. -- 2004: 1342:. I was very surprised at the number of votes and amount of and kind comments that I gathered. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I mess up in the use of my new powers. -- 505:

As my record shows, I am not only a fairly active contributor, and I dare say a rather serious one, but also an active believer in appropriate redirects, like you. However in

2687:

Yes any page which you are the sole author too is speedy deletable if you request it and can reasonably document that it was a mistake. I am deleting all three of them now.

1802:

Voice of All(MTG) reported the results as " ", and he and The Literate Engineer used that as the basis to erase the content of the list, which they did in successive edits.

2364: 2702: 2594: 2403: 2343: 1870: 1480: 3468:

Sjakkalle, O.K., so you don't believe in Santa, but I still want to wish you and your loved ones all the happiness in the world and the best new year ever. Your friend,

3550: 2561: 1719:

But word is getting out, and supporters of the list are starting to rally against them and protect the list (via rerverting vandalism, countering their tactics, etc.).

975:

gaining a consensus on both sides (Please don't laugh ;-), we need to try something.). I'm not sure if you're aware but there has been a huge amount of activity on the

624: 602: 2417: 2503: 2322: 925: 3063: 1380: 1672: 99: 3051: 2656: 2651: 1575: 2884: 2208:

Not that I'm bitter over the irony of having saved the article (at least I saved the German AfDers the trouble), mind you, I rather like translating things :-) --

2193: 1992: 661: 651: 1474: 1238: 896: 881: 1925: 1625: 129: 3569: 3195: 2786: 2772: 2759: 2429: 2209: 2158: 1395: 1275: 1263: 964: 932: 907: 695: 545: 3729: 3507:

Ah, OK thanks. Things like that happen and all I wind up seeing on the Recent Changes page is the whole article disappearing. Thanks for the explanation. :-)

3152: 2723: 2696: 2639: 2095: 2069: 1959: 1635:

Hi there. I just spent much of the last few weeks reorganizing the Sportspeople categories so that all athletes have an entry under (nationality/sport), like

1175: 1086: 1077: 3871: 3499: 3433:. The request was successful, with a final tally of 33/0/0. I'm delighted that you decided to support it and I hope that I can live up to your expectations. 2825: 2230: 2226: 1188: 186:

Alright, I see. I don't think this thing should have been deleted, however I believe that this thing should be deleted, and have cast a delete vote as such.

3633: 1877:

article to the November 15 version in the article's change history (the complete list). My username ("Bend over") was banned as inappropriate or offensive.

1039: 3521: 2981: 1481: 195: 2328: 2262: 2132: 1794:

That's 10 votes to keep, out of which 3 voted to clean up. Seven out of ten clearly voiced their desire to retain the list without deleting its entries.

1248: 1232: 841: 3661: 3653: 1937: 806: 3895: 1699: 3307: 592: 299: 181: 3940:, which passed with the final tally of 65/4/3. If you would ever desire my assistance in anything, or wish to give me feedback on any actions I take, 1770: 1722: 560: 989: 754: 247:. The final result was 40/0/0, and my "superpowers" have now been activated. I look forward to helping out with the development of the encyclopedia. 2237: 2212: 2147: 1619:

Knowledge open on my browser while working on other things, and I thought I'd like to thank at least a few of my supporters while I'm here. Cheers.

84: 3618: 2007:? I am creating pages for the many congressional districts. This is not a minor project, and other people will be helping me in conjunction with 1353: 1058: 935: 910: 775: 3965: 3502: 2869: 2802:

the complainant in the posts I skimmed, I thought it was more than a wee bit hypocritical for him to be whinging about someone else's behavior. --

2650:

Damn I still don't get those AFD instructions. This is my 3rd time trying to nominate a page for AFD and it hasn't worked any time. I nominated

2606:

over such things. I thought that you were very diplomatic and I am sure that your comments and decision helped all of the people who commented.

2307: 3047: 2978: 2514:

Now that my RfA is fully and officially completed, I want to thank you for your support. I appreciate your confidence that I can do the job. --

2279: 2119: 1902:

Remember, the three reversion limit does not apply when reverting vandalism. Only if enough concerned users participate will this be successful.

1707: 114: 3039: 1887:

with the actual content of the entire list. Unfortunately, the change history for the list is still part of the change history for the article

1797: 530: 3681: 3657: 3339: 2375:

to be what people spend most of their time on. (Good grief, I have looked at the length of the deletion log in my name and I think I must have

2081: 2018: 1652: 1459: 1427: 3472: 3106: 1639:. Pretty much every athlete is now off the main page of both the sport and the nationality. However, I don't have the knowledge to do that to 680: 287: 206: 171: 3937: 3844: 3830: 3753: 3516: 3323: 3303: 2983: 2848: 1943: 3713: 2392: 2334:

I'm less concerned about ArbCom outcomes than I am my general reputation, and I'm pretty sure that the ugly factor will go up exponentially

2178: 1977: 1850:

On Oct 18 the list was nominated for AfD (article for deletion), but this attempt to delete failed, and the vote was overwhelmingly to Keep.

1747: 1364:

after the AfD debate, but there were two additional articles lumped in the same AfD nomination. Could you take care of those too? They are:

3800: 3487: 3399:. Rather than a whole long section about 4IM I just wrote a sentence and linked to 4IM's website. Maybe this time it won't get reverted. -- 3138: 3116:

Hi Brookie here - how do you post a talk page link in your signing signature - my attempts in preferences haven't worked! Thanks Bonehead

2660: 2222: 1909: 1365: 1024: 492: 478: 457:

to get a compliment like that ;). Stop by my talk page, or on article pages; I look forward to working with you. A belated thanks again, ]

302: 3824: 3812: 3748:. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything or if I ever do something I shouldn't have, please, don't hesitate to 3684: 3216: 3120: 2974: 1417: 1348: 1212: 1017: 1009: 980: 847: 495: 459: 428:, and especially thank you for supporting me. I really appreciate it, and will wield the mop and bucket the best way I know how. I, like 425: 244: 203: 168: 3082:, and weigh in (there's something of a large discussion page, so be prepared. For a quick run-through of what's been said and done, see 1318: 1142: 1003: 3756: 3160: 3083: 2933: 2915: 2255: 1591: 1361: 1158: 414: 3854:

The trust and support of such a Knowledge veteran as yourself means a great deal to me. I'll make sure your trust in me is founded. --

3847:. To tell you the truth, I was surprised by all the support I've gotten. I never saw myself as more than an occasional Wiki-hobbyist. 2953: 2875:

You're welcome. Most likely I caught it on RC patrol. Anons making edits to userpages is always a red flag which calls for attention.

2810: 1608: 1133: 1122: 60:

Welcome to my talkpage! New messages at the bottom please. Responses may be either here or on your talkpage. I am quite inconsistent.

3878: 3768: 3412: 2744: 1844: 1111: 3666: 3284: 3677: 3645: 3604: 3246: 3233: 3209: 2705:

for the same reasons, but it seems that some anon editors came along to edit it recently, so it has to go through the AFD process.

2554: 1441: 1354: 1339: 1299: 1164: 826: 481: 378: 3440: 2518: 1866:

Voice of All(MTG)reported false results for the 10 November AfD vote, and he and The Literate Engineer edited out the entire list.

1805: 1208:

Thanks for looking up (and counting!) my unsigned AfD vote on November 11. Must have been really sleepy not to have signed it. :)

333: 224: 177:

FYI I saw that it had been listed for deletion, but I didn't vote keep because a consensus I agreed with had already been formed.

3745: 3430: 2898: 2891: 2125:

I've protected the page for the night anyway - if he doesn't change pages, that will at least give it all a break for a while --

1195: 2681: 2032: 1237:

By the way, I was wondering: when someone else edits your userpages, do you get a notice saying that that's happened, like the

778:. If my RfA passes I will use my new abilities with the common interest in mind. If you have any questions please feel free to 2446:

dried up, or if it was still 50:50, or 55:45, then one could say there was no consensus. But with one side having reached 60%

2290: 3589: 2539: 2482: 2362: 2305: 2277: 1516: 1217: 797: 622: 590: 556:

Just want to say thanks for finally blocking that vandal. It was getting hard to keep track of changes done by that guy. --

69: 1825: 3829: 3273: 1643:, and I'm guessing you do. There's a weirdness with that page, in that players seem to be on that page for a quality they 3876: 2542:. The final result was 38/0/0. I'm looking forward to spending my summer holidays shut away in a darkened room, drinking 2008: 1613: 985: 3614:

Thanks. I was in the middle of trying to figure out what I was doing wrong merging the two different links for this guy.

581:

But when it's all hysterical language and bluster, I let myself get sucked in. Boo. But, hey, thanks for the message!

162:

I maintain that had they known many of the inclusionists, such as Tony, were likely to have voted delete on NPOV grounds

1880:

Some editors stated that an article is not the place for a list, and used that as a justification to keep list entries.

1819: 1678: 701: 1853:

An anonymous sock-puppet placed a clean-up notice on the list. It has been used as a justification to delete entries.

471: 3609: 551: 2284: 3545: 3079: 1636: 1165: 259: 3372: 3030: 2242: 759: 2038:

It's OK to create articles on congressional districts, but they have to be articles. What I deleted consisted of

1841:, where it was originally. This preserves the spirit of the results of the two AfD discussions mentioned above. 1045: 940: 3771:. I was successfully promoted with a final tally of 74/0/0. I will endeavour not to let you down. Thanks again. 3212:

passed 25/0. Please don't hesitate to contact me if I can help you with anything. See you around the wiki, :-)

3078:, and wondered what you thought about the proposals to curb what's going on there. If you have time, check out 2862:). I know, it wasn't really the most impressive vandalism ever, but still, that was just a cool thing. Thanks. 2103: 1219: 159:

it wasn't necessarily controversial; as even the most ardent inclusionists on Knowledge seem to have avoided it

3703: 2713: 2671: 2614: 2577: 2090: 2027: 1601:

I'm here too to express my thanks at your support on my RFA, and I hope I continue to be a good contributor!

1493:. If Tito had said "delete" and W.marsh had come back, that would have made the magic 66% that is "allowed". 1452: 961: 135: 2297:

disagree. I respect all of their opinions regardless, and the phrasing of my request was fairly neutral. -

3531: 3311: 3004: 2859: 2217: 1030:

OK, the history is back in place. Not much context there really, but it is propbably suitable for merging.

486: 906:

Sorry about that. I'll stop editing now, methinks. It's not worth editing all these arthritis articles. --

629:

Exactly when "deletionist" become a cuss word? I joined the only association which specifically says I am

2293:

a notice at pump, Tito recomended "keep" after I notified him of the Able Baker AfD, and Nendesuka and I

931:

Why do you suspect a campaign is going on against these articles?? Should we get registered accounts?? --

565: 500: 105: 1401: 3600: 3408: 2853: 1688: 1623: 273:

I like your idea in principle, but it's highly impractical to check it, and it feels sort of unwikish.

141: 74: 3915: 2480: 2360: 2303: 2275: 1931: 1514: 1100: 1008: 791: 671: 620: 588: 268: 3761: 3689: 3680:. The final outcome was (30/2/0). I will do my best at the position I now am in. Thanks again! -- 2958: 2199: 1446: 958: 3815:! Your trust means a great deal to me, and I promise to try my hardest to serve the community. — 3671: 3200: 1323: 3492: 3289: 3069: 1810:

During the 10 November AfD discussion, Voice of All(MTG) moved the list to the new article name

1051: 941: 901: 3735: 2890: 3961: 3941: 3866: 3396: 2845: 1692: 1640: 1537: 976: 969: 3226:

Thank you for tyour support on my RFA. It is very much appreciated and will not be forgotten.

1758:

The notice was placed without group consensus, and there was no edit comment. Pretty sneaky.

1528:

articles from Knowledge, anyhow. It's almost as if you had decided that our task here was to

1171:

You're welcome. I make mistakes like that all the time, so please keep a weather eye on mine.

1127:

Thanks for your efforts, didn't seem to work I'm afraid, Let's try removing the <small: -->

28:

I am going to take a Christmas break now. I will be back some time in January. See you around!

3446: 3111: 2988: 2173: 1974: 1630: 1620: 1605: 3575: 3129:] ]into the signature field and check the box turning "raw signatures" on. Hope that helps! 2523: 1338:

I am now an administrator and would like to thank you for your support and kind words on my

3386: 3352: 3299: 3251: 3010: 2475: 2355: 2346:

and said, "Being a PhD student and contributing to a magazine does not make you an expert?"

2298: 2270: 2152: 1965: 1895: 1884: 1838: 1709: 1581: 1509: 1424: 1283: 1203: 785: 779: 760: 615: 583: 253: 3936:

I wish to offer my gratitude for supporting another recent RFA you voted on, specifically

8: 3858: 3779: 3724: 3628: 3564: 3511: 3482: 3334: 3318: 3185: 3133: 3092: 3058: 2949: 2879: 2820: 2796: 2781: 2754: 2691: 2634: 2498: 2424: 2387: 2317: 2188: 2142: 2064: 1987: 1954: 1920: 1894:

An attempt is being made to protect the list against vandalism at its original location:

1667: 1570: 1469: 1390: 1310: 1258: 1147:

Hey buddy. Some of us have put together a page about the recent undeserved Troubles. See

1072: 1034: 949: 920: 891: 877: 866: 836: 812: 690: 646: 540: 338: 190: 124: 94: 64: 17: 2157:

Hello Sjakkalle, It's Moe Epsilon. Im giving you the user box for your user page called

1856:

On Nov 10, The Literate Engineer made an AfD attempt against the list and it failed too.

953: 860:

terrible, goes to Sjakkale for always being friendly, and a pleasure to get along with.

3893: 3794: 3540: 3193: 2941: 2936:. The final count was 46/0/0. I hope I'll live up to your faith in me in my use of the 2769: 2741: 2265:

the most disturbing thing to come out so far? The implication that we'll have to just

2252: 1649: 1272: 1245: 1229: 1108: 419: 292: 277: 120:

Ah bother, I was hoping nobody would see it... Good to see that you approve anyway :-)

81: 2383:. Perhaps I ought to get back working a bit more in the main namespace as well. :-) ) 750:

We need to be considering "useful" more than "pleasurable for the author" more, IMO.

3945: 3863: 3855: 3834: 3820: 3699: 3469: 3147: 2709: 2667: 2610: 2573: 2416:

Thanks and you're welcome. I think this is the second-toughest debate I have closed,

2086: 2023: 1533: 1432: 1346: 1315: 1303: 1180: 1148: 633:

a deletionist, but I don't consider it a swear word. Let's see, some of the things I

465: 409: 388: 354: 325: 314: 2078:

Hmmmm… good point. I'll keep at it, then, with only articles that are complete. --

1983:

You're welcome. After reading the debate thoroughly, the result was quite easy. :-)

3806: 3749: 3639: 3437: 3243: 3230: 3221: 2998: 2920: 2910: 2866: 2807: 2731: 2467: 2234: 2162: 2129: 2116: 1971: 1602: 1094: 658: 599: 144:, and rarely, if ever, use it. However, this case seemed particularly appropriate. 3393:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/4IM Campaign to update Union Jack (2nd nomination)

2750:

The ArbCom should represent the community, and if the community wants you... yes.

3816: 3649: 3417: 3101: 3087: 2937: 2831: 2509: 2161:. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! — 1566:

on vote count and comments, actually I'm a bit surprised that it was that close.

1456: 1421: 1152: 1000: 384: 249: 217: 3709: 3706: 3581: 3344: 3208:

I'm an administrator, and I've got you to thank for it! Thanks to your support,

2719: 2716: 2677: 2674: 2620: 2617: 2583: 2580: 1752:

The following anonymous clean-up notice was posted to the list on November 1st:

1254:

No, I don't but I keep my userpage as well as all its subpages on my watchlist.

3721: 3625: 3597: 3561: 3508: 3479: 3404: 3331: 3315: 3130: 3075: 3055: 2945: 2876: 2817: 2778: 2751: 2688: 2631: 2603: 2495: 2421: 2384: 2314: 2185: 2139: 2104: 2061: 1984: 1951: 1917: 1906: 1696: 1664: 1596: 1567: 1466: 1387: 1255: 1172: 1138: 1129: 1116: 1069: 1031: 917: 888: 871: 861: 833: 819:

Thanks for catching that. I've restored to the version prior to the copyvio.

687: 686:

I blocked them, then regretted slightly. I will be keeping an eye on this one.

643: 639: 598:

Yeah, you're right "deletionist" really is "a lot worse" than "jerk". Please.--

537: 307: 211: 187: 121: 111: 91: 61: 3395:

with the decision to delete the article, but include a brief mention of it at

2462: 1830:

The change history of the list is currently stranded as the change history of

3890: 3786: 3774: 3535: 3190: 3182: 2944:

some vandals). Please accept this wikithanks as a token of my gratitude ;) --

2765: 2737: 2543: 2407: 2057: 1373: 1269: 1242: 1226: 1209: 1104: 824: 677: 557: 527: 399: 344: 274: 153: 2138:

Thanks. End of recess at their school seems to have solved the problem. :-)

3696: 3213: 3144: 3117: 2706: 2664: 2645: 2607: 2570: 1940: 1936:

I saw you placed a LVL4 on his talk page. The vandalism seems to continue.

1888: 1874: 1860: 1831: 1811: 1684: 1343: 1307: 1083: 1055: 988:. Ironically the most useful links in that category are the lists such as 979:

page regarding this issue. Specifically I have outlined the arguments for

404: 394: 387:. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to 349: 339: 318: 280: 221: 2327:

Err, no thanks. I really don't want to enter into the fray there, see my

317:

so that I can work to prevent them in the future, and thanks once again!

3434: 3349:

Thanks for the vote of confidence in my recent RFA, which passed 64-2. —

3240: 3227: 3165: 2994: 2903: 2816:

Thanks! Yes, I also thought the complaint on ANI to be a bit suspicious.

2803: 2515: 2451: 2126: 2113: 1998: 1859:

Then Voice of All(MTG) underhandedly moved the list to the non-list name

1588: 813: 751: 454: 3615: 3277: 3261: 3173: 1660: 1438: 1021: 997: 329: 178: 2858:

Wow, that was awesome of you to revert the vandalism on my user page (

3593: 3454: 3400: 3391:

Hi, it's probably on your watchlist, but just in case: I just closed

2551: 1181: 852: 579:

when some evidence came in, even though it was against my position.

3281: 3265: 2184:

Thanks, I'll see if I can fit it in on my userpage eventually. :-)

1558:

sides of the debate and decided to review it based on the comments.

1192: 820: 3652:. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to 2655:

delete under those circumstances? If so, I'd also like to delete

3276:– following a 30/0/0 vote I’ve now been made an admin. Do have a 2547: 2338:

if I start presenting my views. Just as a for instance, can you

1289: 429: 3373: 732:

establish the importance/significance/need for an article? Did

676:

The vandalism continues. Please put an end to this -- thanks!

3648:. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an 3031: 1687:(formerly "List of sexual slang") was to keep, the opposition ( 156:, or anywhere else that I've seen) would seem to vindicate this 2005:

United States House of Representatives, California District 51

229: 3924: 3423: 2925: 2836: 1068:

was why the article was under so much attack... Oops, sorry.

767: 491:

Thank you again for the detailed explanation on my talk page

235: 3256: 2964: 2630:

Thanks for the kind words! They are always appreciated. :-)

2595:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_modern_day_dictators

2404:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of modern day dictators

2398:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of modern day dictators

1407: 1329: 364: 243:

Thank-you for expressing your confidence in me at my recent

3353: 2562:

Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/Octagon_Press_-_Idries_Shah

984:

with say, 200 schools, yet they endorse categories such as

3011: 2529: 1050:

Please do not protect the main page featured article. See

2437:

File:SOHO solar flare sun large 20031026 0119 eit 304.png

856:

The original barnstar, because sequels and spinoffs are

3744:

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my

1020:

so I can merge it? I'm always grateful for your help.

2546:

and playing with my new tools ;-) Please accept this

2231:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Webcomics/Workshop

2227:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Webcomics/Evidence

638:

non-mainstream subjects. I don't endorse the view of

1837:

The content of the list itself has been restored to

1482:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Progressive Bloggers

3556:Thanks, I have put the LN template on my painfully 3534:or in the category talk if you have any questions. 2844:For reventing vandalism on "David Miller (singer)" 1905:Thank you for taking the time to read this letter. 2973:I would like to thank you for supporting me on my 2313:OK, great! Add a comment on that in the workshop. 1416:I would like to thank you for supporting me on my 521:Therefore I urge you to endure missing out on one 2434: 2112:Otherwise, it's just keep up the good work :) -- 990:List of high schools in Orange County, California 3843:I just wanted to thank you for supporting me in 1767:edit. Nothing before or after. A sock-puppet. 1151:. In the service of the innocent downtrodden ;) 1869:I posted a rebuttal to the above antics on the 1268:Got it. Thanks, I've been curious for a while. 607:Sigh. If you have something to say to me, use 383:The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an 3118::) Brookie: A collector of little round things 2379:about twenty times as many articles as I have 2205:Turkish media attention, which didn't happen. 1451:I think that was a good call. Thanks. Mark in 642:either, but it just is an opposing viewpoint. 3145:Brookie - a collector of little round things! 2701:Thanks. I was asking for the same thing for 1550:will be facing that kind of AFD to close. :-) 3478:Thanks, and Merry Christmas to you too! :-) 2902:the reality rise to the level of the dream. 2225:has been accepted. Please place evidence at 2223:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Webcomics 1789:Delete = 4 votes (including the nomination) 3887: 3644:Hey Sjakkalle! Thanks for your support on 3624:You're welcome! Glad to be of service. :-) 1524:never understood why you're so mad keen to 477:What does that mean? Thanks for your time. 2371:efforts are always appreciated and really 2229:. Proposals and comments may be placed at 2056:the district, the page meets at least two 2044:A template for the congressional districts 3524:Category:Wikipedians by D&D Alignment 3429:Hi Sjakkalle, thanks for your support on 2764:Me and Tony S; everybody's dream ticket. 2289:So that you don't think ill of me: I had 1487:I have to say I'm cranky about this one. 1241:reminder? I've been curious for a while. 1016:Would you mind undeleting the history of 3767:Thank you for your support in my recent 3453: 3255: 3172: 3164: 2835: 2011:. Furthermore, I had put a note on the 1355:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Grimlick 1298:Thank you very much for your support on 851: 148:the project was a flagrant abuse of NPOV 3811:Thank you for supporting my successful 3272:Many thanks for your support during my 14: 3588:Sjakkalle, thanks for your support on 2932:Sjakkalle, thanks for your support on 2865:How'd you come across my page anyway? 2538:Thanks so very much for supporting my 1970:Thanks for closing out this ugly AfD! 3074:I saw you just reverted vandalism on 2052:Without any real content whatsoever 1755:23:44, 1 November 2005 68.17.227.41 887:Thanks, I'll put in on my userpage! 372:Sjakkalle/November and December 2005 3125:On the preferences screen I enter 2009:Knowledge:WikiProject U.S. Congress 1863:, while the AfD was still underway. 1783:Keep, with no mention of clean up = 1663:who made most of those categories. 986:Category:High_schools_in_California 848:Allow me to chuck a barnstar at you 23: 3580: 3422: 3397:Union Jack#Other proposed versions 3161:Thanks for participating on my RfA 2963: 2924: 2528: 1820:Knowledge:Merging and moving pages 1771:The results of the 10 November Afd 1723:The results of the 18 October AfD: 1406: 1328: 1288: 766: 363: 234: 167:reconsider your attitude to this. 24: 3979: 2736:But do you think they'd want me? 774:Thank you for your support on my 242: 3923: 3330:Hi! Responded on your talkpage. 3080:Knowledge:Semi-protection policy 2602:just have to be very careful of 2461: 2436: 1916:it's best to participate there. 1637:Category:Finnish sport wrestlers 1500:there. And my standards aren't 1166:Christianity and Jewish prophecy 872: 862: 424:Thank you so much for voting in 328: 3948: 3909: 3907: 3905: 3903: 3901: 3899: 3143:Brilliant - thanks for that :) 1798:Dishonest report of Afd results 1386:Oops, soory. OK, they're gone. 1370:Tag Team Transformer Pretenders 3676:Thank you for your support on 2342:the fireworks if I pointed to 1883:So I replaced the redirect at 377:Thanks for your support on my 13: 1: 3896:18:12, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 3884: 3872:15:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3825:06:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 3801:06:58, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 3757:16:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 3730:09:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 3714:18:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 3685:03:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 3667:03:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 3634:10:35, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3619:10:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3605:05:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3570:10:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 3551:18:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3517:14:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3503:14:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3488:08:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3473:06:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 3441:10:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 3413:21:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 3340:15:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3324:15:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3285:13:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 3247:14:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 3234:13:16, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 3217:05:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 3196:03:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 3153:08:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 3139:07:33, 12 December 2005 (UTC) 3121:20:32, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 3102: 3095: 3088: 2133:16:31, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2120:16:13, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2096:14:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2070:14:14, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 2033:14:09, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 1993:16:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1978:16:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1960:15:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1944:13:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC) 1926:09:09, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 1910:22:08, 27 November 2005 (UTC) 1748:The anonymous clean-up notice 1700:17:09, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 1673:07:15, 28 November 2005 (UTC) 1653:03:44, 26 November 2005 (UTC) 1626:19:27, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1609:09:25, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1592:08:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC) 1576:13:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 1541:12:24, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 1519:11:17, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 1475:08:53, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 1460:08:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 1453:Historic Triangle of Virginia 1442:05:14, 23 November 2005 (UTC) 1428:02:15, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 1396:06:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC) 1381:17:58, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1349:15:23, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1319:13:29, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1276:07:35, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1264:07:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC) 1249:19:34, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 1233:08:37, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 1213:03:56, 19 November 2005 (UTC) 1196:09:31, 17 November 2005 (UTC) 1176:18:35, 16 November 2005 (UTC) 1159:01:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC) 1143:08:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1134:08:17, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1123:08:15, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1112:08:14, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1087:07:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1078:06:58, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1059:19:12, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 1040:07:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC) 1025:18:26, 14 November 2005 (UTC) 1004:22:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC) 965:16:45, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 936:15:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 926:15:22, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 911:15:17, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 897:10:04, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 882:09:53, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 867: 842:06:51, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 827:02:06, 11 November 2005 (UTC) 807:17:00, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 755:13:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 696:10:45, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 681:10:22, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 662:09:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 652:09:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 625:09:17, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 603:09:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 593:09:10, 10 November 2005 (UTC) 400: 395: 371: 345: 340: 3953: 3930: 3107:22:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 3064:14:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 3040:14:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 2984:03:32, 9 December 2005 (UTC) 2954:23:18, 8 December 2005 (UTC) 2916:17:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2885:06:57, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2870:06:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2849:18:57, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2826:13:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2811:13:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2787:13:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2773:13:29, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2760:13:22, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2745:13:20, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2724:19:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2697:12:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2682:11:16, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2640:07:44, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2625:02:31, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2588:02:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 2555:22:54, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 2550:as a token of my gratitude. 2519:18:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 2504:08:35, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2485:01:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2470:16:03, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 2430:14:46, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 2411:14:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 2393:07:50, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2365:07:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2323:07:16, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2308:07:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC) 2280:07:38, 6 December 2005 (UTC) 2256:09:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC) 2238:22:50, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 2213:15:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 2194:06:55, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 2179:04:01, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 2148:14:04, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 1683:Even though the AfD vote on 561:16:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 546:15:32, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 531:14:51, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 496:17:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 482:11:11, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 460:04:34, 9 November 2005 (UTC) 415:18:22, 8 November 2005 (UTC) 410: 355: 334:07:50, 8 November 2005 (UTC) 303:17:08, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 288:11:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC) 248: 225:15:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC) 207:12:44, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 196:10:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 182:09:57, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 172:09:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 130:09:32, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 115:08:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC) 100:14:49, 1 November 2005 (UTC) 85:13:16, 1 November 2005 (UTC) 70:16:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC) 7: 3966:09:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 3938:my nomination for adminship 2474:Great job on this close. - 1614:Thank you for your support! 536:Answered on your talkpage. 405: 350: 216:Could you do the same with 90:Thanks for the kind words! 55:/September and October 2005 10: 3984: 3086:) Hope to see you there. - 2703:Crystal Palace (chat site) 2593:Wonderful comments on the 2344:User:Snowspinner/Webcomics 1871:talk page for sexual slang 1689:User:The Literate Engineer 1679:Sexual Slang confrontation 702:Understood but disgruntled 3610:William Lipscomb redirect 1054:for explanation. Thanks. 740:fail to advertise? Etc. 724:consideration of whether 552:Thanks for the good block 140:I'm usually not a fan of 110:I noticed, but I approve 3942:feel free to let me know 2058:speedy deletion criteria 1806:Non-consensual list move 728:should be deleted. Did 1052:user:Raul654/protection 1046:Main page FA protection 942:User talk:4.242.198.138 726:this particular article 455:warms my heart and soul 432:, promise four things: 3656:! Again, thanks! :D -- 3586: 3463: 3427: 3269: 3178: 3170: 3052:User:Sjakkallehasamilf 2968: 2929: 2841: 2657:Crossroads (chat site) 2652:Lighthouse (chat site) 2533: 2442: 1822:for more information. 1693:User:Voice of All(MTG) 1641:Category:Chess players 1411: 1333: 1293: 977:Wikipedia_talk:Schools 884: 771: 436:Serve the public trust 368: 239: 3769:request for adminship 3584: 3457: 3426: 3259: 3176: 3168: 2967: 2928: 2839: 2532: 2490:Thanks. That one was 2440: 2251:should I mention it? 1826:The current situation 1777:Keep & clean up = 1414:G'day MarkGallagher, 1410: 1332: 1292: 1239:MediaWiki:Newmessages 855: 770: 379:request for adminship 367: 245:Request for Adminship 238: 136:WikiProject Inclusion 50:/July and August 2005 40:/March and April 2005 3932:Greetings Sjakkalle, 3382:07:02, Dec. 17, 2005 2218:Arbitration accepted 2159:Template:User Member 1896:List of sexual slang 1885:List of sexual slang 1839:List of sexual slang 1761:This was the user's 1710:List of sexual slang 1465:You're welcome, :-) 570:The problem is that 439:Protect the innocent 3955:toujours dorénavant 3345:Freakofnurture says 2402:Thanks for closing 2261:Am I wrong to find 1873:, and reverted the 1708:The assault on the 1532:an encyclopedia! -- 1103:. Hope it helps. -- 959:CambridgeBayWeather 566:Jerk-er, not Jerk-y 501:Physical punishment 106:cassandra Trelawney 18:User talk:Sjakkalle 3949:vécut heureusement 3663:£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 3587: 3465: 3464: 3462: 3449: 3428: 3270: 3179: 3171: 2969: 2930: 2854:Thank you so much! 2842: 2560:Merge decision on 2534: 2494:shiny indeed. :-) 2443: 2420:was the toughest. 1729:Keep & clean = 1412: 1334: 1304:please let me know 1294: 885: 772: 736:pursue NPOV? Did 369: 265: 240: 75:White American AfD 45:/May and June 2005 34:Archived talkpages 3971: 3970: 3958: 3951: 3916:Another thank-you 3913: 3912: 3798: 3727: 3712: 3664: 3631: 3603: 3567: 3514: 3485: 3458: 3452: 3447: 3383: 3379: 3365: 3357: 3337: 3327: 3321: 3302:comment added by 3150: 3136: 3061: 3037: 3023: 3015: 2882: 2846:Rosameliamartinez 2823: 2784: 2757: 2722: 2694: 2680: 2637: 2623: 2586: 2540:Request for Admin 2501: 2448:and still growing 2427: 2390: 2320: 2191: 2145: 2067: 1990: 1957: 1938:User:72.10.122.69 1932:User:72.10.122.69 1923: 1670: 1573: 1472: 1393: 1379: 1261: 1084:→Raul654 1075: 1037: 923: 894: 839: 693: 672:User 212.85.15.86 649: 543: 470:You wrote on the 269:School suggestion 241: 193: 152:on my talk page, 127: 97: 67: 3975: 3957: 3952: 3950: 3947: 3934: 3927: 3920: 3919: 3885: 3877:Thanks for your 3799: 3792: 3789: 3784: 3777: 3725: 3702: 3690:ArbCom elections 3662: 3629: 3596: 3565: 3544: 3538: 3512: 3483: 3381: 3377: 3375: 3369: 3366: 3359: 3355: 3335: 3326: 3319: 3296: 3205:Dear Sjakkalle, 3188: 3148: 3134: 3104: 3097: 3090: 3059: 3035: 3033: 3027: 3024: 3017: 3013: 2971:Dear Sjakkalle, 2959:My failed RFA :) 2908: 2880: 2821: 2782: 2755: 2712: 2692: 2670: 2635: 2613: 2576: 2499: 2478: 2465: 2459: 2438: 2425: 2388: 2358: 2318: 2301: 2273: 2200:Durmus Kumdereli 2189: 2176: 2171: 2168: 2165: 2143: 2094: 2084: 2065: 2031: 2021: 2003:Had you deleted 1988: 1955: 1921: 1735:Keep, no clean = 1668: 1571: 1512: 1470: 1447:Appomattox Basin 1402:Ianblair23's RfA 1391: 1378: 1376: 1360:Hi, you deleted 1313: 1259: 1220:/Admin criterion 1155: 1120:]</small: --> 1073: 1035: 921: 892: 874: 869: 864: 837: 809: 804: 800: 794: 790: 691: 647: 618: 586: 541: 412: 407: 402: 397: 391:. Again, thanks! 373: 357: 352: 347: 342: 332: 323: 285: 264: 263: 191: 142:ignore all rules 125: 95: 65: 3983: 3982: 3978: 3977: 3976: 3974: 3973: 3972: 3956: 3918: 3883: 3838: 3809: 3804: 3787: 3780: 3775: 3772: 3764: 3759: 3738: 3692: 3674: 3642: 3612: 3607: 3578: 3548: 3542: 3536: 3527: 3495: 3493:Cartoon Network 3470:Tony the Marine 3460:Tony the Marine 3451: 3443: 3420: 3389: 3371: 3363: 3347: 3297: 3292: 3290:IP 72.1.206.187 3254: 3224: 3203: 3186: 3163: 3114: 3072: 3070:Semi-protection 3029: 3021: 2991: 2986: 2961: 2923: 2904: 2895: 2856: 2834: 2799: 2770:The kettle's on 2742:The kettle's on 2734: 2648: 2599: 2566: 2557: 2526: 2512: 2476: 2452: 2441:Something shiny 2400: 2356: 2299: 2287: 2271: 2245: 2220: 2210:Last Malthusian 2202: 2174: 2169: 2166: 2163: 2155: 2109: 2080: 2079: 2041:A stub template 2017: 2016: 2013:discussion page 2001: 1968: 1934: 1847: 1828: 1808: 1800: 1773: 1756: 1750: 1725: 1713: 1681: 1633: 1616: 1599: 1584: 1510: 1485: 1449: 1435: 1430: 1404: 1374: 1358: 1351: 1326: 1321: 1311: 1286: 1223: 1206: 1185: 1169: 1153: 1097: 1048: 1014: 972: 945: 933:150.204.105.126 908:150.204.105.126 904: 902:Arthritis edits 850: 832:Great, thanks! 817: 805: 802: 798: 792: 788: 786:Johann Wolfgang 765: 761:Johann Wolfgang 704: 674: 616: 584: 568: 554: 503: 489: 487:Thank you again 468: 462: 422: 392: 361: 319: 310: 295: 282: 271: 266: 232: 218:Ammar ibn Yasir 214: 138: 108: 77: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3981: 3969: 3968: 3962:Be eudaimonic! 3954: 3935: 3928: 3917: 3914: 3911: 3910: 3908: 3906: 3904: 3902: 3900: 3898: 3882: 3875: 3840:Hi Sjakkalle, 3837: 3828: 3808: 3805: 3765: 3763: 3762:Howcheng's RfA 3760: 3750:drop me a line 3742: 3739: 3737: 3734: 3733: 3732: 3691: 3688: 3673: 3670: 3641: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3611: 3608: 3579: 3577: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3546: 3526: 3520: 3500:24.218.198.104 3494: 3491: 3450: 3445: 3444: 3421: 3419: 3416: 3388: 3385: 3361: 3346: 3343: 3291: 3288: 3253: 3250: 3223: 3220: 3202: 3199: 3162: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3113: 3110: 3076:George W. Bush 3071: 3068: 3067: 3066: 3019: 2990: 2987: 2962: 2960: 2957: 2940:(now I can go 2938:mop and bucket 2922: 2919: 2894: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2855: 2852: 2833: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2733: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2647: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2598: 2591: 2565: 2558: 2527: 2525: 2522: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2506: 2433: 2432: 2399: 2396: 2368: 2367: 2353: 2352: 2351: 2347: 2332: 2286: 2285:About the spam 2283: 2260: 2244: 2241: 2219: 2216: 2201: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2154: 2151: 2136: 2135: 2108: 2105:Britney Spears 2102: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2073: 2072: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2000: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1967: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1933: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1900: 1899: 1892: 1881: 1878: 1867: 1864: 1857: 1854: 1851: 1846: 1843: 1827: 1824: 1807: 1804: 1799: 1796: 1792: 1791: 1786: 1780: 1772: 1769: 1754: 1749: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1738: 1732: 1724: 1721: 1712: 1706: 1704: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1632: 1629: 1615: 1612: 1598: 1595: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1559: 1551: 1508: 1505: 1494: 1488: 1484: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1448: 1445: 1434: 1431: 1405: 1403: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1357: 1352: 1336:Hi Sjakkalle, 1327: 1325: 1322: 1296:Hi Sjakkalle, 1287: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1222: 1216: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1189:202.65.191.134 1184: 1179: 1168: 1163: 1119:<small: --> 1096: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1013: 1007: 971: 970:School mergers 968: 944: 939: 929: 928: 916:Good, thanks. 903: 900: 849: 846: 845: 844: 816: 811: 784: 783: 764: 758: 703: 700: 699: 698: 673: 670: 669: 668: 667: 666: 665: 664: 640:conservativism 627: 614: 582: 580: 567: 564: 553: 550: 549: 548: 502: 499: 488: 485: 467: 464: 458: 451: 450: 443: 442:Uphold the law 440: 437: 421: 418: 375: 362: 360: 337: 309: 306: 294: 291: 270: 267: 233: 231: 228: 213: 210: 199: 198: 184: 164: 163: 160: 157: 149: 137: 134: 133: 132: 107: 104: 103: 102: 76: 73: 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3980: 3967: 3963: 3959: 3943: 3939: 3933: 3929: 3926: 3922: 3921: 3897: 3894: 3892: 3886: 3880: 3874: 3873: 3870: 3869: 3865: 3862: 3861: 3857: 3852: 3848: 3846: 3841: 3836: 3832: 3827: 3826: 3822: 3818: 3814: 3803: 3802: 3796: 3791: 3790: 3785: 3783: 3778: 3770: 3758: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3741:Hi Sjakkalle, 3731: 3728: 3723: 3718: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3711: 3708: 3705: 3701: 3698: 3687: 3686: 3683: 3679: 3672:W.marsh's RfA 3669: 3668: 3665: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3650:administrator 3647: 3635: 3632: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3617: 3606: 3602: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3583: 3571: 3568: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3549: 3541: 3539: 3533: 3525: 3519: 3518: 3515: 3510: 3505: 3504: 3501: 3490: 3489: 3486: 3481: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3471: 3461: 3456: 3448:Feliz Navidad 3442: 3439: 3436: 3432: 3431:my recent RFA 3425: 3415: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3368: 3367: 3342: 3341: 3338: 3333: 3328: 3325: 3322: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3305: 3301: 3287: 3286: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3267: 3264:for you from 3263: 3258: 3249: 3248: 3245: 3242: 3236: 3235: 3232: 3229: 3219: 3218: 3215: 3211: 3206: 3201:Alhutch's RfA 3198: 3197: 3194: 3192: 3189: 3184: 3175: 3167: 3154: 3151: 3146: 3142: 3141: 3140: 3137: 3132: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3123: 3122: 3119: 3112:Bonehead here 3109: 3108: 3105: 3100: 3099: 3098: 3091: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3065: 3062: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3048:User:Sjakkale 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3038: 3034: 3026: 3025: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2996: 2989:Impersonator? 2985: 2982: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2966: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2927: 2918: 2917: 2914: 2913: 2909: 2907: 2900: 2893: 2886: 2883: 2878: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2868: 2863: 2861: 2851: 2850: 2847: 2838: 2827: 2824: 2819: 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2809: 2805: 2788: 2785: 2780: 2777:We'll see... 2776: 2775: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2758: 2753: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2743: 2739: 2725: 2721: 2718: 2715: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2695: 2690: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2679: 2676: 2673: 2669: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2653: 2641: 2638: 2633: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2626: 2622: 2619: 2616: 2612: 2609: 2605: 2596: 2590: 2589: 2585: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2563: 2556: 2553: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2531: 2521: 2520: 2517: 2505: 2502: 2497: 2493: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2479: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2458: 2457: 2449: 2439: 2431: 2428: 2423: 2419: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2409: 2405: 2395: 2394: 2391: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2359: 2354: 2348: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2330: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2321: 2316: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2306: 2304: 2302: 2296: 2292: 2282: 2281: 2278: 2276: 2274: 2268: 2267:take the word 2264: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2248: 2243:Webcomics RfA 2240: 2239: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2206: 2195: 2192: 2187: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2177: 2172: 2160: 2150: 2149: 2146: 2141: 2134: 2131: 2128: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2121: 2118: 2115: 2106: 2097: 2092: 2088: 2083: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2071: 2068: 2063: 2059: 2055: 2051: 2046: 2043: 2040: 2039: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2034: 2029: 2025: 2020: 2014: 2010: 2006: 1994: 1991: 1986: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1976: 1973: 1961: 1958: 1953: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1945: 1942: 1939: 1927: 1924: 1919: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1908: 1903: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1882: 1879: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1845:To summarize: 1842: 1840: 1835: 1833: 1823: 1821: 1815: 1813: 1803: 1795: 1790: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1768: 1766: 1765: 1759: 1753: 1742: 1739: 1736: 1733: 1730: 1727: 1726: 1720: 1717: 1711: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1698: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1674: 1671: 1666: 1662: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1650:Mike Selinker 1646: 1642: 1638: 1631:Chess players 1628: 1627: 1624: 1622: 1611: 1610: 1607: 1604: 1594: 1593: 1590: 1577: 1574: 1569: 1565: 1560: 1557: 1552: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1521: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1513: 1504:high, really. 1503: 1499: 1492: 1483: 1476: 1473: 1468: 1464: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1458: 1454: 1444: 1443: 1440: 1429: 1426: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1409: 1397: 1394: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1377: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1356: 1350: 1347: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1331: 1324:GraemeL's RFA 1320: 1317: 1314: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1291: 1277: 1274: 1271: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1262: 1257: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1247: 1244: 1240: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1228: 1221: 1218:re: Typos on 1215: 1214: 1211: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1183: 1178: 1177: 1174: 1167: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1156: 1150: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1125: 1124: 1118: 1114: 1113: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1088: 1085: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1053: 1041: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1011: 1006: 1005: 1002: 999: 993: 991: 987: 982: 978: 967: 966: 963: 960: 955: 951: 943: 938: 937: 934: 927: 924: 919: 915: 914: 913: 912: 909: 899: 898: 895: 890: 883: 879: 875: 870: 865: 859: 854: 843: 840: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 825: 822: 815: 810: 808: 801: 795: 787: 781: 777: 769: 762: 757: 756: 753: 749: 744: 741: 739: 735: 731: 727: 722: 718: 714: 710: 697: 694: 689: 685: 684: 683: 682: 679: 663: 660: 657:completely.-- 655: 654: 653: 650: 645: 641: 636: 632: 628: 626: 623: 621: 619: 612: 611: 606: 605: 604: 601: 597: 596: 595: 594: 591: 589: 587: 578: 573: 563: 562: 559: 547: 544: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 529: 524: 519: 515: 511: 508: 498: 497: 494: 484: 483: 480: 475: 473: 472:wp:an archive 463: 461: 456: 449: 448: 444: 441: 438: 435: 434: 433: 431: 427: 417: 416: 413: 408: 403: 398: 390: 386: 385:administrator 382: 380: 374: 366: 358: 353: 348: 343: 336: 335: 331: 327: 324: 322: 316: 305: 304: 301: 300:Phil Sandifer 290: 289: 286: 279: 276: 261: 258: 255: 251: 246: 237: 227: 226: 223: 219: 209: 208: 205: 197: 194: 189: 185: 183: 180: 176: 175: 174: 173: 170: 161: 158: 155: 150: 147: 146: 145: 143: 131: 128: 123: 119: 118: 117: 116: 113: 101: 98: 93: 89: 88: 87: 86: 83: 82:Youngamerican 72: 71: 68: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 37: 36: 35: 31: 30: 29: 19: 3931: 3867: 3859: 3853: 3849: 3842: 3839: 3835:Deathphoenix 3833:thanks from 3821:Lifeisunfair 3810: 3781: 3773: 3766: 3740: 3736:Izehar's RfA 3693: 3675: 3643: 3613: 3560:userpage... 3557: 3532:My Talk Page 3528: 3506: 3496: 3477: 3467: 3466: 3459: 3390: 3387:4IM campaign 3351: 3350: 3348: 3329: 3293: 3271: 3237: 3225: 3207: 3204: 3180: 3124: 3115: 3094: 3093: 3073: 3009: 3008: 3001: 2992: 2970: 2931: 2911: 2905: 2896: 2892:BD2412's RFA 2864: 2857: 2843: 2800: 2735: 2649: 2600: 2567: 2564:- well done! 2535: 2513: 2491: 2473: 2455: 2453: 2447: 2444: 2401: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2369: 2339: 2335: 2294: 2288: 2266: 2259: 2249: 2246: 2221: 2207: 2203: 2156: 2153:New user box 2137: 2110: 2053: 2002: 1969: 1966:Exicornt AfD 1935: 1904: 1901: 1889:sexual slang 1875:sexual slang 1861:sexual slang 1836: 1832:Sexual slang 1829: 1816: 1812:sexual slang 1809: 1801: 1793: 1788: 1782: 1776: 1763: 1762: 1760: 1757: 1751: 1740: 1734: 1728: 1718: 1714: 1703: 1685:sexual slang 1682: 1644: 1634: 1617: 1600: 1585: 1563: 1555: 1547: 1534:Tony Sidaway 1529: 1525: 1522: 1501: 1497: 1490: 1486: 1450: 1436: 1413: 1372:. Thanks. -- 1359: 1335: 1295: 1236: 1224: 1207: 1204:Unsigned AfD 1199: 1187:Presumably, 1186: 1170: 1157: 1146: 1137: 1126: 1115: 1098: 1082:Hehe ... :) 1065: 1049: 1015: 994: 973: 950:Circuit City 946: 930: 905: 886: 857: 818: 773: 747: 745: 742: 737: 733: 729: 725: 720: 716: 712: 711:and not the 708: 705: 675: 634: 630: 609: 608: 577:really happy 576: 571: 569: 555: 522: 520: 516: 512: 506: 504: 490: 476: 469: 452: 446: 445: 423: 393: 376: 370: 320: 315:my talk page 311: 296: 272: 256: 215: 200: 165: 139: 109: 78: 59: 33: 32: 27: 26: 25: 3710:Eventualist 3707:Darwikinian 3704:Wishy Washy 3654:let me know 3298:—Preceding 2867:Matt Yeager 2797:Matthew 7:3 2720:Eventualist 2717:Darwikinian 2714:Wishy Washy 2678:Eventualist 2675:Darwikinian 2672:Wishy Washy 2621:Eventualist 2618:Darwikinian 2615:Wishy Washy 2584:Eventualist 2581:Darwikinian 2578:Wishy Washy 2536:Sjakkalle, 2329:recent edit 2235:Fred Bauder 1972:FreplySpang 1648:Thoughts?-- 1603:Steve block 1306:! Regards, 1128:altogether 981:NOT merging 954:Pumpkin pie 814:Ernie Dingo 659:Nicodemus75 613:talk page. 600:Nicodemus75 220:? Peace! -- 3944:. Cheers! 3819:(formerly 3817:David Levy 3601:(cntrbtns) 3585:Thank you! 3576:malo's RfA 3280:! Cheers, 3278:Jaffa Cake 3262:Jaffa Cake 3252:Thank you! 3084:#rehashing 2840:{{{text}}} 2661:Ncohafmuta 2524:Cnwb's RfA 2082:Mark_Adler 2047:Categories 2019:Mark_Adler 1582:RfA thanks 1457:Vaoverland 1422:Ianblair23 1366:Joust More 1284:Thank you! 1154:encephalon 1149:WP:SIGHELP 780:contact me 447:Classified 420:THANK YOU! 389:contact me 293:CoW Greeks 250:Physchim62 230:RfA thanks 3722:Sjakkalle 3626:Sjakkalle 3562:Sjakkalle 3509:Sjakkalle 3480:Sjakkalle 3332:Sjakkalle 3316:Sjakkalle 3131:Sjakkalle 3056:Sjakkalle 2897:Although 2877:Sjakkalle 2818:Sjakkalle 2779:Sjakkalle 2752:Sjakkalle 2689:Sjakkalle 2632:Sjakkalle 2496:Sjakkalle 2477:brenneman 2422:Sjakkalle 2385:Sjakkalle 2357:brenneman 2315:Sjakkalle 2300:brenneman 2272:brenneman 2186:Sjakkalle 2140:Sjakkalle 2062:Sjakkalle 1985:Sjakkalle 1952:Sjakkalle 1918:Sjakkalle 1907:Red Rover 1697:Bend over 1665:Sjakkalle 1568:Sjakkalle 1511:brenneman 1467:Sjakkalle 1433:MONGO RfA 1388:Sjakkalle 1256:Sjakkalle 1182:GMA Films 1173:NatusRoma 1139:Sjakkalle 1130:Sjakkalle 1117:Sjakkalle 1070:Sjakkalle 1032:Sjakkalle 1018:Aqua Cure 1010:Aqua Cure 918:Sjakkalle 889:Sjakkalle 834:Sjakkalle 688:Sjakkalle 644:Sjakkalle 617:brenneman 585:brenneman 538:Sjakkalle 523:technical 466:How lost? 188:Sjakkalle 122:Sjakkalle 112:Sandpiper 92:Sjakkalle 62:Sjakkalle 3891:jnothman 3726:(Check!) 3630:(Check!) 3566:(Check!) 3537:xaosflux 3513:(Check!) 3484:(Check!) 3336:(Check!) 3320:(Check!) 3312:contribs 3300:unsigned 3177:two fish 3169:one fish 3135:(Check!) 3060:(Check!) 3005:contribs 2881:(Check!) 2822:(Check!) 2783:(Check!) 2766:Filiocht 2756:(Check!) 2738:Filiocht 2693:(Check!) 2636:(Check!) 2544:G&Ts 2500:(Check!) 2426:(Check!) 2418:this one 2408:RoySmith 2389:(Check!) 2319:(Check!) 2190:(Check!) 2144:(Check!) 2066:(Check!) 1989:(Check!) 1956:(Check!) 1922:(Check!) 1741:Delete = 1669:(Check!) 1587:again. 1572:(Check!) 1471:(Check!) 1392:(Check!) 1375:howcheng 1362:Grimlick 1270:Blackcap 1260:(Check!) 1243:Blackcap 1227:Blackcap 1210:Turnstep 1105:Blackcap 1099:Replied 1095:Your sig 1074:(Check!) 1056:→Raul654 1036:(Check!) 998:David D. 922:(Check!) 893:(Check!) 838:(Check!) 821:User:Zoe 715:that is 692:(Check!) 678:BeteNoir 648:(Check!) 558:LifeStar 542:(Check!) 528:Fastifex 260:contribs 192:(Check!) 126:(Check!) 96:(Check!) 66:(Check!) 3881:support 3868:phoenix 3697:Zordrac 3682:W.marsh 3658:Eliezer 3558:chaotic 3418:Cheers! 3356:REAK OF 3214:Alhutch 3149:(Talk!) 3014:REAK OF 2979:Jaranda 2832:Gracias 2707:Zordrac 2665:Zordrac 2608:Zordrac 2604:WP:NPOV 2571:Zordrac 2548:Tim Tam 2510:Thanks! 2456:ÉIREANN 2381:created 2377:deleted 2340:imagine 2107:article 1941:Chelman 1785:7 votes 1779:3 votes 1530:unwrite 1498:nothing 1344:GraemeL 1012:history 957:Thanks 873:dwolf24 858:usually 748:useful. 709:article 430:RoboCop 321:ALKIVAR 222:Striver 3845:my RfA 3807:My RfA 3754:Izehar 3700:(talk) 3678:my RfA 3646:my RfA 3640:My RFA 3590:my RFA 3438:(talk) 3435:Leithp 3304:Frufru 3244:(talk) 3231:(talk) 3222:My RFA 3210:my RfA 3103:kurity 2995:Skalle 2946:bainer 2934:my RfA 2921:My RfA 2906:BD2412 2899:my RfA 2804:Calton 2732:Thanks 2710:(talk) 2668:(talk) 2611:(talk) 2574:(talk) 2516:SCZenz 2291:placed 2130:(talk) 2127:sannse 2117:(talk) 2114:sannse 1975:(talk) 1597:Cheers 1589:Jkelly 1526:remove 1425:(talk) 1300:my RfA 1273:(talk) 1246:(talk) 1230:(talk) 1001:(Talk) 962:(talk) 763:'s RfA 752:Geogre 426:my RfA 308:My RFA 278:adiant 212:thanks 154:WP:ANI 3946:Elle 3776:howch 3616:Bduke 3598:(tlk) 3241:Gator 3228:Gator 3007:). — 2942:check 2373:ought 2350:time. 2295:often 2253:J•A•K 2054:about 1661:Quale 1645:don't 1439:MONGO 1308:Joann 1022:Kappa 713:topic 493:Travb 479:Travb 284:|< 283:: --> 179:Kappa 16:< 3795:chat 3594:malo 3401:Angr 3374:TALK 3364:TURE 3308:talk 3050:and 3032:TALK 3022:TURE 2999:talk 2993:See 2950:talk 2860:this 2808:Talk 2659:and 2646:Help 2597:page 2552:Cnwb 2492:very 2454:Fear 2336:when 2263:this 2247:Hi. 2015:. -- 1764:only 1691:and 1621:AnnH 1606:talk 1564:both 1556:both 1538:Talk 1502:that 1491:vote 1455:aka 1368:and 1132:]]] 1109:talk 1101:here 1066:that 992:. 952:and 878:talk 721:must 717:ever 635:like 507:this 254:talk 204:Ambi 169:Ambi 3879:RFA 3864:ath 3831:RfA 3813:RfA 3746:RfA 3547:CVU 3522:re: 3282:CLW 3274:RfA 3266:CLW 3183:Tom 3089:Mys 2975:RfA 1999:AFD 1548:you 1507:me. 1418:RfA 1340:RfA 1193:Nlu 1121:]] 1064:So 796:... 776:RfA 631:not 396:Fir 359:RFA 341:Fir 3964:) 3823:) 3788:ng 3752:. 3660:| 3411:) 3360:UR 3314:) 3310:• 3260:A 3054:. 3018:UR 2952:) 2806:| 2768:| 2740:| 2233:. 1834:. 1737:11 1141:] 1107:| 880:) 782:. 738:it 734:it 730:it 610:my 406:Fo 381:. 351:Fo 3960:( 3860:e 3856:D 3797:} 3793:{ 3782:e 3543:/ 3409:c 3407:· 3405:t 3403:( 3378:) 3370:( 3362:x 3358:N 3354:F 3306:( 3268:! 3191:r 3187:e 3096:e 3036:) 3028:( 3020:x 3016:N 3012:F 3002:· 2997:( 2948:( 2912:T 2466:\ 2331:. 2175:ε 2170:e 2167:o 2164:M 2093:) 2091:c 2089:· 2087:t 2085:( 2030:) 2028:c 2026:· 2024:t 2022:( 1898:. 1891:. 1743:2 1731:3 1536:| 1316:B 1312:e 876:( 868:e 863:R 823:| 803:] 799:C 793:T 789:[ 572:I 411:x 401:e 356:x 346:e 326:™ 281:_ 275:R 262:) 257:· 252:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index