766:
the first searched site for information on a game series. I was planning to add external links to more Kirby related game articles and the WiKirby site. The standards on the wiki's "substantial-ness" seem vague and open to interpretation. WiKirby isn't going to be obsolete any time in the near future. We're being built by members of long standing wikis such as
Bulbapedia, MarioWiki.com, and Zelda Wiki.org. Judging from so many talk pages, it seems Knowledge's interests would be to provide an outlet for fans of a specific series wanting to get more in-depth with the articles. There are several other game pages with external links to fandom wikis, and it wasn't used to source anything in the article. Do tell me if there are further details to measure an independent wiki's status on the "substantial" requirement.
1208:
31:
873:
92:
743:
the most reclusive band ever! I check
Knowledge every now and then just in case ... now I'm in the realms of fairy tales! .... there might be a fifth CD in the offing or even a live concert! I need something to keep my dreams alive as I am sadly coming to the conclusion that The Blue Nile are no more!
851:
Obviously, I'm biased again, but the mentions in printed media and support of the fan community seem reason enough to present the issue to the staff of
Knowledge for a review. Being substantial seems to be subjective, but I would think those points outweigh a site merely being linked to because of it
312:
I don't agree with it either. But at the moment it does count as a valid external link because it gives people an insight into the marketing style that Sony are using for the game. I suspect that pretty soon after the game's launch the site will go all but dead, and then become a viable candidate for
765:
specifically, and the reason for it being ELNO... Anyway, the only reason in the ELNO link that I thought was applicable was #12. One reason we even have fan specific wikis is to keep
Knowledge free of cluttered articles pertaining to every minor detail of a series. With few exceptions, Knowledge is
512:
Hey
Soetermans! I see that you have compiled a bunch of really impressive edits and I strongly encourage you to request for adminship. Your track record is amazing and you would make a great admin. Knowledge needs more editors like you. If you need someone to nominate you, I am more than happy to do
332:
Regardless of what you consider to be "notable", review sources and news outlets with history over five years is relevant. Also attempting to delete scores that you don't agree with and have been in place for several months is just plain childish. Please utilize
Knowledge the way it was intended and
742:
When you made your edit you appear to have removed references to interviews, Flags and Fences etc. which were very handy. Perhaps you could re-instate these items - I'm sure other people were interested in them too. There is little enough information available about the Blue Nile .... possibly
721:
Thanks for taking the time to talk. I used looked at your previous edit and saw the SFX Magazine was not an article. In the headings, I capitalized
Screenplay and Origional story because of this: "Use sentence-style capitalization, not title-style capitalization: Capitalize the first letter of the
781:
Thanks for answering my question. The conflict of interest part is true, I won't deny nor conceal that. I didn't fully investigate the policy here. There are another set of external links that I think should be reviewed by
Knowledge staff. The Legend of Zelda franchise has 2 major wikis and in my
365:
You want me banned because I posted a review on
Knowledge that you don't agree with and then you went on a cleaning spree removing months worth of contributions? And then you tell me you don't "appreciate" me sending you a message? Well doesn't it make sense to ask why you're deleting so much
722:
first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and
Regulations"." Those both fall under that catagory becuse you are initially saying the origional story is by so and so. If you have anymore on this, just respond. Thanks!
575:
RPGSite receives an average of 600,000 unique hits per month and interviews actors such as Mark Meer (aka the male Commander Shepard in the hit Mass Effect series) and developers such as Motomu Toriyama and Yoshinori Kitase, the director and producer of Final Fantasy XIII.
950:
There was already a discussion in the talk page about the soft sailor review and it there seems to be agreement that it is at least as notable as some other currently included reviews. Could you please restore that part of your revert?
57:
Thank you! I will check over the links you provided. I'm not sure how to quote sources, when the source is my own personal experience and what I had read on forums of other people having the same issue. But i will keep checking!
176:
1038:. The word "American" specifically refers to the United States and its citizens; prior to the last couple of days this week, "North" wasn't even in the intro to Kings of Leon. That makes you the vandal here.
243:
453:
Go out, enjoy the spring weather, and give your wrist a break from using that mouse! Please pass this message along to other patrollers by adding {{subst:User:Wuhwuzdat/Wikiout}} ~~~~ to their talk pages
443:
In order to give our vandalism, new page and spam patrollers a well deserved day off, it is suggested that all edit patrollers take a 1 day vacation from editing Knowledge, on Thursday, April 1, 2010.
537:. Are you just dropping by, or should Knowledge be prepared? ;) Thanks for your kind words :) I don't see myself as an admin really though, but maybe someday I'll be a menace to others too! :D --
648:
are websites that scope a whole range of video games, not only RPGs. On Knowledge, we prefer a more 'neutral' source before a 'specialised' source (just as a mainstream source like
582:
Edited to add that 1) we're a GameRankings site, 2) we're being accepted to Metacritic, and 3) for two months running we have in fact received over a million unique hits.
170:
710:
690:
237:
902:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at
472:
500:
744:
988:
752:
592:
632:
2) I'm not familiar with www.rpgsite.net, but if I have to guess, it mainly revolves around role-playing games. Well-established websites such as
561:
1131:
970:
861:
853:
767:
411:
377:
341:
66:
514:
488:
302:
762:
423:
104:
937:
353:
1151:
731:
1047:
1198:
1184:
1170:
1075:
852:
being on wikia. Both wikis could quickly fill in a discussion with its members so a staff decision would be fair to all parties.
737:
1016:
685:
283:
954:
604:
322:
775:
942:
389:
191:
467:
396:
158:
1039:
702:
522:
258:
225:
1124:
1003:. This section was created by an Afd and consensus. You don't get to unilaterally remove it without discussion.—
818:
678:
554:
327:
288:
618:
600:
1157:
867:
419:
385:
349:
152:
121:
78:
74:
1000:
111:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
534:
496:
1066:
articles. Now may I just politely and calmly ask you... can you please explain to me why you've done this?--
955:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=StarCraft_II:_Wings_of_Liberty&diff=376411566&oldid=376407735
219:
148:
1052:
918:
837:
Part of the Wikia network which conceals member statistics by combining all of Wikia's member statistics.
307:
1215:
887:
on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a
38:
800:
Affiliated with 26 sites, the bulk of the fan community, 9 of which actually assist in its management.
215:
922:
888:
198:
85:
928:
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
369:
But that is ok. No harm, no foul. If this is what keeps you going, then continue on friend. Enjoy.
298:
129:
806:
Led in article count for 4 years before taking an approach to merge articles of similar natures. (
579:
On what grounds are we not allowed to add nothing more than a review score to Knowledge articles?
1043:
895:
748:
727:
706:
265:
119:. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current
572:
I would like to know how adding www.rpgsite.net reviews to video game reception tables is spam.
1095:
984:
966:
903:
757:
716:
670:
567:
546:
1142:
1094:
genre and as such there is no need for mentioning two very similar genres. Please don't be a
1091:
1021:
1010:
994:
1224:
1146:
1116:
933:
698:
695:
neither of us are correct but it's annoying going back and forth, can you just compromise
588:
484:
463:
407:
373:
360:
337:
164:
62:
47:
17:
8:
899:
884:
596:
294:
1071:
857:
771:
723:
415:
381:
345:
231:
116:
70:
1027:
980:
962:
518:
507:
492:
480:
I would like an explanation of why you undid my contribution to Bioshock 2 article.
430:
279:
112:
629:(and the fact that you are referring www.rpgsite.net as 'we' doesn't help either...)
401:
1194:
1180:
1166:
1099:
1005:
251:
184:
1108:
929:
662:
538:
459:
1223:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
650:
125:
article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
917:, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see
910:
318:
914:
898:
to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only
626:
139:
108:
96:
1138:
1087:
1031:
275:
841:
1190:
1176:
1162:
1067:
447:
811:
1054:
1086:
I'm not sure if you still desire a response, but the reason was that
1035:
872:
645:
314:
206:
1090:
alone is sufficient. A stealth game is considered a subgenre of the
637:
807:
402:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:GNG#General_notability_guideline
909:
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious
641:
782:
opinion, the lesser wiki has its links here by default. Compare:
832:
91:
293:
Thanks man - I see you're putting in work too - great stuff!
921:). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found
95:
Hello Soetermans! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
657:
3) Just adding a score doesn't add anything to an article.
817:
Preferred by even users of sites that are not affiliated
633:
1062:
Sir, I have seen that you've reverted my edits on those
790:
Mentioned in the Official Nintendo Magazine last spring.
250:
183:
894:
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not
1105:And also, there is never a need for a unnecessary
691:we both have opinions on how the page should look
103:of the articles that you created are tagged as
473:Deleting my contribution on Bioshock 2 article
264:
197:
879:Hello. Your account has been granted the "
105:Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons
1026:Take a look at the intro of these pages:
654:is preferred before a video game source).
844:, because there was no one to copy from.
14:
1221:Do not edit the contents of this page.
612:Well, it is consider spamming because:
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
115:, all biographies should be based on
1202:
1145:. But do you mind... if I just add "
1107:break. Thanks, and happy editing. --
434:
25:
625:website, which makes it a possible
23:
871:
803:Just months older than Zeldapedia.
795:The Legend of Zelda and Philosophy
333:contribute instead of destroying.
24:
1239:
891:scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
1206:
90:
29:
738:Why remove the references etc ?
621:were adding review scores by a
13:
1:
1199:20:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1185:19:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1171:19:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
1100:sources to back up your claim
943:Removal of Soft Sailor review
883:" userright, allowing you to
109:biographies of living persons
1132:23:58, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
1076:00:43, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
1048:22:22, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
1017:00:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
562:09:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
523:07:42, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
501:18:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
468:21:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
424:23:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
397:General Notability Guideline
390:17:38, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
354:17:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
323:09:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
303:04:08, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
284:18:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
79:01:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
7:
919:Knowledge:Reviewing process
10:
1244:
900:a small number of articles
732:22:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
711:12:23, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
989:22:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
971:13:27, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
938:17:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
885:review other users' edits
862:12:15, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
840:Couldn't put together an
812:Individual scent articles
776:14:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
753:09:12, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
686:20:14, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
605:18:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
904:Special:OldReviewedPages
328:Stop Deleting Everything
289:Snoopy D-O Double Gizzle
619:your only article edits
135:tag. Here is the list:
876:
868:You are now a Reviewer
831:Fills their wiki with
1219:of past discussions.
1092:action-adventure game
979:Much appreciated :)
875:
528:Hey NWA, you're back!
441:First Annual Wikiout.
42:of past discussions.
1147:third-person shooter
627:conflict of interest
446:(No, this is NOT an
18:User talk:Soetermans
308:Heavy Rain Facebook
1141:is a sub-genre of
877:
651:The New York Times
477:Hello Soetermans,
99:alerting you that
1231:
1230:
1225:current talk page
1129:
1121:
1113:
1028:Smashing Pumpkins
701:comment added by
683:
675:
667:
608:
591:comment added by
559:
551:
543:
504:
487:comment added by
457:
456:
427:
410:comment added by
393:
376:comment added by
357:
340:comment added by
270:
203:
86:Unreferenced BLPs
82:
65:comment added by
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1235:
1210:
1209:
1203:
1143:action-adventure
1127:what I'd do now?
1125:
1117:
1109:
1013:
1008:
882:
713:
681:what I'd do now?
679:
671:
663:
607:
585:
557:what I'd do now?
555:
547:
539:
503:
481:
435:
426:
404:
392:
370:
356:
334:
269:
268:
254:
210:
202:
201:
187:
143:
134:
128:
117:reliable sources
94:
81:
59:
33:
32:
26:
1243:
1242:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1234:
1233:
1232:
1207:
1060:
1024:
1011:
1006:
997:
947:Hi Soetermans,
945:
889:two-month trial
880:
870:
833:Junk "articles"
819:Gamefaqs thread
787:Zelda Wiki.org
760:
740:
719:
696:
693:
586:
570:
510:
482:
475:
452:
433:
405:
399:
371:
363:
335:
330:
310:
291:
211:
144:
132:
130:unreferencedBLP
126:
88:
60:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1241:
1229:
1228:
1211:
1137:Very well, as
1135:
1134:
1119:drop me a line
1106:
1103:
1083:
1082:
1059:
1051:
1023:
1020:
999:In regards to
996:
993:
992:
991:
975:
944:
941:
915:BLP violations
869:
866:
865:
864:
848:
847:
846:
845:
838:
835:
825:
824:
823:
822:
815:
804:
801:
798:
791:
784:
783:
759:
758:Regarding ELNO
756:
739:
736:
734:ChaosMaster16
718:
717:Capitalization
715:
692:
689:
673:drop me a line
659:
658:
655:
630:
614:
613:
569:
568:RPGSite Scores
566:
565:
564:
549:drop me a line
530:
529:
509:
506:
474:
471:
455:
454:
444:
438:
432:
429:
398:
395:
362:
359:
329:
326:
309:
306:
295:Crateescape101
290:
287:
272:
271:
204:
87:
84:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1240:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1212:
1205:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1178:
1173:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1154:
1153:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1122:
1120:
1114:
1112:
1104:
1101:
1097:
1096:Genre Warrior
1093:
1089:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1057:
1056:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1040:71.22.151.202
1037:
1033:
1029:
1022:Kings of Leon
1019:
1018:
1015:
1014:
1009:
1002:
995:Transporter 3
990:
986:
982:
978:
977:
976:
973:
972:
968:
964:
960:
957:
956:
952:
948:
940:
939:
935:
931:
926:
924:
920:
916:
912:
907:
905:
901:
897:
896:autoconfirmed
892:
890:
886:
874:
863:
859:
855:
850:
849:
843:
839:
836:
834:
830:
829:
827:
826:
820:
816:
813:
809:
805:
802:
799:
796:
793:Mentioned in
792:
789:
788:
786:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
773:
769:
764:
763:This revision
755:
754:
750:
746:
745:Pollyleeevans
735:
733:
729:
725:
724:ChaosMaster16
714:
712:
708:
704:
703:68.165.94.228
700:
688:
687:
684:
682:
676:
674:
668:
666:
656:
653:
652:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
628:
624:
620:
616:
615:
611:
610:
609:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
583:
580:
577:
573:
563:
560:
558:
552:
550:
544:
542:
536:
532:
531:
527:
526:
525:
524:
520:
516:
505:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
478:
470:
469:
465:
461:
451:
449:
442:
439:
437:
436:
428:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
403:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
367:
358:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
325:
324:
320:
316:
305:
304:
300:
296:
286:
285:
281:
277:
267:
263:
260:
257:
253:
249:
245:
242:
239:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
217:
214:
213:Find sources:
208:
205:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
141:
140:Harrie Geelen
138:
137:
136:
131:
124:
123:
118:
114:
113:verifiability
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
83:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1220:
1214:
1188:
1174:
1156:
1150:
1136:
1126:
1118:
1110:
1098:without any
1088:stealth game
1063:
1061:
1053:
1032:Bruce Willis
1025:
1004:
998:
981:Zuchinni one
974:
963:Zuchinni one
961:
958:
953:
949:
946:
927:
908:
893:
878:
794:
761:
741:
720:
694:
680:
672:
664:
660:
649:
622:
584:
581:
578:
574:
571:
556:
548:
540:
535:sorta anyway
511:
479:
476:
458:
445:
440:
400:
368:
364:
361:Really dude?
331:
311:
292:
273:
261:
255:
247:
240:
234:
228:
222:
212:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
120:
100:
89:
55:
43:
37:
1213:This is an
828:Zeldapedia
697:—Preceding
587:—Preceding
483:—Preceding
448:April Fools
406:—Preceding
372:—Preceding
336:—Preceding
313:removal. -
238:free images
171:free images
61:—Preceding
36:This is an
1111:Soetermans
1081:Hi King-9,
1064:Metal Gear
1055:Metal Gear
930:Courcelles
842:About page
665:Soetermans
541:Soetermans
460:Clarince63
366:content?
1036:Star Wars
1001:this diff
911:vandalism
646:Eurogamer
593:Rexlemche
589:Rexlemche
508:Adminship
431:Wikibreak
274:Thanks!--
207:Imme Dros
1189:Hello?--
1175:Hello?--
1058:articles
959:Thanks,
881:reviewer
854:Axiomist
797:in 2008.
768:Axiomist
699:unsigned
638:GameSpot
601:contribs
497:contribs
485:unsigned
420:contribs
412:Acfreeze
408:unsigned
386:contribs
378:Acfreeze
374:unsigned
350:contribs
342:Acfreeze
338:unsigned
75:contribs
67:Mrtraver
63:unsigned
1216:archive
1139:stealth
642:1UP.com
515:NWA.Rep
489:Cheatch
276:DASHBot
244:WPÂ refs
232:scholar
177:WPÂ refs
165:scholar
39:archive
1191:King-9
1177:King-9
1163:King-9
1068:King-9
1034:, and
808:Scents
623:single
533:Well,
216:Google
149:Google
107:. The
1158:MGSPW
1149:" to
1012:dαlus
644:, or
513:it.--
450:Joke)
259:JSTOR
220:books
192:JSTOR
153:books
16:<
1195:talk
1181:talk
1167:talk
1155:and
1152:MGS4
1072:talk
1044:talk
985:talk
967:talk
934:talk
923:here
858:talk
772:talk
749:talk
728:talk
707:talk
597:talk
519:talk
493:talk
464:talk
416:talk
382:talk
346:talk
319:talk
315:X201
299:talk
280:talk
252:FENS
226:news
185:FENS
159:news
71:talk
1161:?--
913:or
810:vs
634:IGN
617:1)
266:TWL
199:TWL
122:683
97:bot
1197:)
1183:)
1169:)
1123:|
1115:|
1074:)
1046:)
1030:,
1007:Dæ
987:)
969:)
936:)
925:.
906:.
860:)
774:)
751:)
730:)
709:)
677:|
669:|
661:--
640:,
636:,
603:)
599:•
553:|
545:|
521:)
499:)
495:•
466:)
422:)
418:•
388:)
384:•
352:)
348:•
321:)
301:)
282:)
246:)
209:-
179:)
142:-
133:}}
127:{{
77:)
73:•
1227:.
1193:(
1179:(
1165:(
1102:.
1070:(
1042:(
983:(
965:(
932:(
856:(
821:.
814:)
770:(
747:(
726:(
705:(
595:(
517:(
491:(
462:(
414:(
380:(
344:(
317:(
297:(
278:(
262:·
256:·
248:·
241:·
235:·
229:·
223:·
218:(
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
101:2
69:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
