928:
using it for shopping. But I'm expecting there to be a lag between growth in internet use in an area and growth of the
Knowledge community in that area. This is greatly complicated/hindered by the problem that the smartphone is not as good an editing devise as a pc, and in many areas the increase in Internet use is basically a smartphone phenomena. I'm hoping that we have little overt racism here, but we've yet to come to terms with issues such as people in poorer societies having less access to free reference sources, or even the reliable sources in some countries being much more extensive than others. On the plus side there has been a huge growth in Commons, not least because it is much more inclusionist than Knowledge, and part of that growth has been European museums digitally releasing images from their former colonies.
1967:. Another thing I would point out is that sometimes all your examples are very recent, like from the last month or so. That probably means that AWB already picks up that typo, its just that AWB usually has a backlog of typos to fix. That's why it is useful to have people like me do AWB fixes whilst we are using AWB to do other things. If the people who just use AWB in typo fixing mode were on top of the flow of new typos it would be rare for me to find AWB typo fixes when I'm searching for something else. Would it be possible for you to exclude either existing AWB typo fixes, or articles updated in the last three months? If so that would make your tool a really useful way to find additional typos to go into AWB, or if they have lots of false positives or multiple things they could be, to go into Edward's tool.
2066:, English Knowledge titles and wordnet. I looked only for lower case words, capitalized words have so many false positives of names etc. I posted here only words that appeared on latest dump more than 5 times. I then used AWB to see what it does, and excluded all the words it changed. The result is mainly legit variations of words, some foreign language words and some real typos like duringthe. Let me know if this list helps you and if you have any idea how to exclude more correct words without excluding common typos (like, if you exclude all wiktionary words, you get over 5000 common misspelling recorded there, and many many typos that are words in foreign languages. One of the reasons I try to help Lexeme namespace on Wikidata, where words can be querried and filtered by langauge and many other parameters)
2106:, I'm still working through that useful list of yours. I have found a number that I have suggested incorporating into AWB and which have started going into it. I have also found examples such as "startet" where I corrected 36 articles where it was a typo, but hundreds more are a correct use of a non English word. So far too many false positives to load into AWB, but I might put into Edward's tool as I'm sure there will be more such typos in the future. There are also some words where the meaning is clear and which may in time be recognised as new words in English. I suspect there are also some that are either picked up by the Regex function in AWB or because someone else occasionally patrols for them, so if you have the time to rerun it some time it would be interesting to see the difference.
2019:
false positives that they need a human like me to look at them, or they could be typos of more than one word and you need a human to decide which. I'm not really interested in going through thousands of typos in the way that AWB does, especially not if AWB is going to fix most of them I the next few weeks. But if you can tweak your scanning script to screen out current AWB replacements then I would be very interested in going through some of what you then found. As for other occurrences, if you can treat commas, semicolons, the equals sign and brackets in the same way as spaces then that would be very helpful. If you could also treat "fullstop and space" in the same way that would be good (fullstop without a space would give us a deluge of urls). Once again, thanks for this.
2900:
1247:
work be slapped with an A7 and their talk page pasted with warning banners all because some wikipedian with a hundred thousand twinkle edits and a complete lack of empathy is ignorant of its importance. I know this is a concern WSC and others share. I'm not proposing any major changes to the processes - they are mostly quite well designed. I'm just advocating for a kinder, more empathetic, and perhaps less-rushed approach in dealing with newbies. Much as we need new pages patrollers, we can't ever get into the situation where we are significantly more welcoming to new patrollers than to new good-faith content contributors.
2934:
1989:
replacements, right now the bottleneck is not finding more typos but actually correcting the current typos. I may run a fuller scan in order to find the most frequent typos to add to AWB. I can also exclude current AWB replacements. I'm less of a fan of AWB since it requires a windows app (even if possible to run on other desktop), my script is easy to use right from browser, both desktop and mobile. Current bottleneck is finding more editors to help with this mission, and after we finish the current list of 6k typos, I will improve the scanning script.
3635:
878:
recently rescued an article about a significant topic in
Sikhism (to be fair, the article was a pig's breakfast, and the "rescued" version is basically a stub). We have well-written, well-sourced, multiply-linked articles about "XXX in Catholicism", "XXX in Islam", "XXX in Buddhism" etc, but there was a serious argument from the nominator and an AfD participant that "XXX in Sikhism" was "not notable", a position that is so removed from reality (even reality as revealed by ten seconds of Googling) that I struggle to assume good faith.
77:
1491:
49:
3699:
3677:
3646:
3624:
1214:
stubs. How exciting is that? But over time the trailblazers got burned out, or bored, or just weren't interested in writing about minor topics. On the other hand, there was a need for a new kind of editor - one who would make incremental improvements, and create new articles on minor topics, but who would also defend the encyclopedia from the growing menaces of vandalism, POV-pushing, and commercial interests. This time also corresponded with the explosion of policies, guidelines and the zoo of
35:
3613:
226:
194:
42:
3769:
789:. They have not diminished work on Flow, they are working full speed ahead on specific features for Flow. When the WMF says that their new work is going to be driven by the needs of the Community, they mean they decided what they wanted to give us, then they did research interviews with a couple of editors, then they shoehorned those responses to fit what they wanted to build. I spoke to one of the people they interviewed - the WMF staff interviewing him
84:
1597:
63:
3472:
816:"Flow on Ice" did seem to me a pretty clear sign that Flow was no longer in fashion at the WMF. The dinosaur takes time to change, but in my view that sort of comment is usually code for "this project is dead", due to the obfuscation the message may get out more slowly, and due to its sauropod like nature the WMF's hind legs might still be moving for a while after the brain has squawked end. But I had stopped worrying about Flow. Though
3829:
793:. Specifically they are building a replacement for scripts like Twinkle, except their version won't work on existing pages. The Flow team is going full speed ahead, building a project that largely duplicates functionality we already built, and they are deliberately designing it so it won't work unless we convert every goddamn page on Knowledge into Flow chatboards. Oh.... and it doesn't work unless you switch to Visual Editor too.
28:
91:
21:
3666:
98:
3688:
2795:, there are actually few good photos of the main types of sculpture; most are taken in gloomy Indian museums, often blurry & at funny angles. I would use good ones of the round medallions with scenes, and of the thin coping stone relief on the BM back wall, also the garland frieze above that. One of their rectangular drum-slabs is carved on both sides - pics of each would be great. We only have 11 photos of the
3723:
2427:
films as opposed to starring in them, and neither pubic schools nor pubic libraries last long without me adding the missing l. So I'm well used to finding that hundreds of editors have made minor typos for me to fix, and as encouraged by
Knowledge I have been bold and corrected many contributions that were made by people who knew that their contributions were liable to be "ruthlessly edited". It is possible that
1227:
criticizing, documenting, and ultimately supporting an ever-more-self-referential quasi-judicial bureaucracy that is so many steps removed from the stated goal of building an encyclopedia that it is sometimes alarming. (Why are we arguing about the fairness of the process for establishing a consensus as to how to run an election for membership of an arbitration panel? Don't these people realize that
502:
56:
3399:
3658:
866:
references to reliable sources which specifically discuss the topic in depth, which has been declined now by the same editor three times in a row, with the same reason given - "needs more references". The same editor declines drafts for hours on end at a rate of roughly two per minute. Unsurprisingly, the same editor is also an offender for inappropriate speedy deletion tagging.
936:
work. But we have more of a problem with people who treat unsourced changes in the same way we used to treat vandalism. Personally I'm quite moderate on this issue, but I draw the line at an unsourced change to sourced information, and with a growing proportion of the pedia being sourced even with my stance there is much less room for editors who contribute uncited content.
1915:. This tool adds simple buttons to the lis: replace, remove, no much to learn. If after 5 minutes you don't like it, you can revert the edit on you common.js. No need to divide work as every checked typo should be removed from the list. The typos are sorted alphabetically so you can see those who happen couple of time, these are the top reccurring ones:
1013:(based on editors who created pages in the last day, rather than the last 30 days). Note that I don't bother counting pages created if it goes over fifty, because it takes longer and is unnecessary since the guideline threshold is twenty-five. Even from this limited amount of data it is clear that there are many users who should really have autopatrol.
916:
options for the first few minutes were rejected out of hand. I'm more enthusiastic about our chance of protecting more of our established writers from deletionist mistakes, once I get a bot writer to refresh the prospect list we can appoint a load of overlooked ones, the sort of people who create an articles a fortnight and have done so for years.
872:
historically-significant GUIs). I'm staying away from this topic area because it's what led to my quitting in frustration last time. I do feel it's unfortunate that those policy and deletion debates are so dominated by editors with a stridently anti-fair-use point of view, and I'm not sure that they reflect the true consensus of the community.
1169:– and the rate seems to have increased in the last year or so. So, overall, the content creators are still gaining ground. Where they have got the hang of this, this seems to happen without much fuss and so is perhaps just hard to discern. Anyway, welcome back and feel free to ping me if you need help with something.
2494:. So I was careful not to change all the examples that I encountered, only the ones that according to my reading of Wiktionary were wrong. If Wiktionary needs updating, then, well it is a wiki. As for AWB, you don't need to be a user of it to take part in the discussions there, so I have started a thread at
2410:
On the subject of plurals, an apostrophe is not used when pluralising a word. However: English, as ever, has its exceptions and decades is one of those exceptions. Thus referring to the 1970's as a decade is correctly apostrophised. Another good (topical) example would be, "The United
Kingdom will be
1884:
Hi, I already use both AWB and another tool that Edward wrote for me - top thread on this list. I'm finding your list useful, but I'm just using the generic search, that way I get to see the same typo in other projects like
Wikivoyage and Wikibooks as well. Plus I have something in Firefox that helps
935:
I'd agree we have a problem with gatekeeping, but I'd diagnose it slightly differently. The community is roughly the same size today as it was four years ago, but we have significantly more articles; So we probably have less of a problem with people owning articles and rejecting any change to "their"
877:
I keep seeing what appear to be deletion campaigns based on racial or religious grounds. For example there is an editor who is a significant contributor to articles on Sunni Islam, who also seems very keen on getting articles about Shia Islam-related topics, and Shia-believing individuals, deleted. I
850:
It's possible you may vaguely remember me. We had a fair bit of contact several years ago, but I became pretty disillusioned by certain aspects of the whole project (specifically with regard to fair use images) and I have been on pretty substantial wiki-break. Now I'm willingly getting pulled back in
2148:
Thanks Uziel, I have fixed a couple of them, and gone through a couple more that had some to fix. But a lot will be like "Saachi", occasionally a typo for
Saatchi but mostly a rare Indian name. So rare that there aren't enough articles on people with that name to justify a disambiguation page - just
1308:
I know and have been following
Knowledge articles for many years though I never knew how to write or edit one until a few months ago. I am from India and yes, people are getting more involved about from where and how all that information is coming. I am new writer and I have made a few edits; making
1238:
Now you may take issue with the factual accuracy of some or all of the above, and you may be right - it is largely bullshit. I am looking at the past through rose-tinted eyeglasses, and I am being more cynical then necessary about the present. But I do genuinely believe that somewhere along the line
888:
I suppose a lot of these things could have been written in 2011. Maybe not much has changed. Certainly the ongoing trend away from the "optimistic content creators" of 2006 towards the "pessimistic gatekeepers" who will eventually control everything is very noticeable when you take a few years away.
733:
Yep, that's exactly what I'm having to do: weed out Admins (and the occasional
Bureaucrat), and exclude anyone who hasn't edited in a year or more. I'm also checking to see if they're already "Autopatrolled" at less than 50 articles created (I'd say about 20% are...). I'm not sure I have the stomach
711:
sounds like a much more time consuming thing as a lot of those editors will already have the right directly or as admins, and those that don't need to be checked out, some will have already lost the userright due to copyvio or creating unreferenced BLPs, and some will still be creating articles that
2426:
Thanks for your note. Over the years I have corrected tens of thousands of easily confused words and have significantly reduced the occurrence of some words in
Knowledge, especially posses which when I started was mostly a typo of possess. It is because of me that very few actors are now staring in
1001:
So from what I understand, you're looking for editors who have created articles in the last 30 days, who don't currently have autopatrol, and who meet the general autopatrol eligibility criteria of having created at least 25 articles. At that point presumably you and other administrators would want
796:
In the last election for WMF board of directors, all three elected candidates ran on a platform that Flow could not be deployed if the community didn't want it. So.... the WMF is restricting new development and support to Flow. If we want any new features, if we want any continuing support, we have
600:
There's not a lot I can easily do about abuses like
Lochaber Narrow Gauge Railway - content is not supposed to be abstracted away like that, though I understand the reasoning if there are many uses of the template - in this case there is only one. Conversely, of course, if the template was used on
3362:
Hi, both of these articles are about organs we have in common with our distant and very distant cousins among our fellow placental mammals. I suspect that the categorisation reflects that, and the appropriate thing to do is to start a talkpage discussion on the takpages of the respective articles.
2127:
Dear WereSpielChequers, I ran a new scan, this time focusing on capitalized words. Many of them are names, but I expect every name appearing frequently on Knowledge to have an article containing it, or at list a disambiguation page. Here is the list I found the most, please note that all of it are
1341:
and Community Tech Bot is updating it with its slightly-less-useful information twice each month. I suspect it is theoretically possible to have my script run through that mechanism, but I haven't worked in that environment before and there would likely be a learning curve involved. Going that way
1064:
Hi, that's good, almost there, and you've got rid of the bots. Running it daily means we might miss the person who creates an article every week or two, and they are a key group I'm trying to find an appoint as autopatrollers here; so if it could pick up anyone who has created mainspace article in
927:
Yes there has been greater growth in areas such as India, I assume this reflects growing internet use in such places. My view is that editing Knowledge is not usually an entry level Internet task, I don't know if the rule of thumb still holds that it takes two years from getting internet access to
919:
AFC is a failure and I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking so. Part of the problem is that it keeps articles out of mainspace so they don't get collaborative editing, and anyone can decline an AFC submission whilst only an admin can delete a new page in mainspace. I would advise against any goodfaith
883:
There seems to be an increase in the number of new articles from India, the Philippines, etc, and other places where English is not the primary or only language. I think this is a good thing - it reflects the global reach of the project, and increasing global participation is something to be proud
2018:
can help us? I agree that AWB isn't ideal, and I resent having to run a Windows machine in order to use it, but it has an established userbase such that I assume any typo loaded into it is fixed long term whether I'm around or not. Plus I'm really interested in the sort of typos that have so many
1246:
I guess this is where I see myself fitting in, in a small way. I am motivated to look out for new users, particularly those who have created new articles. There are some new users whose contributions we would not miss, it's true, but it breaks my heart to see someone's genuine, well-intended best
1213:
In my mind, the early days of the project were dominated by optimistic, imaginative, open-minded content-creators who loved the idea that they could significantly contribute to an encyclopedia article on a major topic. "Geology", "James Watt", "Scotland", "Christianity" - they were all missing or
738:
numbers here for my proposal are better than none! (I'll hope the people that lost Autopatrolled due to Copyvios, etc. is a very small number here – hopefully ~0.) P.S. Thanks for the answer on nominating – I won't be nominating any of those editors today (with maybe just a few exceptions! – I've
1906:
I understand you already use tools, I am also using AWB. As of Edward's tool, I would love to try it out. The point of my script is to make the obvious corrections as easy and fast, without looking for similar typos and typos in the area, in order to manage to fix the 6000 typos my software have
915:
resolving it one way or the other risks tearing the community apart. I do occasionally decline incorrect speedies and try to educate patrollers, but its a thankless task. There is a new speedy deletion process but it largely missed the point and for example changes such as disabling A1 and A3 as
865:
The new (to me!) Articles for Creation process doesn't seem to have significantly changed things. I regularly see drafts that are really in pretty good state being declined by editors who want to hold them to punitively high standards of referencing. I'm looking at a draft that has three quality
2212:
Indeed, the dollars just helped me separating numbers from words. I started grouping words by 15 and went from there down to 3 so words with over 15 occurrences may appear twice. It was easier than doing a full count. Usually I count on excel but this list was too long for excel to process in a
1988:
Thanks for the elaborated feedback. I only got to see it now, haven't gotten notification on it. I know my scan is selective and doesn't find all occurrences, I only look for words with space on both sides so that the replacement won't replace part of other word. There are other ways to protect
1090:
Hello, apologies for the confusion from the contradictory information as I worked on the code. The current version of the report does indeed consider all of the users who have created articles in the last 30 days, not just those from the last few days. It also does exclude redirects. However it
3308:
They seem to have started adding sources, just not reliable ones or in the right place. So I've dropped them a note about referencing. I'm not confident we can get them to reference properly, but they are new and deserve the assumption of good faith. However if they continue to edit war, can I
2402:
must be wrong. You have been industriously changing "dependant" in all those articles to "dependent". "dependant" is the correct spelling of the word (see ). "dependent" seems to be creeping in as a alternate spelling (historically: it is an olde English spelling often still used by the legal
1995:
is that the edits aren't recorded anywhere except for the project history page. In Hebrew Knowledge I created tag for edits of this script and it makes it easier to keep track of the edits (current count over 16k typos fixed). Is there a chance you can create a tag here for "fix-typo-tool" or
871:
Free-content idealists are still chipping away at fair use images, unnecessarily making the encyclopedia progressively less useful as they work in pursuit of a goal that I do not share (an encyclopedia entirely built from free content, even if it means removing screenshots from articles about
472:
edits per week. Curiously I'm seeing less vandalism nowadays, especially with that particular search, I suspect someone has set an edit filter to stop edits that include removing the first l from "public schools" as I used to get one or two of that sort of vandalism every week. I also stopped
1226:
is played like it's a MMPORG where score is kept by counting the number of pages deleted and new editors banned (the goal being to level-up to admin, at which point you have completed Knowledge and presumably will stop playing it), and where a huge amount of human effort is spent discussing,
923:
Disregarding non-English sources is a problem, people who !vote delete at AFD with rationales such as "no English sources" should soon get the message when admins close as no valid reason given for deletion. A bigger issue is when people who rescue articles don't know how to use non English
2431:
or my reading of it are wrong re dependant, and I have paused my dependent corrections to give you time to convince the good people at wiktionary to change their records accordingly. As for your suggestion that "in the 1970s" could be "in the 1970's". I find that an odd use of the grocers'
712:
get deleted for notability reasons, doing some of those checks is a lot quicker if you have admin rights and can look at deleted revisions. So I don't want to sound discouraging, but I wouldn't want you to waste hours of time doing something that a computer may be about to resume doing.
2701:
It helps to give a diff or an article when you query something. But usually I use that edit summary when changing calvary to cavalry, minster to minister or manger to manager. I've probably also used it for incorrect use of the words font and canon, and angels, especially right angels.
2230:- new list of lower case words that don't appear on aspell list of words but do appear multiple times here, and are very similar to common words. Some are foreign words and some are names, but you might find some that can be real typos, e.g. appointement that appears in non-french text.
1039:
with the complete data set, and also upped the maximum creation count to 200. This should pretty much be the complete list of users who meet the criteria of having created 25+ articles, not currently having autopatrol, and having created at least one article in the last month.
1885:
me find other typos around that one. If you are working from the top of your list I could start working from the bottom? What would make it even more interesting is if you could list words by number of occurrences, as using AWB I would start with the most frequent ones.
1187:
Hello :) What is perhaps not obvious from what I wrote is that speedy deletion was something I was heavily involved with in 2011 as well. I really do notice a less patient, less forgiving, less encouraging mood in the project today versus then. It was already pretty
2397:
to assume the latter in the absence of evidence to the contrary. What makes it so difficult to assume good faith is that you have edited over 200 articles contributed to by well in excess of that number of editors and yet you assume that you are right and therefore
1425:
I have been tussling with a huge (somewhat related) issue of producing accurate region codes for some 100k+ articles, success rate is now about 87-88% (compared with much less than 50% before I started) but of course the last 20% is going to be 80% of the work.
2927:
884:
of, not a problem to be solved. But new page patrollers in particular seem to disregard non-English sources. They don't seem to know how to Google non-latin-alphabet names. I don't think this is deliberate racism, but the behavior is racist in effect.
2149:
passing references such as a minor character in the plot of a Bollywood film. Unfortunately I am a bit pressed for time and or editing away from my home setup for the next few weeks, so I'm not sure when I will have time to go through more of this.
859:
I still see speedy deletion being horribly misapplied, in ways which can only discourage new editors. I'm looking at an article which was tagged as A1 and G2, neither of which was valid, eight minutes after it was created. I doubt that user will be
3077:
Well I might tap you sometime in the early summer during a planned PR on some early Celtic sculpture if that's ok. As I say your comments on the tomb brought the page on quite a lot, and thoughtful feedback is always appreciated. Tks once again.
1963:. Taking aritst as an example. You had it down as 4 examples, I have just fixed 35. Part of that difference is that I think your search is case sensitive, and also misses plurals. Perhaps another involves non-alphanumeric characters, for example
1281:
is one of the responses. My hope is that we can get the WMF to do some technical changes, in particular reducing the edit conflicts caused by people categorising and templating new articles. The difficulty is in getting WMF support for change.
2080:
Thanks Uziel, I've skimmed through part of that, and used it to fix more than a hundred typos and suggest several new ones for AWB. I'm sure there's more to find as well, though most of those words are either jargon or quoted foreign words.
3783:
854:
Anyway, I was wondering if you might have any observations you might share about how editing culture has changed since 2011. There are a few things I have noticed that are at least as bad, and in some ways worse, than they were before:
1221:
A few years later and we have a situation where new article creation is becoming an eccentric minority interest (and we more or less have a default assumption that any article a new user wants to create is probably a bad idea), where
2465:
issue. My own (paper) dictionary gives the spelling as "dependant" and notes no alternative. The fact that over 200 articles (and probably a lot more) used the -ant spelling must be a good indication that it is still very much in
1865:
Thanks for helping correcting typos from this list, I would love it if you can use the script and give me some feedback. If you prefer to correct one by one, please remove the ones you checked after you finish. Thanks again,
1066:
3917:" This is your only warning; if you vandalize Knowledge again, as you did at Erysichthon (son of Cecrops), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr. Ashley Schimmel (talk) 02:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)"
2475:
I often wonder if the exceptions to non-apostrophised plurals is the source of the misused grocer's apostrophe (to give it its correct name). I know not what this Autowiki Browser is and I doubt that I can use it anyway.
1091:
appears that the "count how many articles the user created" method I am using inadvertently includes the File: namespace, which is why the numbers are anomalous for the user you referenced. I'll go work on that now :)
3352:
467:
Thanks, it took a while to get that one under control, and there are still a few music lyrics where I'm really not sure whether to put them on my safe page list or not. But I reckon to make two or three typo fixing
664:"Many people get nominated or are nominated for this user right, and occasionally when we have a list I and others trawl through the list of prolific article creators and appoint suitable ones as autopatrollers."
1274:
931:
I can't comment as to whether partisan deletion tagging has become more or less common. The biggest such battle I've been involved in was before you left and I don't know whether my experience is indicative of
2604:
70:
3293:
Would you please help again in regards to the same edit warrior ? They for the 2nd time removed sourced content at the Tiger page, which has just received FA status after several months of review rounds. –
451:
Saw that on my watchlist and wondered what the tarnation does that mean? Looked at the diff and laughed. Well done. It is nice to laugh for a change amongst all the vandalism entries on the watchlist.
3996:
3813:
3172:
Howdy - picked you off the top of the recently active admins list because I don't think this requires making a scene at AN/I. Could we have some help with the unceasing addition of unsourced material at
622:
was probably included because of a similar British Overseas Territories miscat, possibly Category:British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies being a sub-cat of "Government of the United Kingdom"
1165:
says but he's perhaps getting too black a view by looking at speedy deletions and AFC which, by their nature, tend to be negative in nature. The number of articles is still going up steadily – see
973:
3796:
1239:
we have stopped assuming good faith about new editors, and the foundational principle of being the encyclopedia that "anyone can edit" (and which anyone else may fix afterwards if necessary) may
957:
Lots to digest there. For now, is there any chance you could share the kind of criteria you're thinking of with regards to protecting established editors? Is there any existing "prospect list"?
3056:
It was a pleasure to be involved in such a fascinating article from a time and place so completely outside my ken. Happy to be involved at an earlier stage in anything as quirky in the future.
2523:. Given the relative frequencies of Dependent and Dependant I would be surprised if the Wiktionary article was wrong, but I'm OK to continue pausing my patrol of dependant for a few days more.
1633:
Thanks for setting me along this road by the way - this kind of work is a lot of fun for me, and I now have all the access required to fix, modify, and create new reports without undue delay.
2368:
1110:- I have fixed the issue with the inclusion of non-mainspace contributions in the count. Updated data (for all users who have created articles in the last thirty days) is in the same place,
3866:
3385:
1627:
1334:
1131:
977:
704:
655:
2922:
It will show information about how active a discussion is, such as the date of the most recent comment. There will soon be a new "Add topic" button. You will be able to turn them off at
1735:, did you mean to link to something else?. Glad you agree that the repetition of the is obviously awkward. Do you want to give an example where you would have resolved this differently?
1604:
1507:
1422:
As I remarked I am still severely restricted in what I am permitted to do, so the list(s) will have to be placed in my user space, from where they can be copied, moved or transcluded.
3142:
Hi going Batty, I have had a couple of bad experiences with that option on Hotcat, not sure whether the problem was my understanding or my IT Setup. But I'll give it another look.
2622:
536:
Note: that this may include non-place entities, e.g. people in the category tree that have burial coordinates. But then there may well be a nice photo of their tomb/grave/crypt.
2966:
1650:
WSC – I can confirm that this list is now useful again! I'll start looking through it on my end for editors I recognize to let them know about applying for autopatrolled... --
743:
should be Autopatrolled!), but I may come back later, on a day I'm bored, and check the 50–100 article editors, and think about nominating some of them for Autopatrolled... --
1811:
I don't think it should be either way, but I also don't think we should change an awkward construction to an incorrect one. I went ahead and changed it to the "the TV series
734:
to do this for the Top 10,000 Article Creators, but I will definitely finish this out for the Top 5,000 (I'm already up to about #2,200 right now...) So, progress!! I figure
3981:
4009:
3779:
3418:
3348:
2961:. It will help people identify some problems before they click "Publish changes". The first tool will encourage people to add references when they add new content. Please
1817:". The best course of action when going through this with AWB (or otherwise) is to perform a minor rewording like this; if that's not obvious, I would just skip the page.
1381:
Your list does look useful. I hope you get some help on this, as your list will be much more helpful than the current Database Report version... You might want to contact
2861:
473:
patrolling for "poop", lots of vandalism when I first went through all the articles that contained that word, but nowadays not enough to be worth manually checking for.
2649:
2191:, good to hear from you. Hope all is well with you and yours. "15$ $ $ Deptt" is a duplicate, and gets no hits for me, but Deptt does. Should i ignore the dollar signs?
1512:
1232:
3733:
3856:
3820:
3185:
seems to be the current state of mind. Blocking from that specific page might do the trick, but any other attempt at stopping this would be appreciated. Cheers! --
2641:
3437:
2946:
1941:
2992:
666:
Well, I'm starting to parse through the data to try to figure out how many editors there are with 20-50 (non-redirect) articles created (which I'm having to do
813:
3379:
3009:
Thanks, if ever get round to writing my SF novel this may actually appear, though I'm no longer thinking about my own plans, something altogether more grand.
703:- though you might want to check a bit more than just the raw number of articles created. However I'm hoping to get one of my contacts to start producing the
3906:
3800:
2671:
2588:
2560:
2539:
2122:
559:
Thanks, that's brilliant. I spotted that where the infobox and image are being delivered by a template your program doesn't realise there is an image see
3752:
1195:
That is the continuation of a long-term trend that I have observed from my earliest days as a Wikipedian when as a brand new editor I created a number of
3095:
Just as a note, as with a few times before, am relying on series of pics you took and uploaded to commons - without them would have bothered to expanded
2725:
2565:
1466:
2912:
2514:
2485:
2452:
678:
have "Autopatrolled" rights! So, I'm thinking that I'd like to nominate some of these for Autopatrolled rights – How do I do that? Thanks in advance! --
3994:
has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at
3295:
3252:
1621:
3598:
3040:. A difficult FAC on the prose side, but your content review was most rewarding, esp wgt to material and the colour scheme. Fwiw, going the PR-: -->
2280:
2222:
2207:
2182:
2165:
2141:
2097:
2053:
2035:
1983:
1901:
1298:
1150:
1125:
1102:
1085:
1030:
1002:
to manually review the persons article creation history with a view to proactively offering them the autopatrol right. I've written a little bit of
996:
968:
952:
2743:
Thou art welcome. That particular typo is one of my favourites, though the depinnipedisation of seal level as an altitude is now my top favourite.
1644:
1452:
700:
649:
515:
489:
3099:. Yeah another tomb; a shrink might say I'm also thinking for what would be the most magnificent celebration of my eventual demise. <shrug: -->
2942:
1830:
1806:
1773:
1751:
1717:
1260:
1178:
758:
728:
3883:
836:
3710:
3705:
3680:
2461:
I would not regard "dependant" as an obsolete spelling. The link that I provided lists "dependent" as the US English spelling so this may be an
1923:
unveilled - 9 receving - 9 awll - 8 teching - 7 coveres - 7 appearanced - 7 adiation - 7 sceni - 6 unnotated - 6 predomnantly - 6 featureed - 6
693:
3356:
708:
671:
453:
3251:
Would you please also protect this page ? Because an anonymous editor 41.200.51.185 keeps on adding the same unsourced text as Ilyes toon. –
2865:
2343:
2325:
1953:
1935:
1859:
3888:
2616:
2608:
3649:
3627:
1342:
may end up being dependent on the same overworked volunteers who haven't yet been able to action your request to modify the current report.
2380:
2362:
2239:
2075:
2005:
1875:
1842:
1051:
1368:
2495:
1665:
1400:
1218:
that we cheerfully throw at each other nowadays, and it was also the time when newcomers began to be treated with suspicion and distrust.
2420:
2244:
Hi Uziel and thanks for doing that - lots of French words as you surmise, but also plenty of typos. I have just fixed 59 occurrences of
1960:
3878:
2572:
doesn't seem to be taking off, are you OK if I resume correcting those examples of dependant that don't fit the wiktionary definition?
1065:
the last 30 days that would be better. Also I'm not sure whether you are excluding redirects and creations of pages outside mainspace.
141:
3533:
2759:
3973:
3959:
707:
again, 14 months after it last ran there should be a good crop of editors ready for this userright. Extracting it manually from the
2908:
2880:
616:
was included because Category:North Sea is a sub-cat of "Bodies of water of the United Kingdom" (among others) (not changed yet...)
3329:
1964:
1325:
806:
3281:
3158:
1588:
1574:
1560:
1546:
1532:
674:!) But what I'm finding alarming is the number of (still active) editors that have 50-100 (non-redirect) articles created and who
610:
Zeta Island was included because Category:Islands of British Overseas Territories was a sub-cat of "Islands of the United Kingdom"
3459:
2718:
1006:
code that might be helpful in identifying those users. It isn't a bot - it doesn't make any edits, and it's run manually for now.
3517:? Not only did you think it vandalism, but the sort of vandalism that merits a single warning bypassing the normal four levels.
3592:
3310:
3246:
3224:
3123:
at the same time, and you made five edits using HotCat in a row. In case you're not aware, you can do it all in one edit: see
2849:
2655:
Whoops, sorry about that. I don't currently have a working machine that supports AWB. But thanks for spotting and fixing that.
2129:
797:
to take Flow first. There's not much chance of the WMF willingly picking up the autosign project. They want our editor *gone*.
402:
397:
393:
380:
376:
368:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
247:
2981:
2737:
3839:
3603:
3363:
Since those discussions have both been started I will leave to those who watchlist those articles to give their views there.
3087:
3072:
3025:
817:
389:
384:
372:
364:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
243:
3303:
2962:
1626:
It's been a while but the all-singing, all-dancing, new version of the report code is now working and its first results are
1320:
4005:
3902:
2923:
2433:
2313:
1850:
beneath. This kind of edits can be easily done using the tool in the title. Let me know if you need any help setting it up.
1843:
766:
469:
3965:
3925:
3202:
2695:
1443:
162:
83:
3933:
3443:
That redirect probably made sense when I made it in 2009. I have no opinion as to whether it is needed or most apt now.
3260:
3124:
2872:
1616:
436:
3849:
3409:
3391:
3229:
Belated thanks. We'll see if the associated IP also got the hint. If not, might come to ask you for a top-up. Cheers --
2477:
2412:
2388:
595:
3571:
2916:
905:
109:
27:
2958:
2887:
1912:
1016:
I would be grateful if you would let me know if this going in the right direction. If so I will work further on it.
432:
169:
155:
134:
120:
90:
76:
55:
41:
2812:
1695:
461:
4001:
3898:
3556:
3514:
3503:
3109:
3050:
3003:
2937:
Daily edit completion rate by test group: DiscussionTools (test group) and MobileFrontend overlay (control group)
3756:
3576:
Hi John, I deleted one of those edits due to BLP concerns, and someone else has now blocked the IP for a year.
1207:
127:
48:
20:
3182:
2827:
2490:
Dependant isn't entirely an obsolete spelling, and it is partly an EngVar issue. Dependant is still valid for
3940:
3241:
3197:
3167:
775:
misleading statements. Some of your comments in the Village Pump discussion were incorrect (not your fault).
560:
2818:
There are still only 11 in the commons cat - I think he had taken some before, but not uploaded them, Best,
1790:
series. I think that of the The is awkward and my solution an improvement. What alternative do you propose?
1411:
I have forgotten how I created the old list, but I found a note on Meta from you asking for a list split by
2977:
2785:
1826:
1769:
1684:
You've fixed a lot of my shoddy reduplicative errors ("the the") etc recently and I appreciate it a lot. ›
1656:
1478:
1391:
1349:
1111:
1036:
1010:
1003:
749:
684:
659:
62:
3746:
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
2629:
851:
to things and I'm once again finding everything for the most part interesting, challenging and enjoyable.
820:
implies that you may be right, staffers may still try to get it deployed wherever they can get consensus.
203:
1. Maintain social distancing by starting new posts in new sections, to avoid contaminating other users.
3921:
2680:
2645:
175:
97:
69:
3136:
531:
1429:
Nonetheless the first list should be uploaded soon. The rest will have to go on my todo list for now.
2492:(Britain) A person who depends on another for support, particularly financial support (= US dependent)
1732:
3489:
2800:
2170:
1813:
1786:
1780:
1460:
1437:
1414:
1316:
1174:
632:
547:
2994:
is one of the funniest and driest comments have seen anywhere in years. I nearly choked laughing :)
2173:.This time all the words are variations of actual words so it may contain higher rate of real typos.
3790:
3499:
3096:
2733:
1134:, that's where people look for it, and we can mark the request as fixed once you refresh it there.
3969:
3929:
2986:
2973:
2855:
1130:
Nicely done, I've started appoint autopatrollers from that list. Do you want to start refreshing
3861:
is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the
2933:
3945:
3912:
3578:
3519:
3445:
3365:
3315:
3267:
3210:
3144:
3058:
3011:
2835:
2745:
2704:
2657:
2574:
2546:
2525:
2500:
2481:
2438:
2416:
2393:
It is not immediately clear whether it's vandalism or good faith editing, but I am required by
2349:
Added some 10K capitalize words that appear at least 5 times and very similar to common words.
2266:
2193:
2151:
2108:
2083:
2059:
2021:
1969:
1887:
1792:
1737:
1703:
1679:
1612:
1584:
1570:
1556:
1542:
1528:
1284:
1136:
1071:
982:
938:
822:
714:
581:
475:
113:
34:
3865:. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review.
3313:
rather than here as I wouldn't want them to think that it is just one admin surveilling them.
1630:. I would be grateful if you would let me know about any problems you identify in the output.
1203:
3539:
2350:
2331:
2227:
604:
576:
3404:
3862:
3698:
3676:
3645:
3623:
3334:
3299:
3256:
3132:
3037:
2015:
1457:
1434:
1312:
1196:
1170:
924:
articles. Is there an essay explaining how to do so? If not would you consider writing one?
629:
564:
544:
2353:. Some are typos, most are names. Would appreciate any help locating and fixing the typos.
539:
If you let me know any items without coords or with images, improvement may be possible.
8:
3510:
3495:
3480:
3433:
2808:
2729:
2689:
2432:
apostrophe, but since that one is embedded in AWB it would probably be better to discuss
2404:
845:
428:
3920:
This looks like a vandalism warning I received last month from Chauncey Green, whom you
3120:
2569:
2312:
I would appreciate if you could try using the script for fixing and dismissing typos of
3413:
3387:
2765:
2376:
2358:
2339:
2321:
2235:
2218:
2178:
2137:
2071:
2049:
2001:
1949:
1931:
1871:
1855:
1639:
1363:
1255:
1166:
1120:
1097:
1046:
1025:
963:
900:
782:
The WMF is asking for community input into things they could do instead of FLOW - Nope.
210:
1199:
791:
didn't even know the Community had already built the functionality they are working on
3991:
3567:
3552:
3237:
3193:
3174:
2823:
2796:
1608:
1580:
1566:
1552:
1538:
1524:
1382:
1270:
511:
457:
446:
3634:
2833:
Thanks, I can't go there for a week or two, but I hope to get some pics this month.
532:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/User:Rich_Farmbrough/British_places_with_coord_and_no_pic
3823:
is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
2612:
2462:
1959:
Thanks Uziel, that's interesting, I have fixed a few and also fed some of those to
1822:
1765:
1690:
1660:
1406:
1395:
1265:
2011 wasn't perfect either- have a look at some of the problems we battled over in
753:
688:
2949:. The Editing team is enabling these features for all editors on the mobile site.
415:
3178:
3128:
3105:
3083:
3046:
3036:
Just to give appreciation for your insightful and though-provoking review of the
2999:
2899:
2776:
You don't appear to be short of pics. Was there anything specifically you wanted?
2766:
1674:
802:
613:
568:
3741:
3041:
GA route next time so not so much glaring grammar errors. Anyway best as usual.
1490:
3484:
3465:
3423:
2781:
2686:
1266:
1215:
1189:
912:
495:
2607:. They note British usage versus American, as well as adjective form vs noun.
411:
3760:
3737:
3544:
2394:
2372:
2354:
2335:
2317:
2251:
2231:
2214:
2188:
2174:
2133:
2103:
2067:
2045:
2011:
1997:
1945:
1927:
1867:
1851:
1635:
1376:
1359:
1338:
1278:
1251:
1240:
1228:
1223:
1162:
1116:
1093:
1042:
1021:
959:
896:
225:
3997:
Knowledge:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period
2991:
To note; "it has given me some ideas for my own idealised funerary monument"
1330:
Thought I would move this discussion into it's own section, hope that's OK.
3844:
3563:
3548:
3231:
3187:
2819:
2804:
2041:
1907:
found. I would appreciate it a lot if you could just try it out, by adding
1345:
It would be much, much easier to put my data somewhere else. Any thoughts?
619:
526:
507:
3612:
2259:
2213:
timely manner, so I stayed on the text editor and ran regex replacements.
2128:
words similar to known words, so it won't surprise me if many are typos:
1818:
1761:
1685:
1651:
1386:
1210:. Today I wonder how many templated warnings I would have earned instead.
974:
Knowledge talk:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege
911:
Hi and welcome back! Yes CSD is an ongoing problem, but as we found with
744:
679:
572:
3419:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 22 § Home computer game
435:. If you want to add something to one of the existing topics go ahead,
417:
3101:
3079:
3042:
2995:
1757:
798:
3181:? Multiple rather clear warnings on talk page have had no effect, and
1596:
3768:
3114:
2792:
2777:
1756:
Sorry, I forgot the link. The sentence I was referring to appears in
1069:, but I could find only twenty mainspace articles they had started.
200:
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this user asks you to take precautions:
1335:
Knowledge:Database_reports/Editors_eligible_for_Autopatrol_privilege
1132:
Knowledge:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege
978:
Knowledge:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege
787:
3471:
3416:. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at
3344:
3208:
I've blocked them from one page. Hopefully that will do the trick.
413:
1731:
Hi Kranix, I have edited a number of "the the" instances, but not
3852:
reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
3828:
3687:
3665:
2907:
The Editing team is nearly finished with this first phase of the
1309:
edits is easier now due to visual formatting. It's very helpful.
206:
2. Follow the one-way system by putting new posts at the bottom.
3340:
2130:
User:Uziel302#Missing names that appear frequently on Knowledge
1202:
articles (in mainspace directly, no less!) and was immediately
3722:
3398:
2633:, but your script broke a citation template by corrupting its
2063:
699:
Hi IJBall, the simple answer is that you can nominate them at
418:
2014:, I'm sorry, but I have no idea how to create a tag. Perhaps
431:. If you just want to make a short comment why not put it in
3808:
3657:
2520:
2403:
profession). There was no reason to change the spelling per
601:
many station pages, then a generic image would not suffice.
2411:
leaving Europe on the 31st of October, no if's or but's". -
3982:
RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review
3343:
article, could you please add Sex organs category and for
2879:
The Editing team will finish adding new features to the
2637:
value. If you have not already fixed it, please do so.
2040:
There should be a simple interface to create new tag on
2491:
2428:
1942:
Knowledge:Correct typos in one click/list by occurrence
2623:
if you haven't already done so, please fix your script
1067:
This editor has over a thousand according to your list
814:
Knowledge:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-09-02/News_and_notes
579:
are not quite in the UK, though the volcano is close.
3125:
Knowledge:HotCat#Making more than one category change
2924:
Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing-discussion
2605:
Merriam-Webster has to say on dependent vs. dependant
3412:
to determine whether its use and function meets the
2685:
Sorry, what? You'll have to explain that one to me.
1607:
were found precious. That's what you are, always. --
1241:
no longer be the consensus position of the community
219:
3119:Hi there! I see we were both adding categories to
2871:This newsletter includes two key updates about the
498:, does show I wasn't copy+pasting form the sources
2866:Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
2728:gave me a chuckle. Thanks for the help! Cheers! --
2496:Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos#In_the_1970's
2171:There is a new list you might want to take a look
2519:OK, now that we have one issue resolved, I have
1453:Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/Femto Bot 7
701:Knowledge:Requests_for_permissions/Autopatrolled
3786:World War II and the history of Jews in Poland
2544:BTW Do you have any opinion re "publicistic"?
1273:society of the pre 2007 era to the subsequent
1009:I have put the output from a limited test run
709:Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by article count
672:Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by article count
3347:add Human male reproductive system category?
1208:constructively engaged in cooperative editing
3939:Looks like all has been resolved overnight,
1595:
3599:Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
2959:a project to help new editors of Knowledge
1489:
403:Article Rescue Squadron & BLP projects
1622:Users eligible for autopatrol... finally!
2965:that page for more information. You can
2932:
2898:
650:Nominating for Autopatrolled user rights
2436:, as you presumably want AWB changed.
1275:WP:SoTagitForSomeHypotheticalOthertoFix
1269:. My theory is that the drift from the
95:
88:
81:
74:
67:
60:
53:
46:
39:
32:
25:
18:
3349:2601:2C5:8484:1C50:AD4C:7AC0:96D5:A18D
3311:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
2967:join a conference call on 3 March 2023
2044:, but it only available for sysadmins.
1909:importScript('User:Uziel302/typo.js');
779:Now that Flow is deprioritised - Nope.
193:
3761:subject-specific notability guideline
2947:more successful with Discussion tools
1849:I saw the edit you made beenath-: -->
976:is worth looking at and explains why
786:I spoke with the Flow project manager
3513:what exactly was your concern about
2314:Knowledge:Correct typos in one click
2264:as they might want to join in this.
1844:Knowledge:Correct typos in one click
607:was in the category "British Museum"
499:
209:3. Sign your comments to facilitate
3789:(the topic and interaction bans on
3606:from the past month (August 2024).
3604:News and updates for administrators
2943:Discussion tools on the mobile site
13:
3656:
2886:They are beginning a new project,
2803:), one a crop of another. Thanks,
14:
4020:
2917:Beta Feature for Discussion tools
980:isn't currently fit for purpose.
3827:
3767:
3721:
3697:
3686:
3675:
3664:
3644:
3633:
3622:
3611:
3470:
3397:
1913:User:WereSpielChequers/common.js
1326:Users eligible for Autopatrolled
739:already seen 2–3 editors that I
654:Hello WereSpielChequers! At our
500:
224:
192:
96:
89:
82:
75:
68:
61:
54:
47:
40:
33:
26:
19:
3812:German history topic ban") was
3639:Interface administrator changes
3483:Knowledge again, as you did at
3422:until a consensus is reached.
2316:and give some feedback. Thanks.
1337:but that page "belongs" to the
1192:back then, but it is worse now.
1035:Further to this, I updated the
4010:09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3858:New Pages Patrol backlog drive
3842:, an alternative for informal
3793:, respectively) were repealed.
3562:Don't worry - 1 yr block now.
2957:The Editing team is beginning
2719:13:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
2696:13:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
2521:started a thread on Wiktionary
1954:18:03, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
1936:05:56, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
1902:20:58, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
1876:11:27, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
1860:15:19, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
1352:with data from December 18th.
1:
4000:. Cheers, and happy editing!
3974:18:57, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3960:07:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3941:User_talk:Dr._Ashley_Schimmel
3934:03:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
3907:18:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3738:criterion for speedy deletion
3159:22:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
3137:22:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
3026:22:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
3004:18:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
2982:23:17, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
2862:Read this in another language
2850:08:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
2828:05:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
2813:17:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
2786:12:26, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
2344:18:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
2166:12:56, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
2142:04:33, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
1401:21:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
1369:22:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
1321:17:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
1299:22:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
1261:17:02, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
1179:09:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
1151:13:13, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
837:19:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
807:19:40, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
561:Lochaber Narrow Gauge Railway
553:19:47, 5 February 2015 (UTC).
3868:Sign up here to participate!
2903:Some of the upcoming changes
2589:17:21, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
2561:13:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
2540:12:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
2515:15:49, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
2486:15:14, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
2453:13:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
2421:12:31, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
2363:18:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
2123:10:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
2098:10:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
1831:18:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
1807:18:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
1774:18:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
1752:18:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
1467:21:11, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
1444:03:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
1350:User:Thparkth/autopatroltest
1126:02:45, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
1112:User:Thparkth/autopatroltest
1103:01:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
1086:23:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
1052:12:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
1031:05:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
997:11:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
969:14:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
953:17:00, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
906:15:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
767:WMF / Auto sign on talkpages
596:22:39, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
174:
168:
161:
154:
147:
140:
133:
126:
119:
112:
108:
7:
3986:Hi there! The trial of the
3840:good article review circles
3838:Editors can now enter into
3816:for a period of six months.
3755:is open to discuss whether
3593:18:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3572:18:09, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3557:02:10, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3534:09:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
3504:09:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
2945:has finished. Editors were
2760:20:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
2738:14:29, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
2076:15:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
2054:13:32, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
2036:11:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
2006:09:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
1984:10:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
1718:05:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
1696:21:54, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
1279:the article rescue squadron
1277:era is an ongoing process.
10:
4025:
4002:MediaWiki message delivery
3988:RfA discussion-only period
3899:MediaWiki message delivery
3168:Help with an edit warrior?
3088:11:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
2672:14:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
2650:14:14, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
2389:Strange sequence of edits.
2381:07:08, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
2248:and a few others. pinging
2223:14:47, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
2208:13:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
2183:12:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
1778:OK, so you prefer: of the
1666:17:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
1645:23:37, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
1617:07:48, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
1589:07:38, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
1575:07:47, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
1561:07:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
1547:06:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
1533:06:46, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
1333:I could definitely update
1161:I agree with much of what
759:22:02, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
729:21:01, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
694:20:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
638:18:02, 8 March 2015 (UTC).
575:and a museum in Abu Dhabi
516:10:48, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
385:Autoreviewers and Rollback
3727:Guideline and policy news
3460:09:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
3438:21:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
3380:15:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
3357:15:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
3330:10:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
3304:08:41, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
3282:10:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
3261:07:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
3247:07:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
3225:23:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
3203:20:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
3073:18:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
3051:16:04, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
2915:are available now in the
2617:18:34, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
2330:Just updated the list on
2326:17:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
1502:
1497:
1488:
1204:welcomed by a real person
490:11:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
462:07:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
102:
3848:arrangements, to have a
3784:remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of
3410:redirects for discussion
3392:Redirects for discussion
3110:22:26, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
3097:Tomb of the Black Prince
2928:tell them what you think
2772:Hi - this from my talk:
2681:secularisation in action
2281:20:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
2240:06:29, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
1339:Database Reports project
1037:page with my output data
571:a pass in South Georgia
3879:Discuss this newsletter
3759:should be adopted as a
3100:as the kids might say.
2953:New Project: Edit Check
1348:Finally I have updated
3661:
3492:without further notice
2938:
2904:
2367:You may want to check
2064:scowl biggest wordlist
1600:
1503:... you were recipient
1385:about your version. --
3819:The arbitration case
3660:
3617:Administrator changes
2936:
2902:
2351:User:Uziel302/sandbox
2332:User:Uziel302/sandbox
2228:User:Uziel302/sandbox
2062:that don't appear on
1599:
1498:native tongue as tool
812:Thanks, interesting.
771:The WMF put out some
605:Zayed National Museum
577:Zayed National Museum
439:to start a new topic.
394:RFA early 2011 - 2015
3821:Historical Elections
3757:Notability (species)
3490:blocked from editing
3309:suggest you post at
3038:Tomb of Philippe Pot
2987:Your planned demised
2856:Editing news 2023 #1
1996:something like that?
1479:Precious anniversary
1419:vs everything else.
1011:in my userspace here
565:Zeta Island, Bermuda
390:RFA 2008- early 2011
3913:Another sockpuppet?
3791:My very best wishes
3753:request for comment
3670:Oversighter changes
3414:redirect guidelines
3408:has been listed at
2570:wikt:Talk:dependant
1733:the one you link to
1723:
1484:Three years ago ...
494:And in the case of
3989:
3943:has been blocked.
3662:
3540:Banworthy, I think
3405:Home computer game
3388:Home computer game
3127:. Happy editing!
2974:Whatamidoing (WMF)
2954:
2939:
2909:Talk pages project
2905:
2896:
2895:Talk pages project
2881:Talk pages project
2369:insource:/ whats /
1628:on the report page
1601:
1537:Four years now! --
1483:
656:earlier discussion
252:2007-December 2008
3987:
3909:
3802:German war effort
3736:, there is a new
3711:GeneralNotability
3692:CheckUser changes
3335:Categories needed
3245:
3201:
3175:Egyptian mongoose
2952:
2894:
2797:Amaravati Marbles
2642:Trappist the monk
2627:Yeah, I know, an
2060:list of odd words
1664:
1579:... and seven! --
1521:
1520:
1470:
1447:
1399:
757:
705:list of prospects
692:
639:
554:
424:
423:
218:
217:
184:
183:
4016:
3957:
3953:
3948:
3896:
3831:
3811:
3771:
3725:
3701:
3690:
3679:
3668:
3648:
3637:
3626:
3615:
3590:
3586:
3581:
3531:
3527:
3522:
3474:
3457:
3453:
3448:
3430:
3407:
3401:
3377:
3373:
3368:
3327:
3323:
3318:
3279:
3275:
3270:
3235:
3234:
3222:
3218:
3213:
3191:
3190:
3156:
3152:
3147:
3121:Lorenzo Aillapán
3070:
3066:
3061:
3023:
3019:
3014:
2941:An A/B test for
2847:
2843:
2838:
2801:this commons cat
2799:from London (in
2757:
2753:
2748:
2716:
2712:
2707:
2669:
2665:
2660:
2636:
2632:
2586:
2582:
2577:
2558:
2554:
2549:
2537:
2533:
2528:
2512:
2508:
2503:
2450:
2446:
2441:
2334:to current dump.
2278:
2274:
2269:
2263:
2255:
2205:
2201:
2196:
2163:
2159:
2154:
2132:. Thanks a lot,
2120:
2116:
2111:
2095:
2091:
2086:
2033:
2029:
2024:
1981:
1977:
1972:
1910:
1899:
1895:
1890:
1814:The Best Singers
1804:
1800:
1795:
1787:The Best Singers
1781:The Best Singers
1749:
1745:
1740:
1725:
1724:
1715:
1711:
1706:
1701:You're welcome!
1688:
1654:
1643:
1551:... and five! --
1493:
1486:
1482:
1465:
1455:. All the best:
1442:
1418:
1415:Infobox UK place
1389:
1380:
1367:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1259:
1233:WP:SHITTYARTICLE
1148:
1144:
1139:
1124:
1101:
1083:
1079:
1074:
1050:
1029:
994:
990:
985:
967:
950:
946:
941:
920:newbie using it.
904:
834:
830:
825:
747:
726:
722:
717:
682:
660:WT:Autopatrolled
637:
593:
589:
584:
567:a Dutch volcano
552:
505:
504:
503:
487:
483:
478:
419:
398:RFA early 2016 -
228:
220:
196:
195:
189:
188:
100:
93:
86:
79:
72:
65:
58:
51:
44:
37:
30:
23:
16:
15:
4024:
4023:
4019:
4018:
4017:
4015:
4014:
4013:
3984:
3955:
3951:
3946:
3915:
3910:
3894:
3893:
3807:
3719:
3718:
3715:
3654:
3601:
3588:
3584:
3579:
3542:
3529:
3525:
3520:
3468:
3455:
3451:
3446:
3424:
3403:
3395:
3375:
3371:
3366:
3337:
3325:
3321:
3316:
3277:
3273:
3268:
3230:
3220:
3216:
3211:
3186:
3170:
3154:
3150:
3145:
3117:
3068:
3064:
3059:
3021:
3017:
3012:
2989:
2969:to learn more.
2858:
2845:
2841:
2836:
2770:
2767:Amaravati Stupa
2755:
2751:
2746:
2714:
2710:
2705:
2683:
2667:
2663:
2658:
2634:
2628:
2625:
2584:
2580:
2575:
2556:
2552:
2547:
2535:
2531:
2526:
2510:
2506:
2501:
2448:
2444:
2439:
2391:
2276:
2272:
2267:
2257:
2249:
2203:
2199:
2194:
2161:
2157:
2152:
2118:
2114:
2109:
2093:
2089:
2084:
2031:
2027:
2022:
2016:Rich_Farmbrough
1979:
1975:
1970:
1908:
1897:
1893:
1888:
1847:
1802:
1798:
1793:
1784:series over of
1747:
1743:
1738:
1726:
1713:
1709:
1704:
1693:
1686:
1682:
1677:
1634:
1624:
1603:Ten years ago,
1565:... and six! --
1517:a prize of QAI!
1481:
1412:
1409:
1374:
1358:
1328:
1323:
1313:Dishita Bhowmik
1294:
1290:
1285:
1250:
1146:
1142:
1137:
1115:
1092:
1081:
1077:
1072:
1041:
1020:
992:
988:
983:
958:
948:
944:
939:
895:
848:
832:
828:
823:
769:
724:
720:
715:
652:
614:Zuidwal volcano
591:
587:
582:
569:Zuidwal volcano
529:
501:
485:
481:
476:
449:
420:
414:
369:Death Anomalies
233:
211:contact tracing
12:
11:
5:
4022:
3983:
3980:
3979:
3978:
3977:
3976:
3924:on 18 August.
3914:
3911:
3895:
3892:
3891:
3886:
3881:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3872:
3871:
3863:new pages feed
3853:
3825:
3824:
3817:
3794:
3765:
3764:
3749:
3717:
3716:
3714:
3713:
3708:
3702:
3684:
3683:
3655:
3653:
3652:
3631:
3630:
3609:
3608:
3600:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3574:
3541:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3511:Chauncey Green
3496:Chauncey Green
3485:Kazuo Kawamura
3467:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3394:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3336:
3333:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3287:
3286:
3285:
3284:
3169:
3166:
3164:
3162:
3161:
3116:
3113:
3093:
3092:
3091:
3090:
3034:
3033:
3029:
3028:
2988:
2985:
2892:
2891:
2884:
2883:and deploy it.
2857:
2854:
2853:
2852:
2816:
2815:
2789:
2788:
2769:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2730:Engineerchange
2724:
2722:
2721:
2682:
2679:
2677:
2675:
2674:
2624:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2601:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2596:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2568:Discussion at
2470:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2456:
2455:
2400:every one else
2390:
2387:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2303:
2302:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
1990:
1986:
1926:Thanks again,
1921:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1917:
1916:
1879:
1878:
1846:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1691:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1669:
1668:
1623:
1620:
1593:
1519:
1518:
1516:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1494:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1448:
1432:All the best:
1408:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1327:
1324:
1311:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1248:
1244:
1236:
1219:
1211:
1193:
1182:
1181:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1105:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1017:
1014:
1007:
1004:MediaWiki::API
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
886:
885:
880:
879:
874:
873:
868:
867:
862:
861:
847:
844:
842:
840:
839:
784:
783:
780:
768:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
651:
648:
646:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
627:All the best:
625:
624:
623:
617:
611:
608:
555:
542:All the best:
528:
525:
523:
521:
520:
519:
518:
496:Empire Air Day
448:
445:
443:
441:
440:
427:Welcome to my
422:
421:
416:
412:
410:
407:
406:
401:
388:
383:
371:
363:
342:
334:
326:
318:
310:
302:
294:
286:
278:
270:
262:
254:
250:
239:
238:
235:
234:
229:
223:
216:
215:
197:
186:
182:
181:
179:
173:
167:
160:
153:
146:
139:
132:
125:
118:
111:
107:
104:
103:
101:
94:
87:
80:
73:
66:
59:
52:
45:
38:
31:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4021:
4012:
4011:
4007:
4003:
3999:
3998:
3993:
3975:
3971:
3967:
3966:67.231.67.253
3963:
3962:
3961:
3958:
3954:
3949:
3942:
3938:
3937:
3936:
3935:
3931:
3927:
3926:67.231.67.253
3923:
3918:
3908:
3904:
3900:
3890:
3887:
3885:
3882:
3880:
3877:
3876:
3870:
3869:
3864:
3860:
3859:
3854:
3851:
3847:
3846:
3841:
3837:
3836:
3835:
3834:
3833:Miscellaneous
3830:
3822:
3818:
3815:
3810:
3809:Cinderella157
3805:
3803:
3798:
3795:
3792:
3788:
3787:
3781:
3777:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3770:
3762:
3758:
3754:
3750:
3747:
3743:
3739:
3735:
3732:Following an
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3724:
3712:
3709:
3707:
3704:
3703:
3700:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3689:
3682:
3678:
3674:
3673:
3672:
3671:
3667:
3659:
3651:
3647:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3636:
3629:
3625:
3621:
3620:
3619:
3618:
3614:
3607:
3605:
3594:
3591:
3587:
3582:
3575:
3573:
3569:
3565:
3561:
3560:
3559:
3558:
3554:
3550:
3546:
3535:
3532:
3528:
3523:
3516:
3512:
3508:
3507:
3506:
3505:
3501:
3497:
3493:
3491:
3487:, you may be
3486:
3482:
3478:
3475:This is your
3473:
3461:
3458:
3454:
3449:
3442:
3441:
3440:
3439:
3435:
3431:
3429:
3428:
3421:
3420:
3415:
3411:
3406:
3402:The redirect
3400:
3393:
3389:
3381:
3378:
3374:
3369:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3332:
3331:
3328:
3324:
3319:
3312:
3306:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3283:
3280:
3276:
3271:
3264:
3263:
3262:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3243:
3239:
3233:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3223:
3219:
3214:
3207:
3206:
3205:
3204:
3199:
3195:
3189:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3165:
3160:
3157:
3153:
3148:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3134:
3130:
3126:
3122:
3112:
3111:
3107:
3103:
3098:
3089:
3085:
3081:
3076:
3075:
3074:
3071:
3067:
3062:
3055:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3048:
3044:
3039:
3031:
3030:
3027:
3024:
3020:
3015:
3008:
3007:
3006:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2984:
2983:
2979:
2975:
2970:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2955:
2950:
2948:
2944:
2935:
2931:
2929:
2925:
2920:
2918:
2914:
2911:. Nearly all
2910:
2901:
2897:
2889:
2885:
2882:
2878:
2877:
2876:
2875:team's work:
2874:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2851:
2848:
2844:
2839:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2798:
2794:
2791:
2790:
2787:
2783:
2779:
2775:
2774:
2773:
2768:
2761:
2758:
2754:
2749:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2735:
2731:
2727:
2720:
2717:
2713:
2708:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2697:
2694:
2692:
2688:
2678:
2673:
2670:
2666:
2661:
2654:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2647:
2643:
2638:
2631:
2618:
2614:
2610:
2606:
2602:
2590:
2587:
2583:
2578:
2571:
2567:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2559:
2555:
2550:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2538:
2534:
2529:
2522:
2518:
2517:
2516:
2513:
2509:
2504:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2488:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2474:
2473:
2472:
2471:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2454:
2451:
2447:
2442:
2435:
2430:
2425:
2424:
2423:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2408:
2406:
2401:
2396:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2365:
2364:
2360:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2328:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2282:
2279:
2275:
2270:
2261:
2253:
2247:
2243:
2242:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2226:
2225:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2206:
2202:
2197:
2190:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2180:
2176:
2172:
2169:
2168:
2167:
2164:
2160:
2155:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2121:
2117:
2112:
2105:
2101:
2100:
2099:
2096:
2092:
2087:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2043:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2034:
2030:
2025:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2003:
1999:
1994:
1993:Another issue
1991:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1978:
1973:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1957:
1956:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1943:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1929:
1924:
1914:
1905:
1904:
1903:
1900:
1896:
1891:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1845:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1815:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1805:
1801:
1796:
1789:
1788:
1783:
1782:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1741:
1734:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1719:
1716:
1712:
1707:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1697:
1694:
1689:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1658:
1653:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1641:
1637:
1631:
1629:
1619:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1598:
1594:
1591:
1590:
1586:
1582:
1577:
1576:
1572:
1568:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1501:
1496:
1492:
1487:
1476:
1468:
1463:
1462:
1459:
1454:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1440:
1439:
1436:
1430:
1427:
1423:
1420:
1416:
1402:
1397:
1393:
1388:
1384:
1378:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1365:
1361:
1356:
1353:
1351:
1346:
1343:
1340:
1336:
1331:
1322:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1300:
1297:
1293:
1288:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1242:
1237:
1234:
1230:
1229:Semiconductor
1225:
1220:
1217:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1191:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1140:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1118:
1113:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1075:
1068:
1063:
1053:
1048:
1044:
1038:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1027:
1023:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1000:
999:
998:
995:
991:
986:
979:
975:
972:
971:
970:
965:
961:
956:
955:
954:
951:
947:
942:
934:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
909:
908:
907:
902:
898:
893:
890:
882:
881:
876:
875:
870:
869:
864:
863:
858:
857:
856:
852:
843:
838:
835:
831:
826:
819:
815:
811:
810:
809:
808:
804:
800:
794:
792:
788:
781:
778:
777:
776:
774:
760:
755:
751:
746:
742:
737:
732:
731:
730:
727:
723:
718:
710:
706:
702:
698:
697:
696:
695:
690:
686:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
647:
635:
634:
631:
626:
621:
618:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
602:
599:
598:
597:
594:
590:
585:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
550:
549:
546:
540:
537:
534:
533:
524:
517:
513:
509:
497:
493:
492:
491:
488:
484:
479:
471:
466:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
444:
438:
437:Or click here
434:
430:
426:
425:
409:
408:
405:
404:
399:
395:
391:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:Deletion 2019
337:
333:
332:Deletion 2018
329:
325:
324:Deletion 2017
321:
317:
316:Deletion 2016
313:
309:
308:Deletion 2015
305:
301:
300:Deletion 2014
297:
293:
292:Deletion 2013
289:
285:
284:Deletion 2012
281:
277:
276:Deletion 2011
273:
269:
268:Deletion 2010
265:
261:
260:Deletion 2009
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
240:
237:
236:
232:
227:
222:
221:
214:
212:
207:
204:
201:
198:
191:
190:
187:
180:
178:
177:
172:
171:
166:
165:
159:
158:
152:
151:
145:
144:
138:
137:
131:
130:
124:
123:
117:
116:
110:
106:
105:
99:
92:
85:
78:
71:
64:
57:
50:
43:
36:
29:
22:
17:
3995:
3985:
3950:
3944:
3919:
3916:
3867:
3857:
3845:quid pro quo
3843:
3832:
3826:
3801:
3785:
3778:Following a
3772:
3766:
3745:
3726:
3720:
3691:
3685:
3669:
3663:
3638:
3632:
3616:
3610:
3602:
3583:
3577:
3543:
3524:
3518:
3488:
3477:only warning
3476:
3469:
3450:
3444:
3426:
3425:
3417:
3396:
3390:" listed at
3370:
3364:
3338:
3320:
3314:
3307:
3292:
3272:
3266:
3215:
3209:
3171:
3163:
3149:
3143:
3118:
3094:
3063:
3057:
3035:
3016:
3010:
2990:
2971:
2956:
2951:
2940:
2921:
2913:new features
2906:
2893:
2870:
2860:
2859:
2840:
2834:
2817:
2771:
2750:
2744:
2723:
2709:
2703:
2690:
2684:
2676:
2662:
2656:
2639:
2626:
2603:Here's what
2579:
2573:
2566:86.130.28.61
2551:
2545:
2530:
2524:
2505:
2499:
2478:86.130.28.61
2443:
2437:
2413:86.130.28.61
2409:
2405:WP:NOTBROKEN
2399:
2392:
2329:
2311:
2271:
2265:
2245:
2198:
2192:
2156:
2150:
2113:
2107:
2088:
2082:
2042:Special:Tags
2026:
2020:
1992:
1974:
1968:
1939:
1925:
1922:
1892:
1886:
1848:
1812:
1797:
1791:
1785:
1779:
1742:
1736:
1727:
1708:
1702:
1683:
1670:
1632:
1625:
1609:Gerda Arendt
1602:
1592:
1581:Gerda Arendt
1578:
1567:Gerda Arendt
1564:
1553:Gerda Arendt
1550:
1539:Gerda Arendt
1536:
1525:Gerda Arendt
1522:
1506:
1474:
1456:
1433:
1431:
1428:
1424:
1421:
1410:
1383:NKohli (WMF)
1357:
1354:
1347:
1344:
1332:
1329:
1307:
1289:
1283:
1200:unreferenced
1141:
1135:
1107:
1076:
1070:
987:
981:
943:
937:
894:
891:
887:
853:
849:
841:
827:
821:
795:
790:
785:
772:
770:
740:
735:
719:
713:
675:
667:
663:
653:
645:
628:
620:Zig-Zag Pass
586:
580:
543:
541:
538:
535:
530:
522:
480:
474:
450:
442:
433:my guestbook
242:
230:
208:
205:
202:
199:
185:
176:
170:
163:
156:
149:
148:
142:
135:
128:
121:
114:
3964:Thank you.
3773:Arbitration
3466:August 2024
1231:is still a
1167:WP:5MILLION
846:Hello again
573:Zigzag Pass
381:Poop patrol
373:FAC Reviews
248:live events
3992:WP:RFA2024
3990:passed at
3706:Courcelles
3547:- cheers,
3296:BhagyaMani
3253:BhagyaMani
3179:Ilyes toon
3129:GoingBatty
2888:Edit check
2429:wiktionary
1758:Silbermond
1680:Thank you!
1461:Farmbrough
1438:Farmbrough
1271:wp:soFixIt
633:Farmbrough
548:Farmbrough
244:Big Events
3884:Subscribe
3814:suspended
3797:Remedy 3C
3681:Wugapodes
3515:this edit
3481:vandalize
3479:; if you
3427:Steel1943
2926:. Please
2463:WP:ENGVAR
2058:I made a
1171:Andrew D.
932:anything.
773:extremely
662:you said
470:not curly
447:not curly
429:talk page
157:Guestbook
143:Editcount
136:Userboxen
3956:Chequers
3897:Sent by
3744:, which
3589:Chequers
3545:This guy
3530:Chequers
3456:Chequers
3376:Chequers
3345:Testicle
3326:Chequers
3278:Chequers
3242:contribs
3221:Chequers
3198:contribs
3155:Chequers
3069:Chequers
3022:Chequers
2846:Chequers
2756:Chequers
2715:Chequers
2668:Chequers
2630:old edit
2585:Chequers
2557:Chequers
2536:Chequers
2511:Chequers
2449:Chequers
2373:Uziel302
2355:Uziel302
2336:Uziel302
2318:Uziel302
2277:Chequers
2252:Wpollard
2246:qualifed
2232:Uziel302
2215:Uziel302
2204:Chequers
2189:Uziel302
2175:Uziel302
2162:Chequers
2134:Uziel302
2119:Chequers
2104:Uziel302
2094:Chequers
2068:Uziel302
2046:Uziel302
2032:Chequers
2012:Uziel302
1998:Uziel302
1980:Chequers
1946:Uziel302
1940:I made:
1928:Uziel302
1911:to your
1898:Chequers
1868:Uziel302
1852:Uziel302
1827:contribs
1803:Chequers
1770:contribs
1748:Chequers
1714:Chequers
1657:contribs
1636:Thparkth
1513:Precious
1407:New list
1392:contribs
1377:Thparkth
1360:Thparkth
1355:Cheers,
1295:Chequers
1252:Thparkth
1216:acronyms
1190:WP:BITEy
1163:Thparkth
1147:Chequers
1117:Thparkth
1094:Thparkth
1082:Chequers
1043:Thparkth
1022:Thparkth
1019:Cheers,
993:Chequers
960:Thparkth
949:Chequers
897:Thparkth
892:Cheers,
833:Chequers
750:contribs
725:Chequers
685:contribs
668:manually
592:Chequers
486:Chequers
231:Archives
3922:blocked
3889:Archive
3799:of the
3564:Johnbod
3549:Johnbod
3339:On the
3232:Elmidae
3188:Elmidae
2873:Editing
2820:Johnbod
2805:Johnbod
2687:Echetus
1675:The the
1267:WP:NEWT
913:WP:NEWT
563:. Also
508:Shirt58
454:Bgwhite
365:My Badz
129:Content
3780:motion
3650:Pppery
3628:Pppery
3341:Vagina
3265:Done.
3115:HotCat
3032:Thanks
2609:isaacl
2395:policy
2260:Pdebee
1819:Kranix
1762:Kranix
1687:Mortee
1652:IJBall
1387:IJBall
1224:WP:NPP
1197:shitty
1108:Update
745:IJBall
680:IJBall
3952:Spiel
3585:Spiel
3526:Spiel
3452:Spiel
3372:Spiel
3322:Spiel
3274:Spiel
3217:Spiel
3151:Spiel
3102:Ceoil
3080:Ceoil
3065:Spiel
3043:Ceoil
3018:Spiel
2996:Ceoil
2963:watch
2842:Spiel
2793:©Geni
2778:©Geni
2752:Spiel
2711:Spiel
2664:Spiel
2635:|url=
2581:Spiel
2553:Spiel
2532:Spiel
2507:Spiel
2445:Spiel
2434:there
2273:Spiel
2200:Spiel
2158:Spiel
2115:Spiel
2102:Dear
2090:Spiel
2028:Spiel
1976:Spiel
1894:Spiel
1799:Spiel
1744:Spiel
1710:Spiel
1291:Spiel
1143:Spiel
1078:Spiel
989:Spiel
945:Spiel
860:back.
829:Spiel
799:Alsee
721:Spiel
676:don't
588:Spiel
482:Spiel
164:Email
122:Bling
4006:talk
3970:talk
3947:Ϣere
3930:talk
3903:talk
3804:case
3580:Ϣere
3568:talk
3553:talk
3521:Ϣere
3500:talk
3447:Ϣere
3434:talk
3367:Ϣere
3353:talk
3317:Ϣere
3300:talk
3269:Ϣere
3257:talk
3238:talk
3212:Ϣere
3194:talk
3183:this
3146:Ϣere
3133:talk
3106:talk
3084:talk
3060:Ϣere
3047:talk
3013:Ϣere
3000:talk
2978:talk
2837:Ϣere
2824:talk
2809:talk
2782:talk
2747:Ϣere
2734:talk
2726:This
2706:Ϣere
2659:Ϣere
2646:talk
2613:talk
2576:Ϣere
2548:Ϣere
2527:Ϣere
2502:Ϣere
2482:talk
2466:use.
2440:Ϣere
2417:talk
2377:talk
2359:talk
2340:talk
2322:talk
2268:Ϣere
2256:and
2236:talk
2219:talk
2195:Ϣere
2179:talk
2153:Ϣere
2138:talk
2110:Ϣere
2085:Ϣere
2072:talk
2050:talk
2023:Ϣere
2002:talk
1971:Ϣere
1950:talk
1932:talk
1889:Ϣere
1872:talk
1856:talk
1823:talk
1794:Ϣere
1766:talk
1739:Ϣere
1705:Ϣere
1692:talk
1661:talk
1640:talk
1613:talk
1585:talk
1571:talk
1557:talk
1543:talk
1529:talk
1505:no.
1458:Rich
1435:Rich
1396:talk
1364:talk
1317:talk
1286:Ϣere
1256:talk
1206:and
1175:talk
1138:Ϣere
1121:talk
1098:talk
1073:Ϣere
1047:talk
1026:talk
984:Ϣere
964:talk
940:Ϣere
901:talk
824:Ϣere
818:this
803:talk
754:talk
741:know
736:some
716:Ϣere
689:talk
670:via
630:Rich
583:Ϣere
545:Rich
527:List
512:talk
477:Ϣere
458:talk
400:,
377:NEWT
360:2024
356:2023
352:2022
348:2021
344:2020
336:2019
328:2018
320:2017
312:2016
304:2015
296:2014
288:2013
280:2012
272:2011
264:2010
256:2009
150:Talk
115:Home
3850:GAN
3734:RfC
3509:Hi
3494:.
3177:by
2187:Hi
2010:Hi
1961:AWB
1605:you
1511:of
1508:432
658:at
506:!--
213:.
4008:)
3972:)
3932:)
3905:)
3855:A
3806:("
3782:,
3751:A
3742:C4
3740::
3570:)
3555:)
3502:)
3436:)
3355:)
3302:)
3259:)
3240:·
3196:·
3135:)
3108:)
3086:)
3049:)
3002:)
2980:)
2930:.
2919:.
2864:•
2826:)
2811:)
2784:)
2736:)
2648:)
2615:)
2498:.
2484:)
2419:)
2407:.
2379:)
2361:)
2342:)
2324:)
2238:)
2221:)
2181:)
2140:)
2074:)
2052:)
2004:)
1952:)
1944:.
1934:)
1874:)
1858:)
1829:)
1825:|
1772:)
1768:|
1760:.
1659:•
1615:)
1587:)
1573:)
1559:)
1545:)
1531:)
1523:--
1417:}}
1413:{{
1394:•
1319:)
1177:)
1114:.
805:)
752:•
687:•
636:,
551:,
514:)
460:)
396:,
392:,
387:,
379:,
375:,
367:,
358:,
354:,
350:,
346:,
338:,
330:,
322:,
314:,
306:,
298:,
290:,
282:,
274:,
266:,
258:,
246:,
4004:(
3968:(
3928:(
3901:(
3763:.
3748:.
3566:(
3551:(
3498:(
3432:(
3386:"
3351:(
3298:(
3255:(
3244:)
3236:(
3200:)
3192:(
3131:(
3104:(
3082:(
3045:(
2998:(
2976:(
2972:–
2890:.
2822:(
2807:(
2780:(
2732:(
2693:e
2691:X
2644:(
2640:—
2611:(
2480:(
2476:-
2415:(
2375:(
2371:.
2357:(
2338:(
2320:(
2262::
2258:@
2254::
2250:@
2234:(
2217:(
2177:(
2136:(
2070:(
2048:(
2000:(
1965:"
1948:(
1930:(
1870:(
1854:(
1821:(
1764:(
1663:)
1655:(
1642:)
1638:(
1611:(
1583:(
1569:(
1555:(
1541:(
1527:(
1515:,
1469:.
1464:,
1446:.
1441:,
1398:)
1390:(
1379::
1375:@
1366:)
1362:(
1315:(
1258:)
1254:(
1243:.
1235:?
1173:(
1123:)
1119:(
1100:)
1096:(
1049:)
1045:(
1028:)
1024:(
966:)
962:(
903:)
899:(
801:(
756:)
748:(
691:)
683:(
510:(
456:(
362:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.