618:
The problem I noticed was that you were using something to the effect of "Not globaly notable yet" or something like that. Well, that is not part of the criteria for keeping, a lot of articles are on people who are not globally notable. The question is are they notable. I also don't like your edit summaries for CSD tagging, I'm never quite sure of what it is talking about---especially the older stuff. I like the more standardized edit summaries that tell me what specific category you are looking at. I have to say, that you seem to have found a niche in USER:NAMES/Attack Pages. Attack pages are one of the "safe" csd categories. I personally rarely see anything wrong with them when articles are deleted as attack pages. There was one article that I was going to nail you for, an article in a foreign language, but you didn't tag it for speedy---and amazing the person who deleted it didn't do so for being in Hindi, they apparently spoke hindi and deleted it as blatant advertising in hindi!---
1768:
much of the rest of this year. So I may not be able to run before the New Year. As for Arbcom, I'm waiting for the next big leak to make sense of some of what has happened. For them to drop briefly to five actives hints to me, as if we didn't already know, that all has not been well there. One of the reasons why I am open to running for Crat but not for Arb is that I don't want to put myself into the sort of situation that the arbs have been in in recent months. As far as I'm aware crats don't get any secret unshareable info from the WMF? and apart from one isolated episode, crats are largely above the fray, trying to judge consensus for the whole community on RFAs, but mainly with information that is available to everyone except a few things that are available to all admins.
639:
write edit summaries of attack pages primarily with the admin in mind, when I'm dealing with bios of teenagers and the newly redundant I tend to think of the author whose reading why I've nommed their CV for deletion. Hence my use of "Not yet globally notable" to spare their feelings. Searching User space for "badwords" certainly turned up a lot of old attack pages, perhaps naively I was expecting just to be reverting vandalism on long dormant user pages, and a little surprised at how many times it was the user who was the author. I don't agree that all attacks are clear, and if you don't mind I may bounce some borderline ones by you to see if I've got my tolerance setting right. But once again thanks for the survey.
1651:
wiki-career there would have been a lot of opposes for me being overly supportive at RFA. Since then I've had too many regulars assure me they really don't want to be admins for me to stick to those views, plus I've come to realise that much of our drought at RFA is simply a reaction to unbundlings, especially of
Rollback. Then there was a time when I was probably too inclusionist to pass RFB, and one of the first to oppose for a CSD error, then only for two errors, and now for multiple recent CSD errors. As for now, perhaps I'm ready, but do you really need another crat?
1464:
1453:
169:
141:
127:
31:
584:
83:
287:
855:... make sure that when you answer your questions, you give complete thoughtful answers (this is a job interview) and don't transclude unless you have 2-4 hours to baby sit the RfA. A few months ago, people started opposing if questions sat that first day. That intensity has died down some, but it still rears its ugly head on occassion. Also, if you can highlight some of your article building that would be great---I mean 70% of your edits are in the article space.---
134:
176:
155:
2114:
428:
120:
183:
113:
190:
1584:
2077:
148:
848:. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
2291:
Thanks everyone, that was a humbling experience and not at all what I had prepared for. On the positive side it was very civil. lots of people said nice things about me and the people I expected to oppose stayed away. The only ancient things that were dragged up were the status of a bunch of articles
747:
Well I do like the idea of having the poppable one and one of my opposers as co-noms, so
Balloonman yes please review me, but no need to hurry; One concern I have is over timing, I have been told that three months is on the edge of acceptability as a gap between RFAs, and I don't want to run until I
671:
Woah, I opposed your last one? Well that's just the bat shit because in recent times I thought you were an admin already. My only advice is don't kill your last one by making it a joke, be serious. There's nothing wrong with throwing in a joke or two but don't let other people get the impression that
1767:
Thanks all four of you. I have a couple of Real Life things going on at the moment that make this a tricky time for me to find a week when I'm able to give an RFB the time it needs. One of those is a short project of a month or so which could start at any time and is quite likely to keep me busy for
930:
Thank you for clarifying your position regarding those UAA reports. I wasn't aware that they had created attack pages or other flagrant wiki-violations when I cast my !vote. I still think they aren't username problems, per se, but at least your reasoning was understandable. The oppose is now struck.
617:
Hey Were, A few days ago you made some off the cuff comment about how you didn't know what others thought about your CSD work. I took that as an invitation to take a look... and it looks great. There were some concerns back in
September---particularly with your edit summaries---but nothing major.
1746:
We need more 'crats like Will (who left because of
Framgate) who will stand up for what they believe is best for Knowledge, even in the face of the disgraced Arbcom. If, as I suspect, you are capable of making reasonable sense of a melee of nonsense, and if, as I suspect, you can be trusted, then
1724:
The no-need argument is rot. We don't need a lot of help pushing buttons. We do need a group of active Crats who will speak up with their (policy-informed) views in
Cratchats (and to a lesser extent at BN etc), particularly the difficult ones. The history of Cratchats shows that a good argument can
1832:
I, and prob most others, would support you in a heart beat. Steady, deliberative, thoughtful. Don't see an issue re activity during the election, re duties....bureaucrats don't need to be particularly here and there 24 hours, they just need to be wise and carry gravitas from time to time. You will
638:
Hi
Balloonman, yup that off the cuff comment was indeed an invitation, and thanks for taking it up. I don't remember the Hindi article, and can only speak two words of Hindi so not sure what I picked up on there. I'll have a look for the page on approved edit summaries on CSD tagging, but while I
1650:
Hi Xeno. That's a good question, and a few years ago I would have said not in the foreseeable future. There was a time when I was an active RFA nominator, very concerned about the drought at RFA and unsure how one could structure a community where few were admins. I think in that phase of my
1789:
Bureaucrats don't even have a mailing list anymore. Everything bureaucrats do (in theory), should be onwiki, with no secret processes, etc.. I can only think of one or two instances where non-public information related to an RfA was disclosed on the (now shuttered) mailing list.
1976:
To be honest I think of myself as an historian of RFA and had tended to ignore RFB, but having skimmed most of the successful ones this afternoon I can see some interesting patterns. I may write something up when the current crop of RFBs are over.
720:
I would have to take a closer look at you, but I would be willing to consider a co-nom... my review of your CSD work was a definite positive and my overall impression is positive (But I'd have to do a thorough review
1090:
Congratulations, I have closed your
Request for Adminship as successful and you are now a sysop! If you have any questions about adminship, feel free to ask me. Please consider messaging me on IRC for access to the
162:
1692:
was the very first
Wikipedian I ever met in real life. Since that time we have collaborated on and off, on- and off-Wiki very closely. I would be the first to volunteer to nominate him for 'Crat.
748:
can see a week where I can be online every day. Also though this process of contacting my opposers has started very well I'm not assuming that everyone will be so quick to reply or so positive.
2292:
where I had corrected a typo in the name many years ago. My insistence on hypothetical questions rather than re-examining contentious RFAs was probably the most contentious aspect of it.
1747:
you should go for it. God knows we have no trust in Arbcom now, this has been the worst couple of years ever, so we need some decent hard-working 'crats, and you'd be one of them.
1887:
Thanks Cabayi, this has been delayed a few months by real life stuff, including times when I was trying to edit via an Ipad. But I'm now back home and with a light week coming up.
61:
1629:
530:
1826:
1740:
1859:
1396:
1672:
Weāre down by 7 bureaucrats in 12 months. Thereās only 16 left, and some of us only somewhat active and available. I do think itās time for a bit of a replenishment. ā
1644:
1784:
2220:
All things considered that seemed pretty painless, which is a sign of how much editors appreciate you. Glad to see a fellow Typo Team member become a 'crat! Cheers,
538:
516:
2198:
2015:
1924:
1630:
896:
1957:
1943:
1918:
1577:
805:
766:
740:
715:
657:
2100:
981:
917:
1993:
1386:
1290:
1202:
1903:
1758:
2184:
1420:
1262:
1077:
844:
2271:
1800:
1680:
1667:
1532:
1369:
2229:
1512:
1375:
782:
2215:
2158:
2171:
1135:
2285:
2255:
1971:
1341:
2053:
2042:
1374:
Oh, well, I did not notice your RfA was finished before I changed my vote on you. Although my vote would be kept at "oppose" section for my laziness
1171:
1153:
1058:
2239:
1122:
1962:
As a historian of RFX, I thought you might appreciate that this seems to be the first time since 2009 that there have been two concurrent RFBs.
1844:
932:
2068:
1701:
1377:
2308:
362:
to
Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
2092:
1621:
1238:
1364:
1311:
482:
2009:
1867:
552:
Your RFA was closed as unsuccessful. I encourage you to work on areas of concern and try again in the future. Thank you for your interest.
434:
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
57:
1104:
2140:
1092:
233:
1009:
869:
632:
1822:
1736:
1035:
472:
1212:
1379:, the examples that you gave me are good enough for me to believe that you will be a good admin. Good luck with the shiny tools. --
501:
452:
If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view
1571:
1302:
WereSpielChequers is obviously rouge. So far, 100% of his 0 administrator actions have been an inappropriate use of the tools. --
1196:
975:
799:
760:
709:
651:
492:
Hi, can you just pop back to CHU and confirm the note I've left for you? Then I'll carry out your request immediately. Cheers!
402:
1085:
42:
1413:
957:
691:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
1613:
My late congrats too. Like the thoughtful response comments, not a templated message (like I used on most of mine). Cheers,
405:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
2027:
1881:
573:
1553:
1494:
1472:
453:
417:
254:
175:
1218:
1133:
1014:
201:
119:
38:
462:
By the way, you have the unique pleasure of being the first user I've granted rollback to. Don't let me down!Ā ;: -->
2194:
1916:
1282:
835:
683:
261:
247:
226:
212:
182:
168:
147:
133:
1222:
1605:
672:
you're making a joke of the whole system. I'm supporting anyway, watchlisted. I'll even co-nom you if you want. ā
1544:
Spiel, was cleaning out my watchlist, (your RfA) and saw you closed with a go. Congratulations! Best of luck.
460:
if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing!
951:
219:
140:
112:
1559:
Thanks Ched, and I'm now back in the UK - very glad I timed my RFA for the week I was around and on broadband
478:
386:
1286:
852:
687:
371:
359:
154:
2149:
WSC, please be careful what's in those brownies. You just never knowĀ ;) Congrats on the successful RfB! --
2299:
2190:
1984:
1934:
1894:
1775:
1658:
1566:
1191:
970:
794:
755:
704:
646:
600:
267:
240:
189:
161:
99:
53:
17:
990:
1753:
1706:
Iād be willing to write a short co-nom as well, if only to temper the āno need for moreā contingent. ā
736:
591:
512:
497:
90:
30:
1408:
1257:
1072:
1004:
891:
864:
839:
391:
612:
422:
69:
925:
2182:
2294:
2267:
1979:
1929:
1889:
1770:
1689:
1653:
1561:
1380:
1186:
1131:
965:
789:
750:
699:
641:
524:
366:
205:
126:
2225:
1748:
1527:
909:
508:
493:
398:
341:
2212:
2154:
1953:
1914:
1549:
1463:
1452:
1401:
1338:
1278:
1250:
1065:
997:
884:
857:
829:
820:
778:
730:
679:
627:
8:
2168:
1333:
468:
457:
414:
406:
2281:
2250:
2177:
2120:
2038:
1050:
941:
381:
1391:
60:
for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can
2263:
2023:
1967:
1816:
1730:
1697:
1360:
1307:
1167:
1148:
1128:
1100:
65:
842:
to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at
2221:
2133:
2131:
1877:
1855:
1522:
1113:
1026:
902:
566:
546:
1811:
I think you'd make a fine addition to our ranks. Kick it off whenever you want. --
2204:
2150:
2087:
1949:
1909:
1840:
1834:
1545:
1505:
1487:
1273:
1181:
774:
723:
674:
666:
620:
46:
1908:
I'm looking forward to this transcluding so I can add a "strong support" to it.
1587:
Sorry it's so late, but you never recieved it. Congrats on your successfull RfA!
599:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
98:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2235:
2164:
2126:
2066:
1798:
1712:
1678:
1642:
1326:
1177:
487:
464:
1271:
by the skin of your teethĀ :) Congratulations man, hope to join you some day. ā
337:
2277:
2245:
2048:
2034:
1792:
Thanks for considering to serve, I'll watchlist the page in anticipation =) ā
1268:
1228:
1159:
1044:
1020:
376:
286:
697:
Thanks Cyclo, yes I've taken the point about humour - no
Lolcats next time.
2019:
1963:
1812:
1726:
1693:
1615:
1598:
1481:
Best of luck as an administrator, and good luck in general for the future.
1356:
1303:
1163:
1144:
1096:
1948:
Already supported, but please fix the typos in your self-nom statementĀ ;)
1873:
1851:
555:
1872:
I do like it when one of my longstanding redlinks goes blue. Good luck.
343:
2082:
2113:
2073:
Good things getting out of hand seems like a good idea! Congrats WSC!
1176:
Well more than I have been this week. Maybe I should now try and take
477:
I won't. Thanks for your trust - its a useful tool WereSpielChequers (
456:. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on
2061:
1793:
1707:
1685:
1673:
1637:
821:
427:
2276:
Congratulations and best wishes. Glad to have been able to support.
339:
1591:
1397:
Don't know if you saw this, but thought you might want to see it.
1583:
438:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
409:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place
344:
1833:
certainly have overwhealming support from the content crowd.
2119:
Congratulations on your RfB! I'd give you a beer, but I'm
2060:
This is getting out of hand. Now there are two of them! ā
413:
after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!Ā --
2244:
Congratulations on your consecration as a bureaucrat.
1925:
Knowledge:Requests for bureaucratship/WereSpielChequers
1631:
Knowledge:Requests for bureaucratship/WereSpielChequers
1158:
So, this'll only give you more time to compete in the
832:
would like to nominate you to become an administrator.
1063:
I guess you did meet my expectations after all...---
995:
You are six votes away from getting my support ;0---
845:
Knowledge:Requests for adminship/WereSpielChequers 2
280:
521:Ta Muchly, very impressed at how well that worked
2203:I'd like to offer my congratulations as well.
901:Best of luck both at your RFA and wikicup --
2234:Very happy to see you stepping up. - Dank (
838:to see what this process entails, and then
1355:Well done on passing, use the tools well!
397:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1582:
426:
187:
180:
173:
166:
159:
152:
145:
138:
131:
124:
117:
110:
14:
1850:Go for it, WereSpielChequers, please.
597:Do not edit the contents of this page.
96:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2074:
1370:Congratulations from a sluggish voter
1225:? :O Lol, anyways...congrats manĀ :) ā
1501:Sorry this is so late. Congrats!Ā :)
1419:Congratulations, WereSpielChequers,
578:
448:Rollback may be removed at any time.
77:
25:
1473:User:Neurolysis/R/WereSpielChequers
23:
2018:as successful. Congratulations.
1636:Is this ever going to turn blue? ā
24:
2319:
963:Thanks Wisdom, much appreciated.
851:You might want to take a look at
2112:
2075:
1462:
1451:
836:Knowledge:Requests for adminship
582:
285:
188:
181:
174:
167:
160:
153:
146:
139:
132:
125:
118:
111:
81:
29:
2262:Congratulations from me, too!
2123:one, so have brownies instead.
1217:...and you first two edits are
441:Rollback can be used to revert
1471:The data used is available at
358:Hello, WereSpielChequers, and
13:
1:
1994:18:03, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
1972:15:33, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
1958:18:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
1944:18:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
1919:14:30, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
1904:13:00, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
1882:11:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
1606:04:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
1578:22:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
1554:17:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
1533:18:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
1521:Congratulations and enjoy! --
1513:20:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1495:20:18, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1414:04:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1387:00:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1365:10:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1342:02:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1312:00:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
1291:23:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1263:23:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1239:23:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1203:23:52, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1172:23:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1154:23:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1136:23:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1123:23:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1105:23:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1078:23:43, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1059:23:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1036:23:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
1010:05:47, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
918:12:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
658:01:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
633:22:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
367:The five pillars of Knowledge
1860:01:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
1845:01:06, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
1827:20:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1801:18:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1785:18:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1759:16:44, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1741:10:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1714:08:46, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1702:05:15, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1681:01:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
1668:23:33, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
1645:22:52, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
982:20:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
958:20:38, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
897:23:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
870:17:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
853:Knowledge:How to pass an RfA
806:01:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
767:01:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
387:How to write a great article
266:
260:
253:
246:
239:
232:
225:
218:
211:
204:
200:
7:
2176:Heartiest Congratulations!
783:17:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
741:17:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
716:17:48, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
692:17:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
574:20:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
539:19:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
517:17:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
502:17:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
445:, and not good faith edits.
18:User talk:WereSpielChequers
10:
2324:
2309:15:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
1213:So you became an admin....
418:23:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
2286:04:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
2272:17:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
2256:20:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
2240:13:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
2230:12:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
2216:21:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2199:20:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2185:19:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2172:18:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2159:18:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2141:18:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2093:20:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2069:19:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2054:18:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2043:18:30, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
2028:18:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
1754:Staying alive since 2005!
1622:19:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
1248:If I had only known!!!---
483:18:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
473:19:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
194:
931:Cheers mate. Good luck.
37:Editing of this page by
2047:Welcome to the team! ā
2033:Congratulations WSC. ā
1688:, Many, many years ago
1086:Your RFA was successful
827:
773:I answered via e-mail.
2191:Pharaoh of the Wizards
1588:
1110:Lol, that was fast :P
1095:channel. Good luck! --
840:contact I'm Spartacus!
507:Hi WereSpielChequers!
431:
1725:sway our opinions. --
1586:
595:of past discussions.
430:
94:of past discussions.
2163:Many congrats WSC!!
1093:#wikipedia-en-admins
62:request unprotection
1015:Beat the crat gratz
787:Thanks and replied
407:Knowledge:Questions
45:users is currently
1589:
1127:Congratulations! ā
737:CSD Survey Results
432:
372:How to edit a page
2146:
2145:
1825:
1757:
1739:
1602:
1531:
1363:
1310:
1142:Congratulations.
1121:
1103:
1041:Congratulations!
1034:
953:
948:
739:
607:
606:
601:current talk page
534:
526:WereSpielChequers
350:
349:
276:
275:
106:
105:
100:current talk page
76:
75:
70:create an account
54:protection policy
2315:
2306:
2302:
2297:
2253:
2248:
2210:
2207:
2180:
2129:
2121:too young to buy
2116:
2109:
2108:
2090:
2085:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2051:
1991:
1987:
1982:
1941:
1937:
1932:
1901:
1897:
1892:
1837:
1820:
1782:
1778:
1773:
1751:
1749:The Rambling Man
1734:
1665:
1661:
1656:
1618:
1603:
1600:
1596:
1574:
1569:
1564:
1525:
1511:
1508:
1493:
1490:
1466:
1455:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1404:
1359:
1336:
1331:
1325:Congrats, dude!
1306:
1253:
1236:
1234:
1231:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1120:
1118:
1111:
1099:
1068:
1057:
1053:
1047:
1033:
1031:
1024:
1000:
978:
973:
968:
952:
946:
942:
936:
887:
860:
802:
797:
792:
763:
758:
753:
735:
726:
712:
707:
702:
654:
649:
644:
623:
613:Quick CSD Survey
586:
585:
579:
572:
569:
563:
537:
535:
532:
527:
509:The Rambling Man
494:The Rambling Man
423:Rollback granted
412:
345:
289:
281:
192:
185:
178:
171:
164:
157:
150:
143:
136:
129:
122:
115:
108:
107:
85:
84:
78:
33:
26:
2323:
2322:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2304:
2300:
2295:
2251:
2246:
2208:
2205:
2178:
2136:
2127:
2107:
2088:
2083:
2076:
2049:
2012:
1989:
1985:
1980:
1939:
1935:
1930:
1899:
1895:
1890:
1870:
1835:
1780:
1776:
1771:
1694:Kudpung ąøąøøąøąøąø¶ą¹ąø
1663:
1659:
1654:
1634:
1616:
1601:clamation point
1599:
1592:
1572:
1567:
1562:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1488:
1484:
1479:
1478:
1445:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1402:
1394:
1372:
1357:Camaron | Chris
1334:
1327:
1251:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1215:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:Richard Dawkins
1114:
1112:
1088:
1066:
1051:
1045:
1042:
1027:
1025:
1017:
998:
993:
976:
971:
966:
956:
947:
944:
934:
928:
885:
881:
880:
858:
849:
826:
800:
795:
790:
761:
756:
751:
724:
710:
705:
700:
669:
652:
647:
642:
621:
615:
583:
567:
556:
553:
549:
531:
525:
522:
490:
425:
410:
392:Manual of Style
346:
340:
309:2007 & 2008
294:
82:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2321:
2289:
2288:
2274:
2259:
2258:
2242:
2232:
2218:
2201:
2187:
2174:
2161:
2144:
2143:
2134:
2117:
2106:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2096:
2095:
2057:
2056:
2045:
2014:I have closed
2011:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1848:
1847:
1823:old fashioned!
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1762:
1761:
1737:old fashioned!
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1633:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1581:
1580:
1538:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1516:
1515:
1468:
1467:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1450:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1417:
1403:I'm Spartacus!
1393:
1390:
1371:
1368:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1252:I'm Spartacus!
1214:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1178:Marilyn Manson
1140:
1139:
1138:
1087:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1067:I'm Spartacus!
1023:! Well done!
1016:
1013:
999:I'm Spartacus!
992:
989:
987:
985:
984:
943:
939:
927:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
913:
906:
899:
886:I'm Spartacus!
878:
877:
859:I'm Spartacus!
830:I'm Spartacus!
825:
819:
817:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
771:
770:
769:
668:
665:
663:
661:
660:
614:
611:
609:
605:
604:
587:
577:
576:
548:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
489:
486:
450:
449:
446:
443:vandalism only
439:
424:
421:
415:PaxEquilibrium
403:sign your name
395:
394:
389:
384:
379:
374:
369:
357:
348:
347:
342:
338:
336:
333:
332:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
300:
299:
296:
295:
290:
284:
278:
274:
273:
271:
265:
259:
252:
245:
238:
231:
224:
217:
210:
203:
199:
196:
195:
193:
186:
179:
172:
165:
158:
151:
144:
137:
130:
123:
116:
104:
103:
86:
74:
73:
58:protection log
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2320:
2311:
2310:
2307:
2303:
2298:
2287:
2283:
2279:
2275:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2260:
2257:
2254:
2249:
2243:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2217:
2214:
2211:
2202:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2186:
2183:
2181:
2175:
2173:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2147:
2142:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2132:
2130:
2122:
2118:
2115:
2111:
2110:
2104:
2094:
2091:
2086:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2067:
2065:
2064:
2059:
2058:
2055:
2052:
2046:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2032:
2031:
2030:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2017:
1995:
1992:
1988:
1983:
1975:
1974:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1946:
1945:
1942:
1938:
1933:
1926:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1917:
1915:
1913:
1912:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1902:
1898:
1893:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1879:
1875:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1818:
1814:
1803:
1802:
1799:
1797:
1796:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1783:
1779:
1774:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1760:
1755:
1750:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1732:
1728:
1713:
1711:
1710:
1705:
1704:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1679:
1677:
1676:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1666:
1662:
1657:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1640:
1632:
1623:
1620:
1619:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1604:
1597:
1595:
1585:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1570:
1565:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1534:
1529:
1524:
1523:Regent's Park
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1514:
1510:
1509:
1500:
1499:
1497:
1496:
1492:
1491:
1482:
1477:
1476:
1474:
1465:
1460:
1454:
1449:
1441:
1439:
1425:
1422:
1416:
1415:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1405:
1398:
1389:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1378:
1376:
1367:
1366:
1362:
1358:
1343:
1340:
1337:
1332:
1330:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1309:
1305:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1275:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1224:
1220:
1204:
1201:
1200:
1195:
1190:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1152:
1150:
1146:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1119:
1117:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1070:
1069:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1055:
1054:
1048:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1032:
1030:
1022:
1012:
1011:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1002:
1001:
988:
983:
980:
979:
974:
969:
962:
961:
960:
959:
954:
949:
938:
937:
919:
915:
914:
911:
908:
907:
904:
900:
898:
895:
894:
893:
889:
888:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
868:
867:
866:
862:
861:
854:
847:
846:
841:
837:
834:Please visit
833:
831:
823:
818:
807:
804:
803:
798:
793:
786:
785:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:
764:
759:
754:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
733:
732:
728:
727:
719:
718:
717:
714:
713:
708:
703:
696:
695:
694:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
676:
664:
659:
656:
655:
650:
645:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
630:
629:
625:
624:
610:
602:
598:
594:
593:
588:
581:
580:
575:
570:
564:
562:
560:
551:
550:
540:
536:
529:
528:
520:
519:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
504:
503:
499:
495:
485:
484:
480:
475:
474:
470:
466:
463:
459:
455:
447:
444:
440:
437:
436:
435:
429:
420:
419:
416:
408:
404:
400:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
364:
363:
361:
355:
354:
335:
334:
331:
330:
329:Autoreviewers
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:
298:
297:
293:
288:
283:
282:
279:
272:
270:
269:
264:
263:
258:
257:
251:
250:
244:
243:
237:
236:
230:
229:
223:
222:
216:
215:
209:
208:
202:
198:
197:
191:
184:
177:
170:
163:
156:
149:
142:
135:
128:
121:
114:
109:
101:
97:
93:
92:
87:
80:
79:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
50:
48:
44:
40:
35:
32:
28:
27:
19:
2293:
2290:
2264:MichaelMaggs
2236:push to talk
2125:
2124:
2102:
2062:
2013:
1978:
1928:
1910:
1888:
1871:
1863:
1849:
1810:
1794:
1791:
1769:
1723:
1708:
1674:
1652:
1638:
1635:
1614:
1593:
1590:
1560:
1541:
1539:
1503:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1470:
1469:
1458:
1447:
1427:
1423:
1418:
1409:
1407:
1400:
1395:
1381:
1373:
1354:
1328:
1301:
1272:
1258:
1256:
1249:
1226:
1216:
1185:
1162:, right? :P
1143:
1129:Juliancolton
1115:
1089:
1073:
1071:
1064:
1043:
1028:
1018:
1005:
1003:
996:
994:
991:6 votes away
986:
964:
933:
929:
910:
903:
892:
890:
883:
882:Good luck---
865:
863:
856:
850:
843:
828:
816:
788:
749:
731:
729:
722:
698:
673:
670:
662:
640:
628:
626:
619:
616:
608:
596:
590:
558:
557:
523:
491:
476:
461:
458:my talk page
451:
442:
433:
396:
356:
352:
351:
304:
303:
291:
277:
268:
262:
255:
248:
241:
234:
227:
220:
213:
206:
95:
89:
43:unregistered
36:
2222:Jason Quinn
1528:Rose Garden
1444:Statistics:
1267:You got to
589:This is an
325:FAC Reviews
321:CSD tagging
88:This is an
2179:Puddleglum
2151:Hammersoft
1950:Valenciano
1911:Ritchie333
1274:Cyclonenim
1019:OMG YAY!
775:Ecoleetage
725:Balloonman
721:first.)---
675:Cyclonenim
622:Balloonman
411:{{helpme}}
399:Wikipedian
377:Help pages
305:Big Events
2252:(discuss)
2189:Congrats.
2165:MarnetteD
1927:is live.
926:My oppose
822:Hell week
465:xenocidic
454:this page
401:! Please
249:Guestbook
235:Editcount
228:Userboxen
2305:Chequers
2278:Donner60
2247:Hawkeye7
2105:Brownies
2081:Regards
2050:xaosflux
2035:Ammarpad
2016:your RFB
2010:Your RFB
1990:Chequers
1940:Chequers
1923:Thanks.
1900:Chequers
1868:Redlinks
1781:Chequers
1664:Chequers
1573:Chequers
1421:your RfA
1283:contribs
1198:Chequers
1184:to FAC.
1046:iMatthew
977:Chequers
935:Wisdom89
912:Cherian
801:Chequers
762:Chequers
711:Chequers
684:contribs
653:Chequers
547:Your RFA
382:Tutorial
353:Welcome!
292:Archives
52:See the
47:disabled
2128:Invalid
2020:Useight
1964:Useight
1821:Become
1813:Dweller
1735:Become
1727:Dweller
1617:Spencer
1382:Caspian
1304:Deskana
1164:Useight
1145:seresin
1097:Deskana
879:SUCKER!
667:RE: RfA
592:archive
360:welcome
317:My Badz
221:Content
91:archive
2213:(talk)
2206:Clover
1874:Cabayi
1852:Drmies
1546:ā Ched
1459:Trend:
1448:Tally:
1426:with (
1424:passed
1361:(talk)
1308:(talk)
1269:WP:100
1116:GARDEN
1101:(talk)
1029:GARDEN
1021:WP:100
533:(talk)
488:Rename
66:log in
2301:Spiel
2101:Crat
1986:Spiel
1936:Spiel
1896:Spiel
1836:Ceoil
1777:Spiel
1660:Spiel
1568:Spiel
1542:Seiel
1507:neuro
1489:neuro
1339:forge
1329:Ceran
1287:email
1193:Spiel
972:Spiel
796:Spiel
757:Spiel
706:Spiel
688:email
648:Spiel
561:levse
256:Email
214:Bling
68:, or
16:<
2296:Ļ¢ere
2282:talk
2268:talk
2226:talk
2209:moss
2195:talk
2169:Talk
2155:talk
2135:talk
2103:Beer
2063:xeno
2039:talk
2024:talk
1981:Ļ¢ere
1968:talk
1954:talk
1931:Ļ¢ere
1891:Ļ¢ere
1878:talk
1856:talk
1841:talk
1817:talk
1795:xeno
1772:Ļ¢ere
1731:talk
1709:xeno
1698:talk
1686:xeno
1675:xeno
1655:Ļ¢ere
1639:xeno
1563:Were
1550:talk
1384:blue
1279:talk
1223:this
1221:and
1219:this
1188:Were
1168:talk
1052:talk
967:Were
905:Tinu
791:Ļ¢ere
779:talk
752:Ļ¢ere
701:Ļ¢ere
680:talk
643:Ļ¢ere
568:Talk
513:talk
498:talk
479:talk
469:talk
313:2009
242:Talk
207:Home
56:and
2089:Why
1690:WSC
1540:Hi
1440:)!
1429:100
1399:---
1392:FYI
1230:Ed
1180:or
1160:Cup
1056://
1049://
824:???
41:or
39:new
2284:)
2270:)
2238:)
2228:)
2197:)
2157:)
2084:So
2041:)
2026:)
1970:)
1956:)
1880:)
1858:)
1843:)
1819:)
1733:)
1700:)
1552:)
1504:ā
1486:ā
1335://
1289:)
1285:Ā·
1281:Ā·
1233:17
1170:)
1151:)
1149:Ā”?
1147:(
950:/
916:-
781:)
690:)
686:Ā·
682:Ā·
571:ā¢
565:ā¢
554:ā
515:)
500:)
481:)
471:)
64:,
2280:(
2266:(
2224:(
2193:(
2167:|
2153:(
2037:(
2022:(
1966:(
1952:(
1876:(
1854:(
1839:(
1815:(
1756:)
1752:(
1729:(
1696:(
1594:X
1548:(
1530:)
1526:(
1475:.
1437:2
1435:/
1433:7
1431:/
1277:(
1166:(
955:)
945:T
940:(
777:(
678:(
603:.
559:R
511:(
496:(
467:(
102:.
72:.
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
