7709:. That should be a glaring red warning siren when someone is self-admittedly unable to determine when something is controversial, but insisting that they'll only take uncontroversial actions. I've tried raising these concerns with Dick before, repeatedly, to no avail. Talking with Dick on anything relating to a move discussion is like talking to a brick wall. Nothing gets through, everything just bounces back. It's brought multiple admins to the point of frustration and walking away from participating in this area. Frankly, I think he should be permanently TBANed from any kind of page move or decapitalization discussion or action, but I'll be satisfied to start with not allowing him to have greater tools with which to disrupt the project.
4335:).I can't in good faith argue that Valereee should only be involved with respect to food/society based on the RTH discussion above where it was found that, regardless of the exact content/topic of the edits, RTH was involved with respect to the entire 2023-present war. That would be unfair to RTH and others. I would be okay with Valereee considering themselves involved with the topic of society/culture (but not with respect to military action, for example), but the problem is that over the history of Israel the military actions were all taken because of or had significant crossover with the societal conflict. As such I think Valereee would do best to consider themselves involved with respect to the
2125:, to determine whether the closer interpreted the consensus incorrectly and closed RfC with wrong procedural close. There were five editors in this discussion, two editors thought this was not a RFC, then User: Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) reworded question to make it intelligible and grammatical. Two editors thought editorial synthesis of published material implied a new conclusion. One editor did not express its opinion clearly. Obviously, no consensus was achieved at this RfC. However, the closing comments were: "A summary of the conclusions reached follows. Procedural close for RfC that is not an RfC: N and RFC apply." I tried to discuss this with the closer, but there is no respond in 5 days.
2240:- The closer was right in closing the RFC as malformed. The RFC was rewritten twice after posting, and any substantive close would have involved the closer comparing statements to versions of the RFC. The original version of the RFC was a statement. The Original Poster than rewrote it as an ungrammatical question. Another editor then reworked it to be a grammatical question. The RFC was inherently flawed, which is one of the reasons it had no useful answers. The Original Poster has two options, to leave it alone and unanswered, or to develop a new RFC that asks a question, and leave it unchanged for 30 days to get real answers. Closing the RFC as malformed was the right action.
2744:
else. But from the community point of view let's stick with 'we don't know' or just don't talk about. Of course if you think you have have read the discussion well enough that you can be certain what the consensus was, are sufficiently uninvolved that no one will be able to reasonably complain about you closing the discussion, and have sufficient experience that you can close the discussion in such a way that enough of the community will accept you properly closed the discussion; well then feel free to answer Tazmin's request. Otherwise your opinion of what the discussion found doesn't seem to be something we need to hear about at this time.
7876:. Again, just because DL and our guidelines have a few people who resist them does not make the resisters in the right. To the extent there is disruption regarding capitalization and other style matters, it always comes from those who defy their application to a particular "pet" topic (even against the intent of guidelines particular to that topic and the views of other editors involved in it). To get back to the principal point here, DL clear understands the procedural expectations of him at this point and has been following them, so there is no reason to deny him use of a tool within those expectations.
4090:
on an example of food nationalism makes her involved in the entire ARBPIA area in general, or in the
Zionism article. And the AFD is even weaker sauce. I don't think this is a POINT violation, but I also don't really think this clarification is productive. That said, I also don't see how your comment about preferring incremental editing warranted a formal warning about disruption (maybe the other stuff she referenced later, I don't know, but not the initial comment). Maybe this isn't helpful, but can I just gently ask both of you to do better, without pissing either one of you off?
7930:
problems that result from BOLDMOVES, so if there's any reasonable possibility you might be wrong, RM is the way. Even if most or all of the resultant RMs result in a move, and yet editors are still opposing their moves, we can discuss how to handle it, but it's definitely not just force it through in the hope they'll eventually stop complaining. It's apparent from the above, as well as the links, that
Dickylon really doesn't understand this so it just seems a terrible idea to give them tools which will make it easier for them to make such mistakes.
7684:. Dicklyon is massively understating the disruption he's caused in the military history space. He has a demonstrated pattern of trying to push through poorly researched decapitalization moves without any attempts at prior discussion despite being well aware that they are controversial moves that would be contested. When pressed on the issue and asked to seek consensus *first* for page moves he can reasonably expect to be contested, he has repeatedly and consistently refused to do so. Instead, he simply performs the moves hoping for a
2012:
achieving any kind of "result" here vis-a-vis "overturning": As the "RfC" was not an RfC, this was not an RfC review. A non-productive and time-wasting talk section was archived by Serial Number 54129. No one among the responding editors thinks that that was anything but helpful on his part. The starter of this discussion can start an RfC after determining that an RfC is the correct course of action, which may be the case when other, more lightweight, methods of dispute resolution have been tried (see
6609:
2920:; but if the facts are roughly the same in March, I think the consensus (or lack thereof) will be as well.What I do think might work would be for someone to do a fairly broad close finding no consensus or only rough consensus (I shan't presuppose which, but I think it's clear this is not a slam-dunk in either direction), but primarily concerned with highlighting the main points that should be discussed in any subsequent RfC. That way we could have some sort of incremental progress.
4438:. The list goes on and on, and I've at least touched most of these dishes, often writing about the conflicts over them. If I'm involved not only at the dishes themselves but also at the area of conflict, I'm pretty much involved anywhere people eat food. Which seems a bit silly, as I have zero interest in editing about (and often embarrassingly little understanding of) the conflicts themselves, but if I'm involved anywhere people eat, I might as well take AE off my watch.
7864:. DL's RM track record speaks for itself. That he has a camp of "un-friends" who dislike him for properly applying our title policy and style guidelines is not a reason to partially suppress his work in this area. As for alleged "disruption" in military topics, I've been following this, and what's really happening is a handful of military-focused editors are repetitively fighting tooth and nail against every lower-casing move despite the clear instructions in their own
3619:, it's hard for me to pay attention to your argument when your signature is so obnoxious and it feels like it is "screaming" at the rest of us. It doesn't make me well disposed to listen to whatever point you are trying to make. Could you tone the signature down so it is just your username and a link to your talk page, like the standard editor signature? This is not a situation where bigger and louder is better. Thank you for considering the suggestion.
5467:
either the "Yes" or "No" direction which just goes to show how murky this area has become. You can continue to post if you want but I don't see anything definitive coming out of this discussion at the state of where it is right now so there might be other activities that are more worthy of your time and attention. That's just how I assess this discussion. My only comment is to all admins is to tread carefully when acting in contentious topic areas.
6701:, I'm not focused on the article's past issues or its creation by SPA (although I suspect the recent creator may also be one), but considering potential conflicts of interest or paid editing, we usually recommend AFC process, and so, I see no opposition to unprotect. Additionally, if the article is SIMILAR to the previously deleted one via AFD, it can be speedily deleted and a sockpuppet investigation initiated. Your opinion matters too. Cheers!
7987:. I won't support or oppose, but I think Dicklyon's colleagues do him a disservice when they say, more or less, "he's right on the merits, so restore his access." I can't think of a better way for Dicklyon to wind up right back in hot water than this sort of uncritical support. The community has said in the past that Dicklyon's evaluation of what is and is not a controversial move is heterodox. Whether he's "right" or not doesn't come into it.
8002:. I'm uninvolved with anything specific mentioned here, but have been involved with multiple other style-related (especially capitalisation-related) move discussions involving Dick in other topic areas and the links presented here show that despite the passage of time he has not learned how to predict what is and isn't going to be controversial or how to listen to and constructively communicate with other editors when they disagree with them.
5311:
made here that you haven't been editing in the topic area. So my position is that either you both are involved or neither is involved. I'd have preferred for both you and RTH to not be considered involved, but the RTH matter has already been determined. And btw I don't believe it's a question of partiality or impartiality. One can be impartial and involved. One can be biased and uninvolved. That's not the issue.
4654:(emphasis added; parts not relevant to complaint elided). Has there been a dispute regarding Valereee's Israel/Palestine-and-food editing that resulted in her taking a side in a dispute that can be generalized to the topic area more broadly? If so, then she's probably involved. If not, then no, merely editing in a topic area does not automatically constitute involvement, with ARBPIA or with anything else.
7514:'s contribs).Ā That's a good solution at that scale, but for probably all of the others there's not enough to justify the work to make a bot and get approval for it, and there's too much work to do manually (by me or any other editors), and only AWB/JWB provides a way to make effective progress on the cleanup.Ā It cuts the time per edit by about an order of magnitude (when being careful), I estimate.
7116:
3284:
4828:
disruptive actors. It is valuable to the community to be able to topic ban disruptive users from these broad areas. I don't think it is sensible to use these categoriesāones built specifically to counter disruptionāto limit the participation of non-disruptive admins. I'd feel different about the very narrow topic areas (I'm remembering the
Shakespeare authorship question topic area).
5417:
when I objected to that you accused me of BLUDGEONING and SEALIONING, incivil, unless substantiated. Diffs still haven't been furnished for this. I admit that I may be participating too vigorously and thanked you for your advice. You insist that cherrypicking can only be an accusation, despite the fact that I have made clear that cherrypicking is
4678:. While the outcomes of the article move discussion appear to be settled, there was clearly a move discussion that attracted support and oppose on that article talk, generalizable to a view on whether Israeli food is appropriating Arab food. Pretty contentious topic in this area, with duelling narratives.
7762:
This is the kind of personal attack and strong pushback I was referring to when I said I was going to avoid the
Military History space. Obviously Swatjester's opinion is not aligned with mine, and not aligned with what was judged to be the consensus there. On the missile, I think he was referring to
6867:
Looking at the last few elections, we've had less than vigorous fields, resulting in most candidates getting elected. I don't have anything bad to say about any of the people who got elected, but as a general rule, when you're running elections where most candidates get elected, that's not healthy.
5434:
to advocate that the policy should be changed in such a way. This all seems like a run-of-the-mill behavioral issue? Because usually when I deal with admins, and I was one for a number of years but not terribly active in this area, they warn you once succinctly without a lot of to-do. Then if you put
5367:
My warning to you about making accusations of cherrypicking is a typical warning about behavior. If I'm not involved, it's a warning from an uninvolved admin. A warning about behavior doesn't make an admin involved. If I'm involved, it's a warning from another editor about behavior. Which really, you
5258:
and subsequent creation of the politics article, which again is about
Israeli cultural identity formation, and not especially about culinary matters. So it would seem the two of us edited the same article about the same topics which are subtopics of ARBPIA. At the least, while she may not be involved
4772:
Look, she's involved with a given topic if she was in a dispute over it. You can slice it or dice it however you want, but you're not going to convince me, or I think most people, that a veteran culinary editor having an opinion about whether "politicization of food" or "Israeli appropriation of Arab
4583:
before publishing. I would have phrased it differently as a result. In the linked diff, you argued that you are involved in certain aspects of the war, but not others. Whereas community consensus found that you are involved in IsraelāHamas war broadly construed. My earlier comment regretfully implies
4339:
similar to how RTH was advised to do above. And ideally, to prevent people from having to have more discussions on this, they may do good to just choose to not act as an administrator in the entire Arab/Israeli topic area.To make it abundantly clear, I don't like where this is right now as a whole. I
4314:
administrator making minor wording changes or participating in a discussion about specific sections of a page makes them involved. As such, there is no choice here but to consider
Valereee involved because of the parallel.The question then becomes with respect to what is Valereee involved. My opinion
2758:
Yes, I very much agree. I actually don't have an opinion on what the consensus was, having only participated long enough to make a few comments. I'm just hoping someone will close itāfor, against, no consensus, narrow consensus, whateverāand hope we can use this space to find some closers, and not to
2743:
Can we not have another discussion here on the issue please? Until and unless someone closes the RfC in an unchallenged way, editor are free to believe what they want about what the RfC found be that the
Telegraph is generally reliable on trans issues or not or that there was no consensus or whatever
2456:
on a gender article, and given all the work people put in to expressing their opinions on the matter (including me, full disclosure), it would be nice to have something to point to as the current community consensus, even if it's just an admin-approved finding of no consensus. A key issue in both the
8224:
so that no editor could claim that there was anything wrong with the RFC. That may be one of the reasons for this challenge. I said that any editor who then ignored the second RFC would be editing disruptively and could be sanctioned. After some work on the RFC, Loki submitted the RFC on 17 July,
6290:
User LawNerd123 is persistently removing notional results from UK constituency pages, contrary to usual practice on both
Knowledge and all major news sources. From previous discussion on the talk page this appears to be an issue they have with notional put together by āacademicsā, expressed somewhat
5310:
The RTH discussion involved an admin viewed as being involved with the topic area. As I understand it neither this discussion nor the RTH discussion deals with involvement with any particular editor. We have RTH considered involved due to his edits in the topic area. I don't agree with the arguments
4089:
I have no idea whether the current WP definition of INVOLVED applies here or not. And I have no intention of reading the linked section higher up on this page about RTH to look for similarities and differences in the two cases. But just as a reality check, I don't really see how writing that article
2971:
Finding that there's no consensus is trivially easy, and any of our regular closers could tell you that there's no consensus about whether the
Telegraph is reliable on trans issues. That's not even controversial. What's getting people so angry is the decision about what RSN should say in the absence
2891:
Maybe this one just doesn't need a formal close. It seems obvious that based on the arguments in the RFC and subsequent discussions, the community is not able to agree on any course of action right now. The safe course would be to pretend this drama never happened, and maybe start a fresh discussion
2011:
While it's possible for an RfC that at least has some of the essence of an RfC to be procedurally improper in some regard and liable to procedural closure, this was not an RfC. It did not even resemble one. It was a manifestly inadequate attempt at starting an RfC. There is no prospect of success in
1801:
The consensus is on the result of the move discussions, that the edit notice informs about, and which I'm not discussing. Making a big and disruptive edit notice a bit more discrete, without changing its purpose, should be a simple thing and not require big discussions. As said, I would have done it
7944:
Just wanted to add, the cost to the community of RMs should be the only reason to avoid them. No editor should ever be avoiding an RM because they fear if they start one there will be objections from editors in good standing and achieving consensus might take more effort; but they're hoping if they
7704:
was simply wrong -- in an attempt to push it through without discussion, because he wasn't sure between two ambiguous capitalizations he chose a third, objectively wrong option instead. When the error was pointed out, he still insisted that at some point in the future, he'd open up an RM to further
7316:
In the lastĀ 6 months, I've done a ton of good work, about 13,000 edits (all manually), including moving about 500 articles (usually to fix over-capitalization), plus much of the corresponding post-move cleanup.Ā This work has been done without raising much controversy, with civil discussions in RMs
5416:
If there are legitimate behavioral issues with diffs, they may be presented. As this thread shows, you "warned" me once in the talk page discussion (not a warning, but participation), then you warned me, without any diffs, for arguing for incremental editing, as discussed by
Floquenbeam above. Then
4382:
FWIW, I argued that it was one primary dispute including 1917 Balfour declaration, Zionism up to present, but the community did not find consensus for that. From the community consensus, RTH would be free to admin about the nature of Zionism, despite their extensive editing history, since it is not
4070:
I'm not disagreeing with the nomination. But compare this with the discussion of RTH above. RTH also made a bunch of RMs that he thought were relatively minor and didn't express a POV, but the community found that was involvement, because admins and editors should wear different hats in the area. I
2546:
The irony of it is that it should be closed as generally reliable, which I suppose is the status quo, but it's such a sprawling swamp of a discussionānot counting the review referenced above!āthat everyone will demand a panel* and/or a 5,000-word closing statement to feel justice has been done, and
2525:
I mean putting aside the general problems with closing, that Telegraph RfC is very long (68k words from a simplistic counter) and an extremely fraught issue in recent times. The re-opening happened after it spawned a 50k+ word review. (For clarity I mention the review not because anyone closing has
1744:
The only recommendation that I can make is that the third line of the system message says "To request a change be made to the page, please submit an edit request, ensure you include a description of your requested change and the reason for the change" which did not occur. However, had it been done
8219:
for dispute resolution. I observed that part of the problem was that some editors had disagreed with the RFC, and had ignored the RFC rather than either complying with it or requesting a review of its closure. Since moderated discussion was unlikely to result in a compromise, I said that I would
5466:
If the goal here was to come to a consensus about whether or not Valereee could be considered involved in this contentious area of editing, I think that moment has passed. Participation in this discussion has fallen off and this has become a two person discussion. I don't see a strong consensus in
5229:
The RTH matter transpired while I was on wiki-break. If I had seen it I'd have opined against RTH being viewed as involved because of precisely this kind of situation taking place. Andrevan was right to raise the issue. He can't be blamed for that, whatever the outcome here. So now, yes people are
8554:
Thank you for alerting me to claimed imperfections in my patrolling. I will take extra care now that I have been alerted to my need to be more certain about the quality of certain sources (for example, Times of India). You will see from my edit summaries that I routinely highlight and remove weak
5931:
Furthermore, WP:SPA is an essay.It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge contributors. WP:SPA is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Knowledge's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community.I don't think WP:SPA alone is grounds for any
5765:
Given that the game is from Ubisoft, it's not really special that french IPs edit it. Also if you read the japanese block discussion it wasn't on technical grounds but on behaviour and the behaviour of the IP isn't exactly the same as Regalias. Just because 2 editors revert your contentious edit,
5363:
You seem to be arguing an editor can make an admin involved with themself w:re content in article space by reverting an edit that admin made anywhere on the project? To take that to its logical extreme, that would mean any editor, with a couple hundred reverts, can make every active admin on this
4326:
to a virtually identical topic/information on another page. However, Valereee's contributions to that article include (correctly so) many crossovers to the actual social conflict itself. Unlike RTH's situation above where they made relatively minor edits that basically only dealt with things that
2905:
On some topics, I'd like that solution. If there's, say, a heated and convoluted RfC about how to describe some aspect of the HamasāIsrael war, there's a good chance that scrapping the thing and waiting 6-12 months will yield better results. Here, though, I'm not convinced. This was a contentious
2401:
What am I supposed to do? Wait until tomorrow to make any further edits to the article? Limit myself to only adding new information and not changing any existing information? Make edit requests for the rest of the day? Just keep editing until someone complains about my crossing 1RR and asks me to
8486:
for deletion. It is a BLP (Biographies of Living Persons) article about an Indian politician, but it does not cite any significant coverage sources, nor has the subject been elected to any notable officesājust nominated for election. After checking its curation log, I discovered it had also been
7509:
The trouble with all these style-fixing moves is that it's very hard to keep up with the post-move cleanup, e.g. of links to the redirects at the old over-capitalized titles.Ā In the case of the NFL Draft, I was able to get a bot operator to program a bot that's now completed, having edited 1000
7371:
In addition to what I counted in my move log, and in addition to lots of single-article "Requested Move" discussions that I started that succeeded, I also caused hundreds of other pages to be moved through gaining consensus at multi-RM discussions in the last 6 months or so.Ā Here are the ones I
4313:
more significantly on the topic area - creating a whole article - while the only evidence presented against RTH above consisted of a few wording changes that ultimately were not that significant of contributions to the topic area. Yet, the community apparently clearly showed that they believe an
7929:
is definitely not encouraged. So it doesn't matter how much editors think they are right on the issue as per our policies and guidelines; what matters if there may be good-faith pushback. While it can be hard to predict, and RMs can be costly, ultimately they're still a lot less costly than the
7312:
From the experience a year ago, I learned to appreciate much more deeply that an error rate of 1 in 100 is not nearly good enough when thousands of edits are involved, and I regret that I slipped into that region in some of my too-fast batches of JWB edits.Ā I will strive for zero errors in the
7313:
future, by inspecting the context of everything in the diff more carefully, to ensure that my replace patterns are not unintentionally changing things in ref titles, filenames, category names, commons categories, template names, and other such places where "fixes" often do more harm than good.
6623:
over editing the MOS trivia guideline and good faith editors who are making edits for concision and clarity. Moxy swooped in, reverted one of those edits, accused others of violating 1RR and 3RR without evidence, was told that this discussion is ongoing and productive, and has now sought page
4827:
and closely related articles. In general, I think that contentious topic areas were identified and delimited by either ArbCom or the community to encompass broad areas in which disruptive editors were editing disruptively. The extant contentious topic areas have lasted because there are still
2953:
is the only way we'll move forward. That way, next time the opposing factions will hopefully have a better grip on what they need to prove and what arguments their opponents are likely to raise, so we can get past the blocker of "did X really refute point Y or not". I don't think there's much
7767:
would be better; that was the name of the article many years ago, and agrees with other editors who pointed out that the name is "Standard", not "Standard Missile". And it's based on sources, which are mixed, and also sometimes don't cap "standard". Anyway, my move was reverted and and I
7597:
As to "not bypass the RM route for page moves", that's not related to JWB. And as I pointed out above, I've caused about 780 titles to be moved this year via discussions (RM & RFC), and about 500 without. In the few cases where some of those were reverted, I followed up with RMs, per
4155:
about the incremental changes comment. You mentioned the other stuff only when A pushed back. You probably know I don't touch ARBPIA stuff for this very reason, but it just seems like you're both being a little bit suboptimal here. I guess maybe the topic forces people to be suboptimal?
1723:
I now see (it was pretty obvious in fact) that edit notices can only be edited by admins, template editors, or page movers. In such a niche area that only applies to one or two articles I would still do most of the work myself, only asking an admin or page mover to perform the final move.
2457:
original close and the original overturn was that they were unilateral non-admin closes. Could we maybe get a panel of two or three admins to finally put this to bed? Otherwise I fear all that discussion will have been for naught and we'll be doomed to repeat it all in 6 to 12 months.
5382:
You think it's typical for an admin to get involved on the editorial process of source selection, the meaning of cherrypicking and whether it is reasonable, and try to change the policy to reflect your opinion on what is a reasonable editorial process? That is more than most admins.
2397:
I recently made an edit to a high-profile current events article. That edit was a revert. I later went to make another edit to correct some incorrect information, and it occurred to me that changing what someone else just wrote would be a second revert, and I would be violating 1RR.
6181:
You're not a party right now, so your involvement isn't required. However, if someone does submit evidence about you there's always a chance you could be added. Participation mostly consists of submitting evidence on the evidence page, whether it's about yourself or other editors.
5702:
This is a content dispute that should be, and is being, resolved on the article talk page. Why has it been brought here? The article content will be decided by the RFC, so it doesn't matter what version we display currently. User talk pages are an exception to the general rule and
3975:
I didn't quote any part of the talk discussion but linked to the whole thing. And yes, as I just said and said in that conversation as well, a friendly collegial warning would be heeded, but she insists she is not involved and that this is a formal warning, which seems off to me.
2161:
has offered to talk this through with you and provide advice on resolving this dispute. You should take him up on his offer and stop trying to go forward with this procedurally flawed RfC. There are other ways of resolving disputes on Knowledge, and Robert is well-versed in them.
6392:
could be attempted. LawNerd123 did write an RfC but it doesn't seem to have been done properly but in any case I'd suggest discussion before starting an RfC. Since this is now a CTOP issue, there's likely to be sanctions on both sides if editors continue down the current path.
5425:
policy, one of the key content policies, to basically sanction the preferred editorial process which may be conducive to accidental cherrypicking if misused; I reverted it, and now some of the same editors participating in the process and taking your side of the dispute from
7544:, where my proposal, based on several of my moves that had been reverted, failed to find a consensus.Ā And I've had some strong pushback on some other moves, which made getting to consensus slow and rancorous,Ā with long RM discussions (running to over 6 weeks in the case of
5668:, I'm sorry for simply attacking you. I didn't try to keep things civil and was more concerned with proving a perceived point than actually trying to reach a reasonable solution, which was out of character for me. I knew better but didn't do better, and for that, I'm sorry.
3572:
aren't ideologies, even though they overwhelming consensus for YEARS is that they should be at least included in that section of the infobox. He removes swaths of information with vague summaries that seem to imply his personal opinion and/or what looks good format-wise. š¤
2327:
When you make a report on a noticeboard, you're expected to stick around. The admins' noticeboards aren't places where you can fire and forget; they're places where you have to discuss what the problem you're having that's escalated so quickly you had to bring it there is
2000:
6953:
True, good research that. People are regularly blinded by authority; our elections have no reason to be exempt. I'm increasingly minded to let AI pick our admins; it would certainly resolve a lot of the issues RfA is regularly accused of possessing. Perhaps a little too
4018:
POINT requires disruption, I am simply seeking clarification. As I said to her, she is INVOLVED, but she disputes this, and insists it is a formal warning, I did offer not to have to do this, but essentially my hand was forced by her insistence that she is not INVOLVED.
6095:
while this is not the first time that the Japanese discussion is brought up here, what happened on jawiki stays on jawiki, especially if there is no conclusive device information to tie the accounts together. You are welcome to bring up new sock puppet allegations that
6864:. Speaking entirely as a individual member of the community, I encourage people to start thinking about running. By the time the official announcements come out, it's already kind of late to be thinking about it, so the purpose of this is just to get people primed.
6166:
where this all started? If so, to what capacity would I be involved? I just finished reading up on how ArbCom works and what it's meant for, and if I'm being completely honest, I'm pretty scared of being a "main character" in such. I have no real idea what to expect.
7497:
I've gotten over 100 thanks over that time period, too (nearly 200 over the last year), which makes me think I'm doing something right.Ā I've also been able to reduce over-capitalization on many thousands of articles via a couple of template edit requests, e.g. at
6448:'s talkpage to inform them of this discussion. As an interim step I recommend all users on this subject be restricted to 3 reverts on the subject as a whole in 24 hours and a bar on reverts that either give no explanation or label the previous change "vandalism".
5293:
I'm arguing that your edits imply a perspective on the topics and therefore neutrality and impartiality, or the appearance thereof, are lacking. Again, if I'm wrong, I apologize, but that was what I determined from the RTH thing, which perhaps I misinterpreted.
5230:
going to claim that admins are involved and it is going to be litigated, and they are acting in good faith because of the RTH decision. We can hair-split as to why X is involved and Y is not, but a perception lingers that we're in a mess of our own creation.
1833:
I understand, I was talking about getting consensus for changing the editnotice styling. A much more minor thing, but I preferred to make sure that there wasn't any opposition to it before going ahead, as there might have been support for the current styling.
4240:, and I was arguing that falafel is a food, and even if it's being used politically it should still be treated as a food, and it was clear an article was needed so that all these politics didn't need to be dealt with primarily at the food articles. I created
6881:
Also, if there is someone you'd like to see run, or if you want to know someone else's plans before making your own decision, I encourage you to get in touch with them now! For more information about the work involved with serving on the committee, see the
5832:
4409:
Just made hummus last night. There are nationalistic (and subnationalistic) food fights everywhere there are people in conflict with someone who eats some of the same things they do. Which is pretty much anyone who is in conflict with a neighboring nation.
8117:
Voorts' closure seems to suggest that just because both sides made policy-based arguments, that means those arguments are equivalent, when in fact one set of arguments was more convincing to the actual participants (as proven by the count of supporters).
6922:, but it's not a requirement and I agree that a fully engaged and thoughtful non-admin would be a more useful addition to the committee than somebody who has a mop but doesn't actively participate. So, yes, I encourage anybody who is interested to run.
2405:
These questions also apply to non-current-events articles, but with current-events articles, the articles become outdated and incorrect rather quickly as new sources are constantly being published (which is not the case for non-current-events articles).
5813:
where only 3 people gave input, but I believe that to be for reasons of offending Japanese sensibilities. On Japanese Knowledge I have had a target on my back for a while for attempting to bring the Nanking Massacre article in line with the English
8523:, who described it as entirely promotional, and it will be deleted based on the votes. I respect his NPP work and acknowledge that his efforts greatly help reduce the backlog, but consistently marking these types of articles is not a good practice.
3540:
information, and, at a quick look, which is all I am prepared to do given your lack of evidence here, other edits seem similar. I can not find anything which is not a content issue that should be discussed on the talk page of the relevant article.
2424:
If editing anything would touch the same text that was included in a revert (even if fixing/addressing new issues) I would consider that a partial revert. Better to discuss on talk page, so that it doesnāt escalate or feel like a tit-for-tat. ~ š¦
7924:
I uninvolved in pretty much everything discussed in this thread and AFAIK, I have no personal history with Dicklyon. However the standards have always been that moves that may be controversial should be discussed first. Moves is one aware where
5903:
Your account was added to the Sockpuppeter on August 31, 2024 and I have no intention of tangling with your misconduct on the Japanese Knowledge, as I have been informed that the actions of the Japanese Knowledge have no effect on the English
2526:
to read it, but because it indicates the mess anyone closing probably fear awaits.) So I'm not particularly surprised anyone looking at closing who's even vaguely aware of the background goes "no way!" perhaps with some swear words thrown in.
2906:
issue in the first RfC in Jan. '23, it was contentious when this RfC started in June, and it's contentious now in September. I don't see a reason to think that that trend will have broken in six months. It's possible that there could be some
3366:
for details on our policy. All contributions need to be written in your own words. I have removed the content and deleted the revisions. Please do not re-copy them, and please do not copy content from news articles into Knowledge again.
1927:
and I've sent a notice on the relevant pages to participate here, it makes sense that the discussion on the style of the editnotice could continue here rather than move again. Although, if it's preferable to continue the discussion on
7569:- I've no problems with these tools being restored to Dicklyon, as long as they promise to not bypass the RM route (example RFCs) for page moves. PS - My name in the appeal, isn't "Good Day" & so would appreciate the correction.
6118:
Sure. As a way of cooling off, I won't be editing Assassin's Creed Shadows main page indefinitely. If that's okay, I'm now looking to continue the discussion on the talk page.Still think 0RR should be applied to Symphony Regalia as
6767:, has been globally locked for "lock evasion". So it's almost certainly a recreation by a sock. Given this, do you want the article to be deleted, or would you like to take responsibility for it and make sure it's in a good state?
2257:
This was not an RFC. There was no proposal and the text under the RFC heading was a verbose argument, not even trying to be neutral. This was pointed out to the editor by multiple others. The close as "not an RfC" is appropriate.
8528:
2661:
issue, but the broader community, when presented with the same issue, appears not to. Does the broader community (here) take precedence over the attendees of an RfC? Not necessarily; but who's got the appetite for another RfC?!
2393:
This is a bit of a perennial discussion, but I'm not sure if it's been discussed, at least recently, in a centralized location, and I'd like to solicit admins' views on how 1RR is supposed to work on a current events article.
6938:
for how non-admin candidates have fared in recent elections. In that time period there has always been at least one admin candidate who wasn't elected that got a greaterĀ % support than the highest placed non-admin candidate.
2290:
you don't need a closure review. You just need to discuss at the talk page and develop a new, better RfC question. The experienced users there, including RMC and WAID, can probably help you craft a neutral opening question.
7548:). So I'm going to avoid the military stuff entirely for a while.Ā There's plenty to be done elsewhere.Ā More generally, I'll be doing fewer moves and more just chipping away at cleanup edits, when I have JWB access again.
4035:
BTW, if she would just agree to abide by the plain meaning of INVOLVED (read, that she is), I will close and withdraw the thread, as I'm not seeking any action other than such a finding. She also, I didn't mention, created
3919:. She may have some good points, which I would be happy to consider as the friendly warning of a collegial editor, but she says it is a formal warning. Said admin has created and written the vast majority of the article
8137:
was to participate in that discussion). As I suggested on my talk page, I recommend trying to reach a compromise, for example, by including historical figures whom reliable historians refer to as benevolent dictators.
1740:
As Cambalachero said, edit notices cannot be edited by most users: "This is the page notice for Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk. This editnotice can only be created or edited by administrators, template editors, and page
6058:
They certainly both need CT designation and perhaps EC protection. My recommendation to the panel is in the case request, but I do think a CT desgination for culture war targets based on perceived DEI is appropriate.
8291:
inclusion needs to be achieved. There is pratically no difference between "no consensus for inclusion" and a general "no consensus" because both result in no inclusion. I'm not sure what the point of this review is.
5451:
I'm willing to keep responding to you here, but I'm not sure it's helpful to anyone at this point. Unless someone else thinks this back-and-forth is shedding light here, maybe we should discuss at your talk or mine?
7738:
was a bad close and should be reverted. There is clearly no consensus in that discussion - I understand these discussions are not a vote count, but that discussion is practically 50-50 between opposes and supports.
8411:, probably No Consensus is correct although I would have looked closely considering two of the four "Yes" votes were conditional. As a personal view I would have also removed that example section, it's not good.
6387:
over what's clearly a content dispute is troubling. Editors should continue the discussion and stop making mass changes to articles. Since it's been going on for a while with no clear result, perhaps some form of
7827:
in the block review. I'm not sure whether more time will fix the issues and get Dicklyon to realize that because he wants these changes, that doesn't necessarily mean they're needed and especially not at scale.
7610:, some going back more than a month, and they take a lot of editor time, so shouldn't be done when fixes are simple and uncontroversial; that's what I'll commit to stick to. But that's not what this is about.
2696:
A person should not believe in an "ism". He should believe in himself. John Lennon said it on his first solo album. "I don't believe in Beatles, I just believe in me." A good point there. After all, he was the
4340:
firmly believe that the discussion above dramatically changed the "norm" as to involvement - expanding it to entire topics rather than specifically the edits/content dispute/editors in question. However, as
7778:
When using a numerical model designation, the words following the designation should be left uncapitalized (for example, "M16 rifle" or "M6 bomb service truck") unless it is a proper noun (for example, M1
7705:
push the discussion. Yet despite having admitted that he has difficulty predicting when a move will be controversial, he's insistent in this very discussion that he will continue to make undiscussed moves
4455:
Not just places! Gender & sexuality, GMOs, Pseudoscience, Climate change, Complementary & alternative medicine, and COVID are all food related. We'll ping you back to AE for any gun control stuff.
4134:
This is why I'm at AN, I tried to extend an olive branch, but we're stuck here. How is it fair, then, therefore, that this thread is out of order? I offered a de-escalation path, and it isn't being taken.
2046:
2002:
3935:
applies to ARBPIA here. The article in question is not simply about food but includes such topics as Israeli history, cultural appropriation, and national identity, which is a similar topic of dispute at
799:
794:
8114:, I think there actually is a consensus. Voorts themselves says in the close that the exclude side had far more supporters and that some of their arguments were not answered by the side for inclusion.
7287:
6361:
5102:
I see a few people misinterpreting my close of the RTH thread and how that precedent (if it even is one) would be applied here. If the arguments made here were identical, the rough equivalent would be
1695:
The usual answer to the question "can someone do something?" is "who do you expect to do anything if not you?" If you don't have the technical skills needed can you at least suggest something better?
713:
2343:
8255:. If I had been closing the RFC, I would have found No Consensus, and would have advised that the inclusion of any specific person and the specific historian be discussed on the article talk page,
4352:
should be updated to discuss involvement in a topic area (rather than in specific disputes), the current norm as defined by the RTH discussion above should be equally applied here. -bÉ:Ź³kÉnhÉŖmez |
7968:āSomeone above says: "poorly researched decapitalization moves". Really? I find his research thorough and balanced, and his knowledge of MOSCAPS good as well. A net significant benefit to en.WP.
7299:
7052:
3206:
User is creating more hoax content and making malicious edits. In one article, he changed "three" to "almost four" for no reason. He's clearly not here and I've sent him on his way.--v/r -
8431:
4327:
have happened over about the last year, Valereee has created a quite decent article that covers the topic (politics of food/identity) over the entire history of the conflict. It covers from
2134:
7286:
A year ago, in September 2023, I was indefinitely banned from using AWB/JWB or other semi-automated editing tools, due to my not-careful-enoughĀ fast edits that resulted in some errors; see
4056:
And this is why we need to be careful about how we define involved. Nominating an article about a dish for deletion isn't a political act. The dish is apparently not independently notable.
3076:
If he had checked the edit history of MY personal sandbox, he would know it's fictional, plus, it doesn:t matter if it's a hoax, that's why it's a personal sandbox, i'm not gonna upload it
2480:
2028:
8026:
has a history of adding unsourced content to pages and not following the manual of styles of Knowledge. They fail to engage in consensus building as they never respond in their talk page.
6379:
6261:
Would an admin who feels competent to deal with the topic listed please contact me privately via email? I can't say I always know when I'm out of my league, but I sometimes do. Thanks!
2330:. Perhaps an admin could leave them a message as to expectations. Which do not generally include, when one has been effectively editing for only six weeks, to spend most of one's time on
7525:.Ā Each link on those pages goes to the "what links here" list of links (from article space only, as I've already dealt with links from templates for most of them).Ā Some of these (like
2449:
6285:
7372:
find, with how many moves resulted (total looks like about 380, not counting the 400 or so NFL Draft pages that were moved from an RFC that closed in Feb.); working backwards in time:
3865:. It feels like you have issues with evolving language and you should learn to work with others equally, whether they be 14, 47, and 74, and like the English language, we evolve too.
2958:; there's no chance we won't be back here in a few months so we might as well skip the intermediate steps of the close-review-review-review and the close-review-review-review-review.
8343:
6-4 is not a consensus. It's a nocon. Assuming there weren't irregularities or obvious policy wins here, which is a discretionary matter. Or, basically, per Star Mississippi and CFA
5869:
This is false. It was not the reason for my block, which is why the CheckUser did not block. As mentioned above, I was blocked based on very vague RfC where only 3 editors gave input
7517:
What I intend to start on with JWB is fixing links to miscapitalized redirects that have dozens to hundreds of incoming links.Ā I've compiled partial lists of things to work on at
7317:
when there's any pushback (with the exception of some personal attacks against me from two editors who didn't like my changes and proposed changes on some military gear articles).
6457:
6073:
I would like to point out that Symphony Regalia's behavior is inappropriate for a controversial topic. Not only the recent editorial behavior, but also mentioned repeatedly in the
1932:, I am not categorically opposed to it either. I'm not sure the embedded FAQ page was even a point of contention, the issue is really about the font size on the editnotice itself.
4392:
3793:
There are folks of a certain age who still talk this way. I also know a lady who refers to her best friend as "My girlfriend" and younger people who hear it think she's queer. As
5203:
Valereee is clearly not involved in ARBPIA. I hope this doesn't become a trend where people start coming here to get admins declared involved when they have a dispute with them.
4228:
I'll accept it if the community thinks I'm involved, but I edit around food. I seldom get into anything political except for the intersection of food and nationalism. I created
6232:
6207:
4715:
The current discussion is about sources for the lead of Zionism and whether it fairly describes it as colonization. You can see that the article she wrote includes this text,
4346:
Technically, the policy and guideline pages are not the policy and guidelines in and of themselves. The actual policies and guidelines are behaviors practiced by most editors.
6507:
tag. I just did that with both unresponded requests. I doubt many administrators keep a close eye on that page; the tag categorizes the page in a much more viewed category.
7847:. The encyclopedia would be far better off if Dicklyon never made another edit pertaining to page moves or capitalization, and instead worked on entirely different things.
5252:
politics. If Valereee were just editing about hummus' reception and its recipes, I wouldn't say a word. But I myself have edited about the topic of the politics of falafel
3923:
which goes into detail about exactly that topic: Israeli and Palestinian nationalism and so on, and not in a minor or trivial way. In light of the recent discussion above (
7772:, and that was that. Not a huge disruption. Concurrently, with the gun motor carriages, I learned that in general a couple of MILHIST guys strongly reject the advice at
6147:
Is this dispute within the scope of the recently opened ArbCom case? If so, should this thread be closed, with instructions to the parties to submit evidence to ArbCom?
6074:
5787:
8472:
7294:, and I'm told that this is the place to ask,Ā even though it's a community issue, not an admin issue.Ā I have also waited for more than 6 months after the kerfuffle with
3556:
here he removed several ideologies from an infobox for "not political ideologies" (including Anti Zionism and Islamic democracy, which ARE ideologies or political beliefs
2144:
8467:. I inquired how it meets the notability criteria and why he marked it as reviewed. The film article only cites Times of India (TOI), which is considered unreliable per
8225:
and voorts closed it on 13 September. My involvement is that I drafted the RFC. I was neutral, and was acting as a mediator, but consider myself an involved editor.
6300:
6251:
4851:
There's very few things in PIA that don't tie in to the current war. It's not true in the opposite direction: I don't think a lot of edits to conflict-related parts of
4174:
was on the article talk page, about all the accusations of cherrypicking, before I came to their talk with the second warning. It's a really long talk page. 75K words.
7735:
7545:
7395:
3754:
1537:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
5882:
Your first edit was a week ago, and yet you are also demonstrating knowledge of things like SpecialAuth, RfCs, archived discussions on separate wikis, and so on. Why?
1884:(we're currently at 10) that had been repeatedly opened and closed without consensus for a move, which at that point was becoming disruptive, tiring, and repetitive (
7302:).Ā I've kept my nose clean since then (as far as I can find, nobody has brought me up at AN or ANI in the last year, as they had done a few times the year before).
6682:
6227:
3779:
are defined exclusively in the modern pejorative sense. These words did not always automatically carry the connotation of infidelity or someone being a third party.
1625:
765:
6162:
Pardon me for asking, but if this case were taken to ArbCom, would my involvement in such be required due to me being a part of the original discussion/argument on
5559:
on AN3 (note: user was warned by multiple people). User registered in 2017, and then made their first edit a week ago to strong-arm poorly sourced nationalist POVs/
4004:
yourself (from an uninvolved region perhaps in the Atlantic) and call it day. You could have thanked Valereee for the advice (as you did) and left it at that. ~ š¦
2845:
I'm here asking for a few brave volunteers to step up and close this mess, and I and two others have just begged everyone to not relitigate, and you want to, what,
2187:
was trying to salvage it for you. (Also, why do you think there is a significant difference between a 'no consensus' outcome and a 'procedural close' outcome?) --
7499:
5783:
3733:
2653:'s point is a good one, to clarify: we have a situation in which those who took part in an RfC appear to have decided (with some room for dispute, of course) that
2452:
was reƶpened (correctly, IMO) on 18 August. Well, less reƶpened and more un-closed, since it's sitting in an archive. An edit just came across my watchlist citing
229:
5870:
5811:
5279:
at an entire CTOP if the two ever edited the same article barely within that topic, even if they didn't have any interaction, much less dispute, at that article?
3815:
2231:
8078:
I left a warning at their talk. Ping me in a new message at their talk with a problematic diff if issues continue. In the future, this kind of report belongs at
5514:
942:
7900:
Dicklyon's approach, as he acknowledges above, has sometimes been suboptimal but his actions usually have much more support in the P&G than his opponents. (
2440:
1917:
8690:
8504:
6222:
5736:
4813:
has edited extensively enough in the topic area to be considered involved in everything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. I do think there's evidence that
3224:
This IP 199.119.233.223 (who is almost certainly the blocked editor Kelownatopdog) has engaged in a number of personal attacks in his edit summaries, see here
1669:
1653:
1545:
417:
7824:
5810:
I did not. A CheckUser was performed and the sock puppet allegations were not substantiated because they aren't true. I was blocked based on a comment request
4282:
2278:
1593:
8023:
7437:
7377:
6721:
6620:
5550:
5046:
Not only is that not relevant, but it can't be discussed. But I can say it was unrelated to this topic above, ie not for an ARBPIA topic ban or involvement.
4366:
the only evidence presented against RTH above consisted of a few wording changes that ultimately were not that significant of contributions to the topic area
4237:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1068:
946:
824:
756:
488:
8446:
5128:. If the edits are confined to one narrow piece of an incredibly broad topic area, then involvement should also be narrow where that's reasonably possible.
4773:
food" is a better summary of sources is the same dispute as whether Zionism is colonialist. Loosely related, sure. But "broadly construed" is not infinite.
6935:
6491:
6215:
Community Tech has grouped some related wishes we received in the past 2 months at the Community Wishlist into problem areas (which we call focus areas).
4989:
RESULT: involved in "the topic of the 2023- Israeli-Palestinian conflict ... no consensus that this involvement spreads to all of the WP:ARBPIA topic area"
3959:
If the community believes I'm involved, it's a friendly collegial editor warning about behavioral concerns, which really you should take just as seriously.
2473:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1077:
8621:
Yeah, you are right, but the Times of India alone canāt make any subject notable due to the questionable reliability. Also, the TOI sources cited in the
7190:
If you have email attached to each, you may reset your password. Otherwise, it takes contacting the WMF Trust and Safety team, which is not a guarantee.
3059:
2675:
1521:
1059:
375:
174:
5336:
3362:
While I appreciate your efforts to contribute, you cannot simply copy content from news articles into Knowledge. That is a violation of copyright - see
8274:
7306:
7044:
1643:
1186:
1064:
8322:
of close. There is no consensus in that discussion and this isn't a situation where a firm consensus is likely since the matter itself is subjective.
5557:
5494:
5120:
be, since a lot of the language and culture has shifted since it was written. Topics with Discretionary Sanctions were often tightly defined, such as
3714:, those are examples of what I was talking about in my last post: content issues that should be discussed on the talk pages of the relevant articles.
3590:
3550:
1388:
8421:
6985:
6694:
6686:
6443:
6416:
5961:
5197:
3419:
3003:
2342:
by Cambial Yellowing for personal attacksāwhich was responded to with some belligerenceāand now tying multiple editors up not only on the talk page,
2312:
2285:
2154:
2126:
2050:
930:
925:
920:
915:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
885:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
7700:'s requirement that you must use the discussion process first if "someone could reasonably disagree with the move". His decapitalization attempt of
5136:
2122:
8751:
8239:
8157:
7015:
6690:
5664:
Yeah, my bad. I think I'll distance myself from controversial articles in general and stick to copyedits for now, and I'll stick to the 0RR. Also @
4694:
I agree that Valereee is involved with respect to the question of whether Israelis have appropriated Arab food. Is that what she warned you about?
3806:
Anyway, the respective Wiki pages must be edited by a skilled writer so past understandings of these words are acknowledged. Who's up to the task?
3503:
2078:
1749:
is the primary edit notice that the other one transcludes to. (In any case, this discussion seems to have become the edit request by default.) --
937:
617:
266:
133:
101:
8127:
6514:
8333:
5112:. Note that I haven't evaluated the actual edits made by Valeree so I'm not saying this is or isn't what the result should be here. I also think
5040:
2547:
more importantly, seen to be doneāwrit large. And then there will be another massive discussion about the reclose of the reopening of the close.
1529:
820:
752:
407:
8716:
6415:
What errors were made, so that they can be remedied. I followed all of the instructions and it was listed in the RfC page but no one commented.
4907:
If you had topic banned me from the ARBPIA, and then I added some stuff to hummus about cultural appropriation, that'd be a violation, correct?
3171:
I think they might mean HHW, Hypothetical Hurricanes Wiki. I linked them there, since it seemed like that's what they wanted to write about. --
2718:
2689:
2645:
2611:
6971:
6698:
5220:
3951:
3657:
The š¤š¤š¤ emojis appear like they are directed at whoever's reading your signature. I recommend removing them to avoid any misunderstandings.
3213:
3085:
2892:(without all the baggage) to see if things have changed in 6 months or so. This just doesn't seem like a problem that can be solved right now.
1825:
370:
8789:
8674:
8640:
8616:
8268:
7674:
7660:
6929:
6142:
6068:
5402:
An edit to NPOV is a completely new question, and I don't see how it's even relevant to the question of whether I'm involved at Talk:Zionism.
4844:
4533:
4515:
4501:
4483:
4469:
4430:
is the authentic version. Taiwan thinks its cuisine is the only true remaining traditional Chinese cuisine. Armenia and Azerbaijan both claim
3433:
3301:
3034:
2780:+1. This debate has already spiraled badly out of control between the RfC and close review, the last thing we need is yet another discussion.
1990:
1964:
8546:
7769:
6997:
6887:
6385:
6280:
5691:
5185:
4998:
4229:
3920:
3652:
3386:
3348:
3140:
3077:
8133:
I'm not sure why I wrote that one side far outnumbered the other; this was a 6Ā ā 4 discussion (excluding one yes !vote from an editor whose
7603:
7005:
6913:
6176:
5519:
Although not violating 3RR, Symphony Regalia has been actively trying to censor Assassin's Creed Shadows in a manner that is controversial.
5089:
4901:
4882:
3685:
3663:
2584:
2560:
1950:
8564:
8415:
8379:
8183:
8091:
7839:
7485:
7461:
7407:
7185:
6292:
5181:
4593:
4572:
4037:
3834:
3375:
2418:
1852:
1811:
1796:
1758:
1733:
1718:
1704:
1690:
7160:
7108:
5075:
2987:
8783:
8668:
8610:
8354:
7132:
6868:
So hopefully we'll have a larger field this year, with more vigorous competition, and can attract some new and enthusiastic candidates.
6738:
6552:
6462:
6383:
3530:
3028:
1775:
1307:
436:
209:
51:
8045:
format and the user changed the date format from DMY to MDY on multiple Brazilian tv program pages, ignoring the fact that the template
7560:
6086:
5941:
5926:
5898:
5864:
5846:
5826:
5799:
5777:
5601:
5587:
4309:
This is exactly the slippery slope that myself and others tried to warn about in the recent discussion. Ultimately, Valereee has edited
3856:
1508:
8403:
8072:
6532:
5320:
5270:
5239:
4557:
RTH argued his creation of Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (27 Oct 2023) had nothing to do with the Israel-Hamas war (7 OctāPresent)
4377:
4360:
2139:
1866:
1412:
1181:
446:
365:
214:
7892:
7606:
most recently. In general, when a move is unlikely to be controversial, moving without an RM is preferred. There's typically a huge
6424:
5807:, you are oddly familiar with the intracities of Japanese wikipedia, SpecialAuth, and so on. If there is a sock here it is likely you.
5506:
5160:
4197:
4183:
4165:
4129:
4115:
4099:
3268:
3254:
2966:
2936:
2900:
2753:
2520:
2338:, pushing something ideological, lots of bin Ladin and misunderstandings of original research, POV commentary and editing, as well as
789:
8706:
7958:
7790:
7757:
7727:
7654:
6965:
6907:
6697:
is admin protected. Welp, after taking a look at the past move logs (including today's userfication) and the relevant AFD discussion
6574:
6199:
5057:
4897:
4840:
4631:
4529:
4497:
4465:
3987:
3970:
3276:
2712:
2669:
2639:
2578:
2554:
2496:
2369:
2300:
2072:
411:
8313:
8151:
8011:
7994:
7939:
7856:
7151:
and current username. BTW, if you check my edit history under new account, it is obvious it is an experienced editor, not novice. --
6948:
6324:
You are also required to notify this editor of the discussion here on their talk page per the instructions at the top of this page.
5716:
4923:
Sure. However, if I (or rather some current admin) topic-banned you from hummus, it would not be a violation to edit about Zionism.
4450:
4404:
4395:
I would agree we are in comparable territory then with current question here. This whole conversation is making me hungry now. ~ š¦
4260:
4051:
4030:
4013:
3239:
2434:
2317:
felt it necessary to waste everyone's time with this 'report'. Noting that they haven't edited since, so this was by way of being a
7264:
7232:
7202:
6833:
6808:
6780:
6156:
6031:
5677:
5461:
5446:
5411:
5399:
I think it's typical for an admin to discuss and deal with behavior issues. All of my work at Talk:Zionism has been about behavior.
5394:
5377:
5358:
5305:
5288:
5025:
4296:
4276:
4213:
4146:
4082:
4065:
3490:
3180:
3040:
2886:
2865:
2829:
2535:
194:
7633:
7619:
7592:
7578:
6410:
3889:
3723:
2775:
1436:
7916:
7081:
6895:
6256:
6128:
6113:
4939:
4918:
4789:
4767:
4751:
4730:
4710:
4689:
4670:
2375:
2304:
2272:
2225:
1577:
1561:
537:
307:
7979:
7815:
6662:
2799:
2196:
8514:
8487:
marked as reviewed by BoyTheKingCanDance, which is why it had not been nominated for deletion since its creation on August 13.
8451:
8283:: There was clearly no consensus here, even if all arguments were weighted equally. 6ā4 is not consensus for anything. And per
8199:
8173:
8097:
7537:, which might be linked as part of the proper name of a title or organization, for example), but still JWB will be a big help.
6598:
6573:
That is not appropriate for a decline of a request of protection. @Moxy: The rationale for the decline is sound but I'll watch
6559:
6382:
so it seems there isn't really refusal to discuss from either side. However both sides calling the other vandals ("vandalism")
6373:
6355:
6337:
5527:
3907:
3464:
3450:
3292:
3166:
3148:
3134:
3108:
2249:
1894:(Speaking of which, that discussion needs a close; if anyone here would like to volunteer, they are welcome to do so ā there's
1746:
1460:
530:
302:
224:
6319:
5659:
5645:
5478:
5080:
No, that feels relevant to at least ask. I was curious about it as well given the whole backstory. So no problem in checking.
4756:
Broadly construed, she was involved in a dispute about an article about Israeli national identity construction (ie, Zionism).
3409:
8234:
6637:
6586:
5752:
4391:(27 Oct 2023) had nothing to do with the Israel-Hamas war (7 OctāPresent) which the community disagreed with. If there was a
3326:
3314:
463:
204:
143:
8460:
6875:
6793:
6707:
5758:
5340:
7025:
6732:
6540:
5914:
5740:
1484:
542:
282:
199:
8160:
on this same issue in January 2023. Reaching a compromise would prevent this page from going through upheaval every year.
5852:
4735:
So, no, she is not acting as an administrator regarding something she has been in a dispute over, even broadly construed.
2849:, a month after the fact, for being vaguely "out of process"? For heavens' sake. Please go write an article or something.
2175:
1656:. Yes, I get that there have been several move requests and that it is a controversial discussion, but does it need to be
7503:
7455:
7389:
6568:
6011:
4717:
trategy has prompted accusations of colonization of Arab and Middle Eastern culture and cultural appropriation by Israel.
4285:
clearly shows there are many fraught political issues of identity and cultural appropriation which are hardly clear-cut.
4001:
2816:
It should've remained closed under the original closure. It's obvious the revert of the closure was done out of process.
1831:
The consensus is on the result of the move discussions, that the edit notice informs about, and which I'm not discussing.
1553:
1371:
1312:
402:
327:
182:
113:
8511:): A BLP, marked as reviewed by him, uses Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram as sources, along with a single profile link.
5421:
only an accusation but can be an unconscious bias or an unintentional blind spot. THEN you went on to try to change the
3916:
8253:
5724:
4966:
4388:
4281:
FWIW, lest anyone invoke POINT again, I made a few edits to said article, and I left a note on the talk there. I think
2388:
1986:
1946:
1848:
1792:
1467:
1395:
515:
510:
495:
332:
322:
287:
158:
3563:
8059:
Their lack of interest in the messages on their talk page has prompted me to open this discussion. Is this a case of
7887:
7419:
6802:, delete it then. I have many works to do, but may look at it or request the material when writing articles. Cheers!
5331:
Maybe this doesn't change anything but there's a thread now about changing policy that came out of the discussion at
3677:
3644:
3630:
3582:
3522:
2096:
1585:
1419:
520:
453:
349:
342:
292:
7072:. I don't use those accounts now. Can I get rollback rights? Under my current account, I have made only 200+ edits.
3228:
3225:
8501:
sources, no critical reviews, and includes citations from YouTube and BookMyShow, which are user-generated sources.
8375:
6883:
5908:
3559:
3429:
2983:
2607:
2102:
1955:
I don't know about this notice but there have been concerns raised in the past that people tend to ignore notices.
781:
637:
153:
118:
8625:
article do not provide significant coverage (SIGCOV), so even if I consider TOI reliable, it still wouldnāt work.
6014:). It's likely that another TBAN could be coming their direction, as their behaviour is sometimes disruptive (See
1778:) to get a wider consensus on what's the best way to write the editnotice. (Edit: Relevant alerts have been sent)
8804:
8779:
8664:
8606:
8207:
7518:
7278:
6861:
6049:
5193:
4244:
for the same reason. As far as I can remember I've demonstrated no interest in working in PIA separate from food.
3786:
was commonly used as a synonym for longtime lover (it's since been replaced with "partner" or what have you) and
3024:
2090:
2084:
1491:
1317:
554:
505:
458:
317:
239:
128:
44:
8490:
After checking BoyTheKingCanDance's curation log, one can immediately find multiple incorrect reviews, such as:
6306:
Please provide diffs showing (1) vandalis; (2) refusal to engage in discussion; and (3) "conspiratorial" ideas.
3394:
3356:
1601:
7529:) will be mostly quick and easy to fix with JWB. Some others will require a lot of individual attention (e.g.
7522:
7449:
4980:
4861:
4322:
the actual on-wiki dispute they are commenting in or taking administrator action on is related to that article
1443:
441:
385:
337:
256:
219:
8697:
definitely should not have been marked as reviewed. Two very poor articles, sourced to Facebook is laughable.
8213:
8054:
6762:
2945:
towards (at least not without a ton more drama than we've already had). I think the Knowledge equivalent of a
2354:; they have chosen, unfortunately, not to follow that advice. So now I suspect we are in the realms of WP:CIR
7648:
7607:
6959:
6901:
6501:
6471:
6464:
4893:
4836:
4525:
4493:
4461:
3443:
2706:
2663:
2633:
2572:
2548:
2363:
2296:
2113:
2066:
1617:
261:
249:
244:
8103:
6750:
6343:
1895:
8739:
8560:
8392:
8256:
8195:
8169:
8147:
7905:
7065:
6756:
6633:
6440:
There seems to be a lot of poor use of discussion all over, including poor notifications. I have posted on
6389:
6362:
Knowledge:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Historical_elections_closed
6333:
6315:
4627:
3852:
3711:
3669:
3636:
3616:
3574:
3514:
3382:
3372:
3340:
3162:
3130:
3104:
2362:
both, and neither of which is conducive to collaborative consensus building in an already-difficult topic.
2171:
1771:
1649:
1633:
525:
395:
187:
17:
8036:
5739:.Especially considering that Symphony Regalia has been Blocked indefinitely on the Japanese Knowledge for
5253:
4188:
Ah, I see. I do not have a positive or negative thing to say about that warning on the article talk page.
2331:
2047:
Talk:United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#RfC_for_United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#Syria
2003:
Talk:United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#RfC_for_United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism#Syria
7541:
7479:
7473:
6275:
5805:
5731:
seems to have referenced the noticeboard discussion in Reverting.This is coupled with the coincidence of
5539:
5535:
5531:
5523:
5347:
and other commentary, which to me, suggests that Valereee is a participant and not an impartial arbiter.
5345:
5343:
3743:
2266:
2019:
1821:
743:
690:
390:
70:
8052:
8050:
5107:
in the topic of food as it relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, no consensus that it spreads to all of
4151:
Well, I know, that's what I said. But you brought that up 4 1/2 hours later... your intial warning was
3507:
8765:
8722:
8650:
8592:
8555:
sources including Facebook, Instagram, etc. I routinely point out that YouTube is not a RS. Thank you.
8508:
8328:
8068:
8034:
7834:
7764:
7701:
7467:
7413:
7349:
6857:
6829:
6776:
6744:
6657:
6528:
6511:
6453:
6064:
5894:
5822:
5773:
5757:
You've already been rebuked over this false implication and your contentious behavior by another editor
5687:
5583:
5189:
5169:
4648:
in which they have been involved.Ā ... Involvement is construed broadly by the community to includeĀ ...
4616:
This is exactly the slippery slope that myself and others tried to warn about in the recent discussion.
3054:
3010:
1609:
739:
312:
138:
123:
108:
78:
37:
8111:
7689:
8264:
8230:
7365:
7298:
that resulted in a string of four short blocks on me, including two for personal attacks on him (see
7144:
6981:
6485:
6163:
6152:
6053:
6041:
6003:
5987:
5707:(for most purposes including this one) owned by the user concerned, so point two is a nothingburger.
5630:
There is no rule that says your preferred version gets to stay active until the discussion is over.
5564:
5493:
The Zionism talk page rather suggests a dispute with everyone else there. Also a (non) discussion at
5071:
4956:
4566:
3830:
3510:
3219:
2245:
1960:
297:
148:
5256:
4559:. I would appreciate that you link to the diff where I did so, because I don't think that I have. ā
8517:: A BLP article, which he marked as reviewed without nominating it for AfD, was later nominated by
7291:
6726:
5983:
5782:
There is no doubt that you did engage in Sockpuppet behavior before. I hope any decision will take
5732:
4889:
4832:
4521:
4489:
4457:
3555:
2292:
2061:
1766:
I can do it if there's consensus, although it could be good to put an alert at the relevant pages (
571:
483:
8571:
Just to clarify one point Times of India is not considered unreliable, there is a consensus that
8556:
8452:
7946:
7345:
5999:
5956:
4171:
3368:
2347:
2339:
1913:
1569:
671:
7053:
Knowledge talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard Ā§Ā Changes to the CheckUser team, September 2024
5524:
Ignore existing discussions and attempt to delete large amounts of text without any discussion.
3230:. This is clearly a case of not being here to build an encyclopedia. Thank you for your time. --
2409:
So what is the best practice here? How do I edit a current events article without crossing 1RR?
1816:
What makes it disruptive? Also for the record were you supportive or opposed to that consensus?
8702:
8580:
8046:
8017:
7260:
7228:
7181:
7176:
I have forgot the passwords of those accounts. Is there any way by which I can recover them? --
7156:
7077:
6474:
has an unanswered request from 10 days ago and my request has been sitting for a week. Thanks,
5712:
5316:
5235:
5121:
5031:
Why was the Andrevan account indefinitely blocked by Arbcom, and why was the account unblocked?
4415:
4357:
4265:
It's a good article, but it's also extensively about politics and issues of potential dispute.
3719:
3668:
ok fair but barging into an AN discussion to complain about my signature is incredibly rude š¤
3546:
3506:
has engaged in disruptive editing on articles of political parties, and engaging in edit wars.
2492:
2260:
2192:
1982:
1942:
1889:
1844:
1817:
1807:
1788:
1754:
1729:
1714:
1700:
1686:
1665:
1330:
723:
650:
500:
60:
3843:
and do it. Asking others to make edits for you almost never works. We're all volunteers here.
8725:? It's been open for a while, and I think Izno's on a wikibreak/is busy rn to implement it. ā
8468:
8323:
8123:
8064:
7884:
7829:
7401:
7383:
7128:
7104:
6652:
6508:
6449:
6060:
6025:
5991:
5890:
5831:
You are permanently banned so of course you cannot edit Japanese Knowledge with this account.
5818:
5769:
5683:
5665:
5625:
5618:
too for their false accusations on the talk page. I suggest you two voluntarily commit to a
5579:
5502:
4579:
4193:
4161:
4095:
3931:
does include even fairly small edits, and this is no small edit, I would like to find out if
3484:
3092:
3049:
1745:
at Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk, then it might have been missed as
7781:
So, those are all going to be controversial, which is why I'm going to stay away from them.
7300:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive360#Dicklyon temporarily blocked for incivility
8443:
8412:
8371:
8260:
8226:
8179:
7745:
7715:
7431:
7059:
6977:
6479:
6420:
6247:
6172:
6148:
5728:
5673:
5259:
in everything about the conflict, the two of us have become involved due to similar edits.
5085:
5067:
5036:
4560:
4414:
is claimed by Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, North Macedonia, and Serbia. There's conflict at
4384:
3966:
3826:
3799:
3423:
3363:
3264:
3235:
3176:
2979:
2685:
2603:
2241:
2158:
2130:
1956:
1332:
6104:
if any. Otherwise, don't bring this up again or repeatedly. It does not look good on you.
5166:
4888:
You've reminded me again that I'm hungry and impressed with Turturro's career turnaround.
4849:
If we're quoting our comments from the last thread, mine now feels a bit too on the nose:
3790:
was synonymous for romance between an unmarried couple (now we call it a "relationship").
3400:
I've indeffed the YM Gud for pagemove vandalism and clearly not being here to improve WP.
8:
8007:
7991:
7954:
7935:
7852:
6944:
6851:
6406:
6398:
6109:
5575:
5556:
This is a frivolous posting that is retaliation over me reporting the user's edit warring
5431:
4934:
4877:
4784:
4746:
4705:
4665:
4589:
4400:
4009:
3880:
3811:
3749:
3536:
You need to provide some more evidence. The example you gave was of this editor removing
3472:
3250:
2931:
2860:
2770:
2749:
2531:
2468:
2430:
2351:
2025:
2013:
1885:
1802:
myself if it wasn't for the detail that editnotices can only be edited by certain users.
473:
380:
74:
8645:
I agree, just wanted to clarify the situations in regard to TOI as it's a bit murky. --
6233:
Help newer contributors understand the status and rationale behind a moderation decision
3385:
article, please see the article, the article has also been improved better from before.
2941:
I largely agree with you, I just don't think we can even agree what goal we should have
8350:
8087:
7823:
the responses here and discussions linked therein seem to indicate the same problems I
7786:
7688:
that nobody else will have the time or energy to contest them and clean up his messes.
7670:
7615:
7588:
7556:
7530:
7425:
7361:
6926:
6872:
6582:
6191:
6036:
The panel has my full support. Frankly the ArbCom case couldn't have come soon enough.
5457:
5442:
5407:
5390:
5373:
5354:
5342:
Not sure if this now substantiates that we are in a dispute. See also discussion there
5301:
5284:
5266:
5212:
5173:
5130:
5113:
5104:
5053:
5021:
4986:
The four articles listed above are all among RTH's top 30 most-edited articles all time
4914:
4763:
4726:
4685:
4639:
4511:
4479:
4446:
4373:
4349:
4292:
4272:
4256:
4209:
4179:
4142:
4125:
4111:
4078:
4061:
4047:
4026:
3983:
3947:
3932:
3928:
2960:
2894:
2571:
Present company excepted; I didn't spot that Tamzin had already mentioned a panel Ā :)
2506:
2450:
Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 444 Ā§Ā RFC: The Telegraph on trans issues
2414:
2210:
1909:
1862:
1677:
727:
627:
597:
582:
478:
234:
6785:
It's just another recreation by another sock now globally locked for block evasion.--
6239:
We intend to share these areas with the Moderator Tools Team for their consideration.
590:
8698:
8479:
8432:
Knowledge talk:Responding to threats of harm#Why does it say "contact another admin"?
8060:
7865:
7773:
7629:
7574:
7256:
7224:
7177:
7152:
7073:
6815:
6804:
6715:
6703:
6545:
Is there a formal procedure or place to go to have a review of a protection request?
5872:, with clear political considerations at play (Nanking Massacre article involvement).
5708:
5571:
5312:
5231:
4973:
4353:
4241:
3715:
3542:
3498:
3446:
2788:
2515:
2488:
2318:
2188:
1973:
1933:
1881:
1835:
1803:
1779:
1750:
1725:
1710:
1696:
1682:
1661:
8215:. The closure was against including examples. In July 2024, a request was made at
7288:
WP:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1139#Dicklyon and semi-automated edits
5532:
Ignore the compromises that have been reached and insist that they are controversial
5149:'s editing activity does not rise to the level of involvement in any dispute around
4618:
But, I disagree that the RTH discussion should be viewed as some sort of precedent.
8735:
8635:
8584:
8541:
8498:
8388:
8191:
8165:
8143:
8119:
7926:
7901:
7879:
7869:
7329:
7198:
7124:
7100:
7040:
7001:
6891:
6629:
6369:
6351:
6329:
6311:
6019:
5995:
5642:
5560:
5498:
5157:
5125:
5108:
4623:
4189:
4157:
4091:
3997:
3848:
3772:
3477:
3390:
3352:
3311:
3210:
3158:
3144:
3126:
3100:
3081:
2184:
2167:
1969:
1905:
8049:
indicates what date format should be used. These are some of the edits they made:
7321:
5244:
If I'm wrong I'm wrong and I apologize. But it would seem that the article is not
1857:
If anything, the notice isn't big enough considering the volume of move requests.
1709:
I understood that editnotices can only be edited by admins, that's why I ask here
8694:
8483:
8435:
8365:
7974:
7810:
7740:
7710:
7491:
7333:
7325:
7194:
6643:
6380:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies#Notional election results
6296:
6271:
6243:
6168:
6124:
6082:
5937:
5922:
5860:
5842:
5795:
5748:
5669:
5655:
5613:
5597:
5546:
5536:
Because of the previous point, I initiated the RfC and informed Symphony Regalia.
5081:
5063:
5032:
3962:
3460:
3405:
3260:
3231:
3172:
2973:
2916:
2876:
2835:
2819:
2702:
2681:
2650:
2629:
2597:
2335:
8572:
8494:
8284:
8259:. That is the advice that I will give to both of the parties to the dispute.
8003:
7988:
7950:
7931:
7848:
7685:
7511:
7443:
7020:
Following a request to the Arbitration Committee, the CheckUser permissions of
6940:
6825:
6772:
6524:
6402:
6394:
6105:
5817:
None of this is relevant as I haven't edited on Japanese Knowledge in a while.
5435:
a toe out of line you are sanctioned or blocked. Also, there need to be diffs.
5422:
4585:
4550:
4396:
4005:
3868:
3840:
3807:
3344:
3246:
3245:
I blocked for a year given the previous block record and likely block evasion.
2745:
2527:
2426:
709:
663:
7707:
when fixes are simple and uncontroversial; that's what I'll commit to stick to
7540:
I've had some trouble recently in the military history space, most notably at
7290:.Ā I think it's time to appeal that for reconsideration,Ā in the spirit of the
5855:, so what does it mean that I haven't edited on Japanese Knowledge in a while?
5066:: Entirely irrelevant and I encourage you to focus on the discussion at hand.
4202:
There was no additional activity by me between those two messages, was there?
1892:
passes, it will ensure stability and allow the editnotice to be more subdued.
1328:
8798:
8576:
8475:
at RSN. He then acknowledged his error and marked the article as unreviewed.
8345:
8308:
8249:
8216:
8212:
There was a previous RFC started in October 2022 and closed in January 2023:
8134:
8083:
8079:
8030:
7782:
7697:
7693:
7666:
7611:
7599:
7584:
7552:
7526:
7357:
7337:
7279:
7148:
7069:
6923:
6919:
6869:
6856:
In about six weeks, arbcom election season will really get underway with the
6578:
6184:
6101:
6045:
6015:
5979:
5876:
5619:
5453:
5437:
5403:
5385:
5369:
5349:
5296:
5280:
5261:
5205:
5146:
5048:
5017:
4909:
4758:
4721:
4680:
4507:
4475:
4442:
4411:
4369:
4341:
4287:
4267:
4252:
4204:
4175:
4137:
4121:
4106:
4073:
4057:
4042:
4021:
3993:
3978:
3942:
3912:
3862:
3114:
2410:
1858:
667:
6608:
6346:, but that's obviously the wrong place to be writing to messages to people.
4676:
disputes on topics, regardless of the nature, age, or outcome of the dispute
681:
8221:
7625:
7570:
7534:
7353:
7295:
5427:
5368:
should take just as seriously as you would the same warning from an admin.
5332:
5177:
4423:
4418:
over whether it was invented in Malaysia or Singapore. There's conflict at
3937:
3822:
3438:
3118:
2781:
2510:
2484:
1929:
1901:
1767:
7143:
What evidence do you want? You can check my editing pattern. And I edited
6820:
Done. Thanks for bringing this up, and for your work at AfC in generalĀ :)
5528:
removed the reminder from the user talk page and marked it as a Minor edit
779:
8731:
8626:
8622:
8532:
8464:
8397:
8187:
8161:
8139:
8107:
7910:
7341:
7036:
6955:
6625:
6365:
6347:
6325:
6307:
5951:
but I believe that to be for reasons of offending Japanese sensibilities.
5639:
5154:
4926:
4869:
4856:
4776:
4738:
4697:
4657:
4619:
4427:
4247:
If we are going to consider admins involved for a single foray into a CT
3844:
3825:. This should be discussed on the talk pages of the respective articles.
3308:
3207:
3154:
3122:
3096:
3095:. Creating hoax articles, even in your personal sandbox, is not allowed.
2923:
2852:
2762:
2509:, closing complex discussions is becoming an even more thankless task. ā
2460:
2163:
7945:
don't and just go ahead, no one will make the effort to object. Call it
4329:
After the creation of Israel, Jews migrated from many parts of the world
2847:
challenge the validity of the second close of the challenge of the close
2346:(a failure "at the start" noted the moderator), and now here. They have
77:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see
7969:
7949:
or whatever you want, it's just not something editors should be doing.
7804:
7029:
6786:
6262:
6120:
6092:
6078:
5975:
5933:
5918:
5856:
5838:
5791:
5744:
5651:
5633:
5593:
5542:
3794:
3456:
3401:
2322:
6900:
A few non-admins would buck the committee up, whoever else was on it.
4422:
over whether it's Russian or Ukrainian. Both India and Pakistan claim
8757:
7191:
7021:
6821:
6799:
6768:
6616:
6593:
6547:
6520:
6291:
conspiratorially, and they are now refusing to engage in discussion.
6242:
You are invited to review and give feedback or support by voting. āā
6223:
Help content reviewers more efficiently manage their repetitive tasks
4104:
Fine by me, you know I love ya and your ways, Floq. I'm tryin' here.
3347:, I have copied the all news from this link, please see the article.
3334:
3321:
3296:
2950:
2596:
The community doesn't think it's generally reliable on trans issues.ā
73:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
8760:
has been active over the last few days, and was so this morning. --
7091:
we'd want some kind of evidence that those were your accounts. But
6936:
User:Thryduulf/Arbcom election stats#Non-admin candidates since 2014
6720:
the article is quite similar, yes, and the account that created it,
4071:
don't think this is so controversial that it needs to be litigated.
8294:
7873:
6228:
Make it easier for patrollers and other editors to prioritize tasks
5469:
3621:
2946:
2680:
Maybe your third crack at this will be funny. Believe in yourself!
8220:
prepare a new RFC. I said that it should probably be reviewed at
7802:
Give this editor another chance; his request sounds reasonable. ā
5885:
Why are you intimately familiar with how Japanese Knowledge works?
7320:
I've also added nearly 100 new photos via Commons this year; see
6563:
5875:
You are demonstrating unusual behavior even beyond being a clear
5337:
Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view#Clarification_of_BESTSOURCES
5150:
4419:
4233:
3924:
3658:
3381:
I have added information about hijab and underwear policy in the
7024:
are restored. In addition, the Committee belatedly acknowledges
6286:
Persistent vandalism of UK constituency pages by user LawNerd123
6497:
Thev instructions on that page say to mark the requests with a
6342:
I suspect this is what the filing editor was trying to achieve
6037:
6007:
4852:
4435:
3776:
2505:
and people pushing for the broadest possible interpretation of
2183:: From my perspective, the original RfC attempt was flawed and
1333:
29:
6624:
protection and is forum shopping to stop editing to the page.
5650:
Sure, I will WP:0RR for Assassin's Creed Shadows from now on..
3048:
No merit to report,user directed elsewhere for their sandbox.
3002:
It looks like the Telegraph could soon be under new management
1334:
775:
8463:
BoyTheKingCanDance about his NPP review of the Gujarati film
7604:
Talk:Aerial rocket artillery#Requested move 21 September 2024
4431:
5339:. Valereee made some changes to the policy which I reverted.
4830:
If this keeps happening, I'll make this a template, I swear.
8531:
to check for additional errors and take necessary actions.
7032:
from the CheckUser team and thanks them for their service.
6208:
Community Wishlist: Please check out these groups of wishes
5835:
your Sockpuppet behavior, which is the reason for your ban.
4865:
would necessarily disqualify someone from adminning ARBPIA.
3471:
If any admin at commons is seeing this, please delete this
1900:
Editors are free to discuss the style of the editnotice on
1660:
big and disruptive? Can someone make it a bit less flashy?
7736:
Talk:All-purpose lightweight individual carrying equipment
7546:
Talk:All-purpose lightweight individual carrying equipment
7396:
Talk:All-purpose lightweight individual carrying equipment
7324:. And stubbed in a few handfuls of new articles, such as
6918:
Historically, non-admin candidacies have always failed at
6558:
I don't know about protection requests specificially, but
6052:
crowd since the release of the trailer for said video game
5994:: Since basically all of their edits, since the TBAN from
5567:
article, using a website that denies the Nanking Massacre.
4249:
that happens to intersect with their primary editing focus
2206:
the RfC statement (and heading) neutrally worded and short
1546:
user-generated requests for intervention against vandalism
8042:
6044:
have undergone an abusrd amount of vandalism and blatant
5165:
lol, valereee is a food editor. Her most recent creations
3635:
why are you being so condescending about my signature š¤
2402:
self-revert (and hope I don't catch a no-warning block)?
1538:
bot-generated requests for intervention against vandalism
7500:
Template talk:Infobox Canadian Football League biography
5495:
Knowledge:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard#Talk:Zionism
4719:
Not food related but it does touch on the larger topic.
4644:
In general, editors should not act as administrators in
6077:. Symphony Regalia should also at least follow 0RR too.
5540:
Still trying to remove text in an actively ongoing RfC.
4950:
These two situations are not comparable. Let's review:
2487:, but CR has a backlog of 44 discussions currently. --
8583:. It's should be used with caution but isn't outright
8527:
Request: I would like the community to review his NPP
6996:
If you have someone in mind, please do let them know!
5913:
2.Because there is a magic page where you can see the
5275:
You're arguing an admin should be considered involved
3915:
has recently informed me of a formal warning to me on
3005:, new owners may take it in a different direction. --
1654:
Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk
8519:
4806:
Based on the evidence provided so far, I don't think
4251:, we are going to have no admins who can work at CT.
7255:
How can I contact the WMF Trust and Safety team? --
6674:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5515:
Dispute between User:Symphony Regalia and User:Xslyq
3766:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3071:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2040:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
8364:. I would have closed that as "no consensus" too.ā
7510:files per day for over a month, to fix those, (see
7368:. So it's not like I'm doing gnoming exclusively.
6847:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
6048:-type behavior (Xslyps is a good example) from the
5116:is in need of a refresh to determine what the rule
3903:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3198:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2384:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
8029:The most recent additions of unsourced content to
5955:Do not make negative comments based on ethnicity.
5003:Not a top contributor to any other ARBPIA articles
4959:is their all-time #3 most-edited article talk page
3566:. He mostly just removes infobox information that
2501:I'm not surprised. With close challenges becoming
1530:user-reported username for administrator attention
1522:bot-reported usernames for administrator attention
7583:Fixed your name. Thanks for your understanding.
7438:Talk:Timeline of the Yemeni crisis (2011āpresent)
7378:Talk:2167/2168 ChangchunāMudanjiang through train
7064:I edited Knowledge previously under the username
4638:I think there's a word we're overlooking here in
3996:is involved, but the result of this objection is
3560:here it is again, same article i linked initially
700:When you start a discussion about an editor, you
8796:
5804:For someone who made their first edit a week ago
4962:Voted in 4 RMs on that page and an RM moratorium
3511:here is an example of his removal of information
1890:the proposed moratorium for future move requests
1626:Wikipedians looking for help from administrators
780:
8497:: Which he recently marked as reviewed, has no
7696:-- he admits that he has trouble understanding
6976:Hey I recognize one of the names on that list.
4474:Sorry, people hunt venison and such with guns.
3839:Also, if you feel the need to make changes, be
2914:fucking up on a gender matter to the degree of
618:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
8422:Discussion about responding to threats of harm
6699:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Jishnu (Actor)
6470:Per the instructions at the top of that page,
3957:I think it's remiss not to mention this part:
2123:at United States and state-sponsored terrorism
1923:To be fair, as this discussion was said above
1681:for input as they created the edit notice. --
634:Do not report breaches of personal information
7016:Changes to the CheckUser team, September 2024
6519:Everything there has been taken care of now.
5186:Politics of food in the Arab-Israeli conflict
4999:Politics of food in the Arab-Israeli conflict
4230:Politics of food in the Arab-Israeli conflict
3921:Politics of food in the Arab-Israeli conflict
45:
8721:Hello, can someone implement the request at
7486:Talk:1992 PBA All-Filipino Conference finals
7462:Talk:1991 NHL dispersal and expansion drafts
7408:Talk:PBA Best Player of the Conference award
5853:added to the Sockpuppeter on August 31, 2024
5182:List of regional dishes of the United States
4331:to modern day developments (ex: the section
4038:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Israeli pita
2121:: This is a request to review the RfC close
1880:The flashiness of the editnotice was due to
8426:Since this noticeboard is about matters of
7307:WP:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
5788:Japanese Knowledge's RfC into consideration
5592:You have not denied any of the accusations.
5184:. It's totally unremarkable that she wrote
5153:. The stretch here is light-years.--v/r -
4983:, an article about a major event in the war
4976:, an article about a major event in the war
4969:, an article about a major event in the war
3343:article, and I have added information from
1776:Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Twitter
6681:I wanted to move a newly accepted article
3139:I never knew that may move to HHO instead
1925:to have become the edit request by default
738:Sections inactive for over seven days are
655:to the backlogged page; post here only if
636:on this highly visible pageĀ ā instead use
52:
38:
8717:Edit request that's been open for a while
7624:Don't use the RFC route anymore, please.
7099:, so sure, I'll do it. Hang on a sec. --
6575:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Trivia sections
4434:. South Korea and North Korea both claim
4426:. Every west African nation thinks their
3748:Not something that needs admin attention
2956:a fairly broad close finding no consensus
8186:to Loki about one and a half hours ago.
7035:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,
3508:Has been notified very recently to stop.
2871:Please go write an article or something.
2838:: For the love of G-d, could you please
795:Review of the RfA discussion-only period
614:chronic, intractable behavioral problems
7692:regarding his inability to comply with
7665:Sure, if you're counting style errors.
7223:I don't have email attached to them. --
5766:doesn't mean there's puppetry involved.
14:
8797:
8515:Diane Hamilton (behavioral specialist)
8061:no interest in working collaboratively
6560:Knowledge:Administrative action review
5907:1.This is not true, my first edit was
5682:No worries. I appreciate the apology.
5622:because I'm happy to block you both.
3293:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
3277:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
1747:Template:Editnotices/Page/Talk:Twitter
6858:opening of the self-nomination period
3041:Bbb23 using privileges for misconduct
1652:and I was greeted by the edit notice
1644:"Twitter under Elon Musk" edit notice
570:Welcome ā post issues of interest to
33:
27:Notices of interest to administrators
6670:The following discussion is closed.
6257:Transgender issues in Southeast Asia
5009:RESULT: involved in all of ARBPIA???
3821:This is absolutely not a matter for
3762:The following discussion is closed.
3067:The following discussion is closed.
2036:The following discussion is closed.
71:discussion, request, and help venues
8098:Closure Review: Benevolent Dictator
7868:guideline, and site-wide ones like
7551:Your consideration is appreciated.
7504:Template talk:Infobox NFL biography
7456:Talk:M1126 infantry carrier vehicle
7390:Talk:2023 USL Championship playoffs
6075:RfC consensus in Japanese Knowledge
4318:be that Valereee is not involved -
3908:involvement of admin in ARBPIA area
2954:daylight between my suggestion and
24:
8112:as I brought up on their talk page
4967:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip
4506:There, I actually am involved. :D
4389:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip
25:
8816:
8156:I'll also note that there was an
7420:Talk:NAIA ice hockey championship
6862:WT:AC#Concern about participation
6860:. See the related discussion at
6541:Review of page protection request
5006:No other ARBPIA edits in evidence
3734:The words "mistress" and "affair"
7734:And FWIW, the RM he mentions at
7114:
6843:The discussion above is closed.
6607:
6562:is a general place for reviews.
6378:There's clearly discussion here
6002:), have been about the topic of
5737:Familiarity with French sources,
4440:Threaten me with a good time. :D
3899:The discussion above is closed.
3282:
3194:The discussion above is closed.
2759:re(re(re))litigate the subject.
2380:The discussion above is closed.
638:Knowledge:Requests for oversight
59:
8573:additional considerations apply
8041:The country of Brazil uses the
7647:. Dick Lyon is a net negative.
7519:User:Dicklyon/Under-capitalized
6958:for community taste, though...
5990:could become necessary. As for
5016:Obviously not. Not even close.
4825:disputes over Arab/Israeli food
4584:something you didn't say. ~ š¦
2389:1RR and current events articles
1648:I have just added a comment at
687:If opening a close appeal, use
555:Category:Knowledge noticeboards
8790:13:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8752:10:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8707:13:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8675:14:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8641:13:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8617:13:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8565:09:46, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8547:09:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8447:13:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8428:general administrator interest
8416:09:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8404:03:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8380:17:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8355:22:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8334:22:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8314:22:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8269:00:23, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8252:request concerning this RFC:
8235:00:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8200:22:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8174:22:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8152:22:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8128:22:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8092:01:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8073:19:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8012:13:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7995:11:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7980:10:30, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7959:10:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7940:10:28, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7917:03:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7893:02:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7857:01:17, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7840:00:48, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
7816:23:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7791:22:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7758:20:02, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7728:19:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7675:22:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7661:17:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7634:17:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7620:17:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7593:19:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7579:19:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7561:19:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7523:User:Dicklyon/Over-capitalized
7450:Talk:2024 NWSL expansion draft
7265:20:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7233:20:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7203:19:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7186:13:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
7161:21:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7133:21:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7109:21:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7082:16:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
7045:23:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7006:02:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
6986:20:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6972:20:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6949:19:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6930:14:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6914:13:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6896:22:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6876:22:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6834:16:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6809:16:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6794:16:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6781:16:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6708:16:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6663:13:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6638:13:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6599:19:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6587:07:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6569:04:01, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6553:03:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6533:22:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6515:07:11, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6492:00:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6458:12:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6425:12:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
6411:11:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6374:00:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6356:00:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6338:23:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6320:23:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6301:23:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6281:22:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6252:20:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6200:09:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6177:05:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6157:22:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6129:13:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6114:13:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6087:11:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6069:10:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6032:09:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5962:04:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
5942:15:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5927:15:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5899:13:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5865:12:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5847:12:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5827:11:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5800:11:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5778:10:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5753:08:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5717:19:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5692:10:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5678:05:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5660:19:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5646:19:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5602:19:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5588:19:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5551:19:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5507:11:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5479:05:26, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
5462:20:59, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5447:20:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5430:have joined the discussion at
5412:20:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5395:19:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5378:11:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5359:01:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5321:21:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5306:21:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5289:20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5271:20:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5240:17:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5221:05:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5198:20:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5161:19:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5145:I've read this discussion and
5137:18:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5090:16:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5076:14:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5058:04:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5041:04:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5026:15:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4940:02:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4919:01:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4902:01:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4883:01:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4845:01:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4790:02:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4768:01:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4752:01:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4731:01:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4711:01:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4690:01:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4671:00:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4632:13:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4594:18:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4573:17:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4534:13:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4516:13:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4502:13:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4484:13:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4470:13:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4451:10:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4405:07:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4393:Nationalistic humus food-fight
4378:00:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4361:23:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4297:23:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4277:22:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4261:22:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4214:23:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4198:23:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4184:23:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4166:23:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4147:23:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4130:22:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4116:22:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4100:22:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4083:22:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4066:22:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4052:22:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4031:22:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
4014:22:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3988:21:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3971:21:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3952:21:48, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3890:23:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3857:21:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3835:20:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3816:20:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3755:12:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3724:07:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3686:15:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3664:13:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3653:11:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3631:06:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3591:18:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3551:18:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3531:17:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3491:09:51, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3465:09:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3451:09:44, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3410:06:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3395:06:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3376:05:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3357:05:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3327:16:33, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3315:16:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3302:15:26, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3269:04:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
3255:06:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3240:00:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3214:15:13, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3181:23:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
3167:23:10, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
3149:22:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
3135:22:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
3109:22:52, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
3086:22:49, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
3060:02:19, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
3035:23:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2988:07:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2967:04:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2937:03:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2901:03:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2887:02:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2866:02:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2830:02:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2800:19:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
2776:23:06, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2754:10:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2719:18:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2690:19:53, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2676:19:41, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2646:18:49, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2612:08:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2585:14:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
2561:14:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
2536:14:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
2521:10:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2497:08:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2474:18:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2435:16:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
2419:16:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2376:14:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
2321:(albeit one in the guise of a
2305:13:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2273:05:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2250:04:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2226:03:09, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
2197:19:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2176:13:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2135:11:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2029:14:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2001:RfC closure review request at
1991:19:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
1965:10:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
1951:23:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1918:22:44, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1867:20:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1853:19:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1826:16:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1812:15:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1797:22:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1759:21:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1734:20:53, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
1719:21:16, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1705:21:09, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1691:20:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1670:18:55, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1578:Candidates for history merging
1562:Candidates for speedy deletion
13:
1:
8275:Previously Uninvolved Editors
6472:MediaWiki talk:Bad image list
6465:MediaWiki talk:Bad image list
6010:(which currently has an open
5833:This is the page that records
4981:Re'im music festival massacre
4862:You Don't Mess with the Zohan
4387:. RTH argued his creation of
3782:Up until about 60 years ago,
2657:is a reliable publication on
1570:Fully protected edit requests
1349:
175:Biographies of living persons
8257:Talk:Benevolent dictatorship
7066:User:Otolemur crassicaudatus
3383:Women in the Bangladesh Army
3341:Women in the Bangladesh Army
1772:Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk
1650:Talk:Twitter under Elon Musk
664:requests for page protection
7:
8575:when using the source, see
8240:Previously Involved Editors
7542:Talk:M40 Gun Motor Carriage
7480:Talk:NHL supplemental draft
7474:Talk:MLS supplemental draft
5917:, and I know some Japanese.
5610:You both are problematic.
5364:project involved with them.
4368:is a very false statement.
3113:They are also eligible for
10:
8821:
8723:Template talk:Collapse top
8184:pretty much the same thing
8110:as no consensus. However,
7765:RIM-161 Standard missile 3
7702:RIM-161 Standard Missile 3
7468:Talk:AAF quarterback draft
7414:Talk:UFL championship game
7350:Robert L. White (engineer)
6693:. However, I noticed that
5909:at 19:47, 1 December 2021.
5723:Oddly enough, an IP user (
5170:Zaharakos Ice Cream Parlor
3940:. Is this admin INVOLVED?
3307:It's been cleared.--v/r -
3280:
1586:requests for RD1 redaction
1326:
1303:
1298:
1180:
1058:
936:
814:
580:
543:Discussions for discussion
7763:my suggestion that maybe
7608:backlog of RM discussions
7366:Tripper navigation system
7145:National Masturbation Day
6651:Re-deleted and resolved.
6218:The focus areas look to:
5998:at AE (which they called
5932:sanctions on the account.
5255:prior to Valeree's edits
4577:I should have provided a
3861:This is not the place to
3803:recently, words migrate.
3319:Perfect....thank you all.
2344:but at Dispute Resolution
1554:sockpuppet investigations
1490:
1466:
1442:
1418:
1394:
1370:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1353:
1348:
1313:Sockpuppet investigations
551:
426:
358:
275:
167:
86:
67:
8459:On 27 September 2024, I
8248:as I wrote in closing a
7770:left him a note about it
7690:This exchange is telling
6845:Please do not modify it.
6672:Please do not modify it.
6164:Assassin's Creed Shadows
6042:Assassin's Creed Shadows
6012:arbitration case request
6004:Assassin's Creed Shadows
5988:Assassin's Creed Shadows
5565:Assassin's Creed Shadows
3901:Please do not modify it.
3764:Please do not modify it.
3455:Now in the sock drawer.
3196:Please do not modify it.
3069:Please do not modify it.
2445:RfC hasn't been reclosed
2382:Please do not modify it.
2204:: Epic fail at keeping "
2038:Please do not modify it.
800:ArbCom election RFC 2024
704:leave a notice on their
235:Scalable vector graphics
69:Knowledge's centralized
8453:User:BoyTheKingCanDance
7346:Elizabeth Macarthur Bay
6683:Jishnu Raghavan (actor)
4642:, which is "disputes".
4555:I read your claim that
3712:WeaponizingArchitecture
3672:WeaponizingArchitecture
3639:WeaponizingArchitecture
3617:WeaponizingArchitecture
3577:WeaponizingArchitecture
3517:WeaponizingArchitecture
3259:Thank you Ymblanter! --
1594:elapsed requested moves
1182:Arbitration enforcement
645:administrative backlogs
79:formal review processes
8805:Knowledge noticeboards
8135:only edit to Knowledge
6884:arbitrator experiences
5768:
4416:Hainanese chicken rice
4383:the same topic as the
3220:Personal attacks by IP
2705:, are you the walrus?
2699:
2479:Just to mention, this
2051:Discussion with closer
1764:(non-admin page mover)
782:Centralized discussion
766:Start a new discussion
744:Lowercase sigmabot III
119:Centralized discussion
8478:Today, I found that @
7402:Talk:MLS Cup playoffs
7384:Talk:Bolognese school
6679:Hello administrators,
6390:WP:dispute resolution
5763:
5733:geographical location
5729:never edited anything
5638:Quit warring.--v/r -
5190:ProcrastinatingReader
4957:Talk:IsraelāHamas war
3925:higher up on the page
2694:
2632:, please reclose it.
2325:), which states that
1906:the embedded FAQ page
810:Noticeboard archives
682:recently active admin
538:WikiProject proposals
437:Committee noticeboard
386:Personal restrictions
371:Contributor copyright
210:Neutral point of view
8691:Sayidkhan Kiatpathan
8505:Sayidkhan Kiatpathan
7432:Talk:NHL entry draft
7309:of this discussion.
6689:and subsequently to
6502:edit fully-protected
5982:behaviour I'd say a
5574:IMO, so proposing a
5180:. They also include
3927:), which found that
3564:and here it is AGAIN
3364:Knowledge:Copyrights
3339:I have improved the
2943:incremental progress
2873:Challenge accepted.
2348:already been advised
1618:requests for unblock
1602:Pages at move review
790:Administrator recall
496:Requests for comment
412:Requests for comment
376:Edit warring and 3RR
366:Conflict of interest
168:Articles and content
8387:not a vote count. (
8341:Uninvolved endorse.
8018:User:Hernandofuente
7800:Conditional support
7567:Conditional support
7305:I will also notify
6591:Perfect thank you.
5741:Sockpuppet behavior
4890:Firefangledfeathers
4833:Firefangledfeathers
4522:Firefangledfeathers
4490:Firefangledfeathers
4458:Firefangledfeathers
4238:Politics of falafel
2340:having to be warned
2293:Firefangledfeathers
2062:SerialĀ NumberĀ 54129
1345:
811:
678:Just want an admin?
8557:BoyTheKingCanDance
8102:About a week ago,
7825:had concerns about
7531:Constitutional Law
7426:Talk:Cretan school
7362:Mynavi Corporation
7322:User:Dicklyon#2024
6673:
6621:ongoing discussion
6098:happened on enwiki
5958:Northern Moonlight
5174:Fried onion burger
3863:right great wrongs
3765:
3418:They are back, as
3070:
2039:
1896:a posting at WP:CR
1634:Copyright problems
1610:requested closures
1343:
809:
717:
691:RfC closure review
635:
628:Knowledge:Teahouse
396:Contentious topics
195:Dispute resolution
183:Questions on media
8788:
8773:
8769:
8763:
8745:
8673:
8658:
8654:
8648:
8615:
8600:
8596:
8590:
8413:Black Kite (talk)
8378:
7756:
7726:
7292:WP:Standard offer
7060:Previous accounts
7050:Discuss this at:
6671:
5978:edits show clear
5851:Your account was
4974:Kfar Aza massacre
4938:
4881:
4820:is involved with
4788:
4750:
4709:
4669:
4613:
4441:
4337:societal conflict
4242:Gastronationalism
4236:was turning into
3992:FWIW I do think @
3887:
3763:
3747:
3744:non-admin closure
3703:
3702:
3449:
3068:
3033:
3018:
3014:
3008:
2986:
2935:
2864:
2797:
2774:
2610:
2587:
2519:
2472:
2336:contentious topic
2037:
2023:
2020:non-admin closure
1899:
1888:). Hopefully, if
1765:
1514:
1513:
1340:
1339:
773:
772:
748:
699:
668:deletion requests
633:
562:
561:
391:General sanctions
230:Resource requests
215:Original research
16:(Redirected from
8812:
8776:
8771:
8767:
8761:
8741:
8661:
8656:
8652:
8646:
8638:
8632:
8629:
8603:
8598:
8594:
8588:
8544:
8538:
8535:
8522:
8441:
8438:
8400:
8370:
8353:
8331:
8326:
8312:
8311:
8305:
8304:
8301:
8298:
8065:Telenovelafan215
7977:
7947:WP:Fait accompli
7913:
7891:
7837:
7832:
7813:
7812:(words are wind)
7807:
7755:
7753:
7752:
7749:
7743:
7725:
7723:
7722:
7719:
7713:
7330:Oleshnya (river)
7122:
7118:
7117:
6852:Arbcom elections
6819:
6807:
6791:
6766:
6739:deletedĀ contribs
6719:
6706:
6660:
6655:
6614:
6611:
6596:
6550:
6506:
6500:
6488:
6482:
6477:
6450:Timrollpickering
6447:
6267:
6196:
6195:
6189:
6188:
6143:Possible Closure
6061:Symphony Regalia
6028:
6022:
5992:Symphony Regalia
5959:
5891:Symphony Regalia
5819:Symphony Regalia
5770:Symphony Regalia
5684:Symphony Regalia
5666:Symphony Regalia
5637:
5629:
5626:Symphony Regalia
5617:
5580:Symphony Regalia
5477:
5445:
5393:
5357:
5304:
5269:
5217:
5216:
5210:
5209:
5135:
5056:
4932:
4931:
4929:
4917:
4904:
4875:
4874:
4872:
4831:
4822:IsraelāHamas war
4782:
4781:
4779:
4766:
4744:
4743:
4741:
4729:
4703:
4702:
4700:
4688:
4663:
4662:
4660:
4612:
4611:
4610:
4604:
4582:
4580:diff proactively
4569:
4563:
4554:
4488:Damn! Abortion?
4439:
4385:IsraelāHamas war
4333:Israeli couscous
4295:
4283:this move thread
4275:
4212:
4145:
4114:
4081:
4050:
4029:
4000:. I'd recommend
3986:
3950:
3888:
3883:
3877:
3876:
3871:
3752:
3751:Babysharkboss2!!
3741:
3682:
3674:
3649:
3641:
3629:
3599:
3598:
3587:
3579:
3527:
3519:
3489:
3480:
3442:
3324:
3299:
3286:
3285:
3057:
3052:
3021:
3016:
3012:
3006:
2978:
2972:of a consensus.ā
2965:
2929:
2928:
2926:
2899:
2882:
2879:
2858:
2857:
2855:
2844:
2825:
2822:
2798:
2796:
2793:
2786:
2768:
2767:
2765:
2602:
2570:
2513:
2485:closure requests
2466:
2465:
2463:
2316:
2289:
2271:
2145:Non-participants
2106:
2079:deletedĀ contribs
2017:
1979:
1978:
1970:Banner blindness
1939:
1938:
1893:
1841:
1840:
1818:Horse Eye's Back
1785:
1784:
1763:
1680:
1351:
1346:
1342:
1335:
1190:
1072:
1060:Edit-warring/3RR
950:
828:
812:
808:
761:
760:
736:
731:
694:
654:
610:urgent incidents
600:
593:
567:
566:
225:Reliable sources
159:User permissions
139:Main Page errors
134:Interface admins
124:Closure requests
54:
47:
40:
31:
30:
21:
8820:
8819:
8815:
8814:
8813:
8811:
8810:
8809:
8795:
8794:
8746:
8719:
8695:Than Singh Doli
8636:
8630:
8627:
8581:WP:NEWSORGINDIA
8542:
8536:
8533:
8518:
8457:
8439:
8436:
8424:
8398:
8349:
8329:
8324:
8307:
8302:
8299:
8296:
8295:
8293:
8277:
8261:Robert McClenon
8242:
8227:Robert McClenon
8210:
8180:Robert McClenon
8178:Another note: @
8100:
8020:
7975:
7911:
7877:
7835:
7830:
7811:
7805:
7750:
7747:
7746:
7741:
7720:
7717:
7716:
7711:
7602:; for example,
7492:Talk:USFL draft
7334:Squalicum Creek
7326:Tassajara Creek
7284:
7115:
7113:
7062:
7026:the resignation
7018:
6978:RickinBaltimore
6854:
6849:
6848:
6813:
6803:
6787:
6724:
6713:
6702:
6695:Jishnu Raghavan
6687:Jishnu Raghavan
6676:
6667:
6666:
6665:
6658:
6653:
6646:
6612:
6592:
6546:
6543:
6504:
6498:
6486:
6481:Queen of Hearts
6480:
6475:
6468:
6441:
6288:
6279:
6263:
6259:
6212:Hello Admins,
6210:
6193:
6192:
6186:
6185:
6149:Robert McClenon
6145:
6026:
6020:
5957:
5784:this discussion
5631:
5623:
5611:
5517:
5468:
5441:
5389:
5353:
5300:
5265:
5214:
5213:
5207:
5206:
5129:
5122:Liancourt rocks
5068:Hey man im josh
5052:
4979:#6 by edits at
4927:
4924:
4913:
4887:
4870:
4867:
4829:
4826:
4823:
4819:
4816:
4812:
4809:
4777:
4774:
4762:
4739:
4736:
4725:
4698:
4695:
4684:
4658:
4655:
4608:
4606:
4605:
4578:
4571:
4567:
4562:Red-tailedĀ hawk
4561:
4548:
4291:
4271:
4208:
4172:initial warning
4141:
4110:
4077:
4046:
4025:
3982:
3946:
3910:
3905:
3904:
3881:
3874:
3869:
3866:
3827:RickinBaltimore
3768:
3759:
3758:
3757:
3750:
3736:
3704:
3678:
3670:
3645:
3637:
3620:
3604:
3583:
3575:
3523:
3515:
3501:
3478:
3476:
3337:
3320:
3295:
3289:
3288:
3283:
3279:
3222:
3200:
3199:
3115:speedy deletion
3073:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3055:
3050:
3043:
2959:
2924:
2921:
2917:Dominion v. Fox
2908:deus ex machina
2893:
2880:
2877:
2853:
2850:
2842:
2823:
2820:
2795:
2789:
2782:
2763:
2760:
2703:User:Parabolist
2461:
2458:
2447:
2441:A month later,
2391:
2386:
2385:
2310:
2309:I'm sorry that
2283:
2281:
2259:
2242:Robert McClenon
2234:
2159:Robert McClenon
2147:
2142:
2064:
2042:
2033:
2032:
2031:
2006:
1976:
1974:
1957:Alanscottwalker
1936:
1934:
1882:the various RMs
1838:
1836:
1782:
1780:
1676:
1646:
1638:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1322:
1184:
1062:
940:
818:
816:Administrators'
806:
805:
804:
784:
778:
769:
750:
749:
734:
721:
688:
648:
605:
604:
603:
596:
589:
585:
563:
558:
547:
464:False positives
422:
354:
271:
220:Pending changes
205:Fringe theories
163:
93:Administrators
82:
63:
58:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
8818:
8808:
8807:
8793:
8792:
8740:
8718:
8715:
8714:
8713:
8712:
8711:
8710:
8709:
8682:
8681:
8680:
8679:
8678:
8677:
8569:
8568:
8567:
8525:
8524:
8512:
8509:now draftified
8502:
8495:Khomlang Laman
8482:nominated the
8469:WP:ICTFSOURCES
8456:
8450:
8423:
8420:
8419:
8418:
8406:
8382:
8358:
8357:
8337:
8336:
8316:
8276:
8273:
8272:
8271:
8241:
8238:
8209:
8206:
8205:
8204:
8203:
8202:
8176:
8106:was closed by
8099:
8096:
8095:
8094:
8024:Hernandofuente
8019:
8016:
8015:
8014:
7997:
7982:
7963:
7962:
7961:
7919:
7895:
7859:
7842:
7818:
7796:
7795:
7794:
7793:
7731:
7730:
7679:
7678:
7677:
7641:
7640:
7639:
7638:
7637:
7636:
7595:
7512:User:BsoykaBot
7495:
7494:
7488:
7482:
7476:
7470:
7464:
7458:
7452:
7446:
7444:Talk:CFL draft
7440:
7434:
7428:
7422:
7416:
7410:
7404:
7398:
7392:
7386:
7380:
7283:
7282:JWB ban appeal
7277:
7276:
7275:
7274:
7273:
7272:
7271:
7270:
7269:
7268:
7267:
7244:
7243:
7242:
7241:
7240:
7239:
7238:
7237:
7236:
7235:
7212:
7211:
7210:
7209:
7208:
7207:
7206:
7205:
7168:
7166:
7165:
7164:
7163:
7138:
7137:
7136:
7135:
7061:
7058:
7057:
7056:
7017:
7014:
7013:
7012:
7011:
7010:
7009:
7008:
6994:
6993:
6992:
6991:
6990:
6989:
6988:
6853:
6850:
6842:
6841:
6840:
6839:
6838:
6837:
6836:
6796:
6722:NayabĀ Shareyar
6691:Jishnu (actor)
6680:
6677:
6668:
6650:
6649:
6648:
6647:
6645:
6642:
6641:
6640:
6619:: There is an
6605:
6604:
6603:
6602:
6601:
6542:
6539:
6538:
6537:
6536:
6535:
6467:
6461:
6438:
6437:
6436:
6435:
6434:
6433:
6432:
6431:
6430:
6429:
6428:
6427:
6287:
6284:
6269:
6258:
6255:
6237:
6236:
6230:
6225:
6209:
6206:
6205:
6204:
6203:
6202:
6144:
6141:
6140:
6139:
6138:
6137:
6136:
6135:
6134:
6133:
6132:
6131:
6056:
5972:
5971:
5970:
5969:
5968:
5967:
5966:
5965:
5964:
5953:
5948:
5947:
5946:
5945:
5944:
5929:
5915:global account
5911:
5905:
5888:
5887:
5886:
5883:
5873:
5849:
5836:
5815:
5808:
5761:
5720:
5719:
5699:
5698:
5697:
5696:
5695:
5694:
5662:
5607:
5606:
5605:
5604:
5568:
5516:
5513:
5512:
5511:
5510:
5509:
5491:
5490:
5489:
5488:
5487:
5486:
5485:
5484:
5483:
5482:
5481:
5400:
5365:
5329:
5328:
5327:
5326:
5325:
5324:
5323:
5308:
5277:with an editor
5201:
5200:
5163:
5097:
5096:
5095:
5094:
5093:
5092:
5029:
5028:
5014:
5013:
5012:
5011:
5010:
5007:
5004:
5001:
4992:
4991:
4990:
4987:
4984:
4977:
4970:
4963:
4960:
4948:
4947:
4946:
4945:
4944:
4943:
4942:
4905:
4824:
4821:
4817:
4814:
4810:
4807:
4804:
4803:
4802:
4801:
4800:
4799:
4798:
4797:
4796:
4795:
4794:
4793:
4792:
4636:
4635:
4634:
4614:re this point
4602:
4601:
4600:
4599:
4598:
4597:
4596:
4565:
4546:
4545:
4544:
4543:
4542:
4541:
4540:
4539:
4538:
4537:
4536:
4307:
4306:
4305:
4304:
4303:
4302:
4301:
4300:
4299:
4279:
4245:
4226:
4225:
4224:
4223:
4222:
4221:
4220:
4219:
4218:
4217:
4216:
4200:
4149:
4120:There's more.
4118:
4087:
4086:
4085:
4033:
3909:
3906:
3898:
3897:
3896:
3895:
3894:
3893:
3892:
3771:On Knowledge,
3769:
3760:
3740:
3739:
3738:
3737:
3735:
3732:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3728:
3727:
3726:
3701:
3700:
3699:
3698:
3697:
3696:
3695:
3694:
3693:
3692:
3691:
3690:
3689:
3688:
3606:
3605:
3602:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3594:
3593:
3504:User:Helper201
3500:
3499:User:Helper201
3497:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3413:
3412:
3379:
3378:
3336:
3333:
3332:
3331:
3330:
3329:
3281:
3278:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3221:
3218:
3217:
3216:
3193:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3188:
3187:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3093:WP:FAKEARTICLE
3091:Please review
3074:
3065:
3047:
3046:
3045:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2990:
2910:in that time,
2889:
2841:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2805:
2804:
2803:
2802:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2700:
2619:
2618:
2617:
2616:
2615:
2614:
2589:
2588:
2564:
2563:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2540:
2539:
2538:
2446:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2390:
2387:
2379:
2280:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2252:
2233:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2199:
2178:
2151:Speedy endorse
2146:
2143:
2141:
2138:
2055:
2054:
2043:
2034:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2005:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1855:
1828:
1742:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1693:
1645:
1642:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1628:
1620:
1612:
1604:
1596:
1588:
1580:
1572:
1564:
1556:
1548:
1540:
1532:
1524:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1506:
1503:
1500:
1497:
1494:
1488:
1487:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1473:
1470:
1464:
1463:
1458:
1455:
1452:
1449:
1446:
1440:
1439:
1434:
1431:
1428:
1425:
1422:
1416:
1415:
1410:
1407:
1404:
1401:
1398:
1392:
1391:
1386:
1383:
1380:
1377:
1374:
1368:
1367:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1338:
1337:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1192:
1191:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1126:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1074:
1073:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1004:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
952:
951:
934:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
882:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
841:
836:
830:
829:
807:
803:
802:
797:
792:
786:
785:
777:
774:
771:
770:
763:
707:
703:
697:
696:
695:
685:
675:
672:block requests
660:
641:
631:
624:If you are new
621:
602:
601:
594:
586:
581:
579:
576:
575:
572:administrators
565:
560:
559:
552:
549:
548:
546:
545:
540:
535:
534:
533:
528:
523:
518:
513:
508:
498:
493:
492:
491:
486:
484:Reference desk
481:
476:
468:
467:
466:
461:
451:
450:
449:
444:
439:
430:
428:
424:
423:
421:
420:
415:
405:
400:
399:
398:
393:
388:
378:
373:
368:
362:
360:
356:
355:
353:
352:
347:
346:
345:
340:
335:
330:
325:
320:
310:
305:
300:
295:
290:
285:
283:History merges
279:
277:
273:
272:
270:
269:
264:
262:Titleblacklist
259:
254:
253:
252:
247:
237:
232:
227:
222:
217:
212:
207:
202:
200:External links
197:
192:
191:
190:
185:
177:
171:
169:
165:
164:
162:
161:
156:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
105:
104:
99:
90:
88:
84:
83:
68:
65:
64:
57:
56:
49:
42:
34:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
8817:
8806:
8803:
8802:
8800:
8791:
8787:
8785:
8781:
8775:
8774:
8759:
8756:
8755:
8754:
8753:
8749:
8748:
8747:contributions
8744:
8737:
8733:
8728:
8724:
8708:
8704:
8700:
8696:
8692:
8688:
8687:
8686:
8685:
8684:
8683:
8676:
8672:
8670:
8666:
8660:
8659:
8644:
8643:
8642:
8639:
8633:
8624:
8620:
8619:
8618:
8614:
8612:
8608:
8602:
8601:
8586:
8582:
8578:
8574:
8570:
8566:
8562:
8558:
8553:
8552:
8551:
8550:
8549:
8548:
8545:
8539:
8530:
8529:curation logs
8521:
8516:
8513:
8510:
8506:
8503:
8500:
8496:
8493:
8492:
8491:
8488:
8485:
8481:
8476:
8474:
8470:
8466:
8462:
8454:
8449:
8448:
8445:
8442:
8433:
8429:
8417:
8414:
8410:
8407:
8405:
8402:
8401:
8394:
8390:
8386:
8383:
8381:
8377:
8373:
8369:
8368:
8363:
8360:
8359:
8356:
8352:
8348:
8347:
8342:
8339:
8338:
8335:
8332:
8327:
8321:
8317:
8315:
8310:
8306:
8290:
8286:
8282:
8279:
8278:
8270:
8266:
8262:
8258:
8254:
8251:
8247:
8244:
8243:
8237:
8236:
8232:
8228:
8223:
8218:
8214:
8201:
8197:
8196:contributions
8193:
8189:
8185:
8181:
8177:
8175:
8171:
8170:contributions
8167:
8163:
8159:
8155:
8154:
8153:
8149:
8148:contributions
8145:
8141:
8136:
8132:
8131:
8130:
8129:
8125:
8121:
8115:
8113:
8109:
8105:
8093:
8089:
8085:
8081:
8077:
8076:
8075:
8074:
8070:
8066:
8062:
8057:
8055:
8053:
8051:
8048:
8047:Use dmy dates
8044:
8039:
8037:
8035:
8032:
8027:
8025:
8013:
8009:
8005:
8001:
7998:
7996:
7993:
7990:
7986:
7983:
7981:
7978:
7973:
7972:
7967:
7964:
7960:
7956:
7952:
7948:
7943:
7942:
7941:
7937:
7933:
7928:
7923:
7920:
7918:
7915:
7914:
7907:
7903:
7899:
7896:
7894:
7889:
7886:
7883:
7882:
7875:
7871:
7867:
7863:
7860:
7858:
7854:
7850:
7846:
7843:
7841:
7838:
7833:
7826:
7822:
7819:
7817:
7814:
7809:
7808:
7801:
7798:
7797:
7792:
7788:
7784:
7780:
7775:
7771:
7766:
7761:
7760:
7759:
7754:
7744:
7737:
7733:
7732:
7729:
7724:
7714:
7708:
7703:
7699:
7695:
7691:
7687:
7686:fait accompli
7683:
7680:
7676:
7672:
7668:
7664:
7663:
7662:
7659:
7658:
7657:
7652:
7651:
7646:
7643:
7642:
7635:
7631:
7627:
7623:
7622:
7621:
7617:
7613:
7609:
7605:
7601:
7596:
7594:
7590:
7586:
7582:
7581:
7580:
7576:
7572:
7568:
7565:
7564:
7563:
7562:
7558:
7554:
7549:
7547:
7543:
7538:
7536:
7532:
7528:
7527:New York city
7524:
7520:
7515:
7513:
7507:
7505:
7501:
7493:
7489:
7487:
7483:
7481:
7477:
7475:
7471:
7469:
7465:
7463:
7459:
7457:
7453:
7451:
7447:
7445:
7441:
7439:
7435:
7433:
7429:
7427:
7423:
7421:
7417:
7415:
7411:
7409:
7405:
7403:
7399:
7397:
7393:
7391:
7387:
7385:
7381:
7379:
7375:
7374:
7373:
7369:
7367:
7363:
7359:
7358:Earl Schubert
7355:
7351:
7347:
7343:
7339:
7338:Johnstons Bay
7335:
7331:
7327:
7323:
7318:
7314:
7310:
7308:
7303:
7301:
7297:
7293:
7289:
7281:
7280:User:Dicklyon
7266:
7262:
7258:
7254:
7253:
7252:
7251:
7250:
7249:
7248:
7247:
7246:
7245:
7234:
7230:
7226:
7222:
7221:
7220:
7219:
7218:
7217:
7216:
7215:
7214:
7213:
7204:
7200:
7196:
7193:
7189:
7188:
7187:
7183:
7179:
7175:
7174:
7173:
7172:
7171:
7170:
7169:
7162:
7158:
7154:
7150:
7149:User:NGC 2736
7146:
7142:
7141:
7140:
7139:
7134:
7130:
7126:
7121:
7112:
7111:
7110:
7106:
7102:
7098:
7097:just rollback
7094:
7090:
7086:
7085:
7084:
7083:
7079:
7075:
7071:
7070:User:NGC 2736
7067:
7055:
7054:
7049:
7048:
7047:
7046:
7042:
7038:
7033:
7031:
7027:
7023:
7007:
7003:
6999:
6995:
6987:
6983:
6979:
6975:
6974:
6973:
6970:
6969:
6968:
6963:
6962:
6957:
6952:
6951:
6950:
6946:
6942:
6937:
6933:
6932:
6931:
6928:
6925:
6921:
6917:
6916:
6915:
6912:
6911:
6910:
6905:
6904:
6899:
6898:
6897:
6893:
6889:
6885:
6880:
6879:
6878:
6877:
6874:
6871:
6865:
6863:
6859:
6846:
6835:
6831:
6827:
6823:
6817:
6812:
6811:
6810:
6806:
6805:Safari Scribe
6801:
6797:
6795:
6792:
6790:
6784:
6783:
6782:
6778:
6774:
6770:
6764:
6761:
6758:
6755:
6752:
6749:
6746:
6743:
6740:
6737:
6734:
6731:
6728:
6723:
6717:
6712:
6711:
6710:
6709:
6705:
6704:Safari Scribe
6700:
6696:
6692:
6688:
6684:
6675:
6664:
6661:
6656:
6639:
6635:
6634:contributions
6631:
6627:
6622:
6618:
6610:
6606:
6600:
6595:
6590:
6589:
6588:
6584:
6580:
6577:for a while.
6576:
6572:
6571:
6570:
6567:
6565:
6561:
6557:
6556:
6555:
6554:
6549:
6534:
6530:
6526:
6522:
6518:
6517:
6516:
6513:
6510:
6503:
6496:
6495:
6494:
6493:
6489:
6483:
6473:
6466:
6460:
6459:
6455:
6451:
6445:
6426:
6422:
6418:
6414:
6413:
6412:
6408:
6404:
6400:
6396:
6391:
6386:
6384:
6381:
6377:
6376:
6375:
6371:
6367:
6363:
6359:
6358:
6357:
6353:
6349:
6345:
6341:
6340:
6339:
6335:
6334:contributions
6331:
6327:
6323:
6322:
6321:
6317:
6316:contributions
6313:
6309:
6305:
6304:
6303:
6302:
6298:
6294:
6283:
6282:
6277:
6273:
6268:
6266:
6254:
6253:
6249:
6245:
6240:
6234:
6231:
6229:
6226:
6224:
6221:
6220:
6219:
6216:
6213:
6201:
6198:
6197:
6190:
6180:
6179:
6178:
6174:
6170:
6165:
6161:
6160:
6159:
6158:
6154:
6150:
6130:
6126:
6122:
6117:
6116:
6115:
6111:
6107:
6103:
6099:
6094:
6090:
6089:
6088:
6084:
6080:
6076:
6072:
6071:
6070:
6066:
6062:
6057:
6054:
6051:
6047:
6043:
6039:
6035:
6034:
6033:
6029:
6023:
6017:
6013:
6009:
6005:
6001:
5997:
5993:
5989:
5985:
5981:
5977:
5973:
5963:
5960:
5954:
5952:
5949:
5943:
5939:
5935:
5930:
5928:
5924:
5920:
5916:
5912:
5910:
5906:
5902:
5901:
5900:
5896:
5892:
5889:
5884:
5881:
5880:
5878:
5874:
5871:
5868:
5867:
5866:
5862:
5858:
5854:
5850:
5848:
5844:
5840:
5837:
5834:
5830:
5829:
5828:
5824:
5820:
5816:
5812:
5809:
5806:
5803:
5802:
5801:
5797:
5793:
5789:
5785:
5781:
5780:
5779:
5775:
5771:
5767:
5762:
5759:
5756:
5755:
5754:
5750:
5746:
5742:
5738:
5734:
5730:
5726:
5722:
5721:
5718:
5714:
5710:
5706:
5701:
5700:
5693:
5689:
5685:
5681:
5680:
5679:
5675:
5671:
5667:
5663:
5661:
5657:
5653:
5649:
5648:
5647:
5644:
5641:
5635:
5627:
5621:
5615:
5609:
5608:
5603:
5599:
5595:
5591:
5590:
5589:
5585:
5581:
5577:
5573:
5570:Pretty clear
5569:
5566:
5562:
5558:
5555:
5554:
5553:
5552:
5548:
5544:
5541:
5537:
5533:
5529:
5525:
5520:
5508:
5504:
5500:
5496:
5492:
5480:
5476:
5474:
5473:
5465:
5464:
5463:
5459:
5455:
5450:
5449:
5448:
5444:
5440:
5439:
5433:
5429:
5424:
5420:
5415:
5414:
5413:
5409:
5405:
5401:
5398:
5397:
5396:
5392:
5388:
5387:
5381:
5380:
5379:
5375:
5371:
5366:
5362:
5361:
5360:
5356:
5352:
5351:
5346:
5344:
5341:
5338:
5334:
5330:
5322:
5318:
5314:
5309:
5307:
5303:
5299:
5298:
5292:
5291:
5290:
5286:
5282:
5278:
5274:
5273:
5272:
5268:
5264:
5263:
5257:
5254:
5251:
5247:
5243:
5242:
5241:
5237:
5233:
5228:
5225:
5224:
5223:
5222:
5219:
5218:
5211:
5199:
5195:
5191:
5187:
5183:
5179:
5175:
5171:
5167:
5164:
5162:
5159:
5156:
5152:
5148:
5147:User:Valereee
5144:
5141:
5140:
5139:
5138:
5134:
5133:
5132:The Wordsmith
5127:
5123:
5119:
5115:
5111:
5110:
5106:
5101:
5091:
5087:
5083:
5079:
5078:
5077:
5073:
5069:
5065:
5061:
5060:
5059:
5055:
5051:
5050:
5045:
5044:
5043:
5042:
5038:
5034:
5027:
5023:
5019:
5015:
5008:
5005:
5002:
5000:
4996:
4995:
4993:
4988:
4985:
4982:
4978:
4975:
4972:#1 author of
4971:
4968:
4964:
4961:
4958:
4955:
4954:
4952:
4951:
4949:
4941:
4936:
4930:
4922:
4921:
4920:
4916:
4912:
4911:
4906:
4903:
4899:
4895:
4891:
4886:
4885:
4884:
4879:
4873:
4866:
4864:
4863:
4858:
4854:
4848:
4847:
4846:
4842:
4838:
4834:
4805:
4791:
4786:
4780:
4771:
4770:
4769:
4765:
4761:
4760:
4755:
4754:
4753:
4748:
4742:
4734:
4733:
4732:
4728:
4724:
4723:
4718:
4714:
4713:
4712:
4707:
4701:
4693:
4692:
4691:
4687:
4683:
4682:
4677:
4674:
4673:
4672:
4667:
4661:
4653:
4651:
4647:
4641:
4637:
4633:
4629:
4628:contributions
4625:
4621:
4617:
4603:
4595:
4591:
4587:
4581:
4576:
4575:
4574:
4570:
4564:
4558:
4552:
4547:
4535:
4531:
4527:
4523:
4520:Double damn!
4519:
4518:
4517:
4513:
4509:
4505:
4504:
4503:
4499:
4495:
4491:
4487:
4486:
4485:
4481:
4477:
4473:
4472:
4471:
4467:
4463:
4459:
4454:
4453:
4452:
4448:
4444:
4437:
4433:
4429:
4425:
4421:
4417:
4413:
4412:Shopska salad
4408:
4407:
4406:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4381:
4380:
4379:
4375:
4371:
4367:
4364:
4363:
4362:
4359:
4355:
4351:
4347:
4343:
4338:
4334:
4330:
4325:
4321:
4317:
4312:
4308:
4298:
4294:
4290:
4289:
4284:
4280:
4278:
4274:
4270:
4269:
4264:
4263:
4262:
4258:
4254:
4250:
4246:
4243:
4239:
4235:
4231:
4227:
4215:
4211:
4207:
4206:
4201:
4199:
4195:
4191:
4187:
4186:
4185:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4168:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4154:
4150:
4148:
4144:
4140:
4139:
4133:
4132:
4131:
4127:
4123:
4119:
4117:
4113:
4109:
4108:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4097:
4093:
4088:
4084:
4080:
4076:
4075:
4069:
4068:
4067:
4063:
4059:
4055:
4054:
4053:
4049:
4045:
4044:
4039:
4034:
4032:
4028:
4024:
4023:
4017:
4016:
4015:
4011:
4007:
4003:
3999:
3995:
3991:
3990:
3989:
3985:
3981:
3980:
3974:
3973:
3972:
3968:
3964:
3960:
3956:
3955:
3954:
3953:
3949:
3945:
3944:
3939:
3934:
3930:
3926:
3922:
3918:
3914:
3913:User:Valereee
3902:
3891:
3886:
3884:
3873:
3872:
3864:
3860:
3859:
3858:
3854:
3853:contributions
3850:
3846:
3842:
3838:
3837:
3836:
3832:
3828:
3824:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3817:
3813:
3809:
3804:
3802:
3801:
3796:
3791:
3789:
3785:
3780:
3778:
3774:
3767:
3756:
3753:
3745:
3725:
3721:
3717:
3713:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3707:
3706:
3705:
3687:
3683:
3681:
3675:
3673:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3662:
3660:
3656:
3655:
3654:
3650:
3648:
3642:
3640:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3628:
3626:
3625:
3618:
3614:
3613:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3608:
3607:
3601:
3600:
3592:
3588:
3586:
3580:
3578:
3571:
3570:
3565:
3561:
3557:
3554:
3553:
3552:
3548:
3544:
3539:
3535:
3534:
3533:
3532:
3528:
3526:
3520:
3518:
3512:
3509:
3505:
3492:
3488:
3486:
3481:
3474:
3470:
3466:
3462:
3458:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3448:
3445:
3444:contributions
3441:
3440:
3435:
3431:
3428:
3425:
3421:
3417:
3416:
3415:
3414:
3411:
3407:
3403:
3399:
3398:
3397:
3396:
3392:
3388:
3384:
3377:
3374:
3370:
3365:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3358:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3328:
3323:
3318:
3317:
3316:
3313:
3310:
3306:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3298:
3294:
3270:
3266:
3262:
3258:
3257:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3237:
3233:
3229:
3226:
3215:
3212:
3209:
3205:
3202:
3201:
3197:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3164:
3163:contributions
3160:
3156:
3153:What is HHO?
3152:
3151:
3150:
3146:
3142:
3138:
3137:
3136:
3132:
3131:contributions
3128:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3106:
3105:contributions
3102:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3089:
3088:
3087:
3083:
3079:
3072:
3061:
3058:
3053:
3036:
3032:
3030:
3026:
3020:
3019:
3004:
3001:
2989:
2985:
2981:
2977:
2976:
2970:
2969:
2968:
2964:
2963:
2962:The Wordsmith
2957:
2952:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2939:
2938:
2933:
2927:
2919:
2918:
2913:
2912:The Telegraph
2909:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2898:
2897:
2896:The Wordsmith
2890:
2888:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2872:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2862:
2856:
2848:
2839:
2837:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2828:
2827:
2826:
2815:
2814:
2801:
2794:
2792:
2787:
2785:
2779:
2778:
2777:
2772:
2766:
2757:
2756:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2720:
2717:
2716:
2715:
2710:
2709:
2704:
2701:
2698:
2693:
2692:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2679:
2678:
2677:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2667:
2666:
2660:
2656:
2652:
2649:
2648:
2647:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2637:
2636:
2631:
2627:
2626:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2622:
2621:
2620:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2600:
2595:
2594:
2593:
2592:
2591:
2590:
2586:
2583:
2582:
2581:
2576:
2575:
2569:
2566:
2565:
2562:
2559:
2558:
2557:
2552:
2551:
2545:
2544:
2537:
2533:
2529:
2524:
2523:
2522:
2517:
2512:
2508:
2504:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2494:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2475:
2470:
2464:
2455:
2454:The Telegraph
2451:
2444:
2436:
2432:
2428:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2416:
2412:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2383:
2378:
2377:
2374:
2373:
2372:
2367:
2366:
2361:
2357:
2353:
2349:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2332:the talk page
2329:
2324:
2320:
2314:
2307:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2287:
2274:
2270:
2269:
2264:
2263:
2256:
2253:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2236:
2235:
2227:
2224:
2223:
2222:
2219:
2216:
2213:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2198:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2179:
2177:
2173:
2172:contributions
2169:
2165:
2160:
2156:
2152:
2149:
2148:
2137:
2136:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2120:
2116:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2098:
2095:
2092:
2089:
2086:
2083:
2080:
2077:
2074:
2071:
2068:
2063:
2059:
2052:
2048:
2045:
2044:
2041:
2030:
2027:
2021:
2015:
2004:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1980:
1971:
1968:
1967:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1931:
1926:
1922:
1921:
1920:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1910:InfiniteNexus
1907:
1903:
1897:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1856:
1854:
1850:
1846:
1842:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1777:
1773:
1769:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1702:
1698:
1694:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1679:
1678:InfiniteNexus
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1655:
1651:
1641:
1635:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1621:
1619:
1616:
1613:
1611:
1608:
1605:
1603:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1581:
1579:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1565:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1547:
1544:
1541:
1539:
1536:
1533:
1531:
1528:
1525:
1523:
1520:
1517:
1516:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1489:
1486:
1483:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1459:
1456:
1453:
1450:
1447:
1445:
1441:
1438:
1435:
1432:
1429:
1426:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1414:
1411:
1408:
1405:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1393:
1390:
1387:
1384:
1381:
1378:
1375:
1373:
1369:
1347:
1325:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
953:
948:
944:
939:
935:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
883:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
831:
826:
822:
817:
813:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
787:
783:
768:
767:
762:
758:
754:
747:
745:
741:
733:
729:
725:
718:
715:
711:
705:
701:
692:
686:
683:
679:
676:
673:
669:
665:
661:
658:
652:
651:Admin backlog
646:
642:
639:
632:
629:
625:
622:
619:
615:
611:
607:
606:
599:
595:
592:
588:
587:
584:
578:
577:
573:
569:
568:
564:
557:
556:
550:
544:
541:
539:
536:
532:
531:Miscellaneous
529:
527:
524:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
503:
502:
499:
497:
494:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
471:
469:
465:
462:
460:
457:
456:
455:
452:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
434:
432:
431:
429:
425:
419:
416:
413:
409:
406:
404:
401:
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
383:
382:
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
363:
361:
357:
351:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
324:
321:
319:
316:
315:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
301:
299:
296:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
280:
278:
276:Page handling
274:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
255:
251:
248:
246:
243:
242:
241:
238:
236:
233:
231:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
216:
213:
211:
208:
206:
203:
201:
198:
196:
193:
189:
186:
184:
181:
180:
178:
176:
173:
172:
170:
166:
160:
157:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
94:
92:
91:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
66:
62:
55:
50:
48:
43:
41:
36:
35:
32:
19:
8777:
8772:isinterested
8764:
8742:
8730:
8726:
8720:
8699:AusLondonder
8662:
8657:isinterested
8649:
8604:
8599:isinterested
8591:
8526:
8489:
8480:TheSlumPanda
8477:
8458:
8427:
8425:
8408:
8396:
8384:
8366:
8361:
8344:
8340:
8319:
8288:
8287:, consensus
8280:
8245:
8211:
8116:
8101:
8058:
8040:
8028:
8021:
7999:
7984:
7970:
7965:
7921:
7909:
7897:
7880:
7861:
7844:
7820:
7803:
7799:
7777:
7706:
7681:
7655:
7653:
7650:SerialNumber
7649:
7644:
7566:
7550:
7539:
7535:Data Science
7516:
7508:
7496:
7370:
7354:Carl Kassner
7319:
7315:
7311:
7304:
7296:User:GoodDay
7285:
7257:CometVolcano
7225:CometVolcano
7178:CometVolcano
7167:
7153:CometVolcano
7119:
7096:
7092:
7088:
7074:CometVolcano
7063:
7051:
7034:
7019:
6966:
6964:
6961:SerialNumber
6960:
6908:
6906:
6903:SerialNumber
6902:
6866:
6855:
6844:
6816:SafariScribe
6788:
6759:
6753:
6747:
6741:
6735:
6729:
6716:SafariScribe
6678:
6669:
6644:Unprotection
6566:
6544:
6509:Animal lover
6469:
6439:
6289:
6264:
6260:
6241:
6238:
6217:
6214:
6211:
6183:
6146:
6097:
5950:
5764:
5725:62.34.248.94
5709:Phil Bridger
5704:
5576:WP:BOOMERANG
5521:
5518:
5471:
5470:
5436:
5428:Talk:Zionism
5418:
5384:
5348:
5333:Talk:Zionism
5313:Coretheapple
5295:
5276:
5260:
5249:
5245:
5232:Coretheapple
5226:
5204:
5202:
5178:Pizza bianca
5143:Not involved
5142:
5131:
5117:
5103:
5099:
5098:
5047:
5030:
4908:
4860:
4850:
4757:
4720:
4716:
4679:
4675:
4649:
4645:
4643:
4615:
4556:
4424:Basmati rice
4365:
4345:
4336:
4332:
4328:
4323:
4319:
4315:
4310:
4286:
4266:
4248:
4203:
4152:
4136:
4105:
4072:
4041:
4020:
3977:
3958:
3941:
3938:Talk:Zionism
3917:my talk page
3911:
3900:
3878:
3867:
3805:
3798:
3792:
3787:
3783:
3781:
3770:
3761:
3716:Phil Bridger
3680:scream at me
3679:
3671:
3661:
3647:scream at me
3646:
3638:
3623:
3622:
3585:scream at me
3584:
3576:
3568:
3567:
3543:Phil Bridger
3537:
3525:scream at me
3524:
3516:
3502:
3482:
3437:
3426:
3380:
3338:
3290:
3223:
3203:
3195:
3119:criterion G3
3075:
3066:
3022:
3017:isinterested
3009:
2974:
2961:
2955:
2942:
2915:
2911:
2907:
2895:
2875:
2874:
2870:
2846:
2818:
2817:
2790:
2783:
2713:
2711:
2708:SerialNumber
2707:
2695:
2670:
2668:
2665:SerialNumber
2664:
2658:
2654:
2640:
2638:
2635:SerialNumber
2634:
2598:
2579:
2577:
2574:SerialNumber
2573:
2567:
2555:
2553:
2550:SerialNumber
2549:
2502:
2489:Super Goku V
2453:
2448:
2442:
2408:
2404:
2400:
2396:
2392:
2381:
2370:
2368:
2365:SerialNumber
2364:
2359:
2355:
2352:WP:BOOMERANG
2326:
2308:
2282:
2267:
2261:
2254:
2237:
2232:Participants
2220:
2217:
2214:
2211:
2209:
2205:
2201:
2189:Super Goku V
2180:
2150:
2118:
2117:
2109:
2108:
2099:
2093:
2087:
2081:
2075:
2069:
2057:
2056:
2035:
2014:WP:RFCBEFORE
1930:Talk:Twitter
1924:
1902:Talk:Twitter
1886:WP:DEADHORSE
1879:
1830:
1804:Cambalachero
1768:Talk:Twitter
1751:Super Goku V
1726:Phil Bridger
1711:Cambalachero
1697:Phil Bridger
1683:Super Goku V
1662:Cambalachero
1657:
1647:
1639:
1630:
1622:
1614:
1606:
1598:
1590:
1582:
1574:
1566:
1558:
1550:
1542:
1534:
1526:
1518:
1344:XFD backlog
1299:Other links
815:
764:
737:
735:
720:You may use
719:
698:
677:
662:Do not post
656:
644:
623:
613:
609:
553:
501:Village pump
489:New articles
454:Edit filters
433:Arbitration
359:User conduct
144:Open proxies
96:
61:Noticeboards
18:Knowledge:AN
8623:Bham (film)
8465:Bham (film)
8455:NPP Reviews
8434:qualifies.
8330:Mississippi
8318:Uninvolved
7881:SMcCandlish
7836:Mississippi
7342:Tioga Crest
7147:under both
7125:Floquenbeam
7101:Floquenbeam
7093:in practice
6956:Dark Judges
6659:Mississippi
6463:Backlog at
6276:revolutions
6106:ā robertsky
5974:Given that
5814:counterpart
5499:Selfstudier
5248:food, it's
5126:Cold fusion
5114:WP:INVOLVED
5105:WP:INVOLVED
4857:Bar Refaeli
4640:WP:INVOLVED
4428:Jollof rice
4358:talk to me!
4350:WP:INVOLVED
4190:Floquenbeam
4158:Floquenbeam
4092:Floquenbeam
3933:WP:INVOLVED
3929:WP:INVOLVED
3615:You know,
3479:Ratnahastin
3056:Mississippi
2507:WP:INVOLVED
2185:Giraffedata
447:Enforcement
403:Sockpuppets
308:Importation
267:Translation
179:Copyrights
114:Bureaucrats
8585:unreliable
8437:Clovermoss
8430:, I think
8367:SĀ Marshall
8208:Background
7866:WP:MILCAPS
7774:WP:MILCAPS
7087:I suppose
6757:blockĀ user
6751:filterĀ log
6444:LawNerd123
6417:LawNerd123
6244:STei (WMF)
6169:Sirocco745
6000:harassment
5984:page block
5904:Knowledge.
5727:) who has
5670:Sirocco745
5614:Sirocco745
5572:WP:NOTHERE
5082:PackMecEng
5064:Dan Murphy
5033:Dan Murphy
4588:(he/himĀ ā¢
4399:(he/himĀ ā¢
4008:(he/himĀ ā¢
3963:asilvering
3795:Bill Maher
3420:YunusĀ MIAH
3261:A.S. Brown
3232:A.S. Brown
3173:asilvering
2975:SĀ Marshall
2836:LilianaUwU
2682:Parabolist
2651:S Marshall
2630:S Marshall
2599:SĀ Marshall
2503:de rigueur
2429:(he/himĀ ā¢
2323:damp squib
2319:WP:GRENADE
2313:Kof2102966
2286:Kof2102966
2279:Discussion
2155:Kof2102966
2127:Kof2102966
2097:blockĀ user
2091:filterĀ log
1908:directly.
1904:, or edit
776:Open tasks
732:to do so.
714:not enough
680:Contact a
626:, try the
470:Questions
350:Undeletion
343:Miscellany
328:Categories
303:Protection
8727:Matrix(!)
8499:WP:SIGCOV
8473:consensus
8004:Thryduulf
7989:Mackensen
7951:Nil Einne
7932:Nil Einne
7927:WP:BEBOLD
7870:WP:NCCAPS
7849:Cullen328
7089:in theory
6941:Thryduulf
6763:blockĀ log
6476:Charlotte
6403:Nil Einne
6395:Nil Einne
6050:Gamergate
5996:WP:GENSEX
5561:WP:FRINGE
5109:WP:ARBPIA
4994:Valereee
4652:on topics
4586:Shushugah
4551:Shushugah
4397:Shushugah
4348:So while
4170:Floq, my
4006:Shushugah
3998:WP:POINTY
3808:Yours6700
3603:off-topic
3569:he thinks
3538:unsourced
3247:Ymblanter
2951:hung jury
2949:due to a
2746:Nil Einne
2697:Walrus...
2528:Nil Einne
2481:is listed
2443:Telegraph
2427:Shushugah
2119:Reasoning
2103:blockĀ log
2026:Alalch E.
938:Incidents
728:AN-notice
706:talk page
684:directly.
583:Shortcuts
516:Proposals
511:Technical
474:Help desk
459:Requested
418:Vandalism
408:Usernames
381:Sanctions
333:Templates
323:Redirects
250:Whitelist
245:Blacklist
154:Oversight
129:Education
102:Incidents
75:dashboard
8799:Category
8689:I think
8471:and the
8104:this RFC
8084:Johnuniq
7874:MOS:CAPS
7783:Dicklyon
7779:Abrams).
7667:Dicklyon
7612:Dicklyon
7585:Dicklyon
7553:Dicklyon
6924:RoySmith
6870:RoySmith
6830:contribs
6777:contribs
6733:contribs
6579:Johnuniq
6529:contribs
6187:Pinguinn
5786:and the
5454:Valereee
5404:Valereee
5370:Valereee
5281:Valereee
5208:Pinguinn
5168:include
5018:Levivich
4997:Created
4965:Created
4898:contribs
4841:contribs
4811:Valereee
4650:disputes
4646:disputes
4530:contribs
4508:Valereee
4498:contribs
4476:Valereee
4466:contribs
4443:Valereee
4370:Levivich
4253:Valereee
4232:because
4176:Valereee
4122:Valereee
4058:Valereee
4002:trouting
3994:Valereee
3800:The View
3797:said on
3784:mistress
3773:mistress
3430:contribs
3291:Backlog
3287:Resolved
2947:mistrial
2411:Levivich
2350:to read
2301:contribs
2262:Cambial
2110:Notified
2073:contribs
1987:contribs
1975:Chaotic
1947:contribs
1935:Chaotic
1859:Cortador
1849:contribs
1837:Chaotic
1793:contribs
1781:Chaotic
1741:movers."
1675:Pinging
1187:archives
1065:archives
943:archives
821:archives
753:archives
740:archived
630:instead.
521:Idea lab
479:Teahouse
442:Requests
318:Articles
188:Problems
8768:ctively
8743:useless
8653:ctively
8595:ctively
8484:article
8409:Endorse
8385:Endorse
8362:Endorse
8320:endorse
8285:WP:ONUS
8281:Endorse
8246:Endorse
7985:Comment
7966:Support
7898:Support
7862:Support
7626:GoodDay
7571:GoodDay
7095:, it's
6272:spin me
5563:in the
5432:WT:NPOV
5423:WP:NPOV
5227:Comment
5151:Zionism
5100:Comment
4935:they|xe
4878:they|xe
4785:they|xe
4747:they|xe
4706:they|xe
4666:they|xe
4420:Borscht
4234:Falafel
3882:chatter
3439:bonadea
3432:). See
3204:Blocked
3013:ctively
2932:they|xe
2878:Liliana
2861:they|xe
2821:Liliana
2771:they|xe
2469:they|xe
2358:WP:RGW
2268:foliarā§
2255:Endorse
2238:Endorse
2202:Endorse
2181:Comment
1318:Backlog
730:}} ~~~~
710:Pinging
288:Mergers
87:General
8577:WP:TOI
8520:Amigao
8444:(talk)
8399:buidhe
8188:voorts
8162:voorts
8140:voorts
8108:voorts
8080:WP:ANI
8033:were:
8000:Oppose
7992:(talk)
7976:(talk)
7922:Oppose
7912:buidhe
7845:Oppose
7821:Oppose
7751:Jester
7721:Jester
7698:WP:PCM
7694:WP:PCM
7682:Oppose
7645:Oppose
7600:WP:BRD
7490:10 at
7484:15 at
7478:10 at
7472:13 at
7466:12 at
7460:14 at
7454:10 at
7448:33 at
7442:63 at
7436:10 at
7430:69 at
7418:18 at
7406:12 at
7400:19 at
7382:13 at
7376:38 at
7364:, and
7195:Public
7037:Sdrqaz
6998:isaacl
6927:(talk)
6920:WP:ACE
6888:isaacl
6886:page.
6873:(talk)
6626:voorts
6366:Daniel
6360:Also,
6348:Daniel
6326:voorts
6308:voorts
6102:WP:SPI
6046:WP:SPA
6038:Yasuke
6021:Nobody
6016:WP:ARC
6008:Yasuke
5976:Xslyqs
5877:WP:SPA
5620:WP:0RR
5118:should
4928:Tamzin
4871:Tamzin
4859:, and
4853:hummus
4778:Tamzin
4740:Tamzin
4699:Tamzin
4659:Tamzin
4620:voorts
4568:(nest)
4436:Kimchi
4344:says,
4342:WP:PAG
4320:unless
3845:voorts
3788:affair
3777:affair
3387:YM Gud
3373:(talk)
3349:YM Gud
3335:YM Gud
3155:voorts
3141:ZZenyx
3123:voorts
3117:under
3097:voorts
3078:ZZenyx
2925:Tamzin
2854:Tamzin
2764:Tamzin
2462:Tamzin
2164:voorts
2140:Closer
2058:Closer
1366:Total
1069:search
947:search
825:search
757:search
657:urgent
616:, use
598:WP:ANB
506:Policy
293:Splits
8736:talk?
8587:. --
8461:asked
8346:Andre
8222:WP:AN
8182:said
8031:BLP's
8022:User
7806:Sadko
7656:54129
7424:3 at
7412:4 at
7394:3 at
7388:7 at
7030:Spicy
6967:54129
6909:54129
6789:Ponyo
6613:Trout
6512:|666|
6293:Icc27
6265:78.26
6121:Xslyq
6119:well.
6093:Xslyq
6079:Xslyq
5986:from
5934:Xslyq
5919:Xslyq
5857:Xslyq
5839:Xslyq
5792:Xslyq
5745:Xslyq
5652:Xslyq
5634:Xslyq
5594:Xslyq
5543:Xslyq
5438:Andre
5386:Andre
5350:Andre
5297:Andre
5262:Andre
5250:about
5246:about
5049:Andre
4910:Andre
4759:Andre
4722:Andre
4681:Andre
4432:Dolma
4316:would
4288:Andre
4268:Andre
4205:Andre
4138:Andre
4107:Andre
4074:Andre
4043:Andre
4022:Andre
3979:Andre
3943:Andre
3823:WP:AN
3475:too.
3473:image
3457:Nthep
3402:Nthep
2714:54129
2671:54129
2641:54129
2580:54129
2556:54129
2371:54129
2334:of a
2328:about
724:subst
674:here.
670:, or
591:WP:AN
427:Other
338:Files
298:Moves
257:Style
8758:Izno
8732:user
8703:talk
8693:and
8637:Talk
8628:Grab
8579:and
8561:talk
8543:Talk
8534:Grab
8325:Star
8265:talk
8231:talk
8192:talk
8166:talk
8144:talk
8124:talk
8120:Loki
8088:talk
8069:talk
8008:talk
7971:Tony
7955:talk
7936:talk
7872:and
7853:talk
7831:Star
7787:talk
7748:SWAT
7718:SWAT
7671:talk
7630:talk
7616:talk
7589:talk
7575:talk
7557:talk
7521:and
7502:and
7261:talk
7229:talk
7199:talk
7192:Izno
7182:talk
7157:talk
7129:talk
7120:Done
7105:talk
7078:talk
7068:and
7041:talk
7022:Izno
7002:talk
6982:talk
6945:talk
6934:See
6892:talk
6826:talk
6822:Elli
6800:Elli
6773:talk
6769:Elli
6745:logs
6727:talk
6654:Star
6630:talk
6617:Moxy
6594:Moxy
6583:talk
6548:Moxy
6525:talk
6521:Elli
6487:talk
6454:talk
6421:talk
6407:talk
6399:talk
6370:talk
6352:talk
6344:here
6330:talk
6312:talk
6297:talk
6248:talk
6173:talk
6153:talk
6125:talk
6110:talk
6083:talk
6065:talk
6040:and
6027:talk
6006:and
5938:talk
5923:talk
5895:talk
5861:talk
5843:talk
5823:talk
5796:talk
5774:talk
5749:talk
5735:and
5713:talk
5688:talk
5674:talk
5656:talk
5598:talk
5584:talk
5547:talk
5503:talk
5458:talk
5408:talk
5374:talk
5317:talk
5285:talk
5236:talk
5194:talk
5176:and
5086:talk
5072:talk
5037:talk
5022:talk
4953:RTH
4894:talk
4837:talk
4624:talk
4590:talk
4526:talk
4512:talk
4494:talk
4480:talk
4462:talk
4447:talk
4401:talk
4374:talk
4311:much
4257:talk
4194:talk
4180:talk
4162:talk
4153:only
4126:talk
4096:talk
4062:talk
4010:talk
3967:talk
3870:Nate
3849:talk
3841:bold
3831:talk
3812:talk
3775:and
3720:talk
3547:talk
3485:talk
3461:talk
3447:talk
3436:. --
3434:this
3424:talk
3406:talk
3391:talk
3353:talk
3345:here
3322:Moxy
3297:Moxy
3265:talk
3251:talk
3236:talk
3227:and
3177:talk
3159:talk
3145:talk
3127:talk
3101:talk
3082:talk
3051:Star
2750:talk
2686:talk
2628:Hey
2532:talk
2516:talk
2493:talk
2431:talk
2415:talk
2297:talk
2246:talk
2221:Path
2193:talk
2168:talk
2131:talk
2114:diff
2085:logs
2067:talk
1983:talk
1977:Enby
1961:talk
1943:talk
1937:Enby
1914:talk
1863:talk
1845:talk
1839:Enby
1822:talk
1808:talk
1789:talk
1783:Enby
1774:and
1755:talk
1730:talk
1715:talk
1701:talk
1687:talk
1666:talk
1363:Sep
1360:Aug
1357:Jul
1354:Jun
1308:Talk
1053:1167
1048:1166
1043:1165
1038:1164
1033:1163
1028:1162
1023:1161
1018:1160
1013:1159
1008:1158
1001:1157
996:1156
991:1155
986:1154
981:1153
976:1152
971:1151
966:1150
961:1149
956:1148
702:must
647:add
643:For
612:and
608:For
240:Spam
109:Bots
97:Main
8782:Ā» Ā°
8762:LCU
8667:Ā» Ā°
8647:LCU
8609:Ā» Ā°
8589:LCU
8289:for
8250:DRN
8217:DRN
8158:RfC
8043:DMY
7890:š¼
7533:or
7028:of
6685:to
6597:š
6551:š
6100:at
6018:).
5980:SPA
5705:are
5538:5.
5534:4.
5530:3.
5526:2.
5522:1.
5419:not
5124:or
4925:--
4868:--
4818:she
4808:RTH
4775:--
4737:--
4696:--
4656:--
3961:--
3684:š¤
3651:š¤
3589:š¤
3529:š¤
3513:š¤
3369:PMC
3325:š
3300:š
3027:Ā» Ā°
3007:LCU
2922:--
2881:UwU
2851:--
2840:not
2824:UwU
2791:Kip
2784:The
2761:--
2511:Joe
2483:at
2459:--
2218:hed
2215:nis
2212:Tar
2208:".
2016:).
1615:115
1492:AfD
1481:96
1468:RfD
1444:FfD
1420:MfD
1396:TfD
1385:10
1372:CfD
1293:340
1288:339
1283:338
1278:337
1273:336
1268:335
1263:334
1258:333
1253:332
1248:331
1241:330
1236:329
1231:328
1226:327
1221:326
1216:325
1211:324
1206:323
1201:322
1196:321
1175:487
1170:486
1165:485
1160:484
1155:483
1150:482
1145:481
1140:480
1135:479
1130:478
1123:477
1118:476
1113:475
1108:474
1103:473
1098:472
1093:471
1088:470
1083:469
1078:468
931:365
926:364
921:363
916:362
911:361
906:360
901:359
896:358
891:357
886:356
879:355
874:354
869:353
864:352
859:351
854:350
849:349
844:348
839:347
834:346
742:by
712:is
526:WMF
313:XfD
149:VRT
8801::
8784:āt
8750:}
8738:-
8734:-
8705:)
8669:āt
8634:-
8631:Up
8611:āt
8563:)
8540:-
8537:Up
8440:š
8395:)
8391:Ā·
8351:š
8309:š¬
8267:)
8233:)
8198:)
8172:)
8150:)
8126:)
8090:)
8082:.
8071:)
8063:?
8056:.
8038:.
8010:)
7957:)
7938:)
7908:)
7904:Ā·
7878:ā
7855:)
7789:)
7776::
7673:)
7632:)
7618:)
7591:)
7577:)
7559:)
7506:.
7360:,
7356:,
7352:,
7348:,
7344:,
7340:,
7336:,
7332:,
7328:,
7263:)
7231:)
7201:)
7184:)
7159:)
7131:)
7123:--
7107:)
7080:)
7043:)
7004:)
6984:)
6947:)
6894:)
6832:)
6828:|
6779:)
6775:|
6636:)
6585:)
6564:Ca
6531:)
6527:|
6505:}}
6499:{{
6490:)
6484:ā¢
6456:)
6423:)
6409:)
6401:)
6372:)
6364:.
6354:)
6336:)
6318:)
6299:)
6274:/
6250:)
6194:š§
6175:)
6155:)
6127:)
6112:)
6085:)
6067:)
6030:)
5940:)
5925:)
5897:)
5879:.
5863:)
5845:)
5825:)
5798:)
5776:)
5751:)
5715:)
5690:)
5676:)
5658:)
5600:)
5586:)
5578:.
5549:)
5505:)
5497:.
5475:iz
5460:)
5443:š
5410:)
5391:š
5376:)
5355:š
5335:,
5319:)
5302:š
5287:)
5267:š
5238:)
5215:š§
5196:)
5188:.
5172:,
5088:)
5074:)
5054:š
5039:)
5024:)
4915:š
4900:)
4896:/
4855:,
4843:)
4839:/
4815:he
4764:š
4727:š
4686:š
4630:)
4592:)
4532:)
4528:/
4514:)
4500:)
4496:/
4482:)
4468:)
4464:/
4449:)
4403:)
4376:)
4356:|
4354:me
4324:or
4293:š
4273:š
4259:)
4210:š
4196:)
4182:)
4164:)
4143:š
4128:)
4112:š
4098:)
4079:š
4064:)
4048:š
4040:.
4027:š
4012:)
3984:š
3969:)
3948:š
3855:)
3833:)
3814:)
3722:)
3676:|
3659:Ca
3643:|
3627:iz
3581:|
3562:.
3558:.
3549:)
3521:|
3463:)
3408:)
3393:)
3371:ā
3355:)
3267:)
3253:)
3238:)
3179:)
3165:)
3147:)
3133:)
3121:.
3107:)
3084:)
3029:āt
2752:)
2688:)
2534:)
2495:)
2433:)
2417:)
2360:or
2356:or
2303:)
2299:/
2265:ā
2248:)
2195:)
2174:)
2157:,
2153::
2133:)
2112::
2060::
1989:)
1985:Ā·
1972:?
1963:)
1949:)
1945:Ā·
1916:)
1898:.)
1865:)
1851:)
1847:Ā·
1824:)
1810:)
1795:)
1791:Ā·
1770:,
1757:)
1732:)
1717:)
1703:)
1689:)
1668:)
1658:so
1631:11
1607:25
1591:34
1583:43
1551:55
1519:12
1505:1
1502:0
1499:0
1496:0
1485:96
1478:0
1475:0
1472:0
1457:4
1454:1
1451:0
1448:0
1433:5
1430:1
1427:0
1424:0
1409:7
1406:1
1403:0
1400:0
1389:15
1382:5
1379:0
1376:0
1067:,
945:,
823:,
755:,
722:{{
708:.
693:}}
689:{{
666:,
653:}}
649:{{
574:.
8786:Ā°
8780:@
8778:Ā«
8770:D
8766:A
8729:{
8701:(
8671:Ā°
8665:@
8663:Ā«
8655:D
8651:A
8613:Ā°
8607:@
8605:Ā«
8597:D
8593:A
8559:(
8507:(
8393:c
8389:t
8376:C
8374:/
8372:T
8303:A
8300:F
8297:C
8263:(
8229:(
8194:/
8190:(
8168:/
8164:(
8146:/
8142:(
8122:(
8086:(
8067:(
8006:(
7953:(
7934:(
7906:c
7902:t
7888:Ā¢
7885:ā
7851:(
7785:(
7742:ā
7712:ā
7669:(
7628:(
7614:(
7587:(
7573:(
7555:(
7259:(
7227:(
7197:(
7180:(
7155:(
7127:(
7103:(
7076:(
7039:(
7000:(
6980:(
6943:(
6890:(
6824:(
6818::
6814:@
6798:@
6771:(
6765:)
6760:Ā·
6754:Ā·
6748:Ā·
6742:Ā·
6736:Ā·
6730:Ā·
6725:(
6718::
6714:@
6632:/
6628:(
6615:@
6581:(
6523:(
6478:(
6452:(
6446::
6442:@
6419:(
6405:(
6397:(
6368:(
6350:(
6332:/
6328:(
6314:/
6310:(
6295:(
6278:)
6270:(
6246:(
6235:.
6171:(
6151:(
6123:(
6108:(
6091:@
6081:(
6063:(
6055:.
6024:(
5936:(
5921:(
5893:(
5859:(
5841:(
5821:(
5794:(
5790:.
5772:(
5760:.
5747:(
5743:.
5711:(
5686:(
5672:(
5654:(
5643:P
5640:T
5636::
5632:@
5628::
5624:@
5616::
5612:@
5596:(
5582:(
5545:(
5501:(
5472:L
5456:(
5406:(
5372:(
5315:(
5283:(
5234:(
5192:(
5158:P
5155:T
5084:(
5070:(
5062:@
5035:(
5020:(
4937:)
4933:(
4892:(
4880:)
4876:(
4835:(
4787:)
4783:(
4749:)
4745:(
4708:)
4704:(
4668:)
4664:(
4626:/
4622:(
4609:1
4607:+
4553::
4549:@
4524:(
4510:(
4492:(
4478:(
4460:(
4445:(
4372:(
4255:(
4192:(
4178:(
4160:(
4124:(
4094:(
4060:(
3965:(
3885:)
3879:(
3875:ā¢
3851:/
3847:(
3829:(
3810:(
3746:)
3742:(
3718:(
3624:L
3545:(
3487:)
3483:(
3459:(
3427:Ā·
3422:(
3404:(
3389:(
3367:ā
3351:(
3312:P
3309:T
3263:(
3249:(
3234:(
3211:P
3208:T
3175:(
3161:/
3157:(
3143:(
3129:/
3125:(
3103:/
3099:(
3080:(
3031:Ā°
3025:@
3023:Ā«
3015:D
3011:A
2984:C
2982:/
2980:T
2934:)
2930:(
2863:)
2859:(
2843:?
2834:@
2773:)
2769:(
2748:(
2684:(
2659:Y
2655:X
2608:C
2606:/
2604:T
2568:*
2530:(
2518:)
2514:(
2491:(
2471:)
2467:(
2413:(
2315::
2311:@
2295:(
2288::
2284:@
2244:(
2191:(
2170:/
2166:(
2129:(
2105:)
2100:Ā·
2094:Ā·
2088:Ā·
2082:Ā·
2076:Ā·
2070:Ā·
2065:(
2053:)
2049:(
2024:ā
2022:)
2018:(
1981:(
1959:(
1941:(
1912:(
1861:(
1843:(
1820:(
1806:(
1787:(
1753:(
1728:(
1713:(
1699:(
1685:(
1664:(
1623:0
1599:3
1575:1
1567:3
1559:9
1543:7
1535:1
1527:1
1509:1
1461:5
1437:6
1413:8
1350:V
1189:)
1185:(
1071:)
1063:(
949:)
941:(
827:)
819:(
759:)
751:(
746:.
726::
716:.
659:.
640:.
620:.
414:)
410:(
81:.
53:e
46:t
39:v
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.