7998:(I paste here the answer I gave to Netherzone). Ok thanks for letting me know. Frankly, I am a bit surprised about your vision (even after I tried to explain a bit myself...). However, I will try to explain it better than I did in the past. I start from the Cilento International Poetry Prize: I read that many times you wrote that it is a Prize that Lerro gives to people to make them to adher to the Movement. As I have already told you, the Prize was born 2017 while the Movement was born 2020, therefore it means two things: first, that important authors accepted the prize before of the movement existence, and second that they have chose to adher to the Movement in a next moment (did you consider for a moment that maybe great authors, included a Nobel Prize for literature, are trusting this movement and wanted to be part of it? I do not think Menotti Lerro was so able to corrupt even all of them to promote himself and his movement...). Still, the Prize has been financed by Italian Ministry of Culture for 140.000 Euro (it happened in the last two years because they liked and trusted this Prize and the same Movement, which is part of the artistical project). Moreover, I wish to tell you I was creating these profiles starting from the list included in the ACCADEMIC VOLUME "The Empathic Movement, Cambridge Scholars 2023 and paperback 2024" published in UK of adherents to the Movement: I DID NOT do it to promote people and the movement in a malicious way, but I was thinking, in good faith, they were encyclopedic profiles, therefore I thought it would have been nice to create the lovely ferment which is involving so many important people both in Italy and abroud... (please look things from another point of view: a beautiful, new Movement is born and 200 and more good artist and scholars and people of culture wanted to be part of it... and now, after all this is already "living" in volumes and articals, I thought It was nice to put it also on Knowledge! The thing that you say that "someone adhering a Movement cannot talk of the same Movement or of his founder", is a bit unconfortable to answer for me: high literary cultured world is connected (thanks to God) therefore it is normal in this field they talk to each other and adher to a Movement of one of them if they respect him. But it is not a limit, or a cheating thing, it is just genuine relations and collaborations among artists, critics, poets, scholars, academics, ecc... they like the work of someone else in the same field or related field and want to talk, write criticism and sometimes adhere to a new movement... Critics such Alessandro Serpieri (writer), Francesco D'Episcopo, Roberto Carifi, Maurizio Cucchi, Giorgio Barberi Squarotti and many others have not been teachers of Menotti Lerro but just in the years they appreciated him, wrote of him and finally wanted to be in his Movement (what is wrong with this?) (and what is wrong if also his own old academic professors trust him so much to adher to his movement?) all this is just a merit, I think, not a bad thing. IN ADDITION: Please, do not quote only local articals: Lerro has been mentioned on many national and international articles such as Corriere della Sera, Il Mattino, Il Sole 24 Ore, The New Arab, "Gradiva" Magazine, "Poesia" Magazine, Nuovi Argomenti Magazine. I understand that something as this movement does not happen often... But can you just for a moment consider that a pretty interesting new Movement arose in 2020, from Italy, going on in a more or less fast way towards the World (it happened after so many decades that something like this did not happen... and never in the past something similar happened starting from the South of Italy...). Lerro is not a powerful, rich person who could be so able to influence so many important authors just to "cheat" academic publishers and now Knowledge... It seems just a relevant, new, beautiful situation spreading good feelings and literature and art in the World... (therefore i thought that also, and in particular, it should have be on Knowledge as the amazing expression of "š" to welcome new pretty important, and maybe very relevant things.) In the Movement there are also young artists and cultured, passionate people and maybe ONE, TWO or THREE OF THEM WANTED TO MAKE THIS EFFORT to tell to the world also through Knowledge the beauty that all of them, starting from the founder - which has 4 academic titles (included MA in Uk and Phd) and studied and taught or was visiting around ten different universities, and wrote 40 creative fiction and no fiction volumes - are creating! You, maybe, should help all of it and be pleased to help to put it on Knowledge... Do you think that good authors could exist just in the past? Maybe Lerro is one that is working pretty well nowadays... cannot be? (would you so surprised for instance if a Nobel Prize was creating this Movement?). Well, Lerro is not a Nobel Prize but it does not mean he cannot create a notable movement or being a good author the same... I think. In conclusion, dear Netherzone, I ask you to not go too far with your thoughts and ideas about what is going on. All of this is extremely clean, and fruit of deep work and passion. Please look things from another point of view and, if you can, I ask you even to help to improve some of the profiles have been created. Maybe not all of them are encyclopedic (sorry if I thought so) but many are at 100%, starting with the Nobel adhered to the movement who DID NOT receive the "Cilento Prize", while the Nobel Prize for literature 2023 got this year the "Cilento Prize" and I see he did not adhere to the Movement... (so as you can see, maybe things are not really as you are thinking. I hope you can change your mind and, as I said, even help a bit if you like...). Thank you a lot to give me the opportunity to explain a bit better everything. With very best wishes.
11688:, in the same way that even an entirely different editor's conduct can become the focus of an ANI discussion, so too can other behaviour by the reported editor--even be it very distantly related to the original matter raised. And I'm not so entirely convinced that the intersection here is as small as you frame it. Now obviously, I just very vociferously defended your opening of those RfCs as presumptively valid actions, absent more particular evidence on disruption on your part. That is because, for better or for worse, wars of subjectivity over lead images are just a phenomena on this project that aren't going anywhere, and RfCs are probably the quickest way of resolving them. As such, even given that you are opening more of them than is typical for a given editor, I didn't see that it was reasonable to penalize you for what I assume are good faith (if arguably mostly pointless) efforts to make your case for a change on each article. That said, this additional infobox issue highlights just how pedantic you are willing to be about the smallest and most inconsequential of changes, how divorced your arguments can be from a policy predicate, and how many characters-worth of time (your own, and finite community time) you are willing to spill to pursue your preferred vision of these tiny details. The order of those names in that infobox is not something even your typical devoted WWII history editor would think was worth invoking an edit. Among those few who would, almost all of them would recognize it was certainly not worth edit warring over, and among those who did edit war (however briefly), fewer still would have thought the matter worth a talk page dispute. Now, I discount the lack of perspective there somewhat, because the discussion clearly illuminates the fact that you are not the first to dispute the ordering of those names--which just goes to show that, much as with some of the persons they cover, for some of our military history editors, there really is no hill too small to die on. But what really pulls this behaviour into potentially disruptive territory is that once you created the discussion, the arguments you proceeded upon were constructed of nothing but idiosyncratic views and
11435:
second most populous nation had just ordered the project to remove certain content which was the subject of the dispute. Pretty much the best case for the necessity of the process, and someone questioned it, reflexively. Now, I'm not stating that editor's name here because their approach isn't the issue. My point is that if you open an RfC at present, it gets challenged; that's almost always a given reality. So from the start I'm not considering pushback an automatic indicator that there is a problem with an given proponent's approach to RfC. Now, are the number or the hit rate more concerning to me? Not really on the number: one or two a month on average is well within what I consider acceptable rates. The fact that the status quo was retained roughly 84% of the time does suggest that at least some of these could have been avoided. But as I mentioned at the outset here, opinions on the best lead images tend to be quite varied and loosely bounded by the policy language on point. It is just one of those things which often best solved by bringing in a cluster of un-involved editors to break the deadlock. And they are often the quickest, most painless and straight forward discussions you will have, with a clear consensus usually formed quickly. Yes, when I get to one, I do often honestly do a little eyeroll that this discussion couldn't have been resolved short of RfC. But then commenting is quick and these RfCs more often than not end up being a little amuse-bouche of a dispute. And for me, the aggregate community time spent only has to be lesser than any disruption that might have been caused by leaving the issue unresolved between two small, entrenched camps unable to reach a consensus by itself. Long and the short of it: I'm not seeing the issue with the existence of these discussions, so far as has been presented here so far.
11696:. But you brought absolutely no such to bear, and the main thing that seems to have animated you was the perspective that Stalin, "a mass-murdering dictator with a death toll that rivals that of Adolf Hitler at the top of the Allied Powers" above FDR. Now, is all of this worth a sanction? No, not really. But taken with the rest above, it does highlight some very salient points you clearly need to take on board. You are chewing through too much community time for too little gain (both because your positions in these cases are generally non-winners and even if they were, the benefit of the changes is too minuscule compared to the effort needed to effect them). In short, you need to do a better job of picking your battles, because sooner or later it will not just be community time that these issues will be sapping, but also community patience. Even good faith activities by well-intentioned volunteers can be judged net-negatives to the project, given certain particulars.
14457:
don't think that this user deserves an indefinite ban from GAN/FAC/FLC/PR/DYK. I'd support a 6 month restriction that sawyer proposed instead. TheNuggeteer should in the future address concerns and constructive criticism from other more experienced contributors instead of ignoring them. During this 6 month period (if approved), they could work on improving other parts of
Knowledge such as those that asilvering proposed. I feel like you've also received enough information on what things you should improve on from your GANs. The main concern seems to be the prose and the use of non-encyclopedic tone. As a side activity, I'd strongly recommend you take a look at our other (recently promoted) GAs and FAs, read the criteria more thoroughly, and learn how those articles were constructed. The restriction could possibly become indefinite if others conclude that you did not improve after your first temporary restriction.
11430:
so loose and the precedents so indeterminate that subjectivity creeps in and you just have to bring in extra voices and have a straight forward consensus. RfC is one of my main modes of talk space contribution; I think I've contributed to somewhere between 1,000-1,200 over the last 15 years. And what I've noticed over the last few years is an absolutely startling uptick in efforts to shoot down most RfCs before they have even started on either procedural grounds or a general implication that the RfC is unnecessary. Honestly, it's the vast majority today: it is much more the norm than the exception, now. We actually just had what might be reasonably described as our most important important RfC to take place on an article talk page in years, and the very first comment in that discussion? A suggested procedural close because
14578:
TheNuggeteer chooses to work on
Knowledge moving forward, it is clear that they need to improve their communication with and ability to accept feedback from other editors when valid concerns are being raised. They seemingly ignored or did not pay serious attention to the issues that were raised on their talk page several times and the GAN talk page, and did not appear to take the feedback they were receiving on board. That is why this ultimately ended up at ANI. If this persists, I'm afraid we might end up back here again at some point in the future. In addition to temporarily stepping away from featured content processes, it is my hope that TheNuggeteer also uses this opportunity to make constructive changes in their approach to communicating with other editors and responding to their concerns.
10056:
indefinite blocks. Also, I'll copy something I wrote at
Wikipediocracy re IP school blocks: I check the last school year's contributions of an IP range before I block them and if a significant portion of their edits are tagged as reverted (a relatively new feature), I block them ... and sometimes find unreverted vandalism that way. Usually for the ones I've blocked like 90% of their edits are vandalism to either articles or talk pages and the other 10% are either silly but harmless replies to their user talk page or updates to their school's article (which are sometimes good, sometimes not). A lot of pages are on my watchlist because of vandalism, often from school IP's, that has gone unreverted for a while.
4569:. I patrol a long list of Western, Central and Southern Asian articles, which are constantly plagued by these type of users. The majority of them would be a shitshow if I didn't almost single handedly take care of them (including making hundreds of SPIs). I don't do or say this to get thanked or some sort of badge of honor. However, I am not a fucking punching bag, and I wonder if the same carelessness was shown if I belonged to a more historically persecuted group, such as an African American or Jew. Let's be honest, it wouldn't, and that's a good thing. Such behaviour should be taken seriously - but that should equally apply to ALL backgrounds. --
6367:, though I had assumed at the time it was because of my errors in editing, then went one for several more hours to make my additions in the same style of the original article, yet I can't help but see this as another user who simply hates Arabs, and Arab sources. The note is Xenophobic, offensive, and worthless. Why is the summary of the battle being used as a springboard for an agenda? That literally what it is being used for, not what it is assumed to be used for. Not only did I not remove the note, I simply added more information to the topic. But the first user here added the link here from the talk page, hence the second user's remark.
10501:
and may still do, Knowledge is not a utopian social experiment. Vandals exist. Point-of-view pushers and promotional editors exist. Well-meaning doofuses can do a lot of damage, and that includes newbies and people lacking the competence to edit for whatever reason, and also people fixated on "correcting" the
English of articles. Admins are made admins in large part for their cluefulness in identifying all of those problems and figuring out how to deal with them. What's largely happened in this case, I think (I disagree with Graham87 about school IPs) is that his use of the blocking tool has indeed diverged from community expectations, as
12351:, at this point, I think that this discussion would end if you simply stopped replying to everyone and stopped trying to defend yourself. No one has proposed sanctions, they raised concerns and I hope what they said had an impact on your future conduct around RFCs and a reconsideration if all of the ones you started were really necessary. But I think this whole discussion would end if you ceased replying to every comment and returned to regular editing. But if the problems perceived by other editors persist, there might be a return visit to ANI. As for now, I recommend disengaging from this discussion.
3767:. If any of the those three points were not the case, I wouldn't have closed it. Any RFC that had a chance would require rewritingāas their attempt to do so in reopening shows. I have no compunctions about it being a SNOW close if I'm to trust my own faculties, and I feel that's been vindicated by the fact that no one has challenged the close on its meritsāas opposed to challenging it on procedural grounds as you're doing here (and are completely within your rights to do, of course). That it seemed appropriate to do after only a day is a function of just how weak the RFC's premise was.
8750:
Empathetic
Movement that lists all of their names or the claim is based on the fact that they won this literary award. I think this is a weak attribution and the statement that an academic belongs to a literary movement should be based on statements by that author themselves, we should take the claims of the movement on who its members are. And I think if the article subjects have a demonstratable notability based on their academic or literary work, we shouldn't hold it against them that an editor with a different COI created or contributed to these articles.
3747:, my question to you is why did you close this RFC after one day? RFCs typically last at least one week or longer. And I don't think 3 editors' opinion merits a SNOW close after just one day. I think our understanding of SNOW has gotten way out of whack, it's used too often when there is just a small group of editors who agree when it is supposed to be used for a tidal wave of Keeps, not just 3 editors. That's a "consensus" that could easily change with a few more participants and 1 day is not long enough for editors to even discover that the RFC is going on.
8094:
by the other. I repeat, they are only hipotethical cases, just to tell you, that there are possibilities... (but I see you just want to find a good reason to offend myself...). Maybe another thing is that in the second house in the same little village lives there with old parents in a secon house he goes to visit sistematically.... (you should not be so strict to imagine the reasons of others, in case it would be really the same person). Anyway, all of these are only suppositions to let you consider reasons at your focused question. All the best
13041:. In brief, "poop" is vandalism but changing a default category sort may be an incorrect good-faith edit. Also, Commons links are sometimes unhelpful and their presence needs at least a nod of discussion. However, the IP is making about a hundred edits a day but has never commented. Many of their edits have been reverted so I issued a partial block for three days to encourage them to start discussing their proposed changes. Let me know if it continues without consensus but please try to engage them in a discussion without templated warnings.
5445:) has been made aware of their talk page but does not respond there or here. Since the mainspace-block, they have repeatedly recreated an article on their user page and repeatedly uploaded a copyright-violating image to Commons to use on their user page ( that's being dealt with on Commons). The article on their user page was deleted yesterday by Justlettersandnumbers under U5, and Edit the error has just restored it. With their problematic edits, refusal to communicate, and misuse of userspace, I think it's time to stop the disruption.
3100:: they has repeteadly derailed the RFC and refusing to engage in constructive dialogue. Preventing consensus. they has actively worked to prevent the community from reaching a wider consensus by monopolizing the discussion and dismissing opposing viewpoints. Gagging the procedure: their actions have effectively stifled the RFC process, preventing the community from having a fair and open discussion. I urge you to take immediate action to address this issue and ensure that the RFC can proceed in a productive and respectful manner.
10747:
sing or say negative things about the UK, and seems determined to call them "Anglophobes" without bothering to provide references to reliable sources describing them as
Anglophobes. His edits to various members of the Farrell family are to attempt to deny that they are English while failing to produce any reliable sources that they are not English. My conclusion is that this editor is an ethnonationalist POV pusher who simply does not see the need to provide references to reliable sources verifying his contentious assertions.
4150:"Further provoking editors who are already clearly upset"? Sorry, but really? What gives them the right to be upset? Are we just going to ignore their blatantly xenophobic (borderline racist) attacks? I am the one who should be upset here. I am just following procedure, I can't have the patience of a saint when a user is persistently attacking me and just generally disregarding our policies. You gave them a chance to strike their personal attacks, they refused and doubled down. Are there not any repercussions? Or is
8770:, I agree that many of these claims were added by the socks promoting Empathism rather than a neutral source or the person themself. I too found that the list of "members" or "adherents" were coming from Lerro/Empathism or from the socks. Many of these people are indeed notable, some are not. To my way of thinking we should keep the notables but remove the promo/spam, and either AfD or redirect the non-notables that were simply added because they signed the Empathism manifesto or were designated a "member".
8043:
this thing (arriving to mock me... "indomito teatrante" and such) which, sorry, doesn't seem so relevant to me... (but maybe I was and I am wrong. I don't reeally know so well all these rules... Sorry!) My connection is that of someone, with a bit of knowledge of literature and art, passionate of all this new work has been done and the nice ferment is going on. If I can I will keep writing happily of it, if I cannot anymore, because I did something wrong, I will stop. Thank you a lot. All the best.
2294:
12326:
they are already aware that their contribution there was, even though in alignment with the ultimate disposition of the infobox, less than ideal behaviorally. My comments here and elsewhere (forever) indicate that I am sometimes pedantic and am usually willing to continue arguments when others would think it a waste of time and effort. If those other edits can illuminate a behavioral pattern, that can give us an idea of what to expect in the future, and therefore what changes to recommend.
13917:
14597:. I also think that TheNuggeteer needs to address their lack of communication with others as well as how they have seemingly ignored feedback from others. Their lack of communication is ultimately what led us here and I donāt feel that a topic ban will be sufficient without them improving this pattern of behaviour. Additionally I think they should do a co-review or at least have someone checking over their reviews if/when they return to the GA process.
10485:
often can be hard to distinguish a paid editor from somebody who just wants to write an article on a musician or influencer they like. That's why the SPI backlog is so long. Still, it's better to let a sockpuppet or COI go than it is to block legitimate editors who are trying to learn. We do need a lot more admins to handle various backlogs, but driving out newbies before they can gain experience is only going to make the problem worse in the long run.
8173:"One, Two, Three" is just to say I DO NOT KNOW if there are more people involed in creating the articles... It could be one, or two or three or ten as for all Knowledge articles i guess, (I was not really thinking at all of this). I really let me know I do not understand your aim starting from personal little mocking you did on me since the beginnig. Maybe someone should look at yo too... Kind regards
6627:
the range Arab sources cite. Why is this note not being left in place for all the Greco-Persian battles now? According to the reasoning deployed in the aforementioned article by the two users here, where primary sources are omitted for the sake of offensive remarks, all numbers in all Greco-Persian battle articles (in particular the summary) ought be omitted for the sake of that singular note, which
7859:, and itās various projects and members. Itās obviously a COI project, and I feel confident in saying it is likely UPE ā perhaps the work of a PR firm to promote Lerro and his associates and projects. Both editors have denied having a COI, claiming to be fans, however Gingeksace admitted asking Lerro for photos to publish, however for an āunconnectedā editor they sure know a lot about Lerroās life.
10513:
different kinds of cases, how rapidly do they block, when do they use indef, how long are their blocks on IPs. Some of your comments, here and elsewhere, indicate you study editors who you think might be promotional, and schools that produce problematic edits. Step back from blocking and instead turn that analytical focus on current blocking practice for a while. You've drifted from best practice.
9800:...once they make such an unambiguous statement I agree that an immediate block is reasonable. There is no alternative beyond "you are prohibited by policy from editing unless and until you withdraw it", and it's reasonable discretion to enforce that with a block. Legal threats aren't a level1 up to level4 warning situation, and it's not for us to try to discern how serious they are about it.
9245:
7863:
8810:, as one example. I don't think the listing of his name among many others on an empathist web page is adequate sourcing for this. He did edit a volume of poetry by Lerro but it doesn't seem very central to his publications. I agree with Liz above that if any of the rest of this pile of articles avoids deletion, we should look carefully at whether any empathist claims are warranted.
11467:
example of you speaking to a second community member like you spoke to Nemov there, we'd probably be talking about a serious sanction right now. I know I would be amenable to a topic ban at the minimum. The fact that, even in the heat of the moment, you thought that was an acceptable way to interact in a collaborative workspace raises serious questions about your
7188:
English as a second language years after birth, and who are clearly here to build this encyclopedia. I will happily copyedit their little quirks. They are among our best editors, and I commend them for the work they do. This editor's writing, on the other hand, is at least an order of magnitude worse. Their prose approaches deranged and hallucinatory territory.
11184:
of other editors if they so rarely change the status quo. I'm not against change but it looks like this hasn't been an effective way to change articles. It could be low participation (an issue all over the project) or the wording of the RFC or just your timing. But if you keep trying a method with little success, I'd probaly move on and try something else.
11144:, I have no obligation to give you my assessment at this point. As an administrator, I am still investigating and I expect you to answer my questions frankly and honestly as you did my initial question. Please do so. Stonewalling is not a good strategy for you. Be fully responsive to the concerns about your RFC conduct that have been raised here.
13502:. I got called a "dictator" even though 316 Knowledge editors supported me becoming an administrator and I do my best every single day to justify that support. Most amusingly, I got called "little". There are quite a few active editors who have met me face to face over the years, and they can all attest that I am 6'-3" and about 240 pounds.
6975:
doesn't write like a person who is an
American attorney. Her Instagram is all modeling photos but I checked the Bar website and a woman with this name is a practicing attorney. There is just something that doesn't gel with her presentation of herself and her claims about JoĆ£o Teixeira de Faria who, she states repeatedly, is just like Gandhi.
12101:
to. I really don't feel like taking the aspersions seriously, but it's fairly clear that our positions expressed were not the same: I thought the ordering was arbitrary and likely shouldn't be changed because it could cause further disruption, while Nick-D did not think it was arbitrary, and claimed the ordering was based in what RS say.
6416:, are you using primary sources on an article about a battle from antiquity? You should not be doing that, no, except in certain circumstances (such as to say something like "Tertullian said that 'blah blah'; however, modern historians believe that 'blah blah'." Weaving together an article based on historical sources from antiquity is
1721:. Responding to people with things like "so according to me it doesn't make sense" and "it's still unfair" are not helpful or substantive. Make all your points and leave others to make theirs and let the closer evaluate consensus. An ANI warning was fair at this point, though I don't think action needs to be taken if you actually
12980:), removing Wikiquote templates, Rotten Tomatoes templates, as well as TCMDb, AFI, stub sorting templates et al. Supported with no edit summaries. They are now edit warring to restore their desired versions. Given their far-reaching dedication I would not be surprised if this is an IP sock of a past persistent vandal.
8903:, and others, while other editors are draftifying those with potential or redirecting others if there's a suitable target; I've been cleaning up the ones that seem to be notable and doing a little of all of the above. This sort of teamwork on a clean up effort like this is such an amazing aspect of this community.
14910:'s user page proudly states their status as "Knowledge Evader" and also calls for people to use their talk page to chat with. I wasn't very sure whether ANI was the right place to put this since it's labeled as "for urgent incidents", but AN says that narrow issues, like user related ones, should be put in ANI.
12972:- I and others have warned this IP numerous times. They vandalised past my 4th warning so I reported them at AIV but was directed to take the issue here. Their edits are varied but focus on horror film-related articles. They include incorrectly altering sortkeys, refactoring book ISBNs without hyphens (against
10526:
promotionalism. (And personally I think you're overly suspicious of new editors who show clue or even familiarity with the rules or the mark-up. Sometimes they're long-term IP editors, people using some WMF gizmo, retired professors, computer professionals, or simply geniuses ... but I'm known for my naĆÆvetĆ©.)
9986:. I hope it continues and, on second thought, was hasty with my earlier comment. I donāt want to see him deysysopped, but the community doesnāt have the power to decide whether or not someone has used the tools fairly. When thereās reasonable arguments to be made for either side, I do support escalation.
11332:, I have already directed you to the appropriate pages and asked you to take on board the feedback you have received from other editors. If you choose to reject that advice, then please be prepared for some negative consequences if you ignore the warning that I gave to you. The choice is entirely yours.
4803:
offense to HoI keeping strictly to our requirements for sourcing and NPOV in this topic area. Zemen's personal attacks should not be taken lightly, and their claims of "typos" around ethnic insults are not believable. Seeing admins dismiss them out of hand & accuse HoI of "bullying" is appalling. ā
4991:) uses the iOS mobile app to edit. Although they've only been editing since 6 September, their talk page is full of messages and warnings. They found their user page (and are using it to draft an article) but there's no sign that they've seen their talk page. Some of the messages are about copyright.
4241:
serious attempt to try to take the temperature down when dealing with content disputes, even if you think the other editor is stupid, wrong, rude, or all three. What you've done here instead is try to get the other editor blocked. You should both apologize to each other for the misunderstandings (yes,
14279:
does a review with a more experienced reviewer. I know co-reviews arenāt common with GA but I think this could be really helpful in the learning process. I did try to reach out with this idea but didnāt get much of a response. Either this or if they choose to do reviews after their ban someone checks
13907:
TheNuggeteer has been given every opportunity to receive guidance from more experienced editors, but shows no signs that they understand they are being disruptive, nor that they are taking steps to prevent it. I cannot in good conscience recommend an indefinite block against a good-faith editor, so I
12169:
I'm still hashing out my position on drive-by templating: at this moment, this is a case where putting a big maintenance banner atop a highly developed, highly visible article for what is a potential but not universally perceived problemāis more disruptive and unhelpful than you starting a discussion
11854:
The first makes your bold change; the second reverts to your bold change. (The third is unrelated.) Making a change, getting reverted, re-reverting, and being re-reverted again actually can constitute edit warring. It might not be a problem worth enforcing ā you know that if the speed limit is 40,
11434:
hadn't been satisfied. Nevermind that the most cursory search of the archives and the circumstances would have immediately revealed that it was a highly contentious issue going back to the article's inception, that there had been numerous previous discussions, or that the
Supreme Court of the world's
11220:
If I do what, exactly? You have yet to provide me with specific criteria on when it is or is not appropriate to open an Rfc in the future. Unless you say otherwise, this seems less like a constructive warning and more like an indefinite ban on my ability to open Rfcs even if I have a valid reason for
10500:
Here from the
Wikipediocracy thread, where I've weighed in a few times and so for transparency's sake, I should join the conversation here, too. Speaking as a former admin and also just as a long-time editorĀ ... I appreciate Graham87's working to protect the encyclopaedia. As it used to say somewhere
10394:
I'm neutral on whether anything ought to be done about Graham87, but I do want to suggest that the current state of the unblock request list perhaps aggravates this type of thing. You have a relatively small number of admins taking on an extremely large workload that -- let's be honest -- consists of
9753:
The NBM of Africa, which is known as the Neo-Black
Movement of Africa is registered under the laws of Nigeria. This published article is defamatory and we as an organization will not stand and watch criminals or unscrupulous elements damage the reputation of this Organization. We have written a court
9334:- Keeps making unsourced date changes, hasn't responded to warnings, and /64 has previously been blocked for 3 months in February 2024 and a month in November 2023 for disruptive editing - every edit from this /64 going back months is unsourced date changes. Recent examples of unsourced date changes:
8108:
PS about my words "we all know that about many authors there are people close to that authors" I just wanted to say that usually it is clear that very often behinde contemporary authors there are people close to them... It is at the least my impression. But I did not mean myself in that close way...
7847:
Regarding User:Nihaon created 7 articles on Lerroās Empathic Movement members/adherents during the same time as Gingeksace creating dozens. Nihaon also removed COI templates from several articles involving Lerro & Empathism. Of their 900-some edits most have been to add content or name-drop Lerro
6626:
to scare away anyone that's after the spread of inconvenient facts. It seems the article for the battle is being used as a springboard to cast a shadow of doubt over all Arab sources with a note, one that is utterly nonsensical by the fact that non-Arab sources use figures that are actually MORE than
6187:
In the talk page the user refuses to include anything that doesn't agree with them I'm new to the wiki interface so I cannot use wiki as weapons of abuse as well as he can. I am not interested in engaging with a party that actively hampers knowledge. Here is the previous wiki page, Please look at and
4240:
Let me put it this way: what I see here is an experienced user deciding to bully a less-experienced user with an ANI report instead of trying to calmly resolve a content dispute that went only mildly sideways before the ANI threats started. Has Zemen behaved well? No. Have you? Also no. Please make a
4177:
more experienced editor, I'd expect that you know when to take a step back. I haven't looked at the sources, but given your experience, I expect you're the one who has the right of the content dispute here. Once you can explain that to the other editor without feeling needled by their response (which
4172:
Anyone has the "right" to be upset. It's a normal human emotion, and it's perfectly normal to feel that way when someone has frustrated you. Reversions are frustrating; they're upset. You feel attacked and are also upset. I can certainly understand your frustration. But neither of you are going to be
3924:
I asked you once directly and three times indirectly to end the arguments because we won't reach a conclusion, and you don't like to see 'a word', but you kept going, that I donāt know what you want. you can just remove my edits and let me know what to do in the edit summary, not come to my talk page
2641:
Alright, I'll bite: since you have no personal information on your user page, how is it the charity could have possibly found you on social media? How would the police be coming to your door? As far as "weaponising" the Online Safety act goes, the information about the inquiry appears not merely to
13970:
I empathize with you when you say this is incredibly scary, because frankly, this forum generally is. Especially for people still new to some aspect of Knowledge. What I would advise right now, before the heat gets intense and gets to you, is to step away from the site for a couple of days and allow
12240:
I don't know how long you've been reading this thread but the tone is hardly what I would characterize as friendly. The overall aim by some of the editors here seems to be to significantly limit if not outright stifle any further contributions of mine to this project. If I sound "manic", that is the
12100:
deserves any particular sanction or redress, that's news to me. Secondly, could you please relax? Casting aspersions against me or others seems like another unneeded ratcheting up of what is already a fairly manic dialogue on your part. As someone who is also capable of mania, it is not fun to reply
11044:
Outside of this focus on infobox image RFCs, Emiya1980 seems like a good editor, but theyāre taxing the RFC process with needless RFCs. I could understand if they were improving the project, but most of the RFCs are ending in status quo. Maybe itās time to focus on something else? The RFC process is
10746:
without providing a reference verifying this highly contentious claim. I could be wrong but I have been unable to find reliable sources that verify that Oliver has renounced his UK citizenship or that he broadly dislikes "British people". The editor also clearly dislikes Irish musical performers who
10512:
Graham87, stop blocking people (except for the most obvious and nasty vandals) and recalibrate your sense of blocking policy and its implementation. Maybe choose 2 or 3 admins active in blocking (and not checkusers or other special cases) and analyse their blocks in recent months: what do they do in
10484:
I do a lot of SPI work, so I completely understand how difficult it can be to maintain a good attitude when dealing with the worst of the worst. Still doesn't excuse this. I often close SPI cases without action even when my instincts tell me they're a sock, because I can't prove it. Even for UPE, it
10399:
when they just come in to review a single editor's appeal on a request than it is for an admin who has just spent hours dealing with UPEs, angry failed autobiographers, and vandals. If there are admins who have the ability and time to provide assistance here, I'd urge them to consider reviewing more
8935:
Sure thing, there are a few AfD's for some with questionable notability, and I noticed this morning that another editor had PRODDED 4 or 5 articles. Mostly what needs to be removed from the notables is the spam/promo about Menotti Lerro and his "cultural movement", the Empathic Movement (Empathism).
8235:
Anyway, please, try to consider that in that case I even did not could imagine these things... (people I guess does not even know about all these a bit inedd strict rules...). And honestly I think that I have explained very deeply my reasons and goood faith even if I did some whatever eventual thing
8190:
Sadly your approach over the years has always been that your abuses are unimportant and that other users should overlook them. If only you had just read the relevant policies and abided by them we wouldn't be here now. But here we are looking at a sockmaster operating multiple accounts in one narrow
7927:
I then looked at the two usersā overall editing histories and noticed that they never seem to be online at the same time, often having clear days when only one is online, or otherwise apparently tagging each other in and out through the course of a day (as for example on Sept 1, 15, 17, 19, 20 &
6991:
My edits are professional anf pointed at clarity of a human being being murdered by the way this page is written. The word "murder" is used the way it appears in legal act to this writing. I am an attorney United States Supreme Court barred, I write enumerating all basis for rewrite as instructed by
6889:
As whole, this article reads: Criminally deceptive, unfounded, malicious and criminal labeling to indict murder through Knowledge meant to be informative only. Not a neutral portrayal of a biography. Pointed to murder, written from a pointed perspective to take life. Non neutral igniting violence in
5621:
when I got bombarded by a bunch of talk page notifications and emails that I couldn't clear. It's hard to figure out how to get rid of that yellow banner when the software doesn't like the location of your talk page. And then you panic/lose a lot of good faith given the new location of my user page.
4821:
out of hand here. I have said (quite clearly, I think) that Zemen has behaved poorly, and that it's entirely understandable that both editors here are upset. I have not said that there should be no actions taken. I remain convinced that it's always best to be collegial to editors you're in a content
3301:
inadvertent about my revert of your edit. It's bizarre that you interpreted Remsense's comment as justification to reopen the RFC, it was inappropriate for you to reopen that RFC (let alone for the second time), and it was even more inappropriate for you to change the wording of the rfc after it was
2752:
Hmm. As a Brit myself, I am unconvinced by "it's a small country where everyone knows everyone." I am certainly not on friendly terms with every single one of the other 69 million people on these isles. Regardless, about the article - that section dominating an article for a 156-year old charity is
13070:
If you have posted a lot of templated warnings on their talk page, they really do not need you repeating it all again. Post a regular talk page message, trying to connect with the editor rather than posting any more notices. The goal is to get this editor to communicate, not to scold them. But this
13055:
Thank you, Johnuniq. Sorry for any imprecise language. I was going to start a non-templated discussion on their talk but noticed you have already done so. I already (as required) notified them of this ANI discussion. So I won't repeat all of my grievances listed here. But I will make mention of the
12325:
Of course, any and all edits provide information about the editor's abilities, interests, and behavioral patterns. For example, the WWII edits indicate that Emiya1980 is willing to carefully follow clearly stated, objective rules to the letter. Remsense's comments here and elsewhere indicate that
12211:
I meant what I said above: if you feel people need to "take the fall" or write a page's worth of dialogue over a tiny incident, that's a you problem, and others really aren't required to follow your logic to its conclusion. What matters is that editors are able to work with each other, which I feel
11429:
It's very peculiar that no one, neither the OP nor the reported party, thought to point out that all of these RfC's have a common purpose--specifically, that they are all for the purpose of deciding on a lead image. So here's the thing--this is just one of those areas where the policy language is
11183:
But if the assessment at the beginning of this case is true, all of these RFCs have not resulted in any changes. So, I guess I would try to appeal to the fact that we all have limited amount of time we can work on this project and ask whether starting another RFC is a good use of your time and that
11158:
I confess to pushing the envelope with regards to publishing notices about Rfcs which I have opened or am otherwise involved. I also admit fault with regards to opening more than one or two Rfcs at a time. However, if more than a few editors are involved in a discussion and a decisive consensus has
10322:
There is a general agreement that, for some time now, there have been intermittent issues with Graham87's use of the block tool, and of issues with WP:INVOLVED. Graham87 has been admonished for doing so, and has agreed to work harder in the future to abide by the restrictions on admins using their
10157:
be evaluated on a procedural basis, as Graham87 reviewed himself and revoked talk page access. One other general note, I noticed that Graham87 has used the phrases "your editing pattern is highly suspicious" and "you are not welcome here" toward multiple editors whom he blocked for relatively mild
10072:
I'm not going to weigh in here in either direction as I closed the prior thread but I'm not sure what another ANI achieves when these are about blocks that happened before the prior thread. Were you hoping Graham would go through their past blocks and reassess? If you think it merits tool removal,
8093:
NO. I tried to give an hipotethical answers at the question you did. Another hipothethical answer is someone else has what (you) see as "similiar style". In additiopn: PC keep (remind) the passwords, so maybe I could just use two different accounts because one password is reminded by one PC and one
8042:
I do not know... but: in case, (it is ipothetical) I would have another house and I go there to eat and pass my other kind of time and maybe I created a second profile because I did not remind the password of the first account, would it be such a bad thing? It seems to me you are so curious to know
7091:
Rsjaffe, there is no legal threat in what was written. What was written in old version of article is clear criminal defamation on its face and could bring legal action as it incites violence and ignites riot. You are taking a human being's life away through criminal prose which is actionable, not a
6200:
I did not alter the xenophobic note that he put in place of the figure, or the figures that were there before. I fixed them as they were being cited as medieval estimates, which nonsensical. I added additional numbers and actial primary sources because I am neutral as far as what had happened, but
5499:
For that matter, whatās to say this isnāt someone planning to make that draft up, then have a sock replace the existing article with the junk theyāve ripped? Maybe letās not take that risk? This is, of course, in addition to the Copyvio notices theyāve removed, and AFC declines, that I pointed out,
4854:
HistoryofIran is a very hard working editor operating in an unbelievably difficult topic area. While doing that work they are consistently beset by uncivil ethno-nationalist POV pushers. HistoryofIran is fully deserving of the community's support and thanks. They shouldn't have to put up with being
3271:
You're hindering the discussion by not engaging with the points of site procedure and policy communicated to you by literally everyone who has engaged with you so far. You're not entitled to discussion on your terms alone, and there's no particular reason we care about "alternative perspectives" if
2938:
I think topic banning GDX420 from attempting to investigate or fix COI editing would be a reasonable step here, since a lot of the disruption seems to stem from their belief that this article is being edited by COI editors. They have had issues with lacking the competence to properly deal with paid
2528:
That misrepresentation of the source on the Pune rename is problematic for me. Its a false representation of information and straight up NPOV and incorrect rename of an article. Its more than that. I don't know enough about the area to call for a topic ban. A simple reading of the source, it states
1493:
Agree. This editor has been asked to provide summaries on the editor's talk page (twice by me), and has been told about the MoS, but has made multiple edits ignoring it despite warnings by other editors, all warnings without any result. This is especially problematic as the editor's edits are often
14456:
I've recently seen some TheNuggeteer's contributions and warnings they received. I personally wanted to weigh in and recommend them to step away from what they've been doing at GAN, though I ultimately didn't because of the lack of responses at previous warnings. Despite everything they've done, I
13732:
I am here after every alternative means of intervention has been exhausted and with extreme disappointment that it has come to this. TheNuggeteer is a newer editor who has been getting involved in several content processes and some administrative tasks. While without a doubt approaching their work
11471:
for this project. I would strongly urge you to not get within a kilometer of the kind of "Ok, time for you to shut up." style of statement to a fellow community member going forward. It was very hard for me to separate my thoughts about your decision to open the RfCs, as discussed above, from how
11312:
ready to throw anything he can at me to stop me from bucking his preferred version of the status quo, I need clarifications on what is acceptable and what is not (especially when dealing with guidelines as contradictory and open to interpretation as these). If you are not willing to provide me the
10516:
When you resume blocking, always watchlist the blockee's user page (or maintain a separate list of user pages to check every day). It's courteous, I think most admins do it, and for whatever reasons, a large percentage of people don't follow the instructions for filing an unblock request using the
8683:
Anyone have thoughts on whether this "garden of delights" is undisclosed paid editing, or just the garden-variety COI? The reason I ask is I've been tagging some of the articles as COI, but am wondering if PAID would be a better clean up tag to use. Many thanks to those who are already starting to
7120:
Even if the Vmarkova isn't suggesting they will personally take any action, the chilling effect of making such threats remains. If there were substantial problems with any of our articles Vmarkova could have brought them up without saying someone might be subject to criminal sanction for not doing
6621:
actually. The user conducted themselves in bad faith, not being assumed to. Again, explain yourselves, you who also aided them in their corruption of the article. The xenophobic note is contradicted by other sources; non-Arab, non-Muslim sources. Yet again this is omitted, censored, and obfuscated
6239:
Without evidence? What? How is removing numerical figures for a derogatory note acceptableĀ ? Are all primary sources taboo on wikipedia now? Should all battles from antiquity, or even the modern era (as the figures from them too are contested) ought to be replaced by a concise offensive remark? By
4802:
HoI has been dealing with a constant barrage of harassment from POV-pushers in a highly contentious area of the Wiki for years. Their reports to ANI have been extremely on-point, and at this point deserve the benefit of the doubt. EducatedRedneck is correct, a lot of ethno-nationalist editors take
4787:
exists, but we also need another essay (if it doesn't exist) that we can't just let new editors come in and attack long-term editors with no consequence. That's a good way to lose long-term editors, too. For old-timers, I'm thinking of Malik. HoI does not need to accept attacks on his ethnicity
4770:
I'm sorry, I don't have time to dig too deeply into this. But I do agree that there are repeated personal attacks in there, and that the repeated claims that they're all just typos is untrue on its face, and that HoI does not need to just take them forever. I've left a warning at their talk page
4736:
Other comments, such as the "laughing while eating chips" one, come off as dismissive, implying that reaching a compromise is not Zemen's objective. I don't think an indefinite block is needed, but something should stop the disruption now and make it clear to Zemen that it will not be tolerated in
3470:
In the meantime, I kindly request that you and the concerned editors reconsider your stance and engage in a constructive dialogue through the RFC process. I believe that open communication and a willingness to participate are essential for resolving disputes and maintaining a collaborative editing
2880:
Honestly it seems like GDX420 is determined to just turn the entire article into a hit piece against the RNIB, and their edit history does show that perhaps they're a little too obsessed with doing so. Does the scandal have a place, yes it does. Does it deserve to override everything else and even
2618:
Since adding the content staff from the charity have contacted me via social media demanding my full name and address and when I refused to provide them with this information gangs of Police officers have been showing up at my house banging on my door in the middle of the night waking up the whole
1635:
was opened and failed. The editor bludgeoned folk there, was warned. The merge never got anywhere. The articles were then moved to Afd to get a better consensus. However, the editor is bludgeoning folk there as well, was warned at Afd, but still doing it which is stalling the discussion on them as
14577:
I have been watching this situation from a distance over the last week. At this time, I support a 6 month topic ban from participation in featured content assessment processes (e.g., DYK, GAN, FA, FL), broadly construed, at a minimum, based on the totality of what I have seen. Regardless of where
14428:). i mostly just want to encourage them to slow down and focus less on points or green circles and more on substantively improving articles without incentive. i also completely understand how nerve-wracking it can be to be taken to this board, and i appreciate the kindness shown here by everyone.
14121:
A good plan, I think. The open-ended nature of an indefinite ban would be extra stress for this particular editor, and would probably lead to unban requests that made everyone unhappy. I would broaden the topic ban to include contests as well, since I think they share the same perverse-incentives
10373:
I personally don't have confidence in this admin at all, unfortunately. Everyone makes mistakes, of course, but this is way, way beyond that. It is active, repeated and ongoing abuse of admin tools. I think an apology by Graham87 to some of the inappropriately blocked editors such as StattoSteven
10055:
I will endeavour to use more warnings than blocks from now on where feasible (it can be harder for IP and especially IPV6 users ... and in my experience many warnings are ignored, but that could be confirmation bias) ... and I'd forgotten there was a separate section of the blocking policy about
8788:
I agree with Liz that whether an individual belongs to a movement should be based on their own comments, rather than claims made by others. However, given the significant practical problems of sourcing such comments in Italian, and the very large number of articles involved, can I suggest that it
8726:
But then the fact that the ringleader was apparently the same in both 2015 and 2024, despite the fact the the 2015 campaign failed, makes me question that idea. Similarly the rather amateur nature of the activity, using someone with poor English skills and no understanding of Knowledge policy and
8370:
I think you'll have better results from filing an SPI (it's very straightforward, I've found) than trying to badger Gingeksace into an admission. A good faith explanation does exist: two editors with similar interests and different schedules. I'm dubious, hence why I think the SPI is a good idea.
7931:
It looks to me as though one end user has been editing the various articles as essentially a full time (and thus paid?) endeavour over the last 4 weeks, alternating between 2 different accounts. Either that or the activity is closely co-ordinated, which would strongly support the idea of COI/UPE.
4716:
First, HoI has a history of being taken here, typically by NOTHERE editors who don't like their reliance on scholarship. While I below may assume too much good faith, I by no means fault HoI for having exhausted theirs; they edit in a topic area prone to vitriolic nationalism, and I commend their
4225:
So does Zemen just get away with all their attacks, including in this report, where they have called me "childish" twice? Do you think that's okay? Is it allowed to attack users and engage in namecalling due to their perceived ethnicity? Two other users have called them out for their behaviour in
12901:, if you supplied a few diffs (I'd say between 3 and 8) of edits you were concerned about, rather than just listing accounts, you might get more of a response here. You need to point out the obvious rather than expecting editors to go looking for what the problems are. That's just my suggestion.
12266:
If you don't want your editing to be seen as problematic, I'd strongly suggest taking the feedback various editors have provided in this thread on board as this type of editing and the way in which you participate in related discussions (including this discussion) is not constructive or helpful.
10505:
suggests. It's become abusive at times. With an added problem that he isn't good at explaining to the user in plain English what they've been doing wrong (far from the only admin with that issue, but our PAGS can be counter-intuitive and our jargon can be hard to understand, and admins should be
10187:
I've deemed an editing pattern highly suspicious when it seemed like an editor was trying to get to autoconfirmed/extended-confirmed (perhaps for nefarious purposes) using minor edits to pad their edit count. My use of "you are not welcome here" has probably been rather harsh and I'll avoid that
8542:
Lots of articles all about Menotti Lerro etc., lots of socks all with indistinguishable interests and editing patterns. Ringleader seemed to be an account called Rainermaria27 who used poor English to express sentiments very similar to those expressed by Gingeksace above (e.g. rules breaches are
8221:
different accounts. E.g. when adding wikilinks one account consistently used the summary "underlined name" while the other consistently used the summary "highlighted name". However, you were given away by the fact that the two accounts were never online together and tagged each other in and out.
6734:
Go away man. You're neither interesting, nor worthwhile to me. I asked for arbitration, because you are clearly an oldhand at abuse of the system here and I did not want the article to remain corrupted. Enough terror tactics. How many Editors has this user scared offf wikipedia, followed by them
5373:
Following U5 deletion of their user page and deletion of the copyright-breaching image from Commons, they've recreated the page with a different copyright-breaching image. They still haven't responded on their talk page or here. Their creation still seems to be low-quality LLM copypasta to which
14254:
A thought occurs. If you like doing GA Reviews, what else would be up your street, on-wiki? Letās find Nugget something else to do, that theyāll like. Preferably something that is easier to pick up, and less damaging if it goes wrong. If itās the āreading long thingsā aspect, the COPYEDIT drive
9786:
I, for one, am concerned they (at least ostensibly) jumped to filing a court order after their AFC was denied, rather than discussing it. That's a tad more drastic than an ANI filing. Unlike a mere threat, which can be made in the heat of the moment, it indicates they are unlikely to back down.
8220:
As I said above, it would be the usual reason for sockpuppetry. i.e. passing yourself off as more than one end user. The deception in that regard between Gingeksace and Nihaon was actually quite subtle, including using two entirely different styles of language for the edit summaries for the two
7812:
Forgive me for the length of this report. I am bringing it here rather than to COIN because itās an ongoing problem, and there have been efforts to resolve these issues, but the problems have recently escalated, and it seems that a type of "walled garden" has been created. These two editors are
7187:
I, too, endorse this block for the belligerent and irrational legal threats, and also agree with Grandpallama that this editor lacks the minimum level of English language competence required to edit here. I am very forgiving of the minor English language errors of good faith editors who learned
11466:
That is not, however, to say that I see nothing wrong with Emiya's conduct inside the discussions after they have started. Emiya, let me be blunter than my diplomatic colleagues have been above: your conduct on the Mussolini article was so over the line that had there been even a single extra
6974:
I'm almost wondering if this is impersonation. She has two college degrees, passed the California bar exam and yet her English in the edits to the article and talk page, are barely coherent. She uses the word "murder" liberally in a way that has no connection to its actual or legal meaning and
6120:
User is conveniently again using selective quotations that suits their bias. "I included several references and citations, you did nothing but include a note by some guy. Ought I find some note about how worthless persian sources are." The charge of xenophobia is nonsensical as the xenophobic
4751:
Context is key when it comes to something along the lines of "Naturally a X would believe Y"... If Zemen was making a simple bias argument there is a way and a place to respectfully bring up a potential bias based on nationality or ethnicity... What Zemen absolutely can not do is use a real or
10525:
about new articles, suggesting they ask at the Teahouse, using short-term protection rather than repeatedly reverting, or asking at a noticeboard or on another admin's user talk (or, dare I suggest it, on Discord/IRC/e-mail) if you are at wit's end over something that seems, for example, like
8749:
I've looked at some of these articles and I think the claim that all of these scholars are part of this intellectual movement is tenuous and probably added to their articles and infoboxes by these socks. The primary source I've found to ascertain their "membership" is a publication of the the
6635:
omitted for that note? By their reasoning there is a far greater case to make for that. Not only is it similar in scope, not only are the parties involved named in that illustrious note, it lacks corroborating non-Greek sources for numbers involved to boot; unlike the situation here which had
5316:
The file's been tagged for copyvio speedy on Commons, so we might as well wait for that to happen since they keep restoring it. Obviously they saw the message about their talk page and decided to ignore it. I guess as long as they can't be disruptive in mainspace or add copyrighted content to
10089:
The previous thread (which I didn't participate in) was about a single bad block. Every admin makes an occasional mistake, I've made plenty. My digging showed that it looks to be a much larger issue, but realistically Arbcom is not going to accept a case, admonish, or yank the bit unless the
7129:
regular, I can say that from my experience such threats do not make us take their concerns more seriously. They actually cause us to take them less seriously since probably 95% of the time when editors make such threats there isn't a problem or at least not a significant one. (Although per
6153:
It's obvious that I cut parts of the quote to only highlight your attacks (hence the "...."), which is what is the point of this report. And by all means, please show the diff that says I rejected a source because it was by an Arab, because such diff doesn't exist. All I did was mention
2709:
You are underestimating how much information a dedicated person can find about a person online. One photo can compromise location, one shared username(or even email) could expose private accounts, email and some money is all that is necessary to reveal personal information collected by
6320:
does not support removing everything to suit xenophobic tendencies. And again they're the figures being used in modern scholarship, as elaborated in the talk page. What is this nonsense? In addition their ad hominem against my contributions are baseless, they actually resulted in a
3324:
I have attended to 1. modified RfC by changing the query 2. including the supplementary material and being prepared to include further supplementary materials till you cease gagging the process 3. and using every available method to allay the worries of any participating editors .
14001:
Well, I'm not sure I'd say you "deserved it", but you did have a lot of opportunities to get off this path, and you didn't take them. But it's going to be okay. Mostly what you've done is driven a bunch of people crazy, and we'll get over it. Let's find you something else to do.
2598:
I have created and maintained a section the the Charities Commission enquiry into, amongst other things sexual abuse of the charity's beneficiaries at an RNIB facility in Coventry. The content is supported by national news outlets considered reliable for contentious statements;
6559:. I have no interest in some racist xenophobe. How many Editors has this user scared off wikipedia, followed by them running around talking about how the grandeur of their contribution, how many contributions of higher value has their existence prevented by his terror tactics?
4463:
Focusing on my alleged ethnicity. I don't care what they claim, E and O are not even close to each other on the keyboard, it's not that hard to spell "Persian". "Porsian" is a not a word. Clearly, they meant "Poorsian" ("Poor-sian"), a common xenophobic remark against Persians.
9920:) looked especially unwarranted, as well as 8 IP blocks that were anywhere from 1-10 years that I shortened because I felt them excessive. There were several more that I thought were questionable but within reasonable admin discretion, so I left those alone. Graham87's response
4069:
Still donāt know which personal attack you guys accusing me of. he called my edits 'non-neutral', simply because I tagged his language and not the other, and I told him in return that your comments are 'too persian' not following wiki rules. What is there to accuse me of here?
10621:
A short aside re school blocks: I started blocking schools more aggressively after noticing that some IP's would have gaps of years in ther contributions, and figuring out that was due to long-term range blocks by other admins ... so I emulated and perhaps overextended those.
14617:
Could an admin please semi-protect talk:Hassan_Nasrallah for two days? The amount of IP vandalism and disruption, much of it openly racist and derogatory, is at levels I've never seen. I requested at RfPP but the backlog there is very heavy and urgent action would be needed.
12023:
I hold you responsible only for your part of the edit war. You did not believe that you were involved in an edit war. I have explained that there really was an edit war underway. Your part in the edit war might be smaller, but that doesn't mean that there was no edit war.
2205:, before this discussion snowballs into sanctions, can you stop participating in these identified AFDs? I'm sure you have already made your opinions known at this point. But this step would be a start in curbing some of your behavior which has been identified as problematic.
2623:
to whitewash their reputation, mislead their donors and keep their Royal charter by any means neccessary. What steps can be taken to de-escalate this matter while preserving the article's independense and objectivity? What legal rights do I have as a content creator on this
10865:. Happymappy took to continuing to reinstate their unsourced additions, as well as disrupt Willondon's user and talk pages. Happymappy has created a very obvious sock account, called Happymappy123, seemingly to get around their p-block on Carlisle Public Schools imposed by
8730:
So on balance I would conclude it was someone close to Lerro, or otherwise involved in his movement, but perhaps not paid specifically for this work (for which they were evidently unsuited). Maybe it was an agent who was doing this as well as other non-wiki related duties.
4440:
11412:
situation. This maybe goes hand-in-hand with an increasingly "legalistic" approach to Knowledge, especially among newer editors: they want a case and they want a ruling and they want precedent. I really wish there was something the community could do to tamp down on this.
4847:
That sort of false equivalence is, I'd suggest, really quite offensive. Anybody being racially abused, in any walk of life, clearly has an absolute right to file a report and for that report to be taken seriously. To imply that raising such a report is itself an abuse is
8784:
Most of the BLP articles listed at the top of this thread contain a sentence in the lede along the lines of "is an adherent of the Empathic movement". The relevant sentence always(?) seems to be cited to a webpage for the book mentioned by Liz, which includes a list of
5473:. Not building the encyclopedia, not collaborating, not communicating, not respecting copyright in images, previously inserted errors and copyright-violating text into articles, repeatedly made nonsense AfC submissions, all despite many messages and warnings. Enough.
4724:
The "Porsian" comment is suggestive, but I've seen weirder typos happen. Given Zemen's imperfect grasp of English, I don't think it's beyond the pale to suggest it could have been an honest mistake. Similarly, the "childish" exchange I could chalk up to translation
8012:
Please explain how Gingeksace and Nihaon have the same editing style and agenda, but are never editing on Knowledge at the same time, and can frequently be seen to tag one another in and out through the course of a single day. You operate both accounts, don't you?
4728:
Even discounting those, there remains a core of incivility which should be addressed. The biggest one is the focus on nationality; I'd expect anyone who said, "Of course a Mexican would think X" or "Naturally a Czech would believe Y" would get a swift block for
14204:, I agree with you that it would help with familiarizing one with GA, FA, or FL criteria, but at the moment I don't feel comfortable letting them proceed without the guidance of mentors, which to me is a less destructive alternative than independent reviewing.
2737:
on the platform, there is nothing much we can do. Even if there is, it would likely result in a block on that account making the threat. As for your offline personality being known, there's nothing much we can do. You may have to seek legal advice on your own.
1508:
This editor has never replied to any messages on their Talk page, so I have to assume that they have never read them. They probably don't even realize that anyone is sending them messages. I'm not sure how to contact them in another way to get their attention.
10644:
User:DanielTokenhouse has made persistent controversial edits to various articles implying that the subjects harbour Anti-English/British sentiment or to question whether or not they are English, British or Irish. Most of these edits are without any sources.
7969:
As far as I can see that post is an obvious tacit confession of what is going on here. Otherwise why would a non-COI editor suggest that COI concerns are irrelevant if the subject is notable and that in their opinion there should be far more latitude on COI
4088:, placing notices like the ones you've received is a very normal thing that editors do here, to give some explanation for why they are reverting another user's edits. You need to be able to receive these notices without perceiving them as personal attacks. @
6510:
then and add that note instead. Why the double standards? I left the note, added nuance. They removed nuance. I added non-Arab sources which are used by modern historians, and they still removed it. Ibn Khaldun already did the work "modern" historians do.
10005:
for some of the blocks is remarkably childish. "I raised it to five years because they complained that three years was too long". I hate spammy editors as much as anyone but the block of MarcArchives00 was an utter abuse of power. It also appears Graham87
10449:
Having attempted to deal with the oldest of the appeals a few weeks ago, which was extremely time consuming and led to a quick burnout, I want to say that I saw many of your comments at the appeals and found them thoughtful and helpful. So thank you.--
4822:
dispute with, even if they're dicks. (For one thing, if you remain calm and they nevertheless double down on being a dick, it's very easy to tell that the issue is, indeed, that they're not the slightest bit interested in building an encyclopedia.) --
10609:
10103:
Thank you for lifting that block, The Wordsmith. I came across them when I deleted that draft and they had such a brief contribution history, I didn't see anything blockable. As for sanctions, in my limited experiences, cases like this are posted on
4915:, what I was talking about was the behaviour on the talk pages, not the act of bringing the question to ANI. I see that's not fully clear from my original post, and I'm happy to apologize for that, and for describing the behaviour as "bullying". --
1919:
I welcome new users when I have time to do so. Also being a user with over 5000 edits, it would be very dumb of me to think that this welcoming of users will "bury" my edit history. The welcoming of users is done as my everyday interest and nothing
12281:
If I'm being singled out for an incident where blame is clearly shared by another editor, there is nothing wrong with me pointing out. Your willingness to turn a blind eye to Remsense's part in said edit war clearly shows your bias in this matter.
3706:
You really ought to be WAY less combative if you want to collaborate with other people. If things worked like your template warnings would lead us to believe there would be very few editors left that didn't get blocked. This isn't the way to go. ā
2646:. The article's "independence" and objectivity does not now seem to be at stake. As far as what dealings you and your family might have with UK law enforcement, that's not part of Knowledge's remit, nor does the WMF have any authority over that.
10506:
explicators first, and it's always best to avoid the block. And I see both in the discussion above and in the user talk examples cited here and at Wikipediocracy, Graham87 getting frustrated. And trying again and again in the same vein of comment.
10038:
on the basis they had engaged in overlinking in their first edits and hadn't been on here in a while and didn't immediately request an unblock). What's the point of the unblock process if such an obviously inappropriate block is allowed to stand?
10463:
I've tried to be at least mildly helpful when I can be. I figure any question that I or another editor can field is one less thing to deal with for you or Yamla or 331dot or any of the others. I know what a workload it is for you and the others.
8250:
Unfortunately the attempt to make the two accounts look different by using different forms of edit summaries gave you away. How could that possibly have happened other than intentionally, and what possible intent could there have been except to
1739:
My intent was never to be aggressive or dominate, the intent was to clear misunderstandings and nothing else as most users may not be aware of how Indian Power Sector is structured or work, so yeah, let us let the closer evaluate the consensus.
10317:
10264:(which is how I found them ... and isn't in any sort of tutorial) set off alarm bells. I knew that asking for me to review their unblock request probably wasn't what they meant but by then their general evasiveness was getting to me. And they
3673:
situation. Very strange that DwilfaStudwell's fourth edit was to template warning an experienced user. Now this user is opening up a discussion here. This doesn't seem like a editor who is here to improve the project or work well with others.
11638:(I also did two reverts. I revert twice and thrice much more than I'd like, I will admit. I think I'm at my worst when I revert twice and thrice without being particularly communicative or helpful, and I could've been better here I guess.)
11313:
answers I want, you can at least point me in the direction of a page or forum where I can find others who are. If you are sincere in wanting me to be a more constructive part of Knowledge, you should have no problem doing this much for me.
2108:
2062:
2026:
I reviewed all of them and before-hand and nominated for merger. I'm not aware of WP:WELCOMING, now I am. Pune airport name change did occur and citations can be found too in the article, I added more than 1 citation regarding name change.
11971:
happen so that might be something for the admins to look into because I don't know how that happened. Back to the matter at hand, one of the edits which you are referring is a notice I posted at the top of the page indicating the lede for
11045:
a valuable part of the project and this doesn't appear to be a productive use of it. Perhaps Iām overreacting, so Iām presenting this here for comment. If the community believes this is a productive use of resources, Iāll drop it. Thanks!
14280:
over their first review back before final decisions are made. I know this creates extra work for others but personally Iām more than happy to take on this extra responsibility and I think it would be beneficial for everyone in involved.
2403:
10652:
The user has changed the ethnonyms on the articles for Johnny Marr, Kirsty MacColl, Andy Farrell, Liam Farrell, Owen Farrell, Steve Coogan, John Squire and Ian Brown, to state they are Irish, without any source stating they identify as
11104:. Now, please respond in detail to other editor's concerns about your use of the RFC process. Do you have a good understanding of the circumstances when an RFC is the best solution, as opposed to situations when less dramatic forms of
10259:
I've gone and done the unblock and we'll see what happens. The Indian entrepreneur bit of their user page (the combination of the two, because it seems to be a hotspot of paid editing) plus their tendency to make very minor edits like
9818:
Having taken a quick look at the article in question, I'd have to suggest that at least some of the complaints about it may be entirely legitimate. It appears to include, amongst other things, unsourced allegations of rape and murder.
8334:
If you read again all you will find the answer... I talked about the possibilities at your question... But if to tell you one reason will mean to have attacks on me I prefer you immagine by yourself which of that possibilities ragards
8722:
The number of times that the same ambitious plan has been put into action, affecting more than one version of Knowledge, suggests it was paid, as does the sheer amount of time that was being spent in creating and developing so many
4136:. I did read that talk page before making my initial comment, and I think you would have gotten much further with more patience. Please try to work things out, rather than further provoking editors who are already clearly upset. --
8254:
It did occur to me at one point earlier today that I must be looking at two different people taking turns using the same computer - but obviously if it had been something as innocent as that you would have said it a long time ago.
7946:
One other thing, I note that when directly questioned on COI the user Gingeksace has responded along the lines of (and I paraphrase) ānever mind about the COI, just concentrate on whether Lerro is notable or notā, for example here
4342:
What do you want from me now?? I wouldn't lie to anyone to do it for you, you apparently know nothing about the ADVKu keyboard recommendation system. Plus I didn't call you childish, but your thoughts and accusations are childish.
2813:
And really, it's not believable at all. Only in lurid fiction and tabloid fantasies can one find omniscient charities who can mobilize squads of brownshirts at the drop of an utterly unremarkable username. We're being BSed here.
1620:
14346:
7973:
Over the last 3 years the user has made 761 edits to the article for Menotti Lerro and 392 edits to the article for Empathism, as well as making a further c.2,000 edits to other Lerro-related articles (most of which they created
6992:
you. All words make sense from legal perspective, not from Knowledge editor's vantage point that doesn't have context. You don't sound like an editor to me as those are kind, not pointed in criminal through accusation unfounded.
3115:
My apologies, seriously: I should've been far less impulsive, and more willing to listen to the type of editor that can pick up all this lingo and knowledge of site procedure over the course of 30 edits made in less than a day.
11994:
I see one reversion (though edit warring isn't limited strictly to reversions) by you and three by another editor. That's one bold edit plus four reversions within 72 minutes, which is easily into the edit warring territory.
11734:
is an issue I consider worthy of continued debate. If the sticking point to my continued involvement in said discussion is that I presented no reliable sources in support of my argument, then I am more than willing to provide
6188:
judge for yourselves. I even asked for arbitration, but the user here did not relent. The user appears to be the xenophobic here, using personal affiliation as bases. I have no knowledge of his person to base that on anything.
5636:
No kidding. I'm not going to act on Liz's warning, since I can't find the vandalism she's talking about, but I hope one of that editor's next edits is an apology and not more inventively rude vandalism, for their own sake. --
3861:
Focusing on my alleged ethnicity again. E and O are not even close to each other on the keyboard, it's not that hard to spell "Persian". Clearly, he means "Poorsian" ("Poor-sian"), a common xenophobic remark against Persians.
3605:, it is pretty evident that even a new RFC (even with more sources) wouldn't yield any different result. Remsense isn't abusing the system, your RFC was soundly rejected and the responses on it explain pretty well why it was.
11203:, consider yourself formally warned for your suboptimal conduct regarding RFCs and I urge you to behave appropriately regarding RFCs in the future. You have used up your assumption of good faith in this area, so be cautious.
10323:
tools in disputes where they could be considered substantially involved. At this point, no formal sanctions are enacted, without prejudice to opening a new case some time in the future should problems of this nature persist.
3020:
The police banged on your door in the middle of the night, didn't bring any tools to forcibly enter, just left after waking up the entire street, and then went to your parents' house to ... mosey around? Pull the other one.
11557:
seems another example of this, where Emiya1980 has in the last 24 hours or so started an edit war and dispute on a much debated topic in an overwise stable and high profile article based purely on their personal views (see
8205:
Sorry, it was not you "mocking" indeed. But anyway that was very bad behaviour... About myself, I did not do any abuse, what would be the reason for me to do that when I could with a single account? Anyway... All the best
10222:
when the user was apparently being receptive of advice and I don't see anything in their recent contributions to warrant such a quick block, especially since they ceased editing mainspace after the "really weird feeling"
3256:
I respectfully request that you reconsider your inadvertent reversal. It appears to be hindering open discussion on the talk page. Please allow the community to thoroughly explore alternative perspectives on this matter.
1683:
10517:
template that puts their page in the category. And anyone can make a mistake; with the best will in the world, an admin will sometimes make a block that, after reading what the blockee has to say, they decide to reverse.
12593:
into articles that have no corresponding references. I was patiently leaving warning messages at all these IP pages, but apparently they either don't see them or ignore them. I guess it is time to start issuing blocks.
8158:
Let me say even for a bank robbery there are not so many ivestigations and strong wish to prove something pretty seconday in all this. But I understood it is your main interest in all this. It is fine than. Cheers!Ā :-)
3929:
and I'm against it, I didnāt even know what you meant that time. All that aside, why is "good that you understood your purpose. good look" a bad thing? btw it's my talk page, laughing or eating chips, not your problem.
13741:
in meeting community standards. They have received numerous warnings from numerous editors, most of which received no response, acknowledgment of error, or commitment to improvement. Below are the most recent of them.
6674:
I'm actually here to add that the reason why that note isn't inplace of every single Greco-Persian battle instead of figures is because they have more eyes on them, hence corrupting the article wouldn't be as tenable.
2357:
10132:
I've skimmed through all of the accounts blocked by Graham87 over the last six months. I only took a brief look, and many of them are routine, but a few stood out. I ask that an uninvolved admin review the blocks of
2728:
12863:
12807:
7134:
we try not to ignore them.) Editors able understand the basics of how stuff works around here will also know they shouldn't make such threats so are much more likely to be correct when they say their is a problem.
4114:. The worst of these attacks is no doubt "Poorsian", which is just xenophobic and has no place on this site, yet they clearly don't care. I have already tried to work out stuff with them, such as the afromentioned
3532:
While it's frustrating to respond to, I am sympathetic to people who might have limited comfort writing in English and might be apprehensive about it, or think the LLM or machine translation is smarter than it is.
14688:
12751:
9946:
4840:. I agree with The Hand That Feeds You, that was an appalling comment to make in response to an editor rightly reporting being repeatedly attacked, especially as some of the attacks were clearly on ethnic grounds.
3712:
3619:
I've done things like close RFCs where I was pretty sure I was right and someone else disagreed. As such, I got reverted and life goes on. That isn't happening here, because no one else agrees with your premises.
1494:
reverted or are otherwise problematic. Although the editor has been editing for only a year, the editor has over 3,000 edits and should have attended to his talk page warnings and stopped disruptive edits by now.
10520:
You've been promising to be nicer, but also try to be clearer. In particular, explain more from the start, and change tacks if the person isn't getting it. That could include linking to simpler explanations like
2664:
In terms of due weight. I mean, it's difficult to balance the POV when the secondary coverage of the scandal outweighs anything they've done before or since with the possible exception of election accessibility.
11402:
says "RfCs are time consuming, and editor time is valuable". RfCs are a heavyweight process which should only really be used when other, less time-intensive, methods have failed. Unfortunately there seems (e.g.
3484:
I have secondary sources to support my claim, and I would like the opportunity to properly present the RFC. I believe that the RFC process is a valuable tool for resolving disputes and ensuring that WP:NPOV are
8288:
Denying it is no good, because it can be demonstrated that that was indeed happening. In the absence of a plausible explanation the only possibility is that you created the two accounts with intent to deceive.
4564:
If anyone is getting "bullied" and should be "upset" that is me. I tire of constantly being attacked due to my background by new users with barely any edits and who ultimately end up getting indeffed for being
1765:ā I find Thewikizoomer's behaviour to be very problematic, for example they responded to scope_creep's comments with the exact same comment beginning with "Oppose merge all" in bold despite them already voting
8284:
I want to be entirely fair here, so I'll give you another chance. Can you explain why the two accounts were never online at the same time and used different edit summaries to make them look like different end
8027:
Also, for the sake of transparency, this would be a good opportunity for you to clarify what your connection is to Lerro. Let's be honest, you aren't just someone who once asked him for some photos, are you?
3456:
Unfortunately, due to my current travel schedule, I am unable to devote the necessary time to further escalate this matter at present. However, I intend to follow up on this issue as soon as possible upon my
14924:
9955:
This seems like a prelude to an ARBR request (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, Wordsmith). After reading through Graham87's talk page, the previous ANI thread, and the WPO thread, I would support such.
7041:
There is no legal threat in edit summary. There is clarification as to urgency of call to change contents as emergency. Its not "not liking," content. Content is hate speech necessitating immediate resolve.
3974:
Everything you say is nonsense, look I can tell you so. If you think everything I say now and in the future is 'nonsense' why don't you try to avoid me? why do you keep replying? you're almost bothering me.
2881:
delete general information from the lead, absolutely not. I'd suggest GDX420 is outright blocked from the page and everyone else gets involved in resetting it and rebalancing the article and removing undue.
768:
14536:
As someone who has been involved in this often the person in question wouldnāt be very communicative and often didnāt respond to talk page messages or would just not seem to take other advice on the topic.
12212:
I'm perfectly capable of on that article going forward if you are: if there's anything here others need to worry about, it would be the longer-term patterns of behavior that said tiny incidents constitute.
6339:
Proving that you seem unable to interact in a consructive manner with editors who disagree with you, unable to stick to comments about the topic rather than editors and, last but not least, unable to avoid
1636:
well. I'd like a couple of weeks of clear discussion so it can come to a consensus without interference. The editor has made his point clearly in all three Afds. Can somebody have a chat with the editor.
12857:
12829:
12801:
12717:
12661:
11583:
so this feels a draconian application of the edit-war ban; especially considering I consented to the reverting editor's recommendation for a discussion after being reverted only twice. Most significantly,
7006:
Becoming a member of the USSC bar is fairly easy. Iāve seen reports that there are over 70,000 members, so I wouldnāt be using that as a special qualification or proof of being correct in this discussion.
733:
Closed discussions are usually not archived for at least 24 hours. Routine matters might be archived more quickly; complex or controversial matters should remain longer. Sections inactive for 72 hours are
13516:
Well, I was "forgiven" for posting a warning notice to their User talk page earlier this month. Looking into this point of disagreement, I'm wondering if there is any connection between SinisterUnion and
10649:
For the articles of Rich Peppiatt, Steve Coogan, Miriam Margolyes and John Oliver, they have implied they have renounced their British citizenship without any source, which has been reverted in all cases.
6640:, and the reason why we are having this conversation here in the first place. Instead of letting the reader judge for themselves, the users here act as censors to tell the reader what they ought to think.
12773:
12745:
12689:
8269:
ok, I see and now I understand a bit. Yes if I would have used two accounts on a same PC changing like that sistematically it would be very intentionally. I can confirm I did not do it. Have a nice day.
4578:
2363:
issues and is causing alot of problems in ARBIPA topic area. Therefore, I propose that Thewikizoomer be topic banned from all articles related to ARBIPA (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan) broadly construed.
799:
794:
6138:
Even non-Arab sources were rejected for this user to suit their bias. Even if those primary sources were cited by people being cited in the main article. And I don't even know if the user is Persian or
10730:, surely a highly contentious claim, and they provided no reference to a reliable source. Worth noting is that Peppiatt apparently still lives in the UK, in Belfast. Similarly with the far more famous
8144:. They all have the same editing pattern of making large numbers of small edits minutes apart over periods of perhaps an hour or two. It's obviously not credible that these are all separate end users.
5188:
That was after I blocked them, and if they haven't gotten any of their talk page messages, they won't have much reason to understand why their user page spontaneously evaporated in the first place. --
9860:
688:
9610:
4658:
1523:
With my talk page warnings I also pinged the editor. I don't think we can assume he's not reading them versus the editor is just ignoring them. Also, the editor hasn't learned from repeated reverts.
9899:) he had made back in February 2024. I checked and it seemed to be a completely unfounded block based on "padding his edit count" by doing the tutorial that we show to new users plus a deleted stub
12304:. They admit that their behavior wasn't ideal, and they're working on ideas to improve. We don't need to make a big deal out of it, because they've already said everything that needs to be said.
9293:
5775:
acknowledges that the brand was bought from Ticketmaster and revived. Having Google pick up our categorization and mark it as defuct seems to be causing harm. We should make the changes.--v/r -
5230:
Whilst it may, theoretically, be misuse of their user page why not put a message there, referring to the discussions and user:talk warnings - at least we know (assume?) they read their user-page.
3141:
Thank you for acknowledging your error. The Request for Comments has been reopened, and additional secondary sources have been incorporated. I invite you to participate in the renewed discussion.
2785:
And thirded. I have never seen the UK described like that, except by very ignorant people from other countries who were disappointed that I didn't know Prince Charles (as he then was) personally.
15237:
10740:
No, he publicly renounced his British citizenship. Heās stated on more than one occasion heās ashamed of his association with the āshitholeā country and never wants to be associated with it again
3518:
shows lack of respect for the people you're addressing. You don't even seem to be giving it sensible instructions ("Thank you for your attention to this matter.") Stop it before you're blocked.
2066:
1983:
1791:
9903:
that looked promotion-ish but hardly worth a block without discussion. I lifted the block and left a message on Graham's talkpage, then went back and checked all his blocks from September 2024.
6284:
Apparently the user is unable to use actual words, again utilising wiki interface as their weapon of misuse. And those citations aren't poor, they're all we have. The user is being ridiculous.
4851:
You've made a serious error of judgement and it would be better if you were to acknowledge that fact and apologise, rather than seeking to reframe your involvement in a positive light, as above.
13946:
11406:
10549:
and I think studying the ones around my position (#40 for now) seems like the best approach ... and seeing how many people do indeed come back after a block (zero on a quick check of blocks by
6131:"According to Daryaee, "Islamic texts usually report the number of the Persian soldiers to have been in the hundreds or tens of thousands and several times larger than the Arab armies. This is
4092:, you need to be able to assume good faith and try to work things out more thoroughly before threatening other editors with ANI. If they're a sockpuppet, they'll step on a rake soon enough. --
5920:
IP also made a legal threat against my ANI notification. For what it's worth, I tried revising the lede to mention the 2017 trademark buyout and subsequent online business but was reverted by
4598:, not even bothering to read the Safavid Kurdistan article, which does not support Zemens replacement, as the Kurdistan province did not extend that far. Go on, say that I am "bullying" them.
4324:
Feel free to explain how my "interpretations" are not good and what this so called "system" is, and what "Porsian" means, since it's not a synonym for Persian. I've given you more than enough
1815:
13667:
2087:
14400:(GAN, FAC, PR, etc). i want to emphasize to TheNuggeteer that everyone here wants the best for both you and the encyclopedia. de-stubbing sounds like a great way to continue contributingĀ :)
8123:
It doesn't really matter what the reason is, it is still sockpuppetry. However, the real reason for the multiple accounts is presumably to allow you to make statements like this one, above,
4733:. I'm willing to extend AGF to its breaking point and accept that Zemen was alluding to a common argument, but even so it needs to be made clear that they must comment on edits, not editors.
11953:
The first two edits don't show a change in the flag size. They only show you copying the whole line (carefully preserved in their original form, with no changes at all) to a new location.
9283:
6654:
Are you done constantly tweaking your comment? Most readers aren't going to see all the changes you've made to it over the last 24 hours. Please stop constantly reviewing and altering it.
4226:
this report, whilst you haven't told them anything. Facing no repercussions from their actions, they will no doubt continue, especially as they clearly think their behaviour was justified.
3498:
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I respectfully request that the administrators intervene to ensure that the RFC is restored and that a fair and equitable resolution is reached.
10374:
would have been an start of acknowledging that was has happened is unacceptable. At the absolute bare minimum, Graham87 should no longer be blocking editors or reviewing unblock requests.
9969:; part of me still hopes for it. Given the response, either Graham's sense of when to block is far outside community norms or mine is so I'm not sure it can be avoided one way or another.
9699:
in a very short time, deleting old reliable sources and including bare URLs to questionable sources. User has received multiple warnings for this same behaviour on this same page in 2012.
13423:
I wonder if they are the same person, creating an illusion of a group, since they coincidentally want to improve the same articles about FIFA and football. We'll see if any socks appear.
9288:
8432:
This walled garden is full of some of the wordiest least penetrable articles ever put on Knowledge. It seems the only reason these articles haven't been instantly deleted is because of a
9718:
3443:. Despite multiple attempts to resolve this issue through Talk Page discussions and the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incident (ANI), I have been unable to reach a satisfactory resolution.
11976:
was too long. For the record, I do in fact think the lede is unnecessarily detailed and contains two bloated paragraphs which could use some trimming. Again, however, I am only seeing
9367:
7813:
involved in what appears to be an orchestrated effort to promote Menotti Lerro & Empathism and their associates. Efforts were made to resolve the issues, see Gingeksaceās talk page
6777:
5965:
4178:
may be confused, or ignorant, or rude), you should try again. Engaging further right now, and getting into arguments on each other's user talk pages, is just going to make both of you
2799:
It would be more believable if one comes from a smaller country like myself, but even then, I wouldn't know everyone in this 42km-long island, neither do I expect everyone to know me.
11667:, I actually reverted Remsense only once during the incident in question. The original change I made to the infobox should not be counted as a reversion for purposes of edit-warring.
10722:
Although it would have been nice for the OP to have provided diffs, it only took a few minutes examining DanielTokenhouse's edits to see severe problems. For example, they wrote that
9494:
No worries. I am suspicious of non-standard domains as well as things get shady really fast with some TLDs. You could easily replace the .co with the .com and have it all still work.
9199:
8900:
8141:
accounts operating in the same topic area over the last 18 month can be seen by looking for the redlink users in the contribution history for Cilento International Poetry Prize, here
8125:
In the Movement there are also young artists and cultured, passionate people and maybe ONE, TWO or THREE OF THEM WANTED TO MAKE THIS EFFORT to tell to the world also through Knowledge
5749:
4476:
Yeah, what I expected, these words, I know what you want, on the pretext of 'Knowledge rules' (which I respect much) exactly what you don't want to see: 'Kurd' why donāt you go get ]?
3874:
Yeah, what I expected, these words, I know what you want, on the pretext of 'Knowledge rules' (which I respect much) exactly what you don't want to see: 'Kurd' why donāt you go get ]?
2925:
I hadn't seen that particular edit-summary and on that alone I have partially blocked GDX420 from the article. If I'd seen it at the time, that block might well have been site-wide.
6114:
6096:
I don't care who you are. I don't know who you are. I'm saying what your actions are doing. You are the hyper emotional one here, using clunky wiki interface as your weapon of abuse.
13799:
2729:
https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/training/support-and-safety/dealing-with-online-harassment-communication-best-practices/what-kind-of-support-can-the-wikimedia-foundation-offer
14390:
7924:
Looking at the Menotti Lerro article I noticed that although both of the users spend a lot of time there editing over extended periods they never seem to be there at the same time.
2899:"I believe the article's subject is weaponising the Online Safety Act 2023 to whitewash their reputation, mislead their donors and keep their Royal charter by any means neccessary"
13785:
8792:
Any comments on Empathism further down in the articles would obviously need to be treated on their merits, which in some cases may influence retaining the sentences in the lede.
6611:
14372:
13250:
12976:), disrupting existing reference/footnotes, widespread superfluous and disruptive cosmetic edits which, among others, include removing spaces, proper punctuation (violations of
7106:
To clarify the āno legal threatā comment, you agree you will not engage in a legal or other governmental process that would target other editors or Knowledge itself. Correct? ā
6162:
is a historian (he doesn't use the word "worthless" either, more made up stuff), you're not - we base our info on academic sources, as you've already been told when I mentioned
8847:
3716:
2346:
when this board is exactly for highlighting a user's problematic behaviour. And that he is still continuing to misrepresent sources in order to defend his disruptive page move.
13511:
10597:
9950:
9172:
8998:
8941:
7981:
seems obvious. There is clearly something wrong when the connection has gone undeclared in over 3 years (and 3,000+ edits) despite various attempts to ask them to declare COI.
5941:
4288:
Claiming "Porsian" ("Poorsian") is a "typo", which I find it hard to believe, when O and E are not even close to each other, how could the "system" possibly change those two.
743:
721:
13310:, One of them just requested that an ArbCom case be opened against me. This is more than WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior, from what I am seeing. They're just harrasing people now.
11286:
more specifically. It is also your obligation to fully take on board the legitimate concerns that other editors have raised about your RFC conduct. My warning is by no means
9236:
7082:
7073:
Taking both of these, it is evident they are both in reference to the article - with an implication the article would be subject to a lawsuit if your edits werenāt accepted.
7051:
6597:: The reported editor seems unable to engage in a constructive manner when they have a disagreement with another editor, they comment on editors, not the topic and they make
4055:. Nobody 'deserves' incivility. If you wish to make amends, I suggest that you strike through the personal attacks and do not make any more. Would you be willing to do that?
7831:
7733:
7369:
13115:
9960:
8853:
I think they need to be nominated one-by-one, because there is the potential (and in at least one case actuality) of claims of notability unrelated to the promotionalism. ā
8456:
1487:
1465:
12869:
12841:
12813:
12729:
12673:
8608:
4413:, Im glad you wrote this comment in this way, thank you very much for letting me know that my goal was not achieved properly, thanks again! I will try to improve on this.
2407:
2365:
11822:
on said page regarding the infobox issue which (as I've already indicated) is what happened here. Assuming you are characterizing my original change to the infobox as an
10325:
This has only further convinced me that every time an ANI discussion is closed without action, it's tacit permission to continue whatever behavior was being scrutinized.
2574:
13094:
12785:
12757:
12701:
10605:
OK, I'll watchlist talk pages of people I do block (not always possible for IP ranges though, obviously). Sometimes I do find their requests when checking contributions.
9942:
9082:
7589:
7115:
7101:
7093:
7043:
7016:
6993:
3708:
1717:
You're literally aggressively responding to every single comment, sometimes multiple times. These links read like you're clearly trying to dominate the conversation per
13859:
10613:
8693:
14322:(review, with assistance from IntentionallyDense, although he has said onwiki and offwiki he would appreciate another pair of eyes due to the subject's medical nature)
10750:
Accordingly, I have indefinitely blocked this editor for BLP violations and also for persistent additions of unsourced content, POV pushing, and tendendtious editing.
9935:
9305:
2998:
and changed its name to The National Institute for the Blind, or NIB, to reflect its status as a national body involved in all aspects of the welfare of blind people.
2373:
1628:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1037:
1032:
1027:
1022:
1017:
1012:
1007:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
13746:
6890:
hate crime. This hate crime is punishable by a court of law through fine/imprisonment. Hate crime taking a human beings life through resolved suicide of mot resolved.
5374:
they're adding citations of unacceptable sources, and we already have a better article. It seems as if they're just using the user page to play at making an article.
3917:
1850:, I can't see this as anything other than an attempt to bury their edit history in order to avoid scrutiny. I would also like to state that Thewikizoomer is aware of
14368:
11797:
says Emiya "started an edit war"; Emiya's response is basically to claim that there was no violation of 3RR. Both of these statements can be true at the same time.
8789:
would be best for the claims to just be removed from each of the articles? At the end of the day the relevant sentences in the ledes are perhaps best viewed as spam.
7613:
7001:
6262:, that does not make a xenophobe, using my "personal afflilation", "using clunky wiki interface as a weapon of abuse", or any of your other accusations. As for your
1682:
If anything is undesirable here, that is trying to create hostility by using words such as "one more comment and I'll take you to WP:ANI" like an involved user said
1624:
13771:
12545:
10034:, intended for "significant disruption or threats of disruption, or major breaches of policy") and disappointingly the unblock request was twice declined (first by
7911:
7899:
E qui si precisa, ugualmente a gran voce, che le speculazioni armate ad arte dallāindomito teatrante, palesano ulteriormente una pomposa esaltazione ben conosciuta.
6492:
to me, as described. (Note that in the example I said was acceptable, the ancient historian's statement is immediately answered by one from a modern historian.) --
2520:
9900:
1632:
230:
11785:
means "more than once"; it does not mean "more than three times within 24 hours". Also, the definition of an edit war doesn't technically have to involve reverts
9760:
6133:
pure fiction and it is boastful literature which aims to aggrandize Arab Muslim achievement, which may be compared to the Greek accounts of the Greco-Persian wars
5202:
Either they've created that very quickly - at LLM speed - or they'd already spent time off-wiki creating a new article on a subject on which we already have one.
12301:
9197:
8981:
7870:
7805:
7553:
7547:
5567:
2690:
942:
10316:
For a further look, I pulled up recent ANI posts involving Graham87's admin actions. There have been several of varying merit, but the most relevant one was in
2619:
street and when they didn't get a response they went to my sick elderly parent's house and woke them up too. I believe the article's subject is weaponising the
14684:
14289:
12989:
12434:
12375:
10772:
9012:
8884:
7595:
6121:
opinion expressed by the note that they left is being described as "worthless, meaning that an opinion saying the same thing about 'persians' would be equally
5460:
5009:
2457:
2423:
418:
11372:
This response reads like you still intend to push RfCs as a way to force your changes into articles when other editors disagree with you. Also, be careful of
6270:. We're not going to ignore the policies of this website merely because you oppose them, and it certainly doesn't give you the right to constantly attack me.
5791:, where somebody bought an old trademark and started a new company with the same name some 70 years later. Note that our article isn't about the new company.
2635:
1503:
14360:
12926:
12628:
12600:
11886:
Ok, what I am about to say may seem far-fetched but is genuinely the truth. I have no recollection of consciously editing the size of the Soviet flag in the
10692:
9886:
8862:
7673:
7649:
7407:
5432:
5265:
5165:
4945:
4937:
3689:
3588:
3499:
3344:
3326:
3258:
3142:
3101:
2543:
2397:
1292:
1287:
1282:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1262:
1257:
1252:
1247:
1240:
1235:
1230:
1225:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1205:
1200:
1195:
1068:
946:
824:
755:
489:
14270:
12082:. So you can excuse me if I feel at least one of the editors calling me out in this situation is somewhat biased in their application of Knowledge's rules.
10368:
4761:
2498:
14378:
14364:
10813:
9748:
9382:
8870:
8658:
7473:
5708:
5597:
4697:
2324:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1129:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1077:
13607:
12578:
11408:)to be an increasing trend of users jumping straight to RfC immediately on getting any pushback, or as a kind of last roll of the dice when they are in a
10098:
10084:
7619:
14926:
14789:
14249:
13961:
13237:
as an example). They have been warned several times about this now. Apologies if this is formatted improperly, this is only my second-ever report here.
12562:
11890:
infobox as set forth in your link. One of the reasons I want to point this out is something strange happened like this before around a week ago. Over at
10383:
10180:
9547:
9513:
On the English Knowledge you probably should switch it. .co is the TLD for Colombia - that is why the IPs version of the link has a Spanish-language UI.
9407:
9299:
9133:- Keeps adding unsourced content to articles, continued after final warning and hasn't responded to warnings. Examples of addition of unsourced content:
9087:
8952:
8930:
8912:
8598:
7511:
7499:
7207:
5886:
5866:
5852:
5834:
3352:
2610:
2110:
The fact you have misinterpreted and misrepresented these sources to portray an approval of a proposal as an actual rename serves as a testament to your
1059:
376:
175:
14557:
14522:
I support a six-month ban too. I just don't understand why these things that were referenced above had to be said so often, why it had to come to this.
14316:. In view of this, I will outline some of their pending nominations or reviews at GAN, DYK, and FLC. Anybody is welcome to volunteer to take over them.
14059:
12427:
5068:
2463:
1550:
1532:
14034:) suggesting that they chip in here with what they like doing. With any luck, we can find them a backlog that theyāll enjoy, and can benefit the wiki.
13418:
9615:
8713:
8672:
8534:
8502:
8471:
7799:
4628:
4607:
3614:
3439:
I am writing to formally request the restoration of the Request for Comments (RFC) that I initiated regarding a content dispute and user conduct with @
3409:
2475:
2440:
2283:
2269:
1712:
1343:
1186:
1064:
14486:
seems appropriate; they're clearly well-intentioned and willing to work on improvement and I think will become a valuable contributor to the project.
14116:
14045:
13562:
13394:
10493:
10409:
10048:
9275:
9001:
has been spamming AI-generated unblock requests 5 times in their talk page, someone please cover the user's mouth up with a duct tape and shut it up.
8611:
is quite revealing; I agree that the excuses by Rainermaria27 sound a lot like Gingeksace. The Lerro AfD on en-WP from 2015 is also very interesting:
3739:
1749:
1734:
14712:
14546:
14352:
14073:
13205:
11367:
10535:
10437:
10423:
10277:
10254:
9261:
8626:
8485:
7479:
6687:
6665:
5546:
4746:
3701:
3030:
2251:
2177:
2163:
2143:
2129:
2098:
2082:
2056:
2036:
2021:
1932:
1698:
1518:
930:
925:
920:
915:
910:
905:
900:
895:
890:
885:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
10347:
9977:
9027:
6816:
6802:
5522:
5368:
5091:
4924:
4906:
4831:
4297:
4272:
4254:
4235:
4213:
4191:
4167:
4145:
4127:
2953:
2794:
14919:
14356:
14087:
14023:
13808:
12918:
12835:
12723:
12667:
11389:
9907:
9828:
9441:
9191:
8813:
I don't think we need to speculate on whether the editors adding this content are fans, subjects, or publicists in order to push back against it. ā
8740:
7793:
7781:
7775:
7769:
6744:
6736:
6729:
6679:
6641:
6568:
6560:
6550:
6512:
6485:
6471:
6413:
6372:
6334:
6326:
6307:
6293:
6285:
6279:
6249:
6241:
6234:
6216:
6208:
6182:
6148:
6140:
5982:
5268:
that they've just uploaded claiming they're the copyright holder, that it's their own work and that it was created today. It's also at unsplash.com
4812:
4650:
3654:
3640:
3596:
3582:
3526:
3507:
3377:
3292:
3253:
Thank you for bringing the oversight in the question to my attention. I should have included a reference to the secondary source in the discussion.
3175:
3150:
3136:
1869:
267:
134:
14606:
14303:
14193:
12892:
12335:
12313:
12033:
12004:
11989:
11962:
11948:
11872:
11839:
11806:
10197:
10065:
9593:
I meant to block that IP, while allowing accounts from that IP to edit. Also, 99.175.18.1, is registered to School District 57, Prince George, BC
8384:
7197:
2808:
2780:
2549:
1664:
And also my inputs were civil, reasonable, and much needed for reaching consensus. The discussions available at Afds are self explanatory to this.
1646:
13337:
13323:
13273:
12779:
12695:
11554:
11422:
10734:
who, as is widely known, became a US citizen in 2019. But dual citizenship is a thing and many people are citizens of both the US and the UK. At
9990:
9850:
8822:
8556:
8516:
8182:
8118:
7655:
7583:
7565:
7097:
7047:
6997:
5933:
5915:
5761:
5689:
5646:
5631:
5612:
5493:
How many times have they remade this page, with Copyvios, now? Arenāt we supposed to come down hard on folks who donāt take the hint on copyvios?
5044:
5024:
4797:
3434:
3334:
3319:
3266:
3211:
3007:
1914:
820:
751:
408:
14131:
13434:
13375:
13361:
13302:
11692:. If you were going to open a discussion on the matter, that's an engagement that requires a certain type of munition: arguments predicated in
11010:
All of these RFCs ended with the status quo except for Woodrow Wilson. The editor has been approached about creating too many RFCs on this topic
10631:
9791:
9781:
6969:
6951:
6735:
running around talking about how they have positive contributions, how many better contributions, better editors has their existence prevented?
6520:
6501:
6479:
6429:
5818:
5782:
5383:
3683:
2920:
2892:
2824:
2764:
2606:
14670:
14447:
13548:
12513:
12473:
12091:
12018:
11765:
11718:
11633:
11543:
11516:
11498:
11457:
11341:
11322:
11176:
11153:
11135:
11117:
9842:
8539:
For anyone wishing to avoid reading through the 2015 SPI linked to the 2015 AfD which Allan pointed out above, the brief version is as follows:
7679:
6714:
6649:
6395:
6380:
6350:
5197:
5159:
5135:
4392:
4378:
4337:
4319:
4106:
Sorry, but I don't think that Zemen is a sockpuppet? And I was not threatening them, I was warning them, which I did after they had engaged in
3984:
3969:
3939:
3795:
2989:
2318:
371:
14627:
14587:
13466:
Well, that was predictable. New editors wanting to "revolutionize" Knowledge do not have the patience to wait out a week or month-long block.
12261:
12232:
12190:
12148:
12121:
11676:
11658:
11299:
10473:
10458:
9734:
9064:
7182:
6703:
5539:
5239:
4559:
4554:
4547:
4544:
4286:
4079:
4064:
3993:
and it's a typo, I used it on my keyboard before so the system set that. I didn't write this on purpose, it's childish to blame me with that.
3758:
2356:. He made a page move request today by citing that the target name was more popular in Google books ngram, when in reality it's the opposite.
15127:
14503:
13282:
12462:
10123:
9740:
9685:
9602:
9588:
9329:
8896:
8801:
8617:. Then the PR campaign moved back to en-WP in 2021. It has been quite a persistent effort, more than just a random "fan" or two of the poet.
8361:
8347:
8329:
8315:
8298:
8279:
8264:
8245:
8230:
8215:
8200:
8168:
8153:
8103:
8088:
8052:
8022:
8007:
7865:. While I am not claiming Menotti Lerro is not notable, his article is supported with a lot of local sourcing, and sources by his professor,
7144:
5183:
4864:
3553:
2676:
2656:
2230:
1839:
I have noticed your actions on the NTPC Power Plant pages I created as per WP:NBUILDING rule. This seems to be driven by a sense of vengeance
14772:
14750:
14570:
14179:
14162:
13994:
13980:
13477:
13461:
13050:
12291:
12276:
11619:
11597:
11570:
9809:
9559:
7964:
do not be so focused on the "COI problem" and help the page to be developed if earned a place on this š. Life is too short to be so strict
6768:. If they have a change of heart, they can request an unblock and contribute to the encyclopedia without casting aspersions at other users.
5663:
5259:
4422:
4101:
4042:
4024:
3877:
nt: my talk page history, which is common mistakes made by new users, is irrelevant. and im right that youre a farsist (maybe Ų§Ų·ŁŲ§Ų¹Ų§ŲŖ) glo.
2747:
1883:
1541:
has resumed editing, without response here or even to the polite message on their usertalk requesting their acknowledgement of this thread.
14656:
14642:
13649:
13633:
12468:
11898:. Similarly, while I recall making changes to the lede, I have no recollection of undoing said edits. Either I have an undiagnosed case of
11354:
describes the process, including instructions for how and why to create a request for comment (RfC), to participate in one, and to end one.
11095:
11078:
10789:
10639:
10295:
9489:
9317:
6916:
5674:
Adding to the ANI report (apologies for the initial brevity) that this user has previously been warned about their page move vandalism by @
5397:
5225:
5211:
4936:
3244:
2929:
2875:
2850:
2216:
13580:
11290:. I will not hold your hand. You are on your own and you are completely responsible for your own edits. So, conduct yourself accordingly.
11054:
9043:
8779:
8761:
5800:
4033:: He keeps bothering me and keeps replying to only three edits, what do you want me to do? he's annoying, and I text the way he deserves.
14733:
14419:
13537:
Do you guys and gals need an SPI chucked together on this? It feels like folks are finding bits and pieces, and a CU could find the lot.
13532:
13065:
12943:
12912:
11251:
11230:
11212:
11195:
10906:
10892:
10759:
10311:
9681:
9508:
9475:
9461:
9323:
8570:
8037:
7993:
7941:
7169:
Good block. Frankly, the English here is so incoherent and poor that, even without the legal and COI issues, there would be a legitimate
7164:
5482:
5332:
5296:
5280:
5121:
4962:
4691:
4535:
Two other users in this thread called Zemen out for their behaviour (one even asking them to strike their attacks and cease them). Admin
3191:
2720:
2702:
1623:
amongst other Afds, driving editors away and stopping it coming to consensus. This is one of three articles with similar names including
1307:
437:
210:
52:
13032:
12362:
8545:
I created different accounts because edited the page from different places so I did not have with me the password of previous accounts
4523:
What attack? this is the idea of the persian Iranians, which some Kurds also have, sir. and ofc something you don't like isn't reliable.
3787:
3109:
3049:
14477:
13199:
13158:
12387:
12252:
other editors to pile on me in this thread in what seems as a barely disguised attempt to muzzle any further participation on my part.
10830:
7727:
7032:
6986:
5725:
4775:. That should cover the low-hanging fruit. Another admin may want to review this in more depth and see if anything else is in order.
4352:
4002:
2975:
1987:
1583:
1181:
447:
366:
215:
14531:
14512:
from article quality assessment as well as related contests. A focus on other endeavors, like expanding stubs, is highly recommended.
14216:
12296:
Nobody is turning a blind eye to Remsense's part. Remsense's part has already been addressed and solved. They have said things like
11163:. To restrict myself otherwise feels like censorship designed to discourage changes to the status quo which I feel certain users like
10717:
9522:
2002:
789:
14953:
14806:
13782:
Please gain some more experience with Knowledge and improve your writing skills before you review or nominate articles at FAC/FLC/GAN
13693:
13014:
9311:
9104:
9018:
I am the blocking administrator. Cryptic revoked talk page access while I was visiting with my granddaughter and picking up a pizza.
7739:
6720:
by asilvering. To no surprise, they are also attacking me (and Wikaviani) in the thread, even commenting in OUR summary of disputes.
5311:
3198:
And I closed it again. The consensus here seems to be that it was a good close, and it certainly is not appropriate to reopen it and
2905:
1803:
412:
14151:? Peer reviews are not quite assessment and offer an opportunity to develop the skills needed for the areas that have been an issue
13082:
12404:
11607:
3763:
In addition to the opinions already expressed, the RFC's question was clearly both out of scope for the article, and a violation of
17:
15185:
14895:
14517:
11069:
is an utterly inappropriate thing to say to a fellow editor? If so, will you commit to never saying anything like that ever again?
9906:
There ended up being a total of 4 user blocks that I ended up lifting. Two were probably okay but not needed anymore; the block of
9673:
9632:
7876:
The promo has been occurring at a highly accelerated rate this past month. Administrator attention to this situation is requested.
7092:
legal threat. You told me to enumerate changes/all basis for edits on Talk page for article, I did exactly that. Keep all changes.
6030:
Looks like its national insult me and Persians day today. Such behaviour has no place on this site (or elsewhere for that matter).
2592:
1794:
195:
6089:
You are hampering the spread of knowledge using the clunky wikipedia interface as your weapon. Your account needs to be suspended.
2560:
OP should forward whatever evidence they have that this happened in the tiny everyone-knows-everyone else United Kingdom, to both
2466:, making the above thread nonsensical in spots. I cannot undo the edit and do not currently have time to manually restore them. ā
14256:
13886:
that you immediately disengage from content qualityārelated processes on Knowledge and focus your efforts elsewhere for some time
12070:
has received no reprimand whatsoever for his conduct on the page while I have a big, ugly edit-war tag on my talk page posted by
10875:
7233:
538:
308:
15225:
13972:
13867:
11756:
is based on fairly flimsy evidence and does not involve any abuse of the Rfc process which is the primary focus of this thread.
8079:
Just state your wrongdoing clearly. You might as well because this is the least convincing attempt at deception that I've seen.
2481:
1973:
1703:
Also I can't help it if there are no the merge proposal lead nowhere due to lack of participation. I can't be blamed for that.
15121:
14107:
six month topic ban on article quality assessment, broadly construed. Use that time to substantively improve articles instead.
11274:, I am under no obligation to instruct you on the precise circumstances when you can or cannot open an RFC. It is incumbent on
11126:) feel I have been abusing the Rfc process and when you believe it is (or is not) appropriate to open one in the first place.
10936:
10703:
9663:
9569:, Knowledge doesn't require accounts. The IP has been given a final warning; if disruptive edits continue, just report them to
8962:
6854:
6389:" What are you talking aboutĀ ? Any of your comments contains attacks towards other editors, which only proves my above comment.
5999:
5545:
2004:
1661:
Most importantly, my inputs may have also made it clear to users unfamiliar with the subject that they are different companies.
1365:
815:
531:
303:
225:
97:
11863:
very unlikely to get stopped by the police for it? This is similar, in some respects ā but there is no "right to re-revert".
4546:
with no diffs to back it up. And before that, they asked ME to not "further provoke" an editor who is already clearly "upset"
1396:
This editor has brought MoS problems to an awful lot of film/television-related articles and never explained their edits (see
14875:
14424:
as an aside, i don't feel comfortable weighing in on a restriction on contest participation as a current coordinator of one (
14268:
14043:
13876:
You've had some experienced editors telling you you need to slow down, but you seem to be ignoring them. Can you tell me why?
13818:
13546:
12560:
12444:
11603:
11365:
10783:
10018:
Flight709 as "completely untrustworthy and are not welcome here". How is this not plain and simple abuse of admin power? The
5787:
Buying a trademark and starting a new company doesn't mean the old company didn't go defunct. Compare the situation with the
5520:
5366:
5066:
2602:
464:
205:
144:
11561:
in particular for where they acknowledge that this rationale is their personal views, not what reliable sources might say).
5244:
I don't like editing other editors' user pages, but it seems worth a shot in this instance. I've left them a message there.
4870:
I remain convinced that it's always best to be collegial to editors you're in a content dispute with, even if they're dicks.
15011:
14499:
13020:
12937:
12920:
12640:
12612:
10015:
9923:
acknowledges some of them were excessive, but comes across as deeply suspicious of new/anonymous editors with an immediate
9896:
8612:
8491:
5442:
4956:
4889:
We are all volunteers here, not professionals or robots. The insistence on politeness over everything else just encourages
4585:
2000:
543:
283:
200:
13328:
I have blocked CrazyLoverFutbolLoko for one week for disruptive editing including factionalism and battleground behavior.
8699:
I think it's the fan excitement flavor of COI. I doubt they're literally paid to do this, but I think either tag is fine @
6637:
5109:
5105:
15069:
14824:
14495:
13521:
who had a very different writing style but was making a similar argument about a FIFA World Cup and was blocked in July.
13152:
12509:
12410:
10824:
7281:
6095:
6088:
6055:
6034:
5719:
2945:
1577:
1312:
403:
328:
183:
114:
13881:
12875:
12847:
12819:
12735:
12679:
12078:
opinion on how the page should look just so happens to coincide with the views strongly articulated on the talk page by
11017:
10744:
has stated on multiple occasions how ashamed he is of being born in the United Kingdom and his dislike of British people
5164:
This isn't looking promising. After their draft article on their user page was deleted, they've just started a new one (
5074:
14947:
14800:
14781:
13687:
13457:
13223:
13132:
So I am impartial to this entire thing, but I'll take it here since I stumbled across it and it isn't looking good. On
12791:
12763:
12707:
11472:
you engaged once they started, and admins and the community won't care to make that effort in general if you give them
9833:
Each sentence containing the word "rape" or "murder" has a cite after it; one is even as part of a cited direct quote.
9223:
9141:
9098:
8581:
In the meantime, I would suggest mass draftification of all articles created by these editors (that are not undergoing
8065:. Also, why would you need to use a different account when in a different house anyway? And how could you consistently
7835:
7751:
7450:
7441:
7432:
7423:
7402:
7355:
7322:
4310:. I don't have to lie to you, I've used the 'porsian' phrase before, and the system suggests that I've used it before.
3817:
3093:
516:
511:
496:
333:
323:
288:
159:
14032:
12248:
not only (1) characterizing me as a "problem editor" in the discussion which I started at your recommendation but (2)
12009:
Why are you holding me responsible for the behavior of another editor? You should be taking that up with them, not me.
11844:
WP:EW and WP:BB are in tension. What looks like "bold editing" to one person can look like "edit warring" to another.
11559:
15179:
14664:
12244:
If I just received an edit-war tag on my talk page, I would not feel the need to complain. What I take issue with is
9626:
9178:
Every edit they have made appears to be problematic as all have been reverted either directly or indirectly. Clearly
6537:? I couldnt care less if they were Arab or Kryptonian. You are unable to make a single comment without attacking me.
5840:
5073:
There was recently another editor also using the iOS app who didn't discover their talk page until they were blocked,
3728:
1841:". Since this report was filed, they have been mass welcoming new users despite some of those users having zero edits
521:
454:
350:
343:
293:
14298:, this is a reasonable idea, and I see Rollinginhisgrave has taken the initiative to take over some of the reviews.
13229:
9336:
9135:
5900:
2942:
2382:
per nomination, clearly a net negative in this topic area. They are only creating more work for others to clean up.
2354:
2352:
2105:
The decision was taken at a state cabinet meeting, an official said, adding the proposal will be sent to the Centre.
1851:
14332:
14275:
I do see that most people are in agreement about a topic ban but I would also like to suggest that upon returning @
14011:
13211:
12494:
12490:
12415:
10795:
7822:
Regarding User:Gingeksace - of the 68 articles they created, all except 5 are about the Italian poet/entrepreneur
7227:
6435:
5823:
Hold on. Had the company been revived? Or is someone else just using the name and mark? That's not the same thing.
5652:
5341:
5338:
3944:
Not only what you said makes no sense, has zero diffs, and barely addresses my report. Now you're doubling down at
2860:
2168:
I thought MOS for Civil Aviation is the approving authority so my bad. The approving authority is central cabinet.
1824:
1822:
781:
668:
154:
119:
14854:? They've been vandalizing various pages for the past 4 hours but for some reason no one has checked AIV. Thanks.
13217:
11031:
11025:
6439:
3097:
2006:. I don't think that short window of time is enough for you to decide whether an article should be merged or not.
15251:
13553:
I'm about 95% confident that SinisterUnion and CrazyLoverFutbolLoko will come up as a match. Okay, maybe 98%. --
10930:
10742:. When asked to provide a reliable source for that claim, he did not do so. In the article, he wrote that Oliver
10561:
10238:(bolding mine). Honestly, that is mind-boggling how someone would come to that conclusion. Support another admin
9917:
9777:
9378:
9348:
9342:
7948:
6848:
5993:
4687:
3848:
This is just their attacks, I could cite their disruptive edits too. Their talk page history is full of warnings
3357:
As is clearly stated at the top of the page, the filer should expect scrutiny applied to their behavior as well.
2940:
2369:
1805:
1359:
1317:
555:
506:
459:
318:
240:
129:
45:
15157:
14078:
Go ahead. No one's obligating you to keep any templates on your user page that you don't want to keep there. --
13235:
11023:
11021:
11014:
11011:
5843:, most entries are "some group of investors thrice removed from the original company bought out the trademark".
5015:
Do you know if they can read page histories? I could make a dummy edit with a link to their UTP in the summary.
4458:
I'm sure u, like all other porsians, will resort to the saying that the word 'Kurd' is a word used for shepherd.
3856:
I'm sure u, like all other porsians, will resort to the saying that the word 'Kurd' is a word used for shepherd.
3602:
15151:
14901:
14319:
13193:
12584:
11349:
10836:
10807:
10660:
article, they implied the Irish version was Anglophobic without a reference, further implying the same for the
10002:
9921:
9874:
9725:
Turns out- the vast majority of that content was copyvio. I've removed it and marked it for revdel. Sincerely,
9388:
9354:
8142:
6931:
6623:
6464:
6446:
6364:
5731:
5618:
4646:
626:
442:
386:
338:
257:
220:
15145:
12967:
12521:
12517:
11731:
11065:, I have a question for you and would appreciate a direct and concise answer: Do you understand that writing
11028:
10676:
10672:
10668:
10395:
a large proportion of bad faith editors who are freuently abusive and/or lie. It's much easier for someone to
4986:
15133:
15005:
14680:
14612:
14472:
14396:
of course i am not happy to see it come to this board, but i have to corroborate the issues raised here. i'd
14006:
suggested copyediting, or maybe you could "adopt" some other backlog. How about de-stubbing? I see you're in
13597:
13576:
I was the admin who blocked Fa30sp and I would lay a small bet that both the editors named above are linked.
13182:
12589:
There is probably one and the same person who under various IP accounts pushing various subcategories of the
11778:
occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions."
10848:
10801:
10573:
10291:
9693:
8644:
7888:
6101:
Account created on February 2021, 133 edits, majority of which have been reverted. Fail to see how they're a
5743:
5112:. I left them a message about copying another bit from within Knowledge but those two had some other origin.
2314:
1658:
I never said a single point again and again. My discussion lead to clearing misunderstanding that took place.
1607:
657:
262:
250:
245:
14983:
14848:
13723:
12955:
10914:
10298:) and agreed not to repeat it (sadly, no one looked at that unblock request within a reasonable timeframe).
9128:
8936:
Most of this material is sourced to Lerro himself or to his "members/adherents" - to it's all COI sourcing:
4974:
4596:
4509:
4502:
4495:
4478:
4475:
3907:
3900:
3893:
3876:
3873:
1819:
Owned by NTPC and there is little to no reason to have separate article, All plants are owned by one company
15215:
15139:
15063:
14602:
14542:
14285:
13440:
13170:
12961:
10591:
10579:
9677:
9656:
8926:
8843:
8074:
We all know that behind almost every page of living authors there is often someone close to the same author
7952:
We all know that behind almost every page of living authors there is often someone close to the same author
7844:
and there were a few sockpuppet investigations on it-wp. Gingeksace has removed COI templates in the past.
7721:
7352:(which was redirected to Menotto Lerroās article) (Note: this has now been blank-and-redirected to Empathy)
7275:
5904:
4980:
3026:
2698:
2572:
1842:
1595:
1560:
1528:
1499:
638:
526:
396:
188:
14971:
14812:
13711:
11891:
9941:
I'm not offering to do it, but what exactly is it that you are asking the community to do? Talk to him? ā
9147:
9116:
7873:, who is a member of Lerroās Empathism, other members/adherents of Empathism or other affiliated sources.
7257:
6128:
This is what was said, the note they left in place of primary sources that actually had numerical figures:
5506:
NebY has pretty much said all else that there is to say. Blocks are meant to prevent, and a site one will
5350:
5347:
5344:
5302:'s message about an hour ago but carried on editing their user page. They haven't edited their talk page.
4529:
4522:
4457:
3954:
3952:
3949:
3855:
3414:
It would be a practice point for me to remember to state explicitly that the RfC was malformed next time.
15203:
13176:
12501:
11689:
10960:
10842:
10567:
9714:
9644:
8921:
ping me with particular tasks. I can make a source assessment table or remove cruft from artist pages. --
7841:
Interestingly, Lerroās article on Italian Knowledge was deleted for lack of encyclopedic value/notability
6878:
6556:
6368:
6023:
5737:
4783:
Let me know if the attacks on your ethnicity or motivations continue, and I'll block indef. I know that
4757:
4642:
4613:
3811:
1997:
1846:
1813:
1601:
1389:
739:
391:
71:
10546:
9153:
8895:, there is not a defined action plan to my knowledge. Some of the editors have opened AfDs (for example
7245:
5603:
I've reversed it, but you should probably try to explain to them why their article is being deleted. --
3692:, but that looks like a good close. You'll have to accept that you're outside consensus on this one. --
1414:). They continued disrupting Knowledge even though they had been warned about these multiple times (see
15115:
15041:
14977:
14842:
14689:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#Seeking en masse rollback of disruptive edits
14336:
13937:
13717:
13389:
13140:, there appears to be a group of editors trying to band together under some "faction" (these users are
12949:
12573:
11693:
11034:
10948:
10585:
10360:
10307:
10246:
10079:
9689:
9402:
9374:
9122:
8976:
8879:
8838:
on the promotional items listed or do they need to be nominated one-by-one? Thanks for any guidance. --
8708:
8653:
8352:
Okay, maybe we'll get a straighter answer if you log out and then log back in with the Nihaon account?
7023:
Off-wiki postings on social media by the editor are consistent with the thought processes seen here. ā
6939:
6866:
6011:
5562:
4968:
4673:
3180:
I'd say someone's irony detector needs to be taken in for recalibration, but ChatGPT doesn't do irony.
2897:
Yes. Whether or not off-wiki events have occurred as described, GDX420's description of their stance ā
1879:
1377:
735:
313:
139:
124:
109:
79:
38:
15099:
13061:
13010:
12985:
7305:
6468:
6458:
6452:
6192:
2760:
and needs to get trimmed significantly. It probably doesn't need to be mentioned in the lead either.
1844:
15209:
15029:
14959:
14687:" I've reverted all of their relevent edits. We spent a lot of time last December dealing with this (
14263:
14038:
13699:
13541:
13499:
13188:
13164:
12555:
12438:
12322:
Emiya1980, I don't think that anyone is expecting to issue sanctions specifically for the WWII edits.
11360:
11159:
not been reached in favor of either position, I do not see the problem in opening an Rfc as I did on
10777:
10341:
10174:
9742:
9650:
9542:
8380:
7700:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement who also participated in a presentation about Lerroās manifesto
6832:
6812:
6773:
6660:
5961:
5881:
5829:
5703:
5515:
5491:
5361:
5101:
5061:
5050:
4742:
4468:
4154:
and namecalling due to ones alleged ethnicity (my ethnicity is not disclosed on my userpage, in fact
3866:
3841:
2887:
2614:
2448:
Editor clearly does not want to listen & just wants to get their way, regardless of the facts. ā
2041:
That is pure disinformation. No name change has occurred so far. Which source are you talking about?
1671:
may note "Sometimes, a long comment or replying multiple times is perfectly acceptable or needed for
1589:
1483:
1461:
298:
149:
15087:
14050:
I love reviewing AFC articles, and I also like destubbing articles, though I didn't do much lately.
12135:, not you. With that being said, I'm not going to be only one taking the fall for an edit war which
8320:
Okay, so evidently there is no plausible good faith explanation for your activity. Good day to you.
7293:
6927:
6893:
5805:
I have gone ahead and adjusted the opening sentence and lede to establish that the company has been
1807:
1783:
of personally attacking them when there was nothing in their reply that could be considered as such
15191:
14965:
14583:
13705:
13593:
13133:
12931:
12634:
12606:
12370:
11894:, another editor confronted me over my reversion to his edits in the "Locarno Treaties" section of
11624:
I did only two reverts. That's pretty common in terms of what I've seen of other editors' conduct.
10871:(see filter log). Any admin willing to take action on these accounts would be greatly appreciated.
10352:
The only possible "action" here is to take this to ArbCom, no? Seems they'd be likely to accept an
9890:
9159:
9110:
9007:
8858:
8818:
8594:
8498:
8452:
7742:ā an autobiographical novel by Lerro with the ācritical receptionā section of the article cited to
7251:
6170:. Yet I am clearly the "hyper emotional" one here, everyone can see your treatment towards me here
5679:
5436:
4994:
Could an admin apply a gentle mainspace block to get their attention so they read their talk page?
4950:
4838:
what I see here is an experienced user deciding to bully a less-experienced user with an ANI report
4110:
and namecalling several times. As you can see, they're still doubling down, showing signs of being
3829:
3592:
3503:
3348:
3330:
3262:
3146:
3105:
1452:
1410:
1404:
1398:
632:
484:
10011:
15197:
14598:
14538:
14491:
14313:
14295:
14281:
13892:
13146:
13137:
12534:
10954:
10856:
10818:
10608:
OK, all good alternatives to blocking. Short-term semi-protection has seemed to work so far at a
10265:
10261:
10230:
really ought to have known better than to interpret them tagging him in their unblock request as
9983:
9668:
9638:
9271:
9231:
9187:
9060:
8922:
8892:
8839:
8543:
trivial, what is the problem, why are you concentrating on this irrelevant stuff. Also, notably,
8072:
Presenting your abuses as hypotheticals, such as your sockpuppetry and the comment earlier about
7685:
7574:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement, writer of the āofficial anthemā of the Empathic Movement
7067:
7057:
6935:
6904:
6897:
6884:
6872:
6725:
6546:
6303:
6275:
6230:
6178:
6110:
6017:
5929:
5862:
5848:
5814:
5757:
5713:
5585:
5289:
4624:
4603:
4574:
4374:
4333:
4293:
4268:
4231:
4209:
4163:
4123:
3965:
3913:
3022:
2949:
2569:
2515:
2493:
2419:
2279:
2247:
2226:
2173:
2139:
2094:
2078:
2032:
1928:
1848:
1810:
1801:
1799:
1797:
1745:
1708:
1694:
1571:
1524:
1495:
1471:
1383:
13342:
Not mentioned here, after the above edit, block extended to 1 month, and TPA revoked by Cullen.
12646:
12618:
12498:
12170:
on talk first, and then only placing a banner if no consensus or improvements result from that.
11038:
4649:. He has no problem using offensive language when it is directed at groups other than his own.
2529:
it clearly would have show not to go ahead, but it could also have inexperience but it could be
1971:
14941:
14794:
14566:
14325:
14245:
14189:
14069:
14055:
13990:
13957:
13920:
13777:
13681:
13453:
13261:
12481:
12331:
12309:
12029:
12000:
11958:
11868:
11802:
11771:
11503:
SnowRise while they could have been clearer, in fact Nemov/the OP did say in their first post "
10469:
10433:
10419:
10405:
10379:
10044:
9824:
9730:
9257:
9219:
9092:
8530:
8481:
8467:
7365:
7239:
7178:
7078:
6947:
6356:
5020:
4753:
4358:
4060:
3610:
3405:
3307:
3003:
2985:
2964:
Positive content written in an unencyclopaedic tone and sourced to the organisation's website?
2790:
2620:
2511:
2411:
1990:
1730:
1330:
698:
501:
61:
14818:
13758:
I believe you need to learn more about the GAN/article-writing process first before taking on
7977:
The exact degree of association between the editor and Lerro seems unclear, but that they are
7892:
6892:
It is obviously this user, as the extensive edits are the same as previously posted by her on
1954:" but this does not address why you welcomed users that have made zero edits to this site. As
15173:
15035:
14148:
14007:
13927:
13626:
13384:
13316:
13243:
12568:
11418:
10942:
10699:
10531:
10074:
9878:
9620:
9429:
9397:
8971:
8874:
8703:
8648:
7634:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement and received Lerroās Cilento International Poetry Prize
7616:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement and received Lerroās Cilento International Poetry Prize
7604:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement and received Lerroās Cilento International Poetry Prize
7393:
7361:
7349:
6860:
6765:
6632:
6534:
6507:
6317:
6259:
6167:
6005:
5557:
4793:
4487:
When I tried to explain to them why it was not nice to resort to namecalling ("farsist") and
4441:
Request for secondary admin opinion; since when is attacking others for their ethnicity okay?
3885:
When I tried to explain to them why it was not nice to resort to namecalling ("farsist") and
3735:
2995:
2776:
2391:
2157:
2123:
2050:
2015:
1863:
1446:
1440:
1434:
1428:
1422:
1416:
1371:
13057:
13006:
12981:
7839:
6938:
because she doesn't like the contents only exacerbates this COI and begins learning towards
5655:, I imagine. Anyway, blocked indefinitely for disruptive page moves and personal attacks.--
4772:
4752:
perceived nationality or ethnicity as an adhominem (which is what they appear to be doing).
3849:
1989:. And even if the name change occurred, it would still be disruptive to move that page, see
15233:
15093:
15017:
14915:
14692:
14260:
14127:
14083:
14035:
14019:
14003:
13791:
13577:
13558:
13538:
13407:
13350:
13291:
12552:
12423:
11473:
11357:
10414:
That's not an excuse nor does it explain the initial block of an editor like StattoSteven.
10326:
10159:
9987:
9957:
9788:
9757:
9702:
9471:
9437:
8948:
8908:
8775:
8689:
8668:
8622:
8376:
8343:
8311:
8275:
8241:
8211:
8178:
8164:
8114:
8099:
8048:
8003:
7881:
7541:
7358:ā founded by Lerro to give āprize awardsā to adherents/members of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7299:
7221:
6808:
6769:
6699:
6655:
6497:
6425:
6222:
6077:
5957:
5946:
5876:
5824:
5685:
5642:
5627:
5608:
5593:
5512:
5393:
5358:
5221:
5193:
5131:
5058:
4920:
4827:
4738:
4540:
4488:
4446:
4362:
4260:
4259:
Okay, that's it. I would a more experienced admin to look into this. I won't tolerate more
4250:
4197:
4187:
4151:
4141:
4107:
4097:
4015:
3886:
3764:
3697:
3515:
3397:
3221:
3054:
2926:
2882:
2815:
2761:
2647:
2070:
1479:
1457:
1332:
11404:
9796:
They're welcome to withdraw the threat at any time and perhaps have the block lifted, but
9466:
OK, no problem then. I was suspicious of .co domains, since those have been used to spam.
9211:
adding Personal attacks. and Reply. that say "Stop being so gay" and "Die cunt" vandalism?
2714:. I deliberately performed a clean start for this reason, 'ca' is basically unsearchable.
1686:
which doesn't appear to be a comment to be made on a collaborative project like Knowledge.
1621:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited
8:
15075:
15023:
14768:
14708:
14579:
14441:
14413:
14175:
14112:
13507:
13371:
13333:
13269:
13002:
12997:
12888:
12287:
12257:
12144:
12087:
12066:; which you yourself admit I bore a smaller part of the blame for. From what I can tell,
12014:
11985:
11944:
11902:
or somebody is piggy-backing on my account to make additional edits without my knowledge.
11895:
11835:
11761:
11715:
11672:
11629:
11593:
11540:
11512:
11495:
11454:
11399:
11337:
11318:
11295:
11247:
11226:
11208:
11172:
11149:
11131:
11113:
11091:
11074:
11004:
10924:
10902:
10755:
10555:
10353:
10014:. They blocked Flight709 for editing "far too quickly, recklessly, and suspiciously" and
9965:
I was hoping that there would be some introspection so it wouldn't be necessary to go to
9911:
9363:
9168:
9023:
9002:
8854:
8814:
8590:
8494:
8448:
7984:
It seems to me that this is a straightforward promo only account (and ditto for Nihaon).
7559:
7385:
7193:
7140:
6842:
6740:
6683:
6645:
6618:
6564:
6516:
6475:
6376:
6330:
6289:
6245:
6212:
6144:
5987:
5535:
4654:
3926:
3835:
3670:
3303:
2804:
2743:
1999:, especially when you have proposed multiple of them to be merged within a single minute
1955:
1905:
1672:
1546:
1514:
1353:
702:
474:
381:
75:
15226:
There's five brand new accounts swarming the discussion in a span of less than two hours
8940:
So if you see any sources written by any of the names listed at the bottom of this page:
8372:
594:
15081:
14638:
14487:
13871:
13257:
13141:
13046:
12449:
12224:
12182:
12113:
11650:
11610:
to the talk page were to advertise some of the RfCs noted at the start of this thread.
11382:
10627:
10502:
10487:
10273:
10193:
10092:
10061:
9971:
9929:
9868:
9598:
9581:
9555:
9267:
9183:
9056:
7691:
7661:
7643:
7628:ā adherent of Empathic Movement and received Lerroās Cilento International Poetry Prize
7571:
7517:
7461:
7287:
6795:
6721:
6706:
6598:
6542:
6341:
6299:
6271:
6226:
6174:
6106:
5925:
5858:
5844:
5810:
5753:
5453:
5325:
5252:
5176:
5152:
5084:
5037:
5002:
4912:
4899:
4878:
is a cornerstone of the wiki, demanding editors remain perfectly calm and professional
4805:
4778:
4638:
4620:
4599:
4570:
4530:
haven't said anything about you, you confirmed this theory yourself with your comments.
4370:
4329:
4303:
4289:
4264:
4227:
4205:
4204:, which you and I both know is not okay. Especially not due to ones alleged ethnicity.
4159:
4119:
4089:
3961:
3909:
3779:
3650:
3632:
3574:
3545:
3523:
3426:
3369:
3284:
3236:
3167:
3128:
2468:
2450:
2415:
2326:
2300:
2275:
2262:
2243:
2222:
2202:
2169:
2135:
2090:
2074:
2028:
1939:
1924:
1741:
1718:
1704:
1690:
1616:
1566:
587:
579:
479:
235:
14830:
13952:
Sure, I can accept a topic ban, this is scary on my part, but I probably deserved it.
11579:
That is a complete misrepresentation of my conduct on the page. I did not go over the
10974:
10965:
has created 8 RFCs since May 27th. All of these RFCs have been on stable biographies.
8134:
and the question can be resolved one way or the other. I'd do it myself if I knew how.
7901:
5054:
14999:
14674:
14563:
14468:
14340:
14276:
14242:
14186:
14066:
14052:
13987:
13967:
13954:
13444:
13096:
13028:
12590:
12505:
12327:
12305:
12302:"As someone whose biggest point of self-critique is easily that they revert too much"
12136:
12025:
11996:
11954:
11881:
11864:
11813:
11798:
11588:
complaint is completely unrelated to Rfcs which is the primary focus of this thread.
11108:
are more appropriate? Do you understand the concerns that other editors have raised?
11037:, and itās another completely pointless RFC that wasnāt necessary after the original
10465:
10444:
10429:
10415:
10401:
10375:
10290:
as the reasoning for the block wasn't particularly strong to begin with and the user
10040:
9820:
9726:
9710:
9518:
9253:
9213:
9179:
8526:
8477:
8463:
7398:
7174:
7112:
7074:
7029:
7013:
6966:
6943:
6913:
6757:
6602:
6538:
6102:
5911:
5796:
5235:
5016:
4709:
While I quibble over a couple of HoI's points, I think there's enough for at least a
4616:
4589:
4566:
4111:
4056:
4011:
3957:
3925:
and arbitrarily tag just because three of my edits don't 'look neutral', which is an
3823:
3724:
3606:
3401:
2999:
2981:
2786:
2310:
1829:
1726:
10989:
10679:
edits show they not only know how to use citations but also know the correct format.
7814:
4886:
by bringing those attacks to ANI is what I found to be dismissive of their concerns.
4560:....Plus I didn't call you childish, but your thoughts and accusations are childish.
2339:
and reviewing Thewikizoomer's behaviour in this thread, especially comments such as
15057:
14746:
14652:
14623:
14527:
14158:
13621:
13311:
13238:
13111:
13071:
can be challenging with IP editors due to few of them participating on talk pages.
12458:
12272:
11939:
If anybody else viewing this thread has any ideas what's going on, please chip in.
11615:
11566:
11431:
11414:
10999:
10984:
10735:
10688:
10527:
10205:
9838:
9805:
9770:. I'm concerned that no warning was given prior to filing this ANI action, though.
8797:
8736:
8566:
8552:
8512:
8436:
8357:
8325:
8294:
8260:
8226:
8196:
8149:
8084:
8033:
8018:
7989:
7937:
7907:
7747:
7709:
7667:
7577:
7505:
7486:
7446:
7269:
6930:(even stating it's what she is known for), making her edits on his article a clear
6710:
6469:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1247695404
6459:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1247670270
6453:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1241923794
6263:
6193:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah&oldid=1247670270
5857:
Also I wrote "re-established" in the article, not "revived". Sorry for the mix-up.
5788:
5779:
4860:
4789:
4484:"Farsist" means "Persianist", whatever that is supposed to mean. More namecalling.
3882:"Farsist" means "Persianist", whatever that is supposed to mean. More namecalling.
3731:
3315:
3217:
3207:
2970:
2907:
don't indicate someone who can edit the article collaboratively and in accord with
2772:
2671:
2630:
2565:
2561:
2536:
2485:
2384:
2150:
2116:
2043:
2008:
1856:
1769:
1668:
1639:
11852:
11850:
11848:
10664:
yet using a joke interview from the aforementioned article subject as a reference.
7348:ā a so-called ācultural movementā founded by Lerro who also wrote its āmanifestoā
7121:
what they ask. (They can't anymore now that they've been rightfully blocked.) And
4584:
As this report is ongoing, Zemen is still causing disruption. They just replaced "
3956:. Would appreciate if an admin would look at this, fail to see how this user is a
2980:
How is this content that was removed unencyclopaedic and inappropriately sourced?
1812:. Their mass merging proposals of NTPC building articles are problematic as well.
15229:
14911:
14780:
14123:
14079:
14015:
13985:
Okay, I will not edit for a few days, but I will still watch from the sidelines.
13843:
13585:
13554:
13401:
13344:
13285:
12973:
12419:
11980:
reversion here by myself; classifying this as edit-warring is frankly overkill.
11752:
However, the fact remains that Nick-D's claim that I started an edit war over at
11050:
10897:
I semi-protected the article for two weeks to deter additional socking attempts.
10031:
10023:
9467:
9433:
9038:
8944:
8918:
8904:
8771:
8700:
8685:
8664:
8618:
8522:
8339:
8307:
8271:
8237:
8207:
8174:
8160:
8110:
8095:
8044:
7999:
7877:
7756:
7715:
7637:
7625:
7601:
7455:
7216:
7160:
7126:
6526:
6493:
6421:
6267:
5921:
5681:
5638:
5623:
5604:
5589:
5389:
5217:
5189:
5141:
5127:
4916:
4875:
4823:
4593:
4536:
4418:
4410:
4388:
4348:
4315:
4246:
4220:
4183:
4137:
4093:
4075:
4038:
4030:
3998:
3980:
3935:
3805:
3693:
3679:
3186:
3083:
2935:
2757:
2684:
2643:
2436:
2221:
I made my points. So yes, I'll stop any further comments/edits on the said AFDs.
1970:". Starting welcoming new users right after proposing merger of over 30 articles
1817:
Especially when the rationale for it is seemingly lacking in any actual policy. "
14064:
I really want to revert the wikibreak template and review and de-stub articles.
11967:
Apparently, I misread the link. That being said, the problem over at Hindenburg
8561:
And the purpose of the multiple accounts was... to cast multiple votes at AfDs.
7918:
Just a brief note to say that I entirely agree with Netherzone's analysis above.
6240:
the logic the user is employing here, in guise of factuality, that is the case.
6205:
6171:
5354:
4665:
4014:. It's neither a blog, nor a Discord chat, nor a jocular texting conversation.
14764:
14738:
14704:
14431:
14425:
14403:
14207:
14171:
14138:
14108:
13973:
You have already implied before that activities like reviews make you exhausted
13822:
13812:
13750:
13503:
13367:
13329:
13307:
13278:
13265:
13038:
13023:
for the third time, after being given a warning for edit warring it yesterday.
12995:
I was told at AIV this is not obvious vandalism. Except how are revisions like
12898:
12885:
12383:
12348:
12283:
12253:
12140:
12083:
12010:
11981:
11940:
11831:
11827:
11757:
11723:
11698:
11685:
11668:
11625:
11589:
11523:
11508:
11478:
11437:
11333:
11329:
11314:
11305:
11291:
11271:
11243:
11222:
11217:
11204:
11200:
11168:
11145:
11141:
11127:
11109:
11101:
11087:
11083:
11070:
11062:
10979:
10919:
10898:
10872:
10751:
10661:
10550:
10303:
9966:
9924:
9852:
9797:
9771:
9485:
9447:
I am a bit confused. How is this spam? google.com.co is a Google owned domain.
9359:
9227:
9164:
9050:
9019:
8807:
8062:
7866:
7787:
7743:
7631:
7607:
7535:
7529:
7523:
7467:
7379:
7189:
7136:
7131:
6923:
6837:
6159:
5768:
5531:
5478:
5470:
5379:
5307:
5276:
5207:
5117:
4784:
4173:
much good at communicating with each other while you're both upset, and as the
2916:
2908:
2871:
2800:
2739:
1893:
1834:
who voted oppose on the original Afd, in their reply to Thewikizoomer they said
1676:
1542:
1538:
1510:
1475:
1348:
684:
13796:
I don't believe this user is ready to participate in the GAN process quite yet
12567:
Article SEMIed, IP blocked for 31h, named user warned for logged out editing.
10007:
8191:
subject area and who refuses to declare his transparent conflict of interest.
1996:
How do you explain your blanket merge proposals of NTPC power station articles
1328:
15245:
14907:
14870:
14719:
14634:
14014:. You won't run out of those any time soon, and it will be good practice. --
13738:
13734:
13042:
12516:'s edit were right and started personal attack towards me; here are the IP's
12237:
12214:
12172:
12128:
12103:
12075:
12067:
11790:
11727:
11640:
11580:
11555:
Talk:World War II#Who should be listed at the top of the main Allied leaders?
11468:
11409:
11373:
11283:
10994:
10767:
10723:
10657:
10623:
10396:
10269:
10227:
10189:
10109:
10057:
9864:
9767:
9594:
9574:
9570:
9566:
9551:
8835:
8586:
8582:
8521:
I think one could take a loaf of bread down to the nearest pond and get less
8444:
8440:
8138:
8131:
7862:
Since this campaign began, Lerro is now mentioned hundreds of times on en-wp
7852:
7823:
7493:
7437:
7389:
7336:
7314:
7170:
7122:
6788:
6530:
6313:
6255:
6155:
6081:
5942:
5446:
5318:
5299:
5245:
5169:
5145:
5077:
5030:
4995:
4730:
4718:
4515:
4450:
4366:
4201:
4158:
is not even a Persian city..) okay now? I hope you understand my frustation.
4115:
4052:
3945:
3769:
3744:
3646:
3622:
3564:
3535:
3519:
3440:
3416:
3359:
3274:
3226:
3157:
3118:
3089:
2863:
2734:
2530:
2360:
2111:
1944:
You haven't addressed any of the issues that have been pointed out by me and
1887:
11086:
Yes, I will commit to refraining from making such statements in the future.
10090:
community has agreed there's a problem it can't solve through normal means.
8547:). Basically, it was transparently the same user operating the same racket.
7750:
and āadherentā of the Empathic Movement who was then awarded one of Lerroās
2847:
I have created and maintained a section the the Charities Commission enquiry
2349:
2347:
2340:
2337:
2335:
2333:
1835:
1784:
1781:
1778:
1776:
1774:
1772:
1766:
647:
14458:
13024:
12977:
12097:
12063:
11973:
11887:
11753:
11664:
11279:
11160:
11105:
10969:
10522:
10105:
9514:
9502:
9455:
8303:
Be patient, I think I have already answerd at all possibilities and more...
7703:
7697:
7428:
7413:
7329:, 4 articles on Lerroās works and at least one article on a family member.
7107:
7024:
7008:
6961:
6908:
6717:
6672:
Changes were made right after posting, they're additions for the most part.
6489:
6417:
6163:
6073:
6048:
5907:
5792:
5231:
4325:
4307:
2711:
2304:
1979:
1787:
14484:
six-month restriction from content assessment processes, broadly construed
13592:: Well would you look at that. Both blocked as confirmed socks of Fa30sp.
10151:
to determine whether they were appropriate. I also ask that the appeal by
9207:
7802:ā adherent to Lerroās Empathic Movement, an āEmpathic Masterā of Empathism
7373:
6060:... ...Ought I find some note about how worthless persian sources are, or
5269:
2293:
779:
14742:
14648:
14619:
14523:
14201:
14170:, I definitely believe that peer review is a form of article assessment.
14167:
14152:
13763:
13638:
And thus ends the rise and fall of "Encyclopedic Revolutionary Faction".
13518:
13107:
12454:
12268:
12245:
12132:
12079:
12071:
11794:
11611:
11585:
11562:
10731:
10684:
10035:
9834:
9801:
8793:
8732:
8604:
8562:
8548:
8508:
8433:
8367:
8353:
8321:
8290:
8256:
8222:
8192:
8145:
8080:
8029:
8014:
7985:
7933:
7903:
7419:
7264:
6201:
the user here appears to act as if the article is a fact finding mission.
5776:
4893:
and punishes good editors who are understandably upset at being targeted
4856:
3311:
3250:
3203:
2965:
2694:
2666:
2625:
1923:
To other mentions, I think I've already responded in respective replies.
13234:), who are personally attacking others and basically vandalising pages (
12062:
Well, it seems I'm the only one who is being slammed for an edit war on
11606:
edited the World War II article before starting this edit war, and your
8834:
Question- I have lost the action item on this ANI. Will there be a mass
8615:
7842:
7746:
a member of the Empathic Movement and former professor of Lerro, and to
7325:, 55 articles on members and āadherentsā to Lerroās "Empathic Movement"
1809:, in spite of the fact it is not the official name yet, let a common one
78:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see
14881:
12477:
12297:
11309:
11164:
11123:
11046:
10451:
9927:
reflex, so I think it needs to be brought to the community for review.
9706:
9611:
Obsessively editing same biographical page after a decade of inactivity
9033:
7580:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement, and interviewer of Menotti Lerro
7156:
5656:
4890:
4414:
4384:
4344:
4311:
4085:
4071:
4048:
4034:
3994:
3976:
3931:
3800:
3675:
3562:
No one agrees with your premises. This is not a failing of the system.
3181:
2661:
Any number of ways, it's a small country where everyone knows everyone.
2432:
12131:
If you read my last post closely, my criticism was primarily aimed at
7897:. The "day of pickaxes" is fun tho, anyone with a good translation of
7851:
This seems to be a coordinated PR/PROMO effort by two SPAs to promote
7401:ā a member of Lerroās Empathic Movement, who was also awarded Lerroās
3948:(in the very section I opened by asking you not continue your attacks
631:
If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on
14555:
I also have a peer review in the Simple English Wiki, you can see it
12379:
10299:
10019:
9481:
8638:
8187:
I didn't mock you, the post you are referring to was by another user.
7856:
7827:
7449:- adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerroās
7431:- adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerroās
7422:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerroās
7345:
7340:
7326:
7318:
5772:
5474:
5375:
5303:
5272:
5203:
5144:. Hopefully they'll respond on their talk page and it can be lifted.
5113:
3088:
I am writing to formally report the disruptive behavior exhibited by
2912:
2867:
2274:
There is a difference between behavioural issue and content dispute.
74:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
13037:
The IP's edits are not vandalism. Please do not call them that, see
10214:
on the surface. We have yet another case of blocking someone off of
14886:
14856:
14724:
14513:
14386:
14299:
14212:
13976:
13896:
13838:
not wanting to listen to the constructive criticism you are getting
13753:, which discussed several problematic GAN reviews and nominations.
13668:
Well-meaning, but chronically disruptive, editing from TheNuggeteer
13640:
13589:
13571:
13523:
13468:
13425:
13073:
12903:
12395:
12353:
11237:
11186:
10883:
10708:
10114:
9882:
9550:
seems to do some vandalism. Maybe require accounts from that IP? --
8767:
8752:
7440:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement who was also awarded Lerroās
6977:
5675:
4285:
And now up above Zemen is calling me childish (yet another attack)
3749:
3400:) and the outcome of the discussion was obvious to anyone but you.
3202:
the question being asked after editors have already replied to it.
3096:, they continues to undermine the purpose of the RFC by repeatedly
2207:
11826:
and therefore edit-warring, then what is the point of Knowledge's
9284:
Persistent unsourced date changes by 2601:14B:4101:400D:0:0:0:0/64
6445:
There's a mistake in editing, I linked to the article after their
5750:
Category talk:Defunct computer companies based in New York (state)
5057:, so, depending on how āup to dateā that is, itās anyoneās guess.
2849:
is not the whole story; GDX420 also deleted much positive content.
11770:
There may be some definitional issues here. From the top of the
9496:
9449:
9032:
I'm unclear what we're supposed to do with all that information.
2715:
2431:
Clearly not listening since they're bludgeoning this discussion.
13901:
You should hopefully know this by now, but you have to slow down
13848:
I think you should step away from Good Articles entirely for now
10547:
handy-dandy list of admins by number of blocks in the last month
10220:"because attitude is incompatible with writing an encyclopedia"
4469:
your opinions on my edits don't 'look natural' u are too farsist
4357:
It's absolutely mindboggling that you can get away with so much
3867:
your opinions on my edits don't 'look natural' u are too farsist
3587:
Its not about system; its about you. You are abusing the system
2510:. Not a good look that they display no self awareness in citing
2359:
This blatant misrepresentation has shown us that he has serious
15109:
11730:
in the infobox in a way that suggests he was the leader of the
10855:
Happymappy12342 has engaged in repeated unsourced additions to
6206:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Battle_of_al-Qadisiyyah#Estimates
4551:
In fact, this only encouraged Zemen to continue their attacks:
4134:
These don't look like "common mistakes made by new users" to me
4132:
My apologies for the assumption; I misunderstood your comment,
4012:
Your talk page exists for other editors to communicate with you
3730:
to questions about other accounts does not inspire confidence.
2402:
Discussion about the recent move discussion is still ongoing -
2351:
This was after he received warnings for undiscussed page moves
1333:
30:
14741:, I blocked that one as obvious, and CU-confirmed two others.
13910:
indefinite topic ban from good article nominations and reviews
12512:(possibly a sock of the same user) in their talkpage claiming
11308:
No, that is not good enough. When I have a biased editor like
11167:
are trying to impose on me. That is my opinion on the matter.
7830:
and its adherants/members of Lerroās Empathism manifesto, his
7155:
I've blocked Vmarkovna indefinitely and the IP for one week.--
7070:
stating āThe previous version pre rewrite is criminal maliceā.
6387:
this as another user who simply hates Arabs, and Arab sources.
6322:
5264:
They've continued working on their user page, adding an image
3396:
Looks like a good RFC close to me. The RFC was malformed (see
1882:
and thanking them for their non-existent contributions...then
1334:
15224:
Can an admin please consider applying blocks and protection?
11348:
I think I can help on the signposting. The central RFC page,
7313:
Gingeksace has created over 60 articles on the Italian poet,
6629:
says the very same thing about Greek sources being worthless.
5872:
4453:
by Zemen (imagine if I included their disruptive edits too).
4155:
2856:(above, albeit slightly qualified) and an edit summary about
2344:
Comment: Any issues other than WP:BLUD, use appropriate forum
13975:, and now seems like as good a time as any to take a break.
13617:
I think I had a nightmare that the ArbCom case was accepted!
13019:
This IP has just restored their preferred infobox poster at
11521:
I stand corrected: thanks for pointing that out, Nil Einne.
8609:
Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Leicesterdedlock/Archive
8069:
between forgetting the passwords for two different accounts?
5839:
I'm only using Knowledge's own nomenclature; if you look at
5104:
but I'd like to ask them if they used an LLM to create e.g.
4666:#WP:NPA/WP:ASPERSIONS with a dose of xenophobia by M7md AAAA
1725:
and quit trying to be the grand inquisitor of this article.
14935:
13675:
11122:
Before I answer that question, please tell me how you (not
10509:
I think we can avoid bothering ArbCom. My recommendations:
10112:. You might consider moving this case to that noticeboard.
8970:
TPA yanked, Cullen admonished for not sharing his pizza :D
8901:
WP:Articles for deletion/Cilento International Poetry Prize
8635:
I was going to INDEF for DE, which this absolutely is, but
6760:
due to their doubling down on the use of personal attacks (
2939:
editing in the past, resulting in two previous ANI threads
2854:
the scandal outweighs anything they've done before or since
1796:, as well as renaming mentions of it on different articles
1478:, could you please take a look at this? Thanks in advance!
15167:
10153:
10073:
it needs ArbComm anyway so this step appears unnecessary.
8130:
Hopefully someone will open a sockpuppet investigation at
7817:
7724:ā an associate of Lerro who wrote about Lerro and Empathis
6926:
has stated on her draft page that she legally represented
4503:
Just wishin' you good luck? now u can end this discussion.
4479:...and im right that youre a farsist (maybe Ų§Ų·ŁŲ§Ų¹Ų§ŲŖ) glo.
3901:
Just wishin' you good luck? now u can end this discussion.
2994:
In 1914, the organisation relocated to larger premises in
1629:
Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Limited
11899:
10428:
It doesn't, but it can be a symptom of a larger problem.
10135:
7374:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Gingeksace#August_2022
5530:
as user is clearly not here to improve the encyclopedia.
2488:
to restore the context. Feel free to also wrap them in a
1625:
Andhra Pradesh Eastern Power Distribution Company Limited
11030:. They have even gone further and made personal attacks
10861:
10232:"specifically ask that *I* review my own block and that
10147:
9877:) overzealously blocking a user based on "vibes", I saw
9083:
Persistent addition of unsourced content by 71.36.178.63
7954:, which the user goes on to state is (in their opinion)
4717:
efforts. I think they've shown remarkable restraint and
4539:, however, instead of warning/blocking Zemen, joins the
4306:, Your interpretations are not good, I hope you think a
2148:
Show me where the central government approved the name.
1946:
1633:
Talk:Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited
14695:). A block of this user may be warranted. Thank you.
11726:
Characterize me as "pedantic" if you want, but listing
10616:) so I'll keep in mind options like that in the future.
8647:
as sockpuppetry. Do we need a CU to link the two SPIs?
8375:; please add any other evidence you think is relevant.
7734:
2084: Il potere dell'immortalitĆ nelle cittĆ del dolore
6158:, which made you immediately start your attacks. Also,
2691:
foundation:Legal:Community Health Legal Defense Program
14993:
14836:
10286:
10226:
I'd also say that, with this being a new editor, that
10141:
8127:, i.e. passing yourself off as more than one end user.
7958:. They then state the desirability, in their eyes, of
7956:
not a big problem if the author is indeed Enciclopedic
7062:
Malicious and criminal profiling subject to law suit.ā
3723:
There is too much here that is strongly suggestive of
2242:
Any issues other than WP:BLUD, use appropriate forum.
15051:
14683:) be checked to see if they are a sockpuppet of the "
14398:
support a 6-month restriction from content assessment
12484:
on 25 September, which were just vandalism and hoax.
11602:
It is exactly the same conduct. I note that you have
11507:" so did sort of tell us what these RfCs were about.
11380:
with no evidence is going to get you in hot water. ā
9754:
order that this article should be taken down speedily
6047:
After that comment, I asked them to remember to have
5388:
Sigh. I've blocked them from uploading files too. --
2134:
The proposal was accepted by MOS for Civil Aviation.
26:
Noticeboard for reporting incidents to administrators
13971:
your pending reviews to be claimed by someone else.
13856:
content review, contests, and editathons for a while
13498:
I got called "crazy" by an editor whose sidekick is
13127:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
12486:
12096:
To be totally honest: firstly, if anything I did on
10867:
9419:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
8993:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5977:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5579:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2771:
Seconded. By a Brit who actually lives in Coventry.
2586:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
13663:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
13380:
and I just yanked TPA. Hope this ends the nonsense.
12551:Aināt Diff 1 just charmingā¦ Blocks due, methinks.
9538:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
9480:It was in fact a correction to replace a dead URL.
9078:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
8462:Do you think an SPI would be useful at this point?
6828:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
5699:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4836:The issue was I think caused by your comment here:
3272:
you can't make a case for them like everybody else.
3079:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2903:
Anyone who disagrees is complicit with child abuse.
12378:has been adding spam links after a final warning.
11016:Every time thereās push back, Emiya1980 goes into
10236:(contrary to the purpose of the unblock template)"
9266:for what it's worth, this is some LTA or another.
1631:that were sent to Afd after a merge discussion at
14595:Support 6 month topic ban from content assessment
14210:, you used "template" and your ping did not work.
13383:NB, I also closed the malformed ArbComm request.
11356:Have a read down what that page has to say, yes?
10234:you don't want a review from other administrators
8806:I have removed all empathist content/claims from
8439:of sources. Even if the users in question aren't
8236:without knowing it was not permitted... Thanks.
7382:- member of Lerroās Empathic Movement (Empathism)
7125:aside, it's just dumb to make such threats. As a
5901:responded to the talk warning about legal threats
4496:good that you understood your purpose. good look
3894:good that you understood your purpose. good look
3645:Damn, that GPT 4 has a lot more spirit than 3.5.
2733:Generally on Knowledge here, as long as there is
15243:
14328:(review, with assistance from Rollinginhisgrave)
13809:Talk:Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics/GA1
13768:I don't think the editor should be reviewing GAs
10266:did promise a paid editing disclosure in the end
7388:ā an associate of Lerro who authored along with
7208:Promotional editing and possible UPE by two SPAs
6716:right after they were told that they engaged in
6363:removed any sources that do not agree with them
6254:Yes, because I removed those poor citations per
6058:you are doing your utmost to corrupt the article
5357:if anybody fancies the inevitable edit warring.
5216:It looks very much like LLM copypasta to me. --
4514:After the report, they continued the attacks at
1975:does give an impression of burying edit history.
780:
679:When starting a discussion about an editor, you
13834:you seem to be taking on more than you can chew
10242:though it's likely too late with that editor. ā
10210:block + unblock request denial + TP revocation
9145:(date change contradicted by existing source),
7848:and or Empathism or Empathic Movement members.
6764:of HoI, above) and inability or refusal to use
5871:Okay. Was trying to figure if it was more like
5126:I've p-blocked them from mainspace for now. --
3050:"Royal National Institute of Blind People 1868"
2260:the appropriate forum for behavioral issues. ā
1344:Persistent MoS violation and refusal to explain
13056:specific issues with their most recent edits.
11020:and lobs accusations at others of stonewalling
8614:. Lerro's AfD on Italian-WP occurred in 2018:
7950:where the user also states their opinion that
6438:that I added, which was more informative than
5317:articles, it's not an urgent problem anymore.
4196:Asilvering, Zemen is persistently engaging in
2332:After checking diffs presented by Ratnahastin
742:. Editors unable to edit here are sent to the
665:Do not report breaches of personal information
14347:List of Olympic medalists for the Philippines
13912:, and possibly other content venues as well.
12447:) left no wiggle room for misinterpretation.
10022:was beyond completely unreasonable - look at
8938:"I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine".
8493:, I think we should salt the article titles.
7538:ā member of Lerroās Lerroās Empathic Movement
6956:I missed that. She claims article represents
2839:banging on my door in the middle of the night
2533:. In all respects its a very poor decision.
1952:I welcome new users when I have time to do so
1689:It's unreasonable to says it is bludgeoning.
46:
14927:WP:Articles for deletion/Renz Nathaniel Cruz
11663:Upon further review of the edit history for
11288:an indefinite ban on my ability to open Rfcs
10542:All good advice. To respond to it in order:
9055:I hope you brought enough for all of us. š
6762:I have no interest in some racist xenophobe.
3302:already replied to. Nemov's comment about a
3092:during the ongoing RFC process. Despite the
2681:If the situation is precisely as you claim (
1880:this user with an obvious inappropriate name
667:on this highly visible pageĀ ā instead go to
14314:TheNuggeteer has chosen to take a wikibreak
13005:not obvious vandalism? They will not stop.
11505:Outside of this focus on infobox image RFCs
4882:is just tone-deaf. Accusing said editor of
3796:Persistent attacks and provocation by Zemen
1986:, when no such name change has occurred yet
14012:a whopping 10779 stubs that need expanding
10012:restoring an unreliable, deprecated source
8490:Update, it seems this has happened before
5353:. The user page is probably also good for
5076:so I'm just guessing it's the same issue.
5029:No clue, they're completely unresponsive.
4328:, and you have responded by attacking me.
4118:, which resulted in a barrage of attacks.
3306:is looking better and better. You need to
2550:Off-wiki harassment from article's subject
53:
39:
18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
14232:For me, I suggest two months or three. I
13614:Thank you everyone for clearing this up.
13366:I also blocked SinisterUnion for a week.
12469:Personal attack and (maybe) sock-puppetry
12074:. Call it a coincidence if you want, but
11474:low-hanging fruit to block or CBAN you on
10640:Persistent abuse by User:DanielTokenhouse
10356:case if some form of recidivism exists. ā
10010:contribution by Flight709. This included
8869:Just for full disclosure, I have semi'ed
7728:Donna Giovanna, l'ingannatrice di Salerno
6787:. The personal insults are unacceptable.
6525:How many times do you have to be told of
6506:What? Remove herodotus' figures from the
6359:the user is engaged in. This second user
6064:and replace that as a citation now?.. ...
5511:prevent< more Copyvios, in this case.
5337:Besides the two Copyvio notices removed (
4845:Has behaved well? No. Have you? Also no.
3989:Nt: I actually wrote that in porsian not
3339:Looks like this ANI notice filed for the
2845:. Checking the article's history, I find
1619:has been blugeoning other editors at the
9982:Looks like theyāre being less BITEy per
8061:. Yes, it would be an obvious breach of
7740:Augusto Orrel: memorie d'orrore e poesia
4543:fiesta and accuses ME of bullying Zemen
4491:, they instead resorted to provoking me
3889:, they instead resorted to provoking me
2593:Royal National Institute of Blind People
1886:a mere minute later shows we may have a
795:Review of the RfA discussion-only period
14257:Category:All articles needing copy edit
10240:unblocking and restoring TPA post-haste
7834:, Lerroās āinternational poetry prizeā
7778:ā adherent to Lerroās Empathic Movement
7694:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7598:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7586:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7568:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7562:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7514:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7508:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7502:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7496:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7470:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7464:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7458:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7410:ā adherent of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7339:ā āfounderā of the āEmpathic Movementā
7317:and his so-called ācultural movementā,
5100:I wish they were responsive; I assumed
4880:while being subjected to ethnic insults
4615:. This is just scratching the surface.
4555:...it's childish to blame me with that.
14:
15244:
14031:Iāve left Nugget a Talk Page message (
13399:Thanks to both of you, appreciate it.
12858:2001:9E8:54F4:4E00:2456:82FA:42B3:A2B5
12830:2001:9E8:54F4:4E00:6173:6F18:90DB:3090
12802:2001:9E8:54FF:6700:180F:EB86:1CC5:F007
12718:2001:9E8:54C0:E700:4544:2C29:4B54:D212
12662:2001:9E8:54DA:3D00:F476:9BDB:952D:28B5
11774:policy, see the main definition: "An
11067:shut up for the rest of the discussion
10704:Special:Contributions/DanielTokenhouse
8897:WP:Articles for deletion/Menotti Lerro
7784:ā Member of E Lerroās mpathic Movement
5949:with a dose of xenophobia by M7md AAAA
5343:), Iād like to add that this user has
3042:
1984:Jagadguru Sant Tukaram Maharaj Airport
1792:Jagadguru Sant Tukaram Maharaj Airport
627:these tips for dealing with incivility
571:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
14508:My mind is sufficiently convinced: I
14379:Christian Albright + De'Montre Tuggle
13737:, they have consistently displayed a
12774:2001:9E8:54F4:4E00:5489:43F5:9D4:8D04
12746:2001:9E8:54F4:4900:B15A:EA5:7F4B:676A
12690:2001:9E8:54DA:3D00:834:1934:320F:A324
12139:has admitted you also had a part in.
11013:and about pinging multiple projects.
10698:Just providing a link, the editor is
10683:This is all persistent and targeted.
7921:I only have one further point to addā¦
7838:, his plays and books and associates.
7808:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7796:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7772:- member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7718:- member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7712:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7706:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7688:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7682:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7676:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7670:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7664:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7658:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7652:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7646:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7640:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7622:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7592:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7556:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7532:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7526:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7520:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7490:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7482:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7476:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7416:ā member of Lerroās Empathic Movement
7094:2601:600:8E00:1936:9B9:6B54:5097:4D39
7044:2601:600:8E00:1936:9B9:6B54:5097:4D39
6994:2601:600:8E00:1936:9B9:6B54:5097:4D39
6752:I'd like to request an administrator
6041:as you are clearly an involved party.
4855:treated in such a shoddy way at ANI.
2689:have you had a similar experience?),
1786:.Their recent edits where they moved
34:
13888:", which I meant as a final warning.
13123:The following discussion is closed.
13021:Dracula (1931 English-language film)
11847:You have made three edits to WWII:
11789:It is possible to fully comply with
11033:. The 8th RFC was started today on
9415:The following discussion is closed.
8989:The following discussion is closed.
5973:The following discussion is closed.
5903:and then went to Talk:Ticketron and
5619:in the process of formatting a reply
5575:The following discussion is closed.
4897:by ethno-nationalist POV-pushers. ā
4586:Azerbaijan Province (Safavid Empire)
3951:) regarding your attacks against me
2837:Indeed; I couldn't even tell you if
2582:The following discussion is closed.
1978:You haven't explained why you moved
72:discussion, request, and help venues
8963:Continued TPA abuse after hardblock
7364:AfD merged to Menotti Lerro article
6709:. They are also ironically the one
6698:M7md AAAA has now started throwing
6670:They can see them if they want to.
6066:Your account needs to be suspended.
6062:how worthless persians opinions are
5469:which would of course constitute a
5053:, messages on the iOS app is a bit
4245:of you), and try to start over. --
2464:removed many of their comments here
716:you cannot currently edit this page
714:You are not autoconfirmed, meaning
683:leave a notice on their talk page;
23:
10881:Well, I blocked the obvious sock.
7836:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7752:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7451:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7442:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7433:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7424:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7403:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7356:Cilento International Poetry Prize
7323:Cilento International Poetry Prize
6702:against me in my other ANI thread
6636:non-Arab sources, which I added,
6039:This requires dispute resolution,
5875:. Anyway nothing more to do here.
4817:I do not believe I have dismissed
4713:on civility grounds against Zemen.
24:
15263:
14906:Pretty much what the title says.
14718:You should probably file this at
13260:a firm warning against factional
11818:Not if I reverted another editor
10859:, which they were informed of by
10728:renounced his British citizenship
10702:and their contributions are here
8443:, or socks, they definitely fail
6934:. Threatening legal action in an
5841:Category:Re-established companies
13915:
13659:The discussion above is closed.
12411:Personal attack and legal threat
10610:recent edit-warring case I filed
9534:The discussion above is closed.
9396:Resolved as a misunderstanding.
9243:
9200:User:Rverything works for us all
9074:The discussion above is closed.
6824:The discussion above is closed.
6451:Article from before my changes:
5956:NAC: Subject editor indeffed .
5695:The discussion above is closed.
5617:Thank you. I'll note that I was
4843:You then said to Historyof Iran
3075:The discussion above is closed.
2292:
60:
14925:Flood of brand new accounts at
14236:don't want it to be indefinite.
12919:Persistent disruptive edits by
9751:has CSD-nommed the article for
8873:so we don't play whack a sock.
7331:Articles created by Gingeksace:
7173:concern around editing enwiki.
6325:in which they were included (
6072:After that, I reminded them of
5748:is threatening legal action at
1821:". They have nominated articles
556:Category:Knowledge noticeboards
15238:08:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14920:08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14896:01:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14876:01:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14773:22:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14751:22:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14734:18:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14713:16:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14665:Romani are not Indians (again)
14657:09:29, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14643:09:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14628:09:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14607:05:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14588:04:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14571:02:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14547:21:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14532:20:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14518:16:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14504:16:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14478:15:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14448:16:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14420:12:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14391:08:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14320:Talk:Tumor necrosis factor/GA1
14304:04:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14290:17:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14271:08:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14250:07:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14217:01:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14194:00:54, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
14180:22:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14163:22:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14132:09:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14117:07:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14088:22:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14074:12:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14060:12:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14046:09:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
14024:09:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13995:07:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13981:07:39, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13962:05:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13947:05:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13650:18:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13634:12:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13608:16:25, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13581:09:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13563:09:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13549:08:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13533:06:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13512:05:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13478:05:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13462:04:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13435:04:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13419:03:48, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13395:03:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13376:02:52, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13362:01:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13338:01:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13324:01:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13303:01:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13274:01:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13251:01:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13116:20:55, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13083:05:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
13066:03:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
13051:00:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
13033:19:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
13015:07:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
12990:22:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12913:05:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12893:22:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12579:18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12563:14:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12546:12:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12463:10:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12428:10:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12405:07:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12388:06:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
12363:06:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12336:01:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12314:01:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12292:01:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12277:01:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12262:00:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12233:00:37, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12191:00:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12149:00:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12122:00:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12092:00:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
12034:23:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
12019:23:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
12005:22:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11990:22:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11963:22:28, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11949:22:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11873:21:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11840:21:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11807:21:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11766:21:07, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11719:20:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11677:08:21, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11659:08:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11634:08:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11620:07:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11598:06:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11571:06:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11544:03:13, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
11517:14:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11499:13:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11458:13:27, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11423:08:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11390:17:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11368:08:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11350:Knowledge:Requests for comment
11342:08:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11323:08:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11300:08:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11252:07:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11231:07:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11213:07:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11196:07:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11177:07:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11154:06:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11136:06:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11118:06:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11096:05:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11079:05:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
11055:03:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10907:02:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10893:01:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10876:01:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10760:05:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10718:01:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10693:00:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10632:02:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
10536:21:49, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10494:18:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10474:18:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10459:16:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10438:16:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10424:13:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10410:13:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10384:12:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10369:07:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10348:06:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10312:05:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10278:08:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10255:05:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10198:04:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10181:02:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10124:01:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10099:01:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10085:00:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10066:00:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
10049:22:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9991:01:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
9978:00:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
9961:22:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9951:22:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9936:22:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9843:02:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
9829:22:57, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9810:20:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9792:20:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9782:20:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9761:20:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9735:00:33, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
9719:19:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9603:18:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9589:18:23, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9560:18:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9523:16:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9509:14:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9490:14:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9476:14:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9462:14:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9442:13:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9408:16:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9383:13:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9368:13:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9276:11:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9262:10:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9237:10:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9192:02:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9173:02:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9065:11:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9044:10:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9028:03:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
9013:01:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8982:16:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8953:01:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
8931:17:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8913:04:20, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8885:02:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8863:01:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
8848:22:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8823:05:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8802:03:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8780:02:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8762:01:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
8741:18:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8714:17:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8694:17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8673:16:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8659:16:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8627:15:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8603:The SPI report from 2015 that
8599:13:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8571:15:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8557:14:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8535:13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8517:13:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8503:13:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8486:13:22, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8472:13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8457:13:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8385:13:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8362:12:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8348:12:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8330:12:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8316:12:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8299:11:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8280:11:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8265:11:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8246:11:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8231:11:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8216:11:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8201:10:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8183:10:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8169:10:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8154:10:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8119:10:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8104:10:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8089:10:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8053:09:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8038:09:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8023:09:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
8008:09:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7994:08:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7942:04:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7912:04:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7855:, and his āEmpathic Movementā
7198:05:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7183:03:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7165:22:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7145:07:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
7116:22:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7102:22:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7083:22:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7052:22:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7033:22:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7017:22:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
7002:22:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6987:22:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6970:21:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6952:21:16, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6917:20:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6817:17:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6803:17:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6778:17:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6745:16:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6730:07:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6688:02:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6666:16:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6650:12:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6631:Why aren't the numbers in The
6612:07:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6569:16:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6551:07:54, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6521:03:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6502:03:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6480:03:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6430:18:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6396:14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
6381:13:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6351:07:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
6335:20:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6308:20:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6294:20:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6280:20:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6250:20:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6235:20:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6217:19:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6183:19:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6149:19:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6115:19:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
6037:Clarify your double standards.
5966:03:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
5934:02:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5916:02:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5905:made an explicit legal threat.
5887:20:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5867:19:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5853:19:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5835:19:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5819:18:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5801:18:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5783:18:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5762:17:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5690:16:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5664:18:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5647:16:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5632:16:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5613:16:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5598:16:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5568:14:51, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
5540:16:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
5523:21:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5483:18:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5461:17:49, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5398:17:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5384:17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
5369:20:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5333:20:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5312:19:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5281:17:41, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5260:17:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5240:17:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5226:17:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5212:17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5198:16:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5184:16:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5160:16:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5136:16:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5122:16:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5092:16:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5069:16:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5045:16:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5025:15:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
5010:15:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4925:23:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4907:19:19, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4865:07:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4832:17:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4813:17:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4798:16:36, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4762:15:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4747:15:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4698:12:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4659:04:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4629:23:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
4608:22:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
4579:19:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
4423:17:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4393:17:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4379:17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4353:17:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4338:17:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4320:17:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4298:17:12, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4273:18:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
4255:18:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
4236:13:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
4214:17:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4192:17:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4168:17:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4146:17:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4128:16:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4102:16:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4080:15:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4065:15:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4043:15:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4025:14:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
4003:16:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3985:14:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3970:14:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3940:14:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3918:13:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3788:08:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3759:08:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3740:06:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
3717:20:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3702:17:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3684:15:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3655:05:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
3641:11:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3615:11:12, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3597:10:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3583:10:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3554:12:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3527:12:24, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3508:10:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3435:19:52, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3410:13:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3378:09:03, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3353:08:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3335:08:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3320:08:25, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3297:{ec} "Inadvertent"? There was
3293:08:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3267:08:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3245:07:37, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3212:07:33, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3192:04:51, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
3176:07:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3151:07:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
3137:08:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3110:08:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
3031:00:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
3008:20:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2990:20:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2976:13:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2954:16:36, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2930:14:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2921:13:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2893:13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2876:13:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2825:14:55, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2809:02:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2795:18:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2781:18:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2765:12:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2748:10:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2721:11:12, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2703:10:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2677:10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2657:10:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2636:09:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2575:03:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
2544:10:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2521:04:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2499:22:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2476:18:58, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2458:16:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
2441:13:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
2424:04:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
2398:18:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2374:17:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
2319:00:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
2284:05:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
2270:16:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
2252:16:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2231:08:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2217:06:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2178:08:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
2164:16:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2144:16:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2130:16:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2099:16:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2083:16:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2057:16:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2037:15:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
2022:09:09, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1933:08:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1915:01:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1870:01:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1750:18:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1735:17:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1713:17:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1699:17:27, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1647:17:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
1551:23:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
1537:Noting prior to archival that
1533:21:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1519:10:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1504:05:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1488:04:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
1466:10:50, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
13:
1:
14510:support a six-month topic ban
14373:Liberalism in the Philippines
12298:"I could've been better here"
11280:dispute resolution procedures
10292:acknowledged their wrongdoing
10008:blindly reverted every single
9289:2601:14B:4101:400D:0:0:0:0/64
9008:Talk/Report any mistakes here
8059:would it be such a bad thing?
7889:Cambridge Scholars Publishing
7790:ā member of Empathic Movement
7550:ā member of Empathic Movement
6601:attacks. Sounds like we have
6298:Thanks for proving my point.
6196:Edit - added correct version
2901:ā and edit summaries such as
176:Biographies of living persons
13923:me if you need my attention)
13884:opened by myself, advising "
13443:) has already been blocked.
13441:Special:Contributions/FckkOf
13281:, you might wanna see this:
12416:Admin intervention requested
11793:while still edit warring. @
11376:, accusing Nemov of being a
11278:to be fully conversant with
11100:OK, that was a good answer,
10362:"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)
10248:"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)
10216:"a ... really weird feeling"
8999:User:Cloud software solution
7722:Alessandro Serpieri (writer)
7392:the manifesto of Empathism,
4445:This is the updated list of
3216:Or trying once more to cite
7:
14902:Potentially concerning user
14259:still has a few days left.
10212:looks absolutely horrendous
9885:had questioned an indef of
9389:A new way to spam Knowledge
9208:Rverything works for us all
8663:That would be a good idea.
8476:Nvm, Educated created one.
7979:someone close to the author
7832:Cultural Pyramid of Cilento
7764:Articles created by Nihaon:
7370:Contemporary Center of Arts
6922:It's worth noting that the
6434:That's what I did. See the
4788:because the user is new. --
1960:welcome new users who have
10:
15268:
14613:Urgent admin action needed
13099:editors "banding together"
11855:but you drive 41, you are
6713:here, making a DRN thread
4773:User talk:Zemen#Simplicity
2944:and their previous block.
2843:waking up the whole street
2408:User:Georgethedragonslayer
2303:appears to have retired. ā
1326:
1303:
1298:
1180:
1058:
936:
814:
577:
544:Discussions for discussion
14787:Can someone please block
12393:Editor has been blocked.
12225:
12183:
12114:
11824:"override contributions"
11651:
10545:It's good that we have a
9851:Inappropriate blocks and
9743:Black Axe (confraternity)
8917:Thanks for the reponses.
7960:a bit more of flexibility
7610:ā sister of Menotti Lerro
7590:Marco Baudinelli (artist)
4705:Non-administrator comment
3780:
3633:
3575:
3546:
3427:
3370:
3285:
3237:
3168:
3129:
2514:right after bludgeoning.
1561:Thewikizoomer Bludgeoning
1313:Sockpuppet investigations
661:demonstrating the problem
552:
427:
359:
276:
168:
87:
68:
13661:Please do not modify it.
13134:Talk:FIFA Club World Cup
13125:Please do not modify it.
12493:the first 6 edits and I
12476:, a new user made their
9879:a thread on his talkpage
9536:Please do not modify it.
9417:Please do not modify it.
9373:/64 blocked for a year.
9076:Please do not modify it.
8991:Please do not modify it.
6907:for more perspective. ā
6826:Please do not modify it.
5975:Please do not modify it.
5767:This might be a case of
5697:Please do not modify it.
5577:Please do not modify it.
4721:given the circumstances.
3077:Please do not modify it.
2584:Please do not modify it.
2462:Note that Thewikizoomer
800:ArbCom election RFC 2024
744:/Non-autoconfirmed posts
722:/Non-autoconfirmed posts
236:Scalable vector graphics
70:Knowledge's centralized
14669:I ask that the account
14369:Typhoon Virginia (1957)
14312:I want to comment that
13893:Talk:A Boy Is a Gun/GA1
13882:September 22 discussion
13868:September 21 discussion
13819:September 15 discussion
13138:User talk:SinisterUnion
12508:. Earlier today, an IP
11384:The Hand That Feeds You
10915:Emiya1980's use of RFCs
10857:Carlisle Public Schools
10001:The rationale provided
9984:User talk:12.25.163.113
7686:Marius Chelaru (writer)
7614:Diego De Silva (writer)
7321:, Lerroās poetry prize
6905:Draft:Victoria Markovna
6898:Special:Diff/1247575603
6885:Special:Diff/1247753781
6883:, while logged out, in
6624:WP:Disruptive sanctions
6488:, yes, that looks like
6465:WP:Overzealous deletion
6447:WP:Overzealous deletion
6365:WP:Overzealous deletion
5651:The vandalism would be
5586:Special:Diff/1247716582
4901:The Hand That Feeds You
4807:The Hand That Feeds You
4647:WP:Disruptive sanctions
4051:, you need to stop the
3220:, while not addressing
2858:Alton Towers for nonces
2642:be in the article, but
2470:The Hand That Feeds You
2452:The Hand That Feeds You
2325:Topic ban proposal for
2264:The Hand That Feeds You
1182:Arbitration enforcement
80:formal review processes
15252:Knowledge noticeboards
14326:Talk:Swawilla Fire/GA1
13747:September 7 discussion
12482:2027 Cricket World Cup
12478:first and only 7 edits
12433:Well, that comment by
11892:Hindenburg's talk page
11772:Knowledge:Edit warring
10320:, which was closed as
10188:phrase in the future.
9901:Draft:Nur (influencer)
9766:Clearly runs afoul of
9543:IP does some vandalism
8507:Agreed, well spotted.
7806:Maria Teresa Chialant
6928:JoĆ£o Teixeira de Faria
6903:See her autobiography
6894:JoĆ£o Teixeira de Faria
6833:Vmarkova legal threats
6266:argument, again, read
5704:IP making legal threat
5285:They've now deleted a
5271:as published in 2020.
4612:And now source misuse
3098:closing the discussion
2621:Online Safety Act 2023
1780:. Accusing scope_creep
782:Centralized discussion
770:Start a new discussion
740:Lowercase sigmabot III
669:Requests for oversight
120:Centralized discussion
14755:Thank you so much.
14337:Tropical Storm Haikui
14149:Knowledge:Peer review
12497:the last one. Then I
12371:Spammer needs a block
11859:breaking the law and
10700:User:DanielTokenhouse
10020:block of StattoSteven
9988:Sincerely, Dilettante
9958:Sincerely, Dilettante
9789:Sincerely, Dilettante
9758:Sincerely, Dilettante
9375:ScottishFinnishRadish
8871:the Menotti_Lerro AfD
8338:Thanks again. Cheers
7894:The Empathic Movement
7554:Luigi Rossi (scholar)
7394:New Manifesto of Arts
7362:New Manifesto of Arts
7350:New Manifesto of Arts
6633:Battle of Thermopylae
6508:Battle of Thermopylae
4940:not reading talk page
3023:~~ AirshipJungleman29
2996:Great Portland Street
2366:Georgethedragonslayer
2061:Pure disinformation?
1884:reporting them to UAA
1655:It's not bludgeoning.
810:Noticeboard archives
655:Be brief and include
648:recently active admin
539:WikiProject proposals
438:Committee noticeboard
387:Personal restrictions
372:Contributor copyright
211:Neutral point of view
14693:User Talk:Oilcocaine
14333:Tropical Storm Sonca
13500:CrazyLoverFutbolLoko
13189:CrazyLoverFutbolLoko
11690:WP:Original research
11581:three-revert minimum
10028:indefinitely blocked
9198:Revoke talk page by
8585:) given the obvious
8447:with flying colors.
8371:I've gone ahead and
8076:, is fooling nobody.
7962:and asks Netherzone
7871:Francesco D'Episcopo
7596:Alessandro Quasimodo
7548:Francesco D'Episcopo
7542:Annibale Giannarelli
7068:another edit summary
6677:"tweaks" in italics.
6557:WP:Gaming the system
6369:WP:Gaming the system
6084:. So much for that.
6051:, so much for that.
5771:. Even the article
4643:WP:Gaming the system
4263:, now from you too.
3927:indictment of racism
3516:Large language model
3055:Science Museum Group
2852:Expostulating about
2071:Cited in the article
790:Administrator recall
613:behavioral problems.
611:chronic, intractable
497:Requests for comment
413:Requests for comment
377:Edit warring and 3RR
367:Conflict of interest
169:Articles and content
14361:AmBisyon Natin 2040
13594:Yoshi24517 (mobile)
13106:You're welcome.Ā ;)
11896:Paul von Hindenburg
11694:WP:reliable sources
11608:only previous edits
11005:Frederick the Great
10024:their contributions
7674:Giancarlo Pontiggia
7650:Vincenzo Guarracino
7560:Vittorio Santoianni
7408:Vincenzo Missanelli
7386:Antonello Pelliccia
6617:We have a case of
6105:to this project. --
6056:This is a joke and
5556:INDEFFed by Ponyo.
5549:page move vandalism
5266:File:Mala_Beads.jpg
5166:User:Edit the error
4938:User:Edit the error
2484:their comments per
1675:." as mentioned in
811:
644:Just want an admin?
14884:has blocked them.
14599:IntentionallyDense
14539:IntentionallyDense
14365:Typhoon Nat (1991)
14296:IntentionallyDense
14282:IntentionallyDense
13739:lack of competence
13126:
11282:more broadly, and
11106:dispute resolution
10400:unblock requests.
9669:Ana MarĆa MartĆnez
9661:has made 14 edits
9418:
8992:
8923:WomenArtistUpdates
8893:WomenArtistUpdates
8840:WomenArtistUpdates
8306:Have a great day!
7736:ā a novel by Lerro
7692:Giancarlo Turaccio
7662:Annamaria Galeotti
7644:Mario Santagostini
7572:Stefano Pantaleoni
7544:ā member ingeksace
7518:Mauro Afro Borella
7474:Vincenzo Schettino
7462:Edoardo Boncinelli
7212:Editors reported:
6754:indefinitely block
5976:
5578:
5528:Support site block
5488:Support Site Block
5467:Support site block
5430:Propose site block
5102:WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU
5055:wikt:up in the air
5051:WP:THEYCANTHEARYOU
2862:adds a flavour of
2585:
2570:Just Step Sideways
2517:Northern Moonlight
2495:Northern Moonlight
2103:The source noted "
1673:consensus building
1617:user:Thewikizoomer
1525:Quaerens-veritatem
1496:Quaerens-veritatem
1472:Quaerens-veritatem
809:
639:dispute resolution
397:Contentious topics
196:Dispute resolution
184:Questions on media
14763:
14703:
14439:
14411:
14145:broadly construed
13945:
13924:
13778:Rollinginhisgrave
13632:
13619:
13578:Black Kite (talk)
13439:An obvious sock (
13322:
13249:
13124:
12591:category:Lechites
12585:"Lechitic" editor
12543:
10736:Talk: John Oliver
9943:2804:F1...05:9F62
9741:Legal threats at
9721:
9705:comment added by
9548:User:199.175.18.1
9507:
9460:
9416:
9268:-- Deepfriedokra
9057:-- Deepfriedokra
9011:
8990:
7826:, his āmovementā
7730:ā a play by Lerro
7512:Ezio Guaitamacchi
7500:Domenico Giordano
7399:Bernardo Lanzetti
7372:which was G11ād{
7058:this edit summary
6197:
5974:
5653:this deleted edit
5576:
4708:
4696:
4681:
4677:
4671:
4590:Safavid Kurdistan
3709:2804:F1...A5:98DF
3601:From reading the
3514:Blatant use of a
2927:Black Kite (talk)
2762:Black Kite (talk)
2583:
2556:....UH, SURE...OK
1912:
1340:
1339:
778:
777:
747:
738:automatically by
605:This page is for
563:
562:
392:General sanctions
231:Resource requests
216:Original research
15259:
15220:
15219:
15186:deletedĀ contribs
15170:
15162:
15161:
15128:deletedĀ contribs
15112:
15110:Thompson.walkins
15104:
15103:
15070:deletedĀ contribs
15054:
15046:
15045:
15012:deletedĀ contribs
14996:
14988:
14987:
14954:deletedĀ contribs
14938:
14894:
14874:
14873:
14867:
14866:
14863:
14860:
14853:
14852:
14807:deletedĀ contribs
14756:
14732:
14696:
14685:Oilcocaine group
14569:
14476:
14464:
14461:
14446:
14444:
14437:
14434:
14418:
14416:
14409:
14406:
14266:
14248:
14211:
14192:
14155:
14142:
14072:
14058:
14041:
14010:, and they have
13993:
13960:
13942:
13935:
13934:
13932:
13930:TechnoSquirrel69
13919:
13918:
13913:
13895:quick-failed by
13811:quick-failed by
13728:
13727:
13694:deletedĀ contribs
13678:
13648:
13631:
13629:
13624:
13615:
13604:
13575:
13544:
13531:
13476:
13450:
13449:
13433:
13415:
13410:
13404:
13392:
13387:
13358:
13353:
13347:
13321:
13319:
13314:
13299:
13294:
13288:
13248:
13246:
13241:
13233:
13206:deletedĀ contribs
13186:
13159:deletedĀ contribs
13081:
13004:
12999:
12971:
12944:deletedĀ contribs
12911:
12880:
12879:
12860:
12852:
12851:
12832:
12824:
12823:
12804:
12796:
12795:
12776:
12768:
12767:
12748:
12740:
12739:
12720:
12712:
12711:
12692:
12684:
12683:
12664:
12651:
12650:
12631:
12623:
12622:
12603:
12576:
12571:
12558:
12541:
12533:
12531:
12489:
12452:
12403:
12361:
12231:
12229:
12223:
12219:
12189:
12187:
12181:
12177:
12120:
12118:
12112:
12108:
11885:
11817:
11657:
11655:
11649:
11645:
11385:
11363:
11241:
11194:
11000:Benito Mussolini
10985:Martin Van Buren
10964:
10937:deletedĀ contribs
10891:
10870:
10864:
10852:
10831:deletedĀ contribs
10811:
10790:deletedĀ contribs
10716:
10601:
10492:
10456:
10448:
10367:
10363:
10344:
10338:
10335:
10332:
10329:
10289:
10253:
10249:
10209:
10177:
10171:
10168:
10165:
10162:
10156:
10150:
10144:
10138:
10122:
10097:
10082:
10077:
9976:
9934:
9774:
9768:no legal threats
9700:
9698:
9697:
9665:
9660:
9633:deletedĀ contribs
9586:
9579:
9505:
9499:
9495:
9458:
9452:
9448:
9431:
9405:
9400:
9357:
9351:
9345:
9339:
9333:
9306:deletedĀ contribs
9252:by HJ Mitchell.
9251:
9247:
9246:
9235:
9216:
9210:
9162:
9156:
9150:
9144:
9138:
9132:
9105:deletedĀ contribs
9054:
9005:
8979:
8974:
8882:
8877:
8760:
8711:
8706:
8656:
8651:
8642:
8589:of the editors.
8109:Thanks so much!
7816:an Nihaonās talk
7800:Renato Galbusera
7748:Maria Rita Parsi
7710:Angelo Casciello
7668:Giorgio Verdelli
7578:Roberto Guidetti
7506:Francesco Abbate
7487:Giuseppe Gentile
7447:Maria Rita Parsi
7309:
7282:deletedĀ contribs
7261:
7234:deletedĀ contribs
6985:
6882:
6855:deletedĀ contribs
6800:
6793:
6785:indefinite block
6638:and they removed
6609:
6393:
6348:
6195:
6027:
6000:deletedĀ contribs
5809:re-established.
5789:Biograph Company
5747:
5726:deletedĀ contribs
5661:
5565:
5560:
5518:
5458:
5451:
5364:
5330:
5323:
5294:
5288:
5257:
5250:
5181:
5174:
5157:
5150:
5089:
5082:
5064:
5042:
5035:
5007:
5000:
4990:
4963:deletedĀ contribs
4902:
4808:
4782:
4754:Horse Eye's Back
4706:
4702:
4684:
4679:
4675:
4669:
4224:
4053:personal attacks
4021:
3845:
3818:deletedĀ contribs
3786:
3784:
3778:
3774:
3757:
3727:and the response
3639:
3637:
3631:
3627:
3581:
3579:
3573:
3569:
3552:
3550:
3544:
3540:
3433:
3431:
3425:
3421:
3376:
3374:
3368:
3364:
3343:is not working.
3291:
3289:
3283:
3279:
3243:
3241:
3235:
3231:
3174:
3172:
3166:
3162:
3135:
3133:
3127:
3123:
3068:
3067:
3065:
3063:
3046:
2973:
2968:
2821:
2735:no legal threats
2727:Succinctly, see
2688:
2674:
2669:
2653:
2633:
2628:
2541:
2539:
2518:
2496:
2491:
2471:
2453:
2404:Also have a look
2396:
2387:
2307:
2296:
2265:
2215:
2162:
2153:
2128:
2119:
2055:
2046:
2020:
2011:
1958:clearly states "
1950:. You say that "
1949:
1943:
1913:
1908:
1902:
1901:
1896:
1868:
1859:
1833:
1644:
1642:
1611:
1584:deletedĀ contribs
1455:
1449:
1443:
1437:
1431:
1425:
1419:
1413:
1407:
1401:
1393:
1366:deletedĀ contribs
1335:
1190:
1072:
1060:Edit-warring/3RR
950:
828:
812:
808:
771:
760:
759:
732:
726:
706:
597:
590:
568:
567:
226:Reliable sources
160:User permissions
140:Main Page errors
135:Interface admins
125:Closure requests
55:
48:
41:
32:
31:
15267:
15266:
15262:
15261:
15260:
15258:
15257:
15256:
15242:
15241:
15171:
15166:
15165:
15113:
15108:
15107:
15055:
15050:
15049:
14997:
14992:
14991:
14939:
14934:
14933:
14930:
14904:
14885:
14869:
14864:
14861:
14858:
14857:
14855:
14792:
14788:
14785:
14762:
14723:
14702:
14667:
14615:
14562:
14466:
14462:
14459:
14442:
14432:
14429:
14414:
14404:
14401:
14377:DYK review for
14353:Asik-Asik Falls
14265:(Give me info.)
14264:
14241:
14205:
14185:
14153:
14136:
14065:
14051:
14040:(Give me info.)
14039:
14004:Matticusmadness
13986:
13953:
13938:
13928:
13925:
13916:
13792:Thebiguglyalien
13679:
13674:
13673:
13670:
13665:
13664:
13639:
13627:
13622:
13602:
13569:
13543:(Give me info.)
13542:
13522:
13467:
13447:
13445:
13424:
13413:
13408:
13402:
13390:
13385:
13356:
13351:
13345:
13317:
13312:
13297:
13292:
13286:
13262:WP:BATTLEGROUND
13244:
13239:
13191:
13144:
13129:
13120:
13119:
13118:
13101:
13072:
13001:
12996:
12929:
12924:
12902:
12861:
12856:
12855:
12833:
12828:
12827:
12805:
12800:
12799:
12777:
12772:
12771:
12749:
12744:
12743:
12721:
12716:
12715:
12693:
12688:
12687:
12665:
12660:
12659:
12632:
12627:
12626:
12604:
12599:
12598:
12587:
12574:
12569:
12557:(Give me info.)
12556:
12535:
12525:
12485:
12471:
12448:
12435:MihaiVulturul23
12413:
12394:
12376:122.160.165.131
12373:
12352:
12221:
12215:
12213:
12179:
12173:
12171:
12110:
12104:
12102:
11879:
11811:
11647:
11641:
11639:
11383:
11362:(Give me info.)
11361:
11235:
11185:
10975:Philippe PĆ©tain
10922:
10917:
10882:
10866:
10860:
10816:
10775:
10773:Happymappy12342
10770:
10707:
10642:
10553:
10486:
10452:
10442:
10361:
10357:
10342:
10336:
10333:
10330:
10327:
10285:
10284:I've unblocked
10247:
10243:
10203:
10175:
10169:
10166:
10163:
10160:
10152:
10146:
10140:
10134:
10113:
10091:
10080:
10075:
9970:
9928:
9857:
9780:
9772:
9746:
9671:
9667:
9662:
9618:
9613:
9582:
9575:
9545:
9540:
9539:
9503:
9497:
9456:
9450:
9428:
9421:
9412:
9411:
9410:
9403:
9398:
9391:
9353:
9347:
9341:
9335:
9291:
9286:
9244:
9242:
9214:
9212:
9206:
9203:
9158:
9152:
9146:
9140:
9134:
9090:
9085:
9080:
9079:
9048:
8995:
8986:
8985:
8984:
8977:
8972:
8965:
8880:
8875:
8751:
8709:
8704:
8684:help clean up.
8654:
8649:
8645:already blocked
8636:
8377:EducatedRedneck
7759:ā play by Lerro
7757:Il Dottor Faust
7716:Tomasz Krezymon
7638:Alberto Bertoni
7626:Maurizio Cucchi
7620:Corrado CalabrĆ²
7602:Vivian Lamarque
7480:Aldo Castellano
7456:Elena Pontiggia
7267:
7219:
7210:
6976:
6958:criminal malice
6840:
6835:
6830:
6829:
6809:RickinBaltimore
6796:
6789:
6770:EducatedRedneck
6657:Canterbury Tail
6607:
6391:
6346:
6312:Proving what?
5985:
5979:
5970:
5969:
5968:
5958:Robert McClenon
5951:
5878:Canterbury Tail
5826:Canterbury Tail
5711:
5706:
5701:
5700:
5657:
5584:See this move:
5581:
5572:
5571:
5570:
5563:
5558:
5551:
5547:User:Themmajury
5517:(Give me info.)
5516:
5454:
5447:
5363:(Give me info.)
5362:
5326:
5319:
5295:from that page.
5292:
5286:
5253:
5246:
5177:
5170:
5153:
5146:
5085:
5078:
5063:(Give me info.)
5062:
5038:
5031:
5003:
4996:
4948:
4942:
4900:
4806:
4776:
4739:EducatedRedneck
4704:
4594:Siege of Dimdim
4537:User:Asilvering
4443:
4359:WP:BATTLEGROUND
4218:
4017:
3803:
3798:
3776:
3770:
3768:
3748:
3629:
3623:
3621:
3571:
3565:
3563:
3542:
3536:
3534:
3423:
3417:
3415:
3366:
3360:
3358:
3308:WP:DROPTHESTICK
3281:
3275:
3273:
3233:
3227:
3225:
3164:
3158:
3156:
3125:
3119:
3117:
3086:
3081:
3080:
3073:
3072:
3071:
3061:
3059:
3048:
3047:
3043:
2971:
2966:
2884:Canterbury Tail
2817:
2701:
2693:may be of use.
2682:
2672:
2667:
2649:
2631:
2626:
2588:
2579:
2578:
2577:
2557:
2552:
2537:
2535:
2516:
2512:WP:BATTLEGROUND
2494:
2489:
2469:
2451:
2412:WP:BATTLEGROUND
2385:
2383:
2330:
2305:
2263:
2206:
2151:
2149:
2117:
2115:
2044:
2042:
2009:
2007:
1991:WP:OFFICIALNAME
1945:
1937:
1906:
1899:
1894:
1891:
1857:
1855:
1827:
1667:Also the user @
1640:
1638:
1569:
1563:
1480:Thedarkknightli
1458:Thedarkknightli
1451:
1445:
1439:
1433:
1427:
1421:
1415:
1409:
1403:
1397:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1322:
1184:
1062:
940:
818:
816:Administrators'
806:
805:
804:
784:
769:
749:
748:
729:
728:
727:
713:
709:
696:
693:
674:
633:their talk page
614:
602:
601:
600:
593:
586:
582:
564:
559:
548:
465:False positives
423:
355:
272:
221:Pending changes
206:Fringe theories
164:
94:Administrators
83:
64:
59:
27:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
15265:
15255:
15254:
15222:
15221:
15163:
15105:
15047:
14989:
14929:
14923:
14903:
14900:
14899:
14898:
14784:
14779:
14778:
14777:
14776:
14775:
14757:
14736:
14697:
14666:
14663:
14662:
14661:
14660:
14659:
14614:
14611:
14610:
14609:
14591:
14590:
14580:MaterialsPsych
14574:
14573:
14552:
14551:
14550:
14549:
14520:
14506:
14480:
14453:
14452:
14451:
14450:
14384:
14383:
14382:
14381:
14375:
14357:A Boy Is a Gun
14349:
14343:
14329:
14323:
14309:
14308:
14307:
14306:
14273:
14252:
14239:
14238:
14237:
14224:
14223:
14222:
14221:
14220:
14219:
14198:
14197:
14196:
14134:
14101:
14100:
14099:
14098:
14097:
14096:
14095:
14094:
14093:
14092:
14091:
14090:
14008:WP:PHILIPPINES
13999:
13998:
13997:
13905:
13904:
13889:
13879:
13865:
13864:
13863:
13855:
13841:
13816:
13805:
13804:
13803:
13789:
13775:
13761:
13730:
13729:
13669:
13666:
13658:
13657:
13656:
13655:
13654:
13653:
13652:
13612:
13611:
13610:
13567:
13566:
13565:
13497:
13496:
13495:
13494:
13493:
13492:
13491:
13490:
13489:
13488:
13487:
13486:
13485:
13484:
13483:
13482:
13481:
13480:
13421:
13381:
13305:
13130:
13121:
13105:
13104:
13103:
13102:
13100:
13093:
13092:
13091:
13090:
13089:
13088:
13087:
13086:
13085:
13017:
12927:65.102.188.122
12923:
12921:65.102.188.122
12917:
12916:
12915:
12882:
12881:
12853:
12825:
12797:
12769:
12741:
12713:
12685:
12653:
12652:
12629:89.245.176.247
12624:
12601:89.245.176.229
12586:
12583:
12582:
12581:
12565:
12470:
12467:
12466:
12465:
12412:
12409:
12408:
12407:
12372:
12369:
12368:
12367:
12366:
12365:
12346:
12345:
12344:
12343:
12342:
12341:
12340:
12339:
12338:
12323:
12320:
12319:
12318:
12317:
12316:
12242:
12209:
12208:
12207:
12206:
12205:
12204:
12203:
12202:
12201:
12200:
12199:
12198:
12197:
12196:
12195:
12194:
12193:
12094:
12060:
12059:
12058:
12057:
12056:
12055:
12054:
12053:
12052:
12051:
12050:
12049:
12048:
12047:
12046:
12045:
12044:
12043:
12042:
12041:
12040:
12039:
12038:
12037:
12036:
12007:
11920:
11919:
11918:
11917:
11916:
11915:
11914:
11913:
11912:
11911:
11910:
11909:
11908:
11907:
11906:
11905:
11904:
11903:
11845:
11779:
11743:
11742:
11741:
11740:
11739:
11738:
11737:
11736:
11683:
11682:
11681:
11680:
11679:
11622:
11574:
11573:
11551:
11550:
11549:
11548:
11547:
11546:
11501:
11461:
11460:
11426:
11425:
11395:
11394:
11393:
11392:
11370:
11346:
11345:
11344:
11284:RFC procedures
11269:
11268:
11267:
11266:
11265:
11264:
11263:
11262:
11261:
11260:
11259:
11258:
11257:
11256:
11255:
11254:
11242:For how long?
11233:
11215:
11156:
11081:
11008:
11007:
11002:
10997:
10992:
10990:Hermann Gƶring
10987:
10982:
10980:Woodrow Wilson
10977:
10972:
10916:
10913:
10912:
10911:
10910:
10909:
10854:
10853:
10812:
10769:
10766:
10765:
10764:
10763:
10762:
10748:
10681:
10680:
10665:
10662:Kneecap (band)
10654:
10650:
10641:
10638:
10637:
10636:
10635:
10634:
10619:
10618:
10617:
10614:first one ever
10606:
10603:
10539:
10538:
10518:
10514:
10507:
10498:
10497:
10496:
10482:
10481:
10480:
10479:
10478:
10477:
10476:
10392:
10391:
10390:
10389:
10388:
10387:
10386:
10314:
10282:
10281:
10280:
10224:
10184:
10183:
10130:
10129:
10128:
10127:
10126:
10069:
10068:
10052:
10051:
9998:
9997:
9996:
9995:
9994:
9993:
9980:
9887:MarcArchives00
9856:
9849:
9848:
9847:
9846:
9845:
9815:
9814:
9813:
9812:
9794:
9776:
9745:
9739:
9738:
9737:
9612:
9609:
9608:
9607:
9606:
9605:
9544:
9541:
9533:
9532:
9531:
9530:
9529:
9528:
9527:
9526:
9525:
9492:
9424:
9422:
9413:
9395:
9394:
9393:
9392:
9390:
9387:
9386:
9385:
9285:
9282:
9281:
9280:
9279:
9278:
9215:ā TyphoonAmpilā
9202:
9196:
9195:
9194:
9084:
9081:
9073:
9072:
9071:
9070:
9069:
9068:
9067:
8996:
8987:
8969:
8968:
8967:
8966:
8964:
8961:
8960:
8959:
8958:
8957:
8956:
8955:
8943:they are COI.
8888:
8887:
8866:
8865:
8855:David Eppstein
8832:
8831:
8830:
8829:
8828:
8827:
8826:
8825:
8815:David Eppstein
8811:
8808:Andrew Mangham
8790:
8786:
8746:
8745:
8744:
8743:
8728:
8724:
8717:
8716:
8678:
8677:
8676:
8675:
8632:
8631:
8630:
8629:
8591:Allan Nonymous
8579:
8578:
8577:
8576:
8575:
8574:
8573:
8540:
8537:
8519:
8495:Allan Nonymous
8488:
8449:Allan Nonymous
8430:
8429:
8428:
8427:
8426:
8425:
8424:
8423:
8422:
8421:
8420:
8419:
8418:
8417:
8416:
8415:
8414:
8413:
8412:
8411:
8410:
8409:
8408:
8407:
8406:
8405:
8404:
8403:
8402:
8401:
8400:
8399:
8398:
8397:
8396:
8395:
8394:
8393:
8392:
8391:
8390:
8389:
8388:
8387:
8336:
8304:
8286:
8252:
8188:
8185:
8135:
8128:
8121:
8077:
8070:
7982:
7975:
7971:
7967:
7929:
7925:
7922:
7919:
7915:
7914:
7867:Andrew Mangham
7810:
7809:
7803:
7797:
7794:Gianni Macalli
7791:
7788:Franco Arminio
7785:
7782:Enzo Tinarelli
7779:
7776:Carmine Padula
7773:
7770:Michele Pecora
7761:
7760:
7754:
7744:Andrew Mangham
7737:
7731:
7725:
7719:
7713:
7707:
7701:
7695:
7689:
7683:
7677:
7671:
7665:
7659:
7653:
7647:
7641:
7635:
7632:Davide Rondoni
7629:
7623:
7617:
7611:
7608:Lucrezia Lerro
7605:
7599:
7593:
7587:
7581:
7575:
7569:
7563:
7557:
7551:
7545:
7539:
7536:Carmelo Strano
7533:
7530:Maurizio Zenga
7527:
7524:Andrea Granchi
7521:
7515:
7509:
7503:
7497:
7491:
7483:
7477:
7471:
7468:Raffaele Nigro
7465:
7459:
7453:
7444:
7435:
7426:
7417:
7411:
7405:
7396:
7383:
7380:Paolo Guzzanti
7377:
7367:
7359:
7353:
7343:
7311:
7310:
7262:
7209:
7206:
7205:
7204:
7203:
7202:
7201:
7200:
7152:
7151:
7150:
7149:
7148:
7147:
7089:
7088:
7087:
7086:
7085:
7071:
7064:
7039:
7038:
7037:
7036:
7035:
7021:
7020:
7019:
6834:
6831:
6823:
6822:
6821:
6820:
6819:
6807:User indef'd.
6766:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
6750:
6749:
6748:
6747:
6695:
6694:
6693:
6692:
6691:
6690:
6592:
6591:
6590:
6589:
6588:
6587:
6586:
6585:
6584:
6583:
6582:
6581:
6580:
6579:
6578:
6577:
6576:
6575:
6574:
6573:
6572:
6571:
6535:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
6461:
6457:My additions:
6455:
6449:
6443:
6410:
6409:
6408:
6407:
6406:
6405:
6404:
6403:
6402:
6401:
6400:
6399:
6398:
6355:Ironic, given
6318:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
6260:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
6202:
6198:
6189:
6168:WP:SCHOLARSHIP
6160:Touraj Daryaee
6136:
6129:
6126:
6099:
6098:
6092:
6091:
6070:
6069:
6045:
6044:
5980:
5971:
5955:
5954:
5953:
5952:
5950:
5940:
5939:
5938:
5937:
5936:
5897:
5896:
5895:
5894:
5893:
5892:
5891:
5890:
5889:
5855:
5803:
5705:
5702:
5694:
5693:
5692:
5672:
5671:
5670:
5669:
5668:
5667:
5666:
5582:
5573:
5555:
5554:
5553:
5552:
5550:
5544:
5543:
5542:
5525:
5504:
5503:
5501:
5497:
5496:
5494:
5485:
5433:EditĀ theĀ error
5427:
5426:
5425:
5424:
5423:
5422:
5421:
5420:
5419:
5418:
5417:
5416:
5415:
5414:
5413:
5412:
5411:
5410:
5409:
5408:
5407:
5406:
5405:
5404:
5403:
5402:
5401:
5400:
5290:copyvio revdel
5124:
5098:
5097:
5096:
5095:
5094:
5047:
4946:EditĀ theĀ error
4944:A new editor (
4941:
4935:
4934:
4933:
4932:
4931:
4930:
4929:
4928:
4927:
4887:
4872:
4867:
4852:
4849:
4841:
4800:
4767:
4766:
4765:
4764:
4734:
4726:
4722:
4714:
4700:
4632:
4631:
4610:
4533:
4532:
4526:
4525:
4512:
4511:
4506:
4505:
4499:
4498:
4482:
4481:
4472:
4471:
4461:
4460:
4442:
4439:
4438:
4437:
4436:
4435:
4434:
4433:
4432:
4431:
4430:
4429:
4428:
4427:
4426:
4425:
4407:
4406:
4405:
4404:
4403:
4402:
4401:
4400:
4399:
4398:
4397:
4396:
4395:
4340:
4283:
4282:
4281:
4280:
4279:
4278:
4277:
4276:
4275:
4216:
4009:
4008:
4007:
4006:
4005:
3960:to this site.
3921:
3920:
3904:
3903:
3897:
3896:
3880:
3879:
3870:
3869:
3859:
3858:
3797:
3794:
3793:
3792:
3791:
3790:
3742:
3720:
3719:
3704:
3690:DwilfaStudwell
3686:
3667:
3666:
3665:
3664:
3663:
3662:
3661:
3660:
3659:
3658:
3657:
3643:
3617:
3589:DwilfaStudwell
3560:
3559:
3558:
3557:
3556:
3500:DwilfaStudwell
3491:
3490:
3489:
3488:
3487:
3486:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3394:
3393:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3389:
3388:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3383:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3345:DwilfaStudwell
3327:DwilfaStudwell
3295:
3259:DwilfaStudwell
3254:
3247:
3196:
3195:
3194:
3143:DwilfaStudwell
3102:DwilfaStudwell
3085:
3082:
3074:
3070:
3069:
3040:
3039:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3015:
3014:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3010:
2992:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2956:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2829:
2828:
2827:
2731:
2725:
2724:
2723:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2697:
2662:
2596:
2595:
2589:
2580:
2559:
2558:
2555:
2554:
2553:
2551:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2523:
2505:
2504:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2443:
2426:
2400:
2329:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2236:
2235:
2234:
2233:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2189:
2188:
2187:
2186:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2180:
2085:
1994:
1976:
1921:
1917:
1873:
1872:
1759:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1752:
1687:
1680:
1665:
1662:
1659:
1656:
1613:
1612:
1562:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1554:
1553:
1539:User:Croystron
1506:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1320:
1315:
1310:
1304:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1250:
1244:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1198:
1192:
1191:
1178:
1177:
1172:
1167:
1162:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1137:
1132:
1126:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1080:
1074:
1073:
1056:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1004:
1003:
998:
993:
988:
983:
978:
973:
968:
963:
958:
952:
951:
934:
933:
928:
923:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
882:
881:
876:
871:
866:
861:
856:
851:
846:
841:
836:
830:
829:
807:
803:
802:
797:
792:
786:
785:
776:
775:
763:
762:
730:
712:
711:
710:
694:
677:
675:
673:
672:
662:
653:
652:
651:
641:
635:
629:
620:Before posting
616:
604:
599:
598:
591:
583:
578:
576:
573:
572:
566:
561:
560:
553:
550:
549:
547:
546:
541:
536:
535:
534:
529:
524:
519:
514:
509:
499:
494:
493:
492:
487:
485:Reference desk
482:
477:
469:
468:
467:
462:
452:
451:
450:
445:
440:
431:
429:
425:
424:
422:
421:
416:
406:
401:
400:
399:
394:
389:
379:
374:
369:
363:
361:
357:
356:
354:
353:
348:
347:
346:
341:
336:
331:
326:
321:
311:
306:
301:
296:
291:
286:
284:History merges
280:
278:
274:
273:
271:
270:
265:
263:Titleblacklist
260:
255:
254:
253:
248:
238:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
208:
203:
201:External links
198:
193:
192:
191:
186:
178:
172:
170:
166:
165:
163:
162:
157:
152:
147:
142:
137:
132:
127:
122:
117:
112:
107:
106:
105:
100:
91:
89:
85:
84:
69:
66:
65:
58:
57:
50:
43:
35:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
15264:
15253:
15250:
15249:
15247:
15240:
15239:
15235:
15231:
15227:
15217:
15214:
15211:
15208:
15205:
15202:
15199:
15196:
15193:
15192:nukeĀ contribs
15190:
15187:
15184:
15181:
15178:
15175:
15169:
15164:
15159:
15156:
15153:
15150:
15147:
15144:
15141:
15138:
15135:
15134:nukeĀ contribs
15132:
15129:
15126:
15123:
15120:
15117:
15111:
15106:
15101:
15098:
15095:
15092:
15089:
15086:
15083:
15080:
15077:
15076:nukeĀ contribs
15074:
15071:
15068:
15065:
15062:
15059:
15053:
15048:
15043:
15040:
15037:
15034:
15031:
15028:
15025:
15022:
15019:
15018:nukeĀ contribs
15016:
15013:
15010:
15007:
15004:
15001:
14995:
14990:
14985:
14982:
14979:
14976:
14973:
14970:
14967:
14964:
14961:
14960:nukeĀ contribs
14958:
14955:
14952:
14949:
14946:
14943:
14937:
14932:
14931:
14928:
14922:
14921:
14917:
14913:
14909:
14897:
14893:
14891:
14890:
14883:
14880:
14879:
14878:
14877:
14872:
14868:
14850:
14847:
14844:
14841:
14838:
14835:
14832:
14829:
14826:
14823:
14820:
14817:
14814:
14811:
14808:
14805:
14802:
14799:
14796:
14791:
14783:
14774:
14770:
14766:
14760:
14754:
14753:
14752:
14748:
14744:
14740:
14737:
14735:
14731:
14729:
14728:
14721:
14717:
14716:
14715:
14714:
14710:
14706:
14700:
14694:
14690:
14686:
14682:
14679:
14676:
14672:
14658:
14654:
14650:
14646:
14645:
14644:
14640:
14636:
14632:
14631:
14630:
14629:
14625:
14621:
14608:
14604:
14600:
14596:
14593:
14592:
14589:
14585:
14581:
14576:
14575:
14572:
14568:
14565:
14560:
14559:
14554:
14553:
14548:
14544:
14540:
14535:
14534:
14533:
14529:
14525:
14521:
14519:
14515:
14511:
14507:
14505:
14501:
14497:
14493:
14489:
14488:Mike Christie
14485:
14481:
14479:
14474:
14470:
14465:
14455:
14454:
14449:
14445:
14435:
14427:
14423:
14422:
14421:
14417:
14407:
14399:
14395:
14394:
14393:
14392:
14388:
14380:
14376:
14374:
14370:
14366:
14362:
14358:
14354:
14351:DYK noms for
14350:
14348:
14344:
14342:
14338:
14334:
14330:
14327:
14324:
14321:
14318:
14317:
14315:
14311:
14310:
14305:
14301:
14297:
14293:
14292:
14291:
14287:
14283:
14278:
14274:
14272:
14269:
14267:
14262:
14258:
14253:
14251:
14247:
14244:
14240:
14235:
14231:
14228:
14227:
14226:
14225:
14218:
14214:
14209:
14203:
14199:
14195:
14191:
14188:
14183:
14182:
14181:
14177:
14173:
14169:
14166:
14165:
14164:
14160:
14156:
14150:
14146:
14140:
14135:
14133:
14129:
14125:
14120:
14119:
14118:
14114:
14110:
14106:
14103:
14102:
14089:
14085:
14081:
14077:
14076:
14075:
14071:
14068:
14063:
14062:
14061:
14057:
14054:
14049:
14048:
14047:
14044:
14042:
14037:
14033:
14030:
14027:
14026:
14025:
14021:
14017:
14013:
14009:
14005:
14000:
13996:
13992:
13989:
13984:
13983:
13982:
13978:
13974:
13969:
13965:
13964:
13963:
13959:
13956:
13951:
13950:
13949:
13948:
13943:
13941:
13933:
13931:
13922:
13911:
13902:
13898:
13894:
13891:September 27
13890:
13887:
13883:
13880:
13877:
13873:
13872:Mike Christie
13869:
13866:
13861:
13857:
13853:
13849:
13845:
13842:
13839:
13835:
13831:
13830:
13828:
13825:, asking to "
13824:
13820:
13817:
13814:
13810:
13807:September 14
13806:
13801:
13797:
13793:
13790:
13787:
13783:
13779:
13776:
13773:
13769:
13765:
13762:
13759:
13755:
13754:
13752:
13748:
13745:
13744:
13743:
13740:
13736:
13735:in good faith
13725:
13722:
13719:
13716:
13713:
13710:
13707:
13704:
13701:
13700:nukeĀ contribs
13698:
13695:
13692:
13689:
13686:
13683:
13677:
13672:
13671:
13662:
13651:
13647:
13645:
13644:
13637:
13636:
13635:
13630:
13625:
13618:
13613:
13609:
13605:
13599:
13595:
13591:
13587:
13584:
13583:
13582:
13579:
13573:
13568:
13564:
13560:
13556:
13552:
13551:
13550:
13547:
13545:
13540:
13536:
13535:
13534:
13530:
13528:
13527:
13520:
13515:
13514:
13513:
13509:
13505:
13501:
13479:
13475:
13473:
13472:
13465:
13464:
13463:
13459:
13455:
13451:
13442:
13438:
13437:
13436:
13432:
13430:
13429:
13422:
13420:
13417:
13411:
13405:
13398:
13397:
13396:
13393:
13388:
13382:
13379:
13378:
13377:
13373:
13369:
13365:
13364:
13363:
13360:
13354:
13348:
13341:
13340:
13339:
13335:
13331:
13327:
13326:
13325:
13320:
13315:
13309:
13306:
13304:
13301:
13295:
13289:
13283:
13280:
13277:
13276:
13275:
13271:
13267:
13263:
13259:
13258:SinisterUnion
13256:I have given
13255:
13254:
13253:
13252:
13247:
13242:
13236:
13231:
13228:
13225:
13222:
13219:
13216:
13213:
13210:
13207:
13204:
13201:
13198:
13195:
13190:
13184:
13181:
13178:
13175:
13172:
13169:
13166:
13163:
13160:
13157:
13154:
13151:
13148:
13143:
13142:SinisterUnion
13139:
13135:
13128:
13117:
13113:
13109:
13098:
13084:
13080:
13078:
13077:
13069:
13068:
13067:
13063:
13059:
13054:
13053:
13052:
13048:
13044:
13040:
13036:
13035:
13034:
13030:
13026:
13022:
13018:
13016:
13012:
13008:
13003:
12998:
12994:
12993:
12992:
12991:
12987:
12983:
12979:
12975:
12969:
12966:
12963:
12960:
12957:
12954:
12951:
12948:
12945:
12942:
12939:
12936:
12933:
12928:
12922:
12914:
12910:
12908:
12907:
12900:
12897:
12896:
12895:
12894:
12891:
12887:
12877:
12874:
12871:
12868:
12865:
12859:
12854:
12849:
12846:
12843:
12840:
12837:
12831:
12826:
12821:
12818:
12815:
12812:
12809:
12803:
12798:
12793:
12790:
12787:
12784:
12781:
12775:
12770:
12765:
12762:
12759:
12756:
12753:
12747:
12742:
12737:
12734:
12731:
12728:
12725:
12719:
12714:
12709:
12706:
12703:
12700:
12697:
12691:
12686:
12681:
12678:
12675:
12672:
12669:
12663:
12658:
12657:
12656:
12648:
12645:
12642:
12639:
12636:
12630:
12625:
12620:
12617:
12614:
12611:
12608:
12602:
12597:
12596:
12595:
12592:
12580:
12577:
12572:
12566:
12564:
12561:
12559:
12554:
12550:
12549:
12548:
12547:
12542:
12540:
12539:
12530:
12529:
12528:Vestrian24Bio
12523:
12519:
12515:
12511:
12510:125.63.87.106
12507:
12503:
12500:
12496:
12492:
12488:
12483:
12479:
12475:
12464:
12460:
12456:
12451:
12446:
12443:
12440:
12436:
12432:
12431:
12430:
12429:
12425:
12421:
12417:
12406:
12402:
12400:
12399:
12392:
12391:
12390:
12389:
12385:
12381:
12377:
12364:
12360:
12358:
12357:
12350:
12347:
12337:
12333:
12329:
12324:
12321:
12315:
12311:
12307:
12303:
12299:
12295:
12294:
12293:
12289:
12285:
12280:
12279:
12278:
12274:
12270:
12265:
12264:
12263:
12259:
12255:
12251:
12247:
12243:
12239:
12236:
12235:
12234:
12230:
12228:
12220:
12218:
12210:
12192:
12188:
12186:
12178:
12176:
12168:
12167:
12166:
12165:
12164:
12163:
12162:
12161:
12160:
12159:
12158:
12157:
12156:
12155:
12154:
12153:
12152:
12151:
12150:
12146:
12142:
12138:
12134:
12130:
12127:
12126:
12125:
12124:
12123:
12119:
12117:
12109:
12107:
12099:
12095:
12093:
12089:
12085:
12081:
12077:
12073:
12069:
12065:
12061:
12035:
12031:
12027:
12022:
12021:
12020:
12016:
12012:
12008:
12006:
12002:
11998:
11993:
11992:
11991:
11987:
11983:
11979:
11975:
11970:
11966:
11965:
11964:
11960:
11956:
11952:
11951:
11950:
11946:
11942:
11938:
11937:
11936:
11935:
11934:
11933:
11932:
11931:
11930:
11929:
11928:
11927:
11926:
11925:
11924:
11923:
11922:
11921:
11901:
11897:
11893:
11889:
11883:
11878:
11877:
11876:
11875:
11874:
11870:
11866:
11862:
11858:
11853:
11851:
11849:
11846:
11843:
11842:
11841:
11837:
11833:
11829:
11825:
11821:
11815:
11810:
11809:
11808:
11804:
11800:
11796:
11792:
11788:
11784:
11780:
11777:
11773:
11769:
11768:
11767:
11763:
11759:
11755:
11751:
11750:
11749:
11748:
11747:
11746:
11745:
11744:
11733:
11729:
11728:Joseph Stalin
11725:
11722:
11721:
11720:
11717:
11716:
11714:
11713:
11710:
11707:
11704:
11701:
11695:
11691:
11687:
11684:
11678:
11674:
11670:
11666:
11662:
11661:
11660:
11656:
11654:
11646:
11644:
11637:
11636:
11635:
11631:
11627:
11623:
11621:
11617:
11613:
11609:
11605:
11601:
11600:
11599:
11595:
11591:
11587:
11582:
11578:
11577:
11576:
11575:
11572:
11568:
11564:
11560:
11556:
11553:
11552:
11545:
11542:
11541:
11539:
11538:
11535:
11532:
11529:
11526:
11520:
11519:
11518:
11514:
11510:
11506:
11502:
11500:
11497:
11496:
11494:
11493:
11490:
11487:
11484:
11481:
11475:
11470:
11465:
11464:
11463:
11462:
11459:
11456:
11455:
11453:
11452:
11449:
11446:
11443:
11440:
11433:
11428:
11427:
11424:
11420:
11416:
11411:
11407:
11405:
11401:
11397:
11396:
11391:
11388:
11386:
11379:
11378:biased editor
11375:
11371:
11369:
11366:
11364:
11359:
11355:
11351:
11347:
11343:
11339:
11335:
11331:
11328:
11327:
11326:
11325:
11324:
11320:
11316:
11311:
11307:
11304:
11303:
11302:
11301:
11297:
11293:
11289:
11285:
11281:
11277:
11273:
11253:
11249:
11245:
11239:
11234:
11232:
11228:
11224:
11219:
11216:
11214:
11210:
11206:
11202:
11199:
11198:
11197:
11193:
11191:
11190:
11182:
11181:
11180:
11179:
11178:
11174:
11170:
11166:
11162:
11157:
11155:
11151:
11147:
11143:
11139:
11138:
11137:
11133:
11129:
11125:
11121:
11120:
11119:
11115:
11111:
11107:
11103:
11099:
11098:
11097:
11093:
11089:
11085:
11082:
11080:
11076:
11072:
11068:
11064:
11061:
11060:
11059:
11058:
11057:
11056:
11052:
11048:
11042:
11040:
11036:
11032:
11029:
11027:or harassment
11026:
11024:
11022:
11019:
11015:
11012:
11006:
11003:
11001:
10998:
10996:
10995:Hosni Mubarak
10993:
10991:
10988:
10986:
10983:
10981:
10978:
10976:
10973:
10971:
10968:
10967:
10966:
10962:
10959:
10956:
10953:
10950:
10947:
10944:
10941:
10938:
10935:
10932:
10929:
10926:
10921:
10908:
10904:
10900:
10896:
10895:
10894:
10890:
10888:
10887:
10880:
10879:
10878:
10877:
10874:
10869:
10863:
10858:
10850:
10847:
10844:
10841:
10838:
10835:
10832:
10829:
10826:
10823:
10820:
10815:
10814:Happymappy123
10809:
10806:
10803:
10800:
10797:
10794:
10791:
10788:
10785:
10782:
10779:
10774:
10761:
10757:
10753:
10749:
10745:
10741:
10737:
10733:
10729:
10725:
10724:Rich Peppiatt
10721:
10720:
10719:
10715:
10713:
10712:
10705:
10701:
10697:
10696:
10695:
10694:
10690:
10686:
10678:
10674:
10670:
10666:
10663:
10659:
10658:Joe (website)
10655:
10651:
10648:
10647:
10646:
10633:
10629:
10625:
10620:
10615:
10611:
10607:
10604:
10599:
10596:
10593:
10590:
10587:
10584:
10581:
10578:
10575:
10572:
10569:
10566:
10563:
10560:
10557:
10552:
10548:
10544:
10543:
10541:
10540:
10537:
10533:
10529:
10524:
10519:
10515:
10511:
10510:
10508:
10504:
10503:The Wordsmith
10499:
10495:
10491:
10490:
10489:The Wordsmith
10483:
10475:
10471:
10467:
10462:
10461:
10460:
10457:
10455:
10446:
10441:
10440:
10439:
10435:
10431:
10427:
10426:
10425:
10421:
10417:
10413:
10412:
10411:
10407:
10403:
10398:
10393:
10385:
10381:
10377:
10372:
10371:
10370:
10366:
10365:
10364:
10355:
10351:
10350:
10349:
10345:
10339:
10324:
10319:
10315:
10313:
10309:
10305:
10301:
10297:
10293:
10288:
10283:
10279:
10275:
10271:
10267:
10263:
10258:
10257:
10256:
10252:
10251:
10250:
10241:
10237:
10235:
10229:
10225:
10221:
10217:
10213:
10207:
10201:
10200:
10199:
10195:
10191:
10186:
10185:
10182:
10178:
10172:
10158:infractions.
10155:
10149:
10143:
10137:
10131:
10125:
10121:
10119:
10118:
10111:
10107:
10102:
10101:
10100:
10096:
10095:
10094:The Wordsmith
10088:
10087:
10086:
10083:
10078:
10071:
10070:
10067:
10063:
10059:
10054:
10053:
10050:
10046:
10042:
10037:
10033:
10029:
10026:before being
10025:
10021:
10017:
10013:
10009:
10004:
10000:
9999:
9992:
9989:
9985:
9981:
9979:
9975:
9974:
9973:The Wordsmith
9968:
9964:
9963:
9962:
9959:
9954:
9953:
9952:
9948:
9944:
9940:
9939:
9938:
9937:
9933:
9932:
9931:The Wordsmith
9926:
9922:
9919:
9916:
9913:
9909:
9904:
9902:
9898:
9895:
9892:
9888:
9884:
9880:
9876:
9873:
9870:
9866:
9862:
9861:recent thread
9854:
9844:
9840:
9836:
9832:
9831:
9830:
9826:
9822:
9817:
9816:
9811:
9807:
9803:
9799:
9795:
9793:
9790:
9785:
9784:
9783:
9779:
9775:
9769:
9765:
9764:
9763:
9762:
9759:
9755:
9750:
9749:Kpako4stories
9744:
9736:
9732:
9728:
9724:
9723:
9722:
9720:
9716:
9712:
9708:
9704:
9695:
9691:
9687:
9683:
9679:
9675:
9670:
9664:
9658:
9655:
9652:
9649:
9646:
9643:
9640:
9637:
9634:
9631:
9628:
9625:
9622:
9617:
9604:
9600:
9596:
9592:
9591:
9590:
9587:
9585:
9580:
9578:
9572:
9568:
9564:
9563:
9562:
9561:
9557:
9553:
9549:
9537:
9524:
9520:
9516:
9512:
9511:
9510:
9506:
9500:
9493:
9491:
9487:
9483:
9479:
9478:
9477:
9473:
9469:
9465:
9464:
9463:
9459:
9453:
9446:
9445:
9444:
9443:
9439:
9435:
9430:
9425:
9420:
9409:
9406:
9401:
9384:
9380:
9376:
9372:
9371:
9370:
9369:
9365:
9361:
9356:
9350:
9344:
9338:
9331:
9328:
9325:
9322:
9319:
9316:
9313:
9310:
9307:
9304:
9301:
9298:
9295:
9290:
9277:
9273:
9269:
9265:
9264:
9263:
9259:
9255:
9250:
9241:
9240:
9239:
9238:
9233:
9229:
9225:
9221:
9217:
9209:
9201:
9193:
9189:
9185:
9184:Cinderella157
9181:
9177:
9176:
9175:
9174:
9170:
9166:
9161:
9155:
9149:
9143:
9137:
9130:
9127:
9124:
9121:
9118:
9115:
9112:
9109:
9106:
9103:
9100:
9097:
9094:
9089:
9077:
9066:
9062:
9058:
9052:
9047:
9046:
9045:
9042:
9041:
9037:
9036:
9031:
9030:
9029:
9025:
9021:
9017:
9016:
9015:
9014:
9009:
9004:
9000:
8994:
8983:
8980:
8975:
8954:
8950:
8946:
8942:
8939:
8934:
8933:
8932:
8928:
8924:
8920:
8916:
8915:
8914:
8910:
8906:
8902:
8898:
8894:
8890:
8889:
8886:
8883:
8878:
8872:
8868:
8867:
8864:
8860:
8856:
8852:
8851:
8850:
8849:
8845:
8841:
8837:
8824:
8820:
8816:
8812:
8809:
8805:
8804:
8803:
8799:
8795:
8791:
8787:
8783:
8782:
8781:
8777:
8773:
8769:
8765:
8764:
8763:
8759:
8757:
8756:
8748:
8747:
8742:
8738:
8734:
8729:
8725:
8721:
8720:
8719:
8718:
8715:
8712:
8707:
8702:
8698:
8697:
8696:
8695:
8691:
8687:
8682:
8674:
8670:
8666:
8662:
8661:
8660:
8657:
8652:
8646:
8640:
8634:
8633:
8628:
8624:
8620:
8616:
8613:
8610:
8606:
8602:
8601:
8600:
8596:
8592:
8588:
8584:
8580:
8572:
8568:
8564:
8560:
8559:
8558:
8554:
8550:
8546:
8541:
8538:
8536:
8532:
8528:
8524:
8520:
8518:
8514:
8510:
8506:
8505:
8504:
8500:
8496:
8492:
8489:
8487:
8483:
8479:
8475:
8474:
8473:
8469:
8465:
8461:
8460:
8459:
8458:
8454:
8450:
8446:
8442:
8438:
8435:
8386:
8382:
8378:
8374:
8369:
8365:
8364:
8363:
8359:
8355:
8351:
8350:
8349:
8345:
8341:
8337:
8333:
8332:
8331:
8327:
8323:
8319:
8318:
8317:
8313:
8309:
8305:
8302:
8301:
8300:
8296:
8292:
8287:
8283:
8282:
8281:
8277:
8273:
8268:
8267:
8266:
8262:
8258:
8253:
8249:
8248:
8247:
8243:
8239:
8234:
8233:
8232:
8228:
8224:
8219:
8218:
8217:
8213:
8209:
8204:
8203:
8202:
8198:
8194:
8189:
8186:
8184:
8180:
8176:
8172:
8171:
8170:
8166:
8162:
8157:
8156:
8155:
8151:
8147:
8143:
8140:
8136:
8133:
8129:
8126:
8122:
8120:
8116:
8112:
8107:
8106:
8105:
8101:
8097:
8092:
8091:
8090:
8086:
8082:
8078:
8075:
8071:
8068:
8064:
8060:
8056:
8055:
8054:
8050:
8046:
8041:
8040:
8039:
8035:
8031:
8026:
8025:
8024:
8020:
8016:
8011:
8010:
8009:
8005:
8001:
7997:
7996:
7995:
7991:
7987:
7983:
7980:
7976:
7972:
7968:
7965:
7961:
7957:
7953:
7949:
7945:
7944:
7943:
7939:
7935:
7930:
7926:
7923:
7920:
7917:
7916:
7913:
7909:
7905:
7902:
7900:
7896:
7895:
7890:
7887:
7886:
7885:
7883:
7879:
7874:
7872:
7868:
7864:
7860:
7858:
7854:
7853:Menotti Lerro
7849:
7845:
7843:
7840:
7837:
7833:
7829:
7825:
7824:Menotti Lerro
7820:
7818:
7815:
7807:
7804:
7801:
7798:
7795:
7792:
7789:
7786:
7783:
7780:
7777:
7774:
7771:
7768:
7767:
7766:
7765:
7758:
7755:
7753:
7749:
7745:
7741:
7738:
7735:
7732:
7729:
7726:
7723:
7720:
7717:
7714:
7711:
7708:
7705:
7702:
7699:
7696:
7693:
7690:
7687:
7684:
7681:
7678:
7675:
7672:
7669:
7666:
7663:
7660:
7657:
7656:Lino Vairetti
7654:
7651:
7648:
7645:
7642:
7639:
7636:
7633:
7630:
7627:
7624:
7621:
7618:
7615:
7612:
7609:
7606:
7603:
7600:
7597:
7594:
7591:
7588:
7585:
7584:Tomaso Kemeny
7582:
7579:
7576:
7573:
7570:
7567:
7566:Edoardo Landi
7564:
7561:
7558:
7555:
7552:
7549:
7546:
7543:
7540:
7537:
7534:
7531:
7528:
7525:
7522:
7519:
7516:
7513:
7510:
7507:
7504:
7501:
7498:
7495:
7494:Victor Lucena
7492:
7489:
7488:
7484:
7481:
7478:
7475:
7472:
7469:
7466:
7463:
7460:
7457:
7454:
7452:
7448:
7445:
7443:
7439:
7438:Omar Galliani
7436:
7434:
7430:
7427:
7425:
7421:
7418:
7415:
7412:
7409:
7406:
7404:
7400:
7397:
7395:
7391:
7390:Menotti Lerro
7387:
7384:
7381:
7378:
7375:
7371:
7368:
7366:
7363:
7360:
7357:
7354:
7351:
7347:
7344:
7342:
7338:
7337:Menotti Lerro
7335:
7334:
7333:
7332:
7328:
7324:
7320:
7316:
7315:Menotti Lerro
7307:
7304:
7301:
7298:
7295:
7292:
7289:
7286:
7283:
7280:
7277:
7274:
7271:
7266:
7263:
7259:
7256:
7253:
7250:
7247:
7244:
7241:
7238:
7235:
7232:
7229:
7226:
7223:
7218:
7215:
7214:
7213:
7199:
7195:
7191:
7186:
7185:
7184:
7180:
7176:
7172:
7168:
7167:
7166:
7162:
7158:
7154:
7153:
7146:
7142:
7138:
7133:
7128:
7124:
7119:
7118:
7117:
7114:
7111:
7110:
7105:
7104:
7103:
7099:
7095:
7090:
7084:
7080:
7076:
7072:
7069:
7065:
7063:
7059:
7055:
7054:
7053:
7049:
7045:
7040:
7034:
7031:
7028:
7027:
7022:
7018:
7015:
7012:
7011:
7005:
7004:
7003:
6999:
6995:
6990:
6989:
6988:
6984:
6982:
6981:
6973:
6972:
6971:
6968:
6965:
6964:
6959:
6955:
6954:
6953:
6949:
6945:
6941:
6937:
6933:
6929:
6925:
6921:
6920:
6919:
6918:
6915:
6912:
6911:
6906:
6901:
6899:
6895:
6891:
6887:, she writes
6886:
6880:
6877:
6874:
6871:
6868:
6865:
6862:
6859:
6856:
6853:
6850:
6847:
6844:
6839:
6827:
6818:
6814:
6810:
6806:
6805:
6804:
6801:
6799:
6794:
6792:
6786:
6782:
6781:
6780:
6779:
6775:
6771:
6767:
6763:
6759:
6756:M7md AAAA as
6755:
6746:
6742:
6738:
6733:
6732:
6731:
6727:
6723:
6722:HistoryofIran
6719:
6715:
6712:
6708:
6704:
6701:
6700:WP:ASPERSIONS
6697:
6696:
6689:
6685:
6681:
6678:
6673:
6669:
6668:
6667:
6664:
6663:
6659:
6658:
6653:
6652:
6651:
6647:
6643:
6639:
6634:
6630:
6625:
6620:
6616:
6615:
6614:
6613:
6610:
6608:---Wikaviani
6604:
6600:
6596:
6570:
6566:
6562:
6558:
6554:
6553:
6552:
6548:
6544:
6543:HistoryofIran
6540:
6536:
6532:
6528:
6524:
6523:
6522:
6518:
6514:
6509:
6505:
6504:
6503:
6499:
6495:
6491:
6487:
6483:
6482:
6481:
6477:
6473:
6470:
6466:
6462:
6460:
6456:
6454:
6450:
6448:
6444:
6441:
6437:
6433:
6432:
6431:
6427:
6423:
6419:
6415:
6411:
6397:
6394:
6392:---Wikaviani
6388:
6384:
6383:
6382:
6378:
6374:
6370:
6366:
6362:
6358:
6354:
6353:
6352:
6349:
6347:---Wikaviani
6343:
6338:
6337:
6336:
6332:
6328:
6324:
6319:
6315:
6311:
6310:
6309:
6305:
6301:
6300:HistoryofIran
6297:
6296:
6295:
6291:
6287:
6283:
6282:
6281:
6277:
6273:
6272:HistoryofIran
6269:
6265:
6261:
6257:
6253:
6252:
6251:
6247:
6243:
6238:
6237:
6236:
6232:
6228:
6227:HistoryofIran
6224:
6223:WP:ASPERSIONS
6220:
6219:
6218:
6214:
6210:
6207:
6203:
6199:
6194:
6190:
6186:
6185:
6184:
6180:
6176:
6175:HistoryofIran
6172:
6169:
6165:
6161:
6157:
6152:
6151:
6150:
6146:
6142:
6137:
6134:
6130:
6127:
6124:
6119:
6118:
6117:
6116:
6112:
6108:
6107:HistoryofIran
6104:
6097:
6094:
6093:
6090:
6087:
6086:
6085:
6083:
6079:
6078:WP:ASPERSIONS
6075:
6068:
6067:
6063:
6059:
6054:
6053:
6052:
6050:
6043:
6042:
6038:
6033:
6032:
6031:
6028:
6025:
6022:
6019:
6016:
6013:
6010:
6007:
6004:
6001:
5998:
5995:
5992:
5989:
5984:
5978:
5967:
5963:
5959:
5948:
5947:WP:ASPERSIONS
5944:
5935:
5931:
5927:
5926:DigitalIceAge
5923:
5919:
5918:
5917:
5913:
5909:
5906:
5902:
5898:
5888:
5885:
5884:
5880:
5879:
5874:
5870:
5869:
5868:
5864:
5860:
5859:DigitalIceAge
5856:
5854:
5850:
5846:
5845:DigitalIceAge
5842:
5838:
5837:
5836:
5833:
5832:
5828:
5827:
5822:
5821:
5820:
5816:
5812:
5811:DigitalIceAge
5808:
5804:
5802:
5798:
5794:
5790:
5786:
5785:
5784:
5781:
5778:
5774:
5770:
5766:
5765:
5764:
5763:
5759:
5755:
5754:DigitalIceAge
5751:
5745:
5742:
5739:
5736:
5733:
5730:
5727:
5724:
5721:
5718:
5715:
5710:
5709:73.198.81.234
5698:
5691:
5687:
5683:
5680:
5677:
5673:
5665:
5662:
5660:
5654:
5650:
5649:
5648:
5644:
5640:
5635:
5634:
5633:
5629:
5625:
5620:
5616:
5615:
5614:
5610:
5606:
5602:
5601:
5600:
5599:
5595:
5591:
5587:
5580:
5569:
5566:
5561:
5548:
5541:
5537:
5533:
5529:
5526:
5524:
5521:
5519:
5514:
5509:
5505:
5502:
5498:
5495:
5492:
5489:
5486:
5484:
5480:
5476:
5472:
5471:community ban
5468:
5465:
5464:
5463:
5462:
5459:
5457:
5452:
5450:
5444:
5441:
5438:
5434:
5431:
5399:
5395:
5391:
5387:
5386:
5385:
5381:
5377:
5372:
5371:
5370:
5367:
5365:
5360:
5356:
5352:
5349:
5346:
5342:
5339:
5336:
5335:
5334:
5331:
5329:
5324:
5322:
5315:
5314:
5313:
5309:
5305:
5301:
5298:They deleted
5297:
5291:
5284:
5283:
5282:
5278:
5274:
5270:
5267:
5263:
5262:
5261:
5258:
5256:
5251:
5249:
5243:
5242:
5241:
5237:
5233:
5229:
5228:
5227:
5223:
5219:
5215:
5214:
5213:
5209:
5205:
5201:
5200:
5199:
5195:
5191:
5187:
5186:
5185:
5182:
5180:
5175:
5173:
5167:
5163:
5162:
5161:
5158:
5156:
5151:
5149:
5143:
5139:
5138:
5137:
5133:
5129:
5125:
5123:
5119:
5115:
5111:
5107:
5103:
5099:
5093:
5090:
5088:
5083:
5081:
5075:
5072:
5071:
5070:
5067:
5065:
5060:
5056:
5052:
5049:According to
5048:
5046:
5043:
5041:
5036:
5034:
5028:
5027:
5026:
5022:
5018:
5014:
5013:
5012:
5011:
5008:
5006:
5001:
4999:
4992:
4988:
4985:
4982:
4979:
4976:
4973:
4970:
4967:
4964:
4961:
4958:
4955:
4952:
4947:
4939:
4926:
4922:
4918:
4914:
4913:HandThatFeeds
4910:
4909:
4908:
4905:
4903:
4896:
4892:
4888:
4885:
4881:
4877:
4873:
4871:
4868:
4866:
4862:
4858:
4853:
4850:
4846:
4842:
4839:
4835:
4834:
4833:
4829:
4825:
4820:
4816:
4815:
4814:
4811:
4809:
4801:
4799:
4795:
4791:
4786:
4780:
4779:HistoryofIran
4774:
4769:
4768:
4763:
4759:
4755:
4750:
4749:
4748:
4744:
4740:
4735:
4732:
4727:
4723:
4720:
4715:
4712:
4701:
4699:
4695:
4693:
4689:
4683:
4682:
4667:
4663:
4662:
4661:
4660:
4656:
4652:
4648:
4644:
4640:
4639:HistoryofIran
4636:
4630:
4626:
4622:
4621:HistoryofIran
4618:
4614:
4611:
4609:
4605:
4601:
4600:HistoryofIran
4597:
4595:
4591:
4587:
4583:
4582:
4581:
4580:
4576:
4572:
4571:HistoryofIran
4568:
4562:
4561:
4557:
4556:
4552:
4549:
4548:
4545:
4542:
4541:WP:ASPERSIONS
4538:
4531:
4528:
4527:
4524:
4521:
4520:
4519:
4517:
4516:Talk:Gordyene
4508:
4507:
4504:
4501:
4500:
4497:
4494:
4493:
4492:
4490:
4489:WP:ASPERSIONS
4485:
4480:
4477:
4474:
4473:
4470:
4467:
4466:
4465:
4459:
4456:
4455:
4454:
4452:
4448:
4447:WP:ASPERSIONS
4424:
4420:
4416:
4412:
4408:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4382:
4381:
4380:
4376:
4372:
4371:HistoryofIran
4368:
4364:
4363:WP:ASPERSIONS
4360:
4356:
4355:
4354:
4350:
4346:
4341:
4339:
4335:
4331:
4330:HistoryofIran
4327:
4323:
4322:
4321:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4308:little better
4305:
4304:HistoryofIran
4301:
4300:
4299:
4295:
4291:
4290:HistoryofIran
4287:
4284:
4274:
4270:
4266:
4265:HistoryofIran
4262:
4261:WP:ASPERSIONS
4258:
4257:
4256:
4252:
4248:
4244:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4233:
4229:
4228:HistoryofIran
4222:
4217:
4215:
4211:
4207:
4206:HistoryofIran
4203:
4199:
4198:WP:ASPERSIONS
4195:
4194:
4193:
4189:
4185:
4181:
4176:
4175:significantly
4171:
4170:
4169:
4165:
4161:
4160:HistoryofIran
4157:
4153:
4152:WP:ASPERSIONS
4149:
4148:
4147:
4143:
4139:
4135:
4131:
4130:
4129:
4125:
4121:
4120:HistoryofIran
4117:
4116:Talk:Gordyene
4113:
4109:
4108:WP:ASPERSIONS
4105:
4104:
4103:
4099:
4095:
4091:
4090:HistoryofIran
4087:
4083:
4082:
4081:
4077:
4073:
4068:
4067:
4066:
4062:
4058:
4054:
4050:
4046:
4045:
4044:
4040:
4036:
4032:
4028:
4027:
4026:
4023:
4022:
4020:
4013:
4010:
4004:
4000:
3996:
3992:
3988:
3987:
3986:
3982:
3978:
3973:
3972:
3971:
3967:
3963:
3962:HistoryofIran
3959:
3955:
3953:
3950:
3947:
3946:Talk:Gordyene
3943:
3942:
3941:
3937:
3933:
3928:
3923:
3922:
3919:
3915:
3911:
3910:HistoryofIran
3906:
3905:
3902:
3899:
3898:
3895:
3892:
3891:
3890:
3888:
3887:WP:ASPERSIONS
3883:
3878:
3875:
3872:
3871:
3868:
3865:
3864:
3863:
3857:
3854:
3853:
3852:
3850:
3846:
3843:
3840:
3837:
3834:
3831:
3828:
3825:
3822:
3819:
3816:
3813:
3810:
3807:
3802:
3789:
3785:
3783:
3775:
3773:
3766:
3765:WP:RFCNEUTRAL
3762:
3761:
3760:
3756:
3754:
3753:
3746:
3743:
3741:
3737:
3733:
3729:
3726:
3722:
3721:
3718:
3714:
3710:
3705:
3703:
3699:
3695:
3691:
3687:
3685:
3681:
3677:
3672:
3668:
3656:
3652:
3648:
3644:
3642:
3638:
3636:
3628:
3626:
3618:
3616:
3612:
3608:
3604:
3600:
3599:
3598:
3594:
3590:
3586:
3585:
3584:
3580:
3578:
3570:
3568:
3561:
3555:
3551:
3549:
3541:
3539:
3531:
3530:
3528:
3525:
3521:
3517:
3513:
3512:
3511:
3510:
3509:
3505:
3501:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3493:
3492:
3483:
3482:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3478:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3442:
3438:
3437:
3436:
3432:
3430:
3422:
3420:
3413:
3412:
3411:
3407:
3403:
3399:
3398:WP:RFCNEUTRAL
3395:
3379:
3375:
3373:
3365:
3363:
3356:
3355:
3354:
3350:
3346:
3342:
3338:
3337:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3323:
3322:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3309:
3305:
3300:
3296:
3294:
3290:
3288:
3280:
3278:
3270:
3269:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3255:
3252:
3248:
3246:
3242:
3240:
3232:
3230:
3223:
3222:WP:RFCNEUTRAL
3219:
3215:
3214:
3213:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3197:
3193:
3190:
3189:
3185:
3184:
3179:
3178:
3177:
3173:
3171:
3163:
3161:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3148:
3144:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3134:
3132:
3124:
3122:
3114:
3113:
3112:
3111:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3078:
3057:
3056:
3051:
3045:
3041:
3038:
3032:
3028:
3024:
3019:
3009:
3005:
3001:
2997:
2993:
2991:
2987:
2983:
2979:
2978:
2977:
2974:
2969:
2963:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2946:86.23.109.101
2943:
2941:
2937:
2933:
2932:
2931:
2928:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2918:
2914:
2910:
2906:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2891:
2890:
2886:
2885:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2865:
2861:
2859:
2855:
2851:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2836:
2826:
2823:
2822:
2820:
2812:
2811:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2798:
2797:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2784:
2783:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2769:
2768:
2767:
2766:
2763:
2759:
2756:
2751:
2750:
2749:
2745:
2741:
2736:
2732:
2730:
2726:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2713:
2708:
2704:
2700:
2696:
2692:
2686:
2680:
2679:
2678:
2675:
2670:
2663:
2660:
2659:
2658:
2655:
2654:
2652:
2645:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2634:
2629:
2622:
2616:
2615:
2612:
2611:
2608:
2607:
2604:
2603:
2600:
2594:
2591:
2590:
2587:
2576:
2573:
2571:
2567:
2563:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2532:
2527:
2524:
2522:
2519:
2513:
2509:
2506:
2500:
2497:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2478:
2477:
2474:
2472:
2465:
2461:
2460:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2447:
2444:
2442:
2438:
2434:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2421:
2417:
2416:Thewikizoomer
2413:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2399:
2395:
2393:
2388:
2381:
2378:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2362:
2358:
2355:
2353:
2350:
2348:
2345:
2342:
2338:
2336:
2334:
2328:
2327:Thewikizoomer
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2302:
2301:Thewikizoomer
2299:
2295:
2291:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2276:Thewikizoomer
2273:
2272:
2271:
2268:
2266:
2259:
2255:
2254:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2244:Thewikizoomer
2241:
2238:
2237:
2232:
2228:
2224:
2223:Thewikizoomer
2220:
2219:
2218:
2214:
2212:
2211:
2204:
2203:Thewikizoomer
2201:
2200:
2179:
2175:
2171:
2170:Thewikizoomer
2167:
2166:
2165:
2161:
2159:
2154:
2147:
2146:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2136:Thewikizoomer
2133:
2132:
2131:
2127:
2125:
2120:
2113:
2109:
2106:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2091:Thewikizoomer
2089:
2086:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2075:Thewikizoomer
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2059:
2058:
2054:
2052:
2047:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2029:Thewikizoomer
2025:
2024:
2023:
2019:
2017:
2012:
2005:
2003:
2001:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1988:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1974:
1972:
1969:
1967:
1963:
1957:
1953:
1948:
1941:
1940:Thewikizoomer
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1925:Thewikizoomer
1922:
1918:
1916:
1911:
1909:
1898:
1897:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1871:
1867:
1865:
1860:
1853:
1849:
1847:
1845:
1843:
1840:
1836:
1831:
1825:
1823:
1820:
1816:
1814:
1811:
1808:
1806:
1804:
1802:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1775:
1773:
1771:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1760:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1742:Thewikizoomer
1738:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1705:Thewikizoomer
1702:
1701:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1691:Thewikizoomer
1688:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1666:
1663:
1660:
1657:
1654:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1645:
1643:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1600:
1597:
1594:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1573:
1568:
1567:Thewikizoomer
1565:
1564:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1492:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1468:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1454:
1448:
1442:
1436:
1430:
1424:
1418:
1412:
1406:
1400:
1394:
1391:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1379:
1376:
1373:
1370:
1367:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1350:
1325:
1319:
1316:
1314:
1311:
1309:
1306:
1305:
1302:
1297:
1294:
1291:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1259:
1256:
1254:
1251:
1249:
1246:
1245:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1188:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1173:
1171:
1168:
1166:
1163:
1161:
1158:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1136:
1133:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1066:
1061:
1057:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1002:
999:
997:
994:
992:
989:
987:
984:
982:
979:
977:
974:
972:
969:
967:
964:
962:
959:
957:
954:
953:
948:
944:
939:
935:
932:
929:
927:
924:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
883:
880:
877:
875:
872:
870:
867:
865:
862:
860:
857:
855:
852:
850:
847:
845:
842:
840:
837:
835:
832:
831:
826:
822:
817:
813:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
787:
783:
774:
773:
772:
765:
764:
761:
757:
753:
745:
741:
737:
724:
723:
717:
708:
704:
700:
691:
690:
686:
682:
670:
666:
663:
660:
659:
654:
649:
645:
642:
640:
636:
634:
630:
628:
624:
623:
621:
618:
617:
615:
612:
609:incidents or
608:
596:
592:
589:
585:
584:
581:
575:
574:
570:
569:
565:
558:
557:
551:
545:
542:
540:
537:
533:
532:Miscellaneous
530:
528:
525:
523:
520:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
505:
504:
503:
500:
498:
495:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
472:
470:
466:
463:
461:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
435:
433:
432:
430:
426:
420:
417:
414:
410:
407:
405:
402:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
385:
384:
383:
380:
378:
375:
373:
370:
368:
365:
364:
362:
358:
352:
349:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
330:
327:
325:
322:
320:
317:
316:
315:
312:
310:
307:
305:
302:
300:
297:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
281:
279:
277:Page handling
275:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
252:
249:
247:
244:
243:
242:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
207:
204:
202:
199:
197:
194:
190:
187:
185:
182:
181:
179:
177:
174:
173:
171:
167:
161:
158:
156:
153:
151:
148:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
133:
131:
128:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:
96:
95:
93:
92:
90:
86:
81:
77:
73:
67:
63:
56:
51:
49:
44:
42:
37:
36:
33:
29:
19:
15223:
15212:
15206:
15200:
15194:
15188:
15182:
15176:
15154:
15148:
15142:
15136:
15130:
15124:
15118:
15096:
15090:
15084:
15078:
15072:
15066:
15060:
15038:
15032:
15026:
15020:
15014:
15008:
15002:
14980:
14974:
14968:
14962:
14956:
14950:
14944:
14936:Loewemathers
14905:
14888:
14887:
14845:
14839:
14833:
14827:
14821:
14815:
14809:
14803:
14797:
14790:23.16.69.241
14786:
14782:23.16.69.241
14758:
14726:
14725:
14698:
14677:
14668:
14616:
14594:
14556:
14509:
14483:
14397:
14385:
14341:Typhoon Tess
14277:TheNuggeteer
14233:
14230:Weak support
14229:
14144:
14122:problem. --
14104:
14028:
13968:TheNuggeteer
13939:
13929:
13909:
13906:
13900:
13885:
13875:
13851:
13847:
13837:
13833:
13832:Wizardman: "
13826:
13795:
13781:
13767:
13757:
13756:Freedom4U: "
13731:
13720:
13714:
13708:
13702:
13696:
13690:
13684:
13676:TheNuggeteer
13660:
13642:
13641:
13616:
13601:
13525:
13524:
13470:
13469:
13427:
13426:
13400:
13343:
13284:
13226:
13220:
13214:
13208:
13202:
13196:
13179:
13173:
13167:
13161:
13155:
13149:
13131:
13122:
13075:
13074:
12964:
12958:
12952:
12946:
12940:
12934:
12925:
12905:
12904:
12883:
12872:
12866:
12844:
12838:
12816:
12810:
12788:
12782:
12760:
12754:
12732:
12726:
12704:
12698:
12676:
12670:
12655:Rangeblock?
12654:
12643:
12637:
12615:
12609:
12588:
12537:
12536:
12527:
12526:
12474:User:ICT Fan
12472:
12441:
12414:
12397:
12396:
12374:
12355:
12354:
12328:WhatamIdoing
12306:WhatamIdoing
12249:
12226:
12216:
12184:
12174:
12137:WhatamIdoing
12115:
12105:
12098:World War II
12064:World War II
12026:WhatamIdoing
11997:WhatamIdoing
11977:
11974:World War II
11968:
11955:WhatamIdoing
11888:World War II
11882:WhatamIdoing
11865:WhatamIdoing
11860:
11856:
11823:
11819:
11814:WhatamIdoing
11799:WhatamIdoing
11786:
11782:
11775:
11754:World War II
11711:
11708:
11705:
11702:
11699:
11697:
11665:World War II
11652:
11642:
11536:
11533:
11530:
11527:
11524:
11522:
11504:
11491:
11488:
11485:
11482:
11479:
11477:
11450:
11447:
11444:
11441:
11438:
11436:
11400:WP:RFCBEFORE
11381:
11377:
11353:
11287:
11275:
11270:
11188:
11187:
11161:Edward Heath
11066:
11043:
11035:Edward Heath
11018:defense mode
11009:
10970:Edward Heath
10957:
10951:
10945:
10939:
10933:
10927:
10918:
10885:
10884:
10845:
10839:
10833:
10827:
10821:
10804:
10798:
10792:
10786:
10780:
10771:
10743:
10739:
10727:
10710:
10709:
10682:
10643:
10594:
10588:
10582:
10576:
10570:
10564:
10558:
10488:
10466:CoffeeCrumbs
10453:
10445:CoffeeCrumbs
10430:CoffeeCrumbs
10416:AusLondonder
10402:CoffeeCrumbs
10376:AusLondonder
10359:
10358:
10354:WP:ADMINCOND
10321:
10245:
10244:
10239:
10233:
10231:
10219:
10215:
10211:
10116:
10115:
10093:
10041:AusLondonder
10027:
9972:
9930:
9914:
9905:
9893:
9871:
9858:
9821:AndyTheGrump
9752:
9747:
9729:(she/they) (
9727:Guessitsavis
9701:āĀ Preceding
9666:to the page
9653:
9647:
9641:
9635:
9629:
9623:
9614:
9583:
9576:
9546:
9535:
9426:
9423:
9414:
9326:
9320:
9314:
9308:
9302:
9296:
9287:
9254:QwertyForest
9248:
9204:
9125:
9119:
9113:
9107:
9101:
9095:
9088:71.36.178.63
9086:
9075:
9039:
9034:
8997:
8988:
8937:
8833:
8754:
8753:
8680:
8679:
8544:
8527:CoffeeCrumbs
8478:QwertyForest
8464:QwertyForest
8431:
8124:
8073:
8066:
8058:
7978:
7974:themselves).
7963:
7959:
7955:
7951:
7898:
7893:
7875:
7861:
7850:
7846:
7821:
7811:
7763:
7762:
7704:Anna Bianchi
7698:Elvio Annese
7680:Rosanna Lupi
7485:
7429:Umberto Curi
7414:Enrico Testa
7330:
7312:
7302:
7296:
7290:
7284:
7278:
7272:
7254:
7248:
7242:
7236:
7230:
7224:
7211:
7175:Grandpallama
7108:
7075:R0paire-wiki
7061:
7060:you stated ā
7025:
7009:
6979:
6978:
6962:
6957:
6944:R0paire-wiki
6936:edit summary
6909:
6902:
6888:
6875:
6869:
6863:
6857:
6851:
6845:
6836:
6825:
6797:
6790:
6784:
6761:
6753:
6751:
6676:
6671:
6661:
6656:
6628:
6622:followed by
6619:WP:BOOMERANG
6606:
6594:
6593:
6390:
6386:
6371:twice over?
6360:
6357:Edit warring
6345:
6204:Discussion:
6191:Prior Page:
6132:
6122:
6100:
6071:
6065:
6061:
6057:
6046:
6040:
6036:
6029:
6020:
6014:
6008:
6002:
5996:
5990:
5981:
5972:
5882:
5877:
5830:
5825:
5806:
5740:
5734:
5728:
5722:
5716:
5707:
5696:
5658:
5583:
5574:
5527:
5507:
5487:
5466:
5455:
5448:
5439:
5429:
5428:
5327:
5320:
5254:
5247:
5178:
5171:
5154:
5147:
5086:
5079:
5039:
5032:
5017:QwertyForest
5004:
4997:
4993:
4983:
4977:
4971:
4965:
4959:
4953:
4943:
4898:
4894:
4883:
4879:
4869:
4844:
4837:
4818:
4804:
4737:the future.
4710:
4685:
4680:isinterested
4672:
4634:
4633:
4563:
4558:
4553:
4550:
4534:
4513:
4486:
4483:
4462:
4444:
4242:
4179:
4174:
4133:
4057:QwertyForest
4018:
4016:
3990:
3884:
3881:
3860:
3847:
3838:
3832:
3826:
3820:
3814:
3808:
3799:
3781:
3771:
3751:
3750:
3671:WP:BOOMARANG
3634:
3624:
3607:R0paire-wiki
3576:
3566:
3547:
3537:
3471:environment.
3428:
3418:
3402:CoffeeCrumbs
3371:
3361:
3341:User conduct
3340:
3304:WP:BOOMARANG
3298:
3286:
3276:
3238:
3228:
3199:
3187:
3182:
3169:
3159:
3155:Good grief.
3130:
3120:
3087:
3084:User conduct
3076:
3060:. Retrieved
3053:
3044:
3036:
3000:Traumnovelle
2982:Traumnovelle
2902:
2898:
2888:
2883:
2857:
2853:
2846:
2842:
2838:
2818:
2816:
2787:Phil Bridger
2754:
2718:
2712:data brokers
2650:
2648:
2644:dominates it
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2581:
2534:
2525:
2507:
2490:<del: -->
2467:
2449:
2445:
2428:
2389:
2379:
2343:
2331:
2297:
2261:
2257:
2239:
2209:
2208:
2155:
2121:
2104:
2048:
2013:
1980:Pune airport
1966:constructive
1965:
1961:
1959:
1956:WP:WELCOMING
1951:
1903:
1892:
1861:
1838:
1830:CharlieMehta
1818:
1788:Pune airport
1762:
1727:CoffeeCrumbs
1722:
1652:
1637:
1614:
1604:
1598:
1592:
1586:
1580:
1574:
1469:
1395:
1386:
1380:
1374:
1368:
1362:
1356:
1347:
1299:Other links
937:
767:
766:
731:
719:
715:
695:You may use
680:
678:
676:
664:
656:
643:
619:
610:
606:
603:
554:
502:Village pump
490:New articles
455:Edit filters
434:Arbitration
360:User conduct
145:Open proxies
102:
62:Noticeboards
28:
15168:Editlife1tr
14514:Elias / PSA
14387:Elias / PSA
14300:Elias / PSA
14213:Elias / PSA
13977:Elias / PSA
13908:propose an
13899:, stating "
13519:User:Fa30sp
13391:Mississippi
12575:Mississippi
12250:encouraging
11415:Bon courage
10738:they wrote
10732:John Oliver
10667:The user's
10574:protections
10528:Yngvadottir
10206:Sigmaxalpha
10154:Sigmaxalpha
10081:Mississippi
10016:then abused
9855:by Graham87
9616:Musicfan800
9404:Mississippi
8978:Mississippi
8881:Mississippi
8727:guidelines.
8710:Mississippi
8655:Mississippi
8434:Gish Gallop
8373:created one
7420:Elio Pecora
6707:WP:HOUNDING
6323:new article
6103:netpositive
5564:Mississippi
4790:Floquenbeam
4711:short block
4641:engages in
4369:behaviour.
4019:Ravenswing
3958:netpositive
3732:Bon courage
3669:Probably a
2819:Ravenswing
2801:ā robertsky
2773:Narky Blert
2740:ā robertsky
2651:Ravenswing
2538:scope_creep
2406:. I advice
2386:Ratnahastin
2152:Ratnahastin
2118:Ratnahastin
2045:Ratnahastin
2010:Ratnahastin
1890:case here.
1858:Ratnahastin
1826:created by
1719:WP:BLUDGEON
1669:Scope creep
1641:scope_creep
718:. Instead,
448:Enforcement
404:Sockpuppets
309:Importation
268:Translation
180:Copyrights
115:Bureaucrats
15230:Left guide
15210:blockĀ user
15204:filterĀ log
15152:blockĀ user
15146:filterĀ log
15094:blockĀ user
15088:filterĀ log
15036:blockĀ user
15030:filterĀ log
14978:blockĀ user
14972:filterĀ log
14912:Sirocco745
14882:User:Alexf
14843:blockĀ user
14813:filterĀ log
14234:definitely
14147:" include
14124:asilvering
14080:asilvering
14016:asilvering
13874:, asking "
13870:opened by
13844:Asilvering
13821:opened by
13749:opened by
13718:blockĀ user
13712:filterĀ log
13586:Black Kite
13555:asilvering
13403:Yoshi24517
13346:Yoshi24517
13287:Yoshi24517
13264:behavior.
13224:blockĀ user
13218:filterĀ log
13177:blockĀ user
13171:filterĀ log
13097:WP:NOTHERE
12962:blockĀ user
12956:filterĀ log
12420:Left guide
12076:Remsense's
11783:repeatedly
11469:competency
11221:doing so.
11039:discussion
10955:blockĀ user
10949:filterĀ log
10843:blockĀ user
10837:pageĀ moves
10802:blockĀ user
10796:pageĀ moves
10768:Happymappy
10586:pageĀ moves
10136:Lisabofita
9859:After the
9651:blockĀ user
9645:filterĀ log
9468:tgeorgescu
9434:tgeorgescu
9324:blockĀ user
9318:filterĀ log
9180:WP:NOTHERE
9123:blockĀ user
9117:filterĀ log
8945:Netherzone
8919:Netherzone
8905:Netherzone
8785:adherents.
8772:Netherzone
8701:Netherzone
8686:Netherzone
8665:Netherzone
8619:Netherzone
8340:Gingeksace
8308:Gingeksace
8272:Gingeksace
8238:Gingeksace
8208:Gingeksace
8175:Gingeksace
8161:Gingeksace
8111:Gingeksace
8096:Gingeksace
8045:Gingeksace
8000:Gingeksace
7878:Netherzone
7300:blockĀ user
7294:filterĀ log
7252:blockĀ user
7246:filterĀ log
7217:Gingeksace
6873:blockĀ user
6867:filterĀ log
6758:WP:NOTHERE
6705:. This is
6605:case here.
6539:WP:NOTHERE
6494:asilvering
6422:asilvering
6018:blockĀ user
6012:filterĀ log
5922:Pemilligan
5738:blockĀ user
5732:pageĀ moves
5682:Bobby Cohn
5639:asilvering
5624:Bobby Cohn
5605:asilvering
5590:Bobby Cohn
5508:definitely
5390:asilvering
5218:asilvering
5190:asilvering
5142:Asilvering
5128:asilvering
4981:blockĀ user
4975:filterĀ log
4917:asilvering
4895:repeatedly
4891:sealioning
4848:grotesque.
4824:asilvering
4617:WP:NOTHERE
4567:WP:NOTHERE
4411:Asilvering
4247:asilvering
4221:Asilvering
4184:asilvering
4182:upset. --
4138:asilvering
4112:WP:NOTHERE
4094:asilvering
4031:Ravenswing
3836:blockĀ user
3830:filterĀ log
3725:WP:NOTHERE
3694:asilvering
3037:References
2936:Black Kite
2685:Headhitter
2566:WP:T&S
2482:reinstated
2306:TenryuuĀ š²
1878:Welcoming
1602:blockĀ user
1596:filterĀ log
1384:blockĀ user
1378:filterĀ log
707:to do so.
703:ANI-notice
689:not enough
646:Contact a
471:Questions
351:Undeletion
344:Miscellany
329:Categories
304:Protection
15216:blockĀ log
15158:blockĀ log
15100:blockĀ log
15042:blockĀ log
14984:blockĀ log
14849:blockĀ log
14765:Willondon
14739:Willondon
14705:Willondon
14564:šTheNugg
14331:GANs for
14243:šTheNugg
14208:Cullen328
14187:šTheNugg
14172:Cullen328
14139:Cullen328
14109:Cullen328
14067:šTheNugg
14053:šTheNugg
13988:šTheNugg
13955:šTheNugg
13827:slow down
13823:Wizardman
13813:Arconning
13751:Freedom4U
13724:blockĀ log
13603:Very Busy
13504:Cullen328
13414:Very Busy
13368:Cullen328
13357:Very Busy
13330:Cullen328
13308:Cullen328
13298:Very Busy
13279:Cullen328
13266:Cullen328
13230:blockĀ log
13183:blockĀ log
13095:Group of
12968:blockĀ log
12899:Altenmann
12886:Altenmann
12506:talk page
12504:on their
12502:a warning
12349:Emiya1980
12284:Emiya1980
12254:Emiya1980
12141:Emiya1980
12084:Emiya1980
12011:Emiya1980
11982:Emiya1980
11941:Emiya1980
11832:Emiya1980
11828:"Be bold"
11820:only once
11781:The word
11758:Emiya1980
11732:Big Three
11724:Snow Rise
11686:Emiya1980
11669:Emiya1980
11626:Emiya1980
11590:Emiya1980
11509:Nil Einne
11432:WP:BEFORE
11334:Cullen328
11330:Emiya1980
11315:Emiya1980
11306:Cullen328
11292:Cullen328
11272:Emiya1980
11244:Emiya1980
11223:Emiya1980
11218:Cullen328
11205:Cullen328
11201:Emiya1980
11169:Emiya1980
11146:Cullen328
11142:Emiya1980
11128:Emiya1980
11110:Cullen328
11102:Emiya1980
11088:Emiya1980
11084:Cullen328
11071:Cullen328
11063:Emiya1980
10961:blockĀ log
10920:Emiya1980
10899:Cullen328
10873:GrayStorm
10862:Willondon
10849:blockĀ log
10808:blockĀ log
10752:Cullen328
10580:deletions
10551:PaulĀ Erik
10148:Ainguyen9
9908:Flight709
9773:WikiDan61
9657:blockĀ log
9360:Waxworker
9330:blockĀ log
9165:Waxworker
9129:blockĀ log
9051:Cullen328
9020:Cullen328
8723:articles.
8681:Question:
8437:WP:REFBOM
8067:alternate
7857:Empathism
7828:Empathism
7346:Empathism
7341:Empathism
7327:Empathism
7319:Empathism
7306:blockĀ log
7258:blockĀ log
7190:Cullen328
7137:Nil Einne
6924:Vmarkovna
6879:blockĀ log
6838:Vmarkovna
6783:Agree on
6737:M7md AAAA
6711:WP:GAMING
6680:M7md AAAA
6642:M7md AAAA
6561:M7md AAAA
6513:M7md AAAA
6486:M7md AAAA
6472:M7md AAAA
6414:M7md AAAA
6373:M7md AAAA
6327:M7md AAAA
6286:M7md AAAA
6264:WP:REHASH
6242:M7md AAAA
6209:M7md AAAA
6141:M7md AAAA
6123:worthless
6024:blockĀ log
5983:M7mdĀ AAAA
5773:Ticketron
5744:blockĀ log
5532:Tavantius
5355:WP:CSD#U5
5140:Thanks, @
4987:blockĀ log
4651:M7md AAAA
3991:poor-sian
3842:blockĀ log
3485:followed.
3218:WP:MEDPOP
3062:11 August
2755:massively
2624:platform?
2562:WP:ARBCOM
2486:WP:REDACT
2410:to avoid
1947:MrSchimpf
1770:badgering
1768:Constant
1608:blockĀ log
1543:Folly Mox
1511:Nicholas0
1476:Nicholas0
1390:blockĀ log
1349:Croystron
938:Incidents
650:directly.
580:Shortcuts
517:Proposals
512:Technical
475:Help desk
460:Requested
419:Vandalism
409:Usernames
382:Sanctions
334:Templates
324:Redirects
251:Whitelist
246:Blacklist
155:Oversight
130:Education
103:Incidents
76:dashboard
15246:Category
15180:contribs
15122:contribs
15064:contribs
15006:contribs
14948:contribs
14908:Hexerade
14801:contribs
14681:contribs
14647:Thanks!
14635:Johnuniq
14496:contribs
14473:contribs
14345:FLC for
14184:Not me.
13914:(please
13688:contribs
13458:contribs
13446:Chaotic
13200:contribs
13153:contribs
13043:Johnuniq
12974:WP:ISBNs
12938:contribs
12870:contribs
12842:contribs
12814:contribs
12786:contribs
12758:contribs
12730:contribs
12702:contribs
12674:contribs
12641:contribs
12613:contribs
12495:reverted
12491:reverted
12445:contribs
12238:Remsense
12217:Remsense
12175:Remsense
12129:Remsense
12106:Remsense
12068:Remsense
11830:policy?
11776:edit war
11643:Remsense
11586:Nick-D's
10931:contribs
10825:contribs
10784:contribs
10656:For the
10624:Graham87
10562:contribs
10318:May 2022
10308:contribs
10270:Graham87
10262:this one
10228:Graham87
10223:comment.
10190:Graham87
10058:Graham87
10032:WP:INDEF
9918:contribs
9897:contribs
9875:contribs
9865:Graham87
9778:ReadMe!!
9715:contribs
9703:unsigned
9627:contribs
9595:Luhanopi
9577:Schazjmd
9567:Luhanopi
9552:Luhanopi
9300:contribs
9099:contribs
8523:WP:QUACK
8251:deceive?
8137:Further
8057:You ask
7276:contribs
7228:contribs
7127:WP:BLP/N
6940:WP:LEGAL
6896:, e.g.,
6849:contribs
6791:Schazjmd
6599:personal
6555:Begone
6527:WP:OTHER
6344:attacks.
6342:personal
6268:WP:OTHER
5994:contribs
5720:contribs
5449:Schazjmd
5443:contribs
5348:declined
5321:Schazjmd
5300:Schazjmd
5248:Schazjmd
5172:Schazjmd
5148:Schazjmd
5080:Schazjmd
5033:Schazjmd
4998:Schazjmd
4957:contribs
4884:bullying
4876:WP:CIVIL
4819:anything
4588:" with "
3812:contribs
3772:Remsense
3745:Remsense
3647:Levivich
3625:Remsense
3567:Remsense
3538:Remsense
3520:Bishonen
3441:Remsense
3419:Remsense
3362:Remsense
3277:Remsense
3229:Remsense
3160:Remsense
3121:Remsense
3058:. London
2758:WP:UNDUE
2699:Contribs
2240:Comment:
2114:issues.
2088:Citation
1723:back off
1653:Comment:
1578:contribs
1360:contribs
1187:archives
1065:archives
943:archives
821:archives
752:archives
746:subpage.
736:archived
522:Idea lab
480:Teahouse
443:Requests
319:Articles
189:Problems
14994:TOOLINK
14671:Wentigo
14567:eteerš
14516:šļøšŖ
14500:library
14438:he/they
14426:WP:DCWC
14410:he/they
14389:šļøšŖ
14302:šļøšŖ
14246:eteerš
14215:šļøšŖ
14190:eteerš
14105:Support
14070:eteerš
14056:eteerš
13991:eteerš
13979:šļøšŖ
13958:eteerš
13921:mention
13860:message
13800:message
13786:message
13772:message
13628:MemeGod
13318:MemeGod
13245:MemeGod
13039:WP:VAND
13025:Belbury
12514:ICT Fan
12450:Blocked
12241:reason.
10287:Imtisig
10142:Imtisig
9967:WP:RFAR
9925:WP:BITE
9853:WP:BITE
9798:WP:DOLT
9682:history
9515:MrOllie
8607:found:
8335:myself.
8063:WP:SOCK
7970:issues?
7132:WP:DOLT
7109:rsjaffe
7026:rsjaffe
7010:rsjaffe
6963:rsjaffe
6910:rsjaffe
6603:nothere
6595:Comment
5908:MrOllie
5807:revived
5793:MrOllie
5769:WP:DOLT
5232:Arjayay
4785:WP:BITE
4725:errors.
4676:ctively
4635:Comment
3688:Sorry @
3457:return.
3299:nothing
3094:warning
2909:WP:NPOV
2526:Comment
2508:Support
2446:Support
2429:Support
2380:Support
1962:already
1907:chatter
1763:Comment
1677:WP:BLUD
1615:Editor
1318:Backlog
705:}} ~~~~
685:pinging
595:WP:AN/I
289:Mergers
88:General
15052:Ixo490
14759:signed
14743:Drmies
14720:WP:SPI
14699:signed
14649:Jeppiz
14633:Done.
14620:Jeppiz
14524:Drmies
14460:Vacant
14433:sawyer
14405:sawyer
14371:, and
14339:, and
14206:Also @
14202:Rjjiii
14168:Rjjiii
14143:does "
13852:avoid
13764:Drmies
13108:Drmies
12522:diff 2
12520:&
12518:diff 1
12455:Cabayi
12269:Nick-D
12246:Nick-D
12133:Nick-D
12080:Nick-D
12072:Nick-D
11795:Nick-D
11791:WP:3RR
11612:Nick-D
11563:Nick-D
11410:WP:1AM
11374:WP:NPA
10685:UaMaol
10669:second
10592:rights
10568:blocks
10397:WP:AGF
10145:, and
10110:WP:ANI
10108:, not
10036:331dot
9881:where
9863:about
9835:DMacks
9802:DMacks
9584:(talk)
9571:WP:AIV
9498:spryde
9451:spryde
8836:WP:TNT
8794:Axad12
8733:Axad12
8605:Axad12
8587:WP:COI
8583:WP:AFD
8563:Axad12
8549:Axad12
8509:Axad12
8445:WP:CIR
8441:WP:COI
8368:Axad12
8354:Axad12
8322:Axad12
8291:Axad12
8285:users?
8257:Axad12
8223:Axad12
8193:Axad12
8146:Axad12
8139:WP:SPA
8132:WP:SPI
8081:Axad12
8030:Axad12
8015:Axad12
7986:Axad12
7934:Axad12
7904:fiveby
7265:Nihaon
7171:WP:CIR
7123:WP:NLT
7056:So in
6932:WP:COI
6798:(talk)
6531:WP:PST
6463:Their
6440:theirs
6314:WP:PST
6256:WP:PST
6156:WP:PST
6082:WP:NPA
5943:WP:NPA
5500:above.
5456:(talk)
5328:(talk)
5255:(talk)
5179:(talk)
5155:(talk)
5087:(talk)
5040:(talk)
5005:(talk)
4874:While
4857:Axad12
4771:here:
4731:WP:NPA
4719:WP:AGF
4451:WP:NPA
4367:WP:NPA
4202:WP:NPA
3908:ok --
3312:Meters
3251:Meters
3204:Meters
3200:change
2864:WP:RGW
2695:DatGuy
2531:WP:CIR
2361:WP:CIR
2112:WP:CIR
1888:WP:CIR
1852:CT IPA
1450:, and
1408:, and
1069:search
947:search
825:search
756:search
607:urgent
588:WP:ANI
507:Policy
294:Splits
14819:WHOIS
13620::)
12978:WP:LQ
12889:: -->
12876:WHOIS
12848:WHOIS
12820:WHOIS
12792:WHOIS
12764:WHOIS
12736:WHOIS
12708:WHOIS
12680:WHOIS
12647:WHOIS
12619:WHOIS
12487:Bbb23
11735:some.
11604:never
11310:Nemov
11165:Nemov
11124:Nemov
11047:Nemov
10868:Ponyo
10677:fifth
10673:third
10653:such.
10523:WP:42
10454:Ponyo
10337:alien
10170:alien
10106:WP:AN
10030:(per
9707:Kogti
9690:watch
9686:links
7157:Bbb23
7066:With
6718:WP:OR
6490:WP:OR
6420:. --
6418:WP:OR
6361:also
6221:More
6164:WP:RS
6074:WP:GF
6049:WP:GF
5873:Atari
5659:Ponyo
5510:: -->
5345:three
4668:. --
4645:post
4592:" at
4415:Zaman
4385:Zaman
4345:Zaman
4326:WP:GF
4312:Zaman
4156:Rasht
4086:Zemen
4072:Zaman
4049:Zemen
4035:Zaman
3995:Zaman
3977:Zaman
3932:Zaman
3801:Zemen
3676:Nemov
2492:tag.
2433:Nemov
2298:Note:
2256:This
1968:edits
1964:made
1920:else.
1474:and @
699:subst
658:diffs
625:Read
428:Other
339:Files
299:Moves
258:Style
16:<
15234:talk
15198:logs
15174:talk
15140:logs
15116:talk
15082:logs
15058:talk
15024:logs
15000:talk
14966:logs
14942:talk
14916:talk
14837:http
14831:RBLs
14825:RDNS
14795:talk
14769:talk
14747:talk
14709:talk
14675:talk
14653:talk
14639:talk
14624:talk
14603:talk
14584:talk
14558:here
14543:talk
14528:talk
14492:talk
14469:talk
14443:talk
14430:...
14415:talk
14402:...
14286:talk
14176:talk
14159:talk
14128:talk
14113:talk
14084:talk
14029:(ec)
14020:talk
13940:sigh
13850:", "
13836:", "
13706:logs
13682:talk
13598:talk
13588:and
13559:talk
13508:talk
13454:talk
13448:Enby
13409:Chat
13386:Star
13372:talk
13352:Chat
13334:talk
13293:Chat
13270:talk
13212:logs
13194:talk
13187:and
13165:logs
13147:talk
13136:and
13112:talk
13062:talk
13058:Īį¼¶Ī“Ī±
13047:talk
13029:talk
13011:talk
13007:Īį¼¶Ī“Ī±
13000:and
12986:talk
12982:Īį¼¶Ī“Ī±
12950:logs
12932:talk
12890:talk
12864:talk
12836:talk
12808:talk
12780:talk
12752:talk
12724:talk
12696:talk
12668:talk
12635:talk
12607:talk
12570:Star
12538:TALK
12499:left
12459:talk
12439:talk
12424:talk
12384:talk
12380:John
12332:talk
12310:talk
12300:and
12288:talk
12273:talk
12258:talk
12145:talk
12088:talk
12030:talk
12015:talk
12001:talk
11986:talk
11959:talk
11945:talk
11869:talk
11861:also
11857:both
11836:talk
11803:talk
11762:talk
11712:Rise
11673:talk
11630:talk
11616:talk
11594:talk
11567:talk
11537:Rise
11513:talk
11492:Rise
11451:Rise
11419:talk
11338:talk
11319:talk
11296:talk
11248:talk
11227:talk
11209:talk
11173:talk
11150:talk
11140:No,
11132:talk
11114:talk
11092:talk
11075:talk
11051:talk
10943:logs
10925:talk
10903:talk
10819:talk
10778:talk
10756:talk
10726:has
10689:talk
10675:and
10628:talk
10612:(my
10556:talk
10532:talk
10470:talk
10434:talk
10420:talk
10406:talk
10380:talk
10343:talk
10334:ugly
10304:talk
10300:Elli
10274:talk
10218:and
10202:The
10194:talk
10176:talk
10167:ugly
10076:Star
10062:talk
10045:talk
10003:here
9947:talk
9912:talk
9891:talk
9869:talk
9839:talk
9825:talk
9806:talk
9731:Talk
9711:talk
9694:logs
9678:talk
9674:edit
9639:logs
9621:talk
9599:talk
9556:talk
9519:talk
9504:talk
9486:talk
9482:Whpq
9472:talk
9457:talk
9438:talk
9427:See
9399:Star
9379:talk
9364:talk
9312:logs
9294:talk
9272:talk
9258:talk
9249:Done
9205:The
9188:talk
9169:talk
9111:logs
9093:talk
9061:talk
9024:talk
8973:Star
8949:talk
8927:talk
8909:talk
8899:and
8876:Star
8859:talk
8844:talk
8819:talk
8798:talk
8776:talk
8737:talk
8705:Star
8690:talk
8669:talk
8650:Star
8643:has
8639:Izno
8623:talk
8595:talk
8567:talk
8553:talk
8531:talk
8513:talk
8499:talk
8482:talk
8468:talk
8453:talk
8381:talk
8358:talk
8344:talk
8326:talk
8312:talk
8295:talk
8276:talk
8261:talk
8242:talk
8227:talk
8212:talk
8197:talk
8179:talk
8165:talk
8150:talk
8115:talk
8100:talk
8085:talk
8049:talk
8034:talk
8019:talk
8004:talk
7990:talk
7938:talk
7928:22).
7908:zero
7891:for
7882:talk
7869:and
7288:logs
7270:talk
7240:logs
7222:talk
7194:talk
7179:talk
7161:talk
7141:talk
7098:talk
7079:talk
7048:talk
6998:talk
6960:. ā
6948:talk
6861:logs
6843:talk
6813:talk
6774:talk
6741:talk
6726:talk
6684:talk
6662:talk
6646:talk
6565:talk
6547:talk
6533:and
6517:talk
6498:talk
6476:talk
6436:note
6426:talk
6377:talk
6331:talk
6304:talk
6290:talk
6276:talk
6246:talk
6231:talk
6213:talk
6179:talk
6166:and
6145:talk
6139:not.
6111:talk
6080:and
6006:logs
5988:talk
5962:talk
5930:talk
5912:talk
5883:talk
5863:talk
5849:talk
5831:talk
5815:talk
5797:talk
5758:talk
5714:talk
5686:talk
5643:talk
5628:talk
5609:talk
5594:talk
5559:Star
5536:talk
5479:talk
5475:NebY
5437:talk
5394:talk
5380:talk
5376:NebY
5351:AFCs
5308:talk
5304:NebY
5277:talk
5273:NebY
5236:talk
5222:talk
5208:talk
5204:NebY
5194:talk
5132:talk
5118:talk
5114:NebY
5110:this
5106:this
5021:talk
4969:logs
4951:talk
4921:talk
4861:talk
4828:talk
4794:talk
4758:talk
4743:talk
4664:See
4655:talk
4625:talk
4604:talk
4575:talk
4419:talk
4389:talk
4375:talk
4365:and
4349:talk
4334:talk
4316:talk
4294:talk
4269:talk
4251:talk
4243:both
4232:talk
4210:talk
4188:talk
4180:more
4164:talk
4142:talk
4124:talk
4098:talk
4076:talk
4061:talk
4039:talk
3999:talk
3981:talk
3966:talk
3936:talk
3914:talk
3824:logs
3806:talk
3736:talk
3713:talk
3698:talk
3680:talk
3651:talk
3611:talk
3593:talk
3524:tƄlk
3504:talk
3406:talk
3349:talk
3331:talk
3316:talk
3263:talk
3208:talk
3147:talk
3106:talk
3090:user
3064:2024
3027:talk
3004:talk
2986:talk
2950:talk
2917:talk
2913:NebY
2889:talk
2872:talk
2868:NebY
2841:was
2805:talk
2791:talk
2777:talk
2744:talk
2564:and
2437:talk
2420:talk
2392:talk
2370:talk
2341:this
2280:talk
2248:talk
2227:talk
2174:talk
2158:talk
2140:talk
2124:talk
2095:talk
2079:talk
2067:this
2065:and
2063:This
2051:talk
2033:talk
2016:talk
1929:talk
1895:Nate
1864:talk
1746:talk
1731:talk
1709:talk
1695:talk
1684:here
1627:and
1590:logs
1572:talk
1547:talk
1529:talk
1515:talk
1500:talk
1484:talk
1470:Hi @
1462:talk
1453:this
1447:this
1441:this
1435:this
1429:this
1423:this
1417:this
1411:this
1405:this
1399:this
1372:logs
1354:talk
1308:Talk
1053:1167
1048:1166
1043:1165
1038:1164
1033:1163
1028:1162
1023:1161
1018:1160
1013:1159
1008:1158
1001:1157
996:1156
991:1155
986:1154
981:1153
976:1152
971:1151
966:1150
961:1149
956:1148
720:use
681:must
637:Try
241:Spam
110:Bots
98:Main
14771:)
14711:)
14498:-
14154:Rjj
13897:PSA
13858:" (
13854:all
13846:: "
13829:".
13798:" (
13794:: "
13784:" (
13780:: "
13770:" (
13766:: "
13623:Sir
13600:) (
13590:Liz
13572:Liz
13412:) (
13355:) (
13313:Sir
13296:) (
13240:Sir
12480:to
11978:one
11969:did
11900:DID
11398:As
11276:you
11238:Liz
10598:RfA
10331:big
10328:The
10164:big
10161:The
9883:Liz
9474:)
9440:)
9040:Eng
9003:ABG
8768:Liz
7113:š£ļø
7030:š£ļø
7014:š£ļø
6967:š£ļø
6914:š£ļø
6900:.
6035:...
5899:IP
5676:Liz
5168:).
5108:or
4690:Ā» Ā°
4670:LCU
4510:ok
4383:Ok
3603:RFC
3188:Eng
2073:.
1982:to
1790:to
1456:).
1293:340
1288:339
1283:338
1278:337
1273:336
1268:335
1263:334
1258:333
1253:332
1248:331
1241:330
1236:329
1231:328
1226:327
1221:326
1216:325
1211:324
1206:323
1201:322
1196:321
1175:487
1170:486
1165:485
1160:484
1155:483
1150:482
1145:481
1140:480
1135:479
1130:478
1123:477
1118:476
1113:475
1108:474
1103:473
1098:472
1093:471
1088:470
1083:469
1078:468
931:365
926:364
921:363
916:362
911:361
906:360
901:359
896:358
891:357
886:356
879:355
874:354
869:353
864:352
859:351
854:350
849:349
844:348
839:347
834:346
687:is
527:WMF
314:XfD
150:VRT
15248::
15236:)
15228:.
14918:)
14892:iz
14871:š¬
14761:,
14749:)
14730:iz
14722:.
14701:,
14691:,
14655:)
14641:)
14626:)
14605:)
14586:)
14561:.
14545:)
14530:)
14502:)
14494:-
14482:A
14471:ā¢
14440:*
14436:*
14412:*
14408:*
14367:,
14363:,
14359:,
14355:,
14335:,
14288:)
14261:MM
14178:)
14161:)
14130:)
14115:)
14086:)
14036:MM
14022:)
13903:".
13862:).
13840:".
13802:).
13788:).
13774:).
13760:".
13646:iz
13606:)
13561:)
13539:MM
13529:iz
13510:)
13474:iz
13460:)
13456:Ā·
13431:iz
13374:)
13336:)
13272:)
13114:)
13079:iz
13064:)
13049:)
13031:)
13013:)
12988:)
12909:iz
12884:--
12553:MM
12544:)
12524:.
12461:)
12453:.
12426:)
12418:.
12401:iz
12386:)
12359:iz
12334:)
12312:)
12290:)
12275:)
12260:)
12222:ā„
12180:ā„
12147:)
12111:ā„
12090:)
12032:)
12017:)
12003:)
11988:)
11961:)
11947:)
11871:)
11838:)
11805:)
11764:)
11675:)
11648:ā„
11632:)
11618:)
11596:)
11569:)
11515:)
11476:.
11421:)
11358:MM
11352:,
11340:)
11321:)
11298:)
11250:)
11229:)
11211:)
11192:iz
11175:)
11152:)
11134:)
11116:)
11094:)
11077:)
11053:)
11041:.
10905:)
10889:iz
10758:)
10714:iz
10706:.
10691:)
10671:,
10630:)
10534:)
10472:)
10436:)
10422:)
10408:)
10382:)
10346:)
10310:)
10306:|
10296:pl
10276:)
10268:.
10196:)
10179:)
10139:,
10120:iz
10064:)
10047:)
9949:)
9841:)
9827:)
9808:)
9756:.
9733:)
9717:)
9713:ā¢
9692:|
9688:|
9684:|
9680:|
9676:|
9601:)
9573:.
9558:)
9521:)
9501:|
9488:)
9454:|
9432:.
9381:)
9366:)
9358:.
9352:,
9346:,
9340:,
9274:)
9260:)
9234:)
9232:š®
9230:-
9228:š
9226:-
9224:š
9222:-
9220:š¬
9190:)
9182:.
9171:)
9163:.
9157:,
9151:,
9139:,
9063:)
9026:)
9010:)
8951:)
8929:)
8911:)
8861:)
8846:)
8821:)
8800:)
8778:)
8758:iz
8739:)
8692:)
8671:)
8625:)
8597:)
8569:)
8555:)
8533:)
8525:.
8515:)
8501:)
8484:)
8470:)
8455:)
8383:)
8360:)
8346:)
8328:)
8314:)
8297:)
8278:)
8263:)
8244:)
8229:)
8214:)
8199:)
8181:)
8167:)
8152:)
8117:)
8102:)
8087:)
8051:)
8036:)
8021:)
8006:)
7992:)
7940:)
7910:)
7884:)
7819:.
7196:)
7181:)
7163:)
7143:)
7100:)
7081:)
7050:)
7007:ā
7000:)
6983:iz
6950:)
6942:.
6815:)
6776:)
6743:)
6728:)
6686:)
6648:)
6567:)
6549:)
6541:.
6529:,
6519:)
6500:)
6478:)
6467::
6428:)
6379:)
6333:)
6306:)
6292:)
6278:)
6248:)
6233:)
6225:.
6215:)
6181:)
6173:.
6147:)
6135:."
6113:)
6076:,
5964:)
5932:)
5924:.
5914:)
5865:)
5851:)
5817:)
5799:)
5760:)
5752:.
5688:)
5678::
5645:)
5630:)
5611:)
5596:)
5588:.
5538:)
5513:MM
5490::
5481:)
5396:)
5382:)
5359:MM
5340:)(
5310:)
5293:}}
5287:{{
5279:)
5238:)
5224:)
5210:)
5196:)
5134:)
5120:)
5059:MM
5023:)
4923:)
4863:)
4830:)
4796:)
4760:)
4745:)
4692:āt
4657:)
4627:)
4619:.
4606:)
4577:)
4518::
4421:)
4391:)
4377:)
4361:,
4351:)
4336:)
4318:)
4296:)
4271:)
4253:)
4234:)
4212:)
4190:)
4166:)
4144:)
4126:)
4100:)
4078:)
4063:)
4041:)
4001:)
3983:)
3968:)
3938:)
3916:)
3851:.
3777:ā„
3755:iz
3738:)
3715:)
3700:)
3682:)
3653:)
3630:ā„
3613:)
3595:)
3572:ā„
3543:ā„
3529:.
3522:|
3506:)
3424:ā„
3408:)
3367:ā„
3351:)
3333:)
3318:)
3310:.
3282:ā„
3265:)
3234:ā„
3224:.
3210:)
3165:ā„
3149:)
3126:ā„
3108:)
3052:.
3029:)
3006:)
2988:)
2972:š
2967:š
2952:)
2919:)
2911:.
2874:)
2866:.
2807:)
2793:)
2779:)
2746:)
2716:Ca
2673:š
2668:š
2632:š
2627:š
2568:.
2480:I
2439:)
2422:)
2414:.
2372:)
2317:)
2315:š
2313:ā¢
2311:š¬
2309:(
2282:)
2258:is
2250:)
2229:)
2213:iz
2176:)
2142:)
2097:)
2081:)
2069:.
2035:)
1931:)
1854:.
1837::"
1748:)
1733:)
1711:)
1697:)
1549:)
1531:)
1517:)
1502:)
1486:)
1464:)
1444:,
1438:,
1432:,
1426:,
1420:,
1402:,
1067:,
945:,
823:,
754:,
697:{{
622::
15232:(
15218:)
15213:Ā·
15207:Ā·
15201:Ā·
15195:Ā·
15189:Ā·
15183:Ā·
15177:Ā·
15172:(
15160:)
15155:Ā·
15149:Ā·
15143:Ā·
15137:Ā·
15131:Ā·
15125:Ā·
15119:Ā·
15114:(
15102:)
15097:Ā·
15091:Ā·
15085:Ā·
15079:Ā·
15073:Ā·
15067:Ā·
15061:Ā·
15056:(
15044:)
15039:Ā·
15033:Ā·
15027:Ā·
15021:Ā·
15015:Ā·
15009:Ā·
15003:Ā·
14998:(
14986:)
14981:Ā·
14975:Ā·
14969:Ā·
14963:Ā·
14957:Ā·
14951:Ā·
14945:Ā·
14940:(
14914:(
14889:L
14865:A
14862:F
14859:C
14851:)
14846:Ā·
14840:Ā·
14834:Ā·
14828:Ā·
14822:Ā·
14816:Ā·
14810:Ā·
14804:Ā·
14798:Ā·
14793:(
14767:(
14745:(
14727:L
14707:(
14678:Ā·
14673:(
14651:(
14637:(
14622:(
14601:(
14582:(
14541:(
14526:(
14490:(
14475:)
14467:(
14463:0
14294:@
14284:(
14200:@
14174:(
14157:(
14141::
14137:@
14126:(
14111:(
14082:(
14018:(
14002:@
13966:@
13944:)
13936:(
13926:ā
13878:"
13815:.
13726:)
13721:Ā·
13715:Ā·
13709:Ā·
13703:Ā·
13697:Ā·
13691:Ā·
13685:Ā·
13680:(
13643:L
13596:(
13574::
13570:@
13557:(
13526:L
13506:(
13471:L
13452:(
13428:L
13416:)
13406:(
13370:(
13359:)
13349:(
13332:(
13300:)
13290:(
13268:(
13232:)
13227:Ā·
13221:Ā·
13215:Ā·
13209:Ā·
13203:Ā·
13197:Ā·
13192:(
13185:)
13180:Ā·
13174:Ā·
13168:Ā·
13162:Ā·
13156:Ā·
13150:Ā·
13145:(
13110:(
13076:L
13060:(
13045:(
13027:(
13009:(
12984:(
12970:)
12965:Ā·
12959:Ā·
12953:Ā·
12947:Ā·
12941:Ā·
12935:Ā·
12930:(
12906:L
12878:)
12873:Ā·
12867:Ā·
12862:(
12850:)
12845:Ā·
12839:Ā·
12834:(
12822:)
12817:Ā·
12811:Ā·
12806:(
12794:)
12789:Ā·
12783:Ā·
12778:(
12766:)
12761:Ā·
12755:Ā·
12750:(
12738:)
12733:Ā·
12727:Ā·
12722:(
12710:)
12705:Ā·
12699:Ā·
12694:(
12682:)
12677:Ā·
12671:Ā·
12666:(
12649:)
12644:Ā·
12638:Ā·
12633:(
12621:)
12616:Ā·
12610:Ā·
12605:(
12532:(
12457:(
12442:Ā·
12437:(
12422:(
12398:L
12382:(
12356:L
12330:(
12308:(
12286:(
12271:(
12256:(
12227:č®ŗ
12185:č®ŗ
12143:(
12116:č®ŗ
12086:(
12028:(
12013:(
11999:(
11984:(
11957:(
11943:(
11884::
11880:@
11867:(
11834:(
11816::
11812:@
11801:(
11787:.
11760:(
11709:w
11706:o
11703:n
11700:S
11671:(
11653:č®ŗ
11628:(
11614:(
11592:(
11565:(
11534:w
11531:o
11528:n
11525:S
11511:(
11489:w
11486:o
11483:n
11480:S
11448:w
11445:o
11442:n
11439:S
11417:(
11387::
11336:(
11317:(
11294:(
11246:(
11240::
11236:@
11225:(
11207:(
11189:L
11171:(
11148:(
11130:(
11112:(
11090:(
11073:(
11049:(
10963:)
10958:Ā·
10952:Ā·
10946:Ā·
10940:Ā·
10934:Ā·
10928:Ā·
10923:(
10901:(
10886:L
10851:)
10846:Ā·
10840:Ā·
10834:Ā·
10828:Ā·
10822:Ā·
10817:(
10810:)
10805:Ā·
10799:Ā·
10793:Ā·
10787:Ā·
10781:Ā·
10776:(
10754:(
10711:L
10687:(
10626:(
10602:.
10600:)
10595:Ā·
10589:Ā·
10583:Ā·
10577:Ā·
10571:Ā·
10565:Ā·
10559:Ā·
10554:(
10530:(
10468:(
10447::
10443:@
10432:(
10418:(
10404:(
10378:(
10340:(
10302:(
10294:(
10272:(
10208::
10204:@
10192:(
10173:(
10117:L
10060:(
10043:(
9945:(
9915:Ā·
9910:(
9894:Ā·
9889:(
9872:Ā·
9867:(
9837:(
9823:(
9804:(
9709:(
9696:)
9672:(
9659:)
9654:Ā·
9648:Ā·
9642:Ā·
9636:Ā·
9630:Ā·
9624:Ā·
9619:(
9597:(
9565:@
9554:(
9517:(
9484:(
9470:(
9436:(
9377:(
9362:(
9355:4
9349:3
9343:2
9337:1
9332:)
9327:Ā·
9321:Ā·
9315:Ā·
9309:Ā·
9303:Ā·
9297:Ā·
9292:(
9270:(
9256:(
9218:(
9186:(
9167:(
9160:5
9154:4
9148:3
9142:2
9136:1
9131:)
9126:Ā·
9120:Ā·
9114:Ā·
9108:Ā·
9102:Ā·
9096:Ā·
9091:(
9059:(
9053::
9049:@
9035:E
9022:(
9006:(
8947:(
8925:(
8907:(
8891:@
8857:(
8842:(
8817:(
8796:(
8774:(
8766:@
8755:L
8735:(
8688:(
8667:(
8641::
8637:@
8621:(
8593:(
8565:(
8551:(
8529:(
8511:(
8497:(
8480:(
8466:(
8451:(
8379:(
8366:@
8356:(
8342:(
8324:(
8310:(
8293:(
8274:(
8259:(
8240:(
8225:(
8210:(
8195:(
8177:(
8163:(
8148:(
8113:(
8098:(
8083:(
8047:(
8032:(
8017:(
8002:(
7988:(
7966:.
7936:(
7906:(
7880:(
7376:]
7308:)
7303:Ā·
7297:Ā·
7291:Ā·
7285:Ā·
7279:Ā·
7273:Ā·
7268:(
7260:)
7255:Ā·
7249:Ā·
7243:Ā·
7237:Ā·
7231:Ā·
7225:Ā·
7220:(
7192:(
7177:(
7159:(
7139:(
7096:(
7077:(
7046:(
6996:(
6980:L
6946:(
6881:)
6876:Ā·
6870:Ā·
6864:Ā·
6858:Ā·
6852:Ā·
6846:Ā·
6841:(
6811:(
6772:(
6739:(
6724:(
6682:(
6644:(
6563:(
6545:(
6515:(
6496:(
6484:@
6474:(
6442:.
6424:(
6412:@
6385:"
6375:(
6329:(
6316:/
6302:(
6288:(
6274:(
6258:/
6244:(
6229:(
6211:(
6177:(
6143:(
6125:.
6109:(
6026:)
6021:Ā·
6015:Ā·
6009:Ā·
6003:Ā·
5997:Ā·
5991:Ā·
5986:(
5960:(
5945:/
5928:(
5910:(
5861:(
5847:(
5813:(
5795:(
5780:P
5777:T
5756:(
5746:)
5741:Ā·
5735:Ā·
5729:Ā·
5723:Ā·
5717:Ā·
5712:(
5684:(
5641:(
5626:(
5607:(
5592:(
5534:(
5477:(
5440:Ā·
5435:(
5392:(
5378:(
5306:(
5275:(
5234:(
5220:(
5206:(
5192:(
5130:(
5116:(
5019:(
4989:)
4984:Ā·
4978:Ā·
4972:Ā·
4966:Ā·
4960:Ā·
4954:Ā·
4949:(
4919:(
4911:@
4904::
4859:(
4826:(
4810::
4792:(
4781::
4777:@
4756:(
4741:(
4707:)
4703:(
4694:Ā°
4688:@
4686:Ā«
4678:D
4674:A
4653:(
4637::
4623:(
4602:(
4573:(
4449:/
4417:(
4409:@
4387:(
4373:(
4347:(
4332:(
4314:(
4302:@
4292:(
4267:(
4249:(
4230:(
4223::
4219:@
4208:(
4200:/
4186:(
4162:(
4140:(
4122:(
4096:(
4084:@
4074:(
4059:(
4047:@
4037:(
4029:@
3997:(
3979:(
3964:(
3934:(
3912:(
3844:)
3839:Ā·
3833:Ā·
3827:Ā·
3821:Ā·
3815:Ā·
3809:Ā·
3804:(
3782:č®ŗ
3752:L
3734:(
3711:(
3696:(
3678:(
3649:(
3635:č®ŗ
3609:(
3591:(
3577:č®ŗ
3548:č®ŗ
3502:(
3429:č®ŗ
3404:(
3372:č®ŗ
3347:(
3329:(
3314:(
3287:č®ŗ
3261:(
3249:@
3239:č®ŗ
3206:(
3183:E
3170:č®ŗ
3145:(
3131:č®ŗ
3104:(
3066:.
3025:(
3002:(
2984:(
2948:(
2934:@
2915:(
2870:(
2803:(
2789:(
2775:(
2742:(
2687::
2683:@
2473::
2455::
2435:(
2418:(
2394:)
2390:(
2368:(
2278:(
2267::
2246:(
2225:(
2210:L
2172:(
2160:)
2156:(
2138:(
2126:)
2122:(
2107:"
2093:(
2077:(
2053:)
2049:(
2031:(
2018:)
2014:(
1993:.
1942::
1938:@
1927:(
1910:)
1904:(
1900:ā¢
1866:)
1862:(
1832::
1828:@
1744:(
1729:(
1707:(
1693:(
1679:.
1610:)
1605:Ā·
1599:Ā·
1593:Ā·
1587:Ā·
1581:Ā·
1575:Ā·
1570:(
1545:(
1527:(
1513:(
1498:(
1482:(
1460:(
1392:)
1387:Ā·
1381:Ā·
1375:Ā·
1369:Ā·
1363:Ā·
1357:Ā·
1352:(
1189:)
1185:(
1071:)
1063:(
949:)
941:(
827:)
819:(
758:)
750:(
725:.
701::
692:.
671:.
415:)
411:(
82:.
54:e
47:t
40:v
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.