43:
are available for a study of plagiarism on
English Knowledge, comparing the rates of plagiarism by student editors in the US and Canada education programs with those of other groups of editors. In short, the data shows student editors plagiarized at a lower rate than other newcomers, and at a higher
120:
We're looking for common markers of a successful course — is it class size? Number of
Ambassadors? Knowledge experience of the professor? Public or private schools? Age level of the students? We have some hypotheses, but we are doing this research project to prove or disprove our ideas. We will use
90:
so we can determine what factors make courses more successful. We have worked with more than 150 classes at this point, and we'd like to find out patterns among our most successful courses so we can tailor our future professor selection around courses that will be the most successful.
117:. The assessment of quality, quantity, and sustainability will give us a ranking of which classes are most and least successful. We will run successful and not successful classes against those quantitative datapoints.
112:
At the same time as
Wikipedians are assessing the quality of the random sample of student articles, Wikimedia contractors are reaching out to every professor we've worked with, working to determine a set of
39:
64:
54:
145:
130:
102:
71:
59:
23:
150:
108:
Sustainability of professors and
Ambassadors (whether they return or intend to return in future terms; satisfaction level with program)
74:
about what factors lead to success in classes are now available. Additional research will be done on this front in the coming months.
114:
82:
The
Wikimedia Foundation is planning a research project to evaluate each course in the Knowledge Education Program in the
62:
part of the project are now available. Articles that spring 2012 students contributed to improved by an average of
17:
8:
87:
47:
83:
139:
121:
the outcomes to determine which courses we want to work with in the future.
129:
Interested in helping out? Volunteer to help assess student articles. See
98:
Students add a large amount of content to
Knowledge (based on bytes added)
68:
on a 26-point scale, with 87.9% of all articles showing some improvement.
33:
124:
77:
103:
quality ratings from a sample of students done by
Wikipedians
94:How we are defining what a "successful course" is:
101:Content students add is of high quality (based on
137:
131:Knowledge:Ambassadors/Research/Article quality
44:rate than admins and very prolific editors.
146:Knowledge United States Education Program
14:
138:
30:
151:Knowledge Canada Education Program
31:
162:
40:Results and preliminary analysis
24:Knowledge:Ambassadors/Research
13:
1:
7:
18:Knowledge:Education program
10:
167:
48:Update, October 2012
72:Preliminary results
133:for more details.
22:(Redirected from
158:
27:
166:
165:
161:
160:
159:
157:
156:
155:
136:
135:
127:
80:
60:article quality
50:
36:
29:
28:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
164:
154:
153:
148:
126:
123:
110:
109:
106:
99:
79:
76:
49:
46:
35:
34:September 2013
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
163:
152:
149:
147:
144:
143:
141:
134:
132:
125:Get involved!
122:
118:
116:
107:
104:
100:
97:
96:
95:
92:
89:
85:
84:United States
75:
73:
69:
67:
66:
61:
57:
56:
45:
42:
41:
25:
19:
128:
119:
111:
93:
81:
70:
63:
53:
51:
38:
37:
140:Categories
115:datapoints
78:Background
65:6.5 points
58:of the
55:results
88:Canada
16:<
86:and
52:The
142::
105:)
26:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.