Knowledge:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Evidence

1091: 1065: 1104: 1078: 2201:) and yet, as per their edit summaries in their mass reversions of my portal work, the user also in part disapproved of the utilization of transclusion templates that provide verbatim, up-to-date content in portals relative to that in articles. This philosophy leaves portal editors with no way or recourse to improve or expand portals: BHG considers either method to be improper, essentially blocking any improvements from occurring. Meantime, I initiated an RfC to obtain community input regarding formalizing the use of transclusion templates, which has received overwhelming support: 3335:– with excellent result: through BHG's patience and diligent approach the crux of the conflict got defused. She continued to extend her hospitality where other editors might have given hints someone was outstaying their welcome. The discussion took over two months, with only sparse, but very much ad rem, comments by BHG, who thus was very helpful in resolving the conflict (in surplus of "harbouring" the safe place for two other editors to discuss & come to terms). Through that interaction I came to understand BHG has a very sound and thorough understanding of " 4428:-style "rescue" efforts to remedy technical problems whilst )in NA1K's case) demonstrated sustained incompetence at the core editorial task in portals of selecting content and collaborating with editors who have some expertise and experience in the topic to review and assess the work down. Instead, NA1K and their vocal enablers repeat their uncritical mantra of "improvement", object vociferously to analysis of that improvement (e.g. NA1K's denunciation of my analysis of NA!K's efforts wrt Australia: 1025:" As North America well knows, I don't "attack" editors with whom I have honest disagreements.", " NA1K's sustained pattern of strategic mendacity, and per WP:SPADE I call it out for what it is.", " liar NA1K resorts once again to blatant lying", "Now NA1K responds to my compliant with another demonstrable lie. It takes an extraordinary level of mendacity to double down on a lie like that. The only WP:BAITING here is NA1K's persistent and sustained lying about guidelines and about other editors." 43: 1228:. In response, The Transhumanist started a revival project, first introducing new tools that made maintenance easier (many users helped with the technical side of this), later mass-creating portals on all kinds of topics. TTH also replaced manual portals by fully automated ones, annoying me and other old-style maintainers quite a bit. Many others were annoyed by the mass creation, which also changed portals from being a "mini main page" to being a navigational aid, similar to 998:"NA1K's web of lies, deceptions, distortions, misrepresentations, subversions and strategic omissions is a despicable way for any human to behave in any context. NA1K's despicable conduct here will not earn them fame or cash, which are the common motivations elsewhere for such abysmal conduct. But even in this anonymous cash-free space of Knowledge editing, the ethics revealed by this liar-admin NA1K is the ethical framework of the fraudster or confidence trickster." 1661:), the OP and I both provided many links demonstrating BHG's ongoing problems with personal attacks. In the discussion, BHG agreed to stop attacking, but later reneged on this. For months, BHG has smeared others as being dishonest, deceitful, etc., resorting to name calling such as calling users “a liar” etc. when BHG disagrees with their opinions. The user also has a habit of misrepresenting the views of others during discussions and in later discussions. 187: 3469:, all of which were direct at Ɱ. Most of the other participants in the discussion, aside from Newshunter12, were able to participate in the discussion without lashing out at Ɱ. Regardless of whether Ɱ was guilty of making false statements, BHG's outburst was unacceptable and inflammatory. She has shown time and again that she is not willing to respect our civility policies. Her conduct is unbecoming of any editor, admin or otherwise. 2697:

person measures this basic utility, to judge if editor-time overhead is worth it, in page views, which are typically 100-1000 times lower for portals then their head articles. What mattered most to Certes was that the portal looked good, not that the portal would take nearly five years to get the total number of views the head article gets in a single day, and Kusma displayed the same completely aesthetic keep criteria

4469:

competence. If Knowledge is to be a place where NA1K's combination of sustained incompetence, verbose bluster and aversion to critical debate us to be a protected characteristic, then we will have lost something very precious from our goal to build an actual encyclopedia rather than just a playground for people who like making pretty lists by robotic methods and feel hurt by the application of critical thinking. --

3411:"low-quality" edits, largely by NA1k which relate to their use of the "black box" portal which makes portals significantly easier to maintain, have since been backed by consensus, and some of the small problems which arose from those edits were quickly and easily fixed by the template creator (see the Portal talk:Australia discussion above.) This is not a competence issue - it's a disagreement over content. 4001: 3977: 2256:. The lead of POG is ambiguous, and BHG makes continual assumptions that their personal interpretation is correct, stating repeatedly that those who disagree with them are dishonest, or lying. Part of the reason POG was demoted is because 1) it did not have any formal consensus to be a guideline, and 2) it was not intended to be a guideline page. For more information, see 2083:) for details. In doing so, the user places themself in an unjust position of absolute ownership over these portals, essentially holding them hostage by obstructing any improvements from occurring. In instances when others have undone BHG's reversions, BHG has at times quickly reverted to their preferred version, such as occurred with Portal:Australia ( 4420:) is accompanied by huge skill at using diffs to repeatedly misrepresent my actions and views. I have not found any instance anywhere of NA1K acknowledging what a poor job they did in those case, or how their failings went undetected for so long because of their failure to notify other editors or to transparently disclose what they had done. 4108:. The main point here is that this portal was deleted as being unmaintained but it appears that it was being maintained regularly and that the main maintainer only discovered the deletion when he turned up to find that the portal and all its pages had vanished. The maintainer had not been notified and so is naturally upset by this result. 3601:"I find the accusations of editors being "knowingly false" when you simply disagree with what they say, the use of the sarcastic soubriquet "portalista" to discount any views contrary to your own, and the characterisation of anyone who disagrees with you as indulging in "group think" not only unpleasant but also very counterproductive." 1257:

portal by checking whether it is maintained and has lots of readers" and (B) "Portals should be about broad topics, because that makes it more likely to find maintainers and readers". The interpretation (A) brought us such gems as Newshunter12's claim "Culture is not a broad enough topic to attract readers and maintainers."

741:

anyone who doesn't share her take of a situation appears dishonest or incompetent. Coming from such an authoritative admin, the many thousands of words she's posted against pro portal editors may have caused some to think there is equal fault on both sides. So posting a few examples to suggest this is not the case.

4431:... and are evidently sincerely outraged that anyone would dare be so appallingly rude as to apply the sort of critical analysis which should be central to the intellectual task of building an enyclopedia. So they respond by complaining of personal attacks, and complain that the critiques are "impeding progress". 2628:. How can any reasonable editor have the time (let alone the required high level understanding of portal space) to sift through that to study what changes were made or try to discern if this creates a balanced topic list? It's an example of NA1K's "black-box" portal plan as described by BHG in detail here 2114:) were against BHG's unilateral reversion spree and for the reversions to be undone, but the entire discussion was abruptly closed. At that discussion, I also denoted how BHG literally broke many portals when reverting, apparently not even bothering to check them after their series of one-click reverts: 2696:

stated that page views (or lack thereof), a core reason for deleting most of the 1000 abandoned pre-TTH spam portals over the last 7 months, were not a reason to consider deleting a portal. Portals do not have their own content and are useful only for their utility as navigational devices. A rational

1256:

and what its famous statement "portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" means. The main interpretations were (A) "Portals should be about broad topics, and we can find out whether a topic is broad enough for a

1171:

I don't have evidence that is specifically about the case dispute, but I have some background information. I am posting this because some other editors are commenting about BrownHairedGirl's administrative rights, and I believe that this is potentially useful background related to her temperament and

3539:

A group of editors soon decided to "revitalize" WikiProject Portals. The results were ultimately disastrous. They developed a tool to fully automate portals, turning them into glorified navboxes with no human input as to the choice and quality of the articles and images. They then started converting

3498:

for a long time. What is needed is a fresh start for Brown as they are great at category stuff and other behind the scenes essential edits. I acknowledge my wording may have been harsh at times but I have moved on.. and amended my slight in behavior.... this is something Brown needs to do. I hoping

3347:

in such circumstances, and indeed, as is explained in the WP:SPADE essay, those who take offence often do so "not to protect themselves from personal attacks, but to protect their edits from review". Through all the mis- and out-of-context quoting of what BHG said in discussions, when I've read some

1211:

Tracking and describing the entire dispute is beyond both my abilities and my current free time. Here are just a few selections from the dispute that touch on my personal experience. The committee should definitely review the ANI reports in the case request, which contain a lot of evidence, and also

1188:. Re-blocks an editor for making a bad unblock request during a previous block, quickly after the previous block had run its course, without giving the editor an opportunity to respond to the decline of the unblock request. Block is widely criticized by other editors, and is only begrudgingly lifted. 3342:

I've little to add about Portalspace specifics, which for me is somewhat of a playground in another galaxy compared to what I normally do in Knowledge, but I'm sure, as in, not a shred of doubt, that BHG does excellently in that universe, and is indeed the kind of editor we need for Portalspace, if

788:

in question actually contain zero evidence, merely over-passionate arguments. NA1K had been arguing to the effect that while WP:POG can no longer claim to be a formal guideline, it still has an advisory function (like an essay). Admittedly NA1K didn't word it that clearly, yet it was rather bizarre

740:

Like BD2412 I feel it would greatly hurt the project to lose BHG as an editor or admin. She's made over 1.5 million edits, is fiercely intelligent, cultured, and is sometimes helpful and kind. Yet she does seem to get over passionate on some topics. Possibly leading to a tunnel vision effect, where

4442:

That is why I have been slow to write evidence, and have not engaged in detailed diff-farming. When faced with such widespread antics such as NA1K's bluster, or Moxy's repetition of counter-factual follies at multiple venues, or AmericanAir88's readiness to testify the demonstrably false assertion

4044:

The 1st sentence is clearly untrue (unless perhaps the meaning of the word "call" is twisted). The 2nd sentence is incorrect (and Mj probably knew it was incorrect) - and misleading (e.g. even if those editors who were doing gnome work had watchlisted the main portal page they probably wouldn't be

3096:

I should also resolve a misunderstanding. I have occasionally opined that a portal "looks good". I mean that its scope, mechanics and accuracy seem adequate. Those words have been misinterpreted to imply that I enjoy the visual appearance and consider other aspects unimportant. That was not my

2863:

Featured portal candidates often underwent a peer-review process (formally or informally) where major concerns with content were ironed out prior to the formal featured review. Several featured portal reviewers considered utility as an introduction to the area, originality, topic balance including

2074:

BHG obstructs portals from being maintained, expanded or improved. On 12 October 2019, BHG performed mass reversions of many portals I had been working on, many over the course of months, in a rapid, drive-by, knee-jerk, fashion using a copy/paste rationale, all in one day. See the table, listings

637:

4. Not a role model for non-admins. Administrators are meant to be examples of Wikipedias who excel in the pilars and understand all policies. They are meant to cooperate and help build an encyclopedia. BHG being able to commit activities I mention above is not what an Admin stands for or what ANY

4438:

After 14 years editing Knowledge, I find it very hard to persuade myself that it there is any point in continuing to volunteer my time to a project which indulges the sort of low-competence/high-bluster antics displayed by NA1K and some other editors who have given evidence here. When faced with

4434:

I joined Knowledge to build an encyclopedia, and I expect to work with editors who act in good faith, are willing to acknowledge errors, and who welcome critical debate. For 13 years, in wide range range of forums and topics, I have found just that. But in portals discussions I have confronted a

3410:

There are also some anti-portal arguments which have stuck, namely that they're "fun," "fun to create" and "technically neat:" I simply find portals to be a good navigational tool which also highlights featured content. They're not "fun" at all, they're rather difficult to put together. Also, the

930:

specifically states that massive content changes that are difficult to revert and justified by already being carried out is unacceptable. The thing is, NA1k clearly implemented his "black box" format without formally obtaining consensus. Regardless of whether it was "sneaky" or not, BHG dissented

3587:

Both sides have become entrenched leading to sometimes heated exchanges and talking past each other, but I have failed to see any evidence of statements by Northamerica1000, Moxy, Certes, or Kusma in the various debates which are remotely equivalent to BrownHairedGirl's persistent denigration of

4407:

The problem here is and remains that portals have become the playground of editors who do not demonstrate effective skills either in building portals or or analysing the, and who resent critical debate. The most extreme example by far is NA1K, whose repeated inability to acknowledge the abysmal

2766:. I later apologized to her over the hacking misunderstanding, and we have closely collaborated since early August at hundreds of portal MfD's. We have also closely collaborated to clean up the empty categories, long un-carried-out delete decisions, and other debris left behind by portal MfD's: 688:

I have no intention of digging around for further evidence. Others might feel compelled to do so. I do not believe that it benefits the project as a whole to lose BrownHairedGirl either as an editor or as an administrator, but some measure may be required to bar further activity in the vein of

4468:

would be inoperable if that was the case. I have now have little faith in the ability of Knowledge's processes to sustain the principle that we are here to build an encyclopedia, that this requires competence including the ability to acknowledge error and to recognise the limits of one's own

3488:

As seen demonstrated many times on-this page we have an admin that does not have the objectivity to debate anyone in a reasonable manner when it comes to portals. Lack of civility even if they may be right on some points should not be tolerated - especially by an admin representing the admin

3278:

for more than a decade. I agree that the history is correct. This guideline had never actually been approved by the community, but was widely used as if it had been approved by the community. In the middle of 2019, some editors began noting that it had never been ratified. I submitted a

968:

I want to apologize for shortening the quotes, but there is a word limit. Please check all quotes for correctness and look at the corresponding context to get the whole picture. These quotes are from 5 different discussion pages related to portals in 2019 alone. This list is not meant to be

744: 1015:"Note that the comment above by Knowledgekid87 is a blatant lie: i.e. it is a statement which is demonstrably untrue, was known by Knowledgekid87 to be untrue, and made with the intent of deception." (Note: please also note the editing summary: "→‎Portal:Golf: note another portalista lie") 684:, which are worth examining. I do believe that she has toned down her invective following these discussions, but still evinces a tendency to view such disagreements through an ill-fitting moral lens in which those who think differently are harshly characterized as dishonest or incompetent. 833: 4517:

Place argument and diffs which support your assertion; for example, your first assertion might be "So-and-so engages in edit warring", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits to specific articles which show So-and-so engaging in edit warring.

2215:

BHG asks the same questions on multiple discussion pages, and when a user doesn't respond at each one of them, they then say they're being ignored. This has occurred even when BHG is aware that a response has been provided. For example, the user questioned my citing of page views

2232:. Users should not have to follow another user around everywhere to see if they are being continuously maligned. BHG has used this tactic deliberately to smear my reputation, and doesn't seem interested in my actual responses. Another direct example of this problem exists at ANI 2123:

This is all very concerning, because BHG is one of the top nominators of portals for deletion, and in the process of reverting any and all improvements to portals, the user acted to gratify their preference for the deletion of most portals, which the user has previously stated:

1601: 3082:: a civil, reasoned opinion that an otherwise good page should not be deleted simply for lack of incoming links; hardly the sort of conduct for which we drag editors to ArbCom. I deny the accusation that I treat portals as a playground, for which no evidence was presented. 3306: 803: 3588:

editors with whom she disagrees. Her describing them as liars, idiots, unintelligent, and incompetent is amply demonstrated in the diffs by other editors here. It completely crosses the line and makes any kind of reasoned discussion about portals or compromise impossible.

3371: 1046: 983:" the exceptionally poor writing skills which Moxy has displayed in all the discussions I have seen, it is probably a blessing that Moxy puts their efforts into defending the indefensible chunks of portalspace rather than polluting articlespace with gobbledygook such as " 1643:

BHG has engaged in personal attacks to such an extreme level that I turned off receiving pings from them in my preferences some while back. All too often, their pings led to a barrage of attacks against me and others. Other users have also asked BHG to stop pinging them:

4175:

When the deletion of the automated spam portals was complete, the editors who had learnt how scrutinise the complex portals then moved on the many other abysmal portals, and brought them to MFD. This brought organised resistance from the dwindling crew of portals fans.

4261:

NA1K's complaints are all about their sustained misconduct being directly challenged, rather than about the substance of their disruption of MFDs, and their abysmal work on portals. There is no acknowledgement by NA1K of their abysmal work on multiple portals, e.g.

4187:. If the arbitrators believe that such objections to reasoned analysis are well-founded in policy, then I invite ArbCom to assist making a summary finding to that effect, in which case I will promptly withdraw entirely from en.wp, thereby saving us all a lot of time. 1294:

was never really written as a guide to MFDs, and an approach to make it a formal guideline failed), leading to ad hoc guidelines being created by portal MFD regulars, but never turned into real guidelines. Many arguments both on the keep or delete side tend to be

4066:

That's blunt (and not the words I would have used), but in wp discussions we can't rely on other editors understanding subtle hints so being blunt should be a much lesser "sin" than being dishonest (or being reckless about whether the statements one's making are

3197:

resulted in a moratorium on the creation of portals. The reasons for the creation of thousands of portals were never clearly stated, but it is clear that some editors consider creating portals to be fun, and some editors think that portals are technically neat.

2668: 4526:

Place argument and diffs which support the second assertion; for example, your second assertion might be "So-and-so makes personal attacks", which should be the title of this section. Here you would show specific edits where So-and-so made personal attacks.

4498:

1010:"If your comprehension was that poor, it would make your comment an unintentional untruth rather than a deliberate untruth. However, the fact remain that regardless of whether you are confused or mendacious, your keep vote is based on an untrue statement." 2720:

will show. Both Certes and Kusma are ignoring the spirit of the above consensus about ending aesthetic-only valuations of portals and the consensus reached in many hundreds of MfD's about the usefulness of page views, as they use portal space to have fun.

2753:

and initially clashed over many longevity CfD's because I didn't know what I was doing, as can be seen. We further clashed over longevity matters, which a troll worsened by creating a hacking dispute, which resulted in me leaving Knowledge for awhile and

3380:

is a very good example and outside of the MfD where most of the discussion/negativity occurred. In this discussion, there were a number of editors interested in improving the portal, and I made an attempt to identify each of the points BHG brought up

3241: 2145:

they performed the drive-by, rapid-fire reversions, not before. The user has cited WP:FAITACCOMPLI, but this does not hold water: I have been working on many of these for months, but admittedly not all of them. Others have also disagreed, such as

806:

and clicking on a few of the portals to confirm the accuracy.) So it's a bit of a stretch to describe NA1K's improvements as even a minor breach of WP:FAIT, let alone an "extraordinarily huge" one. That description could more fairly describe BHGs

599: 2111: 3614:

BrownHairedGirl and at least one other vocal editor dismiss portals as "playgrounds" and by implication, those who work on them as children. Ditto referring to them as mere "hobbies" which have no place on Knowledge, as if portal editors are

865: 2920: 4205:

Knowledge is an encyclopedia. Its contents are subject to a process of continued improvement, which requires critical analysis. Many of the editors defending portals appear unable and/or unwilling to engage in that process. See e.g.

2640:

It greatly unbalanced the POV of dozens of portals in hostile takeovers NA1K hid from all other interested parties (e.g. associated WikiProjects), including in their generic edit summaries on the portals, until called out by BHG. At

1040:"What on earth is wrong with you? What are you trying to achieve by continually misrepresenting both the guideline and the discussion? Your campaign of deceit and misrepresentation is is completely transparent, and it is shameless." 3582: 2937:. Many more portals were created, some on narrow topics and containing errors, but almost all were soon deleted. The deletion process then turned to existing portals. Early MfDs correctly targeted the worst portals but relied on 2735: 528:

Throughout this entire conflict, the user BrownHairedGirl has exhibited bad behavior through harassment and mass reverting. Most of the harassment is targeted at the user Northamerica1000, a user who is trying to improve portals.

4447:, I am led to believe that some sort of tipping point has been reached in at least part of Knowledge's editor base, where hostility to critical analsyis has gained critical mass. Sadly, this seems to extend even to some admins: 3149: 3361: 3249:

engages in extensive hasty updates to portals that are being nominated for deletion. These edits make the portals under discussion moving targets, and difficult to evaluate as to whether they serve an encyclopedic purpose.

2828:

BHG is a selfless, talented, and forgiving editor who has demonstrated an ability to turn unproductive (and dare I say nasty) relationships into close, productive ones for Knowledge. That is who the evidence shows she is.

655: 2499: 3212: 2205: 1548: 3430: 2851: 2730: 2441:

As I'll quickly run out of diffs if I keep that up I'll just note the other AN/ANI threads in hopes that the arbitrators will look at the many examples of conduct with-in that points to issues in the portals space:

1269:

and many more). The counterclaim was that supporters of interpretation (B) ignored maintenance concerns. I thought it could be beneficial to separate the "broadness" and the "maintenance" requirements. My update to

820: 3755: 2204:. It can also be said that an implied consensus already exists for using transclusion templates, because many portals that I have not contributed significantly to are already using them, such as those listed here: 1239: 3259: 4423:

This whole saga has been a sustained effort by a small crew of portal fans to defend by any means their huge collection of abysmal, abandoned portals, and the abysmal quality of the efforts of NA1K to indulge in

1166: 889: 2763: 2210: 3957: 2713: 1892: 1233: 988:"It is a waste of the community's time for a linguistically-challenged "editor" to be free to unilaterally start to waste the community's time with this sort of straw man game." (Note: referring to User:Moxy) 958: 862: 2115: 2161: 644: 3119: 2488: 2058: 801:

NA1K's improvements were executed over a period of several weeks, largely including talk page comments, and multiple individual edits to each portal (This can be quickly verified by looking at the tables

3493:

the community at large does not agree with the statements about being "sneaky, lying , no talk started, etc.." and has fixed the so called "black box problem" that was not understood by most - even

3192:

and other editors (acting as a task force) created thousands of low-quality portals by automation in the second half of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, before an otherwise inconclusive discussion at

2202: 1819: 3018: 2118: 3440: 2838: 1379:, the only one portal I have really worked on, also belongs in this list. In any case, all of these are serious attempts at presenting Knowledge content, inviting people to read and to contribute. — 3236: 2261: 4154:

process which focused almost entirely on presentation, and almost never even considered the selection of articles. I have found no FP review which examined the portal by a checklist of criteria.

1004: 936: 789:

that BHG seems to read his reasonable argument as evidence of dishonestly. Every other statement I've seen alleging bad faith by the pro editors is either evidence free, or equally unconvincing.

522: 3179: 1613:, many users have already directly stated that BHG has been committing highly unacceptable conduct violations, including Moxy, Mark Schierbecker, Knowledgekid87, Kusma, Certes, Hecato (also see 1115: 3530: 3503:

forward. Also would be best we explain to newer editors that terms like "portal advocates" or " playground" shows bias on the posting editor side and is considered a personal attack by many.--

2910: 2271:

of the matter. Period. However, editors still refer to it because most portals remain based upon its suggestions. I have also further explained my stance regarding POG and deletion discussions

1355:

There are some rather good portals out there that still work well as "mini main pages", combining "showcase", "navigation", and "invite collaboration" elements to some degree. Examples include

1310:, a page where discussion between portal supporters and portal critics has been mostly productive and de-personalised. (Discussion may seem to have stopped, but in my view that is just because 3490: 3002: 2994: 2663: 932: 861:

was (I believe) one of the first community discussions calling into question the usefulness of portals in general, it wasn't until the massive portalspam frenzy was addressed that there were

704: 565: 2716:

ended the abandoned playground practice of giving comprehensive endorsements to certain portals, overwhelmingly on aesthetic value only grounds as any reading of the analysis at a FP review

1224:

Portals were created sometime in 2005, as topic specific mini Main Pages. Many portals did age poorly and were unmaintained for years, bringing the entire namespace in disrepute, leading to

4304:. There has been much criticism of that comment, but while my choice of words was harsh, I stand by the substance: that NA1K's work was not that of a competent editor acting in good faith. 4241:

caused long dramas due their failure to understand very basic statistics. NA1K posted the total pageviews for a period, rather than the daily averages used by every other editor. See e.g.

1201: 3932:

My proposal: "It also doesn't seem common sense/IAR to delete to this non-portal regular. An essay which organizes the deletion thoughts would perhaps be a helpful reference to outsiders."

3609: 3534: 3283:

to ratify it, which instead resulted in a failure to ratify the guidelines, which were then downgraded to a failed proposal. As a result, there are no guidelines for portals other than

3144: 3388:

This is in addition to the large number of personal attacks BHG levied mostly at NA1k but also at anyone who had a different opinion on portals, which are all evidenced above, such as

537:

are common as well. In the recent ANI, BHG created a section called "NA1K is gaming the system again". The name calling and verbal abuse of NA1K is present through other edits such as

3995: 3478: 3393: 884:

The only thing I agree with here is the fact that it was an overreaction, but again, it's time to look at the bigger picture. While NA1k certainly wasn't "lying", his arguments about

103: 1330:. BHG's confrontational approach to portals and especially her personalising of many issues feels like bullying, and has at times significantly decreased my enjoyment of Knowledge. — 593: 3043:, I had already assisted throughout the preceding year by creating and maintaining that Lua software which allows portals to avoid content forks. Editors not involved with portals 2848:

I don't recall ever participating in arbitration before, and as I've been avoiding portal discussions since May for reasons ably summarised by Kusma I was planning to sit this out.

1537: 3920:"... since we aren't arguing within any guidelines here, there's no 'statutes' we can fall back on, so instead of simplifying the argument ... we get drawn into long tangents ..." 3548: 3644: 3526:

to featured status in 2009 and have been one of its principal maintainers for the past 10 years. My direct involvement in the present Portal controversy has been fairly minimal:

1140: 3552: 2182:

The user has repeatedly engaged in the unilateral dictation of their instruction creep as demands that must be met, sometimes reverting portal improvements when they are not.

1813: 1734: 4488: 3962: 3889:

In addition to no guidelines, there is seemingly not even developed essays on portals, perhaps explaining the walls of text posted for MfD !votes (that overwhelm non-regulars)

3620: 3446: 1476:

and pattern of ongoing, extremely uncivil behavior toward me and other portal editors. Over the course of many months, BHG has continuously violated multiple conduct policies

681: 676:, to suggest that she refrain from characterizing editors with whom she has policy disagreements as liars. These discussions generally arose in response to statements made in 3184: 905:

NA1k claimed that POG could still be used as an advisory essay despite being a failed proposal, yet beforehand...in his vote in the aforementioned RfC, he called POG's lead "

4340:

In the same section, NA1K claims that I objected both to the use of content forks in portals, and of transclusions. Not so: I repeatedly supported th use of transclusieons

3743:

An article should be assessed based on whether it has a realistic potential for expansion, not how frequently it has been edited to date. Remember that there is no deadline.

1909:

users directly stated that BHG needed to immediately stop violating conduct policies such as making personal attacks, acting uncivilly and engaging in battleground conduct:

785: 782: 550: 546: 98: 4314: 3764: 3352:), I don't really see any exaggeration in BHG's qualification of behaviour by other editors, when she's confronted with some rather egregious examples of such behaviour. -- 2654:'s nom describes in detail how poor NA1K's update was. An editor with such conduct does not have the competence or judgement to participate in portal space constructively. 2171: 4037:- "I didn't call them maintainers. Simply many of them are highly active editors likely watching the page, who would be able to stop vandalism and make small corrections." 3604: 3560: 2977: 2706: 2698: 2637: 2633: 2096: 408: 3563:. This latter one was so unpleasant, that I was basically driven off participating in any future discussions on improving portals, like several other experienced editors. 3207: 1658: 4117: 2818: 2802: 2461: 1437: 1422: 1041: 1026: 1021: 999: 2693: 2690: 2686: 1285: 1219: 538: 4234: 4091: 3752: 3629: 3596: 2822: 2717: 2541: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2509: 2284: 445: 277: 4321: 4128: 3599:

is a microcosm of the problem (my first and only interaction with her). BHG continually bludgeoned participants who disagreed with her, including me. I finally wrote

3556: 2190: 1682: 1679: 1410: 1016: 1011: 554: 2476: 2125: 92: 81: 52: 4075:

I've also seen incorrect/misleading statements made in portal related discussions I've been involved in; it make's it very difficult to have a sensible discussion.

1685: 1058:

From various MfDs. I have highlighted comment blocks by user BrownHairedGirl indiscriminately to give a rough visual reference. Diffs are last edit before closure.

946: 2456: 2239: 4242: 4170: 2750: 2217: 2107: 1854: 1345: 1317: 210: 51:

Any further edits made to this page may be reverted by an arbitrator or arbitration clerk without discussion. If you need to edit or modify this page, please go

3495: 1697: 1155: 1090: 765: 729: 4273:

NA1K's evidence here is so full of misrepresentations and counter-factuals that I don't have space here or time to rebut them all, but here are some examples:

3788: 2790: 2031: 2028: 2025: 4228:"Please bear in mind that portals should be about broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers" 3840: 3544:. Some members of the group went on to create literally thousands of poor-quality, hopelessly narrow portals which was the genesis of the current controversy. 768:

him to relaunch WikiProject Portals & hence move on to his overly optimistic mass creations. (See talk page for a more detailed timeline of the dispute.)

2786: 439: 3805:"You aren't making the case effectively about gaming the system, because all that can be seen is your anger, and not a technical explanation of the issues." 2421: 2004: 1694: 868:, which could theoretically be applied to the fact that users observing these portals called into question other portals like them as well (as described in 3724: 3567: 3296: 1449: 1036: 1031: 989: 984: 979: 87: 4056: 4034: 4019: 3971: 2193: 1648: 1181:. Blocks an editor for making an April Fool's joke outside of article space. Block is widely criticized by other editors, and is only begrudgingly lifted. 3793: 3512: 2954: 4296:

the sytem by creating a smokescreen of FUD to obscure fact that without discussion or notification or transparecy, they had created a massive breach of

3349: 2050: 1780: 994: 4409: 4352: 4289: 4267: 3389: 3111: 3044: 2702: 2158:

process, making it impossible for portals to be expanded or improved, which further reinforces their preconceived notions that most should be deleted.

2016: 1127: 1125: 1123: 1121: 896: 4231: 3879: 3719: 3623: 2961:

in which two thirds of established portals disappeared within a year. All protest was bludgeoned away, leading to uncivil personal conflicts between

2373:

and suggests NA1K "need to desist from defending this flood of portalspam." and is "at best reckless; at worst, it was wilful disregard of consensus"

1676: 4417: 4207: 2642: 576: 403: 3933: 3926: 3921: 3777: 3770: 3761: 4281:. In reality, in each case I was trying to uphold established consnensus-building processes. For example, one of portals which I had reverted was 4101: 3909: 3904: 3899: 3865: 3860: 3855: 3827: 3825: 3823: 3821: 3819: 3626: 2950: 2798: 1988: 1794: 1688: 1249: 1096: 779: 530: 435: 231: 223: 70: 4217: 4211: 3890: 3541: 2047: 1969: 1966: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1951: 1948: 1945: 1942: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1927: 1924: 1921: 1916: 1910: 1878: 1851: 1797: 1304: 772: 584: 558: 534: 3500: 2814: 2794: 2674: 2013: 1991: 1902: 1845: 1755: 1752: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1740: 1737: 1725: 1715: 1691: 1307: 1258: 972: 893: 4332: 3264: 2864:

regional/language bias, breadth of coverage, tone, relevance, accessibility, currency and other non-aesthetic considerations. See eg reviews of

2177: 1327: 4413: 4263: 4245: 4184: 4097: 3947: 3522:

I'm primarily a content editor. In my 13 years on Knowledge, I've created over 700 articles on opera and arts-related subjects. I helped bring

2810: 2806: 2505: 2022: 2019: 1848: 1761: 1645: 1454: 1404: 3600: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2771: 2767: 2629: 2130:. Keeping portals in an inferior state makes deletion easier to obtain, whereas improved portals are typically more difficult to get deleted. 1994: 1857: 1832: 1829: 1703: 1700: 1267: 1020:"because NA1K is a shamelessly deceitful serial liar", "calculated mendacity in which NA1K is engaging here cannot be mistaken as accidental" 4133:

portals have become detached from content creation and from WikiProjects, and are now largely the domain of editors who specialise in portals

4122: 4078: 2843: 2272: 2253: 2233: 2147: 1913: 1871: 1800: 808: 794: 677: 377: 3106: 3091: 2989: 2229:), yet long afterward, BHG acted like they never saw my post on their talk page, complaining months later about an already resolved matter: 1887: 1884: 1881: 1803: 1394: 1264: 4521: 4512: 4451:

even went so far as to give me my only block in 14 years for challenging the good faith and competence of another editor, asserting that I

4248: 3064: 1824:

BHG has a very poor habit of making negative, attacking armchair proclamations about how they perceive the intelligence of other users:

1323: 1261: 1236:, which was started by BHG. NA1k noticed a flaw in the nomination, told BHG about it, she fixed it, everybody thanked each other nicely. 227: 3845: 3654: 3366: 3332: 2858:

the abandoned playground practice of giving comprehensive endorsements to certain portals, overwhelmingly on aesthetic value only grounds

517: 397: 242: 220: 65: 29: 4435:

sustained pattern of poor skills and hostility to critical analysis, and it has left me deeply disillusioned with Knowledge as a whole.

3385:. However, BHG continued to block the consensus-building process - see my comment at 02:25 on 4 November trying to gauge the consensus. 3343:

its dynamics is gliding (currently at a fast pace apparently) towards a walled garden enterprise. Also, BHG is an editor who is sure to

2427: 2418: 2412: 2393: 2374: 2371: 2364: 2361: 2355: 2353: 2350: 2345: 2343: 2338: 2319: 2317: 2315: 1213: 3517: 2494: 2275:. Also of note is that BHG noticeably appears to never castigate delete !voters at MfD who refer to aspects of POG after its demotion. 735: 478: 430: 368: 287: 215: 4493: 4161:

was tagged as a guideline for years, but the portal fans had it delisted when it was applied to support deletion of junk portals: see

3754:

I explained that the errors were fixed and that "'Four never-updated entries' is a red herring, unless there is something out-of-date"

3577: 2466: 3435: 1399: 393: 3005:

with Twinkle. This is far from being a symmetrical dispute between two groups who need to be admonished equally. It is verging on

2230: 4151: 3325:

who has demonstrated an ability to turn unproductive (and dare I say nasty) relationships into close, productive ones for Knowledge

3039:, accompanied by a diff in which I mention fixing three portals which caused Lua errors. Although cleaning up other editors' work 2755: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2415: 1161: 1070: 504: 373: 4253: 2080: 1673: 1280: 383: 363: 246: 4429: 4327: 3632: 2825:

was cast at one MfD by the portal's creator. This is all thanks to the portal evaluation and nom writing skills BHG taught me.

2174: 1809: 1722: 1709: 1706: 3009:

of the Portal: namespace. Stewardship is welcome, but not when that steward's clear objective is to delete most of the pages.

1109: 750: 388: 301: 282: 4320:

sanctions without any attempt to engage the relevant Wikiprojects, and failed to even meet their own simplistic criteria (see

2983: 2294:

I've noticed that there hasn't been a lot of evidence submitted. That's not because there isn't any. For instance at just the

2128: 2037: 2034: 1864: 1768: 1728: 1532:

Conversely, improving portals on Knowledge is not deviant, wrong or improper, and is congruent with building an encyclopedia.

1083: 351: 4483: 3649: 3574: 3301: 2471: 2451: 2199: 1469: 1418: 1176: 422: 313: 3704: 3698: 3692: 3686: 3680: 3674: 3668: 3884: 3763:

I explained that someone fixed it, so "nobody" is incorrect, and the lack of portal guideline makes for a "kangaroo court".

2915: 2446: 2265: 2227: 2207:. This implied consensus has been strengthened per the obvious overall support for transclusion use in portals at the RfC. 2196: 1712: 963: 825: 650: 346: 4458: 4455: 3811: 3806: 2044: 2007: 1787: 1584: 1581: 1575: 1572: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1554: 1232:

but more visually attractive. In April 2019, a huge number of the quickly-created fully automated portals was deleted in

3425: 2993:

and similar. If no statement alone gives cause for concern then their sheer volume does – for dozens more examples, see

1610: 1276:(trying to state the fact that portals need maintenance and removing details about update schedules) was reverted by BHG 1206: 1186: 869: 669: 272: 201: 25: 2170:

and scolding on portal talk and discussion pages, making it difficult for any progress to occur. Some examples include:

714:

support proposals to desysop BrownHairedGirl. I believe that the concerns raised can be addressed with lesser measures.

4453:

fail to see that making judgements about other people's motives and questioning their intelligence is a personal attack

3483: 1350: 1277: 1274: 4502: 2544:, edits to make a very basic short response. The same type of halting behavior happens on portals themselves, such as 1179: 4213:, after about a dozen editors had failed to spot the problem ... but despite that evidence, the MFD was denoubced as 3592: 2224: 2221: 2053: 2010: 1997: 1981: 1838: 1835: 1777: 1771: 1731: 1541: 1441: 608:

1. Harassment. Plenty of evidence is prominent through diffs and this discussion. Targets other users. This violates

4010:: Lots of prominent editors with tens/hundreds of thousands of edits here, most probably watchlisting the page ... " 2781:. She also helped encourage and foster my skills at evaluating and nominating portals for deletion, as seen in this 2899:

is to request their deletion, feels typical of the hostile climate that made me walk away from portal discussions.

2885: 1064: 3023: 4286: 3225: 2714:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 138#RfC about marking the Featured portals process as .22historical.22

2295: 2093: 2090: 2087: 2084: 338: 178: 2508:, they re-made a long abandoned portal and inexplicably left a sub-page about a dead person the portal said was 1252:, where the debate between BHG and NA1k is already in full swing. It seems to be mostly about how to understand 619:. BHG does not reason properly as she erupts into poor judgement and accusations. She breaches multiple policies 3344: 2889: 2548:, where NA1K rapidly made reams of undiscussed updates without clarifying what, how, or why changes were made: 1515: 1322:

Several people have left portal-related discussion after finding interaction with BHG unpleasant, including me

1314:, who has moderated the discussion so far, is apparently on a break. I expect us to continue when SW returns). 1103: 542: 324: 267: 21: 1596: 1593: 1587: 1077: 660:

I have only one "argument", which is to restate my relevant comments from the discussion proposing this case:

2481: 2076: 1586:). However, four users then objected on the unblocking admin's talk page, stating that the block was proper: 1500: 834:

Rebuttal: Portal advocates have only occasionally presented credible arguments in portal deletion discussions

259: 2360:

Certes and willingness of portal creators to "clean up the mess created by the WikiProject and its members"

1303:. For an example how this plays out, here is an experienced editor arriving at their first ever portal MFD: 497: 309: 207: 4439:

this wall of half-truths and falsehoods, I lean to the conclusion that Mark Twain's advice may be right.

3660: 2865: 1590: 1390: 1341: 1279:, who claimed these changes were controversial but also seemed to oppose having an update schedule there 745:

There's been little wrong doing by pro portal editors; assertions to the contrary collapse under scrutiny

533:

is an example of harassment on Northamerica1000. Northamerica is frequently a target as differences like

319: 237: 2289: 1602:

BrownHairedGirl has performed ongoing continuous personal attacks, uncivil behaviors and the casting of

879:"Those three diffs are of edits where I provide evidence to show that NA1K was systematically lying ..." 773:"Those three diffs are of edits where I provide evidence to show that NA1K was systematically lying ..." 626:

by reverting other admin's edits. She reverts other users edits without consensus and does not consider

3357: 2869: 358: 4222:

By far the worst has been NA1K, whorepeatedly cherrypicked guidelines, and persisted when challenged.

3540:

every portal to this "improved" version unless the portal had a designated maintainer. I consequently

931:

from NA1k because she thought it needed to be formally discussed first, as she repeatedly affirmed in

4479: 4113: 3453:

by accusing him of dishonesty. Her posts in that discussion are littered with derisive terms such as

3292: 3255: 3232: 3203: 3175: 3140: 2975:... it is hard not to see a pattern emerging. The pre-emptive attack became a feature, for example: 2905: 1463: 3908:

BHG response: "if you choose to not even speed-read a numbered list of points, that is your choice."

1976:

comments at this ANI discussion, BHG has been repeatedly asked to desist elsewhere, for months now:

3986:. This portal was created ... by ... who also seems to have been its only significant contributor." 3331:

My evidence to support that is a long discussion I once had with another editor on BHG's talk page

3952: 2881: 1248:

I didn't pay any attention for a few months, mainly because of Framgate. Next thing I noticed was

3773: 3417: 3336: 3073: 3055:, have copied it to several other wikipedias, and are pursuing a WMF grant to extend it further. 3040: 2946: 1623: 1300: 490: 145: 56: 3445:

BHG's mistreatment of NA1K has been discussed in detail, but let's not overlook her behavior at

3376:

The difficulty with this type of case is there's lots of potential evidence, but the discussion

3226:

https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive307#Thousands_of_Portals

3220:

These portals were discussed at length by the community between February 2019 and April 2019 at

1559:

Prior to the block, several users asked BHG on their talk page to stop making personal attacks:

673: 4144: 4139:) have collectively demonstrated low competence in maintaining and managing portals, e.g. they 3640: 3189: 2834: 2726: 2659: 2110:), most users in the "Should BrownHairedGirl's mass portal reversions be reverted..." section ( 2064: 1520: 1510: 1052: 927: 919: 878: 847: 816: 761: 710:

In light of certain other statements posted on this page, I would like to make clear that I do

3399:

I also don't know if anyone has mentioned BHG's mass reversion of NA1k's edits through gaming

2978:

It will be interesting to see which portalistas deploy which of the usual bogus-keep arguments

2248:

after it's demotion from being a guideline page, yet BHG engaged in the exact same behaviors,

689:

addressing the character of disagreeing parties, rather than the subject of the disagreement.

3854:"This is almighty mess: an admin has sneakily and avoidably built a massively POV portal ..." 3474: 3353: 3246: 3167: 2966: 2942: 2873: 2280: 1617: 1445: 197: 17: 4179:

The nature of their resistance is well-summarised in their own evidence to this case. e.g.:

4143:

collaborated in the creation of about 4,000 spam portals, mostly created at rapid speed by @

3573:

However, I've observed many of the other interactions which have resulted in this case, e.g.

3382: 3078: 2971: 1282:. I stopped trying to improve the guideline afterwards, as I do not enjoy arguing with BHG. 4470: 4444: 4374: 4342:

provided that a linked list of the transcluded pages is displayed on the face of the portal

4109: 4080: 3864:"It's a very sad indicator of the state of portal-space that an actual admin describes ..." 3288: 3251: 3228: 3199: 3171: 3159: 3151: 3136: 3128: 3113: 2962: 2930: 2900: 2896: 2741: 2646: 2352:

Twice writes Transhumanist has not been acting in good faith and supplies supporting diffs

2257: 1633: 1603: 1505: 1485: 1459: 1225: 1197: 858: 757: 665: 623: 605:

Reasons for Desysop of BrownHairedGirl (Copied from my ANI proposal). Diffs provided above:

583:

sums it up well. The behavior is unacceptable in discussions and I have been the target of

120: 3663:(WP:POG) was marked as a guideline for over a decade until recently. Here is its history: 3372:

BrownHairedGirl has gamed the system and engaged in battleground behaviour in Portal Space

2877: 8: 3072:

repeats the claim that I prioritise page quality over page views. I repeat that this is

3031:

judges that I support portals. I agree, though even in the selected quotes I state that

3006: 2998: 1620: 1035:"that's a blatant lie (as in something which you stated it when you knew to be untrue)." 616: 609: 580: 569: 131: 2856:

However, I'd like to respond to Newshunter12's comment on the featured portal process: "

1436:(XNRs) were deletion reasons about 14 years ago. The root cause of this case could be a 1290:

One general problem with portal MFDs is the lack of applicable policies and guidelines (

1030:"Moxy, either you are either a congenital liar or you have a very poor grasp of facts." 4397:

by reverting NA1K's edits. False: I did not use admin tools for those reverts. I used

4317: 3738: 3735:

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for AfD.

3412: 3396:. As I mentioned on ANI once, this was so unpleasant it nearly drove me off Knowledge. 3033:

We should certainly delete portals which have too narrow a scope or are of poor quality

2895:

I'd also add, the tone of the remark I quote from, originating from someone whose only

1495: 1490: 1048: 639: 588: 140: 3965:

has been mentioned above by several editors critical of BHG. The relevant edits are:

1421:

sub-page. The redirect was deleted, and I reported the general issue on the WP:SPEEDY

4398: 3943: 3875: 3836: 3784: 3715: 3636: 3404: 3312: 3132: 3069: 2830: 2722: 2655: 2186: 2167: 2138: 853:

In this particular case, I think it's better to look at the bigger picture. While it

839: 812: 4308: 2426:

Accuses Legacypac "as having a penchant for scolding content creators on Knowledge"

4282: 4278: 4136: 3730: 3470: 3102: 3087: 3060: 3014: 2997:. Meanwhile, NA1K's valiant efforts to improve portals were undone. If some were 2349:

Strong support for "any other restraint on TTH, up to and including perma-siteban"

2151: 2068: 1553:

BHG continued their personal attacks and was blocked for them on 17 November 2019:

1525: 1151: 1136: 1051:

portal related discussions and makes participation unappealing to other users with

954: 724: 699: 627: 4131:, whch should be read as part of this evidence. The core issue is as noted there: 4022:- "Look at who you are calling maintainers. added which was immediately reverted 3307:

Additional evidence for "BrownHairedGirl, a valuable contributor to ... Knowledge"

3491:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1020#Portal updates reverted

1808:

BHG has also cast aspersions against me in areas I have not even contributed to:

1614: 1386: 1356: 1337: 1311: 1193: 167: 115: 4157:

Did not establish community connensus for the purpose or structure of portals.

2669:

Certes and Kusma both view portals as playgrounds, not useful encyclopedia tools

545:

is an example of the reverting that takes place. Additional evidence is through

4508:

before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person

4465: 4461: 4297: 4293: 4168:

1127 of the ~1400 remaining portals remain in Category:Unassessed Portal pages.

4105: 4087:

before using the last evidence template, please make a copy for the next person

3505: 3377: 3028: 2545: 2504:

NA1K has repeatedly added content to portals in a sloppy, haphazard manner. On

1668:

of BHG's ongoing various breaches of conduct policies; further examples exist:

1473: 1376: 1260:(although this is part of a large series of similar (templated?) delete votes: 631: 156: 126: 4334:: Australia, where I challenged the use of partisan canvassing of a discussion 3659:

Currently, there are no portal guidelines that debates can refer to. However,

3535:"There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals" 564:

The harassment has been noticed by the community, with a whole section titled

462: 4425: 4316:: Northern Ireland, where NA1K made widespread changes to an page subject to 4223: 4191: 4166:

Did not mainatain systematic assessment of portals. In May 2019 I noted that

4158: 3400: 3284: 3280: 3275: 3265: 2958: 2938: 2245: 2155: 2060: 1414: 1372: 1296: 1291: 1271: 1253: 1241: 1229: 885: 4230:, but NA1K repeatedly omitted the crucial second part of the sentence. e.g. 3810:

BHG response:"And NA1K's choice ... was just plain devious and manipulative"

2935:

a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time

1409:

I stumbled over a technical issue with the portal namespace in May 2019: An

466: 4448: 3939: 3871: 3832: 3780: 3747:

Should portals be different? One MfD was opened with the main rationale of

3711: 3693:"Update" and "Guideline" tags removed, tagged as guideline under discussion 3583:

BrownHairedGirl's persistent denigration of editors with whom she disagrees

3523: 3271: 3242:

Northamerica1000 Engages in Rescue Squadron Behavior with regard to portals

3221: 3214: 3194: 3163: 2762:. Months later, we clashed again over longevity matters and I called her a 1364: 1360: 4373:. Not so: calling out another editor's misconduct where it occurs in not 1625:), Lepricavark, AmericanAir88, Lightburst, WaltCip and Narutolovehinata5. 42: 3098: 3083: 3056: 3010: 2678: 2141:

for portal deletion based upon their preconceived notions. This occurred

1147: 1132: 950: 827: 715: 690: 2712:

There is also precedent for shutting down such playground behavior. The

575:

BHG isn't just harassing NorthAmerica, she harasses other users like in

3450: 2759: 2682: 2307:(18 replies in 13 threads - 1 duplicate !vote struck by another editor) 1381: 1368: 1332: 600:

BrownHairedGirl should be desysopped as the user violates admin conduct

162: 4195: 2133:

BHG has engaged in cherry picking policies to excuse their reversions

908: 186: 151: 4288:

to the status quo ante. The reality can be seen in he discussion at

3053:

one of the best ideas I've seen to improve Knowledge in recent years

2185:

At MfD discussions, the user has based deletion in part upon portal

1549:

BrownHairedGirl was blocked on 17 November 2019 for personal attacks

3958:

Some of the allegations made against BHG don't stand up to scrutiny

464: 4329:: Australia, where nearly all my points were upheld in discusison. 4096:

I've not had much to do with this portal matter but just read the

3772:

BHG made arguments about needing volunteers that to me go against

3394:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Australian rules football

4129:

WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals#Statement_by_BrownHairedGirl

4127:

Much I need to say about this case is in my opening statement at

3313:#BrownHairedGirl, a valuable contributor to portals and Knowledge 2645:, a portal NA1K re-made was deleted yet again for being junk and 2211:

BrownHairedGirl interrogates inappropriately in attempts to smear

1577:. BHG did not heed these requests, and was subsequently blocked. 993:"WARMONGER Certes ", " The Transhumanist (TTH) and his cronies " 978:" Moxy's deep deficiency in logic and of reading comprehension " 888:

were logical fallacies regardless. The fact of the matter is, he

764:'s own words, the failed proposal to mass delete portals is what 3798:

BrownHairedGirl makes personal attacks at inappropriate forums.

2736:

BrownHairedGirl, a valuable contributor to portals and Knowledge

1893:

BrownHairedGirl does not heed advice of others to stop attacking

4309:

BrownHairedGirl orders what can and cannot be done with portals

3619:

not valid contributors deserving respect in disagreements e.g.

2162:

BrownHairedGirl orders what can and cannot be done with portals

467: 3757:

BrownHairedGirl supported the nominator's deadline rationale:

3447:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ohio State University

1628:

BHG continuouosly badgers and derides me and other users, yet

1005:

BrownHairedGirl calls other editors liars/mendacious/deceitful

682:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ohio State University

656:

BrownHairedGirl needs to temper her communications with others

468: 2099:. This ongoing ownership makes improving portals impossible. 1820:

BrownHairedGirl attacks by proclaiming users as unintelligent

1146:

Note: Updated the 4th image. Accidentally marked too much. --

4059:- "that is a staggeringly dishonest, bad faith summary. ..." 3898:"The wall of text above this comment is not appreciated ..." 2819:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Special operations

664:

For full disclosure, I have twice initiated discussions on

3566:

In the September 2019 Village Pump proposal, I once again

3274:

has provided a history of the document that served as the

2420:

supports fairly broad set of possible portal topics (e.g.

1632:

to qualify their claims, in direct, constant violation of

937:

recently agreed to start discussing the "black box" format

3859:"Thryduulf is an admin, and should know a lot better ..." 2298:

thread you have (when looking at only involved parties):

838:

This is a firm rebuttal to each respective point made by

4363: 4351:. This is an inversion of the truth, whch I set out at 3850:

BHG holds other admins to a higher standard as editors:

2949:: an argument to avoid). The numerous examples include 2500:

NorthAmerica1000's sub-par contributions to portal space

2363:(after this Certes does show willingness to do clean-up 1167:

Background information on blocks made by BrownHairedGirl

3316: 3124:

I agree with and will refer to the evidence entered by

2852:

Response to Newshunter12 re the featured portal process

2751:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 December 7

2226:), and also provided more information at my talk page ( 3213:

Discussion of the Thousands of Low-Quality Portals at

3037:

after this Certes does show willingness to do clean-up

2921:

BrownHairedGirl bludgeons and discourages debate with

892:

the adoption of POG as an official guideline, and yet

3903:"I didn't read every point in your wall of text, ..." 2411:

Opposed to mass deletion, wants "case-by-case basis"

848:"The disputes began with" The Transhumanist (TTH)..." 751:"The disputes began with" The Transhumanist (TTH) ... 3768:

I also sympathise with the 'kangaroo court' argument

3699:

Under discussion removed, tagged as information page

1429:does not cover the portal namespace, among others. 4324:), and objected to challenges to their recklessness 4045:

watching the portal's subpages e.g. for vandalism).

2957:. Later MfDs relied on early results, leading to a 2342:Core concern seems to be time spent to cleanup ex: 2095:), and at thirteen more at the portal pages listed 811:mass reverts, which were all done on a single day. 612:

and is against Knowledge policy through the pilars.

4383:. No evidence is offered in support of this claim 3390:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport 3333:here (which I call the "walled garden" discussion) 3323:BHG is a selfless, talented, and forgiving editor 2945:(applicable only to articles) and low page views ( 2703:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Christmas 2435:No participation by Moxy, ToThAc, and Newshunter12 2252:it was demoted, as demonstrated in my ANI comment 572:sums up the situation at the recent ANI very well. 4348: 3441:BHG has made aggressive accusations of dishonesty 2643:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Djibouti 2370:Is already "Tired of defending the indefensible" 1286:Portal MFDs are not governed by agreed upon rules 1220:Early portal deletions were not too controversial 1116:BrownHairedGirl insults the work of other editors 756:It's probably more accurate to say it began with 3542:listed myself there as Portal:Opera's maintainer 3120:Agreement with Evidence Entered by Other Parties 2785:, which led to eight comprehensive nominations ( 1250:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Armenia 920:"extraordinarily huge breach of WP:FAITACCOMPLI" 795:"extraordinarily huge breach of WP:FAITACCOMPLI" 3501:User talk:Scottywong/Portal guideline workspace 3499:that input from this "Arbitration" can move 3162:is of an evidentiary nature, and documents the 2675:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Monaco 1636:. This has been an ongoing serious problem for 1308:User talk:Scottywong/Portal guideline workspace 3097:intended meaning, and I regret the ambiguity. 1758:(directly misrepresents previous user comment) 523:BrownHairedGirl exhibits unacceptable behavior 3531:I opposed the wholesale deletion Portal space 3489:community and Knowledge itself. As seen at 2821:was SNOW delete). At my MfD's, only a single 2166:BHG engages in enormous levels of badgering, 903:But here's where the real contradiction lies: 678:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Golf 498: 4408:standard of their work (see portal MFDs for 4285:, where NA1K cites the diff where I reverted 4185:objects to my posting of detailed rationales 3449:. In that discussion, she repeated attacked 3403:, even though BRD clearly did not apply per 918:NA1K's improvements to ~100 portals were an 793:NA1K's improvements to ~100 portals were an 622:3. Reverting and edit warring. Violation of 4353:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport 4290:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport 4268:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Transport 4252:misrepresented guidelines (e.g. my reply at 3610:Persistent trivialisation of portal editors 2487:I'll conclude by noting that Legacypac was 2264:) and refer to my comment and links there: 1897:At the most recent ANI discussion, titled " 49:The Evidence phase for this case is closed. 2337:Presents timeline of dispute to that date 505: 491: 4302:NA1K is either an idiot or a liar or both 3547:I participated on 4 portal MFDs, !voting 3533:at the first RFC closed in April 2018 as 2984:drive-by portalistas who made this comedy 1655:Civility issues with User:BrownHairedGirl 1306:. Rules are currently being worked on at 949:for more evidence concerning this point. 566:Civility issues with User:BrownHairedGirl 4311:. But look at the examples NA!K cites: 4210:, where I demonstrated that it was spam 3963:The MFD for Portal:Ohio_State_University 3327:. That is who the evidence shows she is. 2267:. I was for POG's demotion based on the 1901:", that was closed on 18 November 2019 ( 4264:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ghana 3001:, they should be improved further, not 14: 4503:Evidence presented by {your user name} 4200:as "insults the work of other editors" 2106:" that was closed on 16 October 2019 ( 1538:temporary injunction regarding portals 1455:Evidence presented by Northamerica1000 4390:. Not so, and no evidence is offered. 4300:. That is what led me to write that 4123:Evidence presented by BrownHairedGirl 3759:Nobody wats to maintain ether portals 2941:(now recognised as not a guideline), 2844:Evidence presented by Espresso Addict 1657:” that was closed on 15 August 2019 ( 1419:Portal:Current events/2016 November 1 1244:meant and it was difficult to resolve 973:BrownHairedGirl insults other editors 912:"...? Sounds like a half-truth to me. 4215:ideologically-driven portal deletion 3319:(my emphasis added in what follows): 2897:apparent contribution to portalspace 1619:), SportingFlyer, Vermont (also see 947:Newshunter12's preliminary statement 278:Clarification and Amendment requests 37: 4358:Some other falsehoods in evidence: 4135:. Those editors (mostly active at 3367:Evidence presented by SportingFlyer 3339:" type of endeavours in Knowledge. 3317:#Evidence presented by Newshunter12 2990:a shamelessly deceitful serial liar 2414:, defends portals they've created 2392:Favors portals being cleaned up ex: 1536:Furthermore, BHG violated Arbcom's 1472:) (BHG) has engaged in a long-term 518:Evidence presented by AmericanAir88 35: 3518:Evidence presented by Voceditenore 3348:of these discussions myself (e.g. 2817:), all of which closed as delete ( 2495:Evidence presented by Newshunter12 2491:owing to portal related behavior. 2220:. I responded on their talk page ( 1609:At the main arbitration case page 736:Evidence presented by FeydHuxtable 36: 4536: 3436:Evidence presented by Lepricavark 2244:BHG has scolded for referring to 1583:) which led to a block reversal ( 1400:Evidence presented by 84.46.53.86 1318:Discussing with BHG is unpleasant 3999: 3975: 3751:along with a few fixable errors. 3185:Thousands of Low-Quality Portals 1162:Evidence presented by Tryptofish 1102: 1089: 1076: 1063: 185: 41: 4092:The MfD process is not reliable 3603:. Nevertheless, she kept it up 3035:. Barkeep goes on to say that 2290:Evidence presented by Barkeep49 2150:. In this process, BHG is also 1580:BHG posted an unblock request ( 2102:At the ANI discussion titled " 1516:Knowledge:Ownership of content 1172:judgment as an administrator. 13: 1: 4118:22:20, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3789:21:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3725:Deadlines and compulsory work 3720:20:09, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3650:Evidence presented by Bagumba 3645:16:03, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3568:opposed deleting portal space 3551:, commenting but not !voting 3513:12:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3479:01:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3431:22:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3362:06:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3302:Evidence presented by Francis 3297:23:21, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3260:04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3237:23:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3208:04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3180:23:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC) 3145:04:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3107:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3092:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3065:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 3049:a great feature - easy to use 3019:00:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 2987:were repeatedly described as 2911:03:52, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 2839:15:06, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 2749:and I met over categories at 2731:15:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 2664:13:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 2285:05:59, 19 December 2019 (UTC) 2077:User:Northamerica1000/Portals 1653:At the AN discussion titled “ 1501:Knowledge:No personal attacks 1450:15:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC) 1395:20:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 1346:21:48, 10 December 2019 (UTC) 959:22:58, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 939:, but the point still stands. 821:13:20, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 730:03:13, 17 December 2019 (UTC) 705:05:08, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 645:06:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC) 594:06:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC) 4457:... yet as I noted in reply, 3953:Evidence presented by DexDor 3794:NPAs at inappropriate forums 3675:Tagged "needs to be updated" 2969:, BHG and Moxy, BHG and me, 2916:Evidence presented by Certes 2705:, which ignored the obvious 2512:, and when called out, took 2240:BrownHairedGirl games WP:POG 2075:and specific information at 1240:There was disagreement what 1202:22:55, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 1156:17:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 1141:14:13, 1 December 2019 (UTC) 964:Evidence presented by Hecato 668:'s user talk page, archived 651:Evidence presented by BD2412 638:Wikipedian should be doing. 409:Conflict of interest reports 7: 4522:{Write your assertion here} 4513:{Write your assertion here} 4494:{Write your assertion here} 4489:00:00, 7 January 2020 (UTC) 3948:19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC) 3880:19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC) 3841:19:17, 5 January 2020 (UTC) 3669:Tagged as content guideline 3661:Knowledge:Portal/Guidelines 2189:existing as content forks ( 1207:Evidence presented by Kusma 899:on that failed proposal...? 804:in this ANI archive section 238:Search archived proceedings 10: 4541: 4395:Violation of WP:TOOLMISUSE 3484:Evidence presented by Moxy 2330:(18 replies in 10 threads) 1411:article namespace redirect 1216:is well worth looking at. 283:Arbitrator motion requests 4196:depicting my comments on 3705:Marked as failed proposal 2890:European military history 2404:(12 replies in 9 threads) 2059:BrownHairedGirl violates 1434:cross-namespace redirects 907:an illogical and bizarre 897:portal content selections 4381:does not reason properly 3597:Template:Featured portal 2385:(8 replies in 7 threads) 1774:(tells user to f*** off) 587:as well form the users. 4279:OWN, editwar and gaming 3126:and assertions made by 2104:Portal updates reverted 1432:Historical background, 1417:ended up on an obscure 1120:"rotten junk", "crud" 935:. Admittedly, NA1k has 4079:Evidence presented by 4008:Lots of of maintainers 3984:Lots of of maintainers 3329: 3315:, third subsection of 3190:User:The Transhumanist 3158:The statement made by 3112:Evidence Presented by 2892:, to list just a few. 2314:Supports portals. Ex: 1521:Knowledge:Edit warring 1234:this well-attended MfD 826:Evidence presented by 686: 3766:SportingFlyer wrote, 3321: 3247:User:Northamerica1000 3168:User:Northamerica1000 3150:Opening Statement by 2707:abandonment and decay 2092:), Portal:Transport ( 1540:on 17 December 2019: 1405:Portals can be abused 926:The information page 662: 479:Track related changes 339:Arbitration Committee 179:Knowledge Arbitration 18:Knowledge:Arbitration 4322:my statement of case 4190:Hecato demonstrates 3846:Admin accountability 3687:Disputed tag removed 3655:No portal guidelines 3345:call a spade a spade 3281:Request for Comments 3170:and other editors. 3160:User:BrownHairedGirl 3152:User:BrownHairedGirl 3129:User:BrownHairedGirl 3114:User:Robert McClenon 1630:never provides diffs 1506:Knowledge:Harassment 666:User:BrownHairedGirl 561:location for attack. 288:Enforcement requests 216:Guide to arbitration 137:Drafting arbitrators 4277:NA1K accuses me of 4208:MFD:Portal:Painting 3741:suggests for AfDs: 2677:, portal advocates 2417:later softening to 1664:The following is a 1621:User:Vermont/BHGANI 933:this ANI discussion 581:User:Vermont/BHGANI 570:User:Vermont/BHGANI 4443:that I engaged in 3801:On her talk page: 3681:Tagged as disputed 3593:the TfD discussion 3285:Using Common Sense 3076:. I stand by the 2995:this AN discussion 1496:Knowledge:Civility 1440:technical issue. – 1297:arguments to avoid 310:Contentious topics 208:Arbitration policy 4487: 4347:NA1K claims that 4145:The Transhumanist 3818:At a portal MFD: 3591:My experience at 3496:Browns proponents 3276:Portal Guidelines 3266:Portal Guidelines 3133:User:Newshunter12 3041:is not compulsory 2909: 2870:Freedom of speech 2168:instruction creep 2139:confirmation bias 2043:September 2019: 1814:entire discussion 1775: 1759: 515: 514: 482: 450: 320:General sanctions 268:All open requests 198:About arbitration 171: 160: 149: 135: 124: 107: 99:Proposed decision 96: 85: 74: 63: 62: 4532: 4478: 4476: 4474: 4283:Portal:Transport 4006: 4003: 4002: 3982: 3979: 3978: 3774:WP:NOTCOMPULSORY 3749:Neglected portal 3511: 3508: 3428: 3420: 3354:Francis Schonken 3081: 2992: 2986: 2980: 2974: 2947:WP:NOBODYREADSIT 2903: 2747: 2745: 2709:of the portal. 2652: 2650: 2422:air conditioning 2402:Northamerica1000 2283: 1863:September 2019: 1773: 1767:September 2019: 1757: 1106: 1093: 1080: 1067: 1047:BrownHairedGirl 809:"truly shocking" 722: 697: 615:2. Violation of 507: 500: 493: 481: 476: 469: 448: 404:Clerk procedures 396: 354: 325:Editor sanctions 302:Active sanctions 260:Open proceedings 230: 189: 175: 174: 165: 154: 143: 129: 118: 101: 90: 79: 68: 45: 38: 4540: 4539: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4531: 4530: 4529: 4524: 4515: 4505: 4496: 4472: 4471: 4292:: that NA1K is 4152:Featured portal 4125: 4094: 4084: 4081:Andrew Davidson 4004: 4000: 3980: 3976: 3960: 3955: 3887: 3848: 3796: 3729:With articles, 3727: 3657: 3652: 3612: 3585: 3549:"Delete" on one 3520: 3509: 3504: 3486: 3443: 3438: 3424: 3416: 3374: 3369: 3309: 3304: 3289:Robert McClenon 3269: 3252:Robert McClenon 3244: 3229:Robert McClenon 3218: 3200:Robert McClenon 3187: 3172:Robert McClenon 3156: 3137:Robert McClenon 3127: 3122: 3117: 3079:only diff cited 3077: 3026: 2988: 2982: 2976: 2970: 2927: 2918: 2901:Espresso Addict 2854: 2846: 2743: 2742: 2738: 2671: 2648: 2647: 2502: 2497: 2292: 2279: 2242: 2213: 2164: 2137:, to support a 2072: 2065:WP:Edit warring 1895: 1877:November 2019: 1822: 1793:November 2019: 1615:User:Hecato/BHG 1607: 1551: 1530: 1511:WP:BATTLEGROUND 1460:BrownHairedGirl 1457: 1407: 1402: 1357:Portal:Cheshire 1353: 1320: 1288: 1246: 1222: 1209: 1169: 1164: 1118: 1111: 1107: 1098: 1094: 1085: 1081: 1072: 1068: 1056: 1007: 975: 966: 928:WP:FAITACCOMPLI 836: 831: 747: 738: 716: 691: 658: 653: 602: 525: 520: 511: 477: 471: 470: 465: 455: 454: 453: 442: 425: 415: 414: 413: 400: 392: 380: 355: 350: 341: 331: 330: 329: 304: 294: 293: 292: 262: 252: 249: 234: 226: 204: 173: 50: 34: 33: 32: 12: 11: 5: 4538: 4523: 4520: 4514: 4511: 4504: 4501: 4495: 4492: 4405: 4404: 4403: 4402: 4391: 4384: 4377: 4362:AmericanAir88 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4330: 4325: 4305: 4259: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4250: 4203: 4202: 4188: 4173: 4172: 4164: 4155: 4148: 4124: 4121: 4106:Weather portal 4093: 4090: 4083: 4077: 4073: 4072: 4071: 4070: 4069: 4068: 4061: 4060: 4051: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4046: 4039: 4038: 4029: 4028: 4027: 4026: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 3990: 3989: 3988: 3987: 3959: 3956: 3954: 3951: 3936: 3935: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3901: 3886: 3883: 3868: 3867: 3862: 3857: 3847: 3844: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3795: 3792: 3726: 3723: 3708: 3707: 3701: 3695: 3689: 3683: 3677: 3671: 3656: 3653: 3651: 3648: 3611: 3608: 3584: 3581: 3571: 3570: 3564: 3555:and "Keep" on 3545: 3537: 3519: 3516: 3485: 3482: 3463:stream of lies 3442: 3439: 3437: 3434: 3373: 3370: 3368: 3365: 3308: 3305: 3303: 3300: 3268: 3263: 3243: 3240: 3217: 3211: 3186: 3183: 3155: 3154:Is Evidentiary 3148: 3125: 3121: 3118: 3116: 3110: 3074:sound practice 3025: 3022: 2943:WP:CONTENTFORK 2926: 2919: 2917: 2914: 2853: 2850: 2845: 2842: 2737: 2734: 2670: 2667: 2546:Portal:Moldova 2501: 2498: 2496: 2493: 2485: 2484: 2479: 2474: 2469: 2464: 2459: 2454: 2449: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2424: 2406: 2405: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2387: 2386: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2368: 2358: 2347: 2340: 2332: 2331: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2309: 2308: 2291: 2288: 2241: 2238: 2212: 2209: 2163: 2160: 2135:after the fact 2071: 2057: 2056: 2055: 2040: 2039: 2003:August 2019: 2000: 1999: 1984: 1983: 1974:In addition to 1894: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1874: 1873: 1870:October 2019: 1867: 1866: 1860: 1859: 1841: 1840: 1821: 1818: 1806: 1805: 1790: 1789: 1786:October 2019: 1783: 1782: 1764: 1763: 1718: 1717: 1606: 1600: 1550: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1529: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1482: 1474:smear campaign 1456: 1453: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1377:Portal:Germany 1352: 1349: 1319: 1316: 1299:, for example 1287: 1284: 1245: 1238: 1221: 1218: 1208: 1205: 1190: 1189: 1183: 1182: 1168: 1165: 1163: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1117: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1101: 1099: 1095: 1088: 1086: 1082: 1075: 1073: 1069: 1062: 1055: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1006: 1003: 1002: 1001: 996: 991: 986: 981: 974: 971: 965: 962: 943: 942: 941: 940: 915: 914: 913: 900: 875: 874: 873: 866:mass deletions 835: 832: 830: 824: 799: 798: 776: 775: 754: 753: 746: 743: 737: 734: 733: 732: 657: 654: 652: 649: 648: 647: 635: 620: 613: 606: 601: 598: 597: 596: 573: 562: 555:Edit summaries 524: 521: 519: 516: 513: 512: 510: 509: 502: 495: 487: 484: 483: 473: 472: 463: 461: 460: 457: 456: 452: 451: 443: 438: 433: 427: 426: 421: 420: 417: 416: 412: 411: 406: 401: 391: 386: 381: 376: 371: 366: 361: 356: 349: 343: 342: 337: 336: 333: 332: 328: 327: 322: 317: 306: 305: 300: 299: 296: 295: 291: 290: 285: 280: 275: 270: 264: 263: 258: 257: 254: 253: 251: 250: 245: 240: 235: 225: 218: 213: 205: 200: 194: 191: 190: 182: 181: 66:Main case page 64: 61: 60: 55:and create an 48: 46: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4537: 4528: 4519: 4510: 4509: 4500: 4491: 4490: 4485: 4481: 4477: 4467: 4463: 4459: 4456: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4445:WP:TOOLMISUSE 4440: 4436: 4432: 4430: 4427: 4421: 4419: 4415: 4411: 4400: 4396: 4392: 4389: 4385: 4382: 4378: 4376: 4375:WP:HARASSMENT 4372: 4368: 4367: 4365: 4361: 4360: 4359: 4356: 4354: 4350: 4349:BHG games POG 4345: 4343: 4333: 4331: 4328: 4326: 4323: 4319: 4315: 4313: 4312: 4310: 4306: 4303: 4299: 4295: 4291: 4287: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4271: 4269: 4265: 4254: 4251: 4249: 4247:with my reply 4246: 4243: 4240: 4239: 4238: 4237: 4236: 4235: 4232: 4229: 4225: 4220: 4218: 4216: 4212: 4209: 4201: 4199: 4193: 4189: 4186: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4177: 4171: 4169: 4165: 4162: 4160: 4156: 4153: 4149: 4146: 4142: 4141: 4140: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4120: 4119: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4099: 4089: 4088: 4082: 4076: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4058: 4055: 4054: 4053: 4052: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4040: 4036: 4033: 4032: 4031: 4030: 4025: 4021: 4018: 4017: 4016: 4015: 4009: 3997: 3994: 3993: 3992: 3991: 3985: 3973: 3970: 3969: 3968: 3967: 3966: 3964: 3950: 3949: 3945: 3941: 3934: 3931: 3927: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3910: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3902: 3900: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3892: 3891: 3885:Walls of text 3882: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3866: 3863: 3861: 3858: 3856: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3843: 3842: 3838: 3834: 3829: 3828: 3826: 3824: 3822: 3820: 3812: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3804: 3803: 3802: 3799: 3791: 3790: 3786: 3782: 3778: 3775: 3771: 3769: 3765: 3762: 3760: 3756: 3753: 3750: 3745: 3744: 3740: 3736: 3732: 3722: 3721: 3717: 3713: 3706: 3702: 3700: 3696: 3694: 3690: 3688: 3684: 3682: 3678: 3676: 3672: 3670: 3667:23 Oct 2008: 3666: 3665: 3664: 3662: 3647: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3634: 3633: 3630: 3627: 3624: 3621: 3618: 3607: 3605: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3589: 3580: 3578: 3575: 3569: 3565: 3562: 3558: 3554: 3550: 3546: 3543: 3538: 3536: 3532: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3525: 3515: 3514: 3507: 3502: 3497: 3492: 3481: 3480: 3476: 3472: 3468: 3464: 3460: 3456: 3452: 3448: 3433: 3432: 3429: 3427: 3421: 3419: 3414: 3413:SportingFlyer 3408: 3406: 3402: 3397: 3395: 3391: 3386: 3384: 3379: 3364: 3363: 3359: 3355: 3351: 3346: 3340: 3338: 3337:walled garden 3334: 3328: 3326: 3320: 3318: 3314: 3299: 3298: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3277: 3273: 3267: 3262: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3248: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3227: 3223: 3216: 3210: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3196: 3191: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3161: 3153: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3115: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3100: 3094: 3093: 3089: 3085: 3080: 3075: 3071: 3067: 3066: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3046: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3021: 3020: 3016: 3012: 3008: 3004: 3003:bulk-reverted 3000: 2996: 2991: 2985: 2979: 2973: 2968: 2964: 2960: 2959:Woozle effect 2956: 2952: 2948: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2924: 2913: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2891: 2887: 2886:New York City 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2861: 2859: 2849: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2826: 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2756:comparing BHG 2752: 2748: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2724: 2719: 2715: 2710: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2695: 2692: 2688: 2685:respectively 2684: 2680: 2676: 2666: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2644: 2639: 2635: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2611: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2595: 2591: 2587: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2492: 2490: 2489:indef blocked 2483: 2480: 2478: 2475: 2473: 2470: 2468: 2465: 2463: 2460: 2458: 2455: 2453: 2450: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2434: 2433: 2428: 2425: 2423: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2394: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2381: 2380: 2375: 2372: 2369: 2366: 2362: 2359: 2356: 2354: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2344: 2341: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2326: 2325: 2320: 2318: 2316: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2306: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2297: 2287: 2286: 2282: 2281:North America 2276: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2263: 2259: 2258:WP:POG2019RFC 2255: 2251: 2247: 2237: 2235: 2231: 2228: 2225: 2222: 2219: 2208: 2206: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2191: 2188: 2183: 2180: 2178: 2175: 2172: 2169: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2131: 2129: 2126: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2113: 2109: 2105: 2100: 2098: 2094: 2091: 2088: 2085: 2082: 2078: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2054: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2041: 2038: 2035: 2032: 2029: 2026: 2023: 2020: 2017: 2014: 2011: 2008: 2005: 2002: 2001: 1998: 1995: 1992: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1975: 1971: 1970: 1967: 1964: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1952: 1949: 1946: 1943: 1940: 1937: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1925: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1888: 1885: 1882: 1879: 1876: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1865: 1862: 1861: 1858: 1855: 1852: 1849: 1846: 1844:August 2019: 1843: 1842: 1839: 1836: 1833: 1830: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1817: 1815: 1811: 1804: 1801: 1798: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1788: 1785: 1784: 1781: 1778: 1772: 1769: 1766: 1765: 1762: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1747: 1744: 1741: 1738: 1735: 1732: 1729: 1726: 1723: 1721:August 2019: 1720: 1719: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1704: 1701: 1698: 1695: 1692: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1680: 1677: 1674: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1667: 1662: 1660: 1656: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1641: 1639: 1635: 1634:WP:ASPERSIONS 1631: 1626: 1624: 1622: 1618: 1616: 1612: 1605: 1604:WP:ASPERSIONS 1599: 1597: 1594: 1591: 1588: 1585: 1582: 1578: 1576: 1573: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1557: 1555: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1489: 1487: 1486:WP:ASPERSIONS 1484: 1483: 1481: 1480:, including: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1461: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1416: 1415:living person 1412: 1397: 1396: 1392: 1388: 1384: 1383: 1378: 1374: 1373:Portal:Canada 1370: 1366: 1362: 1358: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1334: 1329: 1325: 1315: 1313: 1309: 1305: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1283: 1281: 1278: 1275: 1273: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1243: 1237: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1226:WP:ENDPORTALS 1217: 1215: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1129: 1128: 1126: 1124: 1122: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1097: 1092: 1087: 1084: 1079: 1074: 1071: 1066: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1053:walls of text 1050: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1000: 997: 995: 992: 990: 987: 985: 982: 980: 977: 976: 970: 961: 960: 956: 952: 948: 938: 934: 929: 925: 924: 923: 921: 916: 911: 910: 904: 901: 898: 895: 891: 887: 883: 882: 881: 880: 876: 871: 867: 864: 860: 859:WP:ENDPORTALS 856: 852: 851: 850: 849: 845: 844: 843: 841: 829: 823: 822: 818: 814: 810: 805: 796: 792: 791: 790: 787: 784: 781: 774: 771: 770: 769: 767: 763: 759: 758:WP:ENDPORTALS 752: 749: 748: 742: 731: 728: 727: 723: 721: 720: 713: 709: 708: 707: 706: 703: 702: 698: 696: 695: 685: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 661: 646: 643: 642: 641:AmericanAir88 636: 633: 629: 625: 624:WP:TOOLMISUSE 621: 618: 614: 611: 607: 604: 603: 595: 592: 591: 590:AmericanAir88 586: 582: 578: 574: 571: 567: 563: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 532: 527: 526: 508: 503: 501: 496: 494: 489: 488: 486: 485: 480: 475: 474: 459: 458: 447: 444: 441: 437: 434: 432: 429: 428: 424: 419: 418: 410: 407: 405: 402: 399: 395: 390: 387: 385: 382: 379: 375: 372: 370: 367: 365: 362: 360: 357: 353: 348: 345: 344: 340: 335: 334: 326: 323: 321: 318: 315: 311: 308: 307: 303: 298: 297: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 274: 273:Case requests 271: 269: 266: 265: 261: 256: 255: 248: 244: 241: 239: 236: 233: 229: 224: 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 206: 203: 199: 196: 195: 193: 192: 188: 184: 183: 180: 177: 176: 172: 169: 164: 158: 153: 147: 142: 141:KrakatoaKatie 138: 133: 128: 122: 117: 113: 109: 105: 100: 94: 89: 83: 78: 72: 67: 58: 54: 47: 44: 40: 39: 31: 27: 23: 19: 4525: 4516: 4507: 4506: 4497: 4452: 4449:User:Diannaa 4441: 4437: 4433: 4422: 4406: 4394: 4388:edit warring 4387: 4386:I enaged in 4380: 4370: 4369:I engaed in 4357: 4346: 4341: 4339: 4301: 4272: 4260: 4227: 4221: 4214: 4204: 4197: 4192:WP:OWNership 4178: 4174: 4167: 4132: 4126: 4095: 4086: 4085: 4074: 4023: 4007: 3983: 3961: 3937: 3915: 3893: 3888: 3869: 3849: 3830: 3817: 3800: 3797: 3767: 3758: 3748: 3746: 3742: 3734: 3728: 3709: 3673:18 May 2019 3658: 3637:Voceditenore 3635: 3616: 3613: 3590: 3586: 3572: 3524:Portal:Opera 3521: 3487: 3467:lying habits 3466: 3462: 3459:pile of lies 3458: 3455:pack of lies 3454: 3444: 3423: 3415: 3409: 3398: 3387: 3375: 3341: 3330: 3324: 3322: 3310: 3272:User:Bagumba 3270: 3245: 3219: 3188: 3157: 3123: 3095: 3070:Newshunter12 3068: 3052: 3048: 3036: 3032: 3027: 2999:WP:IMPERFECT 2934: 2928: 2922: 2894: 2882:Conservatism 2862: 2857: 2855: 2847: 2831:Newshunter12 2827: 2739: 2723:Newshunter12 2711: 2672: 2656:Newshunter12 2506:Portal:Ghana 2503: 2486: 2440: 2401: 2382: 2327: 2304: 2293: 2277: 2268: 2249: 2243: 2214: 2184: 2181: 2165: 2142: 2134: 2132: 2122: 2103: 2101: 2073: 1980:April 2019: 1973: 1972: 1906: 1898: 1896: 1823: 1807: 1665: 1663: 1654: 1652: 1642: 1637: 1629: 1627: 1608: 1579: 1558: 1552: 1531: 1477: 1466: 1458: 1438:10 years old 1433: 1431: 1426: 1408: 1380: 1365:Portal:Japan 1361:Portal:Opera 1354: 1351:Good portals 1331: 1321: 1289: 1247: 1223: 1214:this AN case 1210: 1191: 1170: 1130: 1119: 1057: 969:exhaustive. 967: 944: 917: 906: 902: 877: 863:two separate 854: 846: 840:FeydHuxtable 837: 813:FeydHuxtable 800: 777: 755: 739: 725: 718: 717: 711: 700: 693: 692: 687: 663: 659: 640: 617:WP:ADMINACCT 610:WP:ADMINCOND 589: 136: 111: 110: 108: 76: 57:edit request 4318:WP:TROUBLES 3739:WP:NOEFFORT 3471:Lepricavark 3166:conduct of 3164:tendentious 2972:BHG and BHG 1987:July 2019: 1828:July 2019: 1672:July 2019: 1638:many months 1491:WP:HOUNDING 1442:84.46.53.86 585:accusations 243:Ban appeals 221:Noticeboard 112:Case clerks 4475:HairedGirl 4399:WP:TWINKLE 4371:harassment 4307:NA1K says 4294:WP:GAMEing 3916:MfD ex. 2 3894:MfD ex. 1 3553:on another 3405:WP:BRD-NOT 3311:See above 2955:Statistics 2923:ad hominem 2866:Literature 2760:Alex Jones 2746:HairedGirl 2718:discussion 2651:HairedGirl 1369:Portal:Law 1312:Scottywong 1194:Tryptofish 870:this essay 857:true that 766:"inspired" 449:(pre-2016) 436:Statistics 369:Procedures 116:Guerillero 4410:Transport 4393:I was in 4137:WP:WPPORT 3925:I agreed: 3731:WP:BEFORE 3029:Barkeep49 3024:Rebuttals 3007:ownership 2823:keep vote 2269:principle 2152:WP:GAMING 2081:perm link 2069:WP:Gaming 1526:WP:GAMING 1478:ad naseum 1423:talk page 1375:. I hope 1301:pageviews 1049:bludgeons 909:syllogism 894:based his 760:– as per 628:WP:ALTREV 577:this edit 568:created. 374:Elections 127:CodeLyoko 4484:contribs 4418:Djibouti 4104:for the 4100:for the 3697:26 Sept 3691:20 July 3617:a priori 3557:this one 3350:this one 3045:describe 2931:2018 RfC 2187:subpages 1470:contribs 1326:or Moxy 1230:outlines 559:frequent 88:Workshop 77:Evidence 28:‎ | 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 4466:WP:VAND 4462:WP:GAME 4364:asserts 4298:WP:NPOV 4198:content 4183:Hecato 3940:Bagumba 3872:Bagumba 3833:Bagumba 3781:Bagumba 3733:states 3712:Bagumba 3685:2 July 3679:2 June 2981:. The 2951:Nigeria 2925:attacks 2874:Society 2365:example 2296:3/19 AN 1899:Portals 890:opposed 632:WP:ROWN 446:Reports 384:History 364:Members 359:Contact 347:Discuss 211:(CU/OS) 30:Portals 4480:(talk) 4426:WP:ARS 4366:that: 4244:, and 4224:WP:POG 4159:WP:POG 4150:Ran a 4110:Andrew 4067:true). 3703:4 Oct 3465:, and 3401:WP:BRD 3224:, in: 3099:Certes 3084:Certes 3057:Certes 3047:it as 3011:Certes 2939:WP:POG 2933:found 2783:thread 2679:Certes 2305:Certes 2246:WP:POG 2176:, and 2156:WP:BRD 2061:WP:OWN 1810:thread 1666:sample 1425:, CSD: 1413:for a 1292:WP:POG 1272:WP:POG 1254:WP:POG 1242:WP:POG 1148:Hecato 1133:Hecato 951:ToThAc 886:WP:POG 828:ToThAc 783:attack 719:BD2412 694:BD2412 579:. The 557:are a 389:Clerks 247:Report 161:& 150:& 125:& 4473:Brown 4460:both 4414:Ghana 4266:, ], 4226:said 4147:(TTH) 3222:WP:AN 3215:WP:AN 3195:WP:AN 2764:troll 2744:Brown 2683:Kusma 2649:Brown 2510:alive 2482:11/19 2477:11/19 2472:10/19 2383:Kusma 2250:after 2143:after 1382:Kusma 1333:Kusma 786:diffs 423:Audit 163:Bradv 16:< 4464:and 4114:talk 3944:talk 3876:talk 3837:talk 3785:talk 3716:talk 3641:talk 3606:. 3595:for 3561:this 3559:and 3506:Moxy 3475:talk 3383:here 3378:here 3358:talk 3293:talk 3256:talk 3233:talk 3204:talk 3176:talk 3141:talk 3131:and 3103:talk 3088:talk 3061:talk 3051:and 3015:talk 2967:NA1K 2965:and 2953:and 2906:talk 2878:Arts 2835:talk 2727:talk 2699:here 2689:and 2681:and 2660:talk 2467:8/19 2462:4/19 2457:4/19 2452:4/19 2447:3/19 2273:here 2262:here 2254:here 2234:here 2218:here 2154:the 2148:here 2112:here 2108:here 2097:here 2067:and 1907:many 1903:here 1659:here 1611:here 1542:here 1464:talk 1446:talk 1328:here 1324:here 1198:talk 1152:talk 1137:talk 955:talk 945:See 817:talk 778:The 680:and 674:here 672:and 670:here 630:and 551:this 549:and 547:this 543:Here 539:this 535:this 531:Here 440:Talk 431:Talk 398:Talk 378:Talk 232:Talk 202:Talk 168:Talk 157:Talk 152:Mkdw 146:Talk 132:Talk 121:Talk 104:Talk 93:Talk 82:Talk 71:Talk 53:here 26:Case 4482:• ( 4194:by 4112:🐉( 4102:MfD 4098:DRV 4057:BHG 3998:- " 3974:- " 3972:BHG 3392:or 3287:. 3135:. 2963:BHG 2860:" 2758:to 2701:at 2673:At 2328:BHG 2030:, 2027:, 1996:, 1993:, 1965:, 1923:, 1905:), 1847:, 1831:, 1730:, 762:TTH 712:not 314:Log 4416:, 4412:, 4379:I 4355:. 4344:. 4270:. 4233:, 4219:. 4116:) 4035:Mj 4024:." 4020:MS 3996:Mj 3946:) 3878:) 3839:) 3787:) 3737:. 3718:) 3643:) 3631:. 3628:, 3625:, 3622:, 3579:. 3576:, 3510:🍁 3477:) 3461:, 3457:, 3407:. 3360:) 3295:) 3258:) 3235:) 3206:) 3178:) 3143:) 3105:) 3090:) 3063:) 3017:) 2929:A 2888:, 2884:, 2880:, 2876:, 2872:, 2868:, 2837:) 2813:, 2809:, 2805:, 2801:, 2797:, 2793:, 2777:, 2770:, 2729:) 2662:) 2636:, 2632:, 2626:20 2624:, 2622:19 2620:, 2618:18 2616:, 2614:17 2612:, 2610:16 2608:, 2606:15 2604:, 2602:14 2600:, 2598:13 2596:, 2594:12 2592:, 2590:11 2588:, 2586:10 2584:, 2580:, 2576:, 2572:, 2568:, 2564:, 2560:, 2556:, 2552:, 2540:, 2536:, 2532:, 2528:, 2524:, 2520:, 2516:, 2278:– 2236:. 2223:, 2198:, 2195:, 2192:, 2179:. 2173:, 2127:, 2120:. 2117:, 2089:, 2086:, 2063:, 2052:, 2049:, 2046:, 2036:, 2033:, 2024:, 2021:, 2018:, 2015:, 2012:, 2009:, 2006:, 1990:, 1968:, 1962:, 1959:, 1956:, 1953:, 1950:, 1947:, 1944:, 1941:, 1938:, 1935:, 1932:, 1929:, 1926:, 1920:, 1918:, 1915:, 1912:, 1886:, 1883:, 1880:, 1856:, 1853:, 1850:, 1837:, 1834:, 1816:. 1812:. 1802:, 1799:, 1796:, 1779:, 1776:, 1770:, 1760:, 1754:, 1751:, 1748:, 1745:, 1742:, 1739:, 1736:, 1733:, 1727:, 1724:, 1714:, 1711:, 1708:, 1705:, 1702:, 1699:, 1696:, 1693:, 1690:, 1687:, 1684:, 1681:, 1678:, 1675:, 1650:. 1647:, 1640:. 1598:. 1595:, 1592:, 1589:, 1574:, 1571:, 1568:, 1565:, 1562:, 1556:. 1448:) 1427:R2 1393:) 1371:, 1367:, 1363:, 1359:, 1344:) 1266:, 1263:, 1200:) 1192:-- 1178:, 1154:) 1139:) 1131:-- 957:) 872:). 855:is 842:: 819:) 553:. 541:. 139:: 114:: 97:— 86:— 75:— 4486:) 4401:. 4255:) 4163:] 4005:Y 3981:N 3942:( 3938:— 3874:( 3870:— 3835:( 3831:— 3783:( 3779:— 3776:. 3714:( 3710:— 3639:( 3473:( 3451:Ɱ 3426:C 3422:· 3418:T 3356:( 3291:( 3254:( 3231:( 3202:( 3174:( 3139:( 3101:( 3086:( 3059:( 3013:( 2908:) 2904:( 2833:( 2815:8 2811:7 2807:6 2803:5 2799:4 2795:3 2791:2 2789:, 2787:1 2779:4 2775:3 2772:2 2768:1 2740:@ 2725:( 2694:3 2691:2 2687:1 2658:( 2638:3 2634:2 2630:1 2582:9 2578:8 2574:7 2570:6 2566:5 2562:4 2558:3 2554:2 2550:1 2542:8 2538:7 2534:6 2530:5 2526:4 2522:3 2518:2 2514:1 2367:) 2357:. 2260:( 2079:( 1544:. 1467:· 1462:( 1444:( 1391:c 1389:· 1387:t 1385:( 1342:c 1340:· 1338:t 1336:( 1196:( 1150:( 1135:( 953:( 922:. 815:( 797:. 780:3 726:T 701:T 634:. 506:e 499:t 492:v 394:+ 352:+ 316:) 312:( 228:+ 170:) 166:( 159:) 155:( 148:) 144:( 134:) 130:( 123:) 119:( 106:) 102:( 95:) 91:( 84:) 80:( 73:) 69:( 59:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Portals/Evidence - Knowledge

Index