161:. Similarly, the order of sections in an article may hold implications for the relative importance of topics. In general, placing a section earlier may imply that it is more central to the overall subject of the article. Starting with "Definition" or "History" as the first section (after the lead) is usually neutral, but starting with "Criticism" is usually not. Different choices of ordering within a section or paragraph may also frame certain parts as rebuttals to other parts, and any such implications should be justified by the sources.
149:) is inherently being emphasized more than information that is placed later. The same is true for placement of information within a sentence, paragraph, or section. On the other hand, placement at the end of a paragraph or section may be interpreted as a conclusion or the "last word", and readers may be more likely to remember it. Information in the middle of a paragraph or section is emphasized the least, especially when the paragraph or section is long, and may even be skipped entirely by some of the readers.
216:"Criticism of..." articles inherently focus on the negative aspects of a phenomenon. By virtue of its title, praise for that same phenomenon is out of place. One man's trash is another man's treasure, but the article is inherently designed to focus on the first man's opinion to the exclusion of the other man. It makes it difficult to represent "fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views", in accordance with the policy on
244:. Creating a subsection within the article on XYZ entitled "Controversies" is also a potential problem, because it may still lead to undue weight on the negative aspects of the topic. In many cases, if there are noteworthy controversies that received significant and sustained media coverage during in a biographical figure's life or a company's history, these can briefly summarized in the biography or history as part of the general text.
21:
174:
of subtitles like this, one wonders what is next–"Ascent to supreme glory"! In the case of the three subtitles presented previously, a neutral way of subtitling the sections of this singer or actor's article could be "1970s", "1980s" and "1990s". Another option could be to use neutral words that reference major structural points in the individual's life, such as "Early career", "London years" and "Move to Los
Angeles".
323:
This is even more difficult for writing about accusations that someone notable lied or behaved inappropriately. Journalists may spend several weeks examining a debate over whether someone lied, which inevitably leads to a discussion about the magnitude of that lie, and whether they should apologize.
231:
The best way to provide context is to re-frame the article, beginning with the topic. "Reception of..." allows praise and criticism to be provided in context with each other. Creating an article or section about a phenomenon's reception is not meant to be a complete list of all praise and criticism,
173:
Even if the text of an article follows the NPOV guidelines, it is possible to introduce POV and bias into the headings. In some cases, articles about a famous singer or actor will have subheadings such as "Rise to fame", "Increasing acclaim" and "International superstardom". When one sees a sequence
277:
A notable example of this tactic is the debate over the legalization of abortion. Supporters of legal abortion describe themselves as "pro choice", thus allowing them to describe their opponents as being against choice. Critics of legal abortion describe themselves as "pro life", thus allowing them
194:
Beware of editors who are opposed to writing about an evolving concept in a chronological structure. Some may intentionally do this so that one part of history can gain undue weight over another, to present that topic in its most negative or positive light. Even if done unintentionally, failing to
152:
Since most people do not read the entire article, information earlier in the article is also more likely to be read, so earlier placement carries more weight for this reason as well. In fact, many people only read the lead, making the lead especially important for ensuring neutrality, and editors
296:
One solution would be to rename the article to a scientific term, or to use a short description to unpack the term. Another option is to merge the article about the term into a section of an article about the larger topic. If the term is sufficiently popular to write a full article about it from
190:
Writing about an evolving concept in sections will allow readers to understand its evolution. This includes the initial intentions and reactions to the concept, how the concept changed as it impacted the world, and the current status of the concept. This also allows periods of extreme success or
207:
The following is a list of red flags that may help identify reasons why an article suffers from constant debate and POV-pushing. Not all red flags are indicative of a problem. This list should be taken as a way to begin a discussion, and find ways to change the fundamental form of an article to
319:
Knowledge articles cover controversies. However, not all controversies are covered equally, and some not at all. It is sensible to cover a controversy when someone is accused of a crime and they are convicted. It is typically reasonable to cover criminal disputes even if someone is found to be
198:
In some cases, however, an article may be structured in a non-chronological structure for reasons that are not related to POV. For example, in the case of a celebrity who has worked professionally as a singer, actor and model, the article might have sections entitled "Singing", "Acting" and
239:
A related type of article or section is ones titled "Controversies regarding...". Where there is already an article on XYZ, creating a new article entitled "Controversies regarding XYZ" may be viewed as a POV fork. That said, there are some articles with this type of title, such as
186:
Organizations, governments, corporations, religions and living notable individuals are all constantly evolving and changing. When writing about a phenomenon that has changed over time, use a "History" section with chronological headings to present information in a neutral form.
320:
innocent, if the trial became notable to reliable journalists and scholars. But in instances where a criminal accusation is found to be completely without merit, writing about it in
Knowledge may only give undue weight to a frivolous complaint.
2760:
126:
Some forms and structures, such as the use of "Criticism of..." or "Controversies regarding..." article titles or section headings often lead to disputes over point of view (POV). This essay suggests better practices to use in their place.
800:
122:
and removing (or properly attributing) opinions. However, Knowledge has greater difficulty with achieving neutrality in form, as it is not always obvious how the structure of an article can favor undue weight on a single perspective.
227:
This is less of a problem for "criticism of..." sections within articles, but these may still lead to undue weight on the negative aspects of a phenomenon. Likewise, "praise of..." articles and sections may run into the same issues.
1961:
1365:
235:
It is typically better to add context to criticism articles than to delete them. Consider revising "criticism" with a proportional amount of "praise", or up-merging the "criticism" back into the main article.
164:
Additional forms of emphasis (which may or may not be warranted, as determined by due weight) include placing information in shorter paragraphs or image captions, where readers are more likely to notice it.
177:
POV in subheadings can also be negative in tone. For example, a rock singer's article would have POV in the subheadings if they read "Early career", "Criticism from music journalists" and "Fan backlash".
830:
293:
and other terms invented recently. This is seldom an issue for new scientific terminology. It is more problematic for terminology popularized in the political arena, or around other public figures.
2096:
2647:
2527:
1699:
2056:
1865:
1460:
2900:
2910:
2208:
845:
3176:
3171:
2840:
2462:
1167:
2587:
512:
2965:
2652:
1265:
421:
2950:
2700:
1240:
1764:
1295:
992:
2970:
2377:
1563:
1017:
940:
522:
2417:
2397:
1360:
1330:
642:
1654:
1380:
1142:
730:
657:
597:
572:
562:
3115:
2422:
1062:
2502:
2457:
2367:
2317:
1583:
1310:
1285:
3010:
1300:
935:
920:
2337:
900:
336:
3224:
2492:
2407:
1523:
1375:
1280:
895:
855:
710:
3120:
2213:
2126:
1724:
1465:
1290:
1215:
950:
925:
850:
632:
462:
2547:
2497:
2352:
2101:
2046:
2031:
1644:
982:
865:
745:
3080:
1709:
1455:
1192:
1117:
687:
2975:
2627:
2472:
2392:
2061:
1810:
1739:
1593:
890:
278:
to describe their opponents as being against life. This difficulty can be avoided by side-stepping these labels, and writing articles about "
290:
199:"Modeling." In this case, the use of a non-chronological structure is used to present the three different sides to the individual's career.
3020:
2577:
1784:
1275:
1162:
1152:
1042:
945:
930:
195:
distinguish between historic facts and current facts will make it difficult for readers to understand how a concept has changed over time.
2562:
2532:
2342:
2091:
2086:
1623:
1072:
1027:
957:
3263:
2875:
1320:
695:
409:
283:
1674:
29:
2830:
2705:
2592:
2307:
1704:
1390:
1172:
1157:
1002:
915:
725:
532:
517:
308:
3181:
3100:
2482:
2442:
2156:
1825:
1779:
1769:
1689:
1205:
1107:
1037:
825:
377:
279:
247:
2960:
2322:
1759:
1505:
1493:
997:
677:
537:
2790:
2710:
2121:
2066:
2036:
1573:
1450:
667:
507:
434:
362:
356:
3268:
3258:
3105:
3075:
3070:
2865:
2845:
2642:
2402:
2071:
2026:
2021:
1830:
1714:
1618:
1355:
1067:
1012:
987:
967:
905:
875:
780:
770:
542:
346:
266:" as a language to control how its subjects talk about the world. In real-world politics, different parties use language to
211:
3040:
2915:
2765:
2487:
2387:
2183:
1991:
1870:
1719:
1315:
1137:
1087:
627:
3055:
2995:
2920:
2412:
2382:
2302:
2131:
1102:
1092:
1057:
870:
775:
497:
3065:
2930:
2905:
2885:
2785:
2680:
2557:
2016:
1925:
1885:
1789:
1445:
1430:
1305:
910:
760:
715:
672:
647:
607:
457:
324:
Ten different columns in newspapers does not mean that the incident should be covered in its own section, or at all.
3207:
3035:
3015:
2940:
2935:
2507:
1996:
1639:
1548:
1410:
1345:
1255:
1245:
1220:
1182:
1177:
1112:
880:
840:
785:
42:
141:
The structure of an article can result in emphasizing some information more than others, which has implications for
3229:
3095:
2632:
2111:
2041:
1920:
1905:
1820:
1603:
1395:
740:
487:
482:
3143:
3025:
2835:
2805:
2770:
2597:
2076:
1986:
1900:
1543:
1513:
1385:
567:
241:
95:
2287:
41:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
3191:
3060:
2890:
2617:
2517:
2327:
2203:
2116:
2081:
2006:
1976:
1840:
1664:
1613:
1440:
1425:
1350:
1122:
972:
815:
602:
547:
472:
402:
1774:
267:
3166:
2980:
2895:
2657:
2602:
2522:
2477:
2432:
2427:
2312:
2146:
2106:
2001:
1966:
1941:
1649:
1470:
1250:
1225:
1132:
1127:
1007:
795:
720:
637:
552:
467:
367:
314:
46:
3217:
2990:
2870:
2750:
2725:
2552:
2188:
2151:
2141:
1744:
1684:
1538:
835:
810:
662:
617:
592:
582:
557:
3110:
2925:
2810:
2735:
2622:
2542:
2512:
2362:
1981:
1951:
1915:
1805:
1669:
1588:
1370:
1235:
1200:
1047:
805:
755:
750:
477:
372:
341:
3212:
3161:
2800:
2795:
2755:
2740:
2730:
2607:
2452:
2357:
1860:
1850:
1749:
1558:
1533:
1420:
705:
577:
3186:
2955:
2820:
2720:
2637:
2582:
2572:
2537:
2372:
2347:
2332:
2173:
1895:
1835:
1568:
1405:
1340:
1335:
1325:
1077:
700:
452:
395:
2567:
181:
2860:
2815:
2178:
2051:
2011:
1815:
1553:
1082:
527:
3090:
3030:
3005:
2945:
2855:
2850:
2437:
2254:
1956:
1946:
1734:
1729:
1147:
820:
790:
622:
136:
78:
3050:
3000:
2780:
2775:
2745:
2234:
2198:
2193:
1890:
1694:
1528:
1052:
885:
860:
735:
232:
but to provide readers with a representative sample of how that phenomenon has been received.
158:
119:
3045:
2612:
2467:
1971:
1880:
1875:
1659:
1578:
1435:
1097:
168:
2985:
2447:
2244:
2168:
1032:
977:
962:
502:
492:
382:
258:
71:
8:
3085:
2695:
2264:
2239:
2218:
1598:
1230:
1022:
587:
351:
2259:
2249:
2163:
2136:
1400:
652:
221:
64:
56:
327:
When writing about a topic, only write about controversies that had a lasting impact.
2761:
Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith
2715:
1679:
1518:
1415:
612:
1855:
1845:
1754:
418:
142:
297:
reliable sources, it is preferable to balance perspectives from sources that talk
1608:
271:
2880:
2825:
1910:
1210:
217:
154:
146:
33:
145:. For example, information that is placed at the beginning of an article (the
3252:
253:
130:
1962:
Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack
115:
111:
387:
1366:
Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
433:
263:
252:
One way to control a debate is to control the use of language. In
831:
Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability
2648:
Knowledge is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
106:. Editors have had many successes in dealing with non-neutral
2528:
Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article
1700:
Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals
202:
91:
Explanatory essay about the the
Neutral point of view policy
2057:
Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify
1866:
Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass
1461:
What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion
801:
Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books
330:
301:
the term, and avoid giving weight to sources that merely
2901:
How many
Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?
2911:
How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle
220:. "Criticism of..." articles may be considered to be a
2463:
No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
2097:
Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature
1168:
Knowledge is not being written in an organized fashion
2209:
There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns
846:
Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
513:
Editing
Knowledge is like visiting a foreign country
270:
the parameters of the debate. This tactic of using "
3172:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays
2951:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them
359:(that phrase doesn't mean what you think it means)
337:meta:2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content
274:" has risen with the growing power of marketeers.
435:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content
3250:
1296:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
1241:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions
993:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography
191:failure to be presented in a historic context.
2971:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man
2701:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball
2378:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity
1018:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area
523:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
2653:Knowledge is not the place to post your résumé
2398:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage
1564:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors
1331:Counting and sorting are not original research
1361:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability
643:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
403:
2891:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake
1655:An uncivil environment is a poor environment
1381:How to save an article proposed for deletion
658:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs
598:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields
573:Not editing because of Knowledge restriction
114:facts to confirm that they are supported by
2423:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
1143:Understanding Knowledge's content standards
118:, ensuring that one viewpoint is not given
3116:You don't have to be mad to work here, but
2503:Notability is not relevance or reliability
2458:News coverage does not decrease notability
2368:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
2318:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
1311:Before commenting in a deletion discussion
1286:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
410:
396:
284:opposition to the legalization of abortion
3011:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you
1301:Arguments to make in deletion discussions
921:Identifying and using independent sources
3177:Don't cite essays as if they were policy
2338:Big events make key participants notable
2286:
901:Formatting bilateral relations templates
417:
378:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Words to watch
309:Sections about a short-lived controversy
280:support for the legalization of abortion
94:Articles on Knowledge must conform to a
3225:How to contribute to Knowledge guidance
2841:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge" as "Wiki"!
2588:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else
2493:Notability is not a level playing field
2408:How the presumption of notability works
1524:Contributing to complicated discussions
1376:How the presumption of notability works
896:Formatting bilateral relations articles
711:Adding images improves the encyclopedia
291:avoid writing articles about neologisms
248:Articles named after loaded terminology
153:should make sure that the lead follows
3251:
3121:You should not write meaningless lists
2418:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments
1725:Staying cool when the editing gets hot
1492:
1466:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork
1291:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
856:Don't hope the house will build itself
633:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
463:All Five Pillars are equally important
363:Knowledge:List of controversial issues
262:, the repressive government promotes "
3141:
2678:
2548:One sentence does not an article make
2498:Notability is not a matter of opinion
2285:
2214:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip
2127:Don't throw your toys out of the pram
1645:A weak personal attack is still wrong
1584:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors
1491:
1216:Don't throw more litter onto the pile
983:Minors and persons judged incompetent
746:An unfinished house is a real problem
731:Alternatives to the "Expand" template
432:
391:
357:Knowledge:Don't teach the controversy
347:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
208:ensure a more neutral point of view.
3081:Things that should not be surprising
2776:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense
2102:Don't remind others of past misdeeds
2047:Don't come down like a ton of bricks
2032:Don't call people by their real name
1710:Profanity, civility, and discussions
1118:There are no shortcuts to neutrality
15:
2976:No one cares about your garage band
2679:
2628:What is and is not routine coverage
2473:No one cares about your garage band
2393:Existence does not prove notability
1811:Assume the assumption of good faith
1740:There is no Divine Right of Editors
1594:Relationships with academic editors
1456:Why was the page I created deleted?
891:Featured articles may have problems
368:Knowledge:NPOV tutorial#Accusations
13:
3021:Please do not murder the newcomers
2578:Reducing consensus to an algorithm
2062:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid
1785:Knowledge should not be a monopoly
1276:Adjectives in your recommendations
1163:Knowledge is not a reliable source
1153:What an article should not include
1043:The problem with elegant variation
851:Don't get hung up on minor details
47:thoroughly vetted by the community
43:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
3280:
3264:Knowledge essays about neutrality
2343:Businesses with a single location
1624:You have a right to remain silent
1073:Restoring part of a reverted edit
1028:Potential, not just current state
958:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats
3142:
2092:Don't knit beside the guillotine
2087:Don't ignore community consensus
1321:Confusing arguments mean nothing
19:
2593:Sources must be out-of-universe
2308:All high schools can be notable
1705:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values
1391:Identifying blatant advertising
1173:The world will not end tomorrow
1158:Knowledge is a work in progress
1003:Not everything needs a template
916:How to write a featured article
533:External criticism of Knowledge
518:Editors will sometimes be wrong
289:Knowledge makes it a policy to
242:List of Knowledge controversies
3182:Avoid writing redundant essays
3101:What Knowledge is not/Outtakes
2831:Don't stuff beans up your nose
2706:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
2533:Obscurity ≠Lack of notability
2483:Notability cannot be purchased
2443:Masking the lack of notability
1780:Knowledge is not about winning
1206:Copyediting reception sections
1108:Temporary versions of articles
1038:Principle of Some Astonishment
826:Creating controversial content
726:Akin's Laws of Article Writing
1:
3208:About policies and guidelines
2961:List of jokes about Knowledge
2323:Articles with a single source
1770:Two wrongs don't make a right
1760:The rules of polite discourse
1690:It's not the end of the world
1451:Knowledge is not Whack-A-Mole
998:Not everything needs a navbox
866:Don't "teach the controversy"
678:Knowledge is not RationalWiki
538:Here to build an encyclopedia
315:Knowledge:Notability (events)
3269:Knowledge essays about style
3259:Knowledge supplemental pages
2791:BOLD, revert, revert, revert
2711:Alternatives to edit warring
1574:Maintaining a friendly space
668:Knowledge is an encyclopedia
7:
3076:The Five Pillars of Untruth
3071:The first rule of Knowledge
2866:Editing under the influence
2643:Knowledge is not Crunchbase
2403:Google searches and numbers
2122:Don't template the regulars
2037:Don't call the kettle black
1831:Be excellent to one another
1715:Revert notification opt-out
1619:We are all Wikipedians here
1068:Put a little effort into it
1013:Obtain peer review comments
968:Introduction to structurism
906:Fruit of the poisonous tree
876:Editors are not mindreaders
781:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
771:Beef up that first revision
543:Leave it to the experienced
508:Don't search for objections
373:Knowledge:Pro and con lists
342:Knowledge:Avoid thread mode
10:
3285:
3106:Why not create an account?
3041:Requirements for adminship
2916:How to vandalize correctly
2846:Don't delete the main page
2766:Avoid using preview button
2488:Notability comparison test
2072:Don't fight fire with fire
2067:Don't eat the troll's food
2027:Don't call a spade a spade
2022:Don't bludgeon the process
1871:Encourage full discussions
1720:Shadowless Fists of Death!
1356:Don't attack the nominator
1316:But there must be sources!
1138:Try not to leave it a stub
1088:Source your plot summaries
312:
212:"Criticism of..." articles
134:
54:
3200:
3154:
3150:
3137:
3056:Sarcasm is really helpful
2996:Notability is not eternal
2921:How to win a citation war
2691:
2687:
2674:
2383:Every snowflake is unique
2303:Advanced source searching
2298:
2294:
2281:
2227:
2184:No, you can't have a pony
2132:Do not insult the vandals
1992:Don't be high-maintenance
1934:
1798:
1632:
1549:Encouraging the newcomers
1504:
1500:
1487:
1264:
1191:
1093:Specialized-style fallacy
1058:Pruning article revisions
886:Endorsements (commercial)
871:Editing on mobile devices
776:Blind men and an elephant
751:Articles have a half-life
686:
498:Dissent is not disloyalty
468:Avoid vague introductions
445:
441:
428:
169:Using neutral subheadings
3066:The Night Before Wikimas
2931:Ignore every single rule
2906:How to get away with UPE
2786:Before they were notable
2558:Overreliance upon Google
2353:Common sourcing mistakes
1926:Settle the process first
1886:Imagine others complexly
1790:Writing for the opponent
1765:There is no common sense
1446:Unopposed AFD discussion
1431:Relisting can be abusive
1306:Avoid repeated arguments
911:Give an article a chance
761:Avoid mission statements
721:Advanced text formatting
716:Advanced article editing
673:Knowledge is a community
648:The rules are principles
608:Product, process, policy
458:Articles must be written
98:, being neutral in both
3201:Policies and guidelines
3036:Requests for medication
3016:Please bite the newbies
2941:Mess with the templates
2508:Notability means impact
2042:Don't call things cruft
2017:Don't be the Fun Police
1947:Knowledge:Because I can
1826:Avoid the word "vandal"
1640:A thank you never hurts
1411:Liar liar pants on fire
1346:Deletion is not cleanup
1256:Writing better articles
1246:Write the article first
1221:Gender-neutral language
1193:Writing article content
1183:Writing better articles
1178:Write the article first
1113:Tertiary-source fallacy
881:Encourage the newcomers
841:Dictionaries as sources
786:Build content to endure
3230:Policy writing is hard
3096:Knowledge is an MMORPG
2936:Is that even an essay?
2633:What notability is not
2388:Existence ≠Notability
1997:Don't be inconsiderate
1921:Read before commenting
1906:Mind your own business
1821:Avoid personal remarks
1396:Identifying test edits
741:A navbox on every page
696:100K featured articles
493:Concede lost arguments
488:Competence is required
3026:Pledge of Tranquility
2771:Avoid using wikilinks
2598:Subjective importance
2112:Don't spite your face
1901:Keep it down to earth
1665:Beware of the tigers!
1604:Too long; didn't read
1544:Edit at your own pace
1514:Accepting other users
1281:AfD is not a war zone
628:There is no seniority
568:Neutrality of sources
218:neutral point of view
96:neutral point of view
34:Neutral point of view
3192:Quote your own essay
3061:Sausages for tasting
2886:Five Fs of Knowledge
2836:Don't-give-a-fuckism
2806:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh?
2618:Vanispamcruftisement
2518:Notability sub-pages
2328:Avoid template creep
2288:Essays on notability
2204:There are no oracles
1987:Don't be a WikiBigot
1841:Call a spade a spade
1614:Unblock perspectives
1441:The Heymann Standard
1426:Overzealous deletion
1386:I just don't like it
1123:There is no deadline
988:"Murder of" articles
816:Common-style fallacy
688:Article construction
603:Process is important
548:Levels of competence
473:Be a reliable source
383:Help:Talkspace draft
259:Nineteen Eighty-Four
2981:No one really cares
2896:Go ahead, vandalize
2658:Two prongs of merit
2603:Third-party sources
2523:Notabilitymandering
2478:No one really cares
2433:Inherent notability
2428:Independent sources
2313:Alternative outlets
2147:Nationalist editing
2117:Don't take the bait
2082:Don't help too much
2007:Don't be prejudiced
1977:Don't be an ostrich
1942:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI
1675:Deletion as revenge
1650:Advice for hotheads
1471:No Encyclopedic Use
1351:Does deletion help?
1251:Writing about women
1133:The deadline is now
1128:There is a deadline
1008:Nothing is in stone
638:Tendentious editing
553:Levels of consensus
352:Knowledge:Criticism
45:as it has not been
2991:No sorcery threats
2871:Embrace Stop Signs
2751:Assume good wraith
2726:Anti-Wikipedianism
2563:Perennial websites
2553:Other stuff exists
2189:Passive aggression
2152:No angry mastodons
2142:Hate is disruptive
2002:Don't be obnoxious
1967:Don't be a fanatic
1745:Most ideas are bad
1685:Forgive and forget
1494:Essays on civility
1103:Run an edit-a-thon
836:Deprecated sources
811:Citation underkill
796:Chesterton's fence
766:Be neutral in form
663:Knowledge in brief
618:Reasonability rule
583:Oversimplification
558:Most ideas are bad
3246:
3245:
3242:
3241:
3238:
3237:
3133:
3132:
3129:
3128:
3111:Yes legal threats
2926:Ignore all essays
2811:Complete bollocks
2736:Asshole John rule
2670:
2669:
2666:
2665:
2623:What BLP1E is not
2543:One hundred words
2513:Notability points
2277:
2276:
2273:
2272:
2077:Don't give a fuck
1952:Civil POV pushing
1916:Mutual withdrawal
1806:Assume good faith
1775:Knowledge clichés
1670:Civility warnings
1589:Please say please
1539:Editors' pronouns
1483:
1482:
1479:
1478:
1371:Follow the leader
1236:Use our own words
1201:Avoid thread mode
1048:Pro and con lists
806:Citation overkill
756:Autosizing images
478:Civil POV pushing
131:Article structure
89:
88:
30:explanatory essay
3276:
3187:Finding an essay
3152:
3151:
3139:
3138:
2801:Butterfly effect
2796:Boston Tea Party
2756:Assume stupidity
2741:Assume bad faith
2731:Articlecountitis
2689:
2688:
2676:
2675:
2608:Trivial mentions
2453:Minimum coverage
2296:
2295:
2283:
2282:
1982:Don't be ashamed
1861:Discussing cruft
1851:Deny recognition
1750:Nothing is clear
1559:Expect no thanks
1502:
1501:
1489:
1488:
1421:Nothing is clear
1268:deleting content
951:Tertiary sources
706:Acronym overkill
578:The one question
443:
442:
430:
429:
423:
419:Knowledge essays
412:
405:
398:
389:
388:
182:History sections
137:WP:Summary style
116:reliable sources
81:
74:
67:
23:
22:
16:
3284:
3283:
3279:
3278:
3277:
3275:
3274:
3273:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3234:
3196:
3167:Value of essays
3146:
3125:
2956:Legal vandalism
2821:Counting juntas
2721:Anti-Wikipedian
2683:
2681:Humorous essays
2662:
2638:What to include
2583:Run-of-the-mill
2573:Read the source
2538:Offline sources
2333:Bare notability
2290:
2269:
2223:
2174:No Confederates
1972:Don't be a jerk
1930:
1896:Keep it concise
1836:Beyond civility
1794:
1628:
1569:How to be civil
1534:Don't retaliate
1496:
1475:
1406:Keep it concise
1341:Delete the junk
1336:Delete or merge
1326:Content removal
1260:
1226:Myth vs fiction
1187:
1078:Robotic editing
941:Science sources
936:Primary sources
926:History sources
701:Abandoned stubs
682:
453:Article content
437:
424:
416:
333:
317:
311:
272:loaded language
250:
214:
205:
184:
171:
159:WP:SUMMARYSTYLE
139:
133:
92:
85:
84:
79:WP:POVSTRUCTURE
77:
70:
63:
59:
51:
50:
20:
12:
11:
5:
3282:
3272:
3271:
3266:
3261:
3244:
3243:
3240:
3239:
3236:
3235:
3233:
3232:
3227:
3222:
3221:
3220:
3215:
3204:
3202:
3198:
3197:
3195:
3194:
3189:
3184:
3179:
3174:
3169:
3164:
3158:
3156:
3148:
3147:
3135:
3134:
3131:
3130:
3127:
3126:
3124:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3108:
3103:
3098:
3093:
3088:
3083:
3078:
3073:
3068:
3063:
3058:
3053:
3048:
3043:
3038:
3033:
3028:
3023:
3018:
3013:
3008:
3003:
2998:
2993:
2988:
2983:
2978:
2973:
2968:
2963:
2958:
2953:
2948:
2943:
2938:
2933:
2928:
2923:
2918:
2913:
2908:
2903:
2898:
2893:
2888:
2883:
2878:
2873:
2868:
2863:
2861:Editsummarisis
2858:
2853:
2848:
2843:
2838:
2833:
2828:
2823:
2818:
2816:Counting forks
2813:
2808:
2803:
2798:
2793:
2788:
2783:
2778:
2773:
2768:
2763:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2743:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2723:
2718:
2713:
2708:
2703:
2698:
2692:
2685:
2684:
2672:
2671:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2663:
2661:
2660:
2655:
2650:
2645:
2640:
2635:
2630:
2625:
2620:
2615:
2610:
2605:
2600:
2595:
2590:
2585:
2580:
2575:
2570:
2565:
2560:
2555:
2550:
2545:
2540:
2535:
2530:
2525:
2520:
2515:
2510:
2505:
2500:
2495:
2490:
2485:
2480:
2475:
2470:
2465:
2460:
2455:
2450:
2445:
2440:
2435:
2430:
2425:
2420:
2415:
2410:
2405:
2400:
2395:
2390:
2385:
2380:
2375:
2373:Don't cite GNG
2370:
2365:
2360:
2355:
2350:
2348:But it's true!
2345:
2340:
2335:
2330:
2325:
2320:
2315:
2310:
2305:
2299:
2292:
2291:
2279:
2278:
2275:
2274:
2271:
2270:
2268:
2267:
2262:
2257:
2252:
2247:
2245:WikiHarassment
2242:
2237:
2231:
2229:
2225:
2224:
2222:
2221:
2216:
2211:
2206:
2201:
2196:
2191:
2186:
2181:
2179:No queerphobia
2176:
2171:
2166:
2161:
2160:
2159:
2149:
2144:
2139:
2134:
2129:
2124:
2119:
2114:
2109:
2104:
2099:
2094:
2089:
2084:
2079:
2074:
2069:
2064:
2059:
2054:
2049:
2044:
2039:
2034:
2029:
2024:
2019:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1994:
1989:
1984:
1979:
1974:
1969:
1964:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1944:
1938:
1936:
1932:
1931:
1929:
1928:
1923:
1918:
1913:
1908:
1903:
1898:
1893:
1888:
1883:
1878:
1873:
1868:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1848:
1843:
1838:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1818:
1816:Assume no clue
1813:
1808:
1802:
1800:
1796:
1795:
1793:
1792:
1787:
1782:
1777:
1772:
1767:
1762:
1757:
1752:
1747:
1742:
1737:
1732:
1727:
1722:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1702:
1697:
1692:
1687:
1682:
1677:
1672:
1667:
1662:
1657:
1652:
1647:
1642:
1636:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1627:
1626:
1621:
1616:
1611:
1606:
1601:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1576:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1554:Enjoy yourself
1551:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1510:
1508:
1498:
1497:
1485:
1484:
1481:
1480:
1477:
1476:
1474:
1473:
1468:
1463:
1458:
1453:
1448:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
1318:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1262:
1261:
1259:
1258:
1253:
1248:
1243:
1238:
1233:
1228:
1223:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1203:
1197:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1175:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1155:
1150:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1130:
1125:
1120:
1115:
1110:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1090:
1085:
1083:Sham consensus
1080:
1075:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1020:
1015:
1010:
1005:
1000:
995:
990:
985:
980:
975:
970:
965:
960:
955:
954:
953:
948:
943:
938:
933:
928:
918:
913:
908:
903:
898:
893:
888:
883:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
838:
833:
828:
823:
818:
813:
808:
803:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
773:
768:
763:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
692:
690:
684:
683:
681:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
650:
645:
640:
635:
630:
625:
620:
615:
610:
605:
600:
595:
590:
585:
580:
575:
570:
565:
560:
555:
550:
545:
540:
535:
530:
528:Explanationism
525:
520:
515:
510:
505:
500:
495:
490:
485:
480:
475:
470:
465:
460:
455:
449:
447:
439:
438:
426:
425:
415:
414:
407:
400:
392:
386:
385:
380:
375:
370:
365:
360:
354:
349:
344:
339:
332:
329:
310:
307:
249:
246:
213:
210:
204:
201:
183:
180:
170:
167:
132:
129:
90:
87:
86:
83:
82:
75:
68:
60:
55:
52:
40:
39:
32:about the the
26:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3281:
3270:
3267:
3265:
3262:
3260:
3257:
3256:
3254:
3231:
3228:
3226:
3223:
3219:
3216:
3214:
3211:
3210:
3209:
3206:
3205:
3203:
3199:
3193:
3190:
3188:
3185:
3183:
3180:
3178:
3175:
3173:
3170:
3168:
3165:
3163:
3160:
3159:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3140:
3136:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3107:
3104:
3102:
3099:
3097:
3094:
3092:
3091:Watchlistitis
3089:
3087:
3086:The WikiBible
3084:
3082:
3079:
3077:
3074:
3072:
3069:
3067:
3064:
3062:
3059:
3057:
3054:
3052:
3049:
3047:
3044:
3042:
3039:
3037:
3034:
3032:
3031:R-e-s-p-e-c-t
3029:
3027:
3024:
3022:
3019:
3017:
3014:
3012:
3009:
3007:
3006:Play the game
3004:
3002:
2999:
2997:
2994:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2982:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2972:
2969:
2967:
2964:
2962:
2959:
2957:
2954:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2946:My local pond
2944:
2942:
2939:
2937:
2934:
2932:
2929:
2927:
2924:
2922:
2919:
2917:
2914:
2912:
2909:
2907:
2904:
2902:
2899:
2897:
2894:
2892:
2889:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2879:
2877:
2874:
2872:
2869:
2867:
2864:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2856:Edits Per Day
2854:
2852:
2851:Editcountitis
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2834:
2832:
2829:
2827:
2824:
2822:
2819:
2817:
2814:
2812:
2809:
2807:
2804:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2794:
2792:
2789:
2787:
2784:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2774:
2772:
2769:
2767:
2764:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2754:
2752:
2749:
2747:
2744:
2742:
2739:
2737:
2734:
2732:
2729:
2727:
2724:
2722:
2719:
2717:
2714:
2712:
2709:
2707:
2704:
2702:
2699:
2697:
2694:
2693:
2690:
2686:
2682:
2677:
2673:
2659:
2656:
2654:
2651:
2649:
2646:
2644:
2641:
2639:
2636:
2634:
2631:
2629:
2626:
2624:
2621:
2619:
2616:
2614:
2611:
2609:
2606:
2604:
2601:
2599:
2596:
2594:
2591:
2589:
2586:
2584:
2581:
2579:
2576:
2574:
2571:
2569:
2566:
2564:
2561:
2559:
2556:
2554:
2551:
2549:
2546:
2544:
2541:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2529:
2526:
2524:
2521:
2519:
2516:
2514:
2511:
2509:
2506:
2504:
2501:
2499:
2496:
2494:
2491:
2489:
2486:
2484:
2481:
2479:
2476:
2474:
2471:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2461:
2459:
2456:
2454:
2451:
2449:
2446:
2444:
2441:
2439:
2438:Insignificant
2436:
2434:
2431:
2429:
2426:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2416:
2414:
2411:
2409:
2406:
2404:
2401:
2399:
2396:
2394:
2391:
2389:
2386:
2384:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2374:
2371:
2369:
2366:
2364:
2361:
2359:
2356:
2354:
2351:
2349:
2346:
2344:
2341:
2339:
2336:
2334:
2331:
2329:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2309:
2306:
2304:
2301:
2300:
2297:
2293:
2289:
2284:
2280:
2266:
2263:
2261:
2258:
2256:
2255:WikiLawyering
2253:
2251:
2248:
2246:
2243:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2232:
2230:
2228:WikiRelations
2226:
2220:
2217:
2215:
2212:
2210:
2207:
2205:
2202:
2200:
2197:
2195:
2192:
2190:
2187:
2185:
2182:
2180:
2177:
2175:
2172:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2162:
2158:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2145:
2143:
2140:
2138:
2135:
2133:
2130:
2128:
2125:
2123:
2120:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2108:
2105:
2103:
2100:
2098:
2095:
2093:
2090:
2088:
2085:
2083:
2080:
2078:
2075:
2073:
2070:
2068:
2065:
2063:
2060:
2058:
2055:
2053:
2052:Don't cry COI
2050:
2048:
2045:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2028:
2025:
2023:
2020:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2012:Don't be rude
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1993:
1990:
1988:
1985:
1983:
1980:
1978:
1975:
1973:
1970:
1968:
1965:
1963:
1960:
1958:
1957:Cyberbullying
1955:
1953:
1950:
1948:
1945:
1943:
1940:
1939:
1937:
1933:
1927:
1924:
1922:
1919:
1917:
1914:
1912:
1909:
1907:
1904:
1902:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1872:
1869:
1867:
1864:
1862:
1859:
1857:
1854:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1842:
1839:
1837:
1834:
1832:
1829:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1819:
1817:
1814:
1812:
1809:
1807:
1804:
1803:
1801:
1797:
1791:
1788:
1786:
1783:
1781:
1778:
1776:
1773:
1771:
1768:
1766:
1763:
1761:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1751:
1748:
1746:
1743:
1741:
1738:
1736:
1735:The last word
1733:
1731:
1730:The grey zone
1728:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1718:
1716:
1713:
1711:
1708:
1706:
1703:
1701:
1698:
1696:
1693:
1691:
1688:
1686:
1683:
1681:
1678:
1676:
1673:
1671:
1668:
1666:
1663:
1661:
1658:
1656:
1653:
1651:
1648:
1646:
1643:
1641:
1638:
1637:
1635:
1631:
1625:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1615:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1605:
1602:
1600:
1597:
1595:
1592:
1590:
1587:
1585:
1582:
1580:
1577:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1511:
1509:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1486:
1472:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1462:
1459:
1457:
1454:
1452:
1449:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1437:
1434:
1432:
1429:
1427:
1424:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1372:
1369:
1367:
1364:
1362:
1359:
1357:
1354:
1352:
1349:
1347:
1344:
1342:
1339:
1337:
1334:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1322:
1319:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1289:
1287:
1284:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1271:
1269:
1263:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1239:
1237:
1234:
1232:
1229:
1227:
1224:
1222:
1219:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1204:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1196:
1194:
1190:
1184:
1181:
1179:
1176:
1174:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1161:
1159:
1156:
1154:
1151:
1149:
1148:Walled garden
1146:
1144:
1141:
1139:
1136:
1134:
1131:
1129:
1126:
1124:
1121:
1119:
1116:
1114:
1111:
1109:
1106:
1104:
1101:
1099:
1096:
1094:
1091:
1089:
1086:
1084:
1081:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1071:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1016:
1014:
1011:
1009:
1006:
1004:
1001:
999:
996:
994:
991:
989:
986:
984:
981:
979:
976:
974:
973:Mine a source
971:
969:
966:
964:
961:
959:
956:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
934:
932:
929:
927:
924:
923:
922:
919:
917:
914:
912:
909:
907:
904:
902:
899:
897:
894:
892:
889:
887:
884:
882:
879:
877:
874:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
837:
834:
832:
829:
827:
824:
822:
821:Concept cloud
819:
817:
814:
812:
809:
807:
804:
802:
799:
797:
794:
792:
791:Cherrypicking
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
774:
772:
769:
767:
764:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
693:
691:
689:
685:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
623:Systemic bias
621:
619:
616:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
599:
596:
594:
591:
589:
586:
584:
581:
579:
576:
574:
571:
569:
566:
564:
561:
559:
556:
554:
551:
549:
546:
544:
541:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
504:
501:
499:
496:
494:
491:
489:
486:
484:
481:
479:
476:
474:
471:
469:
466:
464:
461:
459:
456:
454:
451:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
431:
427:
420:
413:
408:
406:
401:
399:
394:
393:
390:
384:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
358:
355:
353:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
338:
335:
334:
328:
325:
321:
316:
306:
304:
300:
294:
292:
287:
285:
281:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
255:
254:George Orwell
245:
243:
237:
233:
229:
225:
223:
219:
209:
200:
196:
192:
188:
179:
175:
166:
162:
160:
156:
150:
148:
144:
138:
128:
124:
121:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
61:
58:
53:
48:
44:
37:
35:
31:
25:
18:
17:
3155:About essays
3144:About essays
3051:Rouge editor
3001:Oops Defense
2781:Barnstaritis
2746:Assume faith
2568:Pokémon test
2413:High Schools
2235:WikiBullying
2199:Superhatting
2194:POV railroad
1891:Just drop it
1695:Nobody cares
1529:Divisiveness
1053:Printability
946:Style guides
765:
736:Amnesia test
593:Paraphrasing
326:
322:
318:
302:
298:
295:
288:
276:
257:
251:
238:
234:
230:
226:
215:
206:
197:
193:
189:
185:
176:
172:
163:
151:
140:
125:
120:undue weight
107:
103:
99:
93:
27:
3162:Essay guide
3046:Rouge admin
2613:Video links
2468:No big loss
2157:just madmen
2107:Don't shout
1881:How to lose
1876:Get over it
1660:Be the glue
1579:Negotiation
1436:Relist bias
1266:Removing or
1098:Stub Makers
931:Law sources
861:Don't panic
222:WP:POV fork
28:This is an
3253:Categories
3218:Guidelines
2986:No, really
2966:LTTAUTMAOK
2448:Make stubs
2169:No racists
1911:Say "MOBY"
1633:Philosophy
1506:The basics
1063:Publicists
1033:Presentism
978:Merge Test
963:Inaccuracy
446:Philosophy
313:See also:
305:the term.
143:due weight
135:See also:
72:WP:POVFORM
2696:Adminitis
2265:WikiPeace
2240:WikiCrime
2219:UPPERCASE
1599:Thank you
1231:Proseline
1023:Permastub
588:Paradoxes
503:Don't lie
256:'s novel
203:Red flags
112:verifying
57:Shortcuts
3213:Policies
2363:Coatrack
2260:WikiLove
2250:WikiHate
2164:No Nazis
2137:Griefing
1401:Immunity
653:Trifecta
483:Cohesion
331:See also
264:newspeak
2876:Emerson
2716:ANI flu
1680:Failure
1519:Apology
1416:Nothing
613:Purpose
282:" and "
155:WP:LEAD
108:content
102:and in
100:content
2358:Clones
1935:Don'ts
1856:Desist
1846:Candor
1755:Reader
65:WP:NIF
36:policy
1609:Truce
299:about
268:frame
110:, by
2881:Fart
2826:Crap
1211:Coup
563:Need
157:and
147:lead
104:form
1799:Dos
422:(?)
303:use
286:".
3255::
224:.
38:.
411:e
404:t
397:v
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.