21:
188:
199:
Expertise, especially in niche fields, often comes with proximity to the subjects at hand. An expert, by virtue of their deep knowledge and involvement in their area, is more likely to have personal or professional connections, past collaborations, or even subtle biases regarding specific topics or
240:
Self-identification is a two-edged sword: You get points from most users for being honest, and editors often recognize your expertise, but a few have used it to harass editors. Do not disclose personal information that could put you at risk in the real world, such as by attracting stalkers to your
609:
That a conflict of interest exists does not mean that material from a conflicted source or editor should necessarily be dismissed. It does mean that COI editors, and in particular paid editors, are advised to raise concerns on talk pages rather than edit affected articles directly, and to be more
195:
It's essential to differentiate between actual and potential conflicts of interest. For instance, an employee of a pharmaceutical company possesses a potential conflict of interest regarding that company and its products. However, it only becomes an actual conflict only if they choose to edit the
321:
If your conflict of interest relates to your employment, you should check with your employer. Some companies require public disclosure of the conflict of interest, and a few prohibit their employees from editing
Knowledge. If editing from your workplace, or as part of your job, it may be worth
203:
Nevertheless, experts should refrain from using
Knowledge as a platform to push personal theories or to unduly highlight matters that they find especially significant, particularly if this emphasis doesn't mirror the consensus within the broader scientific community. Actions like these might
164:(COI) involves contributing to articles and discussions about yourself or your external relationships, including family, friends and clients. Conflict-of-interest editing is strongly discouraged. It risks causing public embarrassment to the individuals and groups being promoted (see
512:, not simply knowing about the topic: Personal experience is never a valid reason for adjusting a page. Once a source has been identified, the ability of any editor to integrate it into the page and summarize it accurately is limited only by their understanding of the material.
200:
entities within their field. This proximity can be an asset, providing detailed and accurate information. However, it also raises the potential for conflicts of interest. Recognizing and navigating this balance is vital for ensuring the integrity of contributions.
333:
to the world. Corporate IP addresses are highly traceable, and public reports are sporadically issued on abusive editing by unregistered users from corporate offices, leading to embarrassment and occasionally real-world disciplinary actions.
538:. Within your expertise, focus on the 90% that everyone agrees on, rather than the 10% that is disputed. Factual errors can be brought to the attention of other editors, either on the article's talk page or at one of the noticeboards.
295:
require editors to disclose their employer, client and affiliation with respect to any edit for which they receive, or expect to receive, compensation. The disclosure must be made in at least one of the following ways:
466:
People with a close tie to the subject may be very knowledgeable about it, and their input on talk pages can be useful when it comes to the who, what, where, when, and how of complex topics. Examples include:
663:
572:. Propose improvements on the talk pages, explaining your reluctance to edit directly. Be careful not to take up a disproportionate amount of volunteer time; see
257:) to refrain from editing affected articles. They may suggest changes on the talk pages of those articles, and should disclose the COI as part of the request. The
739:
819:
767:
131:
79:
794:
106:
784:
96:
196:
associated article, engage in discussions about it, or make edits about rival products. In most other contexts, their editing remains uncontroversial.
762:
74:
652:
311:
244:
228:
642:
809:
757:
732:
121:
69:
29:
814:
647:
165:
126:
288:) advises paid editors not to edit affected articles directly, but to make suggestions for change on the articles' talk pages.
594:
842:
725:
223:
804:
116:
379:
Requesting the addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content about a product's safety or efficacy, or the deletion of
342:
These are some common mistakes that are specific to editors who have health- or medicine-related conflicts of interest.
42:
777:
89:
365:
208:. If you find yourself deeply moved by a specific medical topic, it's wise to refer to the insights laid out in
168:). "isrepresenting your affiliation with any individual or entity" is a violation of the Wikimedia Foundation's
41:
This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of
799:
631:
111:
33:
515:
563:
46:
270:
671:, on the need to present mainstream views as being mainstream, and minority views as being minority views
323:
182:
658:
176:
179:
outlines possible issues related to conflicts of interest in medicine-related articles on
Knowledge.
216:. Also, consider comparing your actions to typical behaviors observed in advocates, as described at
169:
695:
250:
772:
276:
217:
84:
604:
587:
237:
guideline to disclose it, and you are strongly discouraged from editing affected articles.
8:
611:
151:
674:
583:
529:
482:
419:
357:
213:
143:
711:
573:
553:
315:
310:
Some paid editors have included their employers' names in their account names, e.g.,
261:
205:
191:
Individuals keen on improving an article are more likely to have ties to its subject.
636:
549:
525:
431:
452:
Citing your latest paper in the hope that increased visibility will drive up your
668:
545:
437:
427:
384:
380:
281:
717:
619:
486:
361:
836:
492:
Knowledge of sources regarding a product's regulatory and commercial history
390:
292:
285:
254:
234:
209:
161:
508:
544:. Read our advice on finding the best sources for medical information at
615:
458:
Attempting to diminish or disparage a competitor's views or publications
337:
330:
705:
233:
If you have a general conflict of interest, you are encouraged by the
373:
Editing articles about an employer's or client's products or business
655:– first published in PLoS and intended for scientists and physicians
376:
Taking up disproportionate amounts of volunteers' time on talk pages
306:
a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions.
303:
a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or
500:
Knowledge of sources regarding social movements and their effects
453:
57:
Explanatory essay about the
Knowledge:Conflict of Interest page
681:
639:– an essay to help subject-matter experts understand Knowledge
187:
396:
Requesting the addition of criticism of competitors' products
408:
Promoting your medical practice, department, or institution
677:
You are allowed to cite your own papers, but within limits
625:
411:
Promoting your medical theories, approaches, or inventions
403:
Healthcare providers (physicians, surgeons, nurses, etc.)
368:, and public-relations representatives for such companies
694:
The
Foundation's terms of use are Knowledge policy, see
714:, example of an employer's policy on editing Knowledge
506:
In these cases, "knowledgeable" means knowing about
481:
Owners, employees or contractors of pharmaceutical,
356:
Owners, employees or contractors of pharmaceutical,
712:Guidelines for Participating in Knowledge from NIH
834:
747:
653:Knowledge:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge
733:
556:and is not a patient guide or drug formulary.
552:. Remember that Knowledge does not provide
489:manufacturers, and their PR representatives
249:Editors with a financial COI are advised by
643:Knowledge:How to not get outed on Knowledge
740:
726:
436:Changing the page to make sure it has the
389:Requesting the deletion of well-sourced,
224:COI disclosure and direct article editing
648:Knowledge:Knowledge is in the real world
329:Editing without an account exposes your
326:to segregate work and personal editing.
186:
582:. If you need help, post a message at
835:
622:, and more aware of their own biases.
497:Members of healthcare-advocacy groups
204:contravene Knowledge's stance against
721:
536:Identifying non-controversial changes
475:
472:
393:material about proprietary technology
350:
347:
447:Scientists in academia or companies
15:
312:these accounts from GlaxoSmithKline
13:
566:on the talk page is often helpful.
516:How you can help if you have a COI
47:thoroughly vetted by the community
43:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
854:
595:What does a conflict of interest
318:that is used by multiple people.
314:. You may not, however, set up a
267:template can be used to do this.
564:independent, third-party sources
19:
366:contract research organizations
183:Who has a conflict of interest?
688:
664:Writing for the wrong audience
632:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
524:. Anyone is welcome to revert
300:a statement on your user page,
245:Financial conflict of interest
166:Knowledge is in the real world
34:Knowledge:Conflict of Interest
1:
560:Supplying top-quality sources
843:Knowledge supplemental pages
748:Knowledge biomedical editing
229:General conflict of interest
63:Knowledge biomedical editing
7:
758:Editing for medical experts
548:. Read our style guide at
291:The Wikimedia Foundation's
70:Editing for medical experts
10:
859:
659:Knowledge:Expert retention
602:
580:Getting help with disputes
562:. Supplying high-quality
322:establishing a legitimate
274:
141:
753:
418:Healthcare advocates and
614:, more scrupulous about
588:WikiProject Pharmacology
432:tiny minority viewpoints
206:advocacy on its platform
795:Plain and simple guide
778:Biomedical information
696:Knowledge:Terms of use
542:Learning our standards
192:
107:Plain and simple guide
90:Biomedical information
790:Conflicts of interest
669:Giving equal validity
522:Meeting obvious needs
190:
102:Conflicts of interest
800:WikiProject Medicine
605:Knowledge:Pharmanoia
584:WikiProject Medicine
530:fix grammar problems
162:conflict of interest
112:WikiProject Medicine
45:as it has not been
483:dietary supplement
358:dietary supplement
193:
830:
829:
504:
503:
464:
463:
360:, diagnostic, or
55:
54:
30:explanatory essay
850:
763:Reliable sources
742:
735:
728:
719:
718:
699:
692:
570:Working together
509:reliable sources
470:
469:
345:
344:
266:
260:
160:On Knowledge, a
154:
75:Reliable sources
23:
22:
16:
858:
857:
853:
852:
851:
849:
848:
847:
833:
832:
831:
826:
785:Manual of style
749:
746:
708:
703:
702:
693:
689:
684:
628:
607:
601:
518:
385:adverse effects
383:material about
364:manufacturers,
340:
338:Common mistakes
279:
273:
264:
258:
251:WP:FINANCIALCOI
247:
231:
226:
185:
158:
157:
150:
146:
140:
139:
97:Manual of style
65:
58:
51:
50:
20:
12:
11:
5:
856:
846:
845:
828:
827:
825:
824:
823:
822:
817:
812:
807:
797:
792:
787:
782:
781:
780:
775:
770:
760:
754:
751:
750:
745:
744:
737:
730:
722:
716:
715:
707:
706:External links
704:
701:
700:
686:
685:
683:
680:
679:
678:
672:
666:
661:
656:
650:
645:
640:
634:
627:
624:
610:respectful of
600:
593:
592:
591:
577:
567:
557:
554:medical advice
539:
533:
517:
514:
502:
501:
498:
494:
493:
490:
487:medical device
478:
477:
474:
462:
461:
460:
459:
456:
448:
444:
443:
442:
441:
434:
422:
415:
414:
413:
412:
409:
404:
400:
399:
398:
397:
394:
387:
377:
374:
369:
362:medical device
353:
352:
349:
339:
336:
324:second account
316:shared account
308:
307:
304:
301:
277:WP:DISCLOSEPAY
272:
269:
246:
243:
230:
227:
225:
222:
218:WP:TENDENTIOUS
184:
181:
156:
155:
147:
142:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
129:
124:
119:
109:
104:
99:
94:
93:
92:
87:
82:
72:
66:
61:
60:
59:
56:
53:
52:
40:
39:
26:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
855:
844:
841:
840:
838:
821:
818:
816:
813:
811:
808:
806:
803:
802:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
779:
776:
774:
771:
769:
766:
765:
764:
761:
759:
756:
755:
752:
743:
738:
736:
731:
729:
724:
723:
720:
713:
710:
709:
697:
691:
687:
676:
673:
670:
667:
665:
662:
660:
657:
654:
651:
649:
646:
644:
641:
638:
635:
633:
630:
629:
623:
621:
617:
613:
606:
598:
589:
585:
581:
578:
575:
571:
568:
565:
561:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:
537:
534:
531:
527:
523:
520:
519:
513:
511:
510:
499:
496:
495:
491:
488:
484:
480:
479:
471:
468:
457:
455:
451:
450:
449:
446:
445:
439:
435:
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
417:
416:
410:
407:
406:
405:
402:
401:
395:
392:
388:
386:
382:
378:
375:
372:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
355:
354:
351:COI mistakes
346:
343:
335:
332:
327:
325:
319:
317:
313:
305:
302:
299:
298:
297:
294:
289:
287:
283:
278:
268:
263:
256:
252:
242:
238:
236:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
201:
197:
189:
180:
178:
173:
171:
167:
163:
153:
149:
148:
145:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
77:
76:
73:
71:
68:
67:
64:
48:
44:
37:
35:
31:
25:
18:
17:
789:
690:
608:
596:
579:
569:
559:
541:
535:
521:
507:
505:
465:
440:information.
381:well-sourced
341:
328:
320:
309:
293:terms of use
290:
280:
271:Paid editing
248:
239:
232:
202:
198:
194:
174:
170:terms of use
159:
101:
62:
27:
810:How to edit
675:WP:CITESELF
391:appropriate
275:Main page:
214:WP:ADVOCACY
122:How to edit
28:This is an
773:Why MEDRS?
682:References
620:neutrality
603:See also:
574:WP:COITALK
476:Expertise
426:Promoting
331:IP address
85:Why MEDRS?
32:about the
815:Resources
805:Talk page
637:WP:EXPERT
612:consensus
550:WP:MEDMOS
526:vandalism
420:activists
284:(part of
253:(part of
127:Resources
117:Talk page
837:Category
820:Outreach
626:See also
616:sourcing
546:WP:MEDRS
473:Editors
348:Editors
282:WP:NOPAY
262:edit COI
144:Shortcut
132:Outreach
454:H-index
438:"right"
152:WP:COIM
428:biased
286:WP:COI
255:WP:COI
241:home.
235:WP:COI
210:WP:SPA
599:mean?
485:, or
177:essay
175:This
618:and
528:and
212:and
36:page
768:FAQ
597:not
586:or
430:or
172:.
80:FAQ
839::
265:}}
259:{{
220:.
38:.
741:e
734:t
727:v
698:.
590:.
576:.
532:.
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
