Knowledge

:Deletion reform - Knowledge

Source 📝

21: 84:
works on the system that one user lists the page they want deleted on a subpage of the main deletion page, they put a template on the page specifying that the page is under consideration for deletion and then a vote/discussion takes place where a consensus decision is attempted. Eventually, an admin
77:
As a method of allowing ordinary editors to still participate in this exclusive activity, the Votes for Deletion (VfD) system, now renamed as Articles for Deletion (AfD), evolved. This is a forum (now a series of forums based on types of pages), where anyone can suggest pages be deleted, and others
677:
Variation on the version system sketch, whereby randomly selected editors have the ability to say that a version is better or worse than it could be, the random selection of editors being changed every 2 hours, with better (determined by scores for versions they have worked on) editors having more
74:. Over time, rules have developed about how and when editors become admins, and rules about how and when admins can use their privileged ability to delete. There are also many special additions to the Knowledge software engine to handle listing, reviewing, and restoring of deleted pages. 50:, has recently come under harsh criticism from many users on Knowledge, and there seems to be a general opinion in the community that it has to be somehow replaced or changed. This page is an effort to coordinate the different discussions and make it into a coherent, readable format. 58:
Anyone can edit Knowledge. They can create, extend, correct, change, revamp, trim and rename pages freely. The only thing they can't do is freely delete pages. Unlike these other types of editing, deleting a page is more severe, and harder to correct for mistakes or vandalism.
88:
Although there are many editors that spend a lot of their time on Knowledge participating in AfD, most also think the system can be improved in some way. This may be because AfD is dissimilar to the way the rest of Knowledge works: without
62:
This is because removing a page from Knowledge removes the history of the page. Even if the page text is somehow restored, the edit history of all the contributors is still lost, which can violate Knowledge's
704: 481: 70:
To prevent this, from very early on in Knowledge, page deletion was reserved only to editors who (in theory) are less likely to delete pages by mistake or vandalism. These select few are called
427: 524: 667: 113:
These are areas being brainstormed by the community. They are not complete, specific proposals, nor are they necessarily mutually exclusive, but categories for ideas.
686: 368: 101: 578: 190: 266: 791: 154: 230: 542: 491:
Heavily revising the procedures for the current system, for instance moving votes to talk pages and introducing binary voting, ie either delete or keep.
35:
Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the
627:
Understanding where the system is breaking down, streamline AfD by eliminating much of the guesswork and opinion/adjudication required by the process.
514: 714:
Reduce the number of articles that need to go through AFD by adding a new speedy deletion criteria requiring at least one citation for any new page.
649: 606:
Proposed system whereby all articles get a numerical rating and poor scores are automatically placed on the AfD page (after enough time and votes).
499: 560: 463: 172: 136: 118: 212: 248: 766: 395:
This is based on one idea only: deletions should be a normal part of article history, visible to all, rather than being a special case.
284: 812: 437:
A minimalistic, easy to implement system which focuses on increasing the number of votes in a given time, and prioritizing AFDs.
320: 301: 379:
Allow articles marked for deletion to be deleted without AfD if uncontested. ( Optional and reversable precursor to AfD )
344: 36: 779: 240:
Different ideas for how the current system can be done more expediently, such as removal of AfDs with clear consensus.
807: 596: 510: 445: 81: 47: 146:
Using templates to include an article in a category and have the relevant discussion on the article's talk page.
744: 737: 386: 291: 659:
Similar proposal to the version system sketch, but more automated, applying to every version, and without AfD
730: 90: 722: 402: 770:. If you wish to comment on a proposal, please do so at the page relevant to the proposal in question. 752: 615: 588:
Move to categories and talk pages, binary voting, any user can close and admin s review if requested
359:
Allow article blanking as uncontested deletion method. ( Optional and reversable precursor to AfD )
71: 422:
These proposals have either been inactive for a few weeks or have been specifically withdrawn.
258:
Different ways of making AfD policy instead of a procedure and how that would affect the system
785: 8: 222:
Change how the current system displays information to easily see how each vote is going
28: 20: 764:
If you wish to make general comments or participate in the discussion, you can do so
794:, which aims to agree a policy on speedy-keeping articles within the current system. 570:
Use daily article categories and have discussion on talk pages, and a little more.
417: 201: 200:
Make specialized policies for inclusion or deletion for different subjects, see
348: 801: 411:
In testing. If proposed deletion uncontested after 7 days, no need for AfD.
108: 638: 630: 324: 759: 634: 534:
Establishing firm rules for articles on different topics and other ideas.
311:
Disallow content as a criterion for deletion, replacing it with topic.
726:(as far as I know, this was never proposed to the community at large) 473:
A variation on Requests for Deletion which simplifies many procedures
455:
Add a category to the article and present your case on the talk page.
296:
These are the proposals that are or were active, as of March 2006.
276:
Prevent articles from being deleted solely for being "non-notable"
93:, without voting, and without its own special centralized system. 53: 782:, a list of rejected changes to Knowledge's deletion policies 696:
A clarification of user's choices and administrator's powers.
552:
Pre-emptive redirects. This was an idea; now it's a proposal
336:
A project to create a workable system for Deletion sorting.
64: 773: 85:
reviews the whole discussion, and may delete the page.
792:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Speedy keep proposal
164:
Keeping the system, but reform the voting-procedures
27:
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
748:(only proposal to gather anything near a majority) 515:Knowledge:Votes for Deletion, the next generation 799: 641:, and wishes to avoid further confrontations.) 182:Changing the role of the administrator in AfD 705:Speedy Delete For Pages With No Citations 102:Advantages and problems of current system 482:Votes for Deletion, the next generation 800: 780:Knowledge:Perennial proposals#Deletion 302:Knowledge:Amendment to deletion policy 128:Removing a central page for discussion 46:The deletion procedure on Knowledge, 678:chance of being selected, and no AfD 15: 788:, which aims to reduce AfD debates. 13: 292:Current proposals for a new system 14: 824: 637:. (Note: Xaa is being stalked by 428:Prioritization and Noticeability 19: 813:Knowledge essays about deletion 511:Knowledge:Requests for deletion 191:Specialised policies/precedents 82:Knowledge:Articles for Deletion 48:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 745:Knowledge:Preliminary Deletion 738:Knowledge:Expeditious deletion 668:-Ril-'s alternative suggestion 525:Uninvited Company's suggestion 387:Knowledge:Transparent deletion 1: 345:The Pure Wiki Deletion System 731:Knowledge:Countdown_deletion 633:, please see this article's 629:Withdrawn at the request of 7: 723:Knowledge:Deletion requests 403:Knowledge:Proposed deletion 10: 829: 753:Knowledge:Managed Deletion 267:Remove notable requirement 155:Remove or simplify voting 231:Move things more quickly 808:Inactive project pages 464:The butt-simple option 446:Requests for deletion 369:Uncontested deletions 78:agree or disagree. 786:Knowledge:Importance 418:Historical proposals 321:Categorized deletion 579:Gazpacho's proposal 687:The Karmafist Plan 650:-Ril-'s suggestion 91:classes of editors 109:Ideas/Suggestions 44: 43: 820: 760:General comments 119:Decentralisation 40: 23: 16: 828: 827: 823: 822: 821: 819: 818: 817: 798: 797: 776: 762: 543:Speedy redirect 420: 294: 111: 56: 34: 12: 11: 5: 826: 816: 815: 810: 796: 795: 789: 783: 775: 772: 761: 758: 757: 756: 749: 741: 734: 727: 718: 717: 716: 715: 709: 708: 700: 699: 698: 697: 691: 690: 682: 681: 680: 679: 672: 671: 663: 662: 661: 660: 654: 653: 645: 644: 643: 642: 621: 620: 616:Xaa's Proposal 610: 609: 608: 607: 601: 600: 597:Version System 592: 591: 590: 589: 583: 582: 574: 573: 572: 571: 565: 564: 556: 555: 554: 553: 547: 546: 538: 537: 536: 535: 529: 528: 520: 519: 518: 517: 509:A mix between 504: 503: 495: 494: 493: 492: 486: 485: 477: 476: 475: 474: 468: 467: 459: 458: 457: 456: 450: 449: 441: 440: 439: 438: 432: 431: 419: 416: 415: 414: 413: 412: 406: 405: 399: 398: 397: 396: 390: 389: 383: 382: 381: 380: 374: 373: 363: 362: 361: 360: 354: 353: 340: 339: 338: 337: 331: 330: 315: 314: 313: 312: 306: 305: 293: 290: 289: 288: 280: 279: 278: 277: 271: 270: 262: 261: 260: 259: 253: 252: 244: 243: 242: 241: 235: 234: 226: 225: 224: 223: 217: 216: 208: 207: 206: 205: 195: 194: 186: 185: 184: 183: 177: 176: 168: 167: 166: 165: 159: 158: 150: 149: 148: 147: 141: 140: 137:Categorization 132: 131: 130: 129: 123: 122: 110: 107: 106: 105: 96: 55: 52: 42: 41: 33: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 825: 814: 811: 809: 806: 805: 803: 793: 790: 787: 784: 781: 778: 777: 771: 769: 768: 755: 754: 750: 747: 746: 742: 740: 739: 735: 733: 732: 728: 725: 724: 720: 719: 713: 712: 711: 710: 707: 706: 702: 701: 695: 694: 693: 692: 689: 688: 684: 683: 676: 675: 674: 673: 670: 669: 665: 664: 658: 657: 656: 655: 652: 651: 647: 646: 640: 636: 632: 628: 625: 624: 623: 622: 619: 618: 617: 612: 611: 605: 604: 603: 602: 599: 598: 594: 593: 587: 586: 585: 584: 581: 580: 576: 575: 569: 568: 567: 566: 563: 562: 558: 557: 551: 550: 549: 548: 545: 544: 540: 539: 533: 532: 531: 530: 527: 526: 522: 521: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 505: 502: 501: 497: 496: 490: 489: 488: 487: 484: 483: 479: 478: 472: 471: 470: 469: 466: 465: 461: 460: 454: 453: 452: 451: 448: 447: 443: 442: 436: 435: 434: 433: 430: 429: 425: 424: 423: 410: 409: 408: 407: 404: 401: 400: 394: 393: 392: 391: 388: 385: 384: 378: 377: 376: 375: 372: 371: 370: 365: 364: 358: 357: 356: 355: 352: 350: 346: 342: 341: 335: 334: 333: 332: 329: 328: 326: 322: 317: 316: 310: 309: 308: 307: 304: 303: 299: 298: 297: 287: 286: 282: 281: 275: 274: 273: 272: 269: 268: 264: 263: 257: 256: 255: 254: 251: 250: 246: 245: 239: 238: 237: 236: 233: 232: 228: 227: 221: 220: 219: 218: 215: 214: 210: 209: 203: 199: 198: 197: 196: 193: 192: 188: 187: 181: 180: 179: 178: 175: 174: 173:Change powers 170: 169: 163: 162: 161: 160: 157: 156: 152: 151: 145: 144: 143: 142: 139: 138: 134: 133: 127: 126: 125: 124: 121: 120: 116: 115: 114: 104: 103: 99: 98: 97: 94: 92: 86: 83: 79: 75: 73: 68: 66: 60: 51: 49: 38: 32: 30: 25: 22: 18: 17: 765: 763: 751: 743: 736: 729: 721: 703: 685: 666: 648: 626: 614: 613: 595: 577: 559: 541: 523: 500:DPL deletion 498: 480: 462: 444: 426: 421: 367: 366: 343: 319: 318: 300: 295: 283: 265: 247: 229: 211: 204:for instance 189: 171: 153: 135: 117: 112: 100: 95: 87: 80: 76: 69: 61: 57: 45: 37:village pump 26: 561:Small fixes 213:Information 802:Categories 54:Background 31:reference. 29:historical 635:Talk Page 67:rules. 774:See also 202:WP:MUSIC 639:Amorrow 631:Amorrow 349:WP:PWDS 249:Policy 72:admins 325:WP:DS 285:Other 767:here 513:and 65:GFDL 804:: 351:) 347:( 327:) 323:( 39:.

Index


historical
village pump
Knowledge:Articles for deletion
GFDL
admins
Knowledge:Articles for Deletion
classes of editors
Advantages and problems of current system
Decentralisation
Categorization
Remove or simplify voting
Change powers
Specialised policies/precedents
WP:MUSIC
Information
Move things more quickly
Policy
Remove notable requirement
Other
Knowledge:Amendment to deletion policy
Categorized deletion
WP:DS
The Pure Wiki Deletion System
WP:PWDS
Uncontested deletions
Knowledge:Transparent deletion
Knowledge:Proposed deletion
Prioritization and Noticeability
Requests for deletion

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.