822:
164:
71:
156:
498:. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule often attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Fourth reverts just outside the 24-hour period will usually also be considered edit-warring, especially if repeated or combined with other edit-warring behavior. See
882:
141:
774:, with the words "more than three reverts" replaced by "more than one revert". There may also be a requirement to discuss each reversion on the talk page, and sometimes the phrase "24-hour period" is replaced by some other time period, such as "one week" or "one month". The rule may be applied to pages (excepting Talk pages) or editors.
852:}} template message on their user talk page. Avoid posting a generic warning template if you are actively involved in the edit war yourself; it can be seen as aggressive. Consider writing your own note to the user specifically appropriate for the situation, with a view to explicitly cooling things down.
862:
If, despite such efforts, one or more users fail to cease edit warring, refuse to work collaboratively or heed the information given to them, or do not move on to appropriate dispute resolution, then consider making a request for administrative involvement. The standard way to do this is to add a
790:
An imposed rule does not apply retroactively. That is, if an editor has reverted in the past 24 hours before a 1RR has been applied, their first subsequent revert is not a violation, although editors in these instances are strongly encouraged to discuss instead of revert.
525:
operated by one editor count together. Editors violating 3RR will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident. Even without a 3RR violation, an administrator may still act if they believe a user's behavior constitutes edit warring, and any user may
212:
is to undo the action of another editor. The three-revert rule states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period. Any appearance of
217:
by reverting a fourth time just outside of the 24-hour slot will usually be considered edit warring. There are certain exemptions to the three-revert rule, such as reverting vandalism or clear violations of the policy on biographies of living persons; see
1003:
disruptive behavior, not to punish it. Where a block is appropriate, 24 hours is common for a first offense; administrators tend to issue longer blocks for repeated or aggravated violations, and will consider other factors, such as
541:
their own most recent reversion. Administrators may take this into account and decide not to block in such cases—for example, if the user is not a habitual edit warrior and is genuinely trying to rectify their own mistake.
510:. The term "revert" is defined as any edit (or administrative action) that reverses or undoes the actions of other editors, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, and whether performed using
702:
If you are claiming an exemption, make sure there is a clearly visible edit summary or separate section of the talk page that explains the exemption. When in doubt, do not revert. Instead, follow the guidance below in
191:. An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. Claiming "My edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring" is not a valid defense.
183:
rather than edit war. Edit warring is unconstructive, creates animosity between editors, makes consensus harder to reach, and causes confusion for readers. Users who engage in edit warring risk being
798:). Editors may also voluntarily agree to abide by stricter reverting standards on other pages in response to problems in a particular area or as a general editing philosophy. For more details, see
167:
Edit warring doesn't help when attempting to resolve disputes. In fact, engaging in such behavior will usually inflame the dispute, poisoning the environment that all
Knowledge editors share.
1234:
976:
Rather than reverting repeatedly, discuss the matter with others; if a revert is necessary, another editor may conclude the same and do it (without prompting), which would then demonstrate
396:
Reverting edits in one's own user page is rarely edit warring. Traditionally, Knowledge offers wide latitude to users to manage their user space as they see fit. For more information, see
359:(BRD) cycle. An edit war only arises if the situation develops into a series of back-and-forth reverts. Nevertheless, not every revert or controversial edit is regarded as edit warring:
1381:
1628:
1221:
1015:, "Administrators should not normally use their tools in matters in which they are personally involved (for example, in a content dispute in which they are a party)."
969:. Neutral editors aware of the dispute will help curb egregious edits while also building consensus about the dispute. If these methods fail, seek informal and formal
1008:
and previous blocks. Where multiple editors engage in edit wars or breach 3RR, administrators should consider all sides, since perceived unfairness can fuel issues.
950:
listed above or limiting themselves to a single revert; if there is further dispute, they seek dialog or outside help rather than make the problem worse, i.e., they
833:
and discuss the issue on the associated talk page or seek help at appropriate venues. Other alternative approaches recommended within the community are suggested in
1543:
810:
226:
a definition of "edit warring", and it is absolutely possible to engage in edit warring without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.
518:, or done so completely manually. A series of consecutively saved reverting edits by one user, with no intervening edits by another user, counts as one revert.
1875:
829:
It is better to seek help in addressing the issue than to engage in edit warring. When disagreement becomes apparent, one, both, or all participants should
545:
Edit warring and 3RR violations are not detected automatically. Either wait for an administrator to take action, or take any of the steps suggested in the
355:, but while a potentially controversial change may be made to find out whether it is opposed, another editor may revert it. This may be the beginning of a
1025:
864:
673:
650:(NFCC). What counts as exempt under NFCC can be controversial, and should be established as a violation first. Consider opening a deletion discussion at
527:
60:
175:
occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions. Editors engaged in a dispute should reach
1374:
786:): The zero-revert rule means a complete prohibition on reverts (as defined for the purpose of the three-revert rule) applied to one or more editors.
1801:
1214:
618:
332:
1834:
1105:
1558:
1207:
479:), the violation of which will usually be considered edit warring, and often leads to the user engaging in the behavior to be blocked.
2034:
1030:
37:
1829:
1568:
1310:
669:
379:
961:
When discussion does not produce a conclusion, bringing wider attention to a dispute can lead to compromise. Consider getting a
928:, which is where a reviewing administrator will look for evidence of trying to settle the dispute. Instead of reverting, add an
1849:
1635:
1504:
981:
955:
397:
840:
If the edit warring user(s) appear unaware that edit warring is prohibited, they can be told about this policy by posting a {{
1035:
870:
356:
1099:
951:
940:
799:
795:
2100:
1932:
1087:
929:
692:
647:
2011:
662:
506:
The term "page" in the three-revert rule above is defined as any page on
Knowledge, including those in talk and project
222:
for details. The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly; it
1822:
1000:
891:
246:
17:
1854:
1231:
325:
79:
1844:
1839:
2110:
2105:
1859:
1796:
1305:
1300:
748:
364:
855:
If several days have passed since the last edit action, consider doing nothing—our primary objective is to stop
1573:
1533:
1474:
1391:
1319:
1295:
1065:
966:
933:
651:
639:
522:
372:
291:
237:
805:
668:
Removing contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced according to
Knowledge's
1469:
1118:
286:
2006:
740:"WP:0RR" and "WP:1RR" redirect here. For zero-revert rule for administrative action (no wheel-warring), see
614:
368:
2064:
1885:
1563:
1538:
1484:
1093:
1050:
1045:
970:
825:
If an edit war develops, participants should try to discuss the issue on the talk page and work things out.
816:
752:
464:
318:
266:
180:
1421:
382:, where negative unsourced content is being introduced, the risk of harm is such that removal is required.
367:, general insertion or removal of material, or other good-faith changes are not considered vandalism. See
2095:
1927:
1703:
1650:
1623:
1553:
1528:
1123:
756:
427:
214:
378:
Reverting to enforce certain overriding policies is not considered edit warring. For example, under the
2049:
1499:
1494:
1464:
1369:
1325:
1253:
1060:
424:
should not be used to undo good-faith changes in content disputes without an appropriate edit summary.
87:
1267:
1817:
1698:
1618:
1401:
1396:
460:
390:
301:
184:
1880:
1786:
1741:
1693:
1688:
1406:
1364:
1330:
1012:
710:
606:
386:
346:
276:
188:
1774:
1595:
1359:
1290:
1070:
962:
632:
149:
Don't use edits to fight with other editors. Disagreements should be resolved through discussion.
49:
41:
907:
1769:
1489:
1246:
1113:
610:
296:
2016:
672:(BLP) policy. What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the
1640:
256:
1199:
946:
Some experienced editors deliberately adopt a policy of reverting only edits covered by the
2073:
1939:
1578:
1454:
1386:
1354:
1315:
1162:
1137:
Yasseri, Taha; Sumi, Robert; Rung, András; Kornai, András; Kertész, János (June 20, 2012).
599:
281:
123:
1996:
958:
where views are polarized and emotions run high, resulting in more frequent edit warring.
580:
573:
8:
1944:
1645:
1548:
1459:
1449:
1081:
1055:
1040:
977:
628:
566:
507:
467:
to the affected page. While any amount of edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a
306:
261:
176:
45:
33:
1166:
794:
Editors of policy and guideline pages are strongly encouraged to follow 1RR or 0RR (see
1956:
1951:
1444:
1184:
1152:
1138:
1005:
899:
841:
731:
724:
716:
558:
515:
448:
441:
433:
421:
251:
116:
101:
91:
56:
55:
For the technical problem when multiple editors try to edit the same page at once, see
994:
109:
1791:
1781:
1665:
1189:
921:
658:
413:
405:
352:
1973:
691:
Considerable leeway is also given to editors reverting to maintain the quality of a
538:
511:
1180:
1170:
598:
Reverting edits to pages in your own user space, as long as you are respecting the
552:
468:
417:
195:
2001:
821:
229:
1175:
999:
Administrators decide whether to issue a warning or block; these are intended to
925:
849:
684:
409:
1718:
631:—edits that any well-intentioned user would agree constitute vandalism, such as
1075:
845:
680:
209:
2089:
741:
1192:
521:
The three-revert rule applies per person, not per account; reverts made by
770:): The one-revert rule is analogous to the three-revert rule as described
404:
When reverting, be sure to indicate your reasons. This can be done in the
1130:
683:, where the content would be eligible for page deletion under criterion
163:
363:
Reverting vandalism is not edit warring. However, edits from a slanted
696:
1143:
657:
Removal of content that is clearly illegal under U.S. law, such as
1157:
546:
86:
It describes a widely accepted standard that all editors should
591:
The following reverts are exempt from the edit-warring policy:
1229:
920:
Once it is clear there is a dispute, avoid relying solely on
1904:
747:
Additional restrictions on reverting may be imposed by the
494:—whether involving the same or different material—within a
1018:
398:
Knowledge:User pages § Ownership and editing of user pages
155:
984:
rather than becoming part of the dispute by reverting.
941:
Knowledge:Reverting § Avoid reverting during discussion
704:
890:
Communication is the key to avoiding conflict. Follow
989:
use common sense, and do not participate in edit wars
459:
Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be
1026:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
954:. This policy may be particularly appropriate for
865:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
537:If an editor violates 3RR by mistake, they should
61:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
59:. For reporting editors who are edit warring, see
32:"WP:WAR" redirects here. For similar topics, see
2087:
1382:Do not include copies of lengthy primary sources
530:with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is
159:Knowledge page history showing a severe edit war
1544:Do not disrupt Knowledge to illustrate a point
892:Knowledge:Editing policy § Talking and editing
595:Reverting your own actions ("self-reverting").
1215:
834:
547:§ What to do if you see edit-warring behavior
534:to revert a page a specific number of times.
326:
1970:
1876:Categories, lists, and navigation templates
811:What to do if you see edit-warring behavior
373:Knowledge:Vandalism § What is not vandalism
1222:
1208:
1106:Knowledge:Don't shoot yourself in the foot
771:
333:
319:
200:
90:follow. Changes made to it should reflect
1183:
1174:
1156:
1031:Knowledge:Arguments to avoid in edit wars
924:and discuss the matter on the associated
78:This page documents an English Knowledge
820:
796:Knowledge:Policies and guidelines § Bold
369:Knowledge:Vandalism § Types of vandalism
162:
154:
38:Knowledge:Knowledge is not about winning
1001:prevent, deter, and encourage change in
380:policy on biographies of living persons
14:
2088:
755:procedures, or by the community under
1203:
1036:Knowledge:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
676:instead of relying on this exemption.
654:instead of relying on this exemption.
1139:"Dynamics of Conflicts in Knowledge"
1100:Knowledge:Revert only when necessary
876:
800:Knowledge:Revert only when necessary
705:§ Handling of edit-warring behaviors
135:
65:
2035:List of all policies and guidelines
1088:Knowledge:Alternatives to reversion
24:
2074:Summaries of values and principles
1915:
1753:
1516:
1342:
806:Handling of edit-warring behaviors
27:Knowledge policy on editor conduct
25:
2122:
1984:
1981:
1912:
1729:
1676:
1673:
1606:
1603:
1559:Please do not bite the newcomers
1432:
1278:
880:
463:from editing to prevent further
351:Knowledge encourages editors to
139:
69:
947:
605:Reverting actions performed by
499:
412:. Anti-vandalism tools such as
219:
1066:Knowledge:Ownership of content
759:. These restrictions include:
652:Knowledge:Files for discussion
635:and adding offensive language.
482:The three-revert rule states:
13:
1:
1569:Responding to threats of harm
1311:Biographies of living persons
1119:Knowledge:Tendentious editing
687:if it were a standalone page.
670:biographies of living persons
1636:Criteria for speedy deletion
1505:Paid-contribution disclosure
1176:10.1371/journal.pone.0038869
1094:Knowledge:Baby and bathwater
1051:Knowledge:Disruptive editing
1046:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
817:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
7:
1124:Knowledge:The Wrong Version
888:This section in a nutshell:
648:the non-free content policy
609:in violation of a ban, and
486:An editor must not perform
10:
2127:
2101:Knowledge conduct policies
1061:Knowledge:Lamest edit wars
952:revert only when necessary
897:
835:§ How to avoid an edit war
814:
739:
714:
556:
431:
393:users is not edit warring.
344:
99:
54:
31:
2029:
1969:
1902:
1868:
1810:
1765:
1750:
1726:
1716:
1663:
1593:
1513:
1429:
1419:
1339:
1275:
1265:
1241:
663:links to pirated software
871:How to avoid an edit war
695:while it appears on the
347:Knowledge:Editing policy
147:This page in a nutshell:
2012:Licensing and copyright
1232:policies and guidelines
1071:Knowledge:Page-move war
982:Request page protection
930:appropriate cleanup tag
488:more than three reverts
50:Knowledge:Genre warrior
42:Knowledge:Page-move war
2111:Knowledge user conduct
2106:Knowledge edit warring
1114:Knowledge:Sockpuppetry
995:Administrator guidance
932:and keep in mind that
826:
679:Reverting unambiguous
168:
160:
2007:Friendly space policy
1797:Broad-concept article
1306:What Knowledge is not
1301:Neutral point of view
824:
749:Arbitration Committee
428:The three-revert rule
357:bold, revert, discuss
166:
158:
1574:Talk page guidelines
1534:Conflict of interest
1475:Ownership of content
1320:Copyright violations
1296:No original research
956:controversial topics
934:there is no due-date
640:copyright violations
292:Ownership of content
230:What edit warring is
1470:No personal attacks
1392:Don't create hoaxes
1167:2012PLoSO...738869Y
1082:Knowledge:Reverting
1056:Knowledge:Etiquette
1041:Knowledge:Consensus
967:request for comment
528:report edit warring
385:Reverting edits of
287:No personal attacks
46:Knowledge:Wheel war
2096:Knowledge policies
2065:List of guidelines
1886:Template namespace
1564:Courtesy vanishing
1539:Disruptive editing
1485:Dispute resolution
971:dispute resolution
832:
827:
785:
781:
769:
765:
753:contentious topics
751:, by admins under
711:Other revert rules
533:
532:not an entitlement
497:
493:
489:
478:
474:
267:Dispute resolution
207:
203:
181:dispute resolution
169:
161:
57:Help:Edit conflict
18:Knowledge:Edit war
2083:
2082:
2025:
2024:
1965:
1964:
1928:Project namespace
1898:
1897:
1894:
1893:
1835:Dates and numbers
1802:Understandability
1712:
1711:
1659:
1658:
1651:Revision deletion
1624:Proposed deletion
1589:
1588:
1554:Gaming the system
1529:Assume good faith
1415:
1414:
1013:WP:Administrators
987:The bottom line:
918:
917:
830:
783:
779:
767:
763:
757:General sanctions
659:child pornography
638:Removal of clear
531:
523:multiple accounts
495:
491:
487:
476:
473:three-revert rule
472:
343:
342:
215:gaming the system
205:
201:three-revert rule
199:
153:
152:
134:
133:
16:(Redirected from
2118:
2060:
2059:
2050:List of policies
2045:
2044:
2002:List of policies
1989:
1988:
1987:
1979:
1978:
1975:
1972:
1920:
1919:
1918:
1910:
1909:
1906:
1903:Project content
1763:
1762:
1758:
1757:
1756:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1724:
1723:
1720:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1671:
1670:
1667:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1601:
1600:
1597:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1500:Child protection
1495:No legal threats
1465:Ignore all rules
1437:
1436:
1435:
1427:
1426:
1423:
1370:Reliable sources
1347:
1346:
1345:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1273:
1272:
1269:
1254:Ignore all rules
1236:
1224:
1217:
1210:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1187:
1178:
1160:
980:for the action.
910:
884:
883:
877:
780:zero-revert rule
734:
727:
693:featured article
642:or content that
583:
576:
569:
502:for exemptions.
469:bright-line rule
451:
444:
335:
328:
321:
238:Conduct policies
234:
233:
143:
142:
136:
126:
119:
112:
73:
72:
66:
21:
2126:
2125:
2121:
2120:
2119:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2086:
2085:
2084:
2079:
2057:
2056:
2042:
2041:
2021:
1985:
1983:
1961:
1916:
1914:
1890:
1864:
1818:Manual of Style
1806:
1754:
1752:
1746:
1730:
1728:
1708:
1704:Page protection
1677:
1675:
1655:
1619:Deletion policy
1607:
1605:
1585:
1517:
1515:
1509:
1433:
1431:
1411:
1402:Patent nonsense
1397:Fringe theories
1343:
1341:
1335:
1279:
1277:
1261:
1237:
1228:
1136:
1133:
1131:Further reading
1128:
1021:
997:
914:
913:
908:WP:AVOIDEDITWAR
906:
902:
881:
873:
842:subst:uw-ewsoft
819:
813:
808:
764:one-revert rule
745:
738:
737:
730:
723:
719:
713:
674:BLP noticeboard
587:
586:
579:
572:
565:
561:
555:
549:section below.
504:
455:
454:
447:
440:
436:
430:
349:
339:
302:Username policy
232:
140:
130:
129:
122:
115:
108:
104:
96:
95:
70:
64:
53:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2124:
2114:
2113:
2108:
2103:
2098:
2081:
2080:
2078:
2077:
2070:
2069:
2068:
2053:
2030:
2027:
2026:
2023:
2022:
2020:
2019:
2017:Privacy policy
2014:
2009:
2004:
1999:
1993:
1991:
1976:
1967:
1966:
1963:
1962:
1960:
1959:
1954:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1924:
1922:
1907:
1900:
1899:
1896:
1895:
1892:
1891:
1889:
1888:
1883:
1881:Categorization
1878:
1872:
1870:
1869:Classification
1866:
1865:
1863:
1862:
1857:
1852:
1847:
1842:
1837:
1832:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1814:
1812:
1808:
1807:
1805:
1804:
1799:
1794:
1789:
1787:Disambiguation
1784:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1766:
1760:
1748:
1747:
1745:
1744:
1742:Editing policy
1738:
1736:
1721:
1714:
1713:
1710:
1709:
1707:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1691:
1689:Administrators
1685:
1683:
1668:
1661:
1660:
1657:
1656:
1654:
1653:
1648:
1643:
1638:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1621:
1615:
1613:
1598:
1591:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1571:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1551:
1546:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1525:
1523:
1511:
1510:
1508:
1507:
1502:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1482:
1477:
1472:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1452:
1447:
1441:
1439:
1424:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1410:
1409:
1407:External links
1404:
1399:
1394:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1367:
1365:Citing sources
1362:
1357:
1351:
1349:
1337:
1336:
1334:
1333:
1331:Article titles
1328:
1323:
1313:
1308:
1303:
1298:
1293:
1287:
1285:
1270:
1263:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1230:Knowledge key
1227:
1226:
1219:
1212:
1204:
1198:
1197:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1103:
1097:
1091:
1085:
1076:Help:Reverting
1073:
1068:
1063:
1058:
1053:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1033:
1028:
1022:
1020:
1017:
996:
993:
990:
965:or starting a
922:edit summaries
916:
915:
912:
911:
903:
898:
895:
885:
872:
869:
858:
812:
809:
807:
804:
788:
787:
776:
775:
736:
735:
728:
720:
715:
712:
709:
689:
688:
677:
666:
655:
644:unquestionably
636:
622:
603:
596:
585:
584:
577:
570:
562:
557:
554:
551:
496:24-hour period
484:
453:
452:
445:
437:
432:
429:
426:
402:
401:
394:
383:
376:
341:
340:
338:
337:
330:
323:
315:
312:
311:
310:
309:
304:
299:
294:
289:
284:
279:
277:Editing policy
274:
269:
264:
259:
254:
249:
241:
240:
231:
228:
225:
151:
150:
144:
132:
131:
128:
127:
120:
113:
105:
100:
97:
85:
84:
76:
74:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2123:
2112:
2109:
2107:
2104:
2102:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2093:
2091:
2076:
2075:
2071:
2067:
2066:
2061:
2054:
2052:
2051:
2046:
2039:
2038:
2037:
2036:
2032:
2031:
2028:
2018:
2015:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2005:
2003:
2000:
1998:
1995:
1994:
1992:
1990:
1980:
1977:
1968:
1958:
1955:
1953:
1950:
1946:
1943:
1942:
1941:
1938:
1934:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1926:
1925:
1923:
1921:
1911:
1908:
1901:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1871:
1867:
1861:
1858:
1856:
1853:
1851:
1848:
1846:
1843:
1841:
1838:
1836:
1833:
1831:
1830:Accessibility
1828:
1824:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1816:
1815:
1813:
1809:
1803:
1800:
1798:
1795:
1793:
1790:
1788:
1785:
1783:
1780:
1776:
1775:Summary style
1773:
1772:
1771:
1768:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1749:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1737:
1735:
1725:
1722:
1715:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1697:
1695:
1692:
1690:
1687:
1686:
1684:
1682:
1672:
1669:
1662:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1642:
1639:
1637:
1634:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1622:
1620:
1617:
1616:
1614:
1612:
1602:
1599:
1592:
1580:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1570:
1567:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1550:
1547:
1545:
1542:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1526:
1524:
1522:
1512:
1506:
1503:
1501:
1498:
1496:
1493:
1491:
1488:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1478:
1476:
1473:
1471:
1468:
1466:
1463:
1461:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1448:
1446:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1438:
1428:
1425:
1418:
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1398:
1395:
1393:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1368:
1366:
1363:
1361:
1360:Autobiography
1358:
1356:
1353:
1352:
1350:
1348:
1338:
1332:
1329:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1312:
1309:
1307:
1304:
1302:
1299:
1297:
1294:
1292:
1291:Verifiability
1289:
1288:
1286:
1284:
1274:
1271:
1264:
1256:
1255:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1244:
1243:
1240:
1233:
1225:
1220:
1218:
1213:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1202:
1194:
1191:
1186:
1182:
1177:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1151:(6): e38869.
1150:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1135:
1134:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1107:
1104:
1101:
1098:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1079:
1077:
1074:
1072:
1069:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1054:
1052:
1049:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1032:
1029:
1027:
1024:
1023:
1016:
1014:
1011:According to
1009:
1007:
1002:
992:
988:
985:
983:
979:
974:
972:
968:
964:
963:third opinion
959:
957:
953:
949:
944:
942:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
909:
905:
904:
901:
896:
893:
889:
886:
879:
878:
875:
868:
866:
860:
856:
853:
851:
847:
843:
838:
836:
831:cease warring
823:
818:
803:
801:
797:
792:
778:
777:
773:
762:
761:
760:
758:
754:
750:
743:
733:
729:
726:
722:
721:
718:
708:
706:
700:
698:
694:
686:
682:
678:
675:
671:
667:
664:
660:
656:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
634:
633:page blanking
630:
627:
623:
620:
617:of banned or
616:
612:
608:
604:
601:
597:
594:
593:
592:
589:
582:
578:
575:
571:
568:
564:
563:
560:
550:
548:
543:
540:
535:
529:
524:
519:
517:
513:
509:
503:
501:
483:
480:
470:
466:
462:
457:
450:
446:
443:
439:
438:
435:
425:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
399:
395:
392:
388:
384:
381:
377:
374:
370:
366:
365:point of view
362:
361:
360:
358:
354:
348:
336:
331:
329:
324:
322:
317:
316:
314:
313:
308:
305:
303:
300:
298:
295:
293:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
273:
270:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
247:Block evasion
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
236:
235:
227:
223:
221:
216:
211:
202:
198:known as the
197:
192:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
165:
157:
148:
145:
138:
137:
125:
121:
118:
114:
111:
107:
106:
103:
98:
93:
89:
83:
81:
75:
68:
67:
62:
58:
51:
47:
43:
39:
35:
30:
19:
2072:
2063:
2055:
2048:
2040:
2033:
1997:Terms of Use
1982:
1933:WikiProjects
1913:
1850:Lead section
1770:Article size
1751:
1727:
1674:
1664:Enforcement
1604:
1514:
1490:Sockpuppetry
1480:Edit warring
1479:
1430:
1340:
1276:
1252:
1247:Five pillars
1245:
1148:
1142:
1010:
998:
986:
975:
960:
945:
937:
919:
887:
874:
861:
854:
850:subst:uw-3rr
839:
828:
793:
789:
746:
701:
690:
643:
625:
607:banned users
590:
588:
544:
536:
520:
505:
485:
481:
458:
456:
406:edit summary
403:
350:
297:Sockpuppetry
272:Edit warring
271:
193:
172:
170:
146:
77:
34:WP:NOTBATTLE
29:
1641:Attack page
1629:Biographies
859:edit wars.
846:subst:uw-ew
615:meatpuppets
611:sockpuppets
602:guidelines.
492:single page
471:called the
257:Clean start
196:bright line
194:There is a
2090:Categories
1945:User boxes
1940:User pages
1579:Signatures
1455:Harassment
1387:Plagiarism
1355:Notability
948:exceptions
863:report at
815:See also:
624:Reverting
553:Exemptions
465:disruption
345:See also:
282:Harassment
179:or pursue
124:WP:EDITWAR
1952:Shortcuts
1646:Oversight
1594:Deletion
1549:Etiquette
1460:Vandalism
1450:Consensus
1326:Image use
1316:Copyright
1158:1202.3643
1078:(how-to)
978:consensus
926:talk page
848:}}, or {{
717:Shortcuts
697:Main Page
646:violates
629:vandalism
600:user page
581:WP:3RRBLP
574:WP:NOT3RR
559:Shortcuts
434:Shortcuts
410:talk page
307:Vandalism
262:Consensus
177:consensus
102:Shortcuts
92:consensus
1957:Subpages
1823:Contents
1792:Hatnotes
1717:Editing
1699:Blocking
1445:Civility
1420:Conduct
1375:Medicine
1266:Content
1193:22745683
1144:PLOS ONE
1019:See also
1006:civility
938:See also
900:Shortcut
567:WP:3RRNO
516:rollback
422:rollback
252:Civility
187:or even
173:edit war
88:normally
1855:Linking
1782:Be bold
1694:Banning
1185:3380063
1163:Bibcode
1108:(essay)
1102:(essay)
1096:(essay)
1090:(essay)
1084:(essay)
626:obvious
619:blocked
539:reverse
461:blocked
414:Twinkle
408:and/or
391:blocked
353:be bold
185:blocked
1845:Layout
1840:Images
857:active
844:}}, {{
742:WP:0WW
732:WP:1RR
725:WP:0RR
621:users.
508:spaces
449:WP:4RR
442:WP:3RR
418:Huggle
387:banned
224:is not
210:revert
208:). To
189:banned
117:WP:WAR
80:policy
48:, and
1860:Lists
1811:Style
1153:arXiv
772:above
500:below
490:on a
220:below
110:WP:EW
1190:PMID
681:spam
661:and
512:undo
420:and
371:and
1974:(?)
1971:WMF
1905:(?)
1719:(?)
1666:(?)
1596:(?)
1422:(?)
1268:(?)
1235:(?)
1181:PMC
1171:doi
943:.
784:0RR
768:1RR
685:G11
613:or
477:3RR
389:or
206:3RR
171:An
2092::
2062::
2047::
1188:.
1179:.
1169:.
1161:.
1147:.
1141:.
991:.
973:.
936:.
867:.
837:.
802:.
707:.
699:.
514:,
416:,
44:,
40:,
36:,
2058:G
2043:P
1986:P
1917:G
1755:G
1731:P
1678:P
1608:P
1518:G
1434:P
1344:G
1322:)
1318:(
1280:P
1223:e
1216:t
1209:v
1195:.
1173::
1165::
1155::
1149:7
894:.
782:(
766:(
744:.
665:.
475:(
400:.
375:.
334:e
327:t
320:v
204:(
94:.
82:.
63:.
52:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.