69:
51:
460:
594:, it should also apply here - not only to the person mentioned there but actually EVERYBODY - people, please try not to make to many jokes that can be misunderstood, please. Whithout knowing it, people can get hurt. Try everyone to keep comments at a professional level, at the point, SRITCTLY SO: Yes, she is upset, because the words:
602:- might very well refer to her, because she lives in a very old big house that is several hundred years old in the Scottish Highlands and her broadband is slow, so please stop joking. I don't know WHAT point this remark was meant to prove when mentioned here, but it clearly hit the nominator. This is the
567:
Yes, very good nom. Seem to be able to download the GE version successfully now. I'm not sure why the frame is visible- the left and top edges of the painting seem to have a shadow cast by the frame. I suppose the Google team's desire to include the whole of the painting over-rides any aesthetic
691:
This image was previously a featured picture, but community consensus determined that it no longer meets our featured-picture criteria. If you have a high-quality image that you believe meets the criteria, be sure to upload it, using the proper free-license tag, then
423:
Probably because it is too big... Eh, now - is there anyone who will start supporting it? Truly this is a masterwork. We should have this image as a FP. Or is it too small, this one? One can't open an art history book without being nose to nose with this painting.
613:
wasn't affraid of apologize to Belle when I made a stupid remark about ... well, a thing.) I would hate loosing Phil as a contributor at FP. The nomination has three supports already, it would be a shame to withdraw it.
608:
I would be much obliged if it would be striken or removed. Also, if we would just try not to be overly humoristic, one never knows who might missunderstand it. Thanks. (Also, an apologize would be quite motivated,
63:
has long been recognised as one of the most important paintings in
Western art history and has a complex and enigmatic composition; it is considered to be one of the most important paintings in Western art
181:
474:
414:
581:
231:
Depends on why that image is not being used... if it's because the image is too dark, for instance, what we can do is different than if some editor decided the colours looked off. —
97:
623:
729:
539:
676:
558:
510:
396:
240:
222:
193:
172:
706:
433:
353:
328:
310:
292:
270:
492:
641:
139:
766:
283:
Google image. The nominated version appears to have been lightened considerably, but why not work from the original image? It's more valuable like that. —
742:
456:(well my "optical fibre" connection stops at the end of the street, maybe I'd better go take a look, see if it's too big to go through the copper wire
523:– Thanks for your supports, Hafs and Xanthy and I apologise for having wasted your time. Obviously I made a mistake and I withdraw the nomination.
364:
So, can I change this nomination to the google earth file, and if so, how do I do it? The google earth image seems to be used in lots of articles:
483:). What are they and are they in the humongous version? (Or are they just my PC trying to be funny? Hahaha PC, very good; why don't you grow up?)
405:
I've tried to download the google earth file via the link twice, and get the message "The image cannot be displayed because it contains errors".
105:
756:
632:
I've struck that and apologised (though I thought it was pretty clear that I was referring to myself, that apparently wasn't the case)
153:
Las
Meninas” (1656) by Diego Velázquez is the masterpiece of Spanish painting, and one of the most important paintings in the world.
761:
17:
257:, Source File:Las Meninas, by Diego Velázquez, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg. Not 3,475 × 4,000 but holy smoke, that is
659:(added above). The (undocumented) edit looks much too bright compared to other scans of this painting, and our old FP (
344:
But it was in the article from the beginning. It looks like the person who removed that image in article got blocked.
481:
without moving out of my lovely house in the countryside for the sake of faster broadband; I prefer to be a bumpkin
68:
479:
There are some strange white dots down the bottom half of the right hand side on the largest version I can see (
577:
506:
470:
410:
596:(without moving out of my lovely house in the countryside for the sake of faster broadband; I prefer to be
380:
to list just a handful that it's been in for a long time ... or should I just withdraw the nomination?
152:
26:
301:
Probably just simple ignorance. Changed it, I think the original image is much more valuable, yes. --
202:
Sorry, I'm really just not very good at this at all, am I? Can you tell me how I can fix it, please
573:
502:
466:
406:
149:
Las
Meninas has long been recognised as one of the most important paintings in Western art history
724:
686:
660:
604:
532:
389:
215:
132:
159:
And a really big file too... and the article is a
Featured article on the picture, well, what
672:
554:
324:
288:
279:
That's what I said: why is the lower resolution version being used over its source file, the
236:
189:
501:
The edge of the frame (also visible at the bottom)- the "bump" decoration reflecting light.
253:, not a Google file but a Google Earth file. Look at the picture file, down there it say:
8:
702:
619:
429:
377:
349:
306:
266:
168:
719:
549:
What mistake? Very good nom... just wondering why the huge Google image is not used. —
524:
381:
339:
207:
124:
113:
93:
568:
considerations regarding cropping. In the lower right corner there is an example of
668:
550:
369:
320:
284:
232:
203:
185:
50:
156:
637:
488:
698:
615:
425:
345:
302:
262:
164:
667:
have a version of this painting to feature. Definitely not a waste of time. —
750:
739:
736:
Promoted File:Las
Meninas, by Diego Velázquez, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg
373:
365:
89:
59:
633:
569:
484:
454:
Landmark painting. Large scan shows technique and condition very well.
157:
100 (0) most famous paintings in the world's museums(German)
697:. I think this is a very wise nomination, Phil. Well done.
572:- the ghost of the original position of the child's leg.
663:, straight from the Prado) supports that. We absolutely
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
155:And all serious art books say exactly the same...
748:
590:I think that what earlier was mentioned att the
694:add it to a relevant article and nominate it
767:Featured picture nominations/September 2014
83:High EV, iconic image from the 17th century
261:! (I don't think it is dark, though). --
67:
49:
14:
749:
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
457:
249:I think Crisco is thinking about an
86:Articles in which this image appears
605:definition of the bumpkin, NOT NICE
23:
757:Ended featured picture nominations
718:: per nom. Thanks Sagaciousphil.
24:
778:
180:- Why's this being used over the
458:
163:we want more? Yes, it is great.
592:Knowledge:Featured picture talk
147:Great painting. As it is said:
98:List of cultural icons of Spain
743:16:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
730:15:07, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
13:
1:
707:18:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
677:08:11, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
642:22:19, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
624:07:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
582:06:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
559:05:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
540:05:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
511:15:34, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
493:15:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
475:10:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
434:10:03, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
415:09:43, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
397:09:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
354:09:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
329:07:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
311:07:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
293:07:16, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
271:07:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
241:06:49, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
223:06:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
194:00:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
173:17:00, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
140:16:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
762:Featured picture nominations
7:
10:
783:
102:FP category for this image
121:Support Alt as nominator
687:File:Las Meninas 01.jpg
661:File:Las Meninas 01.jpg
259:26,065 Ă— 30,000 pixels
76:
65:
39:Voting period ends on
71:
53:
574:Xanthomelanoussprog
503:Xanthomelanoussprog
467:Xanthomelanoussprog
407:Xanthomelanoussprog
378:History of painting
319:Hope it sticks.` —
255:description, author
77:
66:
28:Las Meninas (1656)
343:
106:Artwork/Paintings
47:
774:
537:
529:
528:
463:
462:
461:
394:
386:
385:
370:Baroque painting
337:
251:even bigger file
220:
212:
211:
137:
129:
128:
38:
36:
782:
781:
777:
776:
775:
773:
772:
771:
747:
746:
533:
526:
525:
459:
390:
383:
382:
216:
209:
208:
133:
126:
125:
114:Diego Velázquez
94:Diego Velázquez
75:- Google's scan
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
780:
770:
769:
764:
759:
733:
732:
712:
711:
710:
709:
680:
679:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
646:
645:
644:
627:
626:
585:
584:
562:
561:
544:
543:
516:
515:
514:
513:
496:
495:
477:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
420:
419:
418:
417:
400:
399:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
332:
331:
314:
313:
298:
297:
296:
295:
274:
273:
244:
243:
226:
225:
197:
196:
175:
142:
117:
116:
111:
108:
103:
100:
87:
84:
81:
45:16:31:20 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
779:
768:
765:
763:
760:
758:
755:
754:
752:
745:
744:
741:
737:
731:
728:
727:
723:
722:
721:Fylbecatulous
717:
714:
713:
708:
704:
700:
696:
695:
688:
684:
683:
682:
681:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
655:
654:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
629:
628:
625:
621:
617:
612:
607:
606:
601:
599:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
583:
579:
575:
571:
566:
565:
564:
563:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
545:
542:
541:
538:
536:
530:
527:SagaciousPhil
522:
518:
517:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
476:
472:
468:
465:
453:
450:
449:
445:
444:
435:
431:
427:
422:
421:
416:
412:
408:
404:
403:
402:
401:
398:
395:
393:
387:
384:SagaciousPhil
379:
375:
374:Court painter
371:
367:
363:
362:
355:
351:
347:
341:
340:edit conflict
336:
335:
334:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
316:
315:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
277:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
221:
219:
213:
210:SagaciousPhil
205:
201:
200:
199:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
141:
138:
136:
130:
127:SagaciousPhil
122:
119:
118:
115:
112:
109:
107:
104:
101:
99:
95:
91:
88:
85:
82:
79:
78:
74:
70:
62:
61:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
19:
735:
734:
725:
720:
715:
693:
690:
664:
656:
610:
603:
597:
595:
591:
534:
520:
519:
480:
455:
451:
447:
446:
391:
280:
258:
254:
250:
217:
177:
160:
148:
144:
134:
120:
72:
58:
54:
44:
41:16 Sep 2014
40:
32:
27:
716:Support alt
669:Crisco 1492
657:Support alt
551:Crisco 1492
452:Support alt
366:1656 in art
321:Crisco 1492
285:Crisco 1492
233:Crisco 1492
186:Crisco 1492
145:Support ANY
90:Las Meninas
60:Las Meninas
751:Categories
689:- it say:
570:pentimenti
699:Hafspajen
616:Hafspajen
598:a bumpkin
426:Hafspajen
346:Hafspajen
303:Hafspajen
263:Hafspajen
165:Hafspajen
151:. True.
740:Armbrust
521:Withdraw
178:Question
64:history.
55:Original
448:Support
281:massive
110:Creator
665:should
204:Crisco
182:source
80:Reason
685:YES;
634:Belle
485:Belle
16:<
726:talk
703:talk
673:talk
638:talk
620:talk
578:talk
555:talk
535:Chat
507:talk
489:talk
471:talk
430:talk
411:talk
392:Chat
350:talk
325:talk
307:talk
289:talk
267:talk
237:talk
218:Chat
190:talk
184:? —
169:talk
135:Chat
73:ALT
43:at
753::
738:--
705:)
675:)
640:)
622:)
580:)
557:)
531:-
509:)
491:)
473:)
464:)
432:)
413:)
388:-
376:;
372:;
368:;
352:)
327:)
309:)
291:)
269:)
239:)
214:-
206:?
192:)
171:)
161:do
131:-
123:–
96:,
92:,
57:–
701:(
671:(
636:(
618:(
611:I
600:)
576:(
553:(
505:(
487:(
469:(
428:(
409:(
348:(
342:)
338:(
323:(
305:(
287:(
265:(
235:(
188:(
167:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
,_by_Velazquez.jpg)
