Knowledge

:Good article criteria - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

130: 292: 714:
sources) and that those you can access support the content of the article (for example, inline citations lead to sources that agree with what the article says) and are not plagiarized (for example, close paraphrasing of source material should only be used where appropriate, with in-text attribution if necessary)."
713:
says, "Ideally, a reviewer will have access to all of the source material, and sufficient expertise to verify that the article reflects the content of the sources; this ideal is not often attained. At a minimum, check that the sources used are reliable (for example, blogs are not usually reliable
282:
In all other cases, the nominator deserves a full review against the six criteria. For most reviews, the nominator is given a chance to address any issues raised by the reviewer before the article is failed. Often the nomination is brought up to standard during the review.
161:
The six good article criteria are the only aspects that should be considered when assessing whether to pass or fail a GAN. Other comments designed to improve the article are encouraged during the review process but should not be mandated as part of the assessment.
757:), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of disruptive editing may be failed or placed on hold. Stability is based on the article's current state, not any potential for instability in the future. 401:, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); 615:: a good article loses its status when promoted to a featured article. However, demoted featured articles are not automatically graded as good articles and must be reassessed for quality. 643: 278:
It has issues noted in a previous GA review that still have not been adequately addressed, as determined by a reviewer who has not previously reviewed the article
753:
Edits that do not apply to the "stable" criterion include reverting vandalism, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as
52: 398: 659: 649: 319: 625: 347: 38: 579: 770:
a requirement. However, if media with acceptable copyright status is appropriate and readily available, then such media should be provided.
533: 87: 351: 343: 73: 335: 790: 66: 731:
required, although, in practice, enough information must be supplied so that the reviewer is able to identify the source.
674: 150: 80: 785: 631: 553: 142: 45: 710: 637: 59: 664: 744:. It allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics. 339: 473: 421: 409: 203: 525: 286: 741: 611: 592: 571: 740:
The "broad in its coverage" criterion is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of
537: 390: 129: 564: 694: 394: 331: 599: 588: 242: 529: 460: 364: 299: 146: 24: 488: 448: 272: 232: 379:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
195:
An article may fail without further review (known as a quick fail) if, prior to the review:
425: 727:. Using consistent formatting or including every element of the bibliographic material is 179: 8: 724: 120: 106: 477:: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. 113: 549: 171: 165: 98: 186: 208:
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include
583: 575: 510: 506: 252: 212: 514: 671:—within 7 days of promotion, a GA article may be nominated for a DYK hook review 603: 380: 779: 754: 222: 487:: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing 459:
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
262: 677:—setting your sights on FA criteria may help with the GA review process 291: 199:
It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
644:
Knowledge:WikiProject Physics/Quality Control/Reviewing Cheatsheet
723:
Dead links are considered verifiable only if the link is not a
149:(GA). A good article does not have to meet the more demanding 656:
in accordance with the GA criteria, not personal preferences
628:—step-by-step instructions on how to handle the GA process 619: 156: 681: 660:
Knowledge:Compare criteria Good v. Featured article
640:—guidelines for reviewing an article for GA status 320:understandable to an appropriately broad audience 777: 650:Knowledge:What the Good article criteria are not 634:—advice for nominating an article for GA status 626:Knowledge:Good article nominations/Instructions 145:(GAN) may be compared and judged to be a 607:: these pages cannot meet the criteria. 778: 587:: these items should be nominated for 16:List of requirements for good articles 693:Compliance with other aspects of the 18: 675:Knowledge:Featured article criteria 322:; spelling and grammar are correct; 13: 632:Knowledge:Nominating good articles 290: 128: 14: 802: 711:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles 646:—useful suggestions for GA review 638:Knowledge:Reviewing good articles 318:the prose is clear, concise, and 141:are the six standards by which a 652:—GA reviews should be concluded 760: 747: 734: 717: 704: 687: 565:What cannot be a good article? 399:could reasonably be challenged 1: 534:valid non-free use rationales 287:The six good article criteria 791:Knowledge article assessment 258:, or similar tags (See also 7: 701:required for good articles. 10: 807: 381:the layout style guideline 169: 96: 53:October 2024 Backlog Drive 786:WikiProject Good articles 766:The presence of media is 151:featured article criteria 271:It is not stable due to 133:Good article nominations 552:to the topic, and have 143:good article nomination 595:status, if applicable. 295: 134: 438:Broad in its coverage 330:it complies with the 294: 139:good article criteria 132: 669:eligibility criteria 422:copyright violations 410:no original research 370:no original research 238:or large numbers of 204:copyright violations 697:or its subpages is 491:or content dispute. 397:. All content that 530:copyright statuses 501:, if possible, by 352:list incorporation 296: 166:Immediate failures 135: 742:featured articles 612:Featured articles 572:Stand-alone lists 554:suitable captions 536:are provided for 447:it addresses the 95: 94: 798: 771: 764: 758: 751: 745: 738: 732: 721: 715: 708: 702: 691: 593:featured picture 558: 557: 542: 541: 538:non-free content 519: 518: 493: 492: 479: 478: 465: 464: 453: 452: 442: 441: 430: 429: 414: 413: 403: 402: 391:reliable sources 385: 384: 374: 373: 356: 355: 324: 323: 313: 312: 267: 261: 257: 251: 247: 241: 237: 231: 227: 221: 217: 211: 189: 182: 123: 116: 109: 19: 806: 805: 801: 800: 799: 797: 796: 795: 776: 775: 774: 765: 761: 752: 748: 739: 735: 722: 718: 709: 705: 695:Manual of Style 692: 688: 684: 622: 567: 547: 546: 523: 522: 497: 496: 483: 482: 471: 470: 458: 457: 446: 445: 436: 435: 420:it contains no 419: 418: 407: 406: 389: 388: 378: 377: 362: 361: 334:guidelines for 332:Manual of Style 329: 328: 317: 316: 307: 306: 289: 265: 259: 255: 249: 245: 243:citation needed 239: 235: 229: 225: 219: 215: 209: 193: 192: 185: 178: 174: 168: 159: 127: 126: 119: 112: 105: 101: 17: 12: 11: 5: 804: 794: 793: 788: 773: 772: 759: 746: 733: 716: 703: 685: 683: 680: 679: 678: 672: 662: 657: 647: 641: 635: 629: 621: 618: 617: 616: 608: 600:Disambiguation 596: 566: 563: 562: 561: 560: 559: 544: 494: 480: 468: 467: 466: 455: 433: 432: 431: 416: 404: 386: 359: 358: 357: 344:words to watch 326: 288: 285: 280: 279: 276: 269: 206: 200: 191: 190: 183: 175: 170: 167: 164: 158: 155: 125: 124: 117: 110: 102: 97: 93: 92: 90: 85: 83: 78: 76: 71: 69: 67:Review circles 64: 62: 57: 55: 50: 48: 43: 41: 36: 34: 29: 27: 22: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 803: 792: 789: 787: 784: 783: 781: 769: 763: 756: 750: 743: 737: 730: 726: 720: 712: 707: 700: 696: 690: 686: 676: 673: 670: 668: 663: 661: 658: 655: 651: 648: 645: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 623: 614: 613: 609: 606: 605: 601: 597: 594: 590: 589:featured list 586: 585: 581: 577: 573: 569: 568: 555: 551: 545: 539: 535: 531: 527: 521: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 495: 490: 486: 481: 476: 475: 469: 462: 461:summary style 456: 451:of the topic; 450: 444: 443: 439: 434: 427: 423: 417: 411: 405: 400: 396: 392: 387: 382: 376: 375: 371: 367: 366: 360: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336:lead sections 333: 327: 321: 315: 314: 310: 305: 304: 303: 301: 293: 284: 277: 274: 270: 264: 254: 244: 234: 224: 214: 207: 205: 201: 198: 197: 196: 188: 184: 181: 177: 176: 173: 163: 154: 152: 148: 144: 140: 131: 122: 118: 115: 111: 108: 104: 103: 100: 91: 89: 86: 84: 82: 79: 77: 75: 72: 70: 68: 65: 63: 61: 58: 56: 54: 51: 49: 47: 44: 42: 40: 37: 35: 33: 30: 28: 26: 23: 21: 20: 767: 762: 755:copy editing 749: 736: 728: 719: 706: 698: 689: 667:Did you know 666: 653: 610: 598: 570: 502: 498: 484: 472: 449:main aspects 437: 408:it contains 395:cited inline 369: 363: 309:Well-written 308: 300:good article 297: 281: 273:edit warring 233:unreferenced 202:It contains 194: 160: 147:good article 138: 136: 81:Reassessment 39:Instructions 31: 528:with their 499:Illustrated 275:on the page 46:Nominations 780:Categories 665:Knowledge: 602:pages and 548:media are 524:media are 426:plagiarism 365:Verifiable 74:Discussion 60:Mentorship 180:WP:GAFAIL 172:Shortcuts 99:Shortcuts 725:bare url 620:See also 550:relevant 505:such as 489:edit war 157:Criteria 121:WP:WIAGA 32:Criteria 576:portals 474:Neutral 348:fiction 253:clarify 213:cleanup 114:WP:GACR 584:images 582:, and 580:sounds 532:, and 526:tagged 507:images 485:Stable 350:, and 340:layout 107:WP:GA? 88:Report 682:Notes 604:stubs 515:audio 513:, or 511:video 503:media 368:with 187:WP:QF 654:only 591:and 393:are 302:is: 137:The 25:Main 768:not 729:not 699:not 543:and 454:and 424:or 415:and 325:and 223:POV 782:: 578:, 574:, 509:, 463:). 346:, 342:, 338:, 298:A 266:}} 263:QF 260:{{ 256:}} 250:{{ 248:, 246:}} 240:{{ 236:}} 230:{{ 228:, 226:}} 220:{{ 218:, 216:}} 210:{{ 153:. 556:. 540:; 517:: 440:: 428:. 412:; 383:; 372:: 354:. 311:: 268:)

Index

Main
Criteria
Instructions
Nominations
October 2024 Backlog Drive
Mentorship
Review circles
Discussion
Reassessment
Report
Shortcuts
WP:GA?
WP:GACR
WP:WIAGA
Good article nominations
good article nomination
good article
featured article criteria
Shortcuts
WP:GAFAIL
WP:QF
copyright violations
cleanup
POV
unreferenced
citation needed
clarify
QF
edit warring

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑