24:
180:
Use the most general scope for each article you can. Since
Knowledge is a general encyclopedia, it's supposed to summarise essentially all knowledge. Hence accidental or deliberate choice of a limited scope for an article can make notable information disappear from the encyclopedia entirely, or make
219:
The two main reasons for splitting material out from an article, are size and content relevance. If either the whole article, or the specific material within one section becomes too large, or if the material is seen to be inappropriate for the article due to being out of scope, then a split may be
82:
is the topic or subject matter, which is defined by reliable sources. The extent of the subject matter identifies the range of material that belongs in the article, and thus also determines what does not belong (i.e., what is "out of scope").
152:
should be followed to determine if any of the uses of that term is the primary topic, and, if so, then the scope of the article should be limited to, or at least primarily, cover that topic. For example,
112:
Article scope, in terms of what exactly the subject and its scope is, is defined by reliable sources. The suitability of
Knowledge having an article on that subject is decided by reference to
429:
278:
116:—appropriate topics are those that have gained sufficiently significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time—so they are "notable", and are not disallowed by
102:
What reliable sources say about material that is out of scope for the decided-upon subject is largely irrelevant to that article and can be removed or moved to another article.
201:(nor only loosely relevant) information. Knowledge is not the internet, it is an encyclopedia. The difference being: we select, organise, and explain. We do not include
99:
All material that is notable, referenced, and that a reader would be likely to agree matches the specified scope must be covered (at least in a summarised fashion).
138:
Artificially or unnecessarily restricting the scope of an article to select a particular POV on a subject area is frowned upon, even if it is the most popular POV.
414:
285:
181:
it highly inaccessible. Since the primary purpose of the
Knowledge is to be a useful reference work, narrow article scopes are to be avoided.
434:
409:
399:
90:, ideally the introductory sentence or at least introductory paragraph, of an article, should make clear what the scope of the article is.
465:
243:
39:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
40:
306:
238:
117:
384:
258:
253:
233:
460:
44:
271:
113:
439:
424:
419:
394:
486:
444:
316:
248:
202:
345:
149:
135:
material is relevant to the subject, and therefore appropriate to be mentioned or summarised.
372:
311:
8:
367:
214:
198:
142:
339:
62:
54:
220:
considered or proposed. Consideration must be given to size, notability and potential
404:
321:
221:
106:
47:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
333:
32:
378:
362:
194:
75:
327:
141:
When the name of an article is a term that refers to several related topics in
124:
87:
480:
184:
Looking at what scopes other encyclopedias have chosen can often be useful.
162:
145:
263:
131:
of the article should be devoted to any given material; scope limits
208:
93:
174:
177:
are considered to be "cats" in the broad sense of that term.
170:
227:
188:
166:
154:
430:How to apply WP:NOR's "Directly related" principle
478:
123:The issue of scope should not be confused with
279:
157:is limited in scope to the primary topic for
330:(verifiability does not guarantee inclusion)
466:Category:Knowledge essays about notability
415:Notability is not relevance or reliability
286:
272:
244:Knowledge:Guide to writing better articles
224:before proposing or carrying out a split.
293:
479:
267:
18:
13:
435:Meaningful examples in pop culture
410:Indirect relevance is sometimes OK
400:What claims of relevance are false
45:thoroughly vetted by the community
41:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
498:
22:
239:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
259:Knowledge:Relevance of content
254:Knowledge:Avoiding POV funnels
234:Knowledge:No original research
197:, and to ensure that articles
1:
461:Template:Handling miscellanea
7:
10:
503:
212:
52:
16:Essay on editing Knowledge
453:
355:
348:(list selection criteria)
299:
249:Knowledge:Manual of Style
193:Editors are required to
165:(which is a redirect to
300:Policies and guidelines
150:primary topic criteria
307:What Knowledge is not
199:contain no irrelevant
114:WP:Inclusion criteria
107:Identifying the scope
43:, as it has not been
385:Relevance of content
294:Relevance and scope
336:(levels of detail)
474:
473:
425:Coatrack articles
395:Relevance emerges
375:(content removal)
222:neutrality issues
127:, which controls
73:
72:
494:
487:Knowledge essays
288:
281:
274:
265:
264:
146:reliable sources
65:
26:
25:
19:
502:
501:
497:
496:
495:
493:
492:
491:
477:
476:
475:
470:
449:
445:Content removal
381:(stay on topic)
351:
346:WP:LISTCRITERIA
342:(content split)
317:Image relevance
295:
292:
230:
217:
211:
191:
169:), even though
109:
96:
69:
68:
61:
57:
49:
48:
23:
17:
12:
11:
5:
500:
490:
489:
472:
471:
469:
468:
463:
457:
455:
451:
450:
448:
447:
442:
437:
432:
427:
422:
417:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
387:
382:
376:
370:
365:
359:
357:
353:
352:
350:
349:
343:
337:
331:
325:
319:
314:
309:
303:
301:
297:
296:
291:
290:
283:
276:
268:
262:
261:
256:
251:
246:
241:
236:
229:
226:
210:
207:
203:indiscriminate
190:
187:
186:
185:
182:
178:
139:
136:
133:whether or not
121:
108:
105:
104:
103:
100:
95:
92:
71:
70:
67:
66:
58:
53:
50:
38:
37:
29:
27:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
499:
488:
485:
484:
482:
467:
464:
462:
459:
458:
456:
452:
446:
443:
441:
438:
436:
433:
431:
428:
426:
423:
421:
418:
416:
413:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
373:WP:IRRELEVANT
371:
369:
366:
364:
361:
360:
358:
354:
347:
344:
341:
338:
335:
332:
329:
326:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
302:
298:
289:
284:
282:
277:
275:
270:
269:
266:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
242:
240:
237:
235:
232:
231:
225:
223:
216:
209:When to split
206:
205:information.
204:
200:
196:
195:stay on topic
183:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
151:
147:
144:
140:
137:
134:
130:
126:
122:
119:
115:
111:
110:
101:
98:
97:
91:
89:
84:
81:
80:of an article
79:
64:
60:
59:
56:
51:
46:
42:
36:
34:
28:
21:
20:
390:Out of scope
389:
218:
215:WP:WHENSPLIT
192:
163:Domestic cat
158:
132:
128:
94:Aim of scope
85:
77:
74:
30:
340:WP:CONSPLIT
213:Main page:
31:This is an
322:WP:CONTEXT
312:Notability
440:Inclusion
420:Exclusion
368:Relevance
334:WP:DETAIL
324:(linking)
143:secondary
481:Category
454:See also
379:WP:TOPIC
228:See also
189:On topic
129:how much
55:Shortcut
405:Germane
328:WP:ONUS
356:Essays
175:tigers
161:, the
118:policy
63:WP:OOS
363:Scope
171:lions
78:scope
33:essay
173:and
125:NPOV
88:lead
86:The
76:The
167:Cat
159:cat
155:Cat
483::
148:,
287:e
280:t
273:v
120:.
35:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.