Knowledge:Perennial proposals

466:, which advertising by definition is not. Even if well segregated from article content, advertising could create an impression that our content is commercially influenced and that our content could be affected by advertisers threatening to withdraw their ads, whether or not this is actually the case. Advertising could discourage contributors, the lifeblood of Knowledge, many of whom object strongly to advertising. Placing ads would also likely decrease the amount of money raised by community fundraising. Also, since we don't allow spam or advertising by users, doing it ourselves would be, at the very least, hypocritical. Finally, the financial situation of the Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts the website, is stable—there is no pressing need to make such a change. 2418:" new users and discourage them from becoming members of the community, as even good-faith contributions are immediately deleted or proposed for deletion. Keep in mind that not all users fully understand our policies and guidelines the minute they start editing. When a brand-new article is started without references, the creator, or another user, is often gathering sources to add later. Many users—both new and experienced—create stubs as a starting point, with the intention of developing them into full-fledged, well-sourced articles. Of course you are free to tag such pages, and to help clear the backlog of 939:"meta-template" used by the templates means that they are not nearly as cluttered-looking as they were before 2007. The implementation costs would be large: About a million articles have maintenance tags, and moving them all to talk pages would be a massive undertaking, even using a bot or spreading the work out over many months. The documentation on all the templates, several editing help pages, and any bot or script that edits or reads maintenance tags would have to be updated manually. 3448:. Having to decide which sites to include and which not would potentially cause issues in the community where Knowledge would rather remain neutral. The copy-and-paste facility in most computer operating systems already allows people to copy links and paste them into a much wider range of websites than any share or like implementation ever could. In addition, there are potential privacy issues with many "like"/"share" implementations. Most network-sites provide 54: 725:

is not identical to the first source, and therefore is never truly equal in all particulars. Many academic journals eventually release papers, and more books are being digitized, so "unavailable" sources may become freely available later. What appears to be free in your country or computer network may not be free everywhere. Knowledge already has a systemic bias in favor of freely available online sources (called the

2778:, there are always exceptions. The encyclopedia should not lose out on a good candidate just because they have not achieved an arbitrary number of edits or does not frequent a particular area of the encyclopedia. Having a set minimum edit count may not lower the number of failed RfAs substantially, because an otherwise poor candidate could edit just for the sake of meeting the requirements. In addition, 632:

strong source will be deemed unreliable if the claim is unrelated to the source's contents (e.g., a source about electricity being cited for information about a celebrity). Although it may be possible to define a minimum threshold below which sources are never acceptable as reference for Knowledge content, it appears presumptuous to define all sources

3220:

sections, being fluid, are assigned numbers on the page they are situated on, but adding or removing sections above it will change the number. The name of the section can also be changed easily and new sections can be created with the same name. This does not apply to pages which are transcluded within other pages, but this setup is not commonly used.

2121:

edits to the article and aren't concerned whether or not it's deleted. Regardless, editors are encouraged to notify the original author or the main contributors of an article when their article is nominated for deletion, as it is considered courteous; this is strictly optional. This puts fewer requirements for a deletion proposal than for a

1052:; the reason for the existing order follows a logical progression from on-wiki to off-wiki information. About the names of the section headings, different academic fields use different terms, and Knowledge editors do not want to impose the convention preferred by one academic discipline on articles in another discipline. 3409:

There is little if any reason for such a move and we would still need to keep a cross-namespace redirect at the current title to avoid breaking probably millions of incoming links. The Main Page in its modern form dates to 2002, before the modern namespace system fully crystallized, and was placed by

2693:

The Wikimedia Foundation may require an RFA-style process to access some specific permissions anyway, such as viewing deleted revisions. Therefore, it does not make sense to have people go through one RFA to just get a subset of these tools and then later go through a second RFA if they want the full

1988:

Most custom signatures cause little or no trouble. In addition, they are popular throughout Knowledge, and forcing users to give them up would create more trouble than it would be worth. It is better to deal with unacceptable signatures on a case-by-case basis than to issue a blanket prohibition that

631:

Assessing the reliability of sources requires sound editorial judgment, not strict adherence to a list of rules. Whether a source is reliable depends on how the source relates to the material: a very weak source may be reliable for a very small claim, such as "this source was published", while a very

286:, and some proposals that remained on this page for a long time have finally been proposed in a way that reached consensus, but you should address rebuttals raised in the past if you make a proposal along these lines. If you feel you would still like to do one of these proposals, then raise it at the 3571:

In desktop view, a link to the disclaimers appears on the bottom of all pages. In mobile web view, the disclaimers can be accessed from any page via the three-bar settings menu in the upper left-hand corner. The official English Knowledge app has no interface link to the disclaimers, but they can be

2120:

Excessive bureaucracy; people are expected to keep pages important to them on their watchlist. The "first creator" is meaningless for many articles, as this person may have long since left or made few contributions; "everybody" can number several hundred people, including those who have made trivial

2022:

This conflicts with our mission at a fundamental level: our purpose is to create an encyclopedia, not to provide a place for people to hold random discussions on various topics. Similarly, we are not here to endorse any particular external sites for such discussion; people interested in finding such

1844:

Talk pages are not intended as a permanent record of a user's misbehavior. Warnings are frequently placed incorrectly or spuriously. Removal of warnings other than to archive them is strongly discouraged, but does constitute definitive proof that the warning was seen, and can still lead to escalated

1221:

The actual location and formatting of the attribution is merely required to be "reasonable to the medium" and "at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors". The assertion that linking to a file description page is not "reasonable to the medium" of a hypertext encyclopedia

724:

Editors should use the best sources available to them, regardless of cost or format. The content policies require that it be possible for someone to verify a given statement—not that it be quick, easy, and free for you to verify it. A "replacement" source that is available online and/or without cost

455:

To cover server costs, or for some other public good such as charity, Knowledge should add advertisements to its pages. The ads could be highly targeted, unobtrusive textual ads similar to those used by Google. Revenues would be very high based on Knowledge's very high search engine ranking for many

2453:

Pages should be immune to deletion for a certain amount of time after their creation and/or XFD/PROD/speedy nomination. This would give editors time to improve the page or convince editors of its subject's importance, and would help make Knowledge more friendly and inviting for new users. There may

1217:

While the CC license deed (a summary, not legally binding) says attribution is to be provided "in the manner specified by the author or licensor", this does not mean that the author/licensor can require specific fonts, colors, wording, or placement of the credit. Looking at the actual license (the

2464:

are carefully written so that articles can be speedily deleted only if no Knowledge-compliant article is possible at this time or the content is so dangerous to the encyclopedia it must be removed immediately. A mandatory grace period would also be excessively bureaucratic, and would make it more

1210:

Prominently crediting some images without crediting all, including the various icons used in maintenance templates, could itself prove problematic by seemingly valuing some people's contributions over others'. The same applies to prominently crediting image contributions without doing so for text

1129:

If academics can't find a single system suitable for all fields, why would one system work for Knowledge? An extreme amount of time and effort would be necessary to (1) develop, or even agree on, a comprehensive house style that covers most or all situations, and (2) implement it on all 6,889,201

1792:

rules. Very few active users choose names that are difficult to type, so the problem is quite small. Being able to type a name is not necessary, as names can be copied or ignored. Furthermore, banning non-Latin usernames would cause difficulty on Wikipedias in languages that do not use the Latin

1746:

It's already an option in the user preferences, and forcing (or reminding) users to enter edit summaries may annoy them enough they will not save their (possibly constructive) edits. Forcing users to type something in the edit summary box does not mean that they will provide accurate, honest, or

2027:

violations, block or ban disruptive users, and so on, which would reduce the time these people (likely Admins) have to spend on activities that do improve the encyclopedia. Occasionally it is claimed that these forums could provide a place for original research to be "peer reviewed"; this would

3219:

While many users support the use of such a feature, the technical implementation of this feature is difficult, if not impossible with the current version of MediaWiki. At the moment, watchlisting is done on a page-by-page basis, as each page is assigned a unique ID number in the database. Page

567:

reliable sources, not on the opinions or beliefs of editors. The community refuses to let editors delete well-sourced material if they believe the sources are wrong or to include material merely because they personally believe the unpublished, unsourceable material to be true. Adding unsourced

3352:

Few pages in most of these namespaces are linked or navigated to directly (using browser search boxes or direct URL manipulation) often enough that the savings of a few characters for a few users is worth the hassle for the rest of the community. Those few pages that are can be handled with

2673:

There should be some kind of "partial admin" that gets certain admin powers, but not all of them, such as only being allowed to block IP users or only being able to delete pages. Or, new admins should undergo a probationary period, which may include limited abilities or desysopping on

2858:

Many editors object that a system like this would be too open to abuse by editors who have been disciplined by admins for violating policy. While there has generally been consensus that such a system should exist in principle, there is disagreement on the requirements for filing a

1649:

A large portion of our good edits come from IP addresses; positive experiences with initial IP edits lead users to create accounts who otherwise would not do so; software features disabling IPs from creating new articles or editing semiprotected ones are sufficient. According to

2922:

Lack of need; admin workload is not high enough to justify this. There are also possible security concerns; if users could delete pages in their userspace, they would be able to move pages to their user space and delete them. This ability also gives the impression of user space

3612:

As of May 2023, there are 6,275 featured articles and 1,541 former featured articles (1,611 that have lost featured status minus 70 that have regained it). If you divide the 1541 former featured articles by the 6275 articles that have ever been featured, 24% of FAs have been

1519:

because suicide, mental health, domestic violence, and so on are important social issues, and pointing out that many other sites have given in to this advocacy. Proposals also frequently advocate one nation's resources, while if we were going to do this we'd need

1691: 2822:

in 2017 determined that editors must be at least extended confirmed to nominate/self-nominate someone for adminship without the request being reviewed by someone else first. Both proposals were enacted to prevent futile RfAs of very new editors who didn't know

804:

appropriate, encyclopedic information, which often means adding citations to reliable sources for editors who did not name sources at the time the material was added. Increasing the requirements discourages new editors, and would destroy most of Knowledge's

1666:(Prohibiting IP edits would not eliminate 97% of all vandalism, where all vandalism is about 8% of all users, because those inclined to vandalize could easily take the 10 seconds to register.) The ability of anyone to edit articles without registering is a 545:

merely being true in the opinion of an editor. The most common proposal is to require not only that all material be verifiable, but that all material also be true in the opinion of editors. The second most common proposal is to require that material be

3500: 424:

employs legal counsel to advise on whether and when such measures are necessary, and editors may rest assured that appropriate Knowledge policies will inform them of any such needed measures, such as removal of copyrighted material. Please do not make

1114:

Knowledge should establish a house citation style applicable to all articles. This would improve consistency between articles and/or make citing sources easier for new users. Past suggestions include an outside style guide/prescribed format (such as

345:. Our mission is to document human knowledge, no matter how unpleasant or offensive it may be to some people. It is impossible to draw a line between "offensive" and "non-offensive" content that satisfies all cultural, religious and political norms. 2577: 3023: 2015:

People should be allowed to discuss the topic of the article on talk pages, instead of limiting discussion to improvement of the article. Or forums of some sort should be created to allow this, either on Knowledge or elsewhere and linked from all

2321:

forums. Users should be made aware of the very real possibility that the article will in fact be deleted at the end of the discussion (the result for perhaps three-quarters of nominated articles). AFD is already very large and would become even

1845:

warnings. All warnings continue to be available in the page history regardless of whether or not they have been removed from the page's current revision. Revert warring to keep a warning on a user's talk page is disruptive and constitutes "

1190:

There is no need to clutter articles with this information. Credit is already provided for the majority of images by linking them to the file description page, which includes authorship, licensing, and more. (The exceptions to this are

540:

stated, "The threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth". This meant that the absolute minimum standard for including material in Knowledge is that it be possible to verify it; the minimum standard for including material is

866:

While some featured articles deteriorate in quality, this is not a widespread problem. Since the featured article program began in 2004, 24% of promoted articles have been de-featured as of 2023, and this is mainly due to increased

870:

In regards to vandalism, our featured articles are not specifically targeted by vandals, and are among the most-watched pages on Knowledge. Short-term semi-protection and blocks are more than adequate to deal with featured article

2569:

RfA is a discussion and people may need to be able to ask questions they find pertinent towards making a decision. People should be able to ask the questions they want/need to ask to make an assessment based upon their individual

2704:

It would also increase wasteful overhead, because even admins with the "wrong" powers would have to find, explain the situation to, and request help from someone with the correct power, instead of stopping the problem instantly

2360: 928:

Every reader is a potential editor and the maintenance tags give potential editors ideas of how to improve an article. Some tags also serve as warnings to readers about potentially problematic and low-quality content. The

835:. Alternatively, featured articles could be split into two pages: a protected page showing the article as it appeared when originally promoted, and a separate "Draft" version for any future editing the articles may need. 1982:. Personalized signatures (colored text, CSS, HTML, special characters, etc.) are inherently disruptive, draw too much attention to the user, are often poorly designed, and/or take up too much space in the edit window. 1525: 281:

several times in the past. It should be noted that merely listing something on this page does not mean it will never happen or is to be rejected on sight, but that it has been discussed before and never met consensus.

3002: 2206: 3492: 1235: 2891: 3488: 3048:

are generally disregarded anyway. Bureaucrats are empowered and able to discern such activity on an RfA and factor it in appropriately. Vandalism and troll behavior at RfA is low and handled already by current

2807: 2915:

to administer their user space, with the tools technically limited to that space only. This has been proposed in a number of different ways, ranging from individual abilities (such as deletion), to full admin

1204:

Mistaken credit of images taken from Knowledge (e.g. crediting them to "Knowledge" rather than the actual authors) is an issue, but it is not evident that this would be significantly affected by this proposal.

847:

over time, rather than deteriorate. Although a featured article "exemplifies our very best work and features professional standards of writing and presentation", there is, and always will be, room for further

2701:. This means that a protection-only semi-admin, for example, would sometimes deploy page protection when a user block would be far more appropriate, because page protection is the only tool available to them. 1452:

Having GNG be a policy would be overly-restrictive on articles that could be included on Knowledge and preclude the use of common sense. More discretion in deletion discussions is preferred to a clear policy.

3068: 1989:

would anger many users, with few or no benefits. Furthermore, a user whose username uses non-Latin characters could use a custom signature to display an alternate name that English speakers could understand.

1088:

It could cause confusion. Many editors may not realize that they cannot use images under this license for any purpose, and hence inadvertently violate the licensing policy for these kinds of images by doing

2755:

To reduce the number of failed RFAs, all candidates should meet certain requirements, such as a minimum edit count, contributions to featured content, or participation in internal Knowledge processes like

1892:

Some people get missed for weeks at a time, or never welcomed at all. Would it not be better to have a bot drop one of the welcome templates on newcomers' pages instead of depending upon volunteers of the

3644:

style guide (all physical sciences) in naming the primary list of citations "References"; this proposal usually comes from someone who is familiar with the conventions used in history or the humanities.

384:. In an encyclopedia, it is expected that articles on sexual subjects should be illustrated as such. In addition, standards about what is and is not acceptable for pictures vary widely between cultures. 3141: 2895: 2507:

Text and files copyright violations are dealt with in different ways. It is possible to revert to a previous version to remove text copyright violations, but it is not possible to do so for files. A

3056: 2530: 1533: 1521: 1198:

Maintaining these in-article credits would be a significant maintenance burden on our editors, so there should be a similarly significant advantage to doing it. Such advantage has not been evident.

2697:

Many common problems require access to multiple tools (e.g., RevDel, blocking, and page protection for BLP vandalism). Having only a small subset also results in non-optimal responses due to the

882: 2522: 1201:

The existing model of attribution has so far proven to be widely successful, despite resistance by a small number of copyright holders to allowing use of their images without in-article credit.

967: 963: 946: 1374: 3438:

Knowledge pages should have a "Like" button or "Share" widget to enable users to tag their favourite articles and to share article content on Facebook, Twitter/X and other social media sites.

3017:

This would create major problems for the Wikimedia Foundation's legal department. The legal department requires that admin rights only be granted to users who have undergone community review.

3078: 1600: 1571: 1002:) should be changed to the system preferred by the editor/a particular professional field/the editor's school. These proposals may involve changing the names of the sections (e.g., changing 2618:

Reconfirmation "on demand" has faced objections about potential abuse. Although no proposal for mandatory reconfirmation has achieved consensus, some administrators have voluntarily joined

3321:

Along the lines of the existing WP: → Knowledge: and WT: → Knowledge talk: namespace aliases, TT: → Template talk:, U: → User:, UT: → User talk:, P: → Portal:, CAT: → Category:, and so on.

2534: 959: 3375: 2538: 1225:

Providing in-article credit for some but not all images might possibly fall afoul of the CC BY license's "at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors" clause.

414:

Because of such-and-such law, Knowledge must do so-and-so (e.g. implement censorship as above, or require identification of editors, or defer certain rulings to the U.S. Supreme Court).

3496: 2460:

PROD and XFD already have "grace periods" built in, so editors should have ample time to find sources or otherwise improve problematic articles, if possible. As for speedy deletion,

1243: 1560:

of an article, not at the top; we generally already have prevention information inline, links to articles about prevention (where they exist) inline and in "See also" sections, and

1130:

articles with sources, even with the help of one or more bots. Any benefits of a single encyclopedia-wide house style pale in comparison to the massive scope of such an undertaking.

3388: 3384: 1616: 3472: 2607:

There are 851 administrators. Periodically reconfirming them would be an onerous and time-consuming process. For example, with annual reconfirmation, there would be 15+ reviews

1251: 1028:

Policies and guidelines document "actual good practices". Most proposals fail to demonstrate that their proposed practice is an emerging, sustainable alternative to the current

307:

Certain Knowledge pages should display content warnings or disclaimers, such as "This article contains sexually explicit images" or "This article is not suitable for children".

2313:

The purpose of AfD is in fact to decide whether or not to delete an article. Lesser issues such as mergers or renaming should be discussed on the talk page or at the separate

3164:

Watchlists are currently private for each logged-in user. Watchlist functionality should be public so that a given watchlist could be managed by all members of a wikiproject.

918:

from the head of article pages to the article talk pages. Some proposals recommend all tags be moved, and others only propose moving some tags. Moving templates would reduce

975: 1682:

For privacy reasons, the Foundation has stated that the public display of IP addresses will be terminated at an unspecified date, probably in 2024. They intend to deploy a

1654:, "what is commonly called 'anonymous' editing is not particularly anonymous ... and there are good reasons to want vandals on IP numbers instead of accounts". While about 1318: 3504: 2526: 1218:"legal code"), this seems to be referring to the author/licensor's ability to choose the name to be attributed, the title of the work, and the canonical URL for the work. 971: 3064: 3137: 1608: 1488: 3520: 3327:

Adding shortcuts comes with an increase in complexity that the community in general does not feel is justified by the added convenience. Contributing factors include:

2214: 2084:

On occasion the community has imposed specific limitations on specific editors, demonstrating that issue can be handled on a case-by-case basis without a general rule.

257: 3060: 2645: 1182:

Knowledge should include bylines or some other sort of in-article credit for images used in articles. It is sometimes also claimed this is required by CC BY licenses.

3552: 3524: 3312: 2902: 601:

Knowledge should define the reliability of particular types of sources so that no exceptions are possible, and only sources defined as reliable may be used for the

3484: 2006: 1694:

has been published on the results. The Persian Knowledge similarly experimented with ending IP editing, but decided that an anti-vandal bot fit their needs better.

1659: 1239: 979: 3145: 2023:

places should use a search engine. Additionally, hosting such discussions would require volunteers or staff to monitor and/or moderate these discussions, delete

1867:

tags and requests for uninvolved administrator help, and templates and notes on anonymous IP user talk pages that indicate other users share the same IP address.

955: 2984: 1612: 3512: 1793:

alphabet, as speakers of those languages may not be able to enter Latin characters with their keyboards and would have a difficult time in choosing a username.

1247: 793: 397:

proposes user-configurable options. In August 2011, a referendum on how to permit users to suppress types of images they personally deem unwanted was begun at

3480: 3476: 1207:

Including in-article credits would increase the incentive for people to "spam" their images into articles in an attempt to use Knowledge for free advertising.

2586:

While there has been no consensus to ban "canned" questions, they have routinely been criticized as being ineffective and adding little value to the process.

1676:

IP addresses have been unable to create pages in the main namespace since 2005, and are subject to other restrictions such as not being able to vote in RfAs.

568:

material or deleting well-sourced material on the basis of editors' personal beliefs can result in biased, unbalanced articles and frequently does result in

197: 3200: 2375:}} to the top of the page. Users wishing to permanently leave can have a global renamer rename their account with a generic username not tied to them under 766:

that supports it. Any material added without a reliable source should be promptly removed. All articles without references should be deleted, regardless of

2653: 2364: 2144:

This defeats the purpose of deletion, which is to improve Knowledge quality by getting rid of the worst parts; also, it would increase the workload of the

1158: 150: 3468: 2649: 1655: 2836:

There should be a community-based process for removing adminship. Currently, the only way to involuntarily remove adminship outside of emergencies is by

2094: 1402:

Use any color except red to identify links to non-existent articles. The usual reasons are that red is an aggressive color or that it is too easy to see.

375:

Images of a sexual, obscene, emotionally disturbing, religiously offensive or disgusting nature should be hidden from all users or even deleted entirely.

3024:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 116 § RFA reform Proposal: Automatic admintools to users with 1 year of registration and 3000 mainspace edits

2359:. Even if it was not technically impossible, there would still be legal limitations on the implementations of this idea, particularly violations of our 1604: 3423: 1873: 919: 472: 165: 160: 1686:

system. The general public will see "User:~2024 1234" in logs and history pages, but experienced editors will be able to reveal the IP addresses. The

2329: 1383: 497: 3410:

default in the main namespace. It has remained there since largely due to inertia and lack of a solid reason to move it to another namespace. Being

3121:

Users should be able to have multiple watchlists so that they can group the pages they watch and not have to see all watched pages in one huge list.

394: 77:; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Knowledge's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of 3516: 2619: 2939: 2248:

requires consensus for deletion as well as for edits. (One exception: Biographies that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced are considered

3624: 3403:

Since the Main Page isn't an article, it should go in another namespace such as "Knowledge:" or "Portal:" rather than stay in the main namespace.

2423: 155: 2827: 1712: 1343: 1769: 1736:, they should automatically be reminded that no summary has been provided and given another opportunity to include one. (Registered users can 3536: 3508: 1963: 3394: 2894:, a rough consensus was in favor of establishing a procedure for community-based recall of administrators. Implementation details are still 2877: 2637: 1723: 2739: 687:, which dealt with an attempted merger of the verifiability, no original research and reliable sources pages into a single official policy. 655: 381: 338: 175: 36: 20: 2295:

from "Articles for deletion" to "Articles for discussion" in order to seem less confrontational and/or to match some other forums such as

2114:

The first creator, or everybody who has contributed to an article, must be warned on their talk page of a deletion debate of that article.

3038:

New editors lack the knowledge and experience to appropriately evaluate an RfA candidate. This also would eliminate vandalism and trolls.

2477: 2427: 1700: 506:

It is wildly impractical and there is no agreement on which style should be chosen, which has in the past resulted in repeated, needless

28: 2959:

in the country in which they reside. This would provide legal protection for the editor and possibly also for the Wikimedia Foundation.

2415: 1846: 215: 2469:

in your userspace in certain limited cases. If you believe a page was deleted mistakenly or out of process, you are free to request a

62: 2881: 2819: 2075: 1969: 1442:

should become project-wide policy, requiring all articles to meet it or be deleted. Some versions of this proposal continue to allow

851:

Featured articles are not "finished" articles. Not only do they need further editing in response to changes in the topic itself, our

3011:

An editor who has edited for a certain period of time and made a certain number of edits would be automatically granted admin rights

2098: 1418: 2385: 2257: 1528:

has been that independent research has found that these warnings have little benefit in actually preventing suicides and such, and

516: 3429: 1632: 640:-level) definition of reliable sources is impractical. Furthermore, strict rules about what type of source is permitted amount to 2231: 1883: 1162: 520: 1373:

was added to the Main Page every Monday and Friday in 2011, and minor tweaks have been done since 2006. Another major change is

1123:), a system preferred by the user's school or teacher(s), and/or a unique style that would meet the specific needs of Knowledge. 753: 2641: 2461: 2253: 2156:

by the Wikimedia Foundation legal counsel. If you have a plausible reason for seeing a particular page, then you can request a

1864: 1663: 1356:

Although some consensus exists that certain changes are in order, no particular change or specific redesign has had consensus.

651: 220: 2064:

Something like "people can only nominate three articles per day", "articles cannot be nominated more than once per year", etc.

1310:

Including the state makes it clear that the article is about a US municipality, which can be helpful with lesser known places.

3459: 2171: 1825: 860: 1923:

Many vandals are exposed when one of their edits receives extra scrutiny because their user or talk page shows as a redlink.

1069: 3691: 3416:, the Main Page doesn't particularly belong in any of the other namespaces either (with the possible exception of Portals). 733:; this bias may distort its contents, and institutionalizing such a recommendation would only further exacerbate this bias. 359: 264: 3227: 487: 3701: 3595: 3330:

Some namespaces, such as User:, Help:, and Talk:, are already so short that further abbreviation is not really necessary.

3302: 2873: 2599:

Administrators should have their status reconfirmed through RFA or an RFA-like process, either periodically or on demand.

852: 2611:. Endorsements of uncontroversial admins would consume much of the schedule, while the "wait time" to review admins who 2465:

difficult to delete copyright violations and attack pages, even if there are exceptions for such cases. You can already

2389: 889: 3541: 3243: 2863:

should be. Many want very strict requirements for a desysop, while some want it no more difficult, or easier, than the

2729: 2198: 2038: 1904: 1748: 1708: 578: 1995: 3234: 2512: 2466: 2419: 2122: 1860: 637: 229: 74: 1782:

characters, non-English alphabets, and/or any characters that are not easy to type on "standard" computer keyboards.

1236:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Captions/Archive 2 § RfC: Requiring photo credits in footnotes for copyrighted images

3105: 2511:

may be added to non-free files that would otherwise qualify for F9, which is not possible for text. When they were

1690:

does not allow unregistered editors to edit articles (but allows them to edit talk pages and other namespaces) and

1651: 1620: 1553: 1370: 855:

for featured articles change over time. For example: In Knowledge's early days, most featured articles did not use

739: 185: 3209:

Allow specific sections of pages to be watchlisted, so editors can monitor small portions of large pages, such as

2965:

No consensus to implement this; editors are free to use age as a personal rationale for opposing adminship on RfA.

1195:

and public domain images used as icons, where the file description page still exists but is sometimes not linked.)

1173: 1105: 527: 3600: 3149: 2952: 2782:

are not a reliable indicator of an editor's experience or competence. It is better to evaluate candidates on the

2757: 2216: 2129: 2055: 1835: 1347: 743: 680: 586: 557:. It is usually motivated by a desire to reduce errors in Knowledge or increase Knowledge's scholarly reputation. 2622:, agreeing to stand for reconfirmation if requested to do so by a sufficient number of editors in good standing. 1737: 1257: 2328:

This proposal was favorably received in 2009, but technical difficulties and inertia prevented the change; see

2105: 2029: 1809: 789: 622: 582: 283: 206: 70: 3029: 985: 398: 3281: 1999: 1894: 1408:

Red has been used for so many years that its meaning is established among editors. There is no evidence that

390: 82: 2563:, limit the types of questions asked, not allow additional questions to be asked, or ban "canned" questions. 1393: 784:

for someone to name a reliable source that supports it. Sourcing policies require inline citations only for

3696: 2815: 2657: 2408:. This may apply to all articles, newly created articles, or certain types of articles (BLPs, for example). 2395: 2376: 1920:

If a bot is used, it is cold and impersonal, and the bot is incapable of mentoring and assisting newcomers.

1590:" was an acceptable balance between wanting to provide some sort of link to prevention information and the 1512: 1141: 771: 610: 326: 318: 314: 278: 170: 2746: 1429: 691: 2996: 2767: 2405: 1856: 1704: 832: 828: 334: 859:. Today, a proposal to promote such an article to "featured" status would have no chance of surviving a 3706: 3653: 3641: 3547: 3371: 3354: 2686:

A "partial admin" process would at least double the already considerable frictional effort expended at

2493:(deletion of text that is obviously copyright infringement). Both authorize speedy deletion of obvious 2300: 2271: 1541: 1422: 1387: 1282: 1099: 1022:

last), or changing the formatting (e.g., long lists of references should be hidden in a scrolling box).

856: 763: 684: 614: 606: 322: 2550: 3582: 3338: 3292:

by forcing MediaWiki to contact the server for CAPTCHA verification). Using third-party servers is a

2725: 2470: 2444: 2336: 2304: 2050: 1763: 1481: 1144:

to be a de-facto 'house style', however, the use of these is neither encouraged nor discouraged (see

1120: 554: 330: 137: 2590: 1456: 818: 3334: 3194: 3104:

Note that extensive styling of nearly every aspect of one's watchlist is possible through CSS; see

2912: 2404:

Knowledge should automatically delete articles that do not cite at least one source, via speedy or

2352: 2278:

subjects when there is no consensus for keeping the article and the subject has requested deletion.

2090: 1591: 1561: 1529: 1516: 797: 667: 435: 3112: 2664: 2166:

Some articles that are unsuitable in their present state but have potential are often turned into

3277: 3233:

allows editors to subscribe to specific talk page sections. This can be enabled by navigating to

1789: 1149: 885:

there was consensus to semi-protect today's featured article for the day before to the day after.

618: 537: 2032:, even if the "peer review" turned out to be much more rigorous than can be reasonably expected. 592: 366: 2153: 1912: 1908: 569: 507: 287: 3155: 2708:

It's confusing. People won't know who can deal with a problem, especially inexperienced users.

1820: 1329: 3445: 3190: 2841: 2698: 2626: 2356: 2249: 2138:

Make deleted pages visible to everybody (or to all logged-in users), not just administrators.

1716: 1601:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 161#Proposal to add suicidal disclaimer at Suicide

1300: 1062: 747: 342: 107: 3553:

Knowledge:FAQ/Main Page § Why doesn't the cursor appear in the search box, like with Google?

2690:, as users debate who gets full administrator powers versus who gets only partial abilities. 2307:

would be merged into AFD, as the equivalent processes are at the XFD "for discussion" pages.

2170:

for later improvement. Also, several long-standing deleted hoax articles are preserved (see

2071: 1667: 641: 114: 3181: 2779: 2721: 2241: 1979: 1926:

The bot would make thousands of pointless edits welcoming vandals and non-editing accounts.

1687: 1289: 1266:

Remove the state from the titles of articles about unambiguously-named US places. Example:

1116: 1078:

Allow uploading and use of media which is licensed under a non-commercial license (such as

767: 663: 421: 1946:

they created their account within the past 36 hours and have since made at least 10 edits.

8: 2972: 2368: 2245: 2145: 1683: 705: 564: 250: 100: 78: 1244:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 25 § Photograph attribution in image captions

277:

This is a list of things that have been frequently proposed on Knowledge, and have been

2717: 2683:

If we can't trust people to use their tools sensibly, they don't become admins. Period.

1938: 1877: 1585: 1508: 1446:, while others attempt to do away with those and have GNG be the only governing policy. 1409: 1095: 801: 697: 659: 480: 92: 3385:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 68 § Proposal for an alias to templatespace

3098: 1252:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive AZ § Image attribution under CC-Attrib license

3389:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 127 § Prefix suggestion: TP: for Template:

3247: 3171: 3128: 3082: 3003:

Automatically grant adminship to users with a certain number of edits or time editing

2811: 2797: 2629:

process can address problems that arise from accusations of administrator misconduct.

2437: 2261: 2234:(BLPs) where there is no consensus for keeping the article should result in deletion. 1800: 1733: 1617:

Knowledge:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 59#Resources on severe mental illness pages

1575: 1304: 1267: 1166: 1145: 476: 3342: 3288:

will not let us run it on our own servers (so it would introduce a dependency on an

2489:(deletion of files that are obviously copyright infringement) should be merged into 3668: 2992: 2837: 2775: 2372: 2207:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Persistent proposals/Straw poll for view-deleted

2167: 2157: 2152:

visible to everybody. The proposal to allow access to all deleted content has been

1643:

Everybody should register an account before editing; IP addresses are insufficient.

1293: 902: 785: 730: 3664: 3230: 2716:

Several permissions are available to trustworthy non-admins upon request, such as

874:

A link to the "originally featured version" is already available on the talk page.

298: 2956: 2941: 2508: 2498: 2185: 1307:. Always appending the state produces a consistent and predictable set of titles. 1137: 1079: 1058: 426: 3306: 2928: 3424:

Knowledge:FAQ/Main Page § Why is the Main Page in the main (article) namespace?

2932: 2860: 2849: 2771: 1537: 933: 463: 40: 3333:

Some proposed shortcuts, such as TT: → Template talk:, conflict with existing

3254: 2244:, most BLP-related problems do not require deletion of the article. Policy on 922:, reduce clutter, and reserve article space for information about the subject. 3685: 3210: 3045: 2980: 2924: 2864: 2687: 2560: 2490: 2296: 2292: 2227: 2189: 2181: 2024: 1813: 1801:

no usernames are permitted to contain Unicode characters unrelated to writing

1443: 1439: 671: 636:

that threshold as "reliable". For this reason, a universally applicable (or:

32: 24: 2983:

non-disclosure agreement, which requires those to be 18 and older. See also

1532:

should not be overridden for such questionable benefit. There has also been

3086: 2976: 2790:

of their edits. Finally, no one agrees on what the prerequisites should be.

2494: 2486: 2318: 2314: 1934: 1322: 1299:

Repeated or otherwise ambiguous placenames are very common in the US (e.g.

912: 3276:

The primary reasons for rejection were given by Brooke Vibber, our former

718:

Editors should use sources that anyone can read immediately, without cost.

405: 3449: 3412: 1609:

Knowledge:Village pump (idea lab)/Archive 43#Topic related help resources

1472: 780:

The policy is that material must be verifiable, that is, that it must be

602: 2646:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 § Time limits on adminship

446: 353:. Furthermore, once a page has loaded, the disclaimer is often too late. 3044:

There is already a prohibition on IPs from 'voting' on RfA. New and/or

2971:

Certain user rights typically occupied by administrators, specifically

2282: 1803:, although usernames registered before that time were grandfathered in. 1747:

useful edit summaries. Manually added edit summaries also suppress the

726: 1484:

pulls in the latest stable and preview release versions from Wikidata.

658:. Strong community consensus results in a source being classified as " 3637: 3280:, who stated that reCAPTCHA is proprietary (Wikimedia prefers to use 3264: 2148:

body to ensure that copyright violations and libelous statements are

2099:

List of articles that have been nominated for deletion more than once

1952:

the user has not been blocked from editing at any point since joining

1949:

the user has not already received an invitation to visit the Teahouse

1545: 1339: 1240:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 76 § Attribution of images

792:

for supplying these citations. Inline citations are not required for

439: 1248:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)/Archive 17 § Requiring photo credits

1271: 3289: 2345:

Allow users to have their own accounts deleted upon their request.

1412:

are abused to make certain names or words stand out in an article.

3346: 3293: 3267: 1788:

The notion of acceptable characters was broadened to accommodate

1779: 1751:. Blank edit summaries are a good way to spot possible vandalism. 1579: 1549: 1498: 2656:. Reconfirmation is done at some very small Wikipedias, such as 2436:

A deletion process for unreferenced BLPs has been approved, see

1778:

Proposals have included banning usernames that include symbols,

3544:, listing some perennial disputes regarding the Manual of Style 3360:

Shortcuts for Help pages are often created in the WP namespace.

3285: 2351:

This is currently a technical impossibility for both Knowledge

1613:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 212#Suicide hotlines

1507:

Proposals along these lines generally start from a position of

1497:

Add a prominent banner or text in the lead to articles such as

2367:. Alternatively, users can delete their user page by adding {{ 496:

For consistency's sake, we should pick one style of spelling (

2880:. Before proposing a new system to revoke admin rights, read 2515:, it contained numerous caveats that applied solely to files. 1342:. The current design was implemented in March 2006 following 3170:

Technologically unfeasible without further development. See

3127:

Technologically unfeasible without further development. See

3093: 2650:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 97 § Admin tenure

2545: 1534:

concern over our ability to accurately maintain such a list

1489:

Add prominent links to crisis hotlines on relevant articles

1292:

and sufficiently natural that it may be considered part of

382:

Knowledge:What Knowledge is not § Knowledge is not censored

3530: 3462:

have a "share" button accessible through the options menu.

2454:

be exceptions for copyright violations, attack pages, etc.

2044: 3572:

found through the search function or via the links above.

2796:

This is one of the issues that was discussed in depth at

2386:

Knowledge:Username policy § Deleting and merging accounts

1816:

for the list of active accounts using Unicode characters.

1757:

As said above, this is an option for account Preferences.

1715:(new accounts shouldn't be allowed to create pages), and 1664:

82% of IP edits are intended to improve the encyclopedia.

1362:

No consensus on particular changes to the general layout.

1359:

No consensus on what Main Page sections to add or remove.

1303:); a majority would require disambiguation regardless of 1192: 517:

Knowledge:Manual of Style § National varieties of English

3357:

shortcuts, or shortcuts with the full namespace prefix.

3313:

Create shortcut namespace aliases for various namespaces

2951:

Administrators should either indicate or prove at their

2903:

Grant non-admins admin functions within their user space

2878:

Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship § Proposed processes

2638:

Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship § Proposed processes

1627: 1501:

referring readers to crisis hotlines or other resources.

1163:

Knowledge:Citing sources § Variation in citation methods

994:

The standard appendices at the end of an article (e.g.,

768:

whether Knowledge should have an article on that subject

293: 3585:

is free to (most) readers in the UK, but not elsewhere.

1903:

In general, this proposal comes up every few months at

1605:

Knowledge:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 192#Suicides

762:

Every sentence (or paragraph) should be followed by an

19:"WP:PERENNIAL" redirects here. Not to be confused with 3625:

Policies and guidelines: "Sources of Knowledge policy"

2371:}} and can mark the talk page as inactive by adding {{ 3303:

Wikicaptcha: a ReCAPTCHA-like solution for Wikisource

3184:

feature displays changes on pages linked from a page.

2818:(30 days/500 edits) to run for adminship. Earlier, a 1014:), changing the order of the sections (e.g., putting 3558: 2654:

Knowledge:Requests for comment/Adminship term length

1732:

When any editor is about to post an edit without an

1159:

Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Citation discussion

3444:Consensus and policy both establish that Knowledge 3349:

that may be used for future interlanguage prefixes.

2985:

wmf:Policy:Access to nonpublic personal data policy

2274:to permit (not require) deletion of biographies of 2125:, for which all main contributors must be notified. 2095:

Knowledge:Repeated AfD nomination limitation policy

1032:method. These guidelines only seek to document the 1874:Knowledge:Centralized discussion/Removing warnings 1740:to do this, but many users are not aware of this.) 1222:has not received any significant level of support. 654:, and frequently discussed sources are indexed at 605:of Knowledge's content. Examples include changing 473:Knowledge:Funding Knowledge through advertisements 16:List of frequently rejected proposals on Knowledge 3235:Special:Preferences § mw-prefsection-betafeatures 2766:While candidates with few edits and/or a lack of 2497:. Merging into a single criterion would decrease 2330:Knowledge talk:Articles for discussion/Proposal 1 2074:. This is a solution in search of a problem (see 1996:Knowledge:Signatures § Customizing your signature 1465:Implement infoboxes that pull data from Wikidata. 1384:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Main Page features 811: 650:Editors can assess the reliability of sources at 500:, generally), and enforce it throughout the site. 3683: 3201:Allow watchlisting individual sections of a page 2814:, the community decided that candidates must be 2680:The proposal doesn't solve any of the problems. 2620:Category:Knowledge administrators open to recall 1955:the user has not received a level 4 user warning 1425:on how to change the color for your own account. 2007:Allow discussion about the topic of the article 1915:page. There are multiple reasons for rejection: 572:between editors with opposing personal beliefs. 395:m:2010 Wikimedia Study of Controversial Content 2828:Community-based process for removing adminship 2615:controversial could be on the order of months. 1770:Usernames should contain only Latin characters 1713:Knowledge:Autoconfirmed article creation trial 1656:97% of vandalism comes from unregistered users 313:All Knowledge web pages contain a link to the 3537:Knowledge:Bot requests/Frequently denied bots 3085:, the community decided that editors must be 2979:, can only be occupied by those who sign the 2262:a "sticky" proposed deletion for BLP articles 1964:Knowledge:Bot requests/Frequently denied bots 1724:Automatically prompt for missing edit summary 996:See also, Notes, References, Further reading, 258: 3395:Move the Main Page out of the main namespace 3250:("Ability to watch section levels of pages") 1526:the most strongly supported argument against 656:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources 393:for instructions on how to suppress images. 37:Knowledge:Deletion review/Perennial requests 21:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Perennial sources 2740:Knowledge:Unbundling administrators' powers 2478:Merge speedy deletion criterion F9 into G12 1834:Editors should be prohibited from removing 1701:Knowledge:Editors should be logged-in users 740:Knowledge:Verifiability § Access to sources 29:Knowledge:External links/Perennial websites 1863:tags while the discussion is in progress, 1810:Knowledge:Signatures § Non-Latin usernames 1136:Inline parenthetical referencing has been 1080:Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 265: 251: 2882:Knowledge:De-adminship proposal checklist 1375:the removal of portal links in April 2022 2180:Deleted articles may be archived in the 2076:Knowledge:Don't stuff beans up your nose 1633:Prohibit unregistered users from editing 1285:commonly append the state to placenames. 3665:Knowledge Statistics - Tables - English 3430:Share pages on Facebook, Twitter/X etc. 3376:TM: → Template: was created in May 2024 2732:for a list and the application process. 2559:Limit the number of questions asked at 2525:that resulted in the relevant split, a 2039:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not § FORUM 1096:Jimbo's original edict against NC media 949:, orphan tags were moved to talk pages. 754:Require inline citations for everything 536:For a long time, the first sentence of 521:Knowledge:Standardize spellings/Archive 349:page could conceivably be offensive to 3684: 2642:User:SamuelTheGhost/Re-electing admins 2160:. Knowledge is written by its readers. 1061:. Many discussions in the archives of 652:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Noticeboard 2172:Knowledge:List of hoaxes on Knowledge 2028:nonetheless conflict with our policy 1321:are exempted from the convention per 1214:And, specific to the CC BY licenses: 1070:Allow non-commercial licensed content 683:(and/or many archives of that page); 563:Knowledge is supposed to be based on 1859:regarding a currently active block, 1554:World Health Organization's guidance 488:Enforce American or British spelling 360:Knowledge:No disclaimers in articles 48: 3596:Knowledge:Featured article criteria 2874:Knowledge:Requests for de-adminship 2660:, which had just 63 admins in 2013. 2070:Strict numerical limits fall under 1584:For information on prevention, see 890:Move maintenance tags to talk pages 794:material everyone agrees is obvious 13: 3636:A majority of articles follow the 3542:Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/FAQ 3446:is not a social networking service 3244:User:Enterprisey/section-watchlist 3089:to vote in requests for adminship. 3057:2015 administrator election reform 2844:action. This would make adminship 2730:Knowledge:Requests for permissions 2428:articles with unsourced statements 2390:mw:Extension:User Merge and Delete 2240:In articles that meet Knowledge's 2199:Knowledge:Viewing deleted articles 1905:Knowledge talk:Welcoming committee 1709:Knowledge:Not every IP is a vandal 1658:(less than 8% are vandals), about 1346:by the community organized by the 579:Knowledge:Verifiability, not truth 75:Knowledge's policies or guidelines 14: 3718: 2219:for biographies of living persons 1680:This issue is currently evolving: 1475:of Wikidata and subtle vandalism. 1319:Twenty-nine significant US cities 3374:" such as "CAT:". Additionally, 3106:Knowledge:Customizing watchlists 2940:Administrators should be of the 2786:of their contributions, not the 2252:, which makes them eligible for 1970:Disallow personalized signatures 1621:Talk:Suicide/crisis hotline link 1174:Add in-article credit for images 1106:Establish a house citation style 827:To maintain their high quality, 528:Only allow the truth in articles 52: 3442:Reasons for previous rejection: 3325:Reasons for previous rejection: 3274:Reasons for previous rejection: 3217:Reasons for previous rejection: 3168:Reasons for previous rejection: 3125:Reasons for previous rejection: 3055:various proposals such as from 3015:Reasons for previous rejection: 2981:access to nonpublic information 2963:Reasons for previous rejection: 2920:Reasons for previous rejection: 2856:Reasons for previous rejection: 2764:Reasons for previous rejection: 2678:Reasons for previous rejection: 2603:Reasons for previous rejection: 2505:Reasons for previous rejection: 2458:Reasons for previous rejection: 2412:Reasons for previous rejection: 2349:Reasons for previous rejection: 2311:Reasons for previous rejection: 2238:Reasons for previous rejection: 2142:Reasons for previous rejection: 2130:Deleted pages should be visible 2118:Reasons for previous rejection: 2068:Reasons for previous rejection: 2056:Cap on nominations for deletion 2020:Reasons for previous rejection: 1986:Reasons for previous rejection: 1901:Reasons for previous rejection: 1842:Reasons for previous rejection: 1812:on providing transliterations. 1786:Reasons for previous rejection: 1744:Reasons for previous rejection: 1738:set their accounts' Preferences 1647:Reasons for previous rejection: 1536:, and concerns over a possible 1522:an in-house geotargeted service 1505:Reasons for previous rejection: 1469:Reasons for previous rejection: 1450:Reasons for previous rejection: 1406:Reasons for previous rejection: 1354:Reasons for previous rejection: 1278:Reasons for previous rejection: 1258:Remove state from US placenames 1186:Reasons for previous rejection: 1127:Reasons for previous rejection: 1086:Reasons for previous rejection: 1026:Reasons for previous rejection: 926:Reasons for previous rejection: 839:Reasons for previous rejection: 778:Reasons for previous rejection: 744:Knowledge:Reliable sources/Cost 722:Reasons for previous rejection: 681:Knowledge talk:Reliable sources 666:", but exceptions are possible 629:Reasons for previous rejection: 587:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 561:Reasons for previous rejection: 504:Reasons for previous rejection: 460:Reasons for previous rejection: 418:Reasons for previous rejection: 379:Reasons for previous rejection: 317:page, where you can access the 311:Reasons for previous rejection: 3658: 3647: 3630: 3616: 3606: 3588: 3575: 3565: 3407:Reasons for previous rejection 3042:Reason for previous rejection: 2567:Reason for previous rejection: 2106:Notify all authors of deletion 1978:Editors should use only plain 1884:Use a bot to welcome new users 1855:Users may not remove declined 986:Changes to standard appendices 898:Move maintenance tags such as 812:§ Delete unreferenced articles 623:Knowledge:No original research 583:Knowledge:Editorial discretion 1: 3282:free and open-source software 3030:Suffrage requirements for RfA 2770:contributions often fail per 2232:biographies of living persons 2000:User:Kephir/gadgets/unclutter 1564:in "External links" sections. 1444:subject notability guidelines 1394:Change the color of red links 391:Help:Options to hide an image 3213:, instead of the whole page. 2580:of two questions per editor. 2396:Delete unreferenced articles 2299:. This usually assumes that 1826:Prohibit removal of warnings 1552:?).Also of note is that the 1515:, calling on us to override 1440:general notability guideline 1430:Upgrade GNG to policy status 1344:several months of discussion 920:self-references to Knowledge 692:Require free, online sources 555:true according to any editor 462:Knowledge is supposed to be 399:m:Image filter referendum/en 315:Knowledge:General disclaimer 7: 3692:Knowledge information pages 3452:that work on every webpage. 3270:system in place of our own. 2997:Knowledge:Age and adminship 2955:that they have reached the 2927:, and has been rejected by 2747:Prerequisites for adminship 1705:Knowledge:IPs are human too 833:protected or semi-protected 10: 3723: 3702:Knowledge failed proposals 3673:Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought 3667:, accessed April 2, 2008; 3642:Council of Science Editors 3548:Knowledge:Historic debates 3422:The discussions listed in 2726:protected template editing 2301:Knowledge:Proposed mergers 2048: 1821:Talk pages and discussions 1764:Help:Preferences § Editing 1556:suggests resources at the 1423:User:Anomie/linkclassifier 1388:Knowledge:Main Page design 1100:Knowledge:Non-free content 1036:and not to change it. The 861:featured article candidacy 695: 685:Knowledge:Attribution/Poll 607:Knowledge:Reliable sources 337:disclaimers. In addition, 90: 46:Knowledge information page 18: 3675:; accessed July 13, 2010. 3583:Oxford English Dictionary 2694:set of admin permissions. 2551:Too many questions at RfA 2445:Grace period for deletion 2337:Deletion of user accounts 2305:Knowledge:Requested moves 2051:Knowledge:Deletion reform 1542:Surgeon General's Warning 1482:Template:Infobox software 1457:Use Wikidata in infoboxes 819:Protect featured articles 339:Knowledge is not censored 279:rejected by the community 176:Perennial deletion review 3345:prefixes, or codes from 3195:Knowledge:Article alerts 2861:request for de-adminship 2591:Reconfirm administrators 2509:valid fair use rationale 2297:Redirects for discussion 2091:Knowledge:Revotes on Vfd 1941:invites to new users if: 1749:automatic edit summaries 1592:Knowledge:No disclaimers 1530:Knowledge:No disclaimers 1517:Knowledge:No disclaimers 843:Featured articles often 436:Knowledge:Office actions 3598:, as of April 2, 2008. 3046:single purpose accounts 2665:Hierarchical structures 2658:the Norwegian Knowledge 2576:In 2015, the community 2414:Such a practice would " 2123:Featured Article review 2030:WP:No original research 1937:automatically delivers 1861:miscellany for deletion 1562:relevant external links 1540:(e.g. should we have a 1338:Revamp the look of the 1288:Appending the state is 619:Knowledge:Verifiability 593:Define reliable sources 538:Knowledge:Verifiability 367:Censor offensive images 2865:requests for adminship 2738:Discussions listed at 2242:criteria for inclusion 1799:Since 6 November 2017 1574:it was decided that a 1330:Redesign the Main Page 831:should be permanently 786:four types of material 729:) that are written in 3669:Who Writes Knowledge? 3191:Help:Public watchlist 2953:request for adminship 2838:Arbitration Committee 2758:articles for deletion 2699:Law of the instrument 2049:Further information: 1838:from their talk page. 1513:righting great wrongs 1371:Today's Featured List 1348:Usability WikiProject 1140:. One could consider 1063:Knowledge talk:Layout 953:Previous discussions: 617:, or merging it with 166:Common outcomes (TfD) 161:Common outcomes (RfD) 156:Common outcomes (AfD) 3654:Statement from Legal 3460:official mobile apps 2495:copyright violations 2361:CC BY-SA 4.0 License 2228:Deletion discussions 2215:Delete no-consensus 1717:Prosecutor's fallacy 1688:Portuguese Knowledge 800:requires editors to 790:there is no deadline 672:consensus can change 668:depending on context 664:generally unreliable 422:Wikimedia Foundation 343:protection of minors 284:Consensus can change 230:Proposals and policy 216:Guide to arbitration 207:Arbitration (Arbcom) 188:Bureaucratship (RfB) 71:encyclopedic article 3697:Knowledge proposals 3113:Multiple watchlists 3083:the 2024 RfA review 2933:Knowledge community 2291:Change the name of 1895:welcoming committee 1121:Harvard referencing 498:American or British 239:Perennial proposals 186:Adminship (RfA) and 3087:extended confirmed 3061:proposal from 2015 2816:extended confirmed 2513:a single criterion 2467:request undeletion 2377:courtesy vanishing 2276:relatively unknown 1586:Suicide prevention 1471:Concerns over the 1142:citation templates 772:general references 660:generally reliable 481:Enciclopedia Libre 198:Arguments to avoid 171:Overcategorisation 151:Arguments to avoid 3707:Knowledge culture 3640:(psychology) and 3581:For example, the 3372:pseudo-namespaces 3182:"related changes" 3156:Public watchlists 3099:Watchlist changes 2888:Gained consensus: 2406:proposed deletion 2260:.) There is also 2204:Failed proposals: 2154:explicitly vetoed 2072:instruction creep 1836:warning templates 1790:single user login 1684:temporary account 1582:article stating " 1524:.In recent RFCs, 1268:Missoula, Montana 829:featured articles 774:should be banned. 642:instruction creep 477:Spanish Knowledge 456:diverse keywords. 275: 274: 125: 124: 3714: 3676: 3662: 3656: 3651: 3645: 3634: 3628: 3620: 3614: 3610: 3604: 3603: 3592: 3586: 3579: 3573: 3569: 3370:in the form of " 3355:pseudo-namespace 3353:WP-namespace or 3228:discussion tools 2993:Knowledge:Ageism 2353:system operators 2256:under criterion 1857:unblock requests 1668:Foundation issue 1294:American English 1283:Reliable sources 1150:WP:CITECONSENSUS 938: 932: 917: 911: 907: 901: 857:inline citations 708: 299:Content warnings 267: 260: 253: 130:Common decisions 127: 126: 117: 110: 103: 63:information page 56: 55: 49: 3722: 3721: 3717: 3716: 3715: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3663: 3659: 3652: 3648: 3635: 3631: 3621: 3617: 3611: 3607: 3599: 3593: 3589: 3580: 3576: 3570: 3566: 3561: 3533: 3432: 3397: 3315: 3290:external server 3257: 3231:mw:Beta Feature 3203: 3158: 3115: 3101: 3096: 3032: 3005: 2957:age of majority 2945: 2942:age of majority 2905: 2896:being discussed 2892:2024 discussion 2830: 2812:2024 RfA review 2749: 2667: 2593: 2553: 2548: 2531:2019 discussion 2523:2007 discussion 2480: 2471:deletion review 2447: 2398: 2339: 2285: 2254:speedy deletion 2221: 2186:Wayback Machine 2132: 2108: 2058: 2053: 2047: 2009: 1972: 1886: 1865:speedy deletion 1828: 1823: 1772: 1726: 1635: 1630: 1491: 1459: 1432: 1419:Help:Link color 1396: 1332: 1260: 1176: 1108: 1072: 1046:Further reading 988: 936: 930: 915: 909: 905: 899: 892: 821: 764:inline citation 756: 712: 711: 704: 700: 694: 615:official policy 595: 530: 490: 449: 408: 369: 301: 296: 271: 190: 121: 120: 113: 106: 99: 95: 87: 86: 53: 47: 44: 17: 12: 11: 5: 3720: 3710: 3709: 3704: 3699: 3694: 3678: 3677: 3657: 3646: 3629: 3615: 3605: 3587: 3574: 3563: 3562: 3560: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3550: 3545: 3539: 3532: 3529: 3528: 3527: 3521:Village pump 5 3481:Village pump 4 3477:Village pump 3 3473:Village pump 2 3469:Village pump 1 3463: 3453: 3439: 3431: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3417: 3404: 3396: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3379: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3361: 3350: 3339:interWikimedia 3331: 3322: 3314: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3297: 3271: 3256: 3253: 3252: 3251: 3238: 3221: 3214: 3202: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3185: 3175: 3165: 3157: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3132: 3122: 3114: 3111: 3100: 3097: 3095: 3092: 3091: 3090: 3072: 3050: 3039: 3031: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3018: 3012: 3004: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2987: 2966: 2960: 2944: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2929:the developers 2917: 2913:administrators 2904: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2885: 2868: 2853: 2847: 2829: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2801: 2791: 2789: 2785: 2761: 2748: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2733: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2706: 2702: 2695: 2691: 2684: 2675: 2666: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2644:(a proposal), 2632: 2631: 2630: 2623: 2616: 2610: 2600: 2592: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2581: 2571: 2564: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2516: 2502: 2479: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2455: 2446: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2431: 2426:articles, and 2424:poorly sourced 2409: 2397: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2380: 2346: 2338: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2323: 2308: 2284: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2277: 2272:already exists 2265: 2235: 2220: 2213: 2212: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2193: 2175: 2161: 2151: 2139: 2131: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2115: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2085: 2079: 2065: 2057: 2054: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2033: 2017: 2008: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1990: 1983: 1971: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1957: 1956: 1953: 1950: 1947: 1943: 1942: 1928: 1927: 1924: 1921: 1917: 1916: 1898: 1885: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1868: 1850: 1839: 1827: 1824: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1804: 1794: 1783: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1758: 1752: 1741: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1695: 1677: 1671: 1644: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1595: 1565: 1538:slippery slope 1502: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1476: 1466: 1458: 1455: 1454: 1453: 1447: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1413: 1403: 1395: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1378: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1351: 1331: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1308: 1297: 1286: 1275: 1259: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1219: 1212: 1211:contributions. 1208: 1205: 1202: 1199: 1196: 1183: 1175: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1153: 1131: 1124: 1107: 1104: 1103: 1102: 1090: 1083: 1071: 1068: 1067: 1066: 1053: 1050:External links 1023: 1016:External links 1000:External links 987: 984: 983: 982: 956:September 2010 950: 940: 923: 891: 888: 887: 886: 883:in August 2023 877: 876: 875: 872: 868: 864: 849: 836: 820: 817: 816: 815: 806: 798:editing policy 775: 755: 752: 751: 750: 748:WP:NOTONLYFREE 734: 719: 710: 709: 701: 696: 693: 690: 689: 688: 675: 645: 626: 594: 591: 590: 589: 573: 558: 529: 526: 525: 524: 511: 501: 489: 486: 485: 484: 467: 457: 448: 445: 444: 443: 430: 415: 407: 404: 403: 402: 385: 376: 368: 365: 364: 363: 354: 308: 300: 297: 295: 292: 273: 272: 270: 269: 262: 255: 247: 244: 243: 242: 241: 233: 232: 226: 225: 224: 223: 218: 210: 209: 203: 202: 201: 200: 192: 191: 187: 184: 181: 180: 179: 178: 173: 168: 163: 158: 153: 145: 144: 134: 133: 131: 123: 122: 119: 118: 111: 104: 96: 91: 88: 68: 67: 59: 57: 45: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3719: 3708: 3705: 3703: 3700: 3698: 3695: 3693: 3690: 3689: 3687: 3674: 3670: 3666: 3661: 3655: 3650: 3643: 3639: 3633: 3627: 3626: 3619: 3609: 3602: 3597: 3591: 3584: 3578: 3568: 3564: 3554: 3551: 3549: 3546: 3543: 3540: 3538: 3535: 3534: 3526: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3494: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3478: 3474: 3470: 3467: 3464: 3461: 3457: 3454: 3451: 3447: 3443: 3440: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3425: 3421: 3418: 3415: 3414: 3408: 3405: 3402: 3399: 3398: 3390: 3386: 3383: 3380: 3377: 3373: 3369: 3366: 3359: 3358: 3356: 3351: 3348: 3344: 3340: 3336: 3335:interlanguage 3332: 3329: 3328: 3326: 3323: 3320: 3317: 3316: 3308: 3304: 3301: 3298: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3272: 3269: 3266: 3262: 3259: 3258: 3255:Use reCAPTCHA 3249: 3245: 3242: 3239: 3236: 3232: 3229: 3225: 3222: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3208: 3205: 3204: 3196: 3192: 3189: 3186: 3183: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3169: 3166: 3163: 3160: 3159: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3133: 3130: 3126: 3123: 3120: 3117: 3116: 3110: 3109: 3107: 3088: 3084: 3080: 3076: 3073: 3070: 3066: 3065:2016 proposal 3062: 3058: 3054: 3051: 3047: 3043: 3040: 3037: 3034: 3033: 3025: 3022: 3019: 3016: 3013: 3010: 3007: 3006: 2998: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2974: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2950: 2947: 2946: 2943: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2921: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2906: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2879: 2876:, especially 2875: 2872: 2869: 2866: 2862: 2857: 2854: 2851: 2845: 2843: 2840:action or by 2839: 2835: 2832: 2831: 2821: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2805: 2802: 2799: 2795: 2792: 2787: 2783: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2768:project-space 2765: 2762: 2759: 2754: 2751: 2750: 2741: 2737: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2715: 2712: 2707: 2703: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2689: 2685: 2682: 2681: 2679: 2676: 2672: 2669: 2668: 2659: 2655: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2636: 2633: 2628: 2624: 2621: 2617: 2614: 2608: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2601: 2598: 2595: 2594: 2585: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2572: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2558: 2555: 2554: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2520: 2517: 2514: 2510: 2506: 2503: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2485: 2482: 2481: 2472: 2468: 2463: 2459: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2448: 2439: 2435: 2432: 2429: 2425: 2421: 2417: 2413: 2410: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2391: 2387: 2384: 2381: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2347: 2344: 2341: 2340: 2331: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2319:article title 2316: 2312: 2309: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2287: 2286: 2275: 2273: 2269: 2266: 2263: 2259: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2236: 2233: 2229: 2226: 2223: 2222: 2218: 2208: 2205: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2197: 2194: 2191: 2190:archive.today 2187: 2183: 2182:Deletionpedia 2179: 2176: 2173: 2169: 2165: 2162: 2159: 2155: 2149: 2147: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2133: 2124: 2119: 2116: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2086: 2083: 2080: 2077: 2073: 2069: 2066: 2063: 2060: 2059: 2052: 2040: 2037: 2034: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2018: 2014: 2011: 2010: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1984: 1981: 1977: 1974: 1973: 1965: 1962: 1959: 1958: 1954: 1951: 1948: 1945: 1944: 1940: 1936: 1933: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1922: 1919: 1918: 1914: 1910: 1906: 1902: 1899: 1896: 1891: 1888: 1887: 1879: 1875: 1872: 1869: 1866: 1862: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1848: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1829: 1815: 1811: 1808: 1805: 1802: 1798: 1795: 1791: 1787: 1784: 1781: 1777: 1774: 1773: 1765: 1762: 1759: 1756: 1753: 1750: 1745: 1742: 1739: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1699: 1696: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1681: 1678: 1675: 1672: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1648: 1645: 1642: 1639: 1638: 1637: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1587: 1581: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1566: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1500: 1496: 1493: 1492: 1483: 1480: 1477: 1474: 1473:verifiability 1470: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1460: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1441: 1437: 1434: 1433: 1424: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1389: 1385: 1382: 1379: 1376: 1372: 1369: 1366: 1361: 1358: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1349: 1345: 1341: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1324: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1234: 1231: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1215: 1213: 1209: 1206: 1203: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1132: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1091: 1087: 1084: 1081: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1054: 1051: 1047: 1043: 1040:precedes the 1039: 1035: 1031: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 990: 989: 981: 977: 973: 969: 968:December 2008 965: 961: 960:November 2009 957: 954: 951: 948: 947:November 2013 944: 941: 935: 927: 924: 921: 914: 904: 897: 894: 893: 884: 881: 878: 873: 869: 867:requirements. 865: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 841: 840: 837: 834: 830: 826: 823: 822: 813: 810: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 783: 779: 776: 773: 770:. All use of 769: 765: 761: 758: 757: 749: 745: 741: 738: 735: 732: 728: 723: 720: 717: 714: 713: 707: 703: 702: 699: 686: 682: 679: 676: 673: 669: 665: 661: 657: 653: 649: 646: 643: 639: 635: 630: 627: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 604: 600: 597: 596: 588: 584: 580: 577: 574: 571: 566: 562: 559: 556: 553: 549: 544: 539: 535: 532: 531: 522: 518: 515: 512: 509: 505: 502: 499: 495: 492: 491: 482: 478: 474: 471: 468: 465: 461: 458: 454: 451: 450: 441: 437: 434: 431: 428: 427:legal threats 423: 419: 416: 413: 410: 409: 400: 396: 392: 389: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 371: 370: 361: 358: 355: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 309: 306: 303: 302: 291: 289: 285: 280: 268: 263: 261: 256: 254: 249: 248: 246: 245: 240: 237: 236: 235: 234: 231: 228: 227: 222: 219: 217: 214: 213: 212: 211: 208: 205: 204: 199: 196: 195: 194: 193: 189: 183: 182: 177: 174: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 152: 149: 148: 147: 146: 143: 141: 136: 135: 132:and arguments 129: 128: 116: 112: 109: 105: 102: 98: 97: 94: 89: 84: 80: 76: 73:, nor one of 72: 69:It is not an 66: 64: 58: 51: 50: 42: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 3672: 3660: 3649: 3632: 3623: 3618: 3613:de-featured. 3608: 3590: 3577: 3567: 3525:Help desk 10 3465: 3456:Partly done: 3455: 3450:bookmarklets 3441: 3435: 3419: 3411: 3406: 3400: 3381: 3367: 3324: 3318: 3299: 3273: 3260: 3240: 3224:Partly done: 3223: 3216: 3206: 3187: 3178:Partly done: 3177: 3167: 3161: 3134: 3124: 3118: 3103: 3102: 3074: 3052: 3041: 3035: 3020: 3014: 3008: 2989: 2969:Partly done: 2968: 2962: 2948: 2919: 2908: 2887: 2870: 2855: 2833: 2803: 2793: 2763: 2752: 2735: 2714:Partly done: 2713: 2677: 2670: 2634: 2612: 2602: 2596: 2583: 2574:Partly done: 2573: 2566: 2556: 2518: 2504: 2483: 2462:our criteria 2457: 2450: 2434:Partly done: 2433: 2411: 2401: 2382: 2348: 2342: 2325: 2310: 2288: 2268:Partly done: 2267: 2250:attack pages 2237: 2224: 2203: 2195: 2177: 2163: 2141: 2135: 2117: 2111: 2087: 2082:Partly done: 2081: 2067: 2061: 2035: 2019: 2012: 1992: 1985: 1975: 1960: 1932:Partly done: 1931: 1913:bot requests 1909:village pump 1900: 1889: 1870: 1853:Partly done: 1852: 1849:" newcomers. 1841: 1831: 1806: 1797:Partly done: 1796: 1785: 1775: 1760: 1755:Partly done: 1754: 1743: 1734:edit summary 1729: 1697: 1679: 1674:Partly done: 1673: 1646: 1640: 1636: 1597: 1583: 1572:the 2019 RFC 1568:Partly done: 1567: 1557: 1504: 1494: 1479:Partly done: 1478: 1468: 1462: 1449: 1435: 1415: 1405: 1399: 1380: 1368:Partly done: 1367: 1353: 1335: 1316:Partly done: 1315: 1290:common usage 1277: 1263: 1232: 1185: 1179: 1155: 1134:Partly done: 1133: 1126: 1111: 1092: 1085: 1075: 1055: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1019: 1015: 1012:Bibliography 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 995: 991: 980:October 2007 972:October 2008 964:January 2009 952: 942: 925: 895: 879: 848:improvement. 844: 838: 824: 808: 781: 777: 759: 736: 721: 715: 677: 648:Partly done: 647: 633: 628: 603:verification 598: 575: 560: 551: 547: 542: 533: 513: 508:edit warring 503: 493: 469: 459: 452: 432: 417: 411: 406:Legal issues 387: 378: 372: 356: 350: 346: 310: 304: 288:village pump 276: 238: 139: 108:WP:PERENNIAL 60: 3601:(permalink) 3517:Help desk 9 3513:Help desk 8 3509:Help desk 7 3505:Help desk 6 3501:Help desk 5 3497:Help desk 4 3493:Help desk 3 3489:Help desk 2 3485:Help desk 1 3413:sui generis 3368:Partly done 3307:phab:T34695 3079:proposal 14 2850:No big deal 2808:proposal 25 2780:edit counts 2705:themselves. 2627:Arbitration 2578:set a limit 2357:bureaucrats 1878:WP:BLANKING 1652:Jimbo Wales 1301:Springfield 1165:(shortcut: 943:Partly done 880:Partly done 550:verifiable 447:Advertising 115:WP:FREQUENT 61:This is an 3686:Categories 3146:archive 92 3138:archive 68 3059:, another 2916:abilities. 2911:Allow non- 2842:bureaucrat 2820:discussion 2798:WP:RFA2011 2722:page mover 2499:rule creep 2438:WP:BLPPROD 2369:db-userreq 2283:Rename AFD 1980:signatures 1594:guideline. 1167:WP:CITEVAR 1146:WP:CITEVAR 1138:deprecated 1042:References 1034:status quo 1020:References 1018:first, or 1004:References 976:March 2008 871:vandalism. 727:FUTON bias 221:Principles 138:Deletion ( 3638:APA style 3466:See also: 3436:Proposal: 3420:See also: 3382:See also: 3343:interwiki 3319:Proposal: 3300:See also: 3265:reCAPTCHA 3261:Proposal: 3241:See also: 3207:Proposal: 3188:See also: 3142:archive 3 3135:See also: 3094:Technical 3053:See also: 3036:Proposal: 3021:See also: 3009:Proposal: 2990:See also: 2977:oversight 2973:checkuser 2949:Proposal: 2925:ownership 2909:Proposal: 2871:See also: 2834:Proposal: 2794:See also: 2776:WP:NOTNOW 2753:Proposal: 2736:See also: 2671:Proposal: 2635:See also: 2597:Proposal: 2570:criteria. 2557:Proposal: 2546:Adminship 2519:See also: 2484:Proposal: 2451:Proposal: 2420:unsourced 2402:Proposal: 2383:See also: 2343:Proposal: 2289:Proposal: 2270:A policy 2246:consensus 2225:Proposal: 2196:See also: 2158:WP:REFUND 2146:Oversight 2136:Proposal: 2112:Proposal: 2088:See also: 2062:Proposal: 2036:See also: 2016:articles. 2013:Proposal: 1993:See also: 1976:Proposal: 1961:See also: 1911:, or the 1890:Proposal: 1871:See also: 1832:Proposal: 1807:See also: 1776:Proposal: 1761:See also: 1730:Proposal: 1698:See also: 1641:Proposal: 1598:See also: 1546:cigarette 1495:Proposal: 1463:Proposal: 1436:Proposal: 1416:See also: 1410:red links 1400:Proposal: 1381:See also: 1340:Main Page 1336:Proposal: 1264:Proposal: 1233:See also: 1180:Proposal: 1156:See also: 1112:Proposal: 1093:See also: 1076:Proposal: 1056:See also: 992:Proposal: 896:Proposal: 853:standards 825:Proposal: 809:See also: 760:Proposal: 737:See also: 716:Proposal: 678:See also: 611:guideline 599:Proposal: 576:See also: 570:edit wars 565:published 534:Proposal: 514:See also: 494:Proposal: 470:See also: 453:Proposal: 440:CAT:LEGAL 433:See also: 412:Proposal: 388:See also: 373:Proposal: 357:See also: 305:Proposal: 93:Shortcuts 79:consensus 3531:See also 3401:Proposal 3263:Use the 3162:Proposal 3119:Proposal 3069:2017 RfC 3067:, and a 3049:methods. 2931:and the 2867:process. 2788:quantity 2718:rollback 2609:per week 2539:2022 RfC 2537:, and a 2535:2019 RfC 2527:2016 RfC 2045:Deletion 1939:Teahouse 1692:a report 1509:advocacy 1323:AP style 1272:Missoula 1059:WP:ORDER 1038:See also 1030:de facto 805:content. 802:preserve 782:possible 706:WP:FUTON 698:Shortcut 351:somebody 341:for the 101:WP:PEREN 3347:ISO 639 3294:privacy 3268:CAPTCHA 2823:better. 2810:of the 2784:quality 2772:WP:SNOW 2674:demand. 2373:retired 2322:larger. 1935:HostBot 1780:Unicode 1628:Editing 1580:Suicide 1578:on the 1576:hatnote 1550:smoking 1499:suicide 1305:USPLACE 1008:Sources 903:cleanup 845:improve 814:, below 731:English 621:and/or 609:from a 464:neutral 327:medical 319:content 294:Content 83:vetting 41:WP:DRPR 3286:Google 3284:) and 3211:WP:ANI 2846:really 2728:. See 2688:WP:RFA 2652:, and 2293:WP:AFD 2168:drafts 2097:, and 2025:WP:BLP 1907:, the 1847:biting 1814:WP:UUN 1048:, and 796:. The 788:, and 746:, and 662:" or " 638:policy 613:to an 548:either 335:survey 35:), or 33:WP:ELP 25:WP:RSP 3594:From 3559:Notes 3341:, or 3296:risk. 3248:T2738 3172:T9467 3129:T7875 3075:Done: 2890:In a 2804:Done: 2584:Note: 2326:Note: 2315:merge 2188:, or 2178:Note: 2164:Note: 934:ambox 634:above 323:legal 3622:See 3458:The 3226:The 3180:The 3150:Help 3063:, a 2975:and 2625:The 2533:, a 2529:, a 2521:The 2422:and 2416:bite 2365:GFDL 2363:and 2355:and 2317:and 2303:and 2230:for 2217:AfDs 1548:and 1438:The 1148:and 998:and 908:and 670:and 479:and 438:and 420:The 333:and 331:risk 81:and 3278:CTO 3081:of 3077:In 2806:In 2774:or 2724:or 2613:are 2561:RfA 2491:G12 2258:G10 2150:not 1662:or 1660:76% 1570:In 1558:end 1544:on 1511:or 1421:or 1193:CC0 1119:or 1117:MLA 1089:so. 1010:or 1006:to 945:In 913:POV 543:not 347:Any 142:fD) 27:), 3688:: 3671:. 3523:, 3519:, 3515:, 3511:, 3507:, 3503:, 3499:, 3495:, 3491:, 3487:, 3483:, 3479:, 3475:, 3471:, 3387:, 3337:, 3305:, 3246:, 3193:, 3148:, 3144:, 3140:, 2995:, 2852:". 2720:, 2648:, 2640:, 2487:F9 2388:, 2184:, 2174:). 2093:, 2078:). 1998:, 1876:, 1711:, 1707:, 1703:, 1619:, 1615:, 1611:, 1607:, 1603:, 1386:, 1270:→ 1250:, 1246:, 1242:, 1238:, 1161:, 1152:). 1098:; 1082:). 1044:, 978:, 974:, 970:, 966:, 962:, 958:, 937:}} 931:{{ 916:}} 910:{{ 906:}} 900:{{ 742:, 585:, 581:, 552:or 519:, 475:; 329:, 325:, 321:, 290:. 43:). 3378:. 3237:. 3174:. 3131:. 3108:. 3071:. 2935:. 2898:. 2884:. 2848:" 2800:. 2760:. 2742:. 2541:. 2501:. 2473:. 2440:. 2430:. 2379:. 2332:. 2264:. 2192:. 2101:. 2002:. 1897:? 1719:. 1670:. 1623:. 1588:. 1377:. 1350:. 1325:. 1296:. 1274:. 1169:) 1065:. 863:. 674:. 644:. 625:. 523:. 510:. 483:. 442:. 429:. 401:. 362:. 266:e 259:t 252:v 140:X 85:. 65:. 39:( 31:( 23:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:Perennial proposals - Knowledge

Index