150:
219:
430:. So perhaps my threshold for what constitutes an uproar is higher than some people. I did know that though I've deleted thousands of pages, the scores of deletions I've declined cause far more discord. What I didn't expect was either that the first opponents would be so easily won over, or that some of the later opponents could not be. Though to be fair to the detractors, despite the instruction "Write an article that
438:" there were a few submissions that were IMHO correctly deleted. Also not everyone involved was as diplomatic as they could have been when pointing out mistakes by New Page patrollers. But to put the "uproar" in perspective - we've already had two RFAs this year that attracted more opposition than
565:
try it out, it isn't just a quicker way to categorise (though that in itself is useful as it sometimes brings articles to the attention of specialists who are better placed to say whether the subject is notable or not). I find it a useful tool for converting deletionists into
514:
Edit conflicts are frequent at NPP and frustrating - especially if you've spent twenty minutes salvaging something that has been deleted whilst you were editing it; So if something has been tagged for deletion don't be scared of doing multiple small edits in a short
267:
456:
Some of the things we found were really unexpected. The first article created under NEWT was deleted whilst the editor still had a redlinked talkpage. I think that shocked a lot of people. As for the rest - check out
470:
I can't remember when or how I first came across it, but possibly it was following links from the userbox page. I joined months later when I realised that rescuing articles had become my favourite activity on the
335:
I've been a bookworm since I was about 8 or 9. I was on the
Internet for a decade before I started editing Knowledge, and in hindsight I think the surprise is why I came here so late. But when I did, one of my
458:
255:
573:; We've already increased their numbers from about a thousand a couple of months ago to 1115 on the 5th Jan. If you come across someone who you think meets the criteria feel free to nominate them at
279:
402:
was covered quite positively in an article in the signpost (I should at this point disclose that I submitted a draft and others reworked it). The backlash came later. I'm a regular participant at
273:
249:
569:
Appointing more
Autoreviewers is one way to take some pressure off New Page patrol and hopefully reduce the number of mistakes there. There are loads of editors out there who would qualify for
243:
25:
526:
582:
Lastly, please remember
Knowledge is not a battleground, so take care to be as discreet and gentle as possible when informing fellow editors of any mistakes they may have made.
481:
I'm not sure that my advice will be that helpful, as I specialise in CSD and I think your main focus is AFD - though perhaps I can persuade a few of your readers to visit
392:
449:
378:
347:
185:
374:
192:
21:
550:
is a good hunting ground for opportunities to create a sourced stub using the copyvio link as your reference. One edit to remove the tag with an edit summary of
323:
171:
178:
547:
574:
519:
17:
599:
423:
366:
377:
and it kind of took off. After two people created redirects from Wiki space to my userspace I moved it, and eventually it settled at
199:
362:
486:
435:
370:
206:
315:
164:
508:
337:
307:
In this regular feature readers get a chance to learn more about the various editors who contribute to the
511:, and the improvement isn't just cosmetic - a move can give an article useful links and even de-orphan it.
292:
555:
551:
358:
In a nutshell, it was an informal study of how we treat new editors and the articles they contribute.
373:
within two minutes? And, can such new articles survive for 7 days? So I bounced the idea around at
570:
319:
294:
498:
419:
459:
Knowledge:Newbie treatment at
Criteria for speedy deletion#proposals inspired by these tests
8:
369:, which poses two challenges: can we avoid the problem of new articles by newbies being
403:
466:
How did you learn about the
Article Rescue Squadron and why did you join the Squadron?
504:
deletion, it also can give links to articles with relevant references and categories.
562:
542:
on a page, and you think the subject merits an article, remember the template says
507:
Lots of articles are created with the wrong name, you don't need to be an admin to
482:
326:, and has been a member of the Article Rescue Squadron since only September 2009.
489:- remember you don't need to be an admin to remove an incorrect CSD tag. However:
415:
439:
411:
399:
388:
351:
593:
427:
395:. Did you expect such backlash when you created this project in October 2009?
308:
361:
It was inspired by a several things, including the concern at
Wikimania and
536:
529:
and can be useful to use the same arguments that swayed the earlier debate.
407:
375:
Knowledge:Requests for comment/new users#Lets all create an extra account
518:
If you've improved an article after it has been nominated for deletion,
494:"What links here" is terribly useful, especially for saving things from
287:
365:
that we had become a less welcoming place to newbies, as epitomised by
410:
the night she was named as John McCain's running mate, I watchlist
331:
What drew you to
Knowledge, and what prompted you to begin editing?
218:
477:
What advice would you give to editors joining the
Squadron?
450:
Knowledge:Newbie treatment at
Criteria for speedy deletion
379:
Knowledge:Newbie treatment at
Criteria for speedy deletion
348:
Knowledge:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion
422:, and at one point three of the articles involved in the
525:
If there's been a previous decision to keep an article,
544:or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice
548:Category:Copyright violations for speedy deletion
591:
322:has been editing Knowledge since April 2007, an
575:Knowledge:Requests for permissions/Autoreviewer
18:Knowledge:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron
424:Russell Brand Show prank telephone calls row
527:It's important to make people aware of it
442:had at the point when it was put on hold.
487:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
448:Now that the data compiling portion of
14:
592:
340:linked two articles, and I was hooked.
452:is finished, what are the next steps?
426:and I'm an occasional visitor to the
158:
600:WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron
31:
227:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
217:
148:
32:
611:
324:administrator since February 2009
546:. So if you aren't the author,
509:correct the name of an article
13:
1:
391:, which was mentioned in the
244:News items and announcements
7:
10:
616:
387:There was an uproar about
371:tagged for speedy deletion
367:this critique of wikipedia
561:If you haven't installed
556:few minutes of stubifying
520:point that out in the AFD
552:OK I'll fix the copyvio
309:Article Rescue Squadron
316:more than 39,000 edits
262:Featured administrator
222:
153:
420:Large Hadron Collider
221:
152:
558:should do the trick.
393:Knowledge newsletter
186:Article Rescue guide
404:Knowledge Talk:RFA
223:
154:
436:deletion criteria
320:WereSpielChequers
304:
303:
295:WereSpielChequers
282:
276:
270:
264:
258:
252:
246:
214:
213:
607:
541:
535:
503:
497:
483:Special:NewPages
406:, I was editing
288:
278:
272:
266:
260:
254:
248:
242:
179:Current articles
159:
151:
615:
614:
610:
609:
608:
606:
605:
604:
590:
589:
588:
587:
571:wp:Autoreviewer
539:
533:
501:
495:
416:Richard Dawkins
298:
293:Interview with
286:
285:
256:Featured editor
238:
229:
215:
207:Discussion page
155:
149:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
613:
603:
602:
586:
585:
584:
583:
579:
578:
567:
559:
530:
523:
516:
512:
505:
491:
490:
474:
473:
472:
463:
462:
461:
445:
444:
443:
412:Marylin Manson
384:
383:
382:
359:
343:
342:
341:
305:
302:
301:
299:
297:
291:
240:
239:
225:
216:
212:
211:
209:
204:
202:
197:
195:
190:
188:
183:
181:
176:
174:
169:
167:
162:
157:
156:
147:
145:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
138:
137:
136:
135:
134:
133:
132:
131:
130:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
119:
118:
117:
116:
115:
114:
113:
112:
111:
110:
109:
108:
107:
106:
105:
104:
103:
102:
101:
100:
99:
98:
97:
96:
95:
94:
93:
92:
91:
90:
89:
88:
87:
86:
85:
84:
83:
82:
81:
80:
79:
78:
77:
76:
75:
74:
73:
72:
71:
70:
69:
68:
67:
66:
65:
64:
63:
62:
61:
60:
59:
58:
57:
56:
55:
54:
53:
52:
51:
50:
49:
48:
47:
46:
45:
44:
43:
42:
41:
40:
39:
38:
37:
36:
35:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
612:
601:
598:
597:
595:
581:
580:
576:
572:
568:
566:categorisers.
564:
560:
557:
553:
549:
545:
538:
532:If you see a
531:
528:
524:
521:
517:
513:
510:
506:
500:
493:
492:
488:
484:
480:
479:
478:
475:
469:
468:
467:
464:
460:
455:
454:
453:
451:
446:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
398:
397:
396:
394:
390:
385:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
355:
353:
349:
344:
339:
334:
333:
332:
329:
328:
327:
325:
321:
317:
312:
310:
300:
296:
290:
289:
284:
281:
275:
269:
263:
257:
251:
245:
237:
236:
235:
230:
228:
220:
210:
208:
205:
203:
201:
198:
196:
194:
191:
189:
187:
184:
182:
180:
177:
175:
173:
170:
168:
166:
163:
161:
160:
146:
27:
23:
19:
543:
499:db-nocontext
476:
465:
447:
431:
428:Dwama boards
386:
345:
330:
313:
306:
261:
241:
233:
232:
231:
226:
224:
33:
408:Sarah Palin
338:first edits
172:Rescue list
193:Newsletter
22:Newsletter
563:wp:Hotcat
434:meet the
363:elsewhere
350:(acronym
165:Main page
594:Category
346:What is
280:Want ads
26:20091001
24: |
20: |
440:WP:NEWT
432:doesn't
400:WP:NEWT
389:WP:NEWT
352:WP:NEWT
274:Contest
250:Feature
234:Issue 2
200:Members
554:and a
471:pedia.
418:, the
515:time.
314:With
268:Humor
16:<
485:and
537:G12
283:|
596::
540:}}
534:{{
502:}}
496:{{
414:,
354:)?
318:,
311:.
277:|
271:|
265:|
259:|
253:|
247:|
577:.
522:.
381:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
