309:
117:
107:
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
448:
to be a failure, as discussion of this nature cannot be suppressed entirely, it merely moves to different venues (my own talk being one such venue, of many). Venues where the case clerk has little or no remit to ensure orderly and collegial discussion. And THAT is the biggest flaw in suppressing discussion. ++
447:
sense. So, Jeremy, if you view open/close as binary, then yes, it's "open" and not "closed". But if you view open/close as more of a spectrum (which I think is more accurate in this case), then it's "not very open at all". Further, I think on review the clampdown for an extended period will be found
442:
Ncmvocalist has it right, the case is technically open in that it's not formally closed as unresolvable, nor is it yet closed as resolved. But with most all of the pages locked down, and with no progress on the proposed decision (unless you count reassurances from arbitrators that progress is being
427:
Participants, and even some non-participants, can/have dispute whether the case is open where its evidence/workshop is closed, its proposed decision phase has not opened, and participants are prevented from discussing their own case on the actual case pages; this has not happened in the (recent)
379:
428:
past, and it practically seems like the case is closed at this time. Nevertheless, this report clarifies that the case is technically open. No assertion was made in this report about arbitrators abandoning the case - such an assertion would be inaccurate.
110:
90:
130:
100:
140:
247:
414:"This case, which is technically open"? Ncmvocalist, a case is either open or it is not. There is no in-between. Just because the Arbitrators have not set a specific date doesn't mean they've abandoned it. —
187:
255:
268:
251:
437:
394:
73:
178:): This case, which is technically open, resulted from the merging of several Arbitration requests on the same topic matter into a single case, and the failure of a related
358:
460:
353:
296:
287:
239:
235:
231:
120:
368:
202:
179:
422:
348:
333:
473:
343:
338:
326:
195:
190:
on when to expect a proposed decision, and a similar request was made again last week, but since July 19 (three weeks ago) when the workshop phase was
170:
485:
183:
320:
52:
41:
191:
538:
399:
406:
443:
made that are not accompanied by any concrete proposals of any sort, or by any useful guidance), it's certainly not very open in a
67:
21:
513:
383:
508:
503:
498:
157:
493:
308:
46:
32:
17:
457:
416:
467:
This week's presenting is an improvement; it's much more neutral sounding. Good job, Ncmvocalist.
194:, arbitrators have still not set any specific target date. This has sparked a large quantity of
258:
had passed since the proposed decision attracted any other votes or proposals from arbitrators.
433:
242:), the case moved to the proposed decision phase. The proposed decision that was drafted by
186:
were put in place when this arbitration commenced. Two weeks ago, participants requested an
519:
8:
275:
is likely to publish the names of applicants being actively considered for appointment.
390:
163:
429:
150:
211:
226:
on articles related to race and intelligence. Following a number of delays (see
219:
532:
453:
223:
262:
215:
468:
254:). Other proposals by other arbitrators are being considered, however,
243:
198:
among participants, some of which was collapsed as "Extended content".
449:
404:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
530:
160:opened no cases this week, leaving two open.
148:
250:among participants and non-participants (
269:Applications for CheckUser and Oversight
407:
14:
531:
210:): This case concerns accusations of
68:Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
51:
271:permissions have closed. Next week,
539:Knowledge Signpost archives 2010-08
27:
307:
53:
31:
28:
550:
389:These comments are automatically
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
486:putting together the next issue
400:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
375:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
474:19:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
461:11:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
438:04:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
423:01:22, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
10:
555:
182:to make headway. Special
397:. To follow comments,
312:
300:"Arbitration report" →
36:
311:
203:Race and intelligence
158:Arbitration Committee
35:
393:from this article's
292:"Arbitration report"
246:has sparked several
359:Features and admins
224:control the content
180:request for comment
384:Discuss this story
364:Arbitration report
354:WikiProject report
313:
256:more than six days
216:disruptive editing
65:Arbitration report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
408:purging the cache
369:Technology report
47:View Latest Issue
546:
522:
484:needs your help
419:
411:
409:
403:
382:
331:
323:
316:
299:
291:
184:rules of conduct
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
554:
553:
549:
548:
547:
545:
544:
543:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
524:
523:
518:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
489:
478:
477:
417:
413:
405:
398:
387:
386:
380:+ Add a comment
378:
374:
373:
372:
349:Sister projects
324:
319:
317:
314:
303:
302:
297:
294:
289:
265:
166:
154:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
552:
542:
541:
517:
512:
507:
502:
497:
492:
491:
490:
480:
479:
476:
466:
465:
464:
463:
388:
385:
377:
376:
371:
366:
361:
356:
351:
346:
341:
336:
334:News and notes
330:
318:
306:
305:
304:
295:
286:
285:
284:
282:
279:
277:
276:
264:
261:
260:
259:
230:coverage from
199:
171:Climate change
165:
162:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
551:
540:
537:
536:
534:
521:
515:
510:
505:
500:
495:
487:
483:
475:
472:
471:
462:
459:
455:
451:
446:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
424:
421:
420:
410:
401:
396:
392:
381:
370:
367:
365:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
328:
322:
321:9 August 2010
315:In this issue
310:
301:
293:
283:
280:
274:
270:
267:
266:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
204:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
172:
168:
167:
161:
159:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
54:9 August 2010
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
482:The Signpost
481:
469:
444:
415:
363:
327:all comments
281:
278:
273:The Signpost
272:
227:
207:
201:
175:
169:
155:
520:Suggestions
430:Ncmvocalist
391:transcluded
344:Admin stats
339:In the news
220:tag-teaming
151:Ncmvocalist
212:incivility
196:discussion
164:Open cases
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2010-08-09
514:Subscribe
445:practical
395:talk page
533:Category
509:Newsroom
504:Archives
290:Previous
248:concerns
228:Signpost
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
252:example
240:July 12
232:June 28
208:Week 10
111:Twitter
470:Ks0stm
418:Jeremy
236:July 5
218:, and
192:closed
188:update
176:Week 9
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
499:About
263:Other
244:Coren
16:<
494:Home
434:talk
298:Next
156:The
141:Digg
450:Lar
222:to
149:By
76:—
535::
452::
436:)
288:←
238:,
234:,
214:,
488:.
458:c
456:/
454:t
432:(
412:.
402:.
329:)
325:(
206:(
174:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
