173:
256:. People who work on Knowledge ... are not the indiscriminate crowd are the part of the crowd who feels motivated to work with Knowledge. Here it is: I'd replace the theory of the "wisdom of the crowd" with the theory of the "wisdom of the motivated crowds." The general crowd says we should not pay taxes; the motivated crowd says that it's fair to pay them. In fact, it's not the ditch diggers or illiterates who contribute to Knowledge, but people who already belong to a cultural crowd for the very fact they're using a computer.
267:
humanities. "Science is cumulative-destructive, it stores what it needs and throws away what it doesn't require. Humanities are totally cumulative, they don't throw away anything: in fact, there is always a return to the past." He also agreed that the strong collaboration on
Knowledge, facilitated by the use of free licenses and a culture of pseudonymity or even anonymity, might be part of a larger trend, which in 50 years would probably lead to "a cultural situation similar to the one in the Middle Ages, where the
165:
464:
117:
107:
218:.... When I write, I consult Knowledge 30â40 times a day, because it is really helpful". However, he questioned its reliability. He stated that Knowledge is good for the (intellectually) "rich" and bad for the "poor", explaining that as an educated person, he knows how to filter the information on Knowledge, checking and comparing multiple sources rather than accepting a fact while a less well-educated user might not be as discriminating.
33:
127:
87:
348:): "I hate my Knowledge page. It's really boring to look at. I'd get rid of all this white space. And I'd make the font a bit more interesting." The Guardian remarked that "If you've ever seen the fluoro overload of her own website or Twitter page this should come as no surprise." When asked to examine the text for possible inaccuracies, though, she found none. However, she noted that "the section on
137:
97:
374:
that "digital technology makes copying and pasting easy, of course. But that is the least of it. The
Internet may also be redefining how studentsâwho came of age with music file-sharing, Knowledge and Web-linkingâunderstand the concept of authorship and the singularity of any text or image." She went
244:
If I were forced to replace "truth" with "crowd", I would not agree. If you make a statistical analysis of the 6 billion inhabitants of the globe, the majority believes that the Sun revolves around the Earth, there's nothing you can do. The crowd would be prepared to endorse the wrong answer. This
309:
contains background information on the interview and the "Wiki@Home" program. Apart from Eco, several other notable people have been interviewed. Questions are prepared collaboratively on a page on the
Italian Wikinews; Wikimedia Italia then contacts the potential interviewee and chooses the
266:
The interviewer observed a cultural difference on
Knowledge between the coverage of "hard" and "soft" sciences, and related it to a similar difference between the corresponding academic communities. Eco agreed that "hard" sciences place more value on collaboration and less on authorship than
534:
375:
on to say that "at the
University of Maryland, a student reprimanded for copying from Knowledge in a paper on the Great Depression said he thought its entriesâunsigned and collectively writtenâdid not need to be credited since they counted, essentially, as common knowledge."
242:, who argues that scientific truths are, ultimately, approved by the community. The slow work of the community, through revisions and errors, as he put it in the nineteenth century, carries out "the torch of truth". The problem is the definition of truth.
110:
90:
180:
130:
100:
140:
378:"Facebook, Wikimedia and the rest are making millions from the value created by users, acting like a cooperative but paying itself like a private company", freelance creative Richard Buchanan
271:
was lost." However, he doubted this development would reach total anonymity, which, while it might give the appearance of democracy, "gives the idea that just one and only one truth exists".
352:
got removed when we stopped working together. He emailed me about that; that's why I know that section's missing", and that she had "no idea" who removed it (it appears to refer to
73:
513:
518:
508:
523:
549:
503:
120:
488:
328:
570:
578:
498:
481:
451:
442:
590:
282:
in general, Eco said he did not consider piracy to be a tragedy, at least not for himself. The interview touched on the copyright controversy about
475:
52:
41:
642:
569:
a* For me it is a very useful feedback for using wikipedia,I have got some valuable information for you ,my good friend.Thanks very much.
386:
on August 4. Open-source advocate Felix Cohen says in the comments: "I was halfway convinced until you conflated
Wikimedia and Facebook".
324:
405:
221:
Asked whether it is better to have more people involved on a topic, as it is stated to be the case (under certain conditions) by the
67:
554:
21:
424:, to describe a type of missile the unit had secured from locals. The posting noted that the apparently copied content had been
394:
617:
538:
561:
612:
607:
432:, a US government contractor. It did not examine the possibility that both might be based on a third source. The posting was
425:
602:
320:
354:
597:
463:
345:
46:
32:
17:
379:
574:
409:
358:
edit). She said she had never edited the article herself: "I really don't know how to do that."
239:
279:
623:
371:
222:
398:
306:
8:
429:
363:
545:
214:
reasons: the more my back hurts, the more it costs me to get up and go to check the
268:
172:
433:
413:
226:
200:
335:
245:
also happens in a democracy: we are noticing it these days, the crowd votes for
313:
204:
154:
150:
636:
319:
A large number of media outlets reported on the efforts by the United States
246:
210:
Professor Eco described himself as "a compulsive user of
Knowledge, also for
368:
340:
291:
283:
275:
164:
299:
295:
192:
185:
349:
181:
Wikinews interviews
Umberto Eco: "I am a compulsive user of Knowledge"
417:
401:"a really interesting thread lots about deletionism and notability."
189:
158:
298:). Aubrey concluded by stating that Knowledge, too, comes from the
215:
207:
was recently made available on the
Italian Wikinews (Wikinotizie).
390:
287:
252:
We must therefore find another criterion, which I think is the
367:
article, "Plagiarism lines blur for students in digital age",
420:) appears to have copied verbatim from the Knowledge article
196:
188:
from
Wikimedia Italia interviewed famed novelist, critic and
421:
406:
US Army intelligence report copied wholesale from Knowledge
436:
by Wikileaks on Twitter and received more than 9,800 hits.
428:
to Knowledge some months earlier from an IP registered to
310:
interviewer (usually one of the chapter's members).
395:
Who here actually contributes to wikipedia articles?
323:
to make Knowledge take down the image depicting the
559:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
238:I don't quite agree with this. I am a disciple of
416:(a collection of documents recently published by
199:home on April 24, 2010, as part of the chapter's
634:
397:. On the Foundation-l mailing list, Sue Gardner
393:last week, many users responded to the question
344:to comment on the Knowledge article about her (
148:
346:MIA takes on Google, YouTube and Knowledge
68:Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
171:
163:
562:
14:
635:
51:
327:. (See full coverage in this week's
231:
205:English translation of the interview
643:Knowledge Signpost archives 2010-08
27:
462:
53:
31:
28:
654:
589:is written by editors like you â
544:These comments are automatically
404:An analysis published on Reddit (
168:Umberto Eco during the interview
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
321:Federal Bureau of Investigation
294:and free software (Eco praised
555:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
412:by a US military unit in the
530:
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
579:06:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
10:
659:
176:Aubrey (at Wikimania 2010)
229:, Professor Eco replied:
552:. To follow comments,
467:
338:was recently asked by
307:thread on Foundation-l
223:"wisdom of the crowds"
177:
169:
36:
466:
280:intellectual property
175:
167:
35:
548:from this article's
514:Features and admins
539:Discuss this story
519:Arbitration report
509:WikiProject report
468:
430:L-3 Communications
364:The New York Times
178:
170:
42:â Back to Contents
37:
563:purging the cache
524:Technology report
334:British musician
274:When asked about
264:
263:
47:View Latest Issue
650:
626:
566:
564:
558:
537:
486:
478:
471:
454:
446:
414:Afghan War Diary
357:
254:motivated crowds
232:
227:James Surowiecki
161:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
658:
657:
653:
652:
651:
649:
648:
647:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
622:
620:
615:
610:
605:
600:
593:
583:
582:
568:
560:
553:
542:
541:
535:+ Add a comment
533:
529:
528:
527:
504:Sister projects
479:
474:
472:
469:
458:
457:
455:"In the news" â
452:
449:
444:
408:) found that a
353:
316:
183:
162:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
656:
646:
645:
621:
616:
611:
606:
601:
596:
595:
594:
585:
584:
581:
571:Space-flooring
543:
540:
532:
531:
526:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
491:
489:News and notes
485:
473:
461:
460:
459:
450:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
402:
387:
376:
359:
332:
329:News and notes
315:
312:
262:
261:
258:
236:
182:
179:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
655:
644:
641:
640:
638:
625:
619:
614:
609:
604:
599:
592:
588:
580:
576:
572:
565:
556:
551:
547:
536:
525:
522:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
492:
490:
487:
483:
477:
476:9 August 2010
470:In this issue
465:
456:
448:
447:"In the news"
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
366:
365:
360:
356:
351:
347:
343:
342:
337:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
311:
308:
303:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:free licenses
272:
270:
259:
257:
255:
250:
248:
241:
237:
234:
233:
230:
228:
224:
219:
217:
213:
208:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
187:
174:
166:
160:
156:
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
54:9 August 2010
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
587:The Signpost
586:
493:
482:all comments
384:The Guardian
383:
369:Trip Gabriel
362:
341:The Guardian
339:
304:
292:Adobe Reader
284:Google Books
273:
269:authoriality
265:
253:
251:
243:
220:
211:
209:
203:project. An
184:
159:Tilman Bayer
624:Suggestions
546:transcluded
499:Admin stats
494:In the news
410:2007 report
300:open source
296:Open Office
193:Umberto Eco
190:semiotician
186:User:Aubrey
65:In the news
225:theory of
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2010-08-09
618:Subscribe
550:talk page
418:Wikileaks
399:called it
331:section.)
212:arthritic
201:WIKI@Home
155:Theo10011
151:Wackywace
637:Category
613:Newsroom
608:Archives
591:join in!
445:Previous
325:FBI seal
290:market,
216:Treccani
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
314:Briefly
302:world.
195:in his
111:Twitter
391:Reddit
380:argued
336:M.I.A.
288:e-book
286:, the
240:Peirce
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
603:About
434:noted
426:added
372:wrote
361:In a
350:Diplo
247:Bossi
197:Milan
16:<
598:Home
575:talk
453:Next
422:HN-5
355:this
278:and
157:and
141:Digg
389:On
382:in
149:By
76:â
639::
577:)
443:â
305:A
260:â
249:.
235:â
153:,
573:(
567:.
557:.
484:)
480:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
