336:: I have been informally part of the WikiProject for many years being on the South Asian task force of WikiProject Military History but I added the WikiProject India userbox formally on my page as late as April 2011, so that may also be considered as an entry point. In reality, I have been editing articles about India right from the time I became a Wikipedian in 2006. Our challenges, aside from the ones highlighted by RegentsPark above, include large size of subject area, with literally tens of thousands of articles, and these are only the ones tagged as such. There may be as many or even more without the relevant talk page tag. The large number of states, languages, terrains, cultures, communities, tribes, biodiversity etc all add to the quantity and complexity of issues that fall within scope of the Project and that means the talk pages of the Project have tremendous variety. The number of editors? I dont have the figures, but I'm sure they would number in the hundreds, if not thousands. Now, these editors come with widely varying levels of skills, knowledge and attitudes. So, dealing with any issue is usually harder. The educational experience of the majority is not up to Western standards and in my humble opinion there is tremendous need for evangelism on citation, verifiability, copyright violations, paraphrasing, referencing and related topics. Another problem is the paucity of reliable sources. All these are basically challenges of scale - India is a big country with many issues and problems, and it reflects on Knowledge.
462:: A small beginning has been made to develop an Indian offline version of Knowledge. It is a large and difficult task to select the articles and also to improve them to any identified level of quality. I hope that in the next few years, this initiative will help us develop all the major topics in India reach upto near GA level. The Wikipedian communities in India's cities and towns are slowly growing. Many members of WikiProject:India play constructive roles in Indic language Wikimedia projects, usually of their native language or mother-tongue. I'd really like to see a synergy develop between these Indic language communities and WikiProject India articles where content creation in English Knowledge on Indian topics spurs on creation in the Indic language Wikipedias and vice versa.
486:
will be discussed which will impact the WikiProject articles. It would be appropriate to say that most Indian editors of
English Knowledge consider themselves members of WikiProject India even if they have not overtly joined up or participated - so we all like to meet and interact with others. Now with the Wikimedia India Chapter coming into existence, city communities of Wikimedians slowly forming and Wikimedia's office opened up in New Delhi, we are hoping to see more events, meetings, visits and other chances to interact in 2012 than we had in 2011.
363::To be honest, I have not really surveyed this aspect well, though I have asked people from time to time. Islands of excellence abide amidst a wide expanse of run-of-the-mill articles. Indian biodiversity articles are doing fairly well, especially birds (a lot of credit to WikiProject Birds also), but with such a tremendous fauna and flora, even there we are just at the tip of the iceberg. One can see editors fighting lone epic battles to improve articles, or to even retain the highest quality of featured articles, such as
560:
161:
117:
107:
330:
do have a strong core group of editors, many who live in India and who understand India well but also a few who live outside India, who do a great job building quality articles by looking for sources and by politely engaging with other editors. In my opinion, the key to building a successful encyclopedia lies in understanding that even editors with strong pov missions bring something to the table and that polite engagement with these editors can be productive.
33:
127:
87:
137:
97:
325:
opinion that different editors bring to the table and the lack of adequate reliable sources to back up those opinions. In the past, this was dealt with in a straightforward way, editors with outre ideas would be quickly banned and a couple of strong admins kept the project under control. In particular,
452:, these areas are more than adequately covered. Dotting every i and crossing every t, searching for the perfect sentence structure, or seeking perfect balance is a chimerical objective that is never going to be achieved but that's what we seem to spend an inordinate amount of time on. Our coverage of
439:
I'd really like to see more articles of popular interest. On TV serials, local celebrities, that sort of thing. One of the things that distinguishes
Knowledge from other encyclopedias is the breadth of what we can cover and I think that the current focus (of the project members) on history, caste and
392:
makes it clear that editors here go there own way. That is not a bad thing and is reflective, to some extent, to the nature of the country. Indians have a peculiar mix of a simultaneous respect and disdain of authority and both tend to do their own thing as well as respect the rights of others to do
329:
was particularly good at managing the progress of the project in those earlier times. In recent years though the number of editors with an interest in India related topics has multiplied, the strong admins have left the project, and
Knowledge itself has changed making this a harder task. However, we
656:
My impression is that the WikiProject India is problematic because it is dominated by Brit admin/non-admin bullies who are naturally interested in presenting distorted view of India from an obsolete imperilistic, Brit/western supremacist POV and who keep obtaining blocks or bans on anyone who wants
485:
Yes. I am looking forward to the WikiConference and along with other volunteer Indian
Wikipedians, I am helping the Mumbai Community to organise the Conference. We hope to have a great time next week. I will be presenting a three minute update on state of WikiProject India. Besides this many issues
510:
One of the most difficult issues for the India project is access to sources. Unlike most
Western countries, Indian newspapers haven't migrated their archives online. Historical documents are in text form and often scattered across multiple physical libraries. In the unlikely event that a reader of
324:
Around the third week of my active
Knowledge editing experience. I'm sure this is the experience of most editors, but I ended up on Knowledge by accident. Saw something that I felt needed changing and the darn thing took over my life! The challenge for this project has always been the diversity of
412::Not really. In a sense, WikiProject India is a behemoth which overlaps most projects in some way or another. Editors working on articles in many other WikiProjects inadvertently help develop the articles of that WikiProject concerning India. I'd like to thank all these editors and WikiProjects.
304:
WikiProject India doesn't have a formal structure and there are no well defined roles within the project. There is a great deal of diversity amongst members of this project, cultural and ethnic diversity, of course, because India itself is diverse, but also diversity in terms of editing styles,
684:
That's quite the serious allegation. Do you have evidence to support it? On second thoughts, this perhaps isn't the place to discuss such things, but if you really think the WikiProject is inherently biased you should bring that up on a noticeboard somewhere (or the WikiProject discussion page
521:: I would like to thank the many editors of WikiProject India articles for their hard work and contributions. They are doing great work. I do know that many of them feel stressed out, frustrated and impatient at times. I earnestly request them to hang on in there - the best is yet to come.
620:
384:, there really is no formal project. There have been a few, very limited, initiatives in the past, I can't recall any directed push to improve one part of our India wikispace or another. The most recent effort that I can recall is the assessment drive organized by
110:
90:
130:
100:
305:
points of view, etc. The role of any individual in this project is by definition limited, so I see mine as being one of restoring sanity and helping steer a course that conforms to the mission and policies of
Knowledge.
220:
140:
241:
357:. In particular, the noticeboard is an active place where editors bring issues that need a centralized discussion. It can also be an acrimonious place, but isn't that the nature of productive discussion?
431:
What is your vision for the project? How do you see the project itself, as well as the articles within its scope, developing over the next years and future India-related findings, creations and news?
311:: Like RegentsPark said, there are no defined roles here. I'm just an ordinary editor who contributes mostly on natural history, military history and whatever catches my fancy such as philately.
635:
73:
694:
404:
What experiences have you had with the WikiProjects whose scopes overlap with yours? Has your project developed particularly close relationships with any other projects?
341:
What aspects of the project do you consider to be particularly successful? Has the project developed any unusual innovations, or uniquely adopted any common approaches?
604:
547:
538:
269:
236:
120:
609:
599:
584:
530:
67:
495:
399:: As such, small groups of editors team up for a while and deal with a few articles of common interest. Besides that, I'm not aware of any online initiative.
678:
589:
577:
281:
268:. It has 55 FAs and 162 GAs under its scope. The project was featured in one of the WikiProject Report's earliest issues, so be sure to take a look at
208:
571:
316:
When did you first join WikiProject India? What are some of the challenges that the project has met since you joined, and how were they dealt with?
52:
41:
190:, placing greater responsibility upon Articles for Creation. Please help the project approve and improve articles submitted by unregistered users.
761:
640:
245:. Earn barnstars for posting requested pictures of historic sites or sponsor your own photography challenge. The contest ends 4 December.
471:? Do you plan to discuss the WikiProject at the conference? How well do members of WikiProject India stay connected on and off the wiki?
389:
647:
21:
736:
624:
350:
731:
726:
705:
525:
We thank this week's interviewees for taking the time out of their day to answer our questions. Next week, we'll work on our
418:: Can't think of any active projects that I'm involved with whose scope overlaps with WikiProject India. I'm involved with
272:
for a brief overview of the project's structure. With the recent surge in activity regarding India, from the creation of a
195:
721:
468:
277:
716:
559:
423:
224:
is at the halfway point, but it's not too late to get involved. Help improve
Knowledge and earn a barnstar!
46:
32:
17:
419:
381:
372:
Have any major initiatives by the project ended unsuccessfully? What lessons have you learned from them?
511:
this article finds an interesting source for historical documents and images, please let us know at
250:
Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the
Signpost's
456:
topics is phenomenal, and I'd like to see that kind of coverage on other cultural issues as well.
393:
their own thing. So, everyone picks their area of interest and chugs away at filling the gaps.
479:
No. I find that I enjoy the anonymity of
Knowledge too much to show my face at a conference!
742:
8:
676:
690:
658:
631:
526:
512:
354:
251:
491:
385:
285:
515:. Other than that, feel free to stop by, copy edit random pages, or just help out.
260:
187:
183:
178:
662:
216:
150:
755:
686:
449:
233:
is being revived. Join in the effort by inquiring on the project's talk page.
229:
284:), we felt this would be a nice time to revisit the project. We interviewed
326:
265:
200:
487:
445:
289:
296:
First, tell us a bit about yourself and your role in WikiProject India.
453:
349:
I would say that the two parts of the project that work well are the
657:
to stop them and who keep performing admin actions in violation of
441:
364:
426:, but, sadly, both projects are best described as moribund.
273:
380:
It is important to understand that while there is a
645:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
203:and encourage their development within Knowledge.
182:has been inundated with submissions now that the
753:
264:is a ginormous project, started in July 2006 by
237:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
148:
68:Having a Conference with WikiProject India
529:. Until then, browse for articles in the
444:article is unnecessary. To use the term
648:
14:
754:
704:Explore Knowledge history by browsing
388:and that was in 2008. One look at the
51:
762:Knowledge Signpost archives 2011-11
27:
558:
221:November Backlog Elimination Drive
159:
53:
31:
28:
773:
630:These comments are automatically
179:WikiProject Articles for Creation
502:Anything else you'd like to add?
390:collaboration department history
135:
125:
115:
105:
95:
85:
641:add the page to your watchlist
13:
1:
695:00:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
679:04:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
280:being held this weekend (see
616:
496:17:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
186:option was removed from the
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
467:Are you planning to attend
10:
778:
274:Wikimedia Chapter in India
196:WikiProject Bibliographies
278:2011 WikiConference India
276:earlier this year to the
212:is looking for editors.
638:. To follow comments,
563:
551:"WikiProject report" →
230:Counter-Vandalism Unit
164:
36:
562:
351:Assessment department
217:Guild of Copy Editors
209:Roald Dahl Task Force
193:Editors have created
163:
35:
634:from this article's
543:"WikiProject report"
469:WikiConference India
382:WP:Wikiproject India
625:Discuss this story
605:Arbitration report
595:WikiProject report
564:
424:WikiProject Novels
242:Fall Photo Contest
165:
65:WikiProject report
42:← Back to Contents
37:
649:purging the cache
610:Technology report
527:literature review
420:WikiProject Burma
355:India noticeboard
261:WikiProject India
47:View Latest Issue
769:
745:
674:
667:
652:
650:
644:
623:
600:Featured content
582:
574:
572:14 November 2011
567:
550:
542:
270:our 2007 article
252:WikiProject Desk
169:
168:WikiProject news
166:
162:
153:
139:
138:
129:
128:
119:
118:
109:
108:
99:
98:
89:
88:
59:
57:
55:
54:14 November 2011
777:
776:
772:
771:
770:
768:
767:
766:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
741:
739:
734:
729:
724:
719:
712:
701:
700:
668:
663:
654:
646:
639:
628:
627:
621:+ Add a comment
619:
615:
614:
613:
575:
570:
568:
565:
554:
553:
548:
545:
540:
257:
256:
255:
248:
184:userspace draft
173:
172:
167:
160:
158:
154:
147:
146:
145:
136:
126:
116:
106:
96:
86:
80:
77:
66:
62:
60:
50:
49:
44:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
775:
765:
764:
740:
735:
730:
725:
720:
715:
714:
713:
703:
702:
699:
698:
697:
629:
626:
618:
617:
612:
607:
602:
597:
592:
587:
585:News and notes
581:
569:
557:
556:
555:
546:
537:
536:
535:
523:
522:
516:
499:
498:
480:
464:
463:
457:
428:
427:
413:
401:
400:
394:
369:
368:
358:
338:
337:
331:
313:
312:
306:
249:
247:
246:
234:
225:
213:
204:
201:bibliographies
191:
188:Article wizard
174:
170:
157:
156:
155:
144:
143:
133:
123:
113:
103:
93:
82:
81:
78:
72:
71:
70:
69:
64:
63:
61:
58:
45:
40:
39:
30:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
774:
763:
760:
759:
757:
744:
738:
733:
728:
723:
718:
710:
708:
696:
692:
688:
683:
682:
681:
680:
677:
675:
673:
672:
666:
660:
651:
642:
637:
633:
622:
611:
608:
606:
603:
601:
598:
596:
593:
591:
588:
586:
583:
579:
573:
566:In this issue
561:
552:
544:
534:
532:
528:
520:
517:
514:
509:
506:
505:
504:
503:
497:
493:
489:
484:
481:
478:
475:
474:
473:
472:
470:
461:
458:
455:
451:
450:Herbert Simon
447:
443:
438:
435:
434:
433:
432:
425:
421:
417:
414:
411:
408:
407:
406:
405:
398:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
376:
375:
374:
373:
366:
362:
359:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
343:
342:
335:
332:
328:
323:
320:
319:
318:
317:
310:
307:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
293:
291:
287:
283:
282:"In the news"
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
253:
244:
243:
239:is holding a
238:
235:
232:
231:
226:
223:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
205:
202:
198:
197:
192:
189:
185:
181:
180:
176:
175:
171:News in brief
152:
142:
134:
132:
124:
122:
114:
112:
104:
102:
94:
92:
84:
83:
75:
56:
48:
43:
34:
23:
19:
707:The Signpost
706:
670:
669:
664:
655:
594:
578:all comments
524:
518:
508:RegentsPark:
507:
501:
500:
482:
477:RegentsPark:
476:
466:
465:
459:
437:RegentsPark:
436:
430:
429:
415:
409:
403:
402:
396:
378:RegentsPark:
377:
371:
370:
360:
347:RegentsPark:
346:
340:
339:
333:
322:RegentsPark:
321:
315:
314:
308:
302:RegentsPark:
301:
295:
294:
259:
258:
240:
228:
219:
207:
194:
177:
743:Suggestions
659:WP:INVOLVED
632:transcluded
590:In the news
446:satisficing
416:RegentsPark
386:Ncmvocalist
286:RegentsPark
199:to improve
448:coined by
79:Share this
74:Contribute
22:2011-11-14
737:Subscribe
685:itself).
636:talk page
454:Bollywood
440:the main
151:Belugaboy
756:Category
732:Newsroom
727:Archives
709:archives
687:Robofish
541:Previous
353:and the
206:The new
121:LinkedIn
101:Facebook
20: |
531:archive
327:Nichalp
266:Ganeshk
111:Twitter
519:AshLin
488:AshLin
483:AshLin
460:AshLin
410:AshLin
397:AshLin
361:AshLin
334:AshLin
309:AshLin
290:AshLin
131:Reddit
91:E-mail
722:About
513:WT:IN
442:India
365:India
16:<
717:Home
691:talk
549:Next
492:talk
422:and
288:and
227:The
215:The
141:Digg
149:By
76:—
758::
693:)
661:.-
539:←
533:.
494:)
292:.
711:.
689:(
671:W
665:M
653:.
643:.
580:)
576:(
490:(
367:.
254:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
