Knowledge

:Knowledge Signpost/2022-08-01/Essay - Knowledge

Source 📝

391: 231: 192: 130: 150: 467: 110: 140: 36: 160: 120: 170: 350:
That's actually quite useful, and, since there's no real reason to disbelieve it, especially as the seller has a few dozen other prints in this style, which means they probably cut up that book, we have a start. Let's check Lock and Whitfield. Searching for them gets us to the United Kingdom's
295:
It also doesn't/didn't list a photographer at all. (Spoilers for later, but contacting the archive about your discoveries is an important step in doing research properly, so there's a chance I'll be describing things that aren't the case anymore, because they listened to me.)
607: 422:". Librarians, in my experience, are delighted when you help identify things in their collections. So, link the page for the image in question, pull up the Rijksmuseum documentation, and send off an email. Because improvements aren't 163: 245: 511: 133: 362:
Copyright has checked out, there's some backup for our attribution. We're doing well. Would be better if we had a stronger source, but it's not bad, and it's fairly checkable if we can find the book.
123: 690: 173: 205:
contributor and Picture of the Day coordinator Adam Cuerden, who explains how to research an image. This essay is not yet published elsewhere on Knowledge, so please enjoy this first reading.
153: 373:, didn't click through, and missed it completely. Which is honestly a good example of how unfamiliarity with an archive – the United Kingdom's National Portrait Gallery has had 96: 90: 566: 531: 591: 541: 551: 491: 374: 576: 556: 536: 546: 521: 516: 496: 390: 677:
Aye. I can do fine with Latin scripts, but it gets a lot harder. One thing that you might not think to do is to go the Knowledge article on the subject, say,
263:, just not as good). And that... surprising attribution of the old photo should probably be filed away to double check. But the new image had a problem: The 501: 143: 581: 484: 359:
in the same style. Poking around there, and we can identify Lock and Whitfield as Samuel Robert Lock (1822–1881) and George Carpe Whitfield (1831–1917).
622: 561: 478: 55: 44: 586: 526: 366: 644:
Lovely adventure. A really nice and helpful example of how research on the internet can play out, and nice work tracking the photograph down! ~
596: 370: 506: 454: 445: 800: 715: 418:
Update all the image information, and now there's only one thing left to do: On the Library of Congress site, there's a section called "
672: 657: 735: 321:– which is nearly useless, but tells us a copy of this image is on eBay. Worth a shot. Searching for Tom Taylor on eBay gets us to 664:
More of these! I've been trying to track down some Russian archival photos for years—hard stuff when you don't know the language.
21: 776: 384:
and put the image in. While typing the file name, it makes suggestions for files you might mean with little thumbnails, and...
681:, and then see what the name is in various other-language Wikipedias. Because Latin script names are consistent, but consider 771: 766: 627: 191: 318: 634: 761: 356: 367:
the National Portrait Gallery copy of this image with most of the information that I found after all of this was over.
611: 352: 113: 686: 311: 682: 756: 466: 49: 35: 17: 307: 216:
Sometimes, you might want to use an image, but key details aren't known. Let's look at this picture of
244: 429:
Now if only I could figure out if Lewis Carroll was really going around photographing playwrights.
365:
I'd like to say that I then did sensible things to get the rest of the information. Like maybe find
300: 678: 299:
So, how do you deal with this? Well, first thing I do is go into Google's image search and Google "
401:... Well! Lower left hand corner. "Lock and Whitfield". We have a match! And the Rijksmuseum is a 433:(As it turns out – remembering Carroll's real name is Charles Dodgson – he actually photographed 415:– which has all the information we need and more. It even has a publication date for the book! 230: 782: 651: 434: 409: 693:, the correct Cyrillic search term. And this is going to be true of many things. Consider 8: 405:
source. Let's go to the link and see if we can confirm the other information we have...
221: 731: 694: 704: 618: 183: 68:
File:CRAIYON-REALESRGAN-A camera on a tripod in a library, surrounded by papers.jpg
726:
Nice piece! Museums and libraries are treasure troves, and your story is awesome.
645: 341:. Published by Sampson, Low, Marston, Searle and Rivington of Fleet Street c1875 209: 264: 666: 381: 238:
Lovely! Given the lead image of Tom Taylor's article looked like this before:
794: 727: 251: 710: 377:, so I don't use it much – can cause you to miss things in your research. 322: 217: 310:
is going to be a problem. Especially the actor. Let's try again with "
259:...this new image will make a great addition (not that the old one's 698: 419: 306:... At which point we learn that the list of names on 632:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try 303:", and see if another copy of the photo comes up. 792: 339:Men of Mark, a Gallery of Contemporary Portraits 408:A couple clicks later, and I'm looking at the 371:how the National Gallery presented information 201:This month we have a submission from regular 181: 701:as well as Russian archives is very useful. 375:a somewhat rocky relationship with Knowledge 30:How to research an image: Zoom and enhance. 265:Library of Congress information page on it 512:Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine 337:Photo by Lock and Whitfield. Taken from 635: 14: 793: 689:. And, of course, that also gets you 54: 29: 330: 276: 801:Knowledge Signpost archives 2022-08 27: 697:. Knowing how to search for it in 465: 56: 34: 28: 812: 617:These comments are automatically 224:I stumbled across the other day: 389: 243: 229: 190: 168: 158: 148: 138: 128: 118: 108: 751:: doing it for free since 2005. 687:de:Pjotr Iljitsch Tschaikowski 628:add the page to your watchlist 435:a bunch of his famous friends. 410:Rijksmuseum entry of the book 13: 1: 325:, which is much more useful: 603: 18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost 7: 683:fr:Piotr Ilitch Tchaïkovski 396:Hold on, what's this image? 308:Tom Taylor (disambiguation) 10: 817: 736:21:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC) 716:03:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC) 673:02:48, 3 August 2022 (UTC) 658:12:00, 1 August 2022 (UTC) 691:ru:Чайковский, Пётр Ильич 353:National Portrait Gallery 679:Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky 91:How to research an image 357:this portrait of Yeames 284:Date Created/Published: 625:. To follow comments, 470: 39: 469: 380:What I did was go to 355:, with, for example, 312:Tom Taylor playwright 38: 709:Has about 8% of all 621:from this article's 222:Library of Congress 695:Russian Revolution 612:Discuss this story 567:On the bright side 532:Arbitration report 471: 369:I got confused by 317:That gets us to a 45:← Back to Contents 40: 636:purging the cache 592:From the archives 542:Discussion report 438: 382:Wikidata:Q2329794 348: 347: 293: 292: 267:has (or possibly 250:Tom Taylor by... 50:View Latest Issue 808: 785: 714: 671: 669: 654: 648: 647:Maplestrip/Mable 639: 637: 631: 610: 552:Featured content 492:From the editors 489: 481: 474: 457: 449: 432: 393: 331: 319:WorthPoint entry 277: 271:) certain gaps: 247: 233: 212: 194: 186: 172: 171: 162: 161: 152: 151: 142: 141: 132: 131: 122: 121: 112: 111: 62: 60: 58: 816: 815: 811: 810: 809: 807: 806: 805: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 781: 779: 774: 769: 764: 759: 752: 744: 743: 713: 702: 667: 665: 652: 646: 641: 633: 626: 615: 614: 608:+ Add a comment 606: 602: 601: 600: 577:Recent research 557:Tips and tricks 537:Deletion report 482: 477: 475: 472: 461: 460: 455: 452: 447: 441: 440: 426:for Knowledge. 420:Ask a Librarian 397: 394: 255: 248: 234: 208: 195: 188: 187: 180: 179: 178: 169: 159: 149: 139: 129: 119: 109: 103: 100: 89: 85: 84: 81: 78: 75: 72: 69: 65: 63: 53: 52: 47: 41: 31: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 814: 804: 803: 780: 775: 770: 765: 760: 755: 754: 753: 746: 745: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 721: 720: 719: 718: 708: 661: 660: 616: 613: 605: 604: 599: 594: 589: 584: 579: 574: 569: 564: 559: 554: 549: 547:Traffic report 544: 539: 534: 529: 524: 522:Community view 519: 517:Election guide 514: 509: 504: 499: 497:News and notes 494: 488: 476: 464: 463: 462: 453: 444: 443: 442: 399: 398: 395: 388: 346: 345: 342: 335: 328: 291: 290: 287: 281: 274: 257: 256: 249: 242: 236: 235: 228: 214: 213: 197: 196: 189: 177: 176: 166: 156: 146: 136: 126: 116: 105: 104: 101: 95: 94: 93: 92: 87: 86: 82: 79: 76: 73: 70: 67: 66: 64: 61: 48: 43: 42: 33: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 813: 802: 799: 798: 796: 784: 778: 773: 768: 763: 758: 750: 737: 733: 729: 725: 724: 723: 722: 717: 712: 707: 706: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 675: 674: 670: 663: 662: 659: 655: 649: 643: 642: 638: 629: 624: 620: 609: 598: 595: 593: 590: 588: 585: 583: 580: 578: 575: 573: 570: 568: 565: 563: 560: 558: 555: 553: 550: 548: 545: 543: 540: 538: 535: 533: 530: 528: 525: 523: 520: 518: 515: 513: 510: 508: 505: 503: 500: 498: 495: 493: 490: 486: 480: 479:1 August 2022 473:In this issue 468: 459: 451: 439: 436: 430: 427: 425: 421: 416: 414: 413: 406: 404: 392: 387: 386: 385: 383: 378: 376: 372: 368: 363: 360: 358: 354: 343: 340: 336: 333: 332: 329: 326: 324: 320: 315: 313: 309: 304: 302: 297: 288: 285: 282: 279: 278: 275: 272: 270: 266: 262: 253: 252:Lewis Carroll 246: 241: 240: 239: 232: 227: 226: 225: 223: 219: 211: 206: 202: 199: 198: 193: 185: 175: 167: 165: 157: 155: 147: 145: 137: 135: 127: 125: 117: 115: 107: 106: 98: 59: 57:1 August 2022 51: 46: 37: 23: 19: 748: 705:Adam Cuerden 703: 571: 502:In the media 485:all comments 431: 428: 423: 417: 411: 407: 402: 400: 379: 364: 361: 349: 338: 327: 316: 305: 298: 294: 283: 273: 268: 260: 258: 237: 215: 204: 200: 184:Adam Cuerden 114:PDF download 783:Suggestions 619:transcluded 582:Serendipity 412:Men of Mark 164:X (Twitter) 437:Who knew?) 301:Tom Taylor 218:Tom Taylor 102:Share this 97:Contribute 22:2022-08-01 777:Subscribe 623:talk page 458:"Essay" → 220:from the 795:Category 772:Newsroom 767:Archives 749:Signpost 728:Vysotsky 562:In focus 448:Previous 203:Signpost 154:Facebook 144:LinkedIn 134:Mastodon 20:‎ | 699:Gallica 587:Gallery 527:Opinion 450:"Essay" 71:Craiyon 597:Humour 174:Reddit 124:E-mail 762:About 572:Essay 507:Op-Ed 403:great 286:: , 88:Essay 16:< 757:Home 747:The 732:talk 685:and 668:czar 653:chat 456:Next 424:just 323:here 711:FPs 314:". 269:had 261:bad 182:By 99:— 83:300 797:: 734:) 656:) 446:← 344:” 334:“ 289:” 280:“ 207:– 74:PD 730:( 650:( 640:. 630:. 487:) 483:( 254:? 210:E 80:0 77:0

Index

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
2022-08-01
The Signpost
← Back to Contents
View Latest Issue
1 August 2022
Contribute
PDF download
E-mail
Mastodon
LinkedIn
Facebook
X (Twitter)
Reddit
Adam Cuerden

E
Tom Taylor
Library of Congress

Tom Taylor by... Lewis Carroll?
Lewis Carroll
Library of Congress information page on it
Tom Taylor
Tom Taylor (disambiguation)
Tom Taylor playwright
WorthPoint entry
here
National Portrait Gallery
this portrait of Yeames

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.