3972:
2296:, anything that reduces the "catch-all" status of G6 is a win. Yes, technically we could have literally nothing but G6 as criterion, and argue that all other criteria count as "uncontroversial maintenance", but having precise criteria allows for more specificity, and spells out what kind of stuff is already known to be uncontroversial deletions. This is a very good example of a criterion that is both uncontroversial (these categories are never going to be populated again) and precise enough to be formulated as a criterion of its own.
613:
21:
3668:: Grouping this into F2 is more appropriate since F2 is about file pages that are broken in some way while G8 is about pages depending on non-existent/deleted pages. The move should make the criteria easier to learn and apply for newcomers. To address the concern that Graeme raised, we could have a grace period where we allow tagging and deletion under either category for a while and a clear date for when we fully switch over.
1792:
822:
685:
643:
3931:
1777:
1762:
1747:
803:
788:
773:
100:. These processes are more discriminating because they treat articles case-by-case, and involve many points of view; CSD sacrifices these advantages in favor of speed and efficiency. If a situation arises only rarely, it's probably easier, simpler, and fairer to delete it with one of the other methods instead. This also keeps CSD as simple and easy to remember as possible, and avoids
3766:. I just want to comment on the last few comments. G8 and F2 both apply to these pages. While there are some changes proposed, there is no need to add a prohibition for continuing to use G8. It's more a proposed change in examples, and the deletion template, than the actual criteria. Talk of grace periods and 'allowing deletion' is a bit misplaced, IMO. --
1559:, splitting G6 is generally a good idea if we want to clarify that it is not "clearly unnecessary pages that should be deleted". Category pages almost never have any interesting history; everything about categories is on other pages, so there is very little harm in deleting any empty categories as long as there is no limit on undeletion or recreation. —
3710:: F2 is the cleanest and narrowest CSD for this type of deletion, and it makes no sense to have fully-redundant clauses. Re Graeme's oppose, people will learn, and there is no need or expectation of immediate awareness. Re qwerty, I don't think a formal grace period is required, just don't bite anyone who uses the old criterion inadvertently.
2018:
different criteria meaningful is that A) you can show that a given criterion is known to be uncontroversial; B) users can easily tell why a given page was deleted, and if they care, find the underlying discussions why it's uncontroversial; C) you can list what kinds of things that, while superficially meeting a criterion (such as "
3092:- you pick something banal for the log comment like G7 or F5. (And if the file was at File:Omg_child_corn.jpg or whatever, go ahead and revdelete your deletion log too.) Then you mail oversight and block the uploader and it's not your problem anymore, at least once they're out of sleeper socks.And if you insist on playing
2072:-speedy deletions where a specific consensus was formed at TFD, and "Hooray, we've finally cleared the backlog of unreferenced pages! (up until December 2004, anyway)", in a speedy deletion criterion that was created for temporary deletions made as part of history merges, makes it impossible to find such abuses. —
3536:
There is a consensus to move the language of: "File pages without a corresponding file" from G8 to F2 on the grounds that this circumstance better fits the nature of F2 than G8. This is not a major or important change, but editors would be pleased to see such deletions cited to F2 instead of G8 going
2197:
While we're at it, let's explicitly include empty "Knowledge sockpuppets of
Example"/"Suspected Knowledge sockpuppets of examples" categories. Last time I did a G6 taxonomy they were one of the more common kinds of G6, and, assuming we're fine with them being deleted instantly when they become empty,
1349:
Has this ever actually been a problem? A careful admin applying this criterion would have to look at the history to see when (and hence why) the category was removed. and if there's some hairy dispute involved they won't delete it. On the other hand non-careful admins will just use G6 for this anyway
727:
Hi all. I am thinking of drafting a new category CSD, which would cover unused maintenance categories. It would cover two related situations. The first is it would split from G6 empty dated maintenance categories from the past, and thereby lessen the load G6 is bearing. The second case is maintenance
3146:
Incredibly problematic ("illegal") content should not be CSD'd. The
Oversight team should be contacted directly. If a page must be quickly and expediently deleted, contact an admin directly (IRC, Discord, email to an admin you know is active, etc). That being said, it's not the end of the world if a
2625:
on them at one point, actually, because they were maintainenance categories of the sort that were exempt from C1, and then something changed to make them no longer populated. There should be a separate template listing the templates that claim to use a category, so the C4-deleting admin can validate
2040:
get blamed when the move turns out to be controversial, and sometimes my brain's too fried to deal with G11s but I have some spare time I could spend deleting empty maintenance cats if they weren't mixed in with those untouchable db-moves.Worse, the controversial and incorrect uses of G6 are getting
1493:
on all potentially empty categories because it stops the category from appearing in the C1 report. And I agree that both including the insource search link on the tag and an encouragement to note which templates use the category should be sufficient. The worst case scenario is a category needs to be
3206:
I mean, assuming I send somebody a message or whatever, it's still going to be a few minutes before they get it; am I just supposed to refrain from deleting it during this interval and leave the goat sex pics/etc sitting there untouched until they get around to formally OSing it? This feels like it
3128:
Certainly in terms of child pornography and similar, anything that is not the uploader's own work will almost certainly either be a copyright violation (the normal laws around copyright are not impacted by it being illegal), or the free license claimed will be unverifiable. Claims that material of
1328:
I have a bit of a concern with respect to the template rewrite part namely if consensus is required for it or not otherwise for non protected templates anyone could rewrite them and the category ends up being deleted. Maybe the dependant on template part should be added to C1 to allow a week before
3498:
G14 currently does not apply to set indexes. My first thought is that there isn't a good reason why it shouldn't but then I realised that some set indexes can have viable prose or list content so there would need to be some qualification. Thinking a bit more on this I'm not convinced that spending
2045:
criteria of G6 that are only included in G6 because it was too much of a hassle to get an independent criterion passed. Empty maintenance categories are the single largest identifiable group of G6s, accounting for more than one in six out of every deletion mentioning "G6" anywhere in the deletion
3229:
If you are an admin delete or revdel it with a bland summary. If you aren't and it's a busy page revert the edit/blank the page with a bland summary. If you aren't an admin and it's a page with few likely readers just leave it - especially if you aren't autopatrolled. The goal is to avoid drawing
2098:
to old mainspace pages. In the unlikely event I decide to attempt either of those again, having this subcriterion split out won't make the G6 classification runs any easier (dated maintenance category runs were among the easiest to filter out there), and won't make the G8 classification runs that
2056:
where the closest thing to a test was "OK, so you tried to create an autobiography of yourself without anybody noticing. Your test failed, and I noticed and now I'm going to get an admin to delete it!" and I'll show you an admin who hasn't performed enough speedy deletions to talk knowledgeably
119:
If you do have a proposal that you believe passes these guidelines, please feel free to propose it on this discussion page. Be prepared to offer evidence of these points and to refine your criterion if necessary. Consider explaining how it meets these criteria when you propose it. Do not, on the
3428:
If it has to be a CSD (revdel doesn't work well for whatever reason), I'd delete under the broadest criterion with the most vanilla summary (G6-Housekeeping or G3 - Vandalism or something). The core takeaways should be to follow up with the appropriate functionaries immediately, do not tag it,
2017:
maintenance categories is uncontroversial maintenance. Deleting user subpages when their user says they're done with them is uncontroversial maintenance. Deleting disambiguation pages after everything linked from them has already been deleted is uncontroversial maintenance.What makes having
3129:
this nature is the uploader's own work will also almost certainly be unverifiable (by us, the relevant law enforcement body may be interested though) - I would also argue that it is not credible someone would openly claim images that are illegal to create were created by them if it were true.
3074:
don't really play nicely with revision deletion.JPxG, you were made an admin because people had confidence in your good judgment, not in how well you're able to ruleslawyer in order to argue you're permitted to take an action that makes the encyclopedia better. This is the sort of thing
3796:
without discussion I can find, so no help there. I was kind of surprised that edit's so late, since I don't remember this happening much after 2007 or so; but then, all my deletions mentioning "F2" were in 2015 or later, so if that's really the case, it wasn't me cleaning them up.
1689:
1036:
1056:
113:
If the deletion can be accomplished using a reasonable interpretation of an existing rule, just use that. If this application of that rule is contested, consider discussing and/or clarifying it. New rules should be proposed only to cover situations that cannot be speedily deleted
1259:: "All it seems to do is shift these deletions from one category to another, and while I agree that G6 is overused, the proper solution is to talk with admins who are using it incorrectly (and go to DRV if necessary), not to make a new criterion for something that undeniably
1086:
729:
1313:
per Crouch, Swale and Pppery. Stretching criteria on a regular basis is something that we strive to avoid and adding making G6 larger and more complicated is not a solution we should even contemplate undertaking. The nom presents a good case that a new criterion is needed.
1066:
1922:
dated maintenance categories look like the definition of "uncontroversial maintenance". This will add extra complexity (more CSD cats to watch) without changing the end result (the cats always get deleted). I'm not sure that adopting this would solve any problems.
1046:
4100:
Based on the above, and the fact that despite multiple admins indicating that G6 shouldn't be used for /doc deletion in the
Template space, I would like to propose that we add a new T-criteria specifically to fix this issue. It would be something along the lines of
1076:
4511:
1798:
I guess it could be a part of G6, but the last thing we need is to shove more deletion reasons into G6. And obviously dated maintence categories are already part of G6, but G6 is already overloaded and decreasing that burden is a feature, not a
1415:
3291:
I don't see how that CSD would draw any attention to the oversightable material. Much like RD4, admins would never invoke it by name, they would put some other bland reason in the field and contact oversight, just like you said they should.
4120:
Uncontestable: the only situation where I could see an unused /doc needing to be kept is for cases of attribution (if it were copied to another /doc for example) but in those cases it should just be redirected anyway. At TFD they are 100%
3878:
I'd also add that most of this was previously in G6 so apart from the new part of template categories from a rewrite authors could previously remove such tags and its clearly not the same as the likes of A7 or G11 that we shouldn't allow.
986:
2517:
shows that a category is still in use. Therefore this should make it ineligible for C4. Can we make this more explicit? (Asking because I just had some categories deleted under C4 which clearly had this template on them.) — Martin
4216:, and run-of-the-mill speedies under other criteria or other parts of G6. The POTD example brings up an interesting point - this concept of delegation of deletion authority isn't specific to template namespace, it can be seen at
3650:
as a situation that rarely comes up, and you cannot expect taggers and deleters to suddenly be aware of a change. Basically I oppose most changes as unnecessary and changing criteria causes people to not know what they are doing.
2093:
to find questionable G8s largely out of spite at someone arguing G8 applied in a case where I felt it clearly didn't. Neither went anywhere because there were too many "other" for me to have the will to look at, and today I limit
926:
846:
2550:
template, along with trouting the administrators/taggers who are clearly not reading the actual text of the CSD (if they aren't reading the details of C4 they probably aren't reading the details of the other criteria either).
966:
876:
3429:
either straight delete it or leave it, and do not draw attention to the nature of the material in whatever documentation you leave. (I could be misinformed here, I have zero experience and this is a peanut gallery comment)
4221:
1026:
3749:- F2 is the natural fit for an issue where the file is somehow broken or not there. Changes to the CSD criteria are advertised in various appropriate places and any mistagging can be dealt a good dose of common sense. --
3083:
for, for all that it's usually poorly-regarded when it comes to deletion.That said, you don't want to have something like "02:42, 31 July 2024 JPxG (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Me and Joey at
Disneyland.jpg
760:– it just no longer populates that category. (Note that empty != unused: categories which happen to be empty are not necessarily unused. I am talking about categories a template does not populate under any circumstances.)
1016:
936:
3775:
I was about to close and implement this but have a question. F2 already speaks of "files that are missing"; does this refer to a different scenario from "File pages without a file"? They sound like the same thing to me.
2026:), are nonetheless widely considered to be controversial; D) you can find specific instances where deletion is controversial, and E) you can find the sorts of deletions you're willing to make: I don't act on third party
4163:
Can this be made more general? Maybe "a template subpage not used by its parent, or another template"? With the understanding that
Template:*/sandbox and Template:*/testcases are "used" despite not being transcluded.
976:
886:
2453:
3332:
use it in their log comments even if it says not to. Source: there's one deletion, two log deletions, and 135 revision deletions that mention "RD4". (With the false positives like "prod contested by
Richard44306 at
2340:
be empty". It's not at all rare for empty dated maintenance cats to get temporarily repopulated, such as when a redirection is reverted or somebody recreates an article with a cut-and-paste of a predeletion version.
956:
2089:. I found a very large number of different uses, some of which IMO met the criteria and some of which didn't, and then an unclassified "other" which made up a third of the entire set. I also made an attempt once at
1666:
1375:
2924:
I would say that there is, in fact, no CSD category for them, since every category is very rigorously defined and does not include illegal content. All possible options smell strongly of bullshit rules-lawyering.
916:
4330:. As one of the editors that tend to send them to TfD, I sometimes skip them just because of the extra hassle of combining multiple templates into one nomination to make life easier for everyone. These templates
4225:
1006:
2067:
s that amount to the same thing. Lumping them in with automatic deletions made as part of a page move that don't require you to push a delete button or provide a deletion summary or even be an admin, and with
2154:. No one seems to know how to nominate this type of page (C1, G6, G8, etc) so putting these into a dedicated and specific group will ease the burden not only on the nominator but also on the patrolling admin.
996:
946:
906:
1468:
notice on them. Additionally we should strongly encourage category descriptions to link to all the templates that populate that category. These won't quite solve the issue completely but it very nearly will.
850:
896:
2057:
about the subject. Or maybe one who just doesn't give a fuck and will happily twinkle-delete anything you put in front of them.That, of course, is a (terrible) example of a G2, not a G6; but I've declined
1423:
866:
828:
I guess case two could be a part of G6, but the last thing we need is to shove more deletion reasons into G6. And obviously case one is currently part of G6, but getting this out of G6 is a feature, not a
82:
be deleted, according to consensus. CSD criteria should cover only situations where there is a strong precedent for deletion. Remember that a rule may be used in a way you don't expect, unless you word it
3147:
page is tagged (as
Thryduulf suggests above) for G3, but keep in mind that throws it into multiple well-viewed categories so it will likely draw more attention. As much as it might seem like a good idea,
1806:
In sum, this would decrease the burden on both CFD and G6 while also saving editor time rubber-stamping pro forma discussions. One note that did come up in the above discussion is that we can program the
3962:
4061:
Which highlights the problem with G6 that no two people agree on what exactly it includes. If I were still an admin patrolling speedy deletions I would not have been willing to carry out such requests.
3561:
G8 currently includes "File pages without a corresponding file". I would suggest moving this unchanged to F2 instead, as it seems to fit better there with all of the other ways a file can be malformed.
2972:
The only remotely plausible thing I can think of is to manually enter it in as a G9, which I am pretty sure creates an actual urgent issue for WMF Legal, so I do not think it is a good idea to do this.
4205:
1256:
1287:. I guess that could be described as uncontroversial maintenance, but stretching G6 even further is unappealing. Nor is stretching G8 to cover cases in which the "dependent" page still exists, imo.
4127:
Nonredundant: As indicated in the discussion in the main section, we are misusing G6 to allow for deletion, which seems to be the only other criteria that people seem to want to chuck these under.
1203:
1030:
1020:
1010:
1000:
990:
980:
970:
960:
950:
940:
930:
920:
910:
900:
890:
880:
870:
4565:
3994:
3070:
selecting anything from the dropdown, right? Revision deletion doesn't work if there isn't a good version to revert to anyway; and the particular cases raised are likely to be files, which
2457:
1206:, which more or less petered out due to lack of participation. I'm all in favor, with mild preference towards merging the main case into C1 (without a timeout) rather than a separate C4. —
3499:
the time to craft that is worthwhile for the number of times situations like this arise (NEWCSD point 3). An alternative would be to adjust A3 so that it applies to lists with no entries.
1592:
48:
Contributors frequently propose new (or expansions of existing) criteria for speedy deletion. Please bear in mind that CSD criteria require careful wording, and in particular, need to be
4047:
instead", and it's always worked fine. As long as the /doc page is just boilerplate (as opposed to substantial/unique to its template), I think it's clearly uncontroversial maintenance.
1389:
I think we should also allow the creator to remove the CSD tag, because they are the person who best understands whether the category is being used or not. Comments? Suggestions? Typos?
3836:
I suggest like G14 that we allow authors to remove C4 tags given that most such authors will be experienced and this may allow someone who disagrees with a template rewrite to object.
810:
1102:
Is this something people would be inclined to support? Are there other related cases which should be included? If so, we can work on wording, but I wanted to get others' input first.
1090:
1080:
1070:
3374:" to the lead without assigning a criterion number would work, but honestly, it might be better to have it be an unspoken rule, so some admin doesn't delete with reason "oversight".
1669:) or tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories which will
1378:) or tracking categories no longer used by a template after a rewrite. Note that empty maintenance categories are not necessarily unused—this criterion is for categories which will
2574:
does not show that a category is still in use; it just shows that it was in use at one point in time. Things like template rewrites are not automatically reflected by the use of
1060:
1050:
1040:
4528:
4520:
4513:
4204:(which some other admins did too apparently), to which this speedy deletion criterion as currently worded wouldn't apply because they were redirects not templates. Then there's
3370:
Damn. I didn't know RD4 was misused so much. Maybe just adding some text that says "admins can delete oversightable material while waiting for oversight per the instructions at
860:
165:
2095:
2086:
3551:
604:
2678:
1677:
empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.
1386:
empty. If you are unsure whether a category is still being used by a template, consider asking the creator of the category or at the template's talk page before tagging.
1277:
Another thing that I should've made more clear: case two is currently not (at least in my understanding) covered by any CSD criteria. They were in my CSD log because of
4254:
You want to make unused template subpages speediable? Does “unused” mean “never used”? How frequently is “unused template subpage” the driving reason for deletion at
1937:
Per above, the "what's wrong" is that G6 is overloaded and splitting some would make it easier for reviewers. It also lessens the potential hassle of typing a reason.
856:
244:
3789:
3613:
No. When it comes to changes to policies like CSD it's always better not to rush things. The question is less than two days old, let's give people at least a week.
2990:
1837:
1241:
this as well - turns a deletion people (including myself) are doing anyway by stretching G6 and G8 in areas they don't quite into a clear and objective criterion.
3571:
3514:
3189:. I know I wasn't; I was responding directly to and advising another admin. For a non-admin, yes, tagging oversightable material is a bad idea - not only is
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
3353:) in violation of ban or block" filtered out, but I haven't looked at most of the actual deletions except for their log comments. All the ones labeled like "
1646:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
4464:
4386:
4217:
4209:
3089:
4372:
subpages which are no longer used in favor of centralized documentation, /core subpages which are not called by the template itself, and old subpages of
4027:
2380:
again be populated, i.e. dated maintenance categories that have become empty, this criterion allows for specificity and clear guidance to any admins. —
2683:
Lots of very scintillating conversation above, unfortunately none of it seems to address a rather simple core issue: what actual category is it under?
127:
1716:. As a regular closer at CfD, I have only ever seen them get unanimously deleted and it is a fairly regular occurance (you can see the collapsed list
1688:
is carrying. However, the primary reason that I came here is to allow for speedy deletion of additional unused maintenance categories. As an example,
1118:
1961:
1439:
1303:
1272:
4503:
4488:
3153:
as suggested above is a bad idea, primarily because it increases the chances of that showing up in the deletion log itself (and therefore requiring
2099:
much easier (the biggest problem I had there is that there's no way to find out that a redirect was broken without looking at the deleted history).
4095:
4452:
4109:. I'm happy to discuss wording and scope (or clarifications as to what constitutes "no longer used"), but from a point of initial consideration:
2488:
3956:
3894:
3873:
2368:
1722:
List of entries in just my own CSD log since June 1 for unused maintenance categories (it is possible I missed some, but I think I got them all)
1344:
1233:
838:
List of entries in just my own CSD log since June 1 for unused maintenance categories (it is possible I missed some, but I think I got them all)
4004:
There are two types of template /doc pages that have been sent to TfD and always deleted. Navigation templates that had their doc converted to
3999:
2314:
1932:
1907:
1453:
1405:
3813:
3801:
3492:
2192:
4201:
3910:
3783:
3737:
3508:
4437:
3660:
3112:→ "using any image in a way that is disruptive". Genuinely illegal imagery can't fall under the "if they have encyclopedic value" clause. —
2610:
2444:
2345:
2146:
1991:
1973:
1951:
1586:
1541:
1523:
1323:
4422:
4356:
the general concept (ideally as a more general thing, because it is a frequent-ish occurrence), and I want to propose some draft language.
4173:
Are there any other template subpages that are as frequently obsoleted, to the point of being objectively and uncontestably delete-worthy?
3976:
3964:
2388:
2163:
1191:
1177:
1143:
3924:
3851:
2327:
2076:
1359:
1210:
705:
3677:
3636:
3622:
3608:
2666:
2635:
2232:
2207:
2129:
1422:
in detail might help, but even that doesn't rule out that some other template somewhere is using it. I suppose I could run a search like
1250:
663:
4322:
4295:
4281:
4158:
3388:
I think at most we need something (a hatnote perhaps) that points to the instructions elsewhere, perhaps "For material that needs to be
3166:
1568:
4446:
4267:
4140:
3788:
My understanding is that the intent there is for images that 404 (or equivalent), like what was happening with a specific file version
3719:
3141:
3125:
article it definitely cannot elsewhere, but uploading an image that you know it is illegal for the WMF to host is unarguably vandalism.
701:
649:
200:
4195:
4182:
4168:
3702:
3586:
3401:
3301:
3286:
3272:
3201:
2417:
2268:
2249:
1478:
667:
4347:
4085:
4071:
4056:
3438:
2286:
4241:
3423:
3383:
3371:
3365:
3277:
Absolutely not! The goal is to avoid drawing attention to oversightable material, not putting up a bright red arrow pointing to it!
3258:
3239:
2560:
2108:
3770:
3224:
3061:
3031:
654:
3116:
1161:), not redirected to a different template. I was just using the shortcut because that is what the categories used in their names.
3758:
3323:
2502:
3478:
659:
150:
2530:
2046:
summary. There's so many that they make it near-impossible to find genuine abuses. Show me an admin who's never declined a
722:
206:
2240:. I think that falls under "unused maintenance categories" but there is no harm and possible benefit to making it explicit.
131:
2540:. I suggest putting something like "This category is ineligible for speedy deletion under criterion C4" in the text of the
2482:
2319:
This is the sort of thing that would be uncontroversial post-enactment, but as long as we're still discussing, can we link
1574:
1414:
be empty can be challenging, and I'm not convinced we should just let admins figure it out unilaterally. If someone tagged
612:
4334:
get deleted and usually only one editor even cares to comment, which is expected, since no one cares and the newer doc is
3827:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2498:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
4500:
4461:
3686:
1182:
Ah, my misunderstanding. I would still argue that if the template is not populating the category, it is eligible for G8.
3248:
should be created so it's obvious to admins that they should do what
Thryduulf wrote above. I'm thinking something like:
3121:
Crypic has it almost spot on. It is arguable that an image of child pornography could serve an encyclopaedic use on the
4411:
3945:
3862:
2655:
2599:
2310:
2221:
1896:
1826:
1652:
Should C4 (unused maintenance categories) be enacted as a new criterion for speedy deletion? 03:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1512:
1394:
1292:
1166:
1107:
713:
671:
1665:
This applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g.
1374:
This applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past (e.g.
691:
4393:
4251:
Making a new objective criterion, dealing with the misuse of the catchall G6, more “general” seems to miss the point.
3361:: Personal and non-public information: real name and harassment" that I've spot-checked were the real deal though.) —
2187:
709:
4369:
2933:, we've already had deletion discussions that reached consensus to delete all videos of men having sex with horses"
2619:
2578:
2568:
2544:
2511:
2454:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_July_24#Category:Technology_articles_with_topics_of_unclear_notability
1418:, for instance, what would be due diligence for me as a reviewing admin? Examining the source code and history of
696:
2694:
1849:
93:
4481:
when making an edit request to ensure it is seen. However, I do not understand what change you are requesting.
3018:
2733:
2320:
1601:
146:
4008:
2323:
here to make it crystal clear which cats are covered and which need to go through the week-long C1 process? —
195:
3472:
2903:
1642:
1435:
1268:
3540:
3109:
2880:
1629:
186:
97:
3414:
3314:
3215:
3076:
3052:
2981:
239:
4521:
Template talk:Keep local#RfC: Limit usage of this template to files which are fully or partly own work
4514:
Template talk:Keep local#RfC: Limit usage of this template to files which are fully or partly own work
3656:
3591:
Seems that no one is opposing the move/merge, and I don't mind the changes as well. Shall the change
1918:
maintenance" – including, but not limited to, empty dated maintenance categories. Permanently empty
1444:
Can't the deletion tag have an insource search link built into it so all you have to do is click it?
4206:
Wikipedia_talk:Templates for discussion/Archive 26#Making
Category:Unnecessary taxonomy templates G6
92:
Speedy deletion is intended primarily as a means of reducing load on other deletion methods such as
4213:
3831:
2803:
2477:
1821:
search to make it easy for the patrolling admin to double-check that the category is in use. Best,
4313:
anything else without a much more objective proposal than that suggest in the conversation above.
2690:
asking whether I should contact the functionaries — which of these do I select from the dropdown?
716:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
674:
for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
627:
4497:
4458:
4376:
3989:
3937:
3888:
3845:
3596:
3488:
2362:
1867:
1487:
1462:
1431:
1338:
1264:
1227:
763:
NEWCSD checklist (I am only focusing on case two, because case one is already eligible for CSD):
4113:
Objective: yes, as a /doc is either transcluded by its parent template (or for whatever reason,
4418:
3952:
3869:
3793:
3733:
3673:
2662:
2644:
2606:
2306:
2228:
1969:
1928:
1903:
1833:
1706:
1696:
1684:
as proposer. There are two benefits that I see from this change. One, it lessens the load that
1519:
1401:
1299:
1173:
1114:
743:
2693:
The actual options that I get in the dropdown menu when I delete a page (e.g. the contents of
4554:
4484:
3809:
3779:
3547:
2264:
2183:
1947:
4392:. Reasonable exceptions apply for subpages which will be used soon, and editors are free to
1494:
REFUNDed, and at that point we can make a note on the category itself saying something like
224:
4478:
3715:
3690:
3652:
3434:
2826:
1768:
As a regular CFD closer, I have only seen these get deleted unanimously (see my list below)
1204:
Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 86#Empty monthly maintenance categories
794:
As a regular CFD closer, I have only seen these get deleted unanimously (see my list below)
61:
whether a page meets the criterion. Often this requires making the criterion very specific.
39:
8:
4433:
4318:
4291:
4263:
4154:
3906:
3698:
3632:
3618:
3604:
3582:
3504:
3397:
3282:
3252:
3235:
3137:
3103:
3005:
2724:
2556:
2465:
2438:
2274:
2245:
2142:
1987:
1915:
1582:
1537:
1474:
1419:
1319:
176:
1964:
currently contains two (2) pages. What makes you think that two pages is "overloaded"?
1133:, so a redirected template that no longer uses a cat would make the cat eligible for G8.
4494:
4472:
4455:
4277:
4178:
4136:
4081:
4052:
4018:. Can these be tagged with G6? Sending them to TfD really adds nothing to the process.
3980:
3881:
3838:
3577:
Good idea. These are arguably "missing" files anyway so it makes sense to merge there.
3484:
3162:
3037:
3014:
2385:
2355:
2282:
2159:
2004:
1859:
1853:
1622:
to adopt C4. The argument that this criterion would be duplicative of G6 and would not
1426:, but it's not realistic to expect a deleting admin to do that. If it's possible to be
1331:
1220:
1187:
1151:
1139:
750:
736:
216:
191:
31:
2538:
this criterion is for categories which will always be empty, not just currently empty.
4408:
4365:
4188:
3942:
3859:
3729:
3669:
3592:
3122:
2915:
2652:
2596:
2297:
2218:
2061:
1979:
1965:
1924:
1893:
1823:
1509:
1391:
1289:
1163:
1104:
172:
4405:
pedantic, what ENGVAR does WP:CSD use? Favor or favour? Centralized or centralised?)
1458:
We can (and maybe do?) encourage categories that may be sometimes empty to have the
4562:
4343:
4236:
4066:
4023:
3919:
3566:
3379:
3334:
3297:
3268:
3041:
3026:
2775:
2630:
2202:
2174:
2124:
2103:
2050:
2030:
1735:
1638:
1449:
1354:
1350:
so in neither case does the waiting period help. And undeletions are cheap anyway.
1245:
1783:~20 in the past two months at CFD, and many more which are currently handled by G6
4550:
4041:
3711:
3430:
3346:
2831:
2818:
2809:
2799:
2786:
2755:
2255:
1728:
1564:
1281:
1263:'uncontroversial maintenance'" Per the closure there, this would require an RfC.
101:
4524:
4493:
Thank you for the information. For the edit request, someone else corrected it.
4382:. It excludes /testcases and /sandbox subpages, as well as anything tagged with
3338:
3097:
2891:
2885:
2872:
2863:
2853:
2842:
2780:
2771:
2765:
2751:
2738:
2729:
2720:
2714:
2704:
2594:
and create a new template which does indicate which templates use the category.
4546:
4534:
4429:
4314:
4287:
4259:
4150:
4014:
and WikiProject banners that had their doc converted to the automatic one with
3902:
3754:
3694:
3628:
3614:
3600:
3578:
3500:
3419:
3393:
3319:
3278:
3231:
3220:
3197:
mirror the pages in it, the better to fight the Evils of
Rampant Deletionism. —
3175:
3133:
3057:
3022:
2986:
2909:
2588:
2552:
2525:
2428:
2258:
2241:
2138:
1983:
1957:
1941:
1887:
1811:
1578:
1533:
1470:
1315:
4107:: documentation subpages that are no longer transcluded by the parent template
3171:
I don't think Thryduulf was suggesting that non-admins tag material like this
3088:" in your deletion log, for the same reason as the bolded text midway through
1690:
Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
1037:
Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
623:
4273:
4174:
4132:
4077:
4048:
3358:
3354:
3342:
3245:
3158:
3010:
3001:
2997:
2857:
2822:
2794:
2790:
2759:
2746:
2742:
2412:
2381:
2278:
2155:
1883:
1183:
1158:
1135:
3090:
Knowledge:Revision deletion#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight
4538:
4192:
4165:
4034:
3798:
3389:
3362:
3350:
3198:
3113:
3044:
does not explicitly mention actual page deletions anywhere that I can see.
2813:
2708:
2461:
2342:
2324:
2073:
1863:
1685:
1500:
1207:
1126:
3257:
This applies if every revision of a page is eligible for suppression. See
3230:
attention, and most OS requests get actioned in much less than 5 minutes.
2918:: Nominated for seven days with no reliable sources present in the article
1087:
Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
730:
Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) equals year in page title
4559:
4339:
4233:
4063:
4019:
3916:
3767:
3728:
Good point, there. Simply asking people not to bite is probably simpler.
3689:. Additionally if it is enacted then it can (and should) be announced in
3563:
3375:
3293:
3264:
3184:
2940:, anybody who posts a video of a man having sex with a horse is blocked."
2876:
2867:
2627:
2199:
2121:
2100:
2090:
2082:
1879:
1871:
1634:
1445:
1351:
1242:
1057:
Category:EstcatCountry — used with year parameter(s) ≠ year in page title
4529:
Knowledge talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 89#F8 and keep local
628:
4527:. Since the proposal there is very similar to the recent discussion at
4232:
as proposed anyway, though, I'm just bouncing some ideas off the wall.
1875:
1560:
1366:
Alright, before starting a formal RfC here is my draft wording of C4:
1047:
Category:EstcatCountry — used on page without a year in the page title
4542:
4124:
Frequent: I decline at least one per week, and TFD is rife with them.
3901:
I can't think of any good reason not to allow author removal for C4.
3750:
3408:
3308:
3209:
3193:
highly visible on Knowledge, there are some... fine... projects that
3046:
2975:
2879:
in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at
2521:
2458:
Category:Articles_that_need_to_differentiate_between_fact_and_fiction
1067:
Category:Eiei-year — used with year parameter(s) ≠ year in page title
1255:
I continue to think this is not a good idea, for the reasons I gave
2452:
In addition to the ones that are currently handled in CfD, such as
2425:: seems like it'd be useful per nom, Primefac, & Chaotic Enby.
2398:
2087:
Wikipedia_talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 83#New taxonomy
625:
3132:
All of this means that such material is covered under G3 and G12.
2615:
Yeah, agreed with HouseBlaster. I would say most C4 deletions had
2376:- By explicitly limiting this to maintenance categories that will
1982:
it is overloaded in the sense of doing too many different things.
1077:
Category:Eiei-year — used on page without a year in the page title
3190:
3036:
Hmm -- but the revdel criteria don't show up in the dropdown on
3477:
Should G14, or another clause, apply to empty set indexes? See
2023:
2019:
1845:
1702:, but no longer did so after a rewrite. It is not a G8 because
1218:
I'd agree this makes sense similar to G14 and R4 splits of G6.
2894:: Redirect with no space before a parenthetical disambiguation
2774:: One author who has requested deletion – to retrieve it, see
1416:
Category:Technology articles with topics of unclear notability
1410:
Does that really meet NEWCSD #1? Proving that a category will
629:
3093:
1753:
Obviously objective: either a category is in use or it is not
779:
Obviously objective: either a category is in use or it is not
2456:, dated maintenance categories (such as the monthly ones in
742:, but that template no longer populates that category after
4531:, I'm also pinging the people involved in that discussion:
3977:
Knowledge:Village pump (policy) § CSD X4 criterion proposal
3965:
Knowledge:Village pump (policy) § CSD X4 criterion proposal
2081:
I've made several attempts to do what Cryptic suggested at
1428:
unsure whether a category is still being used by a template
987:
Category:European Microstates articles with deprecated tags
3372:
WP:REVDEL#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight
3259:
WP:REVDEL#Hiding oversightable material prior to Oversight
1914:
What's wrong with leaving it at G6? G6 says "This is for
4202:
User talk:Plastikspork/Archive 15#Mass template deletions
2679:
No, really, what category does illegal stuff fall under?
2096:
WP:Database reports/Possibly out-of-process deletions#G6
728:
categories no longer used by a template. As an example,
2961:, it's trying to convince me to have sex with a horse."
1717:
1131:
Categories populated by deleted or retargeted templates
2768:: Housekeeping and routine (non-controversial) cleanup
2332:
Separately, suggest "categories which are expected to
1430:, this probably isn't straightforward enough for CSD.
927:
Category:Channel Islands articles with deprecated tags
847:
Category:Cricket articles needing attention to tagging
2947:, it's not very controversial to delete that, is it?"
2009:
All speedy deletions are uncontroversial maintenance
967:
Category:Southeast Asia articles with deprecated tags
877:
Category:Czech Republic articles with deprecated tags
4222:
Knowledge:Featured article review/M3GAN 2.0/archive1
4210:
Knowledge:Bots/Requests for approval/AnomieBOT III 5
3529:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
1600:
The following discussion is an archived record of a
1027:
Category:United States articles with deprecated tags
141:
4037:before, giving a justification like "template uses
2686:If I see something illegal, such as "child corn" —
1610:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
1017:
Category:Vatican City articles with deprecated tags
937:
Category:Central Asia articles with deprecated tags
809:case one is the most common reason G6 is used (see
655:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Speedy/Criteria
27:
Read this before proposing new or expanded criteria
2273:For reference, these categories are generated via
977:Category:Catholicism articles with deprecated tags
887:Category:South Sudan articles with deprecated tags
4523:that seems relevant to this policy, specifically
2783:: Page dependent on a deleted or nonexistent page
1962:Category:Candidates for technical speedy deletion
957:Category:Montenegro articles with deprecated tags
120:other hand, add it unilaterally to the CSD page.
1856:. Pinging participants in the above discussion:
1667:Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004
1593:RfC: enacting C4 (unused maintenance categories)
1376:Category:Articles lacking sources from July 2004
4453:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as spam
3328:It will draw attention because clueless admins
2584:. I think we need to add the insource magic to
917:Category:Slovakia articles with deprecated tags
4200:What I see in that list is almost exclusively
2336:be empty", rather than "categories which will
1007:Category:Fantasy articles with deprecated tags
4218:WP:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Blackpink/GA1
3532:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
1613:A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
997:Category:Africa articles with deprecated tags
947:Category:Serbia articles with deprecated tags
907:Category:France articles with deprecated tags
666:on 20:38, 4 December 2013. The former page's
2968:, horses can't release content as CC-BY-SA."
2912:: Nominated for seven days with no objection
2845:: Talk page of a nonexistent or deleted page
897:Category:Italy articles with deprecated tags
4000:Template doc pages that have been converted
3357:, serious BLP vio" and "RD4/WP:YOUNG" and "
2888:: Redirect to a deleted or nonexistent page
867:Category:Iran articles with deprecated tags
3975:You are invited to join the discussion at
1573:I've left a note about this discussion at
702:Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Speedy
683:
641:
4187:They seem to mostly be deleted with G6.
3515:"File pages without a corresponding file"
3066:You do know you can type something there
2120:per my comments in the previous section.
57:Most reasonable people should be able to
4428:it seems to use -or and -ize spellings.
1724:; n.b. they were only CSD candidates as
690:Text and/or other creative content from
648:Text and/or other creative content from
4451:Change the number for spam to 1 as per
4447:Extended-confirmed-protect edit request
4244:(edited 03:34, 28 September 2024 (UTC))
4226:WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Wizzrobe61
4212:, expired editnotices, some stuff like
3261:for when and how to use this criterion.
2640:I have added insource functionality to
2137:per proposer and my previous comments.
2041:drowned out by formulaic, well-defined
2022:" not being a plausible misspelling of
708:on 16 November 2016. The former page's
3479:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Hepnar
2091:https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/62274
2083:https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/61527
697:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
660:Knowledge:Criteria for speedy deletion
3792:. The specific wording was added in
3693:, improving awareness of the change.
3523:The following discussion is closed.
1575:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Templates
679:
637:
15:
4189:Mostly-applicable deletions in 2024
3687:Knowledge talk:Files for discussion
3685:I've advertised this discussion at
149:for discussing improvements to the
13:
2711:, meaningless, or incomprehensible
1329:deletion to allow for objections.
723:C4 – unused maintenance categories
14:
4576:
3244:Perhaps a G15 that is similar to
2834:: Unnecessary disambiguation page
2825:submission – to retrieve it, see
2762:user in violation of block or ban
1662:C4. Unused maintenance categories
1370:C4. Unused maintenance categories
3970:
3929:
3823:The discussion above is closed.
3627:A week has passed since the OP.
3004:(any of RD1-4 would apply) then
2954:, it's defamatory to the horse."
2866:: Recently created, implausible
2741:: Recreation of a page that was
2701:General (can apply to any page)
2626:whether they in fact do use it.
2494:The discussion above is closed.
1790:
1775:
1760:
1745:
820:
801:
786:
771:
611:
166:Click here to start a new topic.
70:It must be the case that almost
19:
2695:MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown
1850:Knowledge:Village pump (policy)
94:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
4566:00:24, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
4519:Someone has created an RFC at
4504:02:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
4489:22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
4465:12:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
4438:19:53, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4423:18:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4348:07:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4323:00:50, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4296:07:26, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4282:01:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4268:01:09, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4242:00:36, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4196:00:12, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
4183:23:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4169:23:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4159:23:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4141:21:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4131:Thanks for the consideration.
4086:21:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
4072:05:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
4057:04:52, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
3957:18:24, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
3814:14:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3802:13:39, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3784:12:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3552:18:32, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2966:uh, if you think about it, man
2959:uh, if you think about it, man
2952:uh, if you think about it, man
2945:uh, if you think about it, man
2938:uh, if you think about it, man
2931:uh, if you think about it, man
2536:They already are ineligible -
732:was at one point populated by
1:
4479:one of the relevant templates
4272:Wouldn't it be TfD, not MfD?
4028:08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
3995:21:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
3925:21:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3911:19:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3895:18:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3874:18:19, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3852:17:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3771:20:35, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3759:19:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3738:16:26, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3720:15:51, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3703:13:37, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3678:11:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3439:04:02, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
2667:15:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2636:15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2611:15:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2561:08:31, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
2531:08:11, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
813:), and see below for case two
163:Put new text under old text.
4360:T5. Unused template subpages
4309:for /doc pages as proposed.
4033:I've tagged such pages with
3110:WP:Vandalism#Image vandalism
2904:Knowledge:Copyright problems
2460:) are routinely deleted per
1692:was previously populated by
151:Criteria for speedy deletion
7:
3661:22:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
3637:15:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
3623:06:37, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3609:06:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3587:10:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
3572:03:21, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
3509:22:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
3493:21:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
1647:02:45, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
171:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
98:Knowledge:Proposed deletion
78:be deleted using the rule,
10:
4581:
3806:That makes sense, thanks.
3424:11:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3402:10:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3384:02:06, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3366:00:59, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3324:00:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
3086:(omg iar child corn HALP!)
2650:; thoughts on the design?
2489:06:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
2445:07:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
2353:per my previous comments.
1528:In which case this has my
214:
29:
4286:Yes. Changed to xfd. —-
4076:I am also such an admin.
3794:this edit in October 2015
3595:done right away then per
3473:G14 and empty set indexes
3302:23:56, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3287:23:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3273:23:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3240:18:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3225:18:03, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3202:13:54, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3167:12:11, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3142:11:55, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3117:03:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3062:02:43, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
3032:02:18, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2991:02:27, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
2464:when they become empty. –
2418:22:11, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2389:19:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2369:05:59, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2346:00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2328:00:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2315:00:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
2287:13:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
2269:04:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
2250:22:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2233:22:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2208:20:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2193:19:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2164:12:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2147:08:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2130:05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2109:05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
2077:04:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1992:11:10, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1974:04:15, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1952:04:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1933:03:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1908:03:15, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1838:03:09, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1587:14:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1569:08:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1542:14:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1524:14:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1496:This category is used by
1479:12:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1454:08:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1440:03:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1406:03:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
1360:18:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1345:18:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1324:07:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1304:00:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
1273:18:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1251:17:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1234:17:17, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1211:17:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1192:17:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1178:17:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1144:17:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
1119:17:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
746:. It is not a G8 because
700:was copied or moved into
658:was copied or moved into
201:Be welcoming to newcomers
4214:Template:POTD/2024-05-03
3825:Please do not modify it.
3526:Please do not modify it.
3150:{{db-reason|Child corn}}
2858:Cross-namespace redirect
2507:Marking a category with
2496:Please do not modify it.
1620:near unanimous consensus
1607:Please do not modify it.
811:Taxonomy of G6 deletions
4364:This applies to unused
4096:New T-criteria proposal
2620:possibly empty category
2579:possibly empty category
2569:possibly empty category
2545:possibly empty category
2512:possibly empty category
2321:WP:Maintenance category
857:Category:NRISref errors
4399:Wordsmithing welcome.
4398:
4370:template documentation
4368:of templates, such as
4117:template) or it is not
3263:
2814:copyright infringement
2793:or negative unsourced
2396:per nom and Primefac.
2198:should put them here.
2171:per nom and Primefac.
1626:was roundly rejected.
1388:
1257:in the last discussion
196:avoid personal attacks
4357:
3832:C4 and author removal
3249:
3102:Further information:
2964:"It's a G12 because,
2957:"It's a G11 because,
2950:"It's a G10 because,
2823:Articles for Creation
2821:: Abandoned draft or
1367:
1125:Just to be pedantic,
605:Auto-archiving period
4009:Navbox documentation
3691:Knowledge:Admin news
3207:cannot be the case.
2943:"It's a G6 because,
2936:"It's a G5 because,
2929:"It's a G4 because,
2254:inb4 someone argues
2036:s anymore because I
3104:Knowledge:Vandalism
3077:WP:Ignore all rules
2906:for over seven days
2747:deletion discussion
2275:Template:Sockpuppet
1673:be empty, not just
1602:request for comment
1420:Template:Notability
1382:be empty, not just
714:provide attribution
672:provide attribution
4394:request undeletion
3857:Definitely agree.
3096:, G3 is closest.
2503:Eligibility for C4
2013:. Deleting empty
1868:Extraordinary Writ
1817:tag to include an
1624:solve any problems
1432:Extraordinary Writ
1265:Extraordinary Writ
1202:Last discussed at
207:dispute resolution
168:
4501:What have I done?
4462:What have I done?
4440:
4406:
3993:
3544:
3541:non-admin closure
3123:Child pornography
2881:Wikimedia Commons
2529:
2436:
2008:
1910:
1633:
1630:non-admin closure
1099:
1098:
720:
719:
678:
677:
636:
635:
187:Assume good faith
164:
138:
137:
102:instruction creep
4572:
4557:
4555:The Summum Bonum
4487:
4485:Compassionate727
4476:
4427:
4414:
4400:
4391:
4385:
4381:
4375:
4046:
4040:
4017:
4013:
4007:
3987:
3985:
3974:
3973:
3948:
3936:
3933:
3932:
3891:
3884:
3865:
3848:
3841:
3812:
3810:Compassionate727
3782:
3780:Compassionate727
3597:WP:EDITCONSENSUS
3550:
3548:Compassionate727
3538:
3528:
3491:
3188:
3180:
3174:
3152:
3151:
3030:
2754:: Creation by a
2658:
2649:
2643:
2624:
2618:
2602:
2593:
2587:
2583:
2577:
2573:
2567:
2549:
2543:
2519:
2516:
2510:
2485:
2480:
2443:
2441:
2434:
2431:
2416:
2415:
2409:
2408:
2405:
2402:
2365:
2358:
2303:
2302:
2261:
2224:
2191:
2180:
2177:
2066:
2060:
2055:
2049:
2035:
2029:
2002:
1944:
1899:
1891:
1843:
1829:
1820:
1816:
1810:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1782:
1779:
1778:
1767:
1764:
1763:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1733:
1727:
1711:
1705:
1701:
1695:
1627:
1609:
1515:
1505:
1499:
1492:
1486:
1467:
1461:
1397:
1341:
1334:
1295:
1286:
1280:
1230:
1223:
1169:
1156:
1150:
1110:
834:
833:
827:
824:
823:
808:
805:
804:
793:
790:
789:
778:
775:
774:
755:
749:
741:
735:
699:
687:
686:
680:
657:
645:
644:
638:
630:
616:
615:
606:
227:
142:
115:
105:
84:
62:
42:
23:
22:
16:
4580:
4579:
4575:
4574:
4573:
4571:
4570:
4569:
4532:
4517:
4482:
4477:You should use
4470:
4449:
4412:
4389:
4383:
4379:
4373:
4239:
4238:it has begun...
4098:
4069:
4068:it has begun...
4044:
4038:
4015:
4011:
4005:
4002:
3981:
3971:
3968:
3946:
3934:
3930:
3922:
3921:it has begun...
3889:
3882:
3863:
3846:
3839:
3834:
3829:
3828:
3807:
3777:
3653:Graeme Bartlett
3569:
3568:it has begun...
3559:
3545:
3524:
3517:
3482:
3475:
3341:: Created by a
3182:
3178:
3172:
3149:
3148:
3009:
2899:Other criteria
2850:Redirect pages
2709:Patent nonsense
2681:
2656:
2647:
2641:
2633:
2632:it has begun...
2622:
2616:
2600:
2591:
2585:
2581:
2575:
2571:
2565:
2547:
2541:
2514:
2508:
2505:
2500:
2499:
2483:
2478:
2439:
2429:
2426:
2411:
2406:
2403:
2400:
2399:
2397:
2363:
2356:
2300:
2298:
2259:
2222:
2205:
2204:it has begun...
2178:
2175:
2172:
2127:
2126:it has begun...
2106:
2105:it has begun...
2064:
2058:
2053:
2047:
2033:
2027:
1942:
1916:uncontroversial
1897:
1857:
1827:
1818:
1814:
1808:
1795:
1791:
1780:
1776:
1765:
1761:
1750:
1746:
1731:
1725:
1709:
1703:
1699:
1693:
1678:
1649:
1605:
1595:
1513:
1503:
1497:
1490:
1484:
1465:
1459:
1395:
1357:
1356:it has begun...
1339:
1332:
1293:
1284:
1278:
1248:
1247:it has begun...
1228:
1221:
1167:
1157:was moved (per
1154:
1148:
1129:currently says
1108:
1100:
839:
825:
821:
806:
802:
791:
787:
776:
772:
753:
747:
739:
733:
725:
695:
684:
653:
642:
632:
631:
626:
603:
233:
232:
231:
230:
223:
219:
212:
182:
134:
112:
91:
69:
56:
46:
45:
38:
34:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4578:
4516:
4512:Discussion at
4510:
4509:
4508:
4507:
4506:
4448:
4445:
4444:
4443:
4442:
4441:
4404:
4377:POTD protected
4350:
4337:
4333:
4325:
4304:
4303:
4302:
4301:
4300:
4299:
4298:
4252:
4249:
4248:
4247:
4246:
4245:
4237:
4161:
4129:
4128:
4125:
4122:
4118:
4097:
4094:
4093:
4092:
4091:
4090:
4089:
4088:
4067:
4001:
3998:
3967:
3963:Discussion at
3961:
3960:
3959:
3927:
3920:
3913:
3899:
3898:
3897:
3833:
3830:
3822:
3821:
3820:
3819:
3818:
3817:
3816:
3773:
3761:
3743:
3742:
3741:
3740:
3723:
3722:
3705:
3680:
3663:
3645:
3644:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3640:
3639:
3567:
3558:
3557:
3556:
3555:
3554:
3519:
3518:
3516:
3513:
3512:
3511:
3474:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3464:
3463:
3462:
3461:
3460:
3459:
3458:
3457:
3456:
3455:
3454:
3453:
3452:
3451:
3450:
3449:
3448:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3444:
3443:
3442:
3441:
3326:
3256:
3204:
3195:preferentially
3130:
3126:
3038:Special:Delete
2970:
2969:
2962:
2955:
2948:
2941:
2934:
2922:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2913:
2907:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2889:
2883:
2870:
2861:
2860:from mainspace
2848:
2847:
2846:
2837:
2836:
2835:
2829:
2816:
2812:: Unambiguous
2807:
2802:: Unambiguous
2797:
2784:
2778:
2769:
2763:
2749:
2736:
2727:
2718:
2712:
2680:
2677:
2676:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2671:
2670:
2669:
2631:
2504:
2501:
2493:
2492:
2491:
2447:
2420:
2391:
2371:
2348:
2339:
2335:
2330:
2317:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2271:
2252:
2235:
2203:
2195:
2166:
2149:
2132:
2125:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2104:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1912:
1911:
1840:
1804:
1802:
1801:
1800:
1784:
1769:
1754:
1715:
1676:
1672:
1659:
1656:Proposed text:
1650:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1596:
1594:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1571:
1554:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1488:empty category
1463:Empty category
1385:
1381:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1355:
1326:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1253:
1246:
1236:
1213:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1084:
1074:
1064:
1054:
1044:
1034:
1024:
1014:
1004:
994:
984:
974:
964:
954:
944:
934:
924:
914:
904:
894:
884:
874:
864:
854:
841:
840:
837:
832:
831:
830:
814:
795:
780:
759:
724:
721:
718:
717:
712:now serves to
688:
676:
675:
670:now serves to
646:
634:
633:
624:
622:
621:
618:
617:
235:
234:
229:
228:
220:
215:
213:
211:
210:
203:
198:
189:
183:
181:
180:
169:
160:
159:
156:
155:
154:
136:
135:
122:
117:
116:
106:
85:
63:
44:
43:
35:
30:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4577:
4568:
4567:
4564:
4561:
4556:
4552:
4548:
4544:
4540:
4536:
4530:
4526:
4522:
4515:
4505:
4502:
4499:
4496:
4492:
4491:
4490:
4486:
4480:
4474:
4473:Anonymous1261
4469:
4468:
4467:
4466:
4463:
4460:
4457:
4454:
4439:
4435:
4431:
4426:
4425:
4424:
4420:
4416:
4415:
4410:
4402:
4397:
4395:
4388:
4378:
4371:
4367:
4362:
4361:
4355:
4351:
4349:
4345:
4341:
4335:
4331:
4329:
4326:
4324:
4320:
4316:
4312:
4308:
4305:
4297:
4293:
4289:
4285:
4284:
4283:
4279:
4275:
4271:
4270:
4269:
4265:
4261:
4257:
4253:
4250:
4243:
4240:
4235:
4231:
4227:
4223:
4219:
4215:
4211:
4207:
4203:
4199:
4198:
4197:
4194:
4190:
4186:
4185:
4184:
4180:
4176:
4172:
4171:
4170:
4167:
4162:
4160:
4156:
4152:
4148:
4145:
4144:
4143:
4142:
4138:
4134:
4126:
4123:
4119:
4116:
4112:
4111:
4110:
4108:
4106:
4087:
4083:
4079:
4075:
4074:
4073:
4070:
4065:
4060:
4059:
4058:
4054:
4050:
4043:
4036:
4032:
4031:
4030:
4029:
4025:
4021:
4010:
3997:
3996:
3991:
3986:
3984:
3983:Novem Linguae
3978:
3966:
3958:
3954:
3950:
3949:
3944:
3939:
3928:
3926:
3923:
3918:
3914:
3912:
3908:
3904:
3900:
3896:
3892:
3886:
3885:
3883:Crouch, Swale
3877:
3876:
3875:
3871:
3867:
3866:
3861:
3856:
3855:
3854:
3853:
3849:
3843:
3842:
3840:Crouch, Swale
3826:
3815:
3811:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3800:
3795:
3791:
3787:
3786:
3785:
3781:
3774:
3772:
3769:
3765:
3762:
3760:
3756:
3752:
3748:
3745:
3744:
3739:
3735:
3731:
3727:
3726:
3725:
3724:
3721:
3717:
3713:
3709:
3706:
3704:
3700:
3696:
3692:
3688:
3684:
3681:
3679:
3675:
3671:
3667:
3664:
3662:
3658:
3654:
3649:
3646:
3638:
3634:
3630:
3626:
3625:
3624:
3620:
3616:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3606:
3602:
3598:
3594:
3590:
3589:
3588:
3584:
3580:
3576:
3575:
3574:
3573:
3570:
3565:
3553:
3549:
3542:
3535:
3534:
3533:
3530:
3527:
3521:
3520:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3497:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3485:Voice of Clam
3480:
3440:
3436:
3432:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3422:
3421:
3418:
3417:
3412:
3411:
3405:
3404:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3381:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3368:
3367:
3364:
3360:
3356:
3352:
3348:
3344:
3340:
3336:
3331:
3327:
3325:
3322:
3321:
3318:
3317:
3312:
3311:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3275:
3274:
3270:
3266:
3262:
3260:
3254:
3253:Oversightable
3247:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3237:
3233:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3223:
3222:
3219:
3218:
3213:
3212:
3205:
3203:
3200:
3196:
3192:
3187:|child corn}}
3186:
3177:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3164:
3160:
3156:
3145:
3144:
3143:
3139:
3135:
3131:
3127:
3124:
3120:
3119:
3118:
3115:
3111:
3107:
3105:
3099:
3095:
3091:
3087:
3082:
3078:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3060:
3059:
3056:
3055:
3050:
3049:
3043:
3039:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3028:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2989:
2988:
2985:
2984:
2979:
2978:
2967:
2963:
2960:
2956:
2953:
2949:
2946:
2942:
2939:
2935:
2932:
2928:
2927:
2926:
2917:
2914:
2911:
2908:
2905:
2901:
2900:
2898:
2893:
2890:
2887:
2884:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2871:
2869:
2865:
2862:
2859:
2855:
2852:
2851:
2849:
2844:
2841:
2840:
2838:
2833:
2830:
2828:
2827:WP:REFUND/G13
2824:
2820:
2817:
2815:
2811:
2808:
2805:
2801:
2798:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2785:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2773:
2770:
2767:
2764:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2750:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2737:
2735:
2731:
2728:
2726:
2722:
2719:
2716:
2713:
2710:
2706:
2703:
2702:
2700:
2699:
2698:
2696:
2691:
2689:
2684:
2668:
2664:
2660:
2659:
2654:
2646:
2645:Db-c4/sandbox
2639:
2638:
2637:
2634:
2629:
2621:
2614:
2613:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2603:
2598:
2590:
2580:
2570:
2564:
2563:
2562:
2558:
2554:
2546:
2539:
2535:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2527:
2523:
2513:
2497:
2490:
2486:
2481:
2475:
2474:
2471:
2468:
2463:
2459:
2455:
2451:
2448:
2446:
2442:
2432:
2424:
2421:
2419:
2414:
2410:
2395:
2392:
2390:
2387:
2383:
2379:
2375:
2372:
2370:
2366:
2360:
2359:
2357:Crouch, Swale
2352:
2349:
2347:
2344:
2337:
2333:
2331:
2329:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2295:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2270:
2266:
2262:
2257:
2253:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2236:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2225:
2220:
2215:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2206:
2201:
2196:
2194:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2170:
2167:
2165:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2136:
2133:
2131:
2128:
2123:
2119:
2116:
2110:
2107:
2102:
2097:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2075:
2071:
2063:
2052:
2044:
2039:
2032:
2025:
2021:
2016:
2012:
2011:by definition
2006:
2005:edit conflict
2001:
2000:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1971:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1940:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1895:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1860:Crouch, Swale
1855:
1851:
1847:
1842:
1841:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1830:
1825:
1813:
1805:
1803:
1788:
1785:
1773:
1770:
1758:
1757:Uncontestable
1755:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1737:
1730:
1723:
1719:
1713:
1708:
1707:EstcatCountry
1698:
1697:EstcatCountry
1691:
1687:
1683:
1680:
1679:
1674:
1670:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1658:
1657:
1653:
1648:
1644:
1643:contributions
1640:
1636:
1631:
1625:
1621:
1614:
1611:
1608:
1603:
1598:
1597:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1555:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1502:
1489:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1464:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1398:
1393:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1377:
1372:
1371:
1365:
1361:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1336:
1335:
1333:Crouch, Swale
1327:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1312:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1296:
1291:
1283:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1244:
1240:
1237:
1235:
1231:
1225:
1224:
1222:Crouch, Swale
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1200:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1165:
1160:
1153:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1134:
1132:
1128:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1111:
1106:
1092:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1068:
1065:
1062:
1058:
1055:
1052:
1048:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1025:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1008:
1005:
1002:
998:
995:
992:
988:
985:
982:
978:
975:
972:
968:
965:
962:
958:
955:
952:
948:
945:
942:
938:
935:
932:
928:
925:
922:
918:
915:
912:
908:
905:
902:
898:
895:
892:
888:
885:
882:
878:
875:
872:
868:
865:
862:
858:
855:
852:
848:
845:
844:
843:
842:
836:
835:
818:
815:
812:
799:
796:
784:
783:Uncontestable
781:
769:
766:
765:
764:
761:
757:
752:
745:
738:
731:
715:
711:
707:
703:
698:
693:
689:
682:
681:
673:
669:
665:
661:
656:
651:
647:
640:
639:
620:
619:
614:
610:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
241:
237:
236:
226:
222:
221:
218:
208:
204:
202:
199:
197:
193:
190:
188:
185:
184:
178:
174:
173:Learn to edit
170:
167:
162:
161:
158:
157:
152:
148:
144:
143:
140:
133:
129:
125:
121:
110:
107:
103:
99:
95:
89:
86:
81:
77:
73:
67:
66:Uncontestable
64:
60:
54:
51:
50:
49:
41:
37:
36:
33:
28:
25:
18:
17:
4518:
4450:
4407:
4363:
4359:
4358:
4353:
4327:
4310:
4306:
4255:
4229:
4146:
4130:
4114:
4104:
4102:
4099:
4003:
3982:
3969:
3941:
3880:
3858:
3837:
3835:
3824:
3763:
3746:
3730:QwertyForest
3707:
3682:
3670:QwertyForest
3665:
3647:
3560:
3531:
3525:
3522:
3476:
3415:
3409:
3407:
3406:Yeah, that.
3329:
3315:
3309:
3307:
3250:
3216:
3210:
3208:
3194:
3181:, let alone
3154:
3101:
3085:
3080:
3071:
3067:
3053:
3047:
3045:
3006:WP:OVERSIGHT
2982:
2976:
2974:
2971:
2965:
2958:
2951:
2944:
2937:
2930:
2923:
2806:or promotion
2692:
2687:
2685:
2682:
2651:
2595:
2537:
2506:
2495:
2472:
2469:
2466:
2449:
2422:
2393:
2377:
2373:
2354:
2350:
2293:
2237:
2217:
2213:
2168:
2151:
2134:
2117:
2069:
2042:
2037:
2014:
2010:
1980:WhatamIdoing
1966:WhatamIdoing
1938:
1925:WhatamIdoing
1919:
1892:
1822:
1787:Nonredundant
1786:
1771:
1756:
1741:
1721:
1681:
1661:
1660:
1655:
1654:
1651:
1623:
1619:
1612:
1606:
1599:
1556:
1529:
1508:
1495:
1427:
1411:
1390:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1330:
1310:
1288:
1260:
1238:
1219:
1215:
1162:
1130:
1124:
1103:
1101:
817:Nonredundant
816:
797:
782:
767:
762:
726:
692:this version
650:this version
608:
238:
145:This is the
139:
123:
118:
109:Nonredundant
108:
87:
79:
75:
71:
65:
58:
52:
47:
26:
4498:Talk to me!
4459:Talk to me!
4421:• he/they)
3955:• he/they)
3872:• he/they)
3390:oversighted
3255:information
3000:case, it's
2996:It's not a
2839:Talk pages
2804:advertising
2791:Attack page
2717:: Test page
2665:• he/they)
2609:• he/they)
2231:· he/they)
2216:that, too.
2068:unarguably-
1906:· he/they)
1836:· he/they)
1738:checklist:
1618:There is a
1522:· he/they)
1404:· he/they)
1302:· he/they)
1176:· he/they)
1117:· he/they)
124:this header
74:pages that
4551:Nikkimaria
4234:* Pppery *
4064:* Pppery *
3917:* Pppery *
3712:Tazerdadog
3564:* Pppery *
3431:Tazerdadog
3392:see ...".
2916:WP:BLPPROD
2902:Listed at
2732:: Blatant
2628:* Pppery *
2200:* Pppery *
2122:* Pppery *
2101:* Pppery *
1844:Notified:
1483:We do use
1352:* Pppery *
1243:* Pppery *
1091:discussion
1081:discussion
1071:discussion
1061:discussion
1051:discussion
1041:discussion
1031:discussion
1021:discussion
1011:discussion
1001:discussion
991:discussion
981:discussion
971:discussion
961:discussion
951:discussion
941:discussion
931:discussion
921:discussion
911:discussion
901:discussion
891:discussion
881:discussion
871:discussion
861:discussion
851:discussion
114:otherwise.
83:carefully.
4547:Marchjuly
4535:Asclepias
4525:WP:CSD#F8
4495:Who am I?
4456:Who am I?
4430:Thryduulf
4387:T5-exempt
4315:Thryduulf
4288:SmokeyJoe
4260:SmokeyJoe
4151:SmokeyJoe
4016:|DOC=auto
3903:Thryduulf
3695:Thryduulf
3629:George Ho
3615:Thryduulf
3601:George Ho
3593:be boldly
3579:Thryduulf
3537:forward.
3501:Thryduulf
3394:Thryduulf
3335:WP:REFUND
3279:Thryduulf
3232:Thryduulf
3157:hiding).
3134:Thryduulf
3098:WP:CSD#G3
3042:WP:REVDEL
2776:WP:REFUND
2725:Vandalism
2553:Thryduulf
2260:Aaron Liu
2242:Thryduulf
2139:Thryduulf
1984:Thryduulf
1958:Aaron Liu
1943:Aaron Liu
1888:Thryduulf
1819:insource:
1742:Objective
1736:WP:NEWCSD
1675:currently
1579:Thryduulf
1534:Thryduulf
1471:Thryduulf
1384:currently
1316:Thryduulf
1152:eiei-year
768:Objective
751:eiei-year
744:a rewrite
737:eiei-year
706:this edit
664:this edit
209:if needed
192:Be polite
147:talk page
53:Objective
40:WP:NEWCSD
4366:subpages
4338:better.
4274:jlwoodwa
4175:jlwoodwa
4133:Primefac
4121:deleted.
4078:Primefac
4049:jlwoodwa
3915:Agreed.
3159:Primefac
3011:Headbomb
2877:Redirect
2868:redirect
2382:Jkudlick
2311:contribs
2299:Chaotic
2279:andrybak
2256:WP:CREEP
2188:contribs
2156:Primefac
2062:db-error
1884:Primefac
1772:Frequent
1734:s). The
1424:this one
1184:Primefac
1136:Primefac
798:Frequent
240:Archives
217:Shortcut
177:get help
88:Frequent
32:Shortcut
4553:, and
4539:Fastily
4413:Blaster
4401:(Being
4354:support
4328:Support
4307:Support
4230:Support
4193:Cryptic
4166:Cryptic
4147:Support
3947:Blaster
3864:Blaster
3799:Cryptic
3764:Comment
3747:Support
3708:Support
3666:Support
3363:Cryptic
3351:Ford489
3347:blocked
3337:" and "
3199:Cryptic
3191:CAT:CSD
3114:Cryptic
3079:really
3068:without
2910:WP:PROD
2756:blocked
2743:deleted
2697:) are:
2657:Blaster
2601:Blaster
2467:Laundry
2450:Support
2435:he/they
2423:support
2394:Support
2374:Support
2351:Support
2343:Cryptic
2325:Cryptic
2294:Support
2238:Support
2223:Blaster
2214:support
2169:Support
2152:Support
2135:Support
2118:Support
2074:Cryptic
2051:db-test
2031:db-move
1939:Support
1898:Blaster
1886:, and
1864:Cryptic
1828:Blaster
1682:Support
1557:Support
1530:support
1514:Blaster
1396:Blaster
1311:Support
1294:Blaster
1239:Support
1216:Support
1208:Cryptic
1168:Blaster
1109:Blaster
710:history
668:history
609:30 days
4560:Anomie
4340:Gonnym
4336:always
4332:always
4311:Oppose
4228:etc.
4042:navdoc
4020:Gonnym
3768:zzuuzz
3648:oppose
3376:Nickps
3349:user (
3343:banned
3294:Nickps
3265:Nickps
3246:WP:RD4
3108:... →
3002:WP:CRD
2998:WP:CSD
2760:banned
2745:per a
2430:sawyer
2386:(talk)
2338:always
2334:always
2176:python
2038:always
2024:Africa
2020:AfricA
1880:Pppery
1872:Gonnym
1854:WT:CFD
1852:, and
1846:T:CENT
1729:db-xfd
1714:exists
1712:still
1671:always
1635:voorts
1446:Gonnym
1412:always
1380:always
1282:db-xfd
1159:WP:TPN
758:exists
756:still
225:WT:CSD
80:should
4409:House
4035:WP:G6
3943:House
3938:Added
3860:House
3489:talk)
3251:G15.
3176:db-g3
3094:Nomic
2653:House
2597:House
2589:db-c4
2470:Pizza
2378:never
2219:House
2179:coder
1894:House
1876:Kusma
1824:House
1812:db-c4
1718:above
1686:WP:G6
1561:Kusma
1510:House
1392:House
1290:House
1164:House
1127:WP:G8
1105:House
704:with
662:with
245:Index
205:Seek
153:page.
76:could
59:agree
4543:JPxG
4434:talk
4419:talk
4403:very
4344:talk
4319:talk
4292:talk
4278:talk
4264:talk
4179:talk
4155:talk
4137:talk
4082:talk
4053:talk
4024:talk
3990:talk
3979:. –
3953:talk
3907:talk
3890:talk
3870:talk
3847:talk
3790:here
3755:talk
3751:Whpq
3734:talk
3716:talk
3699:talk
3683:Note
3674:talk
3657:talk
3633:talk
3619:talk
3605:talk
3583:talk
3505:talk
3435:talk
3398:talk
3380:talk
3330:will
3306:G▉?
3298:talk
3283:talk
3269:talk
3236:talk
3163:talk
3155:more
3138:talk
3072:also
3040:and
2734:hoax
2663:talk
2607:talk
2557:talk
2526:talk
2522:MSGJ
2440:talk
2427:...
2364:talk
2307:talk
2301:Enby
2283:talk
2277:. —
2265:talk
2246:talk
2229:talk
2212:I'd
2184:talk
2160:talk
2143:talk
1988:talk
1970:talk
1948:talk
1929:talk
1904:talk
1834:talk
1799:bug.
1639:talk
1583:talk
1565:talk
1538:talk
1520:talk
1475:talk
1450:talk
1436:talk
1402:talk
1340:talk
1320:talk
1300:talk
1269:talk
1229:talk
1188:talk
1174:talk
1140:talk
1115:talk
829:bug.
194:and
132:edit
128:view
96:and
4256:xfd
4191:. —
4115:any
3893:)
3850:)
3420:🗯️
3359:RD4
3355:RD4
3345:or
3320:🗯️
3221:🗯️
3106:and
3058:🗯️
3008:.
2987:🗯️
2832:G14
2819:G13
2810:G12
2800:G11
2795:BLP
2787:G10
2758:or
2688:not
2367:)
2070:non
2043:sub
2015:non
1720:at
1501:foo
1343:)
1232:)
694:of
652:of
72:all
4558:.
4549:,
4545:,
4541:,
4537:,
4436:)
4390:}}
4384:{{
4380:}}
4374:{{
4352:I
4346:)
4321:)
4294:)
4280:)
4266:)
4258:?
4224:,
4220:,
4208:,
4181:)
4157:)
4149:.
4139:)
4084:)
4055:)
4045:}}
4039:{{
4026:)
4012:}}
4006:{{
3940:.
3909:)
3757:)
3736:)
3718:)
3701:)
3676:)
3659:)
3635:)
3621:)
3607:)
3599:?
3585:)
3507:)
3483:—
3481:.
3437:)
3410:jp
3400:)
3382:)
3339:G5
3310:jp
3300:)
3285:)
3271:)
3238:)
3211:jp
3185:db
3183:{{
3179:}}
3173:{{
3165:)
3140:)
3100:→
3081:is
3048:jp
3025:·
3021:·
3017:·
2977:jp
2892:X3
2886:G8
2875::
2873:R4
2864:R3
2856::
2854:R2
2843:G8
2789::
2781:G8
2772:G7
2766:G6
2752:G5
2739:G4
2730:G3
2723::
2721:G3
2715:G2
2707::
2705:G1
2648:}}
2642:{{
2623:}}
2617:{{
2592:}}
2586:{{
2582:}}
2576:{{
2572:}}
2566:{{
2559:)
2548:}}
2542:{{
2524:·
2515:}}
2509:{{
2487:)
2484:c̄
2473:03
2462:G6
2437:*
2433:*
2413:💬
2384:⚓
2313:)
2309:·
2285:)
2267:)
2248:)
2186:|
2162:)
2145:)
2065:}}
2059:{{
2054:}}
2048:{{
2034:}}
2028:{{
1990:)
1972:)
1960:,
1950:)
1931:)
1920:un
1882:,
1878:,
1874:,
1870:,
1866:,
1862:,
1848:,
1815:}}
1809:{{
1789::
1774::
1759::
1744::
1732:}}
1726:{{
1710:}}
1704:{{
1700:}}
1694:{{
1645:)
1604:.
1585:)
1577:.
1567:)
1540:)
1532:.
1507:.
1504:}}
1498:{{
1491:}}
1485:{{
1477:)
1466:}}
1460:{{
1452:)
1438:)
1322:)
1285:}}
1279:{{
1271:)
1261:is
1190:)
1155:}}
1149:{{
1142:)
819::
800::
785::
770::
754:}}
748:{{
740:}}
734:{{
607::
601:89
599:,
597:88
595:,
593:87
591:,
589:86
587:,
585:85
583:,
581:84
579:,
577:83
575:,
573:82
571:,
569:81
567:,
565:80
563:,
561:79
559:,
557:78
555:,
553:77
551:,
549:76
547:,
545:75
543:,
541:74
539:,
537:73
535:,
533:72
531:,
529:71
527:,
525:70
523:,
521:69
519:,
517:68
515:,
513:67
511:,
509:66
507:,
505:65
503:,
501:64
499:,
497:63
495:,
493:62
491:,
489:61
487:,
485:60
483:,
481:59
479:,
477:58
475:,
473:57
471:,
469:56
467:,
465:55
463:,
461:54
459:,
457:53
455:,
453:52
451:,
449:51
447:,
445:50
443:,
441:49
439:,
437:48
435:,
433:47
431:,
429:46
427:,
425:45
423:,
421:44
419:,
417:43
415:,
413:42
411:,
409:41
407:,
405:40
403:,
401:39
399:,
397:38
395:,
393:37
391:,
389:36
387:,
385:35
383:,
381:34
379:,
377:33
375:,
373:32
371:,
369:31
367:,
365:30
363:,
361:29
359:,
357:28
355:,
353:27
351:,
349:26
347:,
345:25
343:,
341:24
339:,
337:23
335:,
333:22
331:,
329:21
327:,
325:20
323:,
321:19
319:,
317:18
315:,
313:17
311:,
309:16
307:,
305:15
303:,
301:14
299:,
297:13
295:,
293:12
291:,
289:11
287:,
285:10
283:,
279:,
275:,
271:,
267:,
263:,
259:,
255:,
251:,
247:,
175:;
130:•
126::
111::
90::
68::
55::
4563:⚔
4533:@
4483:—
4475::
4471:@
4432:(
4417:(
4396:.
4342:(
4317:(
4290:(
4276:(
4262:(
4177:(
4164:—
4153:(
4135:(
4105:X
4103:T
4080:(
4051:(
4022:(
3992:)
3988:(
3951:(
3935:Y
3905:(
3887:(
3868:(
3844:(
3808:—
3797:—
3778:—
3753:(
3732:(
3714:(
3697:(
3672:(
3655:(
3631:(
3617:(
3603:(
3581:(
3546:—
3543:)
3539:(
3503:(
3487:(
3433:(
3416:g
3413:×
3396:(
3378:(
3316:g
3313:×
3296:(
3281:(
3267:(
3234:(
3217:g
3214:×
3161:(
3136:(
3054:g
3051:×
3029:}
3027:b
3023:p
3019:c
3015:t
3013:{
2983:g
2980:×
2661:(
2605:(
2555:(
2528:)
2520:(
2479:d
2476:(
2407:A
2404:F
2401:C
2361:(
2341:—
2305:(
2281:(
2263:(
2244:(
2227:(
2190:)
2182:(
2173:—
2158:(
2141:(
2085:/
2007:)
2003:(
1986:(
1978:@
1968:(
1956:@
1946:(
1927:(
1902:(
1890:.
1858:@
1832:(
1796:Y
1781:Y
1766:Y
1751:Y
1641:/
1637:(
1632:)
1628:(
1581:(
1563:(
1536:(
1518:(
1473:(
1448:(
1434:(
1400:(
1337:(
1318:(
1298:(
1267:(
1226:(
1186:(
1172:(
1138:(
1113:(
1093:)
1089:(
1083:)
1079:(
1073:)
1069:(
1063:)
1059:(
1053:)
1049:(
1043:)
1039:(
1033:)
1029:(
1023:)
1019:(
1013:)
1009:(
1003:)
999:(
993:)
989:(
983:)
979:(
973:)
969:(
963:)
959:(
953:)
949:(
943:)
939:(
933:)
929:(
923:)
919:(
913:)
909:(
903:)
899:(
893:)
889:(
883:)
879:(
873:)
869:(
863:)
859:(
853:)
849:(
826:Y
807:Y
792:Y
777:Y
281:9
277:8
273:7
269:6
265:5
261:4
257:3
253:2
249:1
242::
179:.
104:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.