1356:, for things that I personally announced on over 100 pages, in addition to announcements made by others, and even by editors who participated in the discussions that they are now alleging never happened. Some of this is simple forgetfulness (so much happens that we can't remember it all) or because someone really did get missed (we once ran site banners for two solid weeks about something, and the banners happened to coincide perfectly with one editor's two-week summer holiday), but some editors can be convinced by the diffs, so it's well to have them.
207:
189:
271:
253:
1430:
1396:
until that election's over, so this political stuff will let up. If it looks like everyone is "suddenly" adding "a lot of" links, then you'll notice the deviation from normal, and that will subconsciously make you think that there is something suspicious or abnormal about adding links. If we flipped this on for 100%, we could predict now that several patrollers would complain that "too many" newbies are adding "too many" links in "too many" articles. This wouldn't be proof that there are violations of
338:
317:
429:
1151:
some impressively specific and precise links getting added, for articles on niche subjects that I'd never have expected us to have an article for. I'd also like to see this happen gradually. Maybe only a small percentage gets access for the first few weeks, and the number ramps up slowly from there? Or maybe the per-editor daily limit is reduced (3 links x 5 articles?), so that people can get feedback on their link choices before handling too many articles?
158:
553:
1191:
hour, then patrollers/watchlist users will be surprised by a sudden shift in edit content. I think a gradual introduction will help community on the reviewing end (e.g., who may need time to have conversations about how most first edits are suboptimal, and adding a superfluous link is less destructive than most other mistakes that newbies make). I don't think it will make any direct difference to the individuals making these edits.
143:
754:
it does not seem to be learning anything from our feedback. If you tell it not to wikilink month names, it will still wikilink month names. If, say, "Italy, Germany, Poland, and Greece" is somewhere in the text, it will offer to wikilink Poland, but not the other three; manual link addition is not possible in this mode. Can WMF work on these and other issues, or is this their final product - that I don't know.
2323:.I think a pretty good solution might be a bot report, since that could highlight unanswered mentee questions sooner than we would ever want to mark a mentor as "away". We could have a bot that ingested the current active mentor list each day, then scanned their talkpages every twenty minutes or so for threads that meet all of the following criteria: title matches "Question from
637:. The one with the đ¤ robot icon is the new "Suggested links" task. However, the task has a "Disabled in site configuration" notice next to the task. This is the first time we are releasing this task in this manner (making the task available but not enabling the feature ourselves). We ran into some unexpected technical complexities with this approach (
2293:
to that would like otherwise, but I think it's important for us to consider these questions getting answered to the earliest convenience for the mentee's sake for the sake of encouragement. The
Teahouse is quick to answer usually, so maybe an automated suggestion to ask there if the question stalls could work too?
2292:
This is not
Ritchie's fault of course, as life can be busy in a second. I got so bad at answering questions in a timely manner that I had to turn them off for example. Do we have a system (or should one be made), where a second backup user is notified of absent responses? I'm not sure what a solution
1924:
The
Suggested Edits flow IIRC (maybe only if you click through the five help snippets) has an animated focus effect on the "edit lead" pencil. There's nothing in the included guidance that suggests editors find a specific maintenance tag (or indeed, click a maintenance tag), and initial article focus
1395:
If you do RecentChanges patrol a lot, then you develop a feel for what's "normal", and you notice deviations from what you expect. Like: So many people editing about India today. Weird that I've seen this same website several times today â a spam campaign, or just a coincidence? Ugh, I can't wait
1150:
a while ago, and I found that most new editors did a good job, and few of them added more than a couple of links. (The instructions say to only add a small number, and most folks stick to that.) Sometimes I saw the same editors over and over, but mostly it was new folks each day. I remember seeing
1131:
This sounds really wonderful and has been used on several other language editions of
Knowledge already. I am curious what percentage of linking will either get slightly modified to more specific targets, outright reverted versus "good links", i.e link is retained (particularly on articles where other
2375:
Have we defined what a timely manner for answering questions is? Obviously we canât expect individual mentors to answer as quickly as the
Teahouse, but should we want mentors to be active every day for questions (and does that disqualify those who arenât)? Iâve only seen inactivity quantified at the
2143:
If I remember correctly the 2019 discussions around this, the goal was to provide a number of topics that would not be overwhelming. Also, we selected the (groups of) topics that returned the highest number of articles at most mid-sized
Wikipedias. Variations regarding contents are important wiki to
1372:
If you want to start very small, consider a very small percentage of users for the first week/fortnight, and double regularly. you don't want to get stuck limiting it to a tiny percentage for months/years. If there are structural problems (e.g., it selects articles that have a lot of links, but it
2205:
If we eventually add in more topic granularity (like being able to filter by countries or smaller geographic regions) then we will also need to rethink the UX of the filtering to allow for that additional complexity, and at that point maybe we should consider breaking up some of these categories if
1313:
Okay, we seem in agreement that we should give this a try, with some trepidation about how it might cause significant, unforeseen issues. Limiting the number of users who have access to this feature looks to me like a good idea. So, what number of users should we be limiting this to? And how long a
923:
I'm speaking from a good deal of ignorance about how this will work, but as an old-hand editor, I do think particular aspects should be monitored, such as reverts to these link edits and how much this will pile up in editors' watchlists (i.e., I have no idea as to how much of these are going to pop
753:
In general, this looks like a useful feature. The setting is, I believe, the number of link suggestions per article and the number of articles per day. In my experience, more links per article, and fewer articles per day works better: 9Ă4 seems just fine. What I don't like about the feature is that
1796:
task. It should be possible to compose a search for the exact quantity without querying the database, but I just woke up so won't attempt.The root problem, as I continue to see it same as last year, is that the issues that established
Knowledge editors tend to tag with maintenance templates rather
1403:
A fact that you might want to store in your back pocket, for responding to those inevitable complaints, is that if you divide
Knowledge's non-list articles into "shorter" and "longer" halves, the shorter articles (=stubs and near-stubs) average about two links per sentence, and the longer articles
1231:
there is a list of section names to exclude from consideration for this task, including examples such as "References" and "See also". If we added "0" to this list, would the lead paragraph be excluded from analysis? (A separate question is whether this is a good idea: most articles seem to display
693:
suggests, defaults can also be adjusted. For example, setting the "The maximum number of "Add a link" suggested tasks a newcomer can complete daily" to a lower number might be appreciated by patrollers. Or increasing the "Minimum required link score" should improve the quality of suggestions, but
1190:
I think that limiting the number of users at the start would be valuable because it will change the mix of edits in the RecentChanges queue. The
English Knowledge is so big that we get about 50 new editors making their first edit each hour. If we suddenly have 10 extra edits adding links every
1645:? These articles also looked deeply flawed to an experienced editor but not in a way where they could fix it easily; they may offer a very poor model of what a wiki article 'should' look like; and they may lead to a dispiriting wasted effort on the newbies' part if the article is later deleted.
951:
1536:
Editing a
Knowledge page requires too much context and patience. It means many trial and error for newcomers to contribute, meaning a steeper learning curve and potential discouraging reverts. To support a new generation of volunteers, we will increase the number and availability of smaller,
1805:
guidance to click through the maintenance template to understand the problem tagged and what a solution might look like, so most people seem to tend towards doing mild copyediting of the lead paragraph, which ends up roughly evenly balanced between not a substantial improvement and a clear
2178:
Weâve been exploring ways to introduce more granular topic filtering in the future. For example, many newcomers prefer editing articles related to their home region, but we currently donât offer the ability to filter suggestions by country. This is something we're actively researching:
1351:
It always helps, because if you will let me indulge in cynicism for a moment, a very typical Wikipedian response to change is to complain that "there's no consensus", and that often begins with claiming "nobody knew about it". I have actually seen this claimed for decisions that were
954:, where I filtered all Add a link edits, with reverted edits highlighted in red. As I post this message, I see 2 reverted edits for 500 links addition. It looks like what I observe on average, at any major Knowledge. Would it be the same at English Knowledge? Honestly, I don't know.
1000:
Another option is that the daily task limit can be configured to be lower. The default is currently 25, which means any new account holder that has access to the task can complete up to 25 "add a link" tasks per day. Any English Knowledge admin can update to a lower number via
1337:. Maybe a two-week period and then check in? 2% for two weeks, and if everything goes okay go to 5% or something? We could notify the CVU talk/Village Pump/somewhere with recent changes patrollers that the trial is beginning if anyone feels that would help. Happy editing,
1501:
We will add a new Community Configurable module to the Newcomer Homepage that will allow communities to highlight specific events, projects, campaigns, and initiatives. We have released a simple version available to beta wikis. We will conduct an A/B test at
957:
Reverted edits are not the only point to consider. Let's imagine an article where three links were added, where one link is not okay. Some users will revert the full edit, or leave it like this. Being myself active at French Knowledge as a volunteer, I use
994:
1802:
1314:
trial do we think is good to have before we increase that limit? My inclination would be to start very, very small, but soon after that ramp up to a larger number that is still a small proportion of the overall number of new users. Thoughts? --
2272:
2252:
would be nice for people to see. Maybe some other topics could be bundled into their parent topics to create some space and prevent overwhelm? I do realise en.wp is an outlier, with better coverage than other wikis under consideration.
965:
Also, my watchlist is not really flooded by these links addition. I just checked my watchlist, and I only see three articles edited to add links over the last 500 edits at articles I monitor. ut again, I can't transpose it to English
1616:
be removed from the copyediting task list? In my experience, something gets tagged with "tone" (instead of something more specific) when an experienced editor looks at a huge mess, says "yikes", and walks away. Even when the problem
1407:
Also, some editors prefer very sparse links in articles, and from their POV, moving from their preferred state towards a purely average level of linking makes the articles worse. We should not be surprised by complaints about this.
1308:
697:
Let me know if there is anything I can do to help. I could write a Signpost article to share more details so there is more awareness about the task before it's enabled? Or are there any remaining questions I can help answer?
886:
1561:(in English) if you want to know more about our day-to-day work. If you want to receive more general updates about technical activity happening across the Wikimedia movement (including Growth work), we encourage you to
1739:
Finally! Thanks, asilvering, for doing that! Would it perhaps be worth it to request a query of how many articles are both newcomer copyediting eligible and tagged for notability just to check? Happy editing,
2202:
Also, I just wanted to clarify that itâs not that we are only exposed 39 of the 64 topics â itâs that we combined some of them so that it was a smaller number of topics for newcomers to review and select.
441:
98:
1702:
call them overwhelming. So I'm just... going to go ahead and use these fancy new tools I just got and remove "tone" and "advert". "Peacock" I suspect might be a bit more useful, so I hesitate over that
571:
1720:
I can see the argument that "peacock" works as a newbie copy-editing task, since it's more focused on sentence edits and the problem is explained more concretely. Thanks for removing tone and advert!!
644:
The Growth team can enable the task at any time on the server side. Just let me know if you think consensus is reached and we are happy to enable the task. (We can also disable the task if requested).
1769:
1706:
Filtering out articles tagged for notability sounds like a good idea. I have no idea how much this would reduce the pool of tasks - maybe not much? But it doesn't seem likely to me to be harmful. --
1588:
633:
I just wanted to give you an update and let you know that we have the backend prepared to release the Suggested Links newcomer task. You will now see two "Add links between articles" tasks in
2186:
As we incorporate this level of granularity into the UI, we could also consider expanding filtering options for other topics, while ensuring the user experience remains simple and intuitive.
1824:
Yes, that root problem you identify is why I have reasonably high hopes for the structured tasks. We can enable Find A Link now, we just haven't yet. I'll go give that discussion a kick. --
585:
218:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of efforts to improve editor retention on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
924:
up in my watchlist to have to review), and such. I like the idea of experimenting with this, but I also hope this will not be so hardened that we can't possibly ever decide to stop it.
2316:
777:
2320:
2305:
776:
certainly google translates to "maximum number of link suggestions to display for each suggested task".As to linking month names, country names, etc., I brought this up last year at
2339:â 12? 24? 6?). Then the bot could update a report that people could subscribe to if they're interested in answering questions posed to busy / inactive mentors. (Or it could post to
1637:
are also prone to flagging, 1, articles with research problems and, 2, articles with prose style problems that fall outside of simple copyediting or many newcomers' starting skills.
1068:
I apparently neglected to post my comment any one of the 3+ times I typed it up, but I think we should try it. We can always turn it off again if it causes problems. Happy editing,
1860:
It's the "needs citations for verification" one. I have no idea why it's tagged with "copy edit" though - should be "references" surely. Hopefully someone from WMF can clarify. --
1801:
are typically not easy, and not a good introduction for low editcount junior contributors.It doesn't particularly help that the minimalist instructions in the Suggested Edits flow
973:. And the reverse is true: it will be possible to deactivate the feature in the same way. If the prefered option is a test, the Growth team will have to take care of setting it up.
2180:
1609:
and they suggested talking here for enwiki consensus. So I'd like to pose two suggestions that I think are just a matter of how the tool is configured, to see what others think:
896:
1468:
1376:
The trickier bit is giving the reviewers time to adjust mentally. The unavoidable fact is that new editors make mistakes. They might make fewer mistakes in this system, but
651:
is released (likely by July 2024), and at that point we can ensure the configuration form is working as intended so any English Knowledge admin can enable or disable the task.
1625:
problem), newbies are often still in the early stages of unlearning essaylike prose styles, and may find encyclopedic tone more challenging than the promised "copy-editing".
1012:
mentioned: English Knowledge is welcome to enable the task and see how it goes. If the task is too disruptive to patrollers and experienced editors, it can be turned off.
1026:
Thanks both for your replies. I'm glad this can be adjusted if it gets out of hand. I don't think editors would want their watchlists filling up with a lot more to review.
367:
616:
1205:
True. Newcomer with no Suggested links shave other tasks to work on. If the community prefers to start with XX% of new accounts getting Add a link, we can implement it.
134:
1093:
2137:
1330:
878:
746:
2220:
Yes, apologies for the inclarity in my OP: it's obvious that geographical subregions are bundled into macroregions, and I only realised after creating the list that
2030:
1165:
It is possible to have Add a link for a limited number of users. The Growth team can set it up. Regarding a per-editor limit, the community can set it up anytime in
2283:
had some mentee questions that had stalled for about 3-6 days, so I stepped in to answer them to make sure they weren't left unresolved for too long. One mentee,
874:
2130:
39:
1323:
1943:
We tag the edit according to the task type the user selected. But as these tasks open the full editor, the user can do what is asked and more. We expect use
2164:
Fascinating. I can see why we might want to avoid driving newcomers to "internet culture", but I'm not sure what could be wrong with "books" or "radio". --
1699:
1172:
Speaking of community configuration, we will soon provide the possibility for your community to turn Add a link on. It should be made possible next week.
1648:
In both cases, I'm hoping to avoid sending newbies to complicated, messy articles and telling them they just need the quick "easy task" of copy editing.
1353:
1166:
1104:
newcomer task is pretty much ready for activation at en.wp, and only a handful of people seem to care so far.I have no idea if this is what you meant in
679:
606:
Any editor feel free to refactor this, add subheadings / RFC tags if you feel it necessary. I'm just tryna start a conversation to check in on consensus.
825:
These numbers (25 tasks, 3 links per task) are the default settings we suggest. Most big wikis kept them, except Russian (5 tasks, 3 links per task).
1542:
1523:
1373:
doesn't notice the links because they're inside templates or tables), then we should discover those problems within the first several thousand edits.
1281:
Whatever above the first section header. I used the wrong term for section 0; this happen when you cover multiple wikis, languages and cultures! :D
2433:
1675:(sorry for my patchy memory) but thanks to Pppery's intervention then, I am posing new suggestions this time! I'd love to hear folks' thoughts.
349:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit
2408:
1546:
1108:
or whether you currently care about this, and rather unfortunately I couldn't think of any method of notifying you that wouldn't be considered
1442:
1695:
1232:
the richest link density in the lead, but many very short articles have no subsections, so excluding section "0" would skip them entirely.)
487:
482:
475:
470:
465:
458:
453:
448:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
1246:
The lead paragraph is not excluded, for the reasons you give. The higher the density of links in an article, the lesser links are suggested.
1662:
286:
best practices in the presentation of Knowledge content. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.
219:
1919:
908:
856:
2215:
1400:(the typical FA has hundreds of links in it), but it would be evidence that the patrollers had noticed a shift in the editing patterns.
1294:
1276:
1218:
1200:
1185:
712:
If we need more input or want to adjust some defaults before an admin decides about flipping the switch is it time for those RfC tags @
74:
1976:
1869:
1040:
1021:
988:
404:
2195:
2173:
2014:
1992:
1938:
1905:
1417:
1365:
725:
2376:
away setting of the mentorship dashboard, which defines it as âmore than a weekâ. Do mentors know the time expectation for answers?
2262:
2159:
1960:
1571:
1262:
1241:
895:
will show you task availability, if you want to review metrics on task click through rates, completion, and revert rates, we have a
707:
669:
1887:
1855:
1749:
1346:
1147:
656:
Sorry for the additional complexity, this release is coming at an odd time as the Growth team is also working to finish up the new
2391:
1833:
1819:
2413:
1600:
1734:
1715:
1605:
I have been thinking off an on about how newcomer tasks can best set newbies up for success. A while ago I posted some thoughts
1051:
I'm in favor of giving it a go, if any problems arise they can be discussed. Hoping this helps newbies acclimate to Knowledge! â
959:
950:
It is possible to monitor the reverted links, using Recent Changes or Watchlist, as both links addition and reverts are tagged.
838:
2356:
1160:
214:
194:
2370:
938:
2428:
2423:
1689:
1077:
1060:
817:
800:
394:
80:
1141:
1121:
142:
1694:
The "copyediting tasks actually really difficult and dispiriting" problem has come up repeatedly over the past few years (
1100:
about algorithmic attempts to determine appropriate internal link density in articles. What's new is that the algorithmic
657:
1389:
787:.Anyway there doesn't seem to be much engagement with this topic, so for the purpose of establishing consensus, I'll say
1580:
763:
1397:
1533:, the Growth team will explore various ways to increase the percentage of newcomers who successfully start editing.
1511:
1457:
2044:
1530:
1472:
2418:
969:
We're offering your community the chance to activate the functionality, literally: once you've decided to do so,
278:
258:
844:
791:. It seems like it should be easy enough to turn it back off if the newcomer links become too high maintenance.
1843:
1436:
1228:
24:
20:
1558:
1112:, so I figured maximum transparency would be straight canvassing you to the discussion itself. Avoiding work,
69:
1576:
597:
The default rate limit for links added in this way is 25 per editor per day, and three per article per day.
594:
task will be available and disabled on English Knowledge in one week. (The current task is template based).
169:
2240:
could be made accessible to (albeit not individually selectable by) Newcomer Tasks if the parent category
1494:
2273:
If a question is asked and nobody is around to answer it, was the question ever asked in the first place?
1846:
come through? There are not tags on the affected text, and I can't find copyedit-related tags elsewhere.
773:
520:
354:
60:
1507:
648:
1925:
doesn't skip to any maintenance tag that may have included the article in the task pool. So almost all
93:
2040:
892:
847:
show decent takeup, although as on en.wiki that page does not have ways to see individual examples.
2106:(although these final two may be wrapped up by the label "General Science", which I assume maps to
1892:
There is one {{verify spelling}} in the "Current political issues" section. :) I almost missed it!
1786:
1479:
1002:
970:
634:
561:
1456:. For now, all Growth features can be configured using Community Configuration. Configuration for
2340:
1915:
1851:
1105:
852:
843:
Also not opposed to enabling, presumably it will have a tracking tag or consistent edit summary?
781:
686:, and editors will NOT have access to the task until an English Knowledge admin enables the task.
997:, we found that the revert rate for newcomers who get Add a Link is 11% lower than the baseline.
2211:
2191:
2155:
2140:: "The ORES model we use now offers 64 topics, and we chose to expose 39 of them to newcomers."
2010:
1956:
1901:
1413:
1361:
1290:
1272:
1258:
1214:
1196:
1181:
1156:
1017:
984:
904:
870:
834:
703:
665:
350:
345:
322:
175:
1545:). The Growth team will primarily focus on Structured Tasks, while working closely with the
539:
2387:
2169:
1988:
1972:
1967:
Since it was so hard for us to find it, they probably had trouble finding it too, haha. --
1883:
1865:
1829:
1745:
1711:
1552:
1342:
1319:
1073:
1056:
721:
2317:
Knowledge talk:Growth Team features/Archive 7 § Marking inactive editors/mentors as 'Away'
638:
503:
8:
2352:
2258:
2126:
1934:
1815:
1776:
1642:
1489:
1237:
1137:
1117:
805:
Agreed. I think they misunderstood the setting, they're allowing 25 tasks, 3 links each:
796:
612:
50:
1267:"Section 0" would be the entire lead section, rather than the just the first paragraph.
1911:
1847:
1672:
1517:
1510:. We still welcome community feedback on initial designs and plans, in any language at
1087:
862:
848:
531:
65:
1423:
865:. Yes, these edits are all tagged. Here's an example edit summary and associated tags:
2302:
2207:
2187:
2147:
2002:
1948:
1893:
1875:
1798:
1730:
1685:
1658:
1409:
1357:
1282:
1268:
1250:
1206:
1192:
1173:
1152:
1109:
1013:
1009:
976:
900:
826:
699:
674:
Sorry for the delay! The new Community Configuration extension is released, and the "
661:
46:
1503:
2365:
1630:
1562:
1483:
1027:
944:
925:
2312:
1810:
tag for many months now, so my impressions may be outdated like my body and car).
1461:
1094:
Knowledge talk:Manual of Style/Linking § MOS:OVERLINK: Absolute or relative level?
683:
2383:
2165:
1998:
1984:
1968:
1879:
1861:
1825:
1765:
1741:
1707:
1634:
1338:
1315:
1069:
1052:
813:
759:
717:
1584:
806:
206:
188:
2348:
2344:
2254:
2122:
1930:
1811:
1429:
1233:
1133:
1113:
792:
778:
Knowledge talk:Growth Team features/Archive 7 § Usefulness of "Add links" task?
713:
690:
623:
608:
2343:??)It sounds pretty simple (although not so simple I could code it properly).
1944:
1641:
2. Can tasks be filtered so that newcomers are not shown articles tagged with
1538:
499:
2402:
1758:
1613:
735:
428:
362:
270:
252:
2321:
Knowledge talk:Growth Team features/Mentor list § Marking a mentor as "away"
2289:
is doing some particularly great history work and asking great questions :)
1698:
is me wondering who will bring it up in 2024 - guess that's you). We've had
2294:
1721:
1676:
1649:
2362:
337:
316:
678:" is now set up so that any English Knowledge admin can enable it here:
505:
1392:, but right now, new editors == more well-intended but imperfect edits.
887:
example edits on French Knowledge via this filtered Recent Changes view
809:
755:
357:
and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the
2118:
also don't seem to be represented. My vdiff may contain inaccuracies.
1806:
disimprovement, with some outliers (although I haven't RCPed for the
740:
627:
358:
282:, a group of editors promoting application of web and user-interface
1606:
1146:
I'd like to see this happen. I was manually adding articles to the
682:. In other words, the Growth team released the task as "turned off"
501:
1467:
You can help with translations. The interface translation is done
586:
Should English Knowledge enable the Suggested Links newcomer task?
552:
993:
Edit revert rate is something we monitor for all tasks, and in a
630:
for making sure we opened up this discussion to a wider audience!
572:"Wikimedia is adding features to make editing Knowledge more fun"
2331:)", one person in the conversation, initial timestamp at least
1910:
Thanks. I wonder what brought the editing so far from the tag.
1764:
last year, but I suppose my memory has failed me again. Thanks
2378:
And yes, I say this knowing Iâve been bad about this recently.
506:
2181:
Research on Language-Agnostic Topic Classification by Country
768:
In the thread just above, Trizek describes the "25" value as
601:
Should we enable this feature? Should we modify the defaults?
807:
https://de.wikipedia.org/Spezial:EditGrowthConfig?uselang=en
590:
According to the thread just above, the new algorithm based
1537:
structured, and more task-specific editing workflows (E.g.
1249:
Should we explore an option to exclude the lead paragraph?
1929:
task edits tend to affect the lead, and many exclusively.
2279:
1770:
hastemplate:Notability and hastemplate:"Multiple issues"
2382:
Also, +1 to liking the bot report idea. Happy editing,
1464:) and other features will be available in the future.
1404:
average somewhere around two links per three sentences.
2285:
2121:
What is the reasoning behind these unincluded topics?
2031:
articletopic and its intersection with Suggested Edits
1947:
at some point to narrow down the focus of the task.
1792:
will be in the subset that include an article in the
1768:
for taking care of that.A naive and basic search for
2035:
I've noticed just now that not all of the available
1549:
to ensure our work integrates well with Edit Check.
1309:
What number of users should be involved in the trial
1008:
But also I just wanted to chime in and second what @
422:
15:
2144:
wiki; English Knowledge is always the exception. :)
1878:, is there any chance you can explain this one? --
1167:
Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits
680:
Special:CommunityConfiguration/GrowthSuggestedEdits
641:). I think we have two options for how to proceed:
869:(Link suggestions feature: 2 links added.) (Tags:
785:we aren't using any sort of rejection links lists
2400:
770:the number of edits each newcomer can make daily
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
1621:a prose problem (as opposed to a more complex
1333:was 2% of new accounts. I'd be fine with that
2228:are likely subsumed under "General Science".
514:This page has archives. Sections older than
1428:
1390:ensure Knowledge's survival in the long term
1388:. Increasing the number of new editors may
694:will decrease the number of tasks available.
1335:(or really any number that gets this going)
971:an admin will be able to turn Add a link on
366:
1772:returns ~30k articles, down from ~58k for
1524:Increase constructive activation on mobile
1496:Newcomer Homepage Community Updates module
947:, we are here to answer your questions. :)
647:Or, we can wait until the new version of
168:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1445:at all Wikipedias. You can access it at
1148:Category:Articles with too few wikilinks
1092:I've just noticed that last November at
2434:Knowledge pages referenced by the press
1842:Sorry if this is an aside, but how did
1482:, please join us for the session about
789:Sure, let's turn it on and give it a go
2401:
524:when more than 5 sections are present.
228:Knowledge:WikiProject Editor Retention
2409:WikiProject Editor Retention articles
373:and a volunteer will visit you there.
343:This page is within the scope of the
231:Template:WikiProject Editor Retention
2136:I quickly skimmed around, and found
1754:I thought we had already got rid of
1601:Refining copy-editing newcomer tasks
822:The task is not enabled at de.wp. :)
547:
157:
155:
151:
13:
2335:hours in the past (for some value
1427:
626:for starting this discussion and @
14:
2445:
2277:From general browsing I saw that
2051:s are not presented as options:
1531:Growth team 2024/2025 Annual Plan
1398:Knowledge:Manual of Style/Linking
562:mentioned by a media organization
518:may be automatically archived by
276:This page is within the scope of
212:This page is within the scope of
2045:Special:Homepage/suggested-edits
2041::mw:ORES/Articletopic § Taxonomy
1607:at the MediaWiki discussion zone
1484:Community configuration's future
1227:I have a technical question: at
658:CommunityConfiguration Extension
551:
427:
336:
315:
269:
251:
205:
187:
156:
141:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
2001:, it was a good challenge! :D
1673:raise some of this here in July
1452:This new special page replaces
382:Template:Knowledge Help Project
292:Knowledge:WikiProject Usability
2414:WikiProject Usability articles
2392:17:51, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
2371:17:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
2357:17:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
2306:07:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
2263:16:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
2216:00:01, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
2047:. Specifically, the following
2015:15:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1993:15:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1977:17:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1961:15:29, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1939:14:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1920:13:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1906:13:07, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1629:1A. I could be convinced that
1447:Special:CommunityConfiguration
1295:12:08, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
1229:Special:CommunityConfiguration
1096:you asked me to ping you when
369:ask for help on your talk page
295:Template:WikiProject Usability
174:It is of interest to multiple
1:
2196:22:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
2174:20:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
2160:13:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
2131:10:50, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1888:20:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1870:18:10, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1856:14:12, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1834:18:20, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1820:09:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1782:alone, and of course not all
1750:03:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1735:01:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1716:00:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1690:00:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1663:00:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1418:19:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1366:19:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1347:19:18, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1324:18:23, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1277:16:58, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1263:14:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
1242:11:13, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
570:Robertson, Adi (2022-10-24).
222:and see a list of open tasks.
37:Put new text under old text.
2429:Knowledge Help Project pages
2424:Mid-importance Help articles
676:Add a link (Structured task)
399:This page has been rated as
215:WikiProject Editor Retention
7:
2361:Like the idea behind this.
2347:might be a next step here.
1557:Growth team weekly updates
1473:translate the documentation
962:to quickly fix these links.
774:de:Spezial:EditGrowthConfig
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
2450:
1597:15:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
897:Growth KPIs dashboard here
726:04:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
708:23:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
560:This WMF project has been
529:
405:project's importance scale
2249:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2229:
2226:libraries-and-information
2225:
2221:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2098:
2093:libraries-and-information
2092:
2086:
2080:
2074:
2068:
2062:
2056:
2048:
2036:
1926:
1807:
1793:
1441:The Growth team released
1219:17:24, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1201:16:08, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1186:15:40, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1161:02:19, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
1142:14:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
1122:12:44, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
1101:
893:Special:NewcomerTasksInfo
591:
398:
353:, where you can join the
331:
264:
234:Editor Retention articles
200:
182:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
1589:Subscribe or unsubscribe
1572:Growth team's newsletter
1454:Special:EditGrowthConfig
1354:made in CENT-listed RFCs
1331:the first mentorship run
1078:20:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
1061:13:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
1041:21:03, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
1022:17:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
1003:Special:EditGrowthConfig
989:17:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
952:See for French Knowledge
939:20:44, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
909:19:26, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
857:02:09, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
839:15:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
818:13:12, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
801:18:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
764:02:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
747:21:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
670:17:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
635:Special:EditGrowthConfig
617:17:57, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
2341:Knowledge talk:Teahouse
2315:, and has precedent at
2244:were included. I think
1808:Newcomer task: copyedit
1443:Community Configuration
1437:Community Configuration
649:Community Configuration
2419:NA-Class Help articles
1563:subscribe to Tech News
1433:
1424:Growth News, July 2024
1132:edits continue). ~ đŚ
521:Lowercase sigmabot III
379:Knowledge:Help Project
346:Knowledge Help Project
70:avoid personal attacks
1799:simply solve on sight
1559:are available on wiki
1512:our project talk page
1432:
1098:there is anything new
780:A few threads later,
279:WikiProject Usability
135:Auto-archiving period
1983:Aha! My mistake. --
1700:professional writers
1471:. You can also help
1469:at Translatewiki.net
879:Suggested: add links
25:Growth Team features
1803:still don't include
1643:Template:Notability
772:. The parameter at
2206:it makes sense.
1668:Hah, apparently I
1434:
1129:Enable the feature
790:
602:
298:Usability articles
170:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
2379:
2110:). The catchalls
2043:are available at
1727:
1682:
1655:
1592:
1384:. It's not even
1336:
1034:s among the rest!
995:previous A/B test
932:s among the rest!
788:
749:
600:
583:
582:
528:
527:
493:
492:
419:
418:
415:
414:
411:
410:
310:
309:
306:
305:
246:
245:
242:
241:
150:
149:
61:Assume good faith
38:
2441:
2377:
2338:
2334:
2311:This relates to
2301:
2297:
2288:
2282:
2251:
2247:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2117:
2113:
2109:
2100:
2094:
2088:
2082:
2076:
2070:
2064:
2058:
2057:internet-culture
2050:
2038:
1928:
1809:
1795:
1791:
1785:
1781:
1775:
1763:
1757:
1725:
1724:
1680:
1679:
1653:
1652:
1631:Template:Peacock
1569:
1543:Structured Tasks
1508:Metrics Platform
1455:
1448:
1334:
1103:
1091:
1038:
1036:
936:
934:
861:Good question, @
782:Trizek confirmed
745:
743:
733:
607:
593:
575:
555:
548:
542:
523:
507:
445:
444:
431:
423:
387:
386:
383:
380:
377:
372:
351:the project page
340:
333:
332:
327:
319:
312:
311:
300:
299:
296:
293:
290:
273:
266:
265:
255:
248:
247:
236:
235:
232:
229:
226:
225:Editor Retention
209:
202:
201:
195:Editor Retention
191:
184:
183:
161:
160:
159:
152:
146:
145:
136:
16:
2449:
2448:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2399:
2398:
2368:
2367:it has begun...
2336:
2332:
2299:
2295:
2284:
2278:
2275:
2104:
2033:
1789:
1787:Multiple issues
1783:
1779:
1773:
1761:
1755:
1722:
1677:
1650:
1635:Template:Advert
1603:
1595:
1577:the Growth team
1555:
1529:As part of the
1520:
1504:our pilot wikis
1492:
1453:
1446:
1439:
1426:
1311:
1085:
1035:
1031:
1028:
933:
929:
926:
750:
741:
739:
639:T308144#9811861
605:
588:
579:
578:
569:
565:
546:
545:
538:
534:
519:
508:
502:
436:
384:
381:
378:
375:
374:
325:
297:
294:
291:
288:
287:
233:
230:
227:
224:
223:
133:
87:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
2447:
2437:
2436:
2431:
2426:
2421:
2416:
2411:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2394:
2380:
2373:
2366:
2329:full timestamp
2274:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2203:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2184:
2145:
2141:
2103:
2102:
2096:
2090:
2084:
2078:
2072:
2066:
2060:
2059:(~5k articles)
2053:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2026:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2017:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1752:
1737:
1704:
1692:
1639:
1638:
1602:
1599:
1579:and posted by
1554:
1551:
1519:
1516:
1506:using the new
1491:
1488:
1480:Wikimania 2024
1478:If you attend
1438:
1435:
1425:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1405:
1401:
1393:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1247:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1170:
1144:
1125:
1124:
1084:
1081:
1080:
1063:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1033:
1006:
998:
991:
974:
967:
963:
955:
948:
931:
921:
920:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
911:
890:
883:
866:
823:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
695:
687:
672:
654:
653:
652:
645:
631:
587:
584:
581:
580:
577:
576:
566:
559:
558:
556:
544:
543:
535:
530:
526:
525:
513:
510:
509:
504:
500:
498:
495:
494:
491:
490:
485:
479:
478:
473:
468:
462:
461:
456:
451:
438:
437:
432:
426:
417:
416:
413:
412:
409:
408:
401:Mid-importance
397:
391:
390:
388:
376:Knowledge Help
363:Help Directory
341:
329:
328:
326:Midâimportance
323:Knowledge Help
320:
308:
307:
304:
303:
301:
274:
262:
261:
256:
244:
243:
240:
239:
237:
220:the discussion
210:
198:
197:
192:
180:
179:
173:
162:
148:
147:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2446:
2435:
2432:
2430:
2427:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2417:
2415:
2412:
2410:
2407:
2406:
2404:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2381:
2374:
2372:
2369:
2364:
2360:
2359:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2342:
2330:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2307:
2304:
2298:
2290:
2287:
2281:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2213:
2209:
2204:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2182:
2177:
2176:
2175:
2171:
2167:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2151:
2146:
2142:
2139:
2135:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2128:
2124:
2119:
2097:
2091:
2085:
2079:
2073:
2067:
2061:
2055:
2054:
2052:
2046:
2042:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2006:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1952:
1946:
1942:
1941:
1940:
1936:
1932:
1923:
1922:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1897:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1845:
1841:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1804:
1800:
1788:
1778:
1771:
1767:
1760:
1753:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1738:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1693:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1674:
1671:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1646:
1644:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1624:
1620:
1615:
1614:Template:Tone
1610:
1608:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1590:
1586:
1585:Give feedback
1582:
1578:
1574:
1573:
1566:
1564:
1560:
1553:Stay informed
1550:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1534:
1532:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1515:
1513:
1509:
1505:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1487:
1485:
1481:
1476:
1474:
1470:
1465:
1463:
1459:
1458:AutoModerator
1450:
1444:
1431:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1394:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1286:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1254:
1248:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1230:
1226:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1210:
1204:
1203:
1202:
1198:
1194:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1177:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1149:
1145:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1099:
1095:
1089:
1088:SebastianHelm
1083:
1082:
1079:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1064:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1049:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1004:
999:
996:
992:
990:
986:
982:
980:
975:
972:
968:
964:
961:
956:
953:
949:
946:
942:
941:
940:
937:
935:
922:
910:
906:
902:
898:
894:
891:
888:
885:You can view
884:
882:
880:
876:
875:Newcomer task
872:
867:
864:
863:Chipmunkdavis
860:
859:
858:
854:
850:
846:
845:fr.wiki stats
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
830:
824:
821:
820:
819:
815:
811:
808:
804:
803:
802:
798:
794:
786:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
752:
751:
748:
744:
737:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
710:
709:
705:
701:
696:
692:
688:
685:
681:
677:
673:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
650:
646:
643:
642:
640:
636:
632:
629:
625:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
603:
598:
595:
573:
568:
567:
563:
557:
554:
550:
549:
541:
537:
536:
533:
522:
517:
512:
511:
497:
496:
489:
486:
484:
481:
480:
477:
474:
472:
469:
467:
464:
463:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
446:
443:
440:
439:
435:
430:
425:
424:
421:
406:
402:
396:
393:
392:
389:
385:Help articles
371:
370:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
347:
342:
339:
335:
334:
330:
324:
321:
318:
314:
313:
302:
285:
281:
280:
275:
272:
268:
267:
263:
260:
257:
254:
250:
249:
238:
221:
217:
216:
211:
208:
204:
203:
199:
196:
193:
190:
186:
185:
181:
177:
171:
167:
163:
154:
153:
144:
140:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2328:
2324:
2313:phab:T321509
2291:
2276:
2250:geographical
2208:KStoller-WMF
2188:KStoller-WMF
2149:
2120:
2105:
2087:geographical
2049:articletopic
2039:s listed at
2037:articletopic
2034:
2004:
1950:
1895:
1876:Trizek (WMF)
1669:
1647:
1640:
1622:
1618:
1611:
1604:
1596:
1575:prepared by
1570:
1568:
1567:
1556:
1547:Editing team
1535:
1528:
1522:
1521:
1500:
1495:
1493:
1490:Current work
1477:
1466:
1451:
1440:
1410:WhatamIdoing
1385:
1381:
1377:
1358:WhatamIdoing
1312:
1284:
1269:WhatamIdoing
1252:
1208:
1193:WhatamIdoing
1175:
1153:WhatamIdoing
1128:
1106:your comment
1097:
1065:
1029:
1014:KStoller-WMF
1010:Trizek (WMF)
978:
927:
901:KStoller-WMF
868:
828:
784:
769:
700:KStoller-WMF
675:
662:KStoller-WMF
604:
599:
596:
589:
574:. The Verge.
515:
433:
420:
400:
368:
344:
283:
277:
213:
176:WikiProjects
166:project page
165:
138:
92:
19:This is the
2246:linguistics
2116:visual-arts
2063:linguistics
1997:No worries
1518:Future work
1386:almost none
1329:Looks like
945:StefenTower
871:Visual edit
2403:Categories
2384:Perfect4th
2363:* Pppery *
2280:Ritchie333
2166:asilvering
1999:asilvering
1985:asilvering
1969:asilvering
1945:Edit check
1880:asilvering
1862:asilvering
1826:asilvering
1777:Notability
1766:asilvering
1742:Perfect4th
1708:asilvering
1612:1. Should
1539:Edit Check
1339:Perfect4th
1316:asilvering
1136:(he/him â˘
1110:canvassing
1070:Perfect4th
1053:Ganesha811
966:Knowledge.
734:Notified:
718:Perfect4th
355:discussion
2349:Folly Mox
2255:Folly Mox
2123:Folly Mox
1931:Folly Mox
1844:this edit
1812:Folly Mox
1234:Folly Mox
1134:Shushugah
1114:Folly Mox
793:Folly Mox
714:Folly Mox
691:Folly Mox
624:Folly Mox
622:Thanks, @
609:Folly Mox
488:Archive 8
483:Archive 7
476:Archive 6
471:Archive 5
466:Archive 4
459:Archive 3
454:Archive 2
449:Archive 1
359:Help Menu
289:Usability
284:usability
259:Usability
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
2325:username
2238:software
2081:software
1927:copyedit
1794:copyedit
1623:research
960:Diffedit
532:Shortcut
434:Archives
94:Archives
51:get help
2345:WP:BOTR
2296:Panini!
2286:Gazingo
2089:(~302k)
2065:(~207k)
1462:T365046
1380:is not
1030:Stefen
928:Stefen
684:T370802
516:60 days
403:on the
139:60Â days
2148:Trizek
2101:(~41k)
2083:(~20k)
2077:(~32k)
2071:(~64k)
2003:Trizek
1949:Trizek
1894:Trizek
1283:Trizek
1251:Trizek
1207:Trizek
1174:Trizek
977:Trizek
827:Trizek
736:WP:VPR
540:WT:GTF
172:scale.
2242:media
2234:radio
2230:books
2222:space
2152:(WMF)
2112:media
2099:space
2095:(~3k)
2075:radio
2069:books
2007:(WMF)
1953:(WMF)
1898:(WMF)
1797:than
1378:fewer
1287:(WMF)
1255:(WMF)
1211:(WMF)
1178:(WMF)
1102:links
1032:Tower
981:(WMF)
930:Tower
831:(WMF)
810:Ponor
756:Ponor
592:links
442:Index
365:. Or
164:This
99:Index
79:Seek
2388:talk
2353:talk
2319:and
2259:talk
2248:and
2236:and
2224:and
2212:talk
2192:talk
2170:talk
2156:talk
2138:this
2127:talk
2114:and
2108:stem
2011:talk
1989:talk
1973:talk
1957:talk
1935:talk
1916:talk
1902:talk
1884:talk
1866:talk
1852:talk
1830:talk
1816:talk
1759:Tone
1746:talk
1731:talk
1712:talk
1703:one.
1696:here
1686:talk
1659:talk
1633:and
1541:and
1414:talk
1382:none
1362:talk
1343:talk
1320:talk
1291:talk
1273:talk
1259:talk
1238:talk
1215:talk
1197:talk
1182:talk
1157:talk
1138:talk
1118:talk
1074:talk
1057:talk
1018:talk
985:talk
905:talk
853:talk
835:talk
814:talk
797:talk
760:talk
742:Sdkb
722:talk
704:talk
689:As @
666:talk
628:Sdkb
613:talk
68:and
1912:CMD
1848:CMD
1723:~ L
1678:~ L
1670:did
1651:~ L
1581:bot
1514:.
1486:!
1475:.
1449:.
899:.
849:CMD
660:.
395:Mid
361:or
2405::
2390:)
2355:)
2303:đĽŞ
2261:)
2232:,
2214:)
2194:)
2172:)
2158:)
2129:)
2013:)
1991:)
1975:)
1959:)
1937:)
1918:)
1904:)
1886:)
1868:)
1854:)
1832:)
1818:)
1790:}}
1784:{{
1780:}}
1774:{{
1762:}}
1756:{{
1748:)
1733:)
1726:đ¸
1714:)
1688:)
1681:đ¸
1661:)
1654:đ¸
1619:is
1587:â˘
1583:â˘
1565:.
1416:)
1364:)
1345:)
1322:)
1293:)
1275:)
1261:)
1240:)
1217:)
1199:)
1184:)
1159:)
1140:)
1120:)
1076:)
1066:+1
1059:)
1020:)
987:)
907:)
877:,
873:,
855:)
837:)
816:)
799:)
762:)
738:.
724:)
716:?
706:)
668:)
615:)
137::
129:,
125:,
121:,
117:,
113:,
109:,
105:,
101:,
49:;
2386:(
2351:(
2337:k
2333:k
2327:(
2300:â˘
2257:(
2210:(
2190:(
2183:.
2168:(
2154:(
2150:_
2125:(
2009:(
2005:_
1987:(
1971:(
1955:(
1951:_
1933:(
1914:(
1900:(
1896:_
1882:(
1874:@
1864:(
1850:(
1828:(
1814:(
1744:(
1729:(
1710:(
1684:(
1657:(
1591:.
1460:(
1412:(
1360:(
1341:(
1318:(
1289:(
1285:_
1271:(
1257:(
1253:_
1236:(
1213:(
1209:_
1195:(
1180:(
1176:_
1169:.
1155:(
1116:(
1090::
1086:@
1072:(
1055:(
1016:(
1005:.
983:(
979:_
943:@
903:(
889:.
881:)
851:(
833:(
829:_
812:(
795:(
758:(
720:(
702:(
664:(
611:(
564::
407:.
178:.
131:8
127:7
123:6
119:5
115:4
111:3
107:2
103:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
