1517:) removed them, citing "the consensus was no maps" and "they clutter the page up." As far as I know, the simple solution is to have the maps be automatically be collapsed so that they must be manually opened. I believe this is a good compromise as the maps can stay but Blissfield and others do not have to see them if they believe they take up too much space. Bliss also has a history of removing content to trim down the page length according to his talk page. One other thing I want to note is Bliss pointed out that other large airports do not have maps. This seems ironic, how does removing content make a page better? Maps visualize the scale of the airport without having to look at a "cluttered" table of destinations. A lot of small airports have maps that feel unnecessary but are there to list three destinations. Yet Bliss doesn't want one that's shows almost 90? In the end, is having a closed map a good way to add content and reduce "clutter"?
1320:
dashes not because they serve multiple communities but to distinguish between multiple airports serving a single city. That said, at a quick glance it looks to me that changing the spaced en dashes to unspaced ones would be the way to go. There are probably a few cases where the exact locality of the airport can be dropped from the title altogether, leaving just the name of the place that it serves, but that will require checking whether an
English COMMONNAME exists or whether the French COMMONNAME or OFFICIALNAME should be used. I don't have time to do all those checks right now but I'd be happy to give advice (as a French speaker and resident).
276:
245:
366:
214:
300:
310:
1711:
1678:
1648:
1198:
1015:
common to refer to it as simply
National. I know it's a politically charged question to an extent, but I do see the value of labelling with the name that it is commonly given; especially since it's the official name. The arguments I've seen for just Washington-National are that it's shorter, and it's the status quo. Ok, but why is it the status quo, and does that matter? Seems arbitrary.
1536:, where previous discussions are also linked. While I've advocated in favor of these in the past, I'm honestly not as into them as I used to be. Users adding/removing destinations from the table might not always do the same in the map since it's a little more complex to edit; I think linking these sections to external maps like flightconnections.com would also be fine.
962:. The back and forth edits have been going on for over a month now. Basically, the IP user(s) keeps changing “Washington—National” in the destinations table to “Washington—Reagan National” or something similar. I keep reverting as “Washington—National” is used on every airport page that has it as a destination; it’s even used in the example table at
1045:
Washington-Reagon
National still seems appropriate in my view, even if it may be a long name. Although simplifying the name is ideal, I think the important thing is: 1. is the name correct and 2. is the name consistently applied throughout the article. As long as both conditions are met, then I don't
1559:
Not true. If you scroll down to the RFC I did on that very page, you will see 4-2 in favor of removal (of those who responded). Ultimately, they are difficult to maintain, redundant with the airline and destination table, not well laid out and having styling issues. Now a flightconnections.com link,
1388:
is active on a number of airport articles in Asia. It is an editor who never ever adds sources to an addition, never ever responded on attempts to communicate and often removes connection without explaining why. Very annoying, but he is not a vandal. After all, part of his edits are valid (removing
1352:
Thanks, I'll look there for acceptable French names. To Rosbif's point, there are two questions here that we should not mix up: the
English article title, and the French name in the article. I definitely aim to apply English (and English WP) style conventions in the article title, but we also want
1319:
is pretty short on details about dashes and hyphens, despite hyphenated place names being pretty common in France. It does mention that unspaced en dashes should be used for railway stations that serve two communities, and we could no doubt transpose that advice, even though some airport names have
1145:
Excuse me for not answering before, the question went unnoticed here. I have consulted this website in the past, and observed that it changes very little. It was quite complete at one time, but is not very well kept up to date. Quite good for historical information, though, and that seems to be the
1408:
My two eurocents: @The_Banner, you have been clear and firm yet polite in your communications. Exemplary, all my compliments! Since no reaction came at all, I think you need to continue on the way you entered, and get a first time-limited gentle block on said user. Since her/his contributions are
1014:
on the the KSLC page a while ago, and VenFlyer8 was the only person who responded. I think the ongoing good faith edits to Reagan
National have a lot to do with it being the most commonly used name for that airport among the people who most frequently use KSLC. In other regions it's probably more
398:
1265:
Not mine either. I have little understanding of the French conventions for hyphens and dashes in locale names and such, but there's clearly a problem with these articles using what appear to be made-up French names and styles that are not found in sources. So fixing the styling of the
English
1060:
Agreed with this, full one seems a bit long, even if it’s accurate. I’d say either of those work, it’s just the consistency across pages (although I know that doesn’t really matter as what 1 page does should have no effect on another). I will say the airport’s name is “Ronald Reagan
Washington
1614:
Why don't you start an RfC on this then? The last discussion was over 2 years ago now with no consensus reached (despite more people being in favor of the maps being removed) so it may be good to get a new one going to get a firm consensus.
1189:
1389:
start dates of new connections, removing connections after they ended). He has a talk page full of warnings but zero response. I tried to approach him in multiple languages, but zero response. I am at wits end, what do do next?
1030:
I'll clarify that I think either
Washington-Reagan or -National are acceptable, as long as there's consistency within the article. "Washington-Reagan National" is another option, but perhaps it's unnecessarily long.
1409:
numerous, to say the least, this should be immediately observed, and hopefully it will trigger some reflection, which is indeed long due. If you don't pursue now, you will be making a fool of yourself. To cite from
1081:
Yet another reason that destinations shouldn't be included in airport articles. Destinations are not a property of an airport, they're a property of an airline. Airports don't travel to other airports, airlines do.
1600:. I still do not understand why you will not accept my compromise-having them automatically be in the collapsed form. This allows you to not have to see them while they are still viewable to anybody that wants to.
1702:
1284:
Contact French contributors? But they might only react to messages in their own language, been there, done that. Feel free to invoke my assistance, being originally
Belgian I have a fair bit of French.
1574:
Agreed, I remember there being discussions about maps with most users in favor of removing them. Difficult to maintain and look very cluttered, especially in the case of large airports like BNA. (
1669:
1639:
899:
997:
Is it too simple to refer to that airport with the name/title it has with us? Which does (to my regret, but this is not really my cup of tea) begin with the name of the former US president?
1205:
1191:
529:
1214:
1338:
so it seems fr.wikipedia applies broadly the same guidelines as we do here. I only checked this single one example, though. But everything indicates that@Dicklyon is absolutely correct.
895:
869:
1727:
1125:
889:
1664:
836:
1533:
1697:
909:
1140:
865:
205:
885:
938:
832:
905:
879:
815:
1099:
503:
576:
615:
550:
39:
1181:
1155:
875:
811:
1011:
693:
1475:
1383:
559:
544:
540:
1462:
1432:
637:
472:
1229:
596:
497:
461:
931:
533:
444:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
768:
608:
483:
451:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
764:
569:
555:
507:
1609:
1569:
804:
647:
633:
586:
468:
1426:
1093:
1006:
966:. Just wanted to gather consensus that “Washington—National” is the name we should be using so we have established consensus about it.
592:
493:
457:
74:
1624:
1592:
maps. However if it is necessary I will try to fix overlapping airport names. flightconnections.com does not show future flights like
1583:
1362:
1347:
1308:
1294:
1279:
1260:
1025:
1177:
1136:
1121:
1061:
National
Airport” with “National” following “Washington,” I think that’s the reason for my preference towards “Washington–National.”
924:
714:
525:
489:
440:
1554:
1540:
1353:
an appropriately styled native name. It seems we all agree that at least unspacing the en dashed is a step in the right direction.
1741:
686:
602:
479:
1718:
1704:
1494:
1070:
990:
975:
1746:
1055:
565:
1040:
1756:
1751:
1329:
1245:
1104:
Hello. Sorry if this is an annoying kind of FAQ or I'm in the wrong section but is it possible to tell me, please, whether the
800:
653:
643:
582:
433:
1315:
I guess part of the problem is that here on enwiki, we apply (or ought to be applying) English conventions, not French ones.
1299:
I don't parle no francais, so maybe you can ask someone to take a look at the French names in the articles on that template.
80:
782:
1173:
1132:
1117:
959:
710:
703:
213:
1116:
to be self-published, but I know nothing! Advice gratefully received, even if it is only somewhere else to ask ... Cheers
1510:
825:
793:
518:
423:
1685:
1671:
1655:
1641:
1267:
856:
672:
662:
1526:
1402:
429:
340:
1597:
1545:
I had a feeling he was lying. I am glad somebody with a neutral stance on the topic was able to clarify this for me
327:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
1506:
1417:: "she would not yield to gentle measures, harder ones must have their turn". Cheers, and keep up the good work!
699:
842:
821:
789:
419:
403:
375:
322:
286:
281:
24:
20:
1593:
852:
758:
747:
736:
725:
668:
658:
69:
1172:), so it sounds like it might be OK for that area: I absolutely take your point re currency. Thanks again!
256:
1485:
is way too high a bar for list inclusion in most cases. Just don't link them, in preference to redlinks.
1456:. My impulse is to remove them outright per WP:NOTDIRECTORY but I would prefer to seek consensus whether
1225:
953:
60:
1219:
120:
1441:
1422:
1343:
1290:
1256:
1151:
1088:
1002:
963:
754:
743:
732:
721:
328:
1605:
1565:
1550:
1522:
1514:
105:
1532:
He's making things up, there is no consensus to remove them. This has already been discussed at
1509:–one domestic and one international–back in mid September. It stayed that way for 2 weeks until
98:
1445:
1434:
1471:
1448:
concerns. The list includes a truly epic number of redlinked airports that likely don't meet
262:
1693:
1620:
1579:
1418:
1396:
1339:
1286:
1252:
1161:
1147:
1083:
1066:
998:
971:
228:
8:
1051:
1046:
think it's too much of an issue with whichever of these 3 options the airport is called.
1036:
986:
50:
1601:
1561:
1546:
1518:
1490:
1358:
1325:
1304:
1275:
1241:
1021:
90:
65:
1723:
1660:
1210:
46:
1206:
Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport#Requested move 13 August 2024
1192:
Talk:Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport#Requested move 13 August 2024
1467:
1453:
1228:, a lot of airport article titles with spaced en dashes in them; e.g. the redirect
1689:
1616:
1575:
1457:
1410:
1391:
1334:
Merci, @Rosbif73. To continue on the example given, the French article is titled
1251:
This is not my specialism, but it would seem to me that you might well be right.
1169:
1062:
967:
334:
315:
1534:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive 19#Removal of maps by Blissfield101
1482:
1376:
1047:
1032:
982:
224:
1735:
1537:
1486:
1449:
1354:
1321:
1300:
1271:
1237:
1131:
No comments here so I shall assume it's reliable till told otherwise. Cheers
1016:
1500:
1109:
1164:
for the useful reply. My main motivator was old RAF stations (for example
1165:
229:
1316:
397:
299:
275:
1233:
958:
I’ve been having a bit of an edit war with some IP editors over at
226:
1589:“Difficult to maintain” I don’t care, I do not mind updating these
365:
1414:
1710:
1677:
1647:
1481:
You may be right that there are too many trivial entries, but
1197:
230:
1105:
981:
I'd prefer "Washington-National" since it's more concise.
1721:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1719:
Talk:Matsieng Air Strip#Requested move 22 September 2024
1705:
Talk:Matsieng Air Strip#Requested move 22 September 2024
1688:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1658:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1208:
that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.
1100:
Reliability – Airfields of Britain Conservation Trust
305:
15:
1686:
Talk:Wembo Airport#Requested move 22 September 2024
1672:
Talk:Wembo Airport#Requested move 22 September 2024
1656:
Talk:Mboie Airport#Requested move 22 September 2024
1642:
Talk:Mboie Airport#Requested move 22 September 2024
1112:for articles on former RAF fields? It doesn't look
1270:which I moved and edited, I'm not at all sure of.
1733:
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
1266:article title is only half the problem. E.g.
932:
939:
925:
255:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1717:There is a requested move discussion at
1684:There is a requested move discussion at
1654:There is a requested move discussion at
1204:There is a requested move discussion at
1336:AĂ©roport international AngoulĂŞme-Cognac
1106:Airfields of Britain Conservation Trust
1734:
1460:might be more appropriate. Discussion
1232:and the article it redirects to. Per
339:. To use this banner, please see the
1440:I propose to radically pare down the
1230:Angoulême – Brie – Champniers Airport
321:This page is within the scope of the
960:Salt Lake City International Airport
244:
242:
238:
261:It is of interest to the following
13:
1709:
1676:
1646:
1560:I would very much be in favor of.
1196:
396:
364:
14:
1768:
1236:, these should be unspaced, yes?
308:
298:
274:
243:
212:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
1742:Project-Class aviation articles
1507:Nashville International Airport
1747:Project-Class airport articles
1728:21:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
1698:04:52, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
1665:03:02, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
1625:21:04, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
1610:19:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1584:17:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1570:16:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1555:14:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1541:13:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1527:12:52, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
1495:23:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1476:17:48, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
1433:List of airports in Texas and
1427:17:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1403:17:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1363:15:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1348:07:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1330:07:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1309:03:38, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1295:21:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1280:20:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1261:13:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
1246:18:41, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
866:Aerospace biography task force
349:Knowledge:WikiProject Aviation
1:
1757:WikiProject Aviation articles
1752:WikiProject Airports articles
352:Template:WikiProject Aviation
37:Put new text under old text.
1268:La Môle–Saint-Tropez Airport
896:Military aviation task force
886:Aviation accident task force
430:Announcements and open tasks
7:
1226:Template:Airports in France
1215:01:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
1182:19:17, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
1156:14:42, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
1141:14:34, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
1126:23:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
833:Defunct Airlines task force
711:Aircraft occurrence infobox
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
1773:
906:Soviet aviation task force
373:This page is supported by
88:
1442:list of airports in Texas
1094:21:02, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
1071:20:10, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
1056:11:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
1041:21:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
1026:23:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
1007:20:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
991:16:04, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
976:01:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
372:
293:
269:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
954:Washington National Name
1220:Dashes in airport names
1714:
1681:
1651:
1201:
700:Aircraft begin infobox
401:
369:
70:avoid personal attacks
1713:
1680:
1650:
1200:
1108:can be considered an
876:Air sports task force
812:Rotorcraft task force
400:
368:
206:Auto-archiving period
1505:I added two maps to
628:Project organization
324:Aviation WikiProject
25:WikiProject Airports
566:Outreach department
412:General information
376:the airport project
1715:
1703:Requested move at
1682:
1670:Requested move at
1652:
1640:Requested move at
1224:I notice, esp. in
1202:
1190:Requested move at
1160:Thank you so much
964:WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT
801:Engines task force
577:Current newsletter
402:
370:
257:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
1146:prime intention.
1012:I brought this up
949:
948:
694:Infobox templates
420:Main project page
391:
390:
387:
386:
383:
382:
355:aviation articles
341:full instructions
237:
236:
61:Assume good faith
38:
1764:
1726:
1663:
1411:George McDonalds
1401:
1394:
1387:
1213:
1019:
941:
934:
927:
843:Airports project
822:Airlines project
790:Aircraft project
765:Navigation boxes
669:Project category
558:(NB: Inactive) (
393:
392:
357:
356:
353:
350:
347:
318:
313:
312:
311:
302:
295:
294:
289:
278:
271:
270:
248:
247:
246:
239:
231:
217:
216:
207:
108:
101:
16:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1732:
1731:
1722:
1708:
1675:
1659:
1645:
1503:
1446:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
1438:
1435:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
1419:Jan olieslagers
1392:
1390:
1381:
1379:
1340:Jan olieslagers
1287:Jan olieslagers
1253:Jan olieslagers
1222:
1209:
1195:
1162:Jan olieslagers
1148:Jan olieslagers
1102:
1085:Canterbury Tail
1023:
1017:
999:Jan olieslagers
956:
945:
916:
915:
853:Gliding project
785:
775:
774:
755:Company infobox
744:Aviator infobox
733:Airport infobox
722:Airline infobox
689:
679:
678:
629:
621:
620:
521:
354:
351:
348:
345:
344:
316:Aviation portal
314:
309:
307:
284:
233:
232:
227:
204:
114:
113:
112:
111:
104:
97:
93:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
1770:
1760:
1759:
1754:
1749:
1744:
1707:
1701:
1674:
1668:
1644:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1590:
1587:
1502:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1437:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1378:
1375:
1374:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1221:
1218:
1194:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1143:
1101:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1058:
1022:
994:
993:
955:
952:
947:
946:
944:
943:
936:
929:
921:
918:
917:
914:
913:
903:
893:
883:
873:
862:
861:
860:
850:
840:
829:
819:
808:
797:
786:
781:
780:
777:
776:
773:
772:
762:
751:
740:
729:
718:
707:
696:
690:
685:
684:
681:
680:
677:
676:
666:
659:Project banner
656:
651:
641:
630:
627:
626:
623:
622:
619:
618:
612:
600:
590:
579:
573:
563:
553:
547:
537:
522:
517:
516:
513:
512:
511:
510:
501:
487:
476:
465:
454:
452:Article alerts
448:
437:
427:
414:
413:
409:
408:
405:
389:
388:
385:
384:
381:
380:
371:
361:
360:
358:
320:
319:
303:
291:
290:
279:
267:
266:
260:
249:
235:
234:
225:
223:
222:
219:
218:
116:
115:
110:
109:
102:
94:
89:
87:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1769:
1758:
1755:
1753:
1750:
1748:
1745:
1743:
1740:
1739:
1737:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1724:Safari Scribe
1720:
1712:
1706:
1700:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1679:
1673:
1667:
1666:
1662:
1661:Safari Scribe
1657:
1649:
1643:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1602:King airaglub
1599:
1595:
1591:
1588:
1585:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1572:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1562:Blissfield101
1558:
1557:
1556:
1552:
1548:
1547:King airaglub
1544:
1543:
1542:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1519:King airaglub
1516:
1512:
1511:Blissfield101
1508:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1464:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1436:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1395:
1385:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1243:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1211:Safari Scribe
1207:
1199:
1193:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1153:
1149:
1144:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1095:
1092:
1091:
1087:
1086:
1080:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1059:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1024:
1020:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1004:
1000:
996:
995:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
951:
942:
937:
935:
930:
928:
923:
922:
920:
919:
911:
907:
904:
901:
897:
894:
891:
887:
884:
881:
877:
874:
871:
867:
864:
863:
858:
854:
851:
848:
844:
841:
838:
834:
830:
827:
823:
820:
817:
813:
809:
806:
802:
798:
795:
791:
788:
787:
784:
779:
778:
770:
766:
763:
760:
756:
752:
749:
745:
741:
738:
734:
730:
727:
723:
719:
716:
712:
708:
705:
701:
697:
695:
692:
691:
688:
683:
682:
674:
670:
667:
664:
660:
657:
655:
652:
649:
645:
642:
639:
635:
632:
631:
625:
624:
617:
616:Current issue
613:
610:
606:
605:
604:The WikiEagle
601:
598:
594:
591:
588:
584:
580:
578:
574:
571:
567:
564:
561:
557:
556:Collaboration
554:
552:
548:
546:
542:
538:
535:
531:
527:
524:
523:
520:
515:
514:
509:
508:Popular pages
505:
502:
499:
495:
491:
488:
485:
481:
477:
474:
470:
466:
463:
459:
455:
453:
449:
446:
442:
438:
435:
431:
428:
425:
421:
418:
417:
416:
415:
411:
410:
407:
399:
395:
394:
378:
377:
367:
363:
362:
359:
342:
338:
337:
332:
331:
326:
325:
317:
306:
304:
301:
297:
296:
292:
288:
283:
280:
277:
273:
272:
268:
264:
258:
254:
250:
241:
240:
221:
220:
215:
211:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
124:
122:
118:
117:
107:
103:
100:
96:
95:
92:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
1716:
1683:
1653:
1504:
1461:
1439:
1397:
1380:
1335:
1223:
1203:
1113:
1103:
1089:
1084:
957:
950:
846:
783:Sub-projects
634:Coordinators
603:
551:Instructions
469:New articles
374:
335:
329:
323:
263:WikiProjects
253:project page
252:
209:
119:
19:This is the
1468:Carguychris
1413:book about
1377:What to do?
593:Peer review
519:Departments
494:Style guide
458:Maintenance
406:WikiProject
336:task forces
106:WT:AIRPORTS
1736:Categories
1690:RodRabelo7
1617:VenFlyer98
1576:VenFlyer98
1393:The Banner
1384:Jae winwin
1317:MOS:FRANCE
1063:VenFlyer98
968:VenFlyer98
526:Assessment
490:Notability
441:AfD record
330:open tasks
99:WT:AIRPORT
1501:BNA Maps?
1454:WP:NBUILD
1048:Jrbob 123
1033:Sunnya343
983:Sunnya343
687:Templates
480:Resources
91:Shortcuts
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
1538:Reywas92
1487:Dicklyon
1458:WP:REDNO
1355:Dicklyon
1322:Rosbif73
1301:Dicklyon
1272:Dicklyon
1238:Dicklyon
1234:MOS:DASH
1018:Darkage7
504:Showcase
404:Aviation
346:Aviation
287:Airports
282:Aviation
121:Archives
51:get help
1483:WP:NOTE
1444:due to
1166:Brunton
654:Portals
644:Members
583:Contest
545:A-Class
541:B-Class
210:60Â days
1450:WP:GNG
1415:Lilith
1170:Eshott
1114:to me
259:scale.
251:This
79:Seek
1694:talk
1621:talk
1606:talk
1596:and
1580:talk
1566:talk
1551:talk
1523:talk
1515:talk
1491:talk
1472:talk
1463:here
1452:and
1423:talk
1398:talk
1359:talk
1344:talk
1326:talk
1305:talk
1291:talk
1276:talk
1257:talk
1242:talk
1178:talk
1174:DBaK
1168:and
1152:talk
1137:talk
1133:DBaK
1122:talk
1118:DBaK
1090:talk
1067:talk
1052:talk
1037:talk
1003:talk
987:talk
972:talk
910:talk
900:talk
890:talk
880:talk
870:talk
857:talk
847:talk
837:talk
826:talk
816:talk
805:talk
794:talk
769:talk
759:talk
748:talk
737:talk
726:talk
715:talk
704:talk
673:talk
663:talk
648:talk
638:talk
609:talk
597:talk
587:talk
570:talk
560:talk
534:talk
506:and
498:talk
492:and
484:talk
473:talk
462:talk
445:talk
434:talk
424:talk
333:and
68:and
1598:KEF
1594:MEM
532:) (
530:Log
1738::
1696:)
1623:)
1608:)
1582:)
1568:)
1553:)
1525:)
1493:)
1474:)
1466:.
1425:)
1361:)
1346:)
1328:)
1307:)
1293:)
1278:)
1259:)
1244:)
1180:)
1154:)
1139:)
1124:)
1110:RS
1069:)
1054:)
1039:)
1005:)
989:)
974:)
831:→
810:→
799:→
753:→
742:→
731:→
720:→
709:→
698:→
614:→
581:→
575:→
549:→
543:/
539:→
478:→
467:→
456:→
450:→
439:→
285::
208::
202:20
200:,
198:19
196:,
194:18
192:,
190:17
188:,
186:16
184:,
182:15
180:,
178:14
176:,
174:13
172:,
170:12
168:,
166:11
164:,
162:10
160:,
156:,
152:,
148:,
144:,
140:,
136:,
132:,
128:,
49:;
1692:(
1627:)
1619:(
1615:(
1604:(
1586:)
1578:(
1564:(
1549:(
1521:(
1513:(
1489:(
1470:(
1421:(
1386::
1382:@
1357:(
1342:(
1324:(
1303:(
1289:(
1274:(
1255:(
1240:(
1176:(
1150:(
1135:(
1120:(
1065:(
1050:(
1035:(
1001:(
985:(
970:(
940:e
933:t
926:v
912:)
908:(
902:)
898:(
892:)
888:(
882:)
878:(
872:)
868:(
859:)
855:(
849:)
845:(
839:)
835:(
828:)
824:(
818:)
814:(
807:)
803:(
796:)
792:(
771:)
767:(
761:)
757:(
750:)
746:(
739:)
735:(
728:)
724:(
717:)
713:(
706:)
702:(
675:)
671:(
665:)
661:(
650:)
646:(
640:)
636:(
611:)
607:(
599:)
595:(
589:)
585:(
572:)
568:(
562:)
536:)
528:(
500:)
496:(
486:)
482:(
475:)
471:(
464:)
460:(
447:)
443:(
436:)
432:(
426:)
422:(
379:.
343:.
265::
158:9
154:8
150:7
146:6
142:5
138:4
134:3
130:2
126:1
123::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.