1629:
a quote, is it questioned, is it likely to be questioned or is it controversial? if so, inline') such gems as 'One participant was Tracey Emin, known in the art world but largely unknown to the wider public at that time. She appeared completely drunk (she has said this was caused by painkillers she was taking for a broken finger), swearing, insulting the other panel members and saying that she wanted to go home to her mum (she then left). It caused considerable media attention and brought her national fame.' and 'The
Chapman Brothers (Jake and Dinos Chapman) were given what was generally felt to be a long-overdue nomination', both uncited and potentially controversial (the last one, for example, is weasley unless linked to artists/news orgs going "its about bloody time!" and whatnot). The referencing needs a large overhaul, tbh. Fix that up and I have no problem. In addition the wider B-class criteria include statements like "No reader should be left wanting" and comments that there shouldn't be anything large missing; we have 6-year long gaps in coverage of the artists in the "history" section. Personally I'd move to have all that condensed anyway; it is too gappy to be set out like that, and if you fill in all the missing years then it will be, well, boring. It'd do much better as a few lumps of prose.
3122:
WikiProject scale (especially with a WikiProject of such wide scope) is asking for unnecessary conflict. How much prose there is in the article is a poor parameter of what is an article and a list, as we have lists that are pure prose. As for your example though, awards typically go two routes from my experience. You have the main article and a separate list of winners/nominees or you have simply the awards article that acts as a list. In the former, the awards article goes to GAN and the winners/nominees list goes to FLC. In the latter, the awards article goes to FLC. ā
5907:
31:
5584:
5176:
3479:
4657:
2130:
152:
5169:
5172:
3147:
fails. (I've seen a numer of FLC candidated that had come directly from the failed GAN for just this reason) I'll submit to FLC now, and hopefully it wont result in 2 weeks then fail only due to there being too much text. Listing all the nominees on one article would have been too long imo, hence this situation of a main article acting as a list
3342:, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
2638:, and agreed that cups, prizes directly competed for should not be included. I have not had time to look through all the content taggings and as such there probably remain some inconsistencis, for which I apologise. If you find any in your course of work please feel free to untag them. Lastly welcome, it is great to have you on board.
3587:
about your topic GAs then an outside reviewer. As a result, reviewing your project's articles would improve the quality of the review in ensuring that the article meets your project's concerns on sourcing, content, and guidelines. However, members can also review any other article in the worklist to ensure it meets the GA criteria.
3949:. I am a member of the Canada Project music. This article is currently unassessed for quality and importance for both our projects. I think that the list sections dealing with the Award recipients by year should be spun off to separate articles. Other than that, I really can't comment on the article. Please help, somebody.
3239:
2547:
4245:
3586:
We are always looking for new members to assist with reviewing the remaining articles, and since this project has GAs under its scope, it would be beneficial if any of its members could review a few articles (perhaps your project's articles). Your project's members are likely to be more knowledgeable
3058:
should go to FLC or GAN. There is little to say about this extremely niche award apart from listing the winners, and at the moment the list at the article is longer than the prose, but as it is the main article, it should also make the case for notability, which is not really needed in the lead for a
1894:
Oh god no. How about this; we work it on intent. If the participants sign themselves up of their own volition directly for the running it can be taken as a general rule that the contest is ineligible; it is a hallmark of most awards that candidates are put forward by their peers. I advise whatever we
1868:
Ah, a good point, hrm. I would consider those to be quite imporant. Sports
Personality of the Year is chosen the same way (With televoting). That something is a competition shouldn't make it inelligible, just if it is a sporting trophy that is granted automatically for participation or something like
1628:
I'd disagree on your point about good inline citations, which is the big pillar most B-class articles rest on. Background: 3 para's with no inline citations. At least 6 of the yearly blow-by-blow paragraphs have no citations, and the article includes (noting that the normal rule for inlines is 'is it
3146:
i've never had a GA or FL fail, so wanted to make sure i was submitting to right process first. Failing because a GA reviwer thinks it is too listy would be just time-wasting for all involved, if we can form a guideline to point reveiwers of either process too, it might prevent wrong submissions and
3100:
I agree with your points, but with the stated assumption that it isn't just a size ratio they need to qualify; they do need to be a certain quality (obviously). In regards to your example: Have you considered turning it into a
Featured Topic? If the lists are all FL-quality and the parent article is
4730:
I went ahead and started the task force after a couple of other active editors expressed interest in participation. I strongly encourage WP Awards members to join if interested, or to at least stop by and help with setting up the task force. I need to figure out how to adjust the WP Awards template
3602:
or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help
1602:
It definatly makes the B-class criteria, with its inline citations, coverage from 84 to modern day, coverage of all the turners various things (though admitedly not in all detail) and inclusion of other media (Though I would say it could do with /less/ media, unless such media was of the art rather
1285:
was tagged in this project. It got me thinking of whether pages like this should be included. I think there is a subtle but important difference between awards where a winner is selected, or decided for some predetermined criteria, and competitions that have a trophy at the end of them. I'm am open
3318:
I had started to clean the main page up for this category of awards and began to realize it was more of a major work project than I had either the time or resources to fix. The main page is horribly formatted and the lists need to be inverted. There are two complete years included in tables at the
3062:
So, what do people think (in general and for this example). Would a fail at GAN for being to listy be acceptable for an argument at acceptance at FLC? or the other way around (failing FL for having too much prose cf. to list?). Currently some main article for awards are structured as articles, and
1767:
Agree with the hockey ones. Eurovision is difficult; on the one hand, it is "judged", not based on a scoring system, on the other hand it can be said that entries go in to "win" and it is therefore a competition. A third and completely
British viewpoint would be that it isn't a competition because
870:
Overall my point is thus: lots of lists are already
Featured, just divided up, and many more are close to that level. Through very little effort we can get a lot of pretty stars. Three FT's is a lot to focus on at once (although one is practically done) so I'll leave it there; any suggestions from
531:
I'm not sure which Maths award is considered better Fields or Abel. I would lean towards Abel as it has no "not over 40 years" criteria or anything, and the Field Medal article mentions that Abel may be the more Nobel equivalent prize. I have already changed the High-Importance to Golden Globe, to
1551:
goes all blaxploitation* nuh-uhh girlfriend! Fraid military and national awards are covered by the Orders, medals and awards (or some variant thereof, not sure the exact name) wikiproject. This'n was set up entirely because for some unknown reason they don't cover anything that isn't a "national"
962:
I like the topic workshop idea, as it caters for all users, allowing them to edit any areas of expertise they may have. I think this might be better than the whole project focusing on a specific topic, as some users might not be interested in the topic, and as such be lost from the WikiProject. I
3827:
is a top importance article here on this project and lately I have bee trying to make it into a GA. I have, however, come to a point where I need some help with opinions and somebody to look at the article with a new set of eyes, perhaps doing some copy editing etc. I could really need a hand if
1434:
I have to say I agree. I saw we had a featured article within the project scope, and then noticed it was the
Stanley Cup....which strikes me as not a prize or award in the sense we seem to be going off but is simply a sporting trophy. Is what is agreed that FA Cup/Stanley Cup/European Cup is not
1135:
Suggestion; if we have "X" and "list of winners of X" I propose we have the latter a step-down on the importance scale. For example; the Nobel Prize is a top-importance article. List of winners of it, however, are not as important as the medal itself, and should be bumped down a notch. Thoughts?
100:
We need a way to categorise our articles per importance. Strictly speaking we're going to have a lot more lists than other projects, mainly because unless they are something where the medal itself is extremely notable (example: the pulitzer, the nobel) it is most likely going to be "article with
5887:
to use the number instead of the year for the Grammy awards. I noticed that the word "or" was used in the lead sentence: "The 2005 (or 47th) Grammy Awards were held". As a matter of grammar I would recommend removing the word "or" - "The 2005 (47th) Grammy Awards were held", from every article.
1500:
Indeed; gymnastics, for example, is judged. It is, however, a directly competitive event, which imo should be the deciding factor. When a mathematician discovers a new lie group he isn't doing it to win a Fields Medal; athletes, on the other hand, have a specific goal of performing well to win
4708:
I was wondering if project members would have any interest in a Grammy Awards task force (to be housed under the WikiProject Awards and prizes umbrella). I would love to get some editors together to keep the Grammy lists and articles up-to-date. Please let me know if you would be interested.
3121:
Trying to make a WikiProject guideline here on what is and is not a list is a bad idea. The only time you get a clear answer is when you go to GAN or FLC, as there has been no wiki-wide consensus on what divides the gray area between articles and lists. Trying to set an arbitrary rule on a
157:
scaled down. Probably the best known award we'll work on. In the absence of more contributors I'll judge this discussion to be (current) consensus on how importance will work, and I'll put it on the main page. Future people with problems with it can discuss it here and we'll reevaluate.
2772:
We could judge it the same way as we do standard sporting awards, i.e on what grounds they are awarded. Those with specific entry criteria (you must be X high to ride this hall of fame!) are thrown out; those 'judged' (rock hall of fame, country music hall of fame, so on) are included.
5721:, who gave the award, went quiet in 2008, only to become active again in 2012. I have yet to see if they will continue giving the award. The downside: only one recipient links to the article, besides the link to Angell's article, so it may be deleteable as "unused" or "obsolete". ā
1460:
Indeed. Competitive awards (directly competitive, that is) such as sporting trophies are not within our revised scope. This may be a problem (and I'd like to gauge people's opinion on this) with awards given to individuals but judged based on their performance in competitive games.
2588:
My on-wiki time will be limited and mainly dedicated to discussions and some judicial work (work on judicial pages, that is) for a few days. I have exams coming up and by working on law articles I can pretend I am revising :P. I'll be back soon, though; I have two FTs to work on.
685:
Pulitzers and Emmy's are US awards, and i would be wary of assuming international importance. Similarly with Tony's, , Grammys, BAFTAS, Brit awards, Booker prize - all only high imo. Every country has awards, few can claim true international importance - i don't think Emmy's get
4265:
We have greatly streamlined the process since the
Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as
1358:. List of X awards, I feel, is a step too far; it is something simpsons-focused that happens to be about awards. List of simpsons awards= no. List of annie awards for Best Animated Television Program (which includes the simspons)=yes. People are welcome to disagree, of course.
923:
Works for me! I was thinking of more of a sorta focus thing; the entire project turns their attention to one particular topic, we do it, we move on, so on so forth. If this works better it is fine with me! I'll add the film ones once I've finished the additions I'm making now.
3915:
3204:
1643:
Well, I'll respect your opinion and I've dropped it to C (Guess that C-class finally has a use!). I do think it could probably be brought up to a good standard with some relative ease, and it is a pretty well known prize, so we might want to make note of it for futue work.
3764:
85:
Straight off the bat we need someone to create a template box we can stick on the talk page of our articles. Firstly it allows us to "stake claim" and show ourselves off, but more importantly it is needed to appropriately categorise our articles per importance/quality.
4086:
Hello, I have a question regarding awards received by musical artists, notable figures, etc. Is it required to have an awards table when showing the awards that someone was nominated for or won? The reason I am asking this is because of the merge proposal presented
693:
Pulitzers are not more highly regarded than other countries' awards - i know there are french / German / Italian awards that are considered only a small step below the Nobel in literature and go to international authors - if
Pulitzers are top, then so are they. Eg
3345:
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. ā
4467:, and could appreciate any help that would improve the page. I'm really not sure if this is the best place to post this, but someone recommended I try so I thought it was worth a shot. Any help in cleaning the article would be much appreciated. Thanks so much.
2506:
Just as an FYI, that section's purpose is to list as many possible topics as you see fit, no matter how difficult you think it is. The more options you present to people in terms of what they can work on, the more work that will get done. So fire awayĀ ;-) ā
1603:
than the artists). I don't think it would pass a GA either, but I thik it would be useful to get a point by point run down there on where to proceed, as it is, currently, a JOAT artile, with all areas ok but not great rather than any single huge failing.
1327:
It is difficult, I would leann on including those as they are decided on my fans or whoever, and to me are "awards". I realise that there is a lot of them though. Another thing I was going to ask was what is you view on "List of awards won by..." e.g.
1167:
I agree that "List of ..." should be bumped down one level, and was going to suggest it myself. For now, I think an extra template is not necessary (at least at this early stage) as it will increase maintenance and possibly complicate things overall.
4046:
article), and a strong consensus there that this article shouldn't even exist as a list on its own, some editors are still adamant that this singer's nine awards should be split from a 35KB article, which makes zero sense to me. All of his awards
2200:
I am going away (no internet) for a week, so won't be participating in any discussions for a bit. Also the WikiProject banner looks like it is broken, but it is a Meta problem and has been reported. Keep up the good work with the project all.
4248:. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (ā¦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at
1032:
I am impressed by your
Photoshop (or whatever you use) skills. My graphics editing skills are non-existent, so I appreciate your work on this. I think this should replace the image we currently use. If others agree, I will make the changes.
736:
is with. I thought that the nobel prize icon that we currently use is slightly misleading, or rather leading, in the sense that we don't only cover science or science-related articles. Thoughts and suggestions for improvement are welcomed.
4813:
1200:
3972:
1515:
So, military medals would still come under the scope? (As one doesn't run into fire to get a victoria cross and it s awarded by a panel) Sory for twenty questions, just figure it is better to have clarity now than murky water later.
3989:
3046:
I'*'m guessing this project is quite new, but i was wondering if you/we could maybe have a discussion about when an article is better assessed at FLC or GAN, maybe resulting in a few (non-binding but helpful) project guidelines.
4402:
5219:
Although reality TV does not involve acting (theoretically), what types of awards are reality shows eligible for. What kinds of things have they won or been nominated for? Does the Emmys have a primetime host category. I know
2676:
I must admit this is (suprisingly) not something I had considered before. I think they should be within the scope as they are often "awarded" as recognition for something. There is occasionally even cross-over in the name e.g.
4295:
Hello all. I have made some new articles about some new/quite unknown Orders and Medals (and a single hall of fame). It would be nice for me, if some of you would take a look at them and give some comments on what you think
4644:
3637:
1669:
Finally, my opinion is worth something somewhere :P. It does (as you said) seem to be easy to upgrade a few bits; I'll start a discussion about the history section on the talk page there for you and others to chip in on
4485:
2749:
where people go in when they meet a certain number of tour points). It would be nice to judge everything case by case, however this isn't really feasible. At the moment I think I lean towards inclusion having looked at
3595:
3573:
2521:
Sweet. Medals of the Royal
Society are goooo! Alright, so it doesn't have the ring of 'thunderbirds' but then we don't have to go out rescuing people stupid enough to get trapped under burning buildings/bombs/oceans.
4326:
3963:
3694:
3387:
5260:
3076:
If list is longer than prose, but this is because prose requires significant expansion, list can be renamed and go to FLC, and a second article discussing the award in general created (with no list, but a link to
101:
description of medal and list of recipents"; so, a list. Because of this it will be difficult to say "this is high importance, this is mid importance"; after all, they're all prizes. I recommend it works like so:
800:
maybe better. It is difficult though ,as anything that isn't a real award may indicate that the project is dealing with fictional awards (i.e. for Wikipedians). What's your view, and anyone else for that matter.
4181:
I found it by searching down this page, but it seems to me that it should be placed on the main page with its own ToC entry, so that people can find it more easily--perhaps next to the Assessment section? Best,
4096:
4052:
4081:
3599:
3579:
1985:(you only have to show evidence you're studying towards being a barrister, not that you are yet qualified) I'm only a student and couldn't really justify it. Also I'm a cheap bastard and don't own one :P.
943:
4698:
4055:. I was wondering if I could get an uninvolved editor from this WikiProject, who would likely be more experienced in this area than myself and the other contributors to the discussion, to leave a comment
4331:
1599:
Turner prize definitely isn't a GA; it is difficult to consider it a B, to be honest, the referencing is fairly bad. I'm useless at prose but I'll tag in a load of references in a bit when I have time
5296:
4030:
3858:
597:
should be added, but I don't feel strongly about this. I don't think the Turner Prize should be "Top-", it is certainly well known, but not sure about it being high up in prestige for the art world.
4428:
3984:
5266:
1768:
nobody with two brain cells to bang together gives a toss about the Eurovision and many of the entries patently aren't in it to win (unless there is a 'talentless bozo' category I'm not aware of).
4220:
477:
Support all but the Wolf Prize. The Wolf is a key prize but comes second/third/fourth to the nobel in every field; I'd say the "core" articles are the nobel ones. I'd like to propose to have the
3723:
267:
1420:
Alrighty, can somebody (preferably Rambo, since he knows the new criteria) remove those articles not under our revised scope from the Featured list and also take the tag off their talk pages?
5528:
4171:
4111:
3412:
981:
Good point. Also that attitude is a good way to attract new users; "hey, you might not be interested in awards as a whole, but you like maths? Well we're working on the Fields Medal and...".
5385:
4285:
963:
don't really know how to go about setting one up though. Hopefully this should page will be moved to the WikiProject space today, and then we can start drafting up ideas in a subpage there.
3591:
3563:
2347:
Excellent!Ā :). I think tagging is the first thing to be done, then we should work on the current projects or whatnot. Useless having a 'scope' is articles within that scope are not tagged.
4088:
4056:
5500:
4316:
3727:
5795:
I'm not sure whether this article ought even to exist, as there may be nothing more useful than a dicdef to say about award ceremonies as a whole, but there are a lot of incoming links.
2965:"Knowledge" and "Knowledge talk" namespaces. "User" space is fine, and I don't thing going changing "User talk" archives is necessary as they are just that, archives of what used to be.
2907:
4005:, one of the most important articles of this project has a dispute which needs to be resolved. I would be happy if people could help by adding their opinions (support or oppose) to the
3430:
3719:
3435:
2957:
754:
I see what you are saying, but personally think a made up image is more confusing. If that is Jimbo, as I believe, it will be associated with Knowledge and possibly therefore to the
3464:
532:
allow the Oscars to be Top. Grammy Awards added, I haven't get anywhere in my search to find the top award for art, can you think of any other prominent disciplines we have missed.
5521:
5462:
4076:
4035:
3791:
3583:
has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. Instead of reviewing by topic, editors can consider picking and choosing whichever articles they are interested in.
5452:
107:
Mid Importance: Awards at a national level, or awards given by a not-so-reputable (foundation, say, instead of a massive university or committee of elites)/industry association.
5036:
4841:
4390:
3259:
2016:
the chart on the main page of the project and the priorities don't line up. We have 'High' listed as a valid priority, and not none.....yet...the chart has none but not High.
517:
would fall? Highly prestigious, but I'm not sure where it is in the public conscience. If it isn't top-rated you could use it as the high-rated example instead of the oscars.
149:
You can do that? Awesome, I'll get on to working out which articles go where. Give me a poke when you have it done and I'll start uploading. We need an image, I guess; I vote
3229:
2931:
1313:
That makes sense. If we're talking sporting, here; how would individual awards work? So "player of the year" awards and so on rather than direct competitions between teams.
901:
passes FLC, Scorpion and I will nominate it as part of our Nobel Laureates FT. Given that this project especially caters to topics, might I suggest something similar to the
610:
471:
5836:
For those who will say it's irrelevant: That's a Prize about religion. It is relevant to put each laureate's religion, as it is relevant to put each laureate's language at
5209:
4668:
3394:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3246:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3211:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
2554:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks, where editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
4746:
3964:
3911:
3657:
3051:
2978:
1821:
I'd say any televoting system is a bit dubious as it doesnt make clear the criteria or those judging, without that it becomes very difficult to accept it as a real award.
513:
Haha, that's ok. We probably need to look further afield (i.e out of sciency articles) for the top uns as well; grammy awards, may I suggest. Also, where do you think the
3451:. I'd thought people associated with this WikiProject might be interested so I thought I'd give a heads up, this is the only way I know how!! Reasons can be found on the
2662:
Glad to be aboard, I figured that since I have worked on so many awards-related pages that I might as well join. Just another question, what about Hall/walks of fame? --
4792:
4321:
3529:
2950:
2767:
1762:
5495:
4214:
4797:
3339:
2423:
1938:
ExactlyĀ :). I'm afraid this doesn't mean we get made barons, unfortunately. Maybe we could have that as the title of coordinators if this project gets big, though :P.
976:
104:
High Importance: Awards at an international level, internationally recognised and awarded by a reputable institution. Examples: The Nobel, the Pulizer, the Royal Medal
4820:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3922:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3798:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
3644:. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are
2736:
2707:
2694:
2651:
2302:
2062:
Since the title was very similar to a preexisting WikiProject, I took the liberty of changing the WikiProject's title to "Awards and prizes" to distinguish this from
5792:
a chunk of unsourced, poorly linked, text about one narrow kind of award ceremony, which has been in place pretty much untouched since the stub was created in 2008.
4997:
4311:
3625:
3235:
3027:
3009:
2923:
2901:
2860:
562:
for ice hockey, maybe? Country-limited, though. And of course we're forgetting those non-notable ones, what are they called.. Olympic medals, those are the ones :P.
447:
5678:
5612:
4439:
4191:
2109:
1254:
1118:
1062:
1046:
814:
791:
775:
411:
5845:
5116:
4638:
4198:
4092:
4036:
2782:
2406:
2356:
2342:
2317:
2229:
1777:
1429:
1407:
1393:
1367:
1349:
1322:
1286:
to suggestions, but possibly think we should leave out things that are awarded as a result of a direct competition format to win them. For example, I'm not sure a
1268:
1181:
990:
675:
625:
571:
545:
526:
508:
490:
401:
387:
245:
231:
209:
195:
167:
4882:
4453:
2608:
I was wondering if this project includes trophies given to league champions. I'm assuming it doesn't, but there are inconsistancies, for example, it includes the
2091:
5163:
3543:
2990:
2531:
2437:
933:
5752:
5730:
4149:
2681:. But I am by no means am a definitive member in deciding what is included here. It would be good to know other members opinion on this, in fact what is yours?
1988:
I could make some off colour jokes, but shan't. We are likely confusing others enough as is. How did we end up this off topic? - Oh, back on topic for a moment,
1889:
1863:
458:
I'm not sure about these, as it will be hard to keep the list to the best few. The Nobel Prize is an obvious choice, as for the others I'm open to suggestions.
5708:
5442:
4378:
4230:
3177:, so please add any comments / supports / opposes. The previous lists struggled to get enough reviews of any sort, so hopefully a new project will remedy this.
2543:
1078:
4355:
3708:
3452:
3160:
3130:
2837:
2259:
2245:
1162:
1096:
5432:
4664:
3224:
2189:
1561:
955:
653:
639:
3811:
3733:
In short if i was to get this to FL quality would i be required to make this list sortable or could i go with the man booker style and still get it passed?
2815:
1841:
1816:
4992:
4724:
4660:
4649:
4433:
3748:
Disregarding all the above info as ive decided on a table format. Would someone be able to do quick copyedit on the lead, it would be greatly appreciated.
2493:
2479:
3935:
3110:
2578:
2051:
1972:
1947:
1933:
1908:
1802:
1704:
1679:
1664:
1638:
1594:
1536:
1510:
1495:
1470:
1455:
715:
593:
would be High-Class as it is country & sport specific. Also in my opinion there should only be one Top-Importance field per field, so i'm not sure if
5572:
5468:
in hopes of encouraging editors to work on the most critically acclaimed episodes and highlight the most critically acclaimed episodes for the readers.--
4752:
4464:
3757:
3515:
3328:
3407:
3306:
5864:
5540:
5375:
3070:
If the list is much longer than the prose, but the prose is substantial, it should be split off anyway, the would have 2 articles, one for GAN one FLC.
2985:
2634:, and I have removed and untagged it. Originally there was a very rough scope and in the start up lots of things go tagged. We had a little discussion
2308:
Awards judged by a panel rather than competitively? Go for it. If we argue that "joke" awards shouldn't be present then we rule out the Turner imo :P.
1782:
Eurovision isn't an award. It is a competition, at least that is my view. I'm with wogan that it is an exercise in futility more than a competitionĀ ;)
1623:
796:
I personally think that using the Nobel Prize, one of the worlds most famous awards is acceptable. However if you feel it is not, a more generic award
2624:
2464:
1570:
Might be worth telling Neuro thisĀ ;) The little advert thing is a series of military medalsĀ ;) Oh, I think I ound an article that needs GA reviewing.
1354:
I meant awards 1) awarded by official bodies but 2) based on the performance of an individual rather than a competitive team. An example would be the
1145:
5225:
5158:
4397:
4365:
for intiating the improvement! Article is improved, copyedited, verified on recipient names and got one more reference. Article is now also moved to
3976:
3927:
3626:
1307:
3368:
3186:
3092:
3688:
2962:
2844:
4852:
4601:
3418:
2937:
The only incorrect links in the Knowledge space are archived MfDs, or inactive (kept as an archive) pages. I don't think these should be updated.
838:
4951:
3900:
3862:
3846:
3620:
495:
That's fine, I hadn't realised it wasn't actually considered an official Nobel Prize. And I'm one of the people heading up this projectāoh dear!
144:
4176:
3776:
3742:
3670:
is currently at a FLC, can you please please PLEASE review it, it's in dire need of reviews after 5 days without so much as a blink of the eye.
5255:
2515:
5873:
4515:
917:
5860:
5849:
4608:
4413:
3683:
2452:
2269:
880:
124:
5370:
3877:
2910:
in the "Knowledge talk" space and there are no doubt more in other space as well. I will endeavour to fix these when I have some more time.
2804:
2670:
2160:
2036:
1742:
748:
5897:
5319:
4846:
2380:
1235:
695:
95:
4904:. At some point I will probably get to the Oscars and maybe the BAFTAs. To see what I am talking about see the navboxes at the bottom of
4305:
3730:
which is featured. I prefer the man booker style as it shows the different years better but it isnt sortable whereas the other format is.
5947:
5942:
4538:
3861:
will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the
3191:
2889:
2825:
2220:
As your 'second' I'll keeping things in order *wink, wink*. When you come back we should have a Featured Topic up and another half done.
1725:
With respect to the refined scope, I was about to start retagging things but thought I'd check some things. From the refinement it seems
71:
66:
5089:. I have changed the Pulitzer Prize, Drama Desk and Olivier Awards colors so that they are all different shades from the Tony Awards.--
4474:
3958:
3073:
If the List is as long as or little longer than the prose, but prose will not be expanded as all sources exhausted, it can go to either.
1151:
How about a separate template: "This article is a fork of X. X has an importance rating of Y, but due to our ], this has been rated Z."
860:
Getting all the Royal Society awards and lectures up to Featured (I've already done two) gives us "Royal Society Medals and Lectures" FT
4821:
4809:
4798:
3923:
3799:
3645:
3395:
3247:
3212:
2886:
2555:
2214:
2598:
1026:
558:
is probably the most well-known art award, although not necessarily the highest unless you have a very limited view of the art world.
182:. I have linked the project to my userspace, whilst it remains here. I will update it if & when this is moved to Knowledge space.
3888:
3781:
3448:
3444:
3437:
2809:
478:
422:
5817:
5340:
4709:
Similarly, feel free to express opposition if you are concerned about the task force being incorporated into the project. Thanks! --
3170:
Well, the first comment after submitting was "shouldn't this go to GA first?", but i think that is sorted for this example. Anyway,
5694:
5307:
5184:
5077:
3510:
2074:
357:
5798:
Someone might like to improve it, so it actually says something useful about award ceremonies in general (Nobel Prize ceremony?).
5567:
5006:
3835:
5683:
5509:
4337:
2997:
2878:
1199:
363:
3319:
bottom that seem to be mangled. I just wanted to alert the project about this as it is beyond my resources to check and repair.
762:. As a new project in its place, I think we want to be clear that this is completely detatched from the aforementioned project.
5658:
5047:
4384:
3905:
3693:
Please weigh in with your thoughts about having Razzie Awards templates at the bottom of film-related articles. Check in here:
3488:
3374:
2870:
2063:
1372:
It seems we are reading off the same page, I agree exactly with what you said above, but just wanted to check. I would include
1287:
755:
3333:
5837:
4956:
4366:
2724:
2447:
2394:
2330:
2290:
893:
So basically all non-government awards fall under this WikiProject's scope? If that's the case, check the featured lists for
3594:
for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the
131:
I agree with your idea for how the importances will work. I can make a tempate for talkpages. In fact I will get on it now.
4226:
3041:
2537:
1734:
797:
4999:
4817:
4362:
4347:
3919:
3795:
3641:
3558:
3200:
1130:
898:
850:
299:
Subject is one of the top of recognitions in its field. This should be familiar to most people internationally. Example:
5833:. Would it be a good idea to add each laureate's religion? There are sources for religions at each laureate's article.
5829:
Greetings, Prize community! I'd like to initiate a consensus debate (is that the right way to do it?) on the article of
2822:
2657:
5841:
5718:
5478:
5353:
5279:
5238:
5141:
5099:
5060:
5019:
4975:
4934:
4865:
4775:
4762:
4681:
4645:
4621:
4584:
4498:
3633:
3311:
3264:
2096:
Don't worry about it, anyone who was interested and clicks on the ad will still be redirected to the correct place.Ā :)
1329:
2386:
Can't we add a scroll bar? I think we should all of our featured content, though I agree that it takes a lot of room.ā
5923:
5402:
5392:
4758:
4703:
3616:
2882:
294:
47:
17:
3695:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#Gaining_consensus:_Razzie_award_templates_at_the_bottom_of_articles
3577:
has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A
5558:, advanced from 8-year-old {stub} to far beyond that (marked C), essentially by one editor 10-12 September 2011. --
5482:
5422:
5357:
5283:
5242:
5145:
5103:
5064:
5023:
4979:
4938:
4869:
4779:
4685:
4625:
4588:
4502:
4486:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_March_22#Category:Academy_Award_for_Best_Original_Screenplay_templates
4006:
3991:
3391:
3243:
3208:
2603:
2551:
1501:
medals/gongs/whatnot. Indeed, in athletics your "value" as an athlete is based largely around your trophy cabinet.
728:
Proposed this to Ironholds after doing some tagging - after six revisions it has been suggested that I propose it.
328:
311:
277:
5684:
5662:
5512:? What more needs doing for it to become a FL? I've been working on this list, but I've never done a FL before.
5412:
5128:
5122:
4343:
3882:
3840:
3713:
2751:
1746:
824:
5884:
2716:
is within the scope since it is an award recoginizing recordings. As for other Hall of Fames, I am not so sure.ā
1899:
rule rather than a specific by-the-book one; as contract law is teaching me there are exceptions to everything.
348:
Works for me. Some articles are going to need to be retagged, and you'll need to create the top-class category.
5789:
3501:
Apologies for the notice, but this is being posted to every WikiProject to avoid accusations of systemic bias.
3383:
1847:
1282:
1011:
I just rendered the Nobel prize and removed the holders, since you seem intent on keeping it as the logo. Does
5637:
4103:. I also have asked this question, because I have never seen awards listed in a prose on a Knowledge article.
3828:
possible. If not with editing I would appriciate if somebody at least gave some opinions on the talk pageĀ :)
2371:
50+ lists and so on is a lot to put in the mainpage. Suggest we do a MILHIST and simply link to the category.
2742:
333:
Subject is notable in its field, but not highly regarded. These may be little known to most people. Example:
4154:
Thanks for responding. I was referring to award nominations and awards won by a notable figure like the one
4543:
3548:
3521:
3274:
2874:
2866:
1276:
759:
1259:
Agreed! Perhaps you need to design a barnstar so we can award it to you for your fantastic project work :P
5878:
5650:
5595:
5573:
4887:
4568:
4023:
3080:
If the list is shorter than the prose, it should go to GAN (even if it passes the 10 item FL requirment).
1475:
Hrm. Some olympic medals get a bit into the grey area, but I'd suggest we just blanket say 'No' to them.
442:
176:
3297:. Perhaps someone can check them out (these have separate articles for different categories of awards).
3063:
others as lists, usually the former for awards with many sources (so they actually have more to write).
5914:
5654:
4893:
4739:
4717:
4553:
4275:
4259:
4250:
4207:
4155:
4142:
4042:
Despite this failing at FLC with an early close (for the fact that it can be easily merged to the main
3677:
3312:
3269:
I just found this WP. It appears you're brand new. I went ahead and tagged three articles for your WP:
3020:
2971:
2943:
2916:
2853:
2760:
2687:
2644:
2207:
2102:
1856:
1755:
1386:
1342:
1300:
1247:
1174:
1111:
1039:
1005:
969:
843:
807:
768:
668:
659:
603:
538:
501:
464:
380:
224:
188:
137:
38:
5386:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#Reformating_Emmy_Awards_episodic_Directing_and_Writing_templates
3857:
will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's
1398:
Okies. We should perhaps set these out in a "what is/is not good to tag" guide for people patrolling.
5214:
4962:
4520:
4290:
3055:
2729:
2713:
2678:
2399:
2335:
2295:
1726:
1333:
703:
371:
286:
related article and is considered a core to the project. This should be familiar worldwide. Example:
5591:
5577:
3567:. The process helps to ensure that articles that have passed a nomination before that date meet the
706:, which are world-wide. I think it is only English language bias that makes them seem less notable.
366:
already existed. I believe it should be used sparingly though, under 10 articles or something. i.e.
5748:
5704:
4479:
4458:
4187:
3278:
3172:
2501:
2366:
2117:
897:, as there's quite a few FLs that would fall under the scope of this project. And yeah, as soon as
723:
110:
Low Importance: Internal awards made at a national or sub-national level. Example: scouting awards.
79:
4237:(revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the
550:
Ehh, lesse. Sports, Science, Film, Music.. Is there some TV equivalent to the oscars? Oh, and the
5822:
4351:
3940:
3324:
2881:. This has left a lot of links to the wrong target. The barnstar template talk redirects were to
2746:
1913:
A Lord Denning rule, what? If the outcome is absurd, assume the process made a little mistakeĀ ;)
1187:
888:
854:
334:
2166:
Nice. I was actually thinking that the barnstar should be something like that. Good work Neuro.
1869:
eurovision where itis just a TV show or such. I mean, we don't want to include X-factor, do we?
5760:
5474:
5349:
5324:
5301:
5275:
5234:
5137:
5095:
5056:
5015:
4971:
4930:
4861:
4771:
4677:
4617:
4580:
4494:
4408:
3302:
2802:
2705:
2668:
2622:
2567:
2279:
1291:
1207:
4262:. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
200:
Alrighty then. Can you give an example of the base template we'd use rather than the backend?
5854:
5546:
5315:
4901:
4833:
4732:
4710:
4561:
4202:
4137:
3662:
3612:
3379:
3015:
3005:
2966:
2938:
2911:
2897:
2848:
2833:
2755:
2682:
2639:
2202:
2097:
1851:
1750:
1381:
1337:
1295:
1242:
1169:
1106:
1034:
964:
802:
763:
663:
598:
533:
496:
459:
375:
219:
183:
132:
4124:
3973:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Nobel_laureates_affiliated_with_Princeton_University
5869:
5127:
Does anyone have any information on the relative importance of the various Pulitzers. See
4267:
3980:
3931:
2718:
2388:
2324:
2284:
1738:
1012:
4531:
for the upcoming awards, and any help in improving it would be much appreciated. Thanks!--
2745:
for significant contributions in their chosen field of work), whereas others do not (e.g.
8:
5779:
5744:
5700:
5666:
4897:
4549:
4183:
4070:
3816:
3807:
3672:
3469:
3460:
3106:
2778:
2594:
2583:
2527:
2475:
2433:
2376:
2352:
2313:
2255:
2225:
2047:
1943:
1904:
1812:
1773:
1675:
1634:
1557:
1506:
1466:
1425:
1403:
1363:
1318:
1264:
1141:
1092:
986:
951:
929:
876:
834:
649:
635:
621:
567:
522:
486:
397:
353:
241:
205:
163:
120:
91:
3101:
FL-quality then it qualifies; you just need to add a template to the bottom and submit.
4258:
and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at
3896:
3653:
3426:
3403:
3320:
3255:
3220:
3123:
2573:
2508:
2416:
2187:
2067:
1214:
998:
910:
902:
300:
214:
Not quite sure what you mean. If you mean how it is used, an example would be placing
5726:
5674:
5633:
5608:
5536:
5486:
5469:
5361:
5344:
5287:
5270:
5246:
5229:
5149:
5132:
5107:
5090:
5068:
5051:
5027:
5010:
4983:
4966:
4942:
4925:
4873:
4856:
4783:
4766:
4689:
4672:
4629:
4612:
4592:
4575:
4528:
4521:
4506:
4489:
4374:
4301:
4282:
3954:
3772:
3753:
3738:
3359:
3298:
3290:
3014:
I have added a hatnote here, but don't have time to address the links at the moment.
2797:
2700:
2663:
2617:
2559:
2489:
2460:
218:
on the Nobel Prize talk page. I have now also added a documentation to the template.
5620:
5893:
5311:
5187:
4825:
4535:
4471:
4169:
4129:
4109:
3608:
3604:
3506:
3196:
3182:
3156:
3088:
3001:
2893:
2829:
2027:
1963:
1924:
1880:
1832:
1793:
1695:
1655:
1614:
1585:
1527:
1486:
1446:
1373:
1355:
711:
658:
Not sure about the Olympics. There isn't an article about the Olympic medal, and a
261:
4403:
Deletion review discussion - Category:Worst Picture Golden Raspberry Award winners
4255:
5830:
5823:
5619:
While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
5517:
5186:
One editor has questioned if the award is notable or not. Some feedback please.
4017:
3946:
3854:
3568:
3270:
2412:
2238:
2153:
2084:
1228:
1155:
1071:
1055:
1019:
906:
784:
741:
283:
5922:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
4564:. I am trying to determine if they should have {{Film|Awards-task-force=yes}},
4051:
nominations could easily be covered in simply two paragraphs, as I demonstrated
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
5808:
5772:
5761:
5490:
5365:
5333:
5291:
5250:
5228:. It seems like they should have best Comedy, Drama and Reality show awards.--
5153:
5111:
5072:
5031:
4987:
4946:
4909:
4877:
4802:
4787:
4693:
4633:
4596:
4557:
4510:
4449:
4424:
4062:
3803:
3704:
3539:
3456:
3102:
3054:
for each catergory made featured lists, and i am confilicted as to whether the
2774:
2590:
2523:
2471:
2429:
2372:
2348:
2309:
2275:
2251:
2221:
2195:
2043:
1982:
1939:
1900:
1808:
1769:
1671:
1630:
1553:
1502:
1462:
1421:
1399:
1359:
1314:
1260:
1137:
1088:
1051:
I'll duplicate this to the page, then, so that we can see if consensus exists.
982:
947:
925:
894:
872:
830:
645:
631:
617:
563:
518:
482:
432:
393:
349:
317:
316:
Subject is well recognised within its field or its country of origin. Example:
237:
201:
159:
116:
87:
4099:
because it would be too big to have all of the awards tables for the article,
5768:
5643:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
5563:
5555:
5041:
4921:
4917:
4100:
4095:
could be kept as a stand-alone list, and not a prose, like the one presented
4043:
3892:
3872:
3667:
3649:
3492:
3422:
3399:
3251:
3216:
2167:
944:
List of actors nominated for Academy Awards for foreign language performances
437:
5717:
It's a "retired" award, although no sources can be found to state that. The
662:
isn't quite the same. So I'd keep it from the select few for those reasons.
5740:
5722:
5670:
5604:
5532:
5221:
4913:
4905:
4370:
4297:
4118:
4117:
No it is definately not required. Here are two exmaples of sections from a
3950:
3787:
3768:
3749:
3734:
3554:
3525:
3349:
3286:
2485:
2456:
2080:
Shit, should I do that ad again? I don't have the source files any moreĀ :(
2057:
1571:
699:
555:
514:
452:
5889:
5377:
5267:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes
5261:
Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes
5085:
4532:
4468:
4164:
4104:
4002:
3824:
3817:
3502:
3294:
3178:
3152:
3084:
2613:
2019:
1955:
1916:
1872:
1824:
1785:
1730:
1687:
1647:
1606:
1577:
1519:
1478:
1438:
707:
594:
590:
559:
551:
417:
367:
287:
5310:
and replace the custom divs with the adequate award template. Thanks. --
3845:
This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the
5867:. I would appreciate the thoughts from members of this WikiProject. --
5513:
5180:
4440:
Talk:Acceptance_of_Golden_Raspberry_Awards#RfC:_Removal_of_sourced_info
4394:
4082:
Question about awards and nominations received by musical artists, etc.
4010:
3832:
3282:
2818:
2631:
2609:
863:
BBC sports personality of the year can have the same sort of thing done
586:
427:
3143:
Jepp, it's just that last main list/article that needs to pass for FT.
702:
covers the whole commonwealth, again a larger population than the US,
5799:
4444:
4419:
4238:
4229:
for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were
3699:
3534:
4924:, who had ranges showing on their Oscars original score templates.--
1376:
in our scope, the key reason for me deciding that is the page says "
733:
729:
5559:
3868:
3598:. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the
5083:
For anyone wondering what I did with colors look at the bottom of
4274:
to extend the reach of Knowledge worldwide. Please help us, with
4225:
Version 0.8 is a collection of Knowledge articles selected by the
3491:
discussing if our policy on plot, WP:PLOT, should be removed from
2958:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards and prizes
2741:
I agree it is not clear cut. Some make me think they should (e.g.
1435:
within the project while BBC Sports Personality or such would be?
4369:. I deleted the proposal for deletion and unreferenced template.
4271:
4221:
Awards articles have been selected for the Knowledge 0.8 release
2885:
so they became double redirects in December 2008 and were fixed
2129:
698:
covers a greater population and has bigger prize money, and the
4816:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
3918:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
3794:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
3640:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the
3495:. Please feel free to comment on the discussion and straw poll.
1290:
page would be of worthy inclusion to the project., because the
4391:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish Nobel laureates
4254:
with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's
3413:
Proposed changes to FL criteria WRT length and content forking
3059:
FL (notability is usually assumed to be shown in the parent).
2282:. Does anyone think these two should be part of this project?ā
616:
My feeling almost exactly. I'll add the emmy awards in, then.
151:
2932:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards and prizes
829:
Ideas? We've got a community portal post up.. anything else?
5501:
More work needed for list of presidents of the Royal Society
4731:
so that the task force can have its own assessment chart. --
3965:
List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University
3912:
List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University
3367:
on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at
1192:
Okay, we are now on the ad rotation. Hope you guys like it:
4609:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Template:WikiProject_Awards
3530:
Knowledge:Peer review/29th Golden Raspberry Awards/archive1
3390:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
3242:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
3207:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
2550:. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets
2042:
Sorry, run that past me again but with help files enabled.
5865:
Talk:Melbourne International Film Festival#List of winners
4757:
There may be a problem in the writing credits for certain
3419:
Knowledge talk:Featured list criteria#Revised criteria III
2869:
was originally the project for barnstars and was moved to
4669:
the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page
2934:(article talk looks OK for this but not Knowledge space)
1850:
need to go as well, because it is a music "competition".
909:? Probably a good way to orient our work flow. Cheers, ā
5695:
User talk:Anna Frodesiak#David Angell Humanitarian Award
4851:
Please help me sort out who the award is credited to at
4231:
selected based on their assessed importance and quality
4037:
List of awards and nominations received by Justin Bieber
2888:
by a bot who couldn't know they should be retargeted to
2415:
is probably a good idea given how many lists we have. ā
5739:
That makes sense. So, how about if I merge it into the
5661:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
5463:
DirectorsGuildofAmericaOutstandingDirectingComedySeries
4853:
Talk:Grammy_Award_for_Record_of_the_Year#Person_or_song
2991:
Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards
2754:, but I could probably be persuaded/pushed either way.
5626:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
5453:
DirectorsGuildofAmericaOutstandingDirectingDramaSeries
4892:
I have added the year range to the templates for the
4665:
Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay 1940-1960
4121:
that document awards in prose without using a table:
3889:
Knowledge talk:Featured lists#Awards and prizes issue
3767:
if anyone is interested in waying in their comments.
3236:
Golden Globe Award for Best Director ā Motion Picture
3230:
Golden Globe Award for Best Director ā Motion Picture
4661:
Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay1940-1949
4650:
Template:AcademyAwardBestOriginalScreenplay1940-1949
3000:. Maybe there should also be one on this talk page.
853:
passes FL we can have a Featured Topic based around
448:
LaurƩat Prix International de GƩographie Vautrin Lud
4763:
Talk:Grammy_Award#Grammy_Award_for_Song_of_the_Year
4465:
List of people who accepted Golden Raspberry Awards
732:is the version without the text at the bottom, and
5603:Awarded only four times. Largely unknown price. --
4667:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
2986:Special:WhatLinksHere/Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards
2796:Does anyone else have any comments about this? --
2544:Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture ā Drama
1294:is more of a competition than an award. Thoughts?
5226:Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Game Show Host
3627:List of BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards
2699:I don't know actually, I could go either way. --
2630:No you are quite right the scope doesn't include
5341:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template:ESPYs
4327:Most Honorable Order of Omukama Chwa II Kabalega
4007:Talk:Nobel Prize#Conductive polymers controversy
3992:Talk:Nobel Prize#Conductive polymers controversy
3603:with a particular article, please contact me or
3590:If any members are interested, please visit the
3553:This message is being sent to WikiProjects with
3338:Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new
2814:Many barnstar template talk pages redirect here.
682:I agree with Nobel's, Oscars, Miss world as Top.
5428:. The intention is to make them look more like
5164:Is the Jessie Richardson Theatre Award notable?
3971:Hello, the FLC suggested an AFD so here it is:
1952:No powdered wigs? Bad form old bean! Bad form!
481:included; it is considered equal to the nobel.
4246:Awards articles and revisionIDs we have chosen
2817:Most or all appear to have been redirected by
2234:And I'll have another 2000 lists tagged... :P
216:{{WikiProject Awards|importance=High|class=B}}
5861:Talk:List of International Emmy Award winners
5443:WritersGuildofAmericaEpisodicComedyScreenplay
5046:I have a second issue in need of feedback at
4414:Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2010 December 1
3945:I'm looking for this Project's help with the
3607:and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing!
2470:Thanks! Considered working with the project?
2453:List of Norwich City F.C. Players of the Year
5433:WritersGuildofAmericaEpisodicDramaScreenplay
5007:Template talk:PulitzerPrize History#Reformat
4434:RFC at Acceptance of Golden Raspberry Awards
696:Austrian State Prize for European Literature
589:is the TV equivalent to the oscars. I think
412:Attempt to decide on Top-Importance articles
4753:Wrting credits for 21st century group songs
3516:29th Golden Raspberry Awards at Peer review
2906:Yes you are quite right. I found some more
2890:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Knowledge Awards
2826:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Knowledge Awards
1552:award (VC, Queens Gallantry Medal, so on).
4810:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score
4799:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score
4332:Hall of Fame of the Bunyoro-Kitara Kingdom
3281:. I also want to give you a heads up for:
2411:IMO, doing a redesign and showing it like
2322:Done tagging all related articles. Thanksā
2250:You better! Work faster tagmonkey! *whip*
2138:The WikiProject Awards and Prizes Barnstar
5048:Template talk:PulitzerPrize History#Color
3726:. However i then came across a format on
3449:Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences
3445:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
3438:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
2928:Wrong targets can also be found in these:
2635:
1015:look appropriate to use as project logo?
479:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
423:Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences
5308:1998 New York Film Critics Circle Awards
4548:I am working on lists and templates for
3689:Discussion about Razzie Awards templates
1749:should go, after all it is a "contest".
1745:). Is that agreed? Also do people think
938:Do people think we should include award
150:
5859:There are some unanswered questions at
5771:because a newby editor had put it into
5632:notice, but please explain why in your
5510:List of presidents of the Royal Society
5329:There is a discussion about the use of
5179:all have results. New sources such as
4244:We would like to ask you to review the
4091:. If an awards table is required, then
3520:I've done some work improving the page
3453:Requested move section of the talk page
3340:WikiProject coordinators' working group
2998:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards and prizes
2879:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards and prizes
2865:Thanks. It appears the problem is that
14:
5920:Do not edit the contents of this page.
5885:Talk:2012 Grammy Awards#Requested move
4281:For the Knowledge 1.0 editorial team,
3557:under their scope. Since August 2007,
2871:Knowledge:WikiProject Knowledge Awards
2847:them all. Thanks for letting me know,
2484:I'll add it to my to-do list...Ā :-) --
2064:Knowledge:WikiProject Knowledge Awards
1288:List of Football League Trophy winners
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
5838:List of Nobel laureates in Literature
5265:Please be advised of a discussion at
4463:I've been trying to improve the page
4407:Deletion review discussion regarding
4367:IEEE Donald G. Fink Prize Paper Award
2270:Should these be part of this project?
644:Minus the olympicy ones, all tagged.
5901:
5775:, although it's got a long-standing
5531:. FL nom will happen once reviewed.
4847:Award to songwriter/performer/songĀ ?
4663:has been nominated for merging with
4177:Where's the Project Banner template?
3473:
1684:Rightio. Back to my castle project.
25:
5508:Could someone take a quick look at
5000:Template:Pulitzer Prize for History
3990:Nobel Prize, request for opinions (
3201:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates
3192:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates
899:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates
851:List of Nobel Peace Prize Laureates
23:
5767:This stub came to my notice while
5621:deleted for any of several reasons
5598:because of the following concern:
5582:
5224:has won for best host, but it was
4389:Notifying the relevant project of
4317:Royal Order of the Omujwaara Kondo
3634:BBC Sports Personality of the Year
3052:Gaylactic spectrum awards nominees
2428:Move it to another page, coolies.
24:
5961:
5384:I have initiated a discussion at
5168:A Google news archive search for
5005:I am requesting your feedback at
4963:Talk:Grammy_Award#Award_Templates
4759:Grammy Award for Song of the Year
4346:has been nominated for deletion.
3782:All-NBA Team Featured List Review
3728:the Gaylactic Spectrum Award list
2883:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Awards
2810:Barnstar talk pages redirect here
2066:. Made the moving easier also. ā
1067:Any supporters/opposers of this?
554:should probably be included. The
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Awards
5905:
4655:
3477:
2128:
1198:
1105:I gave earlier on my talk page.
29:
5685:David Angell Humanitarian Award
4527:Hi! I've created an article at
4344:IEEE Donald G. Fink Prize Paper
4338:IEEE Donald G. Fink Prize Paper
4197:Thanks for letting us know. Is
2752:List of halls and walks of fame
1747:Eurovision Song Contest winners
690:coverage in Europe for example.
374:would stay as High-Importance.
5818:10:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
5753:01:17, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
5731:22:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
5541:23:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
4442:. Thank you for your time, --
4417:. Thank you for your time, --
4385:List of Jewish Nobel laureates
4306:14:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
4286:21:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
4125:Frank Zappa#Acclaim and honors
3906:Feature list removal candidate
3684:00:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
3571:. After nearly two years, the
3384:BBC Young Musician of the Year
3375:BBC Young Musician of the Year
1848:BBC Young Musician of the Year
1574:. It isat least almost there.
1283:List of UEFA Super Cup winners
780:What would you suggest, then?
758:that only recently moved from
13:
1:
5496:06:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
5170:Jessie Richards Theater Award
4957:Grammy Award template clutter
4398:02:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
4379:10:50, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
4356:08:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
3812:15:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
3777:17:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
3369:04:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
2824:. Shouldn't they redirect to
2743:Sault Ste. Marie Walk of Fame
2448:Have a featured list on me...
2110:18:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
2092:18:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
2075:17:06, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
2052:16:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
2037:15:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1973:15:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1948:14:47, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1934:14:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1909:14:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1890:14:08, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1864:13:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1842:13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1817:13:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1807:I'd go with competition too.
1803:12:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1778:12:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1763:12:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1705:13:22, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1680:13:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1665:12:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1639:12:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1624:12:07, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1595:11:33, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1562:11:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1537:11:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1511:11:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1496:10:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1471:10:27, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1456:10:11, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
1430:20:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1408:14:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1394:14:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1368:14:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1350:14:13, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1323:14:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1308:14:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1269:14:09, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1255:13:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1236:13:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1182:13:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1163:13:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1146:12:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1119:13:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1097:12:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1079:12:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1063:12:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1047:11:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
1027:10:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
991:11:26, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
977:11:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
956:04:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
934:04:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
918:04:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
881:02:04, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
839:00:24, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
815:00:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
792:00:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
776:23:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
749:22:44, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
716:08:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
676:00:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
654:00:20, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
640:00:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
626:00:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
611:00:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
572:23:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
546:23:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
527:23:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
509:23:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
491:22:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
472:22:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
402:22:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
388:22:21, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
358:22:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
246:19:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
232:18:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
210:18:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
196:18:39, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
168:18:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
145:18:24, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
125:17:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
96:17:15, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
5898:18:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
5874:03:45, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
5371:06:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
4761:winners. Please comment at
4475:23:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
4454:20:30, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
4429:19:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
3878:02:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
3836:13:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
3758:11:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
3743:03:06, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
3709:07:25, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
3522:29th Golden Raspberry Awards
3329:11:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
3307:02:35, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
3275:Carnegie Medal in Literature
3260:00:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
3225:13:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
3187:15:34, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
3161:10:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
3131:10:43, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
3111:10:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
3093:09:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
3042:Lists vs. Articles Guideline
3028:20:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
3010:17:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2979:16:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
2951:16:38, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
2924:13:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2902:13:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2875:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards
2867:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards
2861:12:45, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2838:12:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
2805:18:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
2783:20:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
2768:20:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2737:20:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2708:19:44, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2695:19:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2671:18:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2652:18:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2625:18:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2599:15:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2579:02:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
2538:Featured list removal status
760:Knowledge:WikiProject Awards
756:WikiProject Knowledge Awards
266:Articles are categorised by
7:
5850:20:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
5709:00:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
5665:allows discussion to reach
5646:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
5629:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
5320:23:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
5297:00:48, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
5256:23:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
4276:your WikiProject's feedback
3528:process for it. Please see
3443:I proposed the movement of
3334:Coordinators' working group
2532:20:17, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
2516:20:02, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
2494:10:52, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2480:10:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2465:10:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2438:02:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2424:02:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2407:02:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2381:01:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2357:10:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2343:22:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
2318:22:09, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
2303:22:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
2260:01:33, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2246:01:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
2230:19:45, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
2215:19:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
2190:03:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
2161:02:35, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
1131:Suggestion as to importance
443:Laureus World Sports Awards
10:
5966:
5690:What should become of it?
5657:exist. In particular, the
5551:(re section 2, far above)
5522:22:09, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
4916:. The idea hit me seeing
4894:Screen Actors Guild Awards
4814:featured list removal here
4699:02:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
4639:04:47, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
4602:01:27, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
4554:Screen Actors Guild Awards
4539:02:27, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
4516:17:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
4260:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8
4256:articles with cleanup tags
4251:Knowledge talk:Version 0.8
4215:09:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
4192:06:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
4172:17:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
4150:09:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
4112:01:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
4077:03:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
3916:featured list removal here
3901:03:40, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
3851:Saturday, January 23, 2010
3792:featured list removal here
3638:featured list removal here
3561:has been participating in
3511:13:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
3465:06:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
3431:22:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
3408:01:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
3388:featured list removal here
3313:Category:Black Reel Awards
3265:Just tagged three articles
3240:featured list removal here
3205:featured list removal here
2548:featured list removal here
5883:There is a discussion at
5679:17:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
5651:proposed deletion process
5613:17:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
5210:01:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
4747:23:56, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
4725:15:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
4704:Grammy Awards task force?
4322:Royal Order of the Engabu
3559:WikiProject Good Articles
2714:Grammy Hall of Fame Award
2679:Grammy Hall of Fame Award
2134:
2127:
1727:Clarence S. Campbell Bowl
1197:
704:Prince of Asturias Awards
372:Nobel Prize in Literature
5403:EmmyAward DirectingDrama
5393:EmmyAward ComedyDirector
5159:02:50, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
5117:00:21, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
5078:19:22, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
5037:17:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
4993:05:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
4952:07:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
4883:04:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
4059:? That would be great. ā
4031:18:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
3985:20:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
3959:01:54, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
3936:11:26, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
3847:WP 1.0 assessment system
3658:20:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
3621:22:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
3279:Coretta Scott King Award
3173:Gaylactic Spectrum Award
2821:(retired) in March 2007.
2604:Question about the scope
5638:the article's talk page
5568:16:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
5423:EmmyAward ComedyWriting
5388:regarding reformatting
5123:Major and lesser prizes
4842:03:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
4793:14:30, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
4484:Please come comment at
4312:Medal of Honor of ARKBK
3883:FL categorization issue
3863:WP 1.0 project homepage
3841:WP 1.0 bot announcement
3714:Opinion on tabel format
3544:03:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
2747:World Golf Hall of Fame
855:List of Nobel Laureates
825:Attracting more editors
335:Pipe Smoker of the Year
282:Subject is a must-have
5592:BĆ¼chergilde-Essaypreis
5587:
5578:BĆ¼chergilde-Essaypreis
5413:EmmyAward DramaWriting
5306:Please take a look to
4818:featured list criteria
4646:Nomination for merging
4409:Golden Raspberry Award
3920:featured list criteria
3796:featured list criteria
3642:featured list criteria
3392:featured list criteria
3244:featured list criteria
3209:featured list criteria
2996:There is a hatnote on
2873:in December 2008, but
2552:featured list criteria
2280:Golden Raspberry Award
1380:to have contributed".
1292:Football League Trophy
630:Oh, and the olympics?
155:
5918:of past discussions.
5663:articles for deletion
5596:proposed for deletion
5586:
5376:Reformating selected
5183:do cover the awards.
5173:Jessie Richards Award
5131:for the discussion?--
4902:Primetime Emmy Awards
4562:Primetime Emmy Awards
4272:Knowledge for Schools
4130:The Wiggles#Reception
3493:what Knowledge is not
3380:User:Diaa abdelmoneim
1846:If we lose that does
154:
42:of past discussions.
4544:redundant templates?
4411:winners, please see
4268:One Laptop per Child
3549:GA Sweeps invitation
1739:Hart Memorial Trophy
1277:Refinement of scope?
5879:Grammy award naming
4898:Golden Globe Awards
4888:Year added to title
4550:Golden Globe Awards
3718:I recently created
2274:I am talking about
1895:decide should be a
857:and lists per prize
5655:deletion processes
5588:
4961:Please comment at
4607:Please comment at
4569:WikiProject Awards
4227:Knowledge 1.0 team
4057:at this discussion
3596:running total page
844:Suggested projects
370:would be top, but
364:Top-Class category
301:Golden Globe Award
236:Right got it, ta.
177:WikiProject Awards
172:Template created:
156:
5953:
5952:
5930:
5929:
5924:current talk page
5574:Proposed deletion
5494:
5369:
5295:
5254:
5215:Reality TV awards
5157:
5115:
5076:
5035:
4991:
4950:
4881:
4840:
4808:I have nominated
4791:
4697:
4637:
4600:
4529:The Comedy Awards
4522:The Comedy Awards
4514:
4291:Miniature Review?
4212:
4147:
4119:featured articles
4009:page. Thank you!
3910:I have nominated
3876:
3786:I have nominated
3632:I have nominated
3509:
3499:
3498:
3436:Proposed move of
3371:
3365:
3291:Bram Stoker Award
3234:I have nominated
3025:
2976:
2948:
2921:
2877:now redirects to
2858:
2765:
2692:
2649:
2542:I have nominated
2212:
2148:
2147:
2107:
1861:
1760:
1391:
1347:
1305:
1252:
1223:
1222:
1179:
1116:
1044:
1009:
974:
812:
773:
673:
660:list of medalists
608:
543:
506:
469:
385:
344:
343:
229:
193:
142:
77:
76:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
5957:
5939:
5932:
5931:
5909:
5908:
5902:
5872:
5815:
5806:
5784:
5778:
5743:legacy section?
5715:Propose deletion
5648:
5647:
5631:
5630:
5585:
5505:Hello everyone,
5472:
5467:
5461:
5457:
5451:
5447:
5441:
5437:
5431:
5427:
5421:
5417:
5411:
5407:
5401:
5397:
5391:
5347:
5338:
5332:
5273:
5232:
5206:
5203:
5200:
5197:
5194:
5191:
5135:
5093:
5054:
5013:
4969:
4928:
4859:
4838:
4832:
4830:
4769:
4742:
4735:
4734:Another Believer
4720:
4713:
4712:Another Believer
4675:
4659:
4658:
4615:
4578:
4573:
4567:
4492:
4480:CFD notification
4459:Help with a list
4208:
4167:
4143:
4107:
4073:
4065:
4029:
4026:
4020:
4013:
3866:
3682:
3680:
3524:and started the
3505:
3481:
3480:
3474:
3362:
3357:
3354:
3347:
3197:User:AdjustShift
3175:is now up for FL
3128:
3021:
2972:
2944:
2917:
2854:
2800:
2761:
2735:
2732:
2727:
2721:
2703:
2688:
2666:
2645:
2620:
2576:
2570:
2564:
2513:
2502:Potential topics
2421:
2405:
2402:
2397:
2391:
2367:Featured content
2341:
2338:
2333:
2327:
2301:
2298:
2293:
2287:
2244:
2241:
2208:
2184:
2181:
2178:
2175:
2171:
2159:
2156:
2132:
2125:
2124:
2118:Project barnstar
2103:
2090:
2087:
2072:
2035:
2032:
2024:
1971:
1968:
1960:
1932:
1929:
1921:
1888:
1885:
1877:
1857:
1840:
1837:
1829:
1801:
1798:
1790:
1756:
1703:
1700:
1692:
1663:
1660:
1652:
1622:
1619:
1611:
1593:
1590:
1582:
1535:
1532:
1524:
1494:
1491:
1483:
1454:
1451:
1443:
1387:
1374:Jack Adams Award
1356:Jack Adams Award
1343:
1301:
1248:
1234:
1231:
1217:
1210:
1202:
1195:
1194:
1175:
1161:
1158:
1112:
1077:
1074:
1061:
1058:
1040:
1025:
1022:
1003:
970:
915:
808:
790:
787:
769:
747:
744:
724:Wikiproject logo
669:
604:
539:
502:
465:
381:
274:
273:
225:
217:
189:
181:
175:
138:
80:Initial thoughts
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
5965:
5964:
5960:
5959:
5958:
5956:
5955:
5954:
5935:
5906:
5881:
5870:John Vandenberg
5868:
5857:
5831:Templeton Prize
5827:
5824:Templeton Prize
5809:
5800:
5782:
5776:
5765:
5688:
5659:speedy deletion
5645:
5644:
5628:
5627:
5583:
5581:
5549:
5503:
5465:
5459:
5455:
5449:
5445:
5439:
5435:
5429:
5425:
5419:
5415:
5409:
5405:
5399:
5395:
5389:
5382:
5336:
5330:
5327:
5304:
5263:
5217:
5204:
5201:
5198:
5195:
5192:
5189:
5166:
5125:
5044:
5003:
4959:
4890:
4849:
4834:
4826:
4806:
4755:
4745:
4740:
4733:
4723:
4718:
4711:
4706:
4656:
4653:
4571:
4565:
4546:
4525:
4482:
4461:
4436:
4405:
4387:
4340:
4293:
4233:, then article
4223:
4204:Rambo's Revenge
4179:
4165:
4139:Rambo's Revenge
4105:
4084:
4071:
4063:
4040:
4024:
4018:
4015:
4011:
3996:
3969:
3947:Covenant Awards
3943:
3941:Covenant Awards
3908:
3885:
3843:
3821:
3784:
3724:man booker list
3716:
3691:
3678:
3671:
3665:
3630:
3551:
3518:
3478:
3472:
3441:
3415:
3377:
3360:
3350:
3336:
3316:
3271:Caldecott Medal
3267:
3232:
3194:
3124:
3044:
3017:Rambo's Revenge
2968:Rambo's Revenge
2940:Rambo's Revenge
2913:Rambo's Revenge
2850:Rambo's Revenge
2812:
2798:
2757:Rambo's Revenge
2734:
2730:
2725:
2719:
2717:
2701:
2684:Rambo's Revenge
2664:
2660:
2641:Rambo's Revenge
2618:
2606:
2586:
2574:
2568:
2560:
2540:
2509:
2504:
2450:
2417:
2404:
2400:
2395:
2389:
2387:
2369:
2340:
2336:
2331:
2325:
2323:
2300:
2296:
2291:
2285:
2283:
2272:
2239:
2235:
2204:Rambo's Revenge
2198:
2182:
2179:
2176:
2173:
2169:
2154:
2150:
2120:
2099:Rambo's Revenge
2085:
2081:
2068:
2060:
2028:
2020:
2017:
1964:
1956:
1953:
1925:
1917:
1914:
1881:
1873:
1870:
1853:Rambo's Revenge
1833:
1825:
1822:
1794:
1786:
1783:
1752:Rambo's Revenge
1696:
1688:
1685:
1656:
1648:
1645:
1615:
1607:
1604:
1586:
1578:
1575:
1528:
1520:
1517:
1487:
1479:
1476:
1447:
1439:
1436:
1383:Rambo's Revenge
1339:Rambo's Revenge
1297:Rambo's Revenge
1279:
1244:Rambo's Revenge
1229:
1225:
1215:
1208:
1190:
1188:On ads template
1171:Rambo's Revenge
1156:
1152:
1133:
1108:Rambo's Revenge
1072:
1068:
1056:
1052:
1036:Rambo's Revenge
1020:
1016:
1001:
966:Rambo's Revenge
946:, for example.
911:
891:
889:More FLs, ideas
846:
827:
804:Rambo's Revenge
785:
781:
765:Rambo's Revenge
742:
738:
726:
665:Rambo's Revenge
600:Rambo's Revenge
535:Rambo's Revenge
498:Rambo's Revenge
461:Rambo's Revenge
414:
377:Rambo's Revenge
345:
264:
221:Rambo's Revenge
215:
185:Rambo's Revenge
179:
173:
134:Rambo's Revenge
82:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
5963:
5951:
5950:
5945:
5940:
5928:
5927:
5910:
5880:
5877:
5856:
5853:
5826:
5821:
5773:Category:Stubs
5764:
5762:Award ceremony
5759:
5758:
5757:
5756:
5755:
5745:Anna Frodesiak
5734:
5733:
5701:Anna Frodesiak
5687:
5682:
5669:for deletion.
5649:will stop the
5617:
5616:
5580:
5571:
5548:
5545:
5544:
5543:
5527:Submitted for
5502:
5499:
5381:
5374:
5326:
5325:Template:ESPYs
5323:
5303:
5302:broken infobox
5300:
5262:
5259:
5216:
5213:
5165:
5162:
5124:
5121:
5120:
5119:
5043:
5040:
5002:
4998:Formatting of
4996:
4958:
4955:
4910:Jack Nicholson
4889:
4886:
4848:
4845:
4805:
4796:
4754:
4751:
4750:
4749:
4737:
4715:
4705:
4702:
4652:
4643:
4642:
4641:
4558:Academy Awards
4545:
4542:
4524:
4519:
4481:
4478:
4460:
4457:
4435:
4432:
4404:
4401:
4386:
4383:
4382:
4381:
4339:
4336:
4335:
4334:
4329:
4324:
4319:
4314:
4292:
4289:
4222:
4219:
4218:
4217:
4184:Aristophanes68
4178:
4175:
4162:
4161:
4160:
4159:
4134:
4133:
4132:
4127:
4083:
4080:
4039:
4034:
3995:
3988:
3968:
3962:
3942:
3939:
3907:
3904:
3884:
3881:
3842:
3839:
3823:Hey guys. The
3820:
3815:
3783:
3780:
3761:
3760:
3715:
3712:
3690:
3687:
3664:
3661:
3629:
3624:
3592:GA sweeps page
3550:
3547:
3517:
3514:
3497:
3496:
3482:
3471:
3468:
3440:
3434:
3414:
3411:
3382:has nominated
3376:
3373:
3348:Delievered by
3335:
3332:
3315:
3310:
3266:
3263:
3231:
3228:
3199:has nominated
3193:
3190:
3168:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3144:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3116:
3115:
3114:
3113:
3082:
3081:
3078:
3074:
3071:
3066:Suggestions:
3056:parent article
3043:
3040:
3039:
3038:
3037:
3036:
3035:
3034:
3033:
3032:
3031:
3030:
2994:
2988:
2983:
2982:
2981:
2955:
2954:
2953:
2929:
2811:
2808:
2794:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2789:
2788:
2787:
2786:
2785:
2723:
2659:
2658:Hall of Fames?
2656:
2655:
2654:
2612:, but not the
2605:
2602:
2585:
2582:
2539:
2536:
2535:
2534:
2503:
2500:
2499:
2498:
2497:
2496:
2449:
2446:
2445:
2444:
2443:
2442:
2441:
2440:
2393:
2368:
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2361:
2360:
2359:
2329:
2289:
2276:Ig Nobel Prize
2271:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2197:
2194:
2193:
2192:
2146:
2145:
2141:
2140:
2135:
2133:
2119:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2059:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2014:
2013:
2012:
2011:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2006:
2005:
2004:
2003:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1733:etc. (in fact
1723:
1722:
1721:
1720:
1719:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1565:
1564:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1278:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1241:Awesome work!
1221:
1220:
1212:
1204:
1203:
1189:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1165:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1101:Reiterate the
1099:
1083:Works for me!
1010:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
960:
959:
958:
905:I created for
903:topic workshop
890:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
865:
864:
861:
858:
845:
842:
826:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
725:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
691:
683:
680:
679:
678:
656:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
456:
455:
450:
445:
440:
435:
433:Pulitzer Prize
430:
425:
420:
413:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
342:
341:
340:
339:
331:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:Heisman Trophy
314:
308:
307:
306:
305:
297:
291:
290:
280:
272:
263:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
248:
128:
127:
113:
112:
111:
108:
105:
98:
81:
78:
75:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5962:
5949:
5946:
5944:
5941:
5938:
5934:
5933:
5925:
5921:
5917:
5916:
5911:
5904:
5903:
5900:
5899:
5895:
5891:
5886:
5876:
5875:
5871:
5866:
5862:
5855:Emmy and MIFF
5852:
5851:
5847:
5843:
5839:
5834:
5832:
5825:
5820:
5819:
5816:
5814:
5813:
5807:
5805:
5804:
5796:
5793:
5791:
5786:
5781:
5774:
5770:
5763:
5754:
5750:
5746:
5742:
5738:
5737:
5736:
5735:
5732:
5728:
5724:
5720:
5716:
5713:
5712:
5711:
5710:
5706:
5702:
5697:
5696:
5691:
5686:
5681:
5680:
5676:
5672:
5668:
5664:
5660:
5656:
5652:
5641:
5639:
5635:
5624:
5622:
5615:
5614:
5610:
5606:
5601:
5600:
5599:
5597:
5593:
5579:
5575:
5570:
5569:
5565:
5561:
5557:
5556:Olympic medal
5554:There is now
5552:
5547:Olympic medal
5542:
5538:
5534:
5530:
5526:
5525:
5524:
5523:
5519:
5515:
5511:
5506:
5498:
5497:
5492:
5488:
5484:
5480:
5476:
5471:
5464:
5454:
5444:
5434:
5424:
5414:
5404:
5394:
5387:
5379:
5373:
5372:
5367:
5363:
5359:
5355:
5351:
5346:
5342:
5335:
5322:
5321:
5317:
5313:
5309:
5299:
5298:
5293:
5289:
5285:
5281:
5277:
5272:
5268:
5258:
5257:
5252:
5248:
5244:
5240:
5236:
5231:
5227:
5223:
5212:
5211:
5208:
5207:
5185:
5182:
5178:
5174:
5171:
5161:
5160:
5155:
5151:
5147:
5143:
5139:
5134:
5130:
5118:
5113:
5109:
5105:
5101:
5097:
5092:
5088:
5087:
5082:
5081:
5080:
5079:
5074:
5070:
5066:
5062:
5058:
5053:
5049:
5039:
5038:
5033:
5029:
5025:
5021:
5017:
5012:
5008:
5001:
4995:
4994:
4989:
4985:
4981:
4977:
4973:
4968:
4964:
4954:
4953:
4948:
4944:
4940:
4936:
4932:
4927:
4923:
4922:Maurice Jarre
4919:
4918:John Williams
4915:
4911:
4907:
4903:
4899:
4895:
4885:
4884:
4879:
4875:
4871:
4867:
4863:
4858:
4854:
4844:
4843:
4839:
4837:
4831:
4829:
4823:
4819:
4815:
4811:
4804:
4800:
4795:
4794:
4789:
4785:
4781:
4777:
4773:
4768:
4764:
4760:
4748:
4743:
4736:
4729:
4728:
4727:
4726:
4721:
4714:
4701:
4700:
4695:
4691:
4687:
4683:
4679:
4674:
4671:. Thank you.
4670:
4666:
4662:
4651:
4647:
4640:
4635:
4631:
4627:
4623:
4619:
4614:
4610:
4606:
4605:
4604:
4603:
4598:
4594:
4590:
4586:
4582:
4577:
4570:
4563:
4559:
4555:
4551:
4541:
4540:
4537:
4534:
4530:
4523:
4518:
4517:
4512:
4508:
4504:
4500:
4496:
4491:
4487:
4477:
4476:
4473:
4470:
4466:
4456:
4455:
4451:
4447:
4446:
4441:
4431:
4430:
4426:
4422:
4421:
4416:
4415:
4410:
4400:
4399:
4396:
4392:
4380:
4376:
4372:
4368:
4364:
4363:76.66.203.138
4360:
4359:
4358:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4348:76.66.203.138
4345:
4333:
4330:
4328:
4325:
4323:
4320:
4318:
4315:
4313:
4310:
4309:
4308:
4307:
4303:
4299:
4288:
4287:
4284:
4279:
4277:
4273:
4269:
4263:
4261:
4257:
4253:
4252:
4247:
4242:
4240:
4236:
4232:
4228:
4216:
4213:
4211:
4206:
4205:
4200:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4189:
4185:
4174:
4173:
4170:
4168:
4157:
4153:
4152:
4151:
4148:
4146:
4141:
4140:
4135:
4131:
4128:
4126:
4123:
4122:
4120:
4116:
4115:
4114:
4113:
4110:
4108:
4102:
4101:Justin Bieber
4098:
4094:
4090:
4079:
4078:
4074:
4068:
4067:
4066:
4058:
4054:
4050:
4045:
4044:Justin Bieber
4038:
4033:
4032:
4027:
4021:
4014:
4008:
4004:
3999:
3993:
3987:
3986:
3982:
3978:
3974:
3967:for deletion.
3966:
3961:
3960:
3956:
3952:
3948:
3938:
3937:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3921:
3917:
3913:
3903:
3902:
3898:
3894:
3890:
3880:
3879:
3874:
3870:
3864:
3860:
3859:summary table
3856:
3852:
3848:
3838:
3837:
3834:
3829:
3826:
3819:
3814:
3813:
3809:
3805:
3801:
3797:
3793:
3789:
3779:
3778:
3774:
3770:
3766:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3747:
3746:
3745:
3744:
3740:
3736:
3731:
3729:
3725:
3722:based of the
3721:
3711:
3710:
3706:
3702:
3701:
3696:
3686:
3685:
3681:
3676:
3675:
3669:
3668:Rumford Prize
3663:Rumford Prize
3660:
3659:
3655:
3651:
3647:
3643:
3639:
3635:
3628:
3623:
3622:
3618:
3614:
3610:
3606:
3601:
3597:
3593:
3588:
3584:
3582:
3581:
3576:
3575:
3574:running total
3570:
3566:
3565:
3560:
3556:
3546:
3545:
3541:
3537:
3536:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3513:
3512:
3508:
3504:
3494:
3490:
3486:
3483:
3476:
3475:
3467:
3466:
3462:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3439:
3433:
3432:
3428:
3424:
3420:
3410:
3409:
3405:
3401:
3397:
3393:
3389:
3385:
3381:
3372:
3370:
3366:
3363:
3355:
3353:
3343:
3341:
3331:
3330:
3326:
3322:
3321:Wildhartlivie
3314:
3309:
3308:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3280:
3276:
3272:
3262:
3261:
3257:
3253:
3249:
3245:
3241:
3237:
3227:
3226:
3222:
3218:
3214:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3198:
3189:
3188:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3174:
3162:
3158:
3154:
3150:
3145:
3142:
3141:
3140:
3139:
3138:
3137:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3126:sephiroth bcr
3120:
3119:
3118:
3117:
3112:
3108:
3104:
3099:
3098:
3097:
3096:
3095:
3094:
3090:
3086:
3079:
3075:
3072:
3069:
3068:
3067:
3064:
3060:
3057:
3053:
3048:
3029:
3026:
3024:
3019:
3018:
3013:
3012:
3011:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2992:
2989:
2987:
2984:
2980:
2977:
2975:
2970:
2969:
2964:
2961:
2960:
2959:
2956:
2952:
2949:
2947:
2942:
2941:
2936:
2935:
2933:
2930:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2915:
2914:
2909:
2905:
2904:
2903:
2899:
2895:
2891:
2887:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2872:
2868:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2859:
2857:
2852:
2851:
2846:
2842:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2835:
2831:
2827:
2823:
2820:
2816:
2807:
2806:
2803:
2801:
2784:
2780:
2776:
2771:
2770:
2769:
2766:
2764:
2759:
2758:
2753:
2748:
2744:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2733:
2728:
2722:
2715:
2711:
2710:
2709:
2706:
2704:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2693:
2691:
2686:
2685:
2680:
2675:
2674:
2673:
2672:
2669:
2667:
2653:
2650:
2648:
2643:
2642:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2623:
2621:
2615:
2611:
2601:
2600:
2596:
2592:
2581:
2580:
2577:
2571:
2565:
2563:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2545:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2520:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2514:
2512:
2511:sephiroth bcr
2495:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2482:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2469:
2468:
2467:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2454:
2439:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2426:
2425:
2422:
2420:
2419:sephiroth bcr
2414:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2403:
2398:
2392:
2385:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2339:
2334:
2328:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2315:
2311:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2304:
2299:
2294:
2288:
2281:
2277:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2243:
2242:
2233:
2232:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2219:
2218:
2217:
2216:
2213:
2211:
2206:
2205:
2191:
2188:
2186:
2185:
2165:
2164:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2157:
2143:
2142:
2139:
2136:
2131:
2126:
2123:
2111:
2108:
2106:
2101:
2100:
2095:
2094:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2073:
2071:
2070:sephiroth bcr
2065:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2041:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2033:
2031:
2025:
2023:
1987:
1986:
1984:
1983:Lincoln's Inn
1980:
1976:
1975:
1974:
1969:
1967:
1961:
1959:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1930:
1928:
1922:
1920:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1898:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1886:
1884:
1878:
1876:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1862:
1860:
1855:
1854:
1849:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1838:
1836:
1830:
1828:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1805:
1804:
1799:
1797:
1791:
1789:
1781:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1761:
1759:
1754:
1753:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1706:
1701:
1699:
1693:
1691:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1661:
1659:
1653:
1651:
1642:
1641:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1620:
1618:
1612:
1610:
1601:
1600:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1589:
1583:
1581:
1573:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1566:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1550:
1549:
1538:
1533:
1531:
1525:
1523:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1504:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1492:
1490:
1484:
1482:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1452:
1450:
1444:
1442:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1392:
1390:
1385:
1384:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1370:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1348:
1346:
1341:
1340:
1335:
1331:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1306:
1304:
1299:
1298:
1293:
1289:
1284:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1246:
1245:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1218:
1213:
1211:
1209:Knowledge ads
1206:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1193:
1183:
1180:
1178:
1173:
1172:
1166:
1164:
1160:
1159:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1143:
1139:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1104:
1100:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1075:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1060:
1059:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1014:
1007:
992:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
975:
973:
968:
967:
961:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:
935:
931:
927:
922:
921:
920:
919:
916:
914:
913:sephiroth bcr
908:
904:
900:
896:
882:
878:
874:
869:
868:
867:
866:
862:
859:
856:
852:
848:
847:
841:
840:
836:
832:
816:
813:
811:
806:
805:
799:
795:
794:
793:
789:
788:
779:
778:
777:
774:
772:
767:
766:
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
750:
746:
745:
735:
731:
717:
713:
709:
705:
701:
697:
692:
689:
684:
681:
677:
674:
672:
667:
666:
661:
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
642:
641:
637:
633:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:
613:
612:
609:
607:
602:
601:
596:
592:
588:
573:
569:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
547:
544:
542:
537:
536:
530:
529:
528:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
507:
505:
500:
499:
494:
493:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
475:
474:
473:
470:
468:
463:
462:
454:
451:
449:
446:
444:
441:
439:
438:Academy Award
436:
434:
431:
429:
426:
424:
421:
419:
416:
415:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
386:
384:
379:
378:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
338:
337:
336:
332:
330:
327:
326:
321:
320:
319:
315:
313:
310:
309:
304:
303:
302:
298:
296:
293:
292:
289:
285:
281:
279:
276:
275:
271:
269:
247:
243:
239:
235:
234:
233:
230:
228:
223:
222:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
198:
197:
194:
192:
187:
186:
178:
171:
170:
169:
165:
161:
153:
148:
147:
146:
143:
141:
136:
135:
130:
129:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
106:
103:
102:
99:
97:
93:
89:
84:
83:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
5936:
5919:
5913:
5882:
5858:
5842:94.65.35.192
5835:
5828:
5811:
5810:
5802:
5801:
5797:
5794:
5787:
5769:stub-sorting
5766:
5741:David Angell
5714:
5698:
5692:
5689:
5653:, but other
5642:
5634:edit summary
5625:
5618:
5602:
5590:The article
5589:
5553:
5550:
5507:
5504:
5470:TonyTheTiger
5383:
5345:TonyTheTiger
5328:
5305:
5271:TonyTheTiger
5264:
5230:TonyTheTiger
5222:Tom Bergeron
5218:
5188:
5177:Jessie Award
5167:
5133:TonyTheTiger
5126:
5091:TonyTheTiger
5084:
5052:TonyTheTiger
5045:
5011:TonyTheTiger
5004:
4967:TonyTheTiger
4960:
4926:TonyTheTiger
4914:Sally Fields
4906:Meryl Streep
4891:
4857:TonyTheTiger
4850:
4835:
4827:
4807:
4767:TonyTheTiger
4756:
4707:
4673:TonyTheTiger
4654:
4613:TonyTheTiger
4576:TonyTheTiger
4547:
4536:(let's chat)
4526:
4490:TonyTheTiger
4483:
4472:(let's chat)
4462:
4443:
4437:
4418:
4412:
4406:
4388:
4341:
4294:
4283:SelectionBot
4280:
4264:
4249:
4243:
4234:
4224:
4209:
4203:
4180:
4163:
4144:
4138:
4085:
4061:
4060:
4048:
4041:
4000:
3997:
3970:
3944:
3909:
3886:
3850:
3844:
3830:
3822:
3788:All-NBA Team
3785:
3762:
3732:
3717:
3698:
3692:
3673:
3666:
3631:
3589:
3585:
3580:new worklist
3578:
3572:
3562:
3552:
3533:
3519:
3500:
3487:There is an
3485:WP:NOT#PLOT:
3484:
3442:
3416:
3378:
3356:
3351:
3344:
3337:
3317:
3299:Einbierbitte
3287:Nebula Award
3268:
3233:
3195:
3171:
3169:
3148:
3125:
3083:
3065:
3061:
3049:
3045:
3022:
3016:
2973:
2967:
2945:
2939:
2918:
2912:
2855:
2849:
2813:
2795:
2762:
2756:
2689:
2683:
2661:
2646:
2640:
2607:
2587:
2561:
2541:
2510:
2505:
2455:. Cheers! --
2451:
2418:
2370:
2273:
2236:
2209:
2203:
2199:
2168:
2151:
2149:
2137:
2121:
2104:
2098:
2082:
2069:
2061:
2029:
2021:
2015:
1981:a member of
1978:
1965:
1957:
1926:
1918:
1896:
1882:
1874:
1858:
1852:
1834:
1826:
1795:
1787:
1757:
1751:
1737:), but keep
1697:
1689:
1657:
1649:
1616:
1608:
1587:
1579:
1572:Turner Prize
1529:
1521:
1488:
1480:
1448:
1440:
1388:
1382:
1377:
1344:
1338:
1330:The Simpsons
1302:
1296:
1280:
1249:
1243:
1226:
1224:
1191:
1176:
1170:
1153:
1134:
1113:
1107:
1102:
1084:
1069:
1053:
1041:
1035:
1017:
1004:(originally
1002:
971:
965:
939:
912:
892:
828:
809:
803:
782:
770:
764:
739:
727:
700:Booker prize
687:
670:
664:
605:
599:
584:
556:Turner Prize
540:
534:
515:Fields Medal
503:
497:
466:
460:
457:
453:Grammy Award
382:
376:
270:as follows.
265:
226:
220:
190:
184:
139:
133:
60:
43:
37:
5912:This is an
5840:. Thanks!--
5723:WylieCoyote
5533:WylieCoyote
5529:peer review
5378:Emmy Awards
5312:Enric Naval
5086:Chorus Line
4438:Please see
4241:algorithm.
4003:Nobel Prize
3887:Please see
3825:Nobel Prize
3818:Nobel Prize
3609:Nehrams2020
3605:OhanaUnited
3569:GA criteria
3526:peer review
3470:WP:NOT#PLOT
3295:Edgar Award
3002:PrimeHunter
2894:PrimeHunter
2830:PrimeHunter
2614:Stanley Cup
2584:Just a note
1977:Well why I
1741:etc. (i.e.
1731:Stanley Cup
591:Stanley Cup
560:Stanley Cup
418:Nobel Prize
392:Fair does.
368:Nobel Prize
288:Nobel Prize
36:This is an
5785:template.
5780:award-stub
5693:See also:
5487:WP:CHICAGO
5362:WP:CHICAGO
5288:WP:CHICAGO
5247:WP:CHICAGO
5181:Canada.com
5150:WP:CHICAGO
5108:WP:CHICAGO
5069:WP:CHICAGO
5028:WP:CHICAGO
4984:WP:CHICAGO
4943:WP:CHICAGO
4874:WP:CHICAGO
4784:WP:CHICAGO
4690:WP:CHICAGO
4630:WP:CHICAGO
4593:WP:CHICAGO
4574:or both.--
4507:WP:CHICAGO
4201:okay now?
3977:Sandman888
3928:Sandman888
3855:WP 1.0 bot
3697:. Thanks!
3283:Hugo Award
3151:sub-lists.
2843:Yep, I've
2819:User:Evrik
2632:Vanier Cup
2610:Vanier Cup
2569:Squawk box
2122:Enjoy.Ā :)
1334:Kanye West
999:JPG to PNG
595:Palme d'Or
587:Emmy Award
552:Palme d'Or
428:Miss World
268:importance
115:Comments?
5948:ArchiveĀ 3
5943:ArchiveĀ 2
5937:ArchiveĀ 1
5667:consensus
5594:has been
5380:templates
4239:WikiTrust
3865:. āĀ Carl
3831:Cheers --
3804:Barkeep49
3720:this list
3564:GA sweeps
3457:kittyKAY4
3103:Ironholds
2828:instead?
2775:Ironholds
2591:Ironholds
2575:Fight on!
2524:Ironholds
2472:Ironholds
2430:Ironholds
2373:Ironholds
2349:Ironholds
2310:Ironholds
2252:Ironholds
2222:Ironholds
2044:Ironholds
1940:Ironholds
1901:Ironholds
1809:Ironholds
1770:Ironholds
1672:Ironholds
1631:Ironholds
1554:Ironholds
1503:Ironholds
1463:Ironholds
1422:Ironholds
1400:Ironholds
1360:Ironholds
1315:Ironholds
1281:I notice
1261:Ironholds
1216:file info
1138:Ironholds
1089:Ironholds
983:Ironholds
948:Ironholds
926:Ironholds
873:Ironholds
831:Ironholds
798:like this
646:Ironholds
632:Ironholds
618:Ironholds
564:Ironholds
519:Ironholds
483:Ironholds
394:Ironholds
350:Ironholds
238:Ironholds
202:Ironholds
160:Ironholds
117:Ironholds
88:Ironholds
72:ArchiveĀ 3
67:ArchiveĀ 2
61:ArchiveĀ 1
5699:Thanks.
4235:versions
4093:the list
4025:contribs
3893:Dabomb87
3650:Dabomb87
3600:worklist
3423:Dabomb87
3400:Dabomb87
3252:Dabomb87
3217:Dabomb87
2799:Scorpion
2712:I think
2702:Scorpion
2665:Scorpion
2619:Scorpion
2413:WP:VG/FA
2144:{{{1}}}
1378:adjudged
907:WP:ANIME
871:others?
585:(ā) The
262:Criteria
5915:archive
5790:removed
5671:Kolja21
5605:Kolja21
5491:WP:FOUR
5366:WP:FOUR
5292:WP:FOUR
5251:WP:FOUR
5154:WP:FOUR
5112:WP:FOUR
5073:WP:FOUR
5032:WP:FOUR
4988:WP:FOUR
4947:WP:FOUR
4878:WP:FOUR
4828:Cheetah
4788:WP:FOUR
4694:WP:FOUR
4634:WP:FOUR
4597:WP:FOUR
4511:WP:FOUR
4371:SchreyP
4361:Thanks
4298:Skibden
3998:Hello,
3951:Argolin
3769:Salavat
3750:Salavat
3735:Salavat
3617:contrib
3361:Disable
3352:Ā§hepBot
2486:Dweller
2457:Dweller
1897:general
1103:support
1085:Support
942:pages?
940:related
895:WP:FILM
39:archive
5890:Apteva
5636:or on
4836:(talk)
4533:Yaksar
4469:Yaksar
4395:Jayjg
4210:(talk)
4166:Rp0211
4145:(talk)
4136:Best,
4106:Rp0211
3853:, the
3763:Now a
3503:Hiding
3293:, and
3179:Yobmod
3153:Yobmod
3085:Yobmod
3023:(talk)
2974:(talk)
2946:(talk)
2919:(talk)
2856:(talk)
2763:(talk)
2720:Chris!
2690:(talk)
2647:(talk)
2390:Chris!
2326:Chris!
2286:Chris!
2210:(talk)
2196:Update
2105:(talk)
2022:Narson
1958:Narson
1919:Narson
1875:Narson
1859:(talk)
1827:Narson
1788:Narson
1758:(talk)
1690:Narson
1650:Narson
1609:Narson
1580:Narson
1522:Narson
1481:Narson
1441:Narson
1389:(talk)
1345:(talk)
1303:(talk)
1250:(talk)
1219:ā #169
1177:(talk)
1114:(talk)
1042:(talk)
972:(talk)
810:(talk)
771:(talk)
708:Yobmod
671:(talk)
606:(talk)
541:(talk)
504:(talk)
467:(talk)
383:(talk)
284:awards
227:(talk)
191:(talk)
140:(talk)
5514:Nwhit
5334:ESPYs
5205:Focus
5042:Color
4064:Chase
4012:Esuzu
3849:. On
3833:Esuzu
2963:Fixed
2845:fixed
2636:above
2616:. --
2240:neuro
2155:neuro
2086:neuro
1743:these
1735:these
1230:neuro
1157:neuro
1073:neuro
1057:neuro
1021:neuro
849:Once
786:neuro
743:neuro
16:<
5894:talk
5863:and
5846:talk
5749:talk
5727:talk
5705:talk
5675:talk
5609:talk
5564:talk
5537:talk
5518:talk
5458:and
5418:and
5316:talk
5175:and
5129:here
4920:and
4900:and
4822:here
4812:for
4803:FLRC
4741:Talk
4719:Talk
4560:and
4450:talk
4445:Cirt
4425:talk
4420:Cirt
4375:talk
4352:talk
4342:FYI
4302:talk
4270:and
4199:this
4188:talk
4156:here
4097:here
4089:here
4072:talk
4053:here
4019:talk
4001:The
3981:talk
3955:talk
3932:talk
3924:here
3914:for
3897:talk
3873:talk
3808:talk
3800:here
3790:for
3773:talk
3754:talk
3739:talk
3705:talk
3700:Cirt
3654:talk
3646:here
3636:for
3613:talk
3540:talk
3535:Cirt
3461:talk
3455:. --
3427:talk
3417:See
3404:talk
3396:here
3386:for
3325:talk
3303:talk
3277:and
3256:talk
3248:here
3238:for
3221:talk
3213:here
3203:for
3183:talk
3157:talk
3107:talk
3089:talk
3077:it).
3050:Eg:
3006:talk
2908:here
2898:talk
2834:talk
2779:talk
2595:talk
2556:here
2546:for
2528:talk
2490:talk
2476:talk
2461:talk
2434:talk
2377:talk
2353:talk
2314:talk
2278:and
2256:talk
2226:talk
2058:Move
2048:talk
2030:Talk
1966:Talk
1944:talk
1927:Talk
1905:talk
1883:Talk
1835:Talk
1813:talk
1796:Talk
1774:talk
1698:Talk
1676:talk
1658:Talk
1635:talk
1617:Talk
1588:Talk
1558:talk
1530:Talk
1507:talk
1489:Talk
1467:talk
1449:Talk
1426:talk
1404:talk
1364:talk
1319:talk
1265:talk
1142:talk
1093:talk
1013:this
1006:here
987:talk
952:talk
930:talk
877:talk
835:talk
734:here
730:Here
712:talk
650:talk
636:talk
622:talk
568:talk
523:talk
487:talk
398:talk
362:The
354:talk
295:High
242:talk
206:talk
164:talk
121:talk
92:talk
5803:Pam
5719:ASA
5576:of
5560:P64
5483:BIO
5448:,
5358:BIO
5343:.--
5339:at
5284:BIO
5269:.--
5243:BIO
5146:BIO
5104:BIO
5065:BIO
5050:.--
5024:BIO
5009:.--
4980:BIO
4965:.--
4939:BIO
4912:or
4870:BIO
4855:.--
4824:.--
4801:at
4780:BIO
4765:.--
4686:BIO
4648:of
4626:BIO
4611:.--
4589:BIO
4503:BIO
4488:.--
4278:!
4049:and
3869:CBM
3765:FLC
3679:Mar
3674:Res
3555:GAs
3489:RfC
3447:to
3149:and
2562:KV5
1332:or
688:any
329:Low
312:Mid
278:Top
5896:)
5848:)
5788:I
5783:}}
5777:{{
5751:)
5729:)
5707:)
5677:)
5640:.
5623:.
5611:)
5566:)
5539:)
5520:)
5493:)
5466:}}
5460:{{
5456:}}
5450:{{
5446:}}
5440:{{
5438:,
5436:}}
5430:{{
5426:}}
5420:{{
5416:}}
5410:{{
5408:,
5406:}}
5400:{{
5398:,
5396:}}
5390:{{
5368:)
5337:}}
5331:{{
5318:)
5294:)
5253:)
5156:)
5114:)
5075:)
5034:)
4990:)
4949:)
4908:,
4896:,
4880:)
4790:)
4696:)
4636:)
4599:)
4572:}}
4566:{{
4556:,
4552:,
4513:)
4452:)
4427:)
4393:.
4377:)
4354:)
4304:)
4190:)
4075:)
4022:ā¢
3983:)
3975:.
3957:)
3934:)
3926:.
3899:)
3891:.
3871:Ā·
3810:)
3775:)
3756:)
3741:)
3707:)
3656:)
3648:.
3619:)
3615:ā¢
3542:)
3532:.
3463:)
3429:)
3421:.
3406:)
3398:.
3327:)
3305:)
3289:,
3285:,
3273:,
3258:)
3250:.
3223:)
3215:.
3185:)
3159:)
3109:)
3091:)
3008:)
2900:)
2892:.
2836:)
2781:)
2597:)
2572:ā¢
2566:ā¢
2558:.
2530:)
2492:)
2478:)
2463:)
2436:)
2379:)
2355:)
2316:)
2258:)
2237:ā
2228:)
2152:ā
2083:ā
2050:)
2034:ā¢
2026:~
2018:--
1979:am
1970:ā¢
1962:~
1954:--
1946:)
1931:ā¢
1923:~
1915:--
1907:)
1887:ā¢
1879:~
1871:--
1839:ā¢
1831:~
1823:--
1815:)
1800:ā¢
1792:~
1784:--
1776:)
1729:,
1702:ā¢
1694:~
1686:--
1678:)
1662:ā¢
1654:~
1646:--
1637:)
1621:ā¢
1613:~
1605:--
1592:ā¢
1584:~
1576:--
1560:)
1534:ā¢
1526:~
1518:--
1509:)
1493:ā¢
1485:~
1477:--
1469:)
1453:ā¢
1445:~
1437:--
1428:)
1406:)
1366:)
1336:.
1321:)
1267:)
1227:ā
1154:ā
1144:)
1095:)
1087:.
1070:ā
1054:ā
1018:ā
989:)
954:)
932:)
879:)
837:)
783:ā
740:ā
714:)
652:)
638:)
624:)
570:)
525:)
489:)
400:)
356:)
244:)
208:)
180:}}
174:{{
166:)
123:)
94:)
5926:.
5892:(
5844:(
5812:D
5747:(
5725:(
5703:(
5673:(
5607:(
5562:(
5535:(
5516:(
5489:/
5485:/
5481:/
5479:C
5477:/
5475:T
5473:(
5364:/
5360:/
5356:/
5354:C
5352:/
5350:T
5348:(
5314:(
5290:/
5286:/
5282:/
5280:C
5278:/
5276:T
5274:(
5249:/
5245:/
5241:/
5239:C
5237:/
5235:T
5233:(
5202:m
5199:a
5196:e
5193:r
5190:D
5152:/
5148:/
5144:/
5142:C
5140:/
5138:T
5136:(
5110:/
5106:/
5102:/
5100:C
5098:/
5096:T
5094:(
5071:/
5067:/
5063:/
5061:C
5059:/
5057:T
5055:(
5030:/
5026:/
5022:/
5020:C
5018:/
5016:T
5014:(
4986:/
4982:/
4978:/
4976:C
4974:/
4972:T
4970:(
4945:/
4941:/
4937:/
4935:C
4933:/
4931:T
4929:(
4876:/
4872:/
4868:/
4866:C
4864:/
4862:T
4860:(
4786:/
4782:/
4778:/
4776:C
4774:/
4772:T
4770:(
4744:)
4738:(
4722:)
4716:(
4692:/
4688:/
4684:/
4682:C
4680:/
4678:T
4676:(
4632:/
4628:/
4624:/
4622:C
4620:/
4618:T
4616:(
4595:/
4591:/
4587:/
4585:C
4583:/
4581:T
4579:(
4509:/
4505:/
4501:/
4499:C
4497:/
4495:T
4493:(
4448:(
4423:(
4373:(
4350:(
4300:(
4186:(
4158:.
4069:(
4028:)
4016:(
3994:)
3979:(
3953:(
3930:(
3895:(
3875:)
3867:(
3806:(
3802:.
3771:(
3752:(
3737:(
3703:(
3652:(
3611:(
3538:(
3507:T
3459:(
3425:(
3402:(
3364:)
3358:(
3323:(
3301:(
3254:(
3219:(
3181:(
3155:(
3105:(
3087:(
3004:(
2993:.
2896:(
2832:(
2777:(
2731:t
2726:c
2593:(
2526:(
2488:(
2474:(
2459:(
2432:(
2401:t
2396:c
2375:(
2351:(
2337:t
2332:c
2312:(
2297:t
2292:c
2254:(
2224:(
2183:l
2180:a
2177:m
2174:a
2172:h
2170:C
2046:(
1942:(
1903:(
1811:(
1772:(
1674:(
1633:(
1556:(
1505:(
1465:(
1424:(
1402:(
1362:(
1317:(
1263:(
1140:(
1091:(
1008:)
985:(
950:(
928:(
875:(
833:(
710:(
648:(
634:(
620:(
566:(
521:(
485:(
396:(
352:(
240:(
204:(
162:(
119:(
90:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.