748:), that particular use is probably the third. "Protandry" is, I think, most commonly used in ecology, and also used commonly in botany in cases that do not involve sequential hermaphroditism (to quote the article: "Sequential hermaphroditism in plants is very rare"). It is likewise a very small portion of the world's animal fauna that are sequential hermaphrodites, nearly all of them being fish, and I can't imagine why that rare phenomenon would be the ONLY use of the terms protandry and protogyny that are discussed in Knowledge, except that people have written so many articles about fish, and nearly every fish that exhibits sequential hermaphroditism has protandry linked. What is especially odd is that other editors working on articles discussing ecology and botany do appear to use these terms and wikilink them, but they are all getting unknowingly redirected to an article that has
758:). This is a serious problem, in my opinion, but I'm not sure how best to address it. Should there be a single article that discusses, in sections of that article, the four most common definitions, or should it be a disambiguation page that points to separate articles related to each definition? Offhand, given how many hundreds or thousands of links exist presently, the latter approach is not practical, because a link to "protandry" won't automatically point to the disambiguation article. Thoughts?
194:
253:
341:
163:
243:
225:
520:
If the citation is no longer reliable, then the article needs to be updated, which could be as minor as the removal/replacement of the citation with a reliable one, to rewriting an entire section that was based on flawed premises. If the citation to a retracted paper was intentional, like in the
347:
727:
572:
I put the list of articles within the scope of WP:BIOL in sub-bullets. Any help you can give with those are greatly appreciated. Feel free to remove/strike through those you've dealt with.
767:
470:
713:
on whether the article's scope is limited to evolutionary ecology, or whether it should cover every regularity in the whole of biology. Editors are invited to join the discussion.
154:
393:
39:
672:
490:
659:
430:
722:
498:
369:
has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
634:
370:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
629:
382:
74:
600:
786:
781:
358:
696:
701:
791:
80:
162:
606:
651:
664:
744:. This strikes me as extremely odd and even inappropriate, since out of the four most common uses of the terms (see
595:
373:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.
617:
671:
An RfC to adopt a subject-specific notability guideline regarding the notability of species has been opened at
665:
582:
548:
540:
410:
20:
269:
230:
69:
24:
205:
458:
60:
741:
93:
348:
consensus how scientific names are displayed in the lead of species articles listed under common names
483:
453:
718:
732:
Hi. Until yesterday I had not noticed, despite years editing
Knowledge articles, that the terms
327:
655:
646:
I have noticed that these two articles talk about the same thing. I have created a proposal on
710:
703:
320:
211:
438:
8:
532:
524:
503:
177:
50:
728:
Protandry/Protogyny: suggestion to make standalone or disambiguate rather than redirect
714:
578:
420:
396:
from the
Signpost last month. Things have evolved a bit and now Retraction bot handles
312:
65:
763:
754:
513:
478:
463:
46:
625:
590:
564:
556:
400:
387:
521:
context of a controversy noting that a paper was later retracted, you can replace
378:
586:
508:
258:
173:
775:
691:
574:
448:
759:
647:
640:
621:
178:
443:
374:
737:
733:
673:
Knowledge talk:Notability (species)#Proposal to adopt this guideline
677:
610:
252:
175:
636:
471:
Category:Articles citing publications with expressions of concern
274:
745:
366:
360:
179:
242:
224:
273:, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
752:
nothing to do with what those editors had in mind (e.g.,
248:
15:
607:this content on the discovery of the 23 nonmetals
491:Category:Articles citing publications with errata
773:
277:on Knowledge. Leave messages on the WikiProject
431:Category:Articles citing retracted publications
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
499:Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences
426:. These populate the following categories:
346:There is a discussion in the archive of a
204:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
774:
601:RfC: On discovery of the 23 nonmetals
335:
193:
191:
187:
210:It is of interest to the following
13:
650:'s talk page to discuss a merger.
14:
803:
339:
251:
241:
223:
192:
161:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
709:A discussion is in progress at
787:NA-importance Biology articles
782:Project-Class Biology articles
666:Knowledge:Notability (species)
359:Good article reassessment for
1:
287:Knowledge:WikiProject Biology
37:Put new text under old text.
792:WikiProject Biology articles
290:Template:WikiProject Biology
7:
768:14:52, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
723:09:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
697:05:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
459:Stephen Jackson (biologist)
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
808:
742:Sequential hermaphroditism
660:01:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
310:
630:00:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
596:02:57, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
484:Human genetic enhancement
383:20:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
236:
218:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
454:Hypoxia-inducible factor
551:|...|intentional=yes}}
535:|...|intentional=yes}}
70:avoid personal attacks
711:Talk:Biological rules
704:Talk:Biological rules
549:expression of concern
541:expression of concern
411:Expression of concern
155:Auto-archiving period
609:be removed from the
439:Arsenic biochemistry
504:Biomarkers of aging
270:WikiProject Biology
265:WikiProject Biology
25:WikiProject Biology
567:|...|checked=yes}}
206:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
755:Speyeria mormonia
740:both redirect to
635:Request to merge
514:Rubicon (protein)
479:Fish intelligence
464:Liposome extruder
371:reassessment page
354:
353:
309:
308:
305:
304:
301:
300:
186:
185:
61:Assume good faith
38:
799:
695:
694:
688:
687:
684:
681:
594:
568:
560:
552:
544:
536:
528:
425:
419:
415:
409:
405:
399:
343:
342:
336:
330:
323:
295:
294:
293:Biology articles
291:
288:
285:
261:
256:
255:
245:
238:
237:
227:
220:
219:
197:
196:
195:
188:
180:
166:
165:
156:
16:
807:
806:
802:
801:
800:
798:
797:
796:
772:
771:
730:
707:
690:
685:
682:
679:
678:
676:
669:
644:
603:
573:
562:
554:
546:
538:
530:
522:
423:
417:
413:
407:
403:
397:
390:
364:
340:
334:
333:
326:
319:
315:
292:
289:
286:
283:
282:
267:is part of the
257:
250:
182:
181:
176:
153:
87:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
805:
795:
794:
789:
784:
729:
726:
706:
702:Discussion at
700:
668:
663:
643:
633:
602:
599:
519:
517:
516:
511:
509:Epiphenotyping
506:
501:
495:
494:
487:
486:
481:
475:
474:
467:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
441:
435:
434:
389:
386:
363:
357:
352:
351:
344:
332:
331:
324:
316:
311:
307:
306:
303:
302:
299:
298:
296:
263:
262:
259:Biology portal
246:
234:
233:
228:
216:
215:
209:
198:
184:
183:
174:
172:
171:
168:
167:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
804:
793:
790:
788:
785:
783:
780:
779:
777:
770:
769:
765:
761:
757:
756:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
725:
724:
720:
716:
715:Chiswick Chap
712:
705:
699:
698:
693:
689:
674:
667:
662:
661:
657:
653:
649:
642:
638:
632:
631:
627:
623:
619:
614:
612:
608:
598:
597:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
570:
566:
558:
550:
542:
534:
526:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
496:
492:
489:
488:
485:
482:
480:
477:
476:
472:
469:
468:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
449:Biotechnology
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
436:
432:
429:
428:
427:
422:
412:
402:
395:
388:RetractionBot
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
362:
356:
349:
345:
338:
337:
329:
325:
322:
318:
317:
314:
297:
280:
276:
272:
271:
266:
260:
254:
249:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
232:
229:
226:
222:
221:
217:
213:
207:
203:
199:
190:
189:
170:
169:
164:
160:
152:
148:
144:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
753:
749:
731:
708:
670:
652:80.0.166.171
645:
615:
604:
571:
518:
391:
365:
355:
278:
268:
264:
212:WikiProjects
202:project page
201:
158:
92:
19:This is the
648:Goose bumps
641:Goose bumps
776:Categories
533:retraction
525:retraction
444:Bioeconomy
394:this story
328:WT:BIOLOGY
750:literally
738:protogyny
734:protandry
613:article?
421:Retracted
392:I posted
313:Shortcuts
279:talk page
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
611:nonmetal
575:Headbomb
94:Archives
51:get help
760:Dyanega
637:Frisson
616:RfC is
605:Should
565:Erratum
557:Erratum
401:Erratum
321:WT:BIOL
284:Biology
275:biology
231:Biology
159:90 days
622:Sandbh
620:. ---
559:|...}}
543:|...}}
527:|...}}
416:, and
367:Nature
361:Nature
208:scale.
639:into
561:with
545:with
529:with
433:(266)
375:Z1720
200:This
79:Seek
764:talk
746:here
736:and
719:talk
656:talk
626:talk
618:here
493:(69)
473:(78)
379:talk
68:and
778::
766:)
721:)
692:💬
675:.
658:)
628:)
589:·
585:·
581:·
569:.
563:{{
555:{{
547:{{
539:{{
531:{{
523:{{
424:}}
418:{{
414:}}
408:{{
406:,
404:}}
398:{{
381:)
157::
151:14
149:,
147:13
145:,
143:12
141:,
139:11
137:,
135:10
133:,
129:,
125:,
121:,
117:,
113:,
109:,
105:,
101:,
49:;
762:(
717:(
686:A
683:F
680:C
654:(
624:(
593:}
591:b
587:p
583:c
579:t
577:{
553:/
537:/
377:(
350:.
281:.
214::
131:9
127:8
123:7
119:6
115:5
111:4
107:3
103:2
99:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
