1680:
notability, verifiability etc. anyway. In other words, for people who want to write new articles, there is little to be done here. However, there are several other things that need work. If you take a look at the hundreds of articles we have in this project, you will notice that many articles are full of ugly tags - expressing doubts regarding notability, original research, neutrality etc. - and that most of those that don't have them are very short articles that probably managed to fly under the radar. Indeed, many conlang articles have little or no references. One thing you could try is expanding existing articles, improving them, finding sources for them, addressing tags, and also removing stuff that actually shouldn't be there at all (for example because there is no way of checking certain info). Constructed languages that have not been added to the project yet should be added and evaluated.
1932:. Another editor keeps adding stronger statements than the sources actually support. For example, a source reconstructs the possible Elizabethan pronunciation of this language. The editor titles the corresponding table "Dee's pronunciation" when the source never actually makes that claim, but rather the weaker claim that the table probably represents what the language sounded like to Dee. He is also repeatedly adding the category 'constructed languages', but when asked to back that up, cannot provide a source that makes that statement, instead providing definitions of the term, and claiming that is enough to support the category. Any eyes and editors willing to point out his error in understanding what
1853:
different varieties under the banner of one language. In other words, as soon as a project has a name and an author, it is automatically assumed that it is a language distinct from any other. During my research on
Interslavic, I quickly found out that this approach is not only impractical, but also inherently wrong. Not only are the numerous naturalistic Pan-Slavic language projects from past and present almost identical to each other, they are essentially attempts at the very same language—differences are mostly in orthography and personal bias of their authors. I imagine the same thing should also go for most Pan-Romance language projects.
1167:
have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in
January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at
251:
1615:, the definition of a Volapükologist does not require much (according to that very definition, I am one as well). It would be sufficient to mention that a person is a member of the Volapük Academy since XX/XX/XXXX, wrote this and that in or about Volapük, is an active member of the Volapük community, etc. IMO categories should never give information that is not contained in the article itself (but I am aware of the fact that it happens often anyway). —
128:
1364:
177:
159:
187:
1133:
consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by
November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.
1316:
301:
1866:"Where there is enough intelligibility between varieties to enable communication, the existence of well-established distinct ethnolinguistic identities can be a strong indicator that they should nevertheless be considered to be different languages. This is particularly considered when there are political boundaries separating the language communities."
680:. Jon made a proposal, and I made one based on Jon's. I'm not going to advertise mine in comparison with Jon's. The basic difference is that Jon tries to cover almost all conlang-related articles, while I tried to limit myself to the most important stuff. Anyway, I think we should find an answer to the question which one to use:
1515:
language (at least to some degree), the only difference being the degree in which the subject takes the whole thing seriously. Obviously, nowadays nobody takes Volapük seriously as a contender for a world language, and in the case of people living 100 years ago it is not always easy to find out what there motives were.
1868:) doesn't apply in this case, since even the author of Romanica is also a prominent member of the Interlingua community. To push the same thought even further: in my view Romanica and Interlingua are both part of the same family of language varieties as Latina Sine Flexione, Latino Moderne, Romanova etc.
1899:
article today adding in phonology and writing systems sections. I hope so far I'm doing everything okay, but like I said, I'm very new, so please let me know what I should/shouldn't be doing if you can (including whether or not I should even be posting this). I'll continue adding to the Kēlen article
1643:
I've noticed that some of the articles are people who are on
Knowledge simply because they speak Esperanto & are well known. Shouldn't there just be a list titled Fluent Esperanto speakers that you can get to from the Esperanto page? If that is done it tells just about as much info as a good deal
1591:
From what I have understood, Esperantology is the science that deals with inner linguistics of
Esperanto. That does not really match the description "a volapükologist is a person whose scientific interest is Volapük or who learns the language for hobby reasons". To say the least, this looks like one
1871:
There is absolutely no shame in
Romanica essentially being an adaption of Interlingua! In fact, I believe this is even much better for both sides than Romanica just being number 2055 on an endless list of auxlangs. Consequently, it would IMO be better for Romanica to be mentioned on the Interlingua
1776:
I had noticed for a while now that the
Knowledge article 'Interlingua' has a 'Romanica' redirect. This redirect is really unjustified. A community of users have been present online on social media platforms as well as mailing lists for many years using Romanica and various related varieties of that
1514:
For the record, how real and how relevant is the difference between Volapükists and Volapükologists, really? Is it documented somewhere, or is it in fact original research? I am asking, because to me this whole differentiation looks a bit artificial. After all, both must have learned or studied the
1852:
I have a slightly different point of view on this one. First of all, for some reason it is always assumed that constructed languages cannot have dialects. They can have versions, iterations, reform projects and so on (where one automatically invalidates the other), but no dialects in the sense of
1166:
proposal for an appreciation week to end on
Knowledge Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who
1132:
are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please
1872:
page, which has ca. 200 visitors a day, than to have its own page with no more than 10 visitors a day. Besides, there is always the notability problem: without a reasonable amount of non-trivial coverage in reliable, third-party sources, a separate article wouldn't survive here anyway. Cheers, —
718:
I slightly prefer yours to Jon's, but I think it needs to be pruned even further. It's roughly the same size or even larger than some of the smaller conlang articles, which seems excessive. Probably it should just link to the main articles about types of conlang, and maybe some articles about
1663:
So I'm new to wipedia & I'd like to get involved in this Wiki project but this place seems deserted. I've found out its not but I would like perhaps a bit more guidance on maybe what to do. And maybe what you're looking for in articles & what do they need to be qualified into a
Conlang
965:
and replace it with a link to it. It's not my preferred solution, because there is quite some overlap between fictional languages and other artistic languages and we will soon end up with new doublets again. But before I go on and turn articles into redirects, I'd appreciate some input first.
1819:
in 1947 and he ultimately joined
Interlingua. Internacional by Campos Lima was a similar Romance constructed language of around the same era. Interlingua Romanica was created by Josu Lavin in 2001 and Neolatino by Jordi Cassany-i-Bates has a strong online following for several years as well.
1679:
Welcome! Well, the place certainly isn't as active as it has been in the past. I suppose that is because practically every possible article about the subject has already been written - conlangs that don't have an article at this point are in all likeliness not going to meet the standards of
1231:
I've just created an Esperanto task force to tag, assess, create, and maintain articles on Esperanto in particular. I've already tagged and assessed every known article in Category:Esperanto and all of its subcategories, but the task force is still very basic. I'm trying to create the
2042:
I would like to propose a new Toki Pona task force as coordination between several Wikimedia projects, such as Knowledge, Wiktionary, Wikisource and Wikidata, possibly in the future including others such as Wikibooks and Wikiquote. currently there are two articles for toki pona, namely
1980:
I'd like to make a proposal for a new Interlingue task force; several members of the project have been very active recently in editing Interlingue related content, so I think a place to organise further development would be beneficial. Example projects would be getting articles such as
1861:"Two related varieties are normally considered varieties of the same language if speakers of each variety have inherent understanding of the other variety (that is, can understand based on knowledge of their own variety without needing to learn the other variety) at a functional level."
1607:
I'd also add that we're getting on thin ice with such categories. After all, many conlangers translate longer texts into their own language(s), and so do I. Still, I wouldn't qualify myself as a translator because of that, but only because I am a professional translator
1570:, and the distinction seems fair enough, since today only the latter are really active. Your point about the corresponding articles is relevant enough, however. Do you think something like "So-and-so is considered (by whom?) a Volapükologist because of his work at "? --
1823:
I believe we need one or several good articles to reflect the 'movement' of international Romance languages on Knowledge. But firstly, we must remove the redirect of Romanica to Interlingua. Interlingua is not Romanica. See here some of the redirection discussions:
1894:
Hi all, I've signed up literally just today to start contributing to some Knowledge pages. I speak Esperanto and Toki Pona pretty well and a bit of Klingon and Lojban, as well as dribs and drabs about other conlangs. I've started adding to the
1757:. (I did not create any zbl-4 because a visual symbolic language can hardly be said to be spoken at "a near native level".) Maybe some members of this project can populate the category; maybe some can even correct my Bliss grammar.
1710:
Thanks for the help. I have just a question or two. First off how should I find out if an article is of importance to this wikiproject or not & second how do I find some of the resources for the conlangs. Thanks for you help.
1098:
1603:
mentioned that he made several translations into Neo and Volapük? If so, the information is stored already well enough, if you ask me - and that without creating categories which are very unlikely to ever grow beyond one or two
1171:
where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.
1080:
1104:
1771:
796:
is set up, is actually quite clear. But there are a lot of subpages that overlap, contain double and sometimes conflicting data... In short, I think it would be worth to reorganise this whole thing a little.
1863:
In the case of Romanica and Interlingua, this seems obvious, since both languages use the same dictionary, and there is no rule that forbids a language to have multiple standards. The exception made by SIL
621:
portal, mind ;) ), we should at least be able to promise the person who writes it that it will "in all likeliness" survive an AfD. Looking at the list above, I'm far from sure we can do that in all cases.
2051:. however, with the broader scope into other projects, I hope that it will attract more people into editing content, as the language has a large free and open content movement inside since its inception.
1846:
1092:
1664:
article. Something like that. Sorry for tagging this project as inactive but it looked like it was & I knew if it wasn't people would change it back which they did. I'm glad this isn't inactive.
1232:{{Knowledge:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Constructed_language_articles_by_quality_statistics}} chart for Esperanto-specific articles, but I'm not sure how to do it. Help would be greatly appreciated.
1592:
of those cases of the Esperanto worldview being projected way outside its realm. Well, in the case of Esperanto, the difference kind of makes sense, but in the case of Volapük I very much doubt it.
1074:
1110:
1068:
1086:
1653:
1387:
396:
39:
488:
1638:
1239:
I don't think you can do so easily. The current chart (on the WP:CL main page) is auto-generated by bot. It understands 'quality' and 'importance' (the latter tag is messed up in
440:
1518:
At least, it's perfectly fine to categorise people as Volapükologists, but in my opinion the corresponding articles should somehow make it clear what makes them Volapükologists.
1253:
432:. If you think one of the following subjects meets Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, don't hesitate dig it up from the graveyard, but don't forget to add proper references:
339:
1552:
496:
1151:
1014:
988:
813:
all contain descriptions of what a "fictional language" is. I think that's a bad thing. Since we've decided a while ago to treat fictional languages as a subcategory of
568:
484:
1201:
740:
661:
98:
1194:
979:
1720:
1705:
1447:
1883:
1612:
775:
731:
1628:
1578:
1534:
759:. Added 'notable' wording but didn't actually prune the list; someone else please do so. Templates displayed on all pages should be slender and widely applicable.
265:
1595:
As for translators... To be quite honest, I don't see the need for any of those subcategories. To use Neo as an example, wouldn't it be sufficient if the article
1307:
1259:
but something's wrong in it). It doesn't know any other tags TTBOMK. You could make a bot for the purpose, or make a new category.... dunno really. Try asking on
1120:, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding
504:
1766:
1343:
2073:
as I think they’d a) be interested if they haven’t seen it yet and b) think their input would be valuable as one of the most active tokiponists on the site.
1967:
1465:
1428:
1220:
1148:
1134:
746:
617:
First of all, we should really have a discussion about the question whether we REALLY want those articles. If we put up a list of red links in the Portal (a
378:
572:
2125:
2120:
1915:
1424:
677:
330:
1494:
1176:
889:
2130:
1117:
1064:. These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages:
1137:
1035:, which is as far as I can tell a constructed language. If anyone who watches this page knows anything more about it, please help the stub along. --
1829:
1401:
1279:
448:
436:
388:
1181:
480:
840:
contains a list of auxlangs and a list of artlangs (including several fictional languages). Lists of fictional languages can also be found in the
1907:
736:
Agreed - the point should be to link to general information about conlangs, not to send them to every other conlang page. It's not a webring :)
594:
Instead of writing articles for the red links quoted above, I there are a few other things we should IMO give priority. I've listed them below. —
564:
464:
1928:
I see this project claims this page. But I have yet to see a source that supports that. Nonetheless, I need editors to review the situation at
2031:
1815:
Romance IALs are nothing new (with all the grammatical complexity of a modern Romance language), there was an effort by André Schild to create
665:
1416:
1046:
607:
1556:
1393:
642:
536:
2105:
2091:
2063:
710:
1371:
1285:
508:
472:
326:
259:
200:
164:
24:
2016:
444:
1945:
1685:
857:
560:
492:
468:
456:
452:
74:
1673:
2135:
1728:
1168:
532:
520:
512:
1644:
of these pages. If you need to also couldn't you say a sentence or two saying why they are prominent enough to be put on the list.
576:
556:
544:
516:
476:
271:
865:
1144:
1061:
958:
552:
548:
540:
500:
460:
277:
1190:. Is this suitable for inclusion in Knowledge? And if so, where? (I would need to add some words of explanation, of course.) --
2069:
I think there’s definitely a reason to have one; would it be better to put it on MetaWiki if it’s so cross-project? Pinging @
1507:. To be very honest, this seems like over-categorising to me. Wouldn't the translators in question feel perfectly at home in
1411:
1060:
is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing
80:
2004:
have expressed interest in founding one, so if anyone would like to discuss, please do. If no one opposes, I'll set one up.
657:
283:
1825:
872:, remove all the list stuff from the articles and replace it with a link to the corresponding subsection in the List page.
861:
787:
1889:
407:
1548:
1504:
1473:
1204:. Please check for articles about language codes for other languages, copy their metainfo, and link both to an from.
1129:
1125:
950:. In other words, in my opinion they should both become redirects. That also solves the discussion about a merger of
845:
1226:
1121:
910:
1780:
I would also like to draw your attention to the presence of Knowledge articles on Romanica in different languages
817:, this is what I propose: that we move all there's to know about fictlangs to the "Genres of artlangs" section in
1950:
1143:
Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now moved the new draft in the old
1116:
and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at
1681:
753:
425:
360:
20:
947:
923:
918:
869:
853:
837:
830:
69:
1442:
1338:
1295:
1274:
1215:
1157:
868:
doesn't seem to get us anywhere, I think we better discuss it here. My proposal is: move everything to the
770:
412:
192:
139:
998:
962:
939:
931:
906:
841:
826:
810:
60:
1508:
1479:
802:
1187:
111:
93:
1972:
1963:
1051:
927:. The other lists have been replaced with a link pointing to the corresponding section of the latter.
370:
1955:
Hello! I think that there should be a page about Micronational Languages or a WikiProject about it.
1456:
There was a bug in the way the template handled the project membership category, which I've fixed.
2027:
208:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
2037:
1547:, and I was told that it was best to use a language-specific translator category. That's why the
1147:
pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you.
421:
612:
1982:
1363:
957:
That's at least my idea. But there is a possible alternative solution: that we move the entire
671:
1876:
1696:
1619:
1525:
1005:
970:
880:
701:
633:
598:
145:
1684:
contains many articles that are also part of one of its underlying categories (for example,
1959:
1716:
1669:
1649:
1544:
1243:
1041:
793:
653:
429:
350:
314:
255:
205:
8:
2059:
2023:
2001:
1986:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1742:
1323:
This could also be done by editing the category page to have a text intro with a link to
1163:
1026:
985:
914:
737:
50:
1900:
with Grammar, vocabulary, and so on, such that it is hopefully at least on par with the
801:
First of all, we have no less than three different descriptions of fictional languages:
1941:
1911:
1575:
1491:
1324:
1303:
1291:
1173:
994:
951:
935:
902:
849:
822:
806:
589:
65:
1738:
1734:
1461:
1057:
943:
898:
818:
814:
724:
524:
46:
1483:
897:
Okay, never mind, I've already done most of that. I've merged all lists found under
1997:
1921:
1873:
1762:
1693:
1616:
1522:
1437:
1333:
1269:
1210:
1002:
967:
877:
765:
698:
630:
595:
648:
2101:
2012:
1712:
1665:
1645:
1567:
1349:
1233:
1036:
1816:
1354:
If any of you guys wants to advertise your membership, I made a userbox for it.
2055:
1838:
1563:
728:
720:
626:
401:
107:
2114:
1937:
1933:
1833:
1658:
1600:
1571:
1540:
1487:
1299:
1260:
1801:
1797:
1101:, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents)
2085:
2080:
2048:
1596:
1457:
1191:
420:
Several articles about constructed languages have been deleted for lack of
1599:
mentioned him as the person who made certain translations and the article
2070:
1772:
Creation of (an) article(s) on Romance IALs/constructed Romance languages
1758:
1432:
1328:
1264:
1205:
1162:
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of
1032:
760:
112:
2097:
2074:
2008:
1990:
1856:
852:. As if that wasn't enough already, lists of auxlangs are both in the
2096:
Is there any kind of precedent for making cross-project task forces?
2044:
860:, again heavily overlapping. At last, we have a list of engelangs at
1298:. I don't know how this would be fixed, so I'm alerting you folks.
1929:
1922:
528:
109:
1896:
930:
I've expanded the description of "fictional language" somewhat in
1901:
186:
2054:
if there is no opposition, I will set up a subpage for it here.
1562:
I think it was the Esperantists who first distinguished between
176:
158:
113:
300:
1689:
984:
I say you've done a good thing - let's leave it like that.
1202:
ISO, SIL, and BCP language codes for constructed languages
1639:
Should certain articles be included in this WikiProject?
1840:
1692:
to take care of... Well, many things in fact! Cheers, —
1099:
User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States
1793:
1394:
727:, with very few if any links to specific languages. --
1809:
1805:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1429:
Knowledge:WikiProject Constructed languages/Templates
747:
Knowledge:WikiProject Constructed languages/Templates
1081:
User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory
862:
Engineered language#Examples of engineered languages
858:
International auxiliary language#Auxiliary languages
204:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
182:
15:
1425:
Knowledge:WikiProject Constructed languages/Userbox
1412:
1402:
331:
Knowledge:WikiProject Constructed languages/Userbox
825:becomes a redirect to that, and that we merge the
1688:) and therefore shouldn't be there. There is the
1188:table of language codes for constructed languages
959:list of constructed languages#fictional languages
389:Category:Unassessed constructed language articles
2112:
1105:User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory
846:Artistic language#Examples of artistic languages
866:Talk:List of fictional languages#Merge proposal
649:http://es.groups.yahoo.com/group/universalglot/
27:and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
1392:correct it if you want, I don't really care.
1294:is, for some reason, not the main article for
993:Thanks. So, what precisely do you mean? Turn
1557:Category:Translators_by_destination_language
921:itself into one renewed and fairly complete
2126:NA-importance constructed language articles
2121:Project-Class constructed language articles
260:Knowledge:WikiProject Constructed languages
218:Knowledge:WikiProject Constructed languages
1686:Category:International auxiliary languages
836:The lists themselves are a mess, too. The
221:Template:WikiProject Constructed languages
2131:WikiProject constructed language articles
1169:User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week
1093:User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory
138:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
1611:As far as adding people to the category
1182:Language codes for constructed languages
1830:Articles for deletion/Romanica language
1062:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Directory
2113:
1826:Redirection of Romanica to Interlingua
1075:User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2
1733:I have taken the liberty of creating
1407:
942:have any info that can't be found on
932:artistic language#fictional languages
1482:and tagged those who were listed at
1357:
1111:User:Badbilltucker/Science directory
1069:User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory
803:Artistic language#Genres of artlangs
625:This is more or less the same issue
241:
127:
125:
121:
2022:I totally support this initiative.
1286:Fictional Language article/category
1087:User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory
829:(without its description) with the
408:category:Constructed language stubs
144:It is of interest to the following
13:
1009:In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij
974:In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij
884:In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij
705:In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij
637:In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij
602:In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij
340:Recent changes in related articles
299:
14:
2147:
1729:User categories for Blissymbolics
1373:WikiProject Constructed languages
327:Constructed Languages WikiProject
201:WikiProject Constructed languages
198:This page is within the scope of
25:WikiProject Constructed languages
2136:Knowledge pages with to-do lists
1362:
1314:
911:international auxiliary language
249:
185:
175:
157:
126:
40:Click here to start a new topic.
1859:is how SIL defines a language:
1549:Category:Translators to Volapük
1505:Category:Translators to Volapük
629:addressed on Jon's talk page. —
1682:Category:Constructed languages
1539:Well, I had originally tagged
1503:However, I also noticed a new
295:
1:
1737:and the associated templates
1697:
1620:
1526:
1344:10:44, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
1308:09:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
1177:16:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
1006:
971:
948:list of constructed languages
924:list of constructed languages
919:list of constructed languages
881:
870:List of constructed languages
854:List of constructed languages
838:List of constructed languages
831:List of constructed languages
719:conlang-related matters like
702:
634:
599:
224:constructed language articles
212:and see a list of open tasks.
37:Put new text under old text.
1968:19:30, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
1960:A MicroWikipedian Wikipedian
1946:04:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
1495:19:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
1466:13:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
1448:00:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
1417:22:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
1296:Category:Fictional languages
1280:06:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
1221:01:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
1152:14:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
1138:22:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
954:with its corresponding list.
776:01:38, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
193:Constructed languages portal
7:
1890:Expanding the Kēlen article
1553:Category:Translators to Neo
1015:18:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
999:list of fictional languages
989:16:56, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
980:12:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
963:list of fictional languages
940:list of fictional languages
907:list of fictional languages
890:15:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
842:List of fictional languages
827:List of fictional languages
811:List of fictional languages
741:19:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
732:20:06, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
711:15:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
643:15:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
608:15:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
497:Mezhdunarodny Nauchny Yazyk
45:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
10:
2152:
1916:19:44, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
1767:00:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
1721:03:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
1706:04:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
1674:03:37, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
1654:12:58, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
1195:16:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
1047:18:35, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
864:. Since the discussion at
666:19:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
647:New web on Universalglot:
2106:16:18, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
2092:18:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
2064:10:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
1936:is would be appreciated.
1884:14:02, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
1847:14:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
1629:16:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
1579:15:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
1535:14:20, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
1474:Category: Volapükologists
1370:This user is a member of
489:Language Creation Society
170:
152:
75:Be welcoming to newcomers
2032:09:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
2017:09:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
1509:Category:Volapükologists
1480:Category:Volapükologists
1388:User Conlang-Wikiproject
1227:New Esperanto task force
1951:Micronational Languages
1249:- needs fixing; I made
1001:into redirects, then? —
397:Edit wars and deletions
1983:History of Interlingue
1973:Interlingue Task Force
788:Order instead of Chaos
304:
70:avoid personal attacks
934:. Right now, neither
848:, and in the article
754:Constructed languages
426:independent resources
361:Constructed languages
303:
215:Constructed languages
206:constructed languages
165:Constructed languages
2038:Toki Pona Task Force
1613:Category:Volapükists
1545:Category:Translators
1158:Knowledge Day Awards
794:Constructed language
792:The way the article
505:Modern Indo-European
315:Constructed language
1987:Interlingue grammar
1755:Template:User zbl-5
1751:Template:User zbl-3
1747:Template:User zbl-2
1743:Template:User zbl-1
1254:WP conlangs sandbox
1058:WikiProject Council
1031:I added a stub for
915:engineered language
693:No template at all.
1325:Fictional language
1292:Fictional language
995:fictional language
952:fictional language
936:fictional language
903:fictional language
850:Fictional language
823:Fictional language
815:artistic languages
807:Fictional language
305:
289:Updated 2020-09-10
140:content assessment
81:dispute resolution
42:
1739:Template:User zbl
1735:Category:User zbl
1559:. There are lots.
1380:
1379:
1052:Project Directory
1045:
944:artistic language
899:artistic language
819:Artistic language
725:Translation relay
656:comment added by
587:
586:
580:
383:
310:
309:
240:
239:
236:
235:
232:
231:
120:
119:
61:Assume good faith
38:
2143:
2090:
1842:
1703:
1626:
1532:
1445:
1440:
1435:
1414:
1409:
1404:
1396:
1366:
1358:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1322:
1318:
1317:
1277:
1272:
1267:
1258:
1252:
1248:
1242:
1218:
1213:
1208:
1118:User:B2T2/Portal
1039:
1012:
977:
887:
773:
768:
763:
758:
752:
708:
668:
640:
605:
573:Universalspråket
441:Ancient Language
435:
387:: Everything in
376:
375:
371:Infobox language
369:
365:
359:
355:
349:
296:
290:
253:
252:
242:
226:
225:
222:
219:
216:
195:
190:
189:
179:
172:
171:
161:
154:
153:
131:
130:
129:
122:
114:
16:
2151:
2150:
2146:
2145:
2144:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2111:
2110:
2079:
2040:
1975:
1953:
1926:
1892:
1881:
1843:
1777:same language.
1774:
1731:
1702:
1661:
1641:
1625:
1568:eo:Volapukologo
1555:now exist. See
1531:
1476:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1381:
1367:
1352:
1339:
1334:
1329:
1315:
1313:
1288:
1275:
1270:
1265:
1256:
1250:
1246:
1240:
1229:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1184:
1160:
1054:
1029:
1011:
976:
886:
790:
771:
766:
761:
756:
750:
707:
674:
651:
639:
615:
604:
592:
583:
582:
379:WP:CL Templates
373:
367:
363:
357:
353:
347:
264:
250:
223:
220:
217:
214:
213:
191:
184:
116:
115:
110:
87:
86:
56:
23:for discussing
12:
11:
5:
2149:
2139:
2138:
2133:
2128:
2123:
2109:
2108:
2094:
2039:
2036:
2035:
2034:
2024:Caro de Segeda
2002:Caro de Segeda
1974:
1971:
1952:
1949:
1925:
1920:
1891:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1877:
1869:
1854:
1839:
1773:
1770:
1730:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1698:
1660:
1657:
1640:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1621:
1609:
1605:
1593:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1564:eo:Volapukisto
1560:
1527:
1519:
1516:
1512:
1501:
1484:Volapükologist
1475:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1451:
1450:
1420:
1419:
1378:
1377:
1368:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1287:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1228:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1183:
1180:
1159:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1114:
1113:
1108:
1102:
1096:
1090:
1084:
1078:
1072:
1053:
1050:
1028:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1007:
986:DenisMoskowitz
972:
955:
928:
882:
874:
873:
834:
789:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
738:DenisMoskowitz
721:Relexification
703:
695:
694:
691:
690:Something else
688:
685:
673:
670:
658:79.146.148.149
635:
614:
611:
600:
591:
588:
585:
584:
581:
418:
417:
410:
406:everything in
399:
391:
382:
342:
334:
312:Here are some
308:
307:
306:
292:
247:
245:
238:
237:
234:
233:
230:
229:
227:
210:the discussion
197:
196:
180:
168:
167:
162:
150:
149:
143:
132:
118:
117:
108:
106:
105:
102:
101:
89:
88:
85:
84:
77:
72:
63:
57:
55:
54:
43:
34:
33:
30:
29:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2148:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2129:
2127:
2124:
2122:
2119:
2118:
2116:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2093:
2089:
2088:
2084:
2083:
2078:
2077:
2072:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2052:
2050:
2046:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2005:
2003:
1999:
1994:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1978:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1956:
1948:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1935:
1931:
1924:
1919:
1917:
1913:
1909:
1905:
1903:
1898:
1885:
1882:
1880:
1875:
1870:
1867:
1862:
1858:
1855:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1845:
1844:
1835:
1834:Talk:Romanica
1831:
1827:
1821:
1818:
1813:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1778:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1744:
1740:
1736:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1704:
1701:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1630:
1627:
1624:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1601:Ralph Midgley
1598:
1594:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1580:
1577:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1561:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1546:
1542:
1541:Ralph Midgley
1538:
1537:
1536:
1533:
1530:
1524:
1520:
1517:
1513:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1499:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1449:
1446:
1441:
1436:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1418:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1397:
1391:
1389:
1383:
1382:
1376:
1374:
1369:
1365:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1345:
1342:
1337:
1332:
1326:
1321:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1281:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1262:
1255:
1245:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1235:
1222:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1203:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1189:
1179:
1178:
1175:
1174:Badbilltucker
1170:
1165:
1153:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1136:
1131:
1130:collaboration
1127:
1123:
1119:
1112:
1109:
1106:
1103:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1070:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1063:
1059:
1049:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1034:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1004:
1000:
996:
992:
991:
990:
987:
983:
982:
981:
978:
975:
969:
964:
960:
956:
953:
949:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
926:
925:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
900:
896:
895:
894:
893:
892:
891:
888:
885:
879:
871:
867:
863:
859:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
835:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
798:
795:
777:
774:
769:
764:
755:
748:
744:
743:
742:
739:
735:
734:
733:
730:
726:
722:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
709:
706:
700:
692:
689:
686:
683:
682:
681:
679:
669:
667:
663:
659:
655:
650:
645:
644:
641:
638:
632:
628:
623:
620:
610:
609:
606:
603:
597:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:Herman Miller
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
434:
433:
431:
427:
423:
422:verifiability
416:
414:
409:
405:
403:
398:
394:
390:
386:
380:
372:
362:
352:
345:
341:
337:
332:
328:
324:
321:
319:
317:
316:
302:
298:
297:
294:
291:
288:
285:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
263:
261:
257:
246:
244:
243:
228:
211:
207:
203:
202:
194:
188:
183:
181:
178:
174:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
155:
151:
147:
141:
137:
133:
124:
123:
104:
103:
100:
97:
95:
91:
90:
82:
78:
76:
73:
71:
67:
64:
62:
59:
58:
52:
48:
47:Learn to edit
44:
41:
36:
35:
32:
31:
26:
22:
18:
17:
2086:
2081:
2075:
2053:
2049:sitelen pona
2041:
2006:
1995:
1979:
1976:
1957:
1954:
1927:
1906:
1893:
1878:
1865:
1860:
1837:
1822:
1814:
1779:
1775:
1732:
1699:
1662:
1642:
1622:
1597:Neo language
1528:
1477:
1406:
1398:
1385:
1372:
1353:
1319:
1290:The article
1289:
1230:
1186:I've made a
1185:
1161:
1115:
1055:
1030:
1008:
973:
961:back to the
922:
883:
875:
791:
704:
696:
675:
652:— Preceding
646:
636:
624:
618:
616:
601:
593:
419:
411:
400:
392:
384:
343:
335:
329:& add {{
322:
313:
311:
293:
286:
280:
274:
268:
254:
248:
209:
199:
146:WikiProjects
136:project page
135:
92:
19:This is the
1998:Mithridates
1874:IJzeren Jan
1810:Interlingua
1694:IJzeren Jan
1617:IJzeren Jan
1523:IJzeren Jan
1478:I've added
1423:Moved to {{
1244:WP conlangs
1164:Esperanza's
1126:peer review
1056:Hello. The
1033:Gibson Code
1027:Gibson Code
1003:IJzeren Jan
968:IJzeren Jan
878:IJzeren Jan
699:IJzeren Jan
631:IJzeren Jan
596:IJzeren Jan
351:WP conlangs
2115:Categories
1991:Ric Berger
1879:Uszkiełtu?
1798:Portuguese
1700:Uszkiełtu?
1623:Uszkiełtu?
1529:Uszkiełtu?
1500:Excellent!
1234:TFCforever
1122:assessment
1037:Rick Block
917:, and the
856:and under
749:and added
590:More tasks
537:Sperethiel
430:notability
256:To-do list
2087:contribs
2045:toki pona
2007:Regards,
1977:Hey all,
1934:synthesis
1918:MxMorgan
1904:article.
1841:Cavallèro
1817:Neolatino
1790:Esperanto
1604:articles.
1434:Sai Emrys
1384:Which is
1330:Sai Emrys
1266:Sai Emrys
1207:Sai Emrys
1200:Moved to
1145:directory
762:Sai Emrys
745:Moved to
729:Jim Henry
627:Kaleissin
613:Red links
509:Mondlango
473:Esperando
83:if needed
66:Be polite
21:talk page
1938:Skyerise
1930:Enochian
1923:Enochian
1908:MxMorgan
1572:Evertype
1488:Evertype
1427:}}. See
1300:Bowmanjj
938:nor the
844:, under
672:Template
654:unsigned
619:featured
561:Troscann
529:Romanova
525:Romanica
493:Latejami
469:Ekspreso
457:Dremlang
453:Bluddian
413:Requests
385:Evaluate
94:Archives
51:get help
1993:to GA.
1902:Klingon
1806:Swedish
1802:Spanish
1608:anyway.
1521:Best, —
1458:Pi zero
1350:Userbox
1192:Zundark
946:or the
821:, that
533:Signuno
513:Musbrek
284:refresh
272:history
2082:talk;
2076:Frzzl
2071:Tamzin
1832:, and
1808:, and
1794:Novial
1782:Basque
1759:Fishal
1753:, and
1690:Portal
1261:WP:1.0
1128:, and
809:, and
577:Vorlin
557:Tokcir
545:Tceqli
531:(rd),
527:(rd),
521:Or'zet
517:Noxilo
477:Fasile
445:Arovën
437:Abakwi
402:Expand
393:Report
366:, and
336:Follow
142:scale.
2098:Iostn
2056:Juwan
2009:Frzzl
2000:and @
1897:Kēlen
1786:Dutch
1659:Help?
1486:. --
1107:, and
684:Jon's
553:Thosk
549:Ceqli
541:Szkev
501:Mirad
481:Glide
461:Eaiea
377:(see
318:tasks
278:watch
134:This
79:Seek
2102:talk
2060:talk
2047:and
2028:talk
2013:talk
1989:and
1964:talk
1942:talk
1912:talk
1857:This
1836:. --
1763:talk
1717:talk
1713:T97π
1670:talk
1666:T97π
1650:talk
1646:T97π
1566:and
1551:and
1462:talk
1395:Manu
1320:Done
1304:talk
1149:B2T2
1135:B2T2
1042:talk
997:and
723:and
687:Mine
678:here
676:See
662:talk
565:Unas
465:Eloi
449:Baza
323:Join
266:edit
258:for
68:and
1958:--
1543:as
1413:Ski
1408:pro
569:UNI
428:or
344:Tag
2117::
2104:)
2062:)
2030:)
2015:)
1985:,
1966:)
1944:)
1914:)
1828:,
1812:!
1804:,
1800:,
1796:,
1792:,
1788:,
1784:,
1765:)
1749:,
1745:,
1741:,
1719:)
1672:)
1652:)
1464:)
1439:¿?
1431:.
1403:ve
1390:}}
1386:{{
1335:¿?
1327:.
1306:)
1271:¿?
1263:?
1257:}}
1251:{{
1247:}}
1241:{{
1212:¿?
1124:,
913:,
909:,
905:,
901:,
805:,
767:¿?
757:}}
751:{{
664:)
575:,
571:,
567:,
563:,
559:,
555:,
551:,
543:,
539:,
535:,
523:,
519:,
515:,
511:,
507:,
503:,
499:,
495:,
491:,
487:,
483:,
479:,
475:,
471:,
467:,
463:,
459:,
455:,
451:,
447:,
443:,
439:,
424:,
395::
374:}}
368:{{
364:}}
358:{{
356:,
354:}}
348:{{
346::
338::
333:}}
325::
49:;
2100:(
2058:(
2026:(
2011:(
1996:@
1962:(
1940:(
1910:(
1864:(
1761:(
1715:(
1668:(
1648:(
1576:✆
1574:·
1511:?
1492:✆
1490:·
1460:(
1444:✍
1399:-
1375:.
1340:✍
1302:(
1276:✍
1217:✍
1095:,
1089:,
1083:,
1077:,
1071:,
1044:)
1040:(
966:—
876:—
833:.
772:✍
697:—
660:(
579:.
547:/
415::
404::
381:)
320::
287:·
281:·
275:·
269:·
262::
148::
99:1
96::
53:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
