136:, which I pretty much re-wrote from top to bottom. For some reason he gave the article a 'B'. I have emailed him twice aleardy to ask him his rationale for such a rating, and he has ignored my messages. Its not that I care about the rating, I just wanted to know how he came to conclude that the article deserved this rating, being that nowhere does he explain it on the discussion page or anywhere else. It also seems that he came to rate this article on his own, which I feel is ridiculous - it should be done with feedback from members of the wikiproject dance. From the looks of things this user doesnt seem to me to have any business rating any ballet related article - he has no "credentials" for rating an article pertaining to ballet history, and yet he has still rated this article. Anyway, all of this made me wonder about these assessments, and thier relevance - Does anyone know how one goes about doing them? Can anyone do it? When one does one of these asessments, do they judge the article based on its importance to the wiki dance project, or do they judge it based on wether or not it meets the wikipedia guidelines? When one does judge the article, do they do it with others or on thier own? I am under the impression that this person did this assessment on his own, and had no feedback from others. Thanks a lot! --
224:
31:
200:
has not made any contributions to
Knowledge since January 10, 2007. I assume that he's on wikibreak, hence why he's not responding to your messages. However, I don't think that he actually meant to re-rate the article, he was just reverting what he perceived as vandalism. With your numerous edits
205:
over the
December 15th version and, to my untrained eye, looks better than Badbilltucker's original assessment. However, no single user can give an article "Featured" status without going through the formal process of
125:
140:
214:
120:
104:
154:
287:
279:
274:
262:
257:
252:
94:
86:
81:
69:
64:
59:
183:), which should only be done after the article becomes a Featured Article Candidate and passes the gauntlet of editors there).
190:
165:
112:
Just thought you'd like to know that I've created a new article, timely given that the group performed on the recent
240:
47:
17:
202:
180:
231:
38:
106:
130:
A man who goes by the user name Cswrye did a featured article assesment on the article on
116:
broadcast. It's only a first pass, others here should be able to improve it considerably.
8:
113:
169:
137:
239:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
211:
151:
207:
176:
147:
160:
There was some miscommunication involved here. A little sleuthing reveals:
146:
Where was the review done? Could you provide some links? Did you take it to
117:
197:
187:
132:
179:
with an interest in ballet changes the banner from B-class to FA-class (
126:
Question about the so-called "Featured
Article Asessments"
193:the edit, saying as much in his edit summary.
14:
237:Do not edit the contents of this page.
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
218:
25:
164:December 15, 2006: the article was
23:
24:
301:
175:December 17, 2006: an anonymous
222:
29:
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Dance
13:
1:
121:00:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
7:
10:
306:
215:23:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
155:20:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
141:19:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
107:Pilobolus (dance company)
105:heads-up on new article:
201:today's version appears
235:of past discussions.
42:of past discussions.
186:December 19, 2006:
114:79th Academy Awards
293:
292:
247:
246:
241:current talk page
100:
99:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
297:
271:
249:
248:
226:
225:
219:
78:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
305:
304:
300:
299:
298:
296:
295:
294:
267:
223:
128:
110:
74:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
303:
291:
290:
285:
282:
277:
272:
265:
260:
255:
245:
244:
227:
203:quite improved
195:
194:
184:
173:
158:
157:
127:
124:
109:
103:
98:
97:
92:
89:
84:
79:
72:
67:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
302:
289:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
270:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
250:
242:
238:
234:
233:
228:
221:
220:
217:
216:
213:
209:
204:
199:
192:
189:
185:
182:
178:
174:
171:
170:Badbilltucker
167:
163:
162:
161:
156:
153:
149:
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
135:
134:
123:
122:
119:
115:
108:
102:
96:
93:
90:
88:
85:
83:
80:
77:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
268:
236:
230:
196:
159:
131:
129:
111:
101:
75:
43:
37:
229:This is an
168:B-class by
138:Mrlopez2681
133:La Bayadere
36:This is an
177:IP address
288:ArchiveĀ 8
280:ArchiveĀ 6
275:ArchiveĀ 5
269:ArchiveĀ 4
263:ArchiveĀ 3
258:ArchiveĀ 2
253:ArchiveĀ 1
212:Will.i.am
152:Fang Aili
95:ArchiveĀ 8
87:ArchiveĀ 6
82:ArchiveĀ 5
76:ArchiveĀ 4
70:ArchiveĀ 3
65:ArchiveĀ 2
60:ArchiveĀ 1
232:archive
191:reverts
118:Dyanega
39:archive
208:WP:FAC
198:Cswrye
188:Cswrye
148:WP:FAR
166:rated
16:<
181:diff
150:? --
210:.--
284:ā
91:ā
243:.
172:.
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.