31:
669:, meaning that it relates to one given country (which may vary, depending on what country it is that the user in question may have been expanding our coverage about). It has the parallel goal of stimulating the improvement of articles pertaining to any given country. In that regard, it may be awarded for work in a category, but it would still be in relation to one country (e.g.: expanding our articles on the geographical aspects of
1136:)! The competition is open to everyone and is seeking a logo/trophy, similar to Barnstars, to be placed on every winner's page. We urge you to help us out and submit an entry! Afterwards, the normal rounds, each consisting of ten or more fun, logical, brain-stimulating questions will open. Why don't you give it a try when it opens! Look forward to seeing your contribution. Thanks,
932:
724:
692:
622:
236:
143:
117:
1280:
I made this barnstar image to award for contributions to
Philippine-related articles. It's made from the original barnstar image, plus colors and symbols from the Philippine flag. I know it can't be an "offical" award, since it concerns a specific country, but is there any problem with awarding it to
586:
Yeah, I've been thinking about it, and I can see where you're coming from. I figure the other barnstars are meant for a specific behavior during any work in
Knowledge, whereas the BoNM has a limited (even if somewhat broad) "section" of the website for work on which it can be awarded. I don't think
761:
Let's not forget variety. In terms of generality vs. specificity, I think BoNM and
Running Man are both pretty good: a country-related article, but not a specific country; a sports-related article, but not a specific sport. At the same time, I think topical barnstars shouldn't be too rigid in how it
716:
Simply because they've already been created :). If this discussion had come up before they were crated, I'd have been all in favour of just one overall "Topical
Barnstar". Other topics, like science - fine, but if there were one overall "Topical Barnstar" it would make creation of separate ones less
376:
Hi, I want to give barnstars to a couple of users who helped me, as a newbie get a grasp of
Knowledge, for instance the user who introduced me to the "four tildes" and first put a message to my talk page to explain what a talk page actually is etc. I'm sure some of us have had people who guided them
149:
Unfortunately, I also suck at drawing (be it on paper or on a screen). I'd like something more classy and inspirational than arrowheads, though. I just don't know an appropriate symbol for the community. A small
Knowledge globe at the center, perhaps? But then, every barnstar is awarded for services
1641:
and created the template almost from scratch... we did start with Award2 as a base. Any thoughts on that? I could do a draft, but I'd likely need help with how best to organize the arguments to they are consistent with other templates and are flexible to some extent. Are if/case statements possible
1366:
What about a barnstar for anon editors? There are some great editors who simply don't want to log in. I was thinking a regular barnstar, but with a question mark (?) around it. Have the top point of the staron top of the top of the question mark, and have the question mark sort of draped around the
1007:
Ok folks, I have been putting templates on this page of the awards that are listed. I am doing this so the page can be easier to load up for those who might be having problems getting to it. I know that with many awards that will be created in the next few months, we would be creeping close to the
924:
Also, remember that barnstars - other than recognising good work - are meant to add a dash of fun and enjoyment to
Knowledge. If a person doesn't want one, then it's not going to improve either their enjoyment or yours by arguing the point. In other words, it would defeat the purpose of giving the
664:
I'm all for the idea of
Category-specific barnstars, although I wonder if people are actually going to award them. That's a discussion for the more appropriate forum ClockworkSoul mentioned though. I don't see how the BoNM could fit into it. I was involved in its creation (the original idea was
501:
countries. As its purpose description says, it can be awarded for work in articles about as variable topics as geography, biographies of natable people (of any given country), culture, history, and so on, so long as all these article have something to do with one same country (thus expanding WP's
99:
Can't even think of what to call this one, but I can visualise it. I think a barnstar is needed for people who do a considerable amount either (a) to promote
Knowledge beyond the site, acting as "unofficial spokesperson" for it; or (b) who do wonders in "gee-ing up the troops" either through their
440:
Why is there no
Redirect (or Redirector's?) Barnstar? True, redirects seem small, easy and unimportant, but they can mean the difference between finding an article and running away to the Encyclopaedia Britannica! And I also think having post-nominals for each Barnstar (for use on the recipient's
961:
On each Barnstar page, there is a list of people who have been awarded it, or at least where the image is located. So, techinically, that is the list of people who got it. Plus, me and Redux have been keeping track of who has received the Barnstar of National Merit. But thanks for the suggestion
1431:
Yes, actually I found that it has been brought up several times now. Oh well, it was just a thought. I still think the question mark idea is good, but understand the technical reasons why it couldn't be a anon award. Although I must say, some people's reasoning is a bit off. Thanks.
684:
Perhaps what is needed is one specific "Topical Barnstar" (so named), with room in the citation below to put "This is awarded to XXX for work on YYY-related articles". No need for a huge range of them (although one or two special ones, like sport and geography seem fine).
510:
If need be, I'm sure DP or I could whip up a quick star with a globe in front of it, and call it the Polar North Barnstar or some such thing for the Geography category; it just seemed easier to group them all together, keeping the number of barnstars manageably lower.
455:
This should be awarded to a person who enhances the quality and depth of Wikiepdia's articles by making comprehensive translations from other language Wikipedias. A suitable icon would be the barnstar surrounded by several fictional flags. What do you think?
1063:
over this most recent version. It's not really clear to the average Joe that this is a camera, and it's somehard hard to see the colours because they blend in with the rest of the barnstar. The original barnstar clearly looks like a lens. What do you think?
831:
Me and Redux faced this situation today, which I think should be debated to a full extent: A person who was awarded a barnstar rejected it. What should we do in a situation where a person says they do not want the Barnstar once one is given to them?
100:
general motivation of Wikipedians or through assistance by way of tools, contests, and other things that actually make us 'ground troops' want to go out and write, improve, and wikify - in both cases basically people who help move Knowledge forward.
1367:"shoulders" of the star. I'm not good with graphics, but maybe someone who is could help me out. And if not an Anon Barnstar, it would be a good "Barnstar for some reason that I can't think of right now" or a "Mystery Barnstar". Just my thoughts. --
949:
736:
a degree of specificity; thus the BoNM, Running Man, Photographer's, etc and myriad proposed barnstars that never quite made it to prime time. I think that the "Category Stars" are a pretty good compromise between one star and many stars. –
891:
People don't necessarily want to put up a No-Barnstar image on their pages either. It's okay if they don't want the barnstar. That's why it's much better to award a barnstar on their talk pages, right? :-) So they can decline graciously.
1085:
True, but even if the subject of the barnstar were more apparent, the original version isn't as striking, and the contrast is duller. I've created another version of the current barnstar with more pronounced colors. What do you think?
677:). Long story short: its primary target is a country, not a category, and that's what the name of the award refers to. It would be, I believe, a distortion of the award's pupose to try and use it as a category barnstar. Regards,
1642:
in a template? Like if 3 barnstars are listed, then a generic image would be replaced by the third barnstar. Also I was wondering if we should even bother since it starts to get complicated with multiple awards, and instead have a
154:, but with the Wiki globe? Perhaps that's too political. Hm. A handshake, then? Or a barnstar with two bent "arms" holding the Wiki globe aloft? I'm not sure that works out visually, but I like the idea. Anyone else? :-)
277:
A few good names offered here (selected some from above): Barnstar of Motivation. The Inspirator's Barnstar. The Barnstar Bright. (Getting obscure.) The Raising Barnstar. The Community Barnstar. I personally think that
952:
and place links to them in the Barnstar description. I think it'd be cool to A) see the work that people are being commended for; and B) to draw more attention to the recipients of the awards. What do you all say?
128:
Barnstar. The Barnstar of Faith. The Barnstar of Zealotry. :-) The Inspirator's Barnstar. The Barnstar Bright. (Getting obscure.) The Raising Barnstar. Or just plain and simple: the Community Barnstar.
1128:
Hello! I've noticed all of you have interest in creating logos, barnstars, and have artistic ability! Thus, I just wanted to let you know that the pre-round, an artistic competition, is now open at
1552:
Whether he is serious or not is up to others to decide, but I, personally, find this user's attitude toward others more disturbing than not. Please leave me a note on my talk page. Thank you. -
910:
sign, only for barnstars. If somebody should choose to use that image, we would of course respect it. Similarly, should somebody decline a barnstar, we would (and should) respect their wishes. –
303:
My vote is for the original name, Barnstar of Motivation. I choose this since the Barnstar is being awarded to someone who motivates the Wikipedians to "Be Bold" in everything they say or do.
1506:
roster, and this seemed to be a unilateral decision. So I unilaterally moved it elsewhere for now (I'm not entirely certain this isn't a sarcastic entry, but trying to Assume Good Faith).
346:
I don't like the second as much as the first because it seems more conceptual. The first one is a clear indication of why you're getting the award, and meshes nicely with the bullhorn. --
1273:
425:
and mentor newbies, I still think some special recognition would be good for them. Knowledge does seem to have a harsh learning curve initially, and I'm glad that these ppl are around.
184:
673:), but it may also be given to someone who has worked on several categories, as long as them all pertain to a country (e.g.: work on articles about the culture, people and history of
1077:
1052:
628:
That's not the argument at all - nobody's talking about removing it. Quite the opposite, really: I just making the definition a little more specific. To summarize what I wrote in
1613:
I am a newbie (joined June 2005) and I have given several of these to other newbies who joined later than I did, and I was very impressed with some of the stuff they had done.
1454:
1426:
1408:
1337:
1608:
629:
1325:
1216:
992:
1517:
649:
478:
1620:
1129:
587:"topical" would be my chosen adjective, but it is an acceptable generalization. And thanks for the tip about the ongoing discussion, I'll check it out. Regards,
1596:
1194:
551:
Redux: it is topic, in the respect that it's meant to award an article written about a particular topic, as opposed to a barnstar that awards behavior (like the
421:
Hmm, yes I think for my situation one of those two would be more appopriate than a "mentor" barnstar. Thank you!. But there are folks who regularly troll around
1499:
1104:
Rats, I was hoping for some more feedback (from other users, I mean). Perhaps you could use more colours in the central image (say, rotating between the three
1462:
Wow, I am worse at paint than I thought. Oh well, this is my basic idea. If someone wants to use this idea, but with better graphics, of course, feel free. --
1040:
81:
76:
71:
59:
1289:
762:
can be awarded. IMO, there's nothing wrong with the BoNM being awarded for geography articles. Future topical barnstars could be loosely defined as well. --
1655:
460:
1592:
I don't think so. The article doesn't say so. I've awarded several (some to non-admins, some to admins) without anyone saying a word in opposition. --
1569:
1556:
976:
502:
coverage of that given country). I don't see how that makes it topical, since theoretically all topics may be involved for someone to get it. Regards,
445:
1484:
1389:
954:
1583:
360:
Totally agree! Is there some concencus against simply naming it "Motivation Barnstar" or "Inspiration Barnstar". We don't really need the word "of".
1531:
282:
is really witty, but may go over some people's heads (is the expression "Barn Raising" an Americanism?). In lieu of that, I like both the original
1309:
1261:
1395:
This was discussed earlier, and consensus was that it wouldn't be appropriate. I don't remember where it is, but it should be in the history of
1414:
611:
topics. If the argument above is that it shouldn't be a barnstar because it's too topical (and to be honest it's difficult to work out exactly
1203:. It's what we're all used to, and I almost see it as an inside joke that WP:BS redirects to an award. If there is a university degree titled
1015:
981:
No. Some people keep track of who got what, but I think the main effort is being done at the Barnstar of National Merit. You can see that at
396:
1586:
1181:
1489:
795:
859:
later on, I took your advice, nodded my head and left. You can see my talk page with the exchange me and Redux had on this very subject.
560:
47:
17:
1544:
is placing Barnstars and other awards on his page, creating nonsense titles and fake usernames to go with them (with the exception of
450:
150:
to Knowledge, so... hmmm. A small earth globe? Nah, you'd never get the angle "neutral". :-) Olive branches, perhaps? A bit like the
1313:
972:
Just a question. You keep track, but do you control? (the rule says anybody can give barnstars to someone else he/she appreciates)
103:
I'd see the award as being a white star with the edges and central spines of each arm marked in black, to make it five arrowheads.
595:
I agree about the adjective "topical"... it sounds like it's referring to an ointment or something. We'll have to review that. –
1413:
Ah, I found it. It was proposed as the "Unknown Wikipedian Barnstar", and you can find the last version (before it was deleted)
1396:
811:
633:
530:
1548:). This user also has something of a hitlist at the bottom of his user page. He also has a comment on the left side saying
1036:
Electronics and Maths are both "soft". However this award is not restricted to hard science. It also includes soft science.
1025:
Category: Science and Mathematics ("Hard" sciences, biology, geology, medicine, mathematics, medicine, minerology, physics)
881:
Remember we have the No-Barnstar Zone image? I suggest we can use that more often to users who do not want these honours.
982:
467:
435:
1295:
No, I don't think so. It would be fine if you personally give it away to someone. You could also consider listing it on
732:
In theory, one single "Topical Barnstar" would be great, but I don't think that it would be very popular because people
948:
Is there a list of recipients of the Barnstars/Awards? I think there should be if there isn't. We can make pages like
1312:. We currently use this barnstar to recognise users who contribute to articles of a particular country. Take a look
1632:
268:
1637:
I think we should create Templates to award multiple barnstars by multiple users. For example we recently awarded
1550:"This user is armed with Colt's M-16A2 Assault Rifle and is ready to kill idiot administrators who fuck with him."
636:, rather than be faced with a periodic addition of random topic barnstars, want to preemptivey create a series of
493:
already did it, but I don't know that the BoNM actually is a "topical barnstar". It is not intended for articles
1267:
1046:
1020:
805:
1296:
1282:
1060:
471:
1536:
906:
I think that's really more for the user that wants to preemptively decline any barnstars, sort of of like a
371:
785:
1176:
94:
779:
89:
1638:
943:
38:
1522:
484:
377:
from newbiedom, and wish to thank them. Do we have anything like that? If not, should we create one?
615:
the argument is), then how does that effect the (far more topical) Running man (or woman) barnstar?
1482:
1452:
1387:
1360:
856:
1249:
I don't like barn stars they are not the best idea in my opinion how about an alternitive symbol
914:
873:
847:
818:
741:
656:
599:
575:
365:
294:
217:
1105:
801:
A topical barnstarn is for a topic or wikiproject of substantial interest to users of wikipedia.
1421:
1403:
1320:
1211:
1112:
1068:
896:
766:
403:
350:
248:
1331:
1244:
1562:
1502:
to the Personal user awards section, since I didn't see any discussion on adding it to the
1156:
1149:
1142:
1029:
8:
1512:
1477:
1468:
1463:
1447:
1438:
1433:
1382:
1373:
1368:
1355:
1346:
1341:
1204:
1191:
1012:
989:
966:
885:
863:
836:
706:
541:
519:
415:
389:
326:
205:
151:
1602:
1231:
1092:
911:
870:
844:
815:
738:
653:
645:
596:
572:
490:
361:
291:
214:
1418:
1400:
1317:
1208:
1109:
1065:
1002:
893:
763:
400:
385:
Good idea. If we have a Excelent Newcommer award, we could have a Good Mentor award.
347:
245:
1650:
1601:
Absolutely not: anybody may award anything to anybody that they think deserving. –
1037:
973:
442:
136:
Community Barnstar sounds good. Now all that's needed is a better picture for it!
1618:
1545:
1541:
1316:
and you will see the various countries that are currently using this barnstar. --
1137:
125:
107:, I've only just discovered png, and I'm hopeless at it, but I've made a sketch
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1577:
1507:
1286:
1258:
1188:
1174:
1162:
1133:
1009:
986:
963:
882:
860:
833:
701:
536:
514:
475:
457:
426:
422:
412:
386:
378:
321:
304:
257:
200:
170:
826:
1566:
1553:
1300:
1226:
1087:
926:
718:
686:
616:
230:
137:
112:
1207:, why can't Knowledge have a shortcut titled "BS" that goes to barnstars? --
1528:
1222:
1200:
1166:
162:
665:
mine), and as the name (and the award's page) says, it is the barnstar of
111:. Can anyone help with this one - and perhaps come up with a better name?
1647:
1614:
1272:
1250:
792:
678:
588:
503:
1362:, am giving you this Barnstar, but you must have done something good.
1170:
641:
183:
166:
869:
That's probably best. We're not the barnstar police, after all... –
1593:
1076:
169:
and also can show that a certain Wikipedian is a great motivator.
155:
130:
1161:
Wouldn't this have a smidge more credibility if the shortcut were
1123:
1051:
466:
Oh - I noticed that similar ideas have been proposed before - see
1527:
How about creating a barnstrar for a military related articles --
950:
Knowledge:Barnstars on Knowledge/Recipients of Original Barnstar
652:). I would appreciate any input you anybody have on that... –
674:
670:
1336:
931:
723:
691:
621:
235:
142:
116:
108:
1257:
Sorry pal, it's pretty much entrenched wikipedia tradition
165:
megaphone. The megaphone can symbolize the promoting of
559:). Just FYI, there has been some ongoing discussion on
1059:
I have to say that I prefer the original version of
161:
My idea is to somehow incorporate a barnstar with a
1582:Do you have to be an administrator to award these?
1225:back since it doesn't do harm to have 2 shortcuts.
1281:contributors and advertising its existence on the
640:, based primarily on the categories listed on the
533:for my suggestion for the geography barnstar. --
698:But why specifically sports and not science? --
607:It's topical, certainly, but it can be used for
563:regarding broadening the current concept of the
561:Knowledge:Barnstar_and_award_proposals#Geography
399:is a good award to give for this situation. --
1055:latest version of the Photographer's Barnstar
644:, and I want to use the BoNM as one of them (
1498:and moved the "Back Scratching Barnstar" by
18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Knowledge Awards
1028:are Electronics a "smooth" science ? :p --
855:Thanks. Though the user awarded himself a
474:. Still, what are your current opinions?
1646:for people to copy and paste designs. -
1335:
1271:
1075:
1050:
411:Or the Random Acts of Kindess Barnstar.
182:
441:user page, for example) would be cool.
14:
1397:Knowledge:Barnstar and award proposals
812:Knowledge:Barnstar and award proposals
634:Knowledge:Barnstar_and_award_proposals
531:Knowledge:Barnstar and award proposals
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
1565:is the page at the time of writing. -
1490:Backscratching Barnstar moved to PUA
1283:Philippine Wikipedians' notice board
983:Image:Barnstar of National Merit.png
784:What exactly is the definition of a
557:The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
25:
806:The Hollywood Walk of Fame Barnstar
244:I agree, it looks mahvalous! :-) --
23:
497:countries, but rather to articles
24:
1666:
1308:I would suggest that you use the
1221:Agree with Deathphoenix. I added
1047:Change to Photographer's Barnstar
1032:June, the 8th of 2005, 16:18 CET
553:The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
930:
722:
690:
620:
234:
229:That's a goodie - go for it! :)
141:
115:
29:
1305:02:16, September 11, 2005 (UTC)
1297:Knowledge: Personal user awards
1485:19:31, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1455:19:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1427:19:01, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1409:18:45, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1399:. I'll take a look for you. --
1390:18:22, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1326:18:57, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
1290:01:44, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
13:
1:
1656:02:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
1639:User_talk:FeloniousMonk#Award
1621:23:42, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
1609:20:03, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
1597:06:18, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
1587:02:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
843:Thank them, and let it go. –
796:19:07, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
479:11:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
461:11:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
446:22:54, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
1570:07:38, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
1557:07:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
1532:07:37, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
569:Geography and nation article
7:
1518:18:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
10:
1671:
1310:Barnstar of National Merit
1236:16:38, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
1080:Altered version (Sango123)
565:Barnstar of National Merit
1262:01:44, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
1217:16:30, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
1199:... but be sure you keep
1195:16:08, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
1182:12:51, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
1153:22:04, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1097:20:01, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
1073:18:06, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1041:02:50, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
993:02:52, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
977:02:48, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
969:17:33, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
957:16:12, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
888:01:57, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
878:01:55, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
866:01:17, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
852:01:10, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
839:00:48, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
253:07:34, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
158:23:50, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC)
146:07:40, 23 Dec 2004 (UTC)
133:09:17, 2004 Dec 21 (UTC)
120:11:37, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
1633:Template:Award3 proposal
1165:or the like rather than
1117:15:18, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
935:04:45, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
919:02:04, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
901:05:02, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
857:Hero of the Soviet Union
823:01:39, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
771:05:28, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
746:01:53, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
713:14:29, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
695:05:56, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
661:01:33, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
625:22:19, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
591:01:22, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
548:14:52, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
506:05:40, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
418:3 July 2005 05:58 (UTC)
381:2 July 2005 15:36 (UTC)
367:20:50, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
299:07:02, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
260:14:17, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
239:05:42, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
222:21:17, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
210:20:22, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
173:21:35, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
1340:I forget the reason I,
1276:The Philippine Barnstar
1268:The Philippine Barnstar
1021:Science and Mathematics
1016:02:14, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
727:23:50, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
681:04:32, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
604:03:11, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
580:16:04, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
526:07:04, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
429:3 July 2005 15:05 (UTC)
408:3 July 2005 05:56 (UTC)
392:2 July 2005 15:41 (UTC)
372:Newbie-helper Barnstar!
355:21:59, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
344:Barnstar of Inspiration
333:20:02, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
307:19:19, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
199:Something like this? --
1644:Award Template Gallery
1363:
1277:
1130:Knowledge:Mind Benders
1081:
1056:
340:Barnstar of Motivation
316:The Community Barnstar
312:Barnstar of Motivation
288:The Community Barnstar
284:Barnstar of Motivation
187:
95:Barnstar of Motivation
1537:Fraudulent Barnstars?
1339:
1275:
1187:Ok, make the change.
1079:
1054:
451:Translator's Barnstar
397:Barnstar of Diligence
186:
42:of past discussions.
1253:7/30/05 3:47 PM EST
280:The Raising Barnstar
1169:, of all things? --
1008:32kb warning mark.
152:United Nations flag
90:Requested Barnstars
1561:For good measure,
1364:
1278:
1082:
1057:
944:List of recipients
827:Regretable Subject
638:Category Barnstars
188:
1523:Military Barnstar
1152:
711:
546:
524:
485:Topical Barnstars
436:Redirect Barnstar
331:
87:
86:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1662:
1480:
1475:
1466:
1450:
1445:
1436:
1385:
1380:
1371:
1358:
1353:
1344:
1303:
1234:
1229:
1178:
1146:
1141:
1106:additive primary
1095:
1090:
934:
786:topical barnstar
726:
712:
709:
700:
694:
630:"category stars"
624:
547:
544:
535:
525:
522:
513:
332:
329:
320:
269:What do we call
238:
208:
203:
145:
119:
68:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1670:
1669:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1661:
1660:
1659:
1635:
1580:
1546:User:Sean Black
1542:User:JJ.Johnson
1539:
1525:
1515:
1500:spankthecrumpet
1492:
1478:
1469:
1464:
1448:
1439:
1434:
1383:
1374:
1369:
1356:
1347:
1342:
1334:
1301:
1270:
1247:
1232:
1227:
1179:
1159:
1144:
1126:
1093:
1088:
1049:
1023:
1005:
946:
829:
808:
791:How about this?
782:
707:
699:
567:into a general
542:
534:
520:
512:
487:
453:
438:
374:
327:
319:
318:sound good. --
275:
206:
201:
97:
92:
64:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1668:
1634:
1631:
1629:
1626:
1624:
1623:
1611:
1599:
1579:
1576:
1574:
1538:
1535:
1524:
1521:
1511:
1491:
1488:
1460:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1411:
1333:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1306:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1175:
1158:
1155:
1125:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1099:
1098:
1048:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1022:
1019:
1004:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
945:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
922:
921:
920:
904:
903:
902:
828:
825:
807:
804:
803:
802:
781:
778:
777:
776:
775:
774:
773:
772:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
730:
729:
728:
682:
667:national merit
605:
584:
583:
582:
581:
527:
486:
483:
482:
481:
452:
449:
437:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
409:
393:
373:
370:
369:
368:
357:
356:
335:
334:
308:
274:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
242:
241:
240:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
211:
181:
180:
179:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
96:
93:
91:
88:
85:
84:
79:
74:
69:
62:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1667:
1658:
1657:
1654:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1640:
1630:
1627:
1622:
1619:
1616:
1612:
1610:
1607:
1606:
1600:
1598:
1595:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1588:
1585:
1575:
1572:
1571:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1534:
1533:
1530:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1509:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1487:
1486:
1483:
1481:
1476:
1474:
1473:
1467:
1456:
1453:
1451:
1446:
1444:
1443:
1437:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1425:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1410:
1407:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1388:
1386:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1372:
1361:
1359:
1354:
1352:
1351:
1345:
1338:
1332:Anon Barnstar
1327:
1324:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1304:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1288:
1284:
1274:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1252:
1245:Why Barnstars
1235:
1230:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1215:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1180:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1154:
1151:
1147:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1116:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1091:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1074:
1072:
1071:
1067:
1062:
1053:
1042:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1031:
1026:
1018:
1017:
1014:
1011:
994:
991:
988:
984:
980:
979:
978:
975:
971:
970:
968:
965:
960:
959:
958:
956:
951:
933:
928:
923:
918:
917:
913:
909:
908:no soliciting
905:
900:
899:
895:
890:
889:
887:
884:
880:
879:
877:
876:
872:
868:
867:
865:
862:
858:
854:
853:
851:
850:
846:
842:
841:
840:
838:
835:
824:
822:
821:
817:
813:
800:
799:
798:
797:
794:
789:
787:
770:
769:
765:
760:
759:
758:
757:
756:
755:
745:
744:
740:
735:
731:
725:
720:
715:
714:
710:
705:
704:
697:
696:
693:
688:
683:
680:
676:
672:
668:
663:
662:
660:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
626:
623:
618:
614:
610:
606:
603:
602:
598:
594:
593:
592:
590:
579:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
549:
545:
540:
539:
532:
528:
523:
518:
517:
509:
508:
507:
505:
500:
499:pertaining to
496:
492:
491:ClockworkSoul
480:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
448:
447:
444:
428:
424:
420:
419:
417:
414:
410:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
388:
384:
383:
382:
380:
366:
363:
359:
358:
354:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
336:
330:
325:
324:
317:
313:
309:
306:
302:
301:
300:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
272:
259:
255:
254:
252:
251:
247:
243:
237:
232:
228:
221:
220:
216:
213:I love it! –
212:
209:
204:
198:
197:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
185:
172:
168:
164:
160:
159:
157:
153:
148:
147:
144:
139:
135:
134:
132:
127:
123:
122:
121:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:Unfortunately
101:
83:
80:
78:
75:
73:
70:
67:
63:
61:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1651:
1643:
1636:
1628:
1625:
1604:
1581:
1573:
1560:
1549:
1540:
1526:
1510:
1503:
1495:
1493:
1471:
1470:
1461:
1441:
1440:
1422:
1404:
1376:
1375:
1365:
1349:
1348:
1321:
1279:
1248:
1212:
1160:
1157:The shortcut
1127:
1124:Mind Benders
1113:
1108:colours)? --
1069:
1058:
1027:
1024:
1006:
947:
915:
907:
897:
874:
848:
830:
819:
809:
790:
783:
767:
742:
733:
702:
666:
657:
637:
632:proposal on
612:
608:
600:
585:
576:
571:barnstar. –
568:
564:
556:
552:
537:
515:
498:
494:
488:
454:
439:
404:
395:I think the
375:
351:
343:
339:
322:
315:
311:
295:
287:
283:
279:
276:
270:
256:{Thumbs up)
249:
218:
163:cheerleading
104:
102:
98:
65:
43:
37:
1192:(Sound Off)
1132:(Shortcut:
990:(Sound Off)
955:Cookiecaper
443:Ben davison
416:(Sound Off)
390:(Sound Off)
36:This is an
1615:User:AlMac
1584:Astrokey44
1138:Flcelloguy
780:Definition
717:required.
207:™
126:Revivalist
1603:Clockwork
1465:Lord Vold
1435:Lord Vold
1370:Lord Vold
1343:Lord Vold
1259:Borisblue
1189:Zscout370
1038:Deryck C.
1010:Zscout370
1003:Templates
987:Zscout370
974:Deryck C.
964:Zscout370
912:Clockwork
883:Zscout370
871:Clockwork
861:Zscout370
845:Clockwork
834:Zscout370
816:Clockwork
810:Moved to
739:Clockwork
654:Clockwork
646:Geography
642:main page
597:Clockwork
573:Clockwork
476:Brisvegas
468:this link
458:Brisvegas
427:Borisblue
413:Zscout370
387:Zscout370
379:Borisblue
305:Zscout370
292:Clockwork
258:Zscout370
215:Clockwork
202:brian0918
171:Zscout370
167:Knowledge
82:Archive 5
77:Archive 4
72:Archive 3
66:Archive 2
60:Archive 1
1567:Nameneko
1554:Nameneko
1508:nae'blis
1504:official
1302:Bratsche
962:Cookie.
927:Grutness
719:Grutness
687:Grutness
617:Grutness
472:this one
231:Grutness
138:Grutness
113:Grutness
1529:DimaY2K
1423:phoenix
1405:phoenix
1322:phoenix
1213:phoenix
1177:tɔktəmi
1163:WP:BARN
1134:WP:MIND
1114:phoenix
1070:phoenix
925:award.
898:phoenix
768:phoenix
650:Society
489:I know
423:WP:NOOB
405:phoenix
352:phoenix
338:I like
310:Either
250:phoenix
39:archive
1578:admin?
1513:(talk)
1494:I was
1287:Coffee
1145:note?
1013:(talk)
967:(talk)
886:(talk)
864:(talk)
837:(talk)
1419:Death
1401:Death
1318:Death
1251:Dudtz
1228:Sango
1223:WP:BS
1209:Death
1201:WP:BS
1167:WP:BS
1150:Desk
1110:Death
1089:Sango
1066:Death
1030:Moala
894:Death
793:evrik
764:Death
703:BRIAN
679:Redux
675:Burma
671:Nepal
589:Redux
538:BRIAN
516:BRIAN
504:Redux
495:about
401:Death
348:Death
323:BRIAN
246:Death
16:<
1605:Soul
1563:here
1496:bold
1479:mort
1449:mort
1417:. --
1415:here
1384:mort
1357:mort
1314:here
1171:Angr
1061:here
916:Soul
875:Soul
849:Soul
820:Soul
743:Soul
734:love
708:0918
658:Soul
613:what
609:many
601:Soul
577:Soul
543:0918
529:See
521:0918
470:and
328:0918
296:Soul
290:. –
286:and
273:one?
271:this
219:Soul
124:The
109:here
1652:Boy
1648:Roy
1594:Nlu
1233:123
1094:123
648:or
555:or
511:--
362:Mgm
342:or
314:or
156:JRM
131:JRM
1432:--
1299:.
1285:?
1205:BS
1148:|
1143:A
1064:--
985:.
929:|
892:--
814:–
788:?
721:|
689:|
619:|
233:|
140:|
1617:|
1472:e
1442:e
1377:e
1350:e
1173:/
1140:|
364:|
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
