46:, digital watermarks are often only perceptible under certain conditions, e.g. after using some algorithm. If a digital watermark distorts the carrier signal in a way that it becomes easily perceivable, it may be considered less effective depending on its purpose. Traditional watermarks may be applied to visible media (like images or video), whereas in digital watermarking, the signal may be audio, pictures, video, texts or 3D models. A signal may carry several different watermarks at the same time. Unlike
155:
175:. While the modification may not be malicious, the term attack arises from copyright protection application, where third parties may attempt to remove the digital watermark through modification. There are many possible modifications, for example, lossy compression of the data (in which resolution is diminished), cropping an image or video, or intentionally adding noise.
76:. A watermark is embedded into a digital signal at each point of distribution. If a copy of the work is found later, then the watermark may be retrieved from the copy and the source of the distribution is known. This technique reportedly has been used to detect the source of illegally copied movies.
95:
Watermarks are identification marks produced during the paper-making process. The first watermarks appeared in Italy during the 13th century, but their use rapidly spread across Europe. They were used as a means to identify the paper maker or the trade guild that manufactured the paper. The marks
531:
in court. According to Blythe and
Fridrich, "either camera can provide an undisputable proof of the image origin or its author". A secure digital camera (SDC) was proposed by Saraju Mohanty, et al. in 2003 and published in January 2004. This was not the first time this was proposed. Blythe and
275:
if its presence in the marked signal is noticeable (e.g. digital on-screen graphics like a network logo, content bug, codes, opaque images). On videos and images, some are made transparent/translucent for convenience for consumers due to the fact that they block portion of the view; therefore
510:
The evaluation of digital watermarking schemes may provide detailed information for a watermark designer or for end-users, therefore, different evaluation strategies exist. Often used by a watermark designer is the evaluation of single properties to show, for example, an improvement. Mostly,
567:
has emerged as a candidate solution to provide copyright protection, tamper detection, traitor tracing, and maintaining integrity of relational data. Many watermarking techniques have been proposed in the literature to address these purposes. A survey of the current state-of-the-art and a
237:
if it fails to be detectable after the slightest modification. Fragile watermarks are commonly used for tamper detection (integrity proof). Modifications to an original work that clearly are noticeable, commonly are not referred to as watermarks, but as generalized
162:
The information to be embedded in a signal is called a digital watermark, although in some contexts the phrase digital watermark means the difference between the watermarked signal and the cover signal. The signal where the watermark is to be embedded is called the
57:
in which it is applied. For marking media files with copyright information, a digital watermark has to be rather robust against modifications that can be applied to the carrier signal. Instead, if integrity has to be ensured, a fragile watermark would be applied.
31:; the hidden information should, but does not need to, contain a relation to the carrier signal. Digital watermarks may be used to verify the authenticity or integrity of the carrier signal or to show the identity of its owners. It is prominently used for tracing
201:
with respect to transformations if the embedded information may be detected reliably from the marked signal, even if degraded by any number of transformations. Typical image degradations are JPEG compression, rotation, cropping, additive noise, and
526:
have produced cameras with security features such as the Epson PhotoPC 3000Z and the Kodak DC-290. Both cameras added irremovable features to the pictures which distorted the original image, making them unacceptable for some applications such as
181:(often called extraction) is an algorithm that is applied to the attacked signal to attempt to extract the watermark from it. If the signal was unmodified during transmission, then the watermark still is present and it may be extracted. In
65:
and digital watermarking employ steganographic techniques to embed data covertly in noisy signals. While steganography aims for imperceptibility to human senses, digital watermarking tries to control the robustness as top priority.
167:
signal. A watermarking system is usually divided into three distinct steps, embedding, attack, and detection. In embedding, an algorithm accepts the host and the data to be embedded, and produces a watermarked signal.
295:
The message is conceptually zero-bit long and the system is designed in order to detect the presence or the absence of the watermark in the marked object. This kind of watermarking scheme is usually referred to as
511:
end-users are not interested in detailed information. They want to know if a given digital watermarking algorithm may be used for their application scenario, and if so, which parameter sets seems to be the best.
375:
568:
classification of the different techniques according to their intent, the way they express the watermark, the cover type, granularity level, and verifiability was published in 2010 by Halder et al. in the
1102:
Patrick Bas, Teddy Furon, François Cayre, Gwenaël Doërr, Benjamin Mathon, "Watermarking
Security, Fundamentals, Secure Designs and Attacks", Springer Briefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2016,
218:
imperceptible watermarks has proven to be quite challenging. Robust imperceptible watermarks have been proposed as a tool for the protection of digital content, for example as an embedded
555:
is a technique which enables images to be authenticated and then restored to their original form by removing the digital watermark and replacing the image data that had been overwritten.
1060:
27:
such as audio, video or image data. It is typically used to identify ownership of the copyright of such a signal. Digital watermarking is the process of hiding digital information in a
69:
Since a digital copy of data is the same as the original, digital watermarking is a passive protection tool. It just marks data, but does not degrade it or control access to the data.
493:
if the marked signal is obtained by quantization. Quantization watermarks suffer from low robustness, but have a high information capacity due to rejection of host interference.
482:
if the marked signal is obtained by an additive modification. Spread-spectrum watermarks are known to be modestly robust, but also to have a low information capacity due to host
420:
465:
249:
if it resists benign transformations, but fails detection after malignant transformations. Semi-fragile watermarks commonly are used to detect malignant transformations.
893:
782:
Khan, Asifullah; Mirza, Anwar M. (October 2007). "Genetic perceptual shaping: Utilizing cover image and conceivable attack information during watermark embedding".
256:
if it resists a designated class of transformations. Robust watermarks may be used in copy protection applications to carry copy and no access control information.
171:
Then the watermarked digital signal is transmitted or stored, usually transmitted to another person. If this person makes a modification, this is called an
502:
if the marked signal is embedded by additive modification which is similar to spread spectrum method, but is particularly embedded in the spatial domain.
185:
digital watermarking applications, the extraction algorithm should be able to produce the watermark correctly, even if the modifications were strong. In
210:
if the watermarked content is perceptually equivalent to the original, unwatermarked content. In general, it is easy to create either robust watermarks
1049:
Theoretical framework for a practical evaluation and comparison of audio watermarking schemes in the triangle of robustness, transparency and capacity
467:
and is modulated in the watermark. These kinds of schemes usually are referred to as multiple-bit watermarking or non-zero-bit watermarking schemes.
1005:
Halder, Raju; Pal, Shantanu; Cortesi, Agostino (2010). "Watermarking
Techniques for Relational Databases: Survey, Classification and Comparison".
690:
A.Z.Tirkel, G.A. Rankin, R.M. Van
Schyndel, W.J.Ho, N.R.A.Mee, C.F.Osborne. “Electronic Water Mark”. DICTA 93, Macquarie University. p.666-673
96:
often were created by a wire sewn onto the paper mold. Watermarks continue to be used today as manufacturer's marks and to prevent forgery.
864:
700:
Zigomitros, Athanasios; Papageorgiou, Achilleas; Patsakis, Constantinos (2012). "Social network content management through watermarking".
310:
92:
spread spectrum watermark was demonstrated in 1993 by Andrew Tirkel, Gerard Rankin, Ron Van
Schyndel, Charles Osborne, and others.
1056:
974:
758:
717:
569:
206:. For video content, temporal modifications and MPEG compression often are added to this list. A digital watermark is called
930:
1108:
1120:
989:
916:
88:
was coined by Andrew Tirkel and
Charles Osborne in December 1992. The first successful embedding and extraction of a
203:
1051:; In: Transaction on Data Hiding and Multimedia Security I; Springer LNCS 4300; Editor Yun Q. Shi; pp. 1–40;
1144:
24:
158:
General digital watermark life-cycle phases with embedding-, attacking-, and detection and retrieval functions
1139:
1066:
Smirnov, M. V. (1 June 2005). "Holographic approach to embedding hidden watermarks in a photographic image".
626:
1154:
483:
291:
The length of the embedded message determines two different main classes of digital watermarking schemes:
596:
50:
that is added to the carrier signal, a digital watermark does not change the size of the carrier signal.
380:
1042:
1037:
702:
2012 IEEE 11th
International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications
621:
1019:
796:
835:
425:
116:
Broadcast monitoring (television news often contains watermarked video from international agencies)
743:
2008 International
Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling Control & Automation
853:
189:
digital watermarking, the extraction algorithm should fail if any change is made to the signal.
1014:
791:
130:
32:
948:
1149:
611:
283:, that is, watermarking which uses the limitations of human perception to be imperceptible.
1075:
954:
591:
498:
8:
741:
Rowayda, A. Sadek (2008). "Blind
Synthesis Attack on SVD Based Watermarking Techniques".
564:
1079:
958:
922:
764:
723:
541:
268:
if the original cover signal and the marked signal are perceptually indistinguishable.
1104:
1091:
1052:
970:
912:
809:
754:
713:
581:
528:
47:
894:"VLSI implementation of visible watermarking for secure digital still camera design"
727:
1083:
962:
926:
904:
801:
768:
746:
705:
805:
647:
Data Hiding
Fundamentals and Applications: Content Security in Digital Multimedia
616:
606:
478:
108:
889:
533:
143:
28:
966:
908:
709:
1133:
1095:
813:
601:
126:
89:
62:
104:
Digital watermarking may be used for a wide range of applications, such as:
1087:
750:
113:
Source tracking (different recipients get differently watermarked content)
586:
122:
953:, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5414, pp. 340–341,
154:
133:
programs, to encourage users to purchase the full version to remove it.
1047:
Jana Dittmann, David Megias, Andreas Lang, Jordi Herrera-Joancomarti;
537:
43:
370:{\displaystyle \left(m=m_{1}\ldots m_{n},\;n\in \mathbb {N} \right.}
679:
Digital watermarking and steganography: fundamentals and techniques
225:
Digital watermarking techniques may be classified in several ways.
54:
36:
239:
1124:
699:
523:
519:
385:
364:
53:
The needed properties of a digital watermark depend on the
888:
214:
imperceptible watermarks, but the creation of both robust
23:
is a kind of marker covertly embedded in a noise-tolerant
901:
17th International Conference on VLSI Design. Proceedings
693:
149:
1038:
ECRYPT report: Audio Benchmarking Tools and Steganalysis
558:
946:
827:
882:
428:
383:
313:
892:; Ranganathan, Nagarajan; Namballa, Ravi K. (2004).
639:
681:. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008
459:
414:
369:
1131:
1004:
536:that would use lossless watermarking to embed a
532:Fridrich also have worked on SDC in 2004 for a
496:A digital watermarking method is referred to as
476:A digital watermarking method is referred to as
852:BLYTHE, Paul; FRIDRICH, Jessica (August 2004).
489:A digital watermarking method is said to be of
851:
505:
775:
665:. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, USA, 2008
448:
435:
649:. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 2004.
72:One application of digital watermarking is
645:H.T. Sencar, M. Ramkumar and A.N. Akansu:
351:
1018:
795:
781:
547:
359:
1043:ECRYPT report: Watermarking Benchmarking
153:
1065:
740:
1132:
998:
950:Advances in Image and Video Technology
673:
671:
663:Digital watermarking and steganography
150:Digital watermarking life-cycle phases
1007:Journal of Universal Computer Science
847:
845:
657:
655:
570:Journal of Universal Computer Science
559:Watermarking for relational databases
940:
307:The message is an n-bit-long stream
222:flag in professional video content.
16:Marker covertly embedded in a signal
982:
668:
471:
13:
1031:
994:, The Economist, December 12, 2002
947:Toshikazu Wada; Fay Huang (2009),
861:Digital Forensic Research Workshop
842:
652:
415:{\displaystyle \left.n=|m|\right)}
14:
1166:
1114:
279:This should not be confused with
259:
192:
838:from the original on 2008-02-23.
870:from the original on 2010-06-10
99:
820:
734:
684:
403:
395:
271:A digital watermark is called
264:A digital watermark is called
252:A digital watermark is called
245:A digital watermark is called
233:A digital watermark is called
197:A digital watermark is called
1:
1068:Journal of Optical Technology
632:
627:Automatic content recognition
460:{\displaystyle M=\{0,1\}^{n}}
302:presence watermarking schemes
228:
903:. IEEE. pp. 1063–1068.
806:10.1016/j.inffus.2005.09.007
704:. IEEE. pp. 1381–1386.
7:
597:Pattern Recognition (novel)
575:
540:identifier together with a
506:Evaluation and benchmarking
286:
139:Fraud and Tamper detection.
10:
1171:
514:
79:
991:Unretouched by human hand
967:10.1007/978-3-540-92957-4
909:10.1109/ICVD.2004.1261070
710:10.1109/TrustCom.2012.264
622:Digital on-screen graphic
563:Digital watermarking for
854:"Secure digital camera"
33:copyright infringements
1145:Authentication methods
553:Reversible data hiding
548:Reversible data hiding
461:
416:
371:
159:
142:Content management on
131:video editing software
1088:10.1364/JOT.72.000464
751:10.1109/CIMCA.2008.53
612:Watermark (data file)
462:
417:
372:
157:
1140:Digital watermarking
745:. pp. 140–145.
592:EURion constellation
565:relational databases
499:amplitude modulation
426:
381:
311:
119:Video authentication
109:Copyright protection
1155:Digital photography
1080:2005JOptT..72..464S
959:2008LNCS.5414.....W
44:physical watermarks
890:Mohanty, Saraju P.
784:Information Fusion
542:cryptographic hash
457:
412:
367:
160:
123:Software crippling
1057:978-3-540-49071-5
1013:(21): 3164–3190.
976:978-3-540-92956-7
828:"CPTWG Home Page"
760:978-0-7695-3514-2
719:978-1-4673-2172-3
582:Coded Anti-Piracy
529:forensic evidence
491:quantization type
86:digital watermark
42:Like traditional
21:digital watermark
1162:
1099:
1025:
1024:
1022:
1002:
996:
995:
986:
980:
979:
944:
938:
937:
936:on 4 March 2016.
935:
929:. Archived from
898:
886:
880:
879:
877:
875:
869:
858:
849:
840:
839:
824:
818:
817:
799:
779:
773:
772:
738:
732:
731:
697:
691:
688:
682:
675:
666:
661:Ingemar J. Cox:
659:
650:
643:
472:Embedding method
466:
464:
463:
458:
456:
455:
421:
419:
418:
413:
411:
407:
406:
398:
376:
374:
373:
368:
366:
363:
362:
347:
346:
334:
333:
136:ID card security
39:authentication.
1170:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1130:
1129:
1117:
1034:
1032:Further reading
1029:
1028:
1020:10.1.1.368.1075
1003:
999:
988:
987:
983:
977:
945:
941:
933:
919:
896:
887:
883:
873:
871:
867:
856:
850:
843:
826:
825:
821:
797:10.1.1.708.9509
780:
776:
761:
739:
735:
720:
698:
694:
689:
685:
677:Frank Y. Shih:
676:
669:
660:
653:
644:
640:
635:
617:Audio watermark
607:Traitor tracing
578:
561:
550:
517:
508:
479:spread-spectrum
474:
451:
447:
427:
424:
423:
402:
394:
387:
384:
382:
379:
378:
358:
342:
338:
329:
325:
318:
314:
312:
309:
308:
289:
262:
231:
220:no-copy-allowed
195:
152:
144:social networks
102:
82:
74:source tracking
17:
12:
11:
5:
1168:
1158:
1157:
1152:
1147:
1142:
1128:
1127:
1116:
1115:External links
1113:
1112:
1111:
1109:978-9811005053
1100:
1074:(6): 464–484.
1063:
1045:
1040:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1026:
997:
981:
975:
939:
917:
881:
841:
819:
790:(4): 354–365.
774:
759:
733:
718:
692:
683:
667:
651:
637:
636:
634:
631:
630:
629:
624:
619:
614:
609:
604:
599:
594:
589:
584:
577:
574:
560:
557:
549:
546:
534:digital camera
516:
513:
507:
504:
473:
470:
469:
468:
454:
450:
446:
443:
440:
437:
434:
431:
410:
405:
401:
397:
393:
390:
386:
365:
361:
357:
354:
350:
345:
341:
337:
332:
328:
324:
321:
317:
305:
288:
285:
276:degrading it.
261:
260:Perceptibility
258:
230:
227:
217:
213:
194:
193:Classification
191:
151:
148:
147:
146:
140:
137:
134:
120:
117:
114:
111:
101:
98:
90:steganographic
81:
78:
29:carrier signal
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1167:
1156:
1153:
1151:
1148:
1146:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1126:
1122:
1119:
1118:
1110:
1106:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1064:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1035:
1021:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1001:
993:
992:
985:
978:
972:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
943:
932:
928:
924:
920:
918:0-7695-2072-3
914:
910:
906:
902:
895:
891:
885:
866:
862:
855:
848:
846:
837:
833:
829:
823:
815:
811:
807:
803:
798:
793:
789:
785:
778:
770:
766:
762:
756:
752:
748:
744:
737:
729:
725:
721:
715:
711:
707:
703:
696:
687:
680:
674:
672:
664:
658:
656:
648:
642:
638:
628:
625:
623:
620:
618:
615:
613:
610:
608:
605:
603:
602:Steganography
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
579:
573:
571:
566:
556:
554:
545:
543:
539:
535:
530:
525:
521:
512:
503:
501:
500:
494:
492:
487:
485:
481:
480:
452:
444:
441:
438:
432:
429:
408:
399:
391:
388:
355:
352:
348:
343:
339:
335:
330:
326:
322:
319:
315:
306:
303:
299:
294:
293:
292:
284:
282:
277:
274:
269:
267:
266:imperceptible
257:
255:
250:
248:
243:
241:
236:
226:
223:
221:
215:
211:
209:
208:imperceptible
205:
200:
190:
188:
184:
180:
176:
174:
169:
166:
156:
145:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
127:screencasting
124:
121:
118:
115:
112:
110:
107:
106:
105:
97:
93:
91:
87:
77:
75:
70:
67:
64:
63:steganography
59:
56:
51:
49:
45:
40:
38:
34:
30:
26:
22:
1150:Watermarking
1071:
1067:
1048:
1010:
1006:
1000:
990:
984:
949:
942:
931:the original
900:
884:
872:. Retrieved
860:
831:
822:
787:
783:
777:
742:
736:
701:
695:
686:
678:
662:
646:
641:
562:
552:
551:
518:
509:
497:
495:
490:
488:
484:interference
477:
475:
301:
297:
290:
280:
278:
272:
270:
265:
263:
253:
251:
247:semi-fragile
246:
244:
234:
232:
224:
219:
207:
204:quantization
198:
196:
186:
182:
178:
177:
172:
170:
164:
161:
103:
100:Applications
94:
85:
83:
73:
71:
68:
60:
52:
41:
20:
18:
587:Copy attack
273:perceptible
1134:Categories
1121:Watermarks
633:References
281:perceptual
229:Robustness
1096:1070-9762
1015:CiteSeerX
863:: 11–13.
832:cptwg.org
814:1566-2535
792:CiteSeerX
538:biometric
356:∈
336:…
179:Detection
84:The term
865:Archived
836:Archived
728:17845019
576:See also
298:zero-bit
287:Capacity
240:barcodes
55:use case
48:metadata
37:banknote
35:and for
1076:Bibcode
1059:, 2006
955:Bibcode
927:1821349
874:23 July
769:8927498
515:Cameras
377:, with
235:fragile
187:fragile
80:History
1125:Curlie
1107:
1094:
1055:
1017:
973:
925:
915:
812:
794:
767:
757:
726:
716:
254:robust
199:robust
183:robust
173:attack
25:signal
934:(PDF)
923:S2CID
897:(PDF)
868:(PDF)
857:(PDF)
765:S2CID
724:S2CID
524:Kodak
520:Epson
61:Both
1105:ISBN
1092:ISSN
1053:ISBN
971:ISBN
913:ISBN
876:2018
810:ISSN
755:ISBN
714:ISBN
522:and
165:host
129:and
1123:at
1084:doi
1061:PDF
963:doi
905:doi
802:doi
747:doi
706:doi
422:or
300:or
216:and
125:on
1136::
1090:.
1082:.
1072:72
1070:.
1011:16
1009:.
969:,
961:,
921:.
911:.
899:.
859:.
844:^
834:.
830:.
808:.
800:.
786:.
763:.
753:.
722:.
712:.
670:^
654:^
572:.
544:.
486:.
242:.
212:or
19:A
1098:.
1086::
1078::
1023:.
965::
957::
907::
878:.
816:.
804::
788:8
771:.
749::
730:.
708::
453:n
449:}
445:1
442:,
439:0
436:{
433:=
430:M
409:)
404:|
400:m
396:|
392:=
389:n
360:N
353:n
349:,
344:n
340:m
331:1
327:m
323:=
320:m
316:(
304:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
