3785:
veracity of the claim here. A previous diff was provided to show how bad the IP was with the note of "see this edit summary" upon viewing the edit summary I found nothing wrong with it. It was a factual and accurate description of an edit made that appeared to be a legitimate edit. That's just an example. So far about 2 out of 3 edits being show as indications of problem don't indicate any problem. I've seen a few questionable diffs, but I've seen them from both sides. My point with the accounts comment is that claiming this IP has made accounts to harass you is wrong and can cause a bias. Someone might read that without actually checking think "wow this guy is bad". If you want to cause someone to be banned, do it on facts and not hyperbole. He's had a lot of IPs, but I don't see anything actually tying him to an account, and if the worst thing he has done is get hung up on a claim you made (which honestly for all your explanation, can still be interpreted as claiming multiple degrees, no where did you ever state when making those claims that those were just classes that were part of a single degree) then a site ban really isn't in order. A mutual restraining order is more in order as I've seen you get just as worked up about him as he gets worked up about you.--
2023:
treated with care, to the point where we must be using third party commentary. The article is in need of serious pruning and restructuring at this point, regardless, and there is a seperate move by
PalestineRemembered to get citations in I believe. The latest attempt at the edit that has been warred over does encourage synthesis (It uses a primary source of poor visual quality and certainly a lack of clarity in its content and draws definitive conclusions from that) and also uses sources for the report predating the report by 13 years (It lists the view points of the creators of the report, sources them, then passes this off as the conclusion of the report. Synthesis again). Finding information on the report has not proved easy and even those wanting the edit in disagree over what it says. I do think there is a place for the report, I do not think the tactics being used to get it in are in anyway compliant with policy or conducive to the good of wikipedia. I also take particular umbridge at the accusations of 'censorship' and the accusation that I have ome 'Personal stake in this'. As far as I am aware, I wasn't even born at the time, so was certainly not piloting an Israeli Mirage jet.
7529:
confused about that, as I think that word applies in a "Godzilla-like" way to the above link on the
Bellinghaus site about myself). At most, there a little sarcasm on my page, which outlines my looking into the reason for the phonecalls etc. I don't see how it can be viewed as "accusatory" either, as it simply reproduces "on record" wiki conversations between myself and DC including Bellinghaus's own words. Accusations? I am not accusing him of making a threatening phone call, it actually happened and you can hear a recording of it on my page. Yes the text is somewhat damning - yes, the text gives a very bad impression of Bellinghaus - but he authored it and admitted his wiki ids! He is the author of his own bannings all over the net. No, the page is an explanation for anyone catching a very bad impression of DC and myself via highly critical and incorrect information on Bellinghaus blogs.
6405:
the place, was desysopped by Jimbo, but had the bit back within hours. Such is Wiki; that all of this happened in about a month gives us an idea of the circus we've got going. The Tony1's and Ceoil's, who work to turn out what we put on our main page every day but aren't admins, are judged and hung on one word or edit, while admins are protected even if they toss out a truckload of F-bombs. And then some admins don't understand why hard working volunteers are insulted about having their block log smeared. There needs to be some dialogue somewhere on Wiki to get better understanding about those who are toiling away at the different tasks in different areas of Wiki. Admin tools and tasks are needed and welcomed, but all too often, the vandal fighting mentality is turned on our most productive writers.
4036:
to my satisfaction. It would be nice also if
Arcayne agreed to reciprocal self-restriction of his editing, but not required. I would, however, take it as a complete dick-move should Arcayne take the opportunity to "poke" or "prod" 75.X.X.X given his inability to respond; however I have faith that Arcayne has no desire to do that. I pray he does not make a fool of me for thinking that, because it could turn badly for either party in this dispute should hostilities resume. I think we have reached a good solution, and I thank Crossmr for taking the lead in mediating this. Once again, I endorse this solution, and consider for myself the matter closed, so long as neither party starts it up again. If either side in this dispute DOES start up again, they can expect blocks coming their way... --
1614:
Commandant of the Marine Corps), Rear
Admiral Merlin Staring (former U.S. Navy JAG), and Ambassador James Akins (former ambassador to Saudi Arabia). Among the findings of the commission was that " there is compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew; evidence of such intent is supported by statements from Secretary of State Dean Rusk, Undersecretary of State George Ball, former CIA director Richard Helms, former NSA directors Lieutenant General William Odom, USA (Ret.) and Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, USN (Ret.)...". The Moorer Report continues: "in attacking USS Liberty, Israel committed acts of murder against American servicemen and an act of war against the United States".
3472:
effects. The anon has stated in April that they prefer to edit as a "public user", and more recently that they wish to avoid the "social networking aspects" of Wiki, and simply concentrate on articles. Quite lofty; if only it were true. Out of all the IPs connected to the account (and again the RfCU only addresses those IPs that intersected with my edits), less that a tenth actually add content to an article (and uncited content, in point of fact). The remainder of all of these contributions consist of reverting me, attacking me in article discussion or filing various administrative actions, all against me. All of that seems to pointedly fly in the face of someone trying to avoid the non-encyclopedia-building aspects of
Knowledge.
4021:
and instead chooses to edit articles the IP edits. I made the request in the interest of keeping peace, but it is in no part a requirement of the IPs interaction ban. If arcayne follows the ip around and calls his mother dirty names I'd still consider it a violation of the interaction ban if the IP said anything to him or about him (other than to link me the diffs on my talk page). You do understand the difference between asking another user something and telling them they either do it or there are repercussions right? I did actually mean ask in the traditional sense of the word and not like when the police show up at a club and "ask" someone to leave.--
3141:. The anon had a clear habit of following Arcayne around, unprovoked, reverting him on a multitude of unrelated pages with no other purpose than to annoy him, jumping into disputes that didn't concern him except for his urge to hit out at Arcayne, bringing up the degrees issue again and again without any factual need, again with no other purpose than to taunt Arcayne, and incidentally also distorting every word of what Arcayne was actually saying about the issue. In fact, Arcayne has very clearly stated what degree he has, it is absolutely plausible and matches everything he said earlier, and there is not the slightest reason to doubt his veracity.
3717:
Sometimes you can force a new IP address by rebooting/leaving your modem off for the lease period (typically a day) and sometimes your ISP just decides to randomly reshuffle all the leases, or there is some other problem going on which causes everyone to grab a new ip address. Generally rebooting your modem doesn't grant a new ip address as the DHCP process will typically give you the same address you had if the lease is still valid, or if no one else has taken that address after the lease is up your modem will ask for the last address it had. So it actually can be a little difficult to get a new IP address that way. If you're not familiar with
4133:, which as you admitted is just one degree, So even if you want to argue that you somehow meant that the history degree was from another university(which is a stretch to read in that context), when did you pick up the separate political and international relations degrees? The consensus for an interaction ban is 6 users vs only 3 who want a site ban. There isn't any kind of majority in favour of a site ban. If he doens't respect the interaction ban then his next stop is a full ban. If he ever talks to you again touches one of your edits etc, you don't have to do anything, calmly post it on ANI, and CC me and you're done and so is he.--
10245:) to promote the adoption of IEC prefixes: computer-related issue whereby Thunderbird2 would have Knowledge using terms like “kibibytes (KiB)” instead of “kilobytes (KB)”. On WP:MOSNUM we went back to using the terminology observed by the rest of the real world. This editor refuses to get the point, won’t let it go, continually brings the issue up again and again (in what appears like the vain hope to catch WT:MOSNUM when we’re sleeping), is making a thorough pest of himself, and needs to be banned. The disruption he causes here (significant) far outweighs the value of his contributions (zero, since he is a single-purpose account).
312:
at the fact that someone is questioning his judgment, became extremely defensive and was eager to shut me up by saying "let's close this discussion". He accused me of NPA against ban-evading sock Alex. He then tried to exonerate Alex's pass transgression and sockpuppetry ] as well as demonstrating a flawed understanding of ]. He then failed to assume good faith ] by accusing me of ''boosting your Arbcom candidature by creating a tough-guy profile on ANI? Good lord. Go do what you must and get your "landmark case" rolling, but try to not waste the time of your more mature fellow wikipedians all too much in the process, willya?'']
3955:
they were in fact false and that
Arcayne was lying. I'm uncomfortable about the message we are sending out by allowing someone back that easily with this serious libellous allegation still hanging around. At the very least, I would expect (as a last word before shutting up forever about the topic) that the anon should fully and unconditionally apologise and retract. The whole topic of casting doubts on Arcayne's credentials was an arbitrary fabrication on the anon's part, thought up for no other reason than to harass him and based on no factual evidence or likelihood whatsoever, and I would want to see the anon acknowledge this.
7560:
in conflict with, so the idea of me or Ty asking him to do anything like that is out of the question. Let me also clarify that I have no interest whatsoever in your blog, Bellinghaus's blog or any other blog. My interest has only ever been in removing this offending material from
Knowledge. Once that is done the matter is concluded for me. Furthermore BLP is not entirely predicated on the likelihood of a user actually filing suit against the Wikimedia Foundation, but simply in preventing harm to living people. However ironic it may seem after MB's abusive behavior, I remain committed to correcting this situation on-wiki. --
1669:"Editors can't be bothered to provide secondary sources to support edit". As I have already explained, I provided 5 secondary sources. You merely chose to ignore all of them and write your comment. In fact, not only did you ignore the sources, you incorrectly applied WP:SYN to the sources. They are confirming that the sources actually have said what the Moorer Reports describes them as saying. I 'synthesized' nothing. They spoke - on record - and I reproduced sources confirming that they did indeed say what the Moorer Report claims they said. I can not imagine how this can violate any Knowledge policy whatsoever.
5358:, have rejected. Building consensus through negotiation, the way that disagreements are overcome on Knowledge, is alien to the JIDF. It lacks the glamour and spectacle of taking over an anti-Zionist Facebook group and displaying an Israeli flag on it. So long as they operate like this on Knowledge, they will get blocked and barred, just like some of the people on the opposing side who behave similarly get barred and blocked (e.g NobodyofConsequence and puttyshool). And if they stop acting like this and grow up, they will no longer be the same JIDF and could actually contribute something here instead.--
1937:- if you place a dot in your "UserPage", then your name will no longer show up in red on pages such as this one. Thankyou for the Barnstar, I deeply regret that it was considered a good excuse to jeer at both of us. The idea of WP is to be collegiate - it's disturbing there are still admins around who feel no need to uphold some of the most fundamental principles (not to say policy) of the project. It damages the workings of the whole project, and may explain why I was shortly snippy with another un-named admin as you can see below.
11423:(e/c) A long while ago, I had a very similar situation: an edit warrior asked for a second chance, and when I unblocked his first act was to put a swastika on the talk page of the admin who blocked him. I reblocked indef. I recently became aware they're editing under a new name. Since there's no indication of edit warring or harassing the admin he harrassed before, I figure Knowledge is reults oriented, not rules oriented, and ignored it. If they ever edit war or put up more swastikas, I can reblock immediately with no warnings.
4066:
a consensus for a site ban, though he may be counting folk who were unsure of the limits of the ban, but it seemed to me that banning the anon was the right way to go, as the anon seems either unrepentant or unwilling to see their culpability. Their very last comments (dated only a few hours ago) on their talk page support this lack of agreement. As FuturePerfect pointed out, the anon still has his prefacing remarks calling me a liar in his user talk space. As far as I know, we don't allow attack pages here, and yet, there it is.
3819:
originated. I'm trying to condense a few diffs myself, seeing as some people still fail to see the obvious, but as it's across so many pages and IPs it takes a bit of time. – As far as I'm concerned, Arcayne himself is still not the issue here. He was involved in what was originally a legitimate though heated content dispute back at the time; since then, he's simply been the stalking victim. (And I'm not saying this as somebody who particularly likes
Arcayne; I know it can be exasperating to deal with him at times.)
8005:(edit conflict) Interesting that you comment about British editors - it was something that also occured to me. I could say that I have an onus and duty to uphold the court's decision and should remove the material on that basis irregardless of consensus or 3RR! But I can't delete it entirely, which is why I've come here. The "do no harm" is a policy I can agree with without any hint of sarcasm and wonder if that's enough to scrub the edit history. I can do the work in finding the diffs if required of me.
3974:
he had to leave the IP alone but asked and recommended to him politely that he do so. Unless arcayne is out to start trouble he should have no problem agreeing to that. The IP has pointed out that they generally edit different areas and it was just a coincidence they ended up together on this article. As to an apology and retraction regarding the comments made about arcayne, I'm afraid I don't really see it the way you do. As far as I'm concerned
Arcayne still used the language "degrees"
8891:. If he insists or edit wars over the reversion, then there is some "incident". However, absent behavior like that, it is ok for most policies to be changes slightly without discussion beforehand. Let's say (for an example) that the changes made were uncontroversial--simply making the changes and waiting for reversion would be MUCH easier than proposing them, ensuring that no one had objections, then making the changes. If I am missing something about this, please let me know.
10084:
to protect
Knowledge the account should be blocked at the first sign of any new problems. As Moonriddengirl has pointed out, a good contribution history often does result in the odd hiccup being overlooked, but copyright violation could have consequences for Knowledge as a whole and we have no option but to take this very seriously. If we don't get these reassurances as to future behaviour, but editing continues, I'd suggest perhaps blocking the account until we do.
10047:
since we do run the risk that copyright violations will work their way into what should be Knowledge's best content. I hope that this contributor has simply misunderstood the policies and laws in question and that there won't be any further infringement, but his defensiveness in response to these concerns (including in the initial article's talk page, on my talk page and in response to the issues raised by TheIslander above) and his removal of the matter from
333:
to block me, even claiming that "conflict of interest" does not apply despite the fact that no other editor reverted me during this time except himself. ] He seems to be reverting out of personal vendetta. Even my attempt to compromise by telling him to move the objectionable sentence to another part of the article was rebuffed as he continued to hurl insults in edit summary such as accusing me of being a sexist, misogynist, among other personal attacks.
81:
3389:
a range block, will effect innocent editors from posting their opinions to the guy. Right now Arcayne is not the one in question, his qualifications certainly are not. I could call myself someone famous, I don't have to prove it, just like people don't have to register. However there is a bit of pathetic EW-ing, both disagreeing with each others edits. I don't know what the solution is unless we start a discussion about Arcayne's edits too.
1675:
no way to reach consensus if you delete the entry, and every other variation of the entry you see. WP:CONSENSUS is impossible to reach if the only act you perform is to delete the entry. You have never even attempted to edit the entry to rid it of your objections. That is both a violation of WP:CONSENSUS and the first reason for why I make the charge that you are trying to censor any mention of the report on the USS Liberty incident page.
3851:
HOWEVER, that does not justify the incessant harrassment of him SINCE then. That was 6 months ago, and there has been no defense for the rude edit summaries and the frivolous ANIs and the talk page rudeness that has been cited above, and which dates for every month SINCE then. Seriously, if there is no more recent evidence of provocation by Arcayne, then I fail to see how some diffs from April can be used to justify this behavior... --
3216:
He did nothing wrong in doing so. I'm sure I've mentioned my own qualifications too at some point or other. Anybody is free to draw whatever conclusions they wish from such a statement, or not to draw any. The anon never had any legitimate cause in making this an issue in the first place. Warning: by continuing to talk about this non-topic, you are actually continuing the harassment and could be treated accordingly if you overdo it.
6530:
sought out by academic writers in many disciplines, and we are privileged that he donates so much time and energy to Knowledge. If he is sometimes uncivil, it is in the face of unrelenting provocation from the likes of Anderson, who should consider (once more) backing off and examining what he might do that is constructive, himself. Let him first look to Tony's additional work in coaching editors striving to improve their work (see
230:] is persistently attempting to out someone as a BNP member, using as his source, 'the BNP membership list'. This person's name has not been published in any media source at all. I have removed this four times as it is clearly unjustifiable, and there is simply no justification for using a private membership list as a source on Knowledge. Please could you ensure this doesn't continue ] (]) 19:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
223:] is persistently attempting to out someone as a BNP member, using as his source, 'the BNP membership list'. This person's name has not been published in any media source at all. I have removed this four times as it is clearly unjustifiable, and there is simply no justification for using a private membership list as a source on Knowledge. Please could you ensure this doesn't continue ] (]) 19:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7280:) was recently indef blocked here for similar comments. I am simply linking to the page on her site where Pauline Berry defends herself against Bellinghaus' accusations. I don't feel that the content of that page is offensive, but it's a moot point since it is a private website and WP rules don't apply. She has, as a result of the discussion on my talk page and unbidden by me, changed the title of the page to
11809:. Now with ALL this continuing even now, as pointed out in my complaint raised here, I seriously cannot believe how the Admins let someone clean up their talk page to make it look nice and still continue organized mafia-type hounding, uncivility, sockpuppetry and policy violations to let one guy get away with ALL this, just to write POV nonsense. Can something be done about this? Seriously!! Thanks ] (]
14448:
3985:
himself, but was he being truthful? The anon provided evidence. Oxford doesn't have those degrees and Arcayne later confirmed that indeed it is a single degree, not multiple degrees. I think they can both learn a lesson here. I've also pointed out that as far as I'm concerned Arcayne is guilty of edit warring in August (that he instigated not the IP) over the moving of his comment on a talk page.
7412:
question, and both of us in the last 24 hours have received what I can only describe as the most abusive communication I have ever received in my life, so I can assure you there is no motivation for personal favours. I am, for the record, apparently John, as well as some other people I've never heard of before, and am in league with Delicious Carbuncle. Now, will you kindly remove the link.
5598:(ec)Yes, it seems a little heavy-handed for one edit, made more than a week after the last one. Blocks are a black mark on an editor, especially wrongful blocks, even if they do get overturned. Tony's been here what, 3 years, and has never been blocked before, so it is a little dismaying to see this. I would encourage Tony to stop edit warring though, whether the block was right or wrong. –
14480:
14391:
12984:
12903:
11313:
11043:
10992:
10956:
10622:
9271:
9130:
8860:
7803:
5418:
2774:
12860:) that he is being discussed on an Administrators' noticeboard. Should you mention an editor (and especially an Administrator whose actions are being scrutinised) on a noticeboard, please take a second to issue them a notice in the interests of courtesy, and to solicit their view and/or an explanation on the matter—such is the routine discussion etiquette and procedure, really. Thanks,
4711:
the JIDF are so wedded to the glamour of clandestine action that they can't create an account with their name that contributes to the talk page alone. Then they could draw our attention to new articles about them and complain about and explain anything they considered misrepresentation. Instead they have this series of edit warrior accounts that are transparently connected to them.--
7119:. If people could feel comfortable asking for clarification and/or elaboration ("What do you mean? ~~~~") without being looked down on as trolls or threadshitters, not only would we all collectively end up with a lot more clarity and elaboratification, but long-winded folk (*cough*) wouldn't feel as pressured to address every single conceivable point in one long mass of
3760:, but then spread to almost everywhere I edited. The result was antagonizing, creepy and annoying as all get out. I am sorry, but I am not getting where you are coming from here. I mean, if you are asking to be spoon-fed diffs of what everyone else can feast upon themselves, maybe I am not the guy to do it. I realize that the list of IPs in the RfCU is daunting, but
4179:
I support an interaction ban and a 1 screw up and you're gone rule. If I actually thought arcayne was intentionally trying to mislead us, I would have already opened a new section about just that. No one needs to bring up anything about the april incident again. With the interaction ban in place it should be completely irrelevant at this point.--
3832:
about it on AN/I. We have admittance that you think he can be exasperating and down below Jayron admits that Arcayne could be just as much to blame for the original dispute as the IP. I don't think its a stretch to imagine he might have helped this along (as evidenced by the poking of the IP in august by edit warring over his comment placement)--
9511:, i mean to a sock you suspect that its me, well i dont really dont know about that. It just only happened because i'm a celebrity fanatic who wants to edit showbiz related articles. And dont tell to everybody that my uploaded images were copybio because its really my own work and you have no right to say it because you have no proff. Excuse me
8427:. However, I havent oversighted when there are too many diffs between the introduction and removal of the information (i.e. there is an editorial reason to keep the diffs). Editors have been firm in reverting this information being added to the article, and one other more experienced oversighter acted on a request for oversight on this issue.
12583:, but it is obvious that we're dealing with InternetHero acting anonymously. InternetHero has been blocked once over a not-too-bright response to a warning, but has been warned for breaches of policy several times. Additionally, the way he/she evaluates "consensus" (8 votes against 5) is clearly not the way things are done in Knowledge. --
12725:", so you should not have added a notability tag, what you might question is the references, my chines is not so good and a better reference should be resonably easy to find. On the other hand, to just revert you was not really correct either, the user that removed the tag should have explained in the comment why he removed your tag. --
12441:
a WHOIS check on any IP that isn't vandalising; so the results for your test get wildly skewed towards looking like schools are all vandalising. Its sort of like going to a courthouse and deciding that the entire town must be criminals because everyone at the courthouse is a criminal; law abiding citizens don't show up at court... --
2808:: A ban on contacting or discussing Arcayne in any way, broadly construed. The user is allowed to edit wikipedia content and constructively contribute to the encyclopedia, but if any IP address he/she uses comments on, asks a question about, makes contact with, or in any way references Arcayne or his credentials is blocked on sight.
2470:
plenty wrong in being a meatpuppet, and it was uninvolved admin who have raised those concerns, as it was an uninvolved admin who initiated the Check User. There was no 'brush off'. Policies were clearly mentioned to them, over and over again, with the main problem being that the SPAs appear to have made the common mistake of
8471:. Redvers is right, the court is seeking to protect the siblings of the dead child, and possibly members of his extended family. I do not see that adding the names of the two adults concerned to our articles would add anything encyclopædic, but I do believe it would increase the risk of harm, to the surviving family members.
13870:
inclusion of many names on that list (Which you then *instantly* moved to a random title so that literally anything could go on the page and you could avoid my question) - well I'm sorry but that's what talkpages are for. ANI is for specific issues, so let's have them "those are bad men! wah!" isn't a specific complaint.--
7041:. I am relaxed about most things but this is a flagrant breach of a policy which exists to keep our organization safe from being sued. I am not relaxed about this. I do not want to see anyone blocked over this, I just want the offending and unencyclopedic content removed in accordance with our policy on user pages. --
6982:. Editors may also defend themselves. They're not spamming/advertising. Case closed. I see very little support for your attempts to remove their defense. On top of that, I know that I am a cunning linguist, and the block of a user noted above is partly because of comments made in this thread, so relax a little.
7099:, either, but there are tons of editors linking to their personal blogs on their userpage. Instead of racing to claim the lofty moral righteousness of Policy, why can't people start off with the basics - that the page linked in DC's userpage makes them feel uneasy; nothing more, nothing less - and then have a
7612:
steered clear of), but essentially geared to negative information about a third party. Jimbo's statement is not criticising a third party: it is defending his own actions and relationship to wikipedia. Had there been a litany of Rachel Marsden's perceived flaws, it would have been received very differently.
6725:
Most of the page is actually just cut and paste of WP discussions. I am not refusing to take down the link, but I don't have time for this discussion at the moment. If a consensus is reached that the link must go, please leave the userbox intact and just remove the link. Thanks. 19:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
11406:
might be invoked so that it is made clear this is an alternate account of a blocked editor, that any transgressions will be treated in this knowledge, but if they keep editing usefully then they are to be allowed to do so. I would like Orangemikes comments, he has always struck me as being reasonable
10005:
He is a serious contributor, and has a featured article to his name (much more than I have) and I have dealt with him cordially in the past. I notice that he has done little editing in the last two weeks, and I sincerely hope that he acts to de-escalate things, and we can look forward to more of his
9849:
I agree. I've warned the user, and will block without further warning should they persist in either restoring removed copyvios or introducing more copyvio material. Ignorance of our copyright restrictions is excusable, but quibbling over the details once they've been pointed out and removing a notice
9673:
I know his comment about Wynchard is a little harsh, but I also observed that behaviour, too. His patterns seem to be suspicious, and so he decided to tag him as a Gerald sock. It's also true that Wynchard also acted rather uncivil and called some other editors names (either by using derogatory words
9381:
Just adding "My own work" on the infobox for images says very little on how it became your own work. For instance, did you personally took the photographs as Angel Locsin's oficial photographer? Or, as what sometimes happen to other photos that later become deleted, did you download it from a website
8957:
I agree with you. I changed it back to the version that baseball bugs did. That was the last change made that did not actually change policy. It only clarified it. The other changes actually took the policy in another direction, then used the template as an explanation for the change. That never made
8947:
OK, someone needs to 'splain just what the bleep is going on here. You changed it back to the way I had it, and now someone has put "item" back, based on some argument that doesn't make sense. So tell me - is, or is not, that infobox supposed to be used for people? If it is, then "item" is offensive,
8923:
In all fairness Baseball bugs, your edit was what I would consider the least controversial and in good faith. They were made in good faith. I only added it here to show the progression of the policy change. That being said, the second edit is what I would consider the most controversial, based on the
8200:
case in the sense that what is best for the encyclopedia is to avoid propagating harm against individuals who themselves did nothing to deserve it. I endorse the removal and oversight of their names; and feel that there is no value to the information being added to the article. I am not bothered by
7300:
No. If somebody accuses you of something on-wiki, we can deal with it, as you have seen. Off-wiki stuff doesn't need to be dealt with on your Knowledge user page. I find it astonishing the amount of time and energy you have spent defending this link. It contributes nothing at all to the reason we are
7141:
At the risk of being accused of wikilawyering, I think there's a difference between the content actually being on WP and being on an external site. If the guidelines are to protect WP from being sued, as John suggests, there is good reason to disallow certain content on user pages, but that no longer
6702:
by linking to pages that merely exist to contain information that would not normally be allowed at Knowledge. We do not allow this sort of information on a userpage, so we also should not allow links to this sort of information. A userpage is not about discussing the behaviors of other people in this
6529:
and its associated pages. Anderson is notorious at those pages for his weakening of established and new guidelines, in accord with his obscurely motivated wish that there be no clear standards for high-quality editing. Tony himself is a highly skilled professional editor in his life beyond Knowledge,
6124:
I think it is clear that Rjd0060 should probably be immediate desysoped. This is ridiculous, and no admin should have ever have blocked Tony1 in this situation. Thus, he is either not fit to use the powers, or his account is compromised. Either way, that means that he should be stripped of any access
5814:
I certainly agree that edit warring like that is very bad, but the block was over the one latest diff. Blocks are supposed to be preventative, not punitive. What is the use of blocking a productive editor like this, for 12 hours (which he may not even notice)? It's not supposed to be a punishment, or
5637:(ec)Unless they were officially told not to revert at all on this page, I don't see how one revert could count as edit warring. I also note that the person who reverted Tony's changes was not blocked or warned. I'm glad Bishonen brought this here because I was just about to. Tony should be unblocked.
5353:
Well yes, POV-pushers exist on both sides, not only of the Israel-Palestine dispute but of many others. Some of these POV pushers have learnt after a few blocks to conform to Knowledge process, and are developing into good Wikipedians. Others get blocked long term or banned. The JIDF's methods is to
4244:
Unfortunately I came in after all was said in done and didn't notice the timestamps when I first went through and commented. I'm not sure if arcayne has seen it or not but his call to move on was about 90 minutes after that thread. Unless arcayne wants to show leniency then I'd agree with leaving him
4178:
I was pointing it out because FP was insisting on a full retraction/apology on the part of the anon calling it libelous. I felt that was 1) counter productive and 2) in fact false since there are reasonable discrepancies in what Arcayne has said. I certainly don't condone the IPs actions which is why
4035:
I think that Crossmr's solution to the problem is quite reasonable, and I endorse it as within the spirit of why I started this thread, which was to find a solution to the problem at hand. If 75.X.X.X stops his harassment of Arcayne through the mediation of Crossmr, then the problem has been solved,
3512:
The thing with blocking the IPs he's caused trouble on is that he's clearly on a dynamic IP, which means someone else is also and theres a chance they could end up on a blocked IP (I know its a super-slim chance but still) Its a very extreme idea to ban IPs permanently. Heres an idea, I don't know if
3479:
person with whom the (s)he has taken exception to in the past. However, because the anon has chosen to twist one of our most cherished Foundational ideals - that anyone, anonymous or otherwise, can edit here - and used it to avoid repercussions for their behavior, they should not be afforded the same
3443:
The anon claims that some of the IPs are not his/hers; that might possibly be true. Using fairly ham-fisted IP-matching techniques, it would appear that about 3/4's of the IPs are centered around the Chicago metropolitan area (which includes part of Indiana, for purposes of this discussion); the rest
3228:
There is no need to threaten me. I am a reasonable person who responds well to well-reasoned argument. I don't agree with you, you have not convinced me that I am wrong. You clearly feel the same. We will have to live with that. I will not press the matter any further as I have clearly made my point.
2815:
Some background for anyone unfamiliar with this case: It goes back many months. Apparently, a long time ago, Arcayne made a note of some credentials he may or may not have had. The issue over whether or not Arcayne has these credentials is not what this discussion is really about. This person has
1674:
An attempt at WP:CONSENSUS is impossible with your methods, primarily since you violate the tenets of WP:CONSENSUS yourself. Specifically, the policy calls for changes to entries if one feels that entries are incorrect. You have chosen to delete the entry every single time you see it. There is simply
14139:
No-one is suggesting that the article be censored out of sympathy for his family; I only mentioned BLPN so that editors here would not recommend I post it there. I would simply like responsible editors, preferably including some admins to watch the article so that vandalism is quickly dealt with and
12440:
To half-shadow; its because only those IPs which are the source of vandalism are the ones that get checked for WHOIS and get tagged as school-based IPs. Lots of great edits likely come from school-based IPs; and lots of registered users probably edit from school computers. The deal is, no one does
11857:
is suddenly qualified to call me a problem editor when no one following Knowledge policies and guidelines seem to have had 'problems' with me. My record in Knowledge has been perfect and consistently clean for over two years. I haven't had ANY blocks or spats and I am trying to constructively expand
10046:
I believe you have been the very model of civility in this. :) Good contributions can balance well against a lot of concerns, but persistent copyright infringement is not among them. In my opinion, on the contrary, copyright problems are even more worrisome with a prolific and dedicated contributor,
9519:
too much. I've mensioned that Im a cousin of Locsin which is true and why are you complaining, are you only just insecure or envious with me? I also put sock tag on your userpage because you deserve it, you almost put sock tags 7 times on my userpage. Because you're blaming me as a sock which is not
8722:
I was under the impression that using these other accounts that mean scrutiny is evaded was a big no no. The thing is, I'm not sure his edits completely cross the line to sanction him for pro-pedopdilia editing - I think there is a minor POV problem, but it's small fish compared to some of the other
8447:
The court would be seeking to protect the siblings from ridicule and harassment. They'll be in care or fostered and may be subject to undue interest (eg bullying) from other children in the children's home, at school or in the street, or from adults or the press. The protection order should cut down
8304:
I'm not sure that it matters much, but it's apparently on some blogs and also on Myspace (I'm told). The BBC did publish the names, but then took the report down although it can still be found through google if you're really desperate. A paper referred to as "gutter press" published the names. Can't
8160:
I realise that the decision of the British courts was made to "protect the children" however I am not quite agreeing with this decision, especially as the talk page seems barren of any real discussions of concensus apart from some randomly placed yells of wikipedia is not cneosred. It brings to mind
8105:
Also, we have the ability to add notice when a specific page is edited - could someone create one of those for this article, informing the would-be editor that these names are being systematically reverted by editors, and oversighters are removing the edits. Note that semi-protection isnt likely to
7986:
Legally wikipedia doesn't have to do anything. (Although British editors should take care!) However, our "do no harm" rule comes in here. The law is passed to prevent harm to minors, by reducing the prominence of their names in print. (A prominence that will endure into adulthood!). Given the intent
7712:
I would be quite happy to make a signed statement on DC's page that there is no evidence that DC is Pauline Berry and all the evidence indicates that (s)he is not, and that DC is a respected editor on wikipedia. If some other editors provided something similar, it would be immediately informative to
7611:
I don't think there is an objection to a simple statement of denial (especially as the RL person mentioned is supportive). It's the link that is problematic. The linked page had an extremely inflamatory heading, which has now been toned down, so it is an unpredictable page (just the reason blogs are
7559:
Thanks for that, Restawhile. If you read upthread a few posts you will see that Mark Bellinghaus and I are no longer in contact with one another as a result of some highly abusive emails he has sent to me and Tyrenius, accusing us of both being one and the same and also being someone who he has been
7540:
On another note; Ty and John are worried about threats of Knowledge being sued, rest assured Mark's threats are simply that. I have heard all that before (as can you if you listen to the recordings on my site). Now a question: is the threat of a lawsuit an actual threat? i.e. an empty lawsuit threat
5866:
The page was protected for a week, none of the involved parties attempted to discuss their differences during the protection and resumed the edit war when the protection expired. Locking down an entire guidelines page for 3-4 edit warriors is not beneficial to the 10,000 other users who are editing
4710:
As the person reverted by POVPusher, I did consider coming here or going to a senior admin but decided not to. I also considered the POVPusher = ED equation, but POVPusher didn't react to my reference to JIDF as "your lot" whilst ED always vigorously denied any such connection. It's unfortunate that
4128:
because if you actually meant those from different places you shouldn't have gone out of your way to name drop one place without name dropping the other place and tying them together with "and". The double paste of the diffs was just a copying problem on my part, I've updated it to reflect the other
4065:
I have been trying to stay out of this process as much as possible, aware that it wasn't really about me (or even the anon), but rather about enforcing those policies which make Knowledge a fun place to work. As such, while I am not sure how Jayron orCrossmr is arriving at the idea that there is not
3973:
We can't tell one person to avoid someone and then not ask the other person to reciprocate. Otherwise we're creating a situation where one person can poke the other with impunity and the moment the person being poked says anything they can run to AN/I and demand they be blocked. I never told Arcayne
3739:
user is responsible for most if not all of the IPs. Maybe take a closer look at the most current RfCU; I've listed the prior RfCU's regarding the user, and the anon him/herself acknowledged that the IP addresses were theirs. All I did was point out the string of IPs editing in the same RfCU, and the
3448:
that 75. counts for about 1% of the internet (about 67.1 million IPs), and the wiki benefits from the input of them. We cannot block them out because one particular user is being a jerk. And don't think I am not creeped out (and a little frightened) by the fact that the anon would appear to be in my
3388:
The thing for me is that everyone knows a range block is out of the question because it will effect innocent editors. Obviously this guy admits hes been here 7 years, he's well aware of this fact and is in a way using it to his advantage. Again, any kind of block, whether it be contacting Arcayne or
3353:
I just pointed out above, where he insulted him and then edit warred over the placement of the IPs comment on a talk page when the IP placed his first. That seems plenty provocative to me. This is why I'm insisting on full disclosure on all the events leading up to here, not just a few cherry picked
3322:
Indeed, to refocus the discussion, the fact that Arcayne once, a year ago, claimed some Oxon degree is not in dispute by anyone. The problem is that in the intervening year, this user has done nothing EXCEPT browbeat Arcayne over that fact. Almost on a continuous basis, there is some edit summary,
3215:
Arcayne has nothing to prove, nothing to explain and nothing to account for here. He did nothing wrong. There's no problem he'd have to justifiy himself over. He mentioned his academic qualifications once, in passing (and then, later, explained them again a couple of times when pressed by the anon).
2507:
As far as I am aware, Justin was referring to the past editors of the page not necessarily current editors of the page. There have been problems in the past with people with extreme views either way. The second half of that seems like a pretty poorly veiled legal threat, PR, though I will assume you
2403:
we can "assure" that a particular set of facts is in an article, no matter how obviously relevant they may seem to us. Telling a new editor that seems really, really helpful. MRG: the g-news links are mostly to sources that would be considered biased -- Electronic intifada, for example -- except for
2214:
on my talk page? If you want to show support for an editor, do it at their page. I don't desire the spam. The first part of your comment is strange, as far as I am aware, I've merely commented on an ANI thread in which I am involved. Just as you have. I don't propose, not would I want, to watch you,
2052:
rules should be enforced against editors who keep re-inserting mention of the Moorer report without being willing to join in a Talk page discussion of that report, or supply appropriate references when requested. Repeated re-insertion of the same thing, each time it is reverted, can't be viewed as a
332:
He then launched a relentless campaign to wiki-stalk/harass my contributions as well as censor/impede my editing. He even threatened to block me ] just because I questioned his unblock of a ban-evading sock. After he stalked my contribution, an edit war occured at ] ] ] ] ]. He continued to threaten
11898:
is still continuing to do Wikistalking and uncivility without the faintest remorse and how WP Admins aren't noticing a troll who is hiding all the warnings in his talk page, as pointed out above, by sweeping them under the carpet! If an editor with such a bad editing history and an outrageously bad
11767:
The sort of wikihounding behaviour described here is troubling and unacceptable. It's as if he's seeing how much he can hound a user before he gets blocked, given that his reports of wikistalking in the past were dismissed as frivolous. Additionally, reuploading deleted images and using them in the
11535:
Well, consider that the blocking admin has raised no objections, I think the matter is largely closed. Yes, this is a dangerous precedant, and because we have allowed this user to edit, the sun will run dry, the earth will stop turning on its axis, and every nuclear bomb in the world will detonate
11512:
My own opinion on this matter is that we're kinda undermining our own rules by not reblocking here. An indef block is an indef block. Failing to re-block him gives the clear message that "If you've done wrong, and have been indefinitely blocked for it, just come back with a new account and, so long
10083:
Yes, me too. Personally I'd like to have some kind of assurance from Chrisieboy that he now understands the issues and won't be repeating them. In the light of what looks like attempts to cover up the copyvios and even laugh them off, I think future contributions will also need to be monitored, and
9402:
You may wish to revisit your personal definition of "vandalism". There is, as noted above, a Sockpuppet case that involves your userid. Placing a "suspected sock" tag on your userpage is therefore a valid action. If proven that it's NOT true, it can be removed. Could you please provide diffs of
9214:
I did file an SSP, so if anyone wants to archive it, feel free. I have no doubt that once the current block wears off, he'll be back. If you look at the IP, and the blocked socks, he's pretty persistent, and there's no apparent reason to think otherwise in this case. He's had the same IP for over a
9065:
Looks from here like he's blocked now, on the way to being banned, and the stuff on his talkpage (Am I right that that's what you're referring to??) remains only as part of an ongoing discussion. It ain't pretty, I'm with you there, but it may fall under the category of "giving him enough rope with
8757:
As a further comment on policy, if their other account is linked or traceable to their RL identity, then using an alternate account to edit particularly contentious articles would be OK. The best course of action I can see is for ForesticPig to register their main and alternate accounts with ArbCom
8701:
People are allowed to use another account for contentious articles, for instance there have been problems with aggro writings on other sites over these articles. There are separate sanctions on the paedo articles though which he could fall under if he becomes/is too pro-paedo though, aren't there?
7582:
I find the suggestion that John or I are not neutral because we have received emails from MB to be absurd, unless it means we are biased against MB, which I don't think is what was intended. I mean, DC, please actually read the post you are answering: it describes the emails received as "what I can
7497:
earlier in this thread. NE2's statement is pretty clearly against removal. I don't know how to take Badger Drink's comments. BMW also finds that no consensus has been reached. You and John have dominated this thread. Given that both of you have been involved with Bellinghaus' bio and have off-wiki
7315:
The time I've spent defending it is only as the direct result of your attempts to have me remove it. I've explained several times now why the link is on my userpage. As I said at the beginning of this thread, I will remove the link if that is the consensus that is reached. I honestly don't see that
6792:
C'est folie ! L'escarboucle doit utiliser tous les outils il ou elle a à leur disposition pour se défendre du "bellinghaus" d'équipe et n'importe quelle suggestion autrement serait comme mettre un tas des briques sur un hamster et l'instruire au " équilibre, " de monsieur. Les tendrils de la marque
6724:
The very short version of this is that I am falsely identified in several places on the internet, including Bellinghaus' own blog as Pauline Berry. I am not Pauline Berry. I have linked to the page on Berry's site where she addressed this misidentification. I do not control the content of the site.
6404:
admin later misunderstood another set of jokes between Ceoil and another editor, and baited Ceoil on his talk page, specifically mentioning his block log, and then threatened to block him because of how Ceoil responded to being blatantly baited. Then that admin tossed a truckful of F-bombs all over
6367:
SandyGeorgia, I too have been sleeping down under; and I am appalled to wake up and find that Tony has been treated like this, simply for adjusting a tag. I think there should be a formal apology, and everything should be done to ensure that this mistake by an admin will never count against Tony in
4020:
The majority is clearly in favour of an interaction ban not a site ban. Last I checked I wasn't under some kind of restriction from making a request of another user. Its up to arcayne whether or not he wants to fulfill that request. I didn't outline any penalty if he chose not to act on the request
3960:
The second thing is, some of the things that have been said on the anon's talk page still sound as if there should be a reciprocal expectation on Arcayne to avoid the anon. I want to see it made clear that there is none. I'd sure wish he would see no further need of talking about the case much, but
3643:
You do realize that if the ISP releases his dhcp release and gives him a new IP it isn't "creating a new account" and your usage of that indicates either a complete lack of understanding or an attempt to make something sound worse than it is. Your last CU failed I believe on an account you tried to
3613:
If we are still counting votes on this, I'd add my support to option 1. In practice, the two options are similar, since if a new IP shows up from this range who doesn't attack Arcayne it's unlikely that anyone will react to him in any way or connect him to this issue. The value of making this a ban
3471:
It has also been argued by the anon that they have edited anonymously for seven years. While that is a statement we cannot really prove - again, no single IP means edit histories are difficult to track, what is more telling is the stated reason the anon prefers to edit via dynamic IP and the actual
3331:
to one. I personally feel that Proposal 2, which still allows the user to edit, but prevents him from continuing his harassment of Arcayne a good idea. No one has presented any counterevidence to indicate that Arcayne has done anything in the past year to provoke this guy, so I don't see where he
2177:
Could someone please look at this the talk page is littered with yet another extensive diatribe, that editors are suppressing the truth. I'm just about done with reasonably explaining that synthesising an argument from original material and promoting pet fringe theories just isn't on. My patience
311:
As a neutral editor, I noticed the AN/I thread and immediately questioned Future Perfect's judgment in this episode as well as his categorization of "fundamental opposition". Alex from L.A. was extremely hostile, but Future Perfect's continue to patronize the ban-evading sock. Future Perfect, angry
8272:
As for the comment about lack of discussion on the talk page, yes, there wasn't much, but it seemed pretty clear to me that the prospective harm outweighed the insignificant benefits. I also wanted to take discussion away from the talk page to an arena that was more likely to be neutral - ie here.
7528:
I know its almost too simple a solution to consider. Then DC I am sure would have no problem removing the link, the same as I would have no problem with taking down the page itself referring to this wiki dispute. I have to say there is nothing attacking in my page, (Ty said "vicious" - I am really
7442:
External sites can follow whatever policies they want, but users on this site have to follow wikipedia policies. That is a requiring of having the privilege of editing here, and that is why one of the individuals involved in this dispute has been blocked from this site. It is not appropriate for a
7228:
Wrong, I'm afraid. WP:BLP exists to ensure that this project does no unnecessary harm to living individuals. It way beyond what might be legally actionable. It certainly does apply to userspace, and can at times apply to links that contain libels, or other grossly unhelpful material. We don't link
7055:
I'm not attempting to settle any dispute through having this link on my userpage, either on- or off-wiki. I'm simply trying to correct the misidentification by pointing to the web site of the other person being falsely identified. Let me point out again that what you refer to as "the offending and
6629:
I agree with Pete. Tony1 has worked closely with the FAC and FAR groups and his view on the MoS seems to be built after months (and even years) of learning about how people in those areas feel. That is not to say that he hasn't also done the same with those outside of those areas. However, it sure
6498:
Tony is a persistently uncivil editor with a bad case of ownership over all of MOS. Those of us who know him have learned to deal with this; but the assertion that this block is outrageous is nonsense. He (and his supporters here) are one side of the current date-linking rumpus; Locke Cole is a
6439:
Sadly true. Admins takes a quick look at a block log and then double the last block. What that has to do with building an encyclopedia will forever remain a mystery to me. Administrators get away with murder, but regular editors have every one of their alleged misdemeanours recorded in their block
4211:
The anon knows where (s)he stands at this time. Interaction ban it is. I won't poke the user, or seek them out. I don't need an apology, and while it would be spiffy if the usertalk page comments by the anon calling me a liar were removed, it isn't required. It isn't our job to fix users - we just
4207:
Look, this has gone on long enough. FuturePerfect, Jayron and Crossmr (and many others who emailed me), I appreciate the concern, support and interest. It's time to let this go and move on. I am confident that Crossmr and FutPerf are not going to forget about the anon, and I am fairly certain that
4147:
I cant believe you are defending the anon's attack on his qualifications. no-one except the anon and you really give a crap. we have the right to claim whatever we want whether its true or B-S. Arcayne knows he was wrong to have a superior-than-thou attitude over his quals, and has openly admitted
3954:
As recently as four days ago, at the top of his current talk page, the anon was repeating his bogus accusation against Arcayne of "false credentials". Mind you, he was not just criticising Arcayne for using his credentials without giving proof of them, he was presenting it as an outright fact that
3116:
has a history of accussing other users. He seems to always be in some sort of dispute that ends up on this message board. Also, Arcayne's weakness is that he always has to have the last word. He responds to every little comment and attacks anyone who disagres with him. If he just ignored the anon,
3069:
Proposal 1 - As the target of this user (and I admit that pride of my educational background kinda caused a bit of the initial issue), this has gone on too long. There are users with whom I have disagreed with, but they are all active in actually expanding the project. This user isn't, and most of
2138:. I believe this is enough evidence of abuse to justify a checkuser. I've notified all four editors that they are being discussed at ANI. Their sudden appearance, the narrowness of their interests, and their sophistication in Knowledge policy matters cry out for any explanation other than socking.
1902:
I assume that is when WORLDFACTS is talking about his edit where he uses source from 1990 for a report from 2003? I do see that we are onto the silly hyperbole about self serving, censorship and 'Oh noes the dead people!' again....along with a bit of 'The Truth (tm)'. Someone should make SPA rants
1744:
of the contents of the report? Your inconsistent treatment of this entry speaks volumes about your intentions. You only delete any quotes or entries made on the Moorer Report, but you do not appear to object to a link to the report. Is my belief that you are trying to censor the report really that
1712:
and come to a conclusion. That you do not like the conclusion of the report is not my problem. One of the numbered conclusions of the report is that "there is compelling evidence that Israel’s attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew". This point is not
290:
In his most recent exploit, Future Perfect at Sunrise aggressively albeit controversially pushed for the lifting of the ban of ], who has a habit of making death threats, creating ban-evading sockpuppets, and possessing an overall lack of respect for the due process. ] He controversially unblocked
14169:
Well, in a way, I guess I am. I don't mean per the exact wording of BLP, but the philosophy behind it; that we should try not to be dicks when it affects real people, like any family or friends. Having this pop up as an article while the body is still warm just makes me feel like I'm associated
11574:
I have read the arguments presented and my view is that unless both of you find a way to work together and without edit-warring or making comments on each others supposed motives, it will not end up well, resulting in either or both of you being eventually blocked for disruption. My advice: seek
8743:
Obviously my concern is that he is not an admin and faking it on his userpage to avoid being blocked. I have been in email communication with him and would urge that we hold off blocking for another day or so until he can verify to a third party the identity of his primary account. Obviously if
7427:
Through no actions of my own, my username has been inserted into a pre-existing off-wiki dispute between two people and my userpage linked to by one of those parties. As Bellinghaus' own blog entry shows, the parts of the linked web page that you picked out as offensive are factual. I don't think
7070:
BUt the whole point is, if its information that would not normally be allowed on your userpage, then its not information you should be able to link to from your userpage. The distinction between "actually printed on my userpage" vs. "printed in a link from my userpage" is moot, and attempting to
6665:
and finding nothing that seemed relevant. I asked you in the edit summary to bring it here or MFD if you continued to have concerns. Your comments on my talk page were added after I had restored it, fully 20 minutes after you had removed the material from my userpage. I would appreciate it if you
3980:
when in fact he has only a single degree from oxford and instead the degree is comprised of the various classes he took and he has even stretched it so far to defend his comment of various degrees by claiming larger sections had smaller sections in it. If I take a class of german as an elective I
3711:
The current RFCU is pointless as all a RFCU is is to look at the underlying IPs to see if they're the same or similar. Since all you have are IPs, you're not checking anything. I'm not contending anything other than to tell you to stop claiming that this individual has made accounts to attack you
2715:
Meatpuppets arn't something one can check for. They are merely SPA whose only purpose is to espouse the view of annother (Hence they are like a sock puppet in their actions but acctually are filled by something, annother editor ). Meatpuppets are usually far more difficult as I imagine each admin
2469:
Shall we avoid legalistic terms like libelous, hrm? I am all infavour of avoiding personal attacks, though I note that WorldFacts has yet to remove his and even seems to view personal attacks as a valid fall back to be resorted to. As for nothing necessarily wrong in being a SPA, no, but there is
2259:
Thank you MRG. Not sure about the sources, but I'm going through, I think we should be able to source there was a report, but it never seems to explicitly state the conclusion. Though I'll keep looking through. My search through academic sites has netted me bupkiss. Edited to add: The book hit is
2022:
I should point out, they did offer a 'secondary source'...which was an editorial by the reports author. I don't necessarily agree with Justin on some issues(specifically I remain unconvinced that this is, necessarily, a fringe theory or report), but certainly it is a conspiracy theory and must be
1625:
The Entry contains the quote "there is compelling evidence that Israel's attack was a deliberate attempt to destroy an American ship and kill her entire crew; evidence of such intent is supported by statements from...". This quote is lifted directly from the report. What follows, are the names of
1613:
The Moorer Commission was a group of retired senior-level military and government officials who conducted an investigation of the USS Liberty attack. The Commission was composed of Admiral Thomas H. Moorer (former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff), Marine General Raymond G. Davis (former Assistant
11916:
thinks that an edit war with a blatant POV troll with a miserable edit history in Knowledge, requires also the other editor, with a two-year clean record, to be blocked for 'equality' reasons. I have heard of 'equality', but this is nuts! Maybe he thinks that one user has to be blocked for every
11839:
I am saying that he is making his vandal behavior look unnoticeable by being very organized about not letting admins gain the impression that he is a POV vandal. He is basically sweeping it all under his carpet so that a first look would not reveal anything. Can something be done about ALL these
11260:
and this is the to the admin who is warning him in the most kind of ways. Wow. I am not trying to be an ass here, but this guy sincerely appears to have "issues" when it comes to socialization. The more I read of his posts, the most it seems like the rest of the world are idiots in his eyes.
8830:
Avoid linking the PI associated with my main account with my work on psychology/sexology/race articles and other articles that may be used to maliciously and unreasonably infer conclusions about my personality. The protection offered by the account is also family-related. It is not an attempt to
5493:
which contains the entire timeline. The page was protected at one point, and immediately after unprotection Tony, and others continued to edit war. I felt that since protection was attempted, and failed, blocking was the best alternative. I've blocked all three users who continued to edit war
4882:
Howdy's "Glad I could help" on the talk page acknowledges that this is the same person as POVPUSHER. Obviously not sockpuppetry, as it's overt, and not block evasion as they were given explicit permission to come back in a new guise. (The above is in relation to POVPUSHER, obviously the prior CU
4524:
This is "drama?" My apologies. I don't know what you are talking about. I just learned about the JIDF from the Ha'aretz piece and didn't feel the WP article was very fair to the organization, so I created an account to help make it better. I accidentally took out the "Criticism" section upon
4069:
I am not realy convinced that an interaction ban is going to be effective. While I am certainly not going to run out and edit where the anon does, or slam him any time he makes a comment, it's clear that the anon does not have the same self-restraint. It is unfair of us to expect him to suddenly
3831:
I'm not entirely convinced that there isn't an issue with arcayne here. Which is why I've asked for more detail so we can try and read this dispute from the beginning without bias. I'd like to see diffs of every time they've interacted since April as well as each time one of them started a topic
3755:
And while my IT-skills aren't anywhere near your apparent level, I am not sure they are really required when the same user keeps popping up in articles you are working to attack your edits. In the same ways. Using the same arguments. And the same unpleasant behavior. I mean, I didn't pull the IP
3716:
are tied to him which you don't. You just have a mess of IPs from the same address. Which are not accounts. Personally I've had occasion where my IP has remained the same for months, and other times where it changed 2 or 3 times in a week. Such is the nature of a dynamically assigned IP address.
3261:
Agree. What he claims has no relevence. Only how users act in wikipedia matters. Although Arcayne can be a pill at times, I know, through interactions with him, that he is passionate about what he believes. There is no reason to believe that Arcayne is not telling the truth about what degrees he
1750:
You have argued that there is no secondary sources for the Moorer Report Findings for some time. I am astounded that the following reports, also listed on the "USS Liberty incident" page do not have a single secondary reference listed. The reports listed which do not have a secondary source are:
1658:
The comment you made when you last removed the entry above is: 20:50, 14 November 2008 Justin A Kuntz (Talk | contribs) (76,838 bytes) (rv no talk page consensus for this edit. Relevant policies WP:RS, WP:NPOV, WP:FRINGE, WP:UNDUE editors can't be bothered to provide secondary sources to support
11784:
Thanks for your points. Is there something that can be done about this? This user is very simply an wikihounding troll pushing POV, but does not get noticed because of the fact that he is actually very well organized and gets away with it all the time. He has been issued several warnings but he
11426:
If this user has stopped spamming, and is leaving OrangeMike alone, I'd be inclined to let it go. I know it's slightly trickier since he's left a couple of messages on your talk page, but that would still be my inclination. But if he spams even once, or bugs OrangeMike again, I'd reblock in a
10286:
Ignore, and return images; this is on the level of "I'm going to hold my breath until you say you are sorry..!" I am also suspicious of the use of language by these "muslims" (they would, I should have thought, have capitalised the word) in that "rats ass" is no real insult or invective in such
10001:
I noticed 2 or 3 lapses into cutting and pasting by Chrisieboy, that I cleaned up one by one without disagreement. I hadn't wished to trawl through all his contributions, so after inviting Moonriddengirl's intervention, I am surprised to learn that there are so many so early in the search, and
8905:
Those are not changes in policy, they're changes in wording. I made the initial change because someone was pointing to that page as a guideline on person infoboxes, and it occurred to me that a person is not an "item". Then someone pointed out (and added to the writeup) that there is a separate
7411:
That is quite irrelevant to our policies, which are not dictated by people's blogs; nor is wikipedia a place to promote off-wiki attacks on people, whether justified or not. Your implication about John above is quite unfounded. Both he and I have had email correspondence with the individual in
7265:
John, I know you've corresponded with Bellinghaus and you may feel that you need to protect him. If he were simply posting nasty remarks about "Delicious carbuncle", I really wouldn't care. Sadly, he is targeting an entirely innocent party and claiming that we are one and the same. Bellinghaus'
6143:
Abuse is what people have done in threatening those who challenged this action. This actual action is something that cannot be said because of the civility policy. But I wonder if that is true, especially with yourself declared "snark" acknowledging that no one really cares about civil anymore.
5982:
Damn, what a blow to my ego. I'll try to get blocked a bit more often then in order to increase my profile. (That was a joke, just in case anyone...) But seriously, this whole issue is ample evidence that WP's dispute-resolution and rule-establishing mechanisms, though doubtless philosophically
3984:
Its a bit of a hop skip and jump to go from "degrees in X" to "I had some classes that had some of that in it". Those are all his words, his usage of degrees more than once and then his admittance to having a mixed degree. I'm willing to extend him good faith that he didn't try to misrepresent
3850:
I looked at the IPs' talk page and still see a pile of difs from April 2008. That dipute seems long over at this point. The IP-user in question has STILL not answered for his behavior in every month since then; one could claim that Arcayne was as to blame for the April 2008 dispute as anyone,
3480:
protection that we afford to any other anon who comes here to actually add to the Project. The assumption of Good Faith is not a set of blinders by which we overlook extensive, recurring and nasty behavior. This user has abrogated their right to edit in our community; using Knowledge instead to
14337:
manner. Its not the place to post random rants about personal beliefs over conspiracies and the like. Knowledge is about building an encyclopedia, if one wants to post their personal political views, there's another place called "the rest of the internet" where such views are quite welcome.
13950:. I looked at the sources and at least half didn't say anything about their deaths being linked to their transgendered nature. I mentioned this on the talkpage and Benjiboi pretty much instantly moved it to the new title to avoid the issue. I guess that's the root of this complaint - WP:OWN. --
13869:
of misconduct and provide specific examples where I have acted incorrect on the two articles you mention that I have editted (I have never edited either the murder of amanda milan and Matthew Shepherd]]. You seem pissed off with me because I raised the fact that the sourcing didn't support the
11160:
Lots of "just accept what I say as facts" going on and an open willingness to disregard common courtesy and Knowledge policy. But hey, thats just what I am seeing. And by this I mean I don't think he is very interested in a 3rd opinion. Or a 2nd one. And he has been here long enough to know
10601:
I have removed the link from the talk page; there are many comments between the introduction and removal of this link, which would all need to be removed if oversight was going to be used here. Obviously that is a lot of collateral damage. BNP will need to specifically request WMF that these
7587:
mandates that no contentious material about living people has any place on the project, unless it is properly referenced by reliable sources, not personal interpretations of the blogosphere. That includes links on wikipedia which go to such material. Find acceptable sources which think it is a
4580:
Checkuser is a good idea for thoroughly investigating sock puppetry that may involved use of multiple accounts or block or ban evasion. It would be best to connect the account to a master account and empty any sock drawer. Is there a CU hanging around or do we need to bring this case over to
12308:
So he is here in WP:ANI to "get me first out of the way" by drawing attention to blocks placed on me two years ago, and his imaginary wikihounding that I have allegedly been doing him. Apart from these few articles which I check periodically, I have no interest in Sudharsansn's edits in other
8377:
The Express article was from the first day the "trio" appeared in court and is therefore likely to be before the court secrecy order. If the fact that this article is still on their website were brough to their attention, the Express might actually remove it, as the BBC did with their similar
4640:
This is a disruptive username? Huh? It only is one because of who it might be, and/or the edits they have made. I hate to say so, but NPOV is a key policy, and how many times a day does wikidrama occur in this forum because people are POV-pushing. I hate to use the example, but "Master of
3784:
I'm asking you to prove your case which this is about since you've chosen to make so many complaints about this IP. However many of the diffs I've been provided in the various attempts to show how bad this IP is, don't really show anything bad about this IP which is what makes me question the
3598:
As I keep saying, it's highly unlikely this will have to be enforced with long-term blocks at all, be it of ranges or individual IPs. Short blocks whenever he turns up again, depending of course on the intensity of his activities. In the unlikely event that more wide-reaching blocks should be
3200:
I agree that degrees are not relevant here at WP, and that reliable sources are. My point is that attempting to block the unregistered user is not dealing with the issue, and is somewhat futile as discussed above. The unregistered user has an issue with Arcayne who, somewhat foolishly, has in
1694:
page is the Moorer Report. Since it is niether an American nor Israeli government report, it was explicitly listed as an Independent American Investigation. It is you who are in violation of WP:UNDUE, buy allowing mention and quotes of the other reports, but consistently deleting any contents
353:
I urge the community to take decisive action against this rogue admin who plays by his own rule, have little regards for the due process or wikipedia policies. I demand a formal apology and I also sincerely hope this admin can refrain from wikistalking and censoring my edits based on personal
7660:
It seems a highly tenuous connection for you to make for two reasons. One is that the Jimbo sex scandal was a major gossip story back in March, placing it in a different class entirely from these people bickering over who said what about Marilyn Monroe's dress. The other is that while people
7056:
unencyclopedic content" isn't on my userpage. People coming to my userpage will not see it unless they choose to click on the external link. I don't think there's anything even remotely actionable on the external web page, but I'm not a lawyer so I'm not really qualified to offer an opinion.
3880:, asCrossmr had asked me in the anon's usertalk page to stay away from the anon's edits. I've posted the link, rather than take up any more space here (yes, I am a bit long-winded). I guess its a moot point now, but I thought maybe folk might want something with a bit less varnish on it. -
3818:
The troll's diffs, unsurprisingly, omit all the relevant stuff, namely how he kept following Arcayne around all these months. The original dispute in early April is hardly of interest at this point, except as an explanation of where the various harassment memes (such as the "Oxford" issue)
3663:. Now, for you or I, that's nothing, but those who've interacted with the anon know this is extraordinary in the extreme. I am reckoning that, knowing it would only hurt him/her if a new IP were to pop up amidst an AN/I specifically addressing all these multiple IP identities, the anon has
6935:
I would strongly suggest resolving any off-wiki problems off-wiki and just doing stuff on here that is designed to improve our encyclopedia. I don't think this falls into that area which is why I raised it here, after my attempts to persuade Delicious carbuncle to remove the material were
6537:
I am happy to count myself also as one who believes in our Manual of Style, and who has also worked hard to maintain excellence – though nowhere near as hard as Tony. Surely now Anderson will have some gall to spread against me, too. But let anyone interested enough consult the history of
7498:
communication with Bellinghaus, I question your neutrality in this matter.I think I've said everything I need to say here and I'm tired of repeating myself, so my only request is that someone other than you or John remove the link if they decide that there is consensus to do so. Thanks.
4525:
making edits, and re-added it. However, I'm not sure what WP's policy is of using articles which are originally in German. I feel if criticism is to be made about an organization, that we should only rely upon an accurate, FAZ approved, translation. I'm not sure one is available? --
11401:
the editor self identifies with being 14 years old - I don't think that we are going to get a great deal of maturity from a 14 yo (apologies and stuff) yet I also think that having such an editor contributing usefully is far better than causing a potential vandal. In this case I think
12425:
You are welcome to extend the block. IMO, some schools when they see their IP blocked, make some effort to educate students about how not to use the school computers to vandalize Knowledge, so that is why I always start with one month block and escalate the blocks if needed later on.
2906:
I'd go for P1, as per FPaS. If this individual has anything useful to contribute, then they will be able to do so easily by getting an account; if they insist on continuing harassment as 75.X they should be blocked. Note/disclaimer: I blocked 75.X for I think 12h a little while back
13027:
What I am looking at is the suggestion that there might a darker agenda or modus operandi at operation here. Something will require closer admin and checkuser inspection. Something does does not fit into the establish category of sock puppetry or tag teaming but that suggests group
2716:
will have a different intepretation. Certainly at least one of those who was suspected of puppetry of some kind has proven himself as his own person (Yellabina). It requires an admin to examine the page, examine cotribution histories and decide what, if any, sanctions are required.
2260:
certainly the most likely source. Though it does admit to taking a selective quote of the report. Certainly from that I think an edit could start to be constructed that said Moorer held an independent investigation, which he reported as having found Israel culpable for the attack.
8948:
or at least confusing. If not, then what infobox are they supposed to use? If it's another one, why not state it in that writeup? P.S. This is why I usually don't bother messing around with infoboxes, categories, etc. - they are shifting sand, and not worth the effort they cause.
1621:
There are descriptions and titles supplied of the primary authors. It is difficult to imagine how any real American Citizen loyal to the Unites States could consider an Ambassador, a Former Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, a Marine General, and a Rear Admiral are behind a Fringe
1738:
page. Your charges of WP:FRINGE on the entry I made has never actually caused you to remove the link at the bottom of the page to the Moorer report. Are we to understand that the Moorer Report is an acceptable link when a link to it in "Sources claiming attack was deliberate -:
6477:
in action! The real danger is that it can be totally arbitrary and retrospective, as it appears this incident to have been. I'm totally quaking in my boots now to learn that any old admin can come along, see me doing something xhe disagrees with, and blocks me without warning.
13842:
6614:
I am appalled at the above attacks on Tony. We might disagree on some things, but I have found him to be ever sincere, polite, a tireless worker for understanding and clarity, and one of those editors that Knowledge should fight to keep around performing volunteer excellence.
6318:
Is it clear yet what Tony1 has been dealing with as he tries to keep the MoS pages usable and coherent? All this while Tony sleeps down under, and will awake to find his work was rewarded with a block log. Gee, I want one, too; seems all good editors have one these days.
8129:
I think that semi-protection still could be more effective than nothing at all. I will add the edit notice if necessary, but for now I would think that the standard comment warning will suffice. Naturally, if someone feels different, the page is at the /Editnotice subpage.
12225:
was Dravidian, and that the dravidian languages are attested to 600 BCE, and misquotes references towards that aim, indulges in revert warring, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=List_of_languages_by_first_written_accounts&diff=251706471&oldid=251701594 1,
4979:
situation. It's not a content problem. The problem isn't what Knowledge has to say about the JIDF; it's that there are people who want the JIDF to get more attention. Usual troll management applies; revert slowly, ignore minor annoyances, and block if overly disruptive.
2874:
Thanks for taking this initiative of making it official. This was more or less what I had in mind. I'd go for Proposal 1, being aware of course that in practice there won't be much of a difference, because the duck test is going to be just that hounding of Arcayne anyway.
14426:
I've left a hopefully gently-worded note on his talk page. Usually I think giving someone a chance to retract before blocking is a good idea, but this threat was so crystal clear and unambiguous that I've gone ahead and blocked the account until the threat is withdrawn.
5781:
That doesn't appear to be true. The edit war was over adding and removing part of the text, or a "disputed" tag. That happened on the 10th. On the 18th, Tony did not remove the "Disputed" tag when it was replaced, but proposed replacing it with an "under discussion" tag.
3176:
I think you misread, and in fact are both arguing the same point. Degrees don't matter on WP. Asserting special knowledge/prowess because of degrees is bogus. What matters are properly cited edits. Users therefore cannot browbeat, and they're morons if they try to.
3658:
Okay, let's assume that for a moment: in every account listed in the RfCU, the anon had the IP for a day (two at the most) before the ISP would reassign a new IP address. However, the anon has had this particular IP (the one most recently blocked) since November 7th -
11870:
on the other hand has had a history of bad editing in Knowledge, some of which I have pointed out. He has been blocked five times, he has re-uploaded deleted images, has been served civility warnings, POV warnings and a longer history of bad behavior on Knowledge. So
4083:
degrees. One from the Ox and one from an university here in the States. That the second one is only an A.S. in History doesn't mitigate its value as a degree, Additionally, the two links that Crossmr posted in supposed support of his statement are in fact to the same
3444:
are uniformly from New York. There might be a pattern there to be found - the user might take monthly trips to NY for work or whatever - but I think that it serves everyone's interest to not tar an innocent user editing from 75. with the same brush. Avi mentioned in
4500:
Does this need a checkuser? The name alone is probably blockable, but combined with single-purpose account behaviour and obvious previous editing experience, this is a clearly disruptive second account. An experienced editor can make controversial edits under his
7642:
I don't understand your point. The diff shows him removing the link(s). If you mean he removed the user box as well as the link in it, well, that's just nit-picking, and is not going to help reach a solution, which seems to be evolving further down the discussion.
4682:
Oh, I completely agree that it's not a new user - but we're talking right now about a block due to the username alone. Prove it's a sock (or have a little more duck-like properties than an obvious knock-off of policy) and I'm good with it. Maybe someone wants to
2980:
Per technical concerns expressed by Black Kite, I endorse Proposal 2. Granted, this user would have gotten an account if s/he'd ever intended to edit constructively after this long--but given the circumstances, Proposal 2 will likely have the effect of a siteban.
7826:
Done, but I'm more concerned about what he's planning on doing with his user page. Language like "you can browse through photos, view my discussions, and more" plus email him if someone edits it tells me he probably doesn't understand what Knowledge is about.
11933:
while at the same time being hyper-active and removing ALL warning messages and hiding traces of his bad behavior by occasionally taking breaks from Knowledge. All necessary information pertaining to his current behavior has been listed very clearly with diffs.
10368:
Question; could we revert the "remove the images!" requests from the talk page itself, and save everyone the trouble of pointing out the guidelines of censorship, etc...every time? Or was that in reference to just reverting the attempted removal of the images?
9674:
or something). I guess it's normal for him (and also me), to vent out especially when dealing with fanboys and persistent socks, but we don't really want to bash or trash-talk at other people here, it's just that the socks seem to be the fire-starter sometimes.
9568:
For crying out loud WB, you're in a forum full of admins and you're tossing out incivilities towards another editor like candy from a Santa Claus parade float. Tone it down if you a) expect any positive light on your complaint and b) don't have a Wikibreakwish
7458:
As I stated at the very beginning of this pointlessly long thread, I am perfectly willing to remove the link of there is consensus for me to do so. Despite John's constantly shifting reasons for deleting the link and your assertion that this is in violation of
5372:
The article has quieted down since semi-protection was imposed. We may have trouble in future, but for now, nobody is editing the article and peace has broken out. This item can probably be marked "Resolved" and allowed to scroll off AN/I. Thanks, everyone.
10878:
I tried contacting someone at the Hungadunga office, but none of the Hungadungas were there. I spoke to McCormick, and he gave me some good a-spice. I wanted to challenge the defendant to a handball match, but my lawyer recommended an out-of-court settlement.
1689:
page. Without it, WP:UNDUE is valid for the list of reports, since it gives undue weight to those reports mentioned, and none to the Moorer Report, entries to which you invariably delete. Amazingly enough, the only report which is not quoted explicitly in the
8348:
I concur, and I'm in agreement that the names should be left out, at least for the present. I only brought it up to illustrate two points: that oversight can be fickle and that the legal position in the UK (relevant for British editors) may not be clear cut.
6601:
Unfortunately, I agree with Noetica that it's clear who has been constructive and consensual, and who has been negative and a deletionist (pun intended) maverick, but, as we don't agree which is which, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to dwell on it. —
7526:
7390:
1680:
WP:UNDUE claims: WP:UNDUE says, in part: "NPOV says that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each.". There is little mention of the
4289:
I concur with the block, Crossmr and FuturePerfect. He's gone for a month; let's avoid giving him any more of our time; could someone blank the anon's attack page, please? Or is that tantamount to asking for an apology (which I reiterate I do not need). -
1648:
It is interesting that you played the 'anti-semitic' card. I suppose I am supposed to cringe at this thought and somehow defend my actions. I think not. I am merely trying to get portions of an Independent Report from the 4 reputable persons listed on the
3201:
argument claimed degrees that he has not substantiated. I still suggest that Arcayne prove it to the Arbcom, for privacy, (or withdraw the claims) so that the issue might be resolved, and there be no need to chase around blocking anonymous IP addresses.
3667:(as opposed to it being an ISP choice - and the ISP apparently hasn't changed since March) to either not reboot the modem (which is what I have assumed the user has done to also reboot their anonymity). In prior instance when the anon was saddled with
73:
14170:
with jackels and hyenas. I wish we were more civilized and let one of the 10,000 websites devoted to immediate pop-internet phenomena deal with stuff like this. I also wish I had a million dollars, though, and that's not going to happen either. --
11445:
I was kinda leaning that way anyways. I think I will IAR this as well; he seems to be doing NONE of the problems he was blocked for, and his new account has caused no problems. Thanks for the input. I think I will leave this guy alone for now...
5338:
One interesting thing to note is that some of the edits they refer to are in fact seriously POV. But they are undermining their case by a) including actually NPOV edits that they just don't like and b) trying out and harass editors in the process.
3463:
By banning the user, we remove ourselves from Proposal Two's added duty (and me the additional nuisance) of reporting behavior which would likely reoccur (case in point: the anon has been blocked three different times for this behavior, and each of
3948:
He is to refrain from talking about arcayne on wiki except in the case where Arcayne edits an article the IP has edited or revets an edit the IP has done. At that point he's not to engage Arcayne and instead leave me a diff and I'll have a look at
8162:
9340:
is an obvious copyvio up for deletion, and the other three, frankly, don't give me a ton of confidence that you actually took the pictures with your own camera, as you assert. I'm not surprised other users, like Starczamora, feel the same way.
11150:
I haven't looked the merits of his arguments, since he was arguing them with threats and I don't edit those articles. He's been an editor since 2006 over 500 edits, people have approached him on his talk page, he was already blocked once, his
3491:
Since they have shown they cannot follow our rules, and instead use them to continue action against their fellow users, I think that Proposal One removes the problem user without really interrupting the contributions of similar IP accounts. -
9895:
in his archives), in which Chrisieboy tries hard to Wikilawyer us into believing he's right. It's crystal-clear that Chrisieboy has learnt nothing from this, and the observable trend is concerning - we have a serious copyright violator here.
5488:
I encourage you (and everybody else reading this) to take a close look at the history of edit warring on that article. Tony1 was one of the primary "warrers". There were two others, who were also blocked. Please review my comment to Tony,
4919:. The latter has been cautioned against edit-warring on his Talk, and has not reverted since 18:18 UTC on 17 November. Between the two of them they are over 3RR but is unlikely that action will be taken if the reverting has actually stopped.
9188:
No, I took care of it. In the future, should this re-arise, SSP is an appropriate venue to take this; however there is no need to jump through the hoops for such obvious socks. The "investgation" took me all of 2 minutes to verify via the
3305:
every time people provide diffs to try and paint how bad the IP is, I just see more evidence that makes me question arcayne. Your last diff wasn't reported by the IP (he contributed, but someone else started the discussion complaining about
4095:
I don't loathe the anon. I don't know (and don't much care) about their edits. I certainly haven't been following their edits around for eight months. The anon has, and has followed my edits to articles they had never made a single edit in
2302:
Don't worry Jayjg, the award is fairly comical. 'Various topic areas' being just one and of course I think more people should be honoured for 'boundrylessness'. It is practically Colbert-like. Not sure anyone is going to take it seriously.
2115:
I've had my suspicions but not sure there is enough evidence to support a Check User. I've done sock puppet reports before but only where it was very obvious as the sock puppet master was none too subtle. If there enough evidence there?
3678:
did not connect the anon to a known user. Perhaps it is my own bad faith assumption that the user is previously blocked or banned user, and my apologies to Jojhutton for disturbing him while trying to connect some dots about the anon. The
5856:
A page protection should have worked better, again what's the point of blocking productive editors over one edit. If the edit waring was a day ago instead of a week, a block could have been in order, but it's not. Blocks aren't punitive.
3262:
holds. Asking him to prove it is irrelevent. Arcayne, I just wanted you to know that I don't always disagree with you. I have seem many of your edits and you seem to to be smack on most of the time. I just think you need to relax, and
6076:
The answer is surely obvious. Those who vote people like Rjd0060 to be admins are generally those who want to be admins themselves. Who else in their right mind would choose to hang around the corrupted slough of despond that is Rfa?
3683:
makes no such mistake, simply addressing the various 75.etc. IPs that keep popping up to attack my edits, and the prior checkusers have been useful in that the anon had previously admitted to editing under the anons denoted in bold
11688:
Sudharsansn, u have to make u'r case clearer to admins. For example when you said that edit comments were uncivil, first that it does not link to any edit comments, second you have to say what comment was uncivil. This is just one
1637:
Since statements by each of the 5 above are reproduced in the articles listed, there is no violation of WP:OR. There is no original research involved. The articles are published, and readily available, via link, directly from the
12564:
The originator of this request has only three edits prior to this request, all of which are related to the content in dispute. Two of those edits are reverts, and the third one contains the exact same text previously inserted by
5476:
While I see some editwarring in the history, that was over a week ago. I don't get how one edit deserves a block, especially of one of the more variable editors in the project. I also agree that this should be discussed further.
6139:
I find your comment to be lacking in (a) use of exclamation marks; and (b) use of the words "abuse" and/or "harassment." A more appropriate comment would be in the form, "How dare he block an editor! Abuse!11! Desysop at once!"
192:
129:
11989:
Well, I am not the angry user here and I don't need a 'cool-down' break for having reported this behavior here. If reporting such behavior would earn a block, it would only create an aversion towards the very purpose of having
7583:
only describe as the most abusive communication I have ever received in my life". So I am under no illusion about the nature of the aggravation involved. But it has no place on wikipedia. We are here to write an encyclopedia.
8496:
Nice to see you are polite, civil, and non-aggressive. On your user page you've told us all to 'go to hell'. I won't be going there, but I'm certainly not going to spend time looking into your 'demand'. I'm not your servant.
11513:
as you behave, you'll be fine", in which case an indef block is no better than a finite block. Worse, in fact, because the user can dictate the length of the block by the length of time before they create their new account.
11155:
show a complete disrespect for other people's opinions. I am trying not to read too much into this, but he is pretty consistant in his actions and attitudes if you read his talk comments on other issues. Example summary:
7524:
OK, my 10c worth as owner of the site pointed to from DC's page is this: since both Ty and John are in contact with Bellinghaus could they possibly suggest he could solve his own problems by removing HIS accusations on his
4664:
BMW, I partially agree with you but I also think that such a name is somewhat indicative of puppetry. Think about it, POV Pusher is uniquely Wikipedian lingo, it's unlikely that a new user would use it right off the bat...
3997:
It does take two to edit war, but the IP certianly didn't make the first move there, and I have no idea why it was so important to arcayne that he insert his comment on top. With that in mind I don't think its untoward to
9888:
1629:
Each of these persons are identified, and each of thier statements have the stated third party reference as part of the entry. The assertion that "Despite explaining to those editors the need for secondary sources as per
4505:
account or not at all. (Blanking sections of a controversial article takes us clearly into 'bad-hand' sock territory.) The only useful purpose that a checkuser might serve here is to clear the drawer of sleeper socks.
7534:
Furthermore, I dare not communicate with Bellinghaus myself, as anything I could possibly say (and I tried total understanding and kindness, believe me) will be twisted against me and reproduced a 100 times on various
11568:
8486:
6759:, and the lengths someone went to in order to trash them. I have NO issue with DC defending themselves. You insist they remove the link, then DC can just copy and paste a whole whack of it ... and place <ref: -->
12542:
would be a better location for that information, and mention of these Arab scientists should be done in no more than one sentence in the articles listed above. Ibn Sahl did not invent the telescope, and that's that.
8786:
I was requested via email to confirm that ForesticPig belongs to an administrator. (Sorry for the delay, I don't check that address often...) This is the case. I am personally acquainted with the account's operator.
3599:
necessary, ability for logged-in editors to edit through the block and ability to create new accounts through them are parameters that can be individually fine-tuned, just like we do with vandal blocks all the time.
2788:
2003:
The article is in an utterly crap state but what do you expect with SPA shoe horning in pet theories at every opportunity. It desperately needs some quality editing but they're put off by the nonsense it attracts.
14266:
I think that an RfC is for less clear-cut cases than this one. Here, according to the proclamations at his talk page and his actions, we have a self-described POV warrior whose main motivation on Knowledge is to do
9507:, well she's famous and many loves her, well theres no doubt that many wikipedians are interested to make her article good, but only you is against her, well i dont care. If my works are the same or related to your
8928:
must somehow trump the actual policy. That user may not like it, but I may have to remove that part, and then fix the template to fall in line with the policy. I was hoping to get more guidance before I did so, but
6399:
Noetica, if you harbor delusions that this won't be held against Tony, you missed the Ceoil case. He was blocked because an admin misunderstood jokes between him and another friend on their own talk pages. Then yet
5516:" Really? He made one (notably harmless) edit, and that was the entirety of his "continuation". Theoretically, you blocked him for it. But what I take from your post is that you either blocked him for edit warring
5796:
Yes, and the disputed tag had been placed by Locke Cole in objection to the under discussion tag placed by Kotinski. Since there was disagreement over the tag type, Tony1 should have known better than to revert.
9886:
It might interest people to know that Chrisieboy is an old hand at this - back in January this year he tried to get me 3RR-blocked for reverting his addition of a non-free-use image without valid rationale - see
8612:
5935:
7987:
of the law, the possibility of harm to minors, and the fact that the names add little to the reader's appreciation of the case and its significance, then all such names should be expunged from wikipedia pages.--
7754:
I too would be happy with this solution. Far better than linking to an attack blog out of some misguided sense of equal time. Knowledge is not here to provide equal time or to address perceived wrongs off-site.
6597:
provides that almost all day-of-the-year links and most year links shouldn't be linked, but "most" is not adequate for bots or certain editors who don't check each individual link before approving semiautomated
7395:"Pauline Berry, 45, the Cyberstalker & Marilyn Monroe mocker is bored to death in New Zealand and hiding behind names like Delicious Carbuncle on Knowledge and more of the hired haters, freaks & creeps"
3513:
its possible, but is there a way you can block the IPs but still allow registration from them? That way if he does register whilst banned and then abuse Arcayne from an account, then we can sort it from there?
2766:
13976:
compliant as a title. I take no position as to whether or not the list should stay or go, but the list MUST be renamed to a more neutral one. Maybe something like "Transgender murder victims" or something...
12998:
7477:
To date those asking for removal are John, Jayron32, Scott MacDonald, Tyrenius. The only clear supporter (in English) of this link is BMW. It's quite obvious that the consensus is that it is not appropriate.
14727:
12736:
Okay, thank you for explaining. I'm not really worried about the other user, I'm just trying to understand the reasoning. Does this mean that every Olympian can have an article? What about Div. 1 athletes?
11816:
I haven't looked through those diffs, but users are generally allowed to remove warnings and comments from their talk page - except if they're blocked, where the block notice+reasons should remain viewable.
1729:
can be considered Neutral if it explicitly does NOT provide at least some conclusion of the Moorer Report. So we have again you making an accusation, when it is in fact you who are guilty of the accusation.
12078:. All this has been happening for over ten days, and for over a week after I have reported it here. I have listed ALL of them in the posts above this one. I request someone to look into this. Thanks. ] (]
11698:
8448:
on this. Knowledge isn't obliged to obey the order, but I don't think there's any harm in voluntarily following it and practicing some self-censorship when we're dealing with the ruined lives of minors. ➨
6041:
to have the power to block one of Knowledge's most valuable edotors? How dare he? Who on earth votes these peole t be Admins? No wonder this site is going to the dogs. Make sure he never crosses my path.
13743:
I think this guy's trolling. A misguided user doesn't write a long, elegant rant citing bizarre historical precedents in response to a minor error - i really get the feeling he's just after a reaction. ~
11540:. He's been a good user since, so we'll risk the end of world in allowing this user to continue... I consider the matter closed, given the thoughtful opinions of everyone above. Thanks for the help. --
11100:? They certainly seem to make a good case for their preferred version of the content, and providing them with a venue to pursue the issue may also end the edit war, and coincidentally improve Knowledge.
141:
103:
12469:
4401:
2250:. Obviously, some of those sources are more reliable than others and in the google news search, some are false positives. I do not know the degree to which they may or may not address weight concerns. --
1045:
1040:
14811:
I would support unblocking and monitoring, given the situation. Knowledge always needs more good editors, and we shouldn't lock people out forever if they wish to be a genuinely positive contributor.
4091:
in fact make the first move there. I tried to ignore the fellow by not replying to him/her. The anon kept moving my comments around, and I undid the moves before getting tired of the nonsense and moved
3159:
card to brow beat his opponents in argument he should provide reliable sources to show that he is so qualified. I am certainly not convinced, and I think there is plenty of scope to doubt his veracity.
291:
the ban-evading sockpuppet Alex contribution from L.A. himself after little discussion on AN/I claiming that there was ''since there doesn't seem to be any fundamental opposition here, I've unblocked''
41:
38:
14867:
11969:
sneaking under the system of policies and guidelines and continuing to be a previously blocked five times, uncivil, wikihounding POV troll is, simply, just a problem with the system, seriously!! ] (]
5218:
11899:
block/warning history can continue to go on a POV rampage, without any civility, to stalk other editors thereby creating a negative edit atmosphere, I fail to see the need for guidelines or policies.
4756:
14363:
is about. Someone who, according to their own user page, comes to Knowledge with a self-professed agenda of fighting some political and ideological battles here should find another place to do it.
10323:
That is what I was thinking. Not to stereotype or anything, but this rant just doesn't sound like the usual requests for image removal, which usually come in a more reverential-of-Muhammad style.
4641:
Puppets", based on meaning alone would be considered more disruptive (no offence intended). If someone created the usernames "AlwaysAGF" and "DontBeAnEditWarrer", are we going to delete them too?
9829:
as another cut-and-paste job by him. You're in the right here - these are obvious copyvios and I simply don't believe his wikilawyering over the precise definition of plagiarism and copyright. ➨
14837:
Agreed, I think it doesn't matter as much as how long he's been blocked, but that it did it's job and he'll do the right thing from now on. It's how I would want to be treated in the situation.
5441:
Unless you understand the background here, I advise not unblocking without discussion. The background is a lengthy war concerning MOSNUM that has led to admins being given block warnings, etc.
12976:
11077:
as well, and it's a slow edit-war on whether Simmons is American or Israeli (wouldn't it be Israeli-American?). Concur that a block may be in order, if only to prevent the threatened edit war.
9768:
We can assume that such testimonial would not be written by a relative of Locsin. We can also assume that the person who uploaded the image on Knowledge is not a cousin of Locsin as claimed.
25:
14877:
4245:
blocked. First time through I didn't notice the date stamp and just saw the time and thought the thread was started before his acceptance but I went back and noticed it was about +22 hours.--
148:
5829:
If I'm reading the timestamps correctly, Rjd blocked Tony three minutes after his last edit, I don't think the "he knew he was asleep and still blocked" argument applies to that timeline.
5434:
137:
99:
14033:
Topics like this always resurface, and reliable coverage of them tends to emerge slightly slower than coverage in tabloids/blogs. To delete now would not serve any long term purpose. See
11858:
Knowledge by reliable citations and I haven't made ANY edits without proper referencing. My work in Knowledge has been completely within the framework of Knowledge policy and guidelines.
10753:
Who are you calling a sob? Them's fightin' words, boy! You'll hear from my lawyer - Hon. Charles H. Hungadunga, of the firm Hungadunga, Hungadunga, Hungadunga, Hungadunga, and McCormick.
8581:
I demand that everyone who edits this page gives me $ 1,000,000. I suspect we're going to get the same response...except my demand might not be received with an understandable eye-roll.
5921:
Isn't Locke Cole still in Arbcom Enforsement, also most of the edits I saw from him is edit warning of many articles. I'll support the block of him unless there is something I'm missing?
1799:
Anti-Semetic? Showing Israel deliberately attacked the USS Liberty and lied about it is Anti-semetic ? I don't like Gefilte fish - does that make me an anti-semite? Give me a break. --
12869:
I didn't know he was an administrator, as his userpage contains no such designation and he's not in the category. Either way, it was more of an aside than anything. Not worth any drama.
5842:
Sorry, when I said notice I meant it wouldn't affect him because he'd be able to go and do something else (be that sleep, eat, work whatever). I'm sure he's noticed he's been blocked. –
5960:
I'm not familiar with Locke Cole, but now see that he has a lengthy block log. Still, a week seems a bit long when page protection could work instead. And, I don't know anything about
4547:
By the same token, I added other cited material from the new Ha'aretz article, which was quickly reverted by Nagle. It was new background information which I thought was important. --
3429:
I am the first one to admit - freely - that I am sometimes less tactful than I could be. I also agree that I should never have noted my educational background in a discussion (the only
3381:
12790:
In future, why don't you ask the person undoing your edits why they did do so? It is much easier and friendlier than directly going to an noticeboard over something like that. Regards
3614:
is that any admin who notices the usual pattern will be able to block the IP without further ado. Most likely these blocks will be short, a month or less, and they will be anon-only.
9122:
6693:
10865:
10854:
9116:
9075:
yes, it's the stuff on his talk page. His ranting and attacking there has nothing to do with trying to be unblocked, and all to do with giving him a forum to continue his attacks.
3606:
1641:
WP:SYN is also not violated here. Each of the sources speaks of ONLY that person speaking - effectively making the point that is stated in the Moorer Report quote which I reproduced.
11336:
7443:
user page to direct people to extreme accusations in a vicious blog war. As you don't seem to be willing to take the link off, I am making a proposal that it is removed regardless.
2585:
The age old 'I'm not going to beat you up but you might have an accident' routine, PR? Please, pull the other, it has bells on. Can an admin deal with this as they deem appropiate?
1634:
none have been provided" is 100% incorrect. Each of the 5 persons listed has a secondary source identifying that each of these five have said what is implied in the quoted Sentence.
12521:
10883:
6345:
4481:
This account appears indistinguishable from Einsteindonut in terms of interests and behaviors. Whether it is them, or a sympathizer following the same agenda does not matter, per
3623:
3137:
Nonsense. Arcayne's real-world qualifications are not at issue here, nor is his overall behaviour (which, I agree, can sometimes be annoying). What is at issue here is the fact of
10473:
7238:
3296:
3275:
3026:
to be a dynamic range) would keep out those users who haven't done anything wrong, and that's the reason why it was avoided previously. The tech is a little beyond me, frankly. -
2335:
What causes problems is other editors who are doing it but don't advise others of what they're up to - the I-P conflict topic would be hugely improved if all of them were blocked.
13125:
11261:
Everyone. I have no idea if he is "right or wrong" as I can't seem to get passed the tone to get to the content. We shall see, but I just don't see this ending any other way.
5824:
5317:
Whatever. The JIDF, according to their web site, is currently annoyed with about twenty Knowledge editors, Haaretz, the ADL, Obama and the 78% of American Jews who voted for him
2882:
2394:
13056:
12701:
12593:
12553:
12044:, otherwise no one would report anything here owing to the fear of being 'blocked' just for reporting bad behaviour, since some admin might be trying to foster 'equality'. ] (]
9337:
4556:
4254:
4030:
4011:
3968:
3841:
3826:
3414:
3238:
3223:
3169:
3148:
2899:
11467:
As long as 1) he isn't vandalizing, and 2) he isn't once again creating vanity pages about himself, his garage band, etc., I'm agreeable enough. (And thanx for the compliment,
8734:
8717:
6473:. WTF? True that Tony's been very vocal on the talk pages, which everybody bar none agrees is the correct action. He discusses, makes one teeny edit and he's blocked - This is
5607:
5534:
No, I blocked for continuing to revert edits without pursuing dispute resolution. Long-time editors should know better. Why did he continue to revert? Why did he not pursue
14625:
12970:
11126:
Based on their history, I expect they'll continue. I left a final warning before another block. I'll follow up with SheffieldSteel's advice on reminding them about WP:DR. --
8656:
6745:
5851:
5837:
4534:
3812:
2424:, which seems to suggest that the commission existed but the report wasn't publicised. Whatever's in the Fox article seems mainstream enough for a few lines in the article. --
1007:
12337:, which is obvious from a simple perusal of the last 100-200 edits while Sudharsansn has made absolutely none, apart from these revert wars to inject his Original research.
11224:
10296:
8665:
6372:
and its associated pages – where I for my part simply left, finding certain editors' lack of good will and good sense too much to endure. I am sure others have done the same.
14217:
11879:
of his uncivil, inappropriate, POV Wikihounding. Post ONLY what is relevant to this complaint made here, your judgments and opinions can come in when required. Thanks. ] (]
11305:
10827:
9713:
9376:
6630:
shows that Tony1 has worked with dozens upon dozens of some of the best content contributors in establishing consensus upon MoS before making changes. That is indisputable.
6449:
5621:
is the edit in question, it was not even removing a tag, but instead changing which tag is used. I'm astounded that somebody could consider blocking somebody for that edit.
5538:? Why, just because he is a long time editor, does he get off the hook for reverting edits without following basic policies that even the new users are expected to follow,
3348:
2945:
2916:
2254:
1989:. In my experience, dealing with people who have the time to make hundred line posts is an exercise in futility. I'd cut the whole article down to bare bones at this point.
13716:
13700:
13617:
13533:
13513:
13429:
13278:
13241:
13153:
11289:
9090:
9070:
7507:
7488:
7472:
7453:
7437:
7422:
7406:
7374:
7151:
7091:
6719:
3507:
3315:
2435:
2415:
2360:
1848:
I would dispute how 'serious' a conversation is when one side screams 'CENSORSHIP' and 'Look at our dead Americans!' followed by more 'CENSORSHIP!' and then legal threats.
14619:
14492:
The IP has had its block extended and their talk page protected for the duration. I don't really see where this sort of thing needs to go much farther. Its not really a
13959:
13820:
13264:
11215:
11189:
11113:
9724:
8506:
7819:
5135:
Suggest with the next incarnation the page be protected; semi would serve no purpose as they are named accounts and he doesn't seem intelligent enough to stop on his own.
1808:
12674:
10942:
10912:
10903:
10888:
Geez, I thought this was a serious attempt to indef block Baseball Bugs. I guess I have to go back to trying to get him blocked for having bad taste in baseball teams.
10775:
9541:
9492:
8752:
8014:
7996:
2605:
2580:
2528:
2502:
2492:
2354:
1975:
1966:
1941:
13045:"...20 hour solid block of edits...", is that taken from the "Edits by Time of Day and Day of Week (UTC)" graph? If so that means that I must be several people as well,
12838:
11087:
10641:
10318:
9683:
8683:
8661:
It is simply impossible for anyone here to imagine how utterly crushed I am that I didn't come up with that reference. I will be under the bed crying if anyone needs me.
7972:
7844:
6802:
6086:
5058:
has been blocked for a year, and he seemed to have the same interests as this editor, I believe it would be justified. Jehochman issued the block on October 10 based on
2662:
2147:
1790:
14687:
13937:
13918:
10757:
10748:
10090:
9877:
9860:
9350:
8606:
8372:
8358:
8343:
7325:
7310:
7295:
7260:
7229:
bios to attack blogs for instance, and we don't link the names of private individuals to unauthoritive attack pages. BLP is pertinent here. Please do remove the link.--
7223:
7065:
6779:
6675:
6573:
established consensus; after looking over the history, it seems he's outlasted his critics, rather than providing a reasoned discussion. Tony may think he's improving
6104:
5585:
4087:
What Crossmr apparently missed in the "edit-warring" in the Ibiza article was that the anon showed up there out of the blue and started attacking me. So yeah, the anon
3323:
some comment in a talk page discussion, something where this guy gets his digs in. Its rude, its insulting, and its way overboard. At this point, we appear to have 7
2671:
A good block OrangeMike, but just BTW, you wrote "infinite" on the block log. I wouldn't disagree with that, given how very long that log is, but did you mean do that?
1998:
13836:
12956:
11416:
10798:
10363:
9984:
9954:
9913:
9631:
9587:
9328:
9306:
8967:
8952:
8942:
8876:
8624:
6827:
6117:
6028:
4489:. What shall we do? I think we should consider whether to block them as a sock. Perhaps a checkuser could take a quick look. I've invited the user to comment here.
2961:
2235:
2110:
1923:
1895:
1868:
1835:
1298:
1293:
1288:
1283:
1278:
1273:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1246:
1241:
1236:
1231:
1226:
1221:
1216:
1211:
1206:
1201:
82:
14419:
13993:
13879:
13072:
12757:
12746:
12731:
11826:
11777:
11135:
10729:
10720:
10697:
10688:
10570:
10058:
9842:
9395:
9382:
and uploaded it on Knowledge and then, by virtue of you personally uploading the photo, claim it as "My own work"? Or at least, have you tried providing a reasonable
7954:
6703:
way; we don't maintain lists of "perceived wrongs" at Knowledge, and therefore we should not also link to such pages from our userpage. The link should be removed. --
6271:
As I indicated I won't revert again. But it'd be nice if we could get more than fifteen minutes of discussion before someone closely involved tries to shut it down. —
6003:
I support an unblock of Tony1. He's put a tremendous amount of work into the MoS trying to make it consistent and correct, and a block isn't a good way to repay him.
4970:
3070:
the IP accounts (s)he's created were single-purpose, attack accounts. This is beyond basic pest-control; we need to tent the 75. house and gas the thing. But then, I
2952:
Proposal 2. If harassing Arcayne is their only purpose then it becomes P1 by default, but it gives WP the AGF defence that good edits from that range are encouraged.
2017:
14605:
14512:
13799:
13785:
12803:
12262:
who was mainly undoing Sudharsansn's OR & reverts, although I did the same as Dbachmann once or twice. Here too Sudharsansn is irate and uses uncivil language -
10975:
10274:
10231:
9029:
8910:
8407:
8073:
7934:
7865:
7681:
I don't see how someone's user page can be considered part of the building of the encyclopedia, its simply a user page, of no consequence to actual articles on wiki
7136:
6434:
6153:
6051:
3593:
3563:
3456:
from editing here from whatever account or IP they choose to edit from. While this means that anyone being crafty with the same IP domain is going to get probed for
2758:
2736:
2623:
2571:
2546:
2280:
2195:
2129:
2043:
12785:
10674:
9668:
6624:
6609:
6417:
6211:
6134:
4720:
4705:
4677:
4515:
4305:
4284:
4188:
4173:
3929:
3538:
3105:
2460:
14898:"The Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty, June 8, 1967, and the 32-Year Cover-up That Has Followed, James E. Akins, Washington-Report, December 1999, Pages 28-34,36
14857:
14646:
14228:
12405:
And before anyone starts saying 'Assume good faith', I defy anyone here to show me no fewer than three school-IPs that aren't a giant list of warnings and blocks.
12387:
11487:
10459:
10432:
10258:
9777:
9015:
8998:
8541:
8387:
8282:
8217:
7741:
7723:
7550:
6639:
6283:
6266:
6182:
5992:
5768:
He did revert to a version that was part of the edit war post-protection. Having one's opponent blocked for edit warring is not authorization to revert his edit.
5630:
5367:
5087:
5002:
3121:
attempted to have this user blocked. WMC blocked the anon, but was told by the community, that the block was wrong, so this must be the next attempt for a block.--
2694:
2677:
564:
14671:
14354:
11505:
11027:
10657:
10489:
10175:
10136:
9247:
8767:
8480:
7913:
7891:
7192:
That's a non sequitur though. I am not objecting to this because of BADSITES but because it contravenes WP:USER and WP:BLP, neither of which has been rejected. --
6906:
6564:
6331:
6011:
5805:
5791:
5776:
5763:
5079:
4659:
3058:
2988:
14806:
14588:
14561:
14543:
14148:
14122:
14088:
14071:
14049:
14028:
13760:
12776:
Okay, thanks for the input and the pointer to the relevant discussion. It's been helpful to me. I think this is resolved unless anyone else wants to weigh in...
11556:
11530:
10548:
8900:
8576:
8139:
8112:
8051:
8033:
7945:
Unfortunately, you can't undo moves if there's been intervening changes, as was the case here. I tried moving back in order and it failed, as I had expected. --
7787:
6794:
6499:
champion on the other side. We should seriously consider demoting MOSNUM either from being a guideline, or from controlling FA; it is no service to the project.
6491:
6202:
Seeing as how this was one revert, and this is a well established user, a week old "warning" by a different administrator is not even close to being acceptable.
5947:
5646:
5463:
5450:
5396:
5382:
5333:
5305:
4906:
4892:
4841:
4619:
4598:
4589:
4347:
3130:
2865:
2533:
I was referring to past editors of the page, its quite plain I was not excusing anyone of antisemitism. I'm deeply unimpressed with the threat of a libel case.
2243:
2172:
2070:
1946:
Really? You don't find it dilutes the already watered down notion of 'barnstars' when SPA are awarded barnstars for their work in 'various topics' by other SPA?
1188:
14709:
12936:
12435:
12420:
11462:
11436:
10025:
9425:
9225:
9209:
8840:
8796:
6861:
6508:
6313:
6251:
6197:
5741:
5551:
5528:
5507:
5150:
4989:
4928:
4233:
4142:
4116:
4052:
3895:
3867:
3363:
3210:
3195:
3089:
2440:
Exactly the source I was planning on using :) I have proposed a short edit on the talk page concerning the report, along the lines of the suggested edit above.
2247:
14464:
14436:
14325:
the place to post ones political views regardless of whether said views support the left or right wing of any political system. Knowledge is about collecting
14312:
13099:
11013:
10521:
9045:
8982:
8814:
8461:
8440:
7764:
7569:
5975:
5925:
5481:
5059:
4493:
3794:
3779:
3730:
3706:
3653:
752:
14829:
14372:
14280:
14261:
14179:
14080:
The usual response would be family, friends etc. You can imagine how inaccurate information about Abe's suicide disseminated via Knowledge might effect them.
12457:
11734:""which ignoramus altered this?", "formed by your own ignorance and prejudice", "Under what authority do you find yourself competent to make mass reverts " -
10401:
10378:
10354:
10332:
9183:
9168:
8314:
8299:
8171:
7703:
7690:
6394:
5875:
5861:
5184:
3010:
14663:
14522:
13540:
13352:
12883:
12864:
10608:
10423:
These are different article spaces so I wouldn't move them about, else things could later be even harder to follow: Instead, make a note in the current AfD.
8679:
7598:
7050:
7000:
6945:
5914:
5410:
5348:
5164:
4571:
3041:
1538:
1533:
1528:
1523:
1518:
1513:
1508:
1503:
1498:
1493:
1486:
1481:
1476:
1471:
1466:
1461:
1456:
1451:
1446:
1441:
1314:
1192:
1070:
823:
13090:
Considering the idiosyncrasies in Caspian Blues behavior I would say that if the account is multiple people then they would have to be fairly good actors.
12348:
8831:
escape justifiable scrutiny towards the work in and of itself. There would tend to be more attention paid to the edits of an account with a narrower focus.
7653:
7635:
7622:
6360:
4373:
2323:
2297:
13624:
13436:
13285:
13160:
12771:
10280:
6234:
5130:
3939:
1420:
1415:
1410:
1405:
1400:
1395:
1390:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1343:
1338:
1333:
1328:
1323:
10594:
10359:
The next time someone states that images of Muhammad are not allowed in Islam, point out to them that Knowledge is not Islam. The two are often confused.
13947:
12894:
10013:
either. However, Google Scholar seems pretty certain that the text I deleted came from that 1996 article. Chrisieboy did not contest my deletion there.
9783:
8423:
I have actioned all the outstanding oversight requests for this article. I believe it is within policy due to the court order that Baby P should remain
6819:
Parlez en anglais, s'il vous plait. C'est la "English" Knowledge. (Putting bricks on a hamster and telling it to "balance" - have to remember that one.)
4379:
3671:
on their talk page that connected them to their prior ids by admin reinforcement, that IP would go silent, and a new one would pop up a week or so later.
1305:
710:
509:
11742:
which are listed alongside the edits in the edit history page. His behavior has also been pointed out as being uncivil and rude by other editors in the
10218:
that is why the page has been restored to the last good version. The above user has also been attempting to forum shop (edit disruptively) as described
7670:
7201:
7187:
2699:
I see the legal threats have been deleted, surely policy indicates using strikethrough as now the narrative is destroyed. 20:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11343:
5388:
5359:
5201:
5170:
5063:
4884:
4712:
4215:
As mentioned before, if a problem arises with the anon again, I will post it here and cc Crossmr and FutPerf and that - as the man said - will be that.
3945:
The IP has to avoid, with all reason, editing any article that Arcayne edits. He's self-imposed on himself all types of articles Arcayne usually edits.
2846:
1432:
1310:
12272:
reverts Yogagates' edits and calls us all as "Sanskrit chauvinism revert mafia trolling the same pages" and asks us to "read the damn WP:RS citations"
11875:
suddenly jumping into this and accusing me of being something, does not absolve the reason for this complaint being made and it also does not absolve
11690:
9826:
8852:
7904:
The way he is using his user page seems unacceptable - he's using it like a Myspace page or a blog. His only edits are to his userpage or PicJungle.
7795:
7733:
7682:
7542:
6272:
6240:
5896:
2845:
This lists above are BY NO MEANS COMPREHENSIVE, but a sampling to give both the nature of this harassment, and to the long-period of it. This RFCU:
1176:
1171:
1166:
1161:
1156:
1151:
1146:
1141:
1136:
1131:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1109:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1089:
1084:
1079:
3721:
and how it works I suggest reading up on, its not always possible on a system you don't control to go and get yourself a new IP address on demand.--
2929:. I am not going to answer these questions directly myself, but anyone is free to answer them as they see fit, either here or on that talk page. --
11862:
may disagree with the contents of the edit, however, that does not give him the right to limit that information or accuse me of being a POV editor.
9508:
9441:
9342:
9294:
9279:
7428:
that it is accurate to characterise Berry's site as an attack page, nor is it reasonable to expect that any external site will follow WP policies.
7344:. We got your point from the start. Further repetition of the same point, although with different wording, is not swaying anyone. I see no real
3756:
addresses out of the air, Crossmr; they came up because the same person kept attacking me in places where they never had before. It started out in
1704:
WP:NPOV claims: Another interesting one. The Moorer report makes several numbered statements, the collection of which is it's conclusion available
601:
468:
5494:
despite the protection and despite being warned. All users responded to the warning last week and Tony1's response is noteworthy. Please review
14629:
14571:
14526:
14380:
14113:
etc. If material otherwise conforms to WP policies and guidelines, we should not, in my view, be censoring it out of sympathy for his family. –
14038:
10448:
6368:
any future deliberations on Knowledge. Tony is a fiercely hard-working and remarkably competent editor, passionately concerned to bring order to
6261:
6192:
5984:
5961:
5900:
5354:
try to get what they want through aggression, deception, and sabotage, using techniques that even groups that agree with their aims, such as the
4335:
2135:
1066:
742:
110:
12920:
12328:. I am a bonafide editor who has made significant constructive contributions to the article in question (and related articles on Sanskrit), see
9503:
Excuse me but Its really just normal to improved many articles including Filipino related articles including actors, film, tv series ect. About
5618:
14781:
14678:
That picture...wow what has been seen cannot be unseen. On topic, that talk page might need to be locked down to prevent further, uh....rants.
11958:
11059:
9474:
on my own userpage (saying in the edit summary "if you are not a sock then prove it" to that effect), suspecting me as a puppet of Gerald whom
9235:
7959:
An admin has now undone the move properly. The content of this editor's user page is tolerable, in my view. Anyone who wants to propose it for
7267:
5754:
after he had stopped the edit-warring by proposing a different tag in a single edit. He was then blocked. That's just not a sensible response.
3468:
different AN/I's have all commented about how the user had acted inappropriately - to date, that behavior has only abated by blocking the anon)
705:
7316:
consensus here, nor do I feel that I am in violation of any WP rules, but I'm sure there's an admin or two who will weigh in shortly. Thanks.
5723:
5720:
5717:
5714:
5711:
5708:
5705:
5702:
5699:
5696:
5693:
5690:
5687:
5684:
5681:
5678:
5675:
5672:
5669:
5666:
5663:
5660:
5657:
5654:
4567:
I have indefed the account for a username vio. It also looks like a sock to me but as this is clearly a disruptive name we can do without it.
2061:
are two editors who've been re-inserting almost identical material. Neither has made any contributions outside this article or its Talk page.
13087:, multiple people sharing an account is frowned upon. I doubt there is any way of proving this unless the persons edit from different ISP's.
9286:
9231:
8042:
That's very kind. There are other examples in the edit history. Would you like me to go back over it and provide you with the diffs? Thanks.
4471:
4414:
12255:
12251:
12247:
12243:
12239:
12235:
12231:
12227:
12219:
10265:
Thank you for the explanation Quilbert, but I don't see any edits on the page dated 15 September. Where can I see that the case is closed?
9947:
9892:
7210:
exists to protect WP from potential legal issues, then there is no issue here since the content is not on WP. I still don't see any part of
2971:, s/he'd have gotten an account. I'd have supported Proposal 2, but this has been going on since January. This needs to end, and end now.
10850:
8584:
Plus, if it was "ignored" the first time(s) it was brought up, then nobody here must have agreed with this being a situation that required
6239:
FWIW, I'm done reverting this. But it's getting REALLY frustrating seeing these kinds of actions from editors who are clearly involved... —
2329:
10206:
10201:
5288:
270:
Admin ] seems incline to take the definition of admin abuse to a new level. He is the ultimate epitome of unsavory administrator conducts.
13844:
13557:
13369:
12509:
12211:
7853:
7828:
4826:
1553:
771:
544:
386:
14907:"A Look Over My Shoulder: A Life in the Central Intelligence Agency, By Richard Helms with William Hood, Random House 2003,Pages 300-301
12031:
who is stalking me to create a distaste and aversion towards Knowledge. You'd succeed in helping him if you block me to 'cool' me down!!
11750:
citations and talk page comments that I have added. This is turning out to be a nuisance to have an editor who is out on a spree. ] (]
9950:." I've been working on some other copyright concerns, but hope to have time to take a deeper look at some other contributions later. --
13905:
and If I remember correctly, my own (and only) connection with the guy was here when I supported a block on him for a different issue.
13641:
13453:
13302:
13177:
12275:
12271:
12263:
11945:
And he continues, for the fifth consecutive day, to stalk me wherever I go. Also, please note that I understand the difference between
11912:
recommending his 'newfound' invention, 'cool down' block, is immature and outright silly. I don't know why I should be blocked because
6755:
Having read all the proof (following the links on DC's talk page)((PS: I read it a long time ago)), I was astounded at the attempts to
5231:
5029:
2839:
2387:
1427:
781:
700:
549:
12309:
articles and I dont have any motive to stalk him. However I see him as a desperate editor with a strong tendency towards indulging in
7286:. I don't feel that I am violating any policy or guideline by linking to the page, but does the title change alleviate your concerns?
3155:
How civil of you to dismiss my suggestion as nonsense. I think Arcayne's qualifications are an issue here. If he is going to play the
1781:
Lastly, a checkuser (whatever that is) is welcome, as would be any other WP investigation you choose. I do not worry about my actions.
1035:
13081:
Caspian blue is a renamed account. His old edit history is maintained. So the registration date is when he registred as Appletrees.
8392:
For the record, the Daily Telegraph (which is a considerably more reliable source) also published the names at the time of the trial.
6221:
5311:
4769:
2890:
I finally got curious as to why the anon wasn't defending himself and went and checked the talk page to find out what was going on.--
746:
14105:
applies only to living people. I agree that the article should stick to the facts and avoid tabloidism etc, but that is pursuant to
13269:
It is not a high traffic talkpage, so if there is a spate of ip vandalism then a request for a short semi protection could be made.
13118:
and many others. Checkuser just came back "inconclusive" due to age of the other accounts, but behaviour pattern is pretty obvious.
17:
11360:
10119:
I've asked Chrisieboy to come, take a look at and comment on this thread - hopefully he will, and if so, we'll take it from there.
7588:
sufficiently important matter, and then it can go in the article. Until such time, wikipedia does not provide space to promote it.
7123:, perhaps skipping over important nuances in our drive to explain all. Focused conversations are good, but there's such a thing as
2380:
2290:
529:
13144:
has sprotected the article, and I blocked the most recent ip for 31 hours. Hopefully this is an end to it (for a while, at least).
9515:
but i never harassed you? huh! And I'm not that wikipedian to harrased to a fanboy and a desperate wikipedian who hate my cousin,
4447:
13110:
It is becoming ever more obvious that "Occidentalist" is just another in a never-ending row of harassment socks, same pattern as
12040:
Presenting or endorsing a case to block me, just to foster 'equality' is sheer nonsense. Please don't create an aversion towards
6542:; taking a long view, it is clear who has been constructive and consensual, and who has been negative and a deleterious maverick.
872:
642:
159:
13063:
I'd just like to say that I believe the sort of thing Occidentalist is trying to do here ought to be very strongly discouraged.
13734:
10948:
4739:
4407:
3440:
purpose of attacking another person. I have not stalked that person's edits, nor have I done so for eight months. The anon has.
1061:
865:
637:
559:
431:
14788:
The concepts I have seen written on their userpage make perfect sense to me. We also monitor if they return. Maybe mentor.
14140:
high standards of sourcing (note the types of sources that have been used so far in the article's history) observed. Regards,
10530:
Someone might want to contact the BNP to inform the of the leak as well. May be a UK version of the "Privacy Act" violation.
8801:
Just for the record, can you also confirm whether or not you think that this alternate account is being used in line with the
7493:
I took Scott MacDonald's comments as a request to reduce unnecessary drama, and I think I addressed Jayron32's concerns about
14750:
3229:
I will ask however, that you take the time to deal with me in a more civil tone in future; I do not expect to be threatened.
2383:
2350:
PR apologises - although he felt this way on seeing it, there was no indication or real reason to believe it was intentional
2053:
good-faith effort to reach consensus. If multiple editors re-insert the same thing, sanctions for all should be considered.
1875:
Wow, nice come back. Really. Tell you what, go away, think real hard, then try and come up with a comment about the content.
798:
539:
478:
5264:
2152:
Rlevse has confirmed they are unrelated (Though with a comment that Meatpuppetting and SPA violations should be looked at).
354:
vendetta. If this desysopping is the only solution, then we have to do what we have to.--] (]) 19:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14872:
14472:
13575:
13551:
13387:
13363:
9870:
9708:
9536:
9371:
9323:
9193:
test that this was Moleman 9000. If he wants to edit, he can request an unblock on his main account or contact arbcom. --
7661:
half-jokingly refer to Jimmy Wales as a god-king, we all know that he does not create policy or precedent by his actions.--
6531:
6352:
Me too! Let's dilute the hell out of the system. This whole debacle has done nothing for the dignity of the admin process.
6174:
Erm, I warned everyone Rjd0060 blocked today that I would block for further disruption and edit warring earlier this week.
5194:
877:
617:
534:
166:
14195:
13659:
13471:
13320:
13195:
11929:
is a classic example of someone getting away from all the hue and cry by cleverly posting an 'inactive' status message in
9749:......i got the chance to visit and see gelo on the set of their movie 'land down under' in bukidnon..spent 3days there...
6698:
I would say that a block is premature until DC refuses to take down the link. This link is definately bad; one should not
5895:. Blocking established editors like this is not the way to go. I suggest instead using page protection. Also note that
4802:
3460:, I think we already tend to do this passively and unofficially with most folk who act similar to banned or blocked users.
2849:
shows a list of IPs, some of which can be shown to doing this behavior back as early as April, 2008. This has to stop. --
1776:
Why does the Moorer Report require a secondary source, when not a single one of the other reports listed have a reference?
14850:
13697:
13635:
13614:
13530:
13510:
13447:
13426:
13296:
13261:
13238:
13171:
13122:
12995:
10219:
10215:
6341:
5847:
5820:
5603:
5430:
5224:
5118:
5023:
4329:
3965:
3961:
it should be made quite clear that Arcayne is under no obligation to restrict his choices of article editing in any way.
3823:
3603:
3371:
3293:
3220:
3145:
2879:
2785:
1558:
737:
662:
517:
448:
11654:
11646:
8088:(e/c) Yes, if one person could please email the list of diffs (any/all that contain the names) to the list mentioned at
3691:
created an SPA/rebooted his/her modem simply to have it appear that more than one IP were complaining about my edits? -
14601:
13865:
Again with the bad-mouthing (I was homophobic yesterday, which for personal reasons makes me chuckle) - please provide
13250:
13247:
13226:
12857:
12576:
11282:
11182:
11083:
10239:
8989:
I've given them a 3RR warning, if they revert one more time contact me and I'll block them for long-term edit warring.
8958:
sense to me. I researched the template's history and found that it was also changed last year without any discussion.--
8434:
those news sources went to print. Are overseas sources covering this? Are they disregarding the British court order?
8264:
7330:
Personally, I'm growing rather tired of John's continual one-sided arguments about this. It's starting to look like a
6024:
4762:
4276:
4165:
3921:
3585:
3530:
3406:
850:
845:
830:
667:
657:
622:
493:
12302:
12299:
12296:
12292:
9927:
4998:
I have removed the resolved tag. Does this need further discussion? Does anyone else have views on the need for a CU?
2338:
There is a much smaller problem if newly arrived editors appear initially to act as SPAs - but we have the example of
13811:
Don't worry about it - it's gone now. I guess there is a bit of a delay between the servers, or something like that.
12027:. Blocking me, just because someone thinks that I should be, for a 'cool-down' effect would work exactly in favor of
11395:
11354:
10981:
7919:
4321:
855:
788:
684:
677:
627:
12321:
12267:
11806:
11794:
9467:
9020:
The address is the University of South Florida, I've added the appropriate template, so they can get a schoolblock.
7628:
6109:
All just reinforces Douglas Adams' sentiments: "the only people who should have power are those who don't want it".
3982:
3433:
instance of that ended several months ago, without recurrence), and I was properly chastised for doing so by others.
3050:
Also, it's too wide a range - being effectively AT&T dynamic access for the whole of the East Coast of the USA.
2399:
PR, if you are talking about that, I see MRG's response as perfectly justified. All of us should know that there is
12697:
12678:
12517:
12362:
10908:
Hey, haven't we Cubs fans suffered enough? We're lapping 100 years now. We've practically got our own Y2K problem.
8089:
6440:
logs. It's about time that administrators were held equally to account. Number of blocks reversed, for instance. --
6280:
6248:
1027:
989:
488:
453:
12498:
12493:
2832:
14940:
14667:
14517:
In any event, judging from a traceroute, the IP in question is related to the Brandon Valley School District, or
14300:
13930:
10415:
9471:
9456:
also claims to be a cousin of Locsin, and also exhibited patterns that are similar to the puppet master such as:
7463:, I don't believe that I am in violation of any WP policy and I don't see any consensus for removal of the link.
6936:
unsuccessful. And, although naturally we are all highly able linguists here, this is best resolved in English. --
1815:
He was speaking of people the article has attracted in the long term. Stop with the persecution complex already.
1563:
889:
840:
793:
652:
574:
463:
379:
11962:
9642:"Unfit to be a Wikipedian" is a little harsh. The ACTIONS and EDITS of the person are unfit for Knowledge, but
8261:
8256:
8253:
8248:
8245:
4975:
Agree with Cohen that this can no longer be considered "resolved". But it's not a big deal. I look at this as a
4441:
3904:
therefore refer to him as "the troll" its wrong. you can say he has trolling behaviour but thats a bit too far.
2887:
You didn't feel the need to disclose that you blocked the anon for 48 hours at the beginning of this discussion?
2709:
14800:
14744:
14717:
14640:
14582:
14537:
14507:
14349:
14199:
13988:
13119:
12992:
12452:
11551:
11457:
11331:
10714:
10614:
10542:
9839:
9662:
9581:
9419:
9204:
8600:
8570:
8535:
8458:
8212:
7888:
7368:
7086:
6994:
6900:
6773:
6714:
4699:
4653:
4434:
4325:
4047:
3962:
3862:
3820:
3600:
3557:
3377:
3343:
3290:
3289:
on the person in question we are talking about, to be enforced by short term blocks of any new reincarnations.
3217:
3189:
3142:
2940:
2912:
2888:
2876:
2860:
2782:
947:
776:
720:
672:
591:
554:
13599:
13411:
12200:
12196:
12192:
12188:
12184:
12180:
12176:
12172:
12168:
12164:
12161:
11895:
11790:
11392:
4832:
was created and began editing only the JIDF article. Something to watch; no action requested at this time. --
4458:
4427:
4122:
3975:
3112:
I agree with Crossmr. I also believe that there is not precident to ban a user from entering into discussion.
13683:
13495:
13344:
13219:
13053:
12967:
12501:
12071:
12067:
11258:
Well, thanks to ignorant users instigating an edit war (the ones you really should be talking to, by the way)
11065:
9720:
9222:
9180:
7503:
7468:
7433:
7402:
7321:
7291:
7277:
7219:
7147:
7061:
6689:
6671:
5258:
5104:
5053:
4958:
4380:
3995:
3992:
3989:
3986:
3978:
2093:]) have all been registered in the past few days, and have all made edits exclusively about the USS Liberty.
978:
596:
584:
579:
13563:
13375:
12717:
Hi, I'm not an expert either, but if the contents on the page is correct the page does meet notability, see
11954:
11891:
11768:
same fashion that they were used prior to deletion is disruptive - see his deleted contribs. Tools, anyone?
11626:
11158:
Changed to Israeli again. It's very annoying that I have to keep doing this - please, just accept the facts.
6577:, but there is real debate on that subject. I believe that those parts of the manual of style which have a
5750:
However, instead of continuing to edit war against there being a tag Tony1 was trying to reach a compromise
4796:
4465:
4338:) declined the third unblock request, so hopefully we will get a one month reprieve from this wikidrama. --
2211:
13647:
13593:
13459:
13405:
13308:
13183:
13034:
Is it possible to tell whether Caspian blue is actually more than one person editing from the same account?
12711:
12505:
11802:
11384:
11152:
8981:
8240:
8237:
8234:
6337:
5843:
5816:
5599:
5426:
5275:
5244:
5041:
1589:
959:
860:
730:
522:
12491:
12122:
12111:
12100:
10301:
I think the notion that a sincere follower of Islam posting in good faith would let slip an uncapitalized
9736:
9311:
Thanks for notifying him so that he'll stop doing these disruptive things to me which i dont really know.
9101:
Unless his Talk page is blocked, banning him does no good, since he still has an outlet for his attacks.
8775:
8201:
the lack of policy guidance in how to proceed here; common sense says that removal is the right move... --
4813:
4782:
3735:
Respectfully, I would submit that the RfCU is only pointless in that it points out the obvious - that the
14821:
13677:
13489:
13338:
13213:
13135:
12693:
12513:
12335:
12332:
12329:
12157:
12149:
12145:
12141:
12137:
12133:
12129:
12125:
12118:
12114:
12107:
12103:
12096:
11372:
10844:
10195:
9173:
So even tho this is a known IP of the blocked user, I should still go thru the sock reporting procedure?
8520:
7699:
apply everywhere, including user pages. The question is whether it applies to this statement and link. --
6297:
5282:
5251:
5047:
4883:
suggestion is different.) There are potential 3RR issues but it depends how new we regard this user as.--
725:
405:
155:
14774:
13707:
Stick 'em up at AIV - you will likely get a quicker response. The most recent ip has been blocked, btw.
12286:
4897:
Ah. Howdy has no user page or talk page, and I hadn't noticed that note on the article's talk page. --
4820:
2682:
Actually, it's the software for the blocking mechanism which says "infinite" instead of "indefinite"! --
13805:
12618:
11746:. As listed again, he is basically stalking me and undoing all my edits just to push a POV in spite of
10924:
9763:. Meanwhile, the "sisters" refer to the people who belonged in the same fan club as the photographer.)
9679:
8516:
6798:
6482:
Tony's block will forever be an ugly wart on his nose, unless it is rolled back or expunged forthwith.
6445:
6082:
5581:
4912:
4789:
4733:
4552:
4530:
4454:
4395:
2816:
spent months hounding Arcayne by continuosly bringing up this minor fact over and over and over again.
2364:
1804:
647:
473:
458:
443:
413:
372:
14762:
14496:
threat, just some loser high school kid vandalizing Knowledge. I personally would pay it no mind. --
9462:
Harassing Wikipedians who do not agree with his "style" of editing, calling them "insane" (as seen in
8468:
FYI, the police are investigating a number of websites which may have breached the order, see the BBC
5653:
I believe this sequence of edit warring from Aug 1 to Nov 18 establishes the ground for such a block:
5520:, or else because he spoke to those who warned him in an uppity way. Those are not blocking matters.
4615:
I'm am shutting down for the night. Please do list it, because there seems to be a reasonable basis.
2328:
May I remind people there's nothing wrong with being an SPA? An attempt to force me to change my name
1664:
I would now like to address each of these objections, and others which have been voiced, individually:
13115:
12893:
12781:
12742:
12579:). Now because of dynamically allocated IPs, I would refrain from assuming that we're dealing with a
12495:
11378:
11221:
10862:
10837:
10771:
9386:
rationale for uploading the photo on WIkipedia in case you weren't the photo's original creator? ---
9067:
9055:
8662:
8339:
7992:
7234:
6741:
5035:
5011:
A checkuser should be run, to determine if Howdypardner is evading the block on Einsteindonut. Since
3481:
3373:
2908:
2835:
632:
483:
8780:
8196:, to do no harm. While this situation may not be covered within the text of any policy, this is an
6260:
behavior from you. If you revert again, in any shape or form you will be blocked. Enough is enough.
5271:
14683:
14003:
13712:
13545:
13357:
13274:
13149:
13050:
13046:
12964:
12622:
11412:
11211:
10292:
9261:
8693:
7950:
7499:
7464:
7429:
7398:
7317:
7287:
7215:
7143:
7057:
6685:
6667:
4957:
The edits of DontbeaPOVPUSHER, when combined with those of Howdypardner, may have gone over 3RR on
4809:
4511:
3877:
2957:
2753:
2618:
2577:
2541:
2499:
2351:
2190:
2124:
2012:
1972:
1938:
953:
818:
7777:
I don't know what people's IP addresses are, but for the rest I have the evidence of my own eyes.
5936:
Knowledge:Requests_for_arbitration/Locke_Cole/Proposed_decision#Locke_Cole_placed_on_revert_parole
5899:
was blocked by Rjd0060 for a week, which seems quite excessive. He should be unblocked as well.
4129:
instance where you stated "degrees" and in fact claimed political science and international degree
2551:
Ah, as I expected. I do hope someone talks to PR and explains how inappropiate such silliness is.
14845:
14234:
13955:
13914:
13875:
13816:
13735:
13693:
13629:
13610:
13526:
13506:
13441:
13422:
13290:
13257:
13234:
13165:
11366:
10823:
All things considered, I would rather be "indefinitely" blocked than to be "definitely" blocked.
10637:
10566:
8725:
8710:
8163:
Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/Deletion of Walter Sedlmayr edit history required
7980:
6291:
5212:
5112:
5017:
4421:
4073:
I know we all want to give folk the benefit of the doubt, but I think it is a wasted effort here.
2430:
2410:
13569:
13381:
12006:
However, an angry user who is also being disruptive can be blocked to prevent further disruption
11798:
11786:
9967:
Actually, that last message from Chrisieboy in you post is very concerning, to say the least...
9815:
8744:
this sock is being disruptive, knowing both accounts would help in that both should be blocked.
7037:
Knowledge is not a place for this sort of "defense". "He did it first" is not a defense against
14768:
14597:
13852:
13653:
13465:
13314:
13189:
12851:
12570:
11278:
11178:
11035:
10270:
9934:
to begin with, and he has been correct with respect to other contributions, as when he cleaned
9109:
9083:
7132:
6606:
6525:: PMAnderson is the foremost opponent of Tony's selfless campaign of improving and maintaining
6413:
6327:
6020:
4916:
4750:
2926:
1576:
835:
395:
117:
12762:
A discussion on this line of WP:BIO is currently happening at the talk page of the guideline.
11615:
8288:
5238:
4259:
Think its pretty much "Game Over" for him now. I can't see him getting any support this time.
3644:
tie to him. So do you have any evidence that he's actually created an account to harass you?--
3332:
has any culpability in this problem Any further ideas or comments as to how to handle this?--
13848:
13111:
13015:
12952:
12911:
11822:
11785:
removes them from his talk page accusing the admins/editors of being vandals. Here are some:
11773:
11348:
11066:
10650:
Yeah, this kind of kooky ranting has no place here. I've blanked it and told the user why.
10010:
9923:
9773:
9675:
9627:
9618:
as you posted that same message on three different pages. (including my userpage and that of
9488:
8838:
8328:
6635:
6522:
6487:
6441:
6207:
6149:
6130:
6078:
5577:
5392:
5363:
4888:
4776:
4729:
4716:
4548:
4526:
4315:
1934:
1800:
1725:
actually completes the NPOV of the USS Liberty Page. After all, there can be no way that the
76:
13010:
9803:
5062:. Organized campaigns to edit WP articles toward a particular POV have been commented on in
3680:
3445:
2215:
as you put it. I wasn't aware you were such a threat to wikipedia that you needed watching.
14756:
14655:
14248:
fit that bill nicely? That is, that would be the best way to go if a topic ban is desired.
12777:
12738:
12642:
12626:
12474:
12413:
12372:
12004:, as they often have the opposite effect. So I cannot be blocked 'solely' to cool me down.
11694:
11482:
11407:
and if he is content to allow this account to edit then I suggest we proceed as I suggest.
11206:
So it's "my way or the highway" for this editor....well the highway might be a good start.
11023:
10935:
10767:
10743:
10384:
9799:
9243:
9025:
8994:
8810:
8763:
8502:
8476:
8402:
8383:
8335:
8310:
8278:
8047:
8010:
7988:
7968:
7929:
7909:
7840:
7815:
7737:
7732:
That sounds like a great solution to me. Perhaps mention there is no isp number in common?
7686:
7546:
7230:
6737:
6504:
6276:
6244:
5943:
5787:
5759:
5626:
5143:
5075:
4966:
4924:
3619:
3052:
2689:
2657:
2143:
2066:
1786:
1741:
1735:
1726:
1714:
1709:
1691:
1686:
1650:
1578:
12692:
has an awful lot of people contributing to pre-telescope optics, not just Ibn al-Haytham.
12670:
12285:
thread, the same thing happens with Sudharsansn pushing his bias and Dbachmann undoing it.
10021:
9939:
9811:
9238:. The common theme is 'YouTube Poop.' Blocks have been issued; nothing more to do here.
8293:
How widely disseminated are the names? Appearances in news sources or on blogs/forums? ––
5318:
8:
14679:
14222:
14142:
14082:
14043:
13832:
13827:
There can be a server delay, it can also be your own browser cache (for sundry reasons).
13795:
13781:
13708:
13270:
13145:
12878:
12833:
12668:
12320:
Finally notwithstanding his bogus charge about my uncivility, I request everyone to read
11678:
11468:
11408:
11207:
11102:
11055:
10561:
It's been headline news for two days, they are well aware of the leak at this stage... --
10502:
10495:
10453:
10428:
10350:
10314:
10288:
10055:
9951:
9874:
9795:
9698:
9526:
9453:
9361:
9346:
9313:
9278:
Wynchard Bloom has been blocked as an obvious sockpuppet of Gerald Gonzalez, per the SSP
8963:
8938:
8645:
8024:
7946:
7345:
6857:
5495:
5490:
4507:
4343:
3675:
3271:
3126:
2994:
2985:
2975:
2953:
2747:
2612:
2535:
2391:
2372:
2251:
2184:
2118:
2094:
2054:
2006:
808:
715:
409:
13581:
13393:
13022:
Now, frankly, I have to believe it is inhuman for one person to be able to keep that up.
11739:
10581:
Oversight is pointless, just remove the links and report anybody who edit wars over it.
9891:. More relevant would be the simultaneous discussion on Ryan Postlethwaite's talk page (
8469:
6978:
Off-wiki things are often brought here, such as threats, etc. We have a policy against
6581:
consensus should be followed. I just don't see consensus on this particular section of
5324:, indeed. I suggest about 48 hours of semi-protection to stop editing by new socks. --
3096:
Nobody is talking about blocking all of 75.X.X.X. That would be 1/256 of all IP space.
2610:"I'm not threatening...But" Please pull the other one, legal threats are out of order.
928:
14840:
14824:
14790:
14738:
14556:
14501:
14343:
14256:
13982:
13951:
13934:
13910:
13871:
13812:
13689:
13665:
13606:
13522:
13502:
13477:
13418:
13326:
13253:
13230:
13201:
13068:
12821:
12534:
this does not look to me like something that went into the right article. The articles
12446:
11545:
11514:
11451:
11325:
10909:
10880:
10824:
10754:
10726:
10704:
10694:
10684:
10671:
10633:
10562:
10532:
10517:
10484:
10360:
10227:
10120:
9968:
9897:
9652:
9571:
9409:
9336:
currently has four images that you present as your own work, Wynchard Bloom. At least
9302:
9198:
9013:
8949:
8907:
8703:
8590:
8560:
8525:
8368:
8354:
8206:
7358:
7180:
7111:
discussion from there? Part of what's dragging the project down (as well as many other
7080:
6984:
6890:
6763:
6708:
6594:
6518:
6432:
6047:
5988:
5642:
5525:
5460:
5446:
5108:
5012:
4689:
4643:
4041:
3856:
3547:
3475:
Indeed, if the anon has been editing here anonymously for seven years, I cannot be the
3337:
3179:
3101:
2934:
2854:
2426:
2406:
2376:
2339:
2049:
1595:
The very last entry I made which you deleted concerning the Moorer Report was this one:
921:
913:
813:
569:
9459:
Uploading copyvio images taken from Flickr into Commons, and claim it as his/ her own.
3641:
However, I have not created accounts for the sole purpose of attacking another person.
14705:
14594:
14593:
I'm going to agree with Jayron here. It seems like pure vandalism, and little else. –
14460:
14432:
14415:
14403:
14381:
14175:
14118:
14067:
14024:
14019:, "articles that drag the encyclopedia even further down into the tabloid gutter"? --
13773:
13084:
12918:
12847:
12689:
12638:
12634:
12566:
12487:
12478:
11633:
11619:
11609:
11501:
11432:
11264:
11220:--desperately tries to stop a "Highway to Hell" comment from bursting forth...fails--
11164:
11131:
11078:
11009:
11001:
10970:
10889:
10861:
Someone called the authorities, but nothing was done; they were too busy having sax.
10794:
10266:
10242:
9931:
9833:
9692:
Thanks Blake, you're my friend and I believe on you but I'm really not the sock that
9483:
I find his actions immature, narrow-minded, and definitely UNFIT to be a Wikipedian.
9391:
9219:
9177:
9103:
9077:
9056:
8896:
8802:
8620:
8511:
Of course, "demanding action" will get you nowhere. I will draw admins attention to
8452:
8334:
Call me a moralistic ass, but I'd like us to aim at higher ethics than the Express.--
7882:
7271:
7128:
7096:
6653:
6620:
6603:
6549:
6406:
6379:
6320:
6257:
6099:
6017:
5547:
5503:
5344:
5160:
5098:
4666:
4369:
4298:
4263:
4250:
4226:
4184:
4152:
4138:
4109:
4026:
4007:
3908:
3888:
3837:
3790:
3772:
3726:
3699:
3649:
3572:
3517:
3500:
3393:
3359:
3311:
3234:
3206:
3165:
3082:
3034:
2895:
2421:
1994:
4121:
What you apparently missed is that you previously claimed both degrees from oxford
2997:. But I am assuming this is a dynamic IP? Is the range too broad for a range block?
14721:
14360:
14268:
14213:
14004:
13856:
13095:
12948:
12755:
12729:
12530:
The sources seem to be valid although they are pretty hard to browse, however, per
12343:
12153:
11818:
11769:
10654:
10253:
10214:
The above user has attempted to edit a case after it has been closed, as explained
9769:
9693:
9623:
9521:
9512:
9484:
9262:
9161:
8872:
8832:
8670:
How about you step up to the plate and take the action suggested by user:Bwilkins?
8512:
7494:
6979:
6825:
6756:
6631:
6483:
6203:
6145:
6126:
5730:
5301:
5180:
5121:) expressing somewhat similar sentiments to those expressed by the above user. --
4311:
3981:
don't think anyone is going to sit here and let me claim I have a degree in german.
3545:
Yes, you can make IP ranges so that they may only edit from accounts and not anon.
2727:
2596:
2562:
2519:
2483:
2451:
2314:
2271:
2226:
2163:
2100:
2034:
1957:
1914:
1886:
1859:
1826:
182:
26:
11840:
other complaints raised about blanking content, uncivility and wikihounding? ] (]
6680:
Rather than repeat the discussion here, please see the discussion on my talk page
1740:
Other Sources" is available, but is a Fringe Theory if any mention is made on the
14818:
14368:
14308:
14276:
14245:
14235:
14205:
14016:
14012:
13891:
13769:
12797:
12681:
12650:
12431:
12406:
12383:
12314:
12075:
12063:
12024:
11995:
11603:
11592:
11476:
11019:
11018:
I've gone through the article as well and don't see any major POV issues myself.
10928:
10736:
9943:
9790:
9650:
has something to add to Knowledge, but only if they follow the rules/processes.
9619:
9283:
9239:
9021:
8990:
8806:
8759:
8498:
8472:
8397:
8379:
8306:
8274:
8134:
8068:
8043:
8006:
7964:
7923:
7905:
7860:
7836:
7811:
7713:
anyone going to the user page, having read about it elsewhere in a negative way.
6681:
6500:
6304:
6005:
5939:
5783:
5755:
5622:
5378:
5329:
5321:
5136:
5126:
5071:
4985:
4976:
4962:
4920:
4902:
4837:
3615:
3004:
2683:
2651:
2139:
2062:
2058:
1782:
13907:
just mentioning that in case people think there is some team editing between us.
12666:
12396:
I still say any IP identified as a school-IP should be permanently soft-blocked.
12019:
Now I am neither angry nor disruptive, but seeking action by reporting it here.
10017:
9463:
8883:
I'm not sure I understand. I would say you should just accept that he is being
8226:
More diffs should they wish to be oversighted. I think you got the rest. Thanks:
7342:
relentless-chase-very-much-along-the-same-line-as-the-hunt-for-the-one-armed-man
14659:
13973:
13828:
13791:
13777:
12932:
12871:
12826:
12767:
12685:
12658:
12610:
12259:
11913:
11909:
11872:
11859:
11854:
11537:
11051:
10781:
10424:
10391:
10374:
10346:
10328:
10310:
10170:
10085:
9855:
9807:
9190:
9147:
9040:
8959:
8934:
8884:
8788:
8675:
8273:
Also, the names will doubtless be released in time and they can be added then.
8192:
solution. It is certainly within the spirit of the relevent policies, such as
7760:
7666:
7565:
7306:
7256:
7211:
7197:
7072:
7046:
6941:
6853:
6699:
6662:
6654:
6474:
5970:
5909:
4616:
4586:
4582:
4490:
4486:
4482:
4361:
4339:
4070:
alter their personality after eight months of doing things in a particular way.
3457:
3267:
3122:
2982:
2972:
2799:
12264:
calls my reverts to his Original Research claims as POV edits and me a stalker
10679:
Careful Bugs! Some other very nasty editors are know for their poor spelling.
9873:
at my talk page will help underscore the seriousness of copyright concerns. --
1574:
14934:
14733:
14550:
14497:
14339:
14322:
14250:
14102:
14059:
13978:
13765:
13064:
12861:
12718:
12646:
12580:
12531:
12442:
12041:
11991:
11584:
11541:
11523:
11447:
11403:
11321:
10763:
10680:
10589:
10583:
10507:
10478:
10342:
10224:
10129:
10048:
9977:
9935:
9906:
9851:
9756:
9643:
9298:
9194:
9143:
9004:
8930:
8888:
8827:
Avoid linking alternate locations I edit from, in light of security concerns.
8364:
8350:
8202:
8197:
8193:
7960:
7832:
7780:
7716:
7700:
7646:
7632:
7615:
7591:
7584:
7481:
7460:
7446:
7415:
7207:
7184:
7076:
7038:
6704:
6585:, or any of the specific alternatives proposed. I see a weak consensus that
6582:
6574:
6539:
6526:
6423:
6369:
6043:
5726:
5638:
5521:
5456:
5442:
4037:
3852:
3333:
3097:
2930:
2850:
2823:
2820:
2673:
2179:
14651:
This is the same Florentino Floro who claimed to talk to invisible dwarfs?
14566:
Not sure, but if someone wants to the appropriate local office would be the
14271:
and whose actions confirm this. I do not believe that this is a close call.
13946:
It was moved to that name in the last couple of hours, previously it was at
10780:
Scott, I would have indef blocked him for that, except it's clear Bugs is a
8363:
Actually, I am a cretin; the edits weren't oversighted, the page got moved.
7963:
is welcome to do so, but I see nothing further for us to do in this thread.
5070:, one of their interests is influencing the content of Knowledge articles.
2826:
968:
57:
14718:
14701:
14456:
14428:
14411:
14399:
14330:
14171:
14114:
14110:
14063:
14020:
13141:
12915:
12310:
12282:
12222:
12215:
11747:
11650:
11580:
11576:
11569:
User: Srkris - Persistent uncivility, wikihounding and disruptive POV edits
11497:
11428:
11249:
11127:
11097:
11074:
11005:
10965:
10790:
9728:
9516:
9504:
9449:
9387:
9333:
9216:
9174:
8892:
8746:
8616:
8551:
8424:
7115:-style projects, I should add) is this notion of discussion as a "race" of
6616:
6176:
6093:
6038:
5869:
5831:
5799:
5770:
5735:
5543:
5535:
5499:
5425:
Tony1 unblocked, dispute resolution recommended instead of edit warring. –
5340:
5156:
5094:
4999:
4595:
4568:
4365:
4291:
4246:
4219:
4180:
4134:
4102:
4022:
4003:
3881:
3833:
3786:
3765:
3722:
3692:
3645:
3493:
3355:
3307:
3230:
3202:
3161:
3075:
3027:
2891:
2368:
2348:
was apparently given the brush-off by an admin when enquiring about policy.
1990:
1631:
10725:
Hey, now yer fiddlin' with me. Stringin' me along. But I won't fret none.
9926:
seems also to have been an infringement I cannot read the source, but the
8305:
recall the details. That's about all I know based on the article history.
8165:
where the opposite decision to this one was reached on a similar case. ––
7071:
claim that the former should be allowed where the latter is not is simply
4961:. I've left a note for Spartaz to consider undoing his 'Resolved' banner.
4208:
Jayron wants nothing more than to do precisely that (good guy that he is).
1734:
There is a link to the Findings of the Moorer Report at the bottom of the
1722:
1718:
1705:
1696:
1682:
1605:
1025:
14334:
14326:
14106:
14034:
13091:
12752:
12726:
12672:
12662:
12614:
12339:
12059:
12028:
12020:
11966:
11950:
11930:
11926:
11876:
11867:
11735:
11642:
10983:
10651:
10604:
10309:, much less in a posting having to do with Muhammad, is highly unlikely.
10248:
9152:
8868:
8488:
8436:
8287:
PS, there is a guideline that is relevant to the mother and her partner:
8188:
8108:
8106:
be effective - it is also regular contributors who are adding the names.
8029:
7251:
Well and good; but BLP trumps USER I'm afraid. Please remove the link. --
6820:
6353:
6110:
5922:
5858:
5478:
5296:
5175:
3117:
then the problem might have gone away by now. Recently, both Arcayne and
2719:
2588:
2554:
2511:
2475:
2443:
2345:
2306:
2263:
2218:
2155:
2026:
1949:
1906:
1878:
1851:
1818:
12844:
8546:
If you can't resolve it by consensus on the talkpages, then I recommend
4915:
was blocked indef for username, but this doesn't rule out his return as
2925:
The user in question has posted some questions on an IP talk page. See:
2242:
For what it's worth, though I've remained uninvolved, I did find a few:
412:. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see
14813:
14364:
14304:
14272:
13746:
12792:
12539:
12427:
12379:
11588:
10387:
on the article page linking to the FAQ that they could then ignore. --—
9760:
6228:
5374:
5325:
5122:
4981:
4898:
4833:
2998:
2767:
Request for formal community ban of 75.57.X.X user who harasses Arcayne
2294:
14728:
User:Plyjacks requesting unblock, pledges that he has changed his ways
14518:
12002:
Blocks intended solely to "cool down" an angry user should not be used
11791:
blocked five times for sockpuppetry, wikistalking and uncivil behavior
11599:
9470:, as said by Wynchard himself/ herself). Not to mention when he/ she
1988:
I am not an admin, and I would not touch this one if I were <g: -->
1626:
presumably reputable persons who are in agreement with that statement.
952:
If the issue concerns a specific user, try discussing it with them on
14295:
Really? You do not think that the passage about the Jews ending with
13890:
Not that my name is all that good here, but , I've had run-in's with
12928:
12763:
12723:
Competitors who have competed at the highest level in amateur sports.
12680:
do not include them in their summery of the topic or support the the
12641:
is adding to a summery something that is not in the intro summery of
12630:
12470:
12185:
says it is "POV pushing" & "sheer nonsense" in reply to Dbachmann
10370:
10324:
9615:
9614:
Too long, and I do not bother to read it. Besides, it is an obvious
9035:
8822:
Just to clarify, the reasons I cite for the use of this account are:
7756:
7662:
7561:
7541:
is simply a tool of intimidation, thus a threat, is it not . . . . ?
7302:
7252:
7193:
7116:
7042:
6937:
5965:
5904:
408:. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
12824:
of rollback by Yellow Monkey. He reverted clearly good faith edits.
12676:
12500:. He gets allot of encouragement from similar (pro Islamic?) editors
12023:
on the other hand is angry, disruptive, uncivil and is indulging in
10009:
Oh, by the way, I can't read the source for the possible copyvio at
3900:
Sorry but nothing has been finalised yet. FuturePerfect, you should
3764:
am not the one who chose to edit from that many places, now am I? -
250:== Future Perfect at Sunrise is taking admin abuse to a new level ==
14889:"As I Saw It", Dean Rusks' memoirs, by W.W. Norton, 1990, Page 388
12654:
12606:
12204:
12092:
11636:
and ALL of this without leaving any edit comments on the talk page.
10787::) <-- to avoid being templated or blocked for a personal attack
10693:
Oh, now you're intimitating me. "Help! Help! I'm bein' repressed!"
9732:
9383:
8295:
8167:
4076:
A few clarifying points, mostly in response to Crossmr's comments:
2650:
I've indefinitely blocked that account, as it's a NLT violation. --
12220:
he wants inclusion of his Original Research that the undeciphered
13049:, or that I work shifts and can edit at work as well as at home.
12927:
It was already done by Persian Poet Gal, indefinitely blocked. --
10836:
Related to the above, there was a threat of violins above. Have
10002:
surprised that his perception of free content has lasted so long.
9942:. His response to that contributor for restoring infringement to
9520:
true. And last I'm not totally immature, im just immature to the
9445:
7112:
6227:...and Locke Cole's gone and reverted the close, invoking IAR. --
2472:
Truth' over Verifiability'. (edit conflict....damn you MRG! ^.^ )
14868:
User:Ohlookwhoitisn't possible Joshuarooney/Igniateff sockpuppet
14548:
Didn't someone also notify the FBI the last time this happened?
14299:
as offensive and repulsive? Now, that is pretty sad. What about
14244:
If you're asking for a community review as you said, wouldn't a
13047:
http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=CambridgeBayWeather&l=2000
12136:. Each time his reverts were undone by different editors such as
8064:
I have got one more oversighted, and added a commented warning.
3668:
183:→Future Perfect at Sunrise is taking admin abuse to a new level
14567:
12977:
Is Caspian blue more than one person? (long-term Korean issues)
10474:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Preacher's kid (2nd nomination)
10451:
links to the previous one now at least. Thanks for the advice,
8867:
Refinement of the guideline instruction resolved this dispute.
4390:
2342:
where two such SPAs arrived and were given near carte-blanche.
1579:
364:
14878:
Future Perfect at Sunrise is taking admin abuse to a new level
14220:, with the aforementioned coverage in reliable sources added.
14208:
does not justify speedy deleting articles, it only justifies—"
10766:, I have applied the necessary template to your userpage!!!!--
9524:
i mean person who's most immature wikipedian. Ive ever known.
6848:
Bloqué pendant une semaine pour perturbation, je suppose avec
2344:
My only regret in this case is that one of the new editors at
1580:
7120:
5455:
Discussion is what I'm after. That's why I posted it on ANI.
14058:
I don't mean to be callous, but if he is dead how is this a
11795:
blocked again, and comments, warnings removed from talk page
11096:
Has there been any attempt to encourage this user to follow
5964:, except see that the user has never been blocked before. --
5207:
3687:
As for attack accounts, is it your contention that the anon
3568:
what about registering though? thats what im worried about.
2081:
Something doesn't look right about some of these SPAs: ] (]
12535:
9735:. It was allegedly taken by a fan of Locsin, as testified
9234:. For a previous report that mentions the same editor, see
9215:
month, which has never been used by anyone other than him.
6736:(Hey, if I say my name is Xing, will you do as I ask? ;) --
5067:
4745:
3718:
3118:
3113:
2802:
test as clearly coming from this user are blocked on sight.
13016:
http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=Caspian%20blue&l=all
12095:
article, he has been revert warring to push his bias, see
12066:
describes: "following another user around" accompanied by
11743:
9123:
Question about indef blocked user, and editing anonymously
6256:
Well, I am not involved and what I am seeing is some very
4218:
Let's move on, and get back to editing an encyclopedia. -
3452:
Proposal One doesn't block the IP range; it just bans the
3285:
Of course not. Nobody has suggested a range block. It's a
3157:
I've got degrees in this subject so I know better than you
2498:
I'm not aware of anyone having been found to meat-puppet.
13011:
http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=Caspian_blue&l=2000
11896:
FIVE blocks for uncivility, Wikistalking and Sockpuppetry
11320:
The blocking admin doesn't see a problem, why should I?--
7352:
still don't get why there was any feeling that immediate
5355:
5107:). Incidentally, I just received a Knowledge e-mail from
14410::Legal threat retracted, user unblocked, all is well. --
13587:
13399:
11252:
is trying to reach him, but he keeps saying stuff like:
6661:
Block? For what? I restored the userbox after reviewing
4277:
4166:
3922:
3586:
3531:
3407:
2967:
Proposal 1. If this user had any intention of actually
2798:: A total site ban on this user, all IPs which pass the
13671:
13483:
13332:
13207:
12947:
at it. I've left word with PPG, but no answer yet. --
12497:. although he is supposed to be hanging with his gf
9444:, who has a history of beautifying articles related to
8554:) between the 3 of you. There's nothing that requires
7831:("to be completed in January 2009") also looks to be a
6666:
could withdraw your comment about blocking me. Thanks.
4264:
4153:
3909:
3573:
3518:
3484:
a protracted guerilla action against one or more users
3394:
14525:. It might be prudent to contact a LEO in the area. —/
12276:
calls Yogagates' edits again as "blatant POV nonsense"
11653:
cited edits with a clear POV and a personal agenda as
9938:. The contributor attempted to restore that, too. See
8643:
there for a minute. I demand that I may or may not be
6100:
6094:
64:
14212:"—moving and refocusing articles. I propose that the
12326:
textbook definition of uncivility directed against me
11946:
11306:
User evading block, seeking outside help in resolving
11073:
Got to run, but it looks like they're starting in on
9034:...which amuses me, since their mascot is the Bulls.
7629:
apparently has a problem with more than just the link
6534:, one of several such initiatives he has undertaken).
5983:
pleasing to many, are seriously broken in practice.--
4002:
him to avoid the person he seems to loathe so much.--
2359:
I suspect the "brush off" reference is in respect to
14620:
Another troubling user page - Judge Florentino Floro
10476:to free up space for possible later AfDs. Cheers.
6290:
I've removed Locke Cole's rollback access; see also
4687:
to a new name (highly unlikely, but it can happen).
1653:
Page. There is nothing anti-semitic about the truth.
13948:
list of people killed because they were transgender
12358:
No further edits should be made to this discussion.
6091:Surely not those are aren't cut out to be one. ^_^
1763:
Senate Foreign Intelligence Committee Investigation
12991:spurious complaint by self-confessed banned user.
12688:was the (only) optical "father of the telescope".
10632:Large sections of it certainly fail WP:SOAPBOX. --
9620:an administrator who banned you in the first place
8639:Phew. I thought "Your Radio Enemy" was talking to
7301:here; why is it so important to you to keep it? --
5568:Your logic seems to be as poor as your judgement.
5202:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Howdypardner
5155:Should we just make Einstiendonut block be indef?
5064:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/CAMERA lobbying
3354:diffs which half the time make arcayne look bad.--
2847:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/75.49.223.52
13417:are both involved in the same abusive behaviour.
11894:. I seriously cannot understand how someone with
9869:Thank you both. Hopefully your input and that of
5934:Looks like his 1RR parole expired last year, see
1708:. That is it's purpose. To have investigated the
14932:
12665:since "History of telescope" articles on the web
12305:not to push his bias through unreferenced edits.
11254:it's a shame we have to be civil about ignorance
9295:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez
9280:Knowledge:Suspected sock puppets/Gerald Gonzalez
8186:This case is a unique situation, and requires a
6336:Your sarcasm isn't the slightest bit helpful. –
4212:need them to color within the lines whilst here.
3370:As far as I'm concerned, #2 is already in place
1026:
14194:The story has been picked up by, among others,
12268:warns Dbachmann not to use POV to counter facts
6517:Some context for those unfamiliar with life at
2136:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Yellabina
14782:Knowledge:Requests for checkuser/Case/Plyjacks
11492:I think all he's saying is that you're a very
10734:Move along and sing your sob song elsewhere---
10702:Come see the violins inherent in the system!
9466:, told by a previously banned sockpuppet; and
7214:that applies here - can you be more specific?
4126:both History and Political Science from Oxford
3022:- I imagine that a range block (yes, it would
2363:, a follow-up to my personal note to the user
986:Do not report breaches of personal information
14223:
14143:
14083:
14044:
13039:Would this constitute an abuse of the system?
12490:based on his continual comment "I'll be back"
10454:
7810:The page move has been reverted by an admin.
5411:Tony1 blocked for edit warring after one edit
3436:However, I have not created accounts for the
2332:. Policy specifically defends what I'm doing.
380:
12293:Dbachmann the admin issues him a 3RR warning
12201:says it's all "pure nonsense by POV editors"
10281:Possible threat regarding images of Muhammad
9948:Sorry, I thought (hoped) you had disappeared
9755:(Note that "Gelos" refers to the Locsin and
4594:I guess we list it as there is no rush now.
2390:was evidently insufficient in PR's eyes.) --
1766:House Armed Services Committee Investigation
988:on this highly visible page – instead go to
13972:Yeah, "Violently killed" is definately NOT
13845:List of violently killed transgender people
12510:Knowledge:Requests for comment/InternetHero
12212:List of languages by first written accounts
9784:Serious copyright concerns, input requested
9359:I swear to you that Its really my own work.
2576:I'm not threatening anybody with anything.
2508:genuinely thought we would be amused by it.
14925:Naval Institute Proceedings, March 5, 2003
14916:Naval Institute Proceedings, March 3, 2003
12173:"blatant POV nonsense" in reply to Mitsube
10501:It's certainly inappropriate. Contact an
5320:, Germany, Egypt, Harvard, and socialism.
2404:the couple of obits from wire services. --
2388:Knowledge:No original research/noticeboard
387:
373:
18:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard
13521:now posting abusive comments on my blog.
11715:Thanks for pointing it out Taprobanus :-)
11262:
11162:
11050:Taken care of (for the moment at least).
10238:Complainant is a single-purpose account (
9922:I am inclined to agree, considering that
8853:Major Policy Changes Behind Our Backs....
8430:I think the court order came into effect
7796:Revert move from userspace into mainspace
1600:===Independent American Investigations===
13929:"Violently killed" as opposed to what? "
12486:FYI: This anonymous post seems to be by
10666:He also can't spell. Although he may be
9745:thanks to my sisters (from gelos) of pex
8027:, and I am leaving the user a note now.
7283:"Mark Bellinghaus Accusations Addressed"
5498:section. Should help clarify things. -
3712:unless you have a check user which says
2745:Is there an admin prepared to do that?
1041:Review of the RfA discussion-only period
14398:user blocked until threat withdrawn –
12062:is involved in every single thing that
11471:; I usually see myself denounced as an
9440:actually reported about sockpuppets of
9236:WP:Suspected sock puppets/Particleman24
8491:keeps getting ignored: I demand action!
6793:Bellinghaus vont loin et profondément.
6761:with it, so that it's properly cited.
6187:And honestly, how many warnings does a
14:
14933:
14700:Aagggghhhhh where's my eye bleach?! –
14321:In response to Beamathan: Sorry no...
14101:I can see the point, but as it stands
12177:calls me a patently obvious POV pusher
10207:addition of "archive" tag to same page
10202:revert of recent additions to RfC page
9930:is the one who brought the problem to
9232:WP:Suspected sock puppets/Moleman 9000
5173:has proven that he has been evading. -
4728:within a few hours after the block of
1971:It's called cruft, and it's harmless.
948:these tips for dealing with incivility
905:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
361:Revision as of 19:46, 21 November 2008
138:Revision as of 19:46, 21 November 2008
100:Revision as of 19:42, 21 November 2008
12751:I'm not 100% sure, but I think so. --
9854:is not. Thank you for catching this.
2384:Knowledge:Fringe theories/Noticeboard
368:
14487:IP reblocked and talk page protected
14333:and reporting that information in a
14246:request for comment for user conduct
12502:User talk:InternetHero#Don't give up
9452:whom Gerald claimed as his cousin.
8924:fact that the user decided that the
7142:applies if the content only linked.
6480:How can this be considered resolved?
406:discussion, request, and help venues
90:
56:
12295:and also explains to him patiently
10341:wrote above, I would also add that
10287:culture. I think this is trolling.
8393:
8131:
8065:
7857:
1002:you cannot currently edit this page
1000:You are not autoconfirmed, meaning
191:
178:
147:
135:
128:
123:
109:
97:
23:
12506:User talk:InternetHero#August 2008
11496:eviallll deletionist poopyhead. --
11477:
8889:the cycle of bold, revert, discuss
7924:
7856:PRODded, I will AfD if necessary.
5066:. According to our own article on
3327:of some form of injunction, and 3
2684:
2652:
363:
45:
14952:
14216:article be restored and moved to
12203:. This much only pertains to the
11813:]) 03:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
11685:]) 04:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
9297:. I'll also notify Starczamora.--
8523:to see the oh-so-fun background.
7920:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion
7075:. The link should come down! --
5903:was also blocked for 12 hours. --
3742:admitting that they were his/hers
1606:Findings of the Moorer Commission
14478:
14446:
14406:) 17:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14389:
14359:Exactly, that is precisely what
12982:
12901:
12354:The discussion above is closed.
12082:]) 08:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12048:]) 08:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11982:]) 23:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11973:]) 21:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
11938:]) 10:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
11883:]) 19:36, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
11844:]) 23:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
11754:]) 04:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11661:]) 04:05, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11516:
11311:
11041:
10990:
10954:
10620:
10396:
10122:
9970:
9899:
9697:
9525:
9360:
9312:
9269:
9128:
8906:infobox for persons. And so on.
8858:
8090:Knowledge:Requests for oversight
7801:
5725:as well as indicating a serious
5416:
5294:is back and blatantly evading. -
3876:I actually addressed them in a
2772:
394:
14301:Protocols of the Elders of Zion
14210:cover the event, not the person
13745:
12287:He calls it again "POV pushing"
11917:troll who is blocked or warned.
11787:Removing warnings from tal page
11265:
11165:
10786:Insert smiley face here --: -->
10006:very useful contributions here.
9646:says don't attack the editor.
8712:
8705:
8401:
8396:
7781:
7717:
7647:
7616:
7592:
7482:
7447:
7416:
7348:to take punitive action, and I
6569:I quite disagree that Tony has
6298:
4675:
4668:
890:Category:Knowledge noticeboards
14919:
14910:
14901:
14892:
14883:
14602:
14598:
14297:This is how you pay us back ?!
14221:
14141:
14081:
14042:
14011:Can't we just speedy this per
12189:later deletes his rash remarks
11483:
11101:
10949:User page that needs attention
10890:
10737:
10452:
9707:
9535:
9370:
9322:
8729:
8644:
8556:immediate administrator action
8289:Knowledge:Blp#Privacy_of_names
7930:
7393:on Bellinghaus' blog entitled
6025:
6021:
6016:He's already been unblocked. –
4667:
3488:not part of our core policies.
2690:
2658:
13:
1:
14858:19:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14830:19:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14807:19:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14710:19:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14688:18:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14672:18:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14647:18:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14606:18:31, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14589:18:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14562:18:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14544:18:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14513:18:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14465:17:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14437:17:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14420:18:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14373:18:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14355:17:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14313:18:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14281:17:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14262:17:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14229:18:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14180:17:54, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14149:17:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14123:17:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14089:17:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14072:17:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14050:17:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
14029:17:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13994:18:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13960:18:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13938:17:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13919:17:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13880:16:47, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13837:13:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13821:13:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13800:13:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13786:13:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13761:13:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13717:13:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13701:09:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13618:23:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
13534:01:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
13514:09:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
13430:22:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
13283:I'll suggest that. Meanwhile
13279:21:54, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
13265:18:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
13242:17:34, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
13154:11:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
13126:08:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13100:08:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13073:08:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
13057:07:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12999:12:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12971:07:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12957:07:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12937:06:57, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12921:15:53, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12884:18:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12865:18:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12839:18:14, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12804:18:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12786:18:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12772:08:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12758:07:39, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12747:07:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12732:06:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12702:05:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12594:05:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12554:04:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12522:03:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12504:, but also gets into trouble
12458:04:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12436:00:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12421:00:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12414:
12388:00:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
12349:18:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11827:03:56, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
11778:17:53, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11699:04:12, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
11557:18:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11531:17:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11506:15:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11488:15:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11463:04:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11437:22:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11417:22:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11337:18:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11290:23:30, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11225:22:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11216:22:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11190:22:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11136:22:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11114:22:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11098:dispute resolution procedures
11088:22:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11060:22:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11028:02:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
11014:21:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
11000:User blocked for 24 hours by
10976:20:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10943:20:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10936:
10925:You have balls. I like balls.
10913:19:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10904:19:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10884:18:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10866:19:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10855:18:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10828:19:17, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10799:18:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10776:18:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10758:18:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10749:17:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10730:17:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10721:17:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10698:17:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10689:17:23, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10675:17:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10658:16:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10642:16:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10609:03:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
10595:16:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10571:16:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10549:15:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10522:15:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10490:22:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10477:
10460:15:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10433:15:46, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10402:21:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10379:19:35, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10364:19:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10355:17:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10333:17:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10319:14:12, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10297:14:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10275:18:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
10259:20:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10232:17:28, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10176:13:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
10137:12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
10091:11:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
10059:23:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
10026:22:54, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9985:21:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9955:21:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9914:20:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9878:16:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9861:15:16, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9843:13:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9778:11:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9714:01:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9684:22:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9669:15:37, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9632:06:35, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9588:12:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9542:01:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9493:14:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9426:12:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9396:02:42, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9377:01:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9351:12:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9329:10:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9307:10:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9287:16:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9248:19:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9226:13:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9210:13:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9184:11:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9169:11:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9117:00:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9091:00:01, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
9071:09:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9046:19:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9030:06:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
9016:03:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8999:03:13, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8968:15:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
8953:02:52, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
8943:12:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8911:09:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8901:05:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8877:16:19, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
8841:21:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8815:21:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8797:21:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8768:03:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8753:23:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8735:23:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8726:
8718:23:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8684:16:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
8666:22:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8657:20:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8625:14:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8607:00:32, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8577:22:14, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8542:17:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8507:17:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8487:Ongoing abuse and attacks by
8481:21:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8462:08:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
8441:21:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8408:18:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8388:17:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8373:16:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8359:15:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8344:15:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8315:13:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8300:13:42, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8283:13:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8218:13:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8172:13:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8140:12:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8113:11:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8074:11:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8052:10:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8034:10:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
8015:10:53, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7997:10:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7973:15:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7955:20:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7935:15:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7914:15:26, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7892:15:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7866:11:50, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7845:09:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7820:15:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7788:06:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7765:05:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7742:05:43, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7724:05:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7704:04:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7691:04:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7671:05:59, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7654:06:11, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7636:05:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7623:05:15, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7599:03:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7570:02:32, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7551:00:06, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
7508:20:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7489:19:38, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7473:19:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7454:19:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7438:17:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7423:16:47, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7407:16:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7375:15:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7326:14:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7311:14:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7296:05:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7261:02:40, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
7239:09:11, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7224:05:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7202:05:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7188:04:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7152:04:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7137:03:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7092:03:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7066:03:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7051:00:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
7001:22:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6946:22:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6907:22:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6862:21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6828:20:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6803:20:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6780:19:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6746:19:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6720:19:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6694:19:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6676:19:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6640:03:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
6625:23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
6610:15:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
6565:00:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
6509:18:28, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
6492:07:23, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
6450:00:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
6435:00:48, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
6418:00:33, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
6408:
6395:23:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6361:22:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6346:22:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6332:21:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6322:
6314:20:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6284:20:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6267:20:34, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6252:20:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6235:20:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6212:01:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
6198:22:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6183:22:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6154:22:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6135:21:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6118:23:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6105:21:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6087:21:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6052:20:59, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6029:19:08, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6012:19:07, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
6004:
5993:19:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5976:19:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5948:18:50, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5926:18:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5915:18:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5876:18:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5862:18:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5852:18:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5838:18:41, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5825:18:40, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5806:18:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5792:18:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5777:18:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5764:18:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5742:18:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5647:18:30, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5631:18:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5608:18:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5586:18:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5552:18:43, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5529:18:39, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5512:I have reviewed it, thanks. "
5508:18:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5482:18:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5464:18:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5451:18:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5435:18:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
5397:10:34, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
5383:00:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
5368:22:56, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
5349:16:42, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
5334:05:31, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
5306:00:59, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
5185:05:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
5165:05:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
5151:23:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
5144:
5131:22:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
5080:15:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
5003:07:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4990:03:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4971:22:01, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
4959:Jewish Internet Defense Force
4929:23:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4907:18:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4893:17:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4842:16:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4721:14:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4706:12:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4678:11:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4660:10:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4620:06:18, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4599:06:17, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4590:06:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4572:06:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4557:06:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4535:06:02, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4516:05:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4494:04:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
4381:Jewish Internet Defense Force
4374:04:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
4348:23:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
4306:15:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
4285:09:01, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
4255:08:21, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
4234:04:44, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
4189:02:45, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
4174:21:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4143:21:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4117:14:49, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4053:13:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4031:09:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
4012:07:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
3969:06:36, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
3930:21:54, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
3896:20:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3868:19:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3842:22:13, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3827:15:35, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3795:08:53, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3780:03:44, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3740:anon derailed the process by
3731:03:02, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3707:02:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
3654:22:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3624:17:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3607:17:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3594:17:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3564:16:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3539:16:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3508:15:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3415:13:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
3382:21:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3364:22:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3349:20:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3316:22:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3297:15:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3276:15:43, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3239:22:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3224:21:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3211:20:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3196:20:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3170:19:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3149:15:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3131:15:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3106:06:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3090:22:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
3059:00:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
3053:
3042:22:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
3011:22:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2989:05:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2978:22:09, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2962:22:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2946:21:22, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2917:21:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2900:04:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
2883:20:52, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2866:21:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2789:11:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
2759:10:07, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
2737:22:34, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
2695:18:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
2678:16:35, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
2672:
2663:16:16, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
2624:21:30, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
2606:19:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
2581:18:33, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
2572:14:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
2547:20:37, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2529:18:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2503:17:57, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2493:15:12, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2461:16:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2436:15:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2416:15:39, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2395:15:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2355:15:00, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2324:09:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2298:03:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
2291:awarding each other barnstars
2281:20:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2255:20:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2236:18:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2196:19:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2173:16:04, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
2148:22:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
2130:22:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
2111:22:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
2101:
2071:22:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
2044:21:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
2018:21:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
1999:21:29, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
1976:08:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1967:14:32, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
1942:18:10, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
1924:19:27, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
1896:14:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
1869:10:43, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
1836:09:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
1809:02:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
1791:18:23, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
1757:Joint Chief of Staff's Report
1745:far fetched, in this respect?
510:Biographies of living persons
359:
349:
340:
328:
319:
307:
298:
286:
277:
266:
257:
246:
237:
14555:
14549:
14473:206.176.127.131 Death threat
14255:
14249:
12872:
12827:
12407:
11536:at the same time. However,
11524:
10929:
10895:
10392:
10130:
9978:
9907:
9696:thinks on me! Cheers Blake.
9407:to your userpage? Thanks.
7878:Clear CSD#A7 (web). Gone. ➨
6546:
6376:
6305:
6296:
5514:Tony...continued to edit war
5137:
1760:CIA Intelligence Memorandums
28:Browse history interactively
7:
14455:- will mark as resolved. –
14218:Suicide of Abraham K. Biggs
12169:bad tone reply to Dbachmann
12158:calls us a group of vandals
11677:Well, well, well...........
11475:deletionist poopyhead .) --
9840:a sweet and tender hooligan
9830:
9721:I found the original source
8521:User_talk:Baseball_Card_Guy
8459:a sweet and tender hooligan
8449:
7889:a sweet and tender hooligan
7879:
4324:) protected the page after
3264:don't sweat the small stuff
3005:
2969:working on the encyclopedia
2212:my removal of your comments
2104:
1754:U.S. Naval Court of Inquiry
10:
14957:
14519:Brandon Valley High School
14476:
14387:
12980:
12899:
12625:are already dealt with in
11309:
11039:
10988:
10952:
10618:
9928:contributor who cleaned it
9267:
9126:
8856:
8758:through the mailing list.
8517:User_talk:Your_Radio_Enemy
7799:
7206:If, as you suggest above,
5414:
5088:New JIDF-related editor(s)
2819:See these contribs lists:
2770:
2182:is just about exhausted.
1572:
1549:
1544:
1426:
1304:
1182:
1060:
911:
878:Discussions for discussion
180:
13116:User:Lucyintheskywithdada
12258:. In this article it was
12193:its all "patently obvious
12165:issues me a bogus warning
12162:indulges in wikilawyering
11655:evident from the comments
9436:As you may have noticed,
8615:Law. I demand that I am
6230:
6191:editor need to be given?
5060:a previous ANI discussion
4326:Future Perfect at Sunrise
1559:Sockpuppet investigations
982:demonstrating the problem
886:
761:
693:
610:
502:
421:
402:
347:
338:
326:
317:
305:
296:
284:
275:
264:
255:
244:
235:
202:
199:
134:
96:
12623:Giambattista della Porta
12363:203.33.181.133 Shared IP
12356:Please do not modify it.
11679:he is indeed stalking me
11600:Uncivil in the talk page
10602:revisions are expunged.
10305:in the same sentence as
9066:which to hang himself".
6355:
6112:
5169:I'd say we should since
3074:biased on this issue. -
1717:but is available in the
1046:ArbCom election RFC 2024
1008:/Non-autoconfirmed posts
570:Scalable vector graphics
404:Knowledge's centralized
167:Extended confirmed users
14873:'Outing' of BNP members
14303:being a hoax fact tag?
13736:User:Jayhawk of Justice
10416:AfD assistance required
10220:here in the pending RfC
9747:(or PinoyExchange.com)
9731:riding on horseback in
8239:, rest of info removed
7389:You may want to review
6338:How do you turn this on
5844:How do you turn this on
5817:How do you turn this on
5600:How do you turn this on
5427:How do you turn this on
4742:), a new user account,
1428:Arbitration enforcement
414:formal review processes
95:
14941:Knowledge noticeboards
14015:or something? Or per
13853:Murder of Amanda Milan
13843:Tenditious editing on
13692:(User:Pigsonthewing);
13609:(User:Pigsonthewing);
13525:(User:Pigsonthewing);
13505:(User:Pigsonthewing);
13421:(User:Pigsonthewing);
13256:(User:Pigsonthewing);
13233:(User:Pigsonthewing);
12963:Not anymore he ain't.
12910:Blocked infinitely by
12694:Fountains of Bryn Mawr
12581:single-purpose account
12514:Fountains of Bryn Mawr
10846:This flag once was red
10615:Questionable userpage?
9759:"loveteam," much like
9472:added a sockpuppet tag
9105:Little Red Riding Hood
9079:Little Red Riding Hood
8613:Majikthise–Vroomfondel
8092:, that would be great.
5867:pages constructively.
5729:issue for Tony1 w.r.t
5572:, in the plural; what
5542:after being warned. -
2927:User talk:75.49.223.52
2367:. (My pointing him to
2210:I assume you refer to
1903:into a drinking game.
1769:The NSA History Report
1028:Centralized discussion
990:Requests for oversight
454:Centralized discussion
14384:- Legal threat report
13849:Murder of Gwen Araujo
13112:User:Documentingabuse
11803:more uncivil behavior
11610:Uncivil edit comments
11067:User:Suicidal Lemming
10011:The Co-operative Bank
9946:seems illuminating: "
9924:The Co-operative Bank
9230:The SSP report is at
6589:is deprecated, and a
1713:made anywhere on the
1056:Noticeboard archives
976:Be brief and include
969:recently active admin
873:WikiProject proposals
772:Committee noticeboard
721:Personal restrictions
706:Contributor copyright
545:Neutral point of view
14196:the Associated Press
12712:Tagging v. untagging
12643:history of telescope
12627:history of telescope
12475:history of telescope
8983:User:131.247.244.234
8926:template for persons
8236:, some info removed
6593:weak consensus that
6292:#Edit_warring_at_MFD
3374:William M. Connolley
3119:William M. Connolley
2909:William M. Connolley
1742:USS Liberty incident
1736:USS Liberty incident
1727:USS Liberty incident
1715:USS Liberty incident
1710:USS Liberty incident
1692:USS Liberty incident
1687:USS Liberty incident
1651:USS Liberty incident
1590:USS Liberty Incident
1036:Administrator recall
831:Requests for comment
747:Requests for comment
711:Edit warring and 3RR
701:Conflict of interest
503:Articles and content
14523:Template:City-state
13136:98.18.130.129 et al
13051:CambridgeBayWeather
12965:CambridgeBayWeather
12317:as indicated above.
12142:Dbachmann, an admin
12076:disruptive behavior
11914:User:Dab(Dbachmann)
11910:User:Dab(Dbachmann)
11873:User:Dab(Dbachmann)
11860:User:Dab(Dbachmann)
11855:User:Dab(Dbachmann)
11649:and undoing all my
11616:POV Content forking
10196:request for comment
9454:User:Wynchard Bloom
9448:, especially about
8023:They have all been
7918:Clearly belongs at
7500:Delicious carbuncle
7465:Delicious carbuncle
7430:Delicious carbuncle
7399:Delicious carbuncle
7318:Delicious carbuncle
7288:Delicious carbuncle
7216:Delicious carbuncle
7144:Delicious carbuncle
7058:Delicious carbuncle
6686:Delicious carbuncle
6668:Delicious carbuncle
6532:this page of Tony's
6422:Well said Sandy. —
6037:And who exactly is
5200:Checkuser results:
5093:Already blocked by
2048:I suggest that the
1721:. Inclusion of the
1695:mentioned from the
1057:
965:Just want an admin?
14568:Minneapolis office
13931:Killing him softly
13806:Vandalism on Image
13790:I left a warning.
12822:an appropriate use
12197:calls me desperate
12181:says I am hellbent
12156:becomes irate and
11953:. He continues it
11744:Sanskrit talk page
11736:From the talk page
11577:dispute resolution
11287:
11187:
10345:comes to mind. --
9725:the disputed image
9694:this immature user
9137:IP blocked 1 month
8233:information added
6823:
6475:kangaroo adminship
4360:Anyone want to go
4279:LOOK AT WHAT I DID
4168:LOOK AT WHAT I DID
3924:LOOK AT WHAT I DID
3813:Finally some diffs
3588:LOOK AT WHAT I DID
3533:LOOK AT WHAT I DID
3409:LOOK AT WHAT I DID
2377:Knowledge:Edit war
2340:Muhammed al-Durrah
1055:
960:dispute resolution
731:Contentious topics
530:Dispute resolution
518:Questions on media
145:
107:
14675:
14658:comment added by
14643:
14635:
14585:
14577:
14540:
14532:
14510:
14504:
14382:User:NoKindOfName
14352:
14346:
14329:information from
13991:
13985:
13085:meta:Role_account
12895:User:Krazy Komodo
12690:History of optics
12639:user:InternetHero
12635:Optical telescope
12591:
12551:
12488:user:InternetHero
12481:articles have POV
12479:optical telescope
12455:
12449:
12434:
12386:
12152:(multiple times).
12144:(multiple times),
12140:(multiple times),
11853:I don't know how
11668:And he continues,
11595:
11554:
11548:
11460:
11454:
11334:
11328:
11286:
11273:
11269:
11263:
11186:
11173:
11169:
11163:
11153:contrib summaries
11110:
11106:
11086:
11002:User:Arthur Rubin
10964:Deleted, thanks,
10902:
10788:
10593:
10520:
9207:
9201:
9057:User:75.49.223.52
9044:
9003:Thank you Tim. —
8653:
8649:
8558:that I can see.
8410:
8215:
8209:
7089:
7083:
7073:gaming the system
6850:Google translator
6821:
6717:
6711:
6561:
6507:
6391:
6309:
6010:
5974:
5913:
4303:
4283:
4231:
4172:
4114:
4050:
4044:
3928:
3893:
3865:
3859:
3777:
3704:
3592:
3537:
3505:
3413:
3346:
3340:
3087:
3039:
2943:
2937:
2863:
2857:
2836:this edit summary
2831:See these diffs:
2757:
2622:
2545:
2330:was defeated 12-1
2194:
2128:
2016:
1935:@Henrywinklestein
1586:
1585:
1024:
1023:
897:
896:
726:General sanctions
565:Resource requests
550:Original research
358:
150:Certified Gangsta
136:
98:
78:
14948:
14926:
14923:
14917:
14914:
14908:
14905:
14899:
14896:
14890:
14887:
14856:
14853:
14848:
14843:
14805:
14803:
14799:
14793:
14778:
14751:deleted contribs
14674:
14652:
14639:
14633:
14603:
14599:
14581:
14575:
14559:
14553:
14536:
14530:
14508:
14502:
14488:
14482:
14481:
14454:
14450:
14449:
14422:
14393:
14392:
14350:
14344:
14331:reliable sources
14323:Knowledge is not
14259:
14253:
14227:
14225:
14214:Abraham K. Biggs
14147:
14145:
14087:
14085:
14048:
14046:
14005:Abraham K. Biggs
13989:
13983:
13857:Matthew Shepherd
13759:
13688:
13687:
13642:deleted contribs
13604:
13603:
13558:deleted contribs
13500:
13499:
13454:deleted contribs
13416:
13415:
13370:deleted contribs
13349:
13348:
13303:deleted contribs
13224:
13223:
13178:deleted contribs
13001:
12986:
12985:
12923:
12912:Persian Poet Gal
12905:
12904:
12874:
12829:
12800:
12795:
12590:
12588:
12550:
12548:
12453:
12447:
12430:
12418:
12411:
12382:
12377:
12371:
12347:
12315:personal attacks
12072:personal attacks
11799:personal attacks
11634:disruptive edits
11591:
11552:
11546:
11528:
11520:
11485:
11479:
11458:
11452:
11388:
11361:deleted contribs
11339:
11332:
11326:
11315:
11314:
11288:
11276:
11274:
11271:
11267:
11188:
11176:
11174:
11171:
11167:
11112:
11108:
11104:
11082:
11062:
11045:
11044:
10994:
10993:
10958:
10957:
10940:
10933:
10901:
10899:
10894:
10847:
10785:
10739:
10719:
10717:
10713:
10707:
10624:
10623:
10607:
10587:
10547:
10545:
10541:
10535:
10516:
10483:
10458:
10456:
10397:
10394:
10383:We could put an
10257:
10173:
10134:
10126:
10088:
9982:
9974:
9911:
9903:
9858:
9838:
9820:
9819:
9711:
9701:
9667:
9665:
9661:
9655:
9586:
9584:
9580:
9574:
9539:
9529:
9424:
9422:
9418:
9412:
9405:actual vandalism
9374:
9364:
9326:
9316:
9289:
9273:
9272:
9263:User:Starczamora
9205:
9199:
9167:
9164:
9138:
9132:
9131:
9115:
9112:
9106:
9089:
9086:
9080:
9038:
9011:
8933:, here I come.--
8879:
8862:
8861:
8794:
8791:
8749:
8731:
8728:
8714:
8707:
8694:User:ForesticPig
8655:
8651:
8647:
8605:
8603:
8599:
8593:
8575:
8573:
8569:
8563:
8540:
8538:
8534:
8528:
8513:User_talk:Libro0
8457:
8439:
8412:
8406:
8405:
8400:
8213:
8207:
8138:
8111:
8072:
8032:
7932:
7926:
7887:
7864:
7822:
7805:
7804:
7783:
7719:
7649:
7618:
7594:
7484:
7449:
7418:
7373:
7371:
7367:
7361:
7183:was rejected. --
7087:
7081:
6999:
6997:
6993:
6987:
6905:
6903:
6899:
6893:
6795:Cahiers du jason
6778:
6776:
6772:
6766:
6715:
6709:
6562:
6559:
6503:
6442:Malleus Fatuorum
6430:
6410:
6392:
6389:
6357:
6324:
6311:
6307:
6303:
6300:
6264:
6232:
6195:
6179:
6114:
6102:
6096:
6079:Malleus Fatuorum
6026:
6022:
6009:
6008:
5968:
5907:
5872:
5834:
5802:
5773:
5738:
5578:Malleus Fatuorum
5437:
5420:
5419:
5293:
5291:
5254:
5234:
5232:deleted contribs
5210:
5204:, it seems that
5148:
5141:
5057:
5030:deleted contribs
4913:DontbeaPOVPUSHER
4831:
4829:
4792:
4772:
4770:deleted contribs
4748:
4730:DontbeaPOVPUSHER
4704:
4702:
4698:
4692:
4676:
4673:
4672:
4658:
4656:
4652:
4646:
4549:DontbeaPOVPUSHER
4527:DontbeaPOVPUSHER
4476:
4474:
4437:
4417:
4415:deleted contribs
4393:
4391:DontbeaPOVPUSHER
4302:
4299:
4296:
4281:
4280:
4275:
4268:
4267:
4230:
4227:
4224:
4170:
4169:
4164:
4157:
4156:
4113:
4110:
4107:
4048:
4042:
3926:
3925:
3920:
3913:
3912:
3892:
3889:
3886:
3863:
3857:
3776:
3773:
3770:
3703:
3700:
3697:
3590:
3589:
3584:
3577:
3576:
3562:
3560:
3556:
3550:
3535:
3534:
3529:
3522:
3521:
3504:
3501:
3498:
3446:the related RfCU
3411:
3410:
3405:
3398:
3397:
3344:
3338:
3194:
3192:
3188:
3182:
3086:
3083:
3080:
3055:
3038:
3035:
3032:
3007:
2941:
2935:
2861:
2855:
2791:
2776:
2775:
2751:
2735:
2732:
2724:
2692:
2686:
2676:
2660:
2654:
2616:
2604:
2601:
2593:
2570:
2567:
2559:
2539:
2527:
2524:
2516:
2491:
2488:
2480:
2459:
2456:
2448:
2434:
2414:
2322:
2319:
2311:
2279:
2276:
2268:
2234:
2231:
2223:
2188:
2171:
2168:
2160:
2122:
2106:
2103:
2042:
2039:
2031:
2010:
1965:
1962:
1954:
1922:
1919:
1911:
1894:
1891:
1883:
1867:
1864:
1856:
1834:
1831:
1823:
1801:Henrywinklestein
1581:
1436:
1318:
1306:Edit-warring/3RR
1196:
1074:
1058:
1054:
1012:
931:
924:
902:
901:
560:Reliable sources
494:User permissions
474:Main Page errors
469:Interface admins
459:Closure requests
389:
382:
375:
366:
365:
189:
188:
186:
173:
163:
144:
126:
121:
106:
79:
70:
69:
67:
62:
60:
52:
49:
31:
29:
14956:
14955:
14951:
14950:
14949:
14947:
14946:
14945:
14931:
14930:
14929:
14924:
14920:
14915:
14911:
14906:
14902:
14897:
14893:
14888:
14884:
14880:
14875:
14870:
14851:
14846:
14841:
14838:
14828:
14801:
14795:
14791:
14789:
14736:
14730:
14725:
14653:
14644:
14622:
14586:
14541:
14489:
14486:
14484:
14479:
14475:
14447:
14445:
14423:
14397:
14395:
14390:
14386:
14239:
14236:User:Krzyzowiec
14008:
13908:
13860:
13808:
13740:
13627:
13623:
13543:
13539:
13439:
13435:
13355:
13351:
13288:
13284:
13163:
13159:
13138:
13133:
13132:
13006:
13002:
12990:
12988:
12983:
12979:
12924:
12909:
12907:
12902:
12898:
12798:
12793:
12778:ChildofMidnight
12739:ChildofMidnight
12714:
12584:
12544:
12483:
12375:
12369:
12365:
12360:
12359:
12338:
12068:tendentiousness
11606:warning issued.
11571:
11521:
11346:
11340:
11319:
11317:
11312:
11308:
11070:
11063:
11049:
11047:
11042:
11038:
10997:
10996:
10991:
10987:
10961:
10960:
10955:
10951:
10853:
10845:
10838:the authorities
10768:Scott MacDonald
10715:
10709:
10705:
10703:
10627:
10626:
10621:
10617:
10605:John Vandenberg
10603:
10543:
10537:
10533:
10531:
10498:
10449:the current AfD
10418:
10337:Extending what
10283:
10246:
10240:{contributions}
10198:
10171:
10169:Sounds good ;)
10127:
10086:
10020:(or Hrothulf) (
9975:
9944:Anglia Regional
9904:
9856:
9827:UIA (Insurance)
9793:
9791:User:Chrisieboy
9789:
9786:
9727:which featured
9712:
9663:
9657:
9653:
9651:
9582:
9576:
9572:
9570:
9540:
9442:Gerald Gonzalez
9420:
9414:
9410:
9408:
9375:
9327:
9290:
9277:
9275:
9270:
9266:
9162:
9150:
9139:
9136:
9134:
9129:
9125:
9110:
9104:
9102:
9084:
9078:
9076:
9060:
9005:
8986:
8880:
8866:
8864:
8859:
8855:
8792:
8789:
8783:
8778:
8747:
8696:
8601:
8595:
8591:
8589:
8571:
8565:
8561:
8559:
8536:
8530:
8526:
8524:
8493:
8437:John Vandenberg
8435:
8336:Scott MacDonald
8331:
8263:, removed here
8255:, removed here
8247:, removed here
8109:John Vandenberg
8107:
8030:John Vandenberg
8028:
7989:Scott MacDonald
7983:
7981:Death of Baby P
7823:
7809:
7807:
7802:
7798:
7369:
7363:
7359:
7357:
7231:Scott MacDonald
6995:
6989:
6985:
6983:
6901:
6895:
6891:
6889:
6887:Sacré phoque!!!
6774:
6768:
6764:
6762:
6738:Scott MacDonald
6700:game the system
6658:
6558:
6557:
6553:
6501:Septentrionalis
6424:
6388:
6387:
6383:
6310:
6262:
6224:
6193:
6177:
5897:User:Locke Cole
5893:Support unblock
5870:
5832:
5800:
5771:
5736:
5615:Support unblock
5474:Support unblock
5438:
5424:
5422:
5417:
5413:
5314:
5304:
5267:
5247:
5227:
5206:
5205:
5197:
5183:
5090:
5015:
4805:
4785:
4765:
4744:
4743:
4700:
4694:
4690:
4688:
4654:
4648:
4644:
4642:
4450:
4430:
4410:
4389:
4388:
4385:
4300:
4292:
4278:
4274:
4270:
4265:
4228:
4220:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4154:
4111:
4103:
3942:
3923:
3919:
3915:
3910:
3890:
3882:
3815:
3774:
3766:
3701:
3693:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3574:
3558:
3552:
3548:
3546:
3532:
3528:
3524:
3519:
3502:
3494:
3408:
3404:
3400:
3395:
3190:
3184:
3180:
3178:
3084:
3076:
3036:
3028:
3009:
2792:
2780:
2778:
2773:
2769:
2728:
2720:
2717:
2712:
2597:
2589:
2586:
2563:
2555:
2552:
2520:
2512:
2509:
2484:
2476:
2473:
2452:
2444:
2441:
2425:
2405:
2315:
2307:
2304:
2272:
2264:
2261:
2227:
2219:
2216:
2164:
2156:
2153:
2035:
2027:
2024:
1958:
1950:
1947:
1915:
1907:
1904:
1887:
1879:
1876:
1860:
1852:
1849:
1827:
1819:
1816:
1592:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1568:
1430:
1308:
1186:
1064:
1062:Administrators'
1052:
1051:
1050:
1030:
1015:
1014:
1013:
999:
995:
954:their talk page
936:
935:
934:
927:
920:
916:
898:
893:
882:
799:False positives
757:
689:
606:
555:Pending changes
540:Fringe theories
498:
428:Administrators
417:
398:
393:
355:
343:
334:
322:
313:
301:
292:
280:
271:
260:
251:
240:
231:
224:
215:
210:
195:
190:
181:
179:
177:
176:
175:
171:
169:
153:
151:
146:
140:
132:
130:← Previous edit
127:
125:No edit summary
124:
122:
115:
113:
108:
102:
94:
93:
92:
91:
89:
88:
87:
86:
85:
84:
75:
71:
65:
63:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:Content deleted
47:
44:
39:← Previous edit
36:
35:
34:
27:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
14954:
14944:
14943:
14928:
14927:
14918:
14909:
14900:
14891:
14881:
14879:
14876:
14874:
14871:
14869:
14866:
14865:
14864:
14863:
14862:
14861:
14860:
14816:
14785:
14784:
14779:
14729:
14726:
14724:
14716:
14715:
14714:
14713:
14712:
14695:
14694:
14693:
14692:
14691:
14690:
14680:Wildthing61476
14638:
14621:
14618:
14617:
14616:
14615:
14614:
14613:
14612:
14611:
14610:
14609:
14608:
14580:
14535:
14477:
14474:
14471:
14470:
14469:
14468:
14467:
14440:
14439:
14388:
14385:
14379:
14378:
14377:
14376:
14375:
14319:
14318:
14317:
14316:
14315:
14288:
14287:
14286:
14285:
14284:
14283:
14238:
14233:
14232:
14231:
14191:
14190:
14189:
14188:
14187:
14186:
14185:
14184:
14183:
14182:
14158:
14157:
14156:
14155:
14154:
14153:
14152:
14151:
14130:
14129:
14128:
14127:
14126:
14125:
14094:
14093:
14092:
14091:
14075:
14074:
14055:
14054:
14053:
14052:
14007:
14002:
14001:
14000:
13999:
13998:
13997:
13996:
13965:
13964:
13963:
13962:
13941:
13940:
13926:
13925:
13924:
13923:
13922:
13921:
13906:
13898:
13897:
13896:
13895:
13885:
13884:
13883:
13882:
13859:
13841:
13840:
13839:
13824:
13823:
13807:
13804:
13803:
13802:
13788:
13763:
13739:
13733:
13732:
13731:
13730:
13729:
13728:
13727:
13726:
13725:
13724:
13723:
13722:
13721:
13720:
13719:
13709:LessHeard vanU
13620:
13541:174.131.99.180
13536:
13516:
13432:
13353:174.131.13.112
13271:LessHeard vanU
13146:LessHeard vanU
13137:
13134:
13131:
13130:
13129:
13128:
13105:
13104:
13103:
13102:
13088:
13082:
13076:
13075:
13060:
13059:
13054:Have a gorilla
13042:
13041:
13036:
13030:
13029:
13024:
13023:
13019:
13018:
13013:
13007:
13004:
13003:
12981:
12978:
12975:
12974:
12973:
12968:Have a gorilla
12960:
12959:
12940:
12939:
12900:
12897:
12892:
12891:
12890:
12889:
12888:
12887:
12886:
12817:
12816:
12815:
12814:
12813:
12812:
12811:
12810:
12809:
12808:
12807:
12806:
12713:
12710:
12709:
12708:
12707:
12706:
12705:
12704:
12686:Ibn al-Haytham
12659:Ibn al-Haytham
12649:we have major
12619:Leonard Digges
12611:Ibn al-Haytham
12599:
12598:
12597:
12596:
12559:
12558:
12557:
12556:
12525:
12524:
12482:
12468:
12467:
12466:
12465:
12464:
12463:
12462:
12461:
12460:
12400:
12399:
12398:
12397:
12391:
12390:
12368:Softblock for
12364:
12361:
12353:
12352:
12351:
12318:
12306:
12290:
12279:
12260:User:Dbachmann
12208:
12088:
12087:
12086:
12085:
12084:
12083:
12052:
12051:
12050:
12049:
12035:
12034:
12033:
12032:
12014:
12013:
12012:
12011:
11984:
11983:
11975:
11974:
11942:
11941:
11940:
11939:
11921:
11920:
11919:
11918:
11903:
11902:
11901:
11900:
11892:continues here
11885:
11884:
11864:
11863:
11850:
11849:
11848:
11847:
11846:
11845:
11832:
11831:
11830:
11829:
11781:
11780:
11764:
11763:
11762:
11761:
11760:
11759:
11758:
11757:
11756:
11755:
11723:
11722:
11721:
11720:
11719:
11718:
11717:
11716:
11706:
11705:
11704:
11703:
11702:
11701:
11672:
11671:
11670:
11669:
11663:
11662:
11638:
11637:
11632:Most recently
11630:
11627:Peacock/Weasel
11623:
11612:
11607:
11596:
11573:
11572:
11570:
11567:
11566:
11565:
11564:
11563:
11562:
11561:
11560:
11559:
11515:
11510:
11509:
11508:
11469:LessHeard vanU
11440:
11439:
11424:
11420:
11419:
11409:LessHeard vanU
11398:
11397:
11389:
11310:
11307:
11304:
11303:
11302:
11301:
11300:
11299:
11298:
11297:
11296:
11295:
11294:
11293:
11292:
11236:
11235:
11234:
11233:
11232:
11231:
11230:
11229:
11228:
11227:
11208:Wildthing61476
11197:
11196:
11195:
11194:
11193:
11192:
11143:
11142:
11141:
11140:
11139:
11138:
11119:
11118:
11117:
11116:
11091:
11090:
11069:
11064:
11040:
11037:
11036:AIV backlogged
11034:
11033:
11032:
11031:
11030:
10989:
10986:
10982:Disclaimer at
10980:
10979:
10978:
10953:
10950:
10947:
10946:
10945:
10921:
10920:
10919:
10918:
10917:
10916:
10915:
10873:
10872:
10871:
10870:
10869:
10868:
10849:
10841:
10833:
10832:
10831:
10830:
10818:
10817:
10816:
10815:
10814:
10813:
10812:
10811:
10810:
10809:
10808:
10807:
10806:
10805:
10804:
10803:
10802:
10801:
10760:
10661:
10660:
10647:
10646:
10645:
10644:
10619:
10616:
10613:
10612:
10611:
10598:
10597:
10578:
10577:
10576:
10575:
10574:
10573:
10554:
10553:
10552:
10551:
10525:
10524:
10513:
10510:
10497:
10494:
10493:
10492:
10469:
10468:
10467:
10466:
10465:
10464:
10463:
10462:
10438:
10437:
10436:
10435:
10417:
10414:
10413:
10412:
10411:
10410:
10409:
10408:
10407:
10406:
10405:
10404:
10393:Gadget850 (Ed)
10366:
10299:
10289:LessHeard vanU
10282:
10279:
10278:
10277:
10262:
10261:
10235:
10234:
10211:
10210:
10204:
10197:
10194:
10193:
10192:
10191:
10190:
10189:
10188:
10187:
10186:
10185:
10184:
10183:
10182:
10181:
10180:
10179:
10178:
10152:
10151:
10150:
10149:
10148:
10147:
10146:
10145:
10144:
10143:
10142:
10141:
10140:
10139:
10121:
10104:
10103:
10102:
10101:
10100:
10099:
10098:
10097:
10096:
10095:
10094:
10093:
10070:
10069:
10068:
10067:
10066:
10065:
10064:
10063:
10062:
10061:
10056:Moonriddengirl
10054:concern me. --
10035:
10034:
10033:
10032:
10031:
10030:
10029:
10028:
10014:
10007:
10003:
9992:
9991:
9990:
9989:
9988:
9987:
9969:
9960:
9959:
9958:
9957:
9952:Moonriddengirl
9917:
9916:
9898:
9883:
9882:
9881:
9880:
9875:Moonriddengirl
9864:
9863:
9846:
9845:
9822:
9821:
9785:
9782:
9781:
9780:
9765:
9764:
9752:
9751:
9741:
9740:
9717:
9716:
9706:
9699:Wynchard Bloom
9690:
9689:
9688:
9687:
9686:
9676:Blake Gripling
9640:
9639:
9638:
9637:
9636:
9635:
9634:
9603:
9602:
9601:
9600:
9599:
9598:
9597:
9596:
9595:
9594:
9593:
9592:
9591:
9590:
9553:
9552:
9551:
9550:
9549:
9548:
9547:
9546:
9545:
9544:
9534:
9527:Wynchard Bloom
9481:
9480:
9479:
9478:have reported.
9460:
9434:
9433:
9432:
9431:
9430:
9429:
9428:
9369:
9362:Wynchard Bloom
9357:
9356:
9355:
9354:
9353:
9321:
9314:Wynchard Bloom
9268:
9265:
9260:
9259:
9258:
9257:
9256:
9255:
9254:
9253:
9252:
9251:
9250:
9127:
9124:
9121:
9120:
9119:
9098:
9097:
9096:
9095:
9094:
9093:
9059:
9054:
9053:
9052:
9051:
9050:
9049:
9048:
9018:
8985:
8980:
8979:
8978:
8977:
8976:
8975:
8974:
8973:
8972:
8971:
8970:
8916:
8915:
8914:
8913:
8857:
8854:
8851:
8850:
8849:
8848:
8847:
8846:
8845:
8844:
8843:
8828:
8820:
8817:
8782:
8779:
8777:
8774:
8773:
8772:
8771:
8770:
8741:
8740:
8739:
8738:
8737:
8695:
8692:
8691:
8690:
8689:
8688:
8687:
8686:
8636:
8635:
8634:
8633:
8632:
8631:
8630:
8629:
8628:
8627:
8609:
8492:
8485:
8484:
8483:
8465:
8464:
8444:
8443:
8428:
8420:
8419:
8418:
8417:
8416:
8415:
8414:
8413:
8361:
8330:
8327:
8326:
8325:
8324:
8323:
8322:
8321:
8320:
8319:
8318:
8317:
8267:
8266:
8258:
8250:
8242:
8230:
8229:
8228:
8227:
8221:
8220:
8183:
8182:
8181:
8180:
8179:
8178:
8177:
8176:
8175:
8174:
8149:
8148:
8147:
8146:
8145:
8144:
8143:
8142:
8120:
8119:
8118:
8117:
8116:
8115:
8098:
8097:
8096:
8095:
8094:
8093:
8081:
8080:
8079:
8078:
8077:
8076:
8057:
8056:
8055:
8054:
8037:
8036:
8020:
8019:
8018:
8017:
8000:
7999:
7982:
7979:
7978:
7977:
7976:
7975:
7947:Michael Devore
7942:
7941:
7940:
7939:
7938:
7937:
7899:
7898:
7897:
7896:
7895:
7894:
7871:
7870:
7869:
7868:
7848:
7847:
7800:
7797:
7794:
7793:
7792:
7791:
7790:
7772:
7771:
7770:
7769:
7768:
7767:
7747:
7746:
7745:
7744:
7727:
7726:
7709:
7708:
7707:
7706:
7679:
7678:
7677:
7676:
7675:
7674:
7673:
7658:
7657:
7656:
7606:
7605:
7604:
7603:
7602:
7601:
7575:
7574:
7573:
7572:
7554:
7553:
7537:
7536:
7531:
7530:
7522:
7521:
7520:
7519:
7518:
7517:
7516:
7515:
7514:
7513:
7512:
7511:
7510:
7386:
7385:
7384:
7383:
7382:
7381:
7380:
7379:
7378:
7377:
7356:was required.
7248:
7247:
7246:
7245:
7244:
7243:
7242:
7241:
7177:
7176:
7175:
7174:
7173:
7172:
7171:
7170:
7169:
7168:
7167:
7166:
7165:
7164:
7163:
7162:
7161:
7160:
7159:
7158:
7157:
7156:
7155:
7154:
7139:
7097:WP:NOT#MYSPACE
7018:
7017:
7016:
7015:
7014:
7013:
7012:
7011:
7010:
7009:
7008:
7007:
7006:
7005:
7004:
7003:
6961:
6960:
6959:
6958:
6957:
6956:
6955:
6954:
6953:
6952:
6951:
6950:
6949:
6948:
6920:
6919:
6918:
6917:
6916:
6915:
6914:
6913:
6912:
6911:
6910:
6909:
6873:
6872:
6871:
6870:
6869:
6868:
6867:
6866:
6865:
6864:
6837:
6836:
6835:
6834:
6833:
6832:
6831:
6830:
6810:
6809:
6808:
6807:
6806:
6805:
6785:
6784:
6783:
6782:
6750:
6749:
6733:
6732:
6731:
6730:
6729:
6728:
6727:
6726:
6657:
6652:
6651:
6650:
6649:
6648:
6647:
6646:
6645:
6644:
6643:
6642:
6599:
6587:autoformatting
6555:
6554:
6547:
6543:
6535:
6512:
6511:
6495:
6494:
6467:
6466:
6465:
6464:
6463:
6462:
6461:
6460:
6459:
6458:
6457:
6456:
6455:
6454:
6453:
6452:
6437:
6385:
6384:
6377:
6373:
6350:
6349:
6348:
6302:
6288:
6287:
6286:
6223:
6220:
6219:
6218:
6217:
6216:
6215:
6214:
6171:
6170:
6169:
6168:
6167:
6166:
6165:
6164:
6163:
6162:
6161:
6160:
6159:
6158:
6157:
6156:
6122:
6121:
6120:
6107:
6063:
6062:
6061:
6060:
6059:
6058:
6057:
6056:
6055:
6054:
6000:
5999:
5998:
5997:
5996:
5995:
5979:
5978:
5953:
5952:
5951:
5950:
5929:
5928:
5918:
5917:
5889:
5888:
5887:
5886:
5885:
5884:
5883:
5882:
5881:
5880:
5879:
5878:
5854:
5812:
5811:
5810:
5809:
5808:
5745:
5744:
5650:
5649:
5634:
5633:
5611:
5610:
5595:
5594:
5593:
5592:
5591:
5590:
5589:
5588:
5559:
5558:
5557:
5556:
5555:
5554:
5485:
5484:
5470:
5469:
5468:
5467:
5415:
5412:
5409:
5408:
5407:
5406:
5405:
5404:
5403:
5402:
5401:
5400:
5399:
5313:
5310:
5309:
5308:
5300:
5196:
5193:
5192:
5191:
5190:
5189:
5188:
5187:
5179:
5153:
5089:
5086:
5085:
5084:
5083:
5082:
5006:
5005:
4995:
4994:
4993:
4992:
4954:
4953:
4952:
4951:
4950:
4949:
4948:
4947:
4946:
4945:
4944:
4943:
4942:
4941:
4940:
4939:
4938:
4937:
4936:
4935:
4934:
4933:
4932:
4931:
4861:
4860:
4859:
4858:
4857:
4856:
4855:
4854:
4853:
4852:
4851:
4850:
4849:
4848:
4847:
4846:
4845:
4844:
4629:
4628:
4627:
4626:
4625:
4624:
4623:
4622:
4606:
4605:
4604:
4603:
4602:
4601:
4575:
4574:
4564:
4563:
4562:
4561:
4560:
4559:
4540:
4539:
4538:
4537:
4519:
4518:
4508:TenOfAllTrades
4497:
4496:
4478:
4477:
4384:
4378:
4377:
4376:
4357:
4356:
4355:
4354:
4353:
4352:
4351:
4350:
4273:
4262:
4241:
4240:
4239:
4238:
4237:
4236:
4216:
4213:
4209:
4200:
4199:
4198:
4197:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4191:
4162:
4151:
4148:that. move on
4119:
4099:
4098:
4097:
4093:
4085:
4074:
4071:
4067:
4058:
4057:
4056:
4055:
4017:
4016:
4015:
4014:
3957:
3956:
3951:
3950:
3946:
3941:
3938:
3937:
3936:
3935:
3934:
3933:
3932:
3918:
3907:
3871:
3870:
3847:
3846:
3845:
3844:
3814:
3811:
3810:
3809:
3808:
3807:
3806:
3805:
3804:
3803:
3802:
3801:
3800:
3799:
3798:
3797:
3753:
3733:
3685:
3672:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3635:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3629:
3628:
3627:
3626:
3582:
3571:
3527:
3516:
3489:
3473:
3469:
3461:
3450:
3441:
3434:
3422:
3421:
3420:
3419:
3418:
3417:
3403:
3392:
3368:
3367:
3366:
3320:
3319:
3318:
3300:
3299:
3282:
3281:
3280:
3279:
3256:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3251:
3250:
3249:
3248:
3247:
3246:
3245:
3244:
3243:
3242:
3241:
3134:
3133:
3109:
3108:
3093:
3092:
3066:
3065:
3064:
3063:
3062:
3061:
3045:
3044:
3014:
3013:
3003:
2995:LessHeard vanU
2991:
2964:
2954:LessHeard vanU
2950:
2949:
2948:
2920:
2919:
2904:
2903:
2902:
2871:
2870:
2869:
2868:
2843:
2842:
2841:
2829:
2810:
2809:
2803:
2771:
2768:
2765:
2764:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2740:
2739:
2711:
2708:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2701:
2700:
2666:
2665:
2647:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2635:
2634:
2633:
2632:
2631:
2630:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2626:
2467:
2466:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2418:
2392:Moonriddengirl
2336:
2333:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2252:Moonriddengirl
2239:
2238:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2097:time perhaps?
2079:
2078:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2073:
1986:
1985:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1978:
1927:
1926:
1899:
1898:
1872:
1871:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1838:
1794:
1793:
1778:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1767:
1764:
1761:
1758:
1755:
1747:
1746:
1731:
1730:
1701:
1700:
1677:
1676:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1660:
1655:
1654:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1639:
1635:
1627:
1623:
1616:
1615:
1610:
1609:
1602:
1601:
1597:
1596:
1591:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1575:
1573:
1570:
1569:
1567:
1566:
1561:
1556:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1542:
1541:
1536:
1531:
1526:
1521:
1516:
1511:
1506:
1501:
1496:
1490:
1489:
1484:
1479:
1474:
1469:
1464:
1459:
1454:
1449:
1444:
1438:
1437:
1424:
1423:
1418:
1413:
1408:
1403:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1383:
1378:
1372:
1371:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1351:
1346:
1341:
1336:
1331:
1326:
1320:
1319:
1302:
1301:
1296:
1291:
1286:
1281:
1276:
1271:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1250:
1249:
1244:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1209:
1204:
1198:
1197:
1180:
1179:
1174:
1169:
1164:
1159:
1154:
1149:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1128:
1127:
1122:
1117:
1112:
1107:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1076:
1075:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1043:
1038:
1032:
1031:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1016:
998:
997:
996:
994:
993:
983:
974:
973:
972:
962:
956:
950:
941:Before posting
937:
933:
932:
925:
917:
912:
910:
907:
906:
900:
895:
894:
887:
884:
883:
881:
880:
875:
870:
869:
868:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
833:
828:
827:
826:
821:
819:Reference desk
816:
811:
803:
802:
801:
796:
786:
785:
784:
779:
774:
765:
763:
759:
758:
756:
755:
750:
740:
735:
734:
733:
728:
723:
713:
708:
703:
697:
695:
691:
690:
688:
687:
682:
681:
680:
675:
670:
665:
660:
655:
645:
640:
635:
630:
625:
620:
618:History merges
614:
612:
608:
607:
605:
604:
599:
597:Titleblacklist
594:
589:
588:
587:
582:
572:
567:
562:
557:
552:
547:
542:
537:
535:External links
532:
527:
526:
525:
520:
512:
506:
504:
500:
499:
497:
496:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
441:
440:
439:
434:
425:
423:
419:
418:
403:
400:
399:
392:
391:
384:
377:
369:
362:
357:
356:
352:
350:
348:
345:
344:
341:
339:
336:
335:
331:
329:
327:
324:
323:
320:
318:
315:
314:
310:
308:
306:
303:
302:
299:
297:
294:
293:
289:
287:
285:
282:
281:
278:
276:
273:
272:
269:
267:
265:
262:
261:
258:
256:
253:
252:
249:
247:
245:
242:
241:
238:
236:
233:
232:
229:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
216:
213:
211:
208:
205:
204:
201:
197:
196:
170:
165:
164:
149:
133:
111:
80:
74:
72:
54:
46:
37:
33:
32:
24:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
14953:
14942:
14939:
14938:
14936:
14922:
14913:
14904:
14895:
14886:
14882:
14859:
14855:
14854:
14849:
14844:
14836:
14833:
14832:
14831:
14826:
14823:
14820:
14815:
14810:
14809:
14808:
14804:
14798:
14794:
14787:
14786:
14783:
14780:
14776:
14773:
14770:
14767:
14764:
14761:
14758:
14755:
14752:
14749:
14746:
14743:
14740:
14735:
14732:
14731:
14723:
14720:
14711:
14707:
14703:
14699:
14698:
14697:
14696:
14689:
14685:
14681:
14677:
14676:
14673:
14669:
14665:
14661:
14657:
14650:
14649:
14648:
14642:
14636:
14632:
14627:
14624:
14623:
14607:
14604:
14600:
14596:
14592:
14591:
14590:
14584:
14578:
14574:
14569:
14565:
14564:
14563:
14558:
14552:
14547:
14546:
14545:
14539:
14533:
14529:
14524:
14520:
14516:
14515:
14514:
14511:
14505:
14499:
14495:
14491:
14490:
14466:
14462:
14458:
14453:
14444:
14443:
14442:
14441:
14438:
14434:
14430:
14425:
14424:
14421:
14417:
14413:
14409:
14405:
14401:
14383:
14374:
14370:
14366:
14362:
14358:
14357:
14356:
14353:
14347:
14341:
14336:
14332:
14328:
14324:
14320:
14314:
14310:
14306:
14302:
14298:
14294:
14293:
14292:
14291:
14290:
14289:
14282:
14278:
14274:
14270:
14265:
14264:
14263:
14258:
14252:
14247:
14243:
14242:
14241:
14240:
14237:
14230:
14226:
14224:the skomorokh
14219:
14215:
14211:
14207:
14203:
14202:
14197:
14193:
14192:
14181:
14177:
14173:
14168:
14167:
14166:
14165:
14164:
14163:
14162:
14161:
14160:
14159:
14150:
14146:
14144:the skomorokh
14138:
14137:
14136:
14135:
14134:
14133:
14132:
14131:
14124:
14120:
14116:
14112:
14108:
14104:
14100:
14099:
14098:
14097:
14096:
14095:
14090:
14086:
14084:the skomorokh
14079:
14078:
14077:
14076:
14073:
14069:
14065:
14061:
14057:
14056:
14051:
14047:
14045:the skomorokh
14040:
14039:Jason Fortuny
14036:
14032:
14031:
14030:
14026:
14022:
14018:
14014:
14010:
14009:
14006:
13995:
13992:
13986:
13980:
13975:
13971:
13970:
13969:
13968:
13967:
13966:
13961:
13957:
13953:
13952:Cameron Scott
13949:
13945:
13944:
13943:
13942:
13939:
13936:
13935:Baseball Bugs
13932:
13928:
13927:
13920:
13916:
13912:
13911:Cameron Scott
13904:
13903:
13902:
13901:
13900:
13899:
13893:
13889:
13888:
13887:
13886:
13881:
13877:
13873:
13872:Cameron Scott
13868:
13864:
13863:
13862:
13861:
13858:
13854:
13850:
13846:
13838:
13834:
13830:
13826:
13825:
13822:
13818:
13814:
13813:StephenBuxton
13810:
13809:
13801:
13797:
13793:
13789:
13787:
13783:
13779:
13775:
13771:
13767:
13764:
13762:
13758:
13757:
13753:
13749:
13742:
13741:
13737:
13718:
13714:
13710:
13706:
13705:
13704:
13703:
13702:
13699:
13695:
13691:
13685:
13682:
13679:
13676:
13673:
13670:
13667:
13664:
13661:
13658:
13655:
13652:
13649:
13646:
13643:
13640:
13637:
13634:
13631:
13626:
13625:174.131.11.88
13621:
13619:
13616:
13612:
13608:
13601:
13598:
13595:
13592:
13589:
13586:
13583:
13580:
13577:
13574:
13571:
13568:
13565:
13562:
13559:
13556:
13553:
13550:
13547:
13542:
13537:
13535:
13532:
13528:
13524:
13520:
13519:162.39.211.92
13517:
13515:
13512:
13508:
13504:
13497:
13494:
13491:
13488:
13485:
13482:
13479:
13476:
13473:
13470:
13467:
13464:
13461:
13458:
13455:
13452:
13449:
13446:
13443:
13438:
13437:162.39.211.92
13433:
13431:
13428:
13424:
13420:
13413:
13410:
13407:
13404:
13401:
13398:
13395:
13392:
13389:
13386:
13383:
13380:
13377:
13374:
13371:
13368:
13365:
13362:
13359:
13354:
13346:
13343:
13340:
13337:
13334:
13331:
13328:
13325:
13322:
13319:
13316:
13313:
13310:
13307:
13304:
13301:
13298:
13295:
13292:
13287:
13286:98.18.130.129
13282:
13281:
13280:
13276:
13272:
13268:
13267:
13266:
13263:
13259:
13255:
13251:
13248:
13245:
13244:
13243:
13240:
13236:
13232:
13228:
13221:
13218:
13215:
13212:
13209:
13206:
13203:
13200:
13197:
13194:
13191:
13188:
13185:
13182:
13179:
13176:
13173:
13170:
13167:
13162:
13161:150.226.95.18
13157:
13156:
13155:
13151:
13147:
13143:
13140:
13139:
13127:
13124:
13121:
13117:
13113:
13109:
13108:
13107:
13106:
13101:
13097:
13093:
13089:
13086:
13083:
13080:
13079:
13078:
13077:
13074:
13070:
13066:
13062:
13061:
13058:
13055:
13052:
13048:
13044:
13043:
13040:
13037:
13035:
13032:
13031:
13026:
13025:
13021:
13020:
13017:
13014:
13012:
13009:
13008:
13000:
12997:
12994:
12972:
12969:
12966:
12962:
12961:
12958:
12954:
12950:
12946:
12942:
12941:
12938:
12934:
12930:
12926:
12925:
12922:
12919:
12917:
12913:
12896:
12885:
12882:
12881:
12880:
12876:
12875:
12868:
12867:
12866:
12863:
12859:
12856:
12853:
12849:
12846:
12842:
12841:
12840:
12837:
12836:
12835:
12831:
12830:
12823:
12819:
12818:
12805:
12802:
12801:
12796:
12789:
12788:
12787:
12783:
12779:
12775:
12774:
12773:
12769:
12765:
12761:
12760:
12759:
12756:
12754:
12750:
12749:
12748:
12744:
12740:
12735:
12734:
12733:
12730:
12728:
12724:
12720:
12716:
12715:
12703:
12699:
12695:
12691:
12687:
12683:
12679:
12677:
12675:
12673:
12671:
12669:
12667:
12664:
12660:
12656:
12652:
12648:
12644:
12640:
12636:
12632:
12628:
12624:
12620:
12616:
12612:
12608:
12605:
12604:
12603:
12602:
12601:
12600:
12595:
12587:
12582:
12578:
12575:
12572:
12568:
12563:
12562:
12561:
12560:
12555:
12547:
12541:
12537:
12533:
12529:
12528:
12527:
12526:
12523:
12519:
12515:
12511:
12507:
12503:
12499:
12496:
12494:
12492:
12489:
12485:
12484:
12480:
12476:
12472:
12459:
12456:
12450:
12444:
12439:
12438:
12437:
12433:
12429:
12424:
12423:
12422:
12419:
12417:
12412:
12410:
12404:
12403:
12402:
12401:
12395:
12394:
12393:
12392:
12389:
12385:
12381:
12374:
12367:
12366:
12357:
12350:
12345:
12341:
12336:
12333:
12330:
12327:
12325:
12319:
12316:
12312:
12307:
12304:
12301:
12298:
12294:
12291:
12288:
12284:
12280:
12277:
12273:
12269:
12265:
12261:
12257:
12253:
12249:
12245:
12241:
12237:
12233:
12229:
12224:
12221:
12217:
12213:
12209:
12206:
12202:
12198:
12194:
12190:
12186:
12182:
12178:
12174:
12170:
12166:
12163:
12159:
12155:
12151:
12147:
12143:
12139:
12135:
12131:
12127:
12123:
12120:
12116:
12112:
12109:
12105:
12101:
12098:
12094:
12090:
12089:
12081:
12077:
12073:
12069:
12065:
12061:
12058:
12057:
12056:
12055:
12054:
12053:
12047:
12043:
12039:
12038:
12037:
12036:
12030:
12026:
12022:
12018:
12017:
12016:
12015:
12009:
12007:
12003:
11997:
11993:
11988:
11987:
11986:
11985:
11981:
11977:
11976:
11972:
11968:
11964:
11960:
11956:
11952:
11948:
11944:
11943:
11937:
11932:
11928:
11925:
11924:
11923:
11922:
11915:
11911:
11907:
11906:
11905:
11904:
11897:
11893:
11889:
11888:
11887:
11886:
11882:
11878:
11874:
11869:
11866:
11865:
11861:
11856:
11852:
11851:
11843:
11838:
11837:
11836:
11835:
11834:
11833:
11828:
11824:
11820:
11815:
11814:
11812:
11808:
11804:
11800:
11796:
11792:
11788:
11783:
11782:
11779:
11775:
11771:
11766:
11765:
11753:
11749:
11745:
11741:
11740:edit comments
11738:and also the
11737:
11733:
11732:
11731:
11730:
11729:
11728:
11727:
11726:
11725:
11724:
11714:
11713:
11712:
11711:
11710:
11709:
11708:
11707:
11700:
11696:
11692:
11687:
11686:
11684:
11680:
11676:
11675:
11674:
11673:
11667:
11666:
11665:
11664:
11660:
11656:
11652:
11648:
11645:is basically
11644:
11640:
11639:
11635:
11631:
11628:
11624:
11621:
11617:
11613:
11611:
11608:
11605:
11601:
11598:
11597:
11594:
11590:
11586:
11582:
11578:
11558:
11555:
11549:
11543:
11539:
11534:
11533:
11532:
11529:
11527:
11522:
11519:
11511:
11507:
11503:
11499:
11495:
11491:
11490:
11489:
11486:
11480:
11474:
11470:
11466:
11465:
11464:
11461:
11455:
11449:
11444:
11443:
11442:
11441:
11438:
11434:
11430:
11427:heartbeat. --
11425:
11422:
11421:
11418:
11414:
11410:
11405:
11400:
11399:
11396:
11393:
11390:
11386:
11383:
11380:
11377:
11374:
11371:
11368:
11365:
11362:
11359:
11356:
11353:
11350:
11345:
11342:
11341:
11338:
11335:
11329:
11323:
11291:
11284:
11280:
11275:
11259:
11255:
11251:
11248:
11247:
11246:
11245:
11244:
11243:
11242:
11241:
11240:
11239:
11238:
11237:
11226:
11223:
11219:
11218:
11217:
11213:
11209:
11205:
11204:
11203:
11202:
11201:
11200:
11199:
11198:
11191:
11184:
11180:
11175:
11159:
11154:
11149:
11148:
11147:
11146:
11145:
11144:
11137:
11133:
11129:
11125:
11124:
11123:
11122:
11121:
11120:
11115:
11111:
11099:
11095:
11094:
11093:
11092:
11089:
11085:
11080:
11076:
11072:
11071:
11068:
11061:
11057:
11053:
11029:
11025:
11021:
11017:
11016:
11015:
11011:
11007:
11003:
10999:
10998:
10985:
10977:
10973:
10972:
10967:
10963:
10962:
10944:
10941:
10939:
10934:
10932:
10926:
10922:
10914:
10911:
10910:Baseball Bugs
10907:
10906:
10905:
10900:
10898:
10893:
10887:
10886:
10885:
10882:
10881:Baseball Bugs
10877:
10876:
10875:
10874:
10867:
10864:
10860:
10859:
10858:
10857:
10856:
10852:
10848:
10842:
10840:been alerted?
10839:
10835:
10834:
10829:
10826:
10825:Baseball Bugs
10822:
10821:
10820:
10819:
10800:
10796:
10792:
10783:
10779:
10778:
10777:
10773:
10769:
10765:
10761:
10759:
10756:
10755:Baseball Bugs
10752:
10751:
10750:
10747:
10746:
10745:
10741:
10740:
10733:
10732:
10731:
10728:
10727:Baseball Bugs
10724:
10723:
10722:
10718:
10712:
10708:
10701:
10700:
10699:
10696:
10695:Baseball Bugs
10692:
10691:
10690:
10686:
10682:
10678:
10677:
10676:
10673:
10672:Baseball Bugs
10669:
10665:
10664:
10663:
10662:
10659:
10656:
10653:
10649:
10648:
10643:
10639:
10635:
10634:Cameron Scott
10631:
10630:
10629:
10628:
10610:
10606:
10600:
10599:
10596:
10591:
10586:
10585:
10580:
10579:
10572:
10568:
10564:
10563:Cameron Scott
10560:
10559:
10558:
10557:
10556:
10555:
10550:
10546:
10540:
10536:
10529:
10528:
10527:
10526:
10523:
10519:
10515:
10514:
10511:
10508:
10504:
10500:
10499:
10491:
10488:
10487:
10482:
10481:
10475:
10471:
10470:
10461:
10457:
10455:the skomorokh
10450:
10446:
10445:
10444:
10443:
10442:
10441:
10440:
10439:
10434:
10430:
10426:
10422:
10421:
10420:
10419:
10403:
10400:
10398:
10395:
10386:
10382:
10381:
10380:
10376:
10372:
10367:
10365:
10362:
10361:Baseball Bugs
10358:
10357:
10356:
10352:
10348:
10344:
10340:
10336:
10335:
10334:
10330:
10326:
10322:
10321:
10320:
10316:
10312:
10308:
10304:
10300:
10298:
10294:
10290:
10285:
10284:
10276:
10272:
10268:
10264:
10263:
10260:
10255:
10251:
10250:
10244:
10241:
10237:
10236:
10233:
10230:
10229:
10226:
10221:
10217:
10213:
10212:
10208:
10205:
10203:
10200:
10199:
10177:
10174:
10168:
10167:
10166:
10165:
10164:
10163:
10162:
10161:
10160:
10159:
10158:
10157:
10156:
10155:
10154:
10153:
10138:
10135:
10133:
10128:
10125:
10118:
10117:
10116:
10115:
10114:
10113:
10112:
10111:
10110:
10109:
10108:
10107:
10106:
10105:
10092:
10089:
10082:
10081:
10080:
10079:
10078:
10077:
10076:
10075:
10074:
10073:
10072:
10071:
10060:
10057:
10053:
10050:
10045:
10044:
10043:
10042:
10041:
10040:
10039:
10038:
10037:
10036:
10027:
10023:
10019:
10015:
10012:
10008:
10004:
10000:
9999:
9998:
9997:
9996:
9995:
9994:
9993:
9986:
9983:
9981:
9976:
9973:
9966:
9965:
9964:
9963:
9962:
9961:
9956:
9953:
9949:
9945:
9941:
9937:
9936:District Bank
9933:
9929:
9925:
9921:
9920:
9919:
9918:
9915:
9912:
9910:
9905:
9902:
9894:
9890:
9885:
9884:
9879:
9876:
9872:
9868:
9867:
9866:
9865:
9862:
9859:
9853:
9848:
9847:
9844:
9841:
9836:
9835:
9828:
9824:
9823:
9817:
9813:
9809:
9805:
9801:
9797:
9792:
9788:
9787:
9779:
9775:
9771:
9767:
9766:
9762:
9758:
9757:Piolo Pascual
9754:
9753:
9750:
9746:
9743:
9742:
9738:
9734:
9730:
9726:
9722:
9719:
9718:
9715:
9710:
9705:
9704:
9700:
9695:
9691:
9685:
9681:
9677:
9672:
9671:
9670:
9666:
9660:
9656:
9649:
9645:
9641:
9633:
9629:
9625:
9621:
9617:
9613:
9612:
9611:
9610:
9609:
9608:
9607:
9606:
9605:
9604:
9589:
9585:
9579:
9575:
9567:
9566:
9565:
9564:
9563:
9562:
9561:
9560:
9559:
9558:
9557:
9556:
9555:
9554:
9543:
9538:
9533:
9532:
9528:
9523:
9518:
9514:
9510:
9506:
9502:
9501:
9500:
9499:
9498:
9497:
9496:
9495:
9494:
9490:
9486:
9482:
9477:
9473:
9469:
9465:
9461:
9458:
9457:
9455:
9451:
9447:
9443:
9439:
9435:
9427:
9423:
9417:
9413:
9406:
9401:
9400:
9399:
9398:
9397:
9393:
9389:
9385:
9380:
9379:
9378:
9373:
9368:
9367:
9363:
9358:
9352:
9348:
9344:
9339:
9335:
9332:
9331:
9330:
9325:
9320:
9319:
9315:
9310:
9309:
9308:
9304:
9300:
9296:
9292:
9291:
9288:
9285:
9281:
9264:
9249:
9245:
9241:
9237:
9233:
9229:
9228:
9227:
9224:
9221:
9218:
9213:
9212:
9211:
9208:
9202:
9196:
9192:
9187:
9186:
9185:
9182:
9179:
9176:
9172:
9171:
9170:
9165:
9159:
9158:
9156:
9149:
9145:
9141:
9140:
9118:
9114:
9113:
9107:
9100:
9099:
9092:
9088:
9087:
9081:
9074:
9073:
9072:
9069:
9064:
9063:
9062:
9061:
9058:
9047:
9042:
9037:
9033:
9032:
9031:
9027:
9023:
9019:
9017:
9014:
9012:
9010:
9009:
9002:
9001:
9000:
8996:
8992:
8988:
8987:
8984:
8969:
8965:
8961:
8956:
8955:
8954:
8951:
8950:Baseball Bugs
8946:
8945:
8944:
8940:
8936:
8932:
8927:
8922:
8921:
8920:
8919:
8918:
8917:
8912:
8909:
8908:Baseball Bugs
8904:
8903:
8902:
8898:
8894:
8890:
8886:
8882:
8881:
8878:
8874:
8870:
8842:
8839:
8837:
8836:
8829:
8826:
8825:
8824:
8823:
8821:
8818:
8816:
8812:
8808:
8804:
8803:WP:SOCK#LEGIT
8800:
8799:
8798:
8795:
8785:
8784:
8769:
8765:
8761:
8756:
8755:
8754:
8751:
8750:
8742:
8736:
8733:
8732:
8730:Postlethwaite
8721:
8720:
8719:
8716:
8715:
8709:
8708:
8700:
8699:
8698:
8697:
8685:
8681:
8677:
8673:
8669:
8668:
8667:
8664:
8660:
8659:
8658:
8654:
8642:
8638:
8637:
8626:
8622:
8618:
8614:
8610:
8608:
8604:
8598:
8594:
8588:intervention
8587:
8583:
8582:
8580:
8579:
8578:
8574:
8568:
8564:
8557:
8553:
8549:
8545:
8544:
8543:
8539:
8533:
8529:
8522:
8518:
8514:
8510:
8509:
8508:
8504:
8500:
8495:
8494:
8490:
8482:
8478:
8474:
8470:
8467:
8466:
8463:
8460:
8455:
8454:
8446:
8445:
8442:
8438:
8433:
8429:
8426:
8422:
8421:
8411:
8409:
8404:
8399:
8391:
8390:
8389:
8385:
8381:
8376:
8375:
8374:
8370:
8366:
8362:
8360:
8356:
8352:
8347:
8346:
8345:
8341:
8337:
8333:
8332:
8316:
8312:
8308:
8303:
8302:
8301:
8298:
8297:
8292:
8291:
8290:
8286:
8285:
8284:
8280:
8276:
8271:
8270:
8269:
8268:
8265:
8262:
8259:
8257:
8254:
8251:
8249:
8246:
8244:on talk page
8243:
8241:
8238:
8235:
8232:
8231:
8225:
8224:
8223:
8222:
8219:
8216:
8210:
8204:
8199:
8195:
8191:
8190:
8185:
8184:
8173:
8170:
8169:
8164:
8159:
8158:
8157:
8156:
8155:
8154:
8153:
8152:
8151:
8150:
8141:
8137:
8136:
8128:
8127:
8126:
8125:
8124:
8123:
8122:
8121:
8114:
8110:
8104:
8103:
8102:
8101:
8100:
8099:
8091:
8087:
8086:
8085:
8084:
8083:
8082:
8075:
8071:
8070:
8063:
8062:
8061:
8060:
8059:
8058:
8053:
8049:
8045:
8041:
8040:
8039:
8038:
8035:
8031:
8026:
8022:
8021:
8016:
8012:
8008:
8004:
8003:
8002:
8001:
7998:
7994:
7990:
7985:
7984:
7974:
7970:
7966:
7962:
7958:
7957:
7956:
7952:
7948:
7944:
7943:
7936:
7933:
7927:
7921:
7917:
7916:
7915:
7911:
7907:
7903:
7902:
7901:
7900:
7893:
7890:
7885:
7884:
7877:
7876:
7875:
7874:
7873:
7872:
7867:
7863:
7862:
7855:
7852:
7851:
7850:
7849:
7846:
7842:
7838:
7834:
7830:
7825:
7824:
7821:
7817:
7813:
7789:
7786:
7785:
7784:
7776:
7775:
7774:
7773:
7766:
7762:
7758:
7753:
7752:
7751:
7750:
7749:
7748:
7743:
7739:
7735:
7731:
7730:
7729:
7728:
7725:
7722:
7721:
7720:
7711:
7710:
7705:
7702:
7698:
7694:
7693:
7692:
7688:
7684:
7680:
7672:
7668:
7664:
7659:
7655:
7652:
7651:
7650:
7641:
7640:
7639:
7638:
7637:
7634:
7630:
7626:
7625:
7624:
7621:
7620:
7619:
7610:
7609:
7608:
7607:
7600:
7597:
7596:
7595:
7586:
7581:
7580:
7579:
7578:
7577:
7576:
7571:
7567:
7563:
7558:
7557:
7556:
7555:
7552:
7548:
7544:
7539:
7538:
7533:
7532:
7527:
7523:
7509:
7505:
7501:
7496:
7492:
7491:
7490:
7487:
7486:
7485:
7476:
7475:
7474:
7470:
7466:
7462:
7457:
7456:
7455:
7452:
7451:
7450:
7441:
7440:
7439:
7435:
7431:
7426:
7425:
7424:
7421:
7420:
7419:
7410:
7409:
7408:
7404:
7400:
7396:
7392:
7388:
7387:
7376:
7372:
7366:
7362:
7355:
7351:
7347:
7343:
7340:
7339:
7335:
7334:
7329:
7328:
7327:
7323:
7319:
7314:
7313:
7312:
7308:
7304:
7299:
7298:
7297:
7293:
7289:
7285:
7284:
7279:
7276:
7273:
7269:
7264:
7263:
7262:
7258:
7254:
7250:
7249:
7240:
7236:
7232:
7227:
7226:
7225:
7221:
7217:
7213:
7209:
7205:
7204:
7203:
7199:
7195:
7191:
7190:
7189:
7186:
7182:
7179:
7178:
7153:
7149:
7145:
7140:
7138:
7134:
7130:
7126:
7122:
7118:
7114:
7110:
7106:
7102:
7098:
7095:
7094:
7093:
7090:
7084:
7078:
7074:
7069:
7068:
7067:
7063:
7059:
7054:
7053:
7052:
7048:
7044:
7040:
7036:
7035:
7034:
7033:
7032:
7031:
7030:
7029:
7028:
7027:
7026:
7025:
7024:
7023:
7022:
7021:
7020:
7019:
7002:
6998:
6992:
6988:
6981:
6977:
6976:
6975:
6974:
6973:
6972:
6971:
6970:
6969:
6968:
6967:
6966:
6965:
6964:
6963:
6962:
6947:
6943:
6939:
6934:
6933:
6932:
6931:
6930:
6929:
6928:
6927:
6926:
6925:
6924:
6923:
6922:
6921:
6908:
6904:
6898:
6894:
6888:
6885:
6884:
6883:
6882:
6881:
6880:
6879:
6878:
6877:
6876:
6875:
6874:
6863:
6859:
6855:
6851:
6847:
6846:
6845:
6844:
6843:
6842:
6841:
6840:
6839:
6838:
6829:
6826:
6824:
6818:
6817:
6816:
6815:
6814:
6813:
6812:
6811:
6804:
6800:
6796:
6791:
6790:
6789:
6788:
6787:
6786:
6781:
6777:
6771:
6767:
6760:</ref: -->
6758:
6754:
6753:
6752:
6751:
6747:
6743:
6739:
6735:
6734:
6723:
6722:
6721:
6718:
6712:
6706:
6701:
6697:
6696:
6695:
6691:
6687:
6683:
6679:
6678:
6677:
6673:
6669:
6664:
6660:
6659:
6656:
6641:
6637:
6633:
6628:
6627:
6626:
6622:
6618:
6613:
6612:
6611:
6608:
6605:
6600:
6596:
6592:
6588:
6584:
6580:
6576:
6572:
6568:
6567:
6566:
6552:
6551:
6544:
6541:
6536:
6533:
6528:
6524:
6520:
6516:
6515:
6514:
6513:
6510:
6506:
6502:
6497:
6496:
6493:
6489:
6485:
6481:
6476:
6472:
6469:
6468:
6451:
6447:
6443:
6438:
6436:
6433:
6431:
6429:
6428:
6421:
6420:
6419:
6415:
6411:
6403:
6398:
6397:
6396:
6382:
6381:
6374:
6371:
6366:
6365:
6364:
6363:
6362:
6359:
6358:
6351:
6347:
6343:
6339:
6335:
6334:
6333:
6329:
6325:
6317:
6316:
6315:
6312:
6308:
6301:
6293:
6289:
6285:
6282:
6278:
6274:
6270:
6269:
6268:
6265:
6259:
6255:
6254:
6253:
6250:
6246:
6242:
6238:
6237:
6236:
6233:
6226:
6225:
6213:
6209:
6205:
6201:
6200:
6199:
6196:
6190:
6186:
6185:
6184:
6181:
6180:
6173:
6172:
6155:
6151:
6147:
6142:
6141:
6138:
6137:
6136:
6132:
6128:
6123:
6119:
6116:
6115:
6108:
6106:
6103:
6098:
6097:
6090:
6089:
6088:
6084:
6080:
6075:
6074:
6073:
6072:
6071:
6070:
6069:
6068:
6067:
6066:
6065:
6064:
6053:
6049:
6045:
6040:
6036:
6035:
6034:
6033:
6032:
6031:
6030:
6027:
6023:
6019:
6015:
6014:
6013:
6007:
6002:
6001:
5994:
5990:
5986:
5981:
5980:
5977:
5972:
5967:
5963:
5962:User:Kotniski
5959:
5958:
5957:
5956:
5955:
5954:
5949:
5945:
5941:
5937:
5933:
5932:
5931:
5930:
5927:
5924:
5920:
5919:
5916:
5911:
5906:
5902:
5901:User:Kotniski
5898:
5894:
5891:
5890:
5877:
5874:
5873:
5865:
5864:
5863:
5860:
5855:
5853:
5849:
5845:
5841:
5840:
5839:
5836:
5835:
5828:
5827:
5826:
5822:
5818:
5813:
5807:
5804:
5803:
5795:
5794:
5793:
5789:
5785:
5780:
5779:
5778:
5775:
5774:
5767:
5766:
5765:
5761:
5757:
5753:
5749:
5748:
5747:
5746:
5743:
5740:
5739:
5732:
5728:
5724:
5721:
5718:
5715:
5712:
5709:
5706:
5703:
5700:
5697:
5694:
5691:
5688:
5685:
5682:
5679:
5676:
5673:
5670:
5667:
5664:
5661:
5658:
5655:
5652:
5651:
5648:
5644:
5640:
5636:
5635:
5632:
5628:
5624:
5620:
5616:
5613:
5612:
5609:
5605:
5601:
5597:
5596:
5587:
5583:
5579:
5575:
5571:
5567:
5566:
5565:
5564:
5563:
5562:
5561:
5560:
5553:
5549:
5545:
5541:
5537:
5533:
5532:
5530:
5527:
5523:
5519:
5515:
5511:
5510:
5509:
5505:
5501:
5497:
5492:
5487:
5486:
5483:
5480:
5475:
5472:
5471:
5465:
5462:
5458:
5454:
5453:
5452:
5448:
5444:
5440:
5439:
5436:
5432:
5428:
5398:
5394:
5390:
5386:
5385:
5384:
5380:
5376:
5371:
5370:
5369:
5365:
5361:
5357:
5352:
5351:
5350:
5346:
5342:
5337:
5336:
5335:
5331:
5327:
5323:
5319:
5316:
5315:
5307:
5303:
5299:
5298:
5290:
5287:
5284:
5281:
5277:
5273:
5270:
5266:
5263:
5260:
5257:
5253:
5250:
5246:
5243:
5240:
5237:
5233:
5230:
5226:
5223:
5220:
5217:
5214:
5209:
5208:Einsteindonut
5203:
5199:
5198:
5186:
5182:
5178:
5177:
5172:
5168:
5167:
5166:
5162:
5158:
5154:
5152:
5149:
5147:
5142:
5140:
5134:
5133:
5132:
5128:
5124:
5120:
5117:
5114:
5110:
5109:Einsteindonut
5106:
5103:
5100:
5096:
5092:
5091:
5081:
5077:
5073:
5069:
5065:
5061:
5055:
5052:
5049:
5046:
5043:
5040:
5037:
5034:
5031:
5028:
5025:
5022:
5019:
5014:
5013:Einsteindonut
5010:
5009:
5008:
5007:
5004:
5001:
4997:
4996:
4991:
4987:
4983:
4978:
4974:
4973:
4972:
4968:
4964:
4960:
4956:
4955:
4930:
4926:
4922:
4918:
4914:
4910:
4909:
4908:
4904:
4900:
4896:
4895:
4894:
4890:
4886:
4881:
4880:
4879:
4878:
4877:
4876:
4875:
4874:
4873:
4872:
4871:
4870:
4869:
4868:
4867:
4866:
4865:
4864:
4863:
4862:
4843:
4839:
4835:
4828:
4825:
4822:
4819:
4815:
4811:
4808:
4804:
4801:
4798:
4795:
4791:
4788:
4784:
4781:
4778:
4775:
4771:
4768:
4764:
4761:
4758:
4755:
4752:
4747:
4741:
4738:
4735:
4731:
4727:
4724:
4723:
4722:
4718:
4714:
4709:
4708:
4707:
4703:
4697:
4693:
4686:
4685:properly move
4681:
4680:
4679:
4674:
4671:
4663:
4662:
4661:
4657:
4651:
4647:
4639:
4638:
4637:
4636:
4635:
4634:
4633:
4632:
4631:
4630:
4621:
4618:
4614:
4613:
4612:
4611:
4610:
4609:
4608:
4607:
4600:
4597:
4593:
4592:
4591:
4588:
4584:
4579:
4578:
4577:
4576:
4573:
4570:
4566:
4565:
4558:
4554:
4550:
4546:
4545:
4544:
4543:
4542:
4541:
4536:
4532:
4528:
4523:
4522:
4521:
4520:
4517:
4513:
4509:
4504:
4499:
4498:
4495:
4492:
4488:
4484:
4480:
4479:
4473:
4470:
4467:
4464:
4460:
4456:
4453:
4449:
4446:
4443:
4440:
4436:
4433:
4429:
4426:
4423:
4420:
4416:
4413:
4409:
4406:
4403:
4400:
4397:
4392:
4387:
4386:
4383:-- more drama
4382:
4375:
4371:
4367:
4363:
4359:
4358:
4349:
4345:
4341:
4337:
4334:
4331:
4327:
4323:
4320:
4317:
4313:
4309:
4308:
4307:
4304:
4297:
4295:
4288:
4287:
4286:
4282:
4272:
4271:
4269:
4258:
4257:
4256:
4252:
4248:
4243:
4242:
4235:
4232:
4225:
4223:
4217:
4214:
4210:
4206:
4205:
4204:
4203:
4202:
4201:
4190:
4186:
4182:
4177:
4176:
4175:
4171:
4161:
4160:
4158:
4146:
4145:
4144:
4140:
4136:
4132:
4127:
4123:
4120:
4118:
4115:
4108:
4106:
4100:
4094:
4090:
4086:
4082:
4078:
4077:
4075:
4072:
4068:
4064:
4063:
4062:
4061:
4060:
4059:
4054:
4051:
4045:
4039:
4034:
4033:
4032:
4028:
4024:
4019:
4018:
4013:
4009:
4005:
4001:
3996:
3993:
3990:
3987:
3983:
3979:
3976:
3972:
3971:
3970:
3967:
3964:
3959:
3958:
3953:
3952:
3947:
3944:
3943:
3931:
3927:
3917:
3916:
3914:
3903:
3899:
3898:
3897:
3894:
3887:
3885:
3879:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3872:
3869:
3866:
3860:
3854:
3849:
3848:
3843:
3839:
3835:
3830:
3829:
3828:
3825:
3822:
3817:
3816:
3796:
3792:
3788:
3783:
3782:
3781:
3778:
3771:
3769:
3763:
3759:
3754:
3751:
3747:
3743:
3738:
3734:
3732:
3728:
3724:
3720:
3715:
3710:
3709:
3708:
3705:
3698:
3696:
3690:
3686:
3682:
3677:
3673:
3670:
3666:
3662:
3661:over ten days
3657:
3656:
3655:
3651:
3647:
3642:
3639:
3625:
3621:
3617:
3612:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3608:
3605:
3602:
3597:
3596:
3595:
3591:
3581:
3580:
3578:
3567:
3566:
3565:
3561:
3555:
3551:
3544:
3543:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3536:
3526:
3525:
3523:
3511:
3510:
3509:
3506:
3499:
3497:
3490:
3487:
3483:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3467:
3462:
3459:
3455:
3451:
3449:own backyard.
3447:
3442:
3439:
3435:
3432:
3428:
3427:
3426:
3425:
3424:
3423:
3416:
3412:
3402:
3401:
3399:
3387:
3386:
3385:
3384:
3383:
3379:
3375:
3372:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3357:
3352:
3351:
3350:
3347:
3341:
3335:
3330:
3326:
3321:
3317:
3313:
3309:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3298:
3295:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3283:
3277:
3273:
3269:
3265:
3260:
3259:
3258:
3257:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3227:
3226:
3225:
3222:
3219:
3214:
3213:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3199:
3198:
3197:
3193:
3187:
3183:
3175:
3174:
3173:
3172:
3171:
3167:
3163:
3158:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3147:
3144:
3140:
3136:
3135:
3132:
3128:
3124:
3120:
3115:
3111:
3110:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3094:
3091:
3088:
3081:
3079:
3073:
3068:
3067:
3060:
3057:
3056:
3049:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3043:
3040:
3033:
3031:
3025:
3021:
3018:
3017:
3016:
3015:
3012:
3008:
3002:
3001:
2996:
2992:
2990:
2987:
2984:
2979:
2977:
2974:
2970:
2965:
2963:
2959:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2944:
2938:
2932:
2928:
2924:
2923:
2922:
2921:
2918:
2914:
2910:
2905:
2901:
2897:
2893:
2889:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2881:
2878:
2873:
2872:
2867:
2864:
2858:
2852:
2848:
2844:
2840:
2837:
2833:
2830:
2827:
2824:
2821:
2818:
2817:
2814:
2813:
2812:
2811:
2807:
2804:
2801:
2797:
2794:
2793:
2790:
2787:
2784:
2760:
2756:
2755:
2750:
2749:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2738:
2733:
2731:
2725:
2723:
2714:
2713:
2698:
2697:
2696:
2693:
2687:
2681:
2680:
2679:
2675:
2670:
2669:
2668:
2667:
2664:
2661:
2655:
2649:
2648:
2625:
2621:
2620:
2615:
2614:
2609:
2608:
2607:
2602:
2600:
2594:
2592:
2584:
2583:
2582:
2579:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2568:
2566:
2560:
2558:
2550:
2549:
2548:
2544:
2543:
2538:
2537:
2532:
2531:
2530:
2525:
2523:
2517:
2515:
2506:
2505:
2504:
2501:
2497:
2496:
2495:
2494:
2489:
2487:
2481:
2479:
2468:
2462:
2457:
2455:
2449:
2447:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2432:
2428:
2427:Relata refero
2423:
2419:
2417:
2412:
2408:
2407:Relata refero
2402:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2393:
2389:
2385:
2382:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2357:
2356:
2353:
2349:
2347:
2341:
2337:
2334:
2331:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2320:
2318:
2312:
2310:
2301:
2300:
2299:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2287:
2282:
2277:
2275:
2269:
2267:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2253:
2249:
2245:
2241:
2240:
2237:
2232:
2230:
2224:
2222:
2213:
2209:
2208:
2197:
2193:
2192:
2187:
2186:
2181:
2176:
2175:
2174:
2169:
2167:
2161:
2159:
2151:
2150:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2133:
2132:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2121:
2120:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2109:
2108:
2107:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2060:
2056:
2051:
2047:
2046:
2045:
2040:
2038:
2032:
2030:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2014:
2009:
2008:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1987:
1977:
1974:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1963:
1961:
1955:
1953:
1945:
1944:
1943:
1940:
1936:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1928:
1925:
1920:
1918:
1912:
1910:
1901:
1900:
1897:
1892:
1890:
1884:
1882:
1874:
1873:
1870:
1865:
1863:
1857:
1855:
1847:
1846:
1837:
1832:
1830:
1824:
1822:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1768:
1765:
1762:
1759:
1756:
1753:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1743:
1737:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1723:Moorer Report
1720:
1719:Moorer Report
1716:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1702:
1698:
1697:Moorer Report
1693:
1688:
1684:
1683:Moorer Report
1679:
1678:
1673:
1672:
1668:
1667:
1663:
1662:
1657:
1656:
1652:
1647:
1646:
1640:
1636:
1633:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1617:
1612:
1611:
1607:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1598:
1594:
1593:
1571:
1565:
1562:
1560:
1557:
1555:
1552:
1551:
1548:
1543:
1540:
1537:
1535:
1532:
1530:
1527:
1525:
1522:
1520:
1517:
1515:
1512:
1510:
1507:
1505:
1502:
1500:
1497:
1495:
1492:
1491:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1480:
1478:
1475:
1473:
1470:
1468:
1465:
1463:
1460:
1458:
1455:
1453:
1450:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1434:
1429:
1425:
1422:
1419:
1417:
1414:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1404:
1402:
1399:
1397:
1394:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1384:
1382:
1379:
1377:
1374:
1373:
1370:
1367:
1365:
1362:
1360:
1357:
1355:
1352:
1350:
1347:
1345:
1342:
1340:
1337:
1335:
1332:
1330:
1327:
1325:
1322:
1321:
1316:
1312:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1292:
1290:
1287:
1285:
1282:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1270:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1257:
1255:
1252:
1251:
1248:
1245:
1243:
1240:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1208:
1205:
1203:
1200:
1199:
1194:
1190:
1185:
1181:
1178:
1175:
1173:
1170:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1158:
1155:
1153:
1150:
1148:
1145:
1143:
1140:
1138:
1135:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1126:
1123:
1121:
1118:
1116:
1113:
1111:
1108:
1106:
1103:
1101:
1098:
1096:
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1081:
1078:
1077:
1072:
1068:
1063:
1059:
1047:
1044:
1042:
1039:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1020:
1019:
1010:
1009:
1003:
991:
987:
984:
981:
980:
975:
970:
966:
963:
961:
957:
955:
951:
949:
945:
944:
942:
939:
938:
930:
926:
923:
919:
918:
915:
909:
908:
904:
903:
899:
892:
891:
885:
879:
876:
874:
871:
867:
866:Miscellaneous
864:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
838:
837:
834:
832:
829:
825:
822:
820:
817:
815:
812:
810:
807:
806:
804:
800:
797:
795:
792:
791:
790:
787:
783:
780:
778:
775:
773:
770:
769:
767:
766:
764:
760:
754:
751:
748:
744:
741:
739:
736:
732:
729:
727:
724:
722:
719:
718:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
698:
696:
692:
686:
683:
679:
676:
674:
671:
669:
666:
664:
661:
659:
656:
654:
651:
650:
649:
646:
644:
641:
639:
636:
634:
631:
629:
626:
624:
621:
619:
616:
615:
613:
611:Page handling
609:
603:
600:
598:
595:
593:
590:
586:
583:
581:
578:
577:
576:
573:
571:
568:
566:
563:
561:
558:
556:
553:
551:
548:
546:
543:
541:
538:
536:
533:
531:
528:
524:
521:
519:
516:
515:
513:
511:
508:
507:
505:
501:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
438:
435:
433:
430:
429:
427:
426:
424:
420:
415:
411:
407:
401:
397:
390:
385:
383:
378:
376:
371:
370:
367:
360:
351:
346:
342:
337:
330:
325:
321:
316:
309:
304:
300:
295:
288:
283:
279:
274:
268:
263:
259:
254:
248:
243:
239:
234:
228:
226:
221:
219:
218:
214:
212:
209:
207:
206:
198:
194:
184:
168:
161:
157:
152:
143:
139:
131:
119:
114:
105:
101:
83:
68:
61:
51:Content added
43:
40:
30:
19:
14921:
14912:
14903:
14894:
14885:
14842:SteelersFan-
14839:
14834:
14796:
14771:
14765:
14759:
14753:
14747:
14741:
14719:Ad infinitum
14630:
14595:Juliancolton
14572:
14527:
14493:
14451:
14407:
14296:
14209:
14200:
13866:
13755:
13751:
13747:
13698:Andy's edits
13690:Andy Mabbett
13680:
13674:
13668:
13662:
13656:
13650:
13644:
13638:
13632:
13615:Andy's edits
13607:Andy Mabbett
13605:(same ISP).
13596:
13590:
13584:
13578:
13572:
13566:
13560:
13554:
13548:
13531:Andy's edits
13523:Andy Mabbett
13518:
13511:Andy's edits
13503:Andy Mabbett
13501:(same ISP).
13492:
13486:
13480:
13474:
13468:
13462:
13456:
13450:
13444:
13427:Andy's edits
13419:Andy Mabbett
13408:
13402:
13396:
13390:
13384:
13378:
13372:
13366:
13360:
13341:
13335:
13329:
13323:
13317:
13311:
13305:
13299:
13293:
13262:Andy's edits
13254:Andy Mabbett
13239:Andy's edits
13231:Andy Mabbett
13216:
13210:
13204:
13198:
13192:
13186:
13180:
13174:
13168:
13038:
13033:
12944:
12879:
12877:
12870:
12854:
12848:YellowMonkey
12834:
12832:
12825:
12791:
12722:
12653:problems re:
12585:
12573:
12567:InternetHero
12545:
12415:
12408:
12355:
12323:
12283:Indus Script
12223:Indus Script
12216:Indus Script
12079:
12045:
12005:
12001:
11999:
11979:
11970:
11951:wikihounding
11935:
11931:his userpage
11880:
11841:
11810:
11751:
11682:
11658:
11625:Using clear
11525:
11517:
11493:
11472:
11381:
11375:
11369:
11363:
11357:
11351:
11257:
11253:
11157:
11079:UltraExactZZ
11075:Gene Simmons
10969:
10937:
10930:
10896:
10891:
10744:
10742:
10735:
10710:
10667:
10582:
10538:
10506:
10485:
10479:
10389:
10388:
10338:
10306:
10302:
10267:Thunderbird2
10247:
10223:
10131:
10123:
10051:
9979:
9971:
9908:
9900:
9832:
9825:You can add
9748:
9744:
9729:Angel Locsin
9703:
9702:
9658:
9647:
9577:
9531:
9530:
9517:Angel Locsin
9505:Angel Locsin
9475:
9450:Angel Locsin
9437:
9415:
9404:
9366:
9365:
9334:Angel Locsin
9318:
9317:
9154:
9153:
9108:
9082:
9007:
9006:
8925:
8834:
8745:
8724:
8711:
8704:
8671:
8640:
8596:
8585:
8566:
8555:
8547:
8531:
8451:
8431:
8425:pseudonymous
8394:
8294:
8252:another one
8187:
8166:
8132:
8066:
7881:
7858:
7835:problem. --
7779:
7778:
7715:
7714:
7696:
7645:
7644:
7614:
7613:
7590:
7589:
7480:
7479:
7445:
7444:
7414:
7413:
7394:
7364:
7354:intervention
7353:
7349:
7341:
7337:
7336:
7332:
7331:
7282:
7281:
7274:
7129:Badger Drink
7124:
7108:
7104:
7100:
6990:
6896:
6886:
6849:
6769:
6604:Arthur Rubin
6590:
6586:
6578:
6570:
6548:
6479:
6470:
6426:
6425:
6401:
6378:
6354:
6295:
6188:
6175:
6111:
6092:
6039:User:Rjd0060
6018:Juliancolton
5892:
5868:
5830:
5798:
5769:
5751:
5734:
5614:
5573:
5569:
5539:
5517:
5513:
5473:
5295:
5285:
5279:
5268:
5261:
5255:
5248:
5241:
5235:
5228:
5221:
5215:
5174:
5145:
5138:
5115:
5101:
5050:
5044:
5038:
5032:
5026:
5020:
4917:Howdypardner
4911:To clarify,
4823:
4817:
4806:
4799:
4793:
4786:
4779:
4773:
4766:
4759:
4753:
4746:Howdypardner
4736:
4725:
4695:
4684:
4669:
4649:
4502:
4468:
4462:
4451:
4444:
4438:
4431:
4424:
4418:
4411:
4404:
4398:
4364:hunting...--
4332:
4318:
4293:
4266:chocobogamer
4261:
4260:
4221:
4155:chocobogamer
4150:
4149:
4130:
4125:
4104:
4088:
4080:
3999:
3911:chocobogamer
3906:
3905:
3901:
3883:
3767:
3761:
3757:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3736:
3713:
3694:
3688:
3681:current RfCU
3664:
3660:
3640:
3575:chocobogamer
3570:
3569:
3553:
3520:chocobogamer
3515:
3514:
3495:
3485:
3476:
3465:
3453:
3437:
3430:
3396:chocobogamer
3391:
3390:
3328:
3324:
3286:
3263:
3185:
3156:
3139:wikistalking
3138:
3077:
3071:
3051:
3029:
3023:
3019:
2999:
2993:Concur with
2968:
2966:
2805:
2795:
2752:
2746:
2729:
2721:
2710:Meat Puppets
2617:
2611:
2598:
2590:
2564:
2556:
2540:
2534:
2521:
2513:
2485:
2477:
2471:
2453:
2445:
2400:
2381:by reference
2373:WP:Consensus
2343:
2316:
2308:
2289:They're now
2273:
2265:
2228:
2220:
2189:
2183:
2165:
2157:
2123:
2117:
2099:
2098:
2095:wp:Checkuser
2090:
2089:]) and ] (]
2086:
2082:
2036:
2028:
2011:
2005:
1959:
1951:
1916:
1908:
1888:
1880:
1861:
1853:
1828:
1820:
1659:edit) (undo)
1545:Other links
1183:
1005:
1001:
985:
977:
964:
940:
888:
836:Village pump
824:New articles
789:Edit filters
768:Arbitration
694:User conduct
479:Open proxies
436:
396:Noticeboards
112:82.31.162.27
14654:—Preceding
14035:Megan Meier
13694:Andy's talk
13611:Andy's talk
13527:Andy's talk
13507:Andy's talk
13423:Andy's talk
13258:Andy's talk
13235:Andy's talk
13227:at it again
12949:PMDrive1061
12663:Taqi al-Din
12617:, and also
12615:Taqi al-Din
12373:schoolblock
12154:Sudharsansn
12074:, or other
12060:User Srkris
12029:User Srkris
12021:User Srkris
11967:User:Srkris
11927:User:Srkris
11877:User Srkris
11868:User Srkris
11819:Ncmvocalist
11770:Ncmvocalist
11647:stalking me
11643:User:Srkris
11641:Looks like
11478:Orange Mike
11344:DrummerMike
11020:Tim Vickers
10984:Kent Hovind
10503:oversignter
10496:BNP members
10243:{home page}
9871:Doug Weller
9770:Starczamora
9624:Starczamora
9513:Starczamora
9485:Starczamora
8991:Tim Vickers
8807:Tim Vickers
8776:ForesticPig
8760:Tim Vickers
8189:sui generis
8025:oversighted
7925:Orange Mike
7495:WP:USER#NOT
7181:WP:BADSITES
7125:too focused
6757:identify DC
6632:Ottava Rima
6595:WP:OVERLINK
6484:Ohconfucius
6204:Ottava Rima
6189:established
6146:Ottava Rima
6127:Ottava Rima
5940:Tim Vickers
5815:timeout. –
5784:Tim Vickers
5756:Tim Vickers
5623:Tim Vickers
5389:Peter cohen
5360:Peter cohen
5312:Attack Page
5283:investigate
4885:Peter cohen
4821:investigate
4713:Peter cohen
4670:L'Aquatique
4466:investigate
4312:FisherQueen
4310:Looks like
2685:Orange Mike
2653:Orange Mike
2379:and noting
2346:USS Liberty
2050:WP:Edit war
1004:. Instead,
782:Enforcement
738:Sockpuppets
643:Importation
602:Translation
514:Copyrights
449:Bureaucrats
203:Line 1,172:
200:Line 1,172:
193:Next edit →
187:new section
142:view source
104:view source
42:Next edit →
14769:block user
14763:filter log
14327:verifiable
14017:WP:CSD#G13
13774:WP:SOAPBOX
13678:block user
13648:filter log
13594:block user
13564:filter log
13490:block user
13460:filter log
13406:block user
13376:filter log
13339:block user
13309:filter log
13214:block user
13184:filter log
13005:View rants
12645:. Besides
12586:Blanchardb
12546:Blanchardb
12540:Refraction
12218:articles,
12146:Bharatveer
11959:here again
11691:Taprobanus
11620:WP:POVFORK
11494:reasonable
11379:block user
11373:filter log
11004:. Thanks.
10738:Balloonman
10472:I deleted
10385:editnotice
9761:Brangelina
9240:EdJohnston
9022:dougweller
8887:and begin
8499:dougweller
8473:DuncanHill
8380:GDallimore
8307:GDallimore
8275:GDallimore
8044:GDallimore
8007:GDallimore
7965:EdJohnston
7906:dougweller
7837:Ricky81682
7812:EdJohnston
7734:Restawhile
7695:Well, BLP
7683:Restawhile
7543:Restawhile
7391:this entry
7338:witch-hunt
6684:. Thanks.
6505:PMAnderson
6471:Outrageous
6273:Locke Cole
6258:disruptive
6241:Locke Cole
6222:Locke Cole
6125:to tools.
6006:SlimVirgin
5752:seven days
5540:especially
5518:a week ago
5375:John Nagle
5326:John Nagle
5252:block user
5245:filter log
5123:John Nagle
5072:EdJohnston
5048:block user
5042:filter log
4982:John Nagle
4963:EdJohnston
4921:EdJohnston
4899:John Nagle
4834:John Nagle
4790:block user
4783:filter log
4435:block user
4428:filter log
4079:I do have
3748:mind you,
3669:a template
3616:EdJohnston
3306:Arcayne.--
3054:Black Kite
2806:Proposal 2
2796:Proposal 1
2140:EdJohnston
2063:EdJohnston
2059:WorldFacts
1783:WorldFacts
967:Contact a
805:Questions
685:Undeletion
678:Miscellany
663:Categories
638:Protection
14775:block log
14722:arguments
14660:Shnitzled
14452:Thank you
14361:WP:BATTLE
14269:WP:BATTLE
14201:The Times
14062:issue? –
13829:Gwen Gale
13792:Gwen Gale
13778:Gwen Gale
13684:block log
13600:block log
13496:block log
13412:block log
13345:block log
13246:Ongoing:
13220:block log
13120:Fut.Perf.
12993:Fut.Perf.
12943:And he's
12682:synthesis
12631:Telescope
12471:Telescope
12428:≈ jossi ≈
12380:≈ jossi ≈
11994:. Citing
11963:also here
11947:edit wars
11589:≈ jossi ≈
11538:who cares
11473:evialllll
11391:See also
11385:block log
11052:Kralizec!
10425:Gwen Gale
10347:Kralizec!
10339:Gwen Gale
10311:Gwen Gale
10172:EyeSerene
10087:EyeSerene
9857:EyeSerene
9616:flamebait
9509:boyfriend
9343:Darkspots
9293:There is
9041:reactions
8960:Jojhutton
8935:Jojhutton
8723:editors.
8676:Shnitzled
8611:It's the
8586:immediate
8548:mediation
8378:article.
7854:PicJungle
7829:PicJungle
7346:consensus
7117:some sort
6980:WP:OUTING
6854:Gwen Gale
6663:WP:UP#NOT
6655:WP:UP#NOT
6523:WT:MOSNUM
5731:WP:MOSNUM
5727:ownership
5272:CheckUser
5259:block log
5171:checkuser
5054:block log
4810:CheckUser
4797:block log
4617:Jehochman
4587:Jehochman
4491:Jehochman
4455:CheckUser
4442:block log
4340:Kralizec!
3963:Fut.Perf.
3821:Fut.Perf.
3676:last RfCU
3601:Fut.Perf.
3291:Fut.Perf.
3268:Jojhutton
3218:Fut.Perf.
3143:Fut.Perf.
3123:Jojhutton
2877:Fut.Perf.
2783:Fut.Perf.
2085:]), ] (]
2055:Yellabina
1184:Incidents
971:directly.
914:Shortcuts
851:Proposals
846:Technical
809:Help desk
794:Requested
753:Vandalism
743:Usernames
716:Sanctions
668:Templates
658:Redirects
585:Whitelist
580:Blacklist
489:Oversight
464:Education
437:Incidents
410:dashboard
14935:Category
14825:friendly
14822:contribs
14745:contribs
14734:Plyjacks
14668:contribs
14656:unsigned
14626:Dear god
14551:MuZemike
14509:contribs
14498:Jayron32
14494:credible
14483:Resolved
14394:Resolved
14351:contribs
14340:Jayron32
14251:MuZemike
14206:WP:BLP1E
14013:WP:BLP1E
13990:contribs
13979:Jayron32
13894:as well.
13770:WP:CIVIL
13636:contribs
13622:And now
13552:contribs
13538:And now
13448:contribs
13434:And now
13364:contribs
13297:contribs
13172:contribs
13065:looie496
12987:Resolved
12906:Resolved
12858:contribs
12845:notified
12655:Ibn Sahl
12651:WP:SYNTH
12629:. As to
12607:Ibn Sahl
12592:- timed
12577:contribs
12552:- timed
12454:contribs
12443:Jayron32
12378:issued.
12207:article.
12205:Sanskrit
12191:and says
12150:Jazzmand
12093:Sanskrit
12064:WP:HOUND
12025:WP:HOUND
11996:WP:BLOCK
11689:example.
11604:WP:CIVIL
11553:contribs
11542:Jayron32
11526:Islander
11459:contribs
11448:Jayron32
11355:contribs
11333:contribs
11322:Jayron32
11316:Resolved
11161:better.
11105:HEFFIELD
11084:Evidence
11046:Resolved
10995:Resolved
10959:Resolved
10843:Cheers,
10625:Resolved
10480:lifebaka
10307:rats ass
10132:Islander
9980:Islander
9909:Islander
9733:Bukidnon
9648:Everyone
9388:Tito Pao
9384:fair use
9299:Tikiwont
9274:Resolved
9206:contribs
9195:Jayron32
9133:Resolved
8863:Resolved
8805:policy?
8674:...lol.
8672:I demand
8648:HEFFIELD
8365:CIreland
8351:CIreland
8260:new one
8214:contribs
8203:Jayron32
7806:Resolved
7278:contribs
7266:account
7109:reasoned
7088:contribs
7077:Jayron32
6716:contribs
6705:Jayron32
6356:HWV 258
6263:Tiptoety
6194:Tiptoety
6113:HWV 258
5985:Kotniski
5639:Karanacs
5522:Bishonen
5457:Bishonen
5443:looie496
5421:Resolved
5387:Agreed--
5322:WP:TROLL
5225:contribs
5119:contribs
5105:contribs
5024:contribs
4977:WP:TROLL
4763:contribs
4740:contribs
4408:contribs
4336:contribs
4322:contribs
4081:multiple
4049:contribs
4038:Jayron32
3940:Solution
3864:contribs
3853:Jayron32
3750:derailed
3714:accounts
3458:duckhood
3345:contribs
3334:Jayron32
3325:in favor
3098:looie496
2942:contribs
2931:Jayron32
2862:contribs
2851:Jayron32
2781:banned.
2777:Resolved
2674:IronDuke
2420:Oh, and
1433:archives
1311:archives
1189:archives
1067:archives
856:Idea lab
814:Teahouse
777:Requests
653:Articles
523:Problems
160:contribs
66:Wikitext
14835:Support
14702:ukexpat
14634:endaliv
14576:endaliv
14531:endaliv
14457:ukexpat
14429:barneca
14412:barneca
14400:ukexpat
14335:neutral
14172:barneca
14115:ukexpat
14064:ukexpat
14021:barneca
13974:WP:NPOV
13892:Damiens
13142:Barneca
13028:effort.
12916:GraemeL
12843:I have
12281:In the
12210:In the
12091:In the
11681:. ] (]
11657:. ] (]
11602:with a
11585:WP:RFCs
11498:barneca
11429:barneca
11250:barneca
11128:barneca
11006:Aramgar
10966:GDonato
10791:barneca
10782:WP:DOLT
10762:Oooops
10303:muslims
10018:Hroðulf
9834:ЯEDVERS
9804:history
9709:My work
9537:My work
9446:ABS-CBN
9372:My work
9324:My work
9217:Yngvarr
9191:WP:DUCK
9175:Yngvarr
9148:WP:SOCK
9008:Realist
8893:Protonk
8885:WP:BOLD
8748:MBisanz
8617:Uncle G
8453:ЯEDVERS
7883:ЯEDVERS
7268:Mmmovie
7212:WP:USER
7113:Web 2.0
6560:oetica!
6427:Realist
6409:Georgia
6402:another
6390:oetica!
6323:Georgia
6178:MBisanz
5871:MBisanz
5833:MBisanz
5801:MBisanz
5772:MBisanz
5737:MBisanz
5617:, This
5544:Rjd0060
5500:Rjd0060
5341:JoshuaZ
5157:JoshuaZ
5095:Spartaz
5000:Spartaz
4596:Spartaz
4583:WP:RFCU
4569:Spartaz
4487:WP:MEAT
4483:WP:SOCK
4366:Crossmr
4294:Arcayne
4247:Crossmr
4222:Arcayne
4181:Crossmr
4135:Crossmr
4105:Arcayne
4096:before.
4023:Crossmr
4004:Crossmr
3884:Arcayne
3878:subpage
3834:Crossmr
3787:Crossmr
3768:Arcayne
3723:Crossmr
3695:Arcayne
3646:Crossmr
3496:Arcayne
3356:Crossmr
3329:opposed
3308:Crossmr
3231:Poltair
3203:Poltair
3162:Poltair
3114:Arcayne
3078:Arcayne
3030:Arcayne
3020:Comment
2983:Blueboy
2973:Blueboy
2892:Crossmr
2800:WP:DUCK
1991:Collect
1685:on the
1622:Theory.
1608:of 2003
1564:Backlog
929:WP:AN/I
623:Mergers
422:General
14628:... —/
14408:Update
14103:WP:BLP
14060:WP:BLP
13766:WP:AGF
13738:again,
13092:Taemyr
12873:Enigma
12828:Enigma
12753:Stefan
12727:Stefan
12719:WP:BIO
12661:, and
12647:WP:ROC
12532:WP:ROC
12432:(talk)
12416:Shadow
12384:(talk)
12334:&
12324:latest
12042:WP:ANI
11992:WP:ANI
11908:Also,
11614:Doing
11593:(talk)
11404:WP:IAR
10938:Shadow
10897:Marlin
10892:Orange
10764:WP:NLT
10655:(talk)
10652:Friday
10447:Well,
10343:WP:RBI
10249:Greg L
10049:WP:SCV
9852:WP:SCV
9644:WP:NPA
9522:animal
9144:WP:SSP
8931:WP:BRD
8869:Modocc
8833:forest
8819:Thanks
8781:Update
8713:Parkin
8706:Sticky
8489:Libro0
8198:WP:IAR
8194:WP:BLP
7833:WP:COI
7585:WP:BLP
7535:blogs.
7461:WP:BLP
7350:really
7208:WP:BLP
7039:WP:BLP
6822:Avruch
6607:(talk)
6598:edits.
6583:WP:MOS
6575:WP:MOS
6540:WP:MOS
6527:WP:MOS
6519:WT:MOS
6370:WP:MOS
6306:(talk)
5923:Secret
5859:Secret
5479:Secret
5289:cuwiki
5195:Update
5146:Shadow
4827:cuwiki
4472:cuwiki
3746:failed
3744:. Not
3684:there.
3665:chosen
3024:appear
2748:Justin
2722:Narson
2613:Justin
2591:Narson
2557:Narson
2536:Justin
2514:Narson
2478:Narson
2446:Narson
2401:no way
2309:Narson
2295:Jayjg
2266:Narson
2221:Narson
2185:Justin
2180:WP:AGF
2158:Narson
2119:Justin
2029:Narson
2007:Justin
1952:Narson
1909:Narson
1881:Narson
1854:Narson
1821:Narson
1638:entry.
1315:search
1193:search
1071:search
922:WP:ANI
841:Policy
628:Splits
77:Inline
59:Visual
14814:Ioeth
14365:Nsk92
14305:Nsk92
14273:Nsk92
14111:WP:RS
14041:etc.
13867:diffs
13654:WHOIS
13570:WHOIS
13466:WHOIS
13382:WHOIS
13315:WHOIS
13190:WHOIS
12945:still
12684:that
11978:] (]
11934:] (]
11748:WP:RS
11651:WP:RS
11629:edits
11583:, or
11581:WP:3O
11268:ENNIS
11168:ENNIS
10851:deeds
10681:Giano
10670:one.
10668:under
10590:Help!
10512:dodge
9932:WT:CP
9850:from
9812:watch
9808:links
9284:Sarah
9157:levse
8552:WP:DR
8550:(see
8432:after
8403:scent
8398:iride
8329:break
8135:neuro
8069:neuro
7861:neuro
7627:John
7525:blog?
7333:jihad
7121:tl;dr
7105:paced
7101:level
6407:Sandy
6321:Sandy
6299:Maxim
6044:Giano
5574:edits
5570:Edits
4726:Note:
4084:DIFF.
3758:Fitna
3689:never
3000:JodyB
2431:disp.
2411:disp.
2369:WP:DR
1632:WP:RS
979:diffs
946:Read
762:Other
673:Files
633:Moves
592:Style
174:edits
172:5,106
16:<
14819:talk
14757:logs
14739:talk
14706:talk
14684:talk
14664:talk
14570:. —/
14557:talk
14503:talk
14461:talk
14433:talk
14416:talk
14404:talk
14369:talk
14345:talk
14309:talk
14277:talk
14257:talk
14198:and
14176:talk
14119:talk
14107:WP:V
14068:talk
14025:talk
13984:talk
13956:talk
13915:talk
13876:talk
13833:talk
13817:talk
13796:talk
13782:talk
13776:...
13713:talk
13672:http
13666:RBLs
13660:RDNS
13630:talk
13588:http
13582:RBLs
13576:RDNS
13546:talk
13484:http
13478:RBLs
13472:RDNS
13442:talk
13400:http
13394:RBLs
13388:RDNS
13358:talk
13350:and
13333:http
13327:RBLs
13321:RDNS
13291:talk
13275:talk
13208:http
13202:RBLs
13196:RDNS
13166:talk
13158:Now
13150:talk
13096:talk
13069:talk
12953:talk
12933:talk
12929:John
12914:. --
12852:talk
12820:Not
12782:talk
12768:talk
12764:Fram
12743:talk
12698:talk
12633:and
12571:talk
12538:and
12536:Lens
12518:talk
12448:talk
12409:Half
12344:talk
12340:Kris
12322:his
12313:and
12254:and
12214:and
12132:and
11961:and
11955:here
11949:and
11823:talk
11807:more
11805:and
11774:talk
11695:talk
11579:via
11547:talk
11518:Talk
11502:talk
11484:Talk
11453:talk
11433:talk
11413:talk
11394:and
11367:logs
11349:talk
11327:talk
11272:ROWN
11256:and
11212:talk
11172:ROWN
11132:talk
11109:TEEL
11056:talk
11024:talk
11010:talk
10971:talk
10931:Half
10795:talk
10772:talk
10685:talk
10638:talk
10567:talk
10518:Talk
10429:talk
10375:talk
10371:Tarc
10351:talk
10329:talk
10325:Tarc
10315:talk
10293:talk
10271:talk
10254:talk
10228:aton
10225:Fnag
10216:here
10124:Talk
10052:does
10022:Talk
9972:Talk
9940:here
9901:Talk
9893:here
9889:here
9816:logs
9800:talk
9796:edit
9774:talk
9737:here
9680:talk
9628:talk
9489:talk
9468:here
9464:here
9392:talk
9347:talk
9303:talk
9244:talk
9200:talk
9163:Talk
9146:and
9142:See
9111:talk
9085:talk
9036:shoy
9026:talk
8995:talk
8964:talk
8939:talk
8897:talk
8873:talk
8811:talk
8764:talk
8727:Ryan
8680:talk
8652:TEEL
8621:talk
8519:and
8503:talk
8477:talk
8384:Talk
8369:talk
8355:talk
8340:talk
8311:Talk
8279:Talk
8208:talk
8048:Talk
8011:Talk
7993:talk
7969:talk
7951:talk
7931:Talk
7922:. --
7910:talk
7841:talk
7816:talk
7761:talk
7757:John
7738:talk
7697:does
7687:talk
7667:talk
7663:John
7631:. --
7566:talk
7562:John
7547:talk
7504:talk
7469:talk
7434:talk
7403:talk
7322:talk
7307:talk
7303:John
7292:talk
7272:talk
7257:talk
7253:John
7235:talk
7220:talk
7198:talk
7194:John
7148:talk
7133:talk
7082:talk
7062:talk
7047:talk
7043:John
6942:talk
6938:John
6858:talk
6799:talk
6742:talk
6710:talk
6690:talk
6682:here
6672:talk
6636:talk
6621:talk
6617:Pete
6591:very
6579:real
6571:ever
6521:and
6488:talk
6446:talk
6414:Talk
6342:talk
6328:Talk
6231:ASEM
6208:talk
6150:talk
6131:talk
6101:ergy
6083:talk
6048:talk
5989:talk
5971:talk
5966:Aude
5944:talk
5910:talk
5905:Aude
5848:talk
5821:talk
5788:talk
5760:talk
5643:talk
5627:talk
5619:diff
5604:talk
5582:talk
5576:? --
5548:talk
5526:talk
5504:talk
5496:this
5491:here
5461:talk
5447:talk
5431:talk
5393:talk
5379:talk
5364:talk
5345:talk
5330:talk
5239:logs
5213:talk
5161:talk
5139:Half
5127:talk
5113:talk
5099:talk
5076:talk
5068:JIDF
5036:logs
5018:talk
4986:talk
4967:talk
4925:talk
4903:talk
4889:talk
4838:talk
4777:logs
4751:talk
4734:talk
4717:talk
4553:talk
4531:talk
4512:talk
4485:and
4422:logs
4396:talk
4370:talk
4362:duck
4344:talk
4330:talk
4316:talk
4251:talk
4185:talk
4139:talk
4043:talk
4027:talk
4008:talk
3858:talk
3838:talk
3791:talk
3737:same
3727:talk
3719:DHCP
3674:The
3650:talk
3620:talk
3482:wage
3477:only
3466:nine
3454:user
3438:sole
3431:real
3378:talk
3360:talk
3339:talk
3312:talk
3272:talk
3235:talk
3207:talk
3166:talk
3127:talk
3102:talk
3006:talk
2958:talk
2936:talk
2913:talk
2896:talk
2856:talk
2838:and
2834:and
2825:and
2822:and
2754:talk
2730:Talk
2691:Talk
2659:Talk
2619:talk
2599:Talk
2565:Talk
2542:talk
2522:Talk
2486:Talk
2454:Talk
2422:this
2386:and
2375:and
2365:here
2361:this
2317:Talk
2274:Talk
2248:here
2246:and
2244:here
2229:Talk
2191:talk
2178:and
2166:Talk
2144:talk
2134:See
2125:talk
2102:Rami
2067:talk
2057:and
2037:Talk
2013:talk
1995:talk
1960:Talk
1917:Talk
1889:Talk
1862:Talk
1829:Talk
1805:talk
1787:talk
1706:here
1554:Talk
1299:1167
1294:1166
1289:1165
1284:1164
1279:1163
1274:1162
1269:1161
1264:1160
1259:1159
1254:1158
1247:1157
1242:1156
1237:1155
1232:1154
1227:1153
1222:1152
1217:1151
1212:1150
1207:1149
1202:1148
1006:use
958:Try
575:Spam
444:Bots
432:Main
156:talk
118:talk
14797:BMW
14641:Δ's
14583:Δ's
14538:Δ's
14521:in
13933:"?
13225:is
12862:AGK
12799:Why
12274:and
12148:and
11890:It
11481:|
11281:) (
11222:GJC
11181:) (
10863:GJC
10711:BMW
10584:Guy
10539:BMW
10509:Den
9723:of
9659:BMW
9578:BMW
9416:BMW
9338:one
9223:(c)
9220:(t)
9181:(c)
9178:(t)
9068:GJC
8835:PIG
8663:GJC
8597:BMW
8567:BMW
8532:BMW
8296:Lid
8168:Lid
7961:MfD
7928:|
7701:NE2
7633:NE2
7365:BMW
7185:NE2
6991:BMW
6897:BMW
6770:BMW
6294:.--
6095:Syn
5356:ADL
5302:004
5297:MBK
5276:log
5219:tag
5181:004
5176:MBK
4814:log
4757:tag
4696:BMW
4691:-t
4650:BMW
4645:-t
4503:own
4459:log
4402:tag
4092:on.
4089:did
4000:ask
3949:it.
3902:not
3554:BMW
3549:-t
3287:ban
3186:BMW
3181:-t
2828:and
2688:|
2656:|
1739:-->
1539:340
1534:339
1529:338
1524:337
1519:336
1514:335
1509:334
1504:333
1499:332
1494:331
1487:330
1482:329
1477:328
1472:327
1467:326
1462:325
1457:324
1452:323
1447:322
1442:321
1421:487
1416:486
1411:485
1406:484
1401:483
1396:482
1391:481
1386:480
1381:479
1376:478
1369:477
1364:476
1359:475
1354:474
1349:473
1344:472
1339:471
1334:470
1329:469
1324:468
1177:365
1172:364
1167:363
1162:362
1157:361
1152:360
1147:359
1142:358
1137:357
1132:356
1125:355
1120:354
1115:353
1110:352
1105:351
1100:350
1095:349
1090:348
1085:347
1080:346
861:WMF
648:XfD
484:VRT
14937::
14708:)
14686:)
14670:)
14666:•
14645:/
14637://
14587:/
14579://
14560:)
14542:/
14534://
14485:–
14463:)
14435:)
14427:--
14418:)
14396:–
14371:)
14338:--
14311:)
14279:)
14260:)
14204:.
14178:)
14121:)
14109:,
14070:)
14037:,
14027:)
13977:--
13958:)
13917:)
13909:--
13878:)
13855:,
13851:,
13847:,
13835:)
13819:)
13798:)
13784:)
13772:,
13768:,
13715:)
13696:;
13613:;
13529:;
13509:;
13425:;
13277:)
13260:;
13252:.
13249:,
13237:;
13229:.
13152:)
13114:,
13098:)
13071:)
12989:–
12955:)
12935:)
12908:–
12794:So
12784:)
12770:)
12745:)
12700:)
12657:,
12637:,
12621:,
12613:,
12609:,
12543:--
12520:)
12512:.
12508:,
12477:,
12473:,
12376:}}
12370:{{
12331:,
12311:OR
12270:,
12266:,
12250:,
12246:,
12242:,
12238:,
12234:,
12230:,
12171:,
12167:,
12160:,
12138:me
12134:11
12130:10
12070:,
11998:,
11965:.
11957:,
11825:)
11801:,
11797:,
11793:,
11789:,
11776:)
11697:)
11587:.
11504:)
11446:--
11435:)
11415:)
11318:–
11214:)
11134:)
11058:)
11048:–
11026:)
11012:)
10974:)
10927:'
10797:)
10789:--
10784:.
10774:)
10687:)
10640:)
10569:)
10505:.
10486:++
10431:)
10399:-
10390:—
10377:)
10353:)
10331:)
10317:)
10295:)
10273:)
10222:.
10024:)
10016:--
9814:|
9810:|
9806:|
9802:|
9798:|
9776:)
9682:)
9630:)
9622:.
9491:)
9394:)
9349:)
9305:)
9282:.
9276:–
9246:)
9166:•
9160:•
9151:—
9135:–
9028:)
8997:)
8966:)
8941:)
8899:)
8875:)
8865:–
8813:)
8793:de
8790:Sa
8766:)
8682:)
8641:me
8623:)
8515:,
8505:)
8479:)
8395:–
8386:)
8371:)
8357:)
8342:)
8313:)
8281:)
8133:—
8067:—
8050:)
8013:)
7995:)
7971:)
7953:)
7912:)
7859:—
7843:)
7818:)
7808:–
7782:Ty
7763:)
7755:--
7740:)
7718:Ty
7689:)
7669:)
7648:Ty
7617:Ty
7593:Ty
7568:)
7549:)
7506:)
7483:Ty
7471:)
7448:Ty
7436:)
7417:Ty
7405:)
7397:.
7324:)
7309:)
7294:)
7259:)
7237:)
7222:)
7200:)
7150:)
7135:)
7127:.
7107:,
7103:,
7064:)
7049:)
6944:)
6860:)
6852:.
6801:)
6744:)
6692:)
6674:)
6638:)
6623:)
6615:--
6563:–
6490:)
6448:)
6416:)
6393:–
6344:)
6330:)
6279:•
6275:•
6247:•
6243:•
6210:)
6152:)
6133:)
6085:)
6077:--
6050:)
5991:)
5946:)
5938:.
5850:)
5823:)
5790:)
5762:)
5733:.
5722:,
5719:,
5716:,
5713:,
5710:,
5707:,
5704:,
5701:,
5698:,
5695:,
5692:,
5689:,
5686:,
5683:,
5680:,
5677:,
5674:,
5671:,
5668:,
5665:,
5662:,
5659:,
5656:,
5645:)
5629:)
5606:)
5584:)
5550:)
5536:DR
5531:.
5524:|
5506:)
5459:|
5449:)
5433:)
5423:–
5395:)
5381:)
5373:--
5366:)
5347:)
5332:)
5278:)
5265:CA
5163:)
5129:)
5078:)
4988:)
4980:--
4969:)
4927:)
4905:)
4891:)
4840:)
4816:)
4803:CA
4719:)
4701:c-
4655:c-
4585:?
4555:)
4533:)
4514:)
4461:)
4448:CA
4372:)
4346:)
4301:()
4253:)
4229:()
4187:)
4141:)
4124:.
4112:()
4101:-
4029:)
4010:)
3994:,
3991:,
3988:,
3891:()
3840:)
3793:)
3775:()
3729:)
3702:()
3652:)
3622:)
3559:c-
3503:()
3486:is
3380:)
3362:)
3314:)
3274:)
3266:--
3237:)
3209:)
3191:c-
3168:)
3129:)
3104:)
3085:()
3072:am
3037:()
2986:96
2976:96
2960:)
2915:)
2898:)
2779:–
2734:•
2726:~
2718:--
2603:•
2595:~
2587:--
2578:PR
2569:•
2561:~
2553:--
2526:•
2518:~
2510:--
2500:PR
2490:•
2482:~
2474:--
2458:•
2450:~
2442:--
2371:,
2352:PR
2321:•
2313:~
2305:--
2293:.
2278:•
2270:~
2262:--
2233:•
2225:~
2217:--
2170:•
2162:~
2154:--
2146:)
2069:)
2041:•
2033:~
2025:--
1997:)
1973:PR
1964:•
1956:~
1948:--
1939:PR
1921:•
1913:~
1905:--
1893:•
1885:~
1877:--
1866:•
1858:~
1850:--
1833:•
1825:~
1817:--
1807:)
1789:)
1313:,
1191:,
1069:,
943::
185::
158:|
14852:4
14847:9
14827:)
14817:(
14802:◄
14792:►
14777:)
14772:·
14766:·
14760:·
14754:·
14748:·
14742:·
14737:(
14704:(
14682:(
14662:(
14631:M
14573:M
14554:(
14528:M
14506:.
14500:.
14459:(
14431:(
14414:(
14402:(
14367:(
14348:.
14342:.
14307:(
14275:(
14254:(
14174:(
14117:(
14066:(
14023:(
13987:.
13981:.
13954:(
13913:(
13874:(
13831:(
13815:(
13794:(
13780:(
13756:a
13754:c
13752:z
13750:a
13748:m
13711:(
13686:)
13681:·
13675:·
13669:·
13663:·
13657:·
13651:·
13645:·
13639:·
13633:·
13628:(
13602:)
13597:·
13591:·
13585:·
13579:·
13573:·
13567:·
13561:·
13555:·
13549:·
13544:(
13498:)
13493:·
13487:·
13481:·
13475:·
13469:·
13463:·
13457:·
13451:·
13445:·
13440:(
13414:)
13409:·
13403:·
13397:·
13391:·
13385:·
13379:·
13373:·
13367:·
13361:·
13356:(
13347:)
13342:·
13336:·
13330:·
13324:·
13318:·
13312:·
13306:·
13300:·
13294:·
13289:(
13273:(
13222:)
13217:·
13211:·
13205:·
13199:·
13193:·
13187:·
13181:·
13175:·
13169:·
13164:(
13148:(
13123:☼
13094:(
13067:(
12996:☼
12951:(
12931:(
12855:·
12850:(
12780:(
12766:(
12741:(
12721:"
12696:(
12589:-
12574:·
12569:(
12549:-
12516:(
12451:.
12445:.
12346:)
12342:(
12303:3
12300:2
12297:1
12289:.
12278:.
12256:9
12252:8
12248:7
12244:6
12240:5
12236:4
12232:3
12228:2
12199:,
12195:,
12187:,
12183:,
12179:,
12175:,
12128:,
12126:9
12124:,
12121:,
12119:7
12117:,
12115:6
12113:,
12110:,
12108:4
12106:,
12104:3
12102:,
12099:,
12097:1
12080:·
12046:·
12010:.
12008:"
12000:"
11980:·
11971:·
11936:·
11881:·
11842:·
11821:(
11811:·
11772:(
11752:·
11693:(
11683:·
11659:·
11622:)
11618:(
11550:.
11544:.
11500:(
11456:.
11450:.
11431:(
11411:(
11387:)
11382:·
11376:·
11370:·
11364:·
11358:·
11352:·
11347:(
11330:.
11324:.
11285:)
11283:C
11279:T
11277:(
11270:B
11266:D
11210:(
11185:)
11183:C
11179:T
11177:(
11170:B
11166:D
11130:(
11107:S
11103:S
11081:~
11054:(
11022:(
11008:(
10968:(
10923:'
10793:(
10770:(
10716:◄
10706:►
10683:(
10636:(
10592:)
10588:(
10565:(
10544:◄
10534:►
10427:(
10373:(
10349:(
10327:(
10313:(
10291:(
10269:(
10256:)
10252:(
10209:.
9837:❞
9831:❝
9818:)
9794:(
9772:(
9739::
9678:(
9664:◄
9654:►
9626:(
9583:◄
9573:►
9487:(
9476:I
9438:I
9421:◄
9411:►
9390:(
9345:(
9301:(
9242:(
9203:.
9197:.
9155:R
9043:)
9039:(
9024:(
8993:(
8962:(
8937:(
8895:(
8871:(
8809:(
8762:(
8678:(
8650:S
8646:S
8619:(
8602:◄
8592:►
8572:◄
8562:►
8537:◄
8527:►
8501:(
8475:(
8456:❞
8450:❝
8382:(
8367:(
8353:(
8338:(
8309:(
8277:(
8211:.
8205:.
8046:(
8009:(
7991:(
7967:(
7949:(
7908:(
7886:❞
7880:❝
7839:(
7814:(
7759:(
7736:(
7685:(
7665:(
7564:(
7545:(
7502:(
7467:(
7432:(
7401:(
7370:◄
7360:►
7320:(
7305:(
7290:(
7275:·
7270:(
7255:(
7233:(
7218:(
7196:(
7146:(
7131:(
7085:.
7079:.
7060:(
7045:(
6996:◄
6986:►
6940:(
6902:◄
6892:►
6856:(
6797:(
6775:◄
6765:►
6748:)
6740:(
6713:.
6707:.
6688:(
6670:(
6634:(
6619:(
6556:N
6550:⊥
6545:–
6486:(
6444:(
6412:(
6386:N
6380:⊥
6375:–
6340:(
6326:(
6281:c
6277:t
6249:c
6245:t
6229:M
6206:(
6148:(
6129:(
6081:(
6046:(
5987:(
5973:)
5969:(
5942:(
5912:)
5908:(
5846:(
5819:(
5786:(
5758:(
5641:(
5625:(
5602:(
5580:(
5546:(
5502:(
5466:.
5445:(
5429:(
5391:(
5377:(
5362:(
5343:(
5328:(
5292:)
5286:·
5280:·
5274:(
5269:·
5262:·
5256:·
5249:·
5242:·
5236:·
5229:·
5222:·
5216:·
5211:(
5159:(
5125:(
5116:·
5111:(
5102:·
5097:(
5074:(
5056:)
5051:·
5045:·
5039:·
5033:·
5027:·
5021:·
5016:(
4984:(
4965:(
4923:(
4901:(
4887:(
4836:(
4830:)
4824:·
4818:·
4812:(
4807:·
4800:·
4794:·
4787:·
4780:·
4774:·
4767:·
4760:·
4754:·
4749:(
4737:·
4732:(
4715:(
4551:(
4529:(
4510:(
4475:)
4469:·
4463:·
4457:(
4452:·
4445:·
4439:·
4432:·
4425:·
4419:·
4412:·
4405:·
4399:·
4394:(
4368:(
4342:(
4333:·
4328:(
4319:·
4314:(
4249:(
4183:(
4137:(
4131:s
4046:.
4040:.
4025:(
4006:(
3977:,
3966:☼
3861:.
3855:.
3836:(
3824:☼
3789:(
3762:I
3752:.
3725:(
3648:(
3618:(
3604:☼
3376:(
3358:(
3342:.
3336:.
3310:(
3294:☼
3278:.
3270:(
3233:(
3221:☼
3205:(
3164:(
3146:☼
3125:(
3100:(
2956:(
2939:.
2933:.
2911:(
2894:(
2880:☼
2859:.
2853:.
2786:☼
2433:)
2429:(
2413:)
2409:(
2142:(
2105:R
2091:·
2087:·
2083:·
2065:(
1993:(
1803:(
1785:(
1699:.
1435:)
1431:(
1317:)
1309:(
1195:)
1187:(
1073:)
1065:(
1011:.
992:.
749:)
745:(
416:.
388:e
381:t
374:v
162:)
154:(
120:)
116:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.