User talk:Daniel Case: Difference between revisions

6155:"report" & "vandalism" , with this user ain't have nothing to discuss ,it is imposible.He thinks in his mind that "we" reached a consensus and he says everywhere about it.In this case he modify the height in the way he want like he said about me and if he thinks that I vandalise the page it is the same with him and he deserve a block like mine.You should think for yourself that he is doing with you what he want and you belive him everythime.To be relevant :Ryan Babel when he played at Ajax Amsterdam he has a 1,85 m height .He cannot be shorter now and have a 1,83 m ,thats a fact.In wikipedia in all languages that exists the Ryan Babel page he is listed with 1,85 m height . It is logically ,even kids understand this explenation.Now I tell you that is not necesary to warn me that I can get a block for ever because you don't get anything with that ... I can go to another computer or at a Internet Cafe anytime and get a new account anytime when I want,is not a problem ,I can assure you that if I want to edit a page I do it,I try not to do the job in these way ,I want to be correct but it seems that you dont let me to be correct ,you interpretating my attitude wrong. 7064:

I-787 construction, it is possible 32 did go through Green Island and up Dyke Ave into Cohoes at one point, but we are talking about 30+ years ago at least. If you can get a hold of a Jimapco map those are pretty accurate on city/village/town boundaries and shows the names of hamlets more than most map companies do. I would do the edit myself but dont want to step on any toes as this is a FA article and I dont have any verifiable sources (other than my own substantial geographical knowledge, I tend to work on CD articles about the various hamlets, villages, towns, cities, counties, etc). I hope that was constructive!

7080:

get more information than the much larger Albany-to-northern terminus stretch mean that the article lacks just a little from being a FA article?) I hope its ok that I go ahead and add to this missing stretch and put in more information? I dont want to upset or step on anybody's toes. I know sometimes articles become very important to the people who work on them. I am much better at researching and finding hard to find sources for obscure history facts for articles than I am at putting facts together into a coherent flowing article. I hope that if you have some time you can take a look at

7208:'s editorial contributions as I think they are on barely or not notable topics. However, my read (which may be incomplete due to either (a) nonpublic information or (b) my inability to find the relevant data) is that you blocked the user based on the "say-so" of one editor, backed by incredibly limited information and a wild inference, no discussion, no checkuser, and no debate. Further, it appears that you are waiting for that editor to be satisfied that the charge is baseless, rather than trying to find a consensus or making your own determination. 5255: 5963:

company. IMHO, this user may have created the Digitroll article in good faith, and should be notified about why that article is not appropriate - but not blocked. It may be that he just doesn't know the notability policy, and judging by the deletion log he only created the article once - he has not been repeatedly spamming. If you still think he should be indefblocked for creating this article, I kindly request that you replace the block message with one indicating that he was blocked for creating a promotional article.

7622: 3811:

further edits! What, what, what's the matter with you?! You protect his page on the grounds of abusing the appeal process? Well, how else should he have appealed it?! And you know, he's absolutely right- who the hell would keep up that sort of charade for this long? I beg of you, if you're not gonna unblock him, at least unprotect his talk page so he can speak his mind. And I'll tell you, though- the way he's been treated ever since he joined Knowledge, you'll be lucky if he ever does return.

1832:

were rude and dismissive of me and said, well do you know all the policies by heart? Well no i don't, but I also don't make big edits when I am not sure about a basic policy. That is what Nightscream did. Nightscream still did not understand the BLP policy bc they put examples in a long comment at Jimbo's talk page, where they say potential blp violations should get discussed even when there is not a source before you do anything with it. That is just wrong there is nothing in BLP about doing that.

2663: 7238: 3467: 3092: 382: 4993: 7004:. Comparing the two, I only see a common interest in Filipino entertainment articles; however I am having a hard time finding more definitive connection than that one. I know that you have evidence that shows these two are definately the same person, and I know that evidence is clearer than what I am finding. Could you please post that evidence to the Sweet Autumn Misery's talk page so that I may respond intelligently to the unblock request? Thanks! -- 10666: 10519: 10443: 10221: 9965: 8713: 8504: 8257: 8050: 7952: 6777: 5479: 4613: 4046: 1886: 1397: 1010: 688: 611: 3343: 6469: 1788:, mostly like thirty or forty people who are full time activisits in it in the world, they say HIV and AIDS are not real. They have a message board on MSN and I watch it and some from my friends watch it bc now or then they have a campaign to sabotage WP. They did it in this spring, that is when I first became editor, they did it again in last weeks. They try putting on false claims about HIV and AIDS and on smearing good scientists like 4177: 4491:) Thanks. As if I don't need more proof I waste too much time here ... :-). I suppose the number of total DYKs table should be updated to ... after almost a month without any new hooks (because of two articles, both of which had been on DYK, which I have been working on for possible future GA/FA status), I'm back in the game and I have two on the page, so I'm closing in on 170. With luck I expect to break 200 by the end of January. 71: 10189: 3849: 9525:. However, I also noticed that although the user talk message said blocked for vandalism, the block log says this is a username block. Could you clarify the username issue (I'm afraid I'm notoriously unfamiliar with most current internet memes so often don't understand why some usernames are problematic until it is explained to me) and check whether there was an error. 1853:. Well in mean-time, the IP editor was banned. They made an account call Whereistheproof and put the password on their AIDS denialism MSN group and made socks. The IP was a proxy server they were all using to get around recognition, put rants on WP, stack AFD voting. They kept trying on adding this same blp stuff at Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier and AIDS deniallism. 3072:) and the way "dirty" is defined in this context, applies to beaches exceeding the limit for bacteria content. The list already shows two entries for Hawaii, and Kamilo isn't on it. So, I think we should avoid repeating these claims made by popular sources (I didn't add them to the article) and focus on using more accurate terms, such as "plastic pollution", etc. 3624:

the multiple requests. But if you were to look back at my first request you will find that I only did one. But as I took my time waiting, i think impatience got the better of me, but I still don't think it's much of a disruption. One or three... the net result and workload is still roughly the same. Anyways I apologize for that, and any of all what I have done.

1194:- deleting talk page documentation and rebuttal of his behavior, deleting or discombobulating anything in mainspace he perceives as negative, and adding personal-blog-style commentary such as "At Last Sana and Akito are Together again How Long They Stay Together Is Not Told But We Can All imagine What Happens Will Be Handled By Both of Them......Together..." 9742:. Sadly, following the block expiry, they have removed all the warnings from their talk page and remade the edit you blocked them for previously. I have left a note on their talk page, urging them to self-revert the edit, but I'd appreciate it if you had time to look and see if any further admin action is warranted. Thanks in advance -- 7031:

it goes through other areas of the region, and it's well known to most CD residents. I hope you agree with the importance assessment, if not feel free to change it. I did, however, find what I believe is a minor mistake or oversight in the route description, possibly simply made by someone not all that familar with differences of town/

4552: 8571:(even after months of no progress), and for additional support in promoting the development of the mouz page. I added everything I could, but most of the news developed surrounding mouz is in german. If you could resolve this dispute and if you could inform TheRedPenOfDoom about your decision, I would greatly appreciate it. - 1857:

link to violations. I am happy talking to Nightscream even tho Nightscream keeps calling me "obnoxious" and things, I think we need to talk and work together on WP, and I am not having a personal problem, I just want policy to get understood and followed. May be Nightscream can get a mentor on blp, is that a good idea?? Thx,

3279:) may not be an open proxy, but it is most certainly being used abusively by a user that is using multiple accounts and multiple IPs. This was also previously noted in the block log. A re-block for a shorter period of time but longer than 24 hours would have been more appropriate than simply an unblock in and of itself. 1845:

left a note like that, and MastCell closed the discussion. So a week later Nightscream goes to MastCell talk page and says they want to leave a note, MastCell I do not know if they knew my note and Sheffields were there, is like, ok, whatev, but keep it short. Nightscream puts a paragraph in the discussion that says

9813:, both of which were overlong, clumsy, contained multiple extraneous links, & were using a template that disnt really fit all that well. have offered to discuss compromise wording, recieved a response on one of the talk pages, made adjustments accordingly, but one editor refuses to do anything but revert 9106:, to some extent. Her influence limited to these regions. Her philosophy is her legacy. Whether feminists like her? I don't know, because the references discussing Bahinabai, do not focus on this issue. Any way, why would someone who regretted her female birth, be a role model for feminists. I am going to 10809:

Since a few days I have followed the instruction of an English Wiki admin to create something worthy for Knowledge so that my URL can be whitelisted again. So I created these articles on German Wiki BECAUSE GERMAN WIKI HAS WHITELISTED MY URL BECAUSE THEY HAVE SEEN THAT MY COLLECTION OF MORE THAN 2000

7416:

Thank you for comments. I have just fixed some misprints there. So far, I do not see a strong reason for failing GA. Please do write where you think references and style should be fixed and I can do that on a fly. The article is indeed too technical, but as a first-hand review it might be useful. The

3623:

I would like to disagree on the part of assuming good faith. I think I did. It's just that they didn't seem to have the same on me. I think one of them secretly reported me. But now it doesn't really matter, then I think, I got somewhat upset from it, and tried unblocking myself. Which I think led to

3296:

Not at all, I did not see your post to my talk page as a rant, just a detailed explanation of your thought processes, so thank you. :) As for further info, it basically relates to a banned user using lots of IPs, proxies, and sockpuppets to be disruptive, but you can find more in the history and talk

3043:

from A-class to B-class with these comments: "parts of this are unsourced: e.g. blonde hair was desirable; layout needs sorting out (large white space on my screen; image showing straight-cut neckline next to text about V-cut necklines)". I removed the white space (caused by a recently added image).

2794:

It wasn't contributed by the foundation themselves and wasn't meant to be advertising, let alone blatant advertising. In fact, reading the link to ADS doesn't help me know why it was categorised as advertising - what we wrote seems ok to me. Of course, it might have been changed significantly - but I

2435:

Thanks for the message. I actually had no idea what to do in with this case. It's obviously a fake page. I tried nominating it and for whatever reason couldn't get any of it to work. I'm still kinda new with a lot of the things on here. Basically this person started a page about themselves to justify

2067:

regarding the problem with the signature in it (and then after I left it I realized there's probably nobody other than me watching that page, so I doubt I'll get any answers). Anyway, if you're good with template syntax maybe you could take a look. I haven't been able to figure out what the problem

1555:

Thanx mister daniel case for takin my blocke off.I got punished cuz owen sanders told the admisiter that i waz breaking stuff in the enyclopeda & he made my pg red & it waz red & stuff.It got blockede & then i could do nothing.i waz bad onece & said a bad thing for jessica simpson

10081:

I don't want to step on your toes, but since they cited policy, I'm leaning towards unblocking them. Is there anything particularly disruptive you didn't mention in the block log? P.S. I advised them to write a note about the account's function to avoid further blocking so admins can clearly see the

10066:

camp at Slocan City, where his mother gave birth. The following quote from the "Little Mel" article should clear things up: "A year later, Hatsuye gave birth to her fourth child, Mel, in the barren camp. The government kept the Wakabayashis and the other Japanese-Canadians in the camp until the war

9886:

Of course i just wanted to make sure that the scripts that i had worked before i have it approved i don't want to waste anyone time if its not going to work im still developing the bot. I understand were you are coming from i don't want to break any rules and trust me it is not my inention to.Please

9544:

Isn't it reasonable to say that if something has been up on Knowledge for a while then oversighted later then it will be still up on Knowledge mirror sites? On a tangential note- why do people have those "this page has been vandalised" userboxes on their user pages? Don't you find it just encourages

9135:

Also I have covered "Mary McGee describes with great insight and empathy the life and conflicts of Bahinabai, a seventeenth-century bhakta....." Not the from that book, but the content is covered. There may be thousands of books on Bahinabai, but all of them are dependent on her philosophy, which is

8176:

are examples of what I like. I rather have the shield blend in with the shot than be the focal point. The scenic shots are cool too. Hope you get to make that North Country trip. It's funny because I used to travel to Plattsburgh all the time when my ex-girlfriend went to school there. Had that been

8163:

I totally agree with you about shooting through the windshield when there's an opportunity to get out of the car. Some places you can't obviously, so thank god for a 4GB memory card so you can just snap away! You should have seen me going over the Dunn Memorial Bridge, haha. Some shots you get lucky

8117:

I guess I could start a discussion about it. I see your point with making it more readable for non-roadgeek people, but I also think, like when writing papers for school or something, that they should stick to a formal way of writing. What is the Wiki policy for contractions? I would find that to be

8101:

I was comparing the look of NY 52 and NY 55 to a featured article like NY 32 or NY 22. They use the "NY" pretty much throughout. My "lazy" comment wasn't a slap on anyone. I had an english teacher who called stuff like that lazy writing. Just a term I use. Sorry if it offended you. I also eliminated

7548:

Since you do a lot of work vetting nominations, you are one of the people who will be most affected by the template change (although the effect shouldn't be very big...the main difference is just that this template is less complicated and the format will look a bit different), so I am hoping to hear

7063:

another hamlet of the town, THEN the city of Wateverliet, then the town of Colonie again this time in the hamlet of Maplewood, then it enters Cohoes. Green Island is on the other side of I-787 from Maplewood/Colonie. 32 has had many route changes, I'll have to look at an old map I have from prior to

7030:

I have gone ahead and assigned an importance ranking for NY Route 32 under the Capital District wikiproject banner. The assignment put is High importance as it goes through Albany, Watervliet, Cohoes, and Waterford; important areas and those sections of 32 are important for the regions history, plus

6663:

article for a few days now and today I glanced over the DYK rules. I thought that there wasn't a time limit on expansions for articles being nominated to DYK. But now I noticed in the DYK rules it says that expansions should be completed within 5 days. How strict is this? Is it exactly 120 hours, or

6410:

And what is that first hand information that you are referring to, Shabushabu? I read omy.sg as well. As for editing something that is not made by my own country, as far as I'm concerned, that is not a crime on Knowledge, nor is it a crime to do so in the US, Singapore, or any nation on this planet,

4407:

many of the images, after your refresher on MOS:IMAGES. Almost all image placements violated MOS:IMAGES: many were placed just before the section they were intended for; many were placed on the left just under section headings; and at least a couple were placed in the wrong spot (above or below by a

4395:

I can agree with you that 200px is a doable size. I didn't realize the default was 180; apparently in the past I changed mine to 120 and it's been that ever since, so my intentions were a bit skewed. I still think 300px is just way too big though - takes up too much of my screen (even when I hook my

3612:

The edit you referred is to of someone I know nothing of, but might I add that the IP I am using is that is given by my ISP, something like the one they have in Dubai. Anyone who uses the same network that gave me this IP can access it, As for PAs, well I was being friendly I merely added a hello as

2411:

I have some interest in the ban topic because more than a year ago, I was banned (blocked as a sock of a banned user). Both the administrator calling for the ban and another administrator have told me that they don't believe that I am a sock. I was called a sock simply because someone thought that

1765:

If it Jimbo indicates to me that links to the removed versions were not wanted, then that's fine. My issue is with the manner in which Simone disregards the Civility policy. Jimbo is more than able to clarify any misunderstandings on my part of his instructions without the obnoxiousness exhibited by

845:

article. However I thought about it and decided that if I couldn't find it by searching the first time, neither could anybody else, so I redirected it to the new page in a bold fashion. Don't know if that makes it ineligible for DYK, but I figure telling the DYKing what I did will cover that angle

10277:

Hi Daniel, I have a pretty spunky adoptee who has been talking about trying to suggest creating a new category for CSD. I agree with him for the most part and would like to hear your input. I'm not a huge speedy-deleter, so it's not really my place to advise. I would most likely send him to the CSD

9272:

I left a reply on the Suggestions page. Bradley was already a freshman at Princeton when Cappon died. I think you mis-interpreted the Deford article. One of the other articles notes that Bradley was found at the Princeton student union sitting by himself eating a pint of ice cream after learning

7910:

Hi. Over the years there have been a few things i wanted to discuss with you off-line. I'm not sure if you understood my previous request(s) or not, but i didn't ever see a way to email you and i didn't want to press if you preferred not to have off-line discussions. Above i note several others

7079:

I understand that there will be gaps (though I must ask, and hopefully you know the answer- How does an article get to FA status when one of the criteria is no obvious or essential gaps? I may be biased since I am from the Capital District, but wouldnt the fact that much smaller downstate stretches

3607:

Decline reason: "This edit clearly indicates you are another blocked user using this IP to evade a block. In fact, I might have checked out for open proxiness based on what you said, which, if true, would allow us to block this one permanently. You also engage in personal attacks and fail to assume

2115:

if another indef is needed, I'd appreciate if you do it instead of me--since he claims his deletionism as a reason and my tendency in the other direction is well-known, I'd like to avoid any possible wiggle-room for a claim that what I did might be so motivated. I was reluctant to do even the short

1856:

So what I will do in the future is this, I will try be more polite, but I think linking a blp violation is promoting it, want to or not, delibarate or not. I also want Nightscream to understand BLP better, that is a main policy here, it is bad when administrators do not know it and restore and then

1831:

blp stuff. So what Nightscream does was a blp problem, Nightscream did not look up the sources, did not look at the false smears, just restored it. BC Nightscream thought BLP does not apply on talk pages, Nightscream said that later. I showed Nightscream they were wrong quoting the BLP policy, they

1288:

only not allowed if it is used to disrupt, and as far as I can see, this second account was not used to disrupt, and was only created because the user had forgotten his or her password. Secondly, the original user was never blocked in the first place. I hope that you do not take offense at this.—

9342:

I want to thank you for the support you gave me at my RfA, which failed last night. Glad I made a good enough impression on you that you would trust me with the tools. I'm beginning some admin coaching with Julian and hope to run again in the future. It was quite the learning experience and I come

9196:

It is not "posthumous regard". In Hinduism, unlike in Christianity, people become "saints", before death. Most (if not all) Varkari saints were saints in their lifetimes, just as Bahinabai. "while others considered it a mark of sainthood", "As her fame spread, her husband is portrayed to have been

8024:

I did a little, but it reads like a 'Beginners guide to snow Snowshoes', there was a 'choosing a snowshoe' section that mentioned rentals as good place to start, which didn't seem awfully encyclopaedic even if useful. It's not huge one but I felt it could do with some work that required more time.

6154:

I will be pleased to work at Ryan Babel project with someone who knows who Ryan Babel is and there everything will be fine .I'm sure that in these case there will be no problems. If you find one please tell him contact me at my talk page .I want it not to be Ged UK because he only knows two words:

4102:

I don't see the temporary block flag...and I think that after editor went over the 3-warns and then did it again line, and 3 of us talked to the editor on the IP talk page... I *THINK* the editor got the message. Maybe not. If the block isn't temporary, is it proper for me to ask you to consider

1844:

would be deleting the stuff and leaving a note. Jimbo did not say, "hey nightscream pls leave a note there." But Jimbo also said I did the right thing and SheffieldSteel did the right thing deleting or refactoring. Well I had all ready left a note saying blp violations were deleted, SheffieldSteel

6100: 2636:

I know you did it in good faith. Flickr feeds tend to become lousy with copyvios after this kind of event so the issue comes up a lot. Modern digital cameras will let you take pics in the dark (mine goes up to 3200 iso) but they will be very noisy (so the ability is mostly useless). The amount of

2621:

Sure, but a) IME a flash outdoors at night with a digital camera will give you an almost totally black image anyway and b) most news agencies would clean it up a little before putting it out. Look, can you remember I did this in good faith? It's morning where I am and I haven't been following the

1780:

Daniel thank you for trying on clarifying this problem. Nightscream refuses to talk to me, that is not how we work together at Knowledge. I am sorry when you think my edit summary was abusive, it was just, I am very exasparated Nightscream keeps intervening in a very very simple matter, very very

1509:

suggests that duplication is usually to be used "when the subcategory is not part of a complete categorization scheme for members of the parent category. For example, actor Marlon Brando is in both Category:Best Actor Academy Award winners and its parent Category:Film actors." But if we create a

1287:

I realize that the user in question already has a block review template on their page, I would just like you to review your own block for a moment, considering things. Your template says that the user is a sockpuppet account of a previously blocked user. As to my understanding, sockpuppeting is

8570:

I know that my expired affiliation with Mousesports is obvious, but I would still appreciate to see the page without the threat of merge at the top, simply because I did the majority of the work on the page. My request to you as an accomplished administrator is for the page to be denied merging,

8140:

By the way, where in upstate NY do you live? I live in Rockland County. I went to Albany for a Super Bowl party, but to show you how much of a geek I am, I left at 7am, so I could drive up Route 9 and take some pictures along the way. I ended up collecting over 200 or so from 9 and corresponding

6961:

Hi, I've noticed at least one user who only seems concerned with going to pages and changing the term "passed away" to "died" with the justification that "everyone dies sometime." Is this a policy of Knowledge or this just person who basically has nothing better to do but change terms because he

6680:

Thanks for your quick reply. To clarify: flexible with the size, the time, or both? I would rather take it to 4x instead of 5x, because 5x will be stretching the material to its limits. I plan on keeping up the quality I've put into it so far. There are few sentences that aren't cited. After the

6613:

I was just reading the article on the movie "The Reader". It appears to me that the article says the Kate Winslet won a golden globe for the movie-at the top it says it is a golden glober winner (and it is not), and at the bottom under awards it says that Kate won for it. She won for her role in

6136:

Hi there. Thanks for your short block on this user. I know it probably seems petty over an inch in height, but still. Anyway, I don't know if you are watching his talk page, but they have made a reply to your unblock response. I thought I ought to point it out as it is quite close to threatening

3826:

If'n I may inject me personal opinion into the matter, I've been looking over this case myself a minute ago, and done some thinking. I agree that the circumstances do seem pretty suspicious, and that there's plenty o' reason to think that this Deck the Hallz guy's a sockpuppet. However, I also

1811:

is talking about when he says "RetroS1mone did the right thing, clearly. Knowledge is not a place for people with ranting agendas to come and smear people they don't like." and also "Treating angry lunatics as if they are worthy discussants devalues people who really are worthy. Allowing vicious

8167:

I see what you're saying with shots of the route shields being redundant. I'm not a fan of extreme closeups of shields or when they are centered in the shot unless its unique (like a multiple junction, the Tarrytown 9 cluster, etc..), but I do like getting the shield in the shot somehow though.

5379:

IIRC, it's very often a certain period after publication (don't remember the length) OR 70y after death, whichever is longer/shorter. The lengths usually vary if it's anonymous publication (goes from 50 to 100 years in Canada IIRC), but merely posthumous publication changes nothing. For a bit I

3827:

think Feats-O-Strength here's got himself a valid point. If it were me in this situation, I don't think I'd have the time or willpower to carry on such a pointless, meaningless charade. Especially for what, a year now? 'Course, the whole thing ain't up to me. Sorry if I'd been interfering.

3810:

I just logged in and looked at Deck the Hallz's talk page, to see what he's been up to, or if he's been unblocked. And what do I see? Not only is is STILL blocked, but he had AGAIN requested unblocking. And not only did you DENY the unblocking request, but you PROTECTED his talk page against

2415:

I haven't looked at the ban proposal much but I've started to think if the current definition of bans are overly harsh. People, especially teens and young adults grow and mature. Knowledge will likely be around for many years. Should a ban be limited to 1 year (a common maximum by ArbCom), 3

10805:

Hi Daniel, you could be the one who might ask the Wiki.en gentlemen to whitelist my URL www.realgems.org. Since December 2008 Vsmith & Co. (USA) have deleted all my external links so that all gemstone-interested Wiki users worldwide (! - except Germany) cannot find my collection of faceted

10785:

Well, it is a nice article. And you are entirely correct about the synagogue. Tt is architecturally notable and should be listed on the Natinoal Register. I suspect that it lacks a constituency, since some less notable synagogues are listed. However, it has been neglected by architectural

9308:

hey; was having a convo with the kid; i agree with your reasoning about the account needing to be retired, he's better off with a fresh start, if he's serious about wanting to help (i think he is). he reports that he can't create a new account because his ip is temporarily banned; can you do

6317:

will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the

5962:

Thanks for your reply. I understand it so that you consider the username to be promotional because it contains the string "troll" which is also contained in the name Digitroll. However, since the username is a legitimate word, I don't agree that the username itself is in any way promoting the

9150:"Unlike many of the woman-saints of the period, Bahinabai remains married her entire life, dutifully serving her husband, balancing her roles pativrata (a devoted wife) and virata (the detached)... Her poetry reflects her compromise between her devotion to her husband and her god Vithoba. " 8141:

routes along the way. I really like the US 9 page you put together. The first thing I thought about was in Tarrytown where all those 9 shields exist at one place then I saw you had a pic of it already. That was pretty funny. I think you should try and get that to FA level? It seems close. --

6926: 7926:

I'm sorry, I've only ever had a handful of occasions where i wanted to contact anyone else off-line and they had email-boxes. And, I was always perplexed that you did not respond in the previous occasions, but chalked it up to personal privacy preference which is fine. It just has always

1815:

So I see this stuff, for me it is not worth any thing bc of, WP:SPS, WP:SOAPBOX, WP:BLP, WP:TALK all kinds. I know what the source is, it is from a full time AIDS denialist that publishes her own stuff on the internet and made a "publishing company" to publish her one book. Total Talk page

1835:

I apologized very much when Nightscream said I was incivil, Nightscream never accepted my apologies. Nightscream said they wouldn't talk to me again. Nightscream went to Jimbo Wales. Jimbo said I was right. Jimbo said Nightscreams interpertation of censorship was "odd." Jimbo also said

6411:

to be precise. I am simply a Knowledge user from Arizona who watches Singaporean TV series (for my own reasons, which you have no right to know, Shabushabu). I have already exhausted my patience with you, and I am going to recommend to Knowledge that you be banned by the community.

8136:

My comparison was based on that contractions help readability, so I thought it was a good one =). But I see your point, so again, sorry for stepping on your toes there. Guess its unavoidable sometimes when this is such a group effort. I remember the whole shields thing too. Pretty

8164:

and don't show the windshield blotches, but there were a lot I had to delete too. I'd just be embarrassed to post them. I think state-ends is a cool site, but a good number of their images are terrible. So if you can pull over and take a few shots, that's how they should be done.

2412:

I was opposed to the proposed ban. I was not opposed to it but simply thought that the offense should be cleared spelled out and not just a "I don't like you ban". It took months to get unblocked. The wisdom of unblock has been proven by over a year's worth of good editing.

581:

The IP address from school is 168.221.143.68. The message form school said that the IP address is blocked and it does not allow editing from that IP address. I can only message you from home. The school ip adress is blocked from all types of edits execpt, the usar's talk page.

7911:

mentioning to check your email though, and I have one or two things to broach now. Do you have an email account that i could reach you at for wikipedia-related matters and how do I reach that? You could reply by email to me using the Email box at my own Userpage. Thanks,

5364:(Though I don't remember if that is sufficient for US PD; I haven't rechecked the Mickey Mouse Protection Act recently article.). Far as I can tell, the monument (according to the article) was unveiled 1930, and French died in 1931, so it's PD in quite a few jurisdictions. 1480:

about the desirability of the child/parent combo in these cases, since, if extended to all counties in the state, the child cats would exhaust the parent cat. I belatedly figured out that the county cats in question were created by you, so I thought I should let you know.

4430:

be shrunk due to forced image stacking and the small section it resides in. Even at 150px, it is still identifiable, and it's kind of a minimal addition to begin with. But I will allow you to make that decision. I do appreciate keeping all images the same size throughout.

8792:

immediately? I'll start doing links from the articles when I know the final location of the page. There are three listings (Dick's castle, Dwelling on Moutain Road and Frederick Osborn House) for which I couldn't find in the county lists. I'm assuming they were delisted.

746:

As the reply is to you I suppose it would be better if you asked another admin to look it over just to avoid any chance there might be suggestions of you not being unbiased when it concerns a direct reply to you. I know it ropes someone else in but that is unavoidable.

9820:

as meaning a US citizen (on two actor bio pages). my interpretation of wikipolicy about pov is that internationally understood terms are preferred. since "american" is ambiguous, first usage should be country-specific. after that, i have no problem with using it.

7355:

Plot. I was especially concerned about some details and interpretations not supported by the actions in the film and your effort fixed some of those (I have the feeling someone familiar with the novel had written much of it). I'll continue to take a look at it as

2778:

Thanks for unblocking me.It wasent my fault.my little 3 year old sister,oyu know...IT WAS A DISASTER WHEN MY SISTER TYPED THINGS ALL AT ONCE AND I WAS BLOCKED!!!so see...im sorry for all the bad typing and all that.I will never try to make it happen again.Thnaks!

5380:

suspected it might have been a work for hire, but it does not fall into the category. Copyright renewal is irrelevant to the issue anyway, as renewal prevents the work from becoming PD before the statutory limit, but certainly cannot extend it beyond that limit.

8766:

I am going to ask for a second opinion. This article was not being judged for featured article, but good article. Other articles I have written were judged against the good articl criteria and not because the word former was missing from a sentence describing

3492:

Hmm, maybe a PR would yield some helpful comments, but after a read-through of the article, I didn't find anything of terrible concern. It's a very interesting page, and it provided me with some information I've been in search of for a while. Maybe aim for FA?

4345:

Hi, how ya doin ? I saw many that on users's talk pages (including your's)that you have "archives".My assumption is that you can only have an archive once you have 100 messages on your user talk page,but in case I want to create one , where do I start ? Thnxs

8668:

This will display my complete ignorance of the DYK area of WP. Can you tell me how to easily determine if an article has been expanded 5x? I've copied and pasted the prose into a character counter, is that enough or is there a better tool to use? Thanks.

920:

on Nov 8th and it seems that all the other noms from that date have comments except for mine. Since some of the articles I have referenced are in French, I figured I'd see if you could look at it, given you have an intermediate knowledge of the language.

780: 4521:(DYK article creation), and want to do it before the end of the year (the next eight days). Of course, how can I stop at 25 when those with 26 DYK article creations sit there on the list, with their smug status like they're better than the 25s? : ) -- 63: 5943:) for a username violation. The word "trollmann" is a Norwegian word that translates as "wizard". Therefore, I think that this user probably is Norwegian and chose this name without intending any reference to Internet trolling -- at least, we should 3933:

I request that you withdraw your ban proposal relating to Kurt Weber because of your improper action in canvassing some of his opposes from the arbcom elections. I think that this was highly unethical of you, and can only serve to poison the debate.

7819:

Mr Case, I am writing to request that you might consider undeleting the 'Deskie' article, considering that while the page itself appears as blatent advertising, it was created in response to a request that all webtops in the comparison table of the

7549:

your thoughts before I go ahead with making the switch from the current system to this one. The links I provided above have permalinks to examples of what the template will look like when used; you are also free to experiment with it in a sandbox.

10607:

of Soulfly article, as an admin uninvolved with the editing process. I am under the impression that we'll see sparks flying in a near future, and I'd like some with more experience in Knowledge matters to intervene in case this gets out of hand.

1215:

Thank you very much for your intervention. I'm about to head off to work, so I don't have time to sort through and find any salvageable material. I'll do so when I get home, but almost invariably his edits since Hexachord were unhelpful at best.

4411:

I'm kind of surprised you undid my change rather than just changing them (which you did in your next edit anyway); otherwise you wouldn't have lost my removal of "small" describing roundabouts. It did occur and can be found below line 77 in the

776: 7824:

article have an article to which they link. The comparison chart is intended to provide a thorough list of different webtops as per the article's discussion page, however the listing for Deskie has been removed due to its article's deletion.

762: 5900: 1575:

Is it best to wait to engage a user on their talk page until they've done at least one edit? Thus if the name potentially is a vio but has no edits should one use the "wait until edits tag"? Just looking for best practice on this. Thanks.

9769:. Potentially this could be merged, but given pending completion of renovation, could easily remain a separate article. As it stands is merely so-so. A significant building, certainly, in its own right......See also my recent work on 6350:

Im actuly A girl!who likes science! Ok....Realy.Im not kidding.im only new to wikipedia and I need help how to make a page.please tell users if I make a mistake on a page,give me another chance.I just like createing pages.Ok.Thanks!

3405:

I've been plowing through these. Before I take the next step of breaking out the NY entries from the nationwide list, I thought I'd get some other people to take a look. I figured you might find the topic interesting in any case.

840:

I just created this uniquely Hudson Valley article today and was wondering if you'd be willing to assess it. I also nominated it for DYK. To disclose fully, after I started it I discovered the less-well-named and less-informative

10196:

has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!

3528:

Yeah, I got a couple pictures of some ice on trees, but I haven't found any damage yet. There are some good images of downed trees/powerlines on the websites of local newspapers; I'll try to get permission to use some via e-mail.

784: 966:

was so often used for such comparisons. The article certainly illustrates several instances as well, though it seems to emphasize the video documentaries. Thanks for letting me know; I had no idea I was culturally in-tune. :-)

9224:

that was in my original nomination with it? DYK will win from this image present.Thank you very much for your time and your help.I've already left the same message to other admins. I hope whoever will first read it will help

5815:

I have restarted the dykadminbot so it no longer needs a human to manually update. However I need someone familiar with the process to verify the bot's contributions and tell me that they are correct. Further details are at

558:

From the school, anyway (did you post the message to me from home?). We need to know what the IP address is ... maybe we can soften the block to let you edit from the school. What does the message say from the school IP?

821:

thanks. I really tried above and beyond to steer him in the right direction. His company might even meet the notability guidelines for inclusion if he's only stopped for a while and read some of the links he was given.

9309:

anything about that? if he does get back on i can find him some nice, safe grunt work to do on wiki, that will keep him out of trouble. ...it's probably also a good idea to encourage him to choose a harder password.

5455:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 5232:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 5158:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 5084:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 4969:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 4892:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 4789:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 4309:. If you no longer want to recieve these notifications, remove your name from my list. If you would like to be notified about future unblock requests from this user, remove this template from your page. Thank you, 10070:

I think his birth in an internment camp is a necessary part of the hook to show why his story is unusual and inspirational. If you could take a second look at this, I'd appreciate it. 20:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

1086:

Thanks. I was just mentioning that as the message was erased no one really could engage them in dialogue about their user name. Anyhow, It's sorted regardless due to your continued vigilance, so cheers anyhow :)

9560:

Ah, thanks for clearing things up. I had always wondered why people had that userbox. I suspect the "X users have been blocked indefinitely for vandalizing this user's page" userbox would be far more effective.

7655: 6636:"Tripfag" is a typical 4chan slang term. (It means someone who uses a secondary ID system that's built into the software that 4chan uses.) This account is probably part of 4chan users' preparations for 4chan 2790:

This page has been deleted. The deletion log for the page is provided below for reference. * 13:20, 8 October 2008 Daniel Case (Talk | contribs) deleted "SIDS and Kids Foundation" ‎ (G11: Blatant advertising)

7788: 6501: 7273:, etc. I think that's great as not enough people do this helpful task, but I thought I'd let you know that you're not really supposed to subst: the whois or the sharedip templates (c.f. the documentation for 6017:. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Knowledge policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted. 5737: 3179:

Add sender to Contacts To: xxxxxxxxxxxx@yahoo.com Any of the photos in the gallery on our website are public domain and can be used. We just ask for photo credit and our website listed, if possible. Marieta

6901:

is brand new and is still being worked on, but the progress is steady and already over 100 articles are under it. Having two administrators as members already has helped! Hope to collaborate with you in the

10061:

In reviewing the proposed hook for Wakabayashi, you noted: "Everything good, except he wasn't born in the camp." Actually, he was born in the camp. His family lived in Vancouver and was relocated to the

8350:

Since you weighed in on the image issue (which they fixed by removing the two extra album covers) I thought I'd double check with you that all your concerns had been addressed before passing this as a GA.

6387:

Look at the amount he is editing for a show that is not even from his country. People who receive first-hand information and could not update gets blocked instead. I must applaude your lack of foresight.

5740:

does not seem to have any "featured" mark. Now, I can't read the language, just guess from the layout, so I (and thus my bot) might be wrong. Can you tell me why you thought this article to be featured?

4207:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

8118:

similar to the issue here. People use contractions in their writing to make it more readable, but it isn't a formal way of writing. Interesting. They are good articles though, I never disputed that:p --

7538: 4716:). Granting these are pretty standard for username changes, but I wanted to get your take on whether we should request a promise to not edit in the relevant COI area before unblocking. Happy Holidays, - 10634:

It also has the unusual distinction of being a river that drains into a creek, due to being impounded shortly before the Rondout confluence into a small body of water called Sturgeon Pool near Rifton,

9154:

is "Duty of a (married) woman", which is same as pativrata. "a philosophy of living in the world without really being part of it," is same as being detached as well as having a married worldly life. --

8567:) still had the page requested for merging. This has been done previously for other esports-related pages that were requested to be merged with other esports pages but have all been previously denied. 6532: 7505:

that doesn't leave so much junk on the nominations page (partly just to be tidier, partly to reduce the page's byte count and, hopefully, its load time). The new template is complete and located at

6372: 4889: 4843: 2598:

Well, I thought a professional photographer wouldn't put out something so grainy. The burden is on both of you to provide a link to a copyrighted version of the image before I calm down about this.

10374:

Nevermind, it appears it showed up on the Notice Board for Edit War. I was still wondering how to direct both editors to a neutral space if they seem unable to come to a compromise? Thanks again,

8328:

Daniel -- Sorry about my oversight on the Beth Wymer talk page. I had gotten into the habit of doing that diligently, but have overlooked it in the past couple weeks. I appreciate the reminder.

2746:

When I lived on Long Island I traveled up that side a lot, but now I've gotten eastofhudsoniaphobia. It's a darn shame, and an even worse neologism. I think it's because the toll is eastbound.--

2570:

I remember seeing those pics in news channels. Is it possible for anyone to get the image of a terrorist with a curfew imposed. unless he's a professional photographer working for a news chaneel.

2099: 3447:

spam report. The username is nearly 2 years old and to my knowledge has never been reported. I was rather unsure whether to leave a personal note to the user first or report straightaway to UAA.

6384:

and you did not block him. The actress in the show was criticised as quoted from the reference given. He changed the word to "praised" instead. You mean he is allowed to do such things instead?

5333:. I'd be fine with removing the autoblock only, but I'd suggest leaving the range block (which is anon only). It's a small range, so I'd also keep an eye on Yikai123. Thanks for the note. - 4808:

When did emails become ok? RE "Howard AT grc411 DOT com". If so, they need to prove the address is theirs, otherwise they could be using someone elses. I'm not so sure I agree with this policy.

3615:] but was said by another user to be commiting a vandalism. I'm not trying to say that he's a bad person or anything but I just think that perhaps he should cut the newbies a little more slack. 6269:

Please note that I have deleted this RFC as it was not certified by another user within 48 hours of its creation. If you require any of the content I will userfy it for you for a limited time.

3134:

There's no problem. I'll remove the photo. Both the article and the photo were written by a brand new editor, which is why we are scrambling around here. I think the DYK issues are solved.

15: 10143: 9625:

Hi, Dan. I just wanted to let you know that I unblocked that account solely for the purpose of allowing them to create a new account since I think the user is acting in good faith. I would

3511:

Hmm, that makes sense. On a different note, I hope the ice storm wasn't too bad where you are. The only reason I have power is because of a generator, but eventually we'll run out of gas... –

6962:

doesn't like "passed away" for whatever reason? I tried to find something about it in the various manuals but didn't see anything. Figured an admin would be the right person to ask. Thanks.

6248:

that was totally unrelated to the drama. After you blocked me for complaining about his irrelevant article, he sheepishly went to delete it again. Dude, you have sided with the wrong guy.

4838: 1488:, which would make the parent/child issue moot in that case. The bridge county cats seem fine as cats-- I'm just not sure we should duplicate. Anyway, I will look forward to your views. 4134:

Hi, Roobit posted another block review, and as I'm not entirely comfortable with admins unilaterally blocking others indefinitely for stuff like that, I've posted a request for review at

3897: 2068:

is, so if we can't fix it maybe a better solution would just be to remove the signature part from the template and sign messages manually when using the template (as you've been doing). —

9220:

Hello, Daniel Case. May I please ask for your help? Could you please move DYK Parc naturel régional d'Armorique from queue number 4 to any later queue at your choice and use this image

6060:

This user has done nothing but slandering and defaming me, even after he was blocked. This shows the user is unrepentant, and deserves more than 3 hours of blocking. Can we change that?

236:

Thanks for your help getting this throught the DYK nominations. It was my first try and I don't think it would have succeeded without you. Thanks again.--] (]) 19:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

229:

Thanks for your help getting this throught the DYK nominations. It was my first try and I don't think it would have succeeded without you. Thanks again.--] (]) 19:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

6695:

I've posted my DYK under January 10th. Please tell me if I've done anything wrong. The Icos article is at 4x, and stretching, as the Manufacturing section shows. Thanks for your help!

6614:"Revolutionary Road". I don't know how to correct the article, and under "discussion" it said you might be able to help. I would appreciate it if you could do so. thanks, Pat Hathaway 10806:

gemstones (and their rough versions) any more... From July 2008 until December 2008 all my link additions (to my own, educational and non-profit website) were not regarded as spam!!!

9124:

Thanks for the links, the criterion is "main aspects", not comprehensiveness. Any way the GAR is already started. So I think let it be open. A GAR will improve the article further. --

5582: 9576: 4036: 3375:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2895:

17:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) ...what, exactly, am I supposed to have done differently (for the worse) since people tried (and failed miserably) to do this a couple of months ago?

9629:

do an end run around a fellow admin over something like this, but I thought this was a special circumstance. I hope I haven't breached any etiquette and you should know that you

9593:

No, It's the url is from a blacklisted site so it doesn't allow me to post, Below he speedy tag I have provided a google search that shows the site. I'll provide it like this www

7411: 6527:, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Knowledge and the other Wikimedia projects (see the 6041:

Thanks for reviewing the Holocaust related article at the above link. I stopped by T:TDYK last night before work to do it, and you had beaten me to the punch. :-) Thanks again. --

4465: 7828:

If you feel that any particular material within the original posted article was more advertising than information, please remove this rather than the entire article in question.

5982: 1138:. That's the second one I've seen in short order. They were both web servers in data centers (almost certainly with compromised admin panel access) being used as open proxies. -- 9575:

If people are immature enough to vandalize this site they will probably see that template as a "medal of honour". Could you take a look at this blatant copy vio while I'm here?

3546: 7108:-washing of some sort, when I found out that most of the images he uploads are copyvio ones, masquerading as pictures that he took and uploaded to his account. Oh, and I think 5756:

Thanks for your reply. Might have been "demoted" as well. I just asked to make sure there is no obvious mark I missed (and thus to fix my bot in case there was). Thanks a lot.

3371:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1536:

Since we presently have only two Bridges in X county cats (Ulster and Orange), and one Rivers of X county cat (Ulster), now would be a real good time to settle both issues. --

1000: 10852:

May seem a lame excuse but I didnt know when I gave the message that you were an admin (just a very active user) but when I found out I was unable to remove the said message.

10800: 9920: 9899: 3225:

Wow! I just saw it on the Main Page. Thank you all for your efforts. I am tickled pink! You folks really know how to snap into action. You should be in charge of the planet.--

1453: 7745:, but that I.P. was blocked because he corrected a mistake. I highly suggest you try to apoligise to that I.P. for wrongfully blocking him... This was just my suggestion...-- 4014: 6210: 3608:

good faith. And reposting the same unblock request three times without getting one of them reviewed is disruptive as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC)"

1237: 5246: 4328:

This user seems to understand that his previous edits weren't in line with policy. I'm leaning toward unblocking him provided he changes his username--what do you think?

351:

Tigeroo cites Knowledge rules to corrupt the spirit of these rules ,I have tried really..really hard earlier as well to reason with him ...see but to no avail .<br>

2699:, I was curious if you ever got one of it when the Women in Black were protesting. I don't think they're notable in and of themselves, but probably warrant a mention at 1742:

said to me, "what part of do not modify don't you understand" and accused me of "promoting blp violations" (even though the note I placed was done on the instructions of

10754: 8225: 5872:). Since getting the `bit in 2007, I have only had to deal with autoblocks on a couple of occasions, so please forgive my lack of clue. I followed the instructions at 4855: 3017:

automatically block the underlying IP address. Usually there's no need to ask the blocking admin first in these sorts of cases, but I appreciate the heads-up. Cheers,

1200:

poor command of adult English. But they're almost all detrimental, and I'm not keen on trying to sort through them while he's actively engaged in vandalising the pages.

797: 791: 194: 144: 8304:

Congrats. Thanks for sharing the honors. It's a nice article. I like how the place provides a counter-example to the standard interior design plans of octagonalisto

4423:

because of all the dead space, then I shrunk the image in the artcle to default. The sign is larger as default in the crop than it was in at 300px with the dead space.

4135: 7542: 6415: 6292: 6119: 6080: 6065: 10810:

IMAGES IS WORTH BEING LINKED AT WIKIPEDIA: Tugtupite, Jeremejevite, Benitoite and added some data to Red Beryl. What else can I do to reach a worldwide whitelisting?

8453:. Heh, that's true. It would be nice if the bot knew it was having trouble though...at the least it would help if it didn't reset the clock if something went wrong. 7484: 5853: 1387: 8854:

Hi there if you are an Administrator here on Knowledge. Will you have this IP Address blocked? 92.2.124.124 21:10. The reason is for the vandalism on this article.

3069:

Good work, but we should probably remove that as well due to the problems with the term "dirty". Hawaii's dirtiest beaches are listed by the NRDC (see for example

1348: 1266:

Thanks for your response, I take it from what you are saying, its fine for a corporation to edit an article about itself as long as that edit is non controversial?

9955: 7731: 6897:

I have noticed you like to work on Capital District related articles too. I was wondering if you would like to join the newly formed Capital District wikiproject.

5452: 5406: 5326: 3336: 1812:

insults and/or rants from lunatics to stand, as if they need to be responded to on an equal footing with thoughtful objections, makes Knowledge a less noble place"

10392:

Thanks so much for the guidance. I'm not trying to be an Admin or step into a dispute, but learning how things work is always a good thing I think. Thanks again!

1473: 9019: 5358: 3348: 2356: 10880:

I mean there was no problem here on wiki but the filter on the collage network I edit from blocked access to parts of here so I couldnt (its now been resolved)

6403: 4022:

Could you check whether the link I added re: Trinity Church in the history section is correct? I'm not clear whether the link should be to the village or city.

1781:

easy to interpret policy, again and again. It was not a mistake Nightscream linked to the blp violation, it is Nightscream's on-going disagreeing on blp policy.

10750: 8494: 7737:

Even though the I.P. in the title's block expired in December, I believe it was wrongful. The user of that I.P. was using a computer that shared the I.P. in a

7059:; it actually goes through the town twice, once leaving Albany, because Menands is village WITHIN the town of Colonie and then leaving Menands it goes through 5315: 4932: 1611: 9173:

Through her married life, "dutifully serving her husband" she keeps his pativrata. Through her devotion to Vithoba, virata. Through her verses, we know it. --

8003:

Thanks for the info box, which is nice. But more important (for me, anyway, going forward) thanks for pointing out the cultural bias, which is a good lesson.

7444: 7426: 8888:

tag with the rationale that the article was at AfD. I assume you realise that articles can be speedied regardless of whether they are at AfD or not? Thanks,

6608: 5934: 5724: 5578: 3364:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1281: 3360:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 10842: 10822: 9510: 9465: 6009: 6002: 4849: 4091: 1171: 1114: 10912:

Thanks for your help getting this throught the DYK nominations. It was my first try and I don't think it would have succeeded without you. Thanks again.--

6114:

Thank you for your fine work over the years, in blocking vandals and helping new users getting used to Knowledge. I thank you for your hard work, Daniel!

2716:

Have you really? I should start looking more closely at your edit history to see where else you've taken pictures and make sure I'm not in any of them!--

10656: 10433: 9938:

As you may suspect, am somewhat obsessed with topic. Thanks again for new source. Dunno as of now, how to get photo. Be thrilled if you added one. Thanks

9908:

My bot was deleted even before i would of had a chance anyways,Would you know why this happened and what i can do to prevent that from happen next time.

7537:

parameter, since there seems to have been confusion in the past about the difference between these two); there is more discussion of the new template at

6833: 5401: 4518: 2348: 2319: 1367: 1241: 789: 1442: 10904: 8859: 6623: 5619: 2867: 2391: 2377: 2030: 440: 10689:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 10542:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 10466:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 10244:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 9988:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 8905:

Fair enough, after all you are an admin, and it is quite up to you whether you wish to decline it or not. You're probably right. Thanks for replying,

8869: 8736:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 8527:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 8280:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 8073:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 7975:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 7754: 6800:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 5893: 5506:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4640:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4073:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 4031: 2532:

Don't you think the terrorist Pics are you have added are copyrighted. How can the User on Flickr be trusted. Seems he has copied it from newspapers.

2383: 1913:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1424:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 1037:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 715:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 638:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 10048: 10006: 8540: 8522: 8242: 6752:

Yay. I am coming both days for the event and meet. My dad needed me to pair up with someone I knew. I asked him and he said he trusts you, so thanks!

6209:

Hello, Daniel Case. There is a new contest for U.S. and Canada roads that you may be interested in. To sign up or for more information, please visit

4255: 1670: 435: 430: 425: 410: 405: 7927:

complicated how i experienced our other interactions, and i thot it was relevant for a super-admin type promotion. I wish you good luck with that.

1721: 1694: 1057: 10599: 9669: 6377: 6262: 6241: 5930: 5923: 3247:

May I ask you to un block Chanakya. I have to talk to him about this missile, Sudharshan. And how to go about starting an article about it. Thanks

811: 678: 420: 415: 6940:

Daniel, you really are a great person. Both on and off wiki. A diligent article writer, good friend and great father. I really respect you. :)

6874:

umption that others had already reported this IP since I arrived near the end of its "reign of terror" and ended up jumping the gun and making an

6029: 5750: 775:

think he should be axed because he has been on since 1981! If you look at my userpage, you'll see that I have written a parody of his theme song!

10921: 10707: 10484: 9460: 7294: 6992: 6418: 6084: 5603: 5587: 4926: 4068: 4015: 3836: 3788: 3392: 3234: 860: 743:

Neither are acceptable responses especially the reply to you (as an uninvolved admin who is only helping out after a request for help was made).

156: 93: 10956:

Tigeroo cites Knowledge rules to corrupt the spirit of these rules ,I have tried really..really hard earlier as well to reason with him ...see

10509: 8591: 8398:, based on his style of editing and the habitual flagging of non-minor edits as minor. His tone and writing style seems to be peculiar, too... 4597: 4570:

on DYK. Keep up the good work. P.S. I used to be the most prolific editor to DYK, so expect some stiff competition, I want that record back :)

3044:

You originally did the A-assessment; can you take a look and see if this downgrade seems reasonable? (I admit it, I want my A back.) Thanks -

1662: 887: 31: 28: 10758: 8417:

The bot thinks it just updated from queue 4 (it's reset the clock and given out credits for queue 4), but it hasn't updated the DYK template.

6649: 3380: 1820:

it just like WP:BLP and WP:TALk says, I inform every body like User Verbal and Someguy1221 about why, I even said to the IP editor why it was.

10336: 10129: 9602: 9580: 9562: 9546: 8899: 7025: 6528: 5347: 3948: 3582: 3561: 3541: 3523: 1032: 801: 733: 278:

Need your intervention with restraining User Tigeroo who has again begun wholesale deletions of referenced content with citations .<br>

10560: 10410:

Actually it's a play on my first / last name and what you mentioned. My name is Eric Stevens, so it follows ] and a play on 'even steven'.

9657: 9203: 9179: 9160: 9116: 7417:

original old version of that page was more popular, but unfortunately wrong scientifically - a plague of many Wiki articles. Best regards.

7073: 7020: 6978: 6963: 6761: 6453: 6318:

questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!

5994: 5972: 4873: 3444: 3397: 3208:

P.S. I was very, explicit on the public domain issue. I wanted to be sure. I know how important this issue is to Wiki. I was very clear. --

2967: 2687: 2467: 2452: 2437: 2397: 1868: 1775: 1477: 908: 902: 568: 505:

I am useing this account from a school computer. The Ip adress is blocked, but my account is not. The Ip adress of miami dade is blocked.

400: 72: 9867:

Thanks for Natl' Reg source. I just added a little stuff. Probably will work more on it with what you provided. Is becoming disorganized.

8808:

Thanks. I'll do the edits later. You might to look at the talk page. There is a discussion there regarding the relevance of listing MPSs.

6278: 2740: 2710: 2607: 10744: 10312:

Look closer - I'm obviously not blocked, but my IP address at home is, due to an admin accidentally blocking me (look at the block log).

9053: 9031: 8993: 8955: 8916: 8703: 8484: 8462: 8441: 7773: 7093: 7060: 7052: 6704: 6690: 6310: 2769: 2753: 2723: 1459: 1225: 7104:

It depends, unless if he gives us sufficient proof that he's not Gerald; I suspected him as a sock since he did what appears to be some

6227: 5977:

I have read the explanation you posted on my talk page. I still disagree with your analysis of this case and have asked for a review on

5915: 5373: 4577: 4384: 3888:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! 3693: 3670: 933: 9377:

That was quite the tangent haha. Anyway, the hook you provided (unless it was a joke?) doesn't exactly have a real reference, does it?

8754: 8407: 8186: 8150: 8127: 7606: 7258: 6295: 6204: 5765: 5549: 5301: 4861: 3970: 3734: 3440: 3157: 3143: 2909: 2873: 2052: 1506: 1469: 1331: 1159: 591: 547: 529: 10033: 7311: 6235: 4666: 4534: 4500: 3415: 2612:

It's dark and useing a flash will significantly increase your chance of being shot. Grainy is kinda inevitable under those conditions.

2451:

Deleted the hoax article? It seems to be still up. Unless you were talking about something else? Thanks again for the help with this.

767:

The reason why I chose the username "I Hate Pat, I Hate Pat, I Hate Pat And His Stupid Old Cat" was because yet another new series of

10423: 10405: 10387: 10116: 7649: 7572: 6818: 6767: 6712: 6199: 6175: 5607: 5558: 5418: 4603: 1419: 948: 8317: 6828:

I'VE SERVED MY CONSEQUENCE AND I WON'T SCREW WITH YOU GUYS. REALLY. PLEASE TAKE THE BLOCK OFF OF MY PAGE IF THAT'S COOL WITH YOU. --

5464: 5241: 5167: 5093: 4978: 4901: 4798: 4505:

Funny, when I posted that list, I had similar thoughts in that it reflected hard work and dedication but also reflected a subset of

3755: 2641: 2631: 2616: 1361: 1275: 1261: 10933:

Need your intervention with restraining User Tigeroo who has again begun wholesale deletions of referenced content with citations .

10206: 9983: 9663: 9429: 9391: 9221: 8817: 8789: 8695: 8091: 7936: 7493: 6726: 6495: 6314: 6263: 6171: 5636: 5598: 5389: 3164:

The Algalita photo is public domain. I have emails to prove it. I have been exchanging correspondence with them. Here is an except.

2593: 2565: 2140:

Hey, don't sweat, I was initially convinced he was just a clueless good-faith editor at first too. No need for feeling terrible!

1544: 976: 6911: 6283: 6035: 4586:

I see what you mean about the variety of stars you get. My collection is pretty varied too, but I have duplicates. If these was a

4318: 3772: 3635: 3566:

That would be great if you could upload those. It would make an excellent addition to the ice storm article, and probably for the

3070: 673: 9751: 9610: 9588: 9570: 9215: 8828:

Could you re-check the "Another idea" post you made? I support it, but I have another suggestion... <smiles mischievously: -->

8298: 8040: 7900: 6746: 5273: 5248: 4950: 4542: 4272: 3989: 3709: 2937: 2810: 2637:

cleanup that can be done is limited and the images come from when the news agencies were still trying to rush stuff out the door.

2521: 2144: 2127: 1989: 1316: 1100: 868: 861: 855: 152: 89: 6664:

is it more flexible? I can get Icos to 4x within an hour or two, but 5x will take at least another day. Is this enough? Thanks!

5524: 1931: 1499: 656: 10905: 10893: 10267: 10182: 9297: 9234: 7884: 7725: 7251: 6986: 6898: 6645: 5395: 5172: 5098: 5024: 4909: 4832: 4729: 4427: 4408:

paragraph or two). Once I rearranged the violations, I staggered the left over images to avoid stacking (as best as possible).

3505: 3480: 2460: 9642: 7612: 6737:

Hey there. I was wondering if you were coming. If you are, would you like to pair up with me on the competition? Would be fun!

5956: 4879: 1673:

which is now blocked and even if you unblocked him still he will not changed and still he will stil put fannish statements on

10094: 9477: 9414: 8247: 7872: 7710: 7167: 7158:

do? In running an analysis of ruwiki I found that these two bots are collectively responsible for 10% of ruwiki's content.

6587: 6313:. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's 5869: 5348: 5195: 5121: 5047: 4938: 4752: 4122: 3328: 3312: 3290: 3261: 3256: 1447: 954: 10279: 9142: 9130: 9079: 7338: 5591: 4867: 4676: 2843: 1619: 10617: 9554: 9368: 7121: 6892: 6887: 6615: 6568: 6395: 5733: 5469: 4249: 3954: 1759: 1689: 1231: 122: 9950: 9876: 9539: 9197:

jealous of the attention Bahinabai receives." In Hinduism, when a being is venerated as a sint (s)he is always a saint. --

7394: 7382: 6837: 6362: 6330: 4155:

I would second that. I wholeheartedly disagree with this ban and I have made my reasons clear on the Admin' noticeboards.

3618:

As to the personal attacks, I am a little confused as to what that might mean, what I wrote on Kira's userpage was merely

2023: 1382: 1305: 10684: 10461: 9716: 9711: 8658: 8602: 8426: 8385: 8169: 7851: 7832: 7140: 6146: 6050: 6025: 5545: 4966: 4956: 4920: 4510: 4413: 4404: 4009: 3276: 2802: 1876: 1342: 1179: 1126: 833: 601: 126: 10449: 10368: 10227: 9971: 9802:

i seem to have gotten into 2 different edit wars at the same time, neither one intentionally, & both rather stupid.

8719: 8561:

page from deletion. I was over-aggressive but still had the deletion call nullified. However, the user that opposed me (

8359: 7840: 6717:

I appealed a temporary block and you decline my appeal. Your rationale makes sense to me and I accept your judgement.

6673: 5692: 5674: 2084: 1743: 1244:

account. What is WP policy on reverting edits made by this editor?, should all edits made by this user be reverted? See

10718: 10348: 10173: 10011: 9720: 9396: 8802: 8510: 8263: 8056: 7958: 6783: 6732: 6489: 5790:

some time ago, and I can place these headlines on the talk page for usage. If you're interested or not, let me know! —

5719: 5412: 4944: 4096: 3627: 3592: 3578: 3557: 3537: 3519: 3501: 2984: 2486: 883: 9262: 9012: 8974: 8936: 8678: 7993: 6257: 5016: 3217: 3203: 1824: 1817: 1735: 10211: 10177: 10089: 10024:

and I have dealt with the basic points you made regarding the article. By way, thanks for making this review happen.

8855: 8844: 8220: 8014: 7643: 7231: 6948: 6641: 6438: 5630: 3820: 3666: 3460: 3372: 2293: 2267: 2228: 2040: 1747: 1655: 1556:& the other admister punished me.Im being good now. Pleese make owen sanders stop picking on me.Im scared of him. 1080: 174: 111: 10869: 10828: 10672: 10629:

Hello, I've translated this article into the German WP but I ad problems in understanding in the following passage:

10525: 7809: 7583: 6069: 3026: 2328:

Just added an external reference; do you want to review it? BTW, I'll be going now, so I'll reply later. :) Cheers.

1750:), was clearly uncivil, and could've been worded more politely. If you agree, could you address the matter? Thanks. 1699:

If you could comment on this ASAP so we could get him unblocked (depending on your input) you'd be my hero. Cheers,

10970: 10651: 9703: 9534: 8587: 8380: 8010: 7703: 7661: 7263:

Hi Daniel, I was going through the IPs listed at AIV just now and noticed that you'd tagged a few blocked IPs with

7227: 7131:

That's really strange that another account got clobbered. Anyway, I unblocked it. Thanks for letting me know. --

6602: 6580: 6223: 6123: 5570: 5565: 4488: 4266: 4225: 2931: 2782: 2584: 2546: 1209: 995: 756: 710: 10302: 10155: 9789: 9070: 7371: 6507: 4691: 4566:

I've come across quite a few horrendous road articles in AFD lately, so I'm was very pleasantly surprised to find

4481: 4164: 3923: 3746:

which is printing up some interesting manifesto. I unwound the change, but I'm still seeing it displayed. Help?

2475: 2445: 2425: 2299:

Reply: Yes, it is a hook which no-one reviewed, which is the primary reason I bring it to your attention. Cheers.

1827:

the whole thing w/o an edit summary. WP:BLP is very very clear, burden of proof for sources is on people that add

1183: 514: 10321: 9680: 9620: 9402: 8215: 7601: 7567: 7539:

Knowledge talk:Did you know/Archive 39#New template for nominations--please provide feedback if you have a moment

6823: 6345: 6131: 5940: 5921: 5827: 5577:

Category:Former churches is for "Churches that no longer exist and buildings formerly used as churches." As such

4660: 4454: 4238: 4193: 3995: 3487: 3129: 3081: 2502: 2078: 828: 9332: 9318: 8233:

Just wanted to remind you that our events at the Met Museum and the Brooklyn Museum are this weekend. Thanks.--

8111: 7920: 6576:

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

4724: 3721: 1565: 1144: 10729: 10537: 9924: 9903: 9471: 8631: 8032: 7488: 7305: 7244: 7237: 7178: 7015: 6860: 6676:(I also posted this message on Dravecky's talk page, but he doesn't seem to be online now; he's not answering) 6628: 6300: 5847: 5342: 5189: 5115: 5041: 4915: 4827: 4746: 4713: 4509:. Between feeding the DYK admin bot beast and striving to make it onto or improve our standing in the many DYK 4355: 4335: 3943: 3729: 3434: 3352:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 493: 10950: 10945: 10940: 9449: 7865: 7525:

also works). It is used in almost the exact same way as the current template (the only difference being that

7406: 6971: 3800: 3655: 3600:

May you accept my humble apologies, but first... Thank you for taking the trouble to review my call for help.

3365: 1326: 10352: 10106: 10095: 9725: 9282: 9061: 9000: 8962: 8875: 8648: 8337: 8226: 8173: 7880: 7873: 7680: 6994: 6865: 6637: 6541: 5817: 3918: 3868: 3242: 2700: 2561:

I've seen them both floating around the media yes and the flickr streams show no evidence of self authorship.

2106: 1995: 1964: 875:

created a while ago. I try to keep it updated, but if possible, could you add the ones that I miss? Thanks, –

163: 100: 9363: 8927:

The bot hasn't updated in a day. If you're around, can you update the template? It's due for an update now.

8035: 5442: 10795: 10780: 10504: 10355:. Both seem in good standing and a few of the reverted edits for IPv6 seem legit. Thanks for your thoughts 10342: 10063: 9765:

I know you're very much into the topic and would like help in what ever form, improving recent creation of

8781: 8545:

Hello. I've been representing the esports industry on Knowledge for quite some time now. I was a member of

8451: 8342: 7742: 7696: 6520: 6195: 6187: 6167: 5660: 5613: 4378: 4244: 3686: 3120:

I'm not sure why you declined the DYK when I explained the alternate above it. Did you read what I wrote?

1729: 1600: 1596: 1096: 1076: 489: 9405:. Please let me know if there's anything else you'd like me to take a look at. Thanks for your review! 8776: 8625: 5805: 5430: 4296: 4149: 2961: 2555: 1610:

OK I see what you mean. It seems though someone has dealt with it but I'll keep it in mind in the future.

10847: 9854: 9838: 9824:

i know it seems trivial, but try asking someone from latin america for their opinion of the subject. lol

9692: 8731: 8663: 8412: 7334: 7145: 7081: 6306: 6034: 5648: 3884:

and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a

2978: 2372: 2189: 2058: 2011: 1716: 1650: 1463: 1280: 1062: 834: 9737: 9501: 8823: 5219: 5145: 5071: 4776: 4459: 4284: 4103:

making it so? My apologies if not, and thanks for doing the Admin thing either way. :) All the best.

3189:

Re: Kamilo Beach Friday, December 5, 2008 12:29 PM From: "Marieta Francis" <marieta@algalita.org: -->

3178:

Re: Kamilo Beach Friday, December 5, 2008 12:30 PM From: "Marieta Francis" <marieta@algalita.org: -->

3053: 2949: 10690: 10613: 10543: 10494:

Yes, long time no see! Well, that's not true, I have seen you around. Congrats on adminship, as well.

10467: 10245: 10044: 10029: 9989: 9922: 9901: 9522: 9256: 8737: 8528: 8403: 8281: 8074: 7976: 7942: 7782: 7685: 7469: 7126: 7117: 6801: 6654: 6559: 5801: 5726: 5507: 5436: 5330: 4641: 4074: 3816: 3190:

Add sender to Contacts To: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@yahoo.com Yes, the photos on our website are public domain.

2358: 1914: 1425: 1038: 716: 639: 9489: 9040:

Credits finished; you can clear the queue. Also, can you quickly fix the double "that"s and "..."s in

7191: 6916: 6459: 5207: 5133: 5059: 4764: 4216:}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ 1816:

violations, it should just get deleted, this is a mean angry person trying to disrupt Knowledge. So I

1531:

cats, similar to the Actors/Academy-Award-Actors situation, like Toll Bridges, and Suspension Bridges.

893:

Hey there Julian, thanks for the tip! Not that it was directed at me, but I already updated it. ;)--

9932: 9862: 9843:

thanks, i think both problems have been resolved, to some degree anyway. i certainly hope they have.

8652: 8562: 7509: 6795: 5903: 5863: 5654: 4983: 4635: 3430: 3008: 2878: 2430: 1615: 1605: 1366: 981: 7579: 3723: 2729:

Fair enough. However, you definitely roam up and down I-87 and Route 9W a lot. I try not to cross

2436:

adding themselves into a list elsewhere. Completely asinine. If you could help that would be great.

1524: 8922: 8196: 7205: 7163: 6619: 6399: 5571: 5555: 5424: 4400: 4290: 3230: 3213: 3199: 3022: 2996: 2955: 2064: 738: 8450:

The bot cleared queue 4. It truly thought it had done its job. You can see what was at queue 4 at

6524: 4420: 3603:

I would like to comment and in some parts apologize on the reason of you not wanting to unban me

10565: 10135: 10087: 9946: 9918: 9897: 9872: 9785: 9454: 9343:

out of the process a better editor for sure. Look forward to bumping into you around the wiki! ~

8068: 7998: 7855: 7836: 7814: 7316: 7196: 7099: 6274: 6191: 6183: 6163: 5697: 5665:

after my warnings but before any other edits? Don't you think he deserves a chance to "get it"?

5642: 5539: 4595: 4575: 4506: 4351: 3842: 3270: 2816: 2806: 2696: 2480: 2330: 2301: 2275: 2249: 2210: 1378: 1175: 1120: 500: 118: 10165:

Good to hear you were appointed to oversight, congratulations! Best of luck with the new tool, –

2160: 1373:

Actually, Sargent's dead, but I'm certain the intent of the name was to use his anyway. Thanks.

10829:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/Talk:Spam_blacklist#Realgems.org_-_a_useful_website_for_Wiki_users.3F

10622: 10332: 10317: 10169: 10123: 10110: 9495: 9303: 8371:

JzG has punted. Do you want to make the unblock decision? You're the last admin who commented.

7330: 7036: 6424: 5990: 5968: 5952: 5715: 5213: 5139: 5065: 4770: 4697: 4278: 3832: 3631: 3574: 3553: 3533: 3515: 3497: 3473: 3466: 3455: 3252: 2943: 2850: 2826: 2403: 2155: 1808: 1700: 1634: 1271: 1257: 1132: 879: 816: 808: 10665: 10518: 10442: 10220: 9964: 9733: 8712: 8503: 8256: 8049: 7951: 6776: 6444:

Thanks! its part of a quiet featured topic that's waiting on NY 28A and NY 28B to be complete.

5899:

Hello Kralizec! I happened to see this request. If you are willing to lift the autoblock, hit

5782:! Do you plan to continue working on the article beyond the "Plot" section or not? I set up 5478: 4612: 4045: 2043:) who is apparently an enthusiastic fan but does not have a handle on our fair use policies. 1885: 1629:

Heya. I'm thinking of unblocking, but of course I'll ask you to support/raise concerns first.

1396: 1317:

http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/readability1.4.py?page=The_National_Conference_Center

1009: 687: 610: 10966: 10917: 10791: 10776: 10677: 10609: 10530: 10454: 10232: 10160: 10040: 10025: 9976: 9686: 9653: 9638: 9445: 9387: 9245: 8863: 8724: 8515: 8399: 8364: 8275: 8268: 8061: 7963: 7905: 7845: 7136: 7113: 6956: 6788: 5624: 5494: 5448: 5225: 5151: 5077: 4962: 4885: 4803: 4782: 4687: 4628: 4302: 4160: 4061: 3812: 3715: 3420: 2365: 2244: 2034: 1901: 1863: 1771: 1755: 1412: 1340:, bylaws will be decided on-wiki with a deadline of 2 weeks to complete the process. Please 1295: 1165: 1106: 1025: 763:

Have you not read the reply I posted on my talk page to the question you asked me last month?

703: 626: 468: 170: 107: 66: 8202: 7454: 1196:

It's possible that some of his edits could be perceived as being within AGF, albeit with an

917: 10926: 10740: 10725: 10703: 10594: 10582: 10556: 10480: 10296: 10272: 10262: 10101:

Hi, since you're an active admin, could you make inter links for two words in the hook for

10074: 9774: 9707: 9483: 9370: 9357: 9267: 9049: 9027: 9008: 8989: 8970: 8951: 8932: 8841: 8782: 8619: 8583: 8480: 8458: 8437: 8422: 8395: 8376: 8323: 8005: 7861: 7769: 7750: 7674: 7637: 7628: 7440: 7422: 7365: 7343: 7222: 7089: 7069: 7044: 7001: 6907: 6883: 6700: 6686: 6669: 6483: 6475: 6391: 6358: 6253: 6220: 6159: 6046: 5911: 5859: 5501: 5460: 5320: 5309: 5291: 5237: 5201: 5163: 5127: 5089: 5053: 4974: 4897: 4794: 4758: 4567: 4448: 4314: 4306: 4260: 3939: 3058: 3040: 2925: 2822: 2798: 2766: 2750: 2737: 2720: 2707: 2578: 2540: 1561: 1337: 1221: 1205: 972: 898: 851: 477: 9729: 6977:

It just seemed like a very odd thing for someone to be so concerned about. Thanks though.

8: 10838: 10818: 10647: 10603:

article. I'm not asking for you to get directly involved but to check, now and then, the

10202: 10068: 10002: 9770: 9674: 8836: 8305: 8211: 8182: 8146: 8123: 8107: 8096: 7159: 7084:

and see if you have any suggestions or editing you can do to make it flow better. Thanks!

6429:

I literally just saw it. :) - Thanks, that's been a need for a while. Any luck on NY 28A?

6412: 6289: 6115: 6076: 6061: 5889: 5873: 5810: 5761: 5746: 5680: 5004: 4671: 4390: 4332: 4127: 4087: 3640: 3226: 3209: 3195: 3153: 3139: 3125: 3077: 3018: 3002: 2890: 2671: 2048: 2019: 1936: 1927: 1908: 1679: 1310: 1300: 729: 669: 652: 633: 587: 543: 510: 10771:

You're welcome. It's a good article. Are you involved with the Troy historic district?

7479:

Hi,thank you for explaining to me why my ip add cannot be unblocked.Thanks again!Cheers,

1491:

BTW, am I the only one driven crazy by the Bridges-in/Rivers-of difference? Cheers! --

10577:, which was somewhat inept due to a gerenal lack of sources. Another Knowledge editor, 10415: 10397: 10379: 10360: 10083: 9942: 9911: 9890: 9868: 9781: 9530: 8759: 8750: 8356: 8294: 8087: 8029: 7989: 7896: 7721: 7519: 7480: 7467: 7402: 7388: 7155: 7009: 6814: 6598: 6326: 6055: 5841: 5771: 5688: 5670: 5535: 5520: 5229: 5183: 5155: 5109: 5081: 5035: 4786: 4740: 4707: 4591: 4571: 4347: 4323: 4204: 4113:

I see it is 31 hours. Forgot to check the log. I should sleep now. Thanks again! :)

3881: 3796: 3778: 3402: 3266: 2914: 2421: 1630: 1550: 1374: 944: 929: 7432: 6551: 2014:) the non-stop copyvio machine is at it again and isn't going to stop any time soon. 10712: 10585:), has changed music genres in the Infobox based on an ultimately unreliable source, 10328: 10313: 10307: 10239: 10193: 10166: 10151: 9766: 9759: 9425: 9410: 9239: 8981: 8813: 8798: 8691: 8674: 8644: 8557:

earlier this year. Part of representing the esports community involved defending the

8313: 7932: 7916: 7350: 7287: 7056: 7040: 6381: 6352: 6245: 6090: 5986: 5964: 5948: 5877: 5778: 5711: 5529: 5385: 5369: 5338: 4587: 4514: 4361: 4118: 4108: 4027: 3928: 3913: 3863: 3828: 3805: 3660: 3651: 3571: 3550: 3530: 3512: 3494: 3449: 3298: 3248: 3031: 2990: 1661:

Its better not to unblock him/her because he keeps on making new accounts aside from

1570: 1541: 1496: 1267: 1253: 1245: 1142: 876: 826: 805: 752: 10351:

and I was wondering what should be done in the case of an edit war between IPv6 and

6547: 6075:

Thank you for explaining. I will be on the lookout for anything not kosher. Thanks!

5254: 289:

Here are three specific instances in one single day from the same article <br>

10962: 10913: 10787: 10772: 10017: 9850: 9834: 9810: 9649: 9634: 9606: 9584: 9566: 9550: 9441: 9378: 9328: 9314: 9198: 9174: 9155: 9137: 9125: 9111: 9074: 8882: 8238: 8019: 7802: 7132: 7048: 6842: 6722: 6142: 5881: 5832:

It is fairly critical that one of these four double check the bot before 01:00 UTC.

5259: 4820: 4721: 4683: 4525: 4492: 4472: 4372: 4156: 4005: 3980: 3961: 3751: 3700: 3677: 3411: 3357: 2623: 2599: 2512: 2493: 2185: 2089: 1982: 1957: 1858: 1767: 1751: 1739: 1624: 1592: 1436: 1357: 1290: 1151: 1092: 1072: 1067:

Just FYI. The user blanked their talk page to erase your notice, which I reverted.

991: 560: 521: 485: 16: 7695:

There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing

7000:

Hey, the above user is requesting an unblock. You stated that they are a sock of

2389:

Thanks for accepting my request, I've already awarded him the barnstar. I am done.

1941:

Since you work UAA a lot, just making sure you know that Bots must be approved by

10887: 10863: 10736: 10721: 10699: 10590: 10578: 10573:

Hey Daniel! I've been recently editing the article of Brazilian heavy metal band

10552: 10489: 10476: 10285: 10257: 10136: 10055: 9794: 9747: 9699: 9435: 9346: 9293: 9278: 9045: 9023: 9004: 8985: 8966: 8947: 8928: 8909: 8892: 8608: 8572: 8476: 8454: 8433: 8418: 8372: 8333: 7765: 7746: 7689: 7436: 7418: 7360: 7172: 7151: 7109: 7085: 7065: 6982: 6967: 6941: 6903: 6879: 6696: 6682: 6665: 6555: 6249: 6215: 6042: 6021: 5907: 5456: 5233: 5159: 5085: 4970: 4893: 4790: 4437: 4310: 4213: 3935: 3893: 3784: 3388: 2972: 2920: 2763: 2747: 2734: 2717: 2704: 2703:. If you didn't, I'm going to see if I can get a shot before the war runs out.-- 2571: 2533: 2471: 2456: 2441: 2005: 1557: 1484:

Actually, in the case of rivers, I think the county cats are probably a bad idea

1217: 1201: 968: 894: 847: 800:

has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at

8177:

now, I definitely would taken 9 the whole way. Well see you around the pages! --

7578:

Oops, sorry...the old examples are bad, since I have made a change since then.

5447:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 5224:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 5150:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 5076:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 4961:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 4884:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 4781:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 4464:

You now are the number 1 participant in the DYK suggestion page as indicated at

4301:, has requested to be unblocked, and your username is listed on my notification 2787:

hi Daniel. My daughter contributed an article for this topic, which you removed

10834: 10814: 10643: 10623: 10198: 10021: 9998: 9881: 9337: 9230: 9103: 8943: 8829: 8772: 8206: 8178: 8142: 8119: 8103: 7789:

Knowledge:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight elections/February 2009

7621: 7587: 7553: 7501:

I've been working, somewhat at Gatoclass's behest, to develop a new version of

7474: 7277: 7267: 6014: 5885: 5797: 5757: 5742: 5304:. The inscription is in the description information. Happy Festivus, Dan. -- 5000: 4651: 4340: 4329: 4229: 4217: 4184: 4170: 4083: 3743: 3361: 3324: 3308: 3286: 3149: 3135: 3121: 3073: 3036: 2883: 2795:

can't check :-( Is there any place to discuss how to bring it back correctly?

2759: 2667: 2141: 2103: 2102:. As the unblock was so recent, I thought it prudent to give you a heads-up. 2069: 2044: 2015: 1923: 1804: 1793: 1785: 1674: 1053: 725: 665: 648: 7702:

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at

7543:

Knowledge talk:Did you know/Archive 39#Working on a better nomination template

6848: 6579:

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at

5983:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Block_review_of_User:Trollmann

5947:

until evidence shows something else. Could you consider unblocking this user?

4702:

Hi Daniel. Long time, no see. I'm coming regarding an unblock request made by

4551: 2662: 450: 10497: 10419: 10401: 10383: 10364: 9526: 9107: 8746: 8391: 8365: 8352: 8290: 8083: 8026: 7985: 7888: 7717: 7458: 7398: 7187: 7005: 6810: 6630: 6594: 6322: 5978: 5944: 5884:. If you have any suggestions, I would really appreciate the help! Thanks, 5836: 5783: 5684: 5666: 5516: 5178: 5104: 5030: 4735: 4703: 4142: 3792: 3761: 3567: 3426: 3049: 2417: 2123: 2095: 1942: 1666: 1249: 940: 925: 842: 381: 6878:

of myself. :| I will make sure I follow all the steps next time. Regards,

4000:

Hi. Please check once again due to changed reference as complained. Cheers.

3739: 3091: 1796:. They do not use sources, when they do it is stuff they publish themselves. 454: 47: 10766: 10604: 10147: 10075: 9421: 9406: 8809: 8794: 8687: 8670: 8637: 8596: 8344: 8309: 7928: 7912: 6829: 5381: 5365: 5334: 5282: 4992: 4114: 4104: 4023: 3906: 3874: 3856: 3766: 3646: 3353: 3100: 2919:

Hi! It looks like Mangojuice got to it first, and lifted the autoblock on

2896: 2730: 2527: 2371:

I just that I want to give him a barnstar for the great work he did at the

1800: 1789: 1537: 1492: 1320: 1187: 1139: 872: 823: 748: 583: 539: 506: 10935:

Here are three specific instances in one single day from the same article

9244:

Congrats on getting elected to oversight! I know you'll do a good job. :)

8849: 7397:: I plan to go through the article more throughly, hopefully remove them. 7385:: I plan to go through the article more throughly, hopefully remove them. 9846: 9830: 9420:

Thank you for your kind review. The article is better for the process.

9324: 9310: 9136:

covered in her an autobiographical work and verses, which are limited. --

9095: 8550: 8234: 7821: 7793: 7449: 6718: 6270: 6138: 5485: 4811: 4717: 4619: 4522: 4469: 4366: 4128: 4052: 4001: 3977: 3958: 3747: 3726: 3697: 3674: 3407: 2622:

news all night. So I have no idea what's been out there and what hasn't.

2509: 2490: 2181: 2116:

block, but I though it urgent, since he was continuing at the very time.

1973: 1948: 1892: 1577: 1510:

complete set of Bridges in X county cats, then the county cat assignment

1403: 1353: 1088: 1068: 1016: 987: 694: 481: 10054: 9827:

could use any suggestions for a way to resolve these without bloodshed?

9633:

have my support in any decision you make. Thanks for understanding. --

2098:

a couple of days ago, I regret to inform you he has been re-blocked per

456: 10882: 10858: 9743: 9289: 9274: 9110:. Please participate in the discussion to improve the article there. -- 8760: 8329: 7970: 7887:. Please feel free to contact me with questions or comments. Regards, — 5826:

P.S. This post is being cross posted to the 4 "active" users listed on

3384: 2001: 617: 9273:

of Cappy's death. If you could take a second look, I'd appreciate it.

10786:

historians. sometimes buildings in second-tier cities get forgotten.

9514: 9226: 9099: 9087: 9062: 8788:

Just wanted to let you know I created this page. Should I move it to

8768: 8554: 6468: 5792: 5552:. You might want to sit on that IP and play whac-a-mole for a bit. - 3885: 3877: 3342: 3319: 3303: 3281: 2638: 2613: 2562: 1048: 9073:

related to Bahinabai? I just could not understand your rationale. --

6099: 5354:

I'm looking at this and I figure it's more likely the better tag is

4517:, we set up a very drawing WikiProject. I'm close to making it onto 4176: 4136:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#block_of_User:Roobit

2657: 2273:

And yes, before you ask...it has been more than 6 hours. :D Cheers.

1315:

Daniel, here is the tool I mentioned at the meetup for readability:

9817: 9041: 7324:

Please give me the explanation, and I hope I will have the spirit!

7214:

1. Is that a correct summary of the events that have occurred? and

7182: 6681:

expansion I hope to get it nominated for something (GA, A, or FA).

5707: 4139: 3547:

December_2008_ice_storm_of_New_England_and_Upstate_New_York#Gallery

3045: 2118: 452: 10188: 6925: 2849:

Was there evidence of the user being a Sockpuppet from CheckUser?

1474:

WT:WikiProject_Rivers#Category:Rivers_of_Ulster_County.2C_New_York

10957: 10574: 10566: 9091: 8546: 7678:

the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around

7112:

is more likely to be a GG sock, based on his use of minor edits.

2238: 2205: 2199: 2171: 2161: 1191: 10735:

Thanks - wpuld be helpful to put that on the article talk page.

2758:

Indeed. And hopefully on Saturday we'll have the only image of

2176:

are used as face paint in Australia, and to help heal wounds in

10102: 9518: 7105: 7051:, in reality it goes through Maplewood right after Watervliet, 7032: 4200: 10749:

This has been heavily re-edited, could you now reasses please

5599:

User_talk:Carlaude#Former_churches_vs._former_church_buildings

2879:

It's something that can be perhaps revisited after the voting.

457: 10589:

Now, I've had a nasty run-in with this editor and his friend

9806: 2485:

Hi Daniel. It doesn't seem clear which of the three hooks of

7254:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

6538:

We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography

3957:; the nomination is ready for you to review. Thank you. -- 3848: 3483:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

2364:

Hello, could you please unprotect the page talk of the user

10636:

and what reaches the Rondout from there is the lesser flow.

9440:

Dan, you're the greatest. I'll check it out right now. --

8558: 6660: 5736:. Right now, my bot removed it, as the destination article 5489: 4623: 4056: 2177: 1896: 1407: 1020: 698: 621: 9805:

i'm having a fight with one user over the dab hatnotes on

8205:

again? I have addressed the issue you brought up. Thanks –

7709:

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our

7376: 6586:

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our

5329:

which just happens to be on the same range that I blocked

5292: 3740:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/71.167.94.63

10278:

talk page to make his proposals. What do you think about

4466:

By number of edits over 500 to Template talk:Did you know

3620:] . I can't see how this might be an attack of any sort. 1677:, its better not to unblock him anymore. Its my opinion! 777:

I Hate Pat, I Hate Pat, I Hate Pat And His Stupid Old Cat

9513:

please. His unblock justification appears valid in that

8961:

Another update is due (actually, an hour overdue). From

8495:

DYK for St. Andrew's Episcopal Church (Walden, New York)

7412:

Re: GA nomination of Crystallographic defects in diamond

6573:

adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.

5703: 3953:

Hello. I have posted a response to your DYK comments on

2881:

I don't think people will agree to have it SNOW-closed.

2666:

Happy Thanksgiving from a Pennsylvania wild turkey (and

9509:

Hello Daniel. Could you look at the unblock request at

9022:

needs to be protected. I can do credits if you'd like.

7638:

February 6-7, at the Met Museum and the Brooklyn Museum

802:

the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page

10801:

2,352 Gemstone Images not worth being added as a link?

9323:

thanks, i hope he makes good use of the second chance

8686:

Sounds good and thank you for such a quick response!

8553:

for quite some time before I switched over and joined

7035:/ village boundaries in the CD,- 32 doesnt go through 6519:

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to

6373:

Regarding your lack of foresight in banning ShabuShabu

5876:, but could not find this user in my search at either 4037:

DYK for St. Luke's Episcopal Church (Beacon, New York)

3064:

Kamilo Beach has been described as "Hawaii's dirtiest"

54: 10597:) in the past due to some editing on the now deleted 10254:

Thank you for all that you do to keep DYK running! --

7217:

2. Is that the normal way blocking is done / undone?

6858: 6852: 6759: 6753: 6744: 6738: 6451: 6445: 6436: 6430: 6213:. The contest begins Saturday at 00:00 UTC. Regards, 5579:

Category:Former church buildings in the United States

3692:

Hi Daniel. I fixed the referencing and hoook for the

1514:

be exhaustive, suggesting that duplicate cats should

1349:

comment on them before the process ends on December 1

8858:

that happened at this time 21:10, 13 February 2009.

7150:

Could you provide me with a summary version of what

5451: