526:. I for one have been uploading their images to Commons, and I assume Hafs' recent Fragonard image came from the same source. There are 25,000 such images and it raises a point I've made before - these high resolution are now two a penny (the Prado, the Rijks and many others are similar examples of museums now offering high resolution images, even Getty offers them). Are we really going to Feature them all? Does it really depend just on the personal whims of editors? What we really are in some need of here is attention to the same kinds of details regarding fidelity and scholarship we see amongst the photographers regarding technical issues. At the moment that's not happening.
373:
267:::::Regarding Adam's recent enthusiasm for the NGA high resolution pics, they've been out for more than a year now and were highly publicised at the time . I for one have been uploading their images to Commons, and I assume Hafs' recent Fragonard image came from the same source. There are 25,000 such images and it raises a point I've made before - these high resolution are now two a penny (the Prado, the Rijks and many others are similar examples of museums now offering high resolution images, even Getty offers them). Are we really going to Feature them all? Does it really depend on the personal whims
282:::::Regarding Adam's recent enthusiasm for the NGA high resolution pics, they've been out for more than a year now and were highly publicised at the time . I for one have been uploading their images to Commons, and I assume Hafs' recent Fragonard image came from the same source. There are 25,000 such images and it raises a point I've made before - these high resolution are now two a penny (the Prado, the Rijks and many others are similar examples of museums now offering high resolution images, even Getty offers them). Are we really going to Feature them all? Does it really depend
81:
358:
166:
216:
149:
161:
103:
41:
38:
73:
290:? What we really are in some need of here is attention to the same kinds of details regarding fidelity and scholarship we see amongst the photographers regarding technical issues. At the moment that's not happening. ] (]) 06:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
275:? What we really are in some need of here is attention to the same kinds of details regarding fidelity and scholarship we see amongst the photographers regarding technical issues. At the moment that's not happening. ] (]) 06:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
157:
99:
458:
Great painting, but there's issues with the reproduction - lots of artefacts, and, as it's a Yorck
Project scan, it's highly likely the colours are off. I'd like to see this painting featured, but we'll need a better photo.
258::::Probably wouldn't hurt, but I think Armbrust can figure it out. =) <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 10:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
251::::Probably wouldn't hurt, but I think Armbrust can figure it out. =) <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">''']''' <sup>(])</sup></span> 10:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
535:
449:
391:
593:
605:
518:
505:
480:
574:
557:
82:
25:
524:
523:
Regarding Adam's recent enthusiasm for the NGA high resolution pics, they've been out for more than a year now and were highly publicised at the time
625:
333:
472:
Just look at it: It's gorgeous, and the NGA wants them to be used. (And now you see why we don't tend to promote Yorck
Project copies at FPC)
415:
184:
121:
407:
365:
383:". You have to register, but the registration is free and easy. Methinks we will be seeing a lot of new images from this source...
173:
110:
620:
242:::Ace, brilliant - thank you, Adam! Do I need to change my above support to the NGA version? ] - ] 08:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
235:::Ace, brilliant - thank you, Adam! Do I need to change my above support to the NGA version? ] - ] 08:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
17:
211:
per https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Coat_of_Many_Colours&diff=621242067&oldid=621214453
531:
180:
117:
372:
527:
306:*Shame I can't find this on Google Art Project. — ] (]) 00:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
299:*Shame I can't find this on Google Art Project. — ] (]) 00:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
588:
498:
442:
570:
553:
76:
401:
Quality image with good E.V. - the colours are very near the original colours of the artwork
489:
Ace, brilliant - thank you, Adam! Do I need to change my above support to the NGA version?
8:
423:
322:*'''Support NGA version''', please! — ] (]) 07:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
315:*'''Support NGA version''', please! — ] (]) 07:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
583:
490:
434:
602:
513:
475:
462:
386:
380:
379:
Holy crap, the
National Gallery of Art has an "Open Access Images" project that are "
566:
549:
26:
614:
57:
357:
208:
510:
Probably wouldn't hurt, but I think
Armbrust can figure it out. =)
202:
139:
342:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
64:
548:Shame I can't find this on Google Art Project. —
612:
416:Knowledge:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
203:→Portrait of Mrs Richard Brinsley Sheridan
140:→Portrait of Mrs Richard Brinsley Sheridan
408:Mrs. Richard Brinsley Sheridan (painting)
366:Mrs. Richard Brinsley Sheridan (painting)
335:Portrait of Mrs Richard Brinsley Sheridan
626:Featured picture nominations/August 2014
371:
356:
14:
613:
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
404:Articles in which this image appears
329:Revision as of 20:09, 14 August 2014
158:Revision as of 20:09, 14 August 2014
100:Revision as of 06:35, 14 August 2014
90:
56:
381:free of charge for download and use
215:
198:
172:
155:
148:
135:
109:
97:
23:
470:Oppose original, support NGA copy.
331:
45:
637:
13:
1:
601:, thanks for digging it out.
327:
278:
263:
207:Rephrasing at the request of
621:Featured picture nominations
28:Browse history interactively
7:
606:14:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
594:08:16, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
536:06:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
431:Support either as nominator
269:(and erm...niche interests)
10:
642:
575:07:00, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
558:00:14, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
519:10:30, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
506:08:41, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
481:06:43, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
467:17:35, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
450:10:31, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
412:FP category for this image
392:06:57, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
273:Talk page badge collectors
200:
137:
286:on the personal whims of
226:
223:
154:
96:
95:
394:
369:
368:done by a grand master
346:Voting period ends on
580:Support, for NGA copy
375:
360:
528:Coat of Many Colours
175:Coat of Many Colours
112:Coat of Many Colours
563:Support NGA version
424:Thomas Gainsborough
395:
370:
170:
107:
354:
326:
156:
98:
78:
633:
599:Support NGA copy
517:
503:
495:
494:
479:
466:
447:
439:
438:
390:
345:
343:
213:
212:
206:
193:
188:
169:
164:
146:
145:
143:
130:
125:
106:
79:
70:
69:
67:
62:
60:
52:
49:
31:
29:
641:
640:
636:
635:
634:
632:
631:
630:
611:
610:
511:
499:
492:
491:
473:
460:
443:
436:
435:
384:
344:
341:
338:
323:
316:
307:
300:
291:
289:
285:
276:
274:
270:
259:
252:
243:
236:
219:
214:
201:
199:
197:
196:
195:
191:
178:
176:
171:
165:
160:
152:
150:← Previous edit
147:
138:
136:
134:
133:
132:
128:
115:
113:
108:
102:
94:
93:
92:
91:
89:
88:
87:
86:
85:
84:
75:
71:
65:
63:
58:
55:
53:
50:
48:Content deleted
47:
44:
39:← Previous edit
36:
35:
34:
27:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
639:
629:
628:
623:
609:
608:
596:
577:
560:
545:
544:
543:
542:
541:
540:
539:
538:
484:
483:
452:
427:
426:
421:
418:
413:
410:
405:
402:
399:
364:– Portrait of
352:10:31:11 (UTC)
340:
337:
332:
330:
325:
324:
321:
319:
317:
314:
312:
309:
308:
305:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
292:
287:
283:
281:
279:
277:
272:
268:
266:
264:
261:
260:
257:
255:
253:
250:
248:
245:
244:
241:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
228:
225:
221:
220:
190:
189:
174:
153:
127:
126:
111:
80:
74:
72:
54:
46:
37:
33:
32:
24:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
638:
627:
624:
622:
619:
618:
616:
607:
604:
600:
597:
595:
592:
591:
587:
586:
585:Fylbecatulous
581:
578:
576:
572:
568:
564:
561:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
537:
533:
529:
525:
522:
521:
520:
516:
515:
509:
508:
507:
504:
502:
496:
493:SagaciousPhil
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
477:
471:
468:
465:
464:
457:
453:
451:
448:
446:
440:
437:SagaciousPhil
432:
429:
428:
425:
422:
419:
417:
414:
411:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
396:
393:
389:
388:
382:
378:
374:
367:
363:
359:
355:
353:
349:
336:
328:
320:
318:
313:
311:
310:
304:
302:
297:
295:
294:
280:
265:
262:
256:
254:
249:
247:
246:
240:
238:
233:
231:
230:
222:
218:
210:
204:
186:
182:
177:
168:
163:
159:
151:
141:
123:
119:
114:
105:
101:
83:
68:
61:
51:Content added
43:
40:
30:
19:
603:Brandmeister
598:
589:
584:
579:
565:, please! —
562:
514:Adam Cuerden
512:
500:
476:Adam Cuerden
474:
469:
463:Adam Cuerden
461:
455:
454:
444:
430:
387:Adam Cuerden
385:
376:
361:
351:
348:17 Aug 2014
347:
339:
334:
567:Crisco 1492
550:Crisco 1492
217:Next edit →
209:User:drmies
42:Next edit →
615:Categories
144:NGA images
377:NGA copy
362:Original
227:Line 13:
224:Line 13:
185:contribs
122:contribs
66:Wikitext
420:Creator
288:editors
456:Oppose
398:Reason
77:Inline
59:Visual
194:edits
192:2,884
131:edits
129:2,884
16:<
590:talk
571:talk
554:talk
532:talk
501:Chat
445:Chat
284:just
181:talk
167:undo
162:edit
118:talk
104:edit
582:.
350:at
271:of
617::
573:)
556:)
534:)
497:-
441:-
433:–
205::
183:|
142::
120:|
569:(
552:(
530:(
187:)
179:(
124:)
116:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
