397:'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You've been asked to take said edits to the talk page, and discuss them. Surely that isn't difficult to do. Please do so,''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>] 14:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
377:] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].
346:] and ], if you have the time, I would appreciate your thoughts on my recent edits to ]. My carefully explained edits are being undone with unhelpful claims like "not an improvement", with no attempt being made by the reverters to justify their actions. Also, there is an absurd situation at ] in which people wish to mention a speech without explaining what it contained or why it might be important. Thank you very much. ] (]) 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
68:
295::Thanks. I'll be in touch if I run into problems and will endeavour to drop you a line before they really become problems. No worries about the v-word. I was upset that you described me as having been known by it, because it a) wasn't true, and b) could very easily encourage those who believe I was, or am, any such thing.
306::Wasn't holding my breath but I was very pleased to see one apology actually given. It's perpetually disappointing that people are free to slander me in as base a way as they please, and there is not an iota of community pressure for them to ever admit that they were wrong. ] (]) 21:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
283:
Hi, I'm glad you came back. And I'll ping {{U|Drmies}} again. Once more, I'm sorry for using the word "vandal". However, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for apologies from others if I were you, and please keep it dialled all the way down in the aspersions casting - and if possible ping me or Drmies
170:
60:
284:
when the reverting starts rather than carrying it so far. Or come to my talk page and kick me there. (For one thing one of us may be able to think of a different wording to fix the article.) ] (]) 16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
411:
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the
15:
153:
220:
90:
28:
412:
161:
69:
86:
165:
119:
123:
108:
97:
199:
188:
232:
177:
203:
195:
115:
104:
63:
8:
127:
184:
16:
44:
227:
146:
142:
51:
245:(186 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
216:
141:Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on
406:Latest revision as of 02:05, 1 January 2024
162:Latest revision as of 02:05, 1 January 2024
87:Revision as of 14:10, 30 December 2014
77:
43:
244:
225:
221:blank ancient IP talk page messages
215:
176:
159:
152:
139:
96:
84:
13:
408:
32:
425:
1:
404:
393:
384:
373:
362:
353:
342:
333:
322:
313:
302:
291:
279:
268:
259:
18:Browse history interactively
7:
10:
430:
400:
389:
380:
369:
358:
349:
338:
329:
318:
309:
298:
287:
275:
257:
252:
249:
158:
124:Pending changes reviewers
83:
120:Extended confirmed users
82:
366:== December 2014 ==
263:{{Blanked IP talk}}
200:IP block exemptions
174:
94:
403:
160:
85:
65:
421:
272:==Welcome back==
239:
238:
235:
223:
218:
210:
192:
173:
168:
150:
134:
112:
93:
66:
57:
56:
54:
49:
47:
39:
36:
21:
19:
429:
428:
424:
423:
422:
420:
419:
418:
417:
398:
387:
378:
367:
356:
347:
336:
327:
326:==Problems...==
316:
307:
296:
285:
273:
264:
240:
236:
231:
226:
224:
219:
214:
213:
212:
208:
206:
182:
180:
175:
169:
164:
156:
154:← Previous edit
151:
140:
138:
137:
136:
132:
130:
102:
100:
95:
89:
81:
80:
79:
78:
76:
75:
74:
73:
72:
71:
62:
58:
52:
50:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:Content deleted
34:
31:
29:← Previous edit
26:
25:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
427:
409:
407:
402:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
390:
388:
385:
382:
381:
379:
376:
374:
371:
370:
368:
365:
363:
360:
359:
357:
354:
351:
350:
348:
345:
343:
340:
339:
337:
334:
331:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
319:
317:
314:
311:
310:
308:
305:
303:
300:
299:
297:
294:
292:
289:
288:
286:
282:
280:
277:
276:
274:
271:
269:
266:
265:
262:
260:
258:
255:
254:
251:
247:
246:
242:
241:
207:
204:Administrators
194:
193:
178:
157:
131:
114:
113:
98:
67:
61:
59:
41:
33:
27:
23:
22:
14:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
426:
416:
414:
405:
395:
392:
386:
383:
375:
372:
364:
361:
355:
352:
344:
341:
335:
332:
324:
321:
315:
312:
304:
301:
293:
290:
281:
278:
270:
267:
261:
256:
248:
243:
234:
229:
222:
205:
201:
197:
196:Autopatrolled
190:
186:
181:
172:
167:
163:
155:
148:
144:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:Autopatrolled
110:
106:
101:
99:MelbourneStar
92:
88:
70:
55:
48:
38:Content added
30:
20:
413:page history
410:
143:Paul Keating
128:Rollbackers
209:2,404,391
237:Replaced
189:contribs
109:contribs
53:Wikitext
253:Line 1:
250:Line 1:
179:BD2412
133:82,976
64:Inline
46:Visual
211:edits
135:edits
228:Tags
185:talk
171:undo
166:edit
105:talk
91:edit
233:AWB
145:. (
415:.
230::
202:,
198:,
187:|
147:TW
126:,
122:,
118:,
107:|
217:m
191:)
183:(
149:)
111:)
103:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.