Knowledge

User talk:200.83.101.225: Difference between revisions

Source 📝

294:'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''You've been asked to take said edits to the talk page, and discuss them. Surely that isn't difficult to do. Please do so,''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —]<font color="#FF9F00">☆</font>] 14:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 274:] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. 245:] and ], if you have the time, I would appreciate your thoughts on my recent edits to ]. My carefully explained edits are being undone with unhelpful claims like "not an improvement", with no attempt being made by the reverters to justify their actions. Also, there is an absurd situation at ] in which people wish to mention a speech without explaining what it contained or why it might be important. Thank you very much. ] (]) 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 238:] and ], if you have the time, I would appreciate your thoughts on my recent edits to ]. My carefully explained edits are being undone with unhelpful claims like "not an improvement", with no attempt being made by the reverters to justify their actions. Also, there is an absurd situation at ] in which people wish to mention a speech without explaining what it contained or why it might be important. Thank you very much. ] (]) 14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 71: 316:
again. Once more, I'm sorry for using the word "vandal". However, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for apologies from others if I were you, and please keep it dialled all the way down in the aspersions casting - and if possible ping me or Drmies when the reverting starts rather than carrying it so
332:
Thanks. I'll be in touch if I run into problems and will endeavour to drop you a line before they really become problems. No worries about the v-word. I was upset that you described me as having been known by it, because it a) wasn't true, and b) could very easily encourage those who believe I
336:
Wasn't holding my breath but I was very pleased to see one apology actually given. It's perpetually disappointing that people are free to slander me in as base a way as they please, and there is not an iota of community pressure for them to ever admit that they were wrong.
173: 63: 368:. My carefully explained edits are being undone with unhelpful claims like "not an improvement", with no attempt being made by the reverters to justify their actions. Also, there is an absurd situation at 15: 207: 156: 168: 93: 180: 31: 28: 346: 317:
far. Or come to my talk page and kick me there. (For one thing one of us may be able to think of a different wording to fix the article.)
72: 164: 89: 372:
in which people wish to mention a speech without explaining what it contained or why it might be important. Thank you very much.
373: 365: 338: 122: 196: 126: 111: 381: 326: 100: 187: 200: 118: 107: 322: 66: 307: 8: 352: 130: 361: 318: 16: 364:, if you have the time, I would appreciate your thoughts on my recent edits to 47: 369: 149: 145: 357: 313: 54: 203:) rm unhelpful attack with dishonest edit summary 144:Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on 312:Hi, I'm glad you came back. And I'll ping 303:Revision as of 14:11, 30 December 2014 165:Revision as of 14:11, 30 December 2014 90:Revision as of 14:10, 30 December 2014 366:Motifs in the James Bond film series 80: 46: 206: 193: 179: 162: 155: 142: 99: 87: 13: 305: 35: 392: 1: 382:14:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC) 347:21:51, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 327:16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC) 301: 290: 281: 270: 259: 250: 195:Undid revision 640240489 by 18:Browse history interactively 7: 333:was, or am, any such thing. 10: 397: 297: 286: 277: 266: 255: 217: 214: 161: 127:Pending changes reviewers 86: 377: 342: 123:Extended confirmed users 85: 263:== December 2014 == 177: 97: 300: 163: 88: 68: 388: 362:User:Yngvadottir 204: 191: 176: 171: 153: 137: 115: 96: 69: 60: 59: 57: 52: 50: 42: 39: 21: 19: 396: 395: 391: 390: 389: 387: 386: 385: 355: 310: 295: 284: 275: 264: 253: 246: 239: 230: 225: 210: 205: 194: 192: 185: 183: 178: 172: 167: 159: 157:← Previous edit 154: 143: 141: 140: 139: 135: 133: 105: 103: 98: 92: 84: 83: 82: 81: 79: 78: 77: 76: 75: 74: 65: 61: 55: 53: 48: 45: 43: 40: 38:Content deleted 37: 34: 29:← Previous edit 26: 25: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 394: 374:200.83.101.225 354: 351: 350: 349: 339:200.83.101.225 334: 309: 306: 304: 299: 298: 296: 293: 291: 288: 287: 285: 282: 279: 278: 276: 273: 271: 268: 267: 265: 262: 260: 257: 256: 254: 251: 248: 247: 244: 242: 240: 237: 235: 232: 231: 228: 226: 223: 220: 219: 216: 212: 211: 182:200.83.101.225 181: 160: 134: 117: 116: 101: 70: 64: 62: 44: 36: 27: 23: 22: 14: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 393: 384: 383: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 359: 348: 344: 340: 335: 331: 330: 329: 328: 324: 320: 315: 302: 292: 289: 283: 280: 272: 269: 261: 258: 252: 249: 243: 241: 236: 234: 233: 229: 227: 224: 222: 221: 213: 209: 202: 198: 197:MelbourneStar 189: 184: 175: 170: 166: 158: 151: 147: 132: 128: 124: 120: 119:Autopatrolled 113: 109: 104: 102:MelbourneStar 95: 91: 73: 58: 51: 41:Content added 33: 30: 20: 370:Paul Keating 356: 311: 308:Welcome back 146:Paul Keating 358:User:Drmies 353:Problems... 319:Yngvadottir 208:Next edit → 131:Rollbackers 32:Next edit → 112:contribs 56:Wikitext 218:Line 7: 215:Line 7: 314:Drmies 136:82,975 67:Inline 49:Visual 138:edits 378:talk 360:and 343:talk 323:talk 201:talk 188:talk 174:undo 169:edit 108:talk 94:edit 148:. ( 380:) 345:) 325:) 150:TW 129:, 125:, 121:, 110:| 376:( 341:( 321:( 199:( 190:) 186:( 152:) 114:) 106:(

Index

Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Next edit →
Visual
Wikitext

Revision as of 14:10, 30 December 2014
edit
MelbourneStar
talk
contribs
Autopatrolled
Extended confirmed users
Pending changes reviewers
Rollbackers
Paul Keating
TW
← Previous edit
Revision as of 14:11, 30 December 2014
edit
undo
200.83.101.225
talk
MelbourneStar
talk
Next edit →
Drmies
Yngvadottir
talk
16:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.