Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Featured log/October 2010: Difference between revisions

6600:. 'Accomplishments' section is written rather chaotically. The first paragraph says that a few players were selected by all three selectors and lists some of their other achievements. The second paragraph lists all players selected by all three selectors thus repeating information from the first paragraph. The third paragraph lists some other achievements of the selected players including players already mentioned in the first paragraph. I think that the entire section should rewritten. It should begin with the second paragraph. The first paragraph should be merged with the third (with information duplicating the second paragraph removed) and put after the second. The section should be written in an orderly fashion without jumping back and forth from one player to another (and back to the first). 10553:"Idaho Territory was created from Dakota Territory, Nebraska Territory, and Washington Territory on March 4, 1863. Initially, the territory included all of modern-day Idaho and Montana, and most of Wyoming. On May 26, 1864, Montana Territory was split from Idaho Territory, and most of the Wyoming portion was reassigned to Dakota Territory. The portion east of the 111th meridian was split off as part of the new Wyoming Territory on July 25, 1868, giving Idaho Territory its final borders." All of this is fairly well known among U.S. historians... but it still needs citing in this article. 7500: 85: 12550:

is shorter while the highlights is longer because the lead is supposed to summarize what's in the entire article. Also "For the first time in its history, a delegation from Finland concluded its participation at the Winter Olympics without taking home any gold medals. The Republic of China and the Philippines sent athletes to the Winter Olympics for the first time, but failed to win any medals" goes better into the highlights section.

11868:“He has according to the RIAA 17 million certified albums. Internationally, Adams has sold something in between 65 to a number close to 100 million records and singles worldwide.” → According to the RIAA, Adams’ album sales have been certified at 17 million copies while internationally he has sold between 65 and 100 million records and singles worldwide. (Change the footnote so it links to the actual page of the RIAA site.) 11788:(2002) Adams' was able to regain some of his lost audience in the US.” → Rewrite this. The first part (“In the beginning of the 2000s”) can be dropped, apostrophe after Adams is not needed, “United States” should be spelled out, and nothing prior to this sentence has suggested that Adams lost some of his audience in that country. 7176:"The 1993 All-American class featured 3 Major League Baseball All-Stars, one Major League Baseball record holder and 3 World Series champions. As of 2010 Jason Varitek remained active. A total of 8 players were selected by all three NCAA-sanctioned selectors:" numbers under ten are written out. Only issue I found. 167: 9324:

in tandem with Carroll - so bizarre that I don't mention it in this list, to avoid giving a fringe theory undue weight), a sex scandal and a mallard enthusiast. Not many images, I'm afraid, but only one or two more have possible images and it would be a waste of white space to add them to the side of

5927:

I have (hopefully) addressed the first point, adding something about the significance about being the opening day pitcher. Point two I feel would make the lead too tangential, though I could see if any won the Cy Young Award that year; I wouldn't go beyond that. Point four I think fits, since showing

11480:

The level 3, in section 1.4 should be amended of "Compilations" to "Compilation albums", so that they may use the links to "((Infobox Artist Discography))", also be placed if they are just compilations, greatest hits or other type, in the table, must be shown below the release information, label and

5855:

there is no indication of any "aftermath" of the choices; in other words yes, they were chosen, but how well did they do? were they chosen as MVPs for the season, or did they get any recognition for their status later in the season? Or the bet did not pay up for the team in the end? The only mention

5105:

until certain criteria are met. There is a huge break in timeline, you do not mention anything, except the names of "Unison" and "Celine Dion", and you don't even mention "Miracle", "One Heart" or "Taking Chances". This a Bias point of view, because your only giving notice to her accomplishments and

12549:

I like it much more now. But it still has a small issue with the lead. For example "Spanish Francisco Fernández Ochoa prevailed in the alpine skiing's men's slalom, thus becoming their country's first Winter Olympic champions" is in the lead but not in the highlights section. It is fine if the lead

12463:

Yes... another Olympics medal table. Surprisingly, before the expansion I didn't think I could produce such a large and comprehensive lead section for this medal table list. I'm quite content with the way this list developed. Well, you know the drill. Thanks in advance for all comments/suggestions!

6216:"Opening Day is when the first game of the new baseball season is played" this reads awkwardly to me. I agree it's important to specify what this means to us non-experts, but it would be slightly better if it was something like "The first game of the new baseball season is played on Opening Day..." 5793:

can somebody explain to me why do these articles exist here on wikipedia? This is such an in-universe article, with essentially zero outside relevance. It is a statistics (and in baseball the more statistics the better) that nobody outside of the sport sees any relevance. Let's make a comparison to

12044:

See, here's the thing, though. In the music business, albums and singles go together; each album usually spawns some number of singles. On this list, there's no way to connect each single with the album that it is from. There's just more elegance and usability in covering all of this on a single

10671:

All of those are referenced by the general references (primarily the NGA), just as the table is. If they were not, I would have sourced them specifically. Since some of them are used multiple times, that would require multiple identical footnotes. Is this a needed thing? I mean, you could say that

10250:

For those who took office but later resigned etc, why do you just have "resigned" rather than actually fill in the "Left office" column? The notes can handle the fact they resigned or whatever, surely? I get the fact that Hoyt never took office at all (so no start/end dates at all) but the others

5905:

winners of a certain year (i.e. if someone was the starting pitcher in 1967 and then won the Cy Young that year), but that should be incorporated into the table and is only a minor addition. Otherwise, if the reader wants to know more about a particular player's career, they can open that player's

12124:

Right, I realise this has dragged on but I'm glad the single and album discogs have been merged, it was silly to have them seperate IMO. On the videography, could it also be included. Two of the seven videos are already covered here under Live albums so I would question if the five albums and the

12053:

lists being used to present the same information for Adams. This isn't arbitrary, the FL criteria actually require using as few lists as possible with the "could not reasonably be included as part of a related article." clause. I'm not sure why you decided to split these in the first place—they

8243:

Thanks. You might want to put a note in the itemized list before the table saying that this column sorts by year (and not reference number which appears first). Is there any default ordering to this table? It appears rather random. I think it would make sense to have some kind of default order. I

6063:

An additional comment-- it might be better if the list explain what Opening Day is to those who aren't familiar with it. Maybe something towards the beginning of the lead, saying "Opening Day is the first game in a new baseball season", or something to the like in order to reign in confusion from

10494:

Ok Done. Check the notes created to see if they are alright and make sense. On a side note, it is always interesting to visit Special Collections at the University library. Today had a person researching how the Book of Mormon and Bible came from Egypt as part of a history of visiting aliens.

12021:

There are 20-albums in the list, and seeing that he is not retiring any time soon, more albums will probably be released... And as saidd previously, a discography is "The exact information included varies depending on the type and scope of the discography, but a discography entry for a specific

12000:

of a discography: "The exact information included varies depending on the type and scope of the discography, but a discography entry for a specific recording will often list such details as the names of the artists involved, the time and place of the recording, the title of the piece performed,

10346:

The small numbers by each party, indicating how many of each party have been governor. It's a needed distinction because some states don't count repeat governors, and sometimes we have to use an unofficial numbering (looking at you, Florida) to account for a discrepancy between official and the

6022:

I made that comment when nobody had yet commented on the AfD-- I figured if the article was deleted, then obviously it would be a problem for the list to attain FL status as it would no longer exist. No worries, I plan to carry out a review no matter what the current consensus was at that AfD.

12029:

all discography articles which don't seperate albums and singles discographies, that would be POV by my side and be unconstructive to WP:FL process. But for some weird reason, you, an administrator is doing this. Personal feelings aside, is there anything else that is wrong with this list?

6126:

Agreed– the list is about Opening Day starting pitchers but doesn't mention anywhere why being a pitcher on Opening Day is any more special than being a pitcher on any other day of the season. I'd probably put one or two sentences into the first paragraph of the lead about why its notable.

9325:

the table. I will try and find out the educational details of the current job-holder, who is probably not notable enough for an article (ironically because he's a professional archivist rather than a career academic, like his predecessors); otherwise, the list is complete. Enjoy, review!

12993:

Given that we have an image of a medal, is showing readers where Spain is located really all that useful? I seem to recall we've discussed the utility (or lack thereof) of these maps before, but I can't put my finger on where. (Perhaps around the Vancouver tables coming through here?)

11159:

LOL..So you oppose becasue of layout?? or because there split???.... is there any real reason you oppose besides your personal preferences.. like references, invalid content, grammar, etc... Perhaps you should make your decision on content and not just style...there are many styles out

5802:? So what if they are the MVP of the team in the first day of the season? What does this show? Starting pitchers in the payoff or the final would be fine lists, but this is just plain stupid. I will go ahead and AfD this, and do expect a ton of baseball fans to probably snowball it 7727:

That's fine. Not sure if coordinates for the map actually require sourcing for the map (not sure if there is precedent or how it would be done). Only thing I can suggest is a sentence stating coordinates come from the individual sites' UNESCO page. Not sure what you/others think.

5520:

The first seven albums didn't chart in any territory. Where's the reference that (a) they existed and (b) they were released when you say they were and in those particular formats? Same for first Live album. And first five compilation albums. And "Complete Best" and "Ultimate

13040:"For Canada, it was its weakest result in 36 years, when its athletes..." – Not keen on this phrasing, the three 'it's in the sentence are a bit clumsy, and the second is mostly redundant. Why not rephrase to "It was Canada's weakest result in 36 years, when their athletes..."? 12890:"in the case of Spain, it was its very first medal at this event." In an Olympic context, "event" usually means one specific competition, not one celebration of the Games, or-as used here-one season. This confusion between the usage of event continues in the next section. 12087:

A good compromise. I'll give you my typical citation and grammar nitpicking in the morning, but that should be all from me. (NB: Note that the size of Madonna's album discog is about twice what this one was, and only 8K smaller than Adams' entire discog before the split.)

10592:"the president pro tempore of the state senate is next in line, and then the speaker of the state house of representatives" Some capital letters and wikilinks to the actual bodies (I know we have articles somewhere for the House and the Senate of Idaho) would be good here. 9558:

in order to get the "location" parameter, at the expense of the issue number and column (which "cite news" doesn't support); but, frankly, the date and page are the important things required in order to be able to find the article, and they're kept. Thanks for your review.

10961:) 15:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC) their were in, i wasn't able to leave them alone. So i've done some work here and there. If this nomination is successful, i'll nominate his singles discography and videography lists to FL to. This is my second FL candidate, my first was 6349:"The first game of the new baseball season is played on Opening Day." Yes, but Opening Day varies depending on which team it is. The teams don't all start on the same day. The sentence should reflect this in some way; perhaps "of a team's new baseball season" would work? 11862:“However, it did not achieve any certifications in Canada nor the United Kingdom, but has sold over half-a-million units worldwide.” → Although it did not receive any certifications in Canada or the United Kingdom, the album sold over half-a-million units worldwide. 13059:"Hosting the Olympic Winter Games for the first time, Japan's record in this event consisted.." – 'event' for me means an individual sport, not the whole thing. Maybe replace it with "Japan's record in the games consisted.." (maybe capitalise Games, I'm not sure) 13097:"...thus becoming their country's first Winter Olympic champions." – Pretty sure that this is the wrong form of the possessive. They are two different countries, so I would recommend "...thus becoming their respective countries' first Winter Olympic champions." 13312:

It is unclear whether this second gold medal was (i) the second and last for Czechoslovakia at Sapporo games (ii) the second and last for Czechoslovakia in the figure skating overall (iii) the second and last for Czechoslovakia in Winter Olimpics. See also the

12792:"while Spanish Francisco Fernandez Ochoa prevailed...". I think a better form for this would be either "Spain's Francisco Fernandez Ochoa" or "Francisco Fernandez Ochoa of Spain". One of them would also work for the Polish ski jumper mentioned just before this. 5684:

I am nominating this for featured list because it meets all features list criteria. I thought I'd take a break from draft lists and look through some other ones when I saw that this list was already about 90% ready for FLC. I did the other 10% and here we are.

5799: 12505:

I agree it's on the edge—or past already—of becoming a long lead. I'll work on that. What do you think that second section should be actually called? "Highlights", "Notable wins"? I want to be as accurate as possible without introducing s POV on the title.

6615:

Thanks for the feedback. I think I made some changes to the 1992 list that I mirrored with this list. I have to go back and look at what I have done to all three. My internet access is a bit limited for the next few days because I am traveling on family

12673:

There are two ski jumping events according to the jumping distance: normal and large hill. Their distance has been steadily increased with the years. In 1972 a "normal hill" was a run length of 70 meters, while a "large hill" was 90 meters. Note added.

77: 11452:-What is the reason why the certification column in wikitable of albums is divided in two. being separated by regions?. Should be on a single meaning that certifications are global, and therefore there is no reason to separate ... for example see: 210: 150: 10017:

I agree with you in that I also prefer NGA/Bioguide refs. However, in the case of cabinet secretaries, I also like to add a ref to the to the Department they headed.... The Department being primary and NGA/Bioguide secondary in these cases.

4760: 4513: 4019: 10702:

Yep, the notes should be able to stand on their own-- the reader shouldn't need to go back and look at the table to find the references. I'd add them into the notes even if many of the references will be the same as they are in the table.

4553: 12690:"Karen Magnussen's silver in the figure skating's singles competition summed up Canada's weakest performance" I guess you mean "summed up" in the literal sense, but colloquially this would mean "was a symptom of", if you catch my drift. 4815: 4780: 4600: 4121: 4106: 4740: 3999: 4907: 4660: 12961:

That is a great suggestion, and I'm annoyed I didn't think of that earlier. That should fix the issue of finding lead images for Winter Games where there aren't medal images available. I will do that ASAP. Thanks for your support.

4473: 4453: 4388: 4226: 3979: 3894: 11196:

I thinks it's okay to break Adams' disography into two articles, although it could just as well be placed in one. Perhaps a poll could be taken and develop a "rule of thumb" to go by on future discographies (i.e. an artist like

4680: 3939: 13219:

In Sapporo, Yukio Kasaya (gold), Akitsugu Konno (silver), and Seiji Aochi (bronze) guaranteed a medal sweep for the host team in the ski jumping's normal hill (70 m) event, and gave Japan its first-ever gold medal at the Winter

9940:

should be wikilinked to somewhere in the article, maybe in the lead? I wanted to read about Idaho while I was browsing the list and realized at no point does the article link to the state's page until the infobox at the bottom.

5996: 5819: 8790:

Aye, because, as is typical with the Pakistan cricket team, their names are written in full on cricket scorecards, rather than providing initials, leaving me unsure whether they should be sorted by first or last name. (See

162: 107: 9792:

These are mostly about just the infobox and the list itself– prose isn't my strong suit so I'll let someone else take a look at the lead and the other paragraphs. From the quick glance I took at it, it's a nice list, well

10112:

a seat that he later won, I've omitted that as "resigned to take" since it wasn't a sure thing yet. But this is more sure than that. :P I mean, I guess I'm saying include it, I'm just justifying it out loud or something.

45: 42: 12520:

Not complaining but I predict that if I divide things as you suggest, the intro will become significantly shorter than the following section... but it's just a prediction, and I'm still trying to change the puzzle here.

10326:

I don't think so; we capitalize titles. Their title is probably Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives. It's not Speaker of the State House of Representatives, I figure. Could change 'state' to Idaho to fix this.

12633:

That might be a consequence of stacking the images. I do that because it doesn't mess with the section editing links, but on the other hand it messes up the page layout in different resolutions. Should I unstack them?

9308:. Only 380 years of history on this one, unlike the 550 years of the last one, but this project did once again require a brand-new main article, with several subsidiary articles for the archivists (including a GA for 8296:

In the "Sites by autonomous community" table, are the "shared sites" included in the "number of sites" or not. Looking at the Aragon entry apparently they are not, but maybe a footnote or sentence could explain that

12025:, just a for some reason biasly saying that is list can't become a FL because it's not the way you want it, there seems however, not be any other existing problems with the article. My point is, I have no right to 11671:

went on to sell 15 million units worldwide.” → The album went on to sell 15 million units worldwide (Here is where you can say “The album” as the previous sentence established which particular album we’re talking

13228:

I'm not going to add an explanation for what a medal or podium sweep is, so I replaced the expression with adequate prose with similar meaning. Also rephrased the whole sentence to make it look less intricate.

9051:

Rephrased to "has claimed more wickets in ODI matches", which hopefully make it clearer? Thanks for your eyes on this TonyTheTiger, as I said, I like to get some non-cricketing eyes for exactly these reasons!

6243:

In the key, last three, worthwhile making it clear, White Sox advanced..., White Sox were American League champions, White Sox were World Series Champions, because the table is about individuals, not the whole

158: 103: 12650:

Is that detail on the medal indicative of what it was won for (Margit Schumann and her luge?) If so, definitely worth a mention in the caption, especially if medals were cast dependent on the discipline.

11459:

To not make a huge gap between the writing in the title sections and its colums... (may be a bad explanation).. But its staying this way, the certification table does not need to be the same, and mustn't.

12943:. One think that I hope the editors would add is to create an world image with all the NOCs winning medals and also labeling those that did participate (instead of the bronze medal image). Something like 10107:

Should we include Gossett as having resigned to take a seat in the Senate? I mean, technically, he did it so that he would be appointed, rather than a sure thing... in the past, when someone resigned to

9375:"although the university's records pre-date this" so what? You haven't said that the Keeper was around from the foundation of the University so this isn't really surprising... or am I missing something? 5896:

To respond to your comments, I don't think the list should tell us about all the players' careers. The list notes exceptional circumstances in the lead, such as which pitchers were banned because of the

10212:"David W. Ballard had the longest term of almost four years" while the list says April 10, 1866 to July 1870, which is well over four years. Bennett also appears to have had a term of over four years. 6279: 6201: 12491:

I don't like the very long intro. I strongly suggest splitting it into a proper one (i.e. summarizing succinctly the medal table) and a separate section in the article on the "firsts" or notable wins.

12058:

split would be without any grounding in the same. (For the record, this list is only 27Kb long. Combined they would be right around 70 once combined into a single lede, well within size guidelines.)

12022:

recording will often list such details as the names of the artists involved, the time and place of the recording, the title of the piece performed, release dates, chart positions, and sales figures"

12564:

Addressed all your points except the one regarding the debuting NOCs, which I think belongs in the intro but cannot be developed much more than that so that it's mentioned again in the highlights.

11904:

What makes them rare? This needs to be explained are deleted. Why can’t the first album be added to the compilation section and the second under soundtracks? (This is where they are listed in the

10088:

Do we really need note 17? Constitutionally, the governor's term ended/began on January 2, 1905 (the second monday in January), regardless of when they actually took power. I say omit it entirely.

9425:

It was but isn't now. I'll see if I can find when the last election was; expanded the lead anyway with reference to the juicy wording of the 1634 statutes (which were rather rude about the locals!)

5702: 6375: 6017: 5676: 11469: 11337:"the charts in nine countries six-time platinum and five-time platinum in Canada and the United States respectively" poorly phrased, needs rephrasing, at the very least a comma after countries. 10799:

Idaho Territory had 16 territorial governors appointed from its organization in 1863 until the formation of the state of Idaho in 1890, who were appointed by the President of the United States.

5988: 5884: 12251: 12235: 12213: 12157: 5471:- lead needs overhaul, serious English-speaking copyedit required. Serious reference problems. Surprised and disappointed that two contributors support this in its current state I'm afraid. 29: 7573:

The map is very cramped. After a certain number of sites, Knowledge just can't really handle names on maps. Rather than have a map on Knowledge, why not link to Google or Bing? It worked for

11187: 12813:

Reference 9 doesn't need an English indication since that language is what we generally assume for external links. If it had been Japanese-language, then it would require such a disclaimer.

11987:

Discogs just work better and are more useful when they're on one page. Neither is all that long, so the information should be presented together, as currently written, this list fails 3b.

11437: 9477: 8617: 7967: 5176: 13192:

This is a convoluted sentence. I suggest something like "The Canada's result was the weakest in 36 years since 1936 Winter Olympics, when its athletes brought home a single silver medal".

12356: 12139: 12108: 12092: 12082: 12062: 12039: 7604:

Question. Where do the geocoordinates (for the map) come from and is it worth including them in the table. Also, I agree the map and names is a bit cluttered, maybe a key something along

11287:"and was not certified" then why mention it? Why not leave it until he did get a certified release, and then link "certified" to something appropriate about musical sales certification. 8223:

I'd prefer the "UNESCO data" column to sort after inscription year, which is more meaningful to the reader than the UNESCO reference number. (Never understood why this number appears in

7881: 11490: 11394:

No more. There's a lot to do here, and as I said, this needs a careful view from a native English speaker to reorganise the emphasis of a lot of clauses, check grammar, spelling etc.

11963: 11236: 7952: 7899: 12771: 11107: 10987: 9490: 9454: 7832: 7526: 7488: 6574: 8078:

Are there any remaining issues with sorting? I removed the colspan on the 4 sites in more than one community, leaving the Location column empty. I believe that resolved thos issues.

7081: 6970: 9215: 8671: 8583: 8547: 8168:

How does the last paragraph of the intro relate to "World Heritage Sites in Spain"? It seems to relate rather to "World Heritage Sites NOT in Spain". As for me, it could be removed.

6859: 6535: 6304: 6222:"Opening Day starts" is repeated several times in the third paragraph. Could you reword one or two of them, maybe "started Opening Day"? or "were Opening Day starting pitchers..."? 13328: 13310:

Two-time world figure skating champion Ondrej Nepela added the Olympic men's singles title to his career and guaranteed Czechoslovakia's second and last Winter Olympics gold medal.

13266: 13109: 13090: 12740: 12721: 12702: 12683: 7044: 7007: 6933: 6896: 6675: 12756: 12618: 12592:: Is "Highlights" appropriate for the section title? What do you think of "Highlights and notable contributions" or just "Notable contributions"? Or another completely different? 8651: 8636: 6816: 6177:. My concerns have been addressed and I feel that the changes have also addressed Nergaal's concerns above. As such, I feel that I can support at this time– well done, Wizardman. 13238: 13071: 12663: 12544: 12530: 9646: 9621: 8050: 7166: 7135: 7103: 13012: 12931: 12912: 12894: 12843: 12829: 9604: 9567: 8890: 7848: 7772: 7754: 7741: 7722: 7709: 7691: 7674: 7652: 7639: 7621: 7599: 7568: 7542: 7250: 7225: 7193: 5652: 5586: 5565: 5461: 5141: 5127: 5094: 12473: 12376: 12014: 10765: 9587: 8781: 8753: 7414: 6438: 11386: 11061: 10974: 10945: 9136: 9109: 9094: 8720: 8687: 8428: 7919:"Spain has had 42 total sites" I'd be happy with "Spain has 42 total sites" unless of course some have gone missing from the inscription, in which case this should be noted... 7586: 7274: 6780: 6748: 6725: 6693: 6643: 6610: 6420: 6397: 4997: 4750: 4503: 4256: 4009: 3768: 3533: 3296: 3059: 2818: 2577: 2338: 2095: 1852: 1605: 1358: 1111: 869: 647: 420: 13364: 13295: 13281: 13207: 13147: 13052: 12988: 12971: 12956: 12883: 12805: 12643: 12601: 12573: 12559: 12515: 12500: 12455: 8530: 8160: 8028: 7352: 6587: 6326: 5778: 5298: 12998: 12939:

was planning on staying out, but this list looks the way I would expect a FL to look. While I did not check MOS issues, I think other users did go through; so I am going to

12858: 12486: 11169: 10740: 10722: 10709: 10524: 10181: 9670: 9381:

Hmm, trying to think of a way to explain that the university had archives before 1634 but didn't have a "Keeper of the Archives" until then. Removed "although" - any better?

8847: 8820: 8805: 8736: 8387: 8133: 6183: 6121: 6081: 6070: 6058: 6029: 5007: 4857: 4810: 4790: 4610: 4563: 4543: 4363: 4316: 4296: 4266: 4116: 4069: 4049: 3869: 3822: 3804: 3776: 3634: 3589: 3569: 3399: 3354: 3334: 3306: 3162: 3117: 3097: 2925: 2878: 2858: 2828: 2682: 2635: 2615: 2441: 2396: 2376: 2202: 2155: 2135: 2105: 1959: 1912: 1892: 1862: 1712: 1665: 1645: 1615: 1465: 1418: 1398: 1368: 1218: 1171: 1151: 1121: 971: 924: 909: 879: 739: 702: 682: 512: 470: 450: 86: 12979:

You should probably remove the bronze entry and instead add the legend for the blue color. And it might be nice to keep the medal images, but at the bottom of the article.

10125: 10100: 10081: 9879: 9852: 9198: 9179: 9046: 9032: 9000: 8982: 8508: 6155: 6103: 5963: 5945: 5813: 10489: 10475: 10440: 6133: 5748: 5726: 5310: 5002: 4867: 4837: 4820: 4800: 4770: 4755: 4620: 4590: 4573: 4523: 4508: 4373: 4343: 4326: 4306: 4276: 4261: 4126: 4096: 4079: 4059: 4029: 4014: 3879: 3849: 3832: 3786: 3614: 3579: 3551: 3538: 3409: 3379: 3344: 3316: 3301: 3172: 3142: 3107: 3077: 3064: 2905: 2888: 2868: 2838: 2823: 2662: 2645: 2625: 2595: 2582: 2451: 2423: 2406: 2386: 2356: 2343: 2212: 2182: 2165: 2145: 2115: 2100: 1939: 1922: 1902: 1872: 1857: 1722: 1692: 1675: 1655: 1610: 1475: 1445: 1428: 1408: 1378: 1363: 1228: 1198: 1181: 1161: 1131: 1116: 981: 951: 934: 889: 874: 724: 692: 662: 652: 522: 492: 460: 435: 425: 13347: 13172: 13130: 11776:“… made a big impact on the European albums chart and sold two million copies there” → Cheesy: How big is “big”? Suggestion: State that it went platinum/double-platinum. 11403: 11254: 10866: 10681: 10661: 10642: 10623: 10504: 10421: 10402: 10383: 10356: 10336: 10316: 10285: 10263: 10243: 10060: 10046: 9947: 9929: 9910: 9896: 9833: 8371: 8350: 8309: 5918: 5828: 5443: 5267: 5252: 5202: 12198: 10583: 10454: 10145: 9961: 9440: 9363: 8914: 8330: 8086: 8070: 4977: 4862: 4847: 4795: 4730: 4615: 4568: 4548: 4533: 4483: 4368: 4353: 4321: 4301: 4286: 4236: 4074: 4054: 4039: 3989: 3874: 3859: 3827: 3809: 3748: 3624: 3594: 3574: 3513: 3404: 3389: 3359: 3339: 3276: 3167: 3152: 3122: 3102: 3087: 3041: 2930: 2915: 2883: 2863: 2848: 2800: 2687: 2672: 2640: 2620: 2605: 2557: 2446: 2401: 2381: 2366: 2320: 2207: 2192: 2160: 2140: 2125: 2075: 1964: 1949: 1917: 1897: 1882: 1832: 1717: 1702: 1670: 1650: 1635: 1585: 1470: 1455: 1423: 1403: 1388: 1338: 1223: 1208: 1176: 1156: 1141: 1091: 976: 961: 929: 914: 899: 849: 744: 707: 687: 672: 627: 517: 502: 475: 455: 405: 10604: 10224: 8238: 8216: 8180: 7466:

When sorting by period, "Prehistoric Rock-Art Sites in the Côa Valley and Siega Verde" and "Rock Art of the Mediterranean Basin on the Iberian Peninsula" seem misplaced

7427: 5417: 5400: 5363: 5349: 5328: 11149: 10692: 10540: 9402:

Of Bencherlite, they said "he loves his parentheses" - " (in office 1909–1927) " would be better in prose without the parentheses in my opinion (from 1909 to 1927)...

9062: 8280: 8266: 8253: 8194: 4987: 4897: 4877: 4842: 4775: 4650: 4630: 4595: 4528: 4493: 4403: 4383: 4348: 4281: 4246: 4156: 4136: 4101: 4034: 3909: 3889: 3854: 3791: 3758: 3670: 3650: 3619: 3556: 3523: 3439: 3419: 3384: 3321: 3286: 3200: 3182: 3147: 3082: 2963: 2943: 2910: 2843: 2720: 2700: 2667: 2600: 2567: 2479: 2461: 2428: 2361: 2242: 2222: 2187: 2120: 2085: 1997: 1977: 1944: 1877: 1842: 1752: 1732: 1697: 1630: 1595: 1505: 1485: 1450: 1383: 1348: 1258: 1238: 1203: 1136: 1101: 1011: 991: 956: 894: 859: 774: 754: 729: 667: 637: 552: 532: 497: 440: 9333: 8409: 8115: 5071: 11564:(1981). (“sophomore” sounds cheesy, plus the previous sentences established Adams’ debut album so I think most people can figure out that the next one is his second) 11486: 11145: 11087:

The Hung Medien references (ie citations 10–18) are credited as being published by the chart companies; this is not true. For example, the New Zealand ref should be

10164: 7714:

In my opinion, no. I feel it would add too much to an already full table. I think with the map showing locations, coordinates aren't needed. Just my opinion though.

4982: 4957: 4937: 4887: 4735: 4710: 4690: 4640: 4488: 4463: 4443: 4413: 4393: 4241: 4216: 4196: 4166: 4146: 3994: 3969: 3949: 3919: 3899: 3753: 3728: 3710: 3680: 3660: 3518: 3495: 3475: 3429: 3281: 3258: 3238: 3210: 3046: 3021: 3001: 2973: 2953: 2805: 2780: 2760: 2730: 2710: 2562: 2537: 2519: 2489: 2325: 2302: 2282: 2252: 2232: 2080: 2055: 2035: 1987: 1837: 1812: 1792: 1762: 1742: 1590: 1565: 1545: 1515: 1495: 1343: 1318: 1298: 1268: 1248: 1096: 1071: 1051: 1021: 1001: 854: 829: 809: 784: 764: 632: 607: 592: 562: 542: 410: 390: 375: 12327: 12264: 11991: 11976: 11934: 10843: 10826: 10784: 10027: 9982: 9811: 9780: 9766: 9346: 9292: 8626:

According to the source I had, yeah. Thought it was the one cited, but it clearly isn't. I'll have to find it again! Forgot to sign my replies last time, bad me!

8338:

I was told in one of my FLCs, that in itemized lists like the one just before the main table, every line should end with the same punctuation mark (or none at all).

10565: 10205: 9999: 9533: 9505: 7937:

I think sorting is messed up because of the "Route of Santiago de Compostela" row (where you have a colspan) - once this is done I'll test the rest of the sorting.

5909:

The second paragraph should stay as it tells the reader where the starting pitchers pitched at home. I think that's relevant enough to merit inclusion in the lead.

4967: 4947: 4917: 4902: 4882: 4720: 4700: 4670: 4655: 4635: 4423: 4408: 4206: 4176: 4161: 4141: 3959: 3929: 3914: 3738: 3690: 3675: 3655: 3503: 3485: 3457: 3444: 3424: 3248: 3220: 3205: 3187: 3031: 3011: 2983: 2968: 2948: 2790: 2770: 2740: 2725: 2705: 2547: 2499: 2484: 2466: 2292: 2262: 2247: 2227: 2065: 2045: 2015: 2002: 1982: 1822: 1802: 1772: 1757: 1737: 1575: 1555: 1525: 1510: 1490: 1328: 1308: 1278: 1263: 1243: 1081: 1061: 1031: 1016: 996: 839: 819: 794: 779: 759: 617: 572: 557: 537: 11948: 11921: 11512: 11218: 5653: 4962: 4942: 4927: 4715: 4695: 4468: 4448: 4433: 4221: 4201: 4186: 3974: 3954: 3733: 3715: 3700: 3480: 3263: 3243: 3026: 3006: 2785: 2765: 2750: 2542: 2524: 2509: 2307: 2287: 2272: 2060: 2040: 2025: 1817: 1797: 1782: 1570: 1550: 1535: 1323: 1303: 1288: 1076: 1056: 1041: 834: 814: 612: 597: 582: 395: 380: 11954:

I've decided not to include, because it is not his album. He makes an appearance on it, nothing else. The album belongs in the Pavorotti discography article. --

11009: 6008:

10 days (9 days from now, but it'll probably take two weeks or more). I believe the AfD can be ignored at this point and the reviewing continue in the interim.

7658: 4922: 4675: 4428: 4181: 3934: 3695: 3462: 3225: 2988: 2745: 2504: 2267: 2020: 1777: 1530: 1283: 1036: 799: 577: 11089:{{cite web|url=http://www.charts.org.nz/showinterpret.asp?interpret=Bryan%20Adams |title=Bryan Adams |publisher=Hung Medien. charts.org.nz |accessdate=today}} 7591:

I have added the map (apparantly as Nev was commenting) and will let others comment on it. As an aside, I also added images under the Tentative List section.

12535:

OK, I think I managed to address your suggestion. The new sections look more balanced in terms of content than what I'd initially expect. What do you think?

11749: 11739: 5499:"S'il suffisait d'aimer " = worth noting this is French language, and according to our own article, the second-best-selling French language album in history. 11881:"Soundtracks" → Soundtrack (singular, not plural, as there is only one album listed ; in the infobox “soundtracks” is okay as that is the default spelling) 7382:- It contains all 42 sites currently on the list, as well as a list of tenative inclusions. Each listing has an image and a brief description of the site. 7375:- It contains a prose lead section that explains the World Heritage Site program in general, as well as specific details of Spain's involvement and sites. 6354:"is considered an honor, and is given to...". The whole sentence reads awkwardly because of this. "an honor, which is given to..." would be a suitable fix. 8703:"He has passed 100 on more occasions than any of his compatriots, and his score of 118, made against Canada..." Passed a 100... what? Runs, I'm assuming. 5106:

successes. Why not mention all the other albums? The fact that they were commercial and critical disappointments does not make them exempt from mention.--

12023: 12002: 9976:. You've adequately addressed my concerns, and I have no doubt that you'll get around to The Rambling Man's notes as well. It's a nice list, well done. 5850:

the article does not explain well the importance of the of being the starting pitcher on the starting day to readers not familiar with the terminology

7574: 6009: 5954:"decision" is a major statistics but it is not explained. Considering how notable the statistics is, it is most likely deserving a note in the lead. 12709:"It would take 26 years " I never like these "it would be" kind of prose things, when we already know what happens, so maybe "it took 26 years..."? 12316:

For the Records and Archives Canada refs, the dates need to be moved out of the title and into a separate date field. There's quite a few of them.

12054:

were perfectly fine together until 6 weeks ago—but opposing for that is entirely legitimate and within the criteria. Opposing because a discog was

9799:

was only appointed, but does not have a note as to why he did not take his post like the others. Are there any sources to explain the discrepancy?

13078:"...guaranteed a medal sweep..." – Can you either link to an article explaining what is meant be a 'medal sweep', or explain it with a note here. 12125:

videos could be included here (I doubt you'd make a decent list out of the videography as it stands, but feel free to prove me wrong if it stays!)

12219: 12010:

why two articles works better than one? And try not posting on my talk apge demanding I do something. I know full well how to use a watchlist.

21: 12173:

Live video ... the cell with "EU: 2× Platinum" in it breaks onto two lines "EU:" and then "2x..." on another. Can this be fixed as it looks odd.

12144:

I hope you do (prove me wrong). (If you don't find this possible I hope you would at least welcome a a proper, more specific, merge discussion)

9610: 5229:

Why is the article titled "Celine Dion albums discography" yet she is referred to as "Céline Dion" in the lead and infobox? Consistency, please.

10818: 10732: 10575: 10496: 10481: 10446: 10117: 10092: 10073: 10052: 10038: 10019: 9921: 9902: 9871: 9844: 9825: 9803: 9758: 9741: 6498: 9037:

Really? It doesn't seem painfully obvious that an ODI wicket is a wicket taken in an ODI? I'll leave this up to Harrias, although I disagree.

8208:

They aren't particularly definite dates. But, It should roughly be Prehistoric (atleast these sites), Paleo, Upper. I've changed it. Thanks.

7334: 11072: 10672:

you have to hunt a general reference to find them; on the other hand, that's the case for every other piece of information in the table. --

11275:" In 1978 Adams signed a recording contract with A&M Records. After the success ..." merge the first mini-sentence with the following. 8172:

This concerns the World Heritage program in Spain. Not particularly about the sites of Spain, but I feel it's relevant enough to include.

11850:

became Adams tenth studio album and peaked within the top 100 on the Billboard 200 and became Adams third number-one album in Canada.” →

9821:

is listed as "Jim Risch" in the table, and he's named as "James Risch" in his picture's caption-- you should choose one and stick to it.

8991:

It's explained at the start of the list that an ODI is a One Day International. ODI wickets are wickets taken in One Day Internationals.

11887:"—" denotes releases that did not chart.” → No need for this statement as the album charted in all the countries listed (unless you add 11661:. (Since this is an album discography we don’t need to have the world “album” listed that often; the year 1991 need only be listed once) 9389:

Changed it to "cupboard", which I think is accurate looking at the photo and the dictionary as to the meaning of "press" in this context

11720:, an acoustic live album was released in 1997 and reached the top ten in many countries while selling two million copies in Europe.” → 8706:

Ref 6 needs publisher, and the correct location. (The location of this paper is always London, not where the reporter happened to be).

8488: 7916:"Besides the initial three years of Spain's inclusion (at sessions 8 through 10)" reads awkwardly to me. Any way we can rephrase this? 5484:"one of her six albums certified diamond" - "one of six of her albums to be certified diamond" (and look to link certification as well) 13190:

This was Canada's weakest result in 36 years, when its athletes also brought home a single silver medal from the 1936 Winter Olympics.

12347:

information about the album, It only says its a rare soundtrack which is well proven when you search for the album on the internet. --

9126:

Thanks for your comments, I have resolved those to which Nev hasn't responded, feel free to query further if you feel it is unclear.

8517: 8516:

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel it meets the FL criteria, and follows a similar format to current FLs such as

12436: 12343:-only. So that pretty much covers that one up, the Soundtrack Collector i'm a bit unsure of, but it doesn't include any let's say 10393:

The general rule has been, full sentences get a full stop, fragments do not. But I agree, it's generally better to use periods. --

10374:

Even when one is more relevant than the other? If 34 were the better reference, and 7 just supported it? (nonetheless, swapped) --

6753:

Varitek is not redundant because it says he was also honored by all three in other years. I will add the word also for clarity.--

5508:"with the very successful album, " you probably don't need "very successful" when you then go on to say it sold 12 million copies. 13120:

Other than these pretty picky prose issues, it's a good article, and once these have been resolved I'll happily lend my support.

12944: 12413: 10903: 9707: 9251: 8465: 7311: 6475: 5629: 5029: 12728:"By default, the table is ordered by the number of gold medals the athletes from a NOC have won." reads really awkwardly to me. 8810:

Also, where CricketArchive sorts players by surname for England (for example: ), Afghan players are sorted by the first name: .

5928:

records away and at home adds an extra layer to the significance of pitching on opening day (though it's difficult to explain).

7447: 6499: 5052: 11702:(1996) which was certified platinum in the United States. It sold five million copies worldwide.” → His seventh studio album, 11325:"which contained the theme song for the 1991 film Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves." can't believe you don't link that song here. 10668:

Several of the notes need referenced. 1, 14, 20, 24, and 26 contain information not in or reasonably derived from the table.

6225:"s in throwing the 1919 World Series" is repeated verbatim in two consecutive sentences, would prefer more elegant prose here. 12871:"Seventeen NOCs won at least one medal and 14 of them collected at least one gold." Don't mix formats of words and numerals. 11576:

was released as his fourth studio album in 1984. The album sold eight million copies worldwide and featured the hit singles "

9890:

being the Governor of the Arizona Territory? I figure if all the others are cited that one might as well be for consistency.

9414: 9301: 7555: 7335: 6648:

I have done some rearranging. I don't think merging the college accomplishment section with the pro section would be right.--

6263:

Ref 15 is missing publisher and any other info that could be available. In fact, that reference, could you show me how it's

11856:(2008), Adams’ tenth studio album, peaked at number 80 on the Billboard 200 and became his third number-one album in Canada. 11416:

Looks good! Can an IP even be counted in this vote? I think this is only for registered users so disregard him completely.--

13398: 8224: 5339:. The leading section contains a lot of numbers of album copies sold. It would good if they were also added to the tables. 192: 132: 11820:“It topped the album charts of Germany and Switzerland.” → However, it topped the album charts in Germany and Switzerland. 7626:

To clarify, by "along these lines" I mean the idea of numbering labels and names downs the side not the clickable aspect.

11482: 11141: 10962: 6038:

Why do you list the acronym for Major League Baseball when it's never again referred to as "MLB" in the lead or the list?

12049:, which is actually a good deal longer than Adams, yet fits easily on one article. Combined, it is far longer than the 11726:, an acoustic live album released in 1997, reached the top ten in countries while selling two million copies in Europe. 9917:

Note 17 contains a bare URL reference, which should be cited in footnote form (if it's kept against Golbez's comments).

7507: 5496:"all over the world" doubt it. More likely "in many countries around the world" or, better still, be specific how many. 12403: 11766: 11760: 11686: 11680: 10893: 9867:, it mentions in the notes that they were part of a fusion ticket-- were they serving consecutively or simultaneously? 9730: 9697: 9524:

Refs 29, 30, 32, and 33 need the publisher/location. There are tons of newspapers called "The Times" in normal speech.

9241: 9162: 9077: 9015: 8965: 8873: 8489: 8455: 7301: 7208: 7118: 7064: 7027: 6990: 6953: 6916: 6879: 6842: 6763: 6708: 6658: 6626: 6557: 6518: 6465: 5619: 5019: 17: 11652: 11636: 9552: 8574:

No suggestions, just big enough to nicely fit a 800px wide screen (I guess) without spilling over to the main list.

7244: 7187: 6391: 6320: 6298: 6149: 6097: 5939: 5772: 5742: 5731:

Retrosheet ones fixed. The baseball hall of fame site seems to be down right now, so I'll try replacing it tomorrow.

5696: 7534:

I don't know, I'm not a fan of the map. I think it's so bunched up it isn't helpful. Anybody else want to chime in?

12437: 11810: 11796: 11784: 9166: 9081: 9019: 8969: 8877: 7212: 7122: 7068: 7031: 6994: 6957: 6920: 6883: 6846: 6767: 6712: 6662: 6630: 6561: 6522: 10014:

I've added prose to the 'other high offices' section. Please check it out. I've also rejiggered some referencing.

5999:

is sorted out, so that should probably be taken care of. If the article is kept, here are some comments about it.

12352: 12247: 12209: 12135: 12104: 12078: 12035: 11959: 11465: 11382: 11269:"five compilation albums (one awaiting release)" is that five inclusive or exclusive of the one awaiting release? 11232: 11183: 11121: 11057: 10970: 10958: 10941: 10926: 10480:

Will get 3 of 4 tomorrow. The 4th, George Shoup, doesn't need a reference as Idaho became a state on that day.

7151:– Meets FL standards. I was waiting to see what would become of Ruslik's opposition, which is no longer active. 5524:

You use Platinum in the table but platinum in the lead. Be consistent with the capitalisation o certifications.

9274: 8148:

In "€600,000", the euro-sign overlaps with the "6" on my screen. Is this a general problem and can it be fixed?

7981:

8th is used by the source, as in the 8th Session of the World Heritage Committee, a noun rather than adjective.

5053: 185: 125: 12304:

Ref 6... find a new way to do this. Right now, it reads as if Billboard publishes Reuters, which isn't right.

11708:, was released in 1996. It sold five million copies worldwide and was certified platinum in the United States. 10801:

This is a convoluted sentence. 'appointed' is repeated twice and the last clause can be merged with the first.

9422:

Poole appears to have been elected to the post. I'm not sure if I saw that the post was elected in the lead?

6213:

It's a personal preference but I would merge the first two sentences, as it reads a little clunkily right now.

13257:

Actually, in doubles there was only men competing, but I rephrased the whole sentence to make it more clear.

11834: 11828: 11657: 11641: 11595: 11577: 11508: 10254:

Four separate governors were appointed but never took office, not just Hoyt. The intro has been corrected. --

10037:

Grrr, wrote it in my notes wrong. I'll be up at the University this Friday and will look at the book again.

5217:"becoming one of the best selling albums of all time" → "becoming two of the best-selling albums of all time" 5720: 11103: 11005: 9754: 8103: 11377:

I've fixed this the best way i could; I'll try finding a native speaker who will be willing to help me. --

5226:

Countries should be in alphabetical order, excluding home country - UK and US need to be moved to the end.

13198:

Replaced "in 36 years" with "since 1936 Winter Olympics", thus moving it from the end of the sentence.

12752: 12614: 12348: 12243: 12228: 12205: 12191: 12150: 12131: 12100: 12074: 12031: 11955: 11933:

Looks good to me. One last suggestion: Adams apparently appears as a guest singer on an album called

11912:

I hope my suggestions help. After they are address I will consider offering support for the article. —

11808:, to peak within the top 200 on the Billboard 200; selling only 44,000 copies in the United States” → 11461: 11432: 11399: 11378: 11250: 11228: 11179: 11053: 10966: 10954: 10937: 10520: 10177: 9731: 9473: 9436: 9359: 9211: 8667: 8613: 8579: 8543: 8046: 7963: 7948: 7895: 7874: 7825: 7765: 7734: 7702: 7667: 7632: 7614: 7519: 7481: 7441: 6275: 6197: 5561: 5490:"nearly 9 million copies" - nine million. Check all other "less than ten" millions in the lead please. 5457: 5171: 5122: 5090: 274:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Chicago White Sox Opening Day starting pitchers/archive1}} 174: 114: 11081:

Is there any point in having the four charts in the 'Soundtracks' section where no soundtrack charted?

11599: 11581: 11453: 9595:

Could you explain, either in a key or elsewhere, what "College as Keeper of the Archives" refers to?

7561: 6086:

Done sans the last point; looks like the AfD is finding that last point so I'll add that in shortly.

356: 11647: 11631: 11594:(1984), his fourth studio album, sold eight million copies worldwide and featured the hit singles " 9378:

Or, are you saying there should have been a Keeper because the University had records before 1634?

8424: 11814:(2004) peaked at number 134 on the Billboard 200 and sold only 44,000 copies in the United States. 8301:

I made a note explaining. Made the first column "exclusive sites" meaning just in that community.

12046: 11832:(2005), became Adams' third greatest hits compilation” → Adams' third greatest hits compilation, 11618:

which reached platinum status in the United States and triple-platinum in Canada.” → Comma after

11129: 11125: 10927: 9305: 7958:(By the way, the template which links to a European UNESCO list, has Spain with just 41 sites). 7922:

It may be obvious but I'd like to see something after "Location" like "Town or city of the site".

12045:

list, a list that wouldn't be excessively long. As the IP used the example, I'll keep with it,

7605: 11852: 11846: 11560: 11554: 9275: 9158: 9073: 9011: 8961: 8929: 8869: 8832:– That's a convincing enough argument for me, and I don't have any other issues with the list. 8230:

I made the sort key the year. Would you prefer to arrange by year in the default list as well?

7868:

you can C&P. As I cannot see any other problems with this list so will give it by support.

7204: 7114: 7060: 7023: 6986: 6949: 6912: 6875: 6838: 6759: 6704: 6654: 6622: 6553: 6543:

I am nominating this for featured list because it is similar in format to the 1991 FL and 1992

6514: 10363:

You relink Lt Governors in the second table but you don't relink Appointed by's in the first.

10300:"president pro tempore of" suspect you could use some italics here to emphasise the fact that 9188:: I've updated the table and lead following the conclusion of the Afghanistan – Kenya series. 8009:. I removed the colspan where it was used, and that seems to have resolved any sorting issues. 7389:- Relevant columns of the table are sortable, and {{sort}} has been used to aid where needed. 6234:

And perhaps just "Blue Jays won the game 9–5" because it's clear it was against the White Sox.

5794:

soccer, and let's pick the team that is most probably the most well-known/familiar in the US:

13360: 13324: 13291: 13262: 13234: 13203: 13143: 13105: 13086: 13067: 13048: 13008: 12967: 12908: 12879: 12839: 12801: 12767: 12748: 12736: 12717: 12698: 12679: 12659: 12639: 12610: 12597: 12569: 12540: 12526: 12511: 12469: 12451: 12223: 12186: 12145: 11417: 11395: 11246: 10516: 10273: 10173: 9642: 9617: 9600: 9563: 9486: 9469: 9450: 9432: 9355: 9342: 9329: 9313: 9288: 9207: 8663: 8609: 8575: 8539: 8042: 7959: 7944: 7891: 7869: 7820: 7760: 7729: 7697: 7662: 7627: 7609: 7514: 7476: 7437: 6271: 6193: 5557: 5453: 5156: 5107: 5086: 80: 12630:

Images clash on my 13" Macbook, forcing the Schenk image (and all text) into a tiny column.

12339:

and i'm pretty sure that they won't lie about something so basic such as it was released to

11209:

is listed as a 2004 release; does anyone really consider this the "beginning of the 2000s"?

8594:"When the ban was lifted," a nice way of putting it? Did the Taliban really "lift the ban"? 8060:. The list, in my opinion, fully satisfies the FL criteria. (I hope sorting will be fixed.) 12823: 12372:

I'm not up-to-date on MOS:DISCOG, nor do I even try to be, but this meets the FL criteria.

8841: 8775: 8726:

Fixed refs and changed to "100 runs". And no, "an One" would be very poor English indeed.

8258:

The default order of the list is by reference number. I made a note that it sorts by year.

7549: 7160: 7097: 6810: 6414: 6369: 6013: 11939:. I believe this should be added into the discography (perhaps under a new section ). — 11201:

probably should have two). As for the intro to this one: "In the beginning of the 2000s,

9753:

Another Governor's list that is coming down the pipe. Idaho follows the recently made FL

5856:

is with the five times they reached the series, but what happened in the other 100+ cases?

5079:

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets all of the FL criteria.

8: 12070: 11744: 11734: 11543: 11538: 10652:

It has a publisher, added location. Unless you mean 35, which doesn't need a location. --

8420: 6903:

Varitek's full name isn't given on first use; perhaps this is a result of earlier edits.

6112:

on Opening Day is noteworthy. I hope other baseball editors will add their thoughts too.

5478: 5292: 5246: 5196: 9870:

Consecutively. Governor served two terms and each Lieutenant Governor served one term.

5861:"decision" should be switched to outcome since nobody took the decision to assign W or L 9542: 6117: 5383:

According to Sony Music Entertainment, Dion has sold over 200 million albums, worldwide

181: 121: 12181:

The same thing happens in "Compilation albums" with anything that went multi-platinum.

10810:

Can the lead include information about how many governors have belonged to each party?

8792: 7746:

Easy enough, so I added a reference at the end of the caption to Spain's UNESCO page.

5716: 5712: 285:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/1993 College Baseball All-America Team/archive1}} 13342: 13276: 13170: 13128: 12984: 12952: 12555: 12496: 11944: 11917: 11504: 11214: 10861: 10838: 10822: 10779: 10736: 10579: 10500: 10485: 10450: 10121: 10096: 10077: 10056: 10042: 10023: 9925: 9906: 9875: 9848: 9829: 9807: 9762: 9665: 9529:

And that's where I am on this one. Nitpicking references. Not bad, not bad at all.

9196: 9170: 9153: 9134: 9107: 9085: 9068: 9060: 9023: 9006: 8973: 8956: 8938:

fifth-placed play-off sounds ungrammatical and like it should be fifth-place play-off

8881: 8864: 8861: 8818: 8803: 8734: 8649: 8634: 8528: 8506: 8099: 8065: 7272: 7216: 7199: 7126: 7109: 7072: 7055: 7035: 7018: 6998: 6981: 6961: 6944: 6924: 6907: 6887: 6870: 6850: 6833: 6771: 6754: 6743: 6734:

also repeats the first paragraph. Also what 'in' is doing in the following sentence?

6716: 6699: 6688: 6666: 6649: 6634: 6617: 6605: 6565: 6548: 6526: 6509: 6052:

I only had time for a passing glance, and I'll add more later when I get the chance.

6046: 5959: 5898: 5880: 5809: 5795: 5438: 5395: 5344: 5324: 296:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Spain/archive1}} 11349:"The album managed to sell over 5 million copies " - reads poorly again, and 5-: --> 7461:

Sorting of the years doesn't work. It sorts the info as text so it is all messed up.

6738:. The second section actually needs a copy-edit by an editor who is not its auhtor. 13356: 13320: 13287: 13286:

Attempt no. 2. Officially, it's a mixed event but only male pairs have entered it.

13258: 13230: 13199: 13139: 13101: 13082: 13063: 13044: 13004: 12977:

I suggest using green also for the NOC that did participate but did not win medals.

12963: 12904: 12875: 12835: 12797: 12763: 12732: 12713: 12694: 12675: 12655: 12635: 12593: 12565: 12536: 12522: 12507: 12483: 12465: 12447: 11590: 11572: 11099: 11001: 10984: 10677: 10657: 10638: 10619: 10600: 10561: 10471: 10436: 10417: 10398: 10379: 10352: 10332: 10312: 10281: 10259: 10239: 10220: 10201: 10160: 10141: 9995: 9957: 9864: 9638: 9614: 9596: 9560: 9483: 9447: 9339: 9326: 9285: 7940:

In "Sites by autonomous community", the en/em-dash should sort (or even be) a zero.

7683:

gives minute/second coordinates, which have been converted to decimal for the map.

7424: 6584: 6075:

Also, I'd add in a post that explains the significance of the opening day pitcher.

5912:

No decision is wikilinked on its first appearance, so the explanation is adequate.

5723: 5307: 30: 12204:

I think i've fixed, but i didn't really understand the problem to be truthfull. --

11343:"title, 18 til I Die. 18 til I Die was" instant repeat of album name reads poorly. 7840:

I think I got the only instance. The Committee does use numbers for the sessions.

7661:? Think map is a good addition. Can you vouch for the co-ordinates being correct? 7499:

Just something to consider. Can't vouch for its accuracy but what do you think of

7360:

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that it is meets all of the

5901:

and which pitchers pitched during a world series season– I could maybe see noting

5536:

Ref 26 ISO dates are incorrectly formatted - should be YYYY-MM-DD, not DD-MM-YYYY.

5533:

Compare ref 3 and ref 18 for the way you denote the author. Be consistent please.

307:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Afghanistan ODI cricketers/archive1}} 12995: 12928: 12891: 12855: 12816: 12430: 12373: 12324: 12261: 12222:

works for me, can you (or anyone else) see anything problematic with what I did?

12089: 12059: 12011: 11988: 11973: 10920: 10762: 10719: 10689: 10537: 9860: 9724: 9584: 9530: 9502: 9321: 9268: 8834: 8768: 8750: 8717: 8684: 8482: 8405: 8383: 8326: 8276: 8249: 8190: 8129: 7547:

I think a map is helpful. At least I have an idea where these sites are located.—

7328: 7153: 7090: 6803: 6492: 6435: 6407: 6362: 5867:

2nd lead paragraph does not fit well within the scope of the title of the article

5646: 5582: 5413: 5359: 5263: 5137: 5067: 5046: 10953:

I stumbled across some Bryan Adams article this week, when i saw how bad shape--

8419:

I have not done a full review, but I agree it looks well worthy of being a FL.--

7510:, quite a few seem to include geocordinates. Would these be beneficial here too? 6977:"he led national league catchers in putouts". Two words need capitalizing here. 11603: 11585: 11165: 10463:

All dates but four are individually referenced in this table. Why those four?

9174: 9089: 9042: 9027: 8996: 8977: 8910: 8885: 8111: 7644:

I moved the map to its own section, I think that gives it a little more space.

7582: 7361: 7234: 7220: 7177: 7130: 7076: 7039: 7002: 6965: 6928: 6891: 6854: 6775: 6720: 6670: 6638: 6569: 6530: 6381: 6310: 6288: 6139: 6087: 5929: 5902: 5762: 5732: 5686: 5667: 5284: 5238: 5188: 12899:

Removed "at this event". I think one can understand that it's the first medal

10574:

Fixed. Looks like the reference was deleted at one point. Added it back in.

9206:

my comments were addressed earlier and I can see no issues holding this back.

8765:

Names in the table are sorting by first name; FLs typically sort by last name.

263:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Celine Dion albums discography/archive1}} 13392: 12426: 12336: 11722: 11716: 11620: 11614: 11198: 10916: 10155:

Not sure if I can support, being conommed by Bgwhite, but I support it. :) --

9887: 9720: 9317: 9264: 9005:

No one who, like me, does not know cricket is going to get that connection.--

8608:

Really? The Taliban themselves lifted the ban? (Sorry for my ignorance...)

8478: 8003: 7865: 7324: 6488: 6113: 5863:

decision should be clearly explained as it appears to be a notable statistics

5642: 5042: 10795:. The list is very close to becoming featured but there are a few problems: 5379:

How is this award called? Who gave it to her? This information is important.

61: 13338: 13272: 13164: 13122: 12980: 12948: 12551: 12492: 12242:

It looks good to me... but of course, I couldn't see the problem either. --

11940: 11913: 11704: 11698: 11500: 11210: 11044:

The entire lead needs a copy-edit, especially the addition of a few commas.

10857: 10834: 10775: 10704: 9977: 9942: 9891: 9796: 9775: 9661: 9190: 9128: 9101: 9054: 8812: 8797: 8728: 8643: 8628: 8522: 8500: 8061: 7696:

Great, is it worth adding them to the table like some other FLs do or not?

7495:

Those blank Loaction cells should probably have an — (—) in them.

7266: 6739: 6684: 6601: 6359:"Williams was also the Opening Day started in 1920." "started" → "starter". 6264: 6178: 6128: 6076: 6065: 6053: 6024: 5983: 5955: 5913: 5876: 5823: 5805: 5663: 5434: 5391: 5340: 5320: 8041:

I will re-review this list in due course, now the colspan has been fixed.

7471:

Diacratics should sort as normal letters, i.e. Ávila should sort as Avila.

5549:

Ref 61 looks like it's French so add that to the ref. So does 91. Check

339:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Governors of Idaho/archive1}} 332:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Governors of Idaho/archive1}} 12073:, it is split between three different articles, all of which are FL's. -- 11905: 11738:, which was certified two-times platinum by the CRIA and platinum by the 11533: 11281:"at number sixty-nine on" no real reason not to say "number 69" is there? 11095: 10997: 10673: 10653: 10634: 10615: 10596: 10557: 10467: 10432: 10413: 10394: 10375: 10348: 10328: 10308: 10277: 10255: 10235: 10216: 10197: 10156: 10137: 9991: 9953: 9745: 9309: 8365: 8344: 8303: 8260: 8232: 8210: 8174: 8154: 8080: 8022: 7842: 7748: 7716: 7685: 7646: 7593: 7536: 7408: 7346: 5721:

http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/components/hofers/HallofFamersList.html

10343:

In the key you have "(Official numbering)" but what does it relate to?

10323:

Should "speaker of the state house of representatives" be capitalised?

9518:

Ref 15 needs the same subscription required tag as the other ODNB refs.

8401: 8379: 8322: 8317:

For uniformity, shouldn't it be "NUMBER OF shared sites" in the header?

8272: 8245: 8186: 8125: 6254:

Final score column sorts oddly, 0–1 three times, then 0–12, then 0–2...

5578: 5409: 5355: 5259: 5133: 5063: 11748:(1998), was certified double-platinum by the CRIA and platinum by the 9304:

out of the way and promoted, here's another for all you crazy fans of

5800:

List of captains in the first match of the season of Manchester United

323:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Keeper of the Archives/archive1}} 316:{{Knowledge:Featured list candidates/Keeper of the Archives/archive1}} 11740:

International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) — Europe

11161: 10428:"In addition, two people who were appointed... " is this referenced? 9818: 9038: 8992: 8906: 8560:

Lead image could be expanded, and caption shouldn't take a full stop.

8107: 7578: 12412: