447:
If the edition have occurred in other profiles, ORCID platform will automatically change the old information in its database. In addition, ORCID is known for its non-profittable feature. Thus, comparing to ORCID, ResearcherID is sometimes judged as profitable and proprietary, being not open completely to every researcher. Moreover, ResearcherID will accept any literature published under the Web of
Science Group products, which means, to some extent, it needs more process before a non WoS-registered researcher to publish the study on this platform. In comparison, ORCID has a larger group of users for it accepts various sources of publication without filtering in advance.
490:
system. The form includes all necessary messages for a certain literature, including its publisher, publishing date, book name, etc. In other words, the transformation will consolidate the information on
ResearcherID into a more systematic form, helping both scholars and non-scholars reach the information they are looking for. On the other hand, through using ResearcherID on the Publons platform, users can find the exact researcher, as well as his or her academic collaborators. As an interactive lab environment, researcherID makes it easier to reference literature for the research field and global use.
262:(WoS) database. Researchers were benefited from the system on inter-connection between authors and literatures. Each researcher could list personal publishes in the profiles for others’ references. Scholars were also able to find references through searching the researcherID, name of the author or the literature itself. Links under names were created for more direct searches. Meanwhile, creating personal profiles helped others distinguish researchers with the same first and last names, therefore increasing clarification of worldwide scientific progress.
494:
social science, arts and humanities. The missing information may slow the research process, for the users cannot compare specific authors with other researchers in the same region, states, countries, or continent. This reduces the connection between individual authors and other institutions as well. Meanwhile, it may be misleading for external users while using the Web of
Science. The Information can be assigned into different categories, and result in polarized judgements towards the authors and their literature.
498:
suggested to represent the overall performance of the literature and its influence in relevant disciplines. The eventual data and analyses may vary when the authors' information is missing or not all papers are included. In addition, there have been a number of empty profiles on the Web of
Science with unclear reasons, and yet still are counted in statistics. It is suggested that certain options should be conducted towards these profiles, so as to improve the quality of the networking sites.
486:
usage, but was not selected frequently because it was not automatically coded. On the other hand, ORCID code was more widely accepted by international journals and publishers than
ResearcherID and was somehow mandatory for publications. The Scopus author ID was another researcher identifier which allocate a code directly to any author in the system. Therefore, it is encouraged that ResearcherID to realize automatic registration.
339:
301:
either the name of the author or
ResearcherID on the Web of Science ResearcherID website, users can find the author’s present occupation, his or her publications, key words of research fields, main topics of published literature and direct links to information page of the most cited publications, though full text cannot be uploaded. The ORCID link is also listed on the same page as a connection between two systems.
477:
is able to associate Google
Scholar with other solutions, for example, Endnote. In other words, Google Scholar covers a larger range of research studies, yet have included bibliographic problems, for example, author sequence, different paper title, etc. ResearcherID has a relatively smaller coverage but is more accurate than Google Scholar.
476:
Google
Scholar, like ResearcherID, is also a widely accepted profiling site. However, ResearcherID provides a list of bibliographic information based on authors and publications, while Google Scholar contains full papers, links to multiple accesses, authors, etc. On the other hand, the Web of Science
454:
Nevertheless, both
ResearcherID and ORCID have various user populations, and it has benefits to have both. For ResearcherID, authors primarily distribute among Physical Science, Social Science, Arts and Humanities. ORCID has the largest group in Health Science, but due to its non-profitable features,
211:
As the ongoing globalization of the science and technologies continues, enlarging groups of scientific researchers have stepped into various different fields to study. The dilemmas they are continuously facing include not being able to directly link the author with respective literature, not being up
450:
Due to the fact that
ResearcherID is proprietary and ORCID is non-proprietary, ORCID has developed to be more community driven than ResearcherID. More authors tend not to use ResearcherID to avoid the connection between researchers and commercial profit. Particularly, journals, books, patents etc.,
446:
helps information transfer between two platforms, for example: main research areas, published literature, etc. Through this exchange of information, it can reduce chances of researchers' manual mistakes on profiling. Yet, Researchers cannot directly edit their profiles in the ResearcherID database.
300:
ResearcherID, as a self-registered identifier, will be provided whenever a researcher finishes registration in the ResearcherID database. The identifier was the combination of alphabets and numbers, with the last four numbers representing the year registered, for example: Z-0000-2022. By searching
291:
In 2019, ResearcherID was binded with Publons which was a platform for field workers to make appraisals and authentication on researchers, thus enhancing the general contribution of certain literature among the field and global process on certain subjects. Nowadays, ResearcherID is still actively
485:
ResearcherID was proved to have less users compared with other author identifiers. As a result of an investigation in 2020, there were 172689 profiles in ResearcherID platform, which was less than the 657319 on Scopus database, and 513236 on ResearchGate. ResearcherID was highly recommended for
493:
There are also problems with registration. Since authors complete their registration through self-identification, it becomes easier to have wrong or missing data. For example, the information of authors' geographic addresses is found to be missing in numbers of profiles among the disciplines of
312:
database. Researchers will be asked whether to create the ORCID number or not when completing the registration, in order to transfer data from ResearcherID to ORCID database. ResearcherID accounts can be used to login the Web of Science and Endnote. This enables researchers to arrange their own
489:
Though researchers tend to choose ResearchID for identification less, this system can be used to prove the author sets, especially after having combined with other identifiers. On one hand, ResearcherID can transfer files into RIS form which is specifically established for research information
467:
Scopus' users spread across most disciplines included in health science and other non-mathematics areas. There are also a relative number of authors in the field of science, technology, arts and humanities. Though the Web of Science does not have as many citations as Scopus does, the searching
497:
While the issue of self-identification registration has been addressed, it is not all of the citations uploaded on the Web of Science that are counted towards the citation metrics, which affects the accuracy and reliability of this bibliographic networking platform. These citation metrics are
172:
owned platform, where researchers can track their publications, peer reviewing activity, and journal editing work. With ResearcherID now hosted on Publons researchers can keep a more comprehensive view of their research output and contributions in one place. This is particularly important for
1421:
Martin-Martin, Alberto; Orduna-Malea, Enrique; Ayllon, Juan M.; Lopez-Cozar, Emilio Delgado (7 February 2016). "The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID,
272:
The Web of Knowledge platform was connected to ResearcherID in 2011, compensating manual mistakes between profiles and literature. Due to a vast development of unique identifiers in the research field, there has been numbers of systems serving identification process, for example, ORCID,
29:
149:, it is common to cite the name, surname, and initials of the authors of an article. However, there are sometimes authors with the same name, initials; or the journal may misspell names, resulting in several spellings for the same authors, and different authors with the same spelling.
281:. Missing literature or informational mistakes were frequently shown when one researcher uploaded several profiles on different platforms. Thus, this combination enhanced the reliability of profiles on each platform, and provided a more thorough knowledge to a particular researcher.
320:
Web of Science Core Collection: Web of Science mainly serves as a citation/abstract database, for full texts cannot be uploaded onto the platform. Users are able to search and analyze any publications as well as their citations and references. Choosing
269:(DOI), as to enhance relationships between various researchers, creating larger maps connecting authors in the same research field. Though researchers might work in different fields, it became easier to associate authors with key terms and topics.
468:
results therefore become more accurate compared with Scopus. Yet, data inconsistencies still exist in the Web of Science. For example, the spelling of the authors’ surname and given name, authors' names not corresponding to the correct paper, etc.
235:, who were both bibliographic database providers, ResearcherID helped researchers to create comprehensive profiles, containing research fields, key words, published literature, and connections to other researchers in the same research field.
152:
Researchers can use ResearcherID to claim their published works and link their unique and persistent ResearcherID number to these works for correct attribution. In this way, they can also keep their publication list up to date and online.
451:
have compulsory regulations for authors’ registration in ORCID instead of ResearcherID. In conclusion, ResearcherID plays a more supplementary role among author identifiers, but is more necessary in the Web of Science Groups of products.
160:
with the ResearcherID allows a unique association of authors and research articles. It can be used to link researchers with registered trials or identify colleagues and collaborators in the same field of research.
316:
Due to the integration of ORCID number and ResearcherID, the Web of Science Core Collection assign them to the Author Identifiers index, enabling researchers to get access to numbers of profiles and publications.
226:
ResearcherID, as one of the author identification systems, aiming to offer digital identity to each author and to build closer connections between researchers around the world. First started in 2008 by
455:
ORCID accepts more content types, and thus it also has sufficient population in other science disciplines. Nevertheless, neither researcherID nor ORCID focuses on the mathematics field. Instead,
964:"Use of author identifier services (ORCID, ResearcherID) and academic social networks (Academia.edu, ResearchGate) by the researchers of the University of Caen Normandy (France): A case study"
1063:"The scientometric portrait of Eugene Garfield through the free ResearcherID service from the Web of Science Core Collection of 67 million master records and 1.3 billion references"
203:
ResearcherID has been criticized for being commercial and proprietary, but also praised as "an initiative addressing the common problem of author misidentification".
349:
403:
Standardizing data across platforms: The Web of Science synchronizes personal information and citation details, which may improve search accuracy.
1501:
1317:"Accuracy of PubMed-based author lists of publications and use of author identifiers to address author name ambiguity: a cross-sectional study"
288:(ORCID) was integrated with ResearcherID to share and verify information in both systems, improving the efficiency of independent retrieval.
364:
418:
Strengthening connections between authors and investors: Collaboration may enhance motivation and lead to positive research outcomes.
216:
do not possess the capacity to automatically distinguish between two researchers who happen to share the same, or similar, names”.
1476:
1160:
507:
842:
600:
517:
605:
1270:"Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates"
413:
Facilitating self-positioning within institutions: ResearcherID fosters collaborations and helps align research goals.
386:
1040:
322:
1226:"The Role of Ego in Academic Profile Services: Comparing Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Mendeley, and ResearcherID"
368:
1115:"Faculty Use of Author Identifiers and Researcher Networking Tools | Tran | College & Research Libraries"
698:
Cals, Jochen WL; Daniel Kotz (28 June 2008). "Researcher identification: the right needle in the haystack".
1491:
131:
1365:
266:
157:
1450:
1254:
1145:
1176:"Correctly Linking Researchers to Their Journal Articles: An Overview of Unique Author Identifiers"
423:
Students can explore connections within their discipline using cited papers and track citations.
1233:
547:
Enserink, Martin (27 March 2009). "SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING: Are You Ready to Become a Number?".
1437:
1241:
1132:
142:
138:
1224:
MartĂn-MartĂn, Alberto; Orduna-Malea, Enrique; Delgado LĂłpez-CĂłzar, Emilio (4 March 2016).
558:
8:
213:
169:
146:
50:
1114:
562:
223:
for authors were introduced, which have been developing since the end of last century.
1496:
1423:
1403:
1377:
1346:
1297:
1203:
1090:
998:
963:
939:
892:
788:
733:
675:
650:
582:
713:
356:
1395:
1350:
1338:
1289:
1229:
1195:
1082:
1003:
985:
931:
884:
793:
775:
725:
717:
680:
586:
574:
549:
522:
313:
literature in different profiling systems and track their publications at any time.
220:
1407:
1301:
1207:
1022:
943:
896:
737:
1387:
1328:
1281:
1187:
1118:
1094:
1074:
993:
975:
923:
876:
823:
783:
767:
709:
670:
662:
566:
527:
309:
178:
1191:
570:
980:
927:
771:
251:
228:
186:
1175:
1333:
1316:
911:
628:
360:
259:
239:
193:
1391:
1285:
1078:
880:
755:
1485:
1399:
1342:
1293:
1199:
1086:
989:
935:
888:
779:
721:
1269:
1223:
1062:
864:
1366:"Missing author address information in Web of Science—An explorative study"
1225:
1007:
827:
797:
729:
684:
666:
578:
278:
1420:
912:"The Author Challenge: Identification of Self in the Scholarly Literature"
115:
1123:
174:
700:
325:
enables researchers to search literature among the abstract databases.
182:
865:"The role of unique identifiers in bibliographic information systems"
255:
181:) or in fields that focus on publishing books and chapters in books (
815:
28:
1428:
1382:
232:
61:
165:
127:
754:
Harrison, Andrew Marc; Harrison, Anthony Mark (1 October 2016).
16:
Online author identification software created by Thomson Reuters
962:
Boudry, Christophe; Durand-Barthez, Manuel (2 September 2020).
512:
305:
274:
242:
so as to avoid data inconsistencies between the two platforms.
238:
From April 2022, Publons started to move the profiles into the
1315:
Sebo, Paul; de Lucia, Sylvain; Vernaz, Nathalie (1 May 2021).
1161:"What is the advantage of having both ORCiD and ResearcherID?"
629:"RID – ORCID Integration – IP & Science – Thomson Reuters"
456:
443:
285:
197:
1469:
109:
756:"Necessary but not sufficient: unique author identifiers"
200:, enabling data to be exchanged between these databases.
843:"Your Publons™ profile is moving to the Web of Science™"
428:
Providing access to research for beginners and students.
408:
Storing authors' personal details and research outputs.
1364:
Liu, Weishu; Hu, Guangyuan; Tang, Li (1 August 2018).
601:"Your ResearcherID of Web of Science moved to Publons"
137:
This unique identifier aims at solving the problem of
304:
The ResearcherID’s registration will be completed at
254:
started up the ResearcherID system as an addition of
212:
to date with specific topics within the field, etc."
961:
367:, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a
1113:Tran, Clara Y.; Lyon, Jennifer A. (26 April 2017).
910:Rotenberg, Ellen; Kushmerick, Ann (1 August 2011).
909:
1477:Introduction of ResearcherID, from Thomson Reuters
1314:
471:
192:ResearcherID and Publons are also integrated with
816:"THE ROLE OF PERSISTENT IDENTIFIERS IN E-SCIENCE"
265:Later, ResearcherID was recommended to relate to
1483:
1158:
1023:"Welcome to the new Web of Science ResearcherID"
753:
459:mainly serves in the discipline of Mathematics.
164:In April 2019, ResearcherID was integrated with
869:Scientific and Technical Information Processing
697:
130:. The system was introduced in January 2008 by
432:
173:researchers in fields that predominantly use
292:used by amounts of authors and researchers.
863:Mazov, N. A.; Gureev, V. N. (1 July 2014).
862:
462:
1427:
1381:
1363:
1332:
1122:
997:
979:
916:Cataloging & Classification Quarterly
787:
674:
437:
387:Learn how and when to remove this message
1112:
1020:
648:
546:
126:is an identifying system for scientific
1422:ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter".
840:
1484:
1173:
508:International Standard Name Identifier
348:contains content that is written like
1502:Library cataloging and classification
1219:
1217:
1108:
1106:
1104:
1060:
1056:
1054:
1052:
1050:
1038:
1034:
1032:
957:
955:
953:
813:
141:and correct attribution of works. In
1267:
858:
856:
854:
852:
809:
807:
749:
747:
621:
606:Wageningen University & Research
518:Virtual International Authority File
442:The combination of ResearcherID and
332:
1174:Mering, Margaret (2 October 2017).
13:
1214:
1101:
1047:
1029:
950:
814:Cujba, Rodica (22 November 2019).
399:Having a unique ResearcherID can:
286:Open Researcher and Contributor ID
14:
1513:
1461:
1268:Aman, Valeria (1 November 2018).
849:
804:
744:
1159:Editage Insights (29 May 2017).
1061:Jacso, Peter (1 February 2018).
1041:"Web of Science Core Collection"
337:
27:
1414:
1357:
1308:
1261:
1167:
1152:
1014:
903:
472:ResearcherID and Google Scholar
834:
691:
642:
593:
540:
323:Web of Science Core Collection
295:
245:
1:
1192:10.1080/00987913.2017.1386056
714:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60931-9
571:10.1126/science.323.5922.1662
533:
480:
981:10.1371/journal.pone.0238583
928:10.1080/01639374.2011.606405
772:10.1136/bmjinnov-2016-000135
7:
501:
433:Integration and Distinction
206:
132:Thomson Reuters Corporation
10:
1518:
1334:10.1007/s11192-020-03845-3
820:Journal of Social Sciences
1392:10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.008
1286:10.1007/s11192-018-2895-3
1079:10.1007/s11192-017-2624-3
881:10.3103/S0147688214030101
841:Publons (14 March 2022).
649:Wolinsky, Howard (2008).
308:, which is set up on the
267:Digital Object Identifier
158:Digital Object Identifier
108:
100:
92:
84:
76:
56:
46:
38:
26:
156:The combined use of the
1370:Journal of Informetrics
463:ResearcherID and Scopus
328:
185:and disciplines in the
1445:Cite journal requires
1249:Cite journal requires
1140:Cite journal requires
828:10.5281/zenodo.3550705
667:10.1038/embor.2008.217
438:ResearcherID and ORCID
214:biomedical researchers
369:neutral point of view
177:conference articles (
139:author identification
1124:10.5860/crl.78.2.171
306:www.researcherid.com
708:(9631): 2152–2153.
651:"What's in a name?"
563:2009Sci...323.1662E
557:(5922): 1662–1664.
361:promotional content
277:, ResearcherID and
256:Clarivate Analytics
170:Clarivate Analytics
147:academic literature
93:Current status
51:Clarivate Analytics
23:
1492:Unique identifiers
363:and inappropriate
284:In the year 2012,
221:unique identifiers
21:
1228:. Rochester, NY.
822:. II (4): 40–46.
661:(12): 1171–1174.
523:Unique Identifier
397:
396:
389:
121:
120:
39:Available in
33:ResearcherID logo
1509:
1473:
1472:
1470:Official website
1455:
1454:
1448:
1443:
1441:
1433:
1431:
1418:
1412:
1411:
1385:
1361:
1355:
1354:
1336:
1327:(5): 4121–4135.
1312:
1306:
1305:
1265:
1259:
1258:
1252:
1247:
1245:
1237:
1221:
1212:
1211:
1186:(3–4): 265–267.
1171:
1165:
1164:
1156:
1150:
1149:
1143:
1138:
1136:
1128:
1126:
1110:
1099:
1098:
1058:
1045:
1044:
1036:
1027:
1026:
1018:
1012:
1011:
1001:
983:
959:
948:
947:
907:
901:
900:
860:
847:
846:
838:
832:
831:
811:
802:
801:
791:
751:
742:
741:
695:
689:
688:
678:
646:
640:
639:
637:
635:
625:
619:
618:
616:
614:
597:
591:
590:
544:
528:author profiling
392:
385:
381:
378:
372:
350:an advertisement
341:
340:
333:
310:Web of Knowledge
179:computer science
72:
69:
67:
65:
63:
31:
24:
20:
1517:
1516:
1512:
1511:
1510:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1482:
1481:
1468:
1467:
1464:
1459:
1458:
1446:
1444:
1435:
1434:
1419:
1415:
1362:
1358:
1313:
1309:
1266:
1262:
1250:
1248:
1239:
1238:
1222:
1215:
1172:
1168:
1157:
1153:
1141:
1139:
1130:
1129:
1111:
1102:
1059:
1048:
1037:
1030:
1019:
1015:
974:(9): e0238583.
960:
951:
908:
904:
861:
850:
839:
835:
812:
805:
760:BMJ Innovations
752:
745:
696:
692:
647:
643:
633:
631:
627:
626:
622:
612:
610:
609:. 24 April 2019
599:
598:
594:
545:
541:
536:
504:
483:
474:
465:
440:
435:
393:
382:
376:
373:
354:
342:
338:
331:
298:
252:Thomson Reuters
248:
229:Thomson Reuters
209:
187:social sciences
101:Written in
60:
34:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1515:
1505:
1504:
1499:
1494:
1480:
1479:
1474:
1463:
1462:External links
1460:
1457:
1456:
1447:|journal=
1413:
1376:(3): 985–997.
1356:
1321:Scientometrics
1307:
1280:(2): 705–720.
1274:Scientometrics
1260:
1251:|journal=
1213:
1180:Serials Review
1166:
1151:
1142:|journal=
1100:
1073:(2): 545–555.
1067:Scientometrics
1046:
1028:
1021:ResearcherID.
1013:
949:
922:(6): 503–520.
902:
875:(3): 206–210.
848:
833:
803:
766:(4): 141–143.
743:
690:
641:
620:
592:
538:
537:
535:
532:
531:
530:
525:
520:
515:
510:
503:
500:
482:
479:
473:
470:
464:
461:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
429:
425:
424:
420:
419:
415:
414:
410:
409:
405:
404:
395:
394:
365:external links
345:
343:
336:
330:
327:
297:
294:
260:Web of Science
247:
244:
240:Web of Science
208:
205:
194:Web of Science
119:
118:
113:
106:
105:
102:
98:
97:
94:
90:
89:
86:
82:
81:
78:
74:
73:
58:
54:
53:
48:
44:
43:
40:
36:
35:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1514:
1503:
1500:
1498:
1495:
1493:
1490:
1489:
1487:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1466:
1465:
1452:
1439:
1430:
1425:
1417:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1360:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1340:
1335:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1318:
1311:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1264:
1256:
1243:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1220:
1218:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1170:
1162:
1155:
1147:
1134:
1125:
1120:
1116:
1109:
1107:
1105:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1057:
1055:
1053:
1051:
1042:
1035:
1033:
1024:
1017:
1009:
1005:
1000:
995:
991:
987:
982:
977:
973:
969:
965:
958:
956:
954:
945:
941:
937:
933:
929:
925:
921:
917:
913:
906:
898:
894:
890:
886:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
859:
857:
855:
853:
844:
837:
829:
825:
821:
817:
810:
808:
799:
795:
790:
785:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
761:
757:
750:
748:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
711:
707:
703:
702:
694:
686:
682:
677:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
645:
630:
624:
608:
607:
602:
596:
588:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
543:
539:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
514:
511:
509:
506:
505:
499:
495:
491:
487:
478:
469:
460:
458:
452:
448:
445:
427:
426:
422:
421:
417:
416:
412:
411:
407:
406:
402:
401:
400:
391:
388:
380:
370:
366:
362:
358:
352:
351:
346:This section
344:
335:
334:
326:
324:
318:
314:
311:
307:
302:
293:
289:
287:
282:
280:
276:
270:
268:
263:
261:
257:
253:
243:
241:
236:
234:
230:
224:
222:
217:
215:
204:
201:
199:
195:
190:
188:
184:
180:
176:
175:peer-reviewed
171:
167:
162:
159:
154:
150:
148:
144:
140:
135:
133:
129:
125:
117:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
59:
55:
52:
49:
45:
41:
37:
30:
25:
19:
1438:cite journal
1416:
1373:
1369:
1359:
1324:
1320:
1310:
1277:
1273:
1263:
1242:cite journal
1183:
1179:
1169:
1154:
1133:cite journal
1070:
1066:
1016:
971:
967:
919:
915:
905:
872:
868:
836:
819:
763:
759:
705:
699:
693:
658:
655:EMBO Reports
654:
644:
632:. Retrieved
623:
611:. Retrieved
604:
595:
554:
548:
542:
496:
492:
488:
484:
475:
466:
453:
449:
441:
398:
383:
374:
359:by removing
355:Please help
347:
319:
315:
303:
299:
290:
283:
279:ResearchGate
271:
264:
249:
237:
225:
218:
210:
202:
191:
163:
155:
151:
136:
124:ResearcherID
123:
122:
112: number
88:January 2008
77:Registration
22:ResearcherID
18:
1039:Clarivate.
296:Identifiers
246:Development
219:Therefore,
1486:Categories
1429:1602.02412
1383:1807.09944
701:The Lancet
613:6 December
534:References
481:Inadequacy
377:April 2024
357:improve it
183:humanities
143:scientific
116:926725318
1497:Clarivate
1400:1751-1577
1351:233450773
1343:1588-2861
1294:1588-2861
1200:0098-7913
1087:1588-2861
990:1932-6203
936:0163-9374
889:1934-8118
780:2055-8074
722:0140-6736
587:206584787
250:In 2008,
1408:51724105
1302:52270328
1208:67705659
1008:32877458
968:PLOS ONE
944:62677619
897:14234900
798:28616253
738:44820419
730:18586158
685:19047988
634:29 March
579:19325094
502:See also
457:arXiv ID
233:Elsevier
207:Overview
85:Launched
80:Optional
1234:2745892
1095:3302540
999:7467223
789:5451540
676:2603453
559:Bibcode
550:Science
166:Publons
128:authors
104:English
62:publons
42:English
1406:
1398:
1349:
1341:
1300:
1292:
1232:
1206:
1198:
1093:
1085:
1006:
996:
988:
942:
934:
895:
887:
796:
786:
778:
736:
728:
720:
683:
673:
585:
577:
513:OpenID
275:Scopus
96:Active
66:/about
1424:arXiv
1404:S2CID
1378:arXiv
1347:S2CID
1298:S2CID
1204:S2CID
1091:S2CID
940:S2CID
893:S2CID
734:S2CID
583:S2CID
444:ORCID
198:ORCID
68:/home
47:Owner
1451:help
1396:ISSN
1339:ISSN
1290:ISSN
1255:help
1230:SSRN
1196:ISSN
1146:help
1083:ISSN
1004:PMID
986:ISSN
932:ISSN
885:ISSN
794:PMID
776:ISSN
726:PMID
718:ISSN
681:PMID
636:2013
615:2021
575:PMID
329:Uses
231:and
196:and
168:, a
145:and
110:OCLC
64:.com
1388:doi
1329:doi
1325:126
1282:doi
1278:117
1188:doi
1119:doi
1075:doi
1071:114
994:PMC
976:doi
924:doi
877:doi
824:doi
784:PMC
768:doi
710:doi
706:371
671:PMC
663:doi
567:doi
555:323
189:).
57:URL
1488::
1442::
1440:}}
1436:{{
1402:.
1394:.
1386:.
1374:12
1372:.
1368:.
1345:.
1337:.
1323:.
1319:.
1296:.
1288:.
1276:.
1272:.
1246::
1244:}}
1240:{{
1216:^
1202:.
1194:.
1184:43
1182:.
1178:.
1137::
1135:}}
1131:{{
1117:.
1103:^
1089:.
1081:.
1069:.
1065:.
1049:^
1031:^
1002:.
992:.
984:.
972:15
970:.
966:.
952:^
938:.
930:.
920:49
918:.
914:.
891:.
883:.
873:41
871:.
867:.
851:^
818:.
806:^
792:.
782:.
774:.
762:.
758:.
746:^
732:.
724:.
716:.
704:.
679:.
669:.
657:.
653:.
603:.
581:.
573:.
565:.
553:.
258:’
134:.
1453:)
1449:(
1432:.
1426::
1410:.
1390::
1380::
1353:.
1331::
1304:.
1284::
1257:)
1253:(
1236:.
1210:.
1190::
1163:.
1148:)
1144:(
1127:.
1121::
1097:.
1077::
1043:.
1025:.
1010:.
978::
946:.
926::
899:.
879::
845:.
830:.
826::
800:.
770::
764:2
740:.
712::
687:.
665::
659:9
638:.
617:.
589:.
569::
561::
390:)
384:(
379:)
375:(
371:.
353:.
70:/
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
