Knowledge

Bouie v. City of Columbia

Source 📝

31: 336:
The Court stated that a judicial construction that has the effect of broadening the activities that constitute a crime and is applied retroactively operates precisely like an ex post facto law. Since an ex post facto application of criminal statutes violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
332:
by Justice Brennan noted that the South Carolina trespass statute criminalized entry upon the lands of another after notice from an owner or tenant prohibiting such entry. The South Carolina Supreme Court, in upholding the convictions, had construed the statute as also covering the act of remaining
406:, which outlawed segregation in public accommodations. It has been suggested that the Supreme Court refrained from reaching the merits in these cases in consideration of the Act; had it done so, it would have eliminated the basis for passage of the legislation. 110:
The State Supreme Court gave retroactive application to its new construction of the statute, which deprived petitioners of their right to fair warning of a criminal prohibition and violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
250:
prohibits retroactive application of any judicial construction of a criminal statute that is unexpected and indefensible by reference to the law that has been expressed prior to the conduct in issue. The holding is based on the
1074: 390:. In none of these cases did the Supreme Court reach the merits of any argument addressing whether private actions of segregation that are enforced by state courts constituted a 1375: 1130: 619: 353:
The dissenting opinion by Justice Black argued that the conduct of remaining after being told to leave was understood to violate the South Carolina trespass statute, and
1202: 1154: 1068: 931: 865: 703: 937: 859: 685: 637: 1146: 913: 679: 252: 229: 1278: 985: 943: 919: 895: 889: 793: 775: 757: 495: 443: 420: 72: 305:. The policy at the store was to allow African-Americans to shop anywhere in the store and to use any facilities except for being served at the restaurant. 1365: 1300: 1027: 1009: 997: 967: 835: 823: 817: 733: 715: 1340: 1050: 979: 973: 907: 883: 829: 811: 805: 769: 739: 709: 691: 607: 1003: 991: 955: 853: 841: 799: 1056: 1015: 961: 871: 745: 727: 721: 697: 613: 601: 468:
Webster, McKenzie. "The Warren Court's Struggle With the Sit-In Cases and the Constitutionality of Segregation in Places of Public Accommodations".
1033: 1021: 901: 787: 763: 673: 1295: 877: 847: 650: 308:
After they had sat down, an employee put up a "no trespassing sign," and the two students were asked to leave. Both were arrested on charges of
1350: 1268: 1370: 1290: 1285: 1273: 1256: 1113: 572: 346:, 378 U.S. 226 (1964), another case involving a sit-in demonstration by African-American students that was announced the same day as 340:
The concurring opinions of Justice Goldberg and Justice Douglas stated simply that they would reverse based upon their opinions in
1385: 1335: 1360: 394:, which violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These decisions were announced two days after the 1380: 1103: 333:
on the premises of another after receiving notice to leave, a construction that had been adopted in another case in 1961.
35: 368:
was one of five cases involving segregation protests that were decided on June 22, 1964. The other four cases were
154: 1138: 1062: 565: 316:
but convicted only for trespass in violation of the state code. The trespass convictions were upheld by the
533: 317: 1098: 1345: 595: 1390: 1194: 1108: 631: 558: 515: 403: 376: 298: 357:
stated that the Fourteenth Amendment did not require an owner of a restaurant to serve customers.
1355: 643: 625: 158: 499: 447: 415: 64: 506: 395: 8: 1186: 1170: 382: 370: 309: 781: 667: 524: 450: 256: 142: 751: 1235: 1178: 949: 342: 329: 282: 278: 243: 67: 1261: 1225: 925: 581: 294: 272: 178: 302: 166: 1329: 1310: 1230: 290: 260: 146: 1305: 1220: 391: 247: 170: 126: 399: 134: 542: 79: 313: 550: 1251: 286: 97: 30: 1376:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
421:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 378
54:
Simon Bouie and Talmadge J. Neal v. City of Columbia
195:
Brennan, joined by Warren, Clark, Stewart, Goldberg
1327: 289:demonstration by sitting down at a booth at the 337:Amendment, the Court reversed the convictions. 242:, 378 U.S. 347 (1964), was a case in which the 43:Argued October 14 – October 15, 1963 566: 100:332 (1962), upholding conviction for trespass 1269:International Civil Rights Center and Museum 1366:United States racial desegregation case law 402:and passed the bill which would become the 1341:African-American history of South Carolina 573: 559: 1114:Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee 463: 461: 459: 1328: 456: 554: 18:1964 United States Supreme Court case 1104:Committee on Appeal for Human Rights 360: 1351:History of Columbia, South Carolina 580: 467: 13: 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1402: 1371:United States Supreme Court cases 502:347 (1964) is available from: 484: 29: 1075:Audubon Regional Library sit-in 1386:Civil rights movement case law 1336:1964 in United States case law 1139:Peterson v. City of Greenville 433: 219:Black, joined by Harlan, White 1: 1361:Restaurants in South Carolina 1063:University of Chicago sit-ins 426: 266: 318:South Carolina Supreme Court 7: 1381:Void for vagueness case law 1131:Gober v. City of Birmingham 470:Journal of Law and Politics 409: 386:, 378 U.S. 153 (1964), and 323: 10: 1407: 1099:Nashville Student Movement 543:Oyez (oral argument audio) 270: 203:Goldberg, joined by Warren 1244: 1213: 1203:Hamm v. City of Rock Hill 1163:Bouie v. City of Columbia 1122: 1091: 1084: 1043: 660: 596:Alexandria Library sit-in 588: 492:Bouie v. City of Columbia 440:Bouie v. City of Columbia 366:Bouie v. City of Columbia 239:Bouie v. City of Columbia 228: 223: 215: 207: 199: 191: 186: 120: 115: 109: 104: 92: 87: 59: 49: 42: 28: 24:Bouie v. City of Columbia 23: 1195:Barr v. City of Columbia 1109:Atlanta Student Movement 632:Dockum Drug Store sit-in 620:Read's Drug Store sit-in 404:Civil Rights Act of 1964 377:Barr v. City of Columbia 1155:Avent v. North Carolina 476:(Spring 2001): 373–407. 380:, 378 U.S. 146 (1964), 374:, 378 U.S. 130 (1964), 277:On March 14, 1960, two 932:Corpus Christi sit-ins 866:St. Petersburg sit-ins 704:Elizabeth City sit-ins 644:Katz Drug Store sit-in 626:Royal Ice Cream sit-in 230:U.S. Const. amend. XIV 159:William J. Brennan Jr. 938:St. Augustine sit-ins 860:Daytona Beach sit-ins 686:Winston-Salem sit-ins 638:Oklahoma City sit-ins 416:Civil Rights Movement 271:Further information: 45:Decided June 22, 1964 1147:Lombard v. Louisiana 914:Jacksonville sit-ins 680:Fayetteville sit-ins 253:Fourteenth Amendment 1279:Tallahassee jail-in 1187:Robinson v. Florida 1171:Griffin v. Maryland 1069:Woolworth's sit-ins 986:Baton Rouge sit-ins 944:Statesville sit-ins 920:San Antonio sit-ins 896:Little Rock sit-ins 890:New Orleans sit-ins 794:Chattanooga sit-ins 776:Chapel Hill sit-ins 758:Tallahassee sit-ins 534:Library of Congress 383:Robinson v. Florida 371:Griffin v. Maryland 310:breach of the peace 255:prohibition by the 78:84 S. Ct. 1697, 12 1301:Biracial committee 1028:Starkville sit-ins 1010:Darlington sit-ins 998:Birmingham sit-ins 968:Wilmington sit-ins 836:Petersburg sit-ins 824:Orangeburg sit-ins 818:Montgomery sit-ins 782:Charleston sit-ins 734:Portsmouth sit-ins 716:High Point sit-ins 668:Greensboro sit-ins 257:Due Process Clause 143:William O. Douglas 131:Associate Justices 96:239 S.C. 570, 124 1323: 1322: 1319: 1318: 1051:Rock Hill sit-ins 980:Lynchburg sit-ins 974:Arlington sit-ins 908:Galveston sit-ins 884:Knoxville sit-ins 830:Lexington sit-ins 812:Frankfort sit-ins 806:Baltimore sit-ins 770:Salisbury sit-ins 752:Nashville sit-ins 740:Rock Hill sit-ins 710:Henderson sit-ins 692:Charlotte sit-ins 608:Baltimore sit-ins 361:Critical response 293:restaurant in an 235: 234: 155:John M. Harlan II 1398: 1346:Allen University 1236:Greenville Eight 1179:Bell v. Maryland 1089: 1088: 1004:Danville sit-ins 992:Marshall sit-ins 956:New Bern sit-ins 950:Savannah sit-ins 854:Columbia sit-ins 842:Tuskegee sit-ins 800:Richmond sit-ins 575: 568: 561: 552: 551: 547: 541: 538: 532: 529: 523: 520: 514: 511: 505: 478: 477: 465: 454: 437: 388:Bell v. Maryland 343:Bell v. Maryland 330:majority opinion 283:Allen University 279:African-American 244:US Supreme Court 116:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 20: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1391:Sit-in movement 1326: 1325: 1324: 1315: 1262:Biloxi wade-ins 1240: 1226:Friendship Nine 1209: 1118: 1080: 1057:Sewanee sit-ins 1039: 1016:Augusta sit-ins 962:Memphis sit-ins 926:Atlanta sit-ins 872:Houston sit-ins 746:Norfolk sit-ins 728:Hampton sit-ins 722:Raleigh sit-ins 698:Concord sit-ins 656: 614:Dresden sit-ins 602:Chicago sit-ins 584: 582:Sit-in movement 579: 545: 539: 536: 530: 527: 521: 518: 512: 509: 503: 487: 482: 481: 466: 457: 438: 434: 429: 412: 363: 326: 275: 273:Sit-in movement 269: 179:Arthur Goldberg 169: 157: 145: 83: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1404: 1394: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1356:Lunch counters 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1316: 1314: 1313: 1308: 1303: 1298: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1254: 1248: 1246: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1238: 1233: 1228: 1223: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1210: 1208: 1207: 1199: 1191: 1183: 1175: 1167: 1159: 1151: 1143: 1135: 1126: 1124: 1120: 1119: 1117: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1095: 1093: 1086: 1082: 1081: 1079: 1078: 1072: 1066: 1060: 1054: 1047: 1045: 1041: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1034:Dallas sit-ins 1031: 1025: 1022:Biloxi sit-ins 1019: 1013: 1007: 1001: 995: 989: 983: 977: 971: 965: 959: 953: 947: 941: 935: 929: 923: 917: 911: 905: 902:Austin sit-ins 899: 893: 887: 881: 875: 869: 863: 857: 851: 845: 839: 833: 827: 821: 815: 809: 803: 797: 791: 788:Shelby sit-ins 785: 779: 773: 767: 764:Sumter sit-ins 761: 755: 749: 743: 737: 731: 725: 719: 713: 707: 701: 695: 689: 683: 677: 674:Durham sit-ins 671: 664: 662: 658: 657: 655: 654: 648: 647: 646: 635: 629: 623: 617: 611: 605: 599: 592: 590: 586: 585: 578: 577: 570: 563: 555: 549: 548: 516:Google Scholar 486: 485:External links 483: 480: 479: 455: 431: 430: 428: 425: 424: 423: 418: 411: 408: 362: 359: 325: 322: 303:South Carolina 281:students from 268: 265: 233: 232: 226: 225: 221: 220: 217: 213: 212: 209: 205: 204: 201: 197: 196: 193: 189: 188: 184: 183: 182: 181: 167:Potter Stewart 132: 129: 124: 118: 117: 113: 112: 107: 106: 102: 101: 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1403: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1339: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1331: 1312: 1311:Direct action 1309: 1307: 1304: 1302: 1299: 1297: 1296:Jail, No Bail 1294: 1292: 1289: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1247: 1243: 1237: 1234: 1232: 1231:Tougaloo Nine 1229: 1227: 1224: 1222: 1219: 1218: 1216: 1212: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1197: 1196: 1192: 1189: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1180: 1176: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1133: 1132: 1128: 1127: 1125: 1121: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1094: 1092:Organizations 1090: 1087: 1083: 1076: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1064: 1061: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1035: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 1014: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1002: 999: 996: 993: 990: 987: 984: 981: 978: 975: 972: 969: 966: 963: 960: 957: 954: 951: 948: 945: 942: 939: 936: 933: 930: 927: 924: 921: 918: 915: 912: 909: 906: 903: 900: 897: 894: 891: 888: 885: 882: 879: 878:Miami sit-ins 876: 873: 870: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 852: 849: 848:Tampa sit-ins 846: 843: 840: 837: 834: 831: 828: 825: 822: 819: 816: 813: 810: 807: 804: 801: 798: 795: 792: 789: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 726: 723: 720: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 678: 675: 672: 669: 666: 665: 663: 659: 652: 651:Miami sit-ins 649: 645: 642: 641: 639: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 621: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 603: 600: 597: 594: 593: 591: 587: 583: 576: 571: 569: 564: 562: 557: 556: 553: 544: 535: 526: 517: 508: 507:CourtListener 501: 497: 493: 489: 488: 475: 471: 464: 462: 460: 452: 449: 445: 441: 436: 432: 422: 419: 417: 414: 413: 407: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 384: 379: 378: 373: 372: 367: 358: 356: 351: 349: 345: 344: 338: 334: 331: 321: 319: 315: 312:and criminal 311: 306: 304: 300: 297:drugstore in 296: 292: 291:lunch counter 288: 284: 280: 274: 264: 262: 261:ex post facto 258: 254: 249: 245: 241: 240: 231: 227: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 187:Case opinions 185: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 160: 156: 152: 148: 144: 140: 136: 133: 130: 128: 125: 123:Chief Justice 122: 121: 119: 114: 108: 103: 99: 95: 91: 86: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 1201: 1193: 1185: 1177: 1169: 1162: 1161: 1153: 1145: 1137: 1129: 1123:Sit-in cases 491: 473: 469: 453: (1964). 439: 435: 392:state action 387: 381: 375: 369: 365: 364: 354: 352: 347: 341: 339: 335: 327: 307: 285:conducted a 276: 238: 237: 236: 224:Laws applied 174: 162: 150: 147:Tom C. Clark 138: 88:Case history 71: 53: 15: 1306:Nonviolence 1221:Richmond 34 661:During 1960 589:Before 1960 248:due process 208:Concurrence 200:Concurrence 171:Byron White 127:Earl Warren 1330:Categories 1214:Defendants 1044:After 1960 427:References 400:filibuster 267:Background 246:held that 135:Hugo Black 111:Amendment. 82:894 (1964) 1036:(Apr. 28) 1030:(Apr. 23) 1024:(Apr. 17) 1000:(Mar. 31) 994:(Mar. 29) 988:(Mar. 28) 982:(Mar. 26) 976:(Mar. 19) 970:(Mar. 19) 964:(Mar. 19) 958:(Mar. 17) 952:(Mar. 16) 946:(Mar. 15) 940:(Mar. 15) 934:(Mar. 15) 928:(Mar. 15) 922:(Mar. 13) 916:(Mar. 12) 910:(Mar. 11) 904:(Mar. 11) 898:(Mar. 10) 850:(Feb. 27) 844:(Feb. 26) 838:(Feb. 26) 832:(Feb. 26) 826:(Feb. 25) 820:(Feb. 25) 814:(Feb. 22) 808:(Feb. 22) 802:(Feb. 20) 796:(Feb. 19) 790:(Feb. 18) 784:(Feb. 18) 778:(Feb. 17) 772:(Feb. 16) 766:(Feb. 14) 760:(Feb. 13) 754:(Feb. 13) 748:(Feb. 12) 742:(Feb. 12) 736:(Feb. 11) 730:(Feb. 11) 724:(Feb. 10) 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 1291:Study-in 1018:(Apr. 9) 1012:(Apr. 4) 1006:(Apr. 2) 892:(Mar. 8) 886:(Mar. 7) 880:(Mar. 4) 874:(Mar. 4) 868:(Mar. 2) 862:(Mar. 2) 856:(Mar. 2) 718:(Feb. 9) 712:(Feb. 9) 706:(Feb. 9) 700:(Feb. 9) 694:(Feb. 9) 688:(Feb. 8) 682:(Feb. 8) 676:(Feb. 8) 670:(Feb. 1) 490:Text of 410:See also 398:ended a 324:Decision 314:trespass 299:Columbia 295:Eckerd's 192:Majority 1286:Pray-in 1274:Jail-in 1257:Wade-in 1085:Related 640:(1958) 216:Dissent 211:Douglas 105:Holding 1252:Sit-in 1206:(1964) 1198:(1964) 1190:(1964) 1182:(1964) 1174:(1964) 1166:(1964) 1158:(1963) 1150:(1963) 1142:(1963) 1134:(1963) 1077:(1964) 1071:(1963) 1065:(1962) 1059:(1962) 1053:(1961) 653:(1959) 634:(1958) 628:(1957) 622:(1955) 616:(1954) 610:(1953) 604:(1943) 598:(1939) 546:  540:  537:  531:  528:  525:Justia 522:  519:  513:  510:  504:  442:, 396:Senate 287:sit-in 263:laws. 177: 175:· 173:  165: 163:· 161:  153: 151:· 149:  141: 139:· 137:  98:S.E.2d 1245:Other 498: 446: 348:Bouie 93:Prior 500:U.S. 448:U.S. 355:Bell 328:The 73:more 65:U.S. 63:378 496:378 451:347 444:378 259:of 68:347 1332:: 494:, 474:17 472:. 458:^ 350:. 320:. 301:, 574:e 567:t 560:v 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
347
more
L. Ed. 2d
S.E.2d
Earl Warren
Hugo Black
William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Arthur Goldberg
U.S. Const. amend. XIV
US Supreme Court
due process
Fourteenth Amendment
Due Process Clause
ex post facto
Sit-in movement
African-American
Allen University
sit-in
lunch counter
Eckerd's
Columbia
South Carolina
breach of the peace

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.