561:
827:
277:
22:
817:
795:
colours. That's something I'd like to see cleared out, independently of the question whether
Navarre officially uses these "FIAV Colours". I do not want to get involved in another debate over aesthetics, I have gotten sick of that long ago. I vote a weak support for Fry's preferred image because of the composition. The larger coat of arms with thicker lines results in an image that can be more easily recognized at 30px size. These matters can be addressed in the Miguillen file.
699:
295:
366:
708:
790:, as linked on the file page, shows a gradient. After all these years I have yet to see an authoritative text banning the use of relief. If that is the case, many reconstructed flags on Commons, as well as historical flags on commons are wrong. Furthermore, the file by Miguillen uses two different shades of red. The faux-gradient with black bars also defeats the purpose. Concerning FIAV-colours, I am familiar with the FIAV colour descriptions to
924:
135:
117:
71:
53:
763:
145:
219:
201:
305:
890:), which are described using FIAV terms. (In a related note, this means that all people who change flags based on these supposed FIAV colours are mistaken, and I've seen such changes happen quite a few times. That ought to be addressed on a scale beyond this discussion.) I hope this information will prove useful to you, Fry.
1151:: I'm here because of a bot notice. I prefer the colors and scale on the left and the clarity and detail on the right. I see there is some question of the heraldry & vexiollogy accuracy, so I'd say go with the left one and fine tune it to show the detail. If that can be done, then I vote for the one on the left.
868:
No, we shouldn't have to compromise at all. Miguillen has constantly edit warred and reverted various pages and articles regarding this issue for years and never posted any sources during that entire time or gained any support from other users. Miguillen has no right to dictate what images we can and
829:
As I said the discussion here is not about a coat but a flag with coat which usually appears in these painted or embroidered and this version represents an embossed something that is not usual in coats. It is not natural or real. Nor would it be the same to talk of degraded representations in relief.
740:
The only one who does not give objective reasons is Fry1989. I've dajado clear my opinion and I have yet to see a source where a flag appears with a shield that resembles a word in colored relief. Besides the shield does not follow the same criteria as the other maps flag. And the funny thing is that
604:
Here there is no contancia about besides yours and we are trying to a flag with coat of arms not a coat. These coats of arms played a particular format is a coat of arms embossed in color. A flag may not have a relief simulating coat. That's the same as hitting the photograph of a coat of arms carved
570:
is not the flag because the flag of
Navarra Navarra has the coat of arms with relief effects. Moreover, this effect is totally unreal in any flag in the coat of arms is painted or embroidered. On the other hand red is too dark and although not officially regulated the exact shade of Navarra flags use
979:
That that you have tried to reach an agreement sometime and I have not provided sources is false. Again you you resort to personal disqualification untruthfully because you have no arguments. If you position is to be black or white because I say so and if a user does not agree with you is a troll or
945:
Miguillen has been a thorn in my side for two years, reverting and controlling what images can or can not be used on various articles, but never a source and never another user who actually agreed with them. There was a time I was willing to compromise, but not after what I have been through. I like
1243:
Image is better. Think about what is the important issues here. You are volunteers working to create an encyclopedia which has a main objective of being informative, a place where people doing research can find reasonably accurate, factual information. Clarity in the flag designs proposed here is
849:
The second picture you posted seems to be worthy of imitation. I would propose as a solution a flat-coloured flag and flagmap following that file. Thick black shield and crown cap outline, no outlines on the gold and silver (or outlines of same colour), a colour of gold closer to the posted image
666:
screens produce variations of the same colour/color, if only by adjusting screen brightness. So who's to say that one version is more historically accurate (or even better) than the other? Hopefully this closing will end the struggle so that these two editors can use their considerable talent and
833:
On the other hand I think it is appropriate that this follow the same criteria map flag other regions of Spain. As for color Coat reason is that were determined to be different elements and takes the flag colors of flag and emblem coat. It is very common to see banners that use a different color
619:
This matter has been discussed on several pages, including your talk page and the talk pages of
Navarre and Coats of arms of the autonomous communities of Spain. You oppose certain images solely because they are drawn in a manner different from how you think they should be drawn. You do not post
794:
flag colours by shade (e.g. R++ for very dark red). Where do these "FIAV Colours" originate from? The FOTW website uses community consensus colours which they linked to the FIAV colors. I can not find official "FIAV Colours" on the FIAV website. The FIAV flag itself is standardised with
Pantone
1107:
Regardless of the heraldic and vexiollogical details, the left version is nearly completely indistinguishable, while the right is clearly more recognisable as
Navarra's coat of arm. So from a purely graphical point of view, I without a doubt support the latter. Should it really be unacceptable
658:. Missing in their discussion (and bantering) is the realization that through history the flags and emblems were fashioned by artisans who did not have the same precise and "unchanging" colors/colours that modern technology now produces. "Red" dyes produced "red" fabric and were not always
850:
instead of the rather greenish colour on the file of
Miguillen, the red can stay as Miguillen prefers. The black faux-gradient is in conflict with the image too, doesn't fit with embroidery either. Enlarge the coat of arms on the flagmap for better visibility. Compara also with
1086:
887:
1197:
I prefer Fry1989's design. If no agreement can be reached then I would suggest that a third party provides a slightly different design and this is used instead, and neither Fry1989 nor
Miguillen contribute further to the discussion on this image.
958:, many users do. More importantly, I see no faults in their construction. It is solely Miguillen who forcefully opposes the use of these images under their own artistic POV that they are somehow "wrong". Why should that be tolerated any longer?
1054:
They're the same thing, they're both made of fabric whether you call it a flag or a banner or a repostero or whatever else. You were given a source and say it's wrong. You aren't interested in sources different from what you want.
1035:
not a flag. I do not speak a coat of armas I speak of a flag thus not change the subject. Represents a different coat of armas painted or embroidered one is what is put in a flag. Have a source in the description of image: the
385:
586:
You have no support or consensus for your preferred image. Several users disagree with you about which
Navarre image should be used, including myself, Adelbrecht and Heralder. You must stop reverting and gain a consensus.
869:
can not use based on their personal artistic opinion, but they have taken on that role themselves which is why I was forced to start this AN. I want a choice between the two images we have now, not an appeasement.
769:
Naturally. My preferred image is a more stable file and equally as correct of a representation as the other. The opposition provided by
Miguillen is based solely on artistic preference with no sources.
735:
755:
571:
the same red flags of Spain which is often called red flag. Coat colors vary depending on whether this is painted or embroidered but never used relive effects of using different shades.Regards.--
931:
That's close to what I meant, yes. A thicker line on the red cap in the crown, and no vertical stripes in the inside of the crown. I believe that would closely emulate the official version.
1083:
is made of velvet embroidery also can be mounted with pieces of the same material. A flag is cloth and coat can be painted or embroidered. But still not have that embossed effect.
82:, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Knowledge. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the
741:
now come with big reason that my design is only when I am the only one who raised entirely objective reasons and the only reason given Fry1989 that is entirely subjective.--
500:
642:
1031:
That image has no effect highlight all the gold has same color, same with the other colors which do not demonstrate that you want. Besides that, this image is a
458:
676:
730:
810:
444:
514:
1178:
will be the primary factor in my closing, but the nastiness I've seen in this template's edit history will be a factor if consensus is not clear. –
750:
804:
1122:
1261:
1187:
1131:
The one on the right is only "unacceptable" to a single user who has not been able to substantiate in any manner what is actually wrong with it.
863:
778:
1139:
1233:
966:
899:
877:
451:
415:
389:
1160:
1063:
1049:
1010:
989:
632:
614:
595:
1207:
472:
430:
1314:
1319:
886:
is incorrect, da121aff is not the standard FIAV colour. It is a community consensus of the
Spanish Heraldry and Vexillology project (
605:
in stone. Why can not this case follow the same criteria as other flags map? In no other case has been tried such a thing. Regards.--
654:) is for the right-hand image. I note that this discussion started off between the two concerned editors at least 16 months ago at
940:
1324:
1098:
918:
843:
823:
1174:
debate between two editors who cannot cooperate. I'm going to put this on my watchlist and close at day 30. Of course community
1304:
1284:
437:
411:
883:
1309:
1289:
580:
231:
1037:
787:
1294:
688:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
327:
1271:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
620:
sources and have not had any support for your claims from other users. You simply keep reverting and fighting because you
465:
851:
242:, history and culture on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
83:
78:
58:
1299:
1114:
995:
947:
486:
243:
167:
722:
Considering there is a dispute between which image should be used to represent Navarre, I am initiating this RFC.
318:
282:
405:
955:
567:
507:
396:
378:
226:
206:
33:
1080:
667:
knowledge to make other improvements to Navarre-related topics. In this case, though, enough is enough. –
158:
122:
479:
826:
no where the gradient look I see the whole crown using the same golden tone. Here is a little better:
951:
528:
326:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
166:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
555:
882:
Very well, though I shall not continue with it. I shall share my findings on the FIAV colours.
39:
1002:
that supports the file and you made excuses that it wasn't right because it was embroidery.
1257:
1183:
936:
895:
859:
800:
672:
651:
493:
834:
palette on the bottom and on the coats though if this is an obstacle to change. Regards.--
8:
1248:
variant is superior in clarity and readability than the version suggested by M. Pick the
1175:
1094:
1045:
1040:
where you see the flag with an embroidered coat of armas without relive those effects.--
985:
914:
839:
746:
610:
576:
998:
is a wrong representation except for your personal claims. I on the other hand provided
1226:
1215:-- I prefer the image on the right as it has more clarity and utility for the reader.--
1171:
1156:
423:
1244:
what should decide the issue when you are working to be encyclopedic. Obviously the
1108:
because of said heraldry & vexiollogy, then a new version based on the left one
1203:
1117:
655:
310:
560:
1253:
1179:
932:
891:
855:
796:
668:
663:
659:
239:
1090:
1041:
981:
910:
835:
742:
606:
572:
521:
410:. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see:
386:
Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places
1278:
1218:
716:
The work preferred by Miguillen (left), the work preferred by Fry1989 (right)
294:
276:
235:
1152:
1133:
1057:
1004:
960:
871:
816:
772:
724:
626:
589:
150:
1199:
365:
698:
707:
1032:
323:
923:
134:
116:
70:
52:
1112:
be created, that is at least as recognisable as the right one.
86:, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
163:
999:
218:
200:
230:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
909:
Like this?? Just would have to adjust the tone Gold.--
501:
Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
322:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
300:
162:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
140:
624:, not because there is anything wrong with them.
1276:
980:vandal. Well you can never reach an agreement.--
643:RfC: Which image should be used on this template
459:Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
652:although based on a small number of comments
373:Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
854:. Would that be a reasonable compromise?
515:Knowledge requested photographs of places
32:does not require a rating on Knowledge's
922:
559:
736:Support for Miguillen's preferred image
445:Geographic related deletion discussions
1277:
994:You haven't provided any sources that
756:Support for Fry1989's preferred image
416:Unknown-importance geography articles
316:This template is within the scope of
224:This template is within the scope of
156:This template is within the scope of
21:
19:
684:The following discussion is closed.
473:Geography articles needing infoboxes
431:Geography articles needing attention
402:Tag related article talk pages with
15:
884:File:Explicación relieve corona.svg
38:It is of interest to the following
13:
92:Knowledge:WikiProject Stub sorting
14:
1336:
1315:Template-Class geography articles
996:File:Coat of Arms of Navarre .svg
948:File:Coat of Arms of Navarre .svg
355:WikiProject Geography To-do list:
95:Template:WikiProject Stub sorting
1320:NA-importance geography articles
1267:The discussion above is closed.
815:
761:
706:
697:
390:Missing articles about Locations
364:
303:
293:
275:
217:
199:
143:
133:
115:
69:
51:
20:
336:Knowledge:WikiProject Geography
76:This template is maintained by
1325:WikiProject Geography articles
339:Template:WikiProject Geography
1:
1305:NA-importance Basque articles
1285:Template-Class Spain articles
412:Unassessed geography articles
330:and see a list of open tasks.
246:and see a list of open tasks.
170:and see a list of open tasks.
1310:All WikiProject Basque pages
1290:NA-importance Spain articles
1172:Great taste vs. Less filling
252:Knowledge:WikiProject Basque
7:
1295:All WikiProject Spain pages
650:The community's consensus (
255:Template:WikiProject Basque
176:Knowledge:WikiProject Spain
10:
1341:
179:Template:WikiProject Spain
1262:15:18, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
1234:15:48, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
1208:10:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
1188:04:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
1161:00:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
1140:00:27, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
1123:18:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
350:
288:
212:
128:
64:
46:
1300:NA-Class Basque articles
1269:Please do not modify it.
1099:18:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
1064:17:18, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
1050:19:41, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
1011:16:58, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
990:19:15, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
967:18:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
941:16:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
919:16:33, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
900:16:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
878:16:26, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
864:12:05, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
844:11:21, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
805:21:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
779:19:30, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
751:19:43, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
731:19:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
686:Please do not modify it.
677:17:08, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
633:19:39, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
615:19:31, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
596:18:20, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
581:08:05, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
487:Knowledge requested maps
452:Geographical coordinates
79:WikiProject Stub sorting
662:. Even today different
927:
564:
1252:version and move on.
1168:Non-involved RfC note
1079:It's not the same. A
926:
563:
406:WikiProject Geography
319:WikiProject Geography
98:Stub sorting articles
656:Talk:Navarre#Symbols
811:Threaded discussion
1081:heraldic repostero
928:
786:- The source for
687:
565:
342:geography articles
227:WikiProject Basque
34:content assessment
1116:
685:
553:
552:
549:
548:
545:
544:
541:
540:
537:
536:
270:
269:
266:
265:
194:
193:
190:
189:
159:WikiProject Spain
110:
109:
106:
105:
1332:
1232:
1229:
1136:
1113:
1060:
1007:
963:
874:
819:
788:Miguillen's flag
775:
768:
765:
764:
727:
710:
701:
629:
592:
438:Deletion sorting
409:
379:Article requests
368:
361:
360:
352:
351:
344:
343:
340:
337:
334:
313:
311:Geography portal
308:
307:
306:
297:
290:
289:
279:
272:
271:
260:
259:
256:
253:
250:
221:
214:
213:
203:
196:
195:
184:
183:
180:
177:
174:
153:
148:
147:
146:
137:
130:
129:
119:
112:
111:
100:
99:
96:
93:
90:
73:
66:
65:
55:
48:
47:
25:
24:
23:
16:
1340:
1339:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1227:
1216:
1134:
1058:
1005:
961:
872:
813:
773:
766:
762:
758:
738:
725:
720:
719:
718:
717:
713:
712:
711:
703:
702:
690:
681:
680:
679:
664:computer vision
645:
627:
622:don't like them
590:
558:
556:Flag of Navarra
533:
529:Geography stubs
403:
341:
338:
335:
332:
331:
309:
304:
302:
258:Basque articles
257:
254:
251:
248:
247:
240:Basque language
181:
178:
175:
172:
171:
149:
144:
142:
97:
94:
91:
88:
87:
12:
11:
5:
1338:
1328:
1327:
1322:
1317:
1312:
1307:
1302:
1297:
1292:
1287:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1237:
1236:
1210:
1191:
1190:
1164:
1163:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1126:
1125:
1087:This is a flag
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
972:
971:
970:
969:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
902:
812:
809:
808:
807:
781:
757:
754:
737:
734:
715:
714:
705:
704:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
682:
649:
648:
647:
646:
644:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
599:
598:
557:
554:
551:
550:
547:
546:
543:
542:
539:
538:
535:
534:
532:
531:
517:
503:
489:
475:
461:
447:
433:
419:
392:
372:
370:
369:
357:
356:
348:
347:
345:
328:the discussion
315:
314:
298:
286:
285:
280:
268:
267:
264:
263:
261:
244:the discussion
232:Basque Country
222:
210:
209:
204:
192:
191:
188:
187:
185:
182:Spain articles
168:the discussion
155:
154:
138:
126:
125:
120:
108:
107:
104:
103:
101:
74:
62:
61:
56:
44:
43:
37:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1337:
1326:
1323:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1308:
1306:
1303:
1301:
1298:
1296:
1293:
1291:
1288:
1286:
1283:
1282:
1280:
1270:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1247:
1242:
1239:
1238:
1235:
1230:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1165:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1121:
1120:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1082:
1065:
1062:
1061:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1038:official site
1034:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1012:
1009:
1008:
1001:
997:
993:
992:
991:
987:
983:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
968:
965:
964:
957:
953:
949:
944:
943:
942:
938:
934:
930:
929:
925:
921:
920:
916:
912:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
879:
876:
875:
867:
866:
865:
861:
857:
853:
848:
847:
846:
845:
841:
837:
831:
828:
825:
822:
818:
806:
802:
798:
793:
789:
785:
782:
780:
777:
776:
760:
759:
753:
752:
748:
744:
733:
732:
729:
728:
709:
700:
689:
678:
674:
670:
665:
661:
657:
653:
634:
631:
630:
623:
618:
617:
616:
612:
608:
603:
602:
601:
600:
597:
594:
593:
585:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
569:
562:
530:
526:
524:
523:
518:
516:
512:
510:
509:
504:
502:
498:
496:
495:
490:
488:
484:
482:
481:
476:
474:
470:
468:
467:
462:
460:
456:
454:
453:
448:
446:
442:
440:
439:
434:
432:
428:
426:
425:
420:
417:
413:
407:
401:
399:
398:
393:
391:
387:
383:
381:
380:
375:
374:
371:
367:
363:
362:
359:
358:
354:
353:
349:
346:
329:
325:
321:
320:
312:
301:
299:
296:
292:
291:
287:
284:
281:
278:
274:
273:
262:
245:
241:
237:
236:Basque people
233:
229:
228:
223:
220:
216:
215:
211:
208:
205:
202:
198:
197:
186:
169:
165:
161:
160:
152:
141:
139:
136:
132:
131:
127:
124:
121:
118:
114:
113:
102:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
68:
67:
63:
60:
57:
54:
50:
49:
45:
41:
35:
31:
27:
18:
17:
1268:
1249:
1245:
1240:
1220:
1219:
1212:
1194:
1176:WP:CONSENSUS
1170:– This is a
1167:
1148:
1132:
1118:
1109:
1104:
1085:
1078:
1056:
1003:
959:
952:derived flag
908:
870:
832:
820:
814:
791:
784:Weak support
783:
771:
739:
723:
721:
683:
625:
621:
588:
566:
520:
519:
506:
505:
492:
491:
478:
477:
464:
463:
450:
449:
436:
435:
422:
421:
395:
394:
377:
376:
317:
225:
157:
151:Spain portal
89:Stub sorting
84:project page
77:
59:Stub sorting
40:WikiProjects
29:
1195:RfC comment
1149:RfC comment
1119:victor falk
1105:RfC comment
1279:Categories
1254:Damotclese
933:Adelbrecht
892:Adelbrecht
856:Adelbrecht
824:this image
797:Adelbrecht
494:Notability
443:Listed at
1091:Miguillen
1042:Miguillen
1033:repostero
982:Miguillen
911:Miguillen
836:Miguillen
743:Miguillen
607:Miguillen
573:Miguillen
333:Geography
324:geography
283:Geography
1221:Keithbob
1000:a source
956:flag map
821:Comment:
792:describe
660:constant
30:template
1250:Fry1989
1246:Fry1989
1241:Fry1989
1213:Comment
1180:S. Rich
1153:SW3 5DL
1135:Fry1989
1059:Fry1989
1006:Fry1989
962:Fry1989
950:, it's
873:Fry1989
774:Fry1989
726:Fry1989
669:S. Rich
628:Fry1989
591:Fry1989
466:Infobox
424:Cleanup
1200:Atshal
397:Assess
249:Basque
207:Basque
36:scale.
522:Stubs
508:Photo
173:Spain
164:Spain
123:Spain
28:This
1258:talk
1228:Talk
1204:talk
1184:talk
1157:talk
1110:must
1095:talk
1046:talk
986:talk
954:and
937:talk
915:talk
896:talk
888:link
860:talk
852:this
840:talk
801:talk
747:talk
673:talk
611:talk
577:talk
568:This
527:See
513:See
499:See
485:See
471:See
457:See
429:See
414:and
388:and
384:See
1089:.--
480:Map
1281::
1260:)
1231:•
1225:•
1217:—
1206:)
1186:)
1159:)
1097:)
1048:)
988:)
939:)
917:)
898:)
862:)
842:)
803:)
749:)
675:)
613:)
579:)
408:}}
404:{{
238:,
234:,
1256:(
1202:(
1182:(
1155:(
1093:(
1044:(
984:(
935:(
913:(
894:(
858:(
838:(
799:(
767:Y
745:(
671:(
609:(
575:(
525::
511::
497::
483::
469::
455::
441::
427::
418:.
400::
382::
42::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
