User talk:KHM03/Archive 6

214:

the similarities, but then explore the divergence. Besides, a Jewish philosopher like Rosenzweig had beautiful things to say about the Jewish notion of love. Surely thee have been Christian theologians who have done the same -- they sould be represented. But I think there is a risk in getting bogged down inthe similarities. Scifintel just made an addition pointing out that Jesus said "Love the Lord your God" and "Love they neighbor" as the two most important commandments. Does he know that Jesus was quoting the Torah? I even referred to this in the Jewish section. I am not objecting to Scifintel adding this to the article; I object to the way he added it without explaining what it really means. By itself it simply means Jesus held a belief common to most Jews at that time. So what? Curely there is much more to say about how these statements by Jesus were interpreted and used by Christians in ways different from the Rabbis. Can you help inthis regard?

489:) and from user accounts that were created specially to target me. They all basically had the same message – that someone was going to find out my home address and harm me. Also, a blog about me was created, giving my work address and inviting people to send me anthrax or a letter bomb. The creator of the blog then left a message on my talk page, giving me the URL of the blog, and pretending that he/she had stumbled across it by chance, and had found my Knowledge page through doing a Google search for my name, and wanted to warn me. It was dealt with very promptly and efficiently by the administrators here, but it went on for several weeks, and my mother was a bit upset about it, so I decided that it would be better to be a little more private. I know the new name is a bit pompous, but I had to choose 1400:

cut and pasted from a very similar biography - but I can't find that one online. I hate to block him, because he hasn't actually reverted, and the material is generally useful information (although poorly written). Jones' school is huge, he's had an enormous impact here in the Carolinas. You can hardly shake a tree anywhere without a graduate or two falling out - but, as you say, you won't find them in Methodist churches. I've done business with quite a few of the grads. -Interesting that Jones came out of Methodism, too. At any rate the article needs quite a bit of work to be up to standards, and his importance deserves a good article.

974:, when there is already an article on the Aeneid. I would like to delete this entire section, perhaps replacing it with a short section on how the opera varies from the Aeneid. I've posted on the article's talk page, but no one has responded. I know I'm supposed to Be Bold, but I don't want to get rid of someone's hard work without due process, but I don't want to put it up for articles for deletion or anything. The person who's done most of it is anonymous. What is appropriate in this situation? Thank you for any guidance you can give. 790:"... what I found most refreshing about your work is its objectivity and impartiality. I've been searching for some time for someone who could help fill in the gaps and mostly have found Jesus bashers full of the same sort of hate and prejudice I see in the world religions. These people are no better than those they criticize. Thank you for bringing me closer to the truth without inciting bad emotions. And thank you for providing such a gold mine of information. Your site is at the top of my bookmarks! ... Keep up the good work." 200:

you think necessary? I am very concerned about not misrepresenting, or doing justice to, the Christian point of view. I also added a long quote from Maimonides to the section on Heaven and Hell; in fact, I did a rewrite a week or two ago. I know the Jewish position is well-represented but again I am concerned that in the process the Christian view may appear misrepresented or at least underrepresented. So, I'd be grateful if you checked and made sure the Christian view(s) are accurately and sufficiently represented. Thanks,

316: 1555: 1459: 1089: 1543: 1447: 323: 825: 863:

OK, that can be done, but the rule is rather naive). The other, who is truly anonymous, does not want to have a "link farm" and always takes me out, whenever he/she has the chance. But recently two new posts appeared and no deletion. I feel unjustifiably picked on and my opinion of wikipedia is very low at this time. What do you recommend? Thanks, Bernard

760:"This is where your rational approach is most helpful ... by using historical research and factual information. It really takes a careful eye to spot these things, some of which are buried under layers of "over-familiarity". This is not a criticism, rather more a compliment, but I do want to say that your site is demanding careful attention." 1357:

truly love. I haven't included all the movies I love, but Unforgiven is one of them. As for John versus Ringo - well, you know most people agree with you. But watch the movies, A Hard Day's Night, and Help!. In both movies, the fundamental drama is essentially the same: without Ringo, there would be no Beatles. Happy New Year!

1600:

The sources are the JewishEncyclopedia article on Beersheba, and Abimelech (section 3), and also minor aspects of the Sarah, Isaac, Abraham, and Rebekah articles; Israel Finkelstein concerning the archaeology of Beersheba; Friedmann, Noth, etc. (e.g. "Who wrote the Bible") for much of the documentary

1511:

talk page. It is a particularly sensitive issue for Lutherans who do not consider Luther a revolutionary and the fact that the catagory contains a lot of rebels, communists, etc. does not help. We're also in a bruising battle over Luther's venom against the Jews, and some of our editors are likely to

862:

Hello, I cannot believe my website "Jesus, a historical reconstruction" is turned down. It is certainly more researched, more objective than most of the links of the Jesus page. I have two opponents (see talk:Jesus for details), one saying somebody else other than me should implement the post (that's

423:

Thank you for your welcome message. I've been an anonymous contributor to Knowledge for several months but finially decided to go ahead and get myself an id. I'm interested in contributing to the following sections and acknowledge that I have a great deal to learn when it comes to categorization and

388:

My book was only just released (amazon.com) two weeks ago. I am not trying to post 'commercial' links. Rather, I am trying to post sources of information that can be an excellent and new addition to Bibliographies and references, just as other books and links appear. If I am doing this wrong, or you

1399:

I'm watching another page that might also interest you - Bob Jones, Sr. One editor made an enormous block addition to his bio, which was a copyvio. I removed it, then warned him. He hasn't responded. Since then, he's added much of it back piecemeal, but either slightly rewritten, or (it looks like)

1207:

Hi, I just saw your comment at mythology. I wasn't trying to be misleading with my alert at the cat talk page, I should explain that the specific issue is that the article states that the Book of Revelation is "myths" - I didn't notice that it said that about the entire Bible. Maybe you would not

650:

Hi, if you look at the History, it is Clinkphonist who has reverted to his badly-spelled version four times in the last 24 hours... I didn't mean to suggest it was you... I count 4 reverts of his, two against me and two against you, the question is, will he be called on it, or get away with it...

588:

Since you happen to be one of the people who worked on this article, I should inform you (if you haven't noticed already) that the article is currently a candidate for featured article removal. One major complaint is the writing, which I happen to agree with in several sections (notably the history

213:

Thanks for your note. I agree that Judaism and Christianity have a common root, in this issue. But they ended up diverging entirely. For some reason, Christians do not see keeping kosher as the way to love God and the world; for some reason Jews do see it this way. So I think you can start with

559:

Got your note and read the article. Frankly, I'm not quite sure at this point what is the best way to proceed. One way would be a separate article. Any ideas as to how to approach that would be welcome. In the meantime, I guess we can just chip away (point/counterpoint?) at the article itself.

381:

Dear Brother, I am a Christian. I have just written a book about the life and death of Jesus. I noticed recently that Knowledge is embroiled in several "arguments" about postings...notably attacks on others plus false information. One example would be the pages on Muhammed, obviously maintained by

199:

on "love." It is just a stup of a section, hopefully others will add more about the Jewish notion. But I know that my characterization of the Christian notion is at best wildly incomplete. When you have time, would you go over it and add whatever additional material, detail, nuance, explanation

1356:

I happen to lie Fort Apache, The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence, and also Rio Bravo quite a bit (never liked the Searchers as much as all the critics). I might end up putting the Man Who Shot Liberty Calence on my "soft-spot" list, but what can I say? It just doesn't move me as much as the ones I

722:

I also noted on the link list a posted website called the "Jesus puzzle", which is highly controversial, and against the existence of Jesus. It is strongly promotional towards the author, who uses it to sell his own book (I do not). Another link "Overview of the Life of Jesus' advertises book for

1590:, an article discussing the strikingly similar Abraham&Abimelech (Genesis 20-21), Isaac&Abimelech (Genesis 26), and Pharaoh&Abraham (Genesis 12), incidents where the Abraham/Isaac's wife is confused by Pharaoh/Abimelech for their sister, and a later treaty occurs at Beersheba. 1822:

In the context of the article, trinity is not referred to a proper noun. The reference is to "a trinity" which can be any group of three. Later in the sentence it is inferred that the Chrstian concept is what is being referred to, but grammatically speaking, it should be lowercase.

1521:

Thanks! By the way, if you'd like to work with us on the Luther article, we would be glad to have you. A non-Lutheran view would be a helpful NPOV check. By and large, it is a very quiet place (except for Luther and the Jews) We value wikifolk who actually want to work with us. 8-)

778:"The author clearly writes with a great deal of knowledge ... Furthermore, Bernard does not break any academic rules ... The amount of valuable resources available at the site is exceptional and should not be ignored ... this website should not be overlooked in any study on Jesus." 96:

I've been away on wikiholiday (and will continue to be for an indefinite period), but I checked back in to (A) add a wikiholiday announcement to my userpage, (B) be shocked by Essajay's retirement, and (C) let you know about an upcoming event. I had told you a while back about the

733:"Congratulations! ... easily the best documented & most objective piece of Jesus research that I have found on the internet in almost a year of surfing. ... independent evaluation of the historical evidence that you demonstrate so well. ... such historical clarity ..." 936:

I sent him a message: "To anonymous, Stop taking off the link to my website. Your position cannot be defended, because you allow the posting of new websites and you do not delete the existing ones, except mine. Why mine, and mine only? Explain yourself and be specific."

787:"I just read your website about "The epistles of Ignatius: are they all forgeries?". I was absolutely impressed. Zwingende Argumente! Great work! Will this be published in a "Fachzeitschrift"? ... I appreciate good scholarship - as you call it: "highly inquisitive" ..." 240:

and you said you had never heard of the model, this is a link to her web site.. its just your basic site for a modle, but its there for you to see. plese go to my user page and fallow to link to My photo page i hve a pictuer of her from a comic con there i meet her.

723:

sales (I do not) and carries Google ads (I do not). Another website which sell stuff is "Complete Sayings of Jesus Christ" (I do not). Several other sites promote a religious faith (I do not). So I am very perplexed about your standard of rejection or acceptance.

781:"I recently found your site and I am very impressed, you did a lot of work! I never read about the events at Cesarea before and I can see how they could inspire John the Baptist and Jesus to do what they did. ... I find your reconstruction very believable ..." 518:

a few months ago. Anyway, I've added the new article to my watchlist, and will have a look at it. I appreciate all the work you do here, and in particular your courtesy towards your opponents, and only wish that I had time to help you more. Regards,

599:

Since you said that the article is in a state of constant flux, I don't believe that it could remain featured in the current state it is in. Nevertheless, I will continue to think of ways to clean up the article, though to what extent I don't know.

389:

think I am promoting commercialism (which is not my intention) please advise me how to procede.I, like millions of others, enjoy Wikepedia and want to a healthy and respected and valuable web site here. Thank You and best wishes, Suzanne Olsson

775:"Your history of Jesus is fascinating! Very thorough and impressive. I was just surfing through the net and came upon your site, and I must say, I spent a lot of time going through everything you wrote ... Again, congratulations on your work!" 754:"I have visited your website on the historical reconstruction of Jesus and I have found it very interesting. You have done an excellent work on it ... Your website has helped me understand a great deal of Jesus and life of early Christians." 45:

Hi, Thank you for the welcome! I am still trying to learn my way around. I noticed you are connected with the Methodists. John Wesley is one of my facorite authors. Thanks again for the welcome. Your brother in Christ, Jay N. Forrest

757:"Your work is impressive, and valuable to those like myself ... but have immense difficulty accepting all the add-ons ... Again, thanks for your work, and for sharing it with others who care to explore the truth of religious matters." 1208:

agree, but I think so controversial a statement still seems a little un-neutral, because prophecy is not quite the same thing as myth, and anyway wikipedia should not be trying to decide what books are canonical and what are myth...

784:"... the eloquent cases you make for a later (and real) 'Q', 'Thomas' and the like have given me pause over taking John Crossan's opinions as the last word ... I really think you are closer to disentangling the NT mess than most." 751:"I was researching some information ... and sifted through 10 or 20 documents before finding yours. The others were not helpful in the slightest, and your site was clearly and concisely organized and had the information I needed." 1413:

and tried to fix it. You might want to look it over. Did you ever meet him? I had the privilige once, of not only hearing him preach, but spending a couple hours with him - a great man. Another one you might want to look at is

772:"Bernard D. Muller provides a beautifully presented picture of the historical Jesus ... he brings to the table, mostly, a lot of common sense. It's a deep site, with a lot to think about and ponder over. Highly recommended ..." 1593:

The reason they have given for deletion is "it is entirely based on biblical criticism". I.e. they are trying to have the article deleted because it is based on academic knowledge and not on religiously prejudiced guesswork.

382:

Muslims. When others have attempted to make corrections, or present alternate views, they are blocked. Yet the pages on Christianity actually cast doubt on the histrocity of Jesus and the Bible. This does not seem fair.

1227:, and trashed the original article, all in the name of "Being bold"? I tell you, "be bold" is the very bane of wikipedia -- since it is used to justify so much of this kind of unilateral abuse against consensus... 397:

Good to see another diehard Steelers fan. Just a quick question - one time while browsing I found a page that listed the various userboxes, and I can't find it by searching. Any help? Thanks again. --

183:. Ordinarily I wouldn't bother you about this, but the sudden appearance of 3 editors on the talk page despite nothing happening for a week makes me suspicious that something underhand is going on. -- 137: 766:"I have just finished reading Jesus a historical reconstruction ... What I found in your online book is something very believable ... Thank you very much for your dedication to these matters." 1650:

There must have been some discussion before the Born-again_Christian Wiki page was removed and redirected to the Born-again Wiki page, but I can't find any. Could you direct me to it please.

1444:

I asked on the talk page if someone with more knowledge could comment on this addition, which strikes me as rather strange. Could you comment on my talk page or on the article talk page?

279:

Taking the large section marked "dystheism in the bible" and adding it to an article about morality in the bible under the heading "dystheism" is NOT taking a piece of it out of context.

1687: 1493: 966:

Firstly, thank you for the welcome, I appreciate it. I am attempting not to get bitten, and thus far have succeeded. My difficulty is that an article I'm interested in working on,

875:, the article you supported is now Comics Collaboration of the Month. Please improve it in any way you see fit to bring it up to featured article standard. Thank you in advance, -- 671:

I noticed you removed a link I posted on the Jesus page; it is called "Jesus, a historical reconstruction". First let me tell you I spent seven years developing this website.

530: 485:

Hi KHM03, good to hear from you. With regard to your question, I was wiki-stalked for a while in September, with messages from anonymous IP addresses (usually traced to

510:). (I clicked on one of the images on the article, and saw from the image page that it was on that user page, so I had a look.) I seem to remember that user posting to 293: 165:

I notice you don't list the New Jerusalem Study Edition - I've always found this very useful, so was wondering whether you had any particular opinion on it?

1370: 793:"Here he does a good job of logically reconstructing the life and ministry of Jesus. It's a fascinating read whether you are a Christian or non-believer." 1793:. His work has been reverted by several editors; he continue to violate. I gave him a friendly warning, to which he responded with the above nonsense. 1236: 921: 907: 899: 810: 580: 539:

say "NPOV" when you mean "POV" (for example, "Your recent edit(s) were either a test or outright NPOV vandalism"). Might want to go back and copyedit.

415: 546: 1712:

Why not reinstate the Born-Again_Christian page and remove the redirection, to give Wiki visitors a more balanced view of what being Born again means?

1691: 1285: 564: 1422: 1404: 1383: 1634:

is an authority site packed with highly relevant resources on precisely this topic. It is non commercial, and hosted by a self-financed missionary.

610: 574: 551: 640: 631: 622: 593: 1627:

The similar Wiki page has linked to this site for over a year, but was recently removed and visitors redirected to the 'Born Again' page in Wiki.

961: 406:

One more question - how do I align things to the right? I tried the HTML tag but it didn't work, and I can find it on the "editing a page" page. --

1732:

I am inclined to let it slide because I think I am dealing with a nut-case. But do you consider this (the last sentence) an anti-Semitic threat?

835:. Although I did not make admin, I'm very happy you decided to support me. I hope that I'll live up to your expectations in the future as well. — 1756: 447: 77: 1719: 1683: 1664: 1641: 1489: 903: 978: 930:

b) He has been accused many times of vandalism, including into the Jesus page (through outrageous insertions: see the evidence for yourself).

660: 385:

I realized my new research would be very helpful to others in these discussions, so I have been reading all links about Jesus and the Bible..

1782: 1771: 1764: 1393: 1258: 1194: 1043: 920:

First, I want to thank you, OwenX and Johann Wolfgang for your and their help and appreciation for my work. However, my anonymous opponent,

627:

It's not my "own website." I have absolutely no association with that website. I will continue to insert the link whenever I feel like it.

604: 273: 80: 67: 1742: 1715:

I repeat, I had no part in the writing of either Wiki page. I think this is time for some sensible, comments and responsible discussion.

1297: 1189:. I'll do my best to be a good administrator. If you need anything or if I ever do something I shouldn't have, please, don't hesitate to 879: 1307: 807:

Thanks very much for the welcome, and for pointing out some helpful resources to me. I look forward to talking with you in the future.

525: 107: 1597:

It actually also includes a non-biblical-criticism summary of the passages, and additionally discussion of Midrash views and stances.

143:

I have recently been granted greater access to your systems, and can begin the process of salvaging the sensitive information from my

866: 832: 431:

Religion, especially women in religion, history of the early church, Catholicism, St. Francis of Assisi, paganism, and related topics

330: 1797: 1770:

You are in violation of enforces a POV as a fact. Please do not do this or you will be banned. Thank you for your consideration.

1274: 1264: 645: 570:

After I wrote the above, I noted that others are involved. That is good. What other such articles has this dude/dudette written?--

1526: 1516: 1418:

which I found, that was less than a stub. I amplified it a bit, but I betcha you know much more about church government than I do.

1242: 891: 155: 813: 463: 1497: 1279: 1186: 1069: 1722: 1667: 1644: 1140: 1058: 1727: 553: 475: 410: 401: 269:

It seems to me that that article is fine; taking a piece of it out of context with a "Bible" title is another matter...NPOV.

119: 1558: 1332: 1078: 1063:

And from me too. Thanks, KHM03 for your kind greetings on my talk page, and may you have a wonderful Christmas! Blessings,

60:

Hi, thanks for the welcome too. Is it a standard template, or just something you send to people who've written on religion?

1173: 1027: 1009: 1217: 730:

Now here are excerpts of comments from my readers (complete texts in "my best review" and "... readers' comments" pages)

1164: 1657:

for over a year, I think it is valid to include this link on the Born-again Wiki page, which has usurped the original.

1576: 1462: 1155: 256: 1812: 1774: 1568:

Dear KHM03, I hope you had a good start into 2006. If you are free, could you have a look into the recent addition to

169: 1611: 1502: 1346: 452: 283: 263: 127: 88: 151:

as a token of faith that I will conduct myself as required to complete our transaction. Thank you for your support.

995: 507: 480: 1827: 1365: 1197: 958:

The correct designation is "The Madeira School," not "Madeira School" Two of my daughters attended that school

852: 511: 392: 222: 208: 144: 54: 1342:

Thank you for your kind wishes, and I wish you and your loved ones a Merry Chistmas and Happy New Year as well.

560:

Obviously, as it stands now, it is definitely one-sided, to say the least. Have you sought help from others? --

337:. If you need help, have a question, or just want to chat (or if I get out of line!), please don't hesitate to 1329: 947: 912: 799: 304: 924:, twice within 24 hours, again took off the posting without explanation. I looked into his files and learned: 1674: 1480: 1476: 1637:

Its addition is essenial to prevent Wiki presenting a biased sectarian view of what being Born again means.

769:"You have an excellent site. It's obvious you have put a lot of work/thought/effort into its construction." 180: 1706:

about the removal of the Born-again_Christian Wiki page, and its redirection to the Born_again Wiki page.

1587: 710:- hotly recommended among some of my readers (see below), including a few scholars (from different sides) 1313: 1660:

Please do not remove it, or get a proxy to remove it. I had no part in the construction of either page.

1581: 1733: 1284:

Do you realize that putting the Methodist logo on your userpage is a violation of copyright? Check the

1232: 1213: 1067: 656: 523: 515: 376: 1804:

I've blocked him for vandalism and 3RR violation. If he gives you any more problems, let me know. --

1146: 1083: 1049: 1000: 453: 297: 1762: 1563: 1546: 1450: 1337: 763:"Good Work. I have been reading your account of the life of Jesus, and I find it very insightful." 196: 1303:

Thanks for the "heads up"...I've changed the image to a "generic" Wesley image. Happy new year...

1318:

Thank you for the message, Keith. May the season leave you earnestly awaiting his return ... —

983: 748:"I have just stumbled across your work, and have spent a few hours reading it. Most impressive!" 536: 1178: 618:

Don't tell me what to do. I can put a link in the article if I wish. It's an interesting essay.

535:

Hey, Keith, you need to be a little more careful about what you type. Some of your comments on

1753: 1739: 1362: 1224: 1024: 1019:

Thank you very much - I wish you a very merry Christmas and a healthy and prosperous new year,

1014: 589:

section). I would appreciate your help in trying to address as many of the issues as possible.

289: 219: 205: 1005:

Thank you for the Christmas greeting. Merry Christmas to you and to all of your loved ones.

1228: 1209: 1064: 847: 652: 612: 520: 496:

With regard to the article you mentioned, it seems to have been taken from the user page of

1293: 1137: 501: 160: 101: 1074:

And a Merry Christmas to you and yours from the Old Drone, and God Bless in the New Year!

8: 1376: 1055: 571: 561: 348: 1654: 1631: 1617: 1470: 1324: 1255: 1038: 356: 338: 280: 260: 1512:

be a bit snippy on the subject. Of course, if you were to help us with this last... --

713:- offering a different approach, between "historic" and fully fictional earthly Jesus 1749: 1735: 1604:

Would you consider voting on the AFD concerning the article? I would like it kept. --

1415: 1358: 1202: 1020: 215: 201: 40: 1709:

The former was more popular, and less influenced by theological and sectarian bias.

1824: 1809: 1531: 1190: 885: 836: 637: 628: 619: 371: 250: 242: 233: 103:

book, but I also wanted to let you know that SVS Press is also preparing a book on

1817: 1523: 1513: 1419: 1401: 1390: 1380: 1289: 1075: 967: 895: 736:"I really appreciate your efforts to your homepage. It's great and informative." 717: 497: 334: 166: 152: 64: 28: 17: 1698:

There was no 404 with the link before or after it was replaced. Access is fine.

1169:

Thank you, and Merry Christmas (or at least, Happy Boxing Day) to you as well.

824: 1440:

The Wesleys often composed hymns while riding between preachments on horseback.

1351: 1271: 1251: 1170: 1006: 992: 818: 601: 590: 543: 472: 460: 1653:

Since the original Born-again_Christian page had a link to the authortiy site

857: 1786: 1508: 1319: 1034: 876: 353: 345: 190: 51: 1573: 1569: 1427: 1410: 1161: 944: 581: 301: 315: 1805: 1152: 975: 970:, has an extremely long and poorly written section recounting the entire 704:- under "historical Jesus", on the top 10 on Yahoo! and Google for years 444: 407: 398: 368: 1794: 1343: 1304: 486: 437:

Geographical information about Boston, Massachusetts and outlying areas

270: 953: 1268: 1243: 989: 872: 540: 469: 115: 63:

Not your brother in Christ, I'm afraid, but happy holidays anyway :)

1088: 745:"You are to be commended on your extensive study of these matters." 695:- covering many related topics affecting our understanding of Jesus 1554: 1537: 1458: 1265:

Talk:Mythology#Etymology and usage — some analysis and a suggestion

1054:

Merry Christmas to you, my friend, and a most blessed New Year. --

1542: 1446: 898:. If you need help, or have a question, please don't hesitate to 237: 739:"I am fascinated and impressed ... This is a fantastic effort." 683:- low-key concerning the author, therefore not self-promotional 322: 971: 894:. The final outcome was an unanimous (45/0/0), so I am now an 742:"You have done a very thorough job researching your material." 701:- strictly about Jesus, the one credited to start Christianity 148: 1160:

And from me too: A very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

1790: 468:

See my comments on the talk page. Thanks for the heads-up.

47: 1433: 1151:

Merry Christmas! May the grace of God be with you always.

255:

if you think that isn't neutral go and add the template to

105:

Orthodox and Wesleyan Scriptural Understanding and Practice

698:- posted on about 20 websites, some Christian, others not 1432:

A while ago, an anonymous user added this to the article

680:- not commercial in any way, not trying to sell anything 136: 716:

Here is the link of the front page: judge for yourself:

309: 227: 76:

Thank you for the welcome, thanks for the links, KHMO3.

1185:

I would like to thank you for your kind support on my

441:

Any suggestions or help you can give are appreciated.

362: 1467:

BTW : Belated Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

1033:

Thanks for your kind message and pleasant holidays.

933:

c) He has been threatened repeatedly to be blocked.

666: 531:

Notice from your friendly neighborhood spell-checker

1586:Some religiously biased users are trying to delete 179:Would it be at all possible for you to weigh in at 1536:As you're a proud Scottish-American, I wish you a 333:. The final outcome was (57/4/3), so I am now an 1375:You might be interested in a recent assertion at 329:Hey KHM03/Archive 6! Thanks for your support on 288:Dear KHM, I want to point you to the articles on 927:a) His main interest on wikipedia is SpongeBob. 459:This article is a mess. Where does one begin? 1267:. I would appreciate your input. Thank you. 367:Thank you for your support. I won't forget it. 1789:and is refusing to work with the community at 1507:Dear Friend: Please discuss this issue on the 1223:Oh yeah, did you see where he also redirected 718:http://www.geocities.com/b_d_muller/index.html 174: 1673:Perhaps it was removed because it is 404? - 940:See a more complete message on talk:Jesus. 416:Thank you for your welcome; an introduction 689:- fully researched and utterly documented 195:KHM03, I have just added a new section to 1389:Thanks, I like your nutshell summation... 636:Save it. I'm well aware of our policies. 1087: 1477:Knowledge:Help desk#Further information 1136:, KHM03 A well deserved subst:pressy!-- 890:Hey KHM03! Thanks for your support on 259:from which I copied the text verbatim. 14: 1616:Please do not remove the link to the 831:Hi KHM03, thanks for your support on 686:- presented only as A reconstruction 554:Christianity, tolerance, and equality 296:, as well as certain recent edits on 1623:It is NOT spam and highly relevant. 1479:which I'd like you to see. Thanks, 1250:I responded to your comment on that 181:Talk:Table of nations#Requested move 147:, as I promised. Please accept this 99:Orthodoxy and Wesleyan Spirituality 23: 1371:Bush a "Fundamentalist Methodist?" 1263:I've made a lengthy suggestion at 823: 321: 314: 257:Eutheism, dystheism, and maltheism 135: 24: 1838: 867:Comics Collaboration of the Month 424:other encyclopedic-type matters: 1553: 1541: 1457: 1445: 1582:Criticism of Biblical criticism 1280:Methodist logo on your userpage 1475:Hi. I added some comments at 962:Etiquette question from "N00b" 707:- without hate against anyone 646:My 3RR comment wasn't for you! 584:- featured status questionable 377:Why Did You Send a Post to Me? 236:, we met in the discussion on 109:, due in a couple of weeks. 13: 1: 1728:possible request for comment? 1559:19:37, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1527:15:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1517:14:03, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1498:13:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1463:02:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC) 1423:06:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC) 1405:14:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1394:14:38, 30 December 2005 (UTC) 1384:18:12, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 1366:17:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 1347:03:04, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 1333:23:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1308:01:27, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 1298:17:25, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1275:17:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 1259:13:46, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1237:13:26, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1218:13:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC) 1198:16:38, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1174:16:19, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 1165:11:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC) 1156:04:47, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1141:22:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1079:03:00, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1070:00:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1059:00:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1044:00:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC) 1028:22:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 1010:22:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 996:20:56, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 979:05:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC) 948:05:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 913:03:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 880:16:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC) 853:04:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 814:01:47, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 661:15:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 641:02:16, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 632:02:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 623:02:04, 17 December 2005 (UTC) 605:02:13, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 594:01:58, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 575:21:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 565:20:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 547:16:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 526:16:03, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 476:16:14, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 464:13:33, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 448:21:31, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 411:21:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 402:21:05, 14 December 2005 (UTC) 305:20:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 284:01:09, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 274:00:29, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 264:00:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC) 223:05:50, 13 December 2005 (UTC) 209:00:41, 10 December 2005 (UTC) 187:22:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC) 1608:20:52, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 1588:A wife confused for a sister 1572:by "86.137.164.37". Thanks, 170:22:05, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 156:20:28, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 120:16:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 68:22:02, 4 December 2005 (UTC) 55:02:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC) 7: 1828:12:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1813:00:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC) 1798:04:34, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1775:04:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC) 1757:20:50, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1743:20:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1723:01:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC) 1702:Why has there not been any 1692:21:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1668:13:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1645:00:40, 3 January 2006 (UTC) 1577:14:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC) 692:- the size of a small book 81:14:48, 1 January 2006 (UTC) 10: 1843: 516:Criticisms of Christianity 36:1 Dec 05 through 5 Jan 06. 1655:Born Again Christian Info 1632:Born Again Christian Info 1620:site on the Wiki page. 1618:Born Again Christian Info 1612:Born Again Christian Link 1503:Luther as a Revolutionary 1409:Found another copyvio at 454:Criticism of Christianity 298:Criticism of Christianity 145:politically unstable land 89:Orthodoxy & Methodism 48:http://www.jayforrest.net 481:Your messages on my page 197:Judaism and Christianity 871:Hello KHM03/Archive 6. 537:User_talk:Clinkophonist 393:Thanks for the welcome. 112:Charis soi kai eirene. 1286:image description page 1225:Religion and mythology 1143: 988:You too, my brother. 902:! Again, thanks! :D -- 829: 800:Thanks for the welcome 796:Best regards, Bernard 326: 319: 290:Criticism of the Bible 140: 27:This is ARCHIVE 6 for 1601:hypothesis portions. 1091: 827: 613:User talk:JoeMystical 341:! Again, thanks! :D 325: 318: 294:Science and the Bible 139: 611:Re: Spam message at 1785:is in violation of 1377:Talk:George W. Bush 1314:Christmas greetings 1144: 909:£€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 858:link on Jesus page 830: 434:English literature 327: 320: 141: 1416:Annual Conference 1328: 1084:Merry Christmas!! 1041: 910: 1834: 1704:prior discussion 1678: 1606:User talk:FDuffy 1564:Recent Additions 1557: 1551: 1545: 1484: 1461: 1455: 1449: 1338:Christmas wishes 1322: 1134: 1131: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1119: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1095: 1039: 908: 850: 845: 842: 839: 351: 185:User talk:FDuffy 1842: 1841: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1820: 1768: 1730: 1685: 1676: 1614: 1584: 1566: 1547: 1534: 1505: 1491: 1482: 1473: 1451: 1430: 1373: 1354: 1340: 1316: 1282: 1248: 1205: 1181: 1149: 1147:Merry Christmas 1138:Santa on Sleigh 1132: 1129: 1126: 1123: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1111: 1108: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1096: 1093: 1086: 1052: 1050:Merry Christmas 1017: 1003: 1001:Merry Christmas 986: 984:Merry Christmas 968:Dido and Aeneas 964: 956: 943:Best regards, ( 888: 869: 860: 855: 848: 843: 840: 837: 821: 802: 669: 648: 616: 586: 557: 533: 483: 457: 428:Web Development 418: 395: 379: 365: 360: 358: 349: 312: 253: 230: 193: 177: 163: 134: 91: 43: 22: 21: 20: 18:User talk:KHM03 12: 11: 5: 1840: 1819: 1816: 1802: 1801: 1767: 1761: 1760: 1759: 1729: 1726: 1701: 1697: 1695: 1694: 1682: 1649: 1626: 1613: 1610: 1583: 1580: 1565: 1562: 1538:Happy Hogmanay 1533: 1530: 1504: 1501: 1488: 1472: 1469: 1442: 1441: 1429: 1426: 1397: 1396: 1372: 1369: 1353: 1350: 1339: 1336: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1281: 1278: 1247: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1204: 1201: 1191:drop me a line 1184: 1180: 1177: 1148: 1145: 1085: 1082: 1056:Midnite Critic 1051: 1048: 1047: 1046: 1016: 1015:Happy Holidays 1013: 1002: 999: 985: 982: 963: 960: 955: 954:Madeira School 952: 887: 884: 868: 865: 859: 856: 822: 820: 817: 801: 798: 728: 726: 668: 665: 664: 647: 644: 615: 609: 608: 607: 585: 579: 578: 577: 572:Midnite Critic 562:Midnite Critic 556: 550: 532: 529: 482: 479: 456: 451: 439: 438: 435: 432: 429: 420:Hello, KHMO3: 417: 414: 394: 391: 378: 375: 364: 361: 344: 313: 311: 308: 277: 276: 252: 249: 229: 226: 192: 189: 176: 173: 162: 159: 133: 126: 124: 93:Hey, Keith. 90: 87: 86: 85: 84: 83: 71: 70: 61: 42: 39: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1839: 1830: 1829: 1826: 1815: 1814: 1811: 1807: 1800: 1799: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1773: 1766: 1758: 1755: 1751: 1747: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1734: 1725: 1724: 1721: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1699: 1693: 1690: 1689: 1684: 1680: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1666: 1661: 1658: 1656: 1651: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1619: 1609: 1607: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1589: 1579: 1578: 1575: 1571: 1561: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1550: 1544: 1539: 1529: 1528: 1525: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1510: 1509:Martin Luther 1500: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1490: 1486: 1478: 1468: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1454: 1448: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1403: 1395: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1382: 1378: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1360: 1349: 1348: 1345: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1326: 1321: 1309: 1306: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1277: 1276: 1273: 1270: 1266: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1256:elvenscout742 1253: 1245: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1215: 1211: 1200: 1199: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1176: 1175: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1158: 1157: 1154: 1142: 1139: 1135: 1090: 1081: 1080: 1077: 1072: 1071: 1068: 1066: 1061: 1060: 1057: 1045: 1042: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1026: 1022: 1012: 1011: 1008: 998: 997: 994: 991: 981: 980: 977: 973: 969: 959: 951: 949: 946: 941: 938: 934: 931: 928: 925: 923: 918: 915: 914: 911: 905: 901: 897: 896:administrator 893: 883: 881: 878: 874: 864: 854: 851: 846: 834: 833:my recent RFA 826: 816: 815: 812: 808: 805: 797: 794: 791: 788: 785: 782: 779: 776: 773: 770: 767: 764: 761: 758: 755: 752: 749: 746: 743: 740: 737: 734: 731: 727: 724: 720: 719: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 684: 681: 678: 677:- not a spam 675: 672: 663: 662: 658: 654: 643: 642: 639: 634: 633: 630: 625: 624: 621: 614: 606: 603: 598: 597: 596: 595: 592: 583: 576: 573: 569: 568: 567: 566: 563: 555: 549: 548: 545: 542: 538: 528: 527: 524: 522: 517: 513: 512:the talk page 509: 506: 503: 499: 494: 492: 488: 478: 477: 474: 471: 466: 465: 462: 455: 450: 449: 446: 442: 436: 433: 430: 427: 426: 425: 421: 413: 412: 409: 404: 403: 400: 390: 386: 383: 374: 373: 370: 359: 357: 355: 352: 347: 342: 340: 336: 335:administrator 332: 324: 317: 307: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 286: 285: 282: 281:Clinkophonist 275: 272: 268: 267: 266: 265: 262: 261:Clinkophonist 258: 248: 245: 244: 239: 235: 225: 224: 221: 217: 211: 210: 207: 203: 198: 188: 186: 182: 172: 171: 168: 158: 157: 154: 150: 146: 138: 131: 125: 122: 121: 117: 113: 110: 108: 106: 102: 100: 94: 82: 79: 75: 74: 73: 72: 69: 66: 62: 59: 58: 57: 56: 53: 49: 38: 37: 33: 32: 30: 19: 1821: 1803: 1780: 1769: 1750:Slrubenstein 1736:Slrubenstein 1731: 1717: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1686: 1662: 1659: 1652: 1648: 1639: 1636: 1629: 1625: 1622: 1615: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1592: 1585: 1570:Christianity 1567: 1548: 1535: 1520: 1506: 1492: 1474: 1466: 1452: 1443: 1431: 1411:Harry Denman 1408: 1398: 1374: 1359:Slrubenstein 1355: 1341: 1317: 1283: 1262: 1249: 1246:"dispute"... 1206: 1182: 1179:Izehar's RfA 1168: 1159: 1150: 1092: 1073: 1062: 1053: 1021:Slrubenstein 1018: 1004: 987: 965: 957: 942: 939: 935: 932: 929: 926: 922:64.12.116.70 919: 917:Dear KHM03, 916: 889: 870: 861: 811:CA geologist 809: 806: 803: 795: 792: 789: 786: 783: 780: 777: 774: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 732: 729: 725: 721: 715: 712: 709: 706: 703: 700: 697: 694: 691: 688: 685: 682: 679: 676: 673: 670: 649: 635: 626: 617: 587: 582:Christianity 558: 534: 504: 495: 490: 487:open proxies 484: 467: 458: 443: 440: 422: 419: 405: 396: 387: 384: 380: 366: 343: 328: 287: 278: 254: 246: 231: 216:Slrubenstein 212: 202:Slrubenstein 194: 184: 178: 164: 161:Study bibles 142: 129: 123: 114: 111: 104: 98: 95: 92: 44: 35: 34: 29:my talk page 26: 25: 1825:Pepsidrinka 1765:User:Lengis 900:let me know 638:JoeMystical 629:JoeMystical 620:JoeMystical 339:let me know 243:jimmy-james 234:jimmy-james 128:Mindmatrix 1524:CTSWyneken 1514:CTSWyneken 1471:Fisheaters 1420:Pollinator 1402:Pollinator 1391:Pollinator 1381:Pollinator 1290:BorgHunter 1076:Pollinator 828:Thank you! 804:Hi KHM03, 498:markyjanet 300:. Cheers, 167:Thomas Ash 153:Mindmatrix 65:Thomas Ash 1679:you know? 1675:Just zis 1630:The site 1485:you know? 1481:Just zis 1252:Talk page 1244:Mythology 1203:Mythology 1183:Hi KHM03, 1171:Guettarda 1007:Logophile 873:Superhero 602:Pentawing 591:Pentawing 491:something 461:Logophile 132:adminship 41:Thank you 1748:Thanks, 1549:Camillus 1532:Hogmanay 1453:Camillus 1325:Mkmcconn 877:Jamdav86 508:contribs 251:morality 232:this is 78:Serfalco 52:Jay4rest 1818:trinity 1720:Abeseed 1665:Abeseed 1642:Abeseed 1574:Str1977 1162:Str1977 945:Mullerb 904:Eliezer 674:It is: 310:Woohoo! 302:Str1977 238:Nutopia 228:nutopia 1806:Essjay 1787:WP:3RR 1783:Lengis 1781:Note: 1772:Lengis 1352:movies 1344:Jayjg 1272:(talk) 1195:Izehar 1153:Wesley 993:(talk) 976:Makemi 972:Aeneid 892:my RfA 886:My RFA 819:My RFA 544:(talk) 473:(talk) 445:Okelle 408:Itamae 399:Itamae 372:(talk) 363:My FRA 331:my RfA 149:loonie 1795:KHM03 1791:Jesus 1763:from 1305:KHM03 667:Jesus 552:RE: 369:Gator 271:KHM03 191:help? 16:< 1810:Talk 1754:Talk 1740:Talk 1688:AfD? 1677:Guy, 1494:AfD? 1483:Guy, 1434:Hymn 1428:Hymn 1363:Talk 1320:Mark 1294:talk 1269:JHCC 1233:ውይይት 1214:ውይይት 1065:AnnH 1040:T@lk 1025:Talk 990:JHCC 657:ውይይት 541:JHCC 521:AnnH 502:talk 470:JHCC 292:and 220:Talk 206:Talk 130:scam 116:JHCC 31:.... 1808:· 1752:| 1738:| 1361:| 1288:. — 1229:ፈቃደ 1210:ፈቃደ 1187:RfA 1035:JFW 1023:| 653:ፈቃደ 514:of 346:Tom 218:| 204:| 1718:-- 1663:-- 1640:-- 1540:! 1522:-- 1436:: 1379:. 1330:** 1296:) 1254:. 1235:) 1216:) 1193:. 1037:| 950:) 906:| 882:. 659:) 493:! 247:j 175:Hi 118:] 50:-- 1681:/ 1487:/ 1327:) 1323:( 1292:( 1231:( 1212:( 1133:S 1130:A 1127:M 1124:T 1121:S 1118:I 1115:R 1112:H 1109:C 1106:Y 1103:R 1100:R 1097:E 1094:M 849:ε 844:e 841:o 838:M 655:( 505:· 500:( 354:r 350:e

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index