User talk:MarnetteD/archive 1

778:(thus I leave your edit as it is). This is what Maureen O'Hara reports as having been told to her as Charles, but, as you point, not necessarily what actually happened (though, of course, there is no way to disclose it). I strongly suspect that by telling O'hara so, Laughton was actually covering her wife's neglect to have children in a cavalier way. Elsa Lanchester, in her own 1983 biography, never says that she didn't have children because she was phisically unable to do so, rather, she states, that she wasn't keen on the idea of being a mother. Elsa herself reports two abortions: one, long before meeting Charles Laughton, and another while already engaged in a fully-fledged relationship with him (they were living together) BUT not yet married to each other. She explains that she had the abortion because she thought that the relationship wasn't known to the general public (so becoming a single mother could damage her public image and her career). It is not reported what Laughton thought of her decision 1020:(well all that I know of though there may be more) and then they can choose the one they want. The page that you replaced it with requires one further click (not a big thing in the grand scheme of things but some users give up when they have to go to far in their search) to get to basically the same page. Also, your new page is list page not a disambiguation page (again not an important difference). I also want to make you aware that, although you added 'Category:surname' to your page, if you go the that category you will not yet find Lovejoy listed in the L's. You need go back and and add 31: 793:

the whole, but there are some points where I'd like to have an alternative point of view: some negative comments about Laughton stem from her account, if I have no alternative~but to take the bad news like a big girl, ha, ha. But often there are other accounts which help balance the image of Charles, often in a positive direction. Still, some false myths remain: I have written about them in an article I made for the Catalan Knowledge (which you are welcome to visit :D ).

641:

question, do you think that it is time to archive the discussion page? It is fairly long and I have thought about attempting it, but I have never created an archive page before and am afraid that I would botch it up. It is just a suggestion and if you don't think it is needed yet that is fine too. Once again GOOD JOB!

259:'s first Christmas, for which the movie was commissioned), and the Bowie version probably came along the next year or the one after that. I thought they were probably sexing it up a bit for the overseas market, by adding a well known Brit (Bowie was a huge star in those days, so he was probably a good choice). -- 1099:

but has the full title of your page. All of the other listings are just the surname and while I am not sure that there is anything wrong with your title you may want to also ask whether you should change the name of your page or not when you go to the comment page. Sorry I didn't give better instructions.

1254:

Hi again ENeville. I went offline for dinner and am just catching up. Am I reading it right that the surname template that JHunterJ added to the pagee seems to fit both our needs re the MoS. If not let me know. This has been a good learning experience nad it was nice meeting you thru this discussion.

1019:

More importantly if you read heading #11 'Break rules' you will see that the rules are meant to be flexible. A user who has entered just the word 'Lovejoy' in the search line is first taken to the page for the show, then one more click on the disambig page link takes them to all the possible Lovejoys

815:

Hi Marnette: So glad you liked it :D Stay Tuned as I have a number of themes to sort out for future posts, which I will do as daily labours allow and some further books are read ;). You're welcome to drop in the Message Board, too. In case you are (as I) a hopeless Laughtonian (LOL), maybe you'd like

792:

Hi Marnette, Thanks for your comments. You're right that one must always be cautious about memoirs. The trouble with Laughton is that he never wrote an autobiography, so stories about him are strongly based in his widow's memoirs. I am of the opinion that Elsa is rather honest about Cl and herself on

590:

I'm guessing that he is who he says he is--the changes he's making are really quite minor anyway. I suggest that you do what you've done. Accept his edits, but reshape them to conform to style issues. (He is not likely to become a contributer to other articles, so I doubt if there's much point in

391:

There have recently been a whole series of edits to the plot section - most by Robekyr - which are adding info from the book and not the movie (Floyd's having an hour layover for example). I do not wish to start an edit war because I know that he or she is working hard and that these probably mean a

846:

goes, what can I say? I have seen it three times and projected it once - and it was created as a four part miniseries of 90 minutes each part for RAI TV. (Each theatrical half has a fade out at the middle that indicates where these breaks occur.) I have no idea how it was presented in the US, but I

441:

I may have been wrong about the specifics but, fortunately, a perusal of the discussion page at the film shows that Robeykr - who became Jason Palpatine - had gone into way too much detail about the film and it has now been reduced to a readable synopsis. This was my original concern which prompted

337:

Thanks for the comments. I'm glad you're enjoying the new series. Being in Canada I was able to see it last spring and let's just say it gets better with every episode. The first few episodes up to tonight's "World War III" fall under the "getting the groove back" category -- good episodes all, but

1098:

You can ask for a comment if you wish it will probably lead to us both learning something interesting, though again I don't think that it is a big deal (referring to the Break rules section again, sorry I know I already mentioned it). I went to the surnames category and it doesn't just say Lovejoy

777:

Hi MarnetteD, I have seen your edits in the Elsa Lanchester page. Considering myself reasonably well read about Laughton and Lanchester, I agree with you that there is no evidence that an early abortion prior to her marriage to Charles Laughton, was the cause of her not being able to have children

1166:

is a bit neurotic on the subject. In the ordering of entries, it says that articles that have the dabbed word in the title should be listed after parentheticals but before synonyms and subsections. Then later is says that they should be in a "see also" section or not included at all. Guideline

861:

Thanks, I too am a bit of a nonentity compared to some Wikipedians out there. I have been trying to build a case by being reasonable, citing references, putting a polite note on his talk page etc. so if it does come down to going to the Admins, I will be the "good guy". Meanwhile I see others are

571:

My attitude would be that since we have no way of telling whether this guy is Craig-Morgan or not, he needs to supply references for his claims. Granted the IMDB might be wrong, but if they are someone needs to find another source that contradicts them. I have seen this happen before, with people

358:

article, thanks for clarifying that South Park City is only the name of the museum, not the town from which the museum's buildings were taken. I had added the South Park City, Fairplay, and South Park basin info to refine a vague statement that someone had added to say that the episode reminds

640:

Hi Jmabel. Your move of the popular references for Oscar Wilde to its own page was a great idea. Having read some of the concerns expressed on the discussion page about that section I had been meaning to leave a note suggesting just what you did, but just hadn't gotten around to it. One other

617:

Nice one on the research front. I'm not sure you've made a mountain out of a molehill here: I'm always suspicious of anyone who claims they are the object of an article and doesn't give evidence. His edits weren't exactly done in the most civil manner, anyway! Hopefully he will listen to your

521:

Regarding your revert of the Michael Palin article. I know I wasn't finished yet, but instead of just reverting everything, couldn't you fix some of the faults you saw, or mention them to me? Concerning trivia, it's better to incorporate trivia (or remove it all the way). See also a proposed

416:

Dialouge in the movie. Miller tells Floyd that his flight "leaves in about an hour" and "as a matter of fact I've reserved a table for you in the Earthlight Room." The entrance to the Earthlight Room with the adjoining picturephone booths are clearly visible in the scene in the film. The

946:

I'd just like to note that your edit summary was wrong; adding in the text of the poem was bad because it wasn't formatted well and was redundant with Wikisource. Copyright violations has nothing at all to do with the matter - that poem has been in the public domain for a long, long time.

591:

investing time in showing him how it'd done.) I've left him a message asking if he can point us towards some sources, but I'm guessing that what we'd really want is going to be pretty hard to come by--something that shows that IMDb has made a mess out this article, as they often do.

157:

Hm. That worked for me. It's certainly possible to get that link to go straight to your talk page--my best advice is to fiddle with it until the link goes there. Sorry I can't be more help, and let me know if you get it worked out, or if there's anything else I can do. Best,

477:

No problem. I wasn't the one who added that bit to begin with, but I'd read about the incident in his autobiography so I was pretty sure it would be on IMDB somewhere. Still tricky to find, with the number of films he's made; I ended up searching on the title instead.

1300:" if there are more than few names, per the MoS, especially if their inclusion lengthens the page enough to require page downs (a user dependent variable, admittedly). But it is nice to know about the template. And it has been nice to meet yourself, as well. :-) 313:

Thanks for the kind words. Well, as I qualified in my edit summary, "if I recall correctly", i.e. I wasn't quite sure. I'd swear I saw Davison having it in his pockets once. I'll revert it and do some checking, and if I come up with an example I'll swap it back.

373:

No worries, no harm done. Just discovered that I dont have the NFT DVD that has great notes for M. Hulots Holiday, only for Mon Oncle (which has great notes, like the fact that someone liked the modern house so much they had it built). Will have to get it...

680:

three times) and tries to swap his sweepstake draw with Gene's. Nearer the end of the episode — when they're standing outside the commercial freezer they've locked the suspect in, as I recall — Gene asks Sam how he knew the horse was going to win.

392:

lot to him or her. Perhaps if any wikiadministrators encounter this they can start the process to reach a consensus about what to do about this. I feel that they are detracting from this article but that is just me and others may feel differently.

338:

the show is still looking for its new voice. It finds it next week in "Dalek". Re: Laurie Anderson, yeah I've been a fan of her's for going on 20 years now. I was able to see her perform "End of the Moon" last year and she was terrific.

1029:

I apologize if any of this seems rude because I don't mean it to be. The rules here at wikipedia are numerous and are rarely fixed in stone. I think that both of the pages that we have created are useful and can coexist. Happy Editing!

925: 572:

claiming they are the subject of an article and then demanding that it be changed, taken down, whatever. I would say all this to the buy claiming to be Craig-Morgan, and then if he's still playing up refer to an admin for mediation.

1334:, so I occasionally make somewhat strange spelling corrections - wish I had read the whole thing before just fixing the spelling. I just looked at the words immediately surrounding and they looked fairly tame. My mistake. 1167:

probably needs some clean-up. As you noticed, I took a stab at Lovejoy, and opted for the "see also" (along with the "people with surname" subsection). If you want to see where the path of inclusion leads, check out

731:

As for the wiki links throughout, what you state seems to make sense since someone m,ay come to the list to seewhat was on in (say) 1979 and then want to follow to details of the operas performed that year.

995: 286:

Do you know how many times Oscar came to the US? Was it just the once when he was supposed to have told the customs, "I have nothing to declare but my genius", a wonderful story, I just wish it was true.

691:

I agree it's a very small reference, but even though I didn't add it myself originally I think it deserves to be kept in, because Red Rum winning the Grand National is such a well-known event in the UK.

423:

The quotes from the book pertain to the 2 main climaxes of the movie the acension of Moon-Watcher and Bowman in the end. I felt that these 2 quotes -- both intentionally alike -- wold be appropriate.

1141:

There are a number of ways to handle the listing thing; not yet sure what's best. I think I'll constrain the question, myself, but feel free to add something along those lines if you want.

57:

I'm just starting here so I hope that I'm setting this up correctly. Those of you who are Knowledge veterans feel free to leave messages telling me what I need to do to make this better.

223:

I have the misfortune/talent of being able to look at a full page of print and seeing typos and spelling errors instantly. So no criticism is implied, though I insist on "cemet

820:(well, it's the same link added in his "early Life" part of the English wikipedia article). Thanks for the cookies: truly delicious (extra work at the Gym tomorrow, ha, ha) 655:

Thanks. I'm all for archiving the talk page. I suggest only archiving sections that haven't had any activity in a month or so. Less likely to get anyone's back up. -

676:

Sam knows, when Gene gets it in their sweepstake, that it's going to win the race (it's a very famous horse here in the UK, and the only one I think to have won the

143:

Regarding the "Talk" link in your signature--go to "Preferences", where you'll see a line saying "Your nickname (for signatures)". Enter ]] ]. HTH. Best wishes,

1221:

If there is a separate "List of people named" article, there's probably no reason to repeat that information on the dab though. (Along with the information at

1008:

I fear you may have misinterpreted (not in the words but in the spirit) the MoS page. There are numerous disambiguation pages that have multiple listings see

821: 806: 779: 575:

With regards to the Manual of Style, this is a separate issue. Have you tried simply directing the editor to the MoS? I'd try this first. Good luck! --

273: 824: 983: 1193: 359:

viewers that South Park is SW of Denver…I just wanted to make sure it was clear that the town was fictional but is named for real-life locations.—

847:

wouldn't be in the slightest bit surprised if it were cut for American audiences out of financial considerations. Thanks again for your message,

627: 608: 1344: 842:

issue when time permits. I might actually have access to a PAL copy within the next month, so perhaps that would be worth digging up. As far as

809: 767: 750: 696: 461: 436: 430: 1304: 1263: 1145: 1107: 1085: 1038: 745: 1229: 1200: 1175: 81:, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). 663: 550:

I will look for a credible source on that. I agree that the Sahara was a nicer example. I just happened to find the Peru link and used that.

342: 954: 851: 523: 967: 1330:

I was doing spellchecking since I was too tired to revert vandalism (I actually warned someone by accident by doing that once). I use

720: 1002: 464: 1322: 941: 914: 787: 735:

BTW: while the opera company's site doesn't do a year-by-year listing of operas performed, the 50th Anniv. book, Phillip Huscher's

1222: 299:...regarding the Doctor Who updates - though I found Khaosworks beat me to updating the table for the US/Canada release date! -- 782: 332: 303: 936: 756: 649: 547:

It's not official policy (yet) though. The downside of those sections that they react as a magnet for really pointless stuff.

715: 267: 584: 511: 276: 561: 544:

I just wanted to flesh out that section. The list just seemed so minimal considering what a big part of his career it is.

533: 482: 400: 123: 866: 327: 363: 506: 455: 110: 1024:(that is straight line Lovejoy) next to the word Surname, then it will be added to that list and can be seen by all. 685: 240: 973: 894: 378: 323: 450: 960:

Nae problem. Copyright is hard to understand; as the saying goes, "If you think you understand it, you don't." --

838:

Thanks for your comments on my talk page. I've been on a brief vacation for a bit, but I'll try to look into the

117: 78: 725:

Thanks for your comments, which are helpful. I'll research the Strauss issue and add some clarification there.

433: 1078: 877: 760: 728:

I didn't add all the year-by-year titles myself, but I'll check on those links. Thanks for your help there.

708: 1337:

Thanks for fixing the vandalism, and don't worry about the summary. I would have wondered about it myself!

417:

Earthlight Room sign shows it is a Howard Johnson's restaurant. I AM NOT REFERENCING CLARKE'S NOVELIZATION.

919: 496:

articles, and so there's bound to be some irregularities while we figure things out. Gnome away, please! —

62: 294: 964: 951: 1331: 830: 38: 554:

For now I just re incorporated the trivia. Do you have any idea on how to improve the travel section?

597: 177: 106: 1293: 1056:

Thanks for the heads-up on the list positioning. And I hope, for my part, that my tone is amiable.

979: 911: 848: 816:

to read about the whereabouts of Charles circa 1914-1919, as researched by Mr. Martyn Smith and me:

635: 796:

BTW, if you're interested in Laughton and Lanchester, you might like to visit this message board:

772: 702: 472: 347: 264: 856: 516: 502: 899: 817: 797: 623: 602: 580: 566: 386: 319: 408: 8: 1260: 1104: 1035: 646: 487: 447: 397: 248: 212: 200: 100: 89: 47: 17: 558: 530: 492:

It was no problem at all — we're in the process of discussing how best to organize the

308: 85: 1341: 889: 260: 933: 871: 660: 497: 368: 218: 162: 147: 136: 1163: 1066: 961: 948: 669: 619: 592: 576: 315: 300: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1256: 1100: 1031: 742: 693: 682: 677: 642: 443: 393: 96: 1301: 1226: 1197: 1172: 1142: 1082: 999: 739:

does that and the entries of the "List" which I added came from that source.

712: 555: 527: 339: 255:

No, that's fine. Yes, we did see both versions. The first version in 1982 (

237: 998:, but rather put into a separate article if there are more than a handful. 900: 882: 863: 375: 288: 803: 1192:

Thanks for the note, MarnetteD, I was just finishing a post at the pump:

929: 764: 656: 479: 354: 249: 159: 144: 133: 1077:. Is there another precedent we can look to? Perhaps we should have a 539:

No need to apologise. It wasn't that bad. :) To respond to your points.

181: 1296:. I think that I'd probably still generally separate lists of "John 256: 67: 1009: 763:. Do you have a source that we can use to put this matter to rest? 1168: 360: 862:

also taking up the cause on our behalf, so he looks out numbered.

707:

Thanks, MarnetteD. Much appreciated. I've copied your post onto

670: 281: 1255:

Best wishes in all your future edits and have a good Sunday.

1194:

Knowledge:Village pump (policy)#Names in disambiguation pages

199:'s page, as well as the Mifune article discussion. Cheers! -- 196: 1124:

Yeah, nothing works quite right the first time out, eh? :-)

906:

I'm pretty sure I remember reading this in an interview in

206: 190: 1292:

Hello again. I don't feel a need to fiddle further with

926:

Template:Uncyclopedia template only for use on talk pages

818:

http://www.huntscycles.co.uk/C%20L%201%20Home%20Page.htm

798:

http://movies.groups.yahoo.com/group/laughtonlanchester/

272:

I', sure I've only ever seen the Bowie version on C4...

211:

Marnette, I responded to you on my talk page. Cheers! --

1225:, which happens to be a little scanty on Lovejoys). -- 171: 1340:I will make note of your book suggestions :) -- 984:Knowledge:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) 1014:that don't quite follow the rule that you cite. 1012: 1069:is the way to go, elsewise every article for 1327:Just to copy my response from my talk page: 73:Here are some tips to help you get started: 986:it says that for a disambiguation page for 524:Knowledge:Avoid trivia sections in articles 236:. It's nice you're looking after Oscar. - 70:! Hope you like it here, and stick around. 802:I have a blog myself devoted to Laughton: 1047:Not rude, just a different opinion. :-) 880:. You did post in the right place :-) — 804:http://rootingforlaughton.blogspot.com/ 737:The Santa Fe Opera: an American Pioneer 227:ry" and the appropriate use of "station 105:Eventually, you might want to read the 14: 751:Stanley Kubrick - Barry Lyndon - Prado 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 88:, and feel free to experiment in the 25: 23: 876:I've responded to your request at 711:, for general information. :--) 126:, and, most importantly, have fun! 24: 1355: 721:Your notes on Santa Fe Opera list 460:No problem. Thanks for the info. 1323:About My Spellcheck in Vandalism 942:Ballad of Reading Gaol reversion 788:Thanks for your comments, too ;) 29: 118:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 924:I have nominated the template 878:Knowledge talk:Requested moves 333:Doctor Who and Laurie Anderson 176:Hi Marnette! I replied at my 13: 1: 852:19:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 825:06:05, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 810:16:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 709:Talk:Brother Sun, Sister Moon 451:18:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC) 304:00:05, 30 November 2005 (UTC) 1345:02:10, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 1305:04:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 1264:00:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC) 1230:23:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1201:23:12, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1176:23:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1146:22:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1108:22:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1086:22:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1039:22:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 1003:21:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC) 968:23:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 955:22:20, 18 October 2006 (UTC) 937:22:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC) 915:04:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 895:00:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC) 328:15:43, 13 January 2006 (UTC) 277:10:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 7: 867:14:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 783:10:49, 31 August 2006 (UTC) 768:10:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC) 746:14:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 716:07:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC) 697:22:04, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 686:19:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 664:06:29, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 650:06:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC) 628:20:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 609:14:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 585:11:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC) 562:20:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 534:17:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 512:22:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC) 483:09:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 10: 1360: 994:for only part of the name 910:. I'll try to find it. -- 434:01:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 401:00:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC) 379:11:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 364:18:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC) 352:In your edit today of the 139:23:08, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC) 990:, entries for names with 456:Movie title italicization 343:22:45, 7 April 2006 (UTC) 215:23:32, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) 203:02:57, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC) 184:21:49, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC) 165:02:20, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC) 150:20:56, Mar 27, 2005 (UTC) 99:, post a question at the 1294:Lovejoy (disambiguation) 980:Lovejoy (disambiguation) 974:Lovejoy (disambiguation) 465:02:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 291:18:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC) 268:20:58, 16 May 2005 (UTC) 124:be bold in editing pages 241:17:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 111:Policies and Guidelines 77:To sign your posts (on 1071:Title (disambiguation) 996:should not be included 1073:grows into a list of 426:BTW: I am a guy. ;-) 42:of past discussions. 920:Wilde / Uncyclopedia 195:I also responded on 1079:Request for Comment 912:Scottandrewhutchins 849:Girolamo Savonarola 618:suggestions now. -- 18:User talk:MarnetteD 908:Film Score Monthly 831:Longest films list 759:has reverted your 886: 510: 295:You're welcome... 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1351: 928:for deletion. - 893: 884: 636:A Brilliant Move 500: 442:the above reply. 231:ry" and "station 33: 32: 26: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1332:Live Spellcheck 1325: 1075:So-and-so Title 978:Hi. Regarding 976: 944: 922: 904: 881: 874: 859: 833: 790: 775: 773:Elsa Lanchester 753: 723: 705: 703:Graham Faulkner 674: 638: 569: 519: 490: 475: 473:Christopher Lee 458: 411: 389: 371: 350: 348:South Park City 335: 311: 297: 284: 253: 221: 209: 193: 174: 107:Manual of Style 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1357: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1277: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1065:I still think 1060: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1042: 1041: 1026: 1025: 1016: 1015: 975: 972: 971: 970: 943: 940: 921: 918: 903: 898: 873: 870: 858: 855: 832: 829: 828: 827: 789: 786: 774: 771: 752: 749: 722: 719: 704: 701: 700: 699: 678:Grand National 673: 668: 667: 666: 637: 634: 633: 632: 631: 630: 612: 611: 568: 565: 552: 551: 548: 545: 541: 540: 518: 515: 489: 486: 474: 471: 469: 457: 454: 421: 420: 419: 418: 410: 407: 405: 394:User:MarnetteD 388: 385: 383: 370: 367: 349: 346: 334: 331: 310: 307: 296: 293: 283: 280: 252: 247: 245: 220: 217: 213:Venerable Bede 208: 205: 201:Venerable Bede 192: 189: 187: 173: 170: 169: 168: 167: 166: 152: 151: 128: 127: 120: 114: 103: 93: 82: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1356: 1347: 1346: 1343: 1338: 1335: 1333: 1328: 1306: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1278: 1265: 1262: 1258: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1231: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1202: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1177: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1109: 1106: 1102: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1061: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1046: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1040: 1037: 1033: 1028: 1027: 1023: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 981: 969: 966: 963: 959: 958: 957: 956: 953: 950: 939: 938: 935: 931: 927: 917: 916: 913: 909: 902: 897: 896: 891: 887: 879: 869: 868: 865: 854: 853: 850: 845: 844:Best of Youth 841: 840:War and Peace 836: 835:Hi Marnette, 826: 823: 819: 814: 813: 812: 811: 808: 805: 800: 799: 794: 785: 784: 781: 770: 769: 766: 762: 758: 748: 747: 744: 740: 738: 733: 729: 726: 718: 717: 714: 710: 698: 695: 690: 689: 688: 687: 684: 679: 672: 665: 662: 658: 654: 653: 652: 651: 648: 644: 629: 625: 621: 616: 615: 614: 613: 610: 607: 605: 601: 600: 596: 595: 589: 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 573: 564: 563: 560: 557: 549: 546: 543: 542: 538: 537: 536: 535: 532: 529: 525: 517:Michael Palin 514: 513: 508: 504: 499: 495: 485: 484: 481: 470: 467: 466: 463: 453: 452: 449: 445: 439: 438: 435: 432: 427: 424: 415: 414: 413: 412: 406: 403: 402: 399: 395: 384: 381: 380: 377: 366: 365: 362: 357: 356: 345: 344: 341: 330: 329: 325: 321: 317: 306: 305: 302: 292: 290: 279: 278: 275: 270: 269: 266: 262: 258: 251: 246: 243: 242: 239: 235:ry"<g: --> 234: 230: 226: 216: 214: 204: 202: 198: 188: 185: 183: 179: 164: 161: 156: 155: 154: 153: 149: 146: 142: 141: 140: 138: 135: 131: 125: 121: 119: 115: 112: 108: 104: 102: 98: 94: 91: 87: 83: 80: 76: 75: 74: 71: 69: 65: 64: 58: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1342:FaerieInGrey 1339: 1336: 1329: 1326: 1297: 1074: 1070: 1021: 991: 987: 977: 945: 923: 907: 905: 901:Barry Lyndon 875: 860: 843: 839: 837: 834: 822:Gloria Porta 807:Gloria Porta 801: 795: 791: 780:Gloria Porta 776: 757:modification 754: 741: 736: 734: 730: 727: 724: 706: 675: 639: 603: 598: 593: 574: 570: 567:Craig-Morgan 553: 520: 493: 491: 476: 468: 459: 440: 431:User:Robeykr 428: 425: 422: 404: 390: 387:Recent edits 382: 372: 353: 351: 336: 312: 298: 285: 271: 261:Tony Sidaway 254: 244: 232: 228: 224: 222: 210: 194: 186: 175: 132: 129: 95:If you need 72: 61: 59: 55: 43: 37: 857:Oscar Wilde 498:Josiah Rowe 488:No problem! 355:Smug Alert! 282:Oscar Wilde 274:Robsteadman 250:The Snowman 130:Good luck! 36:This is an 965:(contribs) 952:(contribs) 526:. Cheers, 522:guideline 494:Doctor Who 316:khaosworks 309:TARDIS key 301:JohnDBuell 79:talk pages 60:Hello and 1257:MarnetteD 1101:MarnetteD 1032:MarnetteD 755:A recent 743:Vivaverdi 694:Angmering 683:Angmering 643:MarnetteD 444:MarnetteD 257:Channel 4 122:Explore, 116:Remember 101:Help Desk 90:test area 68:Knowledge 1302:ENeville 1227:JHunterJ 1198:ENeville 1173:JHunterJ 1169:Breaking 1164:WP:MOSDP 1143:ENeville 1083:ENeville 1067:WP:MOSDP 1022:|Lovejoy 1000:ENeville 872:Response 713:JackofOz 556:Garion96 528:Garion96 507:contribs 369:M. Hulot 340:23skidoo 324:contribs 238:Nunh-huh 219:Cemetery 207:Marnette 191:As Did I 86:Tutorial 84:Try the 864:Dabbler 671:Red Rum 462:Nakadai 376:Justinc 289:Dabbler 63:welcome 39:archive 930:Jmabel 765:Jayvdb 761:change 657:Jmabel 559:(talk) 531:(talk) 480:Calair 180:page. 172:Mifune 163:(talk) 160:Meelar 148:(talk) 145:Meelar 137:(talk) 134:Meelar 1298:Title 1223:LOPBN 1171:. -- 992:Title 988:Title 982:, in 962:Gwern 949:Gwern 409:Wrong 197:Quill 182:Quill 16:< 1261:Talk 1162:The 1105:Talk 1036:Talk 1011:and 934:Talk 890:talk 883:Mets 661:Talk 647:Talk 624:Talk 594:Buck 581:Talk 503:talk 448:Talk 437:Talk 398:Talk 320:talk 265:Talk 178:TALK 109:and 97:help 1196:. 885:501 620:Jim 604:ofg 599:ets 577:Jim 429:-- 361:mjb 66:to 1259:| 1103:| 1081:? 1034:| 947:-- 932:| 659:| 645:| 626:) 583:) 505:• 478:-- 446:| 396:| 326:) 322:• 314:-- 892:) 888:( 622:( 606:✐ 579:( 509:) 501:( 318:( 263:| 233:e 229:a 225:e 113:. 92:. 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index