User talk:The Epopt

4135: 2329:

and now I'm sure you're going to use it to silence criticism that you can't handle. That's what people who refuse to admit their own errors do. You do have an alternative, though. Sit back. Tell me what I said that wasn't true. Tell us all. You made a rude, inaccurate, uncivil, insulting post about me, and I called you out on it. I was sarcastic. Big deal. Again, get over it. You were wrong. If you can't handle that, and insist on a pissant display of power here, nothing I do can stop you. If you had a decent sense of shame rather than excessive prideful sensitivity, that could. You do whatever deed you choose, we'll all see which side of the fence you end up on.

4122: 2662:, the many headed user appears to be very knowledgeable about Ampligen, and information is very hard to come by, as I've discovered when writing the article. However, I don't understand their/his/her problem with the article - I have no agenda whatsoever in writing it, other than to provide a neutral and comprehensive view of the drug. I personally would be delighted if it succeeded, I think the technology is very interesting. The article mentions clearly that the drug has shown clear success, so I don't really see the problem. Strange. 3635: 4561: 4295: 5274: 5241: 5221: 5123: 5000: 4028: 4011: 3756: 5325: 5294: 5176: 5143: 5090: 5057: 4883: 4867: 4796: 4707: 4650: 4634: 4508: 4926: 4905: 4683: 4525: 4386: 5018: 4807: 4666: 4357: 4188: 4096: 4084: 4072: 4060: 4048: 3944: 3932: 3920: 21: 4982: 4432: 3908: 3896: 3879: 3867: 3855: 3833: 3821: 4729: 4759: 3663: 3611: 4548: 4282: 3539: 1464: 5203: 4956: 4941: 4217: 3973: 709:

able to claim. Somehow, people have decided that slapping the GFDL onto material that we only have "fair use" of isn't a problem. On the third tentacle, I am not a lawyer, so this is not legal advice. The only thing I know for sure is that HMSO sent me an e-mail message stating very clearly that Crown Copyright and the GFDL are not compatible.

814:... Perhaps you should be more clear, or make separate edits. The latter is common practice when large groups of people are working on a shared piece of information with version control (eg in software development). Besides, what is your opposition to adding two words ("changed capitalization")? Brevity is not an advantage in edit comments. 2401:. If you expand the article, I think it will survive speedy deletion, though it will go to AfD simply because we have numerous admins who hate pornography. Make the first sentence of the article a blatently clear statement of notability: "PureTnA is a BitTorrent community focused on the sharing of pornographic media files 3785: 5032:

and add your name and language(s) you speak? If you are already there and do not want to be, please remove yourself. If you want to remain, please put remain next to your name. If I do not see anything, I will move you to the inactive participant list. I am putting a timeline of 7 days on this action

1316:

The Arbitration Committee voted for decissions that were not discussed in the Worshop. And if any of them were discussed, the discussion has been ignored. As the result, the decissions contradict each other. The proposed enforcement #1 refers to Russian names, while #2 refers to Ukrainian names. What

1092:

I don't think the ArbComm is noticed much by the community, and that's the way it should be. While being appreciated is nice, before working on that, I'd rather work on getting the community to be more reluctant to involve the Committee in their affairs. Arbitration should be a painful last resort,

892:

It's been ages since I read the stories, I always assumed the distance from Pohnpei to R'lyeh was supposed to be maybe a couple dozen miles...but if these numbers actually appear in the text, then of course we should also list them in the appropriate articles (and maybe add a note that these numbers,

746:

Yes, but open-paren comes after a C. I did the alphabetizing by means of the Linux "sort" command, which compared "USS George Washington (SSBN-whatever)" to "USS George Washington Carver (SSBN-whatever)." The result is clearly incorrect in this case. I was entirely interested in getting all of the

1312:

The group of users that has been squeezing Ukrainian editors out of the Community by persisting and scoffing trolling, insulting and personal attacks now is about to succseed to use the Arbitration Committee for this purpose. I called this group "Russian Mafia". It was not a personal attack. It was

1287:

policy about Ukrainian geografic names do not address the question of names associated with the Kievan Rus. How could I know it? There is no any restrictions to particular historical period in the policy about Ukrainian names. How could I know that spelling of Ukrainian names in Knowledge should be

1279:

forbidden by any rules (creating artificial histories of redirect pages). I did it to prevent disrupting Knowledge and violating the Policies. Why not simply to say "do not do it anymore" instead of punish me for something which is not forbidden? How could I know that I was not allowed to do it if

1242:

Thank you very much, sir. I appreciate it. A quick question about bringing this up at RfArb though: having never gone through the dispute resolution process, I have just seen that that is supposed to be the last step, after mediation, requests for comments, etc. In this case, I'm not sure how those

708:

take the image from our site and somehow use it inaccurately, disparagingly, and so on, and claim that we had given him permission to do so. We don't have the right to give that permission. On the other tentacle, we also include material by claiming "fair use," which other people may or may not be

451:

Good to know that you like the class message idea. I also approve of your suggestion of omitting the USS/HMS(although I haven't done any RN lists yet)/whatever prefix. On the DANFS message, I made it because so many places use DANFS material, and the copyright paranoid might be likely to blank such

2625:

and Bioclones (note the additional "o") used to be partners of Ampligen marketeer Hemispherx but the latter sued the both of them some 2 years ago, alleging that they belong to a "conspiratorial group seeking to illegally manipulate our stock for purposes of bringing about a hostile takeover of

2328:

Yeah, it's just terrible that I pointed how you said things that weren't true. Get over it, big guy. It's comforting to see that "hysterical" was the term that came to the fromt of your mind, a word so often used by insecure men confronted by assertive women. But, hey, you've got the power here,

2294:

My apologies for the delay in answering you! The phrase should be understood in two parts: "to be broken up" means to be taken to pieces or disassembled, and "in the ways" refers to the supporting structures used while the ship is being built — specifically the tracks the ship will slide down into

1805:

Thanks. I actually knew that this policy applied to US government employees. I did not realize that it also applied to the military (thus, I added the tag). So if I'm using a US government website as a source, to what extent should I try to paraphrase the information as opposed to directly copying

854:

I am not only an admin; I am an arbiter. Bring your case before the Committee and we will judge you. (Including your oh-so cute listing of your alleged attackers as ...] ] ... oh my goodness, that's persuasive; how can I refrain from leaping to the defense of someone who makes such terribly clever

2845:

I suggest that you discuss this with me first, Thedreamdied. Some considerations for starters: (1) Knowledge talk pages are indexed by Google (2) The company in question has been targeted by shortsellers before (3) we don't want Knowledge involved in any of this. Better safe than sorry. FWIW, the

1381:

You point out that Robert's detractors use loaded terms and that their "arguments ... would not have the gravity of evidence in our courts," which is undoubtedly true. However, the Arbitration Committee is not a court and its rules of procedure and evidence differ from the British — and from the

228:

Like I said the table has been copied all over the place - most people didn't even bother changing the heading color (or even realized where the table first came from - such is the power of wiki!). :) I dunno about the colors -- that will take some thought. It took a while to figure out the best

2405:

___." Then do some serious research. Find sources other than PureTnA itself. Your article says "the website was going to be closed down for personal reasons, but eventually it was decided to keep PureTnA open." Why? What persuaded them? Look into connections. How do they make money? Is PureTnA

676:

symbols; c.f., the various colours of the ensigns of the Royal Navy. Where a given Navy didn't have a jack -- or I had trouble finding a good image of the jack -- I used the ensign. As others joined me in working on ships, they added whatever they felt was appropriate. I do not think we should

167:

I was wondering how long it would take someone to ask that question. There seems to be no consistency anywhere -- chinfo.navy.mil sometimes uses a space, sometimes a hyphen, sometimes both on the same page! I've been using a hyphen (as you can tell) only because I think it looks best.

4402:

on October 26 from 3-6 pm. The event will open with a roundtable discussion about feminism and anti-racist technology projects, followed by an edit-a-thon focusing on feminists & women in science. Experienced Wikipedians will be on hand to support new editors. We hope you can join

2498:

Well, I can't personally help directly, as the only drugs I know anything about — maybe I should stop this sentence now. I've added the {{expert-subject|Drugs}} tag, which is supposed to act like the Bat-signal to summon the kind of help you need. You might also take a look at

270:

say at the bottom of each page that "all text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License" when some of that text is first and foremost under the Crown Copyright. I'll ask the mailing list about this but I'm pretty sure we cannot use Crown Copyright text.

4150:, in Simi Valley, on Saturday, November 19th! The Reagan Library, home to a real Air Force One and other treasures from American history, will take Wikipedians on a special tour of the grounds and archives, followed by an editathon; free catered lunch provided. Please sign up! 1050:

to build our own jurisprudence — we are not bound by any procedure or precedent that we have not chosen ourselves. This freedom has allowed us to design a process specifically tailored to our mission of protecting Knowledge without being distracted by noble but irrelevant

3228:

Given that the user has been contributing (apparently helpfully) since early October, a sudden block with no warning or explanation seems to be a slap in the face. Without addressing the block, specifically, is there some reason you handled the process in this manner? –

1075:

You're full of fire and ready to make a difference now, but will you still be so determined in six months? Don't sign up unless you're prepared to go the distance. Arbitrating is not a sprint, it's a marathon, through the mud, and there's no glory in it even if you do

3310:

IANAL. I am definitely not an IP lawyer, and I am most emphatically not an IP solicitor. This advice is worth nothing, and if you are flogged around the fleet for following it, I will shake my head at your foolishness and drink another round in your memory. That said,

452:

pages for copyvios. I altered quite a number of existing pages which pointed directly to the DANFS page, although I still left a large number of submarines to deal with. As for short articles from DANFS that need expanding, I'd say that's what the stub message is for.

844: 3315:

implies that there is a very good chance the plans and charts are now in the public domain. Even if they are not, I am very confident that a fair use claim would stand up in (United States) court. Of course, part of that confidence comes from the fact that

2295:

the water when she is launched. So to be broken up in the ways is to be partially built in preparation for launching, but then to halt construction and begin taking the partially-built hull apart. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask.

1081:

Both, of course. It is hard to make sense of the mountains of argumentation we're given as evidence, but once I've read through it, a decision is usually very easy. There are exceptions, but most subjects of arbitration are clearly liabilities to

5341:. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 1367:

I have read your post carefully and thank you for it. I have re-reviewed the arbitration case in the light of what you state above, and see no reason to change any of my options. I see no need to address your argument in detail except at two

1035:

If I were up for re-election, I probably would not run — I don't think judges should be chosen by popularity; I'm certainly not on the ArbComm to make friends. Also, I'm not sure this job is worth going through the Hell that was last year's

724:

Crown coyright material. Only HMSO and those to whom HMSO has delegated authority have the right to do that. Anybody using Crown copyrighted pictures from the Knowledge must obey the same stipulations as the Knowledge or risk being sued.

2419:

Hi again, had another thought. I had listed a couple of references on the talk page as to why the page shouldnt be deleted - but i cant remember what they were. Is there any chance you could restore the PureTnA talkpage as well? Merci.

1827:

to change it at all, and often a simple cut'n'paste is a good way to start an article. But we should be improving the article, so any improvement in language clarity, any additional explanation you can add, &c., is very desirable!

1064:

I would dramatically increase the number of arbiters, so that when half of them get tired and disappear, the Committee isn't paralyzed by lack of quorum. Of course, finding that large number of arbiters is much easier to type than to

677:

replace any naval jacks with national ensigns. The jack is the symbol of the Navy; the ensign is the symbol of the entire nation. Precision is valuable. The popularity argument doesn't float for me -- an encyclopedia's job is to be

4257: 4252: 2619:

seems interesting. This situation, if not handled properly, may have Foundation level implications at some point. Some of the involved seem rather litigious to me, and our new arrival much too knowledgeable. Background: Redlabs

2247:

I am the last of the appointed arbiters, but I am tied for the longest serving: Fred Bauder was appointed at the same time I was, but has since stood for (and won) re-election. Thanks a bunch for making me feel so old ... ;-:

1377:

for "aggressive editing" but rather for legal threats. To end that ban, all he has to do is publicly withdraw all legal actions against Knowledge as an organization or against any person in his or her role as a participant in

1320:

Nearly all my statements, comments, evidence, proposal were ignored. It would be OK if the Arbitration Committee would discuss them and then reject. At least I would see a fair procedure. But I did not see anything but silent

703:

use of any material under Crown Copyright is fine -- we use it accurately, not disparagingly, and so on -- but we then license that material for others to use under the GFDL, which does not include those limitations. Someone

928:

Actually, while a quick reading on Bartleby may be confusing, it clearly states that both are alternate spellings of the other, and relies on a 1924 dictionary (which seems rightly out of favor). Had you followed the link to

774:, several biographies, a starkly wonderful stack of correspondence with Doc's daughter, Verna Smith Trestrail, and notes from interviews with a few of Doc's contemporaries. I accumulated most of it during my tour of duty as 436:. I'm not quite so thrilled by the DANFS msg, simply because I hope that DANFS won't be the only source for our articles and having a hard-and-fast msg might actually discourage people citing other sources. Many of the 3379:, that would probably help. The idea here, I suspect, is verifiability. Can anyone confirm that this really is the logo? Hence linking to an official page would help with that. I'm now looking at an earlier warning for 2897: 2305: 2870:

Having reflected on this, i can see the point you are making, although I still think that it is perfectly clear that it is the user's opinion and not Knowledge's. I'll leave it as it is and we can agree to disagree.

333:

The 4000-ton submarine did not leave a debris field only 60x60 feet. The only interpretation of "400 yards square" that makes sense is 160000 sq yd. (To those of you wonder what the hell we're talking about, see

3712: 2630:

Edgar entry - which I would never have found if I had not Googled for redlabs + bioclones...) The puppetmaster may be associated with Hemispherx, Bioclones or Redlabs. Should this be reported somewhere? Thanks.

882:

Well, the location and the distances are correct, and who am I to contradict the stories that say they traveled for only one day? You're right: the ship would have to make over 200 knots to get there in time.

2687:

A user with a similar name seems to have an e-mailbox (staff or student) at a university in Pennsylvania and also sometimes posts positive investment-related information and attacks criticisms on a HEB forum.

1687:

Seeing half the rod-bottom lights go out all at once must have been one of those moments where even the adrenalin doesn't kick in fast enough. Good thing the RO was paying attention and had good reactions.

3885: 1098:

The most frustrating thing is the difficulty we have in closing cases, caused by vanishing arbiters. The most enjoyable is successfully removing from our community those that hinder the creating of a 💕.

2005: 88:

And I don't take offence at your not understanding our affection for guns. We citizens have always been willing to loan you subjects guns when you realize you need them, and I have plenty to spare. ;-:

4485:), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See 5249: 1788:

Sure: Anything created by a US government employee (which includes military personnel) in the course of their duties is automatically released into the public domain. In particular, if you look at

1690:

I know some other FBM crew and have some slight engineering familiarity with them from school, but for some reason hadn't met anyone who was in reactor engineering. Good to make your aquaintence.

1233:: there is no reasonable doubt that some but not all of these users are the same person. I will say no more in public, but if you bring a RfArb, we will have a Finding of Fact of sockpuppetry. 5330: 5315: 1184:

Did you know that if you spell ‘Mason’ backwards you get ‘Nosam,’ which is a five-letter word beginning with ‘N’ like ‘Nitwit’? It's all there if you just shoogle the letters around a bit.

859:?) Until you appear before the Committee, I will not get involved. As my banner states, do not post requests for help in fighting other Wikipedians here. Doing so will not help your cause. 4443:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See

2006: 1349:

I HAVE HAD IT WITH CONSTANT ATTACKS BY T-MAN. The arbitration is just a further opportunity to attack and attack and attack, a relentless illegible onslaught. PLEASE JUST MAKE IT STOP!

1973: 4247: 350:

Plenty of people may *use* them interchangeably, but that does not *make* them interchangeable. "400 square yards" is 20 yards x 20 yards, "400 yards square" is 400 yards x 400 yards.

5028:. I noticed that you signed up at some point to be a participant and as I am reviving this project, one of my tasks is to get the participant list in order. Would you please go to the 5313: 4363: 4262: 2826: 2086: 42: 2227:

I explained my removal on the article's talk page. If you can cite sources, I'll let them stand as the objections that those sources have, but since many of them are simply untrue (

2070:

on the Talk: page. None of that constitutes "Jayjg new revert war", and your spamming of this duplicate message on the Talk: page of every single ArbCom member is highly disruptive.

2105:

Well, I doubt it. I thought I was mistaken once, but it turned out I was wrong. I've provided a source for the grounding. It's possible that source is wrong, of course. ;-: -->

5229: 1317:

have I to do with Russian names? I did not change a single Russian name since I am here. What is the reason for this strange decision about Russian names? Can somebody explain me?

1265: 863: 2270:

accurate and not misleading. We do not pass on the Crown Copyright license; rather, we indicate that everything on our site is available for reuse in any way the reuser chooses.

1491:

Done. God help us if HM Government ever notices how thoroughly we're ignoring the formal letter they sent me stating that we cannot relicense any CC material under the GFDL....

5034: 1645:. I'll always remember: When the RO latched rods for the first time (which you may know is done by driving the rods in even tho they are already bottomed), half the rods moved 1243:

earlier steps would apply (mediation on whether they're actually sockpuppets or not?). Can you advise someone that has never been through this on what steps should be followed?

5209: 4993: 4970: 4893: 1993: 685:-- not made inaccurate to avoid surprising the ignorant. If anything, we should replace the fifty-star USN jack with the one currently flying on the warships of the US Navy. 461:

Stan Shebs also expressed some concern over the larger classes of ship being impractical. He seems to like the idea as well. I actually beat him to creating a DANFS message.

4947: 4182: 2726:

works? As for expressing your disappointment, there are more effective ways to communicate, ways that won't put you in danger of losing your privilege of editing this site.

1001:

I can't argue with you, Texture -- I transliterate Cyrillic by typing on my keyboard while jumping on my pogo stick. What I have above seems to be popular on Google, tho.

4513: 2448: 2312: 1913:

Distraction, actually — my apologies. The missing content, from her fibreglass construction through the list of equipment, will go better in the article about the whole

1302:

It's very surprising if I will be forbidden to correct Ukrainian names and those who were distorting them and ignoring the naming convention are allowed to do it further.

4932: 4749:

related pages, you have been awarded the Strategic Barnstar. Your outstanding performance provides significant and long lasting benefits to Knowledge, Congratulations!

2465:

I found you as the earliest wp encyclopedist on this term. May I, therefore, ask you to re-visit the article? It has been supplanted by the ugly ancient bifurcation of

4801: 3706: 252:

Yes, I do. If you look up the definition of a "Crown copyright," you will see that it can be copied freely as long as it is copied accurately and not dispargingly. --

4988: 4696: 3598: 2278:. The problem is not with our use — we want to be accurate and not misleading and cite our sources — but with the way we relicense everything for "downstream" use. 4020: 4003: 3914: 3890: 3320:

won't be standing up in court. The United States courts have a long history of not giving Crown Copyright the respect the Crown thinks it deserves. So, go for it!

3013: 1842: 1087:

No, I don't have any significant regrets. There are cases I would have handled somewhat differently, if I knew then what I know now, but only in degree, not kind.

1711:

This user is a sock puppet of Ted Wilkes, as established by Knowledge:Requests for CheckUser/Archive/March 2006#Ted Wilkes (talk • contribs) and related accounts,

1361: 5008: 4639: 3938: 3189: 1396: 1023: 50: 562:

Sorry it took so long to see your comment -- I don't usually read my user page. I'll look into K-3's mission and make sure they get the credit they deserve. --

4872: 4785: 3926: 3815: 3748: 3651: 2971: 2818: 2056: 1774: 2062:

The section in question was just a near verbatim reproduction of an uninteresting speech by Ahmadinejad; as part of a cleanup of the article I removed it and

1325: 5366: 5131: 5078: 3902: 3623: 3368: 1853: 3222: 1978: 592:

Yep. I saw your spelling correction, and decided to put the DANFS article up, hoping it would inspire you to add information from your father's patrols. --

5361: 5045: 4856: 4351: 1213: 1954:

Please note that, the immediately-above statement not withstanding, all material submitted here is irrevokably and unavoidably licensed under the GFDL. I

5029: 4090: 4078: 4066: 4054: 3827: 3806: 1658: 5344: 4962: 4660: 4242: 3861: 3801: 2791: 1887:

standard. If you want to change it, I suggest that rather than moving just one relatively unknown submarine, you start with a popular one; e.g., move

3267:

Thanks for following up on this one. I think we're all sorted now, but I'll keep a watch to make sure everything's okay with everyone. Thanks again -

2481: 2018:

Yep. Unclassified material created by Federal government employees during the course of their work is automatically released into the public domain.

1309:

edist of my opponents that disrupted Knowledge: broken links, sneaky vandalism, POV-pushing etc. were completely ignored by the Arbitration Committee.

1173: 4267: 3873: 2627: 2381:

Someone so ignorant of copyright as to be unable to spell it has no business commenting on it. Your comments are meaningless nonsense. Please leave.

1616:

a starkly wonderful stack of correspondence with Doc's daughter, Verna Smith Trestrail, and notes from interviews with a few of Doc's contemporaries.

1353: 933:, which supplies far more useful information, the whole (word hi)story would have become clear - a usefull diagnostic tool to add to your favorites? 525: 5197: 4623: 4533:

No evidence of notability. "References" consists of two websites of organizations he has started, a search engine results page and a personal blog.

4042: 1631: 1716:"See this request for CheckUser: Ted Wilkes, Danny B. (usurped) and Karl Schalike are the same person." Mushroom (Talk) 06:40, 19 March 2006 (UTC) 5282: 5111: 4497: 4177: 3451:

Hudson was an ET who went NESEP. He was LT while on the OHIO's pre-commissioning crew. Don't know which crew he ended up on after commissioning.

2288: 1871: 1070:

No, this is a necessary job, and one that could easily go astray. I'm glad to have had the opportunity to get it started in the right direction.

2893: 1694: 1678: 1390: 4655: 1780: 1188: 2311:

And your hysterical display of incivility deserves a short sharp shock — say, about 24 hours' worth — but it is sufficiently public that I'll

1335: 949:

Well, I would have, except that someone deleted it. It is the original form of the phrase popularized by Ronald Reagan, "trust, but verify."

4112: 3849: 3621: 3587: 2787: 2466: 1702: 201: 4888: 3516: 2350: 2333: 2319: 2258: 1610: 1438: 4691:

Non-notable crater which is also under scrutiny as not actually existing. Can only find a spattering of journal articles pertaining to it.

132: 119: 4819: 4677: 4200: 3956: 3468: 2712: 2369: 1792:, you will see the statement "Information presented on this web site is considered public information and may be distributed or copied." 1625: 1574: 4833:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 4224:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 3980:, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter 3396: 2548: 2539: 2516: 2507: 2424: 2410: 1767: 953: 900: 887: 440:

have a stub in DANFS which must then be expanded using other sources. However, the message can be easily overwritten, so let her run. --

217:! The different colors is an interesting idea -- I'll give it some thought and discussion on the Wikiproject page. Any suggestions? -- 5164: 4918: 3244: 2766: 1518: 1153: 1131: 1016: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 4158: 3417: 2775: 2730: 2385: 2252: 2125: 2109: 1941: 180:). Thereafter, a space was introduced and, more recently, a hyphen, although I've heard that there's a retreat from the hyphen (as at 5334: 5303: 5187: 5154: 5101: 5068: 4420: 3260: 2235: 2188: 2138: 1581: 1564: 1247: 1237: 1005: 614: 539:

Being accused of pro-Kerry bias is the funniest thing that has happened to me all week. Thank you for the belly laugh, Rex071404. --

2641: 2299: 2215: 1921: 1899: 1832: 1810: 1796: 1382:

American — judicial systems. It exists solely to protect our encyclopedia, and has little interest in justice as an abstract ideal.

921: 3460: 3442: 3329: 2995: 2978: 1874: 1512: 992: 937: 3839: 3503: 3494:

I don't see any reason to change a system that has been in use for several centuries, but I'm willing to listen to your argument.

2950: 2925: 2904: 2875: 2861: 2850: 2833: 2799: 2698: 2666: 2579: 2282: 1661:, at 0430, and at 0500 the shipyard electricians got to fix the CRDMs they had wired up backwards, and a good time was had by all. 1504: 1495: 1411: 914:

Not only have I (double-)checked my facts, but The Columbia Guide to Standard American English (1993) apparently has as well. See

2043: 2035: 2022: 1967: 1451: 1427: 1288:

different from Britannica and other English language encyclopedias? Which policy says it? It seem the policy states the opposite.

432:

I like the idea of msgs, and I like the class-list msg, though it will probably be impractical for the larger classes; e.g., the

3554: 3532: 1999: 1542: 1529: 5025: 4971: 4712: 4421: 3283: 2741: 2074: 1947: 1781: 1299:

I will get the same punishment ("Warning") as Ghirlandago will get for multiple insultigs and personal attack made on purpose!

3481: 3184: 3153: 2746: 2063: 414:

for ships that don't have standard prefixes. The main advantage is readability -- "He served on the German aircraft carrier

2406:

related to PirateBay? &c. I think you'll have a good article, but you'll have to put some real work into it. Good luck!

284:

this week, explaining the GFDL and our project and (I hope) getting an official answer to this question from HM Government.

5262: 3727: 3514: 3299: 1224: 2067: 1059:— it is an unpleasant, thankless task that is easy to put off; alas, this means that cases take several months to resolve. 4134: 3694: 3372: 3364: 3335: 3118: 3093: 3078: 3068: 3058: 2598: 2080: 1341: 1211: 378: 370: 299:

So what was the outcome? I'm curious now. Plus some Canadian government websites are probably under Crown copyright. --

4462:.) Knowledge has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at 966: 5251: 4949: 4934: 3844: 2437: 1649:. He scrammed the reactor as soon as the rod-bottom lights went out so no harm was done, and the Engineer got to call 845:

Help me defend Knowledge noble principles of Consensus decisions by Principled Negotiation, not Tyranny of the Majority

802: 869: 5234: 5214: 4898: 2889: 2133: 1219: 4311: 2780:

How many patrols did you make on Ohio Blue? I was on the 3rd through 15th patrols for OHIO, member of RC division.

237:, but those are areas that I know a lot about. This is the type of detail that can be worked-out later though. --mav 3342: 3304: 3135: 4518: 4463: 3652: 3599: 3488: 2964: 2012: 1595: 1557: 1483: 3645: 3998: 2569:. I don't think the account should be branded a possible sock right now, just alerting you to the new arrival. 2565:. For now the account has made similar comments but the approach is somewhat more aware of our procedures, see 1934: 1433: 1423:

I have added a detailed explanation to my rejection. I will recuse when I feel I have a conflict of interest.

1194: 811: 4594: 3688: 2857:

PS As I have already said, the editor in question did not present this as opinion but as a statement of fact.

4851: 4399: 4037: 3562: 3482: 3402: 3387:). I do see some deleted images even further up the page, but those could be undeleted if they can be fixed. 3347: 3289: 3038: 2747: 2469:--to my despair!!! May I recruit your support to revive, restore, or supplant this poetically lovelier usage? 2221: 1888: 1761: 1206: 976:

I'm rusty, but would't it be "doveryah, no proveryah"? (Or is that pesky й messing with what I remember?) -

943: 204: 27: 5033:

to help keep things moving along. It would also be great if you would be willing to join the task force for

4332: 829: 4963: 4415: 3656: 3616: 3572: 3357: 3202: 3140: 2817: 2795: 2616: 2194: 1859: 1773: 1255: 786: 5263: 5230: 5210: 5112: 4989: 4894: 4746: 4514: 4147: 3743: 3684: 3336: 3083: 3043: 3028: 2500: 1992:

Rather unsurprisingly, Siddiqui failed to direct you to this conversation, which gives the full context:

1852: 407: 53: 1749: 4913: 4719: 4618: 4603: 4471: 4341: 4167: 4121: 2535:

You've done it. I'll keep an eye on the article. Your many-named friend will soon cease to bother you.

2362: 2119: 1763:,etc. This suggests that DW alias Ted Wilkes has created many more sockpuppets, as DW did in the past. 1746: 503: 365:

It probably, once upon a fictional time when people wrote more carefully, would have been "yards square

310: 5338: 5307: 5191: 5158: 5105: 5072: 3808: 3669: 3003: 2398: 2346:"Hysterical" can also mean "causing uncontrollable laughter" — but, okay, let's use your definition. 1691: 839: 140: 3734: 3385:"This low resolution copy will not prevent Schering-Plough Corporation from selling sun tan lotion." 1758: 600: 5257: 4975: 4613: 4410: 3088: 3073: 3063: 3048: 2812: 2097: 1022: 834: 437: 2231:, it is false that the owner's SSN is printed on the card) I won't let them be presented as fact. 824: 514: 426: 4475: 4143: 4127: 3583: 3567: 3294: 2487: 2051: 1722: 1484: 1401: 1260: 1145:

On an unrelated note except that it's to do with the same ArbCom case - Epopt, you might want to

634: 374: 3593: 747:-boats in the right place, and didn't think to look for the side-effects you found. Well done! 693: 181: 4698: 4573: 4452: 4307: 3629: 3509: 3212: 3207: 3113: 3053: 2241: 1927: 1638: 1350: 897: 507: 335: 2092: 4841: 4602:

If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from

4569: 4553: 4340:

If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from

4303: 4287: 4232: 4166:

If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from

3988: 3470: 3239: 2139: 1440: 1178: 145: 106: 59: 4107: 1755: 4770: 4742: 4641: 4538: 4490: 4467: 3423: 3413: 3392: 2783: 2330: 2195: 1864: 1159: 1118: 1111: 812:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Littoral_Combat_Ship&diff=prev&oldid=13518445

787: 433: 4314:

blog post on it) and we hope we can do better this year. We would love to have you there!

3700: 1742:. Both Cynthia B. and DW/JillandJack or Ted Wilkes contributed to the following articles: 176:

World War II practice was no space. Decklogs, etc., generally used the form "BB35" (as at

8: 4874: 4787: 3476: 3380: 3312: 3256: 3171: 3148: 3098: 2432: 2375: 2184: 1743: 1667: 1417: 1150: 1139: 391: 129: 775: 755: 343:

I've heard plenty of people use 'yards square' to mean the same thing as 'square yards'.

5149: 5133: 5116: 5096: 5080: 4815: 4758: 4588: 4326: 4272: 4196: 3952: 3642: 3579: 1704: 1446: 1127: 1123: 499: 3251:

Since you seem to be away, I've asked for assistance in this matter at AN/I. Thanks.

1752: 1275:

The Arbitration Committee is going to punish me for something what was (and stil is!)

492: 5346: 5299: 5284: 5063: 5047: 4858: 4834: 4713: 4225: 4155: 3981: 3456: 3108: 3008: 2991: 2922: 2872: 2753: 2663: 2545: 2513: 2421: 2274:

has informed me directly that we cannot relicense Crown Copyright material under the

2045: 1907: 1650: 1168: 982: 894: 726: 462: 234: 113: 4258:

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

3376: 3231: 3166: 3130: 2839: 2492: 2366: 2118:

article says “UB-123”. It seems we do not have an article on the UB-123. see also

2098: 1883:

The hundreds of other consistently named "Russian vessel name" articles create the

1764: 1739: 1517: 1453: 856: 850:

I can say I will not help like this (now watch closely as my keys go up and down):

192:

Similarly, World War II practice was to refer to a ship without using "the," i.e.,

4253:

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

3720: 3430: 2566: 1313:

merely a stating of the fact. Is there a more appropriate name? I do not think so.

740: 67:

That's sounds like it would have been fun to watch. Was there a cat involved? --

4444: 3409: 3388: 3158: 2763: 2722:

ago, after a week of asking if anyone objected. No one did. Do you know what how

2391: 2122: 1731: 1106: 1013: 908: 272: 4486: 4459: 3634: 3538: 2846:

removed content is in the page history and I left a link for anyone interested.

4448: 4310:, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 23, 2012! Last year's was a blast (see the 3755: 3550: 3524: 3495: 3434: 3321: 3252: 2975: 2830: 2772: 2727: 2723: 2536: 2504: 2407: 2382: 2347: 2316: 2296: 2279: 2249: 2232: 2212: 2180: 2106: 2019: 1964: 1938: 1918: 1896: 1829: 1793: 1675: 1622: 1578: 1561: 1526: 1492: 1463: 1424: 1408: 1387: 1332: 1244: 1234: 1185: 1161: 1002: 963: 950: 918: 884: 860: 799: 779: 748: 710: 686: 672:

Back when I was the only one doing this, I chose to use jacks because they are

652: 593: 563: 540: 529: 516: 441: 397: 390:

Two years in the shipyard watching her being built, then two years sea duty on

289: 253: 230: 218: 169: 116: 100:

Just thought I would point out, subject and citizen are synonomous under UK law

91: 68: 4576:, in Los Angeles, on Saturday, June 22, 2013! We would love to see you there! 4458:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See

1917:

class, which I mean to create, but haven't yet. I'll get to it this weekend.

5355: 4625: 4580: 4560: 4318: 4294: 3767: 3639: 3603: 3194: 2947: 2901: 2858: 2847: 2693: 2636: 2593: 2574: 2529: 2478: 1807: 1654: 1599: 934: 815: 419: 300: 261:

Thank you for actually checking, and not just shrieking hysterically. ;-: -->

46: 45:

I award this Barnstar to The Epopt for his gracious editing of my article on

2503:, and perhaps write to people who have listed themselves there. Good luck! 1847: 666: 418:" is a good English sentence. Obviously, we can't simply title the article 5267: 4499: 4151: 3675: 3452: 3176: 2988: 2474: 2306:

Your grossly irresponsible AFD comments demand a conspicuous public apology

2115: 1994:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Siddiqui and Qadianism

1267: 987: 977: 660: 317: 4829:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

4210:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

3966:

Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to

735: 3352: 3268: 3103: 3033: 2562: 2524: 2171: 2167: 2155: 1550: 1501: 915: 766:

As well as every word Doc published, I have a few obscure books, such as

326: 2453: 2071: 2032: 1996: 1980: 648: 266:

Problem. IIRC the Crown Copyright and the GNU FDL are incompatible. We

3775:

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

2585: 2066:. It was subsequently moved to Wikiquote. The removal has also been 1556:

I have deleted numerous inappropriate articles here on Knowledge, but

549: 4925: 4728: 3886:

lisa marie (heitman?) bruce or lisa marie heitman or LM Heitman Bruce

3546: 2457: 2449: 1984: 1539: 582: 573:

While K-3 may need to be given greater credit, let's not forget that

481: 351: 4672: 4481:

It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company,

3907: 3895: 3878: 3866: 3854: 3832: 3820: 2085: 2007:

Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Locke Cole/Proposed decision

1789: 1093:

only invoked when all other avenues of reconciliation are exhausted.

41: 5037:

that would be awesome, as there are troublesome words we run into.

3662: 3610: 3433:. I don't recall Ed Hudson -- what rate and which crew was he on? 2689: 2659: 2632: 2589: 2570: 1056: 214: 152: 5017: 4385: 2179:

Thanks for your speedy assistance! It is greatly appreciated!! --

1500:

Thank you, hopefully that will put a brake on unsuitable uploads.

893:

however improbable, are actually based on the Lovecraft texts) --

794:

You are mistaken. The main change I made was to add a link to USS

659: 556: 316:

I know I was just being picky, but thanks for fixing your error.

20: 5182: 5166: 1735: 874: 870: 82: 78: 2621: 3784:

the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click

3770:, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions. 3383:, and the process there worked quite well (I particularly like 2203: 177: 5202: 4955: 4940: 4547: 4281: 1538:

Okay gotcha, just making sure. Heh, you deleted it anyway :] -

623: 2114:

Clarification, UB-123 sank the Leinster, not the U-123. The

369:". But that's perhaps too Victorian for today's Dear Reader. 4491:

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

4102: 2762:

Probably much MUCH later. I was on the Ohio from 2000-2003.

2623: 930: 4847:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

4248:

Better source request for File:Swimmer Delivery Vehicle.jpg

4238:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

3994:

to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

2275: 2271: 2208: 4263:

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

2771:

I was on the first patrol, so, yep, much earlier. ;-: -->

760: 699:

There is no hard-and-fast answer. On the first tentacle,

281: 4741:

For your hard work and due diligence creating or editing

4425: 1974:

User Jayjg's revert war at Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Israel

77:

I didn't move anything -- I simply created a redirect at

1195: 5329:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5298:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5180:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5147:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5094:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

5061:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

3190:

Fleet Marine Force Enlisted Warfare Specialist Insignia

3719: 2266:

We cannot guarentee that the material (the arms) will

1174:

Requests for arbitration/Onefortyone/Proposed decision

5024:

Hi The Epopt! I am Galendalia and I have revived the

4374:

October 26 - FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable -

4183:

File permission problem with File:GURPS Cyberpunk.JPG

5333: