199:, without weighing in explicitly on the authorship of the text, comments, however, that "many of the literary techniques employed are utterly typical of Lucian himself; if this work is by an imitator, (s)he was a very skillful one." James Jope, defending more explicitly the authenticity of the dialogue, states that it was common in Bloch's era to judge the authenticity of works of literature from classical antiquity "on tenuous grounds", adding that "critics sensitive to irony, ambivalence, and different authorial personae have a very different appreciation of Lucian than Bloch's generation". Like Bloch, Jope also performs an analysis of the vocabulary of the text, but
122:
and was transmitted as part of the corpus of his writings. Beginning in the early 20th century, some modern scholars have stated that the dialogue was probably not written by Lucian on account of its style, but others—including among those who do not vouch for its authenticity—have posited that the
203:
Bloch, he shows that the words employed there, including the rarer and more idiosyncratic ones, previously exploited to deny Lucian's authorship, are actually found in other writings uncontroversially ascribed to him.
118:. It is an example of contest literature, comparing the love of women and the love of boys, and concluding that the latter is preferable over the former. The dialogue is traditionally attributed to the satirist
548:
187:
The second dialogue consists of a contest between
Callicratidas and Charicles to decide which is the more desirable: the love for boys or the love for women (respectively).
164:, but with the opposite conclusion in the former and with the latter reaching no verdict. In terms of structure, the dialogue may be considered similar to
195:
The authorship of the work was first questioned in depth in an essay published in 1907 by a classicist named Robert Bloch. In the late 1990s,
146:
342:
Sandra
Boehringer (2014). "What is named by "Philaenis"? Gender, function, and authority of an antonomastic figure". In Mark Masterson;
323:
Judith
Mossman (2007). "Chapter 7: Heracles, Prometheus, and the play of genres in 's Amores". In in Simon Swain; Stephen Harrison;
570:
216:
was regarded as inauthentic and was not studied by many scholars. It was brought to renewed scholarly attention in 1984 when
431:
575:
196:
580:
222:
449:
343:
156:
486:
472:
507:
424:
379:
348:
Sex in
Antiquity: Exploring Gender and Sexuality in the Ancient World (Rewriting Antiquity)
276:
261:
8:
134:
383:
280:
527:
395:
292:
235:
123:
style resembles that of Lucian. As such, the work is normally cited under the name of
399:
296:
387:
284:
417:
217:
161:
89:
564:
518:
479:
370:
James Jope (2011). "Interpretation and
Authenticity of the Lucianic Erotes".
125:
115:
74:
35:
500:
465:
111:
64:
391:
288:
534:
324:
138:
129:, but acceptance of its authenticity has increased in the 2010s. The
244:
541:
169:
151:
409:
493:
441:
119:
31:
165:
93:
98:; "Loves", or "The two kinds of love"), also known as the
262:"Interpretation and authenticity of the Lucianic Erotes"
184:
begins as a dialogue between
Lycinus and Theomnestus.
341:
562:
133:is also famous for its vivid description of the
322:
425:
275:(1). Texas Tech University Press: 103–120.
432:
418:
369:
248:(Greek original and Danish translation)
212:For most of the twentieth century, the
16:Roman dialogue written in Ancient Greek
563:
365:
363:
361:
359:
357:
172:is often in contest with another man.
413:
318:
316:
259:
439:
354:
331:. Cambridge, CUP. pp. 146–159.
144:The same subject is treated in the
13:
313:
14:
592:
571:Ancient Greek erotic literature
229:
110:, is a dialogue written in the
335:
1:
253:
190:
207:
7:
239:(English only, Loeb version
10:
597:
175:
94:
46:
517:
487:The Passing of Peregrinus
448:
350:. Routledge. p. 384.
70:
60:
52:
42:
28:
21:
519:Pseudo-Lucianic writings
223:The History of Sexuality
346:; James Robson (eds.).
344:Nancy Sorkin Rabinowitz
56:2nd, 3rd or 4th century
549:Judgment of the Vowels
157:Leucippe and Clitophon
576:Pederastic literature
473:Dialogues of the Gods
466:On the Syrian Goddess
392:10.1353/hel.2011.0004
289:10.1353/hel.2011.0004
220:examined the text in
508:How to Write History
260:Jope, James (2011).
107:Affairs of the Heart
384:2011Helio..38..103J
281:2011Helio..38..103J
168:'s works, in which
558:
557:
480:The Lover of Lies
135:Cnidian Aphrodite
80:
79:
588:
434:
427:
420:
411:
410:
404:
403:
367:
352:
351:
339:
333:
332:
320:
307:
305:
303:
266:
97:
96:
48:
38:
24:
19:
18:
596:
595:
591:
590:
589:
587:
586:
585:
581:Works by Lucian
561:
560:
559:
554:
513:
450:Works by Lucian
444:
438:
408:
407:
368:
355:
340:
336:
329:Severan culture
321:
314:
301:
299:
264:
256:
232:
218:Michel Foucault
210:
193:
178:
162:Achilles Tatius
29:
22:
17:
12:
11:
5:
594:
584:
583:
578:
573:
556:
555:
553:
552:
545:
538:
531:
523:
521:
515:
514:
512:
511:
504:
497:
490:
483:
476:
469:
462:
454:
452:
446:
445:
437:
436:
429:
422:
414:
406:
405:
378:(1): 103–120.
353:
334:
311:
310:
309:
308:
255:
252:
251:
250:
242:
231:
228:
209:
206:
197:Judith Mossman
192:
189:
177:
174:
78:
77:
72:
68:
67:
62:
58:
57:
54:
50:
49:
44:
43:Original title
40:
39:
26:
25:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
593:
582:
579:
577:
574:
572:
569:
568:
566:
551:
550:
546:
544:
543:
539:
537:
536:
532:
530:
529:
525:
524:
522:
520:
516:
510:
509:
505:
503:
502:
498:
496:
495:
491:
489:
488:
484:
482:
481:
477:
475:
474:
470:
468:
467:
463:
461:
460:
456:
455:
453:
451:
447:
443:
435:
430:
428:
423:
421:
416:
415:
412:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
366:
364:
362:
360:
358:
349:
345:
338:
330:
326:
319:
317:
312:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
263:
258:
257:
249:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
233:
227:
225:
224:
219:
215:
205:
202:
198:
188:
185:
183:
173:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
153:
149:
148:
142:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
126:Pseudo-Lucian
121:
117:
116:Ancient Greek
113:
109:
108:
103:
102:
91:
87:
86:
76:
75:Ancient Greek
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
45:
41:
37:
36:Pseudo-Lucian
33:
27:
20:
547:
540:
533:
526:
506:
501:A True Story
499:
492:
485:
478:
471:
464:
458:
457:
375:
371:
347:
337:
328:
300:. Retrieved
272:
268:
245:
236:
230:Translations
221:
213:
211:
200:
194:
186:
181:
179:
155:
145:
143:
130:
124:
112:Roman Empire
106:
105:
100:
99:
84:
83:
81:
65:Roman Empire
535:Philopatris
565:Categories
325:Jas Elsner
302:1 December
254:References
191:Authorship
139:Praxiteles
440:Works by
400:144874219
297:144874219
208:Reception
147:Amatorius
542:Timarion
327:(eds.).
170:Socrates
152:Plutarch
71:Language
528:Halcyon
494:Toxaris
380:Bibcode
277:Bibcode
176:Summary
61:Country
53:Written
459:Amores
442:Lucian
398:
372:Helios
295:
269:Helios
246:Erotes
237:Amores
214:Amores
201:contra
182:Amores
131:Erōtes
120:Lucian
101:Amores
95:Ἔρωτες
85:Erōtes
47:Ἔρωτες
32:Lucian
23:Amores
396:S2CID
293:S2CID
265:(PDF)
166:Plato
90:Greek
304:2015
180:The
154:and
82:The
388:doi
285:doi
160:by
150:of
137:of
114:in
104:or
34:or
30:by
567::
394:.
386:.
376:38
374:.
356:^
315:^
291:.
283:.
273:38
271:.
267:.
226:.
141:.
92::
433:e
426:t
419:v
402:.
390::
382::
306:.
287::
279::
241:)
88:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.