Knowledge

Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG)

Source 📝

29: 55:
Sabrina Freeman in her personal capacity, Jordan Lefaivre, an Infant, by his Guardian ad litem, Leighton Lefaivre, and the said Leighton Lefaivre in his personal capacity, Russell Gordon Pearce, an Infant, by his Guardian ad litem, Janet Gordon Pearce, and the said Janet Gordon Pearce in her personal capacity
278:
from which differential treatment must be shown. In this case, the Court identified the comparator group as a person who is not suffering from a mental disability who wants funding for an emergent or experimental treatment. As the petitioners were unable to show that other seekers of experimental
54:
Attorney General of British Columbia and Medical Services Commission of British Columbia v. Connor Auton, an Infant, by his Guardian ad litem, Michelle Auton,and the said Michelle Auton in her personal capacity, Michelle Tamir, an Infant, by her Guardian ad litem, Sabrina Freeman, and the said
270:
The Court further rejected the possibility that people with autism were adversely discriminated against by the underinclusiveness of the legislation. Non-core medical services, McLachlin stated, are by their very nature underinclusive and cannot be considered discriminatory.
256: 207: 109: 275: 259:). However, here, she claimed, the benefit of "funding for all medically required treatment" is not guaranteed by law, as it is neither promised in the 255:, writing for the Court, reiterated that the question here is whether the petitioners were denied a benefit in a discriminatory manner (see 249:
The Court unanimously decided that the refusal to fund the ABA/IBI treatment did not violate the children's section 15 equality rights.
302: 338: 211: 333: 343: 234: 206:
wherein the Court ruled that government funding for non-core medically necessary treatments is not protected under
87: 195: 348: 108:
Not providing government funding for all medically required treatment is not a discrimination protected by
315: 297: 227: 199: 289: 203: 34: 293: 263:
nor any provincial health legislation. Rather, the Health Act only guarantees funding for
8: 279:
treatments are guaranteed funding, the Court rejected the claim on this basis as well.
252: 128: 260: 143: 61: 28: 223: 183:
Iacobucci and Arbour JJ. took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
83: 238: 159: 135: 327: 151: 139: 222:
The parents of several children with autism brought an action against the
163: 155: 147: 226:
government for failing to fund Applied Behavioral Analysis (
274:
For a claim to succeed the petitioner must establish a
191:
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG)
22:
Auton (Guardian ad litem of) v British Columbia (AG)
325: 230:), a form of therapy for children with autism. 267:of which ABA/IBI for autism is not one. 212:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 112:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms 326: 241:(under section 15) were not violated. 237:the Court found that the children's 316:SCC Case Information - Docket 29508 13: 14: 360: 282: 339:Section Fifteen Charter case law 235:British Columbia Court of Appeal 88:British Columbia Court of Appeal 27: 309: 1: 334:Supreme Court of Canada cases 217: 202:is a leading decision of the 16:Supreme Court of Canada case 7: 45:Judgment: November 19, 2004 10: 365: 344:2004 in Canadian case law 244: 233:Both at trial and in the 182: 174: 169: 124: 119: 107: 102: 94: 78: 70: 66:3 S.C.R. 657, 2004 SCC 78 60: 49: 42: 26: 21: 303:LEAF (intervener) Factum 318:Supreme Court of Canada 290:Supreme Court of Canada 204:Supreme Court of Canada 35:Supreme Court of Canada 292:decision available at 43:Hearing: June 9, 2004 175:Unanimous reasons by 349:Disability case law 129:Beverley McLachlin 82:Judgement against 261:Canada Health Act 187: 186: 144:Michel Bastarache 356: 319: 313: 276:comparator group 224:British Columbia 133:Puisne Justices: 120:Court membership 84:British Columbia 31: 19: 18: 364: 363: 359: 358: 357: 355: 354: 353: 324: 323: 322: 314: 310: 285: 247: 239:equality rights 220: 160:Marie Deschamps 136:Frank Iacobucci 131: 98:Appeal allowed. 44: 38: 17: 12: 11: 5: 362: 352: 351: 346: 341: 336: 321: 320: 307: 306: 305: 300: 284: 283:External links 281: 246: 243: 219: 216: 185: 184: 180: 179: 178:McLachlin C.J. 176: 172: 171: 167: 166: 126:Chief Justice: 122: 121: 117: 116: 105: 104: 100: 99: 96: 92: 91: 80: 76: 75: 72: 68: 67: 64: 58: 57: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 32: 24: 23: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 361: 350: 347: 345: 342: 340: 337: 335: 332: 331: 329: 317: 312: 308: 304: 301: 299: 295: 291: 288:Full text of 287: 286: 280: 277: 272: 268: 266: 265:core services 262: 258: 254: 250: 242: 240: 236: 231: 229: 225: 215: 213: 209: 208:section 15(1) 205: 201: 197: 193: 192: 181: 177: 173: 170:Reasons given 168: 165: 161: 157: 153: 152:Louise Arbour 149: 145: 141: 140:John C. Major 137: 134: 130: 127: 123: 118: 114: 113: 110:s. 15 of the 106: 101: 97: 93: 89: 85: 81: 79:Prior history 77: 73: 69: 65: 63: 59: 56: 52: 48: 41: 37: 36: 30: 25: 20: 311: 273: 269: 264: 251: 248: 232: 221: 190: 189: 188: 132: 125: 111: 53: 33: 200:2004 SCC 78 164:Morris Fish 156:Louis LeBel 328:Categories 218:Background 148:Ian Binnie 71:Docket No. 253:McLachlin 62:Citations 257:Law test 228:ABA/IBI 210:of the 103:Holding 86:in the 298:CanLII 245:Ruling 196:S.C.R. 95:Ruling 74:29508 294:LexUM 198:657, 194:, 3 296:and 158:, 330:: 214:. 162:, 154:, 150:, 146:, 142:, 138:, 115:. 90:.

Index

Supreme Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
British Columbia
British Columbia Court of Appeal
s. 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Beverley McLachlin
Frank Iacobucci
John C. Major
Michel Bastarache
Ian Binnie
Louise Arbour
Louis LeBel
Marie Deschamps
Morris Fish
S.C.R.
2004 SCC 78
Supreme Court of Canada
section 15(1)
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
British Columbia
ABA/IBI
British Columbia Court of Appeal
equality rights
McLachlin
Law test
Canada Health Act
comparator group
Supreme Court of Canada
LexUM

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.