Knowledge

Ballew v. Georgia

Source 📝

31: 720: 629: 1744: 314: 273: 72: 1724: 613: 400: 223: 1651: 1739: 1729: 1685: 391: 93:
A criminal conviction based on a five person jury is unconstitutional, the minimum size for a jury hearing a petty offense is six.
1734: 1492: 784: 1265: 696: 546: 35: 1451: 1412: 1313: 1126: 928: 704: 963: 1294: 384: 352: 1150: 843: 241: 1356: 669: 661: 219: 1245: 1038: 816: 653: 565: 426: 334: 1631: 1460: 1439: 1142: 1046: 808: 792: 768: 573: 442: 1500: 1220: 1062: 947: 920: 912: 752: 597: 377: 1404: 1174: 1094: 760: 712: 530: 116: 1661: 1516: 1476: 1380: 736: 605: 318: 64: 1540: 1484: 1372: 1364: 1166: 1019: 744: 450: 245: 8: 1669: 1572: 1388: 1257: 1118: 1110: 1102: 851: 589: 538: 414: 369: 148: 325: 1693: 1639: 1564: 1532: 1420: 1273: 1134: 998: 883: 875: 645: 637: 492: 343: 1556: 1548: 1396: 1340: 1332: 1201: 1078: 955: 891: 859: 688: 160: 152: 136: 1677: 1596: 1524: 1468: 1182: 1054: 800: 257: 108: 67: 1086: 1070: 903: 728: 434: 1612: 1588: 1580: 1348: 835: 621: 140: 124: 1718: 1604: 1158: 776: 581: 1508: 484: 471: 261: 361: 128: 237: 79: 294:
Constitutional Law Cases and Materials, Concise Thirteenth Edition.
249: 30: 252:
authorizing criminal conviction upon the unanimous vote of a
253: 399: 260:. The constitutional minimum size for a jury hearing 1745:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
274:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 435
209:Brennan (in judgment), joined by Stewart, Marshall 201:Powell (in judgment), joined by Burger, Rehnquist 1716: 1293: 1244: 385: 296:Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2009, p. 356 1725:United States Sixth Amendment jury case law 392: 378: 1686:Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California 512: 1018: 470: 413: 1717: 987: 1740:Legal history of Georgia (U.S. state) 1292: 1243: 1017: 986: 511: 469: 412: 373: 18:1978 United States Supreme Court case 54:Claude D. Ballew v. State of Georgia 785:Southern Union Co. v. United States 13: 1266:United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal 697:Almendarez-Torres v. United States 547:Blanton v. City of North Las Vegas 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1756: 1730:United States Supreme Court cases 1213:Restrictions on cross-examination 321:223 (1978) is available from: 303: 29: 1314:United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez 1735:1978 in United States case law 1127:Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts 630:Rosales-Lopez v. United States 286: 1: 401:United States Sixth Amendment 279: 236:, 435 U.S. 223 (1978), was a 1295:Assistance of Counsel Clause 7: 844:Rassmussen v. United States 267: 242:United States Supreme Court 177:Blackmun, joined by Stevens 10: 1761: 1194:Face-to-face confrontation 964:Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado 662:McDonnell v. United States 362:Oyez (oral argument audio) 220:United States Constitution 1650: 1623: 1450: 1431: 1324: 1305: 1301: 1288: 1252: 1246:Compulsory Process Clause 1239: 1212: 1193: 1039:Reynolds v. United States 1030: 1026: 1013: 993: 982: 939: 902: 827: 817:Erlinger v. United States 680: 670:United States v. Tsarnaev 654:Skilling v. United States 566:Reynolds v. United States 557: 522: 518: 507: 479: 465: 427:Klopfer v. North Carolina 421: 408: 218: 213: 205: 197: 189: 181: 173: 168: 102: 97: 92: 87: 82:234; 3 Media L. Rep. 1979 59: 49: 42: 28: 23: 1632:Massiah v. United States 1461:Strickland v. Washington 1440:Glasser v. United States 1413:Nichols v. United States 1143:Bullcoming v. New Mexico 1047:Dowdell v. United States 809:United States v. Haymond 793:Alleyne v. United States 769:Cunningham v. California 574:Glasser v. United States 443:Doggett v. United States 1501:Glover v. United States 1221:Chambers v. Mississippi 1063:Bruton v. United States 1031:Out-of-court statements 948:Tanner v. United States 940:Impeachment of verdicts 921:Burton v. United States 913:United States v. Dawson 753:United States v. Booker 721:Harris v. United States 598:Witherspoon v. Illinois 262:petty criminal offenses 43:Argued November 1, 1977 1624:Uncounseled statements 1452:Ineffective assistance 1405:Pennsylvania v. Finley 1175:Samia v. United States 1095:Crawford v. Washington 929:Smith v. United States 761:Washington v. Recuenco 713:Apprendi v. New Jersey 705:Jones v. United States 531:Cheff v. Schnackenberg 117:William J. Brennan Jr. 45:Decided March 21, 1978 1662:Faretta v. California 1517:Woodford v. Visciotti 1477:Kimmelman v. Morrison 1381:Argersinger v. Hamlin 737:Blakely v. Washington 606:Ham v. South Carolina 513:Impartial Jury Clause 1541:Wright v. Van Patten 1485:Lockhart v. Fretwell 1373:Anders v. California 1365:Gideon v. Wainwright 1167:Hemphill v. New York 1151:Williams v. Illinois 1020:Confrontation Clause 745:Schriro v. Summerlin 451:Betterman v. Montana 292:Varat, J.D. et al. 264:was held to be six. 1670:McKaskle v. Wiggins 1573:Padilla v. Kentucky 1389:Gagnon v. Scarpelli 1357:Hamilton v. Alabama 1258:Washington v. Texas 1119:Giles v. California 1111:Whorton v. Bockting 1103:Davis v. Washington 852:Williams v. Florida 590:Sheppard v. Maxwell 539:Duncan v. Louisiana 415:Speedy Trial Clause 353:Library of Congress 193:White (in judgment) 149:Lewis F. Powell Jr. 78:98 S. Ct. 1029; 55 1694:Indiana v. Edwards 1640:Brewer v. Williams 1565:Porter v. McCollum 1533:Holland v. Jackson 1493:Williams v. Taylor 1421:Alabama v. Shelton 1274:Taylor v. Illinois 1135:Michigan v. Bryant 999:Rabe v. Washington 988:Information Clause 884:Ramos v. Louisiana 876:Burch v. Louisiana 828:Size and unanimity 646:Morgan v. Illinois 638:Wainwright v. Witt 493:Presley v. Georgia 113:Associate Justices 1712: 1711: 1708: 1707: 1704: 1703: 1557:Wong v. Belmontes 1549:Bobby v. Van Hook 1397:Scott v. Illinois 1341:Johnson v. Zerbst 1333:Powell v. Alabama 1284: 1283: 1235: 1234: 1231: 1230: 1202:Maryland v. Craig 1079:Illinois v. Allen 1009: 1008: 978: 977: 974: 973: 956:Warger v. Shauers 892:Edwards v. Vannoy 868:Ballew v. Georgia 860:Apodaca v. Oregon 689:Walton v. Arizona 503: 502: 461: 460: 311:Ballew v. Georgia 244:that held that a 233:Ballew v. Georgia 229: 228: 153:William Rehnquist 137:Thurgood Marshall 24:Ballew v. Georgia 1752: 1678:Rock v. Arkansas 1597:Lafler v. Cooper 1525:Wiggins v. Smith 1469:Nix v. Whiteside 1303: 1302: 1290: 1289: 1241: 1240: 1183:Smith v. Arizona 1055:Pointer v. Texas 1028: 1027: 1015: 1014: 984: 983: 801:Hurst v. Florida 614:Ristaino v. Ross 520: 519: 509: 508: 467: 466: 410: 409: 394: 387: 380: 371: 370: 366: 360: 357: 351: 348: 342: 339: 333: 330: 324: 297: 290: 258:unconstitutional 109:Warren E. Burger 98:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 20: 1760: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1700: 1646: 1619: 1446: 1427: 1320: 1297: 1280: 1248: 1227: 1208: 1189: 1087:Ohio v. Roberts 1071:Frazier v. Cupp 1022: 1005: 989: 970: 935: 904:Vicinage Clause 898: 823: 729:Ring v. Arizona 676: 553: 514: 499: 475: 457: 435:Barker v. Wingo 417: 404: 398: 364: 358: 355: 349: 346: 340: 337: 331: 328: 322: 306: 301: 300: 291: 287: 282: 270: 161:John P. Stevens 151: 139: 127: 83: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1758: 1748: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1710: 1709: 1706: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1699: 1698: 1690: 1682: 1674: 1666: 1657: 1655: 1654:representation 1648: 1647: 1645: 1644: 1636: 1627: 1625: 1621: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1613:Garza v. Idaho 1609: 1601: 1593: 1589:Premo v. Moore 1585: 1581:Sears v. Upton 1577: 1569: 1561: 1553: 1545: 1537: 1529: 1521: 1513: 1505: 1497: 1489: 1481: 1473: 1465: 1456: 1454: 1448: 1447: 1445: 1444: 1435: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1425: 1417: 1409: 1401: 1393: 1385: 1377: 1369: 1361: 1353: 1349:Betts v. Brady 1345: 1337: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1319: 1318: 1309: 1307: 1299: 1298: 1286: 1285: 1282: 1281: 1279: 1278: 1270: 1262: 1253: 1250: 1249: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1232: 1229: 1228: 1226: 1225: 1216: 1214: 1210: 1209: 1207: 1206: 1197: 1195: 1191: 1190: 1188: 1187: 1179: 1171: 1163: 1155: 1147: 1139: 1131: 1123: 1115: 1107: 1099: 1091: 1083: 1075: 1067: 1059: 1051: 1043: 1034: 1032: 1024: 1023: 1011: 1010: 1007: 1006: 1004: 1003: 994: 991: 990: 980: 979: 976: 975: 972: 971: 969: 968: 960: 952: 943: 941: 937: 936: 934: 933: 925: 917: 908: 906: 900: 899: 897: 896: 888: 880: 872: 864: 856: 848: 840: 836:Maxwell v. Dow 831: 829: 825: 824: 822: 821: 813: 805: 797: 789: 781: 773: 765: 757: 749: 741: 733: 725: 717: 709: 701: 693: 684: 682: 678: 677: 675: 674: 666: 658: 650: 642: 634: 626: 622:Adams v. Texas 618: 610: 602: 594: 586: 578: 570: 561: 559: 555: 554: 552: 551: 543: 535: 526: 524: 516: 515: 505: 504: 501: 500: 498: 497: 489: 480: 477: 476: 463: 462: 459: 458: 456: 455: 447: 439: 431: 422: 419: 418: 406: 405: 397: 396: 389: 382: 374: 368: 367: 335:Google Scholar 305: 304:External links 302: 299: 298: 284: 283: 281: 278: 277: 276: 269: 266: 227: 226: 216: 215: 211: 210: 207: 206:Concur/dissent 203: 202: 199: 195: 194: 191: 187: 186: 183: 179: 178: 175: 171: 170: 166: 165: 164: 163: 141:Harry Blackmun 125:Potter Stewart 114: 111: 106: 100: 99: 95: 94: 90: 89: 85: 84: 77: 61: 57: 56: 51: 50:Full case name 47: 46: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1757: 1746: 1743: 1741: 1738: 1736: 1733: 1731: 1728: 1726: 1723: 1722: 1720: 1696: 1695: 1691: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1664: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1649: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1634: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1622: 1615: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1606: 1605:Buck v. Davis 1602: 1599: 1598: 1594: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1575: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1559: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1542: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1511: 1510: 1506: 1503: 1502: 1498: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1487: 1486: 1482: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1458: 1457: 1455: 1453: 1449: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1436: 1434: 1432:Conflict-free 1430: 1423: 1422: 1418: 1415: 1414: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1386: 1383: 1382: 1378: 1375: 1374: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1362: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1338: 1335: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1327: 1323: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1310: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1291: 1287: 1276: 1275: 1271: 1268: 1267: 1263: 1260: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1247: 1242: 1238: 1223: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1204: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1196: 1192: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1177: 1176: 1172: 1169: 1168: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159:Ohio v. Clark 1156: 1153: 1152: 1148: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1035: 1033: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1016: 1012: 1001: 1000: 996: 995: 992: 985: 981: 966: 965: 961: 958: 957: 953: 950: 949: 945: 944: 942: 938: 931: 930: 926: 923: 922: 918: 915: 914: 910: 909: 907: 905: 901: 894: 893: 889: 886: 885: 881: 878: 877: 873: 870: 869: 865: 862: 861: 857: 854: 853: 849: 846: 845: 841: 838: 837: 833: 832: 830: 826: 819: 818: 814: 811: 810: 806: 803: 802: 798: 795: 794: 790: 787: 786: 782: 779: 778: 777:Oregon v. Ice 774: 771: 770: 766: 763: 762: 758: 755: 754: 750: 747: 746: 742: 739: 738: 734: 731: 730: 726: 723: 722: 718: 715: 714: 710: 707: 706: 702: 699: 698: 694: 691: 690: 686: 685: 683: 679: 672: 671: 667: 664: 663: 659: 656: 655: 651: 648: 647: 643: 640: 639: 635: 632: 631: 627: 624: 623: 619: 616: 615: 611: 608: 607: 603: 600: 599: 595: 592: 591: 587: 584: 583: 582:Irvin v. Dowd 579: 576: 575: 571: 568: 567: 563: 562: 560: 556: 549: 548: 544: 541: 540: 536: 533: 532: 528: 527: 525: 521: 517: 510: 506: 495: 494: 490: 487: 486: 482: 481: 478: 473: 468: 464: 453: 452: 448: 445: 444: 440: 437: 436: 432: 429: 428: 424: 423: 420: 416: 411: 407: 402: 395: 390: 388: 383: 381: 376: 375: 372: 363: 354: 345: 336: 327: 320: 316: 312: 308: 307: 295: 289: 285: 275: 272: 271: 265: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 243: 240:heard by the 239: 235: 234: 225: 221: 217: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 169:Case opinions 167: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 115: 112: 110: 107: 105:Chief Justice 104: 103: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 75: 74: 69: 66: 62: 58: 55: 52: 48: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 1692: 1684: 1676: 1668: 1660: 1638: 1630: 1611: 1603: 1595: 1587: 1579: 1571: 1563: 1555: 1547: 1539: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1509:Bell v. Cone 1507: 1499: 1491: 1483: 1475: 1467: 1459: 1438: 1419: 1411: 1403: 1395: 1387: 1379: 1371: 1363: 1355: 1347: 1339: 1331: 1312: 1272: 1264: 1256: 1219: 1200: 1181: 1173: 1165: 1157: 1149: 1141: 1133: 1125: 1117: 1109: 1101: 1093: 1085: 1077: 1069: 1061: 1053: 1045: 1037: 997: 962: 954: 946: 927: 924:(1905, 1906) 919: 911: 890: 882: 874: 867: 866: 858: 850: 842: 834: 815: 807: 799: 791: 783: 775: 767: 759: 751: 743: 735: 727: 719: 711: 703: 695: 687: 668: 660: 652: 644: 636: 628: 620: 612: 604: 596: 588: 580: 572: 564: 558:Impartiality 545: 537: 529: 523:Availability 491: 485:In re Oliver 483: 472:Public Trial 449: 441: 433: 425: 310: 293: 288: 256:of five was 232: 231: 230: 224:Amendment VI 214:Laws applied 156: 144: 132: 120: 71: 53: 15: 1325:Appointment 681:Facts found 198:Concurrence 190:Concurrence 182:Concurrence 129:Byron White 1719:Categories 280:References 174:Plurality 80:L. Ed. 2d 60:Citations 403:case law 309:Text of 268:See also 326:Cornell 250:statute 246:Georgia 185:Stevens 88:Holding 1697:(2008) 1689:(2000) 1681:(1987) 1673:(1984) 1665:(1975) 1652:Pro se 1643:(1977) 1635:(1963) 1616:(2019) 1608:(2017) 1600:(2012) 1592:(2011) 1584:(2010) 1576:(2010) 1568:(2009) 1560:(2009) 1552:(2009) 1544:(2008) 1536:(2004) 1528:(2003) 1520:(2002) 1512:(2002) 1504:(2001) 1496:(2000) 1488:(1993) 1480:(1986) 1472:(1986) 1464:(1984) 1443:(1942) 1424:(2002) 1416:(1994) 1408:(1987) 1400:(1979) 1392:(1973) 1384:(1972) 1376:(1967) 1368:(1963) 1360:(1961) 1352:(1942) 1344:(1938) 1336:(1932) 1317:(2006) 1306:Choice 1277:(1988) 1269:(1982) 1261:(1967) 1224:(1973) 1205:(1990) 1186:(2024) 1178:(2023) 1170:(2022) 1162:(2015) 1154:(2012) 1146:(2011) 1138:(2011) 1130:(2009) 1122:(2008) 1114:(2007) 1106:(2006) 1098:(2004) 1090:(1980) 1082:(1970) 1074:(1969) 1066:(1968) 1058:(1965) 1050:(1911) 1042:(1878) 1002:(1972) 967:(2017) 959:(2014) 951:(1987) 932:(2023) 916:(1853) 895:(2021) 887:(2020) 879:(1979) 871:(1978) 863:(1972) 855:(1970) 847:(1905) 839:(1900) 820:(2024) 812:(2019) 804:(2016) 796:(2013) 788:(2012) 780:(2009) 772:(2007) 764:(2006) 756:(2005) 748:(2004) 740:(2004) 732:(2002) 724:(2002) 716:(2000) 708:(1999) 700:(1998) 692:(1990) 673:(2022) 665:(2016) 657:(2010) 649:(1992) 641:(1985) 633:(1981) 625:(1980) 617:(1976) 609:(1973) 601:(1968) 593:(1966) 585:(1961) 577:(1942) 569:(1878) 550:(1989) 542:(1968) 534:(1966) 496:(2010) 488:(1948) 474:Clause 454:(2016) 446:(1992) 438:(1972) 430:(1967) 365:  359:  356:  350:  347:  344:Justia 341:  338:  332:  329:  323:  248:state 159: 157:· 155:  147: 145:· 143:  135: 133:· 131:  123: 121:· 119:  317: 319:U.S. 254:jury 238:case 73:more 65:U.S. 63:435 315:435 68:223 1721:: 313:, 222:, 393:e 386:t 379:v 76:) 70:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
223
more
L. Ed. 2d
Warren E. Burger
William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart
Byron White
Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens
United States Constitution
Amendment VI
case
United States Supreme Court
Georgia
statute
jury
unconstitutional
petty criminal offenses
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 435
435
U.S.
Cornell
Google Scholar
Justia
Library of Congress

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.