36:
27:
204:: "The Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring, may submit at a general election the question whether to call a convention to revise the Constitution. If the majority vote yes on that question, within 6 months the Legislature shall provide for the convention. Delegates to a constitutional convention shall be voters elected from districts as nearly equal in population as may be practicable." (ARTICLE XVIII AMENDING AND REVISING THE CONSTITUTION SEC. 2)
628:
109:
223:
would have three types of delegates: Assembly district, County, and Tribal. There would be 240 delegates from the
Assembly districts: three delegates elected by, and among, a randomly selected pool of 50 eligible persons from each Assembly district. There would be one County delegate for every whole
411:
Biographical sketches of the delegates to the convention to frame a new constitution for the State of
California, 1878 : together with a succinct review of the facts leading to the formation of the Monterey Convention of 1849, a list of its members, and the Constitutional Act of
224:
fraction of 175,000 persons residing in each County, provided that there would be at least one County delegate for each County. According to the 2010 census, there would have been 217 County delegates. One delegate would be selected by federally recognized tribes in each of the four
78:, held in September and October 1849 in advance of California attaining U.S. statehood the following year, adopted the state's original constitution. This document maintains jurisdiction along with the current constitution which was ratified on May 7, 1879, following the
228:
of
California. This plan would have provided total of 461 delegates, each having one vote. 231 would have been required to propose amendments to the electorate, but broad consensus would have been highly encouraged.
184:
The
Convention was composed of 152 delegates. A series of districts were apportioned 88 delegates. Some of the districts were composed of a single county, some composed of several counties, and others operated as
136:
The memorial presenting the proposed constitution to
Congress claimed it banned slavery not because of anti-slavery sentiment, but just unanimous agreement (including convention delegates originally from
141:) that California's climate and soil were not suitable for slave labor. It also described the proposed eastern boundary as a compromise between those who wished to include all of former Mexican
86:
mistrust of elected officials, this later constitution took a full year to finalize (March 1878 to March 1879) and has been described as "the perfect example of what a constitution ought
133:
Governor of
California, issued a proclamation on June 3, 1849 calling for a convention and a special election on August 1 where delegates to the convention would be elected.
532:
90:
to be". Multiple calls for a third state constitutional convention have been raised during the past quarter-century, but none has thus far gained widespread
422:
82:. Article 3 Section 2 of the current Constitution references the original boundaries as stated in the 1849 Constitution at Article 12. The result of
502:
Debates and proceedings of the
Constitutional convention of the state of California, convened at the city of Sacramento, Saturday, September 28, 1878
67:
720:
715:
331:
357:
317:
192:
The new
California Constitution produced by the Convention was voted for on May 7, 1879, and adopted by a vote of 77,959 to 67,134.
655:
225:
560:
434:
Kogan, Vladimir; Binder, Michael (2017). "Parties
Without Brands? Evidence from California's 1878–79 Constitutional Convention".
254:
Report of the
Debates in the Convention of California on the Formation of the State Constitution in September and October, 1849
650:
602:
373:
577:
561:"ALLOWS VOTERS TO PLACE QUESTION OF CALLING A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION ON THE BALLOT. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT"
189:. The electorate of the State at-large elected 32 delegates. Each of the four Congressional district elected 8 delegates.
612:
596:
103:
393:
succeed in producing what one writer has called 'a document that was the perfect example of what a constitution ought
487:
291:
219:"shall specify a fair method for selecting or electing citizens to be delegates to a constitutional convention". The
123:
645:
607:
695:
660:
215:, when read together would have amended the mechanism of calling a constitutional convention. Specifically the
640:
268:
700:
177:
The Sacramento Convention of 1878–79 amended and ratified the original 1849 constitution. It took place in
710:
705:
690:
150:
201:
71:
45:
685:
680:
675:
70:
that took place in California during the nineteenth century which led to the creation of the modern
35:
158:
119:
The Monterey Convention of 1849 was the first California Constitutional Convention to take place.
335:
178:
145:(including today's Nevada, Utah, and Arizona) and a committee-proposed eastern boundary at
26:
8:
146:
505:. Harvard University. Sacramento : State office, J. D. Young, Supt. State printing.
252:
500:
459:
186:
162:
463:
451:
351:
311:
120:
443:
370:
126:
53:
49:
377:
154:
142:
83:
476:
447:
669:
455:
138:
295:
608:
Recommendations of the 1996 California Constitutional Revision Commission
410:
112:
515:
91:
622:
618:
488:
Rose Institute - Original Intent of California's Blaine Provision
166:
389:
Wilson and Ebbert via Korey 11. Korey states, "The convention
108:
641:
Cries for reform of California government come from all sides
169:), saying Southern Californians had no interest in division.
578:"The Call for a Citizens' Limited Constitutional Convention"
157:), and denied having considered north–south division at the
213:
The Call for a Citizens' Limited Constitutional Convention
498:
149:(including the western half of Nevada but excluding the
520:. California Law Review, volume 6, number 1, Nov. 1917.
207:
Two proposition petitions circulating in 2010, 09-0066
115:
in Monterey, site of the 1849 Constitutional Convention
16:
Two 19th-century state conventions in the United States
615:, a wiki project to re-design the state's constitution
221:
Call for a Citizens' Limited Constitutional Convention
599:, a group advocating for a constitutional convention
499:California; Willis, E. B.; Stockton, P. K. (1880).
172:
518:The California Constitutional Convention of 1878-9
371:1878–1879 Constitutional Convention Working Papers
423:A Humorous Account of America's Past: 986 to 1898
667:
661:Alameda officials back constitutional convention
646:A California constitutional convention for all
619:Works by California Constitutional Conventions
397:to be.'" The work cited is Wilson and Ebbert,
97:
583:. State of California Department of Justice.
383:
364:
247:
245:
243:
241:
80:1879 Constitutional Convention of Sacramento
603:California Constitutional Convention Summit
433:
76:1849 Constitutional Convention of Monterey
436:Studies in American Political Development
238:
651:Long road to a constitutional convention
107:
217:Citizens' Constitutional Convention Act
209:Citizens' Constitutional Convention Act
668:
356:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
316:: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (
572:
570:
555:
553:
195:
64:California Constitutional Conventions
721:American constitutional conventions
716:Pre-statehood history of California
44:The 1849 handwritten copies of the
13:
634:
567:
550:
104:History of California through 1899
14:
732:
590:
563:. UC Hastings College of the Law.
656:Be wary of constitution re-write
626:
613:The California Constitution Wiki
181:from March 1878 to March 1879.
173:Sacramento Convention of 1878–79
34:
25:
525:
509:
492:
481:
470:
427:
257:. United States Congress. 1850.
416:
404:
324:
284:
275:
261:
1:
232:
7:
625:(public domain audiobooks)
380:, California State Archives
151:Lower Colorado River Valley
98:Monterey Convention of 1849
74:. The first, known as the
10:
737:
537:leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
226:federal judicial districts
202:Constitution of California
101:
72:Constitution of California
68:constitutional conventions
46:Constitution of California
522:Available online at JSTOR
477:Los Angeles Herald - 1879
448:10.1017/S0898588X17000025
399:California's Legislature
200:Present language in the
159:Missouri Compromise Line
269:"TEXAS v. WHITE ET AL"
179:Sacramento, California
116:
696:September 1849 events
111:
701:October 1849 events
338:on January 28, 2010
298:on February 2, 2014
187:floterial districts
711:1879 in California
706:1878 in California
691:1849 in California
376:2010-01-28 at the
196:Future Conventions
117:
92:political momentum
66:were two separate
597:Repair California
728:
686:1879 conferences
681:1878 conferences
676:1849 conferences
630:
629:
585:
584:
582:
574:
565:
564:
557:
548:
547:
545:
543:
529:
523:
513:
507:
506:
496:
490:
485:
479:
474:
468:
467:
431:
425:
420:
414:
408:
402:
387:
381:
368:
362:
361:
355:
347:
345:
343:
334:. Archived from
328:
322:
321:
315:
307:
305:
303:
294:. Archived from
288:
282:
279:
273:
272:
265:
259:
258:
249:
127:Bennett C. Riley
38:
29:
736:
735:
731:
730:
729:
727:
726:
725:
666:
665:
637:
635:Further reading
627:
593:
588:
580:
576:
575:
568:
559:
558:
551:
541:
539:
531:
530:
526:
516:Sargent, Noel.
514:
510:
497:
493:
486:
482:
475:
471:
432:
428:
421:
417:
409:
405:
388:
384:
378:Wayback Machine
369:
365:
349:
348:
341:
339:
332:"Archived copy"
330:
329:
325:
309:
308:
301:
299:
292:"Archived copy"
290:
289:
285:
280:
276:
267:
266:
262:
251:
250:
239:
235:
198:
175:
155:Imperial Valley
143:Alta California
106:
100:
60:
59:
58:
57:
41:
40:
39:
31:
30:
17:
12:
11:
5:
734:
724:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
664:
663:
658:
653:
648:
643:
636:
633:
632:
631:
616:
610:
605:
600:
592:
591:External links
589:
587:
586:
566:
549:
524:
508:
491:
480:
469:
426:
415:
403:
382:
363:
323:
283:
274:
260:
236:
234:
231:
197:
194:
174:
171:
99:
96:
43:
42:
33:
32:
24:
23:
22:
21:
20:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
733:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
673:
671:
662:
659:
657:
654:
652:
649:
647:
644:
642:
639:
638:
624:
620:
617:
614:
611:
609:
606:
604:
601:
598:
595:
594:
579:
573:
571:
562:
556:
554:
538:
534:
533:"Law section"
528:
521:
519:
512:
504:
503:
495:
489:
484:
478:
473:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
430:
424:
419:
413:
407:
400:
396:
392:
386:
379:
375:
372:
367:
359:
353:
337:
333:
327:
319:
313:
297:
293:
287:
281:Grodin 8, 16.
278:
270:
264:
256:
255:
248:
246:
244:
242:
237:
230:
227:
222:
218:
214:
210:
205:
203:
193:
190:
188:
182:
180:
170:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
134:
132:
128:
125:
122:
114:
110:
105:
95:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
55:
51:
47:
37:
28:
19:
540:. Retrieved
536:
527:
517:
511:
501:
494:
483:
472:
442:(1): 68–87.
439:
435:
429:
418:
406:
398:
394:
390:
385:
366:
340:. Retrieved
336:the original
326:
300:. Retrieved
296:the original
286:
277:
263:
253:
220:
216:
212:
211:and 09-0067
208:
206:
199:
191:
183:
176:
139:slave states
135:
130:
118:
87:
79:
75:
63:
61:
18:
342:January 23,
302:January 23,
113:Colton Hall
84:Progressive
670:Categories
233:References
161:(south of
131:ex officio
124:Brig. Gen.
102:See also:
464:233361580
456:0898-588X
623:LibriVox
374:Archived
352:cite web
312:cite web
48:in both
542:May 23,
54:Spanish
50:English
462:
454:
167:Fresno
163:Carmel
581:(PDF)
460:S2CID
544:2022
452:ISSN
412:1878
358:link
344:2014
318:link
304:2014
165:and
153:and
147:116°
121:Bvt.
62:The
52:and
621:at
444:doi
395:not
391:did
88:not
672::
569:^
552:^
535:.
458:.
450:.
440:31
438:.
354:}}
350:{{
314:}}
310:{{
240:^
129:,
94:.
546:.
466:.
446::
401:.
360:)
346:.
320:)
306:.
271:.
56:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
_(cropped).jpg)
