Knowledge

Catchiness

Source đź“ť

197:- to 4-minute pop song, just like every other hit at that time. To create that feeling, the producers cut the song at the knees. The last thing heard in the song is the a cappella line, “If you wannabe my lover,” which is also the first lyric of the chorus. The audience has a natural desire to hear something to its completion. When they expect a song to go somewhere, they will not feel completely settled until that song resolves itself. “Wannabe” never resolves, and therefore creates a situation where the listener cannot get the song out of his head." 81:, the psychology of "earworms" (catchy songs) is discussed. These songs are referred to as earworms due to their parasitic characteristics; their entrance and exit from our mind cannot be controlled and despite our best efforts they may refuse to leave. In that aspect, catchiness, depending on how digestible the music is to the listener, has a level of annoyance unlike anything else. In this article Stafford reviews the work of neurologist 209: 180:
John Ashley Burgoyne explained. "Actually, the more conventional your melody in terms of the interval patterns that you use; in terms of the rhythms that you use, the easier the song is to remember over the long term. What makes Wannabe work so well is that it isn’t a difficult song to sing, it has a conventional melody that repeats itself a lot, and it’s just relentless."
116:
use within the song. In music, incongruity refers to the inclusion of varied or irregular musical and lyrical features, such as mispronounced words or unexpected syllable accentuation. These incongruities are intended to capture the listener's attention and to preserve their level of interest throughout the song, regardless of the simple and otherwise repetitive
179:
to be the catchiest pop song of the last 60 years in the UK. The study found that having a simple and relentless melody was the key to a song being "catchy". "We found, much to our surprise, that writing a very surprising and unusual hook is not the recipe for long term memorability,” musicologist Dr
85:
and the conclusion by Sacks that this catchiness is due to the inherent repetitiveness of popular music, which can affect our ability to remember a song. It is concluded that since memory is powerfully affected by repetition that this could be a significant contributing factor to catchiness, though
115:
listed some of its "catchiness factors." The article explains that it has a chorus which is "melodically easy on the ear, simple enough to stay in your head all day, and is topically appealing to Jepsen’s target pop demographic." It also briefly describes the concept of musical incongruity and its
89:
Often, a song with few qualities can still become immensely popular due to its catchiness. According to T.C.W. Blanning: "I would sacrifice everything – rhyme, reason, sense, and sentiment to catchiness. There is... a very great art in making rubbish acceptable". A
120:. Songwriter/producer Eve Nelson was quoted saying, "a five-year-old could probably sing this, because it’s just so easy." As well as having lyrical hooks, the music itself can also be considered a hook. 34:
etc. Alternatively, it can be defined as how difficult it is for one to forget it. Songs that embody high levels of remembrance or catchiness are literally known as "catchy songs" or "
86:
certainly not the only aspect. A song's catchiness may also be due to the auditory "slave system" of our inner ear, much like the visual slave system of our "mind's eye."
597: 620: 38:". While it is hard to scientifically explain what makes a song catchy, there are many documented techniques that recur throughout catchy music, such as 123:
Musicologist Dr. Alison Pawley and psychologist Dr. Daniel Mullensiefen identified the following as factors of a song to incite singing along:
168: 541: 585: 488: 631: 462: 414: 354: 320: 293: 22:
is how easy it is for a song, tune, or phrase to be recalled. It is often taken into account when writing songs,
378: 69:". According to Todd Tremlin, catchy music "spread because resonates similarly from one mind to the next". 654: 66: 659: 112: 164: 183:
Additionally, the book FutureHit DNA by Jay Frank says "Wannabe felt like it should have been a
669: 513: 404: 344: 310: 437: 283: 153: 91: 619:"Catchiest, Most Annoying Songs that burrow into your brains & make you want to die", 8: 664: 39: 27: 410: 350: 316: 289: 256: 596:"Science Determines the 10 Catchiest Songs of All Time — also, science is sexist", 237: 108: 518: 96: 54:
says that "although there was no definition for what made a song catchy, all the
227: 222: 128: 648: 135: 104: 100:) is more than made up for by the... catchiness of the musical arrangement" 214: 157: 82: 47: 43: 608: 176: 55: 23: 62: 406:
The Triumph of Music: The Rise of Composers, Musicians and Their Art
172: 35: 514:"'Wannabe' by the Spice Girls Is the Catchiest Song, Study Says" 232: 117: 31: 145: 542:"Why Spice Girls' Wannabe is the catchiest song of all time" 94:
review explains that "any lack of originality (in the album
285:
Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music
58:
guides agreed that simplicity and familiarity were vital".
52:
Selling Sounds: The Commercial Revolution in American Music
78: 65:
to a catchy song include "running over in our heads or
77:
In an article written by psychologist Tom Stafford for
379:"Earworms: Why catchy tunes get trapped in our heads" 346:
Minds and Gods:The Cognitive Foundations of Religion
204: 111:
has been identified as a catchy song. An article by
16:
Quality of a song that refers to ease of remembrance
646: 152:Based on these factors, the researchers listed " 489:"What makes a song 'catchy' – science explains" 263:(definition) (online ed.). Merriam-Webster 160:as the number one "sing-along song" in the UK. 349:. Oxford University Press, USA. p. 195. 169:Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester 587:Probing Question: What makes a song catchy? 409:. Harvard University Press. p. 164. 402: 376: 288:, Harvard University Press, p. 49, 342: 281: 647: 308: 315:. U of Minnesota Press. p. 133. 486: 460: 13: 463:"Why 'Call Me Maybe' Is So Catchy" 14: 681: 578: 566: 633:How To Write a Catchy Song Title 610:How tunes get stuck in your head 377:Stafford, Tom (April 11, 2012). 312:How to Do Things with Videogames 207: 560: 534: 506: 343:Tremlin, Todd (February 2006). 480: 461:Sher, Lauren (June 22, 2012). 454: 430: 396: 370: 336: 302: 275: 249: 1: 487:Puiu, Tibi (3 October 2011). 309:Bogost, Ian (5 August 2011). 282:Suisman, David (7 May 2012), 243: 148:with noticeable vocal effort 103:For example, the 2011 song " 7: 613:, UK: The BBC, 9 March 2005 442:. April 5, 2003. p. 37 200: 156:" by the British rock band 72: 10: 686: 61:The physical symptoms of 602:, Pajiba, 3 October 2011 165:University of Amsterdam 599:Seriously random lists 403:Blanning, TCW (2008). 163:A 2014 study by the 154:We Are the Champions 127:Longer and detailed 655:Musical terminology 138:in the chorus hook. 28:advertising slogans 639:, Vince core zine 590:, PSU, 2006-06-05 522:. 3 November 2014 134:Higher number of 677: 640: 638: 626: 614: 603: 591: 573: 572: 564: 558: 557: 555: 553: 538: 532: 531: 529: 527: 510: 504: 503: 501: 499: 484: 478: 477: 475: 473: 458: 452: 451: 449: 447: 434: 428: 427: 425: 423: 400: 394: 393: 391: 389: 374: 368: 367: 365: 363: 340: 334: 333: 331: 329: 306: 300: 298: 279: 273: 272: 270: 268: 253: 238:Music psychology 217: 212: 211: 210: 196: 195: 191: 188: 109:Carly Rae Jepsen 685: 684: 680: 679: 678: 676: 675: 674: 660:Music cognition 645: 644: 636: 630: 618: 607: 595: 584: 581: 576: 565: 561: 551: 549: 540: 539: 535: 525: 523: 512: 511: 507: 497: 495: 485: 481: 471: 469: 459: 455: 445: 443: 436: 435: 431: 421: 419: 417: 401: 397: 387: 385: 375: 371: 361: 359: 357: 341: 337: 327: 325: 323: 307: 303: 296: 280: 276: 266: 264: 255: 254: 250: 246: 213: 208: 206: 203: 193: 189: 186: 184: 129:musical phrases 118:lyrical content 97:The Remote Part 75: 17: 12: 11: 5: 683: 673: 672: 667: 662: 657: 643: 642: 628: 616: 605: 593: 580: 579:External links 577: 575: 574: 559: 533: 505: 479: 453: 429: 415: 395: 369: 355: 335: 321: 301: 294: 274: 247: 245: 242: 241: 240: 235: 230: 228:Levitin effect 225: 223:Timing (music) 219: 218: 202: 199: 150: 149: 142: 141:Male vocalists 139: 132: 74: 71: 67:tapping a foot 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 682: 671: 670:Popular music 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 652: 650: 635: 634: 629: 624: 623: 617: 612: 611: 606: 601: 600: 594: 589: 588: 583: 582: 570: 569:Futurehit.DNA 563: 548:. 8 July 2016 547: 543: 537: 521: 520: 515: 509: 494: 490: 483: 472:September 23, 468: 464: 457: 446:September 23, 441: 440: 433: 422:September 23, 418: 416:9780674031043 412: 408: 407: 399: 384: 380: 373: 362:September 23, 358: 356:9780199885466 352: 348: 347: 339: 328:September 23, 324: 322:9781452933122 318: 314: 313: 305: 297: 295:9780674054684 291: 287: 286: 278: 262: 258: 252: 248: 239: 236: 234: 231: 229: 226: 224: 221: 220: 216: 205: 198: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 161: 159: 155: 147: 143: 140: 137: 133: 130: 126: 125: 124: 121: 119: 114: 110: 106: 105:Call Me Maybe 101: 99: 98: 93: 87: 84: 80: 70: 68: 64: 59: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 25: 21: 632: 621: 609: 598: 586: 568: 567:Frank, Jay. 562: 550:. Retrieved 545: 536: 524:. Retrieved 517: 508: 496:. Retrieved 492: 482: 470:. Retrieved 466: 456: 444:. Retrieved 438: 432: 420:. Retrieved 405: 398: 386:. Retrieved 382: 372: 360:. Retrieved 345: 338: 326:. Retrieved 311: 304: 284: 277: 265:. Retrieved 260: 251: 215:Music portal 182: 162: 151: 144:Higher male 122: 102: 95: 88: 83:Oliver Sacks 76: 60: 51: 48:alliteration 24:catchphrases 19: 18: 552:22 February 498:13 February 493:ZME Science 177:Spice Girls 56:songwriting 665:Musicology 649:Categories 625:, May 2009 261:Dictionary 244:References 40:repetition 20:Catchiness 439:Billboard 257:"Earworm" 175:" by the 92:Billboard 63:listening 467:ABC News 383:BBC News 201:See also 167:and the 113:ABC News 73:Analysis 36:earworms 622:Top Ten 526:1 April 388:May 10, 192:⁄ 173:Wannabe 171:found " 136:pitches 32:jingles 413:  353:  319:  292:  233:Rhythm 146:voices 637:(PDF) 267:6 May 158:Queen 107:" by 44:hooks 554:2017 528:2017 519:Time 500:2015 474:2012 448:2012 424:2012 411:ISBN 390:2013 364:2012 351:ISBN 330:2012 317:ISBN 290:ISBN 269:2013 46:and 546:BBC 79:BBC 651:: 544:. 516:. 491:. 465:. 381:. 259:. 50:. 42:, 30:, 26:, 641:. 627:. 615:. 604:. 592:. 571:. 556:. 530:. 502:. 476:. 450:. 426:. 392:. 366:. 332:. 299:. 271:. 194:2 190:1 187:+ 185:3 131:.

Index

catchphrases
advertising slogans
jingles
earworms
repetition
hooks
alliteration
songwriting
listening
tapping a foot
BBC
Oliver Sacks
Billboard
The Remote Part
Call Me Maybe
Carly Rae Jepsen
ABC News
lyrical content
musical phrases
pitches
voices
We Are the Champions
Queen
University of Amsterdam
Museum of Science and Industry in Manchester
Wannabe
Spice Girls
Music portal
Timing (music)
Levitin effect

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑