401:, or sue for minor damages in the law of unjustified threats. This may require the sender to appear in a distant court, at their own expense. So sending a cease-and-desist letter presents a dilemma to the sender, as it would be desirable to be able to address the issues at hand in a candid manner without the need for litigation. Upon receiving a cease-and-desist letter, the recipient may seek a tactical advantage by instituting declaratory-judgment litigation in a more favorable jurisdiction.
38:
453:
infringement. An express threat of litigation is not needed, nor is it a guarantee that jurisdiction will be granted. Some factors courts have considered in this analysis are whether a patent owner has asserted its rights against an alleged infringer in a royalty dispute, whether the owner has sued a customer of an alleged infringer, or whether an owner has made statements regarding its patents in trade magazines.
520:, 401 U.S. 66, 70 (1971) (âAlthough the declaratory judgment sought by the plaintiffs was a statutory remedy rather than a traditional form of equitable relief, the Court made clear that a suit for declaratory judgment was nevertheless âessentially an equitable cause of action,â and was âanalogous to the equity jurisdiction in suits quia timet or for a decree quieting title.ââ) (citations omitted)
766:, 746 F.2d 323, 325 (6th Cir. 1984) (âTitle 28 of the United States Code § 2201 provides that in âa case of actual controversy within its jurisdictionâ a federal court âmayâ give a declaratory judgment, a power permissive, not mandatory. Although it is well settled that the granting of a declaratory judgment rests in the "sound discretion" of the courtâ).
456:
If a patent owner does suggest that there is patent coverage of what an alleged infringer is doing or planning to do, the alleged infringer may bring suit. The alleged infringer, as the plaintiff in the suit, can choose the venue subject to constitutional restrictions and the state long-arm statute
429:
continuously accrue â with no effort expended by the patent owner, apart from marking the patent number on products the patent owner sold or licensed. On the other hand, the alleged infringer could do nothing to rectify the situation if no declaratory judgment existed. The alleged infringer would
364:
to prevent further lawsuits from the same plaintiff (for example, when only a contract claim is filed, but a copyright claim might also be applicable). In some instances, a declaratory judgment is filed because the statute of limitations against a potential defendant may pass before the plaintiff
452:
Usually the claimant is actually making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing, or is prepared to actually make, use or sell, offer to sell or import an allegedly infringing device or method, and usually the patent owner has claimed that such activities by claimant will result in patent
438:
exists. If there is a substantial controversy of sufficient immediacy and reality, the court will generally proceed with the declaratory-judgment action. The court may even hear the action if the patentee has not filed a cease and desist letter. The standard for an actual controversy was most
404:
Sometimes the parties agree in advance of discussions that no declaratory-judgment lawsuit will be filed while the negotiations are continuing. Sometimes a lawsuit is filed, but not served, before sending such a notice, to preserve a jurisdiction advantage without engaging the judicial process
430:
be forced to continue to operate his business with the cloud of a lawsuit over his head. The declaratory-judgment procedure allows the alleged infringer to proactively bring suit to resolve the situation and eliminate the cloud of uncertainty looming overhead.
433:
Common claims for declaratory judgment in patent cases are non-infringement, patent invalidity, and un-enforceability. To bring a claim for declaratory judgment in a situation where a patent dispute may exist or develop, the claimant must establish that an
295:. It is a form of legally binding preventive by which a party involved in an actual or possible legal matter can ask a court to conclusively rule on and affirm the rights, duties, or obligations of one or more parties in a
467:
to a claim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement. If a patent owner fails to assert an infringement counterclaim in a declaratory-judgment non-infringement suit, the patent infringement claim will be deemed waived.
396:
letter to another party. A party contemplating sending such a letter risks that the recipient, or a party related to the recipient (i.e. such as a customer or supplier), may file for a declaratory judgment in their own
405:
fully. Some parties send cease-and-desist letters that make "an oblique suggestion of possible infringement" to lower the risk of the recipient filing a declaratory-judgment lawsuit.
421:
litigation, because declaratory judgments allow an alleged infringer to "clear the air" about a product or service that may be a business's focal point. For example, in a typical
457:
of the forum in question. The suit can be brought in any forum if the local federal district court can properly obtain personal jurisdiction over the alleged infringer.
696:
425:
claim, when a patent owner becomes aware of an infringer, the owner can simply wait until he pleases to bring an infringement suit. Meanwhile, the
697:"Patent Marking Requirements: Patented Articles Must be Marked as Patented in Order For Patentee to Recover Damages Due to Patent Infringement"
48:
832:
496:
28 U.S.C.S. § 2201 (âAny such declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as such.â)
789:
738:
598:
266:
551:
377:
369:
may be shorter than the time period the IRS has to assess a taxpayer for additional tax due to bad advice given by the CPA).
318:, and is thus not subject to equitable requirements, though there are analogies that can be found in the remedies granted by
666:"Patent Law: "Reasonable Apprehension" After Receipt of Cease-and-Desist Letter Grounds for Declaratory Judgment Action"
441:
17:
532:, 474 U.S. 64, 72 (1985) (âThe propriety of issuing a declaratory judgment may depend upon equitable considerationsâ).
240:
82:
821:
445:, 549 U.S. 118 (2007). But even if an actual controversy exists, the declaratory-judgment statute is permissiveâa
380:
and most states enacted statutes in the 1920s and 1930s authorizing their courts to issue declaratory judgments.
259:
356:
but the lawsuit has not yet been filed; or when a party or parties believe that their rights under law and/or
345:
to each party in a matter when this could resolve or assist in a disagreement. Often an early resolution of
508:, 485 U.S. 271, 284 (1988) (âActions for declaratory judgments are neither legal nor equitable . . . .â).
366:
579:
252:
184:
60:
878:
64:
873:
464:
552:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080515150138/http://home.comcast.net/~jlw28129/05Harvey-Appel.pdf
856:
784:
742:
602:
56:
883:
418:
126:
215:
169:
8:
422:
372:
Declaratory judgments are authorized by statute in most common-law jurisdictions. In the
338:
189:
629:
555:
435:
220:
179:
174:
131:
121:
647:
852:
665:
566:
477:
460:
Defendants in infringement cases can ask for declaratory judgment as a counterclaim.
141:
827:
426:
393:
334:
311:
155:
136:
116:
322:. A declaratory judgment does not by itself order any action by a party, or imply
836:
793:
342:
210:
352:
A declaratory judgment is typically requested when a party is threatened with a
446:
284:
146:
867:
373:
315:
225:
398:
361:
346:
319:
303:
98:
299:
230:
194:
449:, in its discretion, may decline to hear a declaratory-judgment action.
686:
But see 35 U.S.C. 286 (imposing a six-year time limitation on damages).
327:
296:
164:
307:
408:
357:
292:
365:
incurs damage (for example, a malpractice statute applicable to a
389:
353:
323:
106:
330:, although it may be accompanied by one or more other remedies.
414:
288:
47:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
741:. Houstoninternetlaw.com. September 23, 2008. Archived from
634:
Patent
Attorney | Orange County | OC Patent Lawyer
349:
will resolve some or all of the other issues in a matter.
333:
A declaratory judgment is generally distinguished from an
306:). The declaratory judgment is generally considered a
843:Bray, Samuel L. (2010). "Preventive Adjudication".
409:Declaratory judgment actions in patent litigation
865:
541:See Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.S. § 2201
511:
806:Vivid Techs., Inc. v. Am. Sci. & Eng'g Inc.
523:
337:because the latter does not resolve an actual
786:Grand T. W. R. Co. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
764:Grand T. W. R. Co. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
506:Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.
260:
45:The examples and perspective in this article
439:recently addressed by the Supreme Court in
267:
253:
828:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 57
417:litigation, as well as in other areas of
392:can follow the sending by one party of a
83:Learn how and when to remove this message
291:that resolves legal uncertainty for the
14:
866:
624:
622:
620:
593:
591:
589:
388:The filing of a declaratory judgment
842:
808:, 200 F.3d 795, 802 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
796:, 746 F.2d 323, 325 (6th Cir. 1984).
463:A counterclaim of infringement is a
413:Declaratory judgments are common in
341:. Declaratory judgments can provide
283:, also called a declaration, is the
31:
383:
24:
726:MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
714:MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
617:
586:
442:MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
25:
895:
815:
845:University of Chicago Law Review
833:Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act
360:might conflict; or as part of a
36:
799:
778:
769:
757:
731:
719:
707:
689:
680:
658:
716:, 549 U.S. 118, 126â27 (2007).
640:
544:
535:
499:
490:
27:Legal determination of a court
13:
1:
839: (archived April 3, 2005)
483:
7:
728:, 549 U.S. 118, 127 (2007).
471:
367:certified public accountant
59:, discuss the issue on the
10:
900:
739:"Cease and Desist Letter"
630:"Cease and Desist letter"
599:"Cease and Desist Letter"
792:August 20, 2011, at the
465:compulsory counterclaim
824:â Declaratory judgment
668:. Library.findlaw.com
419:intellectual property
127:Consequential damages
281:declaratory judgment
216:Election of remedies
170:Specific performance
65:create a new article
57:improve this article
423:patent-infringement
339:case or controversy
285:legal determination
745:on August 20, 2011
636:. January 6, 2010.
605:on August 20, 2011
518:Samuels v. Mackell
436:actual controversy
378:federal government
310:remedy and not an
236:Declaratory relief
221:Provisional remedy
180:Account of profits
175:Constructive trust
156:Equitable remedies
132:Liquidated damages
122:Incidental damages
18:Declaratory action
574:Missing or empty
478:Arrow declaration
277:
276:
142:Statutory damages
99:Judicial remedies
93:
92:
85:
67:, as appropriate.
16:(Redirected from
891:
860:
822:28 U.S.C. 2201-2
809:
803:
797:
782:
776:
773:
767:
761:
755:
754:
752:
750:
735:
729:
723:
717:
711:
705:
704:
693:
687:
684:
678:
677:
675:
673:
662:
656:
655:
648:"Legaltech News"
644:
638:
637:
626:
615:
614:
612:
610:
601:. Archived from
595:
584:
583:
577:
572:
570:
562:
561:on May 15, 2008.
560:
554:. Archived from
548:
542:
539:
533:
530:Green v. Mansour
527:
521:
515:
509:
503:
497:
494:
427:monetary damages
394:cease-and-desist
384:Cease and desist
335:advisory opinion
320:courts of equity
312:equitable remedy
302:(subject to any
269:
262:
255:
137:Reliance damages
117:Punitive damages
105:Legal remedies (
95:
94:
88:
81:
77:
74:
68:
40:
39:
32:
21:
899:
898:
894:
893:
892:
890:
889:
888:
879:Civil procedure
864:
863:
837:Wayback Machine
818:
813:
812:
804:
800:
794:Wayback Machine
783:
779:
774:
770:
762:
758:
748:
746:
737:
736:
732:
724:
720:
712:
708:
695:
694:
690:
685:
681:
671:
669:
664:
663:
659:
646:
645:
641:
628:
627:
618:
608:
606:
597:
596:
587:
575:
573:
564:
563:
558:
550:
549:
545:
540:
536:
528:
524:
516:
512:
504:
500:
495:
491:
486:
474:
411:
386:
343:legal certainty
273:
211:Adequate remedy
89:
78:
72:
69:
54:
41:
37:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
897:
887:
886:
881:
876:
874:Judgment (law)
862:
861:
840:
830:
825:
817:
816:External links
814:
811:
810:
798:
777:
775:35 U.S.C. 271.
768:
756:
730:
718:
706:
688:
679:
657:
652:Legaltech News
639:
616:
585:
543:
534:
522:
510:
498:
488:
487:
485:
482:
481:
480:
473:
470:
447:district court
410:
407:
385:
382:
275:
274:
272:
271:
264:
257:
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
238:
233:
228:
223:
218:
213:
205:
204:
203:Related issues
200:
199:
198:
197:
192:
187:
182:
177:
172:
167:
159:
158:
152:
151:
150:
149:
147:Treble damages
144:
139:
134:
129:
124:
119:
111:
110:
102:
101:
91:
90:
51:of the subject
49:worldwide view
44:
42:
35:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
896:
885:
882:
880:
877:
875:
872:
871:
869:
858:
854:
850:
846:
841:
838:
834:
831:
829:
826:
823:
820:
819:
807:
802:
795:
791:
788:
787:
781:
772:
765:
760:
744:
740:
734:
727:
722:
715:
710:
702:
698:
692:
683:
667:
661:
653:
649:
643:
635:
631:
625:
623:
621:
604:
600:
594:
592:
590:
581:
568:
557:
553:
547:
538:
531:
526:
519:
514:
507:
502:
493:
489:
479:
476:
475:
469:
466:
461:
458:
454:
450:
448:
444:
443:
437:
431:
428:
424:
420:
416:
406:
402:
400:
395:
391:
381:
379:
375:
374:United States
370:
368:
363:
359:
355:
350:
348:
344:
340:
336:
331:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:United States
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
270:
265:
263:
258:
256:
251:
250:
248:
247:
242:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
208:
207:
206:
202:
201:
196:
193:
191:
190:Rectification
188:
186:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
171:
168:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
154:
153:
148:
145:
143:
140:
138:
135:
133:
130:
128:
125:
123:
120:
118:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
104:
103:
100:
97:
96:
87:
84:
76:
73:November 2013
66:
62:
58:
52:
50:
43:
34:
33:
30:
19:
884:Equity (law)
848:
844:
805:
801:
785:
780:
771:
763:
759:
747:. Retrieved
743:the original
733:
725:
721:
713:
709:
700:
691:
682:
670:. Retrieved
660:
651:
642:
633:
607:. Retrieved
603:the original
576:|title=
556:the original
546:
537:
529:
525:
517:
513:
505:
501:
492:
462:
459:
455:
451:
440:
432:
412:
403:
399:jurisdiction
387:
371:
362:counterclaim
351:
347:legal rights
332:
280:
278:
235:
79:
70:
46:
29:
609:October 21,
241:Restitution
231:Court costs
195:Subrogation
868:Categories
484:References
328:injunction
185:Rescission
165:Injunction
308:statutory
293:litigants
61:talk page
851:: 1275.
790:Archived
749:June 13,
672:June 13,
567:cite web
472:See also
358:contract
55:You may
857:1483859
835:at the
701:Findlaw
390:lawsuit
354:lawsuit
324:damages
314:in the
300:dispute
226:Tracing
107:Damages
855:
415:patent
376:, the
326:or an
304:appeal
559:(PDF)
297:civil
289:court
287:of a
63:, or
853:SSRN
751:2012
674:2012
611:2011
580:help
870::
849:77
847:.
699:.
650:.
632:.
619:^
588:^
571::
569:}}
565:{{
279:A
859:.
753:.
703:.
676:.
654:.
613:.
582:)
578:(
268:e
261:t
254:v
109:)
86:)
80:(
75:)
71:(
53:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.