31:
423:
332:
s mental competence standard, for he will be able to work with counsel at trial, yet at the same time he may be unable to carry out the basic tasks needed to present his own defense without the help of counsel." However, the court did not actually provide a CTRO standard, opting instead to leave this
268:
Upon reviewing the evidence, the court decided to grant the writ of certiorari. The court ruled that to be competent to stand trial the defendant must have a "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding" and a "rational as well as factual
134:
The competency standard for standing trial: whether the defendant has "sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding" and a "rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against
429:
772:
1144:
310:(1993), the Supreme Court held that the competency standard for pleading guilty or waiving the right to counsel is the same as the competency standard for standing trial established in
524:
Felthous, Alan R.; Flynn, Lauren E. (January–February 2009). "From competence to waive counsel to competence to represent oneself: the
Supreme Court advances fairness in Edwards".
1015:
1226:
1160:
260:
to the
Supreme Court, the petitioner requested for his conviction to be reversed on the grounds that he was not competent to stand trial at the time of the proceeding.
716:
894:
1211:
812:
740:
1055:
934:
926:
788:
583:
504:
410:
358:
70:
820:
764:
1128:
1120:
804:
796:
1168:
1031:
958:
669:
1152:
1136:
325:
679:
1221:
1216:
1231:
336:
Felhous (2011) argues that many state statutes and the federal statute do not incorporate the rationality standard enunciated in
448:
662:
483:
252:
Milton Dusky, a 33-year-old man, was charged with assisting in the kidnapping and rape of an underage female. He clearly had
320:(2008), however, the Supreme Court made a distinction between competence to waive counsel (CTWC), which was the subject of
328:(CTRO). The majority opinion, authored by Breyer, noted, "In certain instances an individual may well be able to satisfy
237:
35:
655:
182:
273:
exam was insufficient. His case was remanded for retrial, at which time his sentence was reduced to 20 years.
353:
1236:
630:
121:
102:
966:
241:
594:
1108:
612:
1003:
902:
872:
380:
282:
194:
621:
886:
724:
244:
before proceeding to trial. The Court outlined the basic standards for determining competency.
190:
647:
1079:
942:
910:
756:
587:
508:
414:
364:
62:
603:
256:
but was found competent to stand trial and received a sentence of 45 years. On petition of
780:
8:
558:
Felthous, A. R. (2011). Competence to stand trial should require rational understanding.
300:
The defendant must have the ability to aid his or her attorney in his or her own defense.
1184:
1087:
1071:
950:
748:
682:
533:
511:
417:
372:
316:
257:
170:
1176:
1047:
1039:
864:
541:
479:
452:
234:
166:
1063:
918:
849:
708:
696:
499:
306:
65:
269:
understanding of the proceedings against him." The court made clear that a brief
828:
202:
289:. Although the statutes addressing competency vary from state to state in the
1205:
982:
732:
478:(1988 ed.). Sarasota FL: Professional Resource Exchange. pp. 1–23.
290:
286:
270:
253:
563:
974:
639:
545:
178:
150:
537:
344:
court decisions had not consistently affirmed the rationality standard.
158:
81:
77:
106:
523:
293:, the two elements outlined in the decision are held in common:
677:
240:
case in which the Court affirmed a defendant's right to have a
30:
560:
Journal of the
American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39
476:
Competency to Stand Trial
Evaluations: A Manual for Practice
297:
The defendant must understand the charges against him or her
118:
99:
430:
public domain material from this U.S government document
1227:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
359:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 362
1203:
1212:United States Supreme Court per curiam opinions
663:
1107:
526:Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter
217:
670:
656:
564:http://www.jaapl.org/content/39/1/19.full
443:
441:
439:
402:
400:
398:
281:This case set the current standard for
1204:
492:
473:
436:
395:
1106:
1002:
1001:
847:
694:
651:
467:
449:"Assessment of Competency and Sanity"
18:1960 United States Supreme Court case
848:
773:County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
695:
13:
1145:New York ex rel. Whitman v. Wilson
333:to legislatures and lower courts.
36:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
1248:
1222:United States Supreme Court cases
590:402 (1960) is available from:
572:
1217:Adjudicative competence case law
421:
29:
276:
1232:1960 in United States case law
552:
517:
1:
388:
354:List of criminal competencies
247:
233:, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), was a
52:Milton Dusky v. United States
7:
967:Youngblood v. West Virginia
347:
263:
238:United States Supreme Court
10:
1253:
640:Oyez (oral argument audio)
428:This article incorporates
1161:Mesarosh v. United States
1115:
1102:
1010:
997:
859:
843:
703:
690:
215:
210:
144:
139:
133:
128:
113:
94:
89:
57:
47:
42:
28:
23:
1109:Prosecutorial misconduct
717:Holland v. United States
340:, and that various post-
1016:Bishop v. United States
903:United States v. Bagley
895:California v. Trombetta
873:Giglio v. United States
474:Grisso, Thomas (1988).
384:, 900 S.W.2d 702 (2005)
381:United States v. Binion
283:adjudicative competence
1024:Dusky v. United States
887:United States v. Agurs
725:Leary v. United States
580:Dusky v. United States
407:Dusky v. United States
230:Dusky v. United States
218:
191:William J. Brennan Jr.
43:Decided April 18, 1960
24:Dusky v. United States
1080:Sell v. United States
943:United States v. Ruiz
911:Arizona v. Youngblood
813:Sullivan v. Louisiana
757:Patterson v. New York
741:Cool v. United States
376:, 477 U.S. 399 (1986)
368:, 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
365:Faretta v. California
242:competency evaluation
1056:Medina v. California
781:Sandstrom v. Montana
324:, and competence to
195:Charles E. Whittaker
1237:Forensic psychology
935:Strickler v. Greene
927:Wood v. Bartholomew
789:Jackson v. Virginia
631:Library of Congress
1185:McDonough v. Smith
1088:Indiana v. Edwards
1072:Cooper v. Oklahoma
951:Illinois v. Fisher
821:Victor v. Nebraska
765:Taylor v. Kentucky
749:Mullaney v. Wilbur
373:Ford v. Wainwright
317:Indiana v. Edwards
258:writ of certiorari
171:William O. Douglas
155:Associate Justices
1199:
1198:
1195:
1194:
1177:Napue v. Illinois
1129:Hysler v. Florida
1121:Mooney v. Holohan
1098:
1097:
1048:Riggins v. Nevada
1040:Drope v. Missouri
1004:Mental competence
993:
992:
880:Moore v. Illinois
865:Brady v. Maryland
839:
838:
805:Cage v. Louisiana
797:Murray v. Carrier
485:978-0-943158-51-8
326:represent oneself
304:Subsequently, in
226:
225:
183:John M. Harlan II
167:Felix Frankfurter
76:80 S. Ct. 788; 4
1244:
1169:Alcorta v. Texas
1104:
1103:
1064:Godinez v. Moran
1032:Pate v. Robinson
999:
998:
919:Kyles v. Whitley
845:
844:
709:Leland v. Oregon
697:Reasonable doubt
692:
691:
672:
665:
658:
649:
648:
644:
638:
635:
629:
626:
620:
617:
611:
608:
602:
599:
593:
566:
556:
550:
549:
521:
515:
500:Godinez v. Moran
496:
490:
489:
471:
465:
464:
462:
460:
451:. Archived from
445:
434:
425:
424:
404:
307:Godinez v. Moran
221:
140:Court membership
33:
32:
21:
20:
1252:
1251:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1191:
1111:
1094:
1006:
989:
959:Banks v. Dretke
855:
835:
699:
686:
676:
642:
636:
633:
627:
624:
618:
615:
609:
606:
600:
597:
591:
575:
570:
569:
557:
553:
522:
518:
497:
493:
486:
472:
468:
458:
456:
455:on June 4, 2007
447:
446:
437:
422:
405:
396:
391:
350:
279:
266:
250:
193:
181:
169:
124:(8th Cir. 1961)
85:
38:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1250:
1240:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1224:
1219:
1214:
1197:
1196:
1193:
1192:
1190:
1189:
1181:
1173:
1165:
1157:
1153:White v. Ragen
1149:
1141:
1137:Pyle v. Kansas
1133:
1125:
1116:
1113:
1112:
1100:
1099:
1096:
1095:
1093:
1092:
1084:
1076:
1068:
1060:
1052:
1044:
1036:
1028:
1020:
1011:
1008:
1007:
995:
994:
991:
990:
988:
987:
979:
971:
963:
955:
947:
939:
931:
923:
915:
907:
899:
891:
883:
877:
869:
860:
857:
856:
841:
840:
837:
836:
834:
833:
829:Schlup v. Delo
825:
817:
809:
801:
793:
785:
777:
769:
761:
753:
745:
737:
729:
721:
713:
704:
701:
700:
688:
687:
678:United States
675:
674:
667:
660:
652:
646:
645:
613:Google Scholar
574:
573:External links
571:
568:
567:
551:
516:
491:
484:
466:
435:
393:
392:
390:
387:
386:
385:
377:
369:
361:
356:
349:
346:
302:
301:
298:
278:
275:
265:
262:
249:
246:
224:
223:
213:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
203:Potter Stewart
156:
153:
148:
142:
141:
137:
136:
131:
130:
126:
125:
115:
111:
110:
96:
92:
91:
87:
86:
75:
59:
55:
54:
49:
48:Full case name
45:
44:
40:
39:
34:
26:
25:
17:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1249:
1238:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1225:
1223:
1220:
1218:
1215:
1213:
1210:
1209:
1207:
1187:
1186:
1182:
1179:
1178:
1174:
1171:
1170:
1166:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1142:
1139:
1138:
1134:
1131:
1130:
1126:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1110:
1105:
1101:
1090:
1089:
1085:
1082:
1081:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1058:
1057:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1045:
1042:
1041:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1021:
1018:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1009:
1005:
1000:
996:
985:
984:
983:Smith v. Cain
980:
977:
976:
972:
969:
968:
964:
961:
960:
956:
953:
952:
948:
945:
944:
940:
937:
936:
932:
929:
928:
924:
921:
920:
916:
913:
912:
908:
905:
904:
900:
897:
896:
892:
889:
888:
884:
881:
878:
875:
874:
870:
867:
866:
862:
861:
858:
854:
852:
846:
842:
831:
830:
826:
823:
822:
818:
815:
814:
810:
807:
806:
802:
799:
798:
794:
791:
790:
786:
783:
782:
778:
775:
774:
770:
767:
766:
762:
759:
758:
754:
751:
750:
746:
743:
742:
738:
735:
734:
733:In re Winship
730:
727:
726:
722:
719:
718:
714:
711:
710:
706:
705:
702:
698:
693:
689:
684:
681:
673:
668:
666:
661:
659:
654:
653:
650:
641:
632:
623:
614:
605:
596:
595:CourtListener
589:
585:
581:
577:
576:
565:
561:
555:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
520:
513:
510:
506:
502:
501:
495:
487:
481:
477:
470:
454:
450:
444:
442:
440:
433:
431:
420: (1960).
419:
416:
412:
408:
403:
401:
399:
394:
383:
382:
378:
375:
374:
370:
367:
366:
362:
360:
357:
355:
352:
351:
345:
343:
339:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
318:
313:
309:
308:
299:
296:
295:
294:
292:
291:United States
288:
287:United States
284:
274:
272:
271:mental status
261:
259:
255:
254:schizophrenia
245:
243:
239:
236:
232:
231:
222:
220:
214:
209:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:Chief Justice
146:
145:
143:
138:
132:
127:
123:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
101:
97:
93:
88:
83:
79:
73:
72:
67:
64:
60:
56:
53:
50:
46:
41:
37:
27:
22:
16:
1183:
1175:
1167:
1159:
1151:
1143:
1135:
1127:
1119:
1086:
1078:
1070:
1062:
1054:
1046:
1038:
1030:
1023:
1022:
1014:
981:
975:Cone v. Bell
973:
965:
957:
949:
941:
933:
925:
917:
909:
901:
893:
885:
879:
871:
863:
850:
827:
819:
811:
803:
795:
787:
779:
771:
763:
755:
747:
739:
731:
723:
715:
707:
579:
562:(1), 19-30.
559:
554:
532:(1): 14–17.
529:
525:
519:
514: (1993).
498:
494:
475:
469:
457:. Retrieved
453:the original
427:
406:
379:
371:
363:
341:
337:
335:
329:
321:
315:
311:
305:
303:
280:
277:Significance
267:
251:
229:
228:
227:
216:
211:Case opinion
198:
186:
179:Tom C. Clark
174:
162:
90:Case history
69:
51:
15:
683:due process
151:Earl Warren
1206:Categories
853:disclosure
459:October 5,
389:References
248:Background
219:Per curiam
159:Hugo Black
114:Subsequent
82:U.S. LEXIS
80:824; 1960
78:L. Ed. 2d
58:Citations
685:case law
680:criminal
578:Text of
546:20698084
538:27898867
348:See also
264:Decision
235:landmark
107:8th Cir.
604:Findlaw
322:Godinez
285:in the
129:Holding
1188:(2019)
1180:(1959)
1172:(1957)
1164:(1956)
1156:(1945)
1148:(1943)
1140:(1942)
1132:(1942)
1124:(1935)
1091:(2008)
1083:(2003)
1075:(1996)
1067:(1993)
1059:(1992)
1051:(1992)
1043:(1975)
1035:(1966)
1027:(1960)
1019:(1956)
986:(2012)
978:(2009)
970:(2006)
962:(2004)
954:(2004)
946:(2002)
938:(1999)
930:(1995)
922:(1995)
914:(1988)
906:(1985)
898:(1984)
890:(1976)
882:(1972)
876:(1972)
868:(1963)
832:(1995)
824:(1994)
816:(1993)
808:(1990)
800:(1986)
792:(1979)
784:(1979)
776:(1979)
768:(1978)
760:(1977)
752:(1975)
744:(1972)
736:(1970)
728:(1969)
720:(1954)
712:(1952)
643:
637:
634:
628:
625:
622:Justia
619:
616:
610:
607:
601:
598:
592:
544:
536:
503:,
482:
426:
409:,
330:Dusky'
201:
199:·
197:
189:
187:·
185:
177:
175:·
173:
165:
163:·
161:
851:Brady
586:
534:JSTOR
507:
413:
342:Dusky
338:Dusky
314:. In
312:Dusky
135:him."
109:1959)
95:Prior
588:U.S.
542:PMID
509:U.S.
480:ISBN
461:2007
415:U.S.
119:F.2d
117:295
100:F.2d
98:271
84:1307
71:more
63:U.S.
61:362
584:362
512:389
505:509
418:402
411:362
122:743
103:385
66:402
1208::
582:,
540:.
530:33
528:.
438:^
397:^
671:e
664:t
657:v
548:.
488:.
463:.
432:.
105:(
74:)
68:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.