Knowledge

Efference copy

Source đź“ť

157:
of Erlangen and thereafter as physician in Heidenheim, Ulm, and Herrenberg (Württemberg, South Germany). As a young university teacher, he was particularly interested in the brain mechanisms which enable the perception of space and objects, but in later years his attention shifted to the more practical problems of clinical medicine. Together with Justinus Kerner he gave a very precise description in 1817 of the clinical symptoms of botulism. In his book "Beytrag zur Physiologie der Sinne”, Steinbuch presented a very careful analysis of the tactile recognition of objects by the grasping hand. Hereby, he developed the hypothesis that the cerebral mechanisms controlling the movement of the hands interact within the brain with the afferent signal flow evoked in the mechanoreceptors while the grasping hand is moving across the surface of the object. The cerebral signals controlling the movement were called "Bewegidee" (motion idea). According to Steinbuch’s model, only by the interaction of the "Bewegidee" with the afferent signal flow did object recognition become possible. He illustrated his statements by a simple experiment: if an object passively activates the mechanoreceptors of the palm and fingers of a resting hand for sufficient sequences and time, object recognition is not achieved. When the hand, however, grasps actively, object recognition occurs within a few seconds.
301:, especially in relation to auditory verbal hallucinations. In the case of inner speech, the efference signal is not sent or is inhibited before action takes place, leaving only the efference copy and leading to the perception of inner speech or inner hearing. In the case of auditory verbal hallucinations, it is thought that a breakdown along the efference copy and forward model route creates a mismatch between what is expected and what is observed, leading to the experience that speech is not produced by oneself. Recent studies suggest that efference copy already occurs when an acoustic signal is generated at the press of a button. The differences in the ERP signal of the efference copy are so severe that machine learning algorithms can distinguish between schizophrenia patients and healthy control subjects, for example. Efference copies also occur not only with spoken words, but with inner language - the quiet production of words. 207:
subsequent reafferent signals. In this state, self-initiated movements of the fly would result in a perception that the world was also moving, rather than standing still as they would in a normal fly. After rotation of the eyes, the animal showed a reinforcement of the optokinetic response in the same direction as the moving visual input. Von Holst and Mittelstaedt interpreted their findings as evidence that corollary discharge (i.e. neural inhibition with active movement) could not have accounted for this observed change as this would have been expected to inhibit the optokinetic reaction. They concluded that an "Efferenzkopie" of the motor command was responsible for this reaction due to the persistence of the reafferent signal and given the consequent discrepancy between expected and actual sensory signals which reinforced the response rather than preventing it.
276:
self-produced tickling motor command and the actual execution of this movement (mediated by a robotic arm) causes an increase in the perceived tickliness of the sensation. This shows that when the efference copy is incompatible with the afference, the sensory information is perceived as if it were exafference. Therefore, it is theorized that it is not possible to tickle ourselves because when the predicted sensory feedback (efference copy) matches the actual sensory feedback, the actual feedback will be attenuated. If the predicted sensory feedback does not match the actual sensory feedback, whether caused by a delay (as in the mediation by the robotic arm) or by external influences from the environment, the brain cannot predict the tickling motion on the body and a more intense tickling sensation is perceived. This is the reason why one cannot tickle oneself.
262:
see whether an internal model is used to predict movement-dependent loads by observing grip force changes with known loads during arm movements. They found that even when giving subjects different known loads the grip force was able to predict the load force. Even when the load force was suddenly changed the grip force never lagged in the phase relationship with the load force, therefore affirming the fact that there was an internal model in the CNS that was allowing for the proper prediction to occur. It has been suggested by Kawato that for gripping, the CNS uses a combination of the inverse and forward model. With the use of the efference copy the internal model can predict a future hand trajectory, thus allowing for the parallel grip to the particular load of the known object.
190:, the founder of modern ideas about motor control, rejected von Helmholtz ideas and argued that efference copies were not needed as muscles had their own sense of the movements they made. "The view which dispenses with peripheral organs and afferent nerves for the muscular sense has had powerful adherents . . . It supposes that during ... a willed movement the outgoing current of impulses from brain to muscle is accompanied by a 'sensation for innervation'. ... it "remains unproven". This resulted in the idea of efference copies being dropped for the next 75 years. 330:
detect self generated EODs that would interfere with interpretation of external EODs needed for communication between fish. However, these fish display corollary discharges that inhibit the ascending sensory pathway at the first CNS relay point. These corollary discharges are timed to arrive at the same time as the reafference from the KS to minimize the interference of self-produced EODs with the perception of external EODs, and optimize the duration of inhibition.
310: 143:
report any reafference to higher levels of the CNS. This is unique from the efference copy, since the corollary discharge is actually fed into the sensory pathway to cancel out the reafferent signals generated by the movement. Alternatively, corollary discharges briefly alters self-generated sensory responses to reduce self-induced desensitization or help distinguish between self-generated and externally generated sensory information.
285: 119: 178:. In contrast, if the eyeball is actively moved by the eye muscles the world is perceived as still. The reasoning made is that with a passive movement of the eyeball, no efferent copies are made as with active movements that allow sensory changes to be anticipated and controlled for with the result in their absence the world appears to move. 297:
auditory information as produced by the articulatory system in a second forward model. Both of these forward models can produce respective predictions and corollary discharge, which can in turn be used in comparisons with somatosensory and auditory feedback. Moreover, this system is thought by some to be the basis for
131:, is then used to generate the predicted sensory feedback that estimates the sensory consequences of a motor command. The actual sensory consequences of the motor command are then deployed to compare with the corollary discharge to inform the CNS about how well the expected action matched its actual external action. 329:
The mormyrid electric fish provides an example of corollary discharge in lower vertebrates. Specifically, the knollenorgan sensor (KS) is involved with electro-communication, detecting the electric organ discharges (EOD) of other fish. Unless the reafference was somehow modulated, the KS would also
275:
than a tickling motion produced by an outside source. They have postulated that this is because when a person sends a motor command to produce the tickling motion, the efference copy anticipates and cancels out the sensory outcome. This idea is further supported by evidence that a delay between the
261:
Efference copy within an internal model allows us to grip objects in parallel to a given load. In other words, the subject is able to properly grip any load that they are provided because the internal model provides such a good prediction of the object without any delay. Flanagan and Wing tested to
156:
In 1811 Johann Georg Steinbuch (1770–1818) referred repeatedly to the problem of efference copy and reafference in his book "Beytrag zur Physiologie der Sinne" ("Contribution to the Physiology of Senses"). After studying medicine, Steinbuch worked for a number of years as lecturer at the University
296:
propose that a motor efference copy is used to produce a forward model of somatosensory estimation, which entails an estimation of the articulatory movement and position of the articulators as a result of planned motor action. A second (subsequent) auditory efference copy entails the estimation of
142:
is characterized as an efference copy of an action command used to inhibit any response to the self generated sensory signal which would interfere with the execution of the motor task. The inhibitory commands originate at the same time as the motor command and target the sensory pathway that would
41:. It can be collated with the (reafferent) sensory input that results from the agent's movement, enabling a comparison of actual movement with desired movement, and a shielding of perception from particular self-induced effects on the sensory input to achieve perceptual stability. Together with 122:
An efference copy is used to generate the predicted sensory input which estimates the (somato)sensory consequences of a motor command (top row). The sensory consequences of the executed motor command (bottom row) are used to compare with the corollary discharge to inform the CNS about external
240:
in a manner that allows for learning and correction of errors experienced from self-generated Coriolis forces. During trunk rotational movements there is a learned CNS anticipation of Coriolis effects, mediated by generation of an appropriate efference copy that can be compared to re-afferent
206:
investigated how species are able to distinguish between exafference and reafference given a seemingly identical percept of the two. To explore this question, they rotated the head of a fly 180 degrees, effectively reversing the right and left edges of the retina and reversing the subject's
173:
so as to aid the brain's determining the location of an object relative to the head. His argument used the experiment in which one gently presses on one's own eye. If this is done, one notices that the visual world seems to have "moved" as a result of this passive movement of the
115:, it has been suggested that a copy of the signal, known as an efference copy, is created so that exafference (sensory signals generated from external stimuli in the environment) can be distinguished from reafference (sensory signals resulting from an animal's own actions). 607:
von Holst E., Mittelstaedt H. (1950). The reafference principle. Interaction between the central nervous system and the periphery. In Selected Papers of Erich von Holst: The Behavioural Physiology of Animals and Man, London: Methuen. (From German) 1 : 1
270:
Experiments have been conducted wherein subjects' feet are tickled both by themselves and with a robotic arm controlled by their own arm movements. These experiments have shown that people find a self-produced tickling motion of the foot to be much less
1308:
Frick, J.; Rieg, T. and Buettner, R. 2020. Detection of schizophrenia: a machine learning algorithm for potential early detection and prevention based on event-related potentials, in HICSS-54 Proc.
1150:
Seal, M.; Aleman, A.; McGuire, P. (2004). "Compelling imagery, unanticipated speech and deceptive memory: Neurocognitive models of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia".
1318:
Whitford, Thomas J.; Jack, Bradley N.; Pearson, Daniel; Griffiths, Oren; Luque, David; Harris, Anthony Wf; Spencer, Kevin M.; Le Pelley, Mike E. (4 December 2017).
288:
Efference copies as used in speech production: motor and auditory efference copies serve to allow for rapid comparison with motor and auditory consequences.
908: 55:
Efference copies are important in enabling motor adaptation such as to enhance gaze stability. They have a role in the perception of self and nonself
541:
Essays in the History of Physiological Sciences: Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University Louis Pasteur Strasbourg, on March 26-27th, 1993
690:
Cohn, JV; DiZio P; Lackner JR (1 June 2000). "Reaching during virtual rotation: context specific compensations for expected coriolis forces".
733:
Pigeon, P; Bortolami SB; DiZio P; Lackner JR (2003). "Coordinated turn and reach movements. II. Planning in an external frame of reference".
249:
It has been proposed that efference copy has an important role in maintaining gaze stability with active head movement by augmenting the
805:"The role of internal models in motion planning and control: evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads" 563:
Sherrington CS. (1900). The muscular sense. In Textbook of Physiology, ed. E. A. Schafer, vol 2 pp. 1002-25. Edinburgh/London Pentland
169:
in the middle of the 19th century. He argued that the brain needed to create an efference copy for the motor commands that controlled
1104:
Jones, Simon R.; Fernyhough, Charles (2007). "Thought as action: Inner speech, self-monitoring, and auditory verbal hallucinations".
439: 768:
Herdman, SJ; Schubert MC; Tusa RJ (2001). "Role of Central Preprogramming in Dynamic Visual Acuity With Vestibular Loss".
573:
Matthews, P. B. C. (1982). "Where Does Sherrington's "Muscular Sense" Originate? Muscles, Joints, Corollary Discharges?".
1440:"Corollary discharge inhibition and preservation of temporal information in a sensory nucleus of mormyrid electric fish" 1500: 548: 1584: 939: 493:
Poulet, JFA; Hedwig B (2006). "New insights into corollary discharges mediated by identified neural pathways".
339: 128: 42: 1564: 1195:"Mental imagery of speech: linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation" 645:
Sperry, R. W. (1950). "Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion".
237: 543:. The Wellcome Institute Series in the History of Medicine: Clio Medica. Vol. 33. pp. 35–56. 370:
Jeannerod, Marc (2003): "Action Monitoring and Forward Control of Movements". In: Michael Arbib (Ed.),
344: 139: 1254:"Did I Do That? Abnormal Predictive Processes in Schizophrenia When Button Pressing to Deliver a Tone" 536: 292:
It has been argued that motor efference copies play an important role in speech production. Tian and
187: 93: 659: 165:
The first person to propose the existence of efferent copies was the German physician and physicist
1599: 322: 1032: 539:(1995). "On the History of the Ideas of Efference Copy and Reafference". In Debru, Claude (ed.). 250: 618:
Von Holst, E. (1954). "Relations between the central Nervous System and the peripheral organs".
431: 425: 16:
Internal copy of an outflowing movement-producing signal generated by an organism's motor system
1589: 1028:
FENS Hertie Winter School 2015: David Poeppel on Linking motor and perceptual systems in speech
654: 81: 1026: 216: 33: 968:"Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models" 8: 88:, and a copy of this signal is called an efference copy. Sensory information coming from 586: 325:
of other fish without also detecting their own self generated electric organ discharges.
1541: 1516: 1464: 1455: 1439: 1354: 1319: 1286: 1253: 1252:
Ford, Judith M.; Palzes, Vanessa A.; Roach, Brian J.; Mathalon, Daniel H. (July 2014).
1229: 1194: 1175: 1129: 1078: 1053: 1002: 967: 889: 834: 824: 715: 518: 220: 203: 877: 631: 468: 45:, efference copies can serve to enable the brain to predict the effects of an action. 1594: 1546: 1496: 1469: 1406: 1359: 1341: 1291: 1273: 1234: 1216: 1167: 1121: 1083: 1007: 989: 931: 927: 881: 839: 785: 750: 707: 672: 590: 544: 510: 472: 455:
Miall, R.C.; Wolpert D. M. (1996). "Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control".
435: 401: 89: 719: 522: 1536: 1528: 1459: 1451: 1398: 1349: 1331: 1281: 1265: 1224: 1206: 1179: 1159: 1133: 1113: 1073: 1065: 997: 979: 923: 873: 829: 819: 777: 742: 699: 664: 627: 582: 502: 464: 393: 1383: 893: 1117: 1069: 804: 781: 199: 1054:"Mental imagery of speech implicates two mechanisms of perceptual reactivation" 864:
Kawato, K (1999). "Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning".
506: 105: 101: 56: 1163: 703: 1578: 1345: 1277: 1220: 1211: 993: 984: 293: 219:
argued for the basis of corollary discharges following his research upon the
175: 60: 1269: 1568: 1550: 1532: 1363: 1295: 1238: 1171: 1125: 1087: 1011: 935: 885: 789: 754: 711: 676: 514: 476: 318: 298: 223:. He is also regarded as the originator of the term "corollary discharge". 112: 38: 1517:"Reafference and the origin of the self in early nervous system evolution" 1473: 1410: 1402: 1384:"Sensory coding and corollary discharge effects in mormyrid electric fish" 843: 746: 594: 405: 1336: 384:
Gyr John W (1972). "Is a Theory of Direct Visual Perception Adequate?".
314: 170: 20: 1521:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
309: 907:
Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne; Wolpert, Daniel; Frith, Chris (August 2000).
668: 397: 166: 906: 374:
Second Edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 83–85, here: p. 83.
732: 64: 1320:"Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech" 118: 284: 1149: 1317: 1571:
on Corollary Discharge In Primate Vision by Robert H. Wurtz
1514: 767: 127:
This efference copy, by providing the input to a forward
100:. On a similar basis, nerves into the nervous system are 37:), movement-producing signal generated by an organism's 1251: 1052:
Tian, Xing; Zarate, Jean Mary; Poeppel, David (2016).
689: 1493:
The Metaphorical Brain 2: Neural Networks and Beyond
111:
When an efferent signal is produced and sent to the
1515:JĂ©kely, G.; Godfrey-Smith, P.; Keijzer, F. (2021). 647:
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
430:. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp.  454: 1433: 1431: 1429: 1427: 1051: 372:The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. 1576: 1103: 802: 1507:pp. 23–26 , p. 33, pp. 297–299 1424: 492: 366: 364: 362: 360: 253:(aVOR) during dynamic visual acuity testing. 1437: 1192: 965: 427:The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis 419: 417: 415: 383: 357: 48:An equal term with a different history is 1540: 1463: 1353: 1335: 1285: 1228: 1210: 1077: 1001: 983: 833: 823: 803:Flanagan, R; Wing AM (15 February 1997). 658: 617: 423: 304: 572: 488: 486: 412: 308: 283: 117: 96:to the central nervous system is called 1377: 1375: 1373: 620:The British Journal of Animal Behaviour 535: 63:. They also underlie the phenomenon of 1577: 863: 857: 644: 231: 134: 31:is an internal copy of an outflowing ( 1490: 1145: 1143: 1099: 1097: 961: 959: 483: 1381: 1370: 1024: 448: 84:(CNS) to the periphery is called an 1193:Tian, Xing; Poeppel, David (2012). 966:Tian, Xing; Poeppel, David (2010). 587:10.1146/annurev.ne.05.030182.001201 226: 13: 1484: 1456:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-03-01029.1989 1438:Bell, CC; Grant K (1 March 1989). 1140: 1094: 956: 825:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-04-01519.1997 14: 1611: 1558: 1495:(2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. 317:corollary discharges enables the 244: 928:10.1097/00001756-200008030-00002 909:"Why can't you tickle yourself?" 160: 75: 70: 1391:Journal of Experimental Biology 1311: 1302: 1245: 1199:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 1186: 1045: 1035:from the original on 2021-12-12 1018: 900: 866:Current Opinion in Neurobiology 796: 770:Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 761: 726: 683: 638: 611: 601: 566: 557: 529: 377: 340:Internal model (motor control) 181: 1: 1382:Bell, CC (1 September 1989). 878:10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00028-8 632:10.1016/S0950-5601(54)80044-X 575:Annual Review of Neuroscience 469:10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00035-4 350: 256: 1118:10.1016/j.concog.2005.12.003 1070:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.002 782:10.1001/archotol.127.10.1205 193: 151: 7: 1444:The Journal of Neuroscience 1106:Consciousness and Cognition 333: 265: 10: 1616: 1491:Arbib, Michael A. (1989). 735:Journal of Neurophysiology 692:Journal of Neurophysiology 507:10.1016/j.tins.2006.11.005 345:Corollary discharge theory 321:sensor (KS) to detect the 236:Efference copy relates to 146: 1164:10.1080/13546800344000156 1152:Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 704:10.1152/jn.2000.83.6.3230 323:electric organ discharges 279: 210: 94:peripheral nervous system 1212:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00314 985:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00166 215:The Nobel Prize winner, 104:and ones out are termed 80:A motor signal from the 972:Frontiers in Psychology 812:Journal of Neuroscience 495:Trends in Neurosciences 251:vestibulo-ocular reflex 1585:Central nervous system 1533:10.1098/rstb.2019.0764 1258:Schizophrenia Bulletin 424:Gallistel, CR (1980). 386:Psychological Bulletin 326: 315:mormyrid electric fish 305:Mormyrid electric fish 289: 124: 82:central nervous system 1565:Peer-reviewed article 1403:10.1242/jeb.146.1.229 1270:10.1093/schbul/sbt072 747:10.1152/jn.00160.2001 537:GrĂĽsser, Otto-Joachim 312: 287: 167:Hermann von Helmholtz 121: 217:Roger Wolcott Sperry 1337:10.7554/eLife.28197 1025:FENS (2016-07-20), 232:The Coriolis effect 188:Charles Sherrington 140:Corollary discharge 135:Corollary discharge 50:corollary discharge 327: 290: 221:optokinetic reflex 125: 776:(10): 1205–1210. 441:978-0-470-26912-1 90:sensory receptors 1607: 1554: 1544: 1509: 1478: 1477: 1467: 1450:(3): 1029–1044. 1435: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1417: 1388: 1379: 1368: 1367: 1357: 1339: 1315: 1309: 1306: 1300: 1299: 1289: 1249: 1243: 1242: 1232: 1214: 1190: 1184: 1183: 1147: 1138: 1137: 1101: 1092: 1091: 1081: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1022: 1016: 1015: 1005: 987: 963: 954: 953: 951: 950: 944: 938:. Archived from 913: 904: 898: 897: 861: 855: 854: 852: 850: 837: 827: 818:(4): 1519–1528. 809: 800: 794: 793: 765: 759: 758: 730: 724: 723: 698:(6): 3230–3240. 687: 681: 680: 669:10.1037/h0055479 662: 642: 636: 635: 615: 609: 605: 599: 598: 570: 564: 561: 555: 554: 533: 527: 526: 490: 481: 480: 463:(8): 1265–1279. 452: 446: 445: 421: 410: 409: 398:10.1037/h0032352 381: 375: 368: 227:Motor adaptation 1615: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1600:Motor cognition 1575: 1574: 1561: 1503: 1487: 1485:Further reading 1482: 1481: 1436: 1425: 1415: 1413: 1386: 1380: 1371: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1303: 1250: 1246: 1191: 1187: 1148: 1141: 1102: 1095: 1050: 1046: 1038: 1036: 1023: 1019: 964: 957: 948: 946: 942: 911: 905: 901: 862: 858: 848: 846: 807: 801: 797: 766: 762: 731: 727: 688: 684: 660:10.1.1.294.2746 643: 639: 616: 612: 606: 602: 571: 567: 562: 558: 551: 534: 530: 491: 484: 457:Neural Networks 453: 449: 442: 422: 413: 392:(4): 246–261 . 382: 378: 369: 358: 353: 336: 307: 282: 268: 259: 247: 238:Coriolis effect 234: 229: 213: 200:Erich von Holst 196: 184: 163: 154: 149: 137: 106:efferent nerves 102:afferent nerves 78: 73: 57:electric fields 43:internal models 17: 12: 11: 5: 1613: 1603: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1573: 1572: 1560: 1559:External links 1557: 1556: 1555: 1511: 1510: 1502:978-0471098539 1501: 1486: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1423: 1397:(1): 229–253. 1369: 1310: 1301: 1264:(4): 804–812. 1244: 1185: 1158:(1–2): 43–72. 1139: 1112:(2): 391–399. 1093: 1044: 1017: 955: 899: 872:(6): 718–727. 856: 795: 760: 741:(1): 290–303. 725: 682: 653:(6): 482–489. 637: 610: 600: 565: 556: 550:978-9051836462 549: 528: 482: 447: 440: 411: 376: 355: 354: 352: 349: 348: 347: 342: 335: 332: 306: 303: 281: 278: 267: 264: 258: 255: 246: 245:Gaze stability 243: 233: 230: 228: 225: 212: 209: 195: 192: 183: 180: 162: 159: 153: 150: 148: 145: 136: 133: 129:internal model 77: 74: 72: 69: 25:efference copy 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1612: 1601: 1598: 1596: 1593: 1591: 1590:Motor control 1588: 1586: 1583: 1582: 1580: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1552: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1498: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1441: 1434: 1432: 1430: 1428: 1412: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1396: 1392: 1385: 1378: 1376: 1374: 1365: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1314: 1305: 1297: 1293: 1288: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1271: 1267: 1263: 1259: 1255: 1248: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1213: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1189: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1146: 1144: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1111: 1107: 1100: 1098: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1048: 1034: 1030: 1029: 1021: 1013: 1009: 1004: 999: 995: 991: 986: 981: 977: 973: 969: 962: 960: 945:on 2014-04-07 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 922:(11): R11-6. 921: 917: 910: 903: 895: 891: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 867: 860: 845: 841: 836: 831: 826: 821: 817: 813: 806: 799: 791: 787: 783: 779: 775: 771: 764: 756: 752: 748: 744: 740: 736: 729: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 697: 693: 686: 678: 674: 670: 666: 661: 656: 652: 648: 641: 633: 629: 625: 621: 614: 604: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 569: 560: 552: 546: 542: 538: 532: 524: 520: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 489: 487: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 451: 443: 437: 433: 429: 428: 420: 418: 416: 407: 403: 399: 395: 391: 387: 380: 373: 367: 365: 363: 361: 356: 346: 343: 341: 338: 337: 331: 324: 320: 316: 311: 302: 300: 295: 286: 277: 274: 263: 254: 252: 242: 241:information. 239: 224: 222: 218: 208: 205: 201: 191: 189: 179: 177: 172: 168: 161:von Helmholtz 158: 144: 141: 132: 130: 120: 116: 114: 109: 107: 103: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 76:Motor signals 71:Motor control 68: 66: 62: 61:electric fish 58: 53: 51: 46: 44: 40: 36: 35: 30: 29:efferent copy 26: 22: 1569:Scholarpedia 1524: 1520: 1506: 1492: 1447: 1443: 1414:. Retrieved 1394: 1390: 1327: 1323: 1313: 1304: 1261: 1257: 1247: 1202: 1198: 1188: 1155: 1151: 1109: 1105: 1061: 1057: 1047: 1037:, retrieved 1027: 1020: 975: 971: 947:. Retrieved 940:the original 919: 915: 902: 869: 865: 859: 847:. Retrieved 815: 811: 798: 773: 769: 763: 738: 734: 728: 695: 691: 685: 650: 646: 640: 626:(3): 89–94. 623: 619: 613: 603: 578: 574: 568: 559: 540: 531: 501:(1): 14–21. 498: 494: 460: 456: 450: 426: 389: 385: 379: 371: 328: 319:knollenorgan 299:inner speech 291: 272: 269: 260: 248: 235: 214: 204:Mittelstaedt 197: 185: 164: 155: 138: 126: 113:motor system 110: 97: 85: 79: 54: 49: 47: 39:motor system 32: 28: 24: 18: 916:NeuroReport 581:: 189–218. 182:Sherrington 171:eye muscles 1579:Categories 1039:2018-04-17 949:2014-04-03 351:References 257:Grip force 202:and Horst 21:physiology 1346:2050-084X 1278:0586-7614 1221:1662-5161 994:1664-1078 655:CiteSeerX 198:In 1950, 194:Von Holst 186:In 1900, 152:Steinbuch 98:afference 86:efference 1595:Tickling 1551:33550954 1527:(1821). 1364:29199947 1296:23754836 1239:23226121 1172:16571574 1126:16464616 1088:26889603 1064:: 1–12. 1033:archived 1012:21897822 936:10943682 886:10607637 790:11587600 755:12522180 720:10870880 712:10848543 677:14794830 523:32216165 515:17137642 477:12662535 334:See also 273:“tickly” 266:Tickling 123:actions. 65:tickling 34:efferent 1542:7934971 1474:2926477 1465:6569966 1416:24 June 1411:2689564 1355:5714499 1287:4059422 1230:3508402 1205:: 314. 1180:8840274 1134:2263260 1079:5357080 1003:3158430 978:: 166. 849:24 June 844:9006993 835:6793733 595:6462096 432:166–209 406:5017819 313:In the 294:Poeppel 176:eyeball 147:History 92:in the 1549:  1539:  1499:  1472:  1462:  1409:  1362:  1352:  1344:  1294:  1284:  1276:  1237:  1227:  1219:  1178:  1170:  1132:  1124:  1086:  1076:  1058:Cortex 1010:  1000:  992:  934:  894:878792 892:  884:  842:  832:  788:  753:  718:  710:  675:  657:  608:39-73. 593:  547:  521:  513:  475:  438:  404:  280:Speech 211:Sperry 1387:(pdf) 1324:eLife 1176:S2CID 1130:S2CID 943:(PDF) 912:(PDF) 890:S2CID 808:(pdf) 716:S2CID 519:S2CID 23:, an 1547:PMID 1497:ISBN 1470:PMID 1418:2008 1407:PMID 1360:PMID 1342:ISSN 1292:PMID 1274:ISSN 1235:PMID 1217:ISSN 1168:PMID 1122:PMID 1084:PMID 1008:PMID 990:ISSN 932:PMID 882:PMID 851:2008 840:PMID 786:PMID 751:PMID 708:PMID 673:PMID 591:PMID 545:ISBN 511:PMID 473:PMID 436:ISBN 402:PMID 1567:in 1537:PMC 1529:doi 1525:376 1460:PMC 1452:doi 1399:doi 1395:146 1350:PMC 1332:doi 1282:PMC 1266:doi 1225:PMC 1207:doi 1160:doi 1114:doi 1074:PMC 1066:doi 998:PMC 980:doi 924:doi 874:doi 830:PMC 820:doi 778:doi 774:127 743:doi 700:doi 665:doi 628:doi 583:doi 503:doi 465:doi 394:doi 59:in 27:or 19:In 1581:: 1545:. 1535:. 1523:. 1519:. 1505:. 1468:. 1458:. 1446:. 1442:. 1426:^ 1405:. 1393:. 1389:. 1372:^ 1358:. 1348:. 1340:. 1330:. 1326:. 1322:. 1290:. 1280:. 1272:. 1262:40 1260:. 1256:. 1233:. 1223:. 1215:. 1201:. 1197:. 1174:. 1166:. 1154:. 1142:^ 1128:. 1120:. 1110:16 1108:. 1096:^ 1082:. 1072:. 1062:77 1060:. 1056:. 1031:, 1006:. 996:. 988:. 974:. 970:. 958:^ 930:. 920:11 918:. 914:. 888:. 880:. 868:. 838:. 828:. 816:17 814:. 810:. 784:. 772:. 749:. 739:89 737:. 714:. 706:. 696:83 694:. 671:. 663:. 651:43 649:. 622:. 589:. 577:. 517:. 509:. 499:30 497:. 485:^ 471:. 459:. 434:. 414:^ 400:. 390:77 388:. 359:^ 108:. 67:. 52:. 1553:. 1531:: 1476:. 1454:: 1448:9 1420:. 1401:: 1366:. 1334:: 1328:6 1298:. 1268:: 1241:. 1209:: 1203:6 1182:. 1162:: 1156:9 1136:. 1116:: 1090:. 1068:: 1014:. 982:: 976:1 952:. 926:: 896:. 876:: 870:9 853:. 822:: 792:. 780:: 757:. 745:: 722:. 702:: 679:. 667:: 634:. 630:: 624:2 597:. 585:: 579:5 553:. 525:. 505:: 479:. 467:: 461:9 444:. 408:. 396::

Index

physiology
efferent
motor system
internal models
electric fields
electric fish
tickling
central nervous system
sensory receptors
peripheral nervous system
afferent nerves
efferent nerves
motor system

internal model
Corollary discharge
Hermann von Helmholtz
eye muscles
eyeball
Charles Sherrington
Erich von Holst
Mittelstaedt
Roger Wolcott Sperry
optokinetic reflex
Coriolis effect
vestibulo-ocular reflex

Poeppel
inner speech

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑